Part 1.
OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR
Chapter 3.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION
The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council ("Council") proposes the amendment
of Subchapter H §3.9000.
The Council proposes the addition of Subchapter H §§3.9005, 3.9010,
and 3.9015.
The Council proposes the repeal of Subchapter H §3.9100 and §3.9200.
The proposed amendments and additions provide processes and procedures
for the certification, decertification, and review of crime stoppers organizations,
and the requirements for the submission of annual probation fee and repayment
reports.
The proposed amendment to §3.9000 clarifies the requirements that
a crime stoppers organization must fulfill to be certified by the Council
to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas
Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12
of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The authority to determine if a crime
stoppers organization is qualified to receive such repayments and payments
is granted to the Council by Texas Government Code, §414.011(a). The
proposed amendment also clarifies the processes and procedures for certification,
and permits the Council to extend the certification period for limited periods
of time under specified circumstances.
The proposed addition of §3.9005 establishes processes and procedures
for deciding if a crime stoppers organization should be decertified during
the certification period. The authority to determine if a crime stoppers organization
should be decertified because the organization no longer meets the certification
requirements is granted to the Council by Texas Government Code, §414.011(d).
The proposed addition of §3.9010 requires a certified crime stoppers
organization to submit an annual probation fee and repayment report postmarked
no later than January 31 of each year. The proposed addition implements the
requirements set forth in Texas Government Code, §414.010(a).
The proposed addition of §3.9015 establishes processes and procedures
for the review of certified crime stoppers organizations. The authority to
direct the review of certified crime stoppers organizations is granted to
the Criminal Justice Division ("CJD") of the Office of the Governor by Texas
Government Code, §414.011(b).
The proposed repeal of §3.9100, entitled "Certification", and §3.9200,
entitled "Decertification", allows these section numbers to be available if
further expansion of the administrative code becomes necessary. The provisions
regarding certification are found in §3.9000 and the provisions regarding
decertification are found in §3.9005.
Dan Glotzer, Manager of Budget and Finance for CJD, has determined that
for the first five-year period the sections are in effect there will be no
fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
or administering the sections.
Mr. Glotzer has also determined that for the first five-year period that
the sections are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the sections will be more efficient processes and procedures and the current
rules will be more easily understood. There will be no anticipated economic
cost to persons or businesses for complying with the proposed rules.
Comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Heather Morgan,
Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, at hmorgan@governor.state.tx.us;
P. O. Box 12428, Austin, Texas 78711; or (512) 463-1919. Comments must be
received no later than 30 days from the date of publication of the proposal
in the
Texas Register
.
Subchapter H. CRIME STOPPERS PROGRAM CERTIFICATION
1.
CRIME STOPPERS PROGRAM CERTIFICATION
1 TAC §§3.9000, 3.9005, 3.9010, 3.9015
The amendment of §3.9000, and the addition of §3.9005
and §3.9010, are proposed under the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.006,
which provides the Council the authority to adopt rules to carry out its functions.
The amendment of §3.9000 implements the Texas Government Code, Title
4, §414.011(a), which requires the Council to certify qualified crime
stoppers organizations to receive payments and reward repayments. The addition
of §3.9005 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(d),
which authorizes the Council to decertify a crime stoppers organization if
it determines that the organization no longer meets the certification requirements.
The addition of §3.9010 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.010(a),
which requires certified crime stoppers organizations to file a detailed report
with the Council not later than January 31 of each year.
The addition of §3.9015 is proposed under the Texas Government Code,
Title 4, §414.011(c), which authorizes CJD or its designee to draft rules
for adoption by the Council relating to the review or audit of certified crime
stoppers organizations.
The addition of §3.9015 implements the Texas Government Code, Title
4, §414.011(b), which subjects certified crime stoppers organizations
to review or audit of their finances or programs at the direction of CJD or
its designee.
No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment and
addition of these rules.
§3.9000. Certification [
(a)
The Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council shall, on application by a crime stoppers organization as defined
by §414.001(2) of the Texas Government Code, determine whether the organization
meets the requirements to be certified to receive repayments of rewards under
Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments
from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
(b)
The Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council shall, in its discretion, certify a crime stoppers organization to
receive those repayments or payments if, considering the organization, continuity,
leadership, community support, and general conduct of the organization, the
Council determines that the repayments or payments will be spent to further
the crime prevention purposes of the organization.
(c)
Certification is valid for
two years from the date of issuance. If a crime stoppers organization's certification
expires, the organization is not eligible to receive repayments of rewards
under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure,
or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal
Procedure, until the organization obtains certification. The two-year certification
period may be extended under the following circumstances:
(1)
If an organization's application to renew its
certification is received by the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council
before the two-year certification period expires, the organization's certification
shall continue in effect until the Council makes a decision regarding the
renewal of its certification.
(2)
The chairman of the Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council may extend the two-year certification period for a period of time
not to exceed 90 days if:
(A)
one of the following extenuating circumstances
occurs before the two-year certification period expires:
(i)
natural or man-made disaster;
(ii)
serious illness, incapacity, or death of the
chairman, treasurer, or secretary of the organization's board of directors;
(iii)
serious illness, incapacity, or death of one
of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators; or
(iv)
death of a member of the immediate family of
one of the officials listed in clauses (ii) and (iii) of this subparagraph;
(B)
one of the extenuating circumstances listed
in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph has a detrimental effect on the organization's
ability to submit an application for certification before the two-year certification
period expires; and
(C)
the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council receives the organization's written request to extend the certification
period no later than 20 calendar days after one of the extenuating circumstances
listed in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph occurs.
(d)
[
(1)
Documentation from the Internal Revenue Service granting
the
[
(2)
Proof that the following persons completed a training
course provided by CJD and the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, or their designee,
within the year prior to submission of its application for certification:
[
(A)
one member of the organization's
board of directors, and
(B)
one of the organization's law
enforcement/civilian coordinators;
(3)
A completed and signed Conditions of Certification
Form;
[
(4)
The names, addresses and telephone numbers of the
members of the organization's board of directors, and the position held by
each member
[
(5)
The names, addresses and telephone
numbers of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators; and
(6)
If the organization is currently
certified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council or the organization's most
recent certification expired within three years prior to submission of its
application for certification, the organization must submit the following
additional information:
(A)
financial statements covering the two-year certification
period on a form prescribed by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council;
(B)
documentation from the relevant community supervision
and corrections departments stating the amount of probation fees disbursed
to the organization during the two-year certification period; and
(C)
any Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Reports
that have not been submitted to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council.
(e)
[
(1)
Proof that one of the organization's
law enforcement/civilian coordinators completed a training course provided
by CJD and the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, or their designee, within
the year prior to submission of its application for certification;
(2)
A completed and signed Conditions
of Certification Form;
(3)
The names, addresses and telephone
numbers of the members of the organization's governing board, and the position
held by each member;
(4)
The names, addresses and telephone
numbers of the organization's law enforcement/civilian coordinators; and
(5)
If the organization is currently
certified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council or the organization's most
recent certification expired within three years prior to submission of its
application for certification, the organization must submit the following
additional information:
(A)
financial statements covering the two-year certification
period on a form prescribed by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council;
(B)
documentation from the relevant community supervision
and corrections departments stating the amount of probation fees disbursed
to the organization during the two-year certification period; and
(C)
any Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Reports
that have not been submitted to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council.
(f)
Decisions regarding the certification
of crime stoppers organizations shall be made by the Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council.
§3.9005.Decertification.
(a)
During the two-year certification period, the Crime Stoppers
Advisory Council shall, in its discretion, decertify a crime stoppers organization
if it determines that the organization no longer meets the certification requirements
described in §3.9000(b), which may include a violation of state or federal
law.
(b)
If a crime stoppers organization is decertified by the
Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, the organization is not eligible to receive
repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073 and 42.152 of the Texas Code of
Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant under Article 42.12 of the
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
(c)
The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall send written
notification to the crime stoppers organization no later than 45 calendar
days prior to the meeting at which the Council will consider the decertification
of the organization. The written notification shall include the following:
(1)
Any noncompliance with the certification requirements described
in §3.9000(b); and
(2)
The date, time, and location of the meeting at which the
Council will consider the decertification of the organization.
(d)
The crime stoppers organization shall submit a written
response, which shall include an explanation and specific reasons why the
organization believes that it should not be decertified. The written response
must be received by the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council at
least 10 calendar days prior to the meeting at which the Council will consider
the decertification of the organization.
(e)
The Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall render a decision
regarding the decertification of the crime stoppers organization and shall
notify the organization in writing of its decision.
(f)
If a crime stoppers organization is decertified, the director
of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council shall notify the state comptroller,
and the relevant county auditors and community supervision and corrections
departments in the organization's region, that the organization is decertified
and is not eligible to receive repayments of rewards under Articles 37.073
and 42.152 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, or payments from a defendant
under Article 42.12 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
(g)
Not later than the 60th day after the date of decertification
of the organization, the decertified organization shall forward all unexpended
money received under this section to the state comptroller.
§3.9010.Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Report.
A crime stoppers organization that is certified by the Crime Stoppers
Advisory Council shall submit to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory
Council an Annual Probation Fee and Repayment Report postmarked no later than
January 31 of each year.
§3.9015.Review.
By accepting certification, a crime stoppers organization agrees to
the following conditions of review:
(1)
CJD will review the activities of a crime stoppers organization
that is certified by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council as necessary to ensure
that the organization's finances and programs further the crime prevention
purposes of the organization in compliance with the laws and rules governing
crime stoppers organizations.
(2)
CJD may perform a desk review or an on-site review at the
organization's location. In addition, CJD may request that the organization
submit relevant information to CJD to support any review.
(3)
After a review, the organization shall be notified in writing
of any noncompliance identified by CJD in the form of a preliminary report.
(4)
The organization shall respond to the preliminary report
within a time frame specified by CJD.
(5)
The organization's response shall become part of the final
report, which shall be submitted to the organization and the director of the
Crime Stoppers Advisory Council.
(6)
Any noncompliance, including an organization's failure
to provide adequate documentation upon request, may serve as grounds for decertification
of the organization by the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 13, 2003.
TRD-200303568
David Zimmerman
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the Governor
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919
1 TAC §3.9100, §3.9200
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the Office of
the Governor or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder
Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these rules is proposed under the Texas
Government Code, Title 4, §414.006, which provides the Council the authority
to adopt rules to carry out its functions.
The repeal of §3.9100 implements the Texas Government Code, Title
4, §414.011(a), which requires the Council to certify qualified crime
stoppers organizations to receive payments and reward repayments. The repeal
of §3.9200 implements the Texas Government Code, Title 4, §414.011(d),
which authorizes the Council to decertify a crime stoppers organization if
it determines that the organization no longer meets the certification requirements.
No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the repeal of these
rules.
§3.9100.Certification.
§3.9200.Decertification.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 13, 2003.
TRD-200303569
David Zimmerman
Assistant General Counsel
Office of the Governor
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919
Chapter 181.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
1 TAC §181.15
The State Aircraft Pooling Board proposes new §181.15,
concerning a 12-hour notice provision in order to accommodate priority scheduling
for statewide elected officials.
The new rule will place into effect the provisions of Texas Government
Code, Title 10, Chapter 2205, §2205.038(d), providing for such advance
notice, in light of reduced availability of aircraft to serve the needs of
state officials and employees traveling on state business.
Jerry Daniels, Executive Director, has determined that for the first five-year
period the rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state
or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rule.
Mr. Daniels has also determined that for the first five years the rule
is in effect, the public will benefit through state officials having greater
accessibility to and efficiency in traveling to all areas of the state on
state business. There is no economic cost to persons who are required to comply
with the rule as proposed and no negative effect on small businesses.
Comments on the proposals may be submitted within thirty days of this publication
to Jerry Daniels, State Aircraft Pooling Board, 10335 Golf Course Road, Austin,
Texas 78719, (512) 936-8900.
The new rule is proposed under Texas Government Code, Title 10,
Chapter 2205, §2205.010, which provides the board the authority to adopt
rules for conducting business.
There are no other statutes, articles, or codes that will be affected by
the new rule.
§181.15.Priority Scheduling.
In accordance with Texas Government Code, Title 10, Chapter 2205, §2205.038(d),
statewide elected officials, upon giving 12-hour advance notice to the scheduling
office, shall be given priority in the scheduling of aircraft.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 12, 2003.
TRD-200303544
Jerry Daniels
Executive Director
State Aircraft Pooling Board
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 936-8900
Chapter 354.
MEDICAID HEALTH SERVICES
Subchapter A. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES
2.
MEDICAID VISION CARE PROGRAM
1 TAC §§354.1015, 354.1021, 354.1023
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 354. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements
of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendments to §354.1015,
Benefits and Limitations, limit the provision of prosthetic and non-prosthetic
eyewear through Vision Care Services to Medicaid recipients eligible for the
Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program under
25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The limitation of prosthetic and non-prosthetic eyewear
through Vision Care Services is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated
funds to continue the service for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT recipients.
The proposed amendment will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292,
78th Leg., R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S.
(2003). The amendments to §354.1021, Additional Claims Information Requirements,
and §354.1023, Optometrist Services, are administrative and update references
within the rules.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will
be savings to the state as follows: $2,156,874 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004;
the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $2,155,790
(GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for
local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur
additional costs.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses
or micro-businesses to comply with the amendments as proposed. This was determined
by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will
not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with
the amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are
required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated
negative impact on local employment.
Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Medicaid/CHIP Program Operations, has determined
that for each year of the first five years the amendments are in effect, the
public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public
benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide
medically necessary eyewear through Vision Care Services to EPSDT recipients
within the level of appropriated funds.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental
rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major
environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or
the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed
amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit
an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043,
Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek,
Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th
Street, MC- H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication
of this proposal in the
Texas Register
. A
public hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00
noon. The hearing will be held at the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas
Department of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756. To comply with federal
regulations, a copy of the proposal is being sent to each Texas Department
of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review
upon request.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority
to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas;
and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt
rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The proposed rules affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the
Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes
are affected by the proposed rules.
§354.1015.Benefits and Limitations.
Except as specified in
§354.1023
[
(1)
Provider eligibility. All services reimbursable by the
program must be provided to eligible recipients by a physician, optometrist,
or optician enrolled in the Medicaid program at the time the service(s) is
provided.
(2)
Reimbursable services.
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
§354.1021.Additional Claims Information Requirements.
Providers must meet the claim criteria established in the provisions
of this subchapter for optometric services and the provisions for participation
in the Medicaid program established under Subchapter A of this chapter (relating
to Medicaid Procedures for Providers) and Subchapter L of this chapter (relating
to General Administration) of the purchased health services chapter. Besides
the claims information requirements established in
§354.1001
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
§354.1023.Optometrist Services.
(a)
In addition to those services described in
§354.1015
[
(b)
To be covered, the
evaluation
services shall
be:
(1)
within the optometrist's scope of practice, as defined
by state law;
(2)
reasonable and medically necessary as determined by the
[
(3)
provided to an eligible recipient by an optometrist enrolled
in the Texas Medical Assistance Program at the time the service(s) is provided.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303606
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §354.1051, §354.1052
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the
benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid)
program. The amendments to §354.1051, Additional Claim Information Requirements,
are administrative and update references within the rule. The amendment to §354.1052,
Authorized Chiropractic Services, limits the provision of chiropractor services
provided by a doctor of chiropractic to Medicaid recipients eligible for the
Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program under
25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The limitation of chiropractor services is necessary
because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue the service
for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT eligible. The proposed amendments will
bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003) and
the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will
be savings to the state as follows: $323,574 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004;
the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $323,411
(GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for
local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur
additional costs.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses
or micro-businesses to comply with the amendments as proposed. This was determined
by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will
not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with
the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons
who are required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated
negative impact on local employment.
Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP,
has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments are
in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated
public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue
to provide medically necessary chiropractor services to EPSDT recipients within
the level of appropriated funds.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental
rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major
environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or
the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed
amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit
an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043,
Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek,
Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th
Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of
this proposal in the
Texas Register
. A public
hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.
The hearing will be held at the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas Department
of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756. To comply with federal regulations,
a copy of the proposal is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services
(DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority
to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas;
and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt
rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas
Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected
by the proposal.
§354.1051.Additional Claim Information Requirements.
In addition to the general requirements in
§354.1001
[
(1)
The diagnosis of subluxation which specifies the level
and condition (acute or chronic).
(2)
Location of subluxation. The precise level of the subluxation
must be specified to substantiate a claim for manipulation of the spine. This
designation is made in relation to the part of the spine in which the subluxation
is identified. The level of subluxation may be specified in the following
ways:
(A)
The exact bones may be listed.
(B)
The location may be used if it implies several bones.
(3)
Place of service.
(4)
The type of each treatment procedure.
(5)
The individual charge for each authorized service related
to a major diagnosis.
(6)
Number of manual manipulations that have been performed.
§354.1052.Authorized Chiropractic Services.
(a)
Chiropractic services include those services provided by
a doctor of chiropractic and which are within the scope of practice of his
profession as defined by state law. Benefits are limited to services which
consist of necessary treatment or correction by means of manual manipulation
of the spine, by use of hands only, to correct a subluxation to the same extent
that such benefits are provided under Part B of Medicare. Benefits are available
under this section only for services which are provided during the first 12
visits to any one eligible recipient by a doctor of chiropractic during any
one benefit period. Benefit period for purposes of this section means a 12
consecutive month period which begins with the month of the first treatment.
(b)
Coverage does not extend to the diagnostic, therapeutic
services, or adjunctive therapies furnished by a chiropractor or by others
under his or her orders or direction. This exclusion applies to the x-ray
taken for the purpose of determining the existence of a subluxation of the
spine. Additionally, braces or supports, even though ordered by an MD or DO
and supplied by a chiropractor, are not reimbursable items.
(c)
Chiropractor services are limited
to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis,
and Treatment program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303607
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §354.1101, §354.1102
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the
benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid)
program. The amendments to §354.1101, Additional Claim Information Requirements,
are administrative and update references within the rule. The amendments to §354.1102,
Authorized Podiatry Services, limit the provision of podiatry services to
recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment
(EPSDT) program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The limitation of podiatry services
is necessary because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue
the service for Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT recipients. The proposed
amendment will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg.,
R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will
be savings to the state as follows: $1,631,800 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004;
the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $1,630,980
(GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for
local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur
additional costs.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses
or micro-businesses to comply with the amendments as proposed. This was determined
by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will
not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with
the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons
who are required to comply with the amendments. There is no anticipated negative
impact on local employment
Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP, has
determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect,
the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated public
benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue to provide
medically necessary podiatry services to EPSDT recipients within the level
of appropriated funds.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental
rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major
environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or
the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed
amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit
an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043
of the Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek,
Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th,
MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of this proposal
in the
Texas Register
. A public hearing is
scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon. The hearing
will be held at the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas Department of Health,
1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756. To comply with federal regulations, a copy
of the proposal is being sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS)
office where it will be available for public review upon request.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority
to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas.
The proposed rules affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the
Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes
are affected by the proposal.
§354.1101.Additional Claim Information Requirements.
In addition to the general requirements in
§354.1001
[
(1)
place of service;
(2)
the type of each diagnostic, treatment, or surgical procedure;
(3)
the number of miles for which a travel charge is made;
(4)
the individual charge for each service related to the major
diagnosis;
(5)
diagnosis(es) to a maximum of two primary and three secondary
diagnoses of the condition(s) for which treatment and services were provided.
With respect to diagnostic or other services furnished at the request of a
physician or another podiatrist, this requirement may be waived by the health
insuring agent if the podiatrist providing the services shows that such information
is not available to him;
(6)
name, address, and appropriate identification number of
the ordering physician or podiatrist if services were provided by a nonordering
podiatrist; and
(7)
all supplemental information, including clarification of
the diagnoses in terms of the degree or extent of involvement, necessary to
substantiate the need for the services provided or changes made, or both.
§354.1102.Authorized Podiatry Services.
(a)
The term "podiatry services" includes those
services provided by or under the personal supervision of a doctor of podiatry
which are within the scope of practice of his profession as defined by state
law and for which benefits are or would have been provided under Medicare
had the recipient been eligible for Medicare.
(b)
Reimbursement for Podiatry
services are limited to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic
Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program under 25 TAC Chapter 33.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303608
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §354.1231, §354.1233, §354.1235
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 354. Chapter 354 describes the benefits and provider requirements
of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program. The amendments to §354.1231,
Benefits and Limitations, §354.1233, Requirements for Hearing Aid Services,
and §354.1235, Requirements for Provider Participation, limit the provision
of hearing aid services available for persons age 21 years and over. The limitation
of hearing aid services for Medicaid recipients 21 years and older is necessary
because of a lack of available appropriated funds to continue the service
without additional limitations. Hearing aid services continue to be available
to Medicaid recipients under the age of 21 through the Texas Department of
Health, pursuant to 25 T.A.C. Chapter 37. The proposed amendments implement
appropriation initiatives directed by the General Appropriations Act, 78th
Leg., R.S. (2003). Additional amendments are administrative and update references
within the rules.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will
be savings to the state as follows: $ 477,600 GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004;
the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $477,360
(GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for
local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur
additional costs.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses
or micro-businesses to comply with the proposed amendments. This was determined
by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will
not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply with
the amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are
required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated
negative impact on local governments.
Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP,
has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments
are in effect, the public will benefit from there adoption. The anticipated
public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue
to provide medically necessary hearing aid services to EPSDT recipients through
the Texas Department of Health, as stated above.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental
rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major
environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or
the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed
amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined that these proposed amendments do not restrict or limit
an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043of
the Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek,
Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th
Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of
this proposal in the
Texas Register
. A public
hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.
The hearing will be held in the Board of Health Room, Texas Department of
Health, Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas
78756. To comply with federal regulations, a copy of the proposal is being
sent to each Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will
be available for public review upon request.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority
to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas;
and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt
rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The proposed amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and
the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes
are affected by the proposed new rules.
§354.1231.Benefits and Limitations.
(a)
Benefits. Reimbursement for hearing aid services available
through the Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) Program shall be provided
in accordance with federal regulations found at 42 CFR Subchapter C, Medical
Assistance Programs; state-legislated appropriations; and the provisions and
procedures found elsewhere in this chapter as cited at
§354.1233
[
(1)
physician examination to determine the medical necessity
for a hearing aid;
(2)
hearing aid evaluations, including home visit hearing evaluations;
[
[
[
(b)
Limitations and exclusions. Hearing aid providers and examining
physicians must comply with the following conditions and limitations established
by the department or its designee.
(1)
Hearing aid services shall be available only to non-EPSDT
eligible Medicaid recipients.
[
(2)
[
(3)
[
(4)
[
[
[
(5)
[
[
[
§354.1233.Requirements for Hearing Aid Services.
(a)
Hearing aid services. Providers of hearing aid services
must comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations, recognized
professional standards, and the provisions cited in Subchapter A of this chapter
(relating to Medicaid Procedures for Providers), and Subchapter L of this
chapter (relating to General Administration), in addition to the conditions,
specifications, limitations established by the Texas Department of Health
(department) or its designee, and applicable requirements of their licensing
authority.
(1)
Physicians. Physicians shall be reimbursed for all services
covered by the Texas Program: examinations
and
[
(2)
Audiologists. Audiologists shall be reimbursed for hearing
evaluations [
[
(b)
Hearing evaluations. Hearing evaluations must be recommended
by a physician based upon examination of the recipient. Reimbursement for
hearing evaluations will be made only to physicians or licensed audiologists.
[
(1)
A physician who recommends a hearing evaluation must be
licensed to practice medicine in the state where and when the evaluation is
conducted.
(2)
The physician must indicate on the Physician Examination
Report form if the recipient needs a hearing evaluation based on the examination
of the recipient. Medicaid reimbursement for a hearing evaluation shall be
based on the physician's recommendation that the hearing evaluation is medically
necessary.
(3)
Providers must administer hearing evaluations using appropriate
procedures as specified within their scope of practice and recognized professional
standards.
(4)
Reimbursement for home visit hearing evaluations shall
be made if the recipient's physician has documented that the recipient's medical
condition prohibits traveling to the provider's place of business.
(5)
Providers of hearing evaluations must have a report in
the recipient's record. Providers must include in the report hearing evaluation
test data [
(6)
Hearing evaluations performed by fitters and dispensers
are not reimbursable. If a fitter or dispenser performs a hearing evaluation
on a recipient the recipient shall not be billed for the hearing evaluation.
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
§354.1235.Requirements for Provider Participation.
(a)
Provider enrollment. Each physician [
(1)
To be eligible for reimbursement of Title XIX benefits
for hearing aid services covered by the Texas Medicaid Program, each provider
of Medical care and services must enter into a written agreement with the
department.
(2)
Participating providers must comply with all federal and
state laws and regulations governing the Texas Medicaid Program. Providers
must also comply with the provisions, conditions, certifications, and limitations
as described in this subchapter.
(b)
Provider licensure and certification. To be eligible for
participation as a provider of hearing aid services under the Texas Medicaid
Program, physicians [
(1)
Physicians (MD or DO) must be currently licensed to practice
medicine by the State Board of Medical Examiners.
(2)
Audiologists must be currently licensed by the State Board
of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology and be certified
by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) or meet ASHA equivalency
requirements. [
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303609
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §354.1281, §354.1282
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the
benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid)
program. The amendment to §354.1281, Benefits and Limitations, limits
the provision of psychologists' services to Medicaid recipients eligible for
the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) program
under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The amendment is necessary because of a lack of
available appropriated funds to continue psychologists' services for Medicaid
clients who are not EPSDT eligible. The amendment to §354.1282, Conditions
of Participation, includes an exception for providers who meet the criteria
specified in §354.1173(b) to the requirement that Medicaid providers
are also enrolled in Medicare. The proposed amendments also replace references
to the Texas Department of Health with references to HHSC. The proposed amendments
will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003)
and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will
be savings to the state as follows: $1,850,700 (GR) in State Fiscal Year 2004;
the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $1,849,770
(GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for
local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur
additional costs.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses
or micro-businesses to comply with these amendments as proposed. This was
determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses
will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply
with the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons
who are required to comply with the amendments as proposed. There is no anticipated
negative impact on local employment.
Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP,
has determined that for each year of the first five years the amendments are
in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated
public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue
to provide medically necessary psychologists' services to EPSDT recipients
within the limits of appropriated funds.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental
rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major
environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or
the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed
amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit
an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043
of the Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek,
Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th
Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of
this proposal in the
Texas Register
. A public
hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.
The hearing will be held in the Board of Health Room, Texas Department of
Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority
to administer the Texas Medicaid program; and Government Code §2001.006,
which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation
of legislation.
The amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas
Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected
by the proposed amendments.
§354.1281.Benefits and Limitations.
(a)
Subject to the specifications, conditions, requirements,
and limitations established by the [
(1)
are within the psychologist's scope of practice, as defined
by state law; and
(2)
would be covered by the Texas Medical Assistance Program
when they are provided by a licensed physician (MD or DO).
(b)
To be payable, the services must be reasonable and psychologically
necessary as determined by the department or its designee.
(c)
The Texas Medical Assistance Program does not reimburse
for the services of a psychological assistant working under the direction
of a licensed psychologist.
(d)
Licensed psychologists who are employed by or remunerated
by a physician, hospital, facility, or other provider may not bill the Texas
Medical Assistance Program directly for psychologists' services if that billing
would result in duplicate payment for the same services. If the services are
covered and reimbursable by the program, payment may be made to the physician,
hospital, or other provider (if approved for participation in the Texas Medical
Assistance Program) who employs or reimburses the licensed psychologist. The
basis and amount of Medicaid reimbursement depends on the services actually
provided, who provided the services, and the reimbursement methodology utilized
by the Texas Medical Assistance Program as appropriate for the services and
provider(s) involved.
(e)
Licensed psychologist services
are limited to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening,
Diagnosis, and Treatment program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33.
§354.1282.Conditions of Participation.
Subject to the specifications, conditions, limitations, and requirements
established by the
Texas Health and Human Services Commission (Commission)
[
(1)
be licensed by the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists
or other appropriate state licensing authority;
(2)
comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations
governing the services provided;
(3)
be enrolled and participating in Medicare
, unless
the provider satisfies the criteria for exception described in §354.1173
(b)
;
(4)
be enrolled and approved for participation in the Texas
Medical Assistance Program;
(5)
sign a written provider agreement with the
Commission
[
(6)
comply with the terms of the provider agreement and all
requirements of the Texas Medical Assistance Program, including regulations,
rules, handbooks, standards, and guidelines published by the
Commission
[
(7)
bill for services covered by the Texas Medical Assistance
Program in the manner and format prescribed by the
Commission
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303610
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §354.1381, §354.1382
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 354, Medicaid Health Services. Chapter 354 describes the
benefits and provider requirements of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid)
program. The amendment to §354.1381, Benefits and Limitations, limits
the provision of counseling services provided by licensed marriage and family
therapists (LMFT), licensed professional counselors (LPC), and licensed master
social worker-advanced clinical practitioners (LMSW-ACP) to Medicaid recipients
eligible for the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT)
program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter 33. The amendment is necessary because of
a lack of available appropriated funds to continue counseling services for
Medicaid clients who are not EPSDT eligible. The amendment to §354.1382,
Conditions for Participation, includes an exception for providers who meet
the criteria specified in §354.1173(b) to the requirement that Medicaid
providers are also enrolled in Medicare. The proposed amendments also replace
references to the Texas Department of Health with references to HHSC. The
proposed amendments will bring the rules into compliance with H.B. 2292, 78th
Leg., R.S. (2003) and the General Appropriations Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003).
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
during the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect there will
be savings to the state as follows: $15,283,200 (GR) in State Fiscal Year
2004; the fiscal savings for each fiscal year for 2005 through 2008 is $15,275,520
(GR). The proposed amendments will not result in any fiscal implications for
local health and human service agencies. Local governments will not incur
additional costs.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses
or micro-businesses to comply with these amendments as proposed. This was
determined by interpretation of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses
will not be required to alter their business practices in order to comply
with the proposed amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons
who are required to comply with the proposal. There is no anticipated negative
impact on local employment.
Mr. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, Medicaid/CHIP,
has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposal is
in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments. The anticipated
public benefit, as a result of enforcing the amendments, will be to continue
to provide medically necessary counseling services to EPSDT recipients within
the levels of appropriated funds.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments are not a "major environmental
rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major
environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or
the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed
amendments are not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce
risks to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments do not restrict or limit
an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of government action and, therefore, do not constitute a taking under §2007.043
of the Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Marianna Zolondek,
Appeals Manager, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th
Street, MC H500, Austin, Texas 78756-3199, within 30 days of publication of
this proposal in the
Texas Register
. A public
hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon.
The hearing will be held in the Board of Health Room, 7th Floor, Texas Department
of Health, 1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority
to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas;
and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt
rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The amendments affect the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the Texas
Government Code, Chapter 531. No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected
by the proposed new rules.
§354.1381.Benefits and Limitations.
(a)
Counseling for emotional disorders or conditions provided
by licensed professional counselors (LPCs), licensed master social worker-advanced
clinical practitioners (LMSW-ACPs), and licensed marriage and family therapists
(LMFTs) as allowed by each respective licensing law are covered services.
(b)
To be considered payable, the services must be reasonable
and medically necessary as determined by the department or its designee.
(c)
LPCs, LMSW-ACPs or LMFTs who are employed by or remunerated
by another provider may not bill the Texas Medical Assistance Program directly
for counseling services if that billing would result in duplicate payment
for the same services.
(d)
Services provided by an LPC,
LMSW-ACP, and LMFT are limited to Medicaid recipients eligible for the Early
and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment program under 25 T.A.C. Chapter
33.
§354.1382.Conditions for Participation.
(a)
To participate in the Texas Medical Assistance Program,
licensed professional counselors (LPCs) must be licensed by the Texas Board
of Examiners of Professional Counselors in accordance with the Texas Licensed
Professional Counselor Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4512g.
(b)
To participate in the Texas Medical Assistance Program,
licensed master social worker-advanced clinical practitioners (LMSW-ACPs)
must be licensed as a master social worker and be recognized as being qualified
for the practice of clinical social work by the Texas State Board of Social
Worker Examiners in accordance with the Human Resources Code, Subtitle E,
Chapter 50.
(c)
To participate in the Texas Medical Assistance Program,
licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFTs) must be licensed by the Texas
Board of Examiners of Marriage and Family Therapists in accordance with the
Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article
4512c-1.
(d)
These providers must:
(1)
meet the appropriate licensing requirements as required
in subsections (a), (b) or (c) of this section;
(2)
comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations
governing the services provided;
(3)
be enrolled and participating in Medicare (this applies
to LMSW-ACPs only)
, unless the provider satisfies criteria for exemption
described in 354.1173(b)
;
(4)
be enrolled and approved for participation in the Texas
Medical Assistance Program;
(5)
sign a written provider agreement with the
Commission
[
(6)
comply with the terms of the provider agreement and all
requirements of the Texas Medical Assistance Program, including regulations,
rules, handbooks, standards, and guidelines published by the
Commission
[
(7)
bill for services covered by the Texas Medical Assistance
Program in the manner and format prescribed by the
Commission
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303611
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
Subchapter A. COST DETERMINATION PROCESS
1 TAC §355.112
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the
reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
HHSC proposes to amend §355.112, to limit the enrollment of new contracted
providers wanting to participate in the Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement,
pending available funds. This amendment restricts the participation opportunity
of new contracted providers if legislation or budgetary constraints limit
the number of enhancement levels and/or enhanced amounts awarded to providers
currently participating in the rate enhancement. By limiting the participation
opportunity of new contracts, this amendment will allow current participating
providers to continue to receive their awarded enhancement levels without
being subjected to an open enrollment and the possibility of reduced enhancement
levels or enhanced amounts. If funding becomes available, new contracted providers
will have the opportunity to participate in the rate enhancement during the
subsequent open enrollment period.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that,
for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect, there
are no fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or
administering the section. There are no fiscal implications for local governments
as a result of enforcing or administering the section.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the
first five years the proposed amendment is in effect, the public benefit anticipated
as a result of enforcing the amendment will be to allow HHSC greater flexibility
in ensuring appropriate payments are made to eligible providers.
There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses as a result
of enforcing or administering the proposed section. There is no anticipated
economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section.
There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected
by this section.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Alisa Jacquet
(telephone: 512-685-3129; FAX: 512-685-3104) in HHSC Rate Analysis. Written
comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. Jacquet via facsimile or
mail to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-400, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
TX 78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
. For further information regarding the proposal or to
make the proposal available for public review, contact local offices of DHS
or Alisa Jacquet at (512) 685-3129 in HHSC Rate Analysis.
A public hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm
until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room 1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building,
4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that
Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to this rule. Accordingly,
HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding this
rule.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The amendment implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).
§355.112.Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement.
(a)-(f)
(No change.)
(g)
New contracts. For the purposes of this section, for each
rate year a new contract is defined as a contract delivering its first day
of service to a DHS client on or after the first day of the open enrollment
period, as defined in subsection (e) of this section, for that rate year.
Contracts that underwent a contract assignment are not considered new contracts.
For purposes of this subsection, an acceptable contract amendment is defined
as a legible enrollment contract amendment that has been completed according
to instructions, signed by an authorized signator as per the DHS Corporate
Board of Directors Resolution applicable to the provider's contract or ownership
type, and received by HHSC Rate Analysis within 30 days of the date of notification
to the provider that such an enrollment contract amendment must be submitted.
If the 30th day is on a weekend day, state holiday, or national holiday, the
next business day will be considered the last day requests will be accepted.
The granting of newly requested rate enhancement increments as outlined in
subsection (p) of this section is limited to available funds.
New contracts
will receive the nonparticipant attendant compensation rate as specified in
subsection (m) until:
(1)-(3)
(No change.)
(h)-(o)
(No change.)
(p)
Granting additional attendant compensation rate enhancement
increments. HHSC divides all requests for attendant compensation rate enhancement
increments into two groups: pre-existing rate enhancement increments which
providers requested to carry over from the prior year and newly requested
rate enhancement increments. Newly requested rate enhancement increments may
be requested by providers who were nonparticipants in the prior year
,
[
(1)-(2)
(No change.)
(q)-(dd)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303612
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.201
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission ("commission")
proposes to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rates. Chapter 355 describes
the reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
The commission proposes new Subchapter B and new Section 355.201, relating
to the establishment and adjustment of Medicaid provider reimbursement rates.
Background and Summary of Factual Basis for the Rules. Section 531.021(b),
Government Code, directs the commission to adopt reasonable rules and standards
to govern the determination of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance
payments under Chapter 32, Human Resources Code. Subsections (d) and (e) of
Section 531.021, effective September 1, 2003, authorizes the commission to
provide for the payment of such rates, fees, and charges for medical assistance
in accordance with rules adopted by the commission, state or federal law,
economic factors that affect provider participation, or in accordance with
levels of appropriated funds. The proposed rule is intended to implement procedures
to enable the commission to comply with the duties and authority granted under
Section 531.021, subsections (d) and (e).
Section-by-Section Explanation. Subsection (a) of the proposed rule defines
certain terms used in the rule. Subsection (b) describes the purpose of the
rule. Subsection (c) establishes the commission's responsibility to set fees,
rates, and charges in accordance with other requirements of this chapter,
state and federal laws, economic considerations that affect entire groups
of providers, and available levels of appropriated funds.
Subsection (d) of the proposed rule authorizes the commission to adjust
such rates, fees, and charges in order to comply with changes in the state
or federal law (including the enactment of new laws, the amendment of current
laws, or the judicial interpretation of existing law) under four circumstances.
First, the commission may adjust rates, fees, or charges if the change in
law specifically requires the commission to increase or reduce a rate, fee,
or charge. Second, the rule authorizes the commission to adjust rates, fees,
or charges if the change in law affects the scope of allowable or unallowable
costs for providers. Third, the commission may adjust rates, fees, or charges
if a change in the law requires all providers within a program or category
of providers to incur additional costs to provide medical assistance (other
than unallowable costs) that are not currently recognized in the reimbursement
methodology established by the commission for the program. Fourth, the commission
may adjust rates, fees, or charges if the state general appropriations act
limits the availability, amount, or use of funds appropriated to pay for medical
assistance.
Subsection (d) also permits the commission to adjust rates in consideration
of economic factors or conditions that may have a significant and measurable
effect on provider participation under specified circumstances. First, the
economic factor or condition must prevail among all providers within a specific
Medicaid program (such as the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and
Treatment program) or within a specific category of providers (such as physicians,
hospitals, etc.). Second, the commission must determine whether the economic
factor or condition results or may result in a demonstrable increase in the
cost of providing services beyond amounts recognized in the commission's established
reimbursement methodology. Alternatively, the economic factor or condition
must require providers to incur costs, other than unallowable costs, that
are not recognized in the commission's reimbursement methodology.
Subsection (e) requires the commission to publish notice of a proposed
adjustment to rates, fees, or charges initiated under the proposed rule at
least 10 calendar days before the proposed adjustment may take effect. If
the adjustment is based on a change in state or federal law, the notice may
(but is not necessarily required to) be published before the effective date
of the change. However, the subsection also provides that the proposed adjustment
will not take effect before the effective date of the change in law. Subsection
(f) prescribes the content of the notice that must be published under subsection
(e).
Public Benefit. Billy Millwee, Deputy Director, Program Operations, has
determined that during the first five years that the proposed rule is in effect,
the public will benefit from the greater flexibility afforded the commission
and health and human services in reimbursing services provided to Medicaid
recipients. Under the proposed rule, the commission may adjust provider reimbursement
to respond to changes in the economy that have a demonstrable impact on providers,
or to comply with limitations or restrictions on the expenditure of funds
enacted by the state legislature. The commission may also adjust rates, fees,
and charges in response to economic factors or conditions that may have a
significant and measurable effect on provider participation or providers'
ability to deliver services in accordance with state and federal law. The
proposed rule also establishes a procedure for publication of advance notice
of a proposed adjustment of rates, fees, or charges.
Fiscal Note. Thomas Suehs, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that
for the first five years that the proposed rule is in effect, no additional
costs will be required of providers or the public to comply with the rule.
Because the proposed rule does not implement specific changes to reimbursement
rates, fees, or charges, no additional costs will be borne by local governments
as a result of the proposed rule, nor is there any anticipated impact on revenues
of state or local government.
Small and Micro-business Impact Analysis. The proposed rule will not result
in additional costs to persons required to comply with the proposed rule,
nor does the proposed rule have any anticipated adverse effect on small or
micro-businesses. The proposed rule will not affect local employment.
Regulatory Analysis. The commission has determined that the proposed rule
is not a "major environmental rule" as defined by §2001.0225, Government
Code. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment
or to reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.
Takings Impact Assessment. The Health and Human Services Commission has
determined that the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right
to property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action
and therefore this action does not constitute a taking under Texas Government
Code, §2007.043. The proposed rule is administrative in nature and does
not impose any new regulatory requirements. The proposed rule is reasonably
taken to fulfill requirements of state law.
Public Hearing. The commission will hold a public hearing regarding this
rule and other proposed rules on July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm. to 5:00 p.m.,
in the Public Hearing Room of the Brown-Heatly State Office Building, 4900
North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. Persons who require interpreter services
for the deaf or hard of hearing or other special assistance should contact
Nancy Kimble, HHSC Rate Analysis (Telephone: 512-338-6496; FAX: 512-338-6544;
or E-mail: nancy.kimble@hhsc.state.tx.us).
Public Comment. Public comment may be submitted in writing to Ms. Kimble,
HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-410, by U.S. mail to 1100 West 49th Street,
Austin, Texas 78756-3101, by overnight, special delivery or hand delivery
to Riata Building III, 12555 Riata Vista Circle, Austin, Texas 78727-6404,
or by facsimile to 512-338-6544. Written comments must be submitted by 5:00
p.m., July 28, 2003. Further information may be obtained by calling Ms. Kimble
at 512-338-6496.
In addition to statutory authority cited in the Background and
Summary of Factual Basis for the Rules above, the rule is also proposed pursuant
to Government Code, §2001.006, which allows state agencies to adopt rule
in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed rule.
§355.201.Establishment and adjustment of reimbursement rates by the Health and Human Services Commission.
(a)
Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise,
the following words and terms when used in this section are defined as follows:
(1)
"Commission" means the Health and Human Services Commission.
(2)
"Medical assistance" means a medical or health care related
service, item, or supply that is delivered to a Medicaid recipient and is
approved and authorized for payment or reimbursement by the commission or
a health and human services agency pursuant to state and federal law.
(3)
"Program" means a specific component of the Medicaid program
for which the commission establishes either a methodology to reimburse a provider
or a specific fee, payment rate, or charge that is paid to a provider for
medical assistance in accordance with state and federal law.
(4)
"Provider" means a health care practitioner, institution,
or other entity that is enrolled in the medical assistance program and is
authorized to submit claims for payment or reimbursement of medical assistance.
(b)
Purpose. This section implements the provisions of Section
531.021, subsections (d) and (e), Government Code and applies to all programs
that provide medical assistance and to all reimbursement methodologies prescribed
under this chapter.
(c)
Establishment of fees, rates, and charges. The commission
establishes fees, rates, and charges to be paid for medical assistance in
accordance with:
(1)
the formulas, procedures, or methodologies prescribed in
this chapter;
(2)
the requirements of state and federal law, including:
(A)
legislative or Congressional enactments that change state
or federal laws in a manner that affects such fees, rates, and charges;
(B)
changes in federal regulations, and policies that affect
such fees, rates, and charges; and
(C)
judicial orders, opinions, or interpretations regarding
state or federal law that affect such fees, rates, and charges;
(3)
the consideration of economic factors that, in the commission's
determination:
(A)
have or may have a significant and measurable effect on
provider participation; or
(B)
have or may have a significant and measurable effect on
providers' ability to deliver services in accordance with state and federal
law; and
(4)
levels of appropriated state and federal funds or state
or federal laws or enactments that limit, restrict, or condition the availability
of appropriated funds for medical assistance.
(d)
Adjustment of fees, rates, and charges. Notwithstanding
any other provision of this chapter, the commission may adjust fees, rates,
and charges paid for medical assistance if:
(1)
state or federal law is enacted, amended, or judicially
interpreted to:
(A)
require the commission to increase or reduce a fee, rate,
or charge paid to a provider for medical assistance;
(B)
change the amount, scope, or type of allowable or unallowable
costs for providers of medical assistance that are required to report costs
to the commission or a health and human services agency for purposes of establishing
a reimbursement rate for medical assistance;
(C)
require all providers within a program or category of providers
to incur additional costs to provide medical assistance, other than unallowable
costs, that are not currently recognized in the reimbursement methodology
established by the commission for the program; or
(D)
restrict, limit, or condition the availability of appropriated
funds to the commission for payment or reimbursement of medical assistance;
(2)
economic conditions that prevail among all providers within
a specific program or category of providers and:
(A)
result in a demonstrable increase in the cost of providing
services beyond amounts recognized in the commission's established reimbursement
methodology; or
(B)
require providers within a program or category of providers
to incur costs, other than unallowable costs, that are not currently recognized
in the reimbursement methodology established by the commission for the program.
(e)
Notice of adjustment of fees, rates, and charges. If the
commission adjusts fees, rates, or charges under this section, the commission
or its designee will publish notice of the proposed adjustment at the earliest
feasible date but not later than 10 calendar days before the effective date
of the adjustment. If the adjustment is required by the enactment or amendment
of state or federal law, such notice may be published before the effective
date of such enactment or amendment, but the adjustment to fees, rates, or
charges will not take effect before the effective date of the enactment or
amendment. The notice may be published either by publication on the commission's
Internet web site, the Texas Register, written communication to providers,
or a combination of these methods.
(f)
Contents of notice. The notice required under subsection
(e) of this section will include the following:
(1)
a description of the specific increase or reduction of
fees, rates, and charges;
(2)
the date on which such adjustment will take effect and
the period during which the adjustment will be in effect;
(3)
a description of the legal and factual bases for the adjustment;
(4)
a description of the specific requirements of the rate
setting methodology established under this chapter that cannot effectively
be implemented as a result of the adjustment; and
(5)
instructions for interested parties to submit written comments
to the commission regarding the proposed adjustment.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303613
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.307, §355.308
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the
reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
HHSC proposes to amend §355.307, concerning reimbursement setting methodology,
and §355.308, concerning enhanced direct care staff rate in its Medicaid
Reimbursement Rates chapter. The purpose of the amendments is to bring the
program into compliance with H.B. 1 and H.B. 2292 of the 78th legislative
session, to clarify and/or simplify various aspects of the program and to
correct erroneous references. H.B. 1 details appropriations for the nursing
facility program for state fiscal years 2004 and 2005; Health and Human Services
Commission Appropriations Rider 46 requires that reductions to any long term
care budget strategy shall be calculated without rebasing of current reimbursement
factors and shall be shared equally across all Medicaid providers funded by
the strategy; H.B. 2292 requires that HHSC not impose a minimum spending requirement
on facilities not participating in the direct care staff rate enhancement
and that HHSC not set a base rate for a facility participating in the direct
care staff rate enhancement that is more than the base rate for a nursing
facility not participating in the program.
Modifications necessary to come into compliance with H.B. 1 and Rider 46
include: (1) setting the direct care staff, dietary, general/administration,
fixed capital asset and other resident care rate components as well as the
ventilator and pediatric tracheostomy add-ons and the pediatric care facility
rate for state fiscal years 2004 and 2005 at the 2003 level adjusted as necessary
to remain within appropriations; (2) indicating that any adjustments necessary
to remain within appropriations will apply equally in percentage terms across
each component of the nursing facility rate and each add-on; (3) indicating
that staffing requirements for enhancement levels between the minimum staffing
requirement for state fiscal years 2004 and 2005 and the minimum staffing
requirement in effect for state fiscal year 2003 will be adjusted for variations
in facility case mix; and (4) modifying the calculation of the ventilator
add-on for participants in the enhancement program to include any enhancement
levels subject to a case mix adjustment.
Major modifications necessary to come into compliance with H.B. 2292 include:
(1) eliminating the minimum spending requirement for nonparticipants in the
direct care staff rate enhancement; and (2) eliminating the base rate for
participants.
Other modifications necessary to come into compliance with H.B. 1 and Rider
46 and/or H.B. 2292 include: (1) indicating that facilities will be notified
if funds are not available to maintain roll-over levels, participation levels
or to fund pre-existing enhancements during an enrollment period; (2) changing
how new facilities are handled to accommodate that fact that there will be
one base rate for participants and nonparticipants instead of two base rates;
(3) clarifying that if the granting of newly requested enhancements to ongoing
providers is limited during enrollment that the granting of enhancements to
new facilities is limited to that same level; (4) modifying reporting requirements
to exclude nonparticipants in the enhancement; (5) deleting the 10 percent
direct care recoupment for nonsubmittal of reports; (6) modifying the spending
requirement for participants to insure that their final rate cannot be lower
than the base rate. In addition, the provision allowing for performance-based
mitigation of spending recoupments is deleted. This provision was enacted
to provide relief to high quality nonparticipants subject to spending recoupment.
Since nonparticipants are no longer subject to spending recoupment, the justification
for this rule no longer exists.
Clarifications include: (1) changing the name of Section 355.308 from Enhanced
Direct Care Staff Rate to Direct Care Staff Rate Component; (2) clarifying
that open enrollment is for enhanced direct care staff rates; (3) clarifying
the training requirements for Annual Staffing and Compensation Report preparers;
(4) clarifying that calculations of minimum staffing requirements are based
on residents in Medicaid-contracted beds only; (5) clarifying that the calculation
of availability of funds to purchase additional staffing time is based upon
direct care revenues and expenses; (6) clarifying that, for facilities adjusting
their enhancement levels in the middle of the rate year, staffing requirements
are weighted averages for the reporting period; (7) changing limited liability
partnerships to limited partnerships in the provision that allows related
facilities to have their compliance with the spending requirement determined
in the aggregate for all related facilities since limited partnership has
the meaning that is consistent with the description in the rule.
Simplifications and other revisions include amending the rules so that
if a report is not received with a year of its due date, any recoupments due
to nonsubmittal of the report are made permanent. As well, simplifications
eliminate the opportunity for unachieved enhancements to qualify as pre-existing
enhancements in terms of enrollment priority if the provider can prove a good
faith effort to meet the requirements. This provision has never been accessed
by a provider since the inception of the enhancement program. In addition
the proposed rules delete interest charges for facilities missing their staffing
requirements by four or more LVN equivalent minutes. The amount of money collected
under this provision did not offset the administrative costs of enforcing
the provision to the state and providers. In addition, the amount of interest
collected was too small to be a disincentive to over-enrollment in the program.
Proposed revisions also include changing the requirement upon HHSC to notify
providers of their recoupment status within 90 days of the due date of the
report to within 90 days of the determination of recoupment. The current requirement
is impractical since recoupments are not determined until after the reports
are audited and auditing does not occur within 90 days of the due date of
the report. Another proposed revision eliminates the provision that allowed
new owners to request to become participants or to increase their enhancement
level within available funds. As all enhancement funds are awarded during
the open enrollment, there would never be funds available to activate this
provision. Erroneous references to §355.306(a)(2)(B), a subparagraph
that no longer exists, are proposed to be corrected to refer to §355.306(a)(2)(A).
