TITLE 1.ADMINISTRATION

Part 1. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

Chapter 3. CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION

The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council ("Council") proposes the amendment of Subchapter H §3.9000.

The Council proposes the addition of Subchapter H §§3.9005, 3.9010, and 3.9015.

The Council proposes the repeal of Subchapter H §3.9100 and §3.9200.

The proposed amendments and additions provide processes and procedures for the certification, decertification, and review of crime stoppers organizations, and the requirements for the submission of annual probation fee and repayment reports.

The proposed amendment to §3.9000 clarifies the requirements that a crime stoppers organization must fulfill to be certified by the Council to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The authority to determine if a crime stoppers organization is qualified to receive such repayments and payments is granted to the Council by Texas Government Code, §414.011(a). The proposed amendment also clarifies the processes and procedures for certification, and permits the Council to extend the certification period for limited periods of time under specified circumstances.

The proposed addition of §3.9005 establishes processes and procedures for deciding if a crime stoppers organization should be decertified during the certification period. The authority to determine if a crime stoppers organization should be decertified because the organization no longer meets the certification requirements is granted to the Council by Texas Government Code, §414.011(d).

The proposed addition of §3.9010 requires a certified crime stoppers organization to submit an annual probation fee and repayment report postmarked no later than January 31 of each year. The proposed addition implements the requirements set forth in Texas Government Code, §414.010(a).

The proposed addition of §3.9015 establishes processes and procedures for the review of certified crime stoppers organizations. The authority to direct the review of certified crime stoppers organizations is granted to the Criminal Justice Division ("CJD") of the Office of the Governor by Texas Government Code, §414.011(b).

The proposed repeal of §3.9100, entitled "Certification", and §3.9200, entitled "Decertification", allows these section numbers to be available if further expansion of the administrative code becomes necessary. The provisions regarding certification are found in §3.9000 and the provisions regarding decertification are found in §3.9005.

Dan Glotzer, Manager of Budget and Finance for CJD, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Mr. Glotzer has also determined that for the first five-year period that the sections are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections will be more efficient processes and procedures and the current rules will be more easily understood. There will be no anticipated economic cost to persons or businesses for complying with the proposed rules.

Comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Heather Morgan, Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, at hmorgan@governor.state.tx.us; P. O. Box 12428, Austin, Texas 78711; or (512) 463-1919. Comments must be received no later than 30 days from the date of publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

Subchapter H. CRIME STOPPERS PROGRAM CERTIFICATION

1. CRIME STOPPERS PROGRAM CERTIFICATION

1 TAC §§3.9000, 3.9005, 3.9010, 3.9015

The amendment of §3.9000, and the addition of §3.9005 and §3.9010, are proposed under the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.006, which provides the Council the authority to adopt rules to carry out its functions.

The amendment of §3.9000 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(a), which requires the Council to certify qualified crime stoppers organizations to receive payments and reward repayments. The addition of §3.9005 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(d), which authorizes the Council to decertify a crime stoppers organization if it determines that the organization no longer meets the certification requirements. The addition of §3.9010 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.010(a), which requires certified crime stoppers organizations to file a detailed report with the Council not later than January 31 of each year.

The addition of §3.9015 is proposed under the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(c), which authorizes CJD or its designee to draft rules for adoption by the Council relating to the review or audit of certified crime stoppers organizations.

The addition of §3.9015 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(b), which subjects certified crime stoppers organizations to review or audit of their finances or programs at the direction of CJD or its designee.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment and addition of these rules.

§3.9000. Certification [ Requirements ].

(a) The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall, on application by a crime stoppers organization as defined by §414.001(2) of the Texas Government Code, determine whether the organization meets the requirements to be certified to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

(b) The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall, in its discretion, certify a crime stoppers organization to receive those repayments or payments if, considering the organization, continuity, leadership, community support, and general conduct of the organization, the Council determines that the repayments or payments will be spent to further the crime prevention purposes of the organization.

(c) Certification is valid for two years from the date of issuance. If a crime stoppers organization's certification expires, the organization is not eligible to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, until the organization obtains certification. The two-year certification period may be extended under the following circumstances:

(1) If an organization's application to renew its certification is received by the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council before the two-year certification period expires, the organization's certification shall continue in effect until the Council makes a decision regarding the renewal of its certification.

(2) The chairman of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council may extend the two-year certification period for a period of time not to exceed 90 days if:

(A) one of the following extenuating circumstances occurs before the two-year certification period expires:

(i) natural or man-made disaster;

(ii) serious illness, incapacity, or death of the chairman, treasurer, or secretary of the organization's board of directors;

(iii) serious illness, incapacity, or death of one of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators; or

(iv) death of a member of the immediate family of one of the officials listed in clauses (ii) and (iii) of this subparagraph;

(B) one of the extenuating circumstances listed in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph has a detrimental effect on the organization's ability to submit an application for certification before the two-year certification period expires; and

(C) the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council receives the organization's written request to extend the certification period no later than 20 calendar days after one of the extenuating circumstances listed in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph occurs.

(d) [ (a) ] A [ In order to obtain certification, a ] private, nonprofit [ non-profit ] crime stoppers organization must submit the following information to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council in order to obtain certification :

(1) Documentation from the Internal Revenue Service granting the [ be a non-profit ] organization tax exempt status;

(2) Proof that the following persons completed a training course provided by CJD and the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, or their designee, within the year prior to submission of its application for certification: [ be granted tax exempt status by the IRS ]

(A) one member of the organization's board of directors, and

(B) one of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators;

(3) A completed and signed Conditions of Certification Form; [ have at least one member of the organization's Board of Directors, as well as the Police/Civilian Coordinator of the Crime Stoppers organization attend a complete training conference provided by the Criminal Justice Division of the Governor's office and the Texas Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, or its designee, in the year prior to certification ]

(4) The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the members of the organization's board of directors, and the position held by each member [ complete and sign the conditions of certification form ];

(5) The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators; and

(6) If the organization is currently certified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council or the organization's most recent certification expired within three years prior to submission of its application for certification, the organization must submit the following additional information:

(A) financial statements covering the two-year certification period on a form prescribed by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council;

(B) documentation from the relevant community supervision and corrections departments stating the amount of probation fees disbursed to the organization during the two-year certification period; and

(C) any Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Reports that have not been submitted to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council.

(e) [ (b) ] A [ In order to obtain certification, a ] public crime stoppers organization must submit the following information to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council in order to obtain certification: [ have at least one employee attend a complete training conference provided by the Office of the Governor or its designee in the year prior to certification. ]

(1) Proof that one of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators completed a training course provided by CJD and the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, or their designee, within the year prior to submission of its application for certification;

(2) A completed and signed Conditions of Certification Form;

(3) The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the members of the organization's governing board, and the position held by each member;

(4) The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators; and

(5) If the organization is currently certified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council or the organization's most recent certification expired within three years prior to submission of its application for certification, the organization must submit the following additional information:

(A) financial statements covering the two-year certification period on a form prescribed by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council;

(B) documentation from the relevant community supervision and corrections departments stating the amount of probation fees disbursed to the organization during the two-year certification period; and

(C) any Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Reports that have not been submitted to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council.

(f) Decisions regarding the certification of crime stoppers organizations shall be made by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council.

§3.9005.Decertification.

(a) During the two-year certification period, the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall, in its discretion, decertify a crime stoppers organization if it determines that the organization no longer meets the certification requirements described in §3.9000(b), which may include a violation of state or federal law.

(b) If a crime stoppers organization is decertified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, the organization is not eligible to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

(c) The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall send written notification to the crime stoppers organization no later than 45 calendar days prior to the meeting at which the Council will consider the decertification of the organization. The written notification shall include the following:

(1) Any noncompliance with the certification requirements described in §3.9000(b); and

(2) The date, time, and location of the meeting at which the Council will consider the decertification of the organization.

(d) The crime stoppers organization shall submit a written response, which shall include an explanation and specific reasons why the organization believes that it should not be decertified. The written response must be received by the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council at least 10 calendar days prior to the meeting at which the Council will consider the decertification of the organization.

(e) The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall render a decision regarding the decertification of the crime stoppers organization and shall notify the organization in writing of its decision.

(f) If a crime stoppers organization is decertified, the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall notify the state comptroller, and the relevant county auditors and community supervision and corrections departments in the organization's region, that the organization is decertified and is not eligible to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

(g) Not later than the 60th day after the date of decertification of the organization, the decertified organization shall forward all unexpended money received under this section to the state comptroller.

§3.9010.Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Report.

A crime stoppers organization that is certified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall submit to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council an Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Report postmarked no later than January 31 of each year.

§3.9015.Review.

By accepting certification, a crime stoppers organization agrees to the following conditions of review:

(1) CJD will review the activities of a crime stoppers organization that is certified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council as necessary to ensure that the organization's finances and programs further the crime prevention purposes of the organization in compliance with the laws and rules governing crime stoppers organizations.

(2) CJD may perform a desk review or an on-site review at the organization's location. In addition, CJD may request that the organization submit relevant information to CJD to support any review.

(3) After a review, the organization shall be notified in writing of any noncompliance identified by CJD in the form of a preliminary report.

(4) The organization shall respond to the preliminary report within a time frame specified by CJD.

(5) The organization's response shall become part of the final report, which shall be submitted to the organization and the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council.

(6) Any noncompliance, including an organization's failure to provide adequate documentation upon request, may serve as grounds for decertification of the organization by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 13, 2003.

TRD-200303568

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


1 TAC §3.9100, §3.9200

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the Office of the Governor or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeal of these rules is proposed under the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.006, which provides the Council the authority to adopt rules to carry out its functions.

The repeal of §3.9100 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(a), which requires the Council to certify qualified crime stoppers organizations to receive payments and reward repayments. The repeal of §3.9200 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(d), which authorizes the Council to decertify a crime stoppers organization if it determines that the organization no longer meets the certification requirements.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the repeal of these rules.

§3.9100.Certification.

§3.9200.Decertification.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 13, 2003.

TRD-200303569

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Part 9. STATE AIRCRAFT POOLING BOARD

Chapter 181. GENERAL PROVISIONS

1 TAC §181.15

The State Aircraft Pooling Board proposes new §181.15, concerning a 12-hour notice provision in order to accommodate priority scheduling for statewide elected officials.

The new rule will place into effect the provisions of Texas Government Code, Title 10, Chapter 2205, §2205.038(d), providing for such advance notice, in light of reduced availability of aircraft to serve the needs of state officials and employees traveling on state business.

Jerry Daniels, Executive Director, has determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.

Mr. Daniels has also determined that for the first five years the rule is in effect, the public will benefit through state officials having greater accessibility to and efficiency in traveling to all areas of the state on state business. There is no economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the rule as proposed and no negative effect on small businesses.

Comments on the proposals may be submitted within thirty days of this publication to Jerry Daniels, State Aircraft Pooling Board, 10335 Golf Course Road, Austin, Texas 78719, (512) 936-8900.

The new rule is proposed under Texas Government Code, Title 10, Chapter 2205, §2205.010, which provides the board the authority to adopt rules for conducting business.

There are no other statutes, articles, or codes that will be affected by the new rule.

§181.15.Priority Scheduling.

In accordance with Texas Government Code, Title 10, Chapter 2205, §2205.038(d), statewide elected officials, upon giving 12-hour advance notice to the scheduling office, shall be given priority in the scheduling of aircraft.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 12, 2003.

TRD-200303544

Jerry Daniels

Executive Director

State Aircraft Pooling Board

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 936-8900


Part 15. TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION

Chapter 354. MEDICAID HEALTH SERVICES

Subchapter A. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES

2. MEDICAID VISION CARE PROGRAM

1 TAC §§354.1015, 354.1021, 354.1023

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 354. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendments to §354.1015, Benefits and Limitations, limit the provision of prosthetic and non-prosthetic eyewear through Vision Care Services to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The limitation of prosthetic and non-prosthetic eyewear through Vision Care Services is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue the service for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT recipients. The proposed amendment will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003). The amendments to §354.1021, Additional Claims Information Requirements, and §354.1023, Optometrist Services, are administrative and update references within the rules.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will be savings to the state as follows: $2,156,874 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004; the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $2,155,790 (GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur additional costs.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to comply with the amendments as proposed. This was determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with the amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated negative impact on local employment.

Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Medicaid/CHIP Program Operations, has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide medically necessary eyewear through Vision Care Services to EPSDT recipients within the level of appropriated funds.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek, Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th Street, MC- H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The hearing will be held at the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas Department of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposal is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The proposed rules affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed rules.

§354.1015.Benefits and Limitations.

Except as specified in §354.1023 [ §29.105 ] of this title (relating to Optometrist Services), the services addressed in this subchapter are those optometric services available to Medicaid recipients who are 21 years old or older. Services are available to Medicaid recipients under 21 years old through the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) Program , Benefits and Limitations, described in 1 T.A.C. §363.502 . The amount, duration, and scope of optometric services available through the Texas Medical Assistance Program are established according to applicable federal regulations, the Texas state plan for medical assistance under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, state law, and department rules. Information regarding benefits and limitations is available to providers of these services through the Texas Medicaid Provider Procedures Manual which is issued to each provider on enrolling in the Medicaid Program. The benefits and limitations applicable to optometric services available through the Medicaid Program to Medicaid recipients who are 21 years old or older are as follows.

(1) Provider eligibility. All services reimbursable by the program must be provided to eligible recipients by a physician, optometrist, or optician enrolled in the Medicaid program at the time the service(s) is provided.

(2) Reimbursable services.

[ (A) ] Examination. One examination of the eyes by refraction may be provided to each eligible recipient every 24 months.

[ (B) Prosthetic (aphakic) eyewear. Prosthetic eyewear, including contact lenses and glass or plastic lenses in frames, is a program benefit provided to an eligible recipient if the eyewear is prescribed for postcataract surgery, congenital absence of the eye lens, or loss of an eye lens because of trauma.]

[ (i) Reimbursement is made for as many temporary lenses as are medically necessary during postsurgical cataract convalescence (the four-month period following the date of cataract surgery).]

[ (ii) Only one pair of permanent prosthetic lenses can be dispensed as a program benefit. Reimbursement is made by the program for the replacement of lost or destroyed prosthetic eyewear and the replacement of prosthetic eyewear if required because of a change in visual acuity of .5 diopters or more.]

[ (C) Nonprosthetic (nonaphakic) eyewear. Nonprosthetic eyewear that is medically necessary to correct defects in vision is a program benefit provided to an eligible recipient only once every 24 months, unless his eyes have undergone a change in visual acuity of .5 diopters or more. Nonprosthetic eyewear includes contact lenses and glass or plastic lenses in frames.]

[ (i) Prescriptions for contact lenses must have written prior authorization by the department or its designee. Prior authorization is based on the provider's written documentation that these lenses are the only means of correcting the vision defect.]

[ (ii) Replacement of nonprosthetic eyewear because of a change in visual acuity begins a new 24-month period governing eligibility for new eyewear.]

[ (D) Repairs. Repairs to prosthetic eyewear are reimbursable if the cost of materials exceeds $2.00. Repairs costing less are not reimbursable by the program and the provider many not bill the recipient for these services. Repairs to nonprosthetic eyewear are not reimbursable by the program.]

[ (E) Replacement of lost or destroyed nonprosthetic eyewear. Replacement of lost or destroyed nonprosthetic eyewear is not reimbursable by the program.]

[ (F) Optometric services provided in skilled or intermediate care facilities. These services are reimbursable by the program if the recipient's attending physician has ordered the service(s) and the order is included in the recipient's medical record in the nursing facility.]

§354.1021.Additional Claims Information Requirements.

Providers must meet the claim criteria established in the provisions of this subchapter for optometric services and the provisions for participation in the Medicaid program established under Subchapter A of this chapter (relating to Medicaid Procedures for Providers) and Subchapter L of this chapter (relating to General Administration) of the purchased health services chapter. Besides the claims information requirements established in §354.1001 [ §29.1 ] of this title (relating to Claim Information Requirements), the following information is required for claims for services:

[ (1) ] name, address, and Medicaid provider identification number of the ordering provider, as appropriate . [ ; ]

[ (2) description of lenses and frames provided;]

[ (3) provider's signature on the claim form verifying the diopter change required for the dispensing of replacement eyewear;]

[ (4) certification by the provider that the dispensed eyewear materials used for repairs to prosthetic eyewear meet the specifications for eyewear in §29. 102 of this title (relating to Specifications for Eyewear);]

[ (5) claims for eyewear with special features must be signed by the recipient, acknowledging his selection of eyewear that is beyond the specifications for eyewear in §29.102 of this title (relating to Specifications for Eyewear). A signed patient certification satisfies this requirement for claims that are electronically submitted;]

[ (6) a copy of this invoice for supplies dispensed must be attached to a claim for repairs;]

[ (7) reimbursement for replacement prosthetic eyewear is contingent upon the original eyewear being lost or damaged beyond repair or upon the recipient's visual acuity having changed significantly as defined in §29.101 (2)(B)(ii) of this title (relating to Benefits and Limitations). If the original eyewear has been lost or damaged beyond repair, the recipient must sign the claim form or, in the case of providers who electronically bill, a patient certification. Reimbursement for replacement nonprosthetic eyewear is contingent upon the recipient's visual acuity having undergone a significant change as defined in §29.101(2)(C) of this title (relating to Benefits and Limitations);]

[ (8) the provider must show the name of the physician who ordered optometric services on a claim showing a skilled nursing facility or an intermediate care facility as the place of service.]

§354.1023.Optometrist Services.

(a) In addition to those services described in §354.1015 [ §29.101 ] and §363.502 [ §33.402 ] of this title (both relating to Benefits and Limitations) and subject to the specifications, conditions, limitations, and requirements established by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (Commission) [ Texas Department of Health (department) ] or its designee, diagnostic and treatment services provided by an optometrist are covered by the Texas Medical Assistance Program.

(b) To be covered, the evaluation services shall be:

(1) within the optometrist's scope of practice, as defined by state law;

(2) reasonable and medically necessary as determined by the [ department ] Commission or its designee; and

(3) provided to an eligible recipient by an optometrist enrolled in the Texas Medical Assistance Program at the time the service(s) is provided.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303606

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


4. MEDICAID CHIROPRACTIC SERVICES

1 TAC §354.1051, §354.1052

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendments to §354.1051, Additional Claim Information Requirements, are administrative and update references within the rule. The amendment to §354.1052, Authorized Chiropractic Services, limits the provision of chiropractor services provided by a doctor of chiropractic to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The limitation of chiropractor services is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue the service for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT eligible. The proposed amendments will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will be savings to the state as follows: $323,574 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004; the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $323,411 (GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur additional costs.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to comply with the amendments as proposed. This was determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated negative impact on local employment.

Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP, has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide medically necessary chiropractor services to EPSDT recipients within the level of appropriated funds.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek, Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The hearing will be held at the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas Department of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposal is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§354.1051.Additional Claim Information Requirements.

In addition to the general requirements in §354.1001 [ §29.1 ] of this title (relating to Claim Information Requirements), the following information is required on chiropractic claims:

(1) The diagnosis of subluxation which specifies the level and condition (acute or chronic).

(2) Location of subluxation. The precise level of the subluxation must be specified to substantiate a claim for manipulation of the spine. This designation is made in relation to the part of the spine in which the subluxation is identified. The level of subluxation may be specified in the following ways:

(A) The exact bones may be listed.

(B) The location may be used if it implies several bones.

(3) Place of service.

(4) The type of each treatment procedure.

(5) The individual charge for each authorized service related to a major diagnosis.

(6) Number of manual manipulations that have been performed.

§354.1052.Authorized Chiropractic Services.

(a) Chiropractic services include those services provided by a doctor of chiropractic and which are within the scope of practice of his profession as defined by state law. Benefits are limited to services which consist of necessary treatment or correction by means of manual manipulation of the spine, by use of hands only, to correct a subluxation to the same extent that such benefits are provided under Part B of Medicare. Benefits are available under this section only for services which are provided during the first 12 visits to any one eligible recipient by a doctor of chiropractic during any one benefit period. Benefit period for purposes of this section means a 12 consecutive month period which begins with the month of the first treatment.

(b) Coverage does not extend to the diagnostic, therapeutic services, or adjunctive therapies furnished by a chiropractor or by others under his or her orders or direction. This exclusion applies to the x-ray taken for the purpose of determining the existence of a subluxation of the spine. Additionally, braces or supports, even though ordered by an MD or DO and supplied by a chiropractor, are not reimbursable items.

(c) Chiropractor services are limited to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303607

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


8. PODIATRY SERVICES

1 TAC §354.1101, §354.1102

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendments to §354.1101, Additional Claim Information Requirements, are administrative and update references within the rule. The amendments to §354.1102, Authorized Podiatry Services, limit the provision of podiatry services to recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The limitation of podiatry services is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue the service for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT recipients. The proposed amendment will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will be savings to the state as follows: $1,631,800 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004; the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $1,630,980 (GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur additional costs.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to comply with the amendments as proposed. This was determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the amendments. There is no anticipated negative impact on local employment

Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP, has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide medically necessary podiatry services to EPSDT recipients within the level of appropriated funds.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043 of the Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek, Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The hearing will be held at the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas Department of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposal is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas.

The proposed rules affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposal.

§354.1101.Additional Claim Information Requirements.

In addition to the general requirements in §354.1001 [ §29.1 ] of this title (relating to Claim Information Requirements), the following information is required on claims for podiatry services:

(1) place of service;

(2) the type of each diagnostic, treatment, or surgical procedure;

(3) the number of miles for which a travel charge is made;

(4) the individual charge for each service related to the major diagnosis;

(5) diagnosis(es) to a maximum of two primary and three secondary diagnoses of the condition(s) for which treatment and services were provided. With respect to diagnostic or other services furnished at the request of a physician or another podiatrist, this requirement may be waived by the health insuring agent if the podiatrist providing the services shows that such information is not available to him;

(6) name, address, and appropriate identification number of the ordering physician or podiatrist if services were provided by a nonordering podiatrist; and

(7) all supplemental information, including clarification of the diagnoses in terms of the degree or extent of involvement, necessary to substantiate the need for the services provided or changes made, or both.

§354.1102.Authorized Podiatry Services.

(a) The term "podiatry services" includes those services provided by or under the personal supervision of a doctor of podiatry which are within the scope of practice of his profession as defined by state law and for which benefits are or would have been provided under Medicare had the recipient been eligible for Medicare.

(b) Reimbursement for Podiatry services are limited to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program under 25 TAC Chapter 33.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303608

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


15. HEARING AID SERVICES

1 TAC §354.1231, §354.1233, §354.1235

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 354. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendments to §354.1231, Benefits and Limitations, §354.1233, Requirements for Hearing Aid Services, and §354.1235, Requirements for Provider Participation, limit the provision of hearing aid services available for persons age 21 years and over. The limitation of hearing aid services for Medicaid recipients 21 years and older is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue the service without additional limitations. Hearing aid services continue to be available to Medicaid recipients under the age of 21 through the Texas Department of Health, pursuant to 25 T.A.C. Chapter 37. The proposed amendments implement appropriation initiatives directed by the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003). Additional amendments are administrative and update references within the rules.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will be savings to the state as follows: $ 477,600 GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004; the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $477,360 (GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur additional costs.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to comply with the proposed amendments. This was determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with the amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated negative impact on local governments.

Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect, the public will benefit from there adoption. The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide medically necessary hearing aid services to EPSDT recipients through the Texas Department of Health, as stated above.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that these proposed amendments do not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043of the Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek, Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The hearing will be held in the Board of Health Room, Texas Department of Health, Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposal is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The proposed amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed new rules.

§354.1231.Benefits and Limitations.

(a) Benefits. Reimbursement for hearing aid services available through the Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Program shall be provided in accordance with federal regulations found at 42 CFR Subchapter C, Medical Assistance Programs; state-legislated appropriations; and the provisions and procedures found elsewhere in this chapter as cited at §354.1233 [ §29.1502 ] of this title (relating to Requirements for Hearing Aid Services). The following hearing aid services shall be reimbursed, through the Texas Medicaid Program:

(1) physician examination to determine the medical necessity for a hearing aid;

(2) hearing aid evaluations, including home visit hearing evaluations;

[ (3) hearing aid;]

[ (4) initial fitting, dispensing, and post-fitting check of hearing aid; and]

[ (5) first and second revisits to assess the recipient's adaptation to the hearing aid and the functioning of the instrument.]

(b) Limitations and exclusions. Hearing aid providers and examining physicians must comply with the following conditions and limitations established by the department or its designee.

(1) Hearing aid services shall be available only to non-EPSDT eligible Medicaid recipients.

[ (2) Recipients shall be limited to one hearing aid every six years (72 months) from the dispensing month of the present instrument.]

(2) [ (3) ] An individual using a hearing aid before becoming eligible for Medicaid benefits may have a hearing evaluation conducted by an approved hearing aid services provider after becoming eligible for Medicaid. [ Medicaid payment for a new hearing aid, however, shall be denied if the provider concludes, based upon the evaluation findings, that the recipient's present hearing aid adequately compensates for the degree of hearing loss. ]

(3) [ (4) ] Providers may not submit a hearing evaluation claim to the [ department ] Commission or its designee unless the Medicaid recipient meets the eligibility criteria in §354.1233 [ §29.1502(b) ] of this title (relating to Requirements for Hearing Aid Services).

(4) [ (5) ] The Commission [ department ] or its designee shall not pay for the replacement of batteries or cords.

[ (6) Binaural fittings shall not be available except for legally blind, hearing-impaired recipients who can document that they have no other available resources.]

[ (7) Providers should dispense United States manufactured hearing aids if the purchase price and quality are comparable to those of foreign manufacturers.]

(5) [ (8) ] Recipients may receive home visit hearing evaluations [ and hearing aid fittings only ] on the written recommendation of a physician.

[ (9) Hearing aid services do not include auditory training, speech reading, or other types of habilitative or rehabilitative services.]

[ (10) Medicaid reimbursement for hearing aids shall be limited to eligible recipients whose air conduction puretone average in the better ear is 45dB or greater.]

§354.1233.Requirements for Hearing Aid Services.

(a) Hearing aid services. Providers of hearing aid services must comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, recognized professional standards, and the provisions cited in Subchapter A of this chapter (relating to Medicaid Procedures for Providers), and Subchapter L of this chapter (relating to General Administration), in addition to the conditions, specifications, limitations established by the Texas Department of Health (department) or its designee, and applicable requirements of their licensing authority.

(1) Physicians. Physicians shall be reimbursed for all services covered by the Texas Program: examinations and [ , ] hearing evaluations [ , and fitting and dispensing services ].

(2) Audiologists. Audiologists shall be reimbursed for hearing evaluations [ and fitting and dispensing services ].

[ (3) Fitters and dispensers. Fitters and dispensers shall be reimbursed for fitting and dispensing services.]

(b) Hearing evaluations. Hearing evaluations must be recommended by a physician based upon examination of the recipient. Reimbursement for hearing evaluations will be made only to physicians or licensed audiologists. [ The recipient must have a medical necessity for a hearing aid as stated in §29.1501(b)(10) of this title (relating to Benefits and Limitations) and have no medical contraindications to the recipient's ability to use and/or wear a hearing aid. ]

(1) A physician who recommends a hearing evaluation must be licensed to practice medicine in the state where and when the evaluation is conducted.

(2) The physician must indicate on the Physician Examination Report form if the recipient needs a hearing evaluation based on the examination of the recipient. Medicaid reimbursement for a hearing evaluation shall be based on the physician's recommendation that the hearing evaluation is medically necessary.

(3) Providers must administer hearing evaluations using appropriate procedures as specified within their scope of practice and recognized professional standards.

(4) Reimbursement for home visit hearing evaluations shall be made if the recipient's physician has documented that the recipient's medical condition prohibits traveling to the provider's place of business.

(5) Providers of hearing evaluations must have a report in the recipient's record. Providers must include in the report hearing evaluation test data [ and a recommendation for the hearing aid most appropriate for the ear being amplified. If any of the criteria cited in this section cannot be met, providers must specify in the evaluation report the factors influencing or preventing assessments, and justify the recommendation for a hearing aid. ]

(6) Hearing evaluations performed by fitters and dispensers are not reimbursable. If a fitter or dispenser performs a hearing evaluation on a recipient the recipient shall not be billed for the hearing evaluation.

[ (c) Hearing aids. Providers must offer each recipient eligible for a hearing aid a new instrument that meets the recipient's hearing need and that is within the allowable fee paid by the Texas Medicaid Program.]

[ (1) Hearing aids above the maximum allowable fee. The department shall pay the maximum allowable fee paid by the Texas Medicaid Program toward hearing aids for recipients who meet the requirements cited at §29.1504(b)(2) of this title (relating to Reimbursement for Hearing Aid Services).]

[ (2) Warranty. Providers must ensure that each hearing aid purchased through the Texas Medicaid Program is a new and current model which meets the performance specification of the manufacturer and the hearing needs of the recipient. Providers must also ensure that each hearing aid is covered by a standard 12-month manufacturer's warranty, effective from the dispensing date.]

[ (3) Required package. Providers must dispense each hearing aid purchased through the Texas Medicaid Program with all necessary tubing, cords, and connectors; instructions for care and use; and a one-month supply of batteries.]

[ (4) Thirty-day trial period. Providers must allow each eligible recipient 30 days to determine if the recipient is satisfied with a hearing aid purchased through the Texas Medicaid Program. The trial period consists of 30 consecutive days from the dispensing date. Providers must inform recipients of the trial period and of the beginning and ending dates.]

[ (A) During the trial period, providers may dispense additional hearing aids, as medically necessary, until the recipient is satisfied with the results of the aid or the provider determines that the recipient cannot benefit from the dispensing of an additional hearing aid. A new trial period begins with the dispensing date of each hearing aid.]

[ (B) Providers may charge a rental fee for hearing aids returned during the trial period.]

[ (i) If a rental fee is charged, providers must assess the rental fee according to the rules and regulations established by the State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments and the State Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology.]

[ (ii) If there is no signed agreement between the recipient and the provider specifying a greater amount, the maximum rental for eligible Medicaid recipients shall be $2 per day. This fee shall not be a covered benefit of the Texas Medicaid Program. Recipients shall be responsible for paying any rental fee assessed them for instruments returned during the 30-day period. Providers must keep in the recipient's file the signed certification acknowledging responsibility to pay hearing aid rental fees.]

[ (iii) Providers must comply with all procedures and directions provided by the department or its designee regarding forms and certifications required during the 30-day trial period. Providers must allow 30 days to elapse from the hearing aid dispensing date before completing a "30-day trial period certification statement," which is kept in the recipient's file.]

[ (5) Postfitting checks. The fitter and dispenser must perform a postfitting check of the hearing aid within five weeks of the initial fitting. The postfitting check is part of the dispensing procedure.]

[ (6) First revisit. The first revisit shall include a hearing aid check and/or counseling and is conducted as needed within six months of the postfitting check.]

[ (7) Second revisit. The second revisit shall be conducted as needed. The purpose of the second revisit is to make any necessary adjustments to the hearing aid or to continue counseling.]

§354.1235.Requirements for Provider Participation.

(a) Provider enrollment. Each physician [ , ] or audiologist [ , or fitter and dispenser of hearing aids ] claiming reimbursement for hearing aid services provided as a Title XIX benefit to an eligible Medicaid recipient must be enrolled in the Texas Medicaid Program.

(1) To be eligible for reimbursement of Title XIX benefits for hearing aid services covered by the Texas Medicaid Program, each provider of Medical care and services must enter into a written agreement with the department.

