TITLE 4.AGRICULTURE

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Chapter 19. QUARANTINES

Subchapter Q. SAPOTE FRUIT FLY QUARANTINE

4 TAC §§19.170 - 19.174

The Texas Department of Agriculture (the department) adopts on an emergency basis new §§19.170 - 19.174, concerning the sapote fruit fly, Anastrepha serpentina (Wiedemann) quarantine. The new sections are adopted on an emergency basis to prevent the spread of the sapote fruit fly and facilitate its eradication. The new sections require application of treatments to achieve eradication and prescribe specific restrictions on the handling and movement of quarantined articles. On January 6, 2003, an adult of the sapote fruit fly was detected in a McPhail trap located south of McAllen in Hidalgo County in a grapefruit orchard. Four additional flies were collected at the following locations: January 8, backyard grapefruit tree southeast of McAllen; January 9, grapefruit orchard near Donna, Hidalgo County; January 13, grapefruit orchard near Donna; and February 7, backyard sour orange tree south of McAllen. The quarantine trigger was met twice because two flies each at Donna and McAllen were less than 3 miles apart. The McPhail traps have been used in the Lower Rio Grande Valley for more than ten years to survey for infestations of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens (Loew). In addition to the Mexican fruit fly, the trap attracts other Anastrepha species as well as other fruit fly species.

The department believes that it is necessary to take this immediate action to prevent the spread of the sapote fruit fly into other citrus growing areas of Texas, and adoption of this quarantine on an emergency basis is both necessary and appropriate. The citrus industry in particular is in peril because without this emergency quarantine and treatment of the infestation, USDA would quarantine Texas and as a result, Texas could lose important export markets and would require regulatory treatments such as fumigation of all exported fruit. The emergency quarantine takes the necessary steps to prevent artificial spread of the quarantined pest and provides for its elimination, thus protecting the industry.

New §19.170 defines the quarantined pest. New §19.171 designates the boundary of the quarantine area. New §19.172 lists the host plants for the quarantined pest. New §19.173 provides for the treatment and movement of the quarantined articles, and new §19.174 provides the trigger to declare an infestation and the treatment requirements. New §19.174 also provides for destruction or treatment of quarantined articles by the department if such articles are required to be destroyed or treated and the producer or handler refuses to destroy or treat the quarantined articles. This section also notes that authority to assess administrative penalties for violations of §§19.170 - 19.174 is provided in Texas Agriculture Code §12.020. The department may propose adoption of this rule on a permanent basis in a separate submission.

The new sections are adopted on an emergency basis under the Texas Agriculture Code, §71.004, which provides the Texas Department of Agriculture with the authority to establish emergency quarantines; §71.007 which authorizes the department to adopt rules as necessary to protect agricultural and horticultural interests, including rules to provide for specific treatment of a grove or orchard or of infested or infected plants, plant products, or substances; §12.020 which authorizes the department to assess administrative penalties for violations of Chapter 71; and the Texas Government Code, §2001.034, which provides for the adoption of administrative rules on an emergency basis, without notice and comment.

§19.170.Quarantined Pest.

The quarantined pest is the sapote fruit fly, Anastrepha serpentina (Wiedemann) in any living stage of development.

§19.171.Quarantined Areas.

The quarantined area is that portion of Hildago County bounded by a line drawn as follows: Beginning at the intersection of South Cage Boulevard and the Rio Grande River; proceeding northwesterly along the Rio Grande River 17.11 miles; then continuing in a straight northerly imaginary line to the intersection of Aloe Vera and Sunrise Street; then continuing northeasterly in a straight imaginary line to the intersection of Victoria and Davina Street; then northwesterly in a straight imaginary line to the intersection of Farm Road 495 and North Stewart Road; then continuing in a straight northeasterly imaginary line to the intersection of Mile 4 North Road and North Ware Road; then easterly along Mile 4 North Road (also known as West Alberta Road) to its intersection with South I Road; then southerly along South I Road to its intersection with West Earling Road; then easterly along West Earling Road to its intersection with North San Juan Road; then southerly along North San Juan Road to its intersection with East Ferguson Avenue; then easterly along East Ferguson Road to its intersection with East Gasline Road; then southerly along East Gasline Road to its intersection with East Nebraska Road; then easterly along East Nebraska Road to its intersection with North Morningside Road; then southerly along North Morningside Road to its intersection with Expressway 83; then easterly along Expressway 83 to its intersection with North Alamo Road; then northerly along North Alamo Road to its intersection with Earling Road; then westerly along Earling Road to its intersection with North Morningside Road; then northerly along North Morningside Road to its intersection with East Curve Road; then easterly along East Curve Road to its intersection with Alamo Road; then northerly along Alamo Road to its intersection with Mile 17 Road North; then westerly along Mile 17 Road North to its intersection with Sharp Road; then northeasterly along Sharp Road to its intersection with Mile 18 Road North; then easterly along Mile 18 Road North continuing in a straight imaginary line to the intersection of Mile 17 1/2 Road North and Mile 6 Road; then southerly along Mile 6 Rd West to its intersection with Mile 17 Road North; then easterly along Mile 17 Road North to its intersection with West Broadway Street; then southerly along West Broadway Street to its intersection with State Highway 107; then easterly along State Highway 107 to its intersection with Mile 4 Road West; then southerly on Mile 4 Road West to its intersection with Mile 13 1/2 North; then easterly along Mile 13 1/2 North to its intersection with Farm Road 1015; then southerly along Farm Road 1015 to its intersection with Expressway 83; then westerly along Expressway 83 to its intersection with South Bridge Avenue; then southerly along South Bridge Avenue to its intersection with East Eighth Street; then westerly along East Eighth Street to its intersection with South Boarder Avenue; then southerly along South Border Avenue to its intersection with Mile 6 North; then westerly along Mile 6 North to its intersection with Midway Road; then southerly along Midway Road to its intersection with Lott Road; then westerly along Lott Road continuing in a straight imaginary line to the intersection of FM 907 and Resaca Road; then southerly along FM 907 to its intersection with Balli Road; then westerly along Balli Road to its intersection with FM 2557; then southerly along FM 2557 to its intersection with Las Milpas Road; then easterly along Las Milpas Road to its intersection with South I Road; then southerly along South I Road to its intersection with Hi Line Road; then westerly along Hi Line Road to its intersection with South Cage Boulevard; then southerly along South Cage Boulevard to the point of beginning.