Erroneous references to 40 TAC §19.1812, a subsection that no longer
exists, are proposed to be corrected to refer to §371.212. Erroneous
references to DHS, which no longer has rate determination authority for nursing
facilities, are proposed to be corrected to refer to HHSC. Finally, the proposed
revisions add a requirement that a contract must be ongoing at the time reinvestment
is determined to qualify for reinvestment. The purpose of this change is to
ensure that reinvested funds are kept within the program rather than being
distributed to entities no longer contracted to provide care to clients.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that,
for the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect, there
are fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering
the sections. There are no fiscal implications for local governments as a
result of enforcing or administering the sections. The effect on state government
for the first five-year period the sections are in effect is an estimated
cost savings of $34,106,565 in fiscal year (FY) 2004; $29,355,571 in FY 2005;
$34,896,440 in FY 2006; $30,127,260 in FY 2007; and $36,042,637 in FY 2008.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the
first five years the proposed sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated
as a result of enforcing the sections is that the nursing facility rates and
the direct care staff enhancement program will come into compliance with H.B.
1 and H.B. 2292 of the 78th legislative session. In addition, clarifications
and simplifications will increase provider understanding of the program. Simplifications
will also reduce the administrative costs of the program to the state and
to providers. Finally, requiring that a contract be ongoing in order to qualify
for reinvestment funds will insure that reinvestment of funds is limited to
providers who are continuing to provide services to clients.
There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses as a result
of enforcing or administering the proposed sections. There is no anticipated
economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed sections.
There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected
by these sections.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Pam McDonald
(telephone: 512-685-3134; FAX: 512-685-3104) in HHSC Rate Analysis. Written
comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. McDonald via facsimile or
mail to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-400, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
TX 78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
. For further information regarding the proposal or to
make the proposal available for public review, contact local offices of DHS
or Pam McDonald at (512) 685-3134 in HHSC Rate Analysis.
A public hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled for Wednesday,
July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room
1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that
Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly,
HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these
rules.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation
The amendments implement the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).
§355.307.Reimbursement Setting Methodology.
(a)
Case mix classes. The Texas
Health and
[
(b)
Reimbursement determination.
HHSC
[
(1)
Rate Components. Under the case mix methodology, reimbursements
are comprised of five cost-related components: the direct care staff component;
the other recipient care component; the dietary component; the general/administration
component; and the fixed capital asset component. The direct care staff component
is calculated as specified in §355.308 of this title (relating to [
(A)
The dietary rate component is constant across all case
mix classes.
(i)
For rates effective May 1, 2000, using the inflation factors
used in determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000,
project the costs in the 1998 Texas Nursing Facility Cost Report data base
to the rate period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending August 31, 2000.
Using these projected costs, determine the median per diem dietary cost (weighted
by Medicaid days of service in the data base) in the array of allowable per
diem costs for all contracted nursing facilities included in the January 1,
2000, data base, multiplied by 1.07.
(ii)
For rates effective September 1, 2000, multiply the dietary
per diem rate from clause (i) of this subparagraph by 1.016.
(iii)
For rates effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter,
the dietary component is calculated at the median cost (weighted by Medicaid
days of service in the rate base) in the array of projected allowable per
diem costs for all contracted nursing facilities included in the rate base,
multiplied by 1.07.
(B)
The general/administration rate component is constant across
all case mix classes.
(i)
For rates effective May 1, 2000, the general/administration
rate component is equal to the difference between the general, administration,
and dietary rate component in effect January 1, 2000, and the dietary rate
component as calculated in paragraph (1)(A)(i) of this subsection.
(ii)
For rates effective September 1, 2000, multiply the general/administration
per diem rate from clause (i) of this subparagraph by 1.016.
(iii)
For rates effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter,
the general/administration component is calculated at the median cost (weighted
by Medicaid days of service in the rate base) in the array of projected allowable
per diem costs for all contracted nursing facilities included in the rate
base, multiplied by 1.07.
(C)
The fixed capital asset component is constant across all
case mix classes.
(i)
For rates effective May 1, 2000, the fixed capital asset
component is equal to the fixed capital asset component in effect January
1, 2000.
(ii)
For rates effective September 1, 2000, the fixed capital
asset component is equal to the fixed capital asset component from clause
(i) of this subparagraph multiplied by 1.016.
(iii)
For rates effective September 1, 2001 and thereafter,
the fixed capital asset component is calculated as follows:
(I)
Determine the 80th percentile in the array of allowable
appraised property values per licensed bed, including land and improvements.
Appraised values for this purpose are determined as follows:
(-a-)
For proprietary facilities, tax exempt facilities provided
an appraisal from their local property taxing authority, and tax exempt facilities
not provided an appraisal from their local property taxing authority because
of an "exempt" status whose independent appraisal is in the first year of
its five-year interval as described in §355.402(f)(2)(B)(ii) of this
title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports),
allowable appraised values are determined as described in §355.402(f)
of this title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost
Reports).
(-b-)
For tax exempt facilities not provided an appraisal from
their local property taxing authority because of an "exempt" status whose
independent appraisal is not in the first year of its five-year interval as
described in §355.402(f)(2)(B)(ii) of this title (relating to Cost Report
Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports), allowable appraised values
are determined by indexing the facility's allowable appraised value as determined
in §355.402(f) of this title (relating to Cost Report Requirements: 1997
and Subsequent Cost Reports) to the median increase in appraised values among
contracted facilities in the state as a whole from the reporting period coinciding
with the first year of the facility's five-year interval to the reporting
period upon which reimbursements are to be based.
(-c-)
Those facilities that do not report an allowable appraised
value as described in §355.402(f) of this title (relating to Cost Report
Requirements: 1997 and Subsequent Cost Reports) are not included in the array
for purposes of calculating the use fee.
(II)
Project the 80th percentile of appraised property values
per bed by one-half the forecasted increase in the personal consumption expenditures
(PCE) chain-type price index from the cost reporting year to the rate year.
(III)
Calculate an annual use fee per bed as the projected
80th percentile of appraised property values per bed times an annual use rate
of 14%.
(IV)
Calculate a per diem use fee per bed by dividing the annual
use fee per bed by annual days of service per bed at the higher of 85% occupancy,
or the statewide average occupancy rate during the cost reporting period.
(V)
The use fee is limited to the lesser of the fee as calculated
in subclauses (I)-(IV) of this clause, or the fee as calculated by inflating
the fee from the previous rate period by the forecasted rate of change in
the PCE chain-type price index.
(2)
Case mix classification system. All Medicaid recipients
are classified according to the Texas Index for Level of Effort (TILE) classification
system described in
1 TAC §371.212
[
(3)
Per diem rate methodology. Staff determine per diem rate
recommendations for each of the 11 TILE groups and for the default group according
to the following procedures:
(A)
Determine the statewide average case mix index for all
Medicaid recipients, except those in the default group. Weight the indexes
from paragraph (2) of this subsection, which are based on a sample of nursing
facilities, by the estimated statewide recipient days of service by case mix
group during the cost reporting period covered by the rate base and determine
the weighted average. The statewide average index is based on the most recent
and complete data available indicating recipient days of service by case mix
group that correspond to the period covered by the cost reports included in
the rate base.
(B)
Determine the standardized statewide case mix index for
each of the 11 TILE groups by dividing each of the indexes described under
paragraph (2) of this subsection by the statewide average case mix index described
under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.
(C)
The other recipient care rate component varies according
to case mix class of service.
(i)
For rates effective May 1, 2000, using the inflation factors
used in determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000,
project the costs in the 1998 Texas Nursing Facility Cost Report data base
to the rate period beginning January 1, 2000, and ending August 31, 2000.
Using these projected costs, determine the sum of other recipient care costs
in all nursing facilities included in the 1998 data base. Then divide the
total by the sum of recipient days of service in all facilities in the 1998
data base. Multiply the resulting weighted, average per diem cost of other
recipient care by 1.07. The result is the average other recipient care rate
component. To calculate the other recipient care per diem rate component for
each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, multiply each
of the standardized statewide case mix indexes used in determination of the
nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000, by the average other recipient
care rate component.
(ii)
For rates effective September 1, 2000, multiply the average
other recipient care per diem rate from clause (i) of this subparagraph by
1.016. To calculate the other recipient care per diem rate component for each
of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, multiply each of
the standardized statewide case mix indexes used in determination of the nursing
facility rates in effect January 1, 2000, by the average other recipient care
rate component.
(iii)
For rates effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter,
the average other recipient care rate component is calculated as follows.
Adjust the raw sum of other recipient care costs in all nursing facilities
included in the rate base in order to account for disallowed costs and inflation,
as specified in §355.306 of this title (relating to Cost Finding Methodology).
Then divide the adjusted total by the sum of recipient days of service in
all facilities in the current rate base. Multiply the resulting weighted,
average per diem cost of other recipient care by 1.07. The result is the average
other recipient care rate component. To calculate the other recipient care
per diem rate component for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the
default group, multiply each of the standardized statewide case mix indexes
from subparagraph (B) of this paragraph by the average other recipient care
rate component.
(D)
Total case mix per diem rates vary according to case mix
class of service and according to participant status in [
(i)
For each participating facility, for each of the 11 TILE
case mix groups and for the default group, the recommended total per diem
rate is the sum of the following five rate components:
(I)
the dietary rate component from paragraph (1)(A) of this
subsection;
(II)
the general/administration rate component from paragraph
(1)(B) of this subsection;
(III)
the fixed capital asset use fee component from paragraph
(1)(C) of this subsection;
(IV)
the case mix group's other recipient care per diem rate
component by case mix group from paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection; and
(V)
the case mix group's total direct care staff rate component
for that participating facility as determined in §355.308
(1)
of
this title (relating to [
(ii)
For nonparticipating facilities, for each of the 11 TILE
case mix groups and for the default group, the recommended total per diem
rate is the sum of the following five rate components:
(I)
the dietary rate component from paragraph (1)(A) of this
subsection;
(II)
the general/administration rate component from paragraph
(1)(B) of this subsection;
(III)
the fixed capital asset use fee component from paragraph
(1)(C) of this subsection;
(IV)
the case mix group's other recipient care per diem rate
component by case mix group from paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection; and
(V)
the case mix group's total direct care staff
base
rate component [
(E)
Qualifying ventilator-dependent residents may receive a
supplement to the per diem rate specified in subparagraph (D) of this paragraph.
(i)
To qualify for supplemental reimbursement, a resident must
require artificial ventilation for at least six consecutive hours daily and
the use must be prescribed by a licensed physician.
(ii)
A ventilator-dependent resource differential case mix
index is calculated, based on time-study research data. This resource differential
index reflects the difference between direct nursing services for ventilator-dependent
residents and services for residents in the most severe heavy-care TILE group.
(I)
The per diem rate supplement for participants in the [
(II)
The per diem rate supplement for non-participants in the
[
(iii)
The supplemental reimbursement for residents requiring
continuous artificial ventilation is 100% of the per diem ventilator rate
supplement.
(iv)
The supplemental reimbursement for residents not requiring
continuous artificial ventilation daily but requiring artificial ventilation
for at least six consecutive hours daily is 40% of the per diem ventilator
rate supplement.
(F)
Qualifying children with tracheostomies requiring daily
care may receive a supplement to the per diem rate specified in subparagraph
(D) of this paragraph.
(i)
To qualify for supplemental reimbursement, a resident must
be less than 22 years of age; require daily cleansing, dressing, and suctioning
of a tracheostomy; and be unable to do self care. The daily care of the tracheostomy
must be prescribed by a licensed physician.
(ii)
The supplemental reimbursement for children receiving
daily tracheostomy care is 60% of the per diem ventilator rate supplement
as specified in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph.
(G)
Children with qualifying conditions as specified in subparagraphs
(E) and (F) of this paragraph may receive only one of the supplemental reimbursements.
Therefore, children with tracheostomies who are also ventilator-dependent
are not eligible to receive both supplemental reimbursements.
(4)
Case mix classification effective periods. The effective
periods of case mix classifications are defined as follows.
(A)
A recipient's case mix classification and associated per
diem rate payment remain in effect until the recipient's next required assessment,
unless one of the following events takes place:
(i)
a provider submits an off-cycle assessment as specified
in 40 TAC §19.2412(a)(5) (relating to Texas Index for Level of Effort
(TILE) Assessments);
(ii)
a DHS nurse reviewer revises the recipient's assessment
and TILE classification under the provisions of 40 TAC §19.2412(b) (Texas
Index for Level of Effort (TILE) Assessments); or
(iii)
the recipient is discharged from the Medicaid nursing
facility vendor payment system for more than 30 days prior to receiving a
permanent medical necessity determination.
(B)
The case mix classification and associated per diem payment
rate of a recipient in the default group are changed retroactively when the
provider furnishes DHS with corrected data that permit classification in one
of the 11 TILE case mix groups.
(c)
Special reimbursement class. HHSC may define special reimbursement
classes, including experimental reimbursement classes of service to be used
in research and demonstration projects on new reimbursement methods and reimbursement
classes of service, to address the cost differences of a select group of recipients.
Special classes may be implemented on a statewide basis, may be limited to
a specific region of the state, or may be limited to a selected group of providers.
(1)
Pediatric Care Facility Class. The purpose of this special
class is to recognize, through the adoption of a facility-specific payment
rate, the cost differences that exist in a nursing facility or distinct unit
of a nursing facility that serves predominantly children.
(2)
Definitions.
(A)
Pediatric care facility--A pediatric care facility is an
entire facility that has maintained an average daily census of 80% or more
children for the six-month period prior to its entry into the pediatric care
facility class based on the entire licensed facility. A pediatric care facility
can also be a distinct unit of a facility that has maintained an average daily
census of 85% or more children for the six-month period prior to its entry
into the pediatric care facility class based on the distinct unit of the facility.
To remain a pediatric care facility, the pediatric care facility must maintain
an average daily census of 80% or more children if the pediatric care facility
is an entire facility and 85% or more children if the pediatric care facility
is a distinct unit of the facility. The contracted provider must request in
writing by certified mail or by special mail delivery where the delivery can
be verified to become a member of the pediatric care facility special reimbursement
class. The request must be sent to the Texas Health and Human Services Commission.
(B)
Distinct unit--A portion of a nursing facility that is
physically separate from (beds are not commingled with) other units of the
facility. The distinct unit can be an entire wing, a separate building, an
entire floor, or an entire hallway. The distinct unit consists of all beds
within the designated area. A distinct unit must consist of 28 or more Medicaid-contracted
beds.
(C)
Children--For the purposes of this pediatric care facility
class, children are defined as being at or below 22 years of age.
(3)
Payment rate determination. Payment rates will be determined
in the following manner:
(A)
Cost reports and payment rate determination for pediatric
care facilities are governed by the requirements specified in Subchapter A
of this chapter (relating to Cost Determination Process). A nursing facility
that contains a pediatric care facility distinct unit must complete two cost
reports: one report for the pediatric care facility distinct unit and one
report for the remainder of the facility.
(B)
Payment rates for this class of service will be determined
on a facility-specific basis for the pediatric care facility. The total allowable
costs from the most recent cost report deemed acceptable are adjusted for
inflation from the cost report period to the rate period. The adjusted cost
is divided by the greater of total patient days of service reported on the
cost report or the days of service at 85% of contracted capacity of the pediatric
care facility. The resulting cost per day is multiplied by a factor of 1.03
to determine the final facility-specific rate. If no acceptable cost report
is available, the provider will be required to submit a cost report covering
the time period specified by HHSC.
(C)
The facility-specific payment rate from paragraph (3)(B)
of this subsection will be paid for all Medicaid residents of a qualifying
pediatric care facility regardless of the TILE level of the resident.
(D)
Residents of the pediatric care facility will not be eligible
to receive the ventilator-dependent or the children-with-tracheostomies supplemental
reimbursements.
(E)
Pediatric care facilities are not eligible to participate
in §355.308 (relating to Enhanced Direct Care Staff Rate).
(d)
Nurse aide training and competency evaluation costs.
(1)
DHS reimburses nursing facilities for the actual costs
of training and testing nurse aides as required under the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act of 1987 (OBRA '87). Payments are based on cost reimbursement vouchers
that are to be submitted quarterly. Allowable costs are limited to those costs
incurred for training provided after October 1, 1990, for:
(A)
actual training course expenses up to a set amount determined
by DHS per nurse aide;
(B)
competency evaluation; or
(C)
supplies and materials used in the nurse aide training
not already covered by the training course fee.
(2)
Nurse aide salaries while in training are factored into
the vendor rate and are not to be included on the reimbursement voucher.
(3)
Training program costs that exceed the DHS cost ceiling
must have prior approval from DHS before costs can be reimbursed. A written
request to Provider Billing Services must include:
(A)
name and vendor number of facility.
(B)
description of training program for which the facility
is seeking reimbursement approval, to include:
(i)
name, telephone number and address of the nurse aide training
and competency evaluation program (NATCEP);
(ii)
whether the NATCEP program is facility or non-facility-based;
and
(iii)
name of the NATCEP program director.
(C)
an explanation of why the cost for the NATCEP exceeds the
reimbursement ceiling. The explanation must include:
(i)
a completed nurse aide unit cost calculation form for a
facility-based NATCEP; or
(ii)
a breakdown of the nurse aide unit cost by the instructor
fees and training materials for a non-facility-based NATCEP.
(D)
an explanation of why the nursing facility cannot utilize
a training program at or below the reimbursement ceiling and what steps the
facility has taken to explore more cost efficient training courses. The explanation
must include:
(i)
the availability of NATCEPs, such as the location or the
frequency of training offered, in the geographic region of the facility;
(ii)
the name and address of each NATCEP that the facility
has explored as a provider of nurse aide training; and
(iii)
the cost per nurse aide for each NATCEP identified in
clause (i) of this subparagraph, as specified in subparagraph (C)(i) of this
paragraph or subparagraph (C)(ii) of this paragraph.
(4)
All prior approval requests as outlined in paragraph (3)
of this subsection must be submitted to DHS, Provider Billing Services that:
(A)
may request additional information in order to evaluate
a reimbursement request; and
(B)
will make the final decision on a reimbursement request.
(5)
All nurse aide training courses must be approved by DHS
before costs associated with them can be reimbursed.
(6)
Nursing facilities are responsible for tracking and documenting
nurse aide training costs for each nurse aide trained. All documentation is
subject to DHS audits. If substantiating documentation for amounts billed
to DHS cannot be verified, DHS will immediately recoup funds paid to the facility.
(7)
Individuals who have successfully completed a nurse aide
training and competency evaluation program (NATCEP) may be directly reimbursed
for costs incurred in completing a NATCEP. The individual must meet all of
the conditions specified in subparagraphs (A)-(E) of this paragraph.
(A)
The individual must not have been employed at the time
of completing the NATCEP.
(B)
The individual must have been employed by, or received
an offer of employment from, a nursing facility not later than 12 months after
successfully completing the NATCEP.
(C)
The individual must have been employed by the facility
for no less than six months.
(D)
The nursing facility must not have claimed reimbursement
for training expenses for the individual.
(E)
The individual must be listed on the current Nurse Aide
Registry.
(8)
Individuals must submit cost reimbursement vouchers to
DHS with proof that the individual has been employed by a facility for no
less than six months.
(9)
Individuals who leave nursing facility employment before
accruing the required six months of employment, as specified in paragraph
(7)(C) of this subsection, may receive 50% reimbursement as long as the individual
was employed for no less than three months.
(10)
Reimbursement to individuals may not exceed the reimbursement
ceiling as detailed in paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection.
(e)
Oxygen costs. Oxygen costs incurred on or after January
1, 1995, will not be reimbursed on cost reimbursement vouchers. Those oxygen
costs must be reported as expenses on the cost report.
(f)
For rates effective September
1, 2003 and September 1, 2004, the rates for the dietary rate component from
subsection (b)(1)(A) of this section, the general/administration rate component
from subsection (b)(1)(B) of this section, fixed capital asset component from
subsection (b)(1)(C) of this section, the other recipient care rate component
from subsection (b)(3)(C) of this section, the supplement to per diem rates
for qualified ventilator-dependent residents from subsection (b)(3)(E) of
this section, the supplement to per diem rates for qualified children with
tracheostomies from subsection (b)(3)(F) of this section and the pediatric
care facility rate from subsection (c) of this section will be equal to the
rates in effect August 31, 2003 adjusted as necessary to remain within appropriations.
Adjustments necessary to remain within appropriations will apply equally in
percentage terms across each component of the nursing facility rate and each
add-on.
§355.308.[
(a)
Direct care staff cost center. This cost center will include
compensation for employee and contract labor Registered Nurses (RNs), including
Directors of Nursing (DONs) and Assistant Directors of Nursing (ADONs); Licensed
Vocational Nurses (LVNs), including DONs and ADONs; medication aides; and
nurse aides performing nursing-related duties for Medicaid contracted beds.
(1)
Compensation to be included for these employee staff types
is the allowable compensation defined in §355.103(b)(1) of this title
(relating to Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs) that is reported
as either salaries and/or wages (including payroll taxes and workers' compensation)
or employee benefits. Benefits required by §355.103(b)(1)(A)(iii) of
this title (relating to Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs)
to be reported as costs applicable to specific cost report line items are
not to be included in this cost center.
(2)
Direct care staff who also have administrative duties not
related to nursing must properly direct charge their compensation to each
type of function performed based upon daily time sheets maintained throughout
the entire reporting period.
(3)
Nurse aides must meet the qualifications enumerated under
40 TAC §19.1903 (relating to Required Training of Nurse Aides) to be
included in this cost center. Nurse aides include certified nurse aides and
nurse aides in training as per 40 TAC §94.3(k) (relating to Nurse Aide
Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) Requirements).
(4)
Contract labor refers to personnel for whom the contracted
provider is not responsible for the payment of payroll taxes (such as FICA,
Medicare, and federal and state unemployment insurance) and who perform tasks
routinely performed by employees. Allowable contract labor costs are defined
in §355.103(b)(2)(C) of this title (relating to Specifications for Allowable
and Unallowable Costs).
(5)
For facilities receiving supplemental reimbursement for
children with tracheostomies requiring daily care as described in §355.307(b)(3)(F)
of this title (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology), staff required
by 40 TAC §19.901(14)(C)(iii) (relating to Quality of Care) performing
nursing-related duties for Medicaid contracted beds are included in the direct
care staff cost center.
(6)
For facilities receiving supplemental reimbursement for
qualifying ventilator-dependent residents as described in §355.307(b)(3)(E)
of this title (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology), Registered
Respiratory Therapists and Certified Respiratory Therapy Technicians are included
in the direct care staff cost center.
(7)
Nursing facility administrators and assistant administrators
are not included in the direct care staff cost center.
(8)
Staff members performing more than one function in a facility
without a differential in pay between functions are categorized at the highest
level of licensure or certification they possess. If this highest level of
licensure or certification is not that of an RN, LVN, medication aide, or
certified nurse aide, the staff member is not to be included in the direct
care staff cost center but rather in the cost center where staff members with
that licensure or certification status are typically reported.
(b)
Rate year. The standard rate year begins on the first day
of September and ends on the last day of August of the following year.
(c)
Open enrollment. Open enrollment
for the enhanced
direct care staff rates
will begin on the first day of July and end
on the last day of that same July preceding the rate year for which payments
are being determined unless the Texas Health and Human Services Commission
(HHSC) notified providers prior to the first day of July that [
(d)
Enrollment contract amendment. An initial enrollment contract
amendment is required from each facility choosing to participate in the enhanced
direct care staff rate. Participating and nonparticipating facilities may
request to modify their enrollment status (i.e., a nonparticipant can request
to become a participant, a participant can request to become a nonparticipant,
a participant can request to change its enhancement level) during any open
enrollment period. Requests to modify a facility's enrollment status during
an open enrollment period must be received by HHSC Rate Analysis by the last
day of the open enrollment period as per subsection (c) of this section. If
the last day of the open enrollment period falls on a weekend, a national
holiday, or a state holiday, then the first business day following the last
day of the open enrollment period is the final day the receipt of the enrollment
contract amendment will be accepted. An enrollment contract amendment that
is not received by the stated deadline will not be accepted. Facilities from
which HHSC Rate Analysis has not received an acceptable request to modify
their enrollment by the last day of the open enrollment period will continue
at the level of participation in effect during the open enrollment period
within available funds.
If HHSC determines that funds are not available
to continue participation at the level of participation in effect during the
open enrollment period, facilities will be notified as per subsection (ee)
of this section.
To be acceptable, an enrollment contract amendment
must be completed according to instructions, signed by an authorized signator
as per the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) Form 2031 applicable to
the provider's contract or ownership type, and be legible.
(e)
New facilities. For purposes of this section, for each
rate year a new facility is defined as a facility delivering its first day
of service to a DHS recipient after the first day of the open enrollment period,
as defined in subsection (c) of this section, for that rate year. Facilities
that underwent an ownership change are not considered new facilities. For
purposes of this subsection, an acceptable enrollment contract amendment is
defined as a legible enrollment contract amendment that has been completed
according to instructions, signed by an authorized signator as per the DHS
Form 2031 applicable to the provider's contract or ownership type, and received
by HHSC within 30 days of the mailing of notification to the facility by HHSC
that such an enrollment contract amendment must be submitted. New facilities
will receive the direct care staff
base
rate [
[
[
[
(f)
Staffing and Compensation Report submittal requirements.