(2) Participating providers must comply with all federal and state laws and regulations governing the Texas Medicaid Program. Providers must also comply with the provisions, conditions, certifications, and limitations as described in this subchapter.

(b) Provider licensure and certification. To be eligible for participation as a provider of hearing aid services under the Texas Medicaid Program, physicians [ , ] and audiologists, [ and fitters and dispensers ] must meet applicable federal and state licensing and/or certification laws and rules for the services they provide. The following requirements shall be applicable to Medicaid providers of hearing aid services practicing in the State of Texas:

(1) Physicians (MD or DO) must be currently licensed to practice medicine by the State Board of Medical Examiners.

(2) Audiologists must be currently licensed by the State Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and be certified by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) or meet ASHA equivalency requirements. [ Audiologists providing fitting and dispensing services must be registered with the State Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. ]

[ (3) Fitters and dispensers must be currently licensed by the State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing Instruments.]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303609

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


19. PSYCHOLOGISTS' SERVICES

1 TAC §354.1281, §354.1282

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendment to §354.1281, Benefits and Limitations, limits the provision of psychologists' services to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The amendment is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue psychologists' services for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT eligible. The amendment to §354.1282, Conditions of Participation, includes an exception for providers who meet the criteria specified in §354.1173(b) to the requirement that Medicaid providers are also enrolled in Medicare. The proposed amendments also replace references to the Texas Department of Health with references to HHSC. The proposed amendments will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will be savings to the state as follows: $1,850,700 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004; the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $1,849,770 (GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur additional costs.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to comply with these amendments as proposed. This was determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated negative impact on local employment.

Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP, has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide medically necessary psychologists' services to EPSDT recipients within the limits of appropriated funds.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043 of the Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek, Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The hearing will be held in the Board of Health Room, Texas Department of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority to administer the Texas Medicaid program; and Government Code §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendments.

§354.1281.Benefits and Limitations.

(a) Subject to the specifications, conditions, requirements, and limitations established by the [ Texas Department of Health (department) ] Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) or its designee, psychological counseling and services provided by a licensed psychologist are covered if the services:

(1) are within the psychologist's scope of practice, as defined by state law; and

(2) would be covered by the Texas Medical Assistance Program when they are provided by a licensed physician (MD or DO).

(b) To be payable, the services must be reasonable and psychologically necessary as determined by the department or its designee.

(c) The Texas Medical Assistance Program does not reimburse for the services of a psychological assistant working under the direction of a licensed psychologist.

(d) Licensed psychologists who are employed by or remunerated by a physician, hospital, facility, or other provider may not bill the Texas Medical Assistance Program directly for psychologists' services if that billing would result in duplicate payment for the same services. If the services are covered and reimbursable by the program, payment may be made to the physician, hospital, or other provider (if approved for participation in the Texas Medical Assistance Program) who employs or reimburses the licensed psychologist. The basis and amount of Medicaid reimbursement depends on the services actually provided, who provided the services, and the reimbursement methodology utilized by the Texas Medical Assistance Program as appropriate for the services and provider(s) involved.

(e) Licensed psychologist services are limited to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33.

§354.1282.Conditions of Participation.

Subject to the specifications, conditions, limitations, and requirements established by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (Commission) [ Texas Department of Health (department) ] or its designee, a psychologist must:

(1) be licensed by the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists or other appropriate state licensing authority;

(2) comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations governing the services provided;

(3) be enrolled and participating in Medicare , unless the provider satisfies the criteria for exception described in §354.1173 (b) ;

(4) be enrolled and approved for participation in the Texas Medical Assistance Program;

(5) sign a written provider agreement with the Commission [ department ] or its designee;

(6) comply with the terms of the provider agreement and all requirements of the Texas Medical Assistance Program, including regulations, rules, handbooks, standards, and guidelines published by the Commission [ department ] or its designee; and

(7) bill for services covered by the Texas Medical Assistance Program in the manner and format prescribed by the Commission [ department ] or its designee.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303610

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


29. LICENSED PROFESSIONAL COUNSELORS AND ADVANCED CLINICAL PRACTITIONERS

1 TAC §354.1381, §354.1382

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendment to §354.1381, Benefits and Limitations, limits the provision of counseling services provided by licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFT), licensed professional counselors (LPC), and licensed master social worker-advanced clinical practitioners (LMSW-ACP) to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The amendment is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue counseling services for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT eligible. The amendment to §354.1382, Conditions for Participation, includes an exception for providers who meet the criteria specified in §354.1173(b) to the requirement that Medicaid providers are also enrolled in Medicare. The proposed amendments also replace references to the Texas Department of Health with references to HHSC. The proposed amendments will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will be savings to the state as follows: $15,283,200 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004; the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $15,275,520 (GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur additional costs.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to comply with these amendments as proposed. This was determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the proposal. There is no anticipated negative impact on local employment.

Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide medically necessary counseling services to EPSDT recipients within the levels of appropriated funds.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043 of the Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek, Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . A public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The hearing will be held in the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas Department of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed new rules.

§354.1381.Benefits and Limitations.

(a) Counseling for emotional disorders or conditions provided by licensed professional counselors (LPCs), licensed master social worker-advanced clinical practitioners (LMSW-ACPs), and licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFTs) as allowed by each respective licensing law are covered services.

(b) To be considered payable, the services must be reasonable and medically necessary as determined by the department or its designee.

(c) LPCs, LMSW-ACPs or LMFTs who are employed by or remunerated by another provider may not bill the Texas Medical Assistance Program directly for counseling services if that billing would result in duplicate payment for the same services.

(d) Services provided by an LPC, LMSW-ACP, and LMFT are limited to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33.

§354.1382.Conditions for Participation.

(a) To participate in the Texas Medical Assistance Program, licensed professional counselors (LPCs) must be licensed by the Texas Board of Examiners of Professional Counselors in accordance with the Texas Licensed Professional Counselor Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4512g.

(b) To participate in the Texas Medical Assistance Program, licensed master social worker-advanced clinical practitioners (LMSW-ACPs) must be licensed as a master social worker and be recognized as being qualified for the practice of clinical social work by the Texas State Board of Social Worker Examiners in accordance with the Human Resources Code, Subtitle E, Chapter 50.

(c) To participate in the Texas Medical Assistance Program, licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFTs) must be licensed by the Texas Board of Examiners of Marriage and Family Therapists in accordance with the Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4512c-1.

(d) These providers must:

(1) meet the appropriate licensing requirements as required in subsections (a), (b) or (c) of this section;

(2) comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations governing the services provided;

(3) be enrolled and participating in Medicare (this applies to LMSW-ACPs only) , unless the provider satisfies criteria for exemption described in 354.1173(b) ;

(4) be enrolled and approved for participation in the Texas Medical Assistance Program;

(5) sign a written provider agreement with the Commission [ department ] or its designee;

(6) comply with the terms of the provider agreement and all requirements of the Texas Medical Assistance Program, including regulations, rules, handbooks, standards, and guidelines published by the Commission [ department ] or its designee; and

(7) bill for services covered by the Texas Medical Assistance Program in the manner and format prescribed by the Commission [ department ] or its designee.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303611

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Chapter 355. MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT RATES

Subchapter A. COST DETERMINATION PROCESS

1 TAC §355.112

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. HHSC proposes to amend §355.112, to limit the enrollment of new contracted providers wanting to participate in the Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement, pending available funds. This amendment restricts the participation opportunity of new contracted providers if legislation or budgetary constraints limit the number of enhancement levels and/or enhanced amounts awarded to providers currently participating in the rate enhancement. By limiting the participation opportunity of new contracts, this amendment will allow current participating providers to continue to receive their awarded enhancement levels without being subjected to an open enrollment and the possibility of reduced enhancement levels or enhanced amounts. If funding becomes available, new contracted providers will have the opportunity to participate in the rate enhancement during the subsequent open enrollment period.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect, there are no fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering the section. There are no fiscal implications for local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendment will be to allow HHSC greater flexibility in ensuring appropriate payments are made to eligible providers.

There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed section. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by this section.

Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Alisa Jacquet (telephone: 512-685-3129; FAX: 512-685-3104) in HHSC Rate Analysis. Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. Jacquet via facsimile or mail to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-400, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, TX 78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the Texas Register . For further information regarding the proposal or to make the proposal available for public review, contact local offices of DHS or Alisa Jacquet at (512) 685-3129 in HHSC Rate Analysis.

A public hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room 1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.

Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to this rule. Accordingly, HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding this rule.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The amendment implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).

§355.112.Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement.

(a)-(f) (No change.)

(g) New contracts. For the purposes of this section, for each rate year a new contract is defined as a contract delivering its first day of service to a DHS client on or after the first day of the open enrollment period, as defined in subsection (e) of this section, for that rate year. Contracts that underwent a contract assignment are not considered new contracts. For purposes of this subsection, an acceptable contract amendment is defined as a legible enrollment contract amendment that has been completed according to instructions, signed by an authorized signator as per the DHS Corporate Board of Directors Resolution applicable to the provider's contract or ownership type, and received by HHSC Rate Analysis within 30 days of the date of notification to the provider that such an enrollment contract amendment must be submitted. If the 30th day is on a weekend day, state holiday, or national holiday, the next business day will be considered the last day requests will be accepted. The granting of newly requested rate enhancement increments as outlined in subsection (p) of this section is limited to available funds. New contracts will receive the nonparticipant attendant compensation rate as specified in subsection (m) until:

(1)-(3) (No change.)

(h)-(o) (No change.)

(p) Granting additional attendant compensation rate enhancement increments. HHSC divides all requests for attendant compensation rate enhancement increments into two groups: pre-existing rate enhancement increments which providers requested to carry over from the prior year and newly requested rate enhancement increments. Newly requested rate enhancement increments may be requested by providers who were nonparticipants in the prior year , [ or ] by providers who were participants during the prior year desiring to be granted additional rate enhancement increments or by new contracts as described in subsection (g) of this section . Using the process described herein, HHSC first determines the distribution of carry-over rate enhancement increments. If funds are available after the distribution of carry-over rate enhancement increments, HHSC determines the distribution of newly requested rate enhancement increments as follows:

(1)-(2) (No change.)

(q)-(dd) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303612

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Subchapter B. ESTABLISHMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT RATES BY THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION

1 TAC §355.201

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission ("commission") proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rates. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The commission proposes new Subchapter B and new Section 355.201, relating to the establishment and adjustment of Medicaid provider reimbursement rates.

Background and Summary of Factual Basis for the Rules. Section 531.021(b), Government Code, directs the commission to adopt reasonable rules and standards to govern the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code. Subsections (d) and (e) of Section 531.021, effective September 1, 2003, authorizes the commission to provide for the payment of such rates, fees, and charges for medical assistance in accordance with rules adopted by the commission, state or federal law, economic factors that affect provider participation, or in accordance with levels of appropriated funds. The proposed rule is intended to implement procedures to enable the commission to comply with the duties and authority granted under Section 531.021, subsections (d) and (e).

Section-by-Section Explanation. Subsection (a) of the proposed rule defines certain terms used in the rule. Subsection (b) describes the purpose of the rule. Subsection (c) establishes the commission's responsibility to set fees, rates, and charges in accordance with other requirements of this chapter, state and federal laws, economic considerations that affect entire groups of providers, and available levels of appropriated funds.

Subsection (d) of the proposed rule authorizes the commission to adjust such rates, fees, and charges in order to comply with changes in the state or federal law (including the enactment of new laws, the amendment of current laws, or the judicial interpretation of existing law) under four circumstances. First, the commission may adjust rates, fees, or charges if the change in law specifically requires the commission to increase or reduce a rate, fee, or charge. Second, the rule authorizes the commission to adjust rates, fees, or charges if the change in law affects the scope of allowable or unallowable costs for providers. Third, the commission may adjust rates, fees, or charges if a change in the law requires all providers within a program or category of providers to incur additional costs to provide medical assistance (other than unallowable costs) that are not currently recognized in the reimbursement methodology established by the commission for the program. Fourth, the commission may adjust rates, fees, or charges if the state general appropriations act limits the availability, amount, or use of funds appropriated to pay for medical assistance.

Subsection (d) also permits the commission to adjust rates in consideration of economic factors or conditions that may have a significant and measurable effect on provider participation under specified circumstances. First, the economic factor or condition must prevail among all providers within a specific Medicaid program (such as the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program) or within a specific category of providers (such as physicians, hospitals, etc.). Second, the commission must determine whether the economic factor or condition results or may result in a demonstrable increase in the cost of providing services beyond amounts recognized in the commission's established reimbursement methodology. Alternatively, the economic factor or condition must require providers to incur costs, other than unallowable costs, that are not recognized in the commission's reimbursement methodology.

Subsection (e) requires the commission to publish notice of a proposed adjustment to rates, fees, or charges initiated under the proposed rule at least 10 calendar days before the proposed adjustment may take effect. If the adjustment is based on a change in state or federal law, the notice may (but is not necessarily required to) be published before the effective date of the change. However, the subsection also provides that the proposed adjustment will not take effect before the effective date of the change in law. Subsection (f) prescribes the content of the notice that must be published under subsection (e).

Public Benefit. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, has determined that during the first five years that the proposed rule is in effect, the public will benefit from the greater flexibility afforded the commission and health and human services in reimbursing services provided to Medicaid recipients. Under the proposed rule, the commission may adjust provider reimbursement to respond to changes in the economy that have a demonstrable impact on providers, or to comply with limitations or restrictions on the expenditure of funds enacted by the state legislature. The commission may also adjust rates, fees, and charges in response to economic factors or conditions that may have a significant and measurable effect on provider participation or providers' ability to deliver services in accordance with state and federal law. The proposed rule also establishes a procedure for publication of advance notice of a proposed adjustment of rates, fees, or charges.

Fiscal Note. Thomas Suehs, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for the first five years that the proposed rule is in effect, no additional costs will be required of providers or the public to comply with the rule. Because the proposed rule does not implement specific changes to reimbursement rates, fees, or charges, no additional costs will be borne by local governments as a result of the proposed rule, nor is there any anticipated impact on revenues of state or local government.

Small and Micro-business Impact Analysis. The proposed rule will not result in additional costs to persons required to comply with the proposed rule, nor does the proposed rule have any anticipated adverse effect on small or micro-businesses. The proposed rule will not affect local employment.

Regulatory Analysis. The commission has determined that the proposed rule is not a "major environmental rule" as defined by §2001.0225, Government Code. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or to reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

Takings Impact Assessment. The Health and Human Services Commission has determined that the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right to property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore this action does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The proposed rule is administrative in nature and does not impose any new regulatory requirements. The proposed rule is reasonably taken to fulfill requirements of state law.

Public Hearing. The commission will hold a public hearing regarding this rule and other proposed rules on July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm. to 5:00 p.m., in the Public Hearing Room of the Brown-Heatly State Office Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. Persons who require interpreter services for the deaf or hard of hearing or other special assistance should contact Nancy Kimble, HHSC Rate Analysis (Telephone: 512-338-6496; FAX: 512-338-6544; or E-mail: nancy.kimble@hhsc.state.tx.us).

Public Comment. Public comment may be submitted in writing to Ms. Kimble, HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-410, by U.S. mail to 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756-3101, by overnight, special delivery or hand delivery to Riata Building III, 12555 Riata Vista Circle, Austin, Texas 78727-6404, or by facsimile to 512-338-6544. Written comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., July 28, 2003. Further information may be obtained by calling Ms. Kimble at 512-338-6496.

In addition to statutory authority cited in the Background and Summary of Factual Basis for the Rules above, the rule is also proposed pursuant to Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rule in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed rule.

§355.201.Establishment and adjustment of reimbursement rates by the Health and Human Services Commission.

(a) Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following words and terms when used in this section are defined as follows:

(1) "Commission" means the Health and Human Services Commission.

(2) "Medical assistance" means a medical or health care related service, item, or supply that is delivered to a Medicaid recipient and is approved and authorized for payment or reimbursement by the commission or a health and human services agency pursuant to state and federal law.

(3) "Program" means a specific component of the Medicaid program for which the commission establishes either a methodology to reimburse a provider or a specific fee, payment rate, or charge that is paid to a provider for medical assistance in accordance with state and federal law.

(4) "Provider" means a health care practitioner, institution, or other entity that is enrolled in the medical assistance program and is authorized to submit claims for payment or reimbursement of medical assistance.

(b) Purpose. This section implements the provisions of Section 531.021, subsections (d) and (e), Government Code and applies to all programs that provide medical assistance and to all reimbursement methodologies prescribed under this chapter.

(c) Establishment of fees, rates, and charges. The commission establishes fees, rates, and charges to be paid for medical assistance in accordance with:

(1) the formulas, procedures, or methodologies prescribed in this chapter;

(2) the requirements of state and federal law, including:

(A) legislative or Congressional enactments that change state or federal laws in a manner that affects such fees, rates, and charges;

(B) changes in federal regulations, and policies that affect such fees, rates, and charges; and

(C) judicial orders, opinions, or interpretations regarding state or federal law that affect such fees, rates, and charges;

(3) the consideration of economic factors that, in the commission's determination:

(A) have or may have a significant and measurable effect on provider participation; or

(B) have or may have a significant and measurable effect on providers' ability to deliver services in accordance with state and federal law; and

(4) levels of appropriated state and federal funds or state or federal laws or enactments that limit, restrict, or condition the availability of appropriated funds for medical assistance.

(d) Adjustment of fees, rates, and charges. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the commission may adjust fees, rates, and charges paid for medical assistance if:

(1) state or federal law is enacted, amended, or judicially interpreted to:

(A) require the commission to increase or reduce a fee, rate, or charge paid to a provider for medical assistance;

(B) change the amount, scope, or type of allowable or unallowable costs for providers of medical assistance that are required to report costs to the commission or a health and human services agency for purposes of establishing a reimbursement rate for medical assistance;

(C) require all providers within a program or category of providers to incur additional costs to provide medical assistance, other than unallowable costs, that are not currently recognized in the reimbursement methodology established by the commission for the program; or

(D) restrict, limit, or condition the availability of appropriated funds to the commission for payment or reimbursement of medical assistance;

(2) economic conditions that prevail among all providers within a specific program or category of providers and:

(A) result in a demonstrable increase in the cost of providing services beyond amounts recognized in the commission's established reimbursement methodology; or

(B) require providers within a program or category of providers to incur costs, other than unallowable costs, that are not currently recognized in the reimbursement methodology established by the commission for the program.

(e) Notice of adjustment of fees, rates, and charges. If the commission adjusts fees, rates, or charges under this section, the commission or its designee will publish notice of the proposed adjustment at the earliest feasible date but not later than 10 calendar days before the effective date of the adjustment. If the adjustment is required by the enactment or amendment of state or federal law, such notice may be published before the effective date of such enactment or amendment, but the adjustment to fees, rates, or charges will not take effect before the effective date of the enactment or amendment. The notice may be published either by publication on the commission's Internet web site, the Texas Register, written communication to providers, or a combination of these methods.

(f) Contents of notice. The notice required under subsection (e) of this section will include the following:

(1) a description of the specific increase or reduction of fees, rates, and charges;

(2) the date on which such adjustment will take effect and the period during which the adjustment will be in effect;

(3) a description of the legal and factual bases for the adjustment;

(4) a description of the specific requirements of the rate setting methodology established under this chapter that cannot effectively be implemented as a result of the adjustment; and

(5) instructions for interested parties to submit written comments to the commission regarding the proposed adjustment.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303613

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Subchapter C. REIMBURSEMENT METHODOLOGY FOR NURSING FACILITIES

1 TAC §355.307, §355.308

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. HHSC proposes to amend §355.307, concerning reimbursement setting methodology, and §355.308, concerning enhanced direct care staff rate in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The purpose of the amendments is to bring the program into compliance with H.B. 1 and H.B. 2292 of the 78th legislative session, to clarify and/or simplify various aspects of the program and to correct erroneous references. H.B. 1 details appropriations for the nursing facility program for state fiscal years 2004 and 2005; Health and Human Services Commission Appropriations Rider 46 requires that reductions to any long term care budget strategy shall be calculated without rebasing of current reimbursement factors and shall be shared equally across all Medicaid providers funded by the strategy; H.B. 2292 requires that HHSC not impose a minimum spending requirement on facilities not participating in the direct care staff rate enhancement and that HHSC not set a base rate for a facility participating in the direct care staff rate enhancement that is more than the base rate for a nursing facility not participating in the program.

Modifications necessary to come into compliance with H.B. 1 and Rider 46 include: (1) setting the direct care staff, dietary, general/administration, fixed capital asset and other resident care rate components as well as the ventilator and pediatric tracheostomy add-ons and the pediatric care facility rate for state fiscal years 2004 and 2005 at the 2003 level adjusted as necessary to remain within appropriations; (2) indicating that any adjustments necessary to remain within appropriations will apply equally in percentage terms across each component of the nursing facility rate and each add-on; (3) indicating that staffing requirements for enhancement levels between the minimum staffing requirement for state fiscal years 2004 and 2005 and the minimum staffing requirement in effect for state fiscal year 2003 will be adjusted for variations in facility case mix; and (4) modifying the calculation of the ventilator add-on for participants in the enhancement program to include any enhancement levels subject to a case mix adjustment.

Major modifications necessary to come into compliance with H.B. 2292 include: (1) eliminating the minimum spending requirement for nonparticipants in the direct care staff rate enhancement; and (2) eliminating the base rate for participants.

Other modifications necessary to come into compliance with H.B. 1 and Rider 46 and/or H.B. 2292 include: (1) indicating that facilities will be notified if funds are not available to maintain roll-over levels, participation levels or to fund pre-existing enhancements during an enrollment period; (2) changing how new facilities are handled to accommodate that fact that there will be one base rate for participants and nonparticipants instead of two base rates; (3) clarifying that if the granting of newly requested enhancements to ongoing providers is limited during enrollment that the granting of enhancements to new facilities is limited to that same level; (4) modifying reporting requirements to exclude nonparticipants in the enhancement; (5) deleting the 10 percent direct care recoupment for nonsubmittal of reports; (6) modifying the spending requirement for participants to insure that their final rate cannot be lower than the base rate. In addition, the provision allowing for performance-based mitigation of spending recoupments is deleted. This provision was enacted to provide relief to high quality nonparticipants subject to spending recoupment. Since nonparticipants are no longer subject to spending recoupment, the justification for this rule no longer exists.

Clarifications include: (1) changing the name of Section 355.308 from Enhanced Direct Care Staff Rate to Direct Care Staff Rate Component; (2) clarifying that open enrollment is for enhanced direct care staff rates; (3) clarifying the training requirements for Annual Staffing and Compensation Report preparers; (4) clarifying that calculations of minimum staffing requirements are based on residents in Medicaid-contracted beds only; (5) clarifying that the calculation of availability of funds to purchase additional staffing time is based upon direct care revenues and expenses; (6) clarifying that, for facilities adjusting their enhancement levels in the middle of the rate year, staffing requirements are weighted averages for the reporting period; (7) changing limited liability partnerships to limited partnerships in the provision that allows related facilities to have their compliance with the spending requirement determined in the aggregate for all related facilities since limited partnership has the meaning that is consistent with the description in the rule.

Simplifications and other revisions include amending the rules so that if a report is not received with a year of its due date, any recoupments due to nonsubmittal of the report are made permanent. As well, simplifications eliminate the opportunity for unachieved enhancements to qualify as pre-existing enhancements in terms of enrollment priority if the provider can prove a good faith effort to meet the requirements. This provision has never been accessed by a provider since the inception of the enhancement program. In addition the proposed rules delete interest charges for facilities missing their staffing requirements by four or more LVN equivalent minutes. The amount of money collected under this provision did not offset the administrative costs of enforcing the provision to the state and providers. In addition, the amount of interest collected was too small to be a disincentive to over-enrollment in the program. Proposed revisions also include changing the requirement upon HHSC to notify providers of their recoupment status within 90 days of the due date of the report to within 90 days of the determination of recoupment. The current requirement is impractical since recoupments are not determined until after the reports are audited and auditing does not occur within 90 days of the due date of the report. Another proposed revision eliminates the provision that allowed new owners to request to become participants or to increase their enhancement level within available funds. As all enhancement funds are awarded during the open enrollment, there would never be funds available to activate this provision. Erroneous references to §355.306(a)(2)(B), a subparagraph that no longer exists, are proposed to be corrected to refer to §355.306(a)(2)(A). Erroneous references to 40 TAC §19.1812, a subsection that no longer exists, are proposed to be corrected to refer to §371.212. Erroneous references to DHS, which no longer has rate determination authority for nursing facilities, are proposed to be corrected to refer to HHSC. Finally, the proposed revisions add a requirement that a contract must be ongoing at the time reinvestment is determined to qualify for reinvestment. The purpose of this change is to ensure that reinvested funds are kept within the program rather than being distributed to entities no longer contracted to provide care to clients.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect, there are fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections. There are no fiscal implications for local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the sections. The effect on state government for the first five-year period the sections are in effect is an estimated cost savings of $34,106,565 in fiscal year (FY) 2004; $29,355,571 in FY 2005; $34,896,440 in FY 2006; $30,127,260 in FY 2007; and $36,042,637 in FY 2008.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the first five years the proposed sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections is that the nursing facility rates and the direct care staff enhancement program will come into compliance with H.B. 1 and H.B. 2292 of the 78th legislative session. In addition, clarifications and simplifications will increase provider understanding of the program. Simplifications will also reduce the administrative costs of the program to the state and to providers. Finally, requiring that a contract be ongoing in order to qualify for reinvestment funds will insure that reinvestment of funds is limited to providers who are continuing to provide services to clients.

There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed sections. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by these sections.

Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Pam McDonald (telephone: 512-685-3134; FAX: 512-685-3104) in HHSC Rate Analysis. Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. McDonald via facsimile or mail to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-400, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, TX 78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the Texas Register . For further information regarding the proposal or to make the proposal available for public review, contact local offices of DHS or Pam McDonald at (512) 685-3134 in HHSC Rate Analysis.

A public hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room 1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.

Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly, HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these rules.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation

The amendments implement the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).

§355.307.Reimbursement Setting Methodology.

(a) Case mix classes. The Texas Health and [ Department of ] Human Services Commission [ (DHS) ] (HHSC) reimbursement rates for nursing facilities (NFs) vary according to the assessed characteristics of recipient. Rates are determined for 11 case mix classes of service, plus a 12th, temporary classification assigned by default when assessment data are incomplete or in error.

(b) Reimbursement determination. HHSC [ DHS ] applies the general principles of cost determination as specified in §355.101 of this title (relating to Introduction).

(1) Rate Components. Under the case mix methodology, reimbursements are comprised of five cost-related components: the direct care staff component; the other recipient care component; the dietary component; the general/administration component; and the fixed capital asset component. The direct care staff component is calculated as specified in §355.308 of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate Component ).

(A) The dietary rate component is constant across all case mix classes.

(i) For rates effective May 1, 2000, using the inflation factors used in determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000, project the costs in the 1998 Texas Nursing Facility Cost Report data base to the rate period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending August 31, 2000. Using these projected costs, determine the median per diem dietary cost (weighted by Medicaid days of service in the data base) in the array of allowable per diem costs for all contracted nursing facilities included in the January 1, 2000, data base, multiplied by 1.07.

(ii) For rates effective September 1, 2000, multiply the dietary per diem rate from clause (i) of this subparagraph by 1.016.

(iii) For rates effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter, the dietary component is calculated at the median cost (weighted by Medicaid days of service in the rate base) in the array of projected allowable per diem costs for all contracted nursing facilities included in the rate base, multiplied by 1.07.

(B) The general/administration rate component is constant across all case mix classes.

(i) For rates effective May 1, 2000, the general/administration rate component is equal to the difference between the general, administration, and dietary rate component in effect January 1, 2000, and the dietary rate component as calculated in paragraph (1)(A)(i) of this subsection.

(ii) For rates effective September 1, 2000, multiply the general/administration per diem rate from clause (i) of this subparagraph by 1.016.

(iii) For rates effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter, the general/administration component is calculated at the median cost (weighted by Medicaid days of service in the rate base) in the array of projected allowable per diem costs for all contracted nursing facilities included in the rate base, multiplied by 1.07.

(C) The fixed capital asset component is constant across all case mix classes.

(i) For rates effective May 1, 2000, the fixed capital asset component is equal to the fixed capital asset component in effect January 1, 2000.

(ii) For rates effective September 1, 2000, the fixed capital asset component is equal to the fixed capital asset component from clause (i) of this subparagraph multiplied by 1.016.

(iii) For rates effective September 1, 2001 and thereafter, the fixed capital asset component is calculated as follows:

(I) Determine the 80th percentile in the array of allowable appraised property values per licensed bed, including land and improvements. Appraised values for this purpose are determined as follows:

(-a-) For proprietary facilities, tax exempt facilities provided an appraisal from their local property taxing authority, and tax exempt facilities not provided an appraisal from their local property taxing authority because of an "exempt" status whose independent appraisal is in the first year of its five-year interval as described in §355.402(f)(2)(B)(ii) of this title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports), allowable appraised values are determined as described in §355.402(f) of this title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports).

(-b-) For tax exempt facilities not provided an appraisal from their local property taxing authority because of an "exempt" status whose independent appraisal is not in the first year of its five-year interval as described in §355.402(f)(2)(B)(ii) of this title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports), allowable appraised values are determined by indexing the facility's allowable appraised value as determined in §355.402(f) of this title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports) to the median increase in appraised values among contracted facilities in the state as a whole from the reporting period coinciding with the first year of the facility's five-year interval to the reporting period upon which reimbursements are to be based.

(-c-) Those facilities that do not report an allowable appraised value as described in §355.402(f) of this title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports) are not included in the array for purposes of calculating the use fee.

(II) Project the 80th percentile of appraised property values per bed by one-half the forecasted increase in the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) chain-type price index from the cost reporting year to the rate year.

(III) Calculate an annual use fee per bed as the projected 80th percentile of appraised property values per bed times an annual use rate of 14%.

(IV) Calculate a per diem use fee per bed by dividing the annual use fee per bed by annual days of service per bed at the higher of 85% occupancy, or the statewide average occupancy rate during the cost reporting period.

(V) The use fee is limited to the lesser of the fee as calculated in subclauses (I)-(IV) of this clause, or the fee as calculated by inflating the fee from the previous rate period by the forecasted rate of change in the PCE chain-type price index.

(2) Case mix classification system. All Medicaid recipients are classified according to the Texas Index for Level of Effort (TILE) classification system described in 1 TAC §371.212 [ 40 TAC §19.1812 ] (relating to Case Mix Classification System). The TILE classification system includes four clinical categories, which are further subdivided on the basis of an activity of daily living (ADL) scale, resulting in a total of 11 TILE case mix groups. A 12th group is used by default when a recipient's case-mix group membership is indeterminate because of assessment errors or omissions. Each of the 12 case-mix groups, including the default group, is assigned a case-mix index of effort. This index indicates the relative amount of staff time required on average to deliver care to recipients in that group. The case-mix index for each of the 11 TILE groups is determined through statistical and clinical analyses of recipient resource utilization data previously collected in Texas NFs. The lowest index for the 11 TILE groups is used as the case-mix index for the default group.

(3) Per diem rate methodology. Staff determine per diem rate recommendations for each of the 11 TILE groups and for the default group according to the following procedures:

(A) Determine the statewide average case mix index for all Medicaid recipients, except those in the default group. Weight the indexes from paragraph (2) of this subsection, which are based on a sample of nursing facilities, by the estimated statewide recipient days of service by case mix group during the cost reporting period covered by the rate base and determine the weighted average. The statewide average index is based on the most recent and complete data available indicating recipient days of service by case mix group that correspond to the period covered by the cost reports included in the rate base.