§19.172.Quarantined Articles.

The quarantined pest is a quarantined article. The fruit or berries of all of the following plants originating from the quarantined area are quarantined:

Figure: 4 TAC §19.172

§19.173.Restrictions.

(a) Movement of quarantined articles.

(1) General. Quarantined articles originating from the quarantined area are prohibited entry into adjoining areas, except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection.

(2) Exceptions. Commercial citrus fruit may be moved outside the quarantined area in fruit bins clearly marked with United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) approved color tags.

(b) Treatment of fruit. The fruit shall be treated using one of the following three options:

(1) Fumigation. The fruit must go directly to an approved treatment facility. The fruit shall be segregated in a packinghouse and fumigated as prescribed in the Texas Valley Mexican Fruit Fly Protocol 2002-2003. A copy of this protocol may be obtained at the department's Valley Regional Office, 900-B East Expressway 83, San Juan, Texas 78589.

(2) Bait Sprays. The fruit shall be treated in the field using approved bait sprays at 10 to 12 day intervals starting at least 30 days before harvest and continued throughout the harvest period or until the quarantine is revoked. The department or the USDA may extend the treatment interval to reflect prolongation of a fly generation especially during winter. Once all fruit has been harvested from the grove, spray applications may cease. Growers may enter into a compliance agreement with the USDA or the department to treat and handle the fruit as prescribed.

(3) Fruit Processing. Fruit should be covered by a tarpaulin if moved outside the quarantined area for juicing under guidelines prescribed by the department or the USDA.

§19.174.Establishment of Quarantined Areas; Core Area; Treatment of Infestation; Destruction of Quarantined Articles.

(a) When two or more adults of the quarantined pest within a time period equal to one fly generation and within 3 miles of each other, a mated female or one larva is detected, a quarantine area is established around the detection site. The quarantine area shall cover an area of approximately 81 square miles (4.5 miles around the detection site). Within the quarantine area, a core area of 1 square mile will be established around each detection site. The core area shall be treated by ground or aerial sprays as prescribed by the department or the USDA. Within the core area, the spray program shall restart if an additional quarantine pest is detected.

(b) The owner, orchard manager or packing sheds may bear all treatment expenses.

(c) The owner or the orchard manager of orchards located in a core area shall enter into a compliance agreement with the department or the USDA to make the required treatments and handle the fruit as prescribed.

(d) Homeowners shall not be required to pay treatment expenses when flies are detected in urban areas. Fruit will be handled as prescribed by the department or the USDA.

(e) Wholesalers, retailers, packing sheds, street fruit vendors, and flea market stall operators shall handle the fruit as prescribed by the department or USDA.

(f) The quarantined pest shall be considered eradicated from the quarantined area when additional flies are not detected beginning with the most recent fly detection and continuing for three subsequent generations. The number of days required to complete a fly generation will vary based on a day-degree model.

(g) In addition to assessment of administrative penalties as provided in the Texas Agriculture Code, §12.020, a violation of this subchapter may require destruction of quarantined articles.

(h) If the producer or handler of quarantined articles required to be destroyed or treated refuses to destroy or treat the articles, the department may treat the quarantined articles and charge the costs of the treatment to the producer or handler, or may deliver an Order of Seizure and Destruction to the producer or handler, in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code, §71.0091, providing notice to the producer or handler of their right to appeal the destruction of quarantined articles pursuant to §71.010, explaining seizure of the articles pending their destruction. The department may charge the costs of the seizure and holding of the articles until the time in which an appeal may be filed and, if filed, decided. If no appeal is filed, the seized articles may be destroyed after the deadline to file has passed. If the producer or handler does file an appeal and the court rules in the department's favor, the department may then destroy the seized articles. In both cases the department may charge the cost of the destruction to the producer or handler, in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code, §71.0091.

This agency hereby certifies that the emergency adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 24, 2003.

TRD-200301366

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Effective Date: February 24, 2003

Expiration Date: May 24, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075