Staffing and Compensation Reports must be submitted as follows:
(1)
Annual Staffing and Compensation Report. All
participating
[
(A)
When a
participating
facility changes ownership,
the prior owner must submit a Staffing and Compensation Report covering the
period from the beginning of the rate year to the date recognized by DHS as
the ownership-change effective date. This report will be used as the basis
for determining any recoupment amounts as described in subsections (n) and
(o) of this section. The new owner will be required to submit a Staffing and
Compensation Report covering the period from the day after the date recognized
by DHS as the ownership-change effective date to the end of the rate year.
(B)
Participating facilities
[
(C)
Participating facilities who voluntarily withdraw from
participation as per subsection (r) of this section must submit a Staffing
and Compensation Report within 60 days of the date of withdrawal as determined
by HHSC, covering the period from the beginning of the rate year to the date
of withdrawal as determined by HHSC. This report will be used as the basis
for determining any recoupment amounts as described in subsections (n) and
(o) of this section.
(D)
Participating facilities
[
(2)
Other reports. HHSC may require other Staffing and Compensation
Reports from all facilities as needed.
(3)
Vendor hold. HHSC or its designee will place on hold the
vendor payments for any
participating
facility that does not submit
a Staffing and Compensation Report completed in accordance with all applicable
rules and instructions by the due dates described in this subsection. This
vendor hold will remain in effect until an acceptable Staffing and Compensation
Report is received by HHSC.
Participating facilities
[
(4)
Provider-initiated amended accountability reports. Reports
must be received prior to the date the provider is notified of compliance
with spending and/or staffing requirements for the report in question as per
subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section.
(g)
Report contents. Annual Staffing and Compensation Reports
will include any information required by HHSC to implement this enhanced direct
care staff rate.
(h)
Completion of Reports. All Staffing and Compensation Reports
must be completed in accordance with the provisions of §§355.102-355.105
of this title (relating to General Principles of Allowable and Unallowable
Costs, Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs, Revenues, and General
Reporting and Documentation Requirements, Methods, and Procedures) and may
be reviewed or audited in accordance with §355.106 of this title (relating
to Basic Objectives and Criteria for Audit and Desk Review of Cost Reports).
Beginning with the state fiscal year 2002 report, all Staffing and Compensation
Reports must be completed by preparers who have attended the required nursing
facility cost report training as per §355.102(d) (relating to General
Principles of Allowable and Unallowable Costs).
For Staffing and Compensation
Reports for even numbered state fiscal years, preparers must have attended
the cost report training for that same even numbered year. For Staffing and
Compensation Reports for odd numbered state fiscal years, preparers must have
attended the most recent cost report training sessions provided prior to the
due date of the Staffing and Compensation Report.
(i)
Enrollment. Facilities choosing to participate in the enhanced
direct care staff rate must submit to HHSC a signed contract amendment as
described in subsection (d) of this section, before the end of the open enrollment
period. Participation will remain in effect, subject to availability of funds,
until the facility notifies HHSC in accordance with subsection (r) of this
section that it no longer wishes to participate or the facility is removed
from participation as described in subsection (n) of this section.
If
HHSC determines that funds are not available to continue participation, facilities
will be notified as per subsection (ee) of this section.
Facilities
voluntarily withdrawing from participation will have their participation end
effective on the date of the withdrawal as determined by HHSC.
(j)
Determination of staffing requirements for participants.
Facilities choosing to participate in the enhanced direct care staff rate
agree to maintain certain direct care staffing levels. In order to permit
facilities the flexibility to substitute RN, LVN and aide (Medication Aide
and nurse aide) staff resources and, at the same time, comply with an overall
nursing staff requirement, total nursing staff requirements are expressed
in terms of LVN equivalent minutes. Conversion factors to convert RN and aide
minutes into LVN equivalent minutes are based upon most recently available,
reliable relative compensation levels for the different staff types.
(1)
Minimum staffing levels. HHSC determines, for each participating
facility, minimum LVN equivalent staffing levels as follows.
(A)
Determine minimum required LVN equivalent minutes per resident
day of service for various types of residents using time study data, cost
report information, and other appropriate data sources.
(i)
Determine LVN equivalent minutes associated with Medicare
residents based on the data sources from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph
adjusted for estimated acuity differences between Medicare and Medicaid residents.
(ii)
Determine minimum required LVN equivalent minutes per
resident day of service associated with each Texas Index for Level of Effort
(TILE) case mix group and additional minimum required minutes for residents
reimbursed under the TILE system who also qualify for supplemental reimbursement
for ventilator care or pediatric tracheostomy care as described in §355.307
of this title (relating to Reimbursement Setting Methodology) based on the
data sources from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph adjusted for acuity differences
between Medicare and Medicaid residents and other factors.
(B)
Based on most recently available, reliable utilization
data, determine for each facility the total days of service by TILE group,
days of service provided to TILE residents qualifying for Medicaid supplemental
reimbursement for ventilator or tracheostomy care, total days of service for
Medicare Part A residents
in Medicaid-contracted beds
, and total
days of service for all other residents
in Medicaid-contracted beds
.
(C)
Multiply the minimum required LVN equivalent minutes for
each TILE group and supplemental TILE reimbursement group from subparagraph
(A) of this paragraph by the facility's Medicaid days of service in each TILE
group and supplemental TILE reimbursement group from subparagraph (B) of this
paragraph and sum the products.
(D)
Multiply the minimum required LVN equivalent minutes for
Medicare residents by the facility's Medicare Part A days of service
in Medicaid-contracted beds
.
(E)
Effective for reporting periods beginning on or after September
1, 2001, divide the sum from subparagraph (C) of this paragraph by the facility's
total Medicaid days of service, with a day of service for a Medicaid TILE
recipient who also qualifies for a supplemental TILE reimbursement counted
as one day of service, compare this result to the minimum required LVN-equivalent
minutes for a TILE 207 and multiply the lower of the two figures by the facility's
other resident days of service
in Medicaid-contracted beds
.
(F)
Sum the results of subparagraphs (C), (D) and (E) of this
paragraph, divide the sum by the facility's total days of service
in
Medicaid-contracted beds
, with a day of service for a Medicaid TILE
recipient who also qualifies for a supplemental TILE reimbursement counted
as one day of service. The results of these calculations are the minimum LVN
equivalent minutes per resident day a participating facility must provide.
(2)
Enhanced staffing levels. Participating facilities desiring
to staff above the minimum requirements from paragraph (1) of this subsection
may request LVN-equivalent staffing enhancements from an array of LVN-equivalent
enhanced staffing options and associated add-on payments during open enrollment.
Add-on payments and staffing requirements associated with staffing increments
between the minimum staffing requirement from paragraph (1) of this subsection
and the minimum staffing requirement for participation in effect in state
fiscal year 2003, adjusted based upon most recently available, reliable relative
compensation levels for the different staff types, will be adjusted for variations
in facility case mix.
(3)
Granting of staffing enhancements. HHSC divides all requested
enhancements into two groups: pre-existing enhancements that facilities request
to carry over from the prior year and newly-requested enhancements. Newly-requested
enhancements may be enhancements requested by facilities that were nonparticipants
in the prior year or by facilities that were participants in the prior year
desiring to be granted additional enhancements. For the granting of enhancements
to be effective on or after September 1, 2001, for an enhancement to qualify
as a pre-existing enhancement a facility must have actually met the enhancement's
staffing requirements during the most recent reporting period from which reliable
data is available at the time qualification is determined. [
(A)
HHSC determines projected units of service
by TILE
group
for facilities requesting each enhancement option, [
(B)
HHSC compares the sum of the
sums
[
(i)
If the product is less than or equal to available funds,
all requested enhancements are granted.
(ii)
If the product is greater than available funds, enhancements
are granted beginning with the lowest level of enhancement and granting each
successive level of enhancement until requested enhancements are granted within
available funds. Based upon an examination of existing staffing levels and
staffing needs, HHSC may grant certain enhancement options priority for distribution.
(4)
Notification of granting of enhancements. Participating
facilities are notified, in a manner determined by HHSC, as to the disposition
of their request for staffing enhancements.
(k)
Determination of direct care staff
base rate
[
(1)
Determine the sum of recipient care costs from the direct
care staff cost center in subsection (a) of this section in all nursing facilities
included in the Texas Nursing Facility Cost Report database used to determine
the nursing facility rates in effect on January 1, 2000 (hereinafter referred
to as the initial database).
(2)
Adjust the sum from paragraph (1) of this subsection in
order to account for inflation utilizing the inflation factors used in the
determination of the nursing facility rates in effect January 1, 2000.
(3)
Divide the result from paragraph (2) of this subsection
by the sum of recipient days of service in all facilities in the initial database
and multiply the result by 1.07. The result is the average direct care staff
base
rate component for
all
[
(4)
To calculate the direct care staff per diem
base
rate
component for
all
[
(5)
The direct care staff per diem
base
rates will
remain constant except as follows. For rates effective September 1, 2000,
the rate derived in paragraph (3) of this subsection will be multiplied by
1.016. Effective September 1, 2001, and thereafter, the direct care staff
per diem rate will remain constant except for adjustments necessitated by
increases in the personal consumption expenditures (PCE) chain-type price
index.
For rates effective September 1, 2003 and September 1, 2004, the
direct care staff per diem base rate will be equal to the direct care staff
rate for nonparticipating facilities in effect August 31, 2003 adjusted as
necessary to remain within appropriations. Adjustments necessary to remain
within appropriations will apply equally in percentage terms across each component
of the nursing facility rate and each add-on.
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
(l)
[
(m)
Staffing requirements for participating facilities. Each
participating facility will be required to maintain adjusted LVN-equivalent
minutes equal to those determined in subsection (j) of this section. Each
participating facility's adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained during
the reporting period will be determined as follows.
(1)
Determine unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained.
Upon receipt of the staffing and spending information described in subsection
(f) of this section, HHSC will determine the unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes
maintained by each facility during the reporting period.
(2)
Determine adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained. Compare
the unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained by the facility during the
reporting period from paragraph (1) of this subsection to the LVN-equivalent
minutes required of the facility as determined in subsection (j) of this section.
The adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes are determined as follows:
(A)
If the number of unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained
by the facility during the reporting period is greater than or equal to the
number of LVN-equivalent minutes required for the facility or less than the
minimum LVN-equivalent minutes required for participation as determined in
subsection (j)(1) of this section; the facility's adjusted LVN-equivalent
minutes maintained is equal to its unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes; or
(B)
If the number of unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained
by the facility during the reporting period is less than the number of LVN-equivalent
minutes required of the facility, but greater than or equal to the minimum
LVN-equivalent minutes required for participation as determined in subsection
(j)(1) of this section, the following steps are performed.
(i)
Determine what the facility's accrued Medicaid fee-for-service
direct care
revenue for the reporting period would have been if their
staffing requirement had been set at a level consistent with the highest LVN-equivalent
minutes that the facility actually maintained, as defined in subsection (j)
of this section.
(ii)
Determine the facility's adjusted accrued
direct
care
revenue by multiplying the accrued
direct care
revenue
from clause (i) of this subparagraph by 0.85.
(iii)
Determine the facility's accrued allowable Medicaid fee-for-service
direct care staff expenses for the rate year.
(iv)
Determine the facility's direct care spending surplus
for the reporting period by subtracting the facility's adjusted accrued
direct care
revenue from clause (ii) of this subparagraph from the facility's
accrued allowable
direct care
expenses from clause (iii) of this
subparagraph.
(v)
If the facility's direct care spending surplus from clause
(iv) of this subparagraph is less than or equal to zero, the facility's adjusted
LVN-equivalent minutes maintained is equal to the unadjusted LVN-equivalent
minutes maintained as calculated in paragraph (1) of this subsection.
(vi)
If the facility's direct care spending surplus from clause
(iv) of this subparagraph is greater than zero, the adjusted LVN-equivalent
minutes maintained by the facility during the reporting period is set equal
to the facility's direct care spending surplus from clause (iv) of this subparagraph
divided by the per diem enhancement add-on as determined in subsection (l)[
(n)
Staffing accountability. Participating facilities will
be responsible for maintaining the staffing levels determined in subsection
(j) of this section. HHSC will determine the adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes
maintained by each facility during the reporting period by the method described
in subsection (m) of this section.
(1)
HHSC or its designee will recoup all direct care staff
revenues associated with unmet staffing goals from participating facilities
that fail to meet their staffing requirements during the reporting period.
(2)
In addition,
effective the first day of the rate year
immediately following the determination that a facility fail
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
(o)
Spending requirements for
participants.
[
(1)
At the end of the rate year, a spending floor will be calculated
by multiplying accrued Medicaid fee-for-service direct care staff revenues
(net of revenues recouped by HHSC or its designee due to the failure of the
facility to meet a staffing requirement as per subsection (n) of this section)
by 0.85.
(2)
Accrued allowable Medicaid direct care staff fee-for-service
expenses for the rate year will be compared to the spending floor from paragraph
(1) of this subsection. HHSC or its designee will recoup the difference between
the spending floor and accrued allowable Medicaid direct care staff fee-for-service
expenses from facilities whose Medicaid direct care staff spending is less
than their spending floor.
(3)
At no time will a participating
facility's direct care rate after spending recoupment be less than the direct
care base rate.
(p)
Mitigation of recoupment. Recoupment of funds described
in subsection (o) of this section may be mitigated as follows.
[
(1)
[
(2)
[
(3)
[
(4)
[
(5)
[
(6)
[
(7)
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
(q)
Adjusting staffing requirements. Facilities that determine
that they will not be able to meet their staffing requirements from subsection
(m) of this section may request a reduction in their staffing requirements
and associated rate add-on. These requests will be effective on the first
day of the month following approval of the request.
(r)
Voluntary withdrawal. Facilities wishing to withdraw from
participation must notify HHSC in writing by certified mail. Facilities voluntarily
withdrawing must remain nonparticipants for the remainder of the rate year.
(s)
Notification of recoupment based on Annual Staffing and
Compensation Report. Facilities will be notified, in a manner specified by
HHSC, within 90 days of the
determination of their recoupment amount
by HHSC
[
(t)
Vendor hold. Facilities required to submit a Staffing and
Compensation Report due to a change of ownership or contract termination as
described in subsection (f)(1)(A)-(B) of this section will have funds held
as per 40 TAC §19.2308(2) (relating to Change of Ownership) until an
acceptable Staffing and Compensation Report is received by HHSC and funds
identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section
are repaid to HHSC or its designee. HHSC or its designee will recoup any amount
owed from the facility's vendor payments that are being held. In cases where
funds identified for recoupment cannot be repaid from the held vendor payments,
the responsible entity from subsection (x) of this section will be jointly
and severally liable for any additional payment due to HHSC or its designee.
Failure to repay the amount due or submit an acceptable payment plan within
60 days of notification will result in placement of a vendor hold on all DHS
contracts controlled by the responsible entity and will bar the responsible
entity from enacting any new contracts with DHS until repayment is made in
full.
(u)
Failure to document staff time and spending. Undocumented
direct care staff and contract labor time and compensation costs will be disallowed
and will not be used in the determination of direct care staff time and costs
per unit of service.
(v)
All other rate components. All other rate components will
be calculated as specified in §355.307 of this title (relating to Reimbursement
Setting Methodology) and will be uniform for all providers.
(w)
Appeals. Subject matter of informal reviews and formal
appeals is limited as per §355.110(a)(3)(B) of this title (relating to
Informal Reviews and Formal Appeals).
(x)
Responsible entities. The contracted provider, owner, or
legal entity that received the revenue to be recouped upon is responsible
for the repayment of any recoupment amount.
(y)
Change of ownership. Participation in the enhanced direct
care staff rate confers to the new owner as defined in 40 TAC §19.2308
(relating to Change of Ownership) when there is a change of ownership. The
new owner is responsible for the reporting requirements in subsection (f)
of this section for any reporting period days occurring after the change.
If the change of ownership occurs during an open enrollment period as defined
in subsection (c) of this section, then the owner recognized by DHS on the
last day of the enrollment period may request to modify the enrollment status
of the facility in accordance with subsection (d) of this section. [
(z)
Contract cancellations. If a facility's Medicaid contract
is cancelled before the first day of an open enrollment period as defined
in subsection (c) of this section and the facility is not granted a new contract
until after the last day of the open enrollment period, participation in the
enhanced direct care staff rate as it existed prior to the date when the facility's
contract was cancelled will be reinstated when the facility is granted a new
contract, if it remains under the same ownership.
(aa)
In cases where a parent company, sole member, or governmental
body controls more than one nursing facility (NF) contract, the parent company,
sole member, or governmental body may request at the time each Annual Staffing
and Compensation Report is submitted, in a manner prescribed by HHSC, to have
its contracts' compliance with the spending requirements detailed in subsection
(o) of this section for the applicable reporting period evaluated in the aggregate
for all NF contracts it controlled at the end of the rate year or at the effective
date of the change of ownership or termination of its last NF contract. In
limited [
(bb)
Medicaid Swing Bed Program for Rural Hospitals. When a
rural hospital participating in the Medicaid swing bed program furnishes NF
nursing care to a Medicaid recipient under 40 TAC §19.2326 (relating
to Medicaid Swing Bed Program for Rural Hospitals), DHS makes payment to the
hospital using the same procedures, the same case-mix methodology and the
same TILE rates that HHSC authorizes for reimbursing NFs participating in
the enhanced direct care staff rate at the minimum level required for participation.
These hospitals are not subject to the staffing and spending requirements
detailed in this section.
(cc)
Reinvestment. HHSC will reinvest recouped funds in the
enhanced direct care staff rate program, to the extent that there are qualifying
facilities.
(1)
Identify qualifying facilities. Facilities meeting the
following criteria during the most recent completed reporting period are qualifying
facilities for reinvestment purposes.
(A)
The facility was a participant in the enhanced direct care
staff rate.
(B)
The facility's unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes as determined
in subsection (m)(1) of this section were greater than the number of LVN-minutes
required of the facility as determined in subsection (j) of this section.
(C)
The facility met its spending requirement as determined
in subsection (o) of this section.
(D)
An acceptable Annual Staffing and Compensation Report for
the reporting period was received by HHSC Rate Analysis at least 30 days prior
to the date distribution of available reinvestment funds was determined.
(E)
The DHS contract that was in
effect for the facility during the reinvestment reporting period is still
in effect as an active contract when reinvestment is determined.
(2)
Distribution of available reinvestment funds. Available
funds are distributed as described below.
(A)
HHSC determines units of service provided during the most
recent completed reporting period by each qualifying facility achieving, with
unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes as determined in subsection (m)(1) of this
section, each enhancement option above the enhancement option awarded to the
facility during the reporting period and multiplies this number by the rate
add-on associated with that enhancement in effect during the reporting period.
Per diem enhancement add-ons associated with staffing increments between the
minimum staffing requirement from subsection (j)(1) of this section and the
minimum staffing requirement for participation in effect in state fiscal year
2003, adjusted based upon the most recently available, reliable relative compensation
levels for the different staff types, will be adjusted for variations in facility
case mix.
(B)
HHSC compares the sum of the products from subparagraph
(A) of this paragraph to funds available for reinvestment.
(i)
If the product is less than or equal to available funds,
all achieved enhancements for qualifying facilities are retroactively awarded
for the reporting period.
(ii)
If the product is greater than available funds, retroactive
enhancements are granted beginning with the lowest level of enhancement and
granting each successive level of enhancement until achieved enhancements
are granted within available funds.
(3)
All retroactive enhancements are subject to spending requirements
detailed in subsection (o) of this section. Revenue from retroactive enhancements
is not eligible for mitigation of spending recoupment as described in subsection
(p) of this section.
(4)
Retroactively awarded enhancements do not qualify as pre-existing
enhancements for enrollment purposes.
(5)
Notification of reinvested enhancements. Qualifying facilities
are notified in a manner determined by HHSC, as to the award of reinvested
enhancements.
(dd)
Disclaimer. Nothing in these rules should be construed
as preventing facilities from adding direct care staff in addition to those
funded by the enhanced direct care staff rate.
(ee)
Notification of lack of available
funds. If HHSC determines that funds are not available to continue participation
for facilities from which it has not received an acceptable request to modify
their enrollment by the last day of an enrollment period as per subsection
(d) of this section, to maintain participation until a facility notifies it
that the facility no longer wishes to participate or is removed from participation
as per subsection (i), or to fund carry-over enhancements as per subsection
(j)(3) of this section, HHSC will notify providers in a manner determined
by HHSC that such funds are not available.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303614
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.312
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the
reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
HHSC proposes to amend §355.312, concerning reimbursement setting methodology
- liability insurance costs, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter.
The purpose of the amendment is to clarify how the add-on rate for liability
insurance costs is calculated, to clarify the definition of purchased general
and professional liability insurance, and to detail the process nursing facilities
must complete with regard to independently procured insurance before the add-on
payment will be made for this type of insurance.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that,
for the first five-year period the proposed amendment is in effect, there
are no fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or
administering the section. There are no fiscal implications for local governments
as a result of enforcing or administering the section.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the
first five years the proposed section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated
as a result of enforcing the section is that the liability insurance add-on
rate will only be paid to nursing facilities with legitimate liability insurance
coverage. In addition, the clarifications will increase provider understanding
of the program.
There is no adverse economic effect on small or micro-businesses as a result
of enforcing or administering the proposed section. There is no anticipated
economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section.
There is no anticipated effect on local employment in geographic areas affected
by these section.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Carolyn
Pratt (telephone: 512-685-3127; FAX: 512-685-3104) in HHSC Rate Analysis.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. Pratt via facsimile
or mail to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-400, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin,
TX 78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
. For further information regarding the proposal or to
make the proposal available for public review, contact local offices of DHS
or Carolyn Pratt at (512) 685-3127 in HHSC Rate Analysis.
A public hearing on the proposed amendment is scheduled for Wednesday,
July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room
1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that
Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to this rule. Accordingly,
HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding this
rule.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The amendment implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).
§355.312.Reimbursement Setting Methodology--Liability Insurance Costs.
(a)
Definitions.
(1)
Purchased liability insurance--Either general
or professional liability insurance that was purchased from a commercial carrier
or a non-profit service corporation in an arm's-length transaction that provides
for the shifting of risk to the unrelated party. The commercial carrier or
non-profit service corporation must meet the requirements as set by the Texas
Department of Insurance (TDI) for authorized insurance.
(2)
Self-insurance--Self-insurance is a means whereby
a contracted provider undertakes the risk to protect itself against anticipated
liabilities by providing funds equivalent to liquidate those liabilities.
If a provider enters into an arrangement with an unrelated party that does
not provide for the shifting of risk to the unrelated party, such an agreement
shall be considered self-insurance. Self-insurance is not purchased liability
insurance.
(b)
Effective September 1, 2003,
payment rates for purchased general and professional liability insurance will
be determined as follows:
(1)
Determine the portion of the general/administration
rate component from 1 TAC §355.307 (relating to Reimbursement Setting
Methodology) attributable to allowable liability insurance costs.
(2)
Determine the amount of total dollars that would
be expended if the liability rate component from paragraph (1) of this subsection
were paid uniformly to all providers during the rate effective period.
(3)
Estimate the number of days of service that
will be covered by purchased liability insurance during the rate period.
(4)
Divide the total dollars available for liability
insurance from paragraph (2) of this subsection by the estimated number of
days of service that will be covered by purchased liability insurance during
the rate period from paragraph (3) of this subsection. Estimate the proportion
of this per diem amount accruing from general liability insurance and the
proportion accruing from professional liability insurance to determine the
payment rate for each day of purchased general liability insurance and the
payment rate for each day of purchased professional liability insurance.
(5)
Payment rates for purchased general and professional
liability insurance may be adjusted as often as HHSC determines is necessary
to ensure that the total dollars expended during the rate period do not exceed
the amount appropriated for this purpose.
(6)
Since these payment rates are determined through
an allocation of available appropriations among estimated units of service
covered by purchased liability insurance, a public rate hearing is not required
when adjustments are made to the payment rates.
(7)
Providers will be notified, in a manner determined
by HHSC, of adjustments to the payment rates for purchased general and professional
liability insurance.
(8)
Providers who purchase general liability insurance
without professional liability insurance are only eligible to receive payment
of the rate for purchased general liability insurance. Providers who purchase
professional liability insurance without general liability insurance are only
eligible to receive payment of the rate for purchased professional liability
insurance. Providers who purchase both general and professional liability
insurance are eligible to receive payment of both rates.
(c)
Purchased liability insurance
issued through insurance companies meeting any one of the following criteria
will be determined automatically to qualify for the payment rates for purchased
general and/or professional liability insurance as appropriate. These insurance
companies have been determined by the TDI to be authorized to issue liability
insurance policies in the State of Texas.
(1)
An insurance company identified as an admitted,
licensed, insurer authorized to write liability insurance in Texas. This type
of insurance company is designated as "active" on the TDI website.
(2)
An insurance company that is an eligible surplus
lines insurer which requires that there be a Texas licensed surplus lines
agent placing the coverage with the insurance company. This type of insurance
company is designated as "eligible" on the TDI website.
(3)
The Texas Medical Liability Insurance Underwriting
Association (JUA). This insurance arrangement is designated as "active" on
the TDI website.
(d)
Independently procured insurance
will not be determined automatically to qualify for the payment rates for
purchased general and/or professional liability insurance. To qualify for
the purchased general and/or professional liability insurance payment rates,
the coverage must have been purchased from an independently procured insurance
company determined by TDI to be authorized to sell liability insurance. The
liability insurance payment rates will not be paid to any nursing facility
until HHSC Rate Analysis has received from the provider a written determination
issued by TDI that the insurance is authorized liability insurance. A separate
determination must be received for each insurance policy before payment of
the liability insurance rate will be made to the nursing facilities covered
by the policy. If, by September 1, 2003, TDI has not made a determination
of authorized liability insurance on policies in effect prior to September
1, 2003, HHSC will stop payment of the liability insurance payment rates until
HHSC Rate Analysis receives the written determination from the provider that
TDI has determined the liability insurance to be authorized. Upon receipt
of the determination by TDI that the independently procured insurance is authorized
liability insurance, payments will be made retroactively to the effective
date of the insurance policy or the date the liability insurance rates were
stopped, whichever is later.