(B) Determine the standardized statewide case mix index for each of the 11 TILE groups by dividing each of the indexes described under paragraph (2) of this subsection by the statewide average case mix index described under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.

(C) The other recipient care rate component varies according to case mix class of service.

(i) For rates effective May 1, 2000, using the inflation factors used in determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000, project the costs in the 1998 Texas Nursing Facility Cost Report data base to the rate period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending August 31, 2000. Using these projected costs, determine the sum of other recipient care costs in all nursing facilities included in the 1998 data base. Then divide the total by the sum of recipient days of service in all facilities in the 1998 data base. Multiply the resulting weighted, average per diem cost of other recipient care by 1.07. The result is the average other recipient care rate component. To calculate the other recipient care per diem rate component for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, multiply each of the standardized statewide case mix indexes used in determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000, by the average other recipient care rate component.

(ii) For rates effective September 1, 2000, multiply the average other recipient care per diem rate from clause (i) of this subparagraph by 1.016. To calculate the other recipient care per diem rate component for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, multiply each of the standardized statewide case mix indexes used in determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000, by the average other recipient care rate component.

(iii) For rates effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter, the average other recipient care rate component is calculated as follows. Adjust the raw sum of other recipient care costs in all nursing facilities included in the rate base in order to account for disallowed costs and inflation, as specified in §355.306 of this title (relating to Cost Finding Methodology). Then divide the adjusted total by the sum of recipient days of service in all facilities in the current rate base. Multiply the resulting weighted, average per diem cost of other recipient care by 1.07. The result is the average other recipient care rate component. To calculate the other recipient care per diem rate component for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, multiply each of the standardized statewide case mix indexes from subparagraph (B) of this paragraph by the average other recipient care rate component.

(D) Total case mix per diem rates vary according to case mix class of service and according to participant status in [ the Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate enhancements described in §355.308 of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate Component ).

(i) For each participating facility, for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, the recommended total per diem rate is the sum of the following five rate components:

(I) the dietary rate component from paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection;

(II) the general/administration rate component from paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection;

(III) the fixed capital asset use fee component from paragraph (1)(C) of this subsection;

(IV) the case mix group's other recipient care per diem rate component by case mix group from paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection; and

(V) the case mix group's total direct care staff rate component for that participating facility as determined in §355.308 (1) of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate Component ).

(ii) For nonparticipating facilities, for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, the recommended total per diem rate is the sum of the following five rate components:

(I) the dietary rate component from paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection;

(II) the general/administration rate component from paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection;

(III) the fixed capital asset use fee component from paragraph (1)(C) of this subsection;

(IV) the case mix group's other recipient care per diem rate component by case mix group from paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection; and

(V) the case mix group's total direct care staff base rate component [ for non-participants ] as determined in §355.308 (k) of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate Component ).

(E) Qualifying ventilator-dependent residents may receive a supplement to the per diem rate specified in subparagraph (D) of this paragraph.

(i) To qualify for supplemental reimbursement, a resident must require artificial ventilation for at least six consecutive hours daily and the use must be prescribed by a licensed physician.

(ii) A ventilator-dependent resource differential case mix index is calculated, based on time-study research data. This resource differential index reflects the difference between direct nursing services for ventilator-dependent residents and services for residents in the most severe heavy-care TILE group.

(I) The per diem rate supplement for participants in the [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Base Rate enhancements described in §355.308 of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate Component ) is calculated by multiplying the resource differential case mix index times the per diem average other recipient care rate component, as described in paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection and by the average direct care staff base rate component [ for participating facilities staffing at the minimum levels required for participation ] as described in §355.308 (k) [ (1) ] of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate) plus any enhancement levels subject to case mix adjustments and summing the products.

(II) The per diem rate supplement for non-participants in the [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Base Rate enhancements described in §355.308 of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Base Rate) is calculated by multiplying the resource differential case mix index times the per diem average other recipient care rate component, as described in paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection and by the average direct care staff base rate component [ for non-participating facilities ] as described in §355.308(k) of this title (relating to [ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Base Rate) and summing the products.

(iii) The supplemental reimbursement for residents requiring continuous artificial ventilation is 100% of the per diem ventilator rate supplement.

(iv) The supplemental reimbursement for residents not requiring continuous artificial ventilation daily but requiring artificial ventilation for at least six consecutive hours daily is 40% of the per diem ventilator rate supplement.

(F) Qualifying children with tracheostomies requiring daily care may receive a supplement to the per diem rate specified in subparagraph (D) of this paragraph.

(i) To qualify for supplemental reimbursement, a resident must be less than 22 years of age; require daily cleansing, dressing, and suctioning of a tracheostomy; and be unable to do self care. The daily care of the tracheostomy must be prescribed by a licensed physician.

(ii) The supplemental reimbursement for children receiving daily tracheostomy care is 60% of the per diem ventilator rate supplement as specified in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph.

(G) Children with qualifying conditions as specified in subparagraphs (E) and (F) of this paragraph may receive only one of the supplemental reimbursements. Therefore, children with tracheostomies who are also ventilator-dependent are not eligible to receive both supplemental reimbursements.

(4) Case mix classification effective periods. The effective periods of case mix classifications are defined as follows.

(A) A recipient's case mix classification and associated per diem rate payment remain in effect until the recipient's next required assessment, unless one of the following events takes place:

(i) a provider submits an off-cycle assessment as specified in 40 TAC §19.2412(a)(5) (relating to Texas Index for Level of Effort (TILE) Assessments);

(ii) a DHS nurse reviewer revises the recipient's assessment and TILE classification under the provisions of 40 TAC §19.2412(b) (Texas Index for Level of Effort (TILE) Assessments); or

(iii) the recipient is discharged from the Medicaid nursing facility vendor payment system for more than 30 days prior to receiving a permanent medical necessity determination.

(B) The case mix classification and associated per diem payment rate of a recipient in the default group are changed retroactively when the provider furnishes DHS with corrected data that permit classification in one of the 11 TILE case mix groups.

(c) Special reimbursement class. HHSC may define special reimbursement classes, including experimental reimbursement classes of service to be used in research and demonstration projects on new reimbursement methods and reimbursement classes of service, to address the cost differences of a select group of recipients. Special classes may be implemented on a statewide basis, may be limited to a specific region of the state, or may be limited to a selected group of providers.

(1) Pediatric Care Facility Class. The purpose of this special class is to recognize, through the adoption of a facility-specific payment rate, the cost differences that exist in a nursing facility or distinct unit of a nursing facility that serves predominantly children.

(2) Definitions.

(A) Pediatric care facility--A pediatric care facility is an entire facility that has maintained an average daily census of 80% or more children for the six-month period prior to its entry into the pediatric care facility class based on the entire licensed facility. A pediatric care facility can also be a distinct unit of a facility that has maintained an average daily census of 85% or more children for the six-month period prior to its entry into the pediatric care facility class based on the distinct unit of the facility. To remain a pediatric care facility, the pediatric care facility must maintain an average daily census of 80% or more children if the pediatric care facility is an entire facility and 85% or more children if the pediatric care facility is a distinct unit of the facility. The contracted provider must request in writing by certified mail or by special mail delivery where the delivery can be verified to become a member of the pediatric care facility special reimbursement class. The request must be sent to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission.

(B) Distinct unit--A portion of a nursing facility that is physically separate from (beds are not commingled with) other units of the facility. The distinct unit can be an entire wing, a separate building, an entire floor, or an entire hallway. The distinct unit consists of all beds within the designated area. A distinct unit must consist of 28 or more Medicaid-contracted beds.

(C) Children--For the purposes of this pediatric care facility class, children are defined as being at or below 22 years of age.

(3) Payment rate determination. Payment rates will be determined in the following manner:

(A) Cost reports and payment rate determination for pediatric care facilities are governed by the requirements specified in Subchapter A of this chapter (relating to Cost Determination Process). A nursing facility that contains a pediatric care facility distinct unit must complete two cost reports: one report for the pediatric care facility distinct unit and one report for the remainder of the facility.

(B) Payment rates for this class of service will be determined on a facility-specific basis for the pediatric care facility. The total allowable costs from the most recent cost report deemed acceptable are adjusted for inflation from the cost report period to the rate period. The adjusted cost is divided by the greater of total patient days of service reported on the cost report or the days of service at 85% of contracted capacity of the pediatric care facility. The resulting cost per day is multiplied by a factor of 1.03 to determine the final facility-specific rate. If no acceptable cost report is available, the provider will be required to submit a cost report covering the time period specified by HHSC.

(C) The facility-specific payment rate from paragraph (3)(B) of this subsection will be paid for all Medicaid residents of a qualifying pediatric care facility regardless of the TILE level of the resident.

(D) Residents of the pediatric care facility will not be eligible to receive the ventilator-dependent or the children-with-tracheostomies supplemental reimbursements.

(E) Pediatric care facilities are not eligible to participate in §355.308 (relating to Enhanced Direct Care Staff Rate).

(d) Nurse aide training and competency evaluation costs.

(1) DHS reimburses nursing facilities for the actual costs of training and testing nurse aides as required under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 (OBRA '87). Payments are based on cost reimbursement vouchers that are to be submitted quarterly. Allowable costs are limited to those costs incurred for training provided after October 1, 1990, for:

(A) actual training course expenses up to a set amount determined by DHS per nurse aide;

(B) competency evaluation; or

(C) supplies and materials used in the nurse aide training not already covered by the training course fee.

(2) Nurse aide salaries while in training are factored into the vendor rate and are not to be included on the reimbursement voucher.

(3) Training program costs that exceed the DHS cost ceiling must have prior approval from DHS before costs can be reimbursed. A written request to Provider Billing Services must include:

(A) name and vendor number of facility.

(B) description of training program for which the facility is seeking reimbursement approval, to include:

(i) name, telephone number and address of the nurse aide training and competency evaluation program (NATCEP);

(ii) whether the NATCEP program is facility or non-facility-based; and

(iii) name of the NATCEP program director.

(C) an explanation of why the cost for the NATCEP exceeds the reimbursement ceiling. The explanation must include:

(i) a completed nurse aide unit cost calculation form for a facility-based NATCEP; or

(ii) a breakdown of the nurse aide unit cost by the instructor fees and training materials for a non-facility-based NATCEP.

(D) an explanation of why the nursing facility cannot utilize a training program at or below the reimbursement ceiling and what steps the facility has taken to explore more cost efficient training courses. The explanation must include:

(i) the availability of NATCEPs, such as the location or the frequency of training offered, in the geographic region of the facility;

(ii) the name and address of each NATCEP that the facility has explored as a provider of nurse aide training; and

(iii) the cost per nurse aide for each NATCEP identified in clause (i) of this subparagraph, as specified in subparagraph (C)(i) of this paragraph or subparagraph (C)(ii) of this paragraph.

(4) All prior approval requests as outlined in paragraph (3) of this subsection must be submitted to DHS, Provider Billing Services that:

(A) may request additional information in order to evaluate a reimbursement request; and

(B) will make the final decision on a reimbursement request.

(5) All nurse aide training courses must be approved by DHS before costs associated with them can be reimbursed.

(6) Nursing facilities are responsible for tracking and documenting nurse aide training costs for each nurse aide trained. All documentation is subject to DHS audits. If substantiating documentation for amounts billed to DHS cannot be verified, DHS will immediately recoup funds paid to the facility.

(7) Individuals who have successfully completed a nurse aide training and competency evaluation program (NATCEP) may be directly reimbursed for costs incurred in completing a NATCEP. The individual must meet all of the conditions specified in subparagraphs (A)-(E) of this paragraph.

(A) The individual must not have been employed at the time of completing the NATCEP.

(B) The individual must have been employed by, or received an offer of employment from, a nursing facility not later than 12 months after successfully completing the NATCEP.

(C) The individual must have been employed by the facility for no less than six months.

(D) The nursing facility must not have claimed reimbursement for training expenses for the individual.

(E) The individual must be listed on the current Nurse Aide Registry.

(8) Individuals must submit cost reimbursement vouchers to DHS with proof that the individual has been employed by a facility for no less than six months.

(9) Individuals who leave nursing facility employment before accruing the required six months of employment, as specified in paragraph (7)(C) of this subsection, may receive 50% reimbursement as long as the individual was employed for no less than three months.

(10) Reimbursement to individuals may not exceed the reimbursement ceiling as detailed in paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection.

(e) Oxygen costs. Oxygen costs incurred on or after January 1, 1995, will not be reimbursed on cost reimbursement vouchers. Those oxygen costs must be reported as expenses on the cost report.

(f) For rates effective September 1, 2003 and September 1, 2004, the rates for the dietary rate component from subsection (b)(1)(A) of this section, the general/administration rate component from subsection (b)(1)(B) of this section, fixed capital asset component from subsection (b)(1)(C) of this section, the other recipient care rate component from subsection (b)(3)(C) of this section, the supplement to per diem rates for qualified ventilator-dependent residents from subsection (b)(3)(E) of this section, the supplement to per diem rates for qualified children with tracheostomies from subsection (b)(3)(F) of this section and the pediatric care facility rate from subsection (c) of this section will be equal to the rates in effect August 31, 2003 adjusted as necessary to remain within appropriations. Adjustments necessary to remain within appropriations will apply equally in percentage terms across each component of the nursing facility rate and each add-on.

§355.308.[ Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate Component .

(a) Direct care staff cost center. This cost center will include compensation for employee and contract labor Registered Nurses (RNs), including Directors of Nursing (DONs) and Assistant Directors of Nursing (ADONs); Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVNs), including DONs and ADONs; medication aides; and nurse aides performing nursing-related duties for Medicaid contracted beds.

(1) Compensation to be included for these employee staff types is the allowable compensation defined in §355.103(b)(1) of this title (relating to Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs) that is reported as either salaries and/or wages (including payroll taxes and workers' compensation) or employee benefits. Benefits required by §355.103(b)(1)(A)(iii) of this title (relating to Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs) to be reported as costs applicable to specific cost report line items are not to be included in this cost center.

(2) Direct care staff who also have administrative duties not related to nursing must properly direct charge their compensation to each type of function performed based upon daily time sheets maintained throughout the entire reporting period.

(3) Nurse aides must meet the qualifications enumerated under 40 TAC §19.1903 (relating to Required Training of Nurse Aides) to be included in this cost center. Nurse aides include certified nurse aides and nurse aides in training as per 40 TAC §94.3(k) (relating to Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) Requirements).

(4) Contract labor refers to personnel for whom the contracted provider is not responsible for the payment of payroll taxes (such as FICA, Medicare, and federal and state unemployment insurance) and who perform tasks routinely performed by employees. Allowable contract labor costs are defined in §355.103(b)(2)(C) of this title (relating to Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs).

(5) For facilities receiving supplemental reimbursement for children with tracheostomies requiring daily care as described in §355.307(b)(3)(F) of this title (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology), staff required by 40 TAC §19.901(14)(C)(iii) (relating to Quality of Care) performing nursing-related duties for Medicaid contracted beds are included in the direct care staff cost center.

(6) For facilities receiving supplemental reimbursement for qualifying ventilator-dependent residents as described in §355.307(b)(3)(E) of this title (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology), Registered Respiratory Therapists and Certified Respiratory Therapy Technicians are included in the direct care staff cost center.

(7) Nursing facility administrators and assistant administrators are not included in the direct care staff cost center.

(8) Staff members performing more than one function in a facility without a differential in pay between functions are categorized at the highest level of licensure or certification they possess. If this highest level of licensure or certification is not that of an RN, LVN, medication aide, or certified nurse aide, the staff member is not to be included in the direct care staff cost center but rather in the cost center where staff members with that licensure or certification status are typically reported.

(b) Rate year. The standard rate year begins on the first day of September and ends on the last day of August of the following year.

(c) Open enrollment. Open enrollment for the enhanced direct care staff rates will begin on the first day of July and end on the last day of that same July preceding the rate year for which payments are being determined unless the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) notified providers prior to the first day of July that [ that ] open enrollment has been postponed or cancelled. Should conditions warrant, HHSC may conduct additional enrollment periods during a rate year.

(d) Enrollment contract amendment. An initial enrollment contract amendment is required from each facility choosing to participate in the enhanced direct care staff rate. Participating and nonparticipating facilities may request to modify their enrollment status (i.e., a nonparticipant can request to become a participant, a participant can request to become a nonparticipant, a participant can request to change its enhancement level) during any open enrollment period. Requests to modify a facility's enrollment status during an open enrollment period must be received by HHSC Rate Analysis by the last day of the open enrollment period as per subsection (c) of this section. If the last day of the open enrollment period falls on a weekend, a national holiday, or a state holiday, then the first business day following the last day of the open enrollment period is the final day the receipt of the enrollment contract amendment will be accepted. An enrollment contract amendment that is not received by the stated deadline will not be accepted. Facilities from which HHSC Rate Analysis has not received an acceptable request to modify their enrollment by the last day of the open enrollment period will continue at the level of participation in effect during the open enrollment period within available funds. If HHSC determines that funds are not available to continue participation at the level of participation in effect during the open enrollment period, facilities will be notified as per subsection (ee) of this section. To be acceptable, an enrollment contract amendment must be completed according to instructions, signed by an authorized signator as per the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) Form 2031 applicable to the provider's contract or ownership type, and be legible.

(e) New facilities. For purposes of this section, for each rate year a new facility is defined as a facility delivering its first day of service to a DHS recipient after the first day of the open enrollment period, as defined in subsection (c) of this section, for that rate year. Facilities that underwent an ownership change are not considered new facilities. For purposes of this subsection, an acceptable enrollment contract amendment is defined as a legible enrollment contract amendment that has been completed according to instructions, signed by an authorized signator as per the DHS Form 2031 applicable to the provider's contract or ownership type, and received by HHSC within 30 days of the mailing of notification to the facility by HHSC that such an enrollment contract amendment must be submitted. New facilities will receive the direct care staff base rate [ associated with minimum staffing requirements ] as determined in subsection (k) [ (j)(1) ] of this section [ until: ] with no enhancements.

[ (1) ] For new [ for ] facilities specifying their desire to participate on an acceptable enrollment contract amendment, the direct care staff rate is adjusted as specified in subsection (l) [ (3) ] of this section, effective on the first day of the month following receipt by HHSC of the acceptable enrollment contract amendment. If the granting of newly requested enhancements was limited as per subsection (j)(3) of this section during the most recent enrollment, enrollment for new facilities will be subject to that same limitation.

[ (2) for facilities specifying their desire not to participate on an acceptable enrollment contract amendment, the direct care staff rate is adjusted as specified in subsection (k) of this section retroactive to the first day of their contract.]

[ (3) for facilities from which an acceptable enrollment contract amendment is not received, the direct care staff rate is adjusted as specified in subsection (k) of this section retroactive to the first day of their contract.]

(f) Staffing and Compensation Report submittal requirements. Staffing and Compensation Reports must be submitted as follows:

(1) Annual Staffing and Compensation Report. All participating [ contracted ] facilities will provide HHSC, in a method specified by HHSC, an Annual Staffing and Compensation Report reflecting the activities of the facility while delivering contracted services from the first day of the rate year through the last day of the rate year. This report will be used as the basis for determining compliance with the staffing requirements and recoupment amounts as described in subsection (n) of this section [ for participants ], and as the basis for determining the spending requirements and recoupment amounts as described in subsection (o) of this section [ for all facilities ]. Participating facilities failing to submit an acceptable Annual Staffing and Compensation Report within 60 days of the end of the rate year will be placed on vendor hold until such time as an acceptable report is received and processed by HHSC.

(A) When a participating facility changes ownership, the prior owner must submit a Staffing and Compensation Report covering the period from the beginning of the rate year to the date recognized by DHS as the ownership-change effective date. This report will be used as the basis for determining any recoupment amounts as described in subsections (n) and (o) of this section. The new owner will be required to submit a Staffing and Compensation Report covering the period from the day after the date recognized by DHS as the ownership-change effective date to the end of the rate year.

(B) Participating facilities [ Facilities ] whose contracts are terminated either voluntarily or involuntarily must submit a Staffing and Compensation Report covering the period from the beginning of the rate year to the date recognized by DHS as the contract termination date. This report will be used as the basis for determining any recoupment amounts as described in subsections (n) and (o) of this section.

(C) Participating facilities who voluntarily withdraw from participation as per subsection (r) of this section must submit a Staffing and Compensation Report within 60 days of the date of withdrawal as determined by HHSC, covering the period from the beginning of the rate year to the date of withdrawal as determined by HHSC. This report will be used as the basis for determining any recoupment amounts as described in subsections (n) and (o) of this section.

(D) Participating facilities [ Facilities ] whose cost report year coincides with the state of Texas fiscal year as per §355.105(b)(5) (relating to General Reporting and Documentation Requirements, Methods and Procedures) are exempt from the requirement to submit a separate Annual Staffing and Compensation Report. For these facilities, their cost report will be considered their Annual Staffing and Compensation Report.

(2) Other reports. HHSC may require other Staffing and Compensation Reports from all facilities as needed.

(3) Vendor hold. HHSC or its designee will place on hold the vendor payments for any participating facility that does not submit a Staffing and Compensation Report completed in accordance with all applicable rules and instructions by the due dates described in this subsection. This vendor hold will remain in effect until an acceptable Staffing and Compensation Report is received by HHSC. Participating facilities [ Facilities ] that do not submit a Staffing and Compensation Report completed in accordance with all applicable rules and instructions within 60 days of the due dates described in this subsection will become nonparticipants retroactive to the first day of the reporting period in question and will be subject to an immediate recoupment of funds related to participation [ 10% of direct care dollars ] paid to the facility for services provided during the reporting period in question. These facilities will remain nonparticipants and recouped funds will not be restored until they submit an acceptable report and repay to HHSC or its designee funds identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section. If an acceptable report is not received within 365 days of the due date, the recoupment will become permanent. In addition, participating facilities with an ownership change or contract termination that do not submit a Staffing and Compensation report completed in accordance with all applicable rules within 60 days of the change in ownership or contract termination will become nonparticipants retroactive to the first day of the reporting period in question and will be subject to an immediate recoupment of funds related to participation [ 10% of direct care dollars ] paid to the facility for services provided during the reporting period in question. These facilities will remain nonparticipants and recouped funds will not be restored until they submit an acceptable report and repay to HHSC or its designee funds identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section. If an acceptable report is not received within 365 days of the change of ownership or contract termination date, the recoupment will become permanent.

(4) Provider-initiated amended accountability reports. Reports must be received prior to the date the provider is notified of compliance with spending and/or staffing requirements for the report in question as per subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section.

(g) Report contents. Annual Staffing and Compensation Reports will include any information required by HHSC to implement this enhanced direct care staff rate.

(h) Completion of Reports. All Staffing and Compensation Reports must be completed in accordance with the provisions of §§355.102-355.105 of this title (relating to General Principles of Allowable and Unallowable Costs, Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs, Revenues, and General Reporting and Documentation Requirements, Methods, and Procedures) and may be reviewed or audited in accordance with §355.106 of this title (relating to Basic Objectives and Criteria for Audit and Desk Review of Cost Reports). Beginning with the state fiscal year 2002 report, all Staffing and Compensation Reports must be completed by preparers who have attended the required nursing facility cost report training as per §355.102(d) (relating to General Principles of Allowable and Unallowable Costs). For Staffing and Compensation Reports for even numbered state fiscal years, preparers must have attended the cost report training for that same even numbered year. For Staffing and Compensation Reports for odd numbered state fiscal years, preparers must have attended the most recent cost report training sessions provided prior to the due date of the Staffing and Compensation Report.

(i) Enrollment. Facilities choosing to participate in the enhanced direct care staff rate must submit to HHSC a signed contract amendment as described in subsection (d) of this section, before the end of the open enrollment period. Participation will remain in effect, subject to availability of funds, until the facility notifies HHSC in accordance with subsection (r) of this section that it no longer wishes to participate or the facility is removed from participation as described in subsection (n) of this section. If HHSC determines that funds are not available to continue participation, facilities will be notified as per subsection (ee) of this section. Facilities voluntarily withdrawing from participation will have their participation end effective on the date of the withdrawal as determined by HHSC.

(j) Determination of staffing requirements for participants. Facilities choosing to participate in the enhanced direct care staff rate agree to maintain certain direct care staffing levels. In order to permit facilities the flexibility to substitute RN, LVN and aide (Medication Aide and nurse aide) staff resources and, at the same time, comply with an overall nursing staff requirement, total nursing staff requirements are expressed in terms of LVN equivalent minutes. Conversion factors to convert RN and aide minutes into LVN equivalent minutes are based upon most recently available, reliable relative compensation levels for the different staff types.

(1) Minimum staffing levels. HHSC determines, for each participating facility, minimum LVN equivalent staffing levels as follows.

(A) Determine minimum required LVN equivalent minutes per resident day of service for various types of residents using time study data, cost report information, and other appropriate data sources.

(i) Determine LVN equivalent minutes associated with Medicare residents based on the data sources from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph adjusted for estimated acuity differences between Medicare and Medicaid residents.

(ii) Determine minimum required LVN equivalent minutes per resident day of service associated with each Texas Index for Level of Effort (TILE) case mix group and additional minimum required minutes for residents reimbursed under the TILE system who also qualify for supplemental reimbursement for ventilator care or pediatric tracheostomy care as described in §355.307 of this title (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology) based on the data sources from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph adjusted for acuity differences between Medicare and Medicaid residents and other factors.

(B) Based on most recently available, reliable utilization data, determine for each facility the total days of service by TILE group, days of service provided to TILE residents qualifying for Medicaid supplemental reimbursement for ventilator or tracheostomy care, total days of service for Medicare Part A residents in Medicaid-contracted beds , and total days of service for all other residents in Medicaid-contracted beds .

(C) Multiply the minimum required LVN equivalent minutes for each TILE group and supplemental TILE reimbursement group from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph by the facility's Medicaid days of service in each TILE group and supplemental TILE reimbursement group from subparagraph (B) of this paragraph and sum the products.

(D) Multiply the minimum required LVN equivalent minutes for Medicare residents by the facility's Medicare Part A days of service in Medicaid-contracted beds .

(E) Effective for reporting periods beginning on or after September 1, 2001, divide the sum from subparagraph (C) of this paragraph by the facility's total Medicaid days of service, with a day of service for a Medicaid TILE recipient who also qualifies for a supplemental TILE reimbursement counted as one day of service, compare this result to the minimum required LVN-equivalent minutes for a TILE 207 and multiply the lower of the two figures by the facility's other resident days of service in Medicaid-contracted beds .

(F) Sum the results of subparagraphs (C), (D) and (E) of this paragraph, divide the sum by the facility's total days of service in Medicaid-contracted beds , with a day of service for a Medicaid TILE recipient who also qualifies for a supplemental TILE reimbursement counted as one day of service. The results of these calculations are the minimum LVN equivalent minutes per resident day a participating facility must provide.

(2) Enhanced staffing levels. Participating facilities desiring to staff above the minimum requirements from paragraph (1) of this subsection may request LVN-equivalent staffing enhancements from an array of LVN-equivalent enhanced staffing options and associated add-on payments during open enrollment. Add-on payments and staffing requirements associated with staffing increments between the minimum staffing requirement from paragraph (1) of this subsection and the minimum staffing requirement for participation in effect in state fiscal year 2003, adjusted based upon most recently available, reliable relative compensation levels for the different staff types, will be adjusted for variations in facility case mix.

(3) Granting of staffing enhancements. HHSC divides all requested enhancements into two groups: pre-existing enhancements that facilities request to carry over from the prior year and newly-requested enhancements. Newly-requested enhancements may be enhancements requested by facilities that were nonparticipants in the prior year or by facilities that were participants in the prior year desiring to be granted additional enhancements. For the granting of enhancements to be effective on or after September 1, 2001, for an enhancement to qualify as a pre-existing enhancement a facility must have actually met the enhancement's staffing requirements during the most recent reporting period from which reliable data is available at the time qualification is determined. [ Enhancements held by nursing facilities whose staffing requirements were not met during the most recent reporting period from which reliable data is available will qualify as pre-existing if the facility submitted, with that staffing report, documentation that demonstrates to the satisfaction of HHSC that the facility has been unable, despite diligent efforts (including offering wages at the community prevailing rate for nursing facilities), to recruit appropriate personnel. If the report from the subsequent rate year indicates that the staffing requirement was again not met, the unmet staffing will no longer be considered pre-existing. ] Using the process described herein, HHSC first determines the distribution of carry-over enhancements. If HHSC determines that funds are not available to carry over some or all pre-existing enhancements, facilities will be notified as per subsection (ee) of this section. If funds are available after the distribution of carry-over enhancements, HHSC then determines the distribution of newly requested enhancements. HHSC may not distribute newly requested enhancements to facilities owing funds identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section.

(A) HHSC determines projected units of service by TILE group for facilities requesting each enhancement option, [ and ] multiplies these units [ this number ] by the rate add-on associated with that enhancement option for each TILE group as determined in subsection (l) of this section and sums the products .

(B) HHSC compares the sum of the sums [ products ] from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to available funds.

(i) If the product is less than or equal to available funds, all requested enhancements are granted.

(ii) If the product is greater than available funds, enhancements are granted beginning with the lowest level of enhancement and granting each successive level of enhancement until requested enhancements are granted within available funds. Based upon an examination of existing staffing levels and staffing needs, HHSC may grant certain enhancement options priority for distribution.

(4) Notification of granting of enhancements. Participating facilities are notified, in a manner determined by HHSC, as to the disposition of their request for staffing enhancements.

(k) Determination of direct care staff base rate [ rates for nonparticipating facilities. ]

(1) Determine the sum of recipient care costs from the direct care staff cost center in subsection (a) of this section in all nursing facilities included in the Texas Nursing Facility Cost Report database used to determine the nursing facility rates in effect on January 1, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the initial database).

(2) Adjust the sum from paragraph (1) of this subsection in order to account for inflation utilizing the inflation factors used in the determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000.

(3) Divide the result from paragraph (2) of this subsection by the sum of recipient days of service in all facilities in the initial database and multiply the result by 1.07. The result is the average direct care staff base rate component for all [ ineligible ] facilities.

(4) To calculate the direct care staff per diem base rate component for all [ nonparticipating ] facilities for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, multiply each of the standardized statewide case mix indices associated with the initial database by the average direct care staff base rate component from paragraph (3) of this subsection.

(5) The direct care staff per diem base rates will remain constant except as follows. For rates effective September 1, 2000, the rate derived in paragraph (3) of this subsection will be multiplied by 1.016. Effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter, the direct care staff per diem rate will remain constant except for adjustments necessitated by increases in the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) chain-type price index. For rates effective September 1, 2003 and September 1, 2004, the direct care staff per diem base rate will be equal to the direct care staff rate for nonparticipating facilities in effect August 31, 2003 adjusted as necessary to remain within appropriations. Adjustments necessary to remain within appropriations will apply equally in percentage terms across each component of the nursing facility rate and each add-on.

[ (l) Determination of direct care staff rates for participating facilities. Direct care staff rates for participating facilities as defined in subsection (i) will be determined as follows:]

[ (1) Determine the direct care staff rate associated with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at the minimum levels required for participation.]

[ (A) Determine the sum of recipient care costs from the direct care staff cost center in subsection (a) in all nursing facilities as included in the initial database from subsection (k)(1) of this section.]

[ (B) Adjust the sum from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph as specified in §355.108 of this title (relating to Determination of Inflation Indices) to inflate the costs to the prospective rate year.]

[ (C) Divide the result from subparagraph (B) of this paragraph by the sum of recipient days of service in all facilities in the initial database from subsection (k)(1) of this section and multiply the result by 1.07. The result is the average direct care staff rate associated with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at the minimum levels required for participation.]

[ (D) Case mix adjustment of direct care staff per diem rate component. To calculate the direct care staff per diem rate component associated with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at the minimum levels required for participation for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups, for the default group and for each supplemental reimbursement group, multiply each of the standardized statewide case mix indices associated with the initial database from subsection (k)(1) of this section by the average direct care staff rate component from subparagraph (C) of this paragraph.]

[ (E) The initial database from subsection (k)(1) of this section used in determining the direct care staff rates will not change, except for adjustments for inflation from subparagraph (B) of this paragraph. HHSC may also recommend adjustments to the rates in accordance with §355.109 of this title (relating to Adjusting Reimbursement When New Legislation, Regulations, or Economic Factors Affect Costs).]

[ (2) Determine the direct care staff rate add-on associated with each enhanced staffing level. Taking into consideration the most recently available, reliable data relating to LVN equivalent compensation levels, HHSC will determine a per diem add-on payment for each enhanced staffing level.]

(l) [ (3) ] Determine each participating facility's total direct care staff rate. Each participating facility's total direct care staff rate will be equal to the direct care staff base rate [ associated with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at the minimum levels required for participation ] from [ paragraph (1) of this ] subsection (k) of this section plus any add-on payments associated with enhanced staffing levels selected by and awarded to the facility during open enrollment. HHSC will determine a per diem add-on payment for each enhanced staffing level taking into consideration the most recently available, reliable data relating to LVN equivalent compensation levels. Add-on payments associated with staffing increments between the minimum staffing requirement from subsection (j)(1) of this section and the minimum staffing requirement for participation in effect in state fiscal year 2003, adjusted based upon most recently available, reliable relative compensation levels for the different staff types, will be adjusted for variations in facility case mix.

(m) Staffing requirements for participating facilities. Each participating facility will be required to maintain adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes equal to those determined in subsection (j) of this section. Each participating facility's adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained during the reporting period will be determined as follows.

(1) Determine unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained. Upon receipt of the staffing and spending information described in subsection (f) of this section, HHSC will determine the unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by each facility during the reporting period.

(2) Determine adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained. Compare the unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by the facility during the reporting period from paragraph (1) of this subsection to the LVN-equivalent minutes required of the facility as determined in subsection (j) of this section. The adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes are determined as follows:

(A) If the number of unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by the facility during the reporting period is greater than or equal to the number of LVN-equivalent minutes required for the facility or less than the minimum LVN-equivalent minutes required for participation as determined in subsection (j)(1) of this section; the facility's adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained is equal to its unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes; or

(B) If the number of unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by the facility during the reporting period is less than the number of LVN-equivalent minutes required of the facility, but greater than or equal to the minimum LVN-equivalent minutes required for participation as determined in subsection (j)(1) of this section, the following steps are performed.

(i) Determine what the facility's accrued Medicaid fee-for-service direct care revenue for the reporting period would have been if their staffing requirement had been set at a level consistent with the highest LVN-equivalent minutes that the facility actually maintained, as defined in subsection (j) of this section.

(ii) Determine the facility's adjusted accrued direct care revenue by multiplying the accrued direct care revenue from clause (i) of this subparagraph by 0.85.

(iii) Determine the facility's accrued allowable Medicaid fee-for-service direct care staff expenses for the rate year.

(iv) Determine the facility's direct care spending surplus for the reporting period by subtracting the facility's adjusted accrued direct care revenue from clause (ii) of this subparagraph from the facility's accrued allowable direct care expenses from clause (iii) of this subparagraph.

(v) If the facility's direct care spending surplus from clause (iv) of this subparagraph is less than or equal to zero, the facility's adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained is equal to the unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained as calculated in paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(vi) If the facility's direct care spending surplus from clause (iv) of this subparagraph is greater than zero, the adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by the facility during the reporting period is set equal to the facility's direct care spending surplus from clause (iv) of this subparagraph divided by the per diem enhancement add-on as determined in subsection (l)[ (2) ] of this section plus the unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by the facility during the reporting period from paragraph (1) of this subsection. according to the following formula: (Direct Care Spending Surplus / Per Diem Enhancement Add-on for One LVN-equivalent Minute) + Unadjusted LVN-equivalent Minutes. Per diem enhancement add-on payments associated with staffing increments between the minimum staffing requirement from subsection (j)(1) of this section and the minimum staffing requirement for participation in effect in state fiscal year 2003, adjusted based upon most recently available, reliable relative compensation levels for the different staff types, will be adjusted for variations in facility case mix.

(n) Staffing accountability. Participating facilities will be responsible for maintaining the staffing levels determined in subsection (j) of this section. HHSC will determine the adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by each facility during the reporting period by the method described in subsection (m) of this section.

(1) HHSC or its designee will recoup all direct care staff revenues associated with unmet staffing goals from participating facilities that fail to meet their staffing requirements during the reporting period.

(2) In addition, effective the first day of the rate year immediately following the determination that a facility fail [ facilities that failed ] to maintain the required weighted average LVN-equivalent minutes for the reporting period by four or more adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes or that a facility that was [ , and facilities ] required to provide at least four LVN-equivalent minutes above its [ their ] minimum staffing requirement, as determined in subsection (j)(1) of this section[ , and that ] failed [ fail ] to meet its [ their ] minimum staffing requirement for the reporting period, [ are subject to the following: ]

[ (A) Effective the first day of the rate year immediately following the determination that a facility met the qualifications detailed in paragraph (2) of this subsection, ] the facility will have its enrollment in the enhancement program limited to a level consistent with the highest adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes, as defined in subsection (m) of this section, that the facility actually attained plus two additional LVN-equivalent minutes. If the adjusted level attained is more than two LVN-equivalent minutes below the minimum direct care staff requirement for participation, the facility will be precluded from enrollment in the enhancement program and will be a nonparticipant. These enrollment limitations will remain in effect for the longer of either one full rate year or until the first day of the rate year that begins after funds identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section are repaid to HHSC or its designee.

[ (B) HHSC or its designee will collect interest from facilities that meet the qualifications of paragraph (2) of this subsection as follows:]

[ (i) Determine the average excess funds available to the provider over the reporting period as the recoupment amount from paragraph (1) of this subsection divided by two.]

[ (ii) Determine the annualized average three-month United States Treasury Bill rate during the provider's reporting period as the unweighted monthly average for all months included, either partially or fully, in the reporting period.]

[ (iii) Determine the interest rate on the recoupment amount by multiplying the annualized average rate from clause (ii) of this subparagraph by the number of days in the reporting period divided by the number of days in the rate year.]

[ (iv) Determine the interest on the recoupment amount by multiplying the recoupment interest rate calculated in clause (iii) of this subparagraph by the average excess funds available to the provider over the reporting period from clause (i) of this subparagraph.]

(o) Spending requirements for participants. [ all facilities. All ] Participating facilities[ , participants and nonparticipants alike, ] are subject to a direct care staff spending requirement with recoupment calculated as follows:

(1) At the end of the rate year, a spending floor will be calculated by multiplying accrued Medicaid fee-for-service direct care staff revenues (net of revenues recouped by HHSC or its designee due to the failure of the facility to meet a staffing requirement as per subsection (n) of this section) by 0.85.

(2) Accrued allowable Medicaid direct care staff fee-for-service expenses for the rate year will be compared to the spending floor from paragraph (1) of this subsection. HHSC or its designee will recoup the difference between the spending floor and accrued allowable Medicaid direct care staff fee-for-service expenses from facilities whose Medicaid direct care staff spending is less than their spending floor.

(3) At no time will a participating facility's direct care rate after spending recoupment be less than the direct care base rate.

(p) Mitigation of recoupment. Recoupment of funds described in subsection (o) of this section may be mitigated as follows.

[ (1) ] Dietary and Fixed Capital Mitigation. Recoupment of funds described in subsection (o) of this section may be mitigated by high dietary and/or fixed capital expenses as follows.

(1) [ (A) ] Calculate dietary cost deficit. At the end of the facility's rate year, accrued Medicaid dietary per diem revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary per diem costs. If costs are greater than revenues, the dietary per diem cost deficit will be equal to the difference between accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary per diem costs and accrued Medicaid dietary per diem revenues. If costs are less than revenues, the dietary cost deficit will be equal to zero.

(2) [ (B) ] Calculate dietary revenue surplus. At the end of the facility's rate, accrued Medicaid dietary per diem revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary per diem costs. If revenues are greater than costs, the dietary per diem revenue surplus will be equal to the difference between accrued Medicaid dietary per diem revenues and accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary per diem costs. If revenues are less than costs, the dietary revenue surplus will be equal to zero.

(3) [ (C) ] Calculate fixed capital cost deficit. At the end of the facility's rate year, accrued Medicaid fixed capital per diem revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid fixed capital per diem costs as defined in §355.306(a)(2) (A) [ (B) ] of this title (relating to Cost Finding Methodology). If costs are greater than revenues, the fixed capital cost per diem deficit will be equal to the difference between accrued, allowable Medicaid fixed capital per diem costs and accrued Medicaid fixed capital per diem revenues. If costs are less than revenues, the fixed capital cost deficit will be equal to zero. For purposes of this paragraph, fixed capital per diem costs of facilities with occupancy rates below 85% are adjusted to the cost per diem the facility would have accrued had it maintained an 85% occupancy rate throughout the rate year.

(4) [ (D) ] Calculate fixed capital revenue surplus. At the end of the facility's rate year, accrued Medicaid fixed capital per diem revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid fixed capital per diem costs as defined in §355.306(a)(2) (A) [ (B) ]of this title (relating to Cost Finding Methodology). If revenues are greater than costs, the fixed capital revenue per diem surplus will be equal to the difference between accrued Medicaid fixed capital per diem revenues and accrued, allowable Medicaid fixed capital per diem costs. If revenues are less than costs, the fixed capital revenue surplus will be equal to zero. For purposes of this paragraph, fixed capital per diem costs of facilities with occupancy rates below 85% are adjusted to the cost per diem the facility would have accrued had it maintained an 85% occupancy rate throughout the rate year.

(5) [ (E) ] Facilities with a dietary per diem cost deficit will have their dietary per diem cost deficit reduced by their fixed capital per diem revenue surplus, if any. Any remaining dietary per diem cost deficit will be capped at $2.00 per diem.

(6) [ (F) ] Facilities with a fixed capital cost per diem deficit will have their fixed capital cost per diem deficit reduced by their dietary revenue per diem surplus, if any. Any remaining fixed capital per diem cost deficit will be capped at $2.00 per diem.

(7) [ (G) ] Each facility's recoupment, as calculated in subsection (o) of this section, will be reduced by the sum of that facility's dietary per diem cost deficit as calculated in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph and its fixed capital per diem cost deficit as calculated in subparagraph (F) of this paragraph.

[ (2) Performance-based Mitigation. Recoupment of funds described in paragraph (1)(G) of this subsection will be mitigated based upon each facility's compliance with state and federal regulations as well as on the basis of resident outcomes as follows.]

[ (A) Calculation of Performance-based Mitigation Index. Calculate the performance-based mitigation index (PMI) using the formula: PMI = (A+B) x C Where "A", "B", and "C" are the performance weights as detailed in 1 TAC §§355.309(l), (m), and (i) (relating to Performance-based Add-on Payment Methodology) for potential advantages, potential disadvantages, and regulatory compliance, respectively. The performance weights used in the calculation of the PMI will be those calculated for the service period as defined in §355.309 (relating to Performance-based Add-on Payment Methodology) that coincides with the rate year to which the recoupment described in subsection (o) of this section applies.]

[ (B) Recoupment eligible for Performance-based Mitigation. Recoupment eligible for Performance-based Mitigation is limited to what the facility's recoupment as described in paragraph (1)(G) of this paragraph would have been if the facility had been a nonparticipant in the enhancement program during the reporting period.]

[ (C) Calculation of Performance-based Mitigation. For each facility, multiply the PMI from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph by the recoupment eligible for Performance-based Mitigation from subparagraph (B) of this paragraph. The resulting product is the performance-based mitigation.]

[ (D) Determination of recoupment after Performance-based Mitigation. Each facility's recoupment as calculated in paragraph (1)(G) of this subsection will be reduced by that facility's performance-based mitigation as described in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph.]

[ (E) In cases where a responsible entity has requested to have its contracts' compliance with the spending requirements evaluated in the aggregate, performance-based mitigation will be based on the lowest PMI associated with any of its contracts.]

[ (F) Facilities, for which a PMI cannot be calculated due to missing, invalid or unverifiable data are not eligible for performance-based mitigation. Facilities that are missing a PMI cannot be included in the group of facilities to be aggregated as defined in subsection (aa), and must have their spending requirement determined on a facility-specific basis.]

[ (G) Facilities whose contracts are terminated, either voluntarily or involuntarily, prior to the calculation of the performance weights described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph are not eligible for performance-based mitigation.]

(q) Adjusting staffing requirements. Facilities that determine that they will not be able to meet their staffing requirements from subsection (m) of this section may request a reduction in their staffing requirements and associated rate add-on. These requests will be effective on the first day of the month following approval of the request.

(r) Voluntary withdrawal. Facilities wishing to withdraw from participation must notify HHSC in writing by certified mail. Facilities voluntarily withdrawing must remain nonparticipants for the remainder of the rate year.

(s) Notification of recoupment based on Annual Staffing and Compensation Report. Facilities will be notified, in a manner specified by HHSC, within 90 days of the determination of their recoupment amount by HHSC [ due date of their Annual Staffing and Compensation Report or within 90 days of the date the report is submitted, whichever is later, ] of the amount to be repaid to HHSC or its designee. If a subsequent review by HHSC or audit results in adjustments to the Annual Staffing and Compensation Report as described in subsection (f)(1) of this section that changes the amount to be repaid to HHSC or its designee, the facility will be notified in writing of the adjustments and the adjusted amount to be repaid. HHSC or its designee will recoup any amount owed from a facility's vendor payment(s) following the date of the notification letter.

(t) Vendor hold. Facilities required to submit a Staffing and Compensation Report due to a change of ownership or contract termination as described in subsection (f)(1)(A)-(B) of this section will have funds held as per 40 TAC §19.2308(2) (relating to Change of Ownership) until an acceptable Staffing and Compensation Report is received by HHSC and funds identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section are repaid to HHSC or its designee. HHSC or its designee will recoup any amount owed from the facility's vendor payments that are being held. In cases where funds identified for recoupment cannot be repaid from the held vendor payments, the responsible entity from subsection (x) of this section will be jointly and severally liable for any additional payment due to HHSC or its designee. Failure to repay the amount due or submit an acceptable payment plan within 60 days of notification will result in placement of a vendor hold on all DHS contracts controlled by the responsible entity and will bar the responsible entity from enacting any new contracts with DHS until repayment is made in full.

(u) Failure to document staff time and spending. Undocumented direct care staff and contract labor time and compensation costs will be disallowed and will not be used in the determination of direct care staff time and costs per unit of service.

(v) All other rate components. All other rate components will be calculated as specified in §355.307 of this title (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology) and will be uniform for all providers.

(w) Appeals. Subject matter of informal reviews and formal appeals is limited as per §355.110(a)(3)(B) of this title (relating to Informal Reviews and Formal Appeals).

(x) Responsible entities. The contracted provider, owner, or legal entity that received the revenue to be recouped upon is responsible for the repayment of any recoupment amount.

(y) Change of ownership. Participation in the enhanced direct care staff rate confers to the new owner as defined in 40 TAC §19.2308 (relating to Change of Ownership) when there is a change of ownership. The new owner is responsible for the reporting requirements in subsection (f) of this section for any reporting period days occurring after the change. If the change of ownership occurs during an open enrollment period as defined in subsection (c) of this section, then the owner recognized by DHS on the last day of the enrollment period may request to modify the enrollment status of the facility in accordance with subsection (d) of this section. [ The new owner may request to become a participant or receive a higher enhancement level than that conferred by submitting an acceptable enrollment contract amendment to HHSC. To be acceptable, the enrollment contract amendment must be received by HHSC Rate Analysis no later than 90 days from the date the new owner is notified in writing by DHS of the ownership-change effective date, be completed according to instructions, be signed by an authorized signator as per DHS Form 2031, Corporate Board of Directors Resolution, and be legible. Such requests will be granted within available funds to be effective on the ownership change effective date. ]

(z) Contract cancellations. If a facility's Medicaid contract is cancelled before the first day of an open enrollment period as defined in subsection (c) of this section and the facility is not granted a new contract until after the last day of the open enrollment period, participation in the enhanced direct care staff rate as it existed prior to the date when the facility's contract was cancelled will be reinstated when the facility is granted a new contract, if it remains under the same ownership.

(aa) In cases where a parent company, sole member, or governmental body controls more than one nursing facility (NF) contract, the parent company, sole member, or governmental body may request at the time each Annual Staffing and Compensation Report is submitted, in a manner prescribed by HHSC, to have its contracts' compliance with the spending requirements detailed in subsection (o) of this section for the applicable reporting period evaluated in the aggregate for all NF contracts it controlled at the end of the rate year or at the effective date of the change of ownership or termination of its last NF contract. In limited [ liability ] partnerships in which the same single general partner controls all the limited [ liability ] partnerships, that single general partner may make this request. Other such requests will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. A new request to have compliance with spending requirements evaluated in the aggregate must be submitted for each reporting period. NF contracts that change ownership or terminate effective after the end of the applicable reporting period, but prior to the determination of compliance with spending requirements as per subsection (o) of this section, are excluded from all aggregate spending calculations. These contracts' compliance with spending requirements will be determined on an individual basis and the costs and revenues will not be included in the aggregate spending calculation.

(bb) Medicaid Swing Bed Program for Rural Hospitals. When a rural hospital participating in the Medicaid swing bed program furnishes NF nursing care to a Medicaid recipient under 40 TAC §19.2326 (relating to Medicaid Swing Bed Program for Rural Hospitals), DHS makes payment to the hospital using the same procedures, the same case-mix methodology and the same TILE rates that HHSC authorizes for reimbursing NFs participating in the enhanced direct care staff rate at the minimum level required for participation. These hospitals are not subject to the staffing and spending requirements detailed in this section.

(cc) Reinvestment. HHSC will reinvest recouped funds in the enhanced direct care staff rate program, to the extent that there are qualifying facilities.

(1) Identify qualifying facilities. Facilities meeting the following criteria during the most recent completed reporting period are qualifying facilities for reinvestment purposes.

(A) The facility was a participant in the enhanced direct care staff rate.

(B) The facility's unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes as determined in subsection (m)(1) of this section were greater than the number of LVN-minutes required of the facility as determined in subsection (j) of this section.

(C) The facility met its spending requirement as determined in subsection (o) of this section.

(D) An acceptable Annual Staffing and Compensation Report for the reporting period was received by HHSC Rate Analysis at least 30 days prior to the date distribution of available reinvestment funds was determined.

(E) The DHS contract that was in effect for the facility during the reinvestment reporting period is still in effect as an active contract when reinvestment is determined.

(2) Distribution of available reinvestment funds. Available funds are distributed as described below.

(A) HHSC determines units of service provided during the most recent completed reporting period by each qualifying facility achieving, with unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes as determined in subsection (m)(1) of this section, each enhancement option above the enhancement option awarded to the facility during the reporting period and multiplies this number by the rate add-on associated with that enhancement in effect during the reporting period. Per diem enhancement add-ons associated with staffing increments between the minimum staffing requirement from subsection (j)(1) of this section and the minimum staffing requirement for participation in effect in state fiscal year 2003, adjusted based upon the most recently available, reliable relative compensation levels for the different staff types, will be adjusted for variations in facility case mix.

(B) HHSC compares the sum of the products from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to funds available for reinvestment.

(i) If the product is less than or equal to available funds, all achieved enhancements for qualifying facilities are retroactively awarded for the reporting period.

(ii) If the product is greater than available funds, retroactive enhancements are granted beginning with the lowest level of enhancement and granting each successive level of enhancement until achieved enhancements are granted within available funds.

(3) All retroactive enhancements are subject to spending requirements detailed in subsection (o) of this section. Revenue from retroactive enhancements is not eligible for mitigation of spending recoupment as described in subsection (p) of this section.

(4) Retroactively awarded enhancements do not qualify as pre-existing enhancements for enrollment purposes.

(5) Notification of reinvested enhancements. Qualifying facilities are notified in a manner determined by HHSC, as to the award of reinvested enhancements.

(dd) Disclaimer. Nothing in these rules should be construed as preventing facilities from adding direct care staff in addition to those funded by the enhanced direct care staff rate.

(ee) Notification of lack of available funds. If HHSC determines that funds are not available to continue participation for facilities from which it has not received an acceptable request to modify their enrollment by the last day of an enrollment period as per subsection (d) of this section, to maintain participation until a facility notifies it that the facility no longer wishes to participate or is removed from participation as per subsection (i), or to fund carry-over enhancements as per subsection (j)(3) of this section, HHSC will notify providers in a manner determined by HHSC that such funds are not available.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303614

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


1 TAC §355.312

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. HHSC proposes to amend §355.312, concerning reimbursement setting methodology - liability insurance costs, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The purpose of the amendment is to clarify how the add-on rate for liability insurance costs is calculated, to clarify the definition of purchased general and professional liability insurance, and to detail the process nursing facilities must complete with regard to independently procured insurance before the add-on payment will be made for this type of insurance.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect, there are no fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering the section. There are no fiscal implications for local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the first five years the proposed section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section is that the liability insurance add-on rate will only be paid to nursing facilities with legitimate liability insurance coverage. In addition, the clarifications will increase provider understanding of the program.

There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed section. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by these section.

Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Carolyn Pratt (telephone: 512-685-3127; FAX: 512-685-3104) in HHSC Rate Analysis. Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. Pratt via facsimile or mail to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-400, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, TX 78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the Texas Register . For further information regarding the proposal or to make the proposal available for public review, contact local offices of DHS or Carolyn Pratt at (512) 685-3127 in HHSC Rate Analysis.

A public hearing on the proposed amendment is scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room 1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.

Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to this rule. Accordingly, HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding this rule.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The amendment implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).

§355.312.Reimbursement Setting Methodology--Liability Insurance Costs.

(a) Definitions.

(1) Purchased liability insurance--Either general or professional liability insurance that was purchased from a commercial carrier or a non-profit service corporation in an arm's-length transaction that provides for the shifting of risk to the unrelated party. The commercial carrier or non-profit service corporation must meet the requirements as set by the Texas Department of Insurance (TDI) for authorized insurance.

(2) Self-insurance--Self-insurance is a means whereby a contracted provider undertakes the risk to protect itself against anticipated liabilities by providing funds equivalent to liquidate those liabilities. If a provider enters into an arrangement with an unrelated party that does not provide for the shifting of risk to the unrelated party, such an agreement shall be considered self-insurance. Self-insurance is not purchased liability insurance.

(b) Effective September 1, 2003, payment rates for purchased general and professional liability insurance will be determined as follows:

(1) Determine the portion of the general/administration rate component from 1 TAC §355.307 (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology) attributable to allowable liability insurance costs.

(2) Determine the amount of total dollars that would be expended if the liability rate component from paragraph (1) of this subsection were paid uniformly to all providers during the rate effective period.

(3) Estimate the number of days of service that will be covered by purchased liability insurance during the rate period.

(4) Divide the total dollars available for liability insurance from paragraph (2) of this subsection by the estimated number of days of service that will be covered by purchased liability insurance during the rate period from paragraph (3) of this subsection. Estimate the proportion of this per diem amount accruing from general liability insurance and the proportion accruing from professional liability insurance to determine the payment rate for each day of purchased general liability insurance and the payment rate for each day of purchased professional liability insurance.

(5) Payment rates for purchased general and professional liability insurance may be adjusted as often as HHSC determines is necessary to ensure that the total dollars expended during the rate period do not exceed the amount appropriated for this purpose.

(6) Since these payment rates are determined through an allocation of available appropriations among estimated units of service covered by purchased liability insurance, a public rate hearing is not required when adjustments are made to the payment rates.

(7) Providers will be notified, in a manner determined by HHSC, of adjustments to the payment rates for purchased general and professional liability insurance.

(8) Providers who purchase general liability insurance without professional liability insurance are only eligible to receive payment of the rate for purchased general liability insurance. Providers who purchase professional liability insurance without general liability insurance are only eligible to receive payment of the rate for purchased professional liability insurance. Providers who purchase both general and professional liability insurance are eligible to receive payment of both rates.

(c) Purchased liability insurance issued through insurance companies meeting any one of the following criteria will be determined automatically to qualify for the payment rates for purchased general and/or professional liability insurance as appropriate. These insurance companies have been determined by the TDI to be authorized to issue liability insurance policies in the State of Texas.

(1) An insurance company identified as an admitted, licensed, insurer authorized to write liability insurance in Texas. This type of insurance company is designated as "active" on the TDI website.

(2) An insurance company that is an eligible surplus lines insurer which requires that there be a Texas licensed surplus lines agent placing the coverage with the insurance company. This type of insurance company is designated as "eligible" on the TDI website.

(3) The Texas Medical Liability Insurance Underwriting Association (JUA). This insurance arrangement is designated as "active" on the TDI website.

(d) Independently procured insurance will not be determined automatically to qualify for the payment rates for purchased general and/or professional liability insurance. To qualify for the purchased general and/or professional liability insurance payment rates, the coverage must have been purchased from an independently procured insurance company determined by TDI to be authorized to sell liability insurance. The liability insurance payment rates will not be paid to any nursing facility until HHSC Rate Analysis has received from the provider a written determination issued by TDI that the insurance is authorized liability insurance. A separate determination must be received for each insurance policy before payment of the liability insurance rate will be made to the nursing facilities covered by the policy. If, by September 1, 2003, TDI has not made a determination of authorized liability insurance on policies in effect prior to September 1, 2003, HHSC will stop payment of the liability insurance payment rates until HHSC Rate Analysis receives the written determination from the provider that TDI has determined the liability insurance to be authorized. Upon receipt of the determination by TDI that the independently procured insurance is authorized liability insurance, payments will be made retroactively to the effective date of the insurance policy or the date the liability insurance rates were stopped, whichever is later.

(e) Liability insurance payments will not be made to facilities that obtain unauthorized insurance. It is the responsibility of the nursing facility provider to ensure that liability insurance submitted for payment is authorized.

(f) To qualify for the purchased liability insurance payment rates each contracted entity must submit the following to HHSC Rate Analysis:

(1) A completed liability insurance coverage certification form provided by HHSC Rate Analysis, signed by an authorized signatory for the provider as per Texas Department of Human Services Form 2031.

(2) A copy of evidence of coverage to include a certificate of insurance, the ACORD 25-S or similar document provided by the insurance company or agent that includes the type of coverage, effective and expiration dates of coverage, insurer, policy, and form number of policy contract, agent/producer, and claims made/occurrences. For catastrophic or excess liability coverage, the evidence of coverage must also include the sum that the catastrophic or excess coverage must exceed to become payable. A binder is not acceptable as evidence of insurance.

(3) For independently procured liability insurance, a copy of the written determination by TDI that the insurance policy was determined to be authorized liability insurance.

(g) If an insurance policy effective date is not the first day of the month, then the liability insurance payment rates will become effective the first day of the following month. If an insurance policy expiration date is not the last day of the month, then the liability insurance payment rates will be paid for the full month that includes the expiration date.

(h) It is the contracted provider's responsibility to notify HHSC Rate Analysis of any changes to liability insurance coverage including cancellation of coverage, change of insurance and renewal of coverage within 15 calendar days of the effective date of the change. Failure to notify HHSC Rate Analysis of cancellation of coverage or change of insurance could constitute Medicaid fraud. Renewals of coverage not received within 15 calendar days of the effective date of the renewal could result in the liability insurance payment rates being stopped until documentation of the renewal per subsection (f) of this section is received by HHSC Rate Analysis. [ Effective September 1, 2001, the portion of the rate accruing from reported general liability insurance costs will only be disbursed to providers certifying that they have purchased general liability insurance acceptable to HHSC and the portion of the rate accruing from reported professional liability insurance costs will only be disbursed to providers certifying that they have purchased professional liability insurance acceptable to HHSC. Providers who cancel or fail to renew their liability coverage during a rate year must notify HHSC within two weeks of the effective date of their cancellation or failure to renew. ]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303615

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Subchapter F. SPECIFIC REIMBURSEMENT METHODOLOGY

1 TAC §355.773, §355.775

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. HHSC proposes amendments to §355.773, concerning Reporting Costs by MRLA Providers, and §355.775, concerning Reimbursement Methodology for the MRLA Program.

These rules are being amended to implement fiscal accountability measures for providers transitioning from the Home and Community-Based Services (HCS) program (currently under §355.722) to the Mental Retardation Local Authority program, clarify cost reporting expectations and bring them into closer conformity to other HHSC cost reporting rules, and define a reimbursement methodology for the MRLA program separate from the HCS program (currently under §355.723). Rule §355.773 explains the cost reporting and fiscal accountability requirements for the MRLA program and rule §355.775 explains the reimbursement methodology for rate setting for the MRLA program.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that during the first five years the amended rules are in effect there will be no fiscal implications to state, federal or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering these amendments.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendments is to provide continuity between the reporting requirements for the HCS program and the MRLA program. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the amendments as proposed. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons required to comply with the proposed amendments, nor any impact on local employment.

HHSC has determined that these proposed amendments do not restrict or limit an owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore do not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Judy Myers, Rate Analyst, Medicaid Rate Analysis, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register .

A public hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room 1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.

§355.773.Reporting Costs by MRLA Providers.

(a) Submission of cost reports. All MRLA providers must submit cost reports as directed by the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) in accordance with §§355.701-355.709 of this title (relating to General Reimbursement Methodology for All Medicaid Assistance Programs.

[ (b) Recordkeeping requirements. Each MRLA provider must retain records according to HHSC's requirements. MRLA providers must ensure that records are accurate and sufficiently detailed to provide the legal, financial, and statistical information requested by HHSC.]

[ (c) Noncompliance with recordkeeping requirements. If an MRLA provider fails to maintain records that support the information submitted, HHSC will notify TDMHMR to place the provider on vendor hold.]

(b) [ (d) ] Cost report certification. MRLA providers [ Providers ] must certify the accuracy of cost reports submitted to the HHSC. MRLA providers [ Providers ] may be liable for civil and/or criminal penalties if the cost report is not completed according to the HHSC requirements.

(c) [ (e) ] Due date. MRLA providers [ Providers ] must submit cost reports no later than 90 days after the reporting period or 90 days after the date that the HHSC mails the form to the provider, whichever is later.

(d) [ (f) ] Extension of due date. The HHSC may grant extensions of due dates for good cause. Good cause is defined as a causal factor that the provider could not reasonably be expected to control. A provider must submit a request for an extension in writing to the HHSC before the cost survey or cost report due date. The HHSC will respond to a request for extension within 15 [ 10 ] working days of its receipt.

(e) Failure to submit the cost report. Failure to submit the cost report by the due date or the extension due date, if granted, will result in HHSC notifying TDMHMR to place the provider on vendor hold.

(f) [ (g) ] Cost data. The HHSC may at times require additional financial and statistical information to ensure the fiscal integrity of the MRLA program. [ Each provider must submit additional information to HHSC upon request, unless the information is not at the provider's disposal. ]

(1) Each MRLA provider must submit additional information to the HHSC upon request, unless the information is not at the MRLA provider's disposal.