(e)
Liability insurance payments
will not be made to facilities that obtain unauthorized insurance. It is the
responsibility of the nursing facility provider to ensure that liability insurance
submitted for payment is authorized.
(f)
To qualify for the purchased
liability insurance payment rates each contracted entity must submit the following
to HHSC Rate Analysis:
(1)
A completed liability insurance coverage certification
form provided by HHSC Rate Analysis, signed by an authorized signatory for
the provider as per Texas Department of Human Services Form 2031.
(2)
A copy of evidence of coverage to include a
certificate of insurance, the ACORD 25-S or similar document provided by the
insurance company or agent that includes the type of coverage, effective and
expiration dates of coverage, insurer, policy, and form number of policy contract,
agent/producer, and claims made/occurrences. For catastrophic or excess liability
coverage, the evidence of coverage must also include the sum that the catastrophic
or excess coverage must exceed to become payable. A binder is not acceptable
as evidence of insurance.
(3)
For independently procured liability insurance,
a copy of the written determination by TDI that the insurance policy was determined
to be authorized liability insurance.
(g)
If an insurance policy effective
date is not the first day of the month, then the liability insurance payment
rates will become effective the first day of the following month. If an insurance
policy expiration date is not the last day of the month, then the liability
insurance payment rates will be paid for the full month that includes the
expiration date.
(h)
It is the contracted provider's responsibility
to notify HHSC Rate Analysis of any changes to liability insurance coverage
including cancellation of coverage, change of insurance and renewal of coverage
within 15 calendar days of the effective date of the change. Failure to notify
HHSC Rate Analysis of cancellation of coverage or change of insurance could
constitute Medicaid fraud. Renewals of coverage not received within 15 calendar
days of the effective date of the renewal could result in the liability insurance
payment rates being stopped until documentation of the renewal per subsection
(f) of this section is received by HHSC Rate Analysis.
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303615
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.773, §355.775
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the
reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
HHSC proposes amendments to §355.773, concerning Reporting Costs by MRLA
Providers, and §355.775, concerning Reimbursement Methodology for the
MRLA Program.
These rules are being amended to implement fiscal accountability measures
for providers transitioning from the Home and Community-Based Services (HCS)
program (currently under §355.722) to the Mental Retardation Local Authority
program, clarify cost reporting expectations and bring them into closer conformity
to other HHSC cost reporting rules, and define a reimbursement methodology
for the MRLA program separate from the HCS program (currently under §355.723).
Rule §355.773 explains the cost reporting and fiscal accountability requirements
for the MRLA program and rule §355.775 explains the reimbursement methodology
for rate setting for the MRLA program.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
during the first five years the amended rules are in effect there will be
no fiscal implications to state, federal or local governments as a result
of enforcing or administering these amendments.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the
first five years the proposed amendments are in effect, the public benefit
anticipated as a result of enforcing the amendments is to provide continuity
between the reporting requirements for the HCS program and the MRLA program.
There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to
comply with the amendments as proposed. There are no anticipated economic
costs to persons required to comply with the proposed amendments, nor any
impact on local employment.
HHSC has determined that these proposed amendments do not restrict or limit
an owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence
of governmental action and therefore do not constitute a taking under §2007.043,
Government Code.
Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Judy Myers,
Rate Analyst, Medicaid Rate Analysis, Texas Health and Human Services Commission,
1100 W. 49th, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of this proposal
in the
Texas Register
.
A public hearing on the proposed amendments is scheduled for Wednesday,
July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in room
1410 at the Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendment.
§355.773.Reporting Costs by MRLA Providers.
(a)
Submission of cost reports. All MRLA providers must submit
cost reports as directed by the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
in accordance with §§355.701-355.709 of this title (relating to
General Reimbursement Methodology for All Medicaid Assistance Programs.
[
[
(b)
[
(c)
[
(d)
[
(e)
Failure to submit the cost
report. Failure to submit the cost report by the due date or the extension
due date, if granted, will result in HHSC notifying TDMHMR to place the provider
on vendor hold.
(f)
[
(1)
Each MRLA provider must submit
additional information to the HHSC upon request, unless the information is
not at the MRLA provider's disposal.
(2)
[
(g)
[
(h)
[
(i)
[
(j)
Recordkeeping requirements.
Each MRLA provider must retain records according to HHSC's requirements. MRLA
providers must ensure that records are accurate and sufficiently detailed
to provide the legal, financial, and statistical information requested by
the HHSC.
(k)
Noncompliance with recordkeeping
requirements. If an MRLA provider fails to maintain records that support the
information submitted, the HHSC will notify TDMHMR to place the provider on
vendor hold.
(l)
Access to records. Each provider must allow access by HHSC
to any and all records necessary to verify cost data submitted to HHSC. This
requirement includes records pertaining to related-party transactions and
other business activities engaged in by the provider that are directly or
indirectly related to the provision of contracted services. Failure to allow
inspection of pertinent records within 10 working days following written notice
from HHSC constitutes a violation of the MRLA provider contract. If the administrative
office or other entity pertaining to a multi-contract operation refuses access
to records, then the penalties are extended to all of the provider's entities
having Medicaid contracts with TDMHMR. Additional rules regarding access to
records that are out-of-state may be found in §355.703 of this title
(relating to Basic Objectives and Criteria for Review of Cost Reports).
(m)
Notification of exclusions
and adjustments. The HHSC will notify a provider of exclusions and any adjustments,
including caps applied, to reported costs in accordance with §355.705
of this title (relating to Notification).
(n)
[
[
(o)
Fiscal Accountability. [
(1)
General principles. Fiscal
accountability is a process used to gauge the ongoing financial performance
under the MRLA program reimbursement rates.
(2)
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
(A)
TDMHMR will place a vendor
hold on payments to an MRLA provider whose provider agreement is being assigned
or terminated. The MRLA provider will submit a cost report for the current
reporting period to HHSC. Upon receipt of an appropriate cost report and repayment
of any amounts due to HHSC in accordance with this section, the vendor hold
will be released.
(B)
HHSC will require MRLA providers
to report all direct costs incurred on an annual fiscal year basis beginning
with the provider's fiscal year that ends after June 30, 2003. HHSC will compare
the reported direct service costs to the total direct service revenue.
(3)
Direct Service Revenues are
calculated by multiplying the number of units eligible for payment that have
been paid for services delivered during the reporting period times the appropriate
direct service portion of the rate for the service billed.
(A)
MRLA providers whose direct service costs are
90% or more of the direct service revenues will not be subject to repayment
under this section.
(B)
MRLA providers whose direct service costs are
between 85% and 90% of the direct service revenues will be required to pay
to TDMHMR 50% of the difference between the direct service costs and 90% of
the direct service revenues.
(C)
MRLA providers whose direct service costs are
between 80% and 85% of the direct service revenues will be required to pay
to TDMHMR 100% of the difference between the direct service costs and 85%
of the direct service revenues plus 50% of the difference between 85% and
90% of the direct service revenues.
(D)
MRLA providers whose direct service costs are
less than 80% of the direct service revenues will be required to pay to TDMHMR
the difference between the direct service costs and 95% of the direct service
revenues.
(4)
The fiscal accountability calculation
may show an estimated amount due to TDMHMR. An MRLA provider's repayment status
may change as a result of the desk reviews or outside audits of cost reports,
or adjustments to claims paid to the MRLA provider for services provided in
the cost reporting period. The MRLA provider will be notified of the results
of these reviews and/or audits in accordance with subsection (m) of this section.
If the adjustments and/or exclusions result in an amount due, or if the original
estimated amount due calculation is upheld, HHSC will notify the MRLA provider
of the amount due and the MRLA provider will remit the repayment amount within
60 days of notification.
(5)
Repayment will be made by the
following:
(A)
the MRLA provider or legal entity submitting
the report;
(B)
any other legal entity responsible for the debts
or liabilities of the submitting entity; or
(C)
the legal entity on behalf of which a report
is submitted.
(6)
MRLA providers who are required
to repay revenues to TDMHMR will be jointly and severally liable for any repayment.
TDMHMR will apply a vendor hold on Medicaid payments to a MRLA provider for
not making the payment to TDMHMR within 60 days of receiving notice as provided
in subsection (o)(4) of this section.
§355.775.Reimbursement Methodology for the MRLA Program.
(a)
HHSC determines reimbursement rates according to §§355.701-355.709
of this title (relating to General Reimbursement Methodology for all TDMHMR
Programs).
(b)
Uniform application.
Reimbursement rates apply
to all providers uniformly by the type of service component provided and the
individual's level-of-need.
(c)
Annual and prospective rates. The HHSC sets rates
to be paid to MRLA providers annually.
The rates are prospective in
nature.
(d)
Modeled rates.
Modeled rates are based on relevant
cost information including a sample of historical cost information and operational
experience of service providers in Texas.
The rates will be based on
the former Home and Community Based Services (HCS) program model, with appropriate
adjustments to reflect differences between the two models. The HCS program
models will be referred to as the MRLA program model effective September 1,
2003.
[
(e)
Rates for residential support, supervised living, MRLA
foster/companion care, and day habilitation vary by level of need and are
paid on a daily basis.
(f)
Rates for respite care are paid on a daily or hourly basis.
Respite care is not a reimbursable service for individuals who are receiving
MRLA program foster/companion care, supervised living, or residential support.
(g)
The modeled rate for a service component developed or modified
after January 1, 1997, but prior to the rebasing process initiated under subsection
(i) of this section, and provided after the effective date of this rule, will
be based on cost assumptions used in modeling existing rates, actual or projected
utilization patterns, and the recommendations of an advisory panel consisting
of program providers, department personnel, and advocates for persons with
mental retardation.
(h)
The administrative rate for the indirect costs of the MRLA
program is paid as a flat monthly fee to the program provider. Effective June
1, 1998, the administrative rate is determined by reducing the HCS modeled
rate for case management by the amount of cost related to the tasks required
of a HCS provider which are not required of a MRLA provider. This reduction
will be based on a detailed task analysis. Case management is not a reimbursable
service under the MRLA program.
(i)
The modeled rates will be analyzed to determine if rebasing
is necessary in accordance with §355.723 of this title (relating to Reimbursement
Methodology for Home and Community-based Services (HCS).
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303616
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
4.
MEDICAID HOSPITAL SERVICES
1 TAC §355.8063
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend §355.8063, concerning the reimbursement methodology for inpatient
hospital services, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The proposed
amendments add language to allow certain Medicaid hospitals with more than
100 licensed beds the option of receiving cost-based reimbursement authorized
by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA). The proposed
amendments also add language to implement Medicaid inpatient hospital rate
reimbursement reductions and reductions in reimbursement for Direct Graduate
Medical Education cost (GME) mandated by the 78th Legislature. The proposed
amendments will implement changes necessary to maintain cost-effective reimbursement
for Medicaid hospital inpatient services within appropriated funds for the
2004-2005 biennium.
Background
Article II, Rider 24 relating to the Health and Human Services Commission
contained in the General Appropriations Act, 78th Legislature, Regular Session,
2003, directs HHSC to reimburse hospitals with fewer than 100 licensed beds
and certain hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds, the greater of the
amount received by the hospital under the Texas Medicaid inpatient prospective
payment system or the TEFRA reimbursement methodology. The inpatient prospective
payments made to hospitals with fewer than 100 licensed beds and certain other
hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds, described in Rider 24, may be
impacted by the reimbursement reductions described in Rider 46. Article II,
Rider 46 relating to the Health and Human Services Commission contained in
the General Appropriations Act, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, directs
HHSC to reduce hospital reimbursement and calculate the reductions without
rebasing of current reimbursement factors. Article II, Rider 48 relating to
the Health and Human Services Commission contained in the General Appropriations
Act, 78th Legislature, Regular Session, 2003, directs HHSC to limit the amount
of reimbursement for GME to amounts appropriated or allocations of appropriations
made specifically for GME reimbursement. HHSC proposes to implement the changes
mandated by Rider 24, 46, and 48 through the adoption of an amendment to the
reimbursement methodology for inpatient hospital services.
Tom Suehs, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that for the first five
years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be fiscal implications to
state and local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the
proposed rule. Estimated increased spending to the state arising from the
provisions of the proposed rule relating to reimbursement of certain hospitals
with more than 100 licensed beds will be $0 in State Fiscal Year 2004; $1,700,000
in State Fiscal Year 2005; $3,400,000 in State Fiscal Year 2006; $3,400,000
in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $3,400,000 in State Fiscal Year 2008. Estimated
savings to the state arising from enforcing or administering the rate reduction
provisions of the proposed rule will be $87,700,000 in State Fiscal Year 2004;
$87,000,000 in State Fiscal Year 2005; $0 in State Fiscal Year 2006; $0 in
State Fiscal Year 2007; and $0 in State Fiscal Year 2008. State and local
governments will experience a loss of revenue as a result of enforcing or
administering the rate reduction provisions of the proposed rule. The loss
of state and local government revenues are estimated to be : $57,00,000 in
State Fiscal Year 2004; $57,000,000 in State Fiscal Year 2005; $0 in State
Fiscal Year 2006; $0 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $0 in State Fiscal Year
2008. Estimated savings to the state arising from enforcing or administering
the GME provisions of the proposed rule will be $21,318,403 in State Fiscal
Year 2004 $21,323,602 in State Fiscal Year 2005 $21,323,6020 in State Fiscal
Year 2006 $21,323,602 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $21,323,602 in State
Fiscal Year 2008. State and local governments also will experience a loss
of revenue as a result of enforcing or administering the reduction in GME
reimbursement provisions of the proposed rule. The loss of state and local
government revenues is estimated to be: $40,841,000 in State Fiscal Year 2004;
$42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year 2005; $42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year 2006;
$42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year 2007; and $42,883,000 in State Fiscal Year
2008.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each
year of the first five years the proposed section is in effect, the public
benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the proposed section will be
to provide HHSC with greater flexibility in allocating appropriations for
GME and to maintain cost-effective reimbursement for hospital inpatient services
within appropriated funds for the 2004-2005 biennium. There is no anticipated
impact on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section
as proposed as they will not be required to alter their business practices
as a result of the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons
who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated
impact on local employment.
HHSC has determined that the proposed rule is not "a major environmental
rule" as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental
rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect
the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure
and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health
and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically
intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure.
HHSC has determined that the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an
owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence
of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043,
Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Scott Reasonover,
Rate Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100
West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of this
proposal in the
Texas Register
. In addition,
a public hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday, July
16, 2003, at 2:00 p.m. in the public hearing room at the Texas Health and
Human Services Commission, Brown Heatly Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard,
4th Floor Room 1410, Austin, Texas 78751-2316. To comply with federal regulations,
a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each Texas Department of Human
Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance
(Medicaid) program in Texas; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b),
which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing
the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.
The proposed amendment affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32 and
the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.
§355.8063.Reimbursement Methodology for Inpatient Hospital Services.
(a) - (g)
(No change.)
(h)
Rebasing the standard dollar amounts. The
HHSC
[
(i) - (m)
(No change.)
(n)
Adjustments to base year claims data.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
The HHSC or its designee updates the standard dollar amount
each year for each payment division by applying a cost-of-living update to
the standard dollar amount established for the base year. The cost-of-living
index for state fiscal
years
[
(A) - (B)
(No change.)
(o)
Reimbursement to in-state children's hospitals. The
HHSC
[
(p)
(No change.)
(q)
Hospitals with 100 or fewer licensed beds
and certain
hospitals with more than 100 licensed beds
. The policies in this subsection
apply only to hospital fiscal years beginning on or after September 1, 1989
for
[
(r)
(No change.)
(s)
Reimbursement of inpatient direct graduate medical education
(GME) costs. The Medicaid allowable inpatient direct graduate medical education
cost, as specified under similar methods and procedures used in the Social
Security Act, Title XVIII, as amended, effective October 1, 1982, by Public
Law 97-248, is calculated for each hospital having inpatient direct graduate
medical education costs on its tentative or final audited cost report. Those
inpatient direct medical education costs are removed from the calculation
of the interim rate described in subsection (b)(7) of this section and
not
[
(t)
(No change.)
(u)
In accordance with this subsection and subject to the availability
of funds, a high volume adjustment factor will be included in the calculation
of the state fiscal year 2003 (September 1, 2002 through August 31, 2003)
, state fiscal year 2004 (September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2004) and state
fiscal year 2005 (September 1, 2004 through August 31, 2005)
Standard
Dollar Amount described in subsection (a)(4) of this section for eligible
hospitals. For purposes of this subsection, payments made in state fiscal
year
2004
[
(1) - (2)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303685
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.8065
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend §355.8065, concerning additional reimbursement to disproportionate
share hospitals, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The proposed
amendment deletes language allowing the state to use a proxy to determine
a hospital's cost of treating uninsured patients. It adds language to allow
for the inclusion of third party reimbursement and Medicaid Upper Payment
Limit funds to the calculation of Medicaid shortfall. It adds language allowing
the state to offset a hospital's Medicaid reimbursement, in excess of its
Medicaid costs, against its costs of treating uninsured patients.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no
fiscal implications for state government as a result of administering the
proposed rule. There will be no fiscal impact on local governments as a result
of enforcing or administering the section.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each
year of the first five years the proposed changes are in place, the public
benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing this section will be improving
the state's administration of the program, and keeping the program aligned
with federal policy changes and recommendations. There is no anticipated impact
on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section as proposed
as they will not be required to alter their business practices as a result
of the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are
required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated impact
on local employment.
HHSC has determined that this proposed rule is not a "major environmental
rule" as defined by the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule"
is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment
or reduce risk to human health from environmental factors that may adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of a state
or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically intended to
protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure.
HHSC has determined the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's
right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental
action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043, Government
Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Scott Reasonover,
Rate Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100
West 49th Street, Austin, Texas, 78756, within 30 days of the publication
of this proposal in the
Texas Register
. In
addition, a public hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday,
July 16, 2003 between 2 and 5 p.m. in Room 1410 of the Brown Heatley Building
at 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. To comply with federal regulations,
a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each Texas Department of Human
Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which provides the commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a),
which provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance
(Medicaid) program in Texas; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b),
which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing
the determination of Medicaid reimbursement.
The proposed amendment affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and
the Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.
§355.8065.Additional Reimbursement to Disproportionate Share Hospitals.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following
words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
Bad debt charges--Uncollectible inpatient and outpatient
charges that result from the extension of credit. [
(3)
(No change.)
(4)
Charity charges--Total amount of hospital charges for inpatient
and outpatient services attributed to charity care in a hospital fiscal year.
These charges do not include bad debt charges, contractual allowances or discounts
(other than for indigent patients not eligible for medical assistance under
the approved Medicaid state plan); that is, reductions or discounts in charges
given to other third party payers such as, but not limited to, health care
maintenance organizations, Medicare, or Blue Cross. [
(5) - (10)
(No change.)
(11)
Hospital specific limit--The sum of the following two
measurements:
(A) - (B)
(No change.)
(C)
When a hospital's cost of services (inpatient
and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients is less than the amount paid
to the hospital under the non-disproportionate share hospital payment method
under the state plan, and from third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid
recipients, the state will reduce the hospital specific limit by the difference.
(12) - (15)
(No change.)
(16)
Medicaid shortfall--The cost of services (inpatient and
outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients, less the amount paid under the
non-disproportionate share hospital payment method under the state plan
, and third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid recipients
.
(17) - (31)
(No change.)
(c) - (e)
(No change.)
(f)
Reimbursing Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals.
The commission shall reimburse Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals on
a monthly basis. Monthly payments will equal one twelfth of annual payments
unless it is necessary to adjust the amount because payments will not be made
for a full 12-month period, to comply with the annual state disproportionate
share hospital allotment, or to comply with other state or federal disproportionate
share hospital program requirements. Before the start of the next state fiscal
year, the commission determines the size of the available funds to reimburse
disproportionate share hospitals for the next state fiscal year, which begins
each September 1. The funds available to reimburse the state chest hospitals
and state mental hospitals equal the total of their adjusted hospital specific
limits. The available fund for the remaining hospitals equals the lesser of
the funds remaining in the state's annual disproportionate share hospital
allotment or the sum of qualifying hospitals' adjusted hospital specific limits.
Payments shall be made in the following manner, unless the commission determines
the hospital's proposed reimbursement has exceeded its specific limit.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
For the remaining hospitals, payments will be made based
on both weighted inpatient Medicaid days and weighted low income days. The
commission weighs each hospital's total inpatient Medicaid days and low income
days by the appropriate weighting factor. The commission defines a low income
day as a day derived by multiplying a hospital's total inpatient census days
from its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year by its low income
utilization rate. Hospital districts and city/county hospitals with greater
than 250 licensed beds in the state's largest MSAs shall receive weights based
proportionally on the MSA population according to the most recent decennial
census. MSAs with populations greater than or equal to 150,000, according
to the most recent decennial census, are considered as the "largest MSAs."
Children's hospitals also shall receive weights because of the special nature
of the services they provide. All other hospitals receive weighting factors
of 1.0. The inpatient Medicaid days of each hospital shall be based on the
latest available state fiscal year data for patients entitled to Title XIX
benefits. The available fund shall be divided into two parts. One half of
the available fund will reimburse each qualifying hospital on a monthly basis
by its percent of the total inpatient Medicaid days. One-half of the available
funds will reimburse each qualifying hospital by its percent of the total
low income days. The commission determines whether hospitals in rural areas
will receive 5.5% or more of the gross disproportionate share hospital funds
for non-state hospitals. If hospitals in rural areas will receive at least
5.5% of the gross non-state hospitals funds, the commission will reimburse
them using existing principles. If hospitals in rural areas will not receive
at least 5.5% of gross non-state hospital funds, the commission will reimburse
them at 5.5% of non-state hospital funds, using existing principles. Reimbursement
for the remaining hospitals is determined as follows.
(A) - (C)
(No change.)
(D)
For state fiscal year
2004 (September 1, 2003 through
August 31, 2004) and state fiscal year 2005 (September 1, 2004 through August
31, 2005)
[
(i)
(No change.)
(ii)
A conversion factor of 1.163881 is applied to payments
made to hospital districts [
(iii) - (vi)
(No change.)
(E)
The commission or its designee determines the hospital
specific limit for each disproportionate share hospital. This limit is the
sum of a hospital's Medicaid shortfall, as defined in subsection (b)(16) of
this section, and its cost of services to uninsured patients, as defined in
subsection (b)(5) of this section, multiplied by the appropriate inflation
update factor, as provided for in subsection (g)(2)(E) of this section.
(i) - (iii)
(No change.)
[(iv)
Hospitals that do not respond to the
survey, or that are unable to determine accurately the charges attributed
to patients without insurance, shall have their bad debt charges as defined
in subsection (b)(2) of this section, and their charity charges as defined
in subsection (b)(4) of this section, reduced by a percentage derived from
a representative sample of hospitals to be determined annually by the commission
or its designee. The commission or its designee derives the percentages using
the following formula: for each specific category of hospitals listed in clause
(v) of this subparagraph, the commission or its designee sums the total amount
of charges for patients without health insurance or other third party payments.
For each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph,
the commission or its designee sums the charity and bad debt charges. For
each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph,
the department then divides the charges for patients without health insurance
or other third party payments by the sum of charity and bad debt charges.
The commission or its designee then uses the resulting ratio for each specific
category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph in the following
manner. Individual hospitals that do not respond to the survey, or that are
unable to accurately determine the charges attributed to patients without
insurance have their hospital's individual sum of bad debt and charity charges
multiplied by the appropriate ratio for the specific hospital category. After
the commission or its designee has calculated a value for the patients without
health insurance or other source of third party payment for each individual
hospital, the commission or its designee multiplies each hospital's calculated
value by that hospital's cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) to
obtain the proxy cost of services delivered to uninsured patients at each
hospital.]
[(v)
The representative sample of hospitals
is one of the following specific categories of hospitals: urban public, other
urban, rural, state-operated psychiatric and non psychiatric. In the event
that less than 20 % of the hospitals in a specific category provide data to
the commission or its designee, the commission or its designee uses the overall
ratio calculated from all responding hospitals. The commission or its designee
creates additional categories, by submitting a state plan amendment, as it
deems appropriate for the economic and efficient operation of the Medicaid
disproportionate share program.]
(iv)
[
(F) - (I)
(No change.)
(g) - (i)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303686
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.8067
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the
reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
HHSC proposes to amend §355.8067, concerning disproportionate share reimbursement
methodology, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. The proposed amendment
deletes language that will simplify the state's administration of the program.
It adds language to allow for the inclusion of third party reimbursement to
the calculation of Medicaid shortfall. It adds language allowing the state
to offset a hospital's Medicaid reimbursement, in excess of its Medicaid costs,
against its costs of treating uninsured patients.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no
fiscal implications for state government as a result of administering the
proposed rule. There will be no fiscal impact on local governments as a result
of enforcing or administering the section.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each
year of the first five years the proposed changes are in place, the public
benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing this section will be improving
the state's administration of the program, and keeping the program aligned
with federal policy changes and recommendations. There is no anticipated impact
on small businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section as proposed
as they will not be required to alter their business practices as a result
of the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are
required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated impact
on local employment. HHSC has determined that this proposed rule is not a
"major environmental rule" as defined by the Texas Government Code. "Major
environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental
factors that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is
not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human
health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's
right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental
action and therefore does not constitute a taking under Section 2007.043,
Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mr. Scott Reasonover,
Rate Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100
West 49th St., Austin, Texas, 78756, within 30 days of the publication of
this proposal in the
Texas Register
. In addition,
a public hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday, July
16, 2003 between 2 and 5 p.m. in Room 1410 of the Brown Heatley Building at
4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. To comply with federal regulations,
a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each Texas Department of Human
Services (DHS) office where it will be available for public review upon request.