(2) [ (h) Failure to submit requested data. ] Failure to submit acceptable cost data by the due date may result in HHSC notifying TDMHMR to place the MRLA provider on vendor hold.

(g) [ (i) ] Review of cost reports and data. The HHSC reviews each MRLA provider's cost reports and additionally requested cost data to ensure that the financial and statistical information submitted conforms to all applicable rules and instructions. Forms that are not completed according to the HHSC's instructions or rules may be returned to the MRLA provider for proper completion.

(h) [ (j) ] On-site [ financial ] audits. The HHSC performs a sufficient number of on-site [ financial ] audits to ensure the fiscal integrity of the MRLA program. The number of on-site audits performed may vary.

(i) [ (k) ] On-site [ financial ] audit standards. The HHSC or its designee performs on-site [ financial ] audits in a manner consistent with the generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) approved by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and included in Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions, issued by the United States Comptroller General.

(j) Recordkeeping requirements. Each MRLA provider must retain records according to HHSC's requirements. MRLA providers must ensure that records are accurate and sufficiently detailed to provide the legal, financial, and statistical information requested by the HHSC.

(k) Noncompliance with recordkeeping requirements. If an MRLA provider fails to maintain records that support the information submitted, the HHSC will notify TDMHMR to place the provider on vendor hold.

(l) Access to records. Each provider must allow access by HHSC to any and all records necessary to verify cost data submitted to HHSC. This requirement includes records pertaining to related-party transactions and other business activities engaged in by the provider that are directly or indirectly related to the provision of contracted services. Failure to allow inspection of pertinent records within 10 working days following written notice from HHSC constitutes a violation of the MRLA provider contract. If the administrative office or other entity pertaining to a multi-contract operation refuses access to records, then the penalties are extended to all of the provider's entities having Medicaid contracts with TDMHMR. Additional rules regarding access to records that are out-of-state may be found in §355.703 of this title (relating to Basic Objectives and Criteria for Review of Cost Reports).

(m) Notification of exclusions and adjustments. The HHSC will notify a provider of exclusions and any adjustments, including caps applied, to reported costs in accordance with §355.705 of this title (relating to Notification).

(n) [ (m) ] Reviews of exclusions or adjustments. A provider who disagrees with the HHSC's exclusion or adjustment of items in cost reports may request an informal review and, when appropriate, a formal appeal [ an administrative hearing ] as specified in §355.707 of this title (relating to Reviews and Administrative Hearings).

[ (n) Notification of exclusions and adjustments. HHSC will notify a provider of exclusions and any adjustments, including caps applied, to reported costs.]

(o) Fiscal Accountability. [ Fiscal accountability is a process used to gauge the ongoing financial performance under the reimbursement rates. ]

(1) General principles. Fiscal accountability is a process used to gauge the ongoing financial performance under the MRLA program reimbursement rates.

(2) [ (1) ] Annual reporting. Fiscal accountability will consist of the annual reporting of direct service costs including wages, benefits, staffing, and supervisory span-of-control information from all MRLA providers. The data will be collected as part of [ on ] a cost report [ survey ] designed by the HHSC.

[ (2) Providers are required to submit direct services costs on a survey during a uniform three-month period of the year, selected by HHSC. The survey will reflect the provider's actual direct costs for the three-month period. The direct service costs will be compared to the "direct service cost" component of the MRLA rates. Instances in which a provider's actual direct service costs, as captured by the quarterly cost surveys, are less than 85% of the direct service revenues in the model will require additional reporting of costs and other information from the provider.]

[ (3) HHSC will review the results obtained from the direct services cost surveys with representatives of provider associations and advocacy groups to further refine the fiscal accountability process. Direct services cost surveys will be collected in each fiscal year. In instances in which a provider's actual direct service costs are less than 85% of the direct service revenues in the model, HHSC may require the provider to: ]

[ (A) report more detailed financial information;]

[ (B) submit to a quality assurance survey and review;]

[ (C) submit to a utilization review of all services provided; and/or]

[ (D) submit to a detailed audit of all relevant financial records.]

(A) TDMHMR will place a vendor hold on payments to an MRLA provider whose provider agreement is being assigned or terminated. The MRLA provider will submit a cost report for the current reporting period to HHSC. Upon receipt of an appropriate cost report and repayment of any amounts due to HHSC in accordance with this section, the vendor hold will be released.

(B) HHSC will require MRLA providers to report all direct costs incurred on an annual fiscal year basis beginning with the provider's fiscal year that ends after June 30, 2003. HHSC will compare the reported direct service costs to the total direct service revenue.

(3) Direct Service Revenues are calculated by multiplying the number of units eligible for payment that have been paid for services delivered during the reporting period times the appropriate direct service portion of the rate for the service billed.

(A) MRLA providers whose direct service costs are 90% or more of the direct service revenues will not be subject to repayment under this section.

(B) MRLA providers whose direct service costs are between 85% and 90% of the direct service revenues will be required to pay to TDMHMR 50% of the difference between the direct service costs and 90% of the direct service revenues.

(C) MRLA providers whose direct service costs are between 80% and 85% of the direct service revenues will be required to pay to TDMHMR 100% of the difference between the direct service costs and 85% of the direct service revenues plus 50% of the difference between 85% and 90% of the direct service revenues.

(D) MRLA providers whose direct service costs are less than 80% of the direct service revenues will be required to pay to TDMHMR the difference between the direct service costs and 95% of the direct service revenues.

(4) The fiscal accountability calculation may show an estimated amount due to TDMHMR. An MRLA provider's repayment status may change as a result of the desk reviews or outside audits of cost reports, or adjustments to claims paid to the MRLA provider for services provided in the cost reporting period. The MRLA provider will be notified of the results of these reviews and/or audits in accordance with subsection (m) of this section. If the adjustments and/or exclusions result in an amount due, or if the original estimated amount due calculation is upheld, HHSC will notify the MRLA provider of the amount due and the MRLA provider will remit the repayment amount within 60 days of notification.

(5) Repayment will be made by the following:

(A) the MRLA provider or legal entity submitting the report;

(B) any other legal entity responsible for the debts or liabilities of the submitting entity; or

(C) the legal entity on behalf of which a report is submitted.

(6) MRLA providers who are required to repay revenues to TDMHMR will be jointly and severally liable for any repayment. TDMHMR will apply a vendor hold on Medicaid payments to a MRLA provider for not making the payment to TDMHMR within 60 days of receiving notice as provided in subsection (o)(4) of this section.

§355.775.Reimbursement Methodology for the MRLA Program.

(a) HHSC determines reimbursement rates according to §§355.701-355.709 of this title (relating to General Reimbursement Methodology for all TDMHMR Programs).

(b) Uniform application. Reimbursement rates apply to all providers uniformly by the type of service component provided and the individual's level-of-need.

(c) Annual and prospective rates. The HHSC sets rates to be paid to MRLA providers annually. The rates are prospective in nature.

(d) Modeled rates. Modeled rates are based on relevant cost information including a sample of historical cost information and operational experience of service providers in Texas. The rates will be based on the former Home and Community Based Services (HCS) program model, with appropriate adjustments to reflect differences between the two models. The HCS program models will be referred to as the MRLA program model effective September 1, 2003. [ The rates will be the same as the HCS rates which are set in accordance with §355.723 of this title (relating to Reimbursement Methodology for Home and Community-based Services (HCS)), with the exception of the case management service component, as explained in subsection (g) of this section. ]

(e) Rates for residential support, supervised living, MRLA foster/companion care, and day habilitation vary by level of need and are paid on a daily basis.

(f) Rates for respite care are paid on a daily or hourly basis. Respite care is not a reimbursable service for individuals who are receiving MRLA program foster/companion care, supervised living, or residential support.

(g) The modeled rate for a service component developed or modified after January 1, 1997, but prior to the rebasing process initiated under subsection (i) of this section, and provided after the effective date of this rule, will be based on cost assumptions used in modeling existing rates, actual or projected utilization patterns, and the recommendations of an advisory panel consisting of program providers, department personnel, and advocates for persons with mental retardation.

(h) The administrative rate for the indirect costs of the MRLA program is paid as a flat monthly fee to the program provider. Effective June 1, 1998, the administrative rate is determined by reducing the HCS modeled rate for case management by the amount of cost related to the tasks required of a HCS provider which are not required of a MRLA provider. This reduction will be based on a detailed task analysis. Case management is not a reimbursable service under the MRLA program.

(i) The modeled rates will be analyzed to determine if rebasing is necessary in accordance with §355.723 of this title (relating to Reimbursement Methodology for Home and Community-based Services (HCS).

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303616

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Subchapter J. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES

4. MEDICAID HOSPITAL SERVICES

1 TAC §355.8063

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend §355.8063, concerning the reimbursement methodology for inpatient hospital services, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The proposed amendments add language to allow certain Medicaid hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds the option of receiving cost-based reimbursement authorized by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA). The proposed amendments also add language to implement Medicaid inpatient hospital rate reimbursement reductions and reductions in reimbursement for Direct Graduate Medical Education cost (GME) mandated by the 78th Legislature. The proposed amendments will implement changes necessary to maintain cost-effective reimbursement for Medicaid hospital inpatient services within appropriated funds for the 2004-2005 biennium.

Background

Article II, Rider 24 relating to the Health and Human Services Commission contained in the General Appropriations Act, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, directs HHSC to reimburse hospitals with fewer than 100 licensed beds and certain hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds, the greater of the amount received by the hospital under the Texas Medicaid inpatient prospective payment system or the TEFRA reimbursement methodology. The inpatient prospective payments made to hospitals with fewer than 100 licensed beds and certain other hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds, described in Rider 24, may be impacted by the reimbursement reductions described in Rider 46. Article II, Rider 46 relating to the Health and Human Services Commission contained in the General Appropriations Act, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, directs HHSC to reduce hospital reimbursement and calculate the reductions without rebasing of current reimbursement factors. Article II, Rider 48 relating to the Health and Human Services Commission contained in the General Appropriations Act, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, directs HHSC to limit the amount of reimbursement for GME to amounts appropriated or allocations of appropriations made specifically for GME reimbursement. HHSC proposes to implement the changes mandated by Rider 24, 46, and 48 through the adoption of an amendment to the reimbursement methodology for inpatient hospital services.

Tom Suehs, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be fiscal implications to state and local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed rule. Estimated increased spending to the state arising from the provisions of the proposed rule relating to reimbursement of certain hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds will be $0 in State Fiscal Year 2004; $1,700,000 in State Fiscal Year 2005; $3,400,000 in State Fiscal Year 2006; $3,400,000 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $3,400,000 in State Fiscal Year 2008. Estimated savings to the state arising from enforcing or administering the rate reduction provisions of the proposed rule will be $87,700,000 in State Fiscal Year 2004; $87,000,000 in State Fiscal Year 2005; $0 in State Fiscal Year 2006; $0 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $0 in State Fiscal Year 2008. State and local governments will experience a loss of revenue as a result of enforcing or administering the rate reduction provisions of the proposed rule. The loss of state and local government revenues are estimated to be : $57,00,000 in State Fiscal Year 2004; $57,000,000 in State Fiscal Year 2005; $0 in State Fiscal Year 2006; $0 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $0 in State Fiscal Year 2008. Estimated savings to the state arising from enforcing or administering the GME provisions of the proposed rule will be $21,318,403 in State Fiscal Year 2004 $21,323,602 in State Fiscal Year 2005 $21,323,6020 in State Fiscal Year 2006 $21,323,602 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $21,323,602 in State Fiscal Year 2008. State and local governments also will experience a loss of revenue as a result of enforcing or administering the reduction in GME reimbursement provisions of the proposed rule. The loss of state and local government revenues is estimated to be: $40,841,000 in State Fiscal Year 2004; $42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year 2005; $42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year 2006; $42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year 2008.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed section will be to provide HHSC with greater flexibility in allocating appropriations for GME and to maintain cost-effective reimbursement for hospital inpatient services within appropriated funds for the 2004-2005 biennium. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section as proposed as they will not be required to alter their business practices as a result of the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

HHSC has determined that the proposed rule is not "a major environmental rule" as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Scott Reasonover, Rate Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . In addition, a public hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 2:00 p.m. in the public hearing room at the Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Brown Heatly Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, 4th Floor Room 1410, Austin, Texas 78751-2316. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.

The proposed amendment affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32 and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.

§355.8063.Reimbursement Methodology for Inpatient Hospital Services.

(a) - (g) (No change.)

(h) Rebasing the standard dollar amounts. The HHSC [ department ] or its designee rebases the standard dollar amount for each payment division at least every three years. HHSC will not rebase or recalculate the standard dollar amounts for each payment division for admissions during the period September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2005. The relative weights are recalibrated whenever the standard dollar amounts are recalculated. The standard dollar amounts are not rebased on an interim basis unless the HHSC [ department ] or its designee determines that special circumstances warrant rebasing.

(i) - (m) (No change.)

(n) Adjustments to base year claims data.

(1) (No change.)

(2) The HHSC or its designee updates the standard dollar amount each year for each payment division by applying a cost-of-living update to the standard dollar amount established for the base year. The cost-of-living index for state fiscal years [ year ] 2003 , 2004, and 2005 will not be applied to the standard dollar amount for admissions during the period September 1, 2003 [ 2002 ] through August 31, 2005 [ 2003 ]. The index used to update the standard dollar amounts is the greater of:

(A) - (B) (No change.)

(o) Reimbursement to in-state children's hospitals. The HHSC [ department ] or its designee reimburses in-state children's hospitals under similar methods and procedures used in the Social Security Act, Title XVIII, as amended, effective October 1, 1982, by Public Law 97-248, Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) except for the cost of direct graduate medical education (DGME). For cost reporting periods beginning on or after September 1, 2003, children's hospitals with allowable DGME costs as determined under TEFRA principles will receive a pro rata share of their annual TEFRA DGME cost based on appropriations or allocations from appropriations made specifically for this purpose. The amount and frequency of interim payments will also be subject to the availability of appropriations made specifically for this purpose. Interim payments are subject to settlement at both tentative and final audit of a hospital's cost report. The HHSC [ department ] or its designee establishes target rates and stipulates payments per discharge, incentives, and percentage of payments. The department or its designee uses each hospital's 1987 final audited cost reporting period (fiscal year ending during calendar year 1987) as its target base period. The target base period for hospitals recognized by Medicare as children's hospitals after the implementation of this subsection is the hospital's first full 12-month cost reporting period occurring after its recognition by Medicare. The HHSC [ department ] or its designee annually increases each hospital's target amount for the target base period by the cost-of-living index described in subsection (n) of this section. The HHSC [ department ] or its designee selects a new target base period at least every three years. The HHSC [ department ] or its designee bases interim payments to each hospital upon the interim rate derived from the hospital's most recent tentative or final Medicaid cost report settlement. If a Title XIX participating hospital is subsequently recognized by Medicare as a children's hospital after the implementation of this subsection, the hospital must submit written notification to the HHSC [ department ] or its designee and include adequate documentation and claims data. Upon receipt of the written notification from the hospital, the HHSC [ department ] or its designee reserves the right to take 90 days to convert the hospital's reimbursement to the reimbursement methodology described in this subsection.

(p) (No change.)

(q) Hospitals with 100 or fewer licensed beds and certain hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds . The policies in this subsection apply only to hospital fiscal years beginning on or after September 1, 1989 for [ and are applicable only to ] hospitals with 100 or fewer licensed beds at the beginning of the hospital's fiscal year or hospital fiscal years beginning on or after September 1, 2003 for hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds at the beginning of the hospital's fiscal year, located in a county that is not in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and designated by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services as a Sole Community Provider (SCH) or Rural Referral Center RCC . At tentative cost settlement of the hospital's fiscal year (with subsequent adjustment at final cost settlement, if applicable), the HHSC [ department ] or its designee determines what the amount of reimbursement during the fiscal year would have been if the HHSC [ department ] or its designee reimbursed the hospital under similar methods and procedures used in Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, as amended, effective October 1, 1982, by Public Law 97-248, Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA). This determination is made without imposing a TEFRA cap. If the amount of reimbursement under the TEFRA principles is greater than the amount of reimbursement received by the hospital under the prospective payment system, the HHSC [ department ] or its designee reimburses the difference to the hospital.

(r) (No change.)

(s) Reimbursement of inpatient direct graduate medical education (GME) costs. The Medicaid allowable inpatient direct graduate medical education cost, as specified under similar methods and procedures used in the Social Security Act, Title XVIII, as amended, effective October 1, 1982, by Public Law 97-248, is calculated for each hospital having inpatient direct graduate medical education costs on its tentative or final audited cost report. Those inpatient direct medical education costs are removed from the calculation of the interim rate described in subsection (b)(7) of this section and not [ are ] used in the calculation of the provider's standard dollar amount described in subsection (c) of this section. Those allowable inpatient direct graduate medical education costs for services delivered to Medicaid eligible patients with inpatient admission dates on or after September 1, 1997, will be subject to the cost determination and settlement provisions as described in this subsection. No Medicaid inpatient direct graduate medical education cost settlement provisions are applied to inpatient hospital admissions prior to September 1, 1997. For cost reporting periods beginning on or after September 1, 2003, providers with Medicaid allowable direct graduate medical education costs as described in this subsection will receive a pro rata share of their annual GME cost based on appropriations or allocations from appropriations made specifically for this purpose. The amount and frequency of interim payments will also be subject to the availability of appropriations made specifically for this purpose. Interim payments are subject to settlement at both tentative and final audit of a provider's cost report. [ Providers with Medicaid allowable inpatient direct graduate medical education costs as described in this subsection will receive an interim monthly payment based upon one-twelfth of their inpatient direct graduate medical education cost from their most recent tentative or final audited cost report. The interim payment amount as described in this subsection will not be updated during the state fiscal year to reflect new tentative or final cost report settlements. These payments are subject to settlement at both tentative and final audit of provider cost reporting periods covering the state fiscal year. ]

(t) (No change.)

(u) In accordance with this subsection and subject to the availability of funds, a high volume adjustment factor will be included in the calculation of the state fiscal year 2003 (September 1, 2002 through August 31, 2003) , state fiscal year 2004 (September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2004) and state fiscal year 2005 (September 1, 2004 through August 31, 2005) Standard Dollar Amount described in subsection (a)(4) of this section for eligible hospitals. For purposes of this subsection, payments made in state fiscal year 2004 [ 2003 ], prior to the effective date of this subsection, may be adjusted in accordance with the methodology set out in this subsection.

(1) - (2) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303685

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


1 TAC §355.8065

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend §355.8065, concerning additional reimbursement to disproportionate share hospitals, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The proposed amendment deletes language allowing the state to use a proxy to determine a hospital's cost of treating uninsured patients. It adds language to allow for the inclusion of third party reimbursement and Medicaid Upper Payment Limit funds to the calculation of Medicaid shortfall. It adds language allowing the state to offset a hospital's Medicaid reimbursement, in excess of its Medicaid costs, against its costs of treating uninsured patients.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state government as a result of administering the proposed rule. There will be no fiscal impact on local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed changes are in place, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing this section will be improving the state's administration of the program, and keeping the program aligned with federal policy changes and recommendations. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section as proposed as they will not be required to alter their business practices as a result of the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

HHSC has determined that this proposed rule is not a "major environmental rule" as defined by the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental factors that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Scott Reasonover, Rate Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas, 78756, within 30 days of the publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . In addition, a public hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday, July 16, 2003 between 2 and 5 p.m. in Room 1410 of the Brown Heatley Building at 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursement.

The proposed amendment affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.

§355.8065.Additional Reimbursement to Disproportionate Share Hospitals.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) (No change.)

(2) Bad debt charges--Uncollectible inpatient and outpatient charges that result from the extension of credit. [ Bad debt charges are used in the calculation of charges attributed to uninsured patients as defined in paragraph (5) of this subsection, and are used only in the limited circumstances described in subsection (f)(2)(E)(iv) of this section. ]

(3) (No change.)

(4) Charity charges--Total amount of hospital charges for inpatient and outpatient services attributed to charity care in a hospital fiscal year. These charges do not include bad debt charges, contractual allowances or discounts (other than for indigent patients not eligible for medical assistance under the approved Medicaid state plan); that is, reductions or discounts in charges given to other third party payers such as, but not limited to, health care maintenance organizations, Medicare, or Blue Cross. [ Charity charges are used in the calculation of charges attributed to uninsured patients as defined in paragraph (5) of this subsection, only in the limited circumstances described in subsection (f)(2)(E)(iv) of this section. ] The amount of total charity charges must be consistent with the amount reported on the Texas Department of Health's [ (department) ] annual hospital survey.

(5) - (10) (No change.)

(11) Hospital specific limit--The sum of the following two measurements:

(A) - (B) (No change.)

(C) When a hospital's cost of services (inpatient and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients is less than the amount paid to the hospital under the non-disproportionate share hospital payment method under the state plan, and from third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid recipients, the state will reduce the hospital specific limit by the difference.

(12) - (15) (No change.)

(16) Medicaid shortfall--The cost of services (inpatient and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients, less the amount paid under the non-disproportionate share hospital payment method under the state plan , and third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid recipients .

(17) - (31) (No change.)

(c) - (e) (No change.)

(f) Reimbursing Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals. The commission shall reimburse Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals on a monthly basis. Monthly payments will equal one twelfth of annual payments unless it is necessary to adjust the amount because payments will not be made for a full 12-month period, to comply with the annual state disproportionate share hospital allotment, or to comply with other state or federal disproportionate share hospital program requirements. Before the start of the next state fiscal year, the commission determines the size of the available funds to reimburse disproportionate share hospitals for the next state fiscal year, which begins each September 1. The funds available to reimburse the state chest hospitals and state mental hospitals equal the total of their adjusted hospital specific limits. The available fund for the remaining hospitals equals the lesser of the funds remaining in the state's annual disproportionate share hospital allotment or the sum of qualifying hospitals' adjusted hospital specific limits. Payments shall be made in the following manner, unless the commission determines the hospital's proposed reimbursement has exceeded its specific limit.

(1) (No change.)

(2) For the remaining hospitals, payments will be made based on both weighted inpatient Medicaid days and weighted low income days. The commission weighs each hospital's total inpatient Medicaid days and low income days by the appropriate weighting factor. The commission defines a low income day as a day derived by multiplying a hospital's total inpatient census days from its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year by its low income utilization rate. Hospital districts and city/county hospitals with greater than 250 licensed beds in the state's largest MSAs shall receive weights based proportionally on the MSA population according to the most recent decennial census. MSAs with populations greater than or equal to 150,000, according to the most recent decennial census, are considered as the "largest MSAs." Children's hospitals also shall receive weights because of the special nature of the services they provide. All other hospitals receive weighting factors of 1.0. The inpatient Medicaid days of each hospital shall be based on the latest available state fiscal year data for patients entitled to Title XIX benefits. The available fund shall be divided into two parts. One half of the available fund will reimburse each qualifying hospital on a monthly basis by its percent of the total inpatient Medicaid days. One-half of the available funds will reimburse each qualifying hospital by its percent of the total low income days. The commission determines whether hospitals in rural areas will receive 5.5% or more of the gross disproportionate share hospital funds for non-state hospitals. If hospitals in rural areas will receive at least 5.5% of the gross non-state hospitals funds, the commission will reimburse them using existing principles. If hospitals in rural areas will not receive at least 5.5% of gross non-state hospital funds, the commission will reimburse them at 5.5% of non-state hospital funds, using existing principles. Reimbursement for the remaining hospitals is determined as follows.

(A) - (C) (No change.)

(D) For state fiscal year 2004 (September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2004) and state fiscal year 2005 (September 1, 2004 through August 31, 2005) [ 2003 (September 1, 2002 through August 31, 2003) ], the monthly disproportionate share payment calculated under subparagraph (C) of this paragraph is subject to a conversion factor that is applied as follows:

(i) (No change.)

(ii) A conversion factor of 1.163881 is applied to payments made to hospital districts [ and city hospitals ] located in MSAs with populations between 1 and 3 million.

(iii) - (vi) (No change.)

(E) The commission or its designee determines the hospital specific limit for each disproportionate share hospital. This limit is the sum of a hospital's Medicaid shortfall, as defined in subsection (b)(16) of this section, and its cost of services to uninsured patients, as defined in subsection (b)(5) of this section, multiplied by the appropriate inflation update factor, as provided for in subsection (g)(2)(E) of this section.

(i) - (iii) (No change.)

[(iv) Hospitals that do not respond to the survey, or that are unable to determine accurately the charges attributed to patients without insurance, shall have their bad debt charges as defined in subsection (b)(2) of this section, and their charity charges as defined in subsection (b)(4) of this section, reduced by a percentage derived from a representative sample of hospitals to be determined annually by the commission or its designee. The commission or its designee derives the percentages using the following formula: for each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph, the commission or its designee sums the total amount of charges for patients without health insurance or other third party payments. For each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph, the commission or its designee sums the charity and bad debt charges. For each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph, the department then divides the charges for patients without health insurance or other third party payments by the sum of charity and bad debt charges. The commission or its designee then uses the resulting ratio for each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph in the following manner. Individual hospitals that do not respond to the survey, or that are unable to accurately determine the charges attributed to patients without insurance have their hospital's individual sum of bad debt and charity charges multiplied by the appropriate ratio for the specific hospital category. After the commission or its designee has calculated a value for the patients without health insurance or other source of third party payment for each individual hospital, the commission or its designee multiplies each hospital's calculated value by that hospital's cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) to obtain the proxy cost of services delivered to uninsured patients at each hospital.]

[(v) The representative sample of hospitals is one of the following specific categories of hospitals: urban public, other urban, rural, state-operated psychiatric and non psychiatric. In the event that less than 20 % of the hospitals in a specific category provide data to the commission or its designee, the commission or its designee uses the overall ratio calculated from all responding hospitals. The commission or its designee creates additional categories, by submitting a state plan amendment, as it deems appropriate for the economic and efficient operation of the Medicaid disproportionate share program.]

(iv) [ (vi) ] After the commission or its designee determines each disproportionate share hospital's cost of services to patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the year, the commission or its designee subtracts from each hospital's cost of services the amount of payments made by or on behalf of those patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the year.

(F) - (I) (No change.)

(g) - (i) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303686

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


1 TAC §355.8067

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. HHSC proposes to amend §355.8067, concerning disproportionate share reimbursement methodology, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The proposed amendment deletes language that will simplify the state's administration of the program. It adds language to allow for the inclusion of third party reimbursement to the calculation of Medicaid shortfall. It adds language allowing the state to offset a hospital's Medicaid reimbursement, in excess of its Medicaid costs, against its costs of treating uninsured patients.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state government as a result of administering the proposed rule. There will be no fiscal impact on local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed changes are in place, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing this section will be improving the state's administration of the program, and keeping the program aligned with federal policy changes and recommendations. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section as proposed as they will not be required to alter their business practices as a result of the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated impact on local employment. HHSC has determined that this proposed rule is not a "major environmental rule" as defined by the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental factors that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking under Section 2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mr. Scott Reasonover, Rate Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 West 49th St., Austin, Texas, 78756, within 30 days of the publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . In addition, a public hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday, July 16, 2003 between 2 and 5 p.m. in Room 1410 of the Brown Heatley Building at 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The rule is proposed under the Texas Government Code, 531.033, which provides the commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the Human Resources Code, 32.021, and the Texas Government Code, 531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; the Texas Government Code, 531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursement; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The proposed rule affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.

§355.8067.Disproportionate Share Hospital Reimbursement Methodology.

(a) A hospital owned and operated by a state university or other agency of the state is eligible for disproportionate share reimbursement. A state-owned teaching hospital is a hospital owned and operated by a state university or other agency of the state.

(b) Each hospital must have a Medicaid inpatient utilization rate defined at a minimum of 1.0%

(c) To qualify for disproportionate share payments, each hospital must have at least two physicians (M.D. or D.O.), with staff privileges at the hospital, who have agreed to provide nonemergency obstetrical services to Medicaid clients. The two-physician requirement does not apply to hospitals whose inpatients are predominantly under 18 years old or that did not offer nonemergency obstetrical services to the general population as of December 22, 1987.

(d) For purposes of this section, the following words and terms, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Total Medicaid inpatient days--Total Medicaid inpatient days means the total number of billed Title XIX inpatient days based on the latest available state fiscal year data for patients eligible for Title XIX benefits. Total Medicaid inpatient days includes days that were denied payment for reasons other than eligibility. Included are inpatient days of care provided to patients eligible for Medicaid at the time the service was provided, regardless of whether the claim was paid. These denied claims include, but are not limited to, claims for patients whose spell of illness limits are exhausted, or claims that were filed late. The term excludes days attributable to Medicaid patients between the ages of 21 and 65 who live in an institution for mental diseases. The term includes days attributable to individuals eligible for Medicaid in other states.

(2) Total inpatient census days--Total inpatient census days means the total number of a hospital's inpatient census days during its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year.

(3) Cost of services--Cost of services to uninsured patients is the inpatient and outpatient charges to patients who have no health insurance or other source of third party payment for services provided during the year, multiplied by the hospital's ratio of costs to charges (inpatient and outpatient), less the amount of payments made by or on behalf of those patients. Uninsured patients are patients who have no health insurance or other source of third party payments for services provided during the year. Uninsured patients include those patients who do not possess health insurance that would apply to the service for which the individual sought treatment. [ Cost of services does not include any bad debt charges. ]

(4) Hospital specific limit--Hospital specific limit is the sum of the following two measurements: Medicaid shortfall and costs of services to uninsured patients. When a hospital's cost of services (inpatient and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients is less than the amount paid to the hospital under the non-disproportionate share hospital payment method under the state plan, and from third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid recipients, the state will reduce the hospital specific limit by the difference.

(5) Medicaid shortfall--Medicaid shortfall is the cost of services (inpatient and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients, less the amount paid under the non-disproportionate share hospital payment method under this state plan , and third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid recipients.

(6) Cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient)--Cost-to-charge ratio is the hospital's overall cost-to-charge ratio, as determined from its Medicare cost report submitted for the fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. The latest available Medicare cost report is used in the absence of the cost report for the hospital's fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year.

(7) Adjusted hospital specific limit--Adjusted hospital specific limit is a hospital specific limit trended forward to account for the inflation update factor since the base year.

(8) Inflation update factor--Inflation update factor is a general increase in prices as determined by the department.

(9) Medicaid inpatient utilization rate--Medicaid inpatient utilization rate is the fraction expressed as a percentage, the numerator of which is the hospital's number of inpatient days attributable to patients who (for these days) were eligible for medical assistance under a state plan, and the denominator of which is the total number of the hospital's inpatient days in that period. The term "inpatient day" includes each day in which an individual (including a newborn) is an inpatient in the hospital, whether or not the individual is in a specialized ward and whether or not the individual remains in the hospital for lack of suitable placement elsewhere.

(10) Payments received--Payments received from uninsured patients are those payments received from or on behalf of uninsured patients as defined in paragraph (3) of this subsection.

(11) Charity charges--Charity charges are the total amount of hospital charges for inpatient and outpatient services attributed to charity care in a cost reporting period . [ , as reported on the state teaching hospitals' annual financial reports, for use only in the calculation of the disproportionate share hospital payment under subsection (e)(1) of this section. ]

(12) Allowable cost--Allowable cost is defined by the department using the rates that are reasonable and adequate to meet the costs that must be incurred by efficiently and economically operated providers when providing services in conformity with applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and quality and safety standards.

(13) Available fund--The available fund for state teaching hospitals is the total amount of funds that may be reimbursed to the state teaching hospitals as determined below.

(e) The department reimburses state-owned teaching hospitals on a monthly basis from the available fund for state teaching hospitals. Monthly payments equal one-twelfth of annual payments unless it is necessary to adjust the amount because payments are not made for a full 12-month period, to comply with the annual state disproportionate share hospital allotment, or to comply with other state or federal disproportionate share hospital program requirements. Prior to the start of the next federal fiscal year, the department determines the size of the fund to reimburse state-owned teaching hospitals for the next federal fiscal year. The available fund to reimburse the state teaching hospitals equals the total of their disproportionate share hospital payments, as follows: a state-owned teaching hospital that meets the requirements for disproportionate share status receives annually 100 percent of its adjusted hospital specific limit.

[ (1) A state teaching hospital will receive a monthly disproportionate share payment based on the following formula: Monthly Charity Charges of the State-Owned Teaching Hospital Divided by Total Monthly Charity Charges of All State-Owned Teaching Hospitals x Available Fund.]

[ (2) If the adjusted hospital specific limit for a state teaching hospital is less than the formula in paragraph (1) of this subsection, a state teaching hospital will receive 100% of its adjusted hospital specific limit, instead of the amount determined under this subsection.]

(f) The department or its designee determines the hospital specific limit for each disproportionate share hospital. This limit is the sum of a hospital's Medicaid shortfall, as defined in subsection (d)(5) of this section, and its cost of services to uninsured patients as defined in subsection (d)(3) of this section, multiplied by the appropriate inflation update factor, as provided for in subsection (g) of this section.

(1) The Medicaid shortfall includes total Medicaid billed charges and any Medicaid payments made for the corresponding inpatient and outpatient services delivered to Texas Medicaid clients, as determined from the hospital's fiscal year claims data, regardless of whether the claim was paid. These denied claims include, but are not limited to, patients whose spell of illness claims were exhausted, or payments were denied due to late filing. Refer to subsection (d)(5) of this section.

(A) The total billed Medicaid charges for each hospital are converted to cost, utilizing a calculated cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient). The department or its designee determines that ratio by using the hospital's HCFA 2552-92, Hospital and Hospital Health Care Complex Cost Report, that was submitted for the fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. The department or its designee uses the latest available Medicare cost report in the absence of the Medicare cost report submitted in the fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. To determine the cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) for each hospital, the department or its designee uses the total cost from the HCFA 2552-92, Worksheet B, Part 1, Column 25, and total charges from the HCFA 2552-92, Worksheet C, Part 1, Column 6. The ratio is the total cost divided by the total gross patient charges.

(B) The department or its designee determines the cost of services to patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the year for each hospital. Hospitals are surveyed each year to determine charges that can be attributed to patients without insurance or other third party resources. The charges are multiplied by each hospital's cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) to determine the cost.

(2) After the department or its designee determines each disproportionate share hospital's cost of services to patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the year, the department subtracts from each hospital's cost of services the amount of payments made by or on behalf of those patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the year.

(g) The department or its designee trends each hospital's "hospital specific limit" calculated from its historical base period cost report from subsection (f) of this section to the state's fiscal year disproportionate share program. For hospitals without full 12-month fiscal year cost reports, the department or its designee annualizes the cost to calculate the hospital specific limit. The department or its designee uses the inflation update factor, as defined in subsection (d)(8) of this section, in calculating the adjusted hospital specific limit. The department or its designee calculates the number of months from the mid-point of the hospital's cost reporting period to the mid-point of the state fiscal year disproportionate share program. The department or its designee then multiplies the portion of the hospital's cost report year occurring in the state fiscal year by the inflation update factor used for each state fiscal year in the calculation of hospital reimbursement rates for each state fiscal year. The product of these calculations is multiplied by each hospital's hospital specific limit to obtain each hospital's adjusted hospital specific limit.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303621

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Subchapter J. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rates. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. HHSC proposes amendments to §355.8085, concerning Texas Medicaid Reimbursement Methodology (TMRM); amendments to §355.8081, concerning Payments for Laboratory and X-ray Services, Radiation Therapy, Physical Therapists' Services, Physician Services, Podiatry Services, Chiropractic Services, Optometric Services, Ambulance Services, Dentists' Services, and Psychologists' Services; the addition of new rule §355.8600, concerning Reimbursement for Ambulance Services, and the addition of new rule §355.8610, concerning Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services, all in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The purpose of the revisions and additions is to transfer reimbursement methodologies for ambulance and clinical diagnostic laboratory services that do not follow TMRM out of the TMRM rule into new rules of their own. Since the TMRM applies only to covered services provided by physicians and certain other practitioners, the title of the rule is being changed to TMRM for Physicians and Certain Other Practitioners. The proposal also updates TMRM by replacing references to the "Texas Department of Health" and "department" with references to "HHSC and/or its designee". The proposal provides HHSC with more flexibility in making inflation adjustments to the TMRM conversion factor. The new rule at §355.8610, concerning Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services, allows HHSC more flexibility in reviewing, determining and updating these fees by removing the requirement that the fees be based solely on the Medicare-established fee schedule, by changing the required period for review to at least every two years, and by adding the requirement that fees must be established within available funding and not exceed the Medicare fee schedule. Revisions to §355.8085 and §355.8600 add the requirement that fees must be established within available funding. The revisions to §355.8081 update rule citations for TMRM for Physicians and Certain Other Practitioners at §355.8085, for ambulance services at §355.8600, and for clinical laboratory services at §355.8610.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that, for the first five-year period the proposed amendments and new sections are in effect, there are fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections. There are no fiscal implications for local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

The effect on state government for the first five-year period the sections are in effect is an estimated cost savings of $252,387 in fiscal year (FY) 2004; $248,581 in FY 2005; $248,581 in FY 2006; $248,581 in FY 2007; and $248,581 in FY 2008.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the first five years the proposed sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections is increased provider understanding of the various affected reimbursement methodologies. There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed sections. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by these sections.

Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Nancy Kimble (telephone: 512-338-6496; FAX: 512-338-6544) in HHSC Rate Analysis. Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. Kimble via facsimile or mail to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-410, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, TX 78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the Texas Register .

A public hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in the Public Hearing Room, of the Brown-Heatly State Office Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78756-3101.

Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to this rule. Accordingly, HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding this rule.

5. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

1 TAC §355.8081, §355.8085

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rule in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The amendments implement the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).

§355.8081.Payments for Laboratory and X-ray Services, Radiation Therapy, Physical Therapists' Services, Physician Services, Podiatry Services, Chiropractic Services, Optometric Services, Ambulance Services, Dentists' Services, and Psychologists' Services.

(a) Subject to qualifications, limitations, and exclusions as provided in this chapter, payment to eligible providers must not exceed the lesser of the provider's billed amount or the amount derived from the methodology described in §355.8085 [ §29.1104 ] of this title (relating to Texas Medicaid Reimbursement Methodology (TMRM) for Physicians and Certain Other Practitioners) .

(b) Reimbursement for ambulance services is described in §355.8600 of this title (relating to Ambulance Services). Reimbursement for clinical laboratory services is described in §355.8610 of this title (relating to Clinical Laboratory Services).

§355.8085.Texas Medicaid Reimbursement Methodology (TMRM) for Physicians and Certain Other Practitioners .

[ (a) ] Reimbursement for physicians and certain other practitioners.

(1) Introduction. Except as otherwise specified, the TMRM for covered services provided by physicians and certain other practitioners shall employ a prospective payment system [ which shall be ] based upon the [ Texas Department of Health's (department's) ] determination of adequacy of access to health care services by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) or its designee as described in this section[ , or the actual resources required by an economically efficient provider to provide each individual service ].

(A) There shall be no geographical or specialty reimbursement differential for individual services.

(B) The fees for individual services will be reviewed at least every two years and will be based upon either:

(i) historical payments, with adjustments, to ensure adequate access to appropriate health care services; or

(ii) actual resources required by an economically efficient provider to provide each individual service.

(C) The fees for individual services or adjustments thereto must be made within available funding.

(2) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(A) Access-based reimbursement fees (ABRF)--Fees for individual services based upon historical payments adjusted, where HHSC or its designee [ the department ] deems necessary, to account for deficiencies relating to the adequacy of access to health care services as defined in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

(B) Adequacy of access--Measures of adequacy of access to health care services include, but are not limited to, the following determinations:

(i) adequate participation in the Medicaid program by physicians and other practitioners; and/or

(ii) the ability of the eligible Medicaid population to receive adequate health care services in an appropriate setting.

(C) Resource-based reimbursement fees (RBRF)--Fees for individual services based upon the [ department's ] determination by HHSC or its designee of the resources required by an economically efficient provider to provide individual services. An RBRF is defined mathematically by the following formula: RBRF1 = (RVUw-1 + RVUo-1 + RVUm-1) * CF where, RBRF1 = Resource-Based Reimbursement Fee for Service 1, RVUw-1 = Relative Value Unit for Work for Service 1, RVUo-1 = Relative Value Unit for Overhead for Service 1, RVUm-1 = Relative Value Unit for Malpractice for Service 1, and CF = Conversion Factor.

(D) Conversion factor--The dollar amount by which the sum of the three cost component RVUs is multiplied in order to obtain a reimbursement fee for each individual service. The initial value of the conversion factor is $26.873 for fiscal years 1992 and 1993. The [ If funding is available, the ] conversion factor will be reviewed at the beginning of each state fiscal year biennium, with any adjustments made within available funding and [ updated ] based on the adjustments described in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph or such other percentage approved by HHSC or its designee or its designee may [ the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) at the beginning of each state fiscal year biennium. The department may, with the approval of HHSC, ] develop and apply multiple conversion factors for various classes of service such as obstetrics, pediatrics, general surgeries, and/or primary care services.

(E) Conversion factor adjustments-- If funding is available and adjustments are made to the conversion factor(s), the adjustments include inflation and/or access-based adjustments [ The biennium adjustment of the conversion factor is composed of the following two components ].

(i) Inflation adjustment--To account for general inflation, the conversion factor is adjusted by [ one-half of ] the forecasted rate of change of a specific inflation factor appropriate to physician or other professional services covered by the TMRM, the [ implicit price deflator-personal consumption expenditures (IPD-DCE) ] Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) chain-type price index, or some percentage thereof . To inflate the conversion factor for the prospective period, HHSC or its designee [ the department ] uses the lowest feasible inflation factor [ IPD-PCE ] forecast consistent with the forecasts of nationally recognized sources available to HHSC or its designee [ the department ] at the time of preparation of the conversion factor(s).

(ii) Access-based adjustment--Adjustments to the conversion factor may also be made to ensure adequacy of access as defined in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.

(F) Relative units (RVUs)--The relative value assigned to each of the three individual components that [ which ] comprise the cost of providing individual Medicaid services. The three cost components of each reimbursement fee are intended to reflect the work, overhead, and professional liability expense required to provide each individual service. The RVUs that are employed in the TMRM must, except as otherwise specified, be based upon the RVUs of the individual services as specified in the Medicare Fee Schedule. HHSC or its designee [ The department ] will review any changes to or revisions of the various Medicare RVUs and, if applicable, adopt [ the department adopts ] the changes as part of the TMRM , within available funding .

(3) Calculating the payment amounts. The fee schedule that results from the TMRM must be composed of two separate components:

(A) the access-based fees; and

(B) the resource-based fees [ which must be ] composed of RVUs for the work, overhead, and malpractice components. The sum of these components must then be multiplied by the conversion factor to produce a reimbursement fee for each individual service.

[ (b) Reimbursement for ambulance services. Ambulance services shall be reimbursed in accordance with a reasonable charge methodology. The department or its designee shall define and determine reasonable charges and payments based on reasonable charges as follows.]

[ (1) A reasonable charge shall be a charge for a specific service shall be the lowest of:]

[ (A) the provider's customary charge for that service;]

[ (B) the prevailing charges made for similar services in the geographic locality; or]

[ (C) the actual charge of the eligible provider.]

[ (2) The department or its designee shall use a statistical base for making reasonable charge determinations. The statistical base is comprised of individual charges gathered from available sources, including Medicare (Title XVIII) and Medicaid (Title XIX).]

[ (3) Determination of reasonable charges, as set forth in this section and established by the department, shall be made in accordance with applicable federal requirements. Payments for services provided must not exceed the Medicare allowable charges.]

[ (c) Reimbursement for clinical diagnostic laboratory services. Clinical diagnostic laboratory tests performed in a physician's office, by an independent laboratory, or by a hospital laboratory for its outpatients shall be reimbursed on the basis of the Medicare-established fee schedule.]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303620

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


31. AMBULANCE SERVICES

1 TAC §355.8600

The new rule is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rule in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The new rule implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).

§355.8600.Reimbursement for Ambulance Services.

Ambulance services shall be reimbursed in accordance with a reasonable charge methodology. The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) or its designee shall define and determine reasonable charges and payments as follows, with all determinations and adjustments to those determinations made within available funding.

(1) A reasonable charge for a specific service shall be the lowest of:

(A) the provider's customary charge for that service;

(B) the prevailing charges made for similar services in the geographic locality; or

(C) the actual charge of the eligible provider.

(2) HHSC or its designee shall use a statistical base for making reasonable charge determinations. The statistical base is comprised of individual charges gathered from available sources, including Medicare (Title XVIII) and Medicaid (Title XIX).

(3) Determination of reasonable charges, as set forth in this section and established by HHSC or its designee, shall be made in accordance with applicable federal requirements. Payments for services provided must not exceed the Medicare fee schedule.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303618

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


32. CLINICAL LABORATORY SERVICES

1 TAC §355.8610

The new rule is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rule in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

The new rule implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).

§355.8610.Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services.

Clinical diagnostic laboratory tests performed in a physician's office, by an independent laboratory, or by a hospital laboratory for its outpatients shall be reimbursed the lower of the provider's usual customary charge for that service or a maximum fee determined by the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) or its designee. HHSC or its designee will review maximum fees at least every two years, with any adjustments made within available funding. Payments for services provided must not exceed the Medicare fee schedule.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303619

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


17. LONESTAR SELECT CONTRACTING PROGRAM

1 TAC §355.8321

The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. HHSC proposes to amend §§355.8321, concerning the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. Section 355.8321 is being amended to require health care providers to apply for selective contracting provider agreements on an individual basis.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering the section. There will be no fiscal impact on local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be to clarify selective contracting requirements. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section as proposed as they will not be required to alter their business practices as a result of the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

HHSC has determined that this proposed rule is not "a major environmental rule" as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that this proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mr. Doug Odle, Rate Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . In addition, a public hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in room 1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation

The proposed rule affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32 and the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.

§355.8321.LoneSTAR Select Contracting Process for Inpatient Hospital Services.

(a) Introduction. This section implements the provisions of Senate Bill 79, 73rd Texas Legislature, 1993, mandating selective contracting for non-emergency inpatient hospital services.

(b) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Market area--A geographic subdivision of the State of Texas defined as a group of geographically contiguous counties in which the Texas Department of Health (department) determines that health care providers will be invited to apply for selective contracting agreements. In general, each Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) in the State will be considered for designation as a market area. Where warranted by historical patient migration patterns, the department may designate certain non-MSA counties that are geographically contiguous to an MSA to be included with MSA counties within a market area.

(2) Effective service area--For each health care provider in a market area, the geographic area, as defined on a zip code basis, in which the health care provider has historically provided inpatient hospital services to Medicaid patients. For purposes of subsections (f) and (g) of this section, the effective service area will be determined based on historical Medicaid inpatient claims data.

(3) Executive Oversight Committee--The executive committee established by the department to direct the selective contracting initiative.

(4) Hospital capacity to provide specialized service offerings--

(A) For the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program I, the presence or absence of specific acute care hospital services, including, but not limited to, trauma centers, burn units, neonatal intensive care unit services, and psychiatric services, that are required to be available in the market to ensure adequate access to quality care.

(B) For the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program II, the presence or absence of specific inpatient psychiatric services, including, but not limited to, separate units for young children and adolescents, separate psychiatric and substance abuse treatment services, closed and open units, and distinct programs (e.g., dual diagnosis, eating disorder) that may be required to be available in the market to ensure adequate access to quality.

(5) New facility--A health care provider facility substantially constructed after the time the department determined the network of health care providers that would be contracted under selective provider agreements. Such term shall not include facilities that were built and operational at the time the department determined the network of selective providers for the affected market area; regardless of whether the facility's corporate structure and/or name have changed due to merger, acquisition, or other corporate reorganization.

(6) Potential network--Any combination of applicant health care providers (whether the result of a joint proposal or determined by the department) that offer a:

(A) combined effective service area that provides geographic coverage of the market area to the same extent that coverage is provided under current practice;

(B) combined service capacity equal to at least:

(i) 115% of the most recently available historic service volume experience for the market area for the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program I; or

(ii) 125% of the most recently available historic service volume experience for the market area for the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program II; and

(C) combination of specialized services available within the market area that is at least as broad as the range of specialized services presently available to Medicaid recipients in that market area.

(7) Selective contracting--A method of contracting, granted through waivers of certain provisions of the Social Security Act, that allows the department to contract selectively with health care providers for non-emergency inpatient services, thereby improving its ability to act as a prudent purchaser of services and to manage the Medical Assistance Program in a more effective and efficient manner, as required by Senate Bill 79.

(8) Selective provider agreement--An agreement which includes an amendment to a health care provider's existing provider agreement with the department and involves selective contracting.

(9) Disproportionate share hospital--A health care provider participating in the Medicaid program that, according to state Medicaid criteria, meets the conditions of participation and serves a disproportionate share of indigent patients. Additional requirements for disproportionate share hospitals are specified in §29.609 of this title (relating to Additional Reimbursement to Disproportionate Share Hospitals) and §29.610 of this title (relating to Disproportionate Share Hospital Reimbursement Methodology for State-Owned Teaching Hospitals).

(10) Health care provider--

(A) any acute care hospital that is eligible to provide inpatient hospital services to Medicaid recipients; or

(B) any inpatient mental health facility, as defined within this section.

(11) Optional volume management activities--Those activities that acute care hospitals may propose to furnish to Medicaid recipients in a market area to expand access to primary care services and ensure more appropriate use of acute care hospital facilities. Such activities may include, but not be limited to, furnishing ambulatory primary care clinic services to Medicaid recipients, and furnishing nurse hotlines which Medicaid recipients may call to receive professional advice about the most appropriate means to obtain medical care.

(12) Hardship exemption procedure--A method for non-contracted health care providers to obtain prior authorization from the department to provide non-emergency inpatient services to Medicaid recipients who would experience an unreasonable travel burden under the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program(s).

(13) Emergency inpatient services--An admission into a health care provider with a diagnosis meeting the definition of a medical emergency.

(14) Non-emergency inpatient services--An admission into a health care provider with a diagnosis not meeting the definition of a medical emergency.

(15) LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program I--The selective contracting program designed and implemented for acute care hospitals.

(16) LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program II--The selective contracting program designed and implemented for inpatient mental health facilities as defined in the Health and Safety Code, §571.003.

(17) Inpatient mental health facility--A mental health facility that can provide 24-hour residential and acute inpatient psychiatric services that is:

(A) a facility operated by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation;

(B) a private mental hospital licensed by the department;

(C) a community center;

(D) a facility operated by a community center or other entity the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation designates to provide mental health services;

(E) an identifiable part of a general hospital in which diagnosis, treatment, and care for persons with mental illness is provided and that is licensed by the department; or

(F) a hospital operated by a federal agency.

(c) General Design. The department shall select that subset of market area that appears to indicate the most effective competition for selective provider agreements to serve Medicaid patients. The market areas shall be divided into one or more groups of solicitations that will avoid an overlap of contract evaluation and negotiation of solicitations.

(1) The department shall implement selective contracting by executing amendments to each health care provider's existing provider agreement with the department. Health care providers that were not parties to provider agreements before implementation of the department's selective contracting are eligible to apply; however, they must enter into a provider agreement that ensures they are subject to all terms and conditions of the Medical Assistance Program. The amendments to the provider agreements, and the process by which the department solicited, evaluated, negotiated, and executed the amended agreements with health care providers under selective contracting are not subject to the laws and regulations governing acquisition of goods and services by state agencies.

(2) Health care providers shall be required to apply for selective provider agreements on an individual basis. [ Proposals by combinations of health care providers under common ownership in a market area shall be considered as individual proposals if the health care providers elect to apply on that basis. Proposals by combinations of health care providers in a market area that are not under common ownership will also be considered, provided that each health care provider that is a party to a joint application in a market area also submits an independent application for a selective contracting agreement in the market area; and each such health care provider provides written assurances that the terms of its individual proposal were arrived at independently without any other health care provider or combination of health care providers, and have not been communicated to any competitor or groups of competitors. The department does not intend any action by the State of Texas in the contracting process to require or sanction any form of communication or joint action by competitors in the market for inpatient hospital services (with respect to either individual or joint applications) that fails to comply with the provisions of this section. ]

(3) The department shall send solicitation packages, inviting proposals for selective provider agreements, to each health care provider serving residents of the counties selected for participation. Health care providers will be required at all times to be eligible to participate in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Health care providers that are not sent solicitation packages for Medicaid recipients of a particular market will be able to request a package after demonstrating their intent to offer services to Medicaid recipients in those markets.

(d) Proposals for selective provider agreements. Health care providers seeking selective provider agreements shall be required to submit the following information in their proposals:

(1) a schedule of proposed payment rates to be applied to all covered health care provider inpatient services during the term of the agreement;

(2) a proposed level of volume of services to Medicaid recipients that the health care provider would agree to serve during the contract period (this proposed level shall serve only as an estimate of services to assist the department in evaluating the availability of services within the relevant market area; it shall not serve as a limit on the amount of reimbursable services to be supplied by a contracting hospital);

(3) data to assist the department in evaluating the effective service area and specialized service offerings of the health care provider;

(4) assurances and certifications required to ensure health care provider compliance with the requirements of federal and Texas law and regulations, and the requirements of the department's selective contracting process;

(5) a narrative description of the proposed plans (if any) of the acute care hospital to furnish optional volume management programs for Medicaid recipients; and

(6) evidence that the application of the health care provider constitutes a binding quotation authorized by the corporate governance of the health care provider.

(e) Evaluation of proposals for selective provider agreements for comprehensive market area selective contracting. The department shall evaluate health care provider proposals, except proposals from new facilities according to the following criteria.

(1) Health care provider proposals shall be due to the department within one month of the release of proposal packages. All health care provider materials submitted to the department during the proposal process, and materials developed by the department or its contractors during the course of evaluation and negotiation, shall be confidential until all agreements are executed for all market areas in the state.

(2) The department shall evaluate health care provider proposals on a market-by-market basis and determine a negotiation strategy to pursue in each market area following its evaluation of all market areas. Based on the application of pre-specified evaluation criteria for each market area, the department shall prepare a recommended strategy for contracting in each market area. Each market area strategy shall be subject to approval by the Executive Oversight Committee established by the department.

(3) The department shall retain the option to make awards without negotiation. In some circumstances, the department may accept the proposals offered by every health care provider in the market area. In most cases, however, the department expects to enter into negotiations with those health care providers whose proposals, taken together, appear to represent the best combination of providers consistent with the overall objectives of the Medical Assistance Program. After negotiation, the department reserves the right not to award an agreement in a specific market area. In most cases, however, the department shall proceed to finalize and execute agreements with some subset of the health care providers in each market area. In that event, coverage restrictions associated with the use of non-contracted health care providers Medicaid recipients shall apply.

(f) Evaluation criteria and methodology for comprehensive market area selective contracting. The department's evaluation of proposals, except proposals from new facilities, for selective provider agreements for comprehensive coverage of each market area shall be conducted in two phases. Phase One shall include determining minimally acceptable network combinations and Phase Two shall include cost evaluation. A description of each phase follows.

(1) In Phase One, the department shall enter the information included in health care provider proposals in each market area into a personal computer based (PC-based) micro-simulation model designed to aid in the evaluation of the department's contracting options for each market. Data from health care provider proposals shall be combined with data from the department's eligibility systems and claims processing records to construct the data base required for this phase of the evaluation. Each health care provider's record in the data base shall contain information necessary to determine each health care provider's:

(A) effective service area for Medicaid recipients in that market area; and

(B) capacity to provide specialized services required by Medicaid recipients in the market area.

(2) The PC-based micro-simulation model shall be used to test all possible combinations of health care providers applying for selective provider agreements to determine potential networks that shall meet the department's requirements for access to services for Medicaid patients. [ Where health care providers have submitted a joint proposal for selective provider agreements, the department shall evaluate the proposed provider network and the proposed network in all possible combinations with remaining health care providers that submitted proposals. ]

(3) In Phase Two, each potential network shall be eligible for further consideration. If the Phase One evaluation fails to identify a potential network of applicant health care providers that meet the department's specified criteria, the department reserves the right to enter into direct negotiations with any health care provider serving the market area. The purpose of these negotiations shall be to develop a minimally acceptable potential network, and allow the department to initiate negotiations with a health care provider that failed to submit a proposal during the proposal period.

(4) In Phase Two, each potential network identified in a market area in Phase One shall be evaluated to determine the estimated reduction in program costs that would result from entering into selective provider agreements with all of the health care providers in that potential network, while excluding all other health care providers from serving non-emergency cases. The department shall use the PC-based micro-simulation model to produce an estimate of the total change in Medicaid program costs that would result by entering into agreements with those health care providers during the base contract period. The estimate by the department shall consider:

(A) changes in unit prices to be paid to providers for inpatient services;

(B) changes in the distribution of service volumes (and case mix) across health care providers that would result from the reallocation of service volume from non-selected to selected providers; and

(C) savings in Medicaid program costs likely to result from the changes in service volumes induced by optional volume management activities proposed by acute care hospitals, including both savings in aggregate acute care hospital service use and offsetting increases in non-hospital service costs.

(5) The result of the evaluation by the department will be a range of values for each potential network. The ranges shall be constructed using best case, worst case, and expected value assumptions about the distribution of service volumes across hospitals in the network.

(6) Following the evaluation, the department shall prepare a recommendation to the Executive Oversight Committee that includes the outcome of both phases of the evaluation for each market area, as well as a proposed strategy for the department to meet the best interests of the Medical Assistance Program. Department options shall include:

(A) making an award without negotiations--including an award at the proposed price schedules to all health care providers in the market;

(B) entering into negotiations with health care providers a single potential network to improve proposed pricing, if possible, and to finalize an agreement about key program features; or

(C) entering into negotiations with one or more health care providers influence the department's choice among multiple potential networks by lowering the pricing terms offered by individual health care providers. These negotiations may result in identifying a single potential network that would differ in its health care provider composition from potential networks initially identified in Phase One.

(g)-(j) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303617

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Chapter 357. MEDICAL FAIR HEARINGS

1 TAC §§357.1, 357.3, 357.5 - 357.7, 357.11 - 357.13, 357.17, 357.21, 357.23, 357.25, 357.29

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes amendments to §357.1, Purpose and Scope; §357.3, Definitions; §357.5, Notice of Agency Action; §357.7, Maintaining Benefits or Services; §357.11, Preliminary Matters for a Standard Fair Hearing; §357.13, Location of Hearing and Accommodation; §357.17, Document Hearing; §357.21, Burden of Proof; §357.23, Procedural Rights of the Individual; §357.25, Dismissal of Hearing; and §357.29, Hearing Decisions. In addition, HHSC is proposing two new rules: §357.6, Notice of MCO Action and Resolution of MCO Appeals; and §357.12, Preliminary Matters for an Expedited Fair Hearing for Individuals Enrolled with an MCO.

The proposed amendments generally clarify language concerning standard state fair hearings and add new language concerning: a Medicaid Managed Care Organization's (MCO) responsibilities after taking an "action"; expedited appeals to an MCO; and expedited state fair hearings for individuals enrolled in an MCO. Proposed new §357.6, Notice of MCO Action and Resolution of MCO Appeals, clarifies that if an MCO takes an "action," an enrollee may file an appeal with the MCO and/or request a state fair hearing. Under the proposed rules, a managed care enrollee may request that the state fair hearing be expedited if the enrollee's health requires it. A state fair hearing must be expedited when the MCO determines or the provider indicates that taking the time for a standard resolution could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's life or health or ability to attain, maintain, or regain maximum function.

For a standard-timeframe state fair hearing, an enrollee does not have to exhaust his or her appeal to the MCO before requesting a fair hearing. For an expedited fair hearing, however, the MCO must first resolve the appeal before the enrollee may request a fair hearing. Proposed new §357.6 also sets forth the MCO notice-of-action requirements; the criteria for an expedited appeal to the MCO; timeframes for resolutions by the MCO of an appeal; notice of appeal resolution requirements; and timeframes for requesting a standard or expedited state fair hearing following an MCO action. A definition of an MCO "action" is added to §357.3, along with definitions for "standard fair hearings" and "expedited fair hearings"; "MCO"; and "MCO appeals."

A proposed amendment to §357.1 adds "action by an MCO" as a basis for requesting a state fair hearing. Proposed new §357.12 addresses notification to an enrollee of an expedited fair hearing and the enrollee's access to records and right to representation at the hearing. Additional non-substantive changes are proposed for clarification, ease of understanding, and internal consistency. These changes include formatting and, in some cases, paragraph restructuring, and affect §§357.5, 357.7, 357.11, 357.13, 357.23, and 357.25.

The proposed amendments and new rules, when adopted, will bring HHSC into compliance with the federal Medicaid managed care rules at 42 C.F.R. Part 438, Subpart F, Grievance System, and 42 C.F.R. §431.220 and §431.244, as amended, effective August 13, 2002. Medicaid managed care plans will be required to revise member materials to include these changes.

Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that for the first five years the proposed amendments and new rules are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amended and new rules.

Mr. Suehs also has determined that during the first five years the proposed amendments and new rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the new and amended sections will be that MCO enrollees will be able to pursue a state fair hearing as well as file an appeal with the MCO if the MCO takes an adverse action. MCO enrollees will also benefit by being able, under certain circumstances, to request that a state fair hearing be expedited. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the amendment and new rules as proposed, as they will not be required to modify business practices. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the proposed rules. There is no anticipated impact on local employment.

HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments and new rules are not a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has determined that the proposed rules do not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government Code.

Written comments on the proposed rules may be submitted to Bonnie Winters, Medicaid/CHIP Division, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

A public hearing is scheduled for Monday, July 14, 2003, from 8:00 am until Noon. The hearing will be held in room 1420 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78751.

The amendments and new rules are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; and Human Resources Code, §32.021(m), and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendments and new rules.

§357.1.Purpose and Scope.

(a) Purpose. The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is required by state law to promulgate uniform fair hearing rules for all Medicaid-funded services. [ An opportunity for a fair hearing is required by federal law and regulation in any Medicaid case for an individual whose claim for services is denied or not acted upon promptly. An opportunity for a fair hearing is also required when an operating agency or its designee takes action to suspend, terminate, or reduce services, including a denial of a prior authorization request for Medicaid-covered services. These fair hearing rules will also apply to any hearing involving the transfer or discharge of an individual from a nursing facility or to an individual adversely affected by the preadmission screening and annual resident review requirements. ]

(1) An opportunity for a fair hearing is required by federal law and regulation:

(A) in any Medicaid case for an individual whose claim for services is denied or not acted upon promptly;

(B) when an operating agency or its designee takes action to suspend, terminate, or reduce services, including a denial of a prior authorization request for Medicaid-covered services;

(C) when an Managed Care Organization (MCO) takes an action, as defined in §357.3 of this chapter (relating to Definitions);

(D) when an adverse determination is made by an operating agency or its designee with regard to the preadmission screening and annual resident review; or

(E) when a determination is made by a skilled nursing facility or nursing facility to transfer or discharge a resident.