The rule is proposed under the Texas Government Code, 531.033,
which provides the commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; the
Human Resources Code, 32.021, and the Texas Government Code, 531.021(a), which
provide HHSC with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance
(Medicaid) program in Texas; the Texas Government Code, 531.021(b), which
provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the
determination of Medicaid reimbursement; and Government Code, §2001.006,
which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation
of legislation.
The proposed rule affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32, and the
Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.
§355.8067.Disproportionate Share Hospital Reimbursement Methodology.
(a)
A hospital owned and operated by a state university or
other agency of the state is eligible for disproportionate share reimbursement.
A state-owned teaching hospital is a hospital owned and operated by a state
university or other agency of the state.
(b)
Each hospital must have a Medicaid inpatient utilization
rate defined at a minimum of 1.0%
(c)
To qualify for disproportionate share payments, each hospital
must have at least two physicians (M.D. or D.O.), with staff privileges at
the hospital, who have agreed to provide nonemergency obstetrical services
to Medicaid clients. The two-physician requirement does not apply to hospitals
whose inpatients are predominantly under 18 years old or that did not offer
nonemergency obstetrical services to the general population as of December
22, 1987.
(d)
For purposes of this section, the following words and terms,
shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
Total Medicaid inpatient days--Total Medicaid inpatient
days means the total number of billed Title XIX inpatient days based on the
latest available state fiscal year data for patients eligible for Title XIX
benefits. Total Medicaid inpatient days includes days that were denied payment
for reasons other than eligibility. Included are inpatient days of care provided
to patients eligible for Medicaid at the time the service was provided, regardless
of whether the claim was paid. These denied claims include, but are not limited
to, claims for patients whose spell of illness limits are exhausted, or claims
that were filed late. The term excludes days attributable to Medicaid patients
between the ages of 21 and 65 who live in an institution for mental diseases.
The term includes days attributable to individuals eligible for Medicaid in
other states.
(2)
Total inpatient census days--Total inpatient census days
means the total number of a hospital's inpatient census days during its fiscal
year ending in the previous calendar year.
(3)
Cost of services--Cost of services to uninsured patients
is the inpatient and outpatient charges to patients who have no health insurance
or other source of third party payment for services provided during the year,
multiplied by the hospital's ratio of costs to charges (inpatient and outpatient),
less the amount of payments made by or on behalf of those patients. Uninsured
patients are patients who have no health insurance or other source of third
party payments for services provided during the year. Uninsured patients include
those patients who do not possess health insurance that would apply to the
service for which the individual sought treatment. [
(4)
Hospital specific limit--Hospital specific limit is the
sum of the following two measurements: Medicaid shortfall and costs of services
to uninsured patients.
When a hospital's cost of services (inpatient
and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients is less than the amount paid
to the hospital under the non-disproportionate share hospital payment method
under the state plan, and from third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid
recipients, the state will reduce the hospital specific limit by the difference.
(5)
Medicaid shortfall--Medicaid shortfall is the cost of services
(inpatient and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients, less the amount
paid under the non-disproportionate share hospital payment method under this
state plan
, and third party payments made on behalf of Medicaid recipients.
(6)
Cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient)--Cost-to-charge
ratio is the hospital's overall cost-to-charge ratio, as determined from its
Medicare cost report submitted for the fiscal year ending in the previous
calendar year. The latest available Medicare cost report is used in the absence
of the cost report for the hospital's fiscal year ending in the previous calendar
year.
(7)
Adjusted hospital specific limit--Adjusted hospital specific
limit is a hospital specific limit trended forward to account for the inflation
update factor since the base year.
(8)
Inflation update factor--Inflation update factor is a general
increase in prices as determined by the department.
(9)
Medicaid inpatient utilization rate--Medicaid inpatient
utilization rate is the fraction expressed as a percentage, the numerator
of which is the hospital's number of inpatient days attributable to patients
who (for these days) were eligible for medical assistance under a state plan,
and the denominator of which is the total number of the hospital's inpatient
days in that period. The term "inpatient day" includes each day in which an
individual (including a newborn) is an inpatient in the hospital, whether
or not the individual is in a specialized ward and whether or not the individual
remains in the hospital for lack of suitable placement elsewhere.
(10)
Payments received--Payments received from uninsured patients
are those payments received from or on behalf of uninsured patients as defined
in paragraph (3) of this subsection.
(11)
Charity charges--Charity charges are the total amount
of hospital charges for inpatient and outpatient services attributed to charity
care in a cost reporting period
.
[
(12)
Allowable cost--Allowable cost is defined by the department
using the rates that are reasonable and adequate to meet the costs that must
be incurred by efficiently and economically operated providers when providing
services in conformity with applicable state and federal laws, regulations,
and quality and safety standards.
(13)
Available fund--The available fund for state teaching
hospitals is the total amount of funds that may be reimbursed to the state
teaching hospitals as determined below.
(e)
The department reimburses state-owned teaching hospitals
on a monthly basis from the available fund for state teaching hospitals. Monthly
payments equal one-twelfth of annual payments unless it is necessary to adjust
the amount because payments are not made for a full 12-month period, to comply
with the annual state disproportionate share hospital allotment, or to comply
with other state or federal disproportionate share hospital program requirements.
Prior to the start of the next federal fiscal year, the department determines
the size of the fund to reimburse state-owned teaching hospitals for the next
federal fiscal year. The available fund to reimburse the state teaching hospitals
equals the total of their disproportionate share hospital payments, as follows:
a state-owned teaching hospital that meets the requirements for disproportionate
share status receives annually 100 percent of its adjusted hospital specific
limit.
[
[
(f)
The department or its designee determines the hospital
specific limit for each disproportionate share hospital. This limit is the
sum of a hospital's Medicaid shortfall, as defined in subsection (d)(5) of
this section, and its cost of services to uninsured patients as defined in
subsection (d)(3) of this section, multiplied by the appropriate inflation
update factor, as provided for in subsection (g) of this section.
(1)
The Medicaid shortfall includes total Medicaid billed charges
and any Medicaid payments made for the corresponding inpatient and outpatient
services delivered to Texas Medicaid clients, as determined from the hospital's
fiscal year claims data, regardless of whether the claim was paid. These denied
claims include, but are not limited to, patients whose spell of illness claims
were exhausted, or payments were denied due to late filing. Refer to subsection
(d)(5) of this section.
(A)
The total billed Medicaid charges for each hospital are
converted to cost, utilizing a calculated cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient
and outpatient). The department or its designee determines that ratio by using
the hospital's HCFA 2552-92, Hospital and Hospital Health Care Complex Cost
Report, that was submitted for the fiscal year ending in the previous calendar
year. The department or its designee uses the latest available Medicare cost
report in the absence of the Medicare cost report submitted in the fiscal
year ending in the previous calendar year. To determine the cost-to-charge
ratio (inpatient and outpatient) for each hospital, the department or its
designee uses the total cost from the HCFA 2552-92, Worksheet B, Part 1, Column
25, and total charges from the HCFA 2552-92, Worksheet C, Part 1, Column 6.
The ratio is the total cost divided by the total gross patient charges.
(B)
The department or its designee determines the cost of services
to patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments
for services provided during the year for each hospital. Hospitals are surveyed
each year to determine charges that can be attributed to patients without
insurance or other third party resources. The charges are multiplied by each
hospital's cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) to determine the
cost.
(2)
After the department or its designee determines each disproportionate
share hospital's cost of services to patients who have no health insurance
or source of third party payments for services provided during the year, the
department subtracts from each hospital's cost of services the amount of payments
made by or on behalf of those patients who have no health insurance or source
of third party payments for services provided during the year.
(g)
The department or its designee trends each hospital's "hospital
specific limit" calculated from its historical base period cost report from
subsection (f) of this section to the state's fiscal year disproportionate
share program. For hospitals without full 12-month fiscal year cost reports,
the department or its designee annualizes the cost to calculate the hospital
specific limit. The department or its designee uses the inflation update factor,
as defined in subsection (d)(8) of this section, in calculating the adjusted
hospital specific limit. The department or its designee calculates the number
of months from the mid-point of the hospital's cost reporting period to the
mid-point of the state fiscal year disproportionate share program. The department
or its designee then multiplies the portion of the hospital's cost report
year occurring in the state fiscal year by the inflation update factor used
for each state fiscal year in the calculation of hospital reimbursement rates
for each state fiscal year. The product of these calculations is multiplied
by each hospital's hospital specific limit to obtain each hospital's adjusted
hospital specific limit.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303621
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes to
amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rates. Chapter 355 describes the
reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
HHSC proposes amendments to §355.8085, concerning Texas Medicaid Reimbursement
Methodology (TMRM); amendments to §355.8081, concerning Payments for
Laboratory and X-ray Services, Radiation Therapy, Physical Therapists' Services,
Physician Services, Podiatry Services, Chiropractic Services, Optometric Services,
Ambulance Services, Dentists' Services, and Psychologists' Services; the addition
of new rule §355.8600, concerning Reimbursement for Ambulance Services,
and the addition of new rule §355.8610, concerning Reimbursement for
Clinical Laboratory Services, all in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter.
The purpose of the revisions and additions is to transfer reimbursement methodologies
for ambulance and clinical diagnostic laboratory services that do not follow
TMRM out of the TMRM rule into new rules of their own. Since the TMRM applies
only to covered services provided by physicians and certain other practitioners,
the title of the rule is being changed to TMRM for Physicians and Certain
Other Practitioners. The proposal also updates TMRM by replacing references
to the "Texas Department of Health" and "department" with references to "HHSC
and/or its designee". The proposal provides HHSC with more flexibility in
making inflation adjustments to the TMRM conversion factor. The new rule at §355.8610,
concerning Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services, allows HHSC more
flexibility in reviewing, determining and updating these fees by removing
the requirement that the fees be based solely on the Medicare-established
fee schedule, by changing the required period for review to at least every
two years, and by adding the requirement that fees must be established within
available funding and not exceed the Medicare fee schedule. Revisions to §355.8085
and §355.8600 add the requirement that fees must be established within
available funding. The revisions to §355.8081 update rule citations for
TMRM for Physicians and Certain Other Practitioners at §355.8085, for
ambulance services at §355.8600, and for clinical laboratory services
at §355.8610.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that,
for the first five-year period the proposed amendments and new sections are
in effect, there are fiscal implications for state government as a result
of enforcing or administering the sections. There are no fiscal implications
for local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.
The effect on state government for the first five-year period the sections
are in effect is an estimated cost savings of $252,387 in fiscal year (FY)
2004; $248,581 in FY 2005; $248,581 in FY 2006; $248,581 in FY 2007; and $248,581
in FY 2008.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that during the
first five years the proposed sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated
as a result of enforcing the sections is increased provider understanding
of the various affected reimbursement methodologies. There is no adverse economic
effect on small or micro-businesses as a result of enforcing or administering
the proposed sections. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who
are required to comply with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated
effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by these sections.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Nancy Kimble
(telephone: 512-338-6496; FAX: 512-338-6544) in HHSC Rate Analysis. Written
comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ms. Kimble via facsimile or mail
to HHSC Rate Analysis, Mail Code H-410, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, TX
78756-3101, within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
.
A public hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, July 16, 2003, from 2:00 pm
until 5:00 pm. The hearing will be held in the Public Hearing Room, of the
Brown-Heatly State Office Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas
78756-3101.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Government Code, HHSC has determined that
Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to this rule. Accordingly,
HHSC is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding this
rule.
5.
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
1 TAC §355.8081, §355.8085
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rule in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The amendments implement the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).
§355.8081.Payments for Laboratory and X-ray Services, Radiation Therapy, Physical Therapists' Services, Physician Services, Podiatry Services, Chiropractic Services, Optometric Services, Ambulance Services, Dentists' Services, and Psychologists' Services.
(a)
Subject to qualifications, limitations, and
exclusions as provided in this chapter, payment to eligible providers must
not exceed the lesser of the provider's billed amount or the amount derived
from the methodology described in
§355.8085
[
(b)
Reimbursement for ambulance
services is described in §355.8600 of this title (relating to Ambulance
Services). Reimbursement for clinical laboratory services is described in §355.8610
of this title (relating to Clinical Laboratory Services).
§355.8085.Texas Medicaid Reimbursement Methodology (TMRM) for Physicians and Certain Other Practitioners .
[
(1)
Introduction. Except as otherwise specified, the TMRM for
covered services provided by physicians and certain other practitioners shall
employ a prospective payment system [
(A)
There shall be no geographical or specialty reimbursement
differential for individual services.
(B)
The fees for individual services will be reviewed at least
every two years and will be based upon either:
(i)
historical payments, with adjustments, to ensure adequate
access to appropriate health care services; or
(ii)
actual resources required by an economically efficient
provider to provide each individual service.
(C)
The fees for individual services
or adjustments thereto must be made within available funding.
(2)
Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in
this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise.
(A)
Access-based reimbursement fees (ABRF)--Fees for individual
services based upon historical payments adjusted, where
HHSC or its designee
[
(B)
Adequacy of access--Measures of adequacy of access to health
care services include, but are not limited to, the following determinations:
(i)
adequate participation in the Medicaid program by physicians
and other practitioners; and/or
(ii)
the ability of the eligible Medicaid population to receive
adequate health care services in an appropriate setting.
(C)
Resource-based reimbursement fees (RBRF)--Fees for individual
services based upon the [
(D)
Conversion factor--The dollar amount by which the sum of
the three cost component RVUs is multiplied in order to obtain a reimbursement
fee for each individual service. The initial value of the conversion factor
is $26.873 for fiscal years 1992 and 1993.
The
[
(E)
Conversion factor adjustments--
If funding is available
and adjustments are made to the conversion factor(s), the adjustments include
inflation and/or access-based adjustments
[
(i)
Inflation adjustment--To account for general inflation,
the conversion factor is adjusted by [
(ii)
Access-based adjustment--Adjustments to the conversion
factor may also be made to ensure adequacy of access as defined in subparagraph
(B) of this paragraph.
(F)
Relative units (RVUs)--The relative value assigned to each
of the three individual components
that
[
(3)
Calculating the payment amounts. The fee schedule that
results from the TMRM must be composed of two separate components:
(A)
the access-based fees; and
(B)
the resource-based fees [
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303620
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.8600
The new rule is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rule in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The new rule implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).
§355.8600.Reimbursement for Ambulance Services.
Ambulance services shall be reimbursed in accordance with a reasonable
charge methodology. The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
or its designee shall define and determine reasonable charges and payments
as follows, with all determinations and adjustments to those determinations
made within available funding.
(1)
A reasonable charge for a specific service shall be the
lowest of:
(A)
the provider's customary charge for that service;
(B)
the prevailing charges made for similar services in the
geographic locality; or
(C)
the actual charge of the eligible provider.
(2)
HHSC or its designee shall use a statistical base for making
reasonable charge determinations. The statistical base is comprised of individual
charges gathered from available sources, including Medicare (Title XVIII)
and Medicaid (Title XIX).
(3)
Determination of reasonable charges, as set forth in this
section and established by HHSC or its designee, shall be made in accordance
with applicable federal requirements. Payments for services provided must
not exceed the Medicare fee schedule.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303618
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.8610
The new rule is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rule in preparation for the implementation of legislation.
The new rule implements the Government Code, §§531.033 and 531.021(b).
§355.8610.Reimbursement for Clinical Laboratory Services.
Clinical diagnostic laboratory tests performed in a physician's office,
by an independent laboratory, or by a hospital laboratory for its outpatients
shall be reimbursed the lower of the provider's usual customary charge for
that service or a maximum fee determined by the Texas Health and Human Services
Commission (HHSC) or its designee. HHSC or its designee will review maximum
fees at least every two years, with any adjustments made within available
funding. Payments for services provided must not exceed the Medicare fee schedule.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303619
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §355.8321
The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
to amend Chapter 355, Medicaid Reimbursement Rate. Chapter 355 describes the
reimbursement methodology of the Texas medical assistance (Medicaid) program.
HHSC proposes to amend §§355.8321, concerning the LoneSTAR Select
Contracting Program, in its Medicaid Reimbursement Rates chapter. Section
355.8321 is being amended to require health care providers to apply for selective
contracting provider agreements on an individual basis.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
for the first five years the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no
fiscal implications for state government as a result of enforcing or administering
the section. There will be no fiscal impact on local governments as a result
of enforcing or administering the section.
Steve Lorenzen, Director of Rate Analysis, has determined that for each
year of the first five years the proposed section is in effect, the public
benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be to clarify
selective contracting requirements. There is no anticipated impact on small
businesses and micro-businesses to comply with the section as proposed as
they will not be required to alter their business practices as a result of
the section. There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required
to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated impact on local
employment.
HHSC has determined that this proposed rule is not "a major environmental
rule" as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental
rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of which is to protect
the environment or reduce risk to human health from environmental exposure
and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment or the public health
and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed rule is not specifically
intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure.
HHSC has determined that this proposed rule does not restrict or limit
an owner's right to their property that would otherwise exist in the absence
of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043,
Government Code.
Written comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mr. Doug Odle, Rate
Analysis Department, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 W. 49th
Street, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of this proposal
in the
Texas Register
. In addition, a public
hearing concerning the proposed rule will be held Wednesday, July 16, 2003,
from 2:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m. The hearing will be held in room 1410 at the
Brown-Heatly Building, 4900 N. Lamar Blvd., Austin, Texas 78751. To comply
with federal regulations, a copy of the proposed rule is being sent to each
Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) office where it will be available
for public review upon request.
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Government Code, §531.033,
which authorizes the commissioner of HHSC to adopt rules necessary to carry
out the commission's duties; §531.021(b), which established HHSC as the
agency responsible for adopting reasonable rules governing the determination
of fees, charges, and rates for medical assistance payments under the Human
Resources Code, Chapter 32; and Government Code, §2001.006, which allows
state agencies to adopt rules in preparation for the implementation of legislation
The proposed rule affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32 and the
Texas Government Code, Chapter 531.
§355.8321.LoneSTAR Select Contracting Process for Inpatient Hospital Services.
(a)
Introduction. This section implements the provisions of
Senate Bill 79, 73rd Texas Legislature, 1993, mandating selective contracting
for non-emergency inpatient hospital services.
(b)
Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in
this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly
indicates otherwise.
(1)
Market area--A geographic subdivision of the State of Texas
defined as a group of geographically contiguous counties in which the Texas
Department of Health (department) determines that health care providers will
be invited to apply for selective contracting agreements. In general, each
Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) in the State will be considered for designation
as a market area. Where warranted by historical patient migration patterns,
the department may designate certain non-MSA counties that are geographically
contiguous to an MSA to be included with MSA counties within a market area.
(2)
Effective service area--For each health care provider in
a market area, the geographic area, as defined on a zip code basis, in which
the health care provider has historically provided inpatient hospital services
to Medicaid patients. For purposes of subsections (f) and (g) of this section,
the effective service area will be determined based on historical Medicaid
inpatient claims data.
(3)
Executive Oversight Committee--The executive committee
established by the department to direct the selective contracting initiative.
(4)
Hospital capacity to provide specialized service offerings--
(A)
For the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program I, the presence
or absence of specific acute care hospital services, including, but not limited
to, trauma centers, burn units, neonatal intensive care unit services, and
psychiatric services, that are required to be available in the market to ensure
adequate access to quality care.
(B)
For the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program II, the presence
or absence of specific inpatient psychiatric services, including, but not
limited to, separate units for young children and adolescents, separate psychiatric
and substance abuse treatment services, closed and open units, and distinct
programs (e.g., dual diagnosis, eating disorder) that may be required to be
available in the market to ensure adequate access to quality.
(5)
New facility--A health care provider facility substantially
constructed after the time the department determined the network of health
care providers that would be contracted under selective provider agreements.
Such term shall not include facilities that were built and operational at
the time the department determined the network of selective providers for
the affected market area; regardless of whether the facility's corporate structure
and/or name have changed due to merger, acquisition, or other corporate reorganization.
(6)
Potential network--Any combination of applicant health
care providers (whether the result of a joint proposal or determined by the
department) that offer a:
(A)
combined effective service area that provides geographic
coverage of the market area to the same extent that coverage is provided under
current practice;
(B)
combined service capacity equal to at least:
(i)
115% of the most recently available historic service volume
experience for the market area for the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program
I; or
(ii)
125% of the most recently available historic service volume
experience for the market area for the LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program
II; and
(C)
combination of specialized services available within the
market area that is at least as broad as the range of specialized services
presently available to Medicaid recipients in that market area.
(7)
Selective contracting--A method of contracting, granted
through waivers of certain provisions of the Social Security Act, that allows
the department to contract selectively with health care providers for non-emergency
inpatient services, thereby improving its ability to act as a prudent purchaser
of services and to manage the Medical Assistance Program in a more effective
and efficient manner, as required by Senate Bill 79.
(8)
Selective provider agreement--An agreement which includes
an amendment to a health care provider's existing provider agreement with
the department and involves selective contracting.
(9)
Disproportionate share hospital--A health care provider
participating in the Medicaid program that, according to state Medicaid criteria,
meets the conditions of participation and serves a disproportionate share
of indigent patients. Additional requirements for disproportionate share hospitals
are specified in §29.609 of this title (relating to Additional Reimbursement
to Disproportionate Share Hospitals) and §29.610 of this title (relating
to Disproportionate Share Hospital Reimbursement Methodology for State-Owned
Teaching Hospitals).
(10)
Health care provider--
(A)
any acute care hospital that is eligible to provide inpatient
hospital services to Medicaid recipients; or
(B)
any inpatient mental health facility, as defined within
this section.
(11)
Optional volume management activities--Those activities
that acute care hospitals may propose to furnish to Medicaid recipients in
a market area to expand access to primary care services and ensure more appropriate
use of acute care hospital facilities. Such activities may include, but not
be limited to, furnishing ambulatory primary care clinic services to Medicaid
recipients, and furnishing nurse hotlines which Medicaid recipients may call
to receive professional advice about the most appropriate means to obtain
medical care.
(12)
Hardship exemption procedure--A method for non-contracted
health care providers to obtain prior authorization from the department to
provide non-emergency inpatient services to Medicaid recipients who would
experience an unreasonable travel burden under the LoneSTAR Select Contracting
Program(s).
(13)
Emergency inpatient services--An admission into a health
care provider with a diagnosis meeting the definition of a medical emergency.
(14)
Non-emergency inpatient services--An admission into a
health care provider with a diagnosis not meeting the definition of a medical
emergency.
(15)
LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program I--The selective contracting
program designed and implemented for acute care hospitals.
(16)
LoneSTAR Select Contracting Program II--The selective
contracting program designed and implemented for inpatient mental health facilities
as defined in the Health and Safety Code, §571.003.
(17)
Inpatient mental health facility--A mental health facility
that can provide 24-hour residential and acute inpatient psychiatric services
that is:
(A)
a facility operated by the Texas Department of Mental Health
and Mental Retardation;
(B)
a private mental hospital licensed by the department;
(C)
a community center;
(D)
a facility operated by a community center or other entity
the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation designates to
provide mental health services;
(E)
an identifiable part of a general hospital in which diagnosis,
treatment, and care for persons with mental illness is provided and that is
licensed by the department; or
(F)
a hospital operated by a federal agency.
(c)
General Design. The department shall select that subset
of market area that appears to indicate the most effective competition for
selective provider agreements to serve Medicaid patients. The market areas
shall be divided into one or more groups of solicitations that will avoid
an overlap of contract evaluation and negotiation of solicitations.
(1)
The department shall implement selective contracting by
executing amendments to each health care provider's existing provider agreement
with the department. Health care providers that were not parties to provider
agreements before implementation of the department's selective contracting
are eligible to apply; however, they must enter into a provider agreement
that ensures they are subject to all terms and conditions of the Medical Assistance
Program. The amendments to the provider agreements, and the process by which
the department solicited, evaluated, negotiated, and executed the amended
agreements with health care providers under selective contracting are not
subject to the laws and regulations governing acquisition of goods and services
by state agencies.
(2)
Health care providers shall be required to apply for selective
provider agreements on an individual basis. [
(3)
The department shall send solicitation packages, inviting
proposals for selective provider agreements, to each health care provider
serving residents of the counties selected for participation. Health care
providers will be required at all times to be eligible to participate in the
Medicare and Medicaid programs. Health care providers that are not sent solicitation
packages for Medicaid recipients of a particular market will be able to request
a package after demonstrating their intent to offer services to Medicaid recipients
in those markets.
(d)
Proposals for selective provider agreements. Health care
providers seeking selective provider agreements shall be required to submit
the following information in their proposals:
(1)
a schedule of proposed payment rates to be applied to all
covered health care provider inpatient services during the term of the agreement;
(2)
a proposed level of volume of services to Medicaid recipients
that the health care provider would agree to serve during the contract period
(this proposed level shall serve only as an estimate of services to assist
the department in evaluating the availability of services within the relevant
market area; it shall not serve as a limit on the amount of reimbursable services
to be supplied by a contracting hospital);
(3)
data to assist the department in evaluating the effective
service area and specialized service offerings of the health care provider;
(4)
assurances and certifications required to ensure health
care provider compliance with the requirements of federal and Texas law and
regulations, and the requirements of the department's selective contracting
process;
(5)
a narrative description of the proposed plans (if any)
of the acute care hospital to furnish optional volume management programs
for Medicaid recipients; and
(6)
evidence that the application of the health care provider
constitutes a binding quotation authorized by the corporate governance of
the health care provider.