(2) Expedited fair hearings. An individual enrolled in a Medicaid MCO may request an expedited fair hearing when:

(A) the MCO determines or the provider indicates that taking the time for a standard appeal and/or fair hearing could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's life or health or ability to attain, maintain, or regain maximum function; and

(B) the individual has exhausted his or her expedited MCO appeal rights.

(b) Scope.

(1) These rules establish fair hearing procedures , which an operating agency will follow when the operating agency is required to conduct a fair hearing for Medicaid-funded services.

(2) An individual's authorized representative, as defined by the operating agency, may, on the individual's behalf, take any step that the individual can take as described in these rules.

§357.3.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Action--

(A) Termination, suspension, or reduction of Medicaid eligibility or covered services by an operating agency or its designee, including:

(i) the denial of Medicaid eligibility;

(ii) the denial of program eligibility;

(iii) the denial of a prior authorization request for covered services; and

(iv) the failure of an operating agency or its designee to act within a reasonable amount of time on an individual's request for Medicaid covered services or for an eligibility determination.

(B) A decision made by an operating agency or its designee concerning disenrollment from an MCO.

(C) An adverse determination made by an operating agency or its designee with regard to the preadmission screening and annual resident review.

(D) When an MCO:

(i) denies or limits authorization of a requested service, including the type or level of service;

(ii) reduces, suspends, or terminates a previously authorized service;

(iii) denies, in whole or part, payment for services;

(iv) fails to provide services in a timely manner;

(v) fails to act within the timeframes for resolution of an MCO appeal required by contract under 42 CFR §438.408(b); or

(vi) denies a request from an individual, who is a resident of a rural area with only one MCO, to exercise his or her right, under 42 CFR §438.52(b)(2)(ii), to obtain services outside the network.

(E) A determination by a skilled nursing facility or nursing facility to transfer or discharge a resident.

(F) "Action" does not include expiration of a time-limited service.

[(1) Action--Termination, suspension, or reduction of Medicaid eligibility or covered services by an operating agency or its designee. "Action" includes the denial of Medicaid eligibility and the denial of program eligibility. The term also means determinations by skilled nursing facilities and nursing facilities to transfer or discharge residents and adverse determinations made by an operating agency or its designee with regard to the preadmission screening and annual resident review. "Action" includes a denial of a prior authorization request for covered services affecting an individual. The term also includes the failure of an operating agency or its designee to act upon an individual's request for Medicaid covered services or for an eligibility determination within a reasonable amount of time. "Action" does not include expiration of a time-limited service.]

(2) Adverse determination--Determination that the individual does not require the level of services provided by a nursing facility or that the individual does or does not require specialized services.

(3) Date of action--The intended date on which a termination, suspension, reduction, transfer, or discharge becomes effective. It also means the date of the determination made by an operating agency with regard to the preadmission screening and resident review.

(4) Day--Calendar day, unless otherwise specified.

(5) [ (4) ] Designee--A contractor of an operating agency authorized to take an action or adverse determination as defined in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this section on behalf of the operating agency.

(6) Fair Hearing--

(A) Expedited Fair Hearing--A fair hearing conducted by an operating agency and held within 3 business days after the receipt of the case file from the MCO for an individual who has exhausted the MCO's expedited appeal process.

(B) Standard Fair Hearing--A fair hearing conducted by an operating agency and held in accordance with this chapter in which a decision is made within 90 days after the receipt of a request.

(7) MCO Appeals--

(A) Expedited MCO appeal--An appeal conducted by an MCO and held within 3 business days after receipt of a request because the individual's health condition meets the criteria for an expedited MCO appeal, determined in accordance with §357.1(b)(2) of this title (relating to Purpose and Scope)

(B) Standard MCO appeal--An appeal conducted by an MCO and held within 30 days after receipt of the request.

(8) MCO--Medicaid managed care organization. An entity that has a current Texas Department of Insurance certificate of authority to operate as an HMO under Chapter 843 of the Texas Insurance Code or as an approved nonprofit health corporation under Chapter 844 of the Texas Insurance Code.

(9) [ (5) ] Medicaid eligibility--The eligibility of an individual to receive services under the Texas Medicaid program.

(10) [ (6) ] Operating agency--A state agency operating part of the Title XIX (Medicaid) program under the Social Security Act and includes the Department of Health, the Department of Human Services, the Rehabilitation Commission, and the Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation , and the Health and Human Services Commission .

(11) [ (7) ] Prior authorization request--a request for services that are reimbursable only when authorization or approval is obtained before services are rendered. Prior authorized services may be limited in duration, scope, and amount. Services provided beyond those authorized are not reimbursable. If a prior authorization is limited in duration, scope, or amount, a separate request and approval must be obtained for each prior authorized service.

(12) [ (8) ] Program eligibility--The eligibility of an individual to receive services within a particular Medicaid program.

§357.5.Notice of Agency Action .

(a) Advance Notice. An operating agency or its designee will deliver to an individual, at least 10 days before the date of action, written notice of the action and of the individual's right to request a standard fair hearing on the action, unless subsection (b) of this section provides otherwise.

[ (a) Agency Notice.]

[(1) Notice at time of action. If the action of the operating agency or its designee is the denial of Medicaid or program eligibility or the denial of a prior authorization request, at the time of action, the operating agency or its designee shall give an individual written notice of the individual's right to request a fair hearing on the action.]

[(2) Advance Notice. If an operating agency or its designee proposes to take an action other than the denial of Medicaid or program eligibility, denial of a prior authorization request, the failure to act upon an individual's request for Medicaid-covered services, or failure to determine eligibility within a reasonable amount of time, the operating agency or its designee shall deliver to the individual notice of the individual's right to request a hearing on the action at least ten days prior to the date of action unless the circumstances in subsection (b) of this section otherwise provide.]

(b) Exceptions to advance notice.

(1) Notice at time of action. An operating agency or its designee will mail written notice to an individual at the time of action if:

(A) the action is the denial of Medicaid or program eligibility; or

(B) the action is the denial of a prior authorization request.

(2) Notice not later than the date of action. An operating agency or its designee may mail written notice to an individual not later than the date of action if:

(A) the operating agency or its designee has factual information confirming the death of the individual;

(B) the operating agency or its designee receives a clear written statement signed by the individual that:

(i) he or she no longer wishes services; or

(ii) gives information that requires termination or reduction of services and indicates that he or she understands that this must be the result of supplying that information;

(C) the individual has been admitted to an institution where he or she is ineligible for further services;

(D) the individual's whereabouts are unknown and the post office returns agency or designee mail directed to him or her indicating no forwarding address;

(E) the operating agency or its designee establishes the fact that the individual has been accepted for Medicaid services by another state;

(F) a change in the level of medical care is prescribed by the individual's physician;

(G) the notice involves an adverse determination made with regard to the preadmission screening requirements; or

(H) the action is the transfer or discharge of a resident from a nursing facility and the date of action will occur in less than 10 days pursuant to 42 CFR §483.12(a)(5)(ii) because:

(i) the safety or health of individuals in the facility would be endangered;

(ii) the resident's health improves sufficiently to allow a more immediate transfer or discharge;

(iii) an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; or

(iv) a resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days.

(3) Notice not required. An operating agency or its designee is not required to provide notice of the agency's or designee's:

(A) failure to act upon an individual's request for Medicaid-covered services; or

(B) failure to determine eligibility within a reasonable amount of time.

[(b) Exceptions. The operating agency or its designee may mail written notice to an individual not later than the date of action if:]

[(1) the operating agency or its designee has factual information confirming the death of the individual;]

[(2) the operating agency or its designee receives a clear written statement signed by the individual that:]

[(A) he or she no longer wishes services; or]

[(B) gives information that requires termination or reduction in services and indicates that he or she understands that this must be the result of supplying that information;]

[(3) the individual has been admitted to an institution where he or she is ineligible for further services;]

[(4) the individual's whereabouts are unknown and the post office returns agency or designee mail directed to him or her indicating no forwarding address;]

[(5) the operating agency or its designee establishes the fact that the individual has been accepted for Medicaid services by another state;]

[(6) a change in the level of medical care is prescribed by the individual's physician;]

[(7) the notice involves an adverse determination made with regard to the preadmission screening requirements; or]

[(8) the action is the transfer or discharge of a resident from a nursing facility and the date of action will occur in less than ten days pursuant to 42 C.F.R. §483.12(a)(5)(ii) because:]

[(A) the safety or health of individuals in the facility would be endangered;]

[(B) the resident's health improves sufficiently to allow a more immediate transfer or discharge;]

[(C) an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; or ]

[(D) a resident has not resided in the facility for thirty days.]

(c) Content of Notice. The notice will [ shall ] contain:

(1) the action that the operating agency, its designee, or nursing facility is taking in the case of a denial of Medicaid or program eligibility , a decision concerning disenrollment from an MCO, [ or ] a denial of a prior authorization request, or that the operating agency intends to take in the case of any other action except for failing to act upon an individual's request for Medicaid covered services or for an eligibility determination within a reasonable amount of time;

(2) the date of action;

(3) a statement of the reason for the action;

(4) a reference to the statutory or regulatory authority supporting the action, or the change in federal or state law that requires the action;

(5) an explanation of the individual's right to request a standard fair hearing and the procedure for requesting same;

(6) a statement that the individual may represent himself or herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson;

(7) the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions regarding the standard fair hearing process; and

(8) an explanation of the circumstances under which services are continued, or a transfer or discharge is deferred, if a standard fair hearing is requested.

(d) Timeframe for Requesting a Hearing. The operating agency and its designee must allow the individual to request a standard fair hearing within 90 days from the date the notice of agency action [ required under subsection (a) of this section ] is mailed.

(1) The request for a standard fair hearing must be submitted according to the instructions provided in the notice of agency action sent to the individual [ under subsection (a) of this section ].

(2) If a request for a standard fair hearing is not received by the operating agency or its designee before the date of action, the action may be taken or allowed.

(3) If a request for a standard fair hearing is not received by the operating agency or its designee within the 90-day period, the individual is deemed to have waived the hearing and the action becomes final.

§357.6.Notice of MCO Action and Resolution of MCO Appeals.

(a) Notice of MCO action

(1) Advance notice. An MCO must deliver to an individual, at least 10 days before the date of action, written notice of the action and of the individual's right to request an MCO appeal and/or a standard fair hearing on the action, unless paragraph (2) of this subsection provides otherwise.

(2) Exceptions to Advance Notice.

(A) An MCO may mail written notice to an individual not later than the date of action under a circumstance described in §357.5(b)(2) of this chapter (relating to Notice of Agency Action).

(B) An MCO may mail written notice to an individual at the time of action if the action is:

(i) denial or limited authorization of a requested service, including the type or level of service;

(ii) denial, in whole or in part, of payment for a service; or

(iii) denial of a request from an individual, who is a resident of a rural area with only one MCO, to exercise his or her right under 42 CFR §438.52(b)(2)(ii) to obtain services outside the network.

(C) An MCO is not required to provide notice of the following actions:

(i) failure to provide services in a timely manner; or

(ii) failure to act within the timeframes for resolution of an MCO appeal required by contract under 42 CFR §438.408(b).

(b) Content of notice of MCO action: The notice must contain:

(1) the action that the MCO is taking or intends to take;

(2) the date of the action;

(3) the reason for the action;

(4) a reference to the statutory or regulatory authority supporting the action, or the change in federal or state law that requires the action;

(5) an explanation of:

(A) the individual's right to request an MCO appeal;

(B) the provider's right to request an MCO appeal on behalf of the individual, with the individual's written consent;

(C) the circumstances under which an expedited MCO appeal is available;

(D) the procedures and timeframes for requesting a standard MCO appeal and an expedited MCO appeal;

(E) a statement that the individual may represent himself or herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson at an MCO appeal; and

(F) the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions regarding the MCO appeal process.

(6) An explanation of:

(A) the individual's right to request a standard fair hearing;

(B) the procedures and timeframes for requesting a standard fair hearing;

(C) a statement that the individual may represent himself or herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson at a fair hearing;

(D) the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions regarding the fair hearing process; and

(7) an explanation of the individual's right to have benefits continue pending resolution of an MCO appeal or a standard fair hearing, how to request that benefits be continued, and the circumstances under which the individual may be required to pay the costs of these services.

(c) Criteria for expedited MCO appeal. An individual meets the criteria for an expedited MCO appeal when the MCO determines (for a request from an individual) or the provider indicates (in making the request on the individual's behalf or supporting the individual's request) that taking the time for resolution of a standard MCO appeal could seriously jeopardize the individual's life or health or ability to attain, maintain, or regain maximum function.

(d) Timeframes for resolution of an MCO appeal.

(1) Standard MCO appeal--for resolution of a standard MCO appeal, the MCO must resolve and provide notice of the resolution to the affected parties within 30 days of receipt of the request. The timeframe may be extended in accordance with paragraph (3) of this subsection.

(2) Expedited MCO appeal--for resolution of an expedited MCO appeal, the MCO must resolve and provide notice of the resolution to the affected parties within 3 business days after receipt of the request. The timeframe may be extended in accordance with paragraph (3) of this subsection. The MCO must also make a reasonable effort to provide oral notice of the resolution to the individual.

(3) Extension of timeframes.

(A) An MCO may extend the timeframes described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection up to 14 days if:

(i) the individual requests the extension; or

(ii) the MCO shows (to the satisfaction of the operating agency, upon its request) that there is need for additional information and how the delay is in the individual's interest.

(B) If the MCO extends the timeframes, it must, for any extension not requested by the individual, give the individual written notice of the reason for the delay.

(e) Notice of MCO appeal resolution. The notice must contain:

(1) the results of the resolution process and the date the appeal was resolved; and

(2) for appeals not wholly resolved in favor of the individual:

(A) the reason for upholding the action;

(B) a reference to the statutory or regulatory authority supporting the action, or the change in federal or state law that requires the action;

(C) an explanation of:

(i) the individual's right to request a fair hearing;

(ii) the circumstances under which an expedited fair hearing is available; and

(iii) the procedures and timeframes for requesting an expedited and standard fair hearing;

(D) a statement that the individual may represent himself or herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson at the fair hearing;

(E) the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions regarding the fair hearing process; and

(F) an explanation that;

(i) the individual has the right to request to receive benefits while the fair hearing is pending and how to make the request; and

(ii) the individual may be held liable for the cost of those benefits if the fair hearing decision upholds the MCO's action.

(f) Timeframe for requesting a standard fair hearing. The operating agency or its designee must allow the individual to request a standard fair hearing within 90 days after the date the notice of MCO action was mailed as required by subsection (a) of this section.

(1) The request for a standard fair hearing must be submitted according to the instructions provided in the notice of MCO appeal resolution as required by subsection (e) of this section.

(2) If a request for a standard fair hearing is not received within the 90-day period, the individual is deemed to have waived the right for a standard fair hearing and the action becomes final.

(g) Timeframe for requesting an expedited fair hearing. The operating agency or its designee must allow the individual to request an expedited fair hearing within 10 days after the date the notice of MCO appeal resolution is sent.

(1) The request for an expedited fair hearing must be submitted according to the instructions provided in the notice of MCO expedited appeal resolution.

(2) If a request for an expedited fair hearing is not received within the 10 day period, the individual is deemed to have waived the right for an expedited fair hearing. A request received after the tenth day will be considered a request for a standard fair hearing.

§357.7.Maintaining Benefits or Services.

(a) Except as otherwise specified in subsections (b), (d) and (e) of this section, if the action is other than a denial of Medicaid or program eligibility or a denial of a prior authorization request and a request for hearing is received before the date of action, the action will not be taken and services will be continued until a final decision is rendered following a fair hearing.

(b) The operating agency or its designee may terminate or reduce services before a hearing decision is rendered if:

(1) it is determined at the fair hearing that the sole issue is one of state or federal law or policy; and

(2) the operating agency or its designee informs the individual in writing of its intent to reduce or terminate services pending the hearing decision at least 5 [ five ] days before the termination or reduction would be effective.

(c) The operating agency or its designee may recover or recoup the cost of any services provided to the individual to the extent that the services were furnished solely by reason of this section if the fair hearing decision supports the operating agency's or designee's action.

(d) If notice is mailed under §357.5(b) of this chapter (relating to Notice of Agency Action ) and the operating agency or its designee receives the individual's request for a hearing within 10 [ ten ] days of the mailing of the notice, and the operating agency or its designee determines that the action resulted from something other than the application of federal or state law or policy, the operating agency or its designee will reinstate and continue an individual's services until a hearing decision is rendered.

(e) The operating agency or its designee has no obligation to begin services requiring prior authorization pending a final decision.

§357.11.Preliminary Matters for a Standard Fair Hearing .

(a) Notification of Standard Fair Hearing. The hearing official will [ shall ], at least 10 [ ten ] days prior to the date of the fair hearing, send a written notification of the fair hearing to the individual who has requested the fair hearing.

(1) This notice will be sent to the address of record for the individual or to the address indicated in the request for fair hearing.

(2) The notification will [ shall ] contain:

(A) the basis of the [ proposed ] action or intended action ;

(B) the time, date, and location [ place ] of the fair hearing;

(C) a statement that the individual may request the fair hearing to be conducted based on the taking of oral testimony (an "oral hearing"), or a fair hearing based on written information contained in any appropriate file and additional written information that the individual may wish to submit for consideration (a "document hearing"), as is described in §357.17 of this chapter (relating to Document Hearing);

(D) a statement that the individual may request any reasonable accommodation required due to disability or language comprehension;

(E) a statement that, before and during the fair hearing, the individual may request to examine any appropriate file and documents or records the operating agency wants the hearing official to consider; and

(F) instructions on submitting written medical information for the hearing official to consider and the deadline for submitting that information.

(b) Access to Records

(1) Upon the individual's request, the individual will [ shall ] be given the opportunity to examine any appropriate file, and other documents or records the operating agency wants the hearing official to consider.

(2) If the individual intends to introduce written medical information at the fair hearing, that information must be submitted to the hearing official at least 5 [ five ] days prior to the fair hearing, to allow the operating agency to obtain a review of the material by medical staff persons. The failure to so submit such medical information shall not render the material inadmissible, but the hearing official will [ shall ] be permitted to keep the hearing record open. The hearing official may request a medical review by the operating agency of the submitted material. If a hearing official requests a medical review, the hearing official will mail a copy of that medical review to the individual within 7 [ seven ] days after the hearing. The individual will have 10 [ ten ] days from the date the medical review was mailed to submit to the hearing official a written response or rebuttal to the medical review. The hearing official will close the hearing record at the end of the tenth day from the date the medical review was mailed to the individual.

(c) Representation. An individual may represent himself or herself, or be represented by legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other designated spokesperson. If the individual does not appear at the hearing, the operating agency may require the submission of documentation demonstrating that the representative appearing on the individual's behalf has authority to represent the individual.

(d) Additional Medical Assessment. If the hearing involves medical issues such as those concerning a diagnosis, an examining physician's report, or a medical review team's decision, and if the hearing official considers it necessary to have a medical assessment other than that of the person involved in making the original decision, that medical assessment must be obtained at the operating agency's expense and made part of the record.

§357.12.Preliminary Matters for an Expedited Fair Hearing for Individuals Enrolled With an MCO.

(a) Notification of Expedited Fair Hearing. The hearing official will notify the individual who has requested the fair hearing of the date and time of the fair hearing via a telephone call or fax. The notification will contain:

(1) the basis of the action or intended action;

(2) the time, date, and location of the expedited fair hearing;

(3) a statement that the individual may request the expedited fair hearing to be conducted based on the taking of oral testimony (an "oral hearing") or an expedited fair hearing based on written medical information contained in any appropriate file and additional medical information that the individual may wish to submit for consideration (a "document hearing"), as described in §357.17 of this chapter (relating to Document Hearing);

(4) a statement that the individual may request any reasonable accommodation required due to disability or language comprehension;

(5) instructions on submitting written medical information for the hearing official to consider and the deadline for submitting that information.

(b) Access to Records

(1) Information submitted by the MCO. Upon receipt of the individual's request for an expedited fair hearing, the hearing office staff will notify the MCO and require the MCO to deliver, within 1 business day, a copy of all of the information the MCO used for resolving the expedited MCO appeal to:

(A) the hearing official; and

(B) the individual.

(2) Information submitted by the individual.

(A) The individual may submit written medical information prior to the hearing, at the hearing or within 10 days after the hearing;

(B) The hearing official may request a medical review by the operating agency of the submitted material.

(C) If the individual submits written medical information less than 3 business days prior to the hearing, then:

(i) The hearing official may keep the hearing record open for up to 3 business days after receipt of the material.

(ii) The individual waives the 3-business-day timeframe for the hearing official to make a decision; and

(iii) The hearing official will make a decision no later than the end of the third business day after receipt of the material.

(c) Representation. An individual may represent himself or herself, or be represented by legal counsel, a relative, a friend or other designated spokesperson. If the individual does not appear at the expedited fair hearing, the operating agency may require the submission of documentation demonstrating that the representative appearing on the individual's behalf has authority to represent the individual.

§357.13.Location of Hearing and Accommodations.

(a) The hearing official will [ shall ] determine the location of the hearing or whether it is appropriate to conduct the hearing by telecommunication as provided in §357.15 of this chapter [ title ] (relating to Telecommunication). In making this determination, the hearing official will consider the location of the individual.

(b) Accommodations.

(1) The operating agency will provide:

(A) any reasonable accommodation for disclosed disabilities;

(B) suitable interpretation for individuals with limited English proficiency.

(2) Requests for any reasonable accommodation and requests fro an interpreter shall be made to the hearing official as follows:

(A) for a standard fair hearing--in writing, at least 3 days prior to the hearing; and

(B) for an expedited fair hearing--at the time the individual is notified of the expedited fair hearing.

[(b) The operating agency shall provide any reasonable accommodation for disclosed disabilities. Requests for any reasonable accommodation should be made in writing to the hearing official at least three days prior to the hearing date.]

[(c) The operating agency shall provide suitable interpretation for individuals with limited English proficiency. Requests for an interpreter should be made in writing to the hearing official at least three days prior to the hearing date.]

§357.17.Document Hearing.

(a) The standard fair hearing may be conducted based on the written information contained in any appropriate file and additional written information submitted to the hearing official and the other party not less than 5 [ five ] days prior to the fair hearing without the necessity of taking oral testimony, provided that the parties are given the opportunity to respond to any written material submitted.

(b) The expedited fair hearing may be conducted based on the written information contained in the MCO case file and any additional written information submitted by the individual.

(1) The individual must submit any additional written information within 10 business days after receiving notification of the expedited fair hearing as described in §357.12(a) of this chapter (relating to Preliminary Matters for an Expedited Fair Hearing for Individuals Enrolled with an MCO).

(2) If the individual submits additional written information less than 3 business days prior to the hearing, then:

(A) the individual waives the 3-business-day timeframe for the hearing official to make a decision; and

(B) the hearing official will make a decision no later than the end of the third business day after receipt of the information.

§357.21.Burden of Proof.

(a) The operating agency bears the burden of proof in a fair hearing on an action described in §357.3(1)(A) - (F) of this chapter (relating to Definitions) [ or an adverse determination ].

(b) The MCO bears the burden of proof in a fair hearing on an action described in §357.3(a) of this chapter (relating to Definitions).

(c) [ (b) ] The nursing facility bears the burden of proof in a fair hearing on an action described in §357.3(1)(E) of this chapter (relating to Definitions) [ transfer or discharge case ].

(d) [ (c) ] The individual bears the burden on any issue requiring the showing of "good cause" or an affirmative defense to the action or adverse determination.

§357.23.Procedural Rights of the Individual.

The individual has the right to:

(1) examine at a reasonable time before the date of the fair hearing and during the hearing the contents of any appropriate file, and all documents and records to be considered by the hearing official [ used by the operating agency or nursing facility at the hearing ];

(2) bring witnesses;

(3) establish all pertinent facts and circumstances;

(4) present an argument without undue interference; and

(5) question or refute any testimony or evidence, including the opportunity to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses.

§357.25.Dismissal of Hearing.

The hearing official will [ shall ] dismiss a request for a fair hearing and the [ proposed ] action becomes final [ may be taken ] if the individual withdraws the request in writing or fails to appear at the scheduled hearing without good cause.

§357.29.Hearing Decisions.

(a) Fair hearing [ Hearing ] decisions must be based exclusively on evidence introduced at the hearing and received in evidence.

(b) The operating agency or its designee may grant, deny, terminate, suspend, modify, or reduce services in accordance with the hearing decision as rendered following a fair hearing.

(c) Record. The record of the hearing consists of the following:

(1) A transcript or recording of testimony and exhibits received in evidence.

(2) All documents and requests for admission, together with the ruling on admissibility made by the hearing official.

(3) The hearing official's decision, composed of a statement of the persuasive evidence, findings of fact and conclusions of law (identifying the relevant regulations and/or statutes), and a statement of restored benefits, if appropriate.

(d) Fair Hearing Decision Timeframes.

(1) Standard fair hearing--the hearing official will make a decision and send a copy of the decision to the individual within 90 days of the date of the request for a standard fair hearing, unless the individual waived the 90 day requirement in writing.

(2) Expedited Fair Hearing--the hearing official will make a decision and send a copy of the decision to the individual within 3 business days after the receipt of the case file from the MCO, unless the individual waives the 3-day requirement. The hearing official will make a reasonable effort to notify the individual via telephone or facsimile if requested by the individual.

[(d) The hearing decision must be made and a copy of the decision furnished to the individual within 90 days of the request for a fair hearing unless the individual waives the 90-day requirement in writing.]

(e) If the action was taken [ proposed ] by a designee of the operating agency, the operating agency will promptly [ also ] notify the designee of its decision. The decision of the operating agency is binding on the designee.

(f) Fair hearing [ Hearing ] decisions are available to the public, subject to the requirements under federal and/or state law for safeguarding information relating to the Medicaid program and for protecting the privacy of individually identifiable health information .

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303622

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Chapter 370. STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM

Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, establishes the State Child Health Plan authorized under Title XXI of the federal Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§1397aa, et seq. Section 62.051, Health and Safety Code, designates the Commission as the agency responsible for developing the state-designed child health plan program for Texas, making policy for the program, and adopting rules as necessary to implement Chapter 62.

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC or Commission) proposes to amend Chapter 370, State Children's Health Insurance Program. Specifically, the HHSC proposes amendments to Subchapter A, §370.4 and §370.10, concerning Program Administration; Subchapter B, Division 1, §§370.20-370.25, concerning TexCare Partnership Application Process; Division 2, §370.30, §370.31, concerning Applicant Rights and Responsibilities Regarding Application and Eligibility; Division 3, §370.40, concerning Eligibility Determination; Division 4, §§370.43, 370.44, 370.46, 370.48, 370.49, concerning Eligibility Criteria; Division 5, §§370.51-370.54, concerning Review and Reconsideration of Eligibility Denials and Temporary Enrollment and new Subchapter C, Division 1, §§370.301, 370.303, 370.305, 370.307, 370.309, concerning TexCare Enrollment and Division 2, §§370.321, 370.323 and 370.325, concerning Cost-Sharing Requirements. Throughout the Chapter, the proposed amendments replace "TCP" (an abbreviation of TexCare Partnership), wherever it occurs, with "TexCare." In subchapter A, Program Administration, §370.4, Definitions, the definitions for "income deductions" and "Texas Healthy Kids Corporation" are deleted. In addition, a definition was added for "gross budget group income." The definition of "income eligibility standard" was changed to mean the "monthly gross budget group income." The definitions have been renumbered to reflect the proposed changes.

Amendments are proposed to several rules in subchapter B, Application Screening, Referral and Processing. The amendments are based on legislative changes to income eligibility standards and removal of the deduction allowances. In Division 1, TexCare application process, the proposed amendment to §370.22, Completion of telephone applications, adds a child's social security number or proof of application to the Social Security Administration for a social security number to the information that must be included in an application. Under the amendments, certain information on budget groups no longer need be included in the application.

In Division 4, Eligibility criteria, the proposed amendment to §370.43, Citizenship and residency, adds refugee letters to the documents that may be submitted to show that a child is a qualified alien. The proposed amendment to §370.44, currently Income (as proposed, Income and assets), deletes language concerning net income and income deductions and adds language concerning gross income. Under the proposed amendment, a gross income test will be used to determine eligibility. The proposal also deletes provisions concerning verification of income deductions. Section 370.44, as proposed, requires an assets test for budget groups with a gross monthly income greater than 150% of the federal poverty level (FPL).

Section 370.46 governs the waiting period and is amended to reflect legislative changes to §62.154, Health and Safety Code, which requires a 90-day waiting period for applicants determined to be CHIP eligible but who do not meet certain program exceptions. As proposed, the waiting period would begin on the first day of the month in which or after which the child is enrolled in CHIP, depending on whether enrollment is before or after the 15th of the month. The proposal also adds to the exempt category children who have access to group-based health benefits plan coverage and who are required to participate in HHSC's premium payment reimbursement program.

The Commission is also proposing new Subchapter C, Enrollment, Disenrollment, and Renewal of Membership. Proposed language in Divisions 1 and 2 removes the requirement of an annual enrollment fee. Proposed Division 1, TexCare Enrollment, addresses enrollment issues. Proposed new §370.301 identifies the contents of the CHIP enrollment packet. Section 370.303 explains how to complete the enrollment process. Section 370.305 governs the enrollment process for children with complex special health care needs. Section 370.307 addresses CHIP's continuous enrollment period. Under the proposed new rule, a child determined to be CHIP eligible will remain enrolled for a period of 6 months. This is a change from the previous continuous eligibility period of 12 months for CHIP. Section 370.309 explains what happens if an enrollment packet is submitted that is incomplete or missing required information.

Division 2, Cost-Sharing Requirements, of proposed new subchapter C governs cost-sharing requirements. Sections 370.321, 370.323, and 370.325 explain the cost-sharing requirements, the exemptions to cost-sharing, and the annual cost-sharing cap. Under proposed §370.321, cost-sharing requirements, cost sharing may be determined based on the maximum levels authorized under federal law and applied to income levels so as to maximize administrative costs. Proposed §370.325, Annual cost-sharing cap, establishes a cost sharing cap of 2.5% of gross income during the 6-month coverage period for budget groups at or below 150% of FPL. Budget groups with gross income during the 6-month coverage period greater than 150% of FPL have a cost-sharing cap equal to 5% of its gross income.

The proposed amendments will bring CHIP into compliance with federal law, H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., Regular .Session. (2003), and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003). The proposed amendments also update references, delete unnecessary terms and provisions, and make other non-substantive changes for clarification.

Tom Suehs, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that a savings would result from the proposed amended and new rules. Annual savings to General Revenue funds are; $83.8M in FY04, $103.4 in FY05, $87.1M in FY06, $90.6M in FY07, and $94.2M in FY08.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses to comply with this proposal. This was determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with the rules as proposed. There is no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the amended and new rules as proposed. There is no anticipated fiscal impact to local government. The proposal will not negatively impact local employment.

Mr. Suehs has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the proposal, will be to continue to make low-cost insurance available for children of low-income families within levels of available appropriated funds. However, public hospitals and medical facilities may incur more cost as uninsured children seek medical attention.

HHSC has determined that none of the proposed amended and new rules is a "major environmental rule" as defined by §2001.0225, Government Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely and materially affect the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. None of the proposed amended or new rules is specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.

HHSC has evaluated the takings impact of the proposed rules under §2007.043, Government Code. HHSC has determined that this action does not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking. The proposed amended and new rules are administrative and do not impose any new regulatory requirements. The proposal is reasonably taken to fulfill requirements of state law.