(e)
Evaluation of proposals for selective provider agreements
for comprehensive market area selective contracting. The department shall
evaluate health care provider proposals, except proposals from new facilities
according to the following criteria.
(1)
Health care provider proposals shall be due to the department
within one month of the release of proposal packages. All health care provider
materials submitted to the department during the proposal process, and materials
developed by the department or its contractors during the course of evaluation
and negotiation, shall be confidential until all agreements are executed for
all market areas in the state.
(2)
The department shall evaluate health care provider proposals
on a market-by-market basis and determine a negotiation strategy to pursue
in each market area following its evaluation of all market areas. Based on
the application of pre-specified evaluation criteria for each market area,
the department shall prepare a recommended strategy for contracting in each
market area. Each market area strategy shall be subject to approval by the
Executive Oversight Committee established by the department.
(3)
The department shall retain the option to make awards without
negotiation. In some circumstances, the department may accept the proposals
offered by every health care provider in the market area. In most cases, however,
the department expects to enter into negotiations with those health care providers
whose proposals, taken together, appear to represent the best combination
of providers consistent with the overall objectives of the Medical Assistance
Program. After negotiation, the department reserves the right not to award
an agreement in a specific market area. In most cases, however, the department
shall proceed to finalize and execute agreements with some subset of the health
care providers in each market area. In that event, coverage restrictions associated
with the use of non-contracted health care providers Medicaid recipients shall
apply.
(f)
Evaluation criteria and methodology for comprehensive market
area selective contracting. The department's evaluation of proposals, except
proposals from new facilities, for selective provider agreements for comprehensive
coverage of each market area shall be conducted in two phases. Phase One shall
include determining minimally acceptable network combinations and Phase Two
shall include cost evaluation. A description of each phase follows.
(1)
In Phase One, the department shall enter the information
included in health care provider proposals in each market area into a personal
computer based (PC-based) micro-simulation model designed to aid in the evaluation
of the department's contracting options for each market. Data from health
care provider proposals shall be combined with data from the department's
eligibility systems and claims processing records to construct the data base
required for this phase of the evaluation. Each health care provider's record
in the data base shall contain information necessary to determine each health
care provider's:
(A)
effective service area for Medicaid recipients in that
market area; and
(B)
capacity to provide specialized services required by Medicaid
recipients in the market area.
(2)
The PC-based micro-simulation model shall be used to test
all possible combinations of health care providers applying for selective
provider agreements to determine potential networks that shall meet the department's
requirements for access to services for Medicaid patients. [
(3)
In Phase Two, each potential network shall be eligible
for further consideration. If the Phase One evaluation fails to identify a
potential network of applicant health care providers that meet the department's
specified criteria, the department reserves the right to enter into direct
negotiations with any health care provider serving the market area. The purpose
of these negotiations shall be to develop a minimally acceptable potential
network, and allow the department to initiate negotiations with a health care
provider that failed to submit a proposal during the proposal period.
(4)
In Phase Two, each potential network identified in a market
area in Phase One shall be evaluated to determine the estimated reduction
in program costs that would result from entering into selective provider agreements
with all of the health care providers in that potential network, while excluding
all other health care providers from serving non-emergency cases. The department
shall use the PC-based micro-simulation model to produce an estimate of the
total change in Medicaid program costs that would result by entering into
agreements with those health care providers during the base contract period.
The estimate by the department shall consider:
(A)
changes in unit prices to be paid to providers for inpatient
services;
(B)
changes in the distribution of service volumes (and case
mix) across health care providers that would result from the reallocation
of service volume from non-selected to selected providers; and
(C)
savings in Medicaid program costs likely to result from
the changes in service volumes induced by optional volume management activities
proposed by acute care hospitals, including both savings in aggregate acute
care hospital service use and offsetting increases in non-hospital service
costs.
(5)
The result of the evaluation by the department will be
a range of values for each potential network. The ranges shall be constructed
using best case, worst case, and expected value assumptions about the distribution
of service volumes across hospitals in the network.
(6)
Following the evaluation, the department shall prepare
a recommendation to the Executive Oversight Committee that includes the outcome
of both phases of the evaluation for each market area, as well as a proposed
strategy for the department to meet the best interests of the Medical Assistance
Program. Department options shall include:
(A)
making an award without negotiations--including an award
at the proposed price schedules to all health care providers in the market;
(B)
entering into negotiations with health care providers a
single potential network to improve proposed pricing, if possible, and to
finalize an agreement about key program features; or
(C)
entering into negotiations with one or more health care
providers influence the department's choice among multiple potential networks
by lowering the pricing terms offered by individual health care providers.
These negotiations may result in identifying a single potential network that
would differ in its health care provider composition from potential networks
initially identified in Phase One.
(g)-(j)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303617
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §§357.1, 357.3, 357.5 - 357.7, 357.11 - 357.13, 357.17, 357.21, 357.23, 357.25, 357.29
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) proposes
amendments to §357.1, Purpose and Scope; §357.3, Definitions; §357.5,
Notice of Agency Action; §357.7, Maintaining Benefits or Services; §357.11,
Preliminary Matters for a Standard Fair Hearing; §357.13, Location of
Hearing and Accommodation; §357.17, Document Hearing; §357.21, Burden
of Proof; §357.23, Procedural Rights of the Individual; §357.25,
Dismissal of Hearing; and §357.29, Hearing Decisions. In addition, HHSC
is proposing two new rules: §357.6, Notice of MCO Action and Resolution
of MCO Appeals; and §357.12, Preliminary Matters for an Expedited Fair
Hearing for Individuals Enrolled with an MCO.
The proposed amendments generally clarify language concerning standard
state fair hearings and add new language concerning: a Medicaid Managed Care
Organization's (MCO) responsibilities after taking an "action"; expedited
appeals to an MCO; and expedited state fair hearings for individuals enrolled
in an MCO. Proposed new §357.6, Notice of MCO Action and Resolution of
MCO Appeals, clarifies that if an MCO takes an "action," an enrollee may file
an appeal with the MCO and/or request a state fair hearing. Under the proposed
rules, a managed care enrollee may request that the state fair hearing be
expedited if the enrollee's health requires it. A state fair hearing must
be expedited when the MCO determines or the provider indicates that taking
the time for a standard resolution could seriously jeopardize the enrollee's
life or health or ability to attain, maintain, or regain maximum function.
For a standard-timeframe state fair hearing, an enrollee does not have
to exhaust his or her appeal to the MCO before requesting a fair hearing.
For an expedited fair hearing, however, the MCO must first resolve the appeal
before the enrollee may request a fair hearing. Proposed new §357.6 also
sets forth the MCO notice-of-action requirements; the criteria for an expedited
appeal to the MCO; timeframes for resolutions by the MCO of an appeal; notice
of appeal resolution requirements; and timeframes for requesting a standard
or expedited state fair hearing following an MCO action. A definition of an
MCO "action" is added to §357.3, along with definitions for "standard
fair hearings" and "expedited fair hearings"; "MCO"; and "MCO appeals."
A proposed amendment to §357.1 adds "action by an MCO" as a basis
for requesting a state fair hearing. Proposed new §357.12 addresses notification
to an enrollee of an expedited fair hearing and the enrollee's access to records
and right to representation at the hearing. Additional non-substantive changes
are proposed for clarification, ease of understanding, and internal consistency.
These changes include formatting and, in some cases, paragraph restructuring,
and affect §§357.5, 357.7, 357.11, 357.13, 357.23, and 357.25.
The proposed amendments and new rules, when adopted, will bring HHSC into
compliance with the federal Medicaid managed care rules at 42 C.F.R. Part
438, Subpart F, Grievance System, and 42 C.F.R. §431.220 and §431.244,
as amended, effective August 13, 2002. Medicaid managed care plans will be
required to revise member materials to include these changes.
Tom Suehs, Deputy Commissioner for Financial Services, has determined that
for the first five years the proposed amendments and new rules are in effect,
there will be no fiscal implications for the state or local governments as
a result of enforcing or administering the amended and new rules.
Mr. Suehs also has determined that during the first five years the proposed
amendments and new rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as
a result of enforcing the new and amended sections will be that MCO enrollees
will be able to pursue a state fair hearing as well as file an appeal with
the MCO if the MCO takes an adverse action. MCO enrollees will also benefit
by being able, under certain circumstances, to request that a state fair hearing
be expedited. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses and micro-businesses
to comply with the amendment and new rules as proposed, as they will not be
required to modify business practices. There are no anticipated economic costs
to persons who are required to comply with the proposed rules. There is no
anticipated impact on local employment.
HHSC has determined that the proposed amendments and new rules are not
a "major environmental rule," as defined by §2001.0225 of the Texas Government
Code. "Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent
of which is to protect the environment or reduce risk to human health from
environmental exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment
or the public health and safety of a state or a sector of the state. The proposed
rule is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks
to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has determined that the proposed rules do not restrict or limit an
owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence
of government action and therefore does not constitute a taking under §2007.043,
Government Code.
Written comments on the proposed rules may be submitted to Bonnie Winters,
Medicaid/CHIP Division, Texas Health and Human Services Commission, 1100 West
49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, within 30 days of publication of the proposal
in the
Texas Register
.
A public hearing is scheduled for Monday, July 14, 2003, from 8:00 am until
Noon. The hearing will be held in room 1420 at the Brown-Heatly Building,
4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78751.
The amendments and new rules are proposed under the Texas Government
Code, §531.033, which provides the Commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking
authority; and Human Resources Code, §32.021(m), and the Texas Government
Code, §531.021(a), which provide HHSC with the authority to administer
the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas.
No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendments
and new rules.
§357.1.Purpose and Scope.
(a)
Purpose. The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
is required by state law to promulgate uniform fair hearing rules for all
Medicaid-funded services. [
(1)
An opportunity for a fair hearing is required
by federal law and regulation:
(A)
in any Medicaid case for an individual whose claim for
services is denied or not acted upon promptly;
(B)
when an operating agency or its designee takes action to
suspend, terminate, or reduce services, including a denial of a prior authorization
request for Medicaid-covered services;
(C)
when an Managed Care Organization (MCO) takes an action,
as defined in §357.3 of this chapter (relating to Definitions);
(D)
when an adverse determination is made by an operating agency
or its designee with regard to the preadmission screening and annual resident
review; or
(E)
when a determination is made by a skilled nursing facility
or nursing facility to transfer or discharge a resident.
(2)
Expedited fair hearings. An individual
enrolled in a Medicaid MCO may request an expedited fair hearing when:
(A)
the MCO determines or the provider indicates that taking
the time for a standard appeal and/or fair hearing could seriously jeopardize
the enrollee's life or health or ability to attain, maintain, or regain maximum
function; and
(B)
the individual has exhausted his or her expedited MCO appeal
rights.
(b)
Scope.
(1)
These rules establish fair hearing procedures
,
which
an operating agency will follow when the operating agency is required to conduct
a fair hearing for Medicaid-funded services.
(2)
An individual's authorized representative, as defined by
the operating agency, may, on the individual's behalf, take any step that
the individual can take as described in these rules.
§357.3.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, have the
following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
Action--
(A)
Termination, suspension, or reduction of Medicaid eligibility
or covered services by an operating agency or its designee, including:
(i)
the denial of Medicaid eligibility;
(ii)
the denial of program eligibility;
(iii)
the denial of a prior authorization request for covered
services; and
(iv)
the failure of an operating agency or its designee to
act within a reasonable amount of time on an individual's request for Medicaid
covered services or for an eligibility determination.
(B)
A decision made by an operating agency or its designee
concerning disenrollment from an MCO.
(C)
An adverse determination made by an operating agency or
its designee with regard to the preadmission screening and annual resident
review.
(D)
When an MCO:
(i)
denies or limits authorization of a requested service,
including the type or level of service;
(ii)
reduces, suspends, or terminates a previously authorized
service;
(iii)
denies, in whole or part, payment for services;
(iv)
fails to provide services in a timely manner;
(v)
fails to act within the timeframes for resolution of an
MCO appeal required by contract under 42 CFR §438.408(b); or
(vi)
denies a request from an individual, who is a resident
of a rural area with only one MCO, to exercise his or her right, under 42
CFR §438.52(b)(2)(ii), to obtain services outside the network.
(E)
A determination by a skilled nursing facility or nursing
facility to transfer or discharge a resident.
(F)
"Action" does not include expiration of a time-limited
service.
[(1)
Action--Termination, suspension, or reduction
of Medicaid eligibility or covered services by an operating agency or its
designee. "Action" includes the denial of Medicaid eligibility and the denial
of program eligibility. The term also means determinations by skilled nursing
facilities and nursing facilities to transfer or discharge residents and adverse
determinations made by an operating agency or its designee with regard to
the preadmission screening and annual resident review. "Action" includes a
denial of a prior authorization request for covered services affecting an
individual. The term also includes the failure of an operating agency or its
designee to act upon an individual's request for Medicaid covered services
or for an eligibility determination within a reasonable amount of time. "Action"
does not include expiration of a time-limited service.]
(2)
Adverse determination--Determination that the individual
does not require the level of services provided by a nursing facility or that
the individual does or does not require specialized services.
(3)
Date of action--The intended date on which a termination,
suspension, reduction, transfer, or discharge becomes effective. It also means
the date of the determination made by an operating agency with regard to the
preadmission screening and resident review.
(4)
Day--Calendar day, unless otherwise specified.
(5)
[
(6)
Fair Hearing--
(A)
Expedited Fair Hearing--A fair hearing conducted by an
operating agency and held within 3 business days after the receipt of the
case file from the MCO for an individual who has exhausted the MCO's expedited
appeal process.
(B)
Standard Fair Hearing--A fair hearing conducted by an operating
agency and held in accordance with this chapter in which a decision is made
within 90 days after the receipt of a request.
(7)
MCO Appeals--
(A)
Expedited MCO appeal--An appeal conducted by an MCO and
held within 3 business days after receipt of a request because the individual's
health condition meets the criteria for an expedited MCO appeal, determined
in accordance with §357.1(b)(2) of this title (relating to Purpose and
Scope)
(B)
Standard MCO appeal--An appeal conducted by an MCO and
held within 30 days after receipt of the request.
(8)
MCO--Medicaid managed care organization.
An entity that has a current Texas Department of Insurance certificate of
authority to operate as an HMO under Chapter 843 of the Texas Insurance Code
or as an approved nonprofit health corporation under Chapter 844 of the Texas
Insurance Code.
(9)
[
(10)
[
(11)
[
(12)
[
§357.5.Notice of Agency Action .
(a)
Advance Notice. An operating agency or
its designee will deliver to an individual, at least 10 days before the date
of action, written notice of the action and of the individual's right to request
a standard fair hearing on the action, unless subsection (b) of this section
provides otherwise.
[
[(1)
Notice at time of action. If the action of the operating
agency or its designee is the denial of Medicaid or program eligibility or
the denial of a prior authorization request, at the time of action, the operating
agency or its designee shall give an individual written notice of the individual's
right to request a fair hearing on the action.]
[(2)
Advance Notice. If an operating agency or its designee
proposes to take an action other than the denial of Medicaid or program eligibility,
denial of a prior authorization request, the failure to act upon an individual's
request for Medicaid-covered services, or failure to determine eligibility
within a reasonable amount of time, the operating agency or its designee shall
deliver to the individual notice of the individual's right to request a hearing
on the action at least ten days prior to the date of action unless the circumstances
in subsection (b) of this section otherwise provide.]
(b)
Exceptions to advance notice.
(1)
Notice at time of action. An operating agency or its designee
will mail written notice to an individual at the time of action if:
(A)
the action is the denial of Medicaid or program eligibility;
or
(B)
the action is the denial of a prior authorization request.
(2)
Notice not later than the date of action. An operating
agency or its designee may mail written notice to an individual not later
than the date of action if:
(A)
the operating agency or its designee has factual information
confirming the death of the individual;
(B)
the operating agency or its designee receives a clear written
statement signed by the individual that:
(i)
he or she no longer wishes services; or
(ii)
gives information that requires termination or reduction
of services and indicates that he or she understands that this must be the
result of supplying that information;
(C)
the individual has been admitted to an institution where
he or she is ineligible for further services;
(D)
the individual's whereabouts are unknown and the post office
returns agency or designee mail directed to him or her indicating no forwarding
address;
(E)
the operating agency or its designee establishes the fact
that the individual has been accepted for Medicaid services by another state;
(F)
a change in the level of medical care is prescribed by
the individual's physician;
(G)
the notice involves an adverse determination made with
regard to the preadmission screening requirements; or
(H)
the action is the transfer or discharge of a resident from
a nursing facility and the date of action will occur in less than 10 days
pursuant to 42 CFR §483.12(a)(5)(ii) because:
(i)
the safety or health of individuals in the facility would
be endangered;
(ii)
the resident's health improves sufficiently to allow a
more immediate transfer or discharge;
(iii)
an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the
resident's urgent medical needs; or
(iv)
a resident has not resided in the facility for 30 days.
(3)
Notice not required. An operating agency or its designee
is not required to provide notice of the agency's or designee's:
(A)
failure to act upon an individual's request for Medicaid-covered
services; or
(B)
failure to determine eligibility within a reasonable amount
of time.
[(b)
Exceptions. The operating agency or its
designee may mail written notice to an individual not later than the date
of action if:]
[(1)
the operating agency or its designee has factual information
confirming the death of the individual;]
[(2)
the operating agency or its designee receives a clear
written statement signed by the individual that:]
[(A)
he or she no longer wishes services; or]
[(B)
gives information that requires termination or reduction
in services and indicates that he or she understands that this must be the
result of supplying that information;]
[(3)
the individual has been admitted to an institution where
he or she is ineligible for further services;]
[(4)
the individual's whereabouts are unknown and the post
office returns agency or designee mail directed to him or her indicating no
forwarding address;]
[(5)
the operating agency or its designee establishes the fact
that the individual has been accepted for Medicaid services by another state;]
[(6)
a change in the level of medical care is prescribed by
the individual's physician;]
[(7)
the notice involves an adverse determination made with
regard to the preadmission screening requirements; or]
[(8)
the action is the transfer or discharge of a resident
from a nursing facility and the date of action will occur in less than ten
days pursuant to 42 C.F.R. §483.12(a)(5)(ii) because:]
[(A)
the safety or health of individuals in the facility would
be endangered;]
[(B)
the resident's health improves sufficiently to allow a
more immediate transfer or discharge;]
[(C)
an immediate transfer or discharge is required by the
resident's urgent medical needs; or ]
[(D)
a resident has not resided in the facility for thirty
days.]
(c)
Content of Notice. The notice
will
[
(1)
the action that the operating agency, its designee, or
nursing facility is taking in the case of a denial of Medicaid or program
eligibility
, a decision concerning disenrollment from an MCO,
[
(2)
the date of action;
(3)
a statement of the reason for the action;
(4)
a reference to the statutory or regulatory authority supporting
the action, or the change in federal or state law that requires the action;
(5)
an explanation of the individual's right to request a
standard fair
hearing and the procedure for requesting same;
(6)
a statement that the individual may represent himself or
herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson;
(7)
the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions
regarding the
standard
fair hearing process; and
(8)
an explanation of the circumstances under which services
are continued, or a transfer or discharge is deferred, if a
standard
fair
hearing is requested.
(d)
Timeframe for Requesting a Hearing. The operating agency
and its designee must allow the individual to request a
standard fair
hearing within 90 days from the date the notice
of agency action
[
(1)
The request for
a standard fair
hearing must
be submitted according to the instructions provided in the notice
of
agency action
sent to the individual [
(2)
If a request for a
standard fair
hearing is
not received
by the operating agency or its designee
before the
date of action, the action may be taken or allowed.
(3)
If a request for
a standard fair
hearing is
not received
by the operating agency or its designee
within the
90-day period, the individual is deemed to have waived the hearing and the
action becomes final.
§357.6.Notice of MCO Action and Resolution of MCO Appeals.
(a)
Notice of MCO action
(1)
Advance notice. An MCO must deliver to an individual, at
least 10 days before the date of action, written notice of the action and
of the individual's right to request an MCO appeal and/or a standard fair
hearing on the action, unless paragraph (2) of this subsection provides otherwise.
(2)
Exceptions to Advance Notice.
(A)
An MCO may mail written notice to an individual not later
than the date of action under a circumstance described in §357.5(b)(2)
of this chapter (relating to Notice of Agency Action).
(B)
An MCO may mail written notice to an individual at the
time of action if the action is:
(i)
denial or limited authorization of a requested service,
including the type or level of service;
(ii)
denial, in whole or in part, of payment for a service;
or
(iii)
denial of a request from an individual, who is a resident
of a rural area with only one MCO, to exercise his or her right under 42 CFR §438.52(b)(2)(ii)
to obtain services outside the network.
(C)
An MCO is not required to provide notice of the following
actions:
(i)
failure to provide services in a timely manner; or
(ii)
failure to act within the timeframes for resolution of
an MCO appeal required by contract under 42 CFR §438.408(b).
(b)
Content of notice of MCO action: The notice must contain:
(1)
the action that the MCO is taking or intends to take;
(2)
the date of the action;
(3)
the reason for the action;
(4)
a reference to the statutory or regulatory authority supporting
the action, or the change in federal or state law that requires the action;
(5)
an explanation of:
(A)
the individual's right to request an MCO appeal;
(B)
the provider's right to request an MCO appeal on behalf
of the individual, with the individual's written consent;
(C)
the circumstances under which an expedited MCO appeal is
available;
(D)
the procedures and timeframes for requesting a standard
MCO appeal and an expedited MCO appeal;
(E)
a statement that the individual may represent himself or
herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson
at an MCO appeal; and
(F)
the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions
regarding the MCO appeal process.
(6)
An explanation of:
(A)
the individual's right to request a standard fair hearing;
(B)
the procedures and timeframes for requesting a standard
fair hearing;
(C)
a statement that the individual may represent himself or
herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson
at a fair hearing;
(D)
the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions
regarding the fair hearing process; and
(7)
an explanation of the individual's right to have benefits
continue pending resolution of an MCO appeal or a standard fair hearing, how
to request that benefits be continued, and the circumstances under which the
individual may be required to pay the costs of these services.
(c)
Criteria for expedited MCO appeal. An individual meets
the criteria for an expedited MCO appeal when the MCO determines (for a request
from an individual) or the provider indicates (in making the request on the
individual's behalf or supporting the individual's request) that taking the
time for resolution of a standard MCO appeal could seriously jeopardize the
individual's life or health or ability to attain, maintain, or regain maximum
function.
(d)
Timeframes for resolution of an MCO appeal.
(1)
Standard MCO appeal--for resolution of a standard MCO appeal,
the MCO must resolve and provide notice of the resolution to the affected
parties within 30 days of receipt of the request. The timeframe may be extended
in accordance with paragraph (3) of this subsection.
(2)
Expedited MCO appeal--for resolution of an expedited MCO
appeal, the MCO must resolve and provide notice of the resolution to the affected
parties within 3 business days after receipt of the request. The timeframe
may be extended in accordance with paragraph (3) of this subsection. The MCO
must also make a reasonable effort to provide oral notice of the resolution
to the individual.
(3)
Extension of timeframes.
(A)
An MCO may extend the timeframes described in paragraphs
(1) and (2) of this subsection up to 14 days if:
(i)
the individual requests the extension; or
(ii)
the MCO shows (to the satisfaction of the operating agency,
upon its request) that there is need for additional information and how the
delay is in the individual's interest.
(B)
If the MCO extends the timeframes, it must, for any extension
not requested by the individual, give the individual written notice of the
reason for the delay.
(e)
Notice of MCO appeal resolution. The notice must contain:
(1)
the results of the resolution process and the date the
appeal was resolved; and
(2)
for appeals not wholly resolved in favor of the individual:
(A)
the reason for upholding the action;
(B)
a reference to the statutory or regulatory authority supporting
the action, or the change in federal or state law that requires the action;
(C)
an explanation of:
(i)
the individual's right to request a fair hearing;
(ii)
the circumstances under which an expedited fair hearing
is available; and
(iii)
the procedures and timeframes for requesting an expedited
and standard fair hearing;
(D)
a statement that the individual may represent himself or
herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other spokesperson
at the fair hearing;
(E)
the name and phone number of a person who can answer questions
regarding the fair hearing process; and
(F)
an explanation that;
(i)
the individual has the right to request to receive benefits
while the fair hearing is pending and how to make the request; and
(ii)
the individual may be held liable for the cost of those
benefits if the fair hearing decision upholds the MCO's action.
(f)
Timeframe for requesting a standard fair hearing. The operating
agency or its designee must allow the individual to request a standard fair
hearing within 90 days after the date the notice of MCO action was mailed
as required by subsection (a) of this section.
(1)
The request for a standard fair hearing must be submitted
according to the instructions provided in the notice of MCO appeal resolution
as required by subsection (e) of this section.
(2)
If a request for a standard fair hearing is not received
within the 90-day period, the individual is deemed to have waived the right
for a standard fair hearing and the action becomes final.
(g)
Timeframe for requesting an expedited fair hearing. The
operating agency or its designee must allow the individual to request an expedited
fair hearing within 10 days after the date the notice of MCO appeal resolution
is sent.
(1)
The request for an expedited fair hearing must be submitted
according to the instructions provided in the notice of MCO expedited appeal
resolution.
(2)
If a request for an expedited fair hearing is not received
within the 10 day period, the individual is deemed to have waived the right
for an expedited fair hearing. A request received after the tenth day will
be considered a request for a standard fair hearing.
§357.7.Maintaining Benefits or Services.
(a)
Except as otherwise specified in subsections (b), (d) and
(e) of this section, if the action is other than a denial of Medicaid or program
eligibility or a denial of a prior authorization request and a request for
hearing is received before the date of action, the action will not be taken
and services will be continued until a final decision is rendered following
a fair hearing.