Public comment may be submitted in writing to Greg Holt, Health and Human Services Commission, by mail addressed to P.O. Box 13247, Austin, Texas 78711, or email at Greg.Holt@hhsc.state.tx.us. Comments must be submitted by 5:00 p.m., Central Time, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register . Further information may be obtained by calling Gregory Holt at (512) 685-3145.

HHSC has scheduled a public hearing to accept public testimony regarding the proposed rules. The hearing will be held from 28:00 to 512:00 p.m., Central Time, on July 164, 2003, in the Public Hearing Room of the Brown-Heatly State Office Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. Persons requiring further information, special assistance, or accommodations should contact Linda Williams, Medicaid/CHIP, 512-424-6646 or linda.williams@hhsc.state.tx.us.

Subchapter A. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION

1 TAC §370.4, §370.10

The amendments are proposed under §531.033, Government Code, which authorizes the commissioner of health and human services to adopt rules necessary to carry out HHSC's duties under Chapter 531; under §62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which directs HHSC to adopt rules necessary to implement Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, concerning CHIP; and under §2001.006, Government Code, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

No other statutory provisions are affected by the proposed rules.

§370.4.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) "Administrative Contractor" means the entity that performs administrative services for the CHIP under contract with the Commission.

(2) "Entrant" [ Alien ] means a person who is not a native born or naturalized citizen of the United States of America.

(3) "Applicant" means an individual who lives with the child and applies for health insurance coverage on behalf of the child. An applicant can only be:

(A) a child's custodial parent, whether natural or adoptive;

(B) a child's grandparent, relative or other adult who provides care for the child;

(C) an emancipated minor applying for himself/herself; or

(D) a child's step-parent.

(4) "Application" means the standardized, written document issued by TexCare [ TCP ] that an applicant must complete to apply for health care benefits or coverage through CHIP.

(5) "Application completion date" means the calendar date a completed CHIP application is entered into the TexCare [ TCP ] database.

(6) "Budget Group" means the group of individuals who live in the home with the child for whom an application for health insurance is submitted and whose information is used to establish family size and calculate income. Individuals receiving Supplemental Security Income payments are not included in the Budget group. Budget group members include only:

(A) the child seeking health insurance benefits;

(B) the child's siblings who live with the child (biological, adopted, or step-siblings);

(C) the child's natural or adoptive parents; or

(D) the child's step-parent.

(7) "Children's Health Insurance Program" or "CHIP" means the Texas State Children's Health Insurance Program established under Title XXI of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C, §§1397aa, et seq.) and chapters 62 and 63, Health and Safety Code.

(8) "Commission" or "HHSC" means the Health and Human Services Commission.

(9) "Completed application" means an application entered into the TexCare [ TCP ] database that includes all information required under §370.23.

(10) "Countable income" means any type of payment that is a regular and predictable gain or a benefit to a budget group that is not specifically exempted. Regular and predictable income is income received in one month that is either likely to be received in the next month and/or was received on a regular and predictable basis in past months. It does not include income that is not received on a regular and predictable basis in past months, or is received by the child or sibling member of the budget group who is enrolled in school.

(11) "Children's Health Insurance Program Service Area" or "CSA" means one of the designated areas in the state that is served by one or more of the CHIP Health Plans or the CHIP Exclusive Provider Organization.

(12) "Community-based Organization" or "CBO" means an organization that contracts with the Commission to provide outreach services to applicants for CHIP coverage.

[(13) "Dental Plan" means an insurance company, health maintenance organization, or other entity regulated by the Texas Department of Insurance that contracts with the Commission to provide dental benefits coverage to CHIP members.]

[(14) "Department" or "TDH" means the Texas Department of Health.]

[(15) "Income deductions" means standardized deductions that are applied to the countable income of the budget group during the CHIP application process.]

(13) [ (16) ] "Enrollment" means the process by which a child determined to be eligible for CHIP is enrolled in a CHIP health plan serving the CHIP Service Area in which the child resides.

(14) [ (17) ] "Exempt income" means income received by the budget group that is not counted in determining income eligibility.

(15) [ (18) ] "FPL" means Federal Poverty Level Income Guidelines.

(16) [ (19) ] "Health Plan" means a licensed health maintenance organization, indemnity carrier, or authorized exclusive provider organization that contracts with the Commission to provide health benefits coverage to CHIP members.

(17) [ (20) ] "Income eligibility standard" means monthly gross [ net ] budget group income at or below 200% of current (FPL). A child meets the CHIP income eligibility standard if the budget group's monthly gross [ net ] income exceeds the income eligibility standard applied to the child in the Texas Medicaid Program and is at or below the 200% of FPL CHIP monthly income standard.

(18) [ (21) ] "Member" means a child enrolled in a CHIP Health Plan.

(19) [ (22) ] " Gross [ Net ] budget group income" means monthly countable income before any payroll [ minus ] deductions.

(20) [ (23) ] "Qualified Entrant [ Alien ]" means an alien who applies for CHIP coverage and who, at the time of such application, satisfies the criteria established under 8 U.S.C. §1641(b).

(21) [ (24) ] "SSI" means Supplemental Security Income.

(22) [ (25) ] "State fiscal year" means the 12-month period beginning September 1 of each calendar year and ending August 31 of the following calendar year.

(23) [ (26) ] "TexCare" [ "Partnership" or "TCP" ] means the name designated to publicly identify the operational entity that provides administrative services for the CHIP program.

[(27) "Texas Healthy Kids Corporation" or "THKC" means the non-profit corporation established under chapter 109, Health & Safety Code.]

(24) [ (28) ] "TDHS" means the Texas Department of Human Services.

§370.10.Duties and Responsibilities of the Commission.

The Commission is the state agency whose responsibilities include, but are not limited to [ , ] the following:

(1) developing a state-designed CHIP to obtain health benefits coverage for children in low-income families in a manner that qualifies for federal funding under Title XXI of the Social Security Act;

(2) making policy for CHIP, including policy related to covered benefits provided under the program, a duty which the Commission may not delegate to another agency or entity;

(3) overseeing the implementation of CHIP;

(4) adopting necessary rules to implement CHIP;

(5) contracting with appropriate individuals and organizations to provide CHIP benefits coverage, community-based outreach, and other services related to the implementation or operation of the CHIP program;

(6) conducting a review of each entity that enters into a contract with the Commission to ensure that the entity is available, prepared and able to fulfill the entity's obligations under the contract; and

(7) ensuring that amounts spent for CHIP administration do not exceed any limit on administrative expenditures imposed by federal law.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303623

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Subchapter B. APPLICATION SCREENING, REFERRAL AND PROCESSING

1. TEXCARE PARTNERSHIP APPLICATION PROCESS

1 TAC §§370.20 - 370.25

The amendments are proposed under §62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033, Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.

The amendments implement §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.

§370.20.Availability and method of initiating an application.

The TexCare [ TCP ] application process may be initiated:

(1) in writing from an application booklet available from TexCare [ TCP ] upon telephone request. The application booklet may also be available through CBOs, local organizations that support CBO outreach efforts, and participating CHIP health care providers;

(2) by computer using printable applications available over the Internet from the TexCare [ TCP ] website; or

(3) by telephone through TexCare's [ TCP's ] toll-free telephone number or through TDD.

§370.21.Application assistance.

An applicant for CHIP coverage may obtain assistance completing the application:

(1) by telephone from TexCare [ TCP ] staff during hours that are posted on the TexCare [ TCP ] website or published in applications, brochures, or other marketing media issued or approved by TexCare [ TCP ]. Telephone applications may also be accepted by TexCare [ TCP ] staff;

(2) by telephone or in person from a local CBO; or

(3) by telephone or in person from a licensed insurance agent or broker that contracts with a CHIP health plan or CBO, provided the applicant is not directly or indirectly induced to enroll in a specific health plan.

§370.22.Completion of telephone applications.

If an applicant telephones to apply, TexCare [ TCP ] completes as much of the application as possible over the telephone, prints it, and mails it to the applicant. The applicant is responsible for completing any missing information, signing the application, attaching all required verifications, and returning it to TexCare [ TCP ].

§370.23.Contents of completed applications.

A completed application must include the following:

(1) Information concerning the applicant, consisting of:

(A) The applicant's full name;

(B) The applicant's home address (including city, county, state and zip code); and

(C) The applicant's mailing address (including city, county, state, and zip code) if different from the home address;

(2) Information concerning each child for whom an application is filed, consisting of:

(A) The child's full name;

(B) A description of the applicant's relationship to the child;

(C) The child's date of birth;

(D) The child's Social Security Number or proof of application to the Social Security Administration to receive a social security number;

(E) [ (D) ] The child's status as a United States citizen or a legal resident;

(F) [ (E) ] The full name of the child's mother or father;

(G) [ (F) ] If the child has income reported on the application, the child's school status; and

(H) [ (G) ] Confirmation by the applicant whether the child currently has health insurance[ , or had health insurance within 90 days prior to the date the application is being completed ] or Medicaid.

(3) Information concerning the budget group, including:

(A) budget group income, including the name of the person receiving the income, the employer or source of the income, the amount received, and the frequency of receipt; and

(B) whether anyone in the budget group is pregnant;

[(C) whether anyone in the budget group pays for child or disabled adult care to permit a budget group member to work or receive training;]

[(D) whether anyone in the budget group pays child support and/or alimony to anyone outside the home;]

(4) the applicant's original signature and the date of signature; and

(5) required income, immigration status, and income deduction verifications.

§370.24.Electronic Entry of Application Information.

Within three working days from receipt of an application TexCare [ TCP ]:

(1) enters the application, regardless of origin or completeness, into a database;

(2) date-stamps the application; and

(3) assigns a unique application identification number.

§370.25.Incomplete applications.

(a) Missing information.

(1) TexCare [ TCP ] monitors the status of entered, incomplete application information.

(2) If it receives an incomplete application, TexCare [ TCP ] sends the applicant an initial follow-up letter requesting the missing information. TexCare [ TCP ] will send the initial follow-up letter within two working days from the date the application information is entered into the database.

(3) If TexCare [ TCP ] does not receive the requested missing information within 14 calendar days, TexCare [ TCP ] sends the applicant a second follow-up letter requesting the missing information.

(b) Missing signatures.

(1) If an application is incomplete because it lacks the signature of the applicant, or a parent, or the step-parent in the budget group, TexCare [ TCP ] enters the application information into the database, then produces and mails an application back to the applicant for signature.

(2) The application remains incomplete until TexCare [ TCP ] receives the signed application and enters receipt of the signed application into the database.

(c) Termination of an incomplete application.

(1) If an application remains incomplete 90 calendar days from the date TexCare [ TCP ] entered the incomplete application information into the database, the application process is terminated.

(2) An applicant whose application is terminated because it is incomplete must complete a new TexCare [ TCP ] application before CHIP coverage is provided.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303624

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


2. APPLICANT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES REGARDING APPLICATION AND ELIGIBILITY

1 TAC §370.30, §370.31

The amendments are proposed adopted under § 62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033, Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.

The proposed rules implement §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.

§370.30.Applicant rights.

An applicant has the right to:

(1) be treated fairly and equally regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, political beliefs or disability;

(2) request a review and/or reconsideration of an adverse decision related to CHIP eligibility, disenrollment, or increased cost sharing

(3) file a complaint, in writing or by telephone, about the application process for reasons other than an eligibility decision, disenrollment, or an increase in cost-sharing within 30 working days from the date of an incident. TexCare [ TCP ] must respond in writing within 15 working days.

§370.31.Applicant responsibilities.

(a) An applicant is responsible for:

(1) correctly and truthfully completing the TexCare [ TCP ] application form regardless of where the application was obtained;

(2) providing all required verifications; and

(3) mailing the completed, signed application along with all required verifications to TexCare [ TCP ].

(b) If an applicant intentionally misrepresents information on an application to receive a program benefit, the applicant:

(1) is responsible for reimbursing the state for the cost of improperly paid benefits; and

(2) may be subject to prosecution under the Texas Penal Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303625

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


3. ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION

1 TAC §370.40

The amendment is proposed under §62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033, Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.

The proposed rule implements §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.

§370.40.Determining Eligibility.

(a) Once TexCare [ TCP ] enters a completed application into the database, the automated eligibility system passes the information through an eligibility screen to determine potential eligibility for CHIP[ , ] or Medicaid[ , or THKC ].

(b) CHIP eligibility is determined not later than the 30th day after the date a complete application is submitted on behalf of a child, unless the child is referred for Medicaid application in accordance with the criteria specified in Sections 370.43 through 370.47.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303626

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


4. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

1 TAC §§370.43, 370.44, 370.46, 370.48, 370.49

The amendments are proposed under §62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033, Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.

The proposed rules implement §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.

§370.43.Citizenship and residency.

(a) An eligible CHIP child must be a citizen of the United States of America or a non-citizen who is a qualified alien.

(b) An eligible CHIP child must be a Texas resident. A child is a Texas resident if:

(1) the child's fixed residence is located in Texas and the child's family intends for the child to return to Texas after any temporary absences;

(2) the child has no fixed residence but the child's family intends to remain in the state; or

(3) the child has recently moved to Texas and the child's family intends to remain in the state.

(c) A child does not lose status as a state resident because of temporary absences from the state. No time limits are placed on a child's temporary absence from the state.

(d) There are no durational requirements for residency. A child without a fixed residence or a new resident in the state who intends to remain in the state is considered a Texas resident.

(e) The applicant states the child's citizenship, lawful resident status and Texas residency on the TCP application form. If the applicant states that the child is a United States citizen and a Texas resident, no verification of this status is required. If the applicant states the child is not a United States citizen, the applicant must provide a photocopy of a Resident Alien Card (I-551) [ Green Card ], I-94 Card, [ (White Visitor Card) ] I-688-B, I-766, refugee letter, [ I-551, ] an INS asylum letter, an order from an immigration judge granting asylum or showing deportation was withheld, employment authorization, passport or visa, or any other Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (formally know as the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service) [ U. S. Immigration and Naturalization Service ] approved document that demonstrates that the child is a qualified alien.

§370.44.Income.

(a) General principles.

(1) Income is either countable income or exempt income.

(2) TexCare [ TCP ] must consider the income of all persons included in the budget group.

(b) Earned income is countable income received by the budget group and includes:

(1) Military pay and allowances for housing, food, base pay, and flight pay;

(2) Self-employment income (minus business expenses). A person is self-employed if he is engaged in an enterprise for gain, either as an independent contractor, franchise holder, or owner-operator. If someone other than the earner withholds either income taxes or FICA from the earner's earnings, the earner is an employee and is not self-employed;

(3) Wages, salaries, and commissions; and

(4) On-the-Job Training payments funded under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. §§2801-2872, if received by an adult member of the budget group.

(c) Unearned income is countable income received by the budget group and includes:

(1) Cash contributions received on a regular and predictable basis;

(2) Child support payments[ , except for the first $50 from the budget group's total monthly child support payments ];

(3) Disability insurance benefits;

(4) Government-sponsored program payments, (except for Supplemental Security Income payments); however, payments from crisis intervention programs are exempt;

(5) Pensions;

(6) Retirement, survivors, and disability insurance (RSDI) benefits and other retirement benefits (minus the amount deducted from the RSDI check for the Medicare premium and any amount that is being recouped for a prior overpayment);

(7) Income from property, whether from rent, lease, or sale on an installment plan;

(8) Unemployment compensation;

(9) Veterans Administration (VA) benefits other than benefits that meet a special need;

(10) Worker's compensation benefits; and

(11) Alimony.

(d) All income that is not included as countable earned income or countable unearned income is exempt income.

(e) Gross [ Net ] Income Test [ income test and deductions ].

[(1) Net income test.]

(1) [ (A) ] Gross [ The net ] income [ test ] is used to determine eligibility.

(2) [ (B) ] Gross [ Net ] monthly income is [ gross ] monthly income before any payroll deduction [ minus income deductions ].

(3) [ (C) ] A child is eligible if the budget group's gross [ net ] monthly income, after rounding down cents, is equal to or less than the 200% of FPL for the budget group's size. All budget groups must pass the gross [ net ] income test.

(4) Budget groups with a gross monthly income greater than 150% of FPL will be subject to an assets test.

[(2) Income deductions. TCP makes the following deductions from countable income:]

[(A) TCP allows a standard work-related expense deduction of $120 a month for each employed budget group member;]

[(B) TCP deducts payments for the actual costs for the care of a dependent child or disabled adult, if necessary for employment or to receive training. The maximum dependent care deduction is $200 per month for each dependent child and $175 per month for each dependent disabled adult.]

[(C) TCP deducts payments for the actual costs of alimony or child support paid to an individual who is not a budget group member.]

[(D) TCP deducts the first $50 of the total child support payments the budget group receives.]

(f) Computing countable income. TexCare [ TCP ] converts income received non-monthly to monthly amounts by:

(1) dividing yearly income by 12;

(2) multiplying weekly income by 4.33;

(3) adding amounts received twice a month; or

(4) multiplying amounts received every other week by 2.17.

(g) Verification of current countable income.

(1) Countable income must be verified unless the amount of income reported by the applicant makes the child ineligible.

(2) TexCare [ TCP ] verifies all countable income at initial application.

(3) Verification may include, but is not limited to, obtaining:

(A) copies of one or more paycheck stubs issued within the immediately preceding 60-day period;

(B) a copy of the most recent federal income tax return;

(C) a copy of the applicant's most recent Social Security statement;

(D) copies of one or more child support checks; or

(E) written confirmation from an employer of the applicant's income.

(h) Verification of income deductions. Verification may include, but is not limited to, obtaining:

(1) a copy of a paycheck stub showing garnishment of wages for a child support deduction if the paycheck clearly indicates the deduction is for child support;

(2) a copy of a hand written statement authored and signed by the custodial parent verifying the child support deduction; or

(3) a copy of a divorce decree specifying child support payments.

§370.46.Waiting period.

(a) The waiting period is a delay in the start of health insurance coverage and applies to a child determined to be CHIP eligible and extends for a period of 90-days after:

(1) the first day of the month in which the applicant is determined eligible for CHIP, if the day of eligibility is on or before the 15th day of the month; or

(2) the first day of the month after which the applicant is determined eligible for CHIP, if the day of eligibility is after the 15th day of the month

[(a) A child who is otherwise eligible for CHIP may not be enrolled if the child was covered by health insurance at any time within the 90 days immediately preceding the submission of a CHIP application. After the 90-day waiting period, the child may be enrolled.]

[(b) Collateral health benefits provided to a CHIP-eligible child under a different type of insurance, such as workers compensation or personal injury protection under an automobile policy, is not health insurance coverage for purposes of this section.]

(b) [ (c) ] The 90-day waiting period specified in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to a child under the following circumstances:

(1) The child's budget group lost insurance coverage for the child because:

(A) The employment of a member of the Budget Group was terminated due to:

(i) a layoff;

(ii) a reduction-in-force; or

(iii) a business closure;

(B) Insurance benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Pub. L. No. 99-272) terminated;

(C) The marital status of a parent of the child has changed;

(D) The child's Medicaid eligibility was terminated because:

(i) the budget group's earnings or resources exceed allowable amounts for Medicaid eligibility; or

(ii) the child reached an age for which Medicaid benefits are no longer available; or

(E) Other circumstances similar to those described in this subparagraph that result in an involuntary loss of insurance coverage;

(2) The child had insurance coverage provided by [ THKC, ] ERS, [ Laredo CHIP Pilot, ] or CHIP in another state;

(3) The child's health insurance coverage costs more than 10 percent of the budget group's gross [ net ] monthly income; [ or ]

(4) The child has access to group-based health benefits plan coverage and will participate in the premium payment reimbursement program administered by the Commission; or

(5) [ (4) ] The Commission grants an exception to the waiting period under subsection [ paragraph ] (d) of this section.

(c) [ (d) ] The Commission may grant an exception to the 90-day waiting period prescribed by this section if it determines good cause exists to grant an exception and either:

(1) An applicant requests an exception:

(A) Prior to submission of an application;

(B) At the time of application; or

(C) As part of a request for review or reconsideration of a denial of eligibility under sections 370.52 or 370.54 of this chapter; or

(2) The Commission reaches a determination based either on information provided by an applicant or information obtained by the Commission.

§370.48.Completion of Application Process.

If the TexCare [ TCP ] application screening indicates:

(1) A child in the budget group appears to meet Medicaid income eligibility requirements, TexCare [ TCP ] sends the applicant a Medicaid Assets Letter to collect information about the budget group's assets and reviews the information returned by the family. If, following this review, the budget group's assets do not exceed Medicaid limits, TexCare [ TCP ]:

(A) electronically transfers the application to the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) within one working day of the application completion date for a Medicaid eligibility determination;

(B) delivers the paper application to the appropriate DHS office within two additional working days; and

(C) notifies the applicant of potential Medicaid eligibility in writing with guidance regarding Medicaid's role for follow-up with the family.

(2) A child in the budget group does not meet one or more Medicaid eligibility requirements, the budget group's gross [ net ] income is at or below 200% of FPL, and the budget group meets all other CHIP eligibility requirements, TexCare [ TCP ]:

(A) Determines that the child is eligible for CHIP; and

(B) Notifies the applicant of the CHIP eligibility by letter and includes a CHIP enrollment packet.

[(3) A child in the budget group does not meet one or more Medicaid or CHIP eligibility requirements and the budget group's net budget group income exceeds 200% of FPL, TCP:]

[(A) electronically transfers the application to THKC within one working day of the application completion date; and]

[(B) Notifies the applicant in writing of the referral to THKC.]

§370.49.Medicaid Referrals.

If a TexCare [ TCP ] applicant child is referred to Medicaid and subsequently determined ineligible for Medicaid, Medicaid denies eligibility and may deem the child eligible for CHIP based on the budget group's income and/or assets, or the child's citizenship or immigration status.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303627

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


5. REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF ELIGIBILITY DENIALS AND TEMPORARY ENROLLMENT

1 TAC §§370.51 - 370.54

The amendments are proposed under §62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033, Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.

The proposal implements §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.

§370.51.Deadline and method for requesting review of initial decision.

(a) An applicant may request a review of an initial CHIP decision described in section 370.50(a) within 30 working days from the date the applicant received written notice of the decision.

(b) An applicant may request a review by contacting TexCare [ TCP ] in writing.

§370.52.Disposition of request for review.

(a) TexCare [ TCP ] must complete its review of the initial decision within 10 working days of receipt of the request for review.

(b) TexCare [ TCP ] must notify the requester in writing of the results of its review of the initial decision not later than the 10th day following receipt of the request. The written notification must:

(1) explain the reason for the initial decision;

(2) inform the requester whether the initial decision was reversed following TexCare's [ TCP's ]review; and

(3) if the initial decision is upheld, inform the requester of its right to request reconsideration of the decision by HHSC if the requester disagrees with the decision and provide instructions for submitting a written request for reconsideration by HHSC.

§370.53.Request for reconsideration by HHSC.

(a) An applicant that is dissatisfied or disagrees with the result of TexCare's [ TCP's ] review of an initial decision may request reconsideration of the TexCare [ TCP ] review by HHSC.

(b) An applicant must request reconsideration by HHSC in writing within 20 working days from the date the applicant received the written notice of the result of the TexCare [ TCP ] review.

(c) Within 20 working days from the date TexCare [ TCP ] receives the written request for reconsideration, HHSC must complete the reconsideration and notify the applicant in writing of its final decision.

§370.54.Temporary enrollment pending disposition of review or reconsideration.

(a) There is no retroactive enrollment in CHIP.

(b) If an applicant's request for review by TexCare [ TCP ] of an adverse eligibility decision includes factual information that could have an impact on the decision, TexCare [ TCP ] will approve temporary enrollment of the child pending completion of the review and/or reconsideration by HHSC of the eligibility decision.

(c) A child will remain enrolled until the TexCare [ TCP ] review and/or HHSC reconsideration process is complete.

(d) If the initial eligibility decision is reversed, the child's 6 [ 12 ] months of eligibility continues. If the review/reconsideration confirms the initial decision of ineligibility, the child is disenrolled as of the next cut-off date.

(e) TexCare [ TCP ] will not approve temporary enrollment if the applicant's request for review/reconsideration includes no factual basis for reversing the initial eligibility decision.

(f) TexCare [ TCP ] may approve temporary enrollment for a child on the basis of a review only once every 6 [ 12 ] months.

(g) If a child who is temporarily enrolled under this section ultimately is determined ineligible for CHIP, no repayment for health care costs during the period of temporary enrollment will be sought by TexCare [ TCP ] or HHSC.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303628

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


Subchapter C. ENROLLMENT, DISENROLLMENT, AND RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP

1. TEXCARE ENROLLMENT

1 TAC §§370.301, 370.303, 370.305, 370.307, 370.309

The new rules are proposed under §531.033, Government Code, which authorizes the commissioner of health and human services to adopt rules necessary to carry out HHSC's duties under Chapter 531; under §62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which directs HHSC to adopt rules necessary to implement Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, concerning CHIP; and under §2001.006, Government Code, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

No other statutory provisions are affected by the proposed rules.

§370.301.CHIP Enrollment Packet.

Within 5 business days of determining a child is CHIP eligible, TexCare must send the applicant a CHIP enrollment packet containing:

(1) an explanation of CHIP benefits;

(2) a comparison chart of the value-added services provided by health plans in areas where there is a choice of health plans;

(3) an enrollment form and instructions for completing the form;

(4) a provider directory for each health plan available in the applicant's CHIP Service Area (CSA);

(5) a health plan member guide;

(6) cost-sharing information specific to the budget group's Federal Poverty Level (FPL), which includes:

(A) the monthly premium amount, if any;

(B) a schedule of co-payments, if any (e.g., Native Americans have no cost-sharing)

(C) a form to help the applicant track the cost-sharing expenditures relative to the member's cost-sharing cap; and

(D) the disenrollment process for non-payment of monthly premiums

(7) the process for requesting review by TexCare of an unfavorable eligibility or enrollment decision or filing a complaint or an appeal of an adverse determination with the member's Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) or Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO) plan; and

(8) a flyer that specifies the date by which the completed enrollment form must be received by TexCare to ensure enrollment on the first day of the following month and that summarizes the importance of appropriate health plan and Primary Care Provider (PCP) choices for applicants who live in CSAs covered by more than one HMO.

§370.303.Completion of Enrollment Process.

(a) To complete the enrollment process in a CSA with health plan choice, an applicant must:

(1) select and indicate on the enrollment form, a single health plan to cover all eligible children, regardless of the number of eligible children in the budget group;

(2) select a PCP and place the name on the enrollment form; and

(3) sign and return the enrollment form to TexCare.

(b) To complete the enrollment process in a CSA without health plan choice, an applicant must sign and return the enrollment form and select a PCP.

(c) An applicant may return the enrollment form to TexCare either by mail, in the postage paid envelope enclosed with the enrollment packet, or by facsimile.

(d) If an applicant who lives in a CSA covered by an HMO fails to choose a PCP, or if the chosen PCP is not accepting new members, the health plan must assign a PCP to each member in the budget group and inform the applicant. The health plan will send the member a health plan identification card by

(e) The enrollment process is closed 90 calendar days after a child is determined eligible for CHIP if the applicant has not completed the enrollment process. An applicant who fails to complete the enrollment process must initiate a new application for CHIP.

§370.305.Children with Complex Special Health Care Needs (CCSHCN).

The enrollment process for an eligible child with complex special health care needs is the same as described in section 370.303 of this subchapter, except for the addition of the following:

(1) based on the criteria identified in the member guide, which is sent as part of the enrollment packet, an applicant may indicate on the enrollment form that an eligible child has special health care needs;

(2) TexCare will notify each HMO and EPO of members identified through the enrollment process as having complex special health care needs;

(3) within 10 business days of the effective date of coverage, each HMO and EPO will contact each member identified on the enrollment form as having complex special health care needs to confirm his or her health care needs status; and

(4) each HMO and EPO will notify TexCare of members who are not confirmed as having complex special health care needs.

§370.307.Continuous Enrollment Period.

CHIP enrollment always begins on the first calendar day of the month and continues for 6 consecutive months unless:

(1) a sibling member in the home has an earlier initial date of coverage, in which case the coverage period for the newly enrolled child will be the remaining period of coverage of the already enrolled sibling; or

(2) one of the circumstances described in section 370.341, concerning reasons for disenrollment, occurs.

§370.309.Incomplete or Missing Information.

(a) Fourteen calendar days after the enrollment packet is mailed, TexCare sends a reminder notice to applicants who have failed to:

(1) sign the enrollment form; or

(2) return the enrollment form or complete it properly.

(b) If the applicant does not respond to the initial reminder notice, TexCare sends a second reminder notice 14 calendar days after the date of the initial reminder notice.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303630

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576


2. COST-SHARING REQUIREMENTS

1 TAC §§370.321, 370.323, 370.325

The new rules are proposed under §531.033, Government Code, which authorizes the commissioner of health and human services to adopt rules necessary to carry out HHSC's duties under Chapter 531; under §62.051(d), Health and Safety Code, which directs HHSC to adopt rules necessary to implement Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, concerning CHIP; and under §2001.006, Government Code, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.

No other statutory provisions are affected by the proposed rules.

§370.321.Cost-Sharing Requirements.

Cost-sharing requirements are based on a budget group's percentage of FPL. Except for costs associated with unauthorized, non-emergency services provided to a member by out-of-network providers, the co-payments and deductibles identified in this section are the only amounts a provider may collect from a member.

(1) General cost-sharing requirements. A member may be required to pay any of the following costs of CHIP coverage:

(A) a monthly premium; and

(B) co-payments.

(2) Basic cost-sharing obligations. The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) determines the cost sharing amounts a member may be required to pay for enrollment in and services provided through CHIP. When determining cost sharing charges, HHSC will solicit public input by publishing proposed cost-sharing amounts and requesting comments. Cost sharing may be determined based on the maximum levels authorized under federal law and applied to income levels so as to minimize administrative costs.

(3) Monthly premium. Monthly premiums are due the first calendar day of each month and are applicable to that month's coverage. Premiums may be prepaid up to the total amount due for a coverage year.

§370.323.Cost-Sharing Exemptions.

(a) American Indian and Alaska Native children are exempt from cost-sharing obligations, as defined in 42 C.F.R. §457.10.

(b) TexCare notifies each health plan regarding members who are exempt from cost-sharing.

(c) Co-payments do not apply, at any income level, to preventive health services, such as well-child or well-baby care visits and immunizations.

(d) A member's exemption from cost sharing is noted on the member's Health Plan Member Identification Card.

§370.325.Annual Cost-Sharing Cap.

(a) There is an annual cost-sharing cap based on the budget group's percentage of FPL. The applicant is responsible for tracking the member's cost-sharing expenditures on the form provided by TexCare and advising TexCare when the cap is reached. TexCare is responsible for:

(1) computing and informing the applicant at enrollment of the amount of their cost-sharing cap;

(2) providing the applicant with a form for keeping track of their co-payments and monthly premiums;

(3) notifying the affected health plan within two business days of a member's reaching the cost-sharing cap; and

(4) informing the Health and Human Services Commission that an applicant is owed a premium refund in the form of a warrant issued by the State Comptroller's Office, if the applicant notifies TexCare that the applicant has exceeded his or her cost-sharing cap and a monthly premium has been received from the applicant that is in excess of the cost-sharing cap.

(b) A budget group with gross income at or below 150% of FPL has a cost-sharing cap of 2.5% of its gross income during the 6-month coverage period.

(c) A budget group with gross income greater than 150% of FPL has a cost-sharing cap equal to 5% of its gross income during the 6-month coverage period.

(d) On notification by TexCare that a member has reached the cost-sharing cap, a health plan will issue a new Health Plan Member Identification Card reflecting the absence of a co-payment requirement.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.

TRD-200303629

Steve Aragón

General Counsel

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576