(b)
The operating agency or its designee may terminate or reduce
services before a hearing decision is rendered if:
(1)
it is determined at the fair hearing that the sole issue
is one of state or federal law or policy; and
(2)
the operating agency or its designee informs the individual
in writing of its intent to reduce or terminate services pending the hearing
decision at least
5
[
(c)
The operating agency or its designee may recover or recoup
the cost of any services provided to the individual to the extent that the
services were furnished solely by reason of this section if the fair hearing
decision supports the operating agency's or designee's action.
(d)
If notice is mailed under §357.5(b) of this chapter
(relating to Notice
of Agency Action
) and the operating agency
or its designee receives the individual's request for a hearing within
10
[
(e)
The operating agency or its designee has no obligation
to begin services requiring prior authorization pending a final decision.
§357.11.Preliminary Matters for a Standard Fair Hearing .
(a)
Notification of
Standard Fair
Hearing. The hearing
official
will
[
(1)
This notice will be sent to the address of record for the
individual or to the address indicated in the request for
fair
hearing.
(2)
The notification
will
[
(A)
the basis of the [
(B)
the time, date, and
location
[
(C)
a statement that the individual may request the
fair
hearing to be conducted based on the taking of oral testimony (an "oral
hearing"), or a
fair
hearing based on written information contained
in any appropriate file and additional
written
information that
the individual may wish to submit for consideration (a "document hearing"),
as is described in §357.17 of this chapter (relating to Document Hearing);
(D)
a statement that the individual may request any reasonable
accommodation required due to disability or language comprehension;
(E)
a statement that, before and during the
fair
hearing,
the individual may request to examine any appropriate file and documents or
records the operating agency wants the hearing official to consider; and
(F)
instructions on submitting written medical information
for the hearing official to consider and the deadline for submitting that
information.
(b)
Access to Records
(1)
Upon the individual's request, the individual
will
[
(2)
If the individual intends to introduce written medical
information at the
fair
hearing, that information must be submitted
to the hearing official at least
5
[
(c)
Representation. An individual may represent himself or
herself, or be represented by legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other
designated spokesperson. If the individual does not appear at the hearing,
the operating agency may require the submission of documentation demonstrating
that the representative appearing on the individual's behalf has authority
to represent the individual.
(d)
Additional Medical Assessment. If the hearing involves
medical issues such as those concerning a diagnosis, an examining physician's
report, or a medical review team's decision, and if the hearing official considers
it necessary to have a medical assessment other than that of the person involved
in making the original decision, that medical assessment must be obtained
at the operating agency's expense and made part of the record.
§357.12.Preliminary Matters for an Expedited Fair Hearing for Individuals Enrolled With an MCO.
(a)
Notification of Expedited Fair Hearing. The hearing official
will notify the individual who has requested the fair hearing of the date
and time of the fair hearing via a telephone call or fax. The notification
will contain:
(1)
the basis of the action or intended action;
(2)
the time, date, and location of the expedited fair hearing;
(3)
a statement that the individual may request the expedited
fair hearing to be conducted based on the taking of oral testimony (an "oral
hearing") or an expedited fair hearing based on written medical information
contained in any appropriate file and additional medical information that
the individual may wish to submit for consideration (a "document hearing"),
as described in §357.17 of this chapter (relating to Document Hearing);
(4)
a statement that the individual may request any reasonable
accommodation required due to disability or language comprehension;
(5)
instructions on submitting written medical information
for the hearing official to consider and the deadline for submitting that
information.
(b)
Access to Records
(1)
Information submitted by the MCO. Upon receipt of the individual's
request for an expedited fair hearing, the hearing office staff will notify
the MCO and require the MCO to deliver, within 1 business day, a copy of all
of the information the MCO used for resolving the expedited MCO appeal to:
(A)
the hearing official; and
(B)
the individual.
(2)
Information submitted by the individual.
(A)
The individual may submit written medical information prior
to the hearing, at the hearing or within 10 days after the hearing;
(B)
The hearing official may request a medical review by the
operating agency of the submitted material.
(C)
If the individual submits written medical information less
than 3 business days prior to the hearing, then:
(i)
The hearing official may keep the hearing record open for
up to 3 business days after receipt of the material.
(ii)
The individual waives the 3-business-day timeframe for
the hearing official to make a decision; and
(iii)
The hearing official will make a decision no later than
the end of the third business day after receipt of the material.
(c)
Representation. An individual may represent himself or
herself, or be represented by legal counsel, a relative, a friend or other
designated spokesperson. If the individual does not appear at the expedited
fair hearing, the operating agency may require the submission of documentation
demonstrating that the representative appearing on the individual's behalf
has authority to represent the individual.
§357.13.Location of Hearing and Accommodations.
(a)
The hearing official
will
[
(b)
Accommodations.
(1)
The operating agency will provide:
(A)
any reasonable accommodation for disclosed disabilities;
(B)
suitable interpretation for individuals with limited English
proficiency.
(2)
Requests for any reasonable accommodation and requests
fro an interpreter shall be made to the hearing official as follows:
(A)
for a standard fair hearing--in writing, at least 3 days
prior to the hearing; and
(B)
for an expedited fair hearing--at the time the individual
is notified of the expedited fair hearing.
[(b)
The operating agency shall provide any
reasonable accommodation for disclosed disabilities. Requests for any reasonable
accommodation should be made in writing to the hearing official at least three
days prior to the hearing date.]
[(c)
The operating agency shall provide suitable
interpretation for individuals with limited English proficiency. Requests
for an interpreter should be made in writing to the hearing official at least
three days prior to the hearing date.]
§357.17.Document Hearing.
(a)
The
standard fair
hearing may be
conducted based on the written information contained in any appropriate file
and additional written information submitted to the hearing official and the
other party not less than
5
[
(b)
The expedited fair hearing may be conducted
based on the written information contained in the MCO case file and any additional
written information submitted by the individual.
(1)
The individual must submit any additional written information
within 10 business days after receiving notification of the expedited fair
hearing as described in §357.12(a) of this chapter (relating to Preliminary
Matters for an Expedited Fair Hearing for Individuals Enrolled with an MCO).
(2)
If the individual submits additional written information
less than 3 business days prior to the hearing, then:
(A)
the individual waives the 3-business-day timeframe for
the hearing official to make a decision; and
(B)
the hearing official will make a decision no later than
the end of the third business day after receipt of the information.
§357.21.Burden of Proof.
(a)
The operating agency bears the burden of proof in a fair
hearing on an action
described in §357.3(1)(A) - (F) of this chapter
(relating to Definitions)
[
(b)
The MCO bears the burden of proof in a
fair hearing on an action described in §357.3(a) of this chapter (relating
to Definitions).
(c)
[
(d)
[
§357.23.Procedural Rights of the Individual.
The individual has the right to:
(1)
examine at a reasonable time before the date of the
fair
hearing and during the hearing the contents of any appropriate
file, and all documents and records to be
considered by the hearing official
[
(2)
bring witnesses;
(3)
establish all pertinent facts and circumstances;
(4)
present an argument without undue interference; and
(5)
question or refute any testimony or evidence, including
the opportunity to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses.
§357.25.Dismissal of Hearing.
The hearing official
will
[
§357.29.Hearing Decisions.
(a)
Fair hearing
[
(b)
The operating agency or its designee may grant, deny, terminate,
suspend, modify, or reduce services in accordance with the hearing decision
as rendered following a fair hearing.
(c)
Record. The record of the hearing consists of the following:
(1)
A transcript or recording of testimony and exhibits received
in evidence.
(2)
All documents and requests for admission, together with
the ruling on admissibility made by the hearing official.
(3)
The hearing official's decision, composed of a statement
of the persuasive evidence, findings of fact and conclusions of law (identifying
the relevant regulations and/or statutes), and a statement of restored benefits,
if appropriate.
(d)
Fair Hearing Decision Timeframes.
(1)
Standard fair hearing--the hearing official will make a
decision and send a copy of the decision to the individual within 90 days
of the date of the request for a standard fair hearing, unless the individual
waived the 90 day requirement in writing.
(2)
Expedited Fair Hearing--the hearing official will make
a decision and send a copy of the decision to the individual within 3 business
days after the receipt of the case file from the MCO, unless the individual
waives the 3-day requirement. The hearing official will make a reasonable
effort to notify the individual via telephone or facsimile if requested by
the individual.
[(d)
The hearing decision must be made and
a copy of the decision furnished to the individual within 90 days of the request
for a fair hearing unless the individual waives the 90-day requirement in
writing.]
(e)
If the action was
taken
[
(f)
Fair hearing
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303622
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, establishes the State Child Health
Plan authorized under Title XXI of the federal Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§1397aa,
et seq. Section 62.051, Health and Safety Code, designates the Commission
as the agency responsible for developing the state-designed child health plan
program for Texas, making policy for the program, and adopting rules as necessary
to implement Chapter 62.
The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC or Commission) proposes
to amend Chapter 370, State Children's Health Insurance Program. Specifically,
the HHSC proposes amendments to Subchapter A, §370.4 and §370.10,
concerning Program Administration; Subchapter B, Division 1, §§370.20-370.25,
concerning TexCare Partnership Application Process; Division 2, §370.30, §370.31,
concerning Applicant Rights and Responsibilities Regarding Application and
Eligibility; Division 3, §370.40, concerning Eligibility Determination;
Division 4, §§370.43, 370.44, 370.46, 370.48, 370.49, concerning
Eligibility Criteria; Division 5, §§370.51-370.54, concerning Review
and Reconsideration of Eligibility Denials and Temporary Enrollment and new
Subchapter C, Division 1, §§370.301, 370.303, 370.305, 370.307,
370.309, concerning TexCare Enrollment and Division 2, §§370.321,
370.323 and 370.325, concerning Cost-Sharing Requirements. Throughout the
Chapter, the proposed amendments replace "TCP" (an abbreviation of TexCare
Partnership), wherever it occurs, with "TexCare." In subchapter A, Program
Administration, §370.4, Definitions, the definitions for "income deductions"
and "Texas Healthy Kids Corporation" are deleted. In addition, a definition
was added for "gross budget group income." The definition of "income eligibility
standard" was changed to mean the "monthly gross budget group income." The
definitions have been renumbered to reflect the proposed changes.
Amendments are proposed to several rules in subchapter B, Application Screening,
Referral and Processing. The amendments are based on legislative changes to
income eligibility standards and removal of the deduction allowances. In Division
1, TexCare application process, the proposed amendment to §370.22, Completion
of telephone applications, adds a child's social security number or proof
of application to the Social Security Administration for a social security
number to the information that must be included in an application. Under the
amendments, certain information on budget groups no longer need be included
in the application.
In Division 4, Eligibility criteria, the proposed amendment to §370.43,
Citizenship and residency, adds refugee letters to the documents that may
be submitted to show that a child is a qualified alien. The proposed amendment
to §370.44, currently Income (as proposed, Income and assets), deletes
language concerning net income and income deductions and adds language concerning
gross income. Under the proposed amendment, a gross income test will be used
to determine eligibility. The proposal also deletes provisions concerning
verification of income deductions. Section 370.44, as proposed, requires an
assets test for budget groups with a gross monthly income greater than 150%
of the federal poverty level (FPL).
Section 370.46 governs the waiting period and is amended to reflect legislative
changes to §62.154, Health and Safety Code, which requires a 90-day waiting
period for applicants determined to be CHIP eligible but who do not meet certain
program exceptions. As proposed, the waiting period would begin on the first
day of the month in which or after which the child is enrolled in CHIP, depending
on whether enrollment is before or after the 15th of the month. The proposal
also adds to the exempt category children who have access to group-based health
benefits plan coverage and who are required to participate in HHSC's premium
payment reimbursement program.
The Commission is also proposing new Subchapter C, Enrollment, Disenrollment,
and Renewal of Membership. Proposed language in Divisions 1 and 2 removes
the requirement of an annual enrollment fee. Proposed Division 1, TexCare
Enrollment, addresses enrollment issues. Proposed new §370.301 identifies
the contents of the CHIP enrollment packet. Section 370.303 explains how to
complete the enrollment process. Section 370.305 governs the enrollment process
for children with complex special health care needs. Section 370.307 addresses
CHIP's continuous enrollment period. Under the proposed new rule, a child
determined to be CHIP eligible will remain enrolled for a period of 6 months.
This is a change from the previous continuous eligibility period of 12 months
for CHIP. Section 370.309 explains what happens if an enrollment packet is
submitted that is incomplete or missing required information.
Division 2, Cost-Sharing Requirements, of proposed new subchapter C governs
cost-sharing requirements. Sections 370.321, 370.323, and 370.325 explain
the cost-sharing requirements, the exemptions to cost-sharing, and the annual
cost-sharing cap. Under proposed §370.321, cost-sharing requirements,
cost sharing may be determined based on the maximum levels authorized under
federal law and applied to income levels so as to maximize administrative
costs. Proposed §370.325, Annual cost-sharing cap, establishes a cost
sharing cap of 2.5% of gross income during the 6-month coverage period for
budget groups at or below 150% of FPL. Budget groups with gross income during
the 6-month coverage period greater than 150% of FPL have a cost-sharing cap
equal to 5% of its gross income.
The proposed amendments will bring CHIP into compliance with federal law,
H.B. 2292, 78th Leg., Regular .Session. (2003), and the General Appropriations
Act, 78th Leg., R.S. (2003). The proposed amendments also update references,
delete unnecessary terms and provisions, and make other non-substantive changes
for clarification.
Tom Suehs, Chief Financial Officer, has determined that a savings would
result from the proposed amended and new rules. Annual savings to General
Revenue funds are; $83.8M in FY04, $103.4 in FY05, $87.1M in FY06, $90.6M
in FY07, and $94.2M in FY08.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that there will be no effect on small businesses
or micro-businesses to comply with this proposal. This was determined by interpretation
of the rule that small businesses and micro-businesses will not be required
to alter their business practices in order to comply with the rules as proposed.
There is no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply
with the amended and new rules as proposed. There is no anticipated fiscal
impact to local government. The proposal will not negatively impact local
employment.
Mr. Suehs has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposal is in effect, the public will benefit from adoption of the amendments.
The anticipated public benefit, as a result of enforcing the proposal, will
be to continue to make low-cost insurance available for children of low-income
families within levels of available appropriated funds. However, public hospitals
and medical facilities may incur more cost as uninsured children seek medical
attention.
HHSC has determined that none of the proposed amended and new rules is
a "major environmental rule" as defined by §2001.0225, Government Code.
"Major environmental rule" is defined to mean a rule the specific intent of
which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely and materially affect the economy, a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. None of the proposed
amended or new rules is specifically intended to protect the environment or
reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure.
HHSC has evaluated the takings impact of the proposed rules under §2007.043,
Government Code. HHSC has determined that this action does not restrict or
limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in
the absence of governmental action and therefore does not constitute a taking.
The proposed amended and new rules are administrative and do not impose any
new regulatory requirements. The proposal is reasonably taken to fulfill requirements
of state law.
Public comment may be submitted in writing to Greg Holt, Health and Human
Services Commission, by mail addressed to P.O. Box 13247, Austin, Texas 78711,
or email at Greg.Holt@hhsc.state.tx.us. Comments must be submitted by 5:00
p.m., Central Time, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the
HHSC has scheduled a public hearing to accept public testimony regarding
the proposed rules. The hearing will be held from 28:00 to 512:00 p.m., Central
Time, on July 164, 2003, in the Public Hearing Room of the Brown-Heatly State
Office Building, 4900 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas. Persons requiring
further information, special assistance, or accommodations should contact
Linda Williams, Medicaid/CHIP, 512-424-6646 or linda.williams@hhsc.state.tx.us.
Subchapter A. PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
1 TAC §370.4, §370.10
The amendments are proposed under §531.033, Government
Code, which authorizes the commissioner of health and human services to adopt
rules necessary to carry out HHSC's duties under Chapter 531; under §62.051(d),
Health and Safety Code, which directs HHSC to adopt rules necessary to implement
Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, concerning CHIP; and under §2001.006,
Government Code, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation
for the implementation of legislation.
No other statutory provisions are affected by the proposed rules.
§370.4.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have
the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
"Administrative Contractor" means the entity that performs
administrative services for the CHIP under contract with the Commission.
(2)
"Entrant"
[
(3)
"Applicant" means an individual who lives with the child
and applies for health insurance coverage on behalf of the child. An applicant
can only be:
(A)
a child's custodial parent, whether natural or adoptive;
(B)
a child's grandparent, relative or other adult who provides
care for the child;
(C)
an emancipated minor applying for himself/herself; or
(D)
a child's step-parent.
(4)
"Application" means the standardized, written document
issued by
TexCare
[
(5)
"Application completion date" means the calendar date a
completed CHIP application is entered into the
TexCare
[
(6)
"Budget Group" means the group of individuals who live
in the home with the child for whom an application for health insurance is
submitted and whose information is used to establish family size and calculate
income. Individuals receiving Supplemental Security Income payments are not
included in the Budget group. Budget group members include only:
(A)
the child seeking health insurance benefits;
(B)
the child's siblings who live with the child (biological,
adopted, or step-siblings);
(C)
the child's natural or adoptive parents; or
(D)
the child's step-parent.
(7)
"Children's Health Insurance Program" or "CHIP" means the
Texas State Children's Health Insurance Program established under Title XXI
of the federal Social Security Act (42 U.S.C, §§1397aa, et seq.)
and chapters 62 and 63, Health and Safety Code.
(8)
"Commission"
or "HHSC"
means the Health and
Human Services Commission.
(9)
"Completed application" means an application entered into
the
TexCare
[
(10)
"Countable income" means any type of payment that is a
regular and predictable gain or a benefit to a budget group that is not specifically
exempted. Regular and predictable income is income received in one month that
is either likely to be received in the next month and/or was received on a
regular and predictable basis in past months. It does not include income that
is not received on a regular and predictable basis in past months, or is received
by the child or sibling member of the budget group who is enrolled in school.
(11)
"Children's Health Insurance Program Service Area" or
"CSA" means one of the designated areas in the state that is served by one
or more of the CHIP Health Plans or the CHIP Exclusive Provider Organization.
(12)
"Community-based Organization" or "CBO" means an organization
that contracts with the Commission to provide outreach services to applicants
for CHIP coverage.
[(13)
"Dental Plan" means an insurance company,
health maintenance organization, or other entity regulated by the Texas Department
of Insurance that contracts with the Commission to provide dental benefits
coverage to CHIP members.]
[(14)
"Department" or "TDH" means the Texas
Department of Health.]
[(15)
"Income deductions" means standardized
deductions that are applied to the countable income of the budget group during
the CHIP application process.]
(13)
[
(14)
[
(15)
[
(16)
[
(17)
[
(18)
[
(19)
[
(20)
[
(21)
[
(22)
[
(23)
[
[(27)
"Texas Healthy Kids Corporation" or
"THKC" means the non-profit corporation established under chapter 109, Health &
Safety Code.]
(24)
[
§370.10.Duties and Responsibilities of the Commission.
The Commission is the state agency whose responsibilities include,
but are not limited to [
(1)
developing a state-designed CHIP to obtain health benefits
coverage for children in low-income families in a manner that qualifies for
federal funding under Title XXI of the Social Security Act;
(2)
making policy for CHIP, including policy related to covered
benefits provided under the program, a duty which the Commission may not delegate
to another agency or entity;
(3)
overseeing the implementation of CHIP;
(4)
adopting necessary rules to implement CHIP;
(5)
contracting with appropriate individuals and organizations
to provide CHIP benefits coverage, community-based outreach, and other services
related to the implementation or operation of the CHIP program;
(6)
conducting a review of each entity that enters into a contract
with the Commission to ensure that the entity is available, prepared and able
to fulfill the entity's obligations under the contract; and
(7)
ensuring that amounts spent for CHIP administration do
not exceed any limit on administrative expenditures imposed by federal law.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303623
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1.
TEXCARE PARTNERSHIP APPLICATION PROCESS
1 TAC §§370.20 - 370.25
The amendments are proposed under §62.051(d), Health
and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary
to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033,
Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services
with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health
and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.
The amendments implement §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning
development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.
§370.20.Availability and method of initiating an application.
The
TexCare
[
(1)
in writing from an application booklet available from
TexCare
[
(2)
by computer using printable applications available over
the Internet from the
TexCare
[
(3)
by telephone through
TexCare's
[
§370.21.Application assistance.
An applicant for CHIP coverage may obtain assistance completing the
application:
(1)
by telephone from
TexCare
[
(2)
by telephone or in person from a local CBO; or
(3)
by telephone or in person from a licensed insurance agent
or broker that contracts with a CHIP health plan or CBO, provided the applicant
is not directly or indirectly induced to enroll in a specific health plan.
§370.22.Completion of telephone applications.
If an applicant telephones to apply,
TexCare
[
§370.23.Contents of completed applications.
A completed application must include the following:
(1)
Information concerning the applicant, consisting of:
(A)
The applicant's full name;
(B)
The applicant's home address (including city, county, state
and zip code); and
(C)
The applicant's mailing address (including city, county,
state, and zip code) if different from the home address;
(2)
Information concerning each child for whom an application
is filed, consisting of:
(A)
The child's full name;
(B)
A description of the applicant's relationship to the child;
(C)
The child's date of birth;
(D)
The child's Social Security Number or
proof of application to the Social Security Administration to receive a social
security number;
(E)
[
(F)
[
(G)
[
(H)
[
(3)
Information concerning the budget group, including:
(A)
budget group income, including the name of the person receiving
the income, the employer or source of the income, the amount received, and
the frequency of receipt;
and
(B)
whether anyone in the budget group is pregnant;
[(C)
whether anyone in the budget group pays
for child or disabled adult care to permit a budget group member to work or
receive training;]
[(D)
whether anyone in the budget group pays
child support and/or alimony to anyone outside the home;]
(4)
the applicant's original signature and the date of signature;
and
(5)
required income, immigration status, and income deduction
verifications.
§370.24.Electronic Entry of Application Information.
Within three working days from receipt of an application
TexCare
[
(1)
enters the application, regardless of origin or completeness,
into a database;
(2)
date-stamps the application; and
(3)
assigns a unique application identification number.
§370.25.Incomplete applications.
(a)
Missing information.
(1)
TexCare
[
(2)
If it receives an incomplete application,
TexCare
[
(3)
If
TexCare
[
(b)
Missing signatures.
(1)
If an application is incomplete because it lacks the signature
of the applicant, or a parent, or the step-parent in the budget group,
TexCare
[
(2)
The application remains incomplete until
TexCare
[
(c)
Termination of an incomplete application.
(1)
If an application remains incomplete 90 calendar days from
the date
TexCare
[
(2)
An applicant whose application is terminated because it
is incomplete must complete a new
TexCare
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303624
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §370.30, §370.31
The amendments are proposed adopted under § 62.051(d),
Health and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary
to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033,
Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services
with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health
and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.
The proposed rules implement §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning
development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.
§370.30.Applicant rights.
An applicant has the right to:
(1)
be treated fairly and equally regardless of race, color,
religion, national origin, gender, political beliefs or disability;
(2)
request a review and/or reconsideration of an adverse decision
related to CHIP eligibility, disenrollment, or increased cost sharing
(3)
file a complaint, in writing or by telephone, about the
application process for reasons other than an eligibility decision, disenrollment,
or an increase in cost-sharing within 30 working days from the date of an
incident.
TexCare
[
§370.31.Applicant responsibilities.
(a)
An applicant is responsible for:
(1)
correctly and truthfully completing the
TexCare
[
(2)
providing all required verifications; and
(3)
mailing the completed, signed application along with all
required verifications to
TexCare
[
(b)
If an applicant intentionally misrepresents information
on an application to receive a program benefit, the applicant:
(1)
is responsible for reimbursing the state for the cost of
improperly paid benefits; and
(2)
may be subject to prosecution under the Texas Penal Code.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303625
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §370.40
The amendment is proposed under §62.051(d), Health and
Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary to implement
chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033, Government Code,
which provides the Commissioner of health and human services with authority
to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health and Human Services
Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.
The proposed rule implements §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning
development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.
§370.40.Determining Eligibility.
(a)
Once
TexCare
[
(b)
CHIP eligibility is determined not later than the 30th
day after the date a complete application is submitted on behalf of a child,
unless the child is referred for Medicaid application in accordance with the
criteria specified in Sections 370.43 through 370.47.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303626
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §§370.43, 370.44, 370.46, 370.48, 370.49
The amendments are proposed under §62.051(d), Health
and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary
to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033,
Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services
with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health
and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.
The proposed rules implement §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning
development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.
§370.43.Citizenship and residency.
(a)
An eligible CHIP child must be a citizen of the United
States of America or a non-citizen who is a qualified alien.
(b)
An eligible CHIP child must be a Texas resident. A child
is a Texas resident if:
(1)
the child's fixed residence is located in Texas and the
child's family intends for the child to return to Texas after any temporary
absences;
(2)
the child has no fixed residence but the child's family
intends to remain in the state; or
(3)
the child has recently moved to Texas and the child's family
intends to remain in the state.
(c)
A child does not lose status as a state resident because
of temporary absences from the state. No time limits are placed on a child's
temporary absence from the state.
(d)
There are no durational requirements for residency. A child
without a fixed residence or a new resident in the state who intends to remain
in the state is considered a Texas resident.
(e)
The applicant states the child's citizenship, lawful resident
status and Texas residency on the TCP application form. If the applicant states
that the child is a United States citizen and a Texas resident, no verification
of this status is required. If the applicant states the child is not a United
States citizen, the applicant must provide a photocopy of a Resident Alien
Card
(I-551)
[
§370.44.Income.
(a)
General principles.
(1)
Income is either countable income or exempt income.
(2)
TexCare
[
(b)
Earned income is countable income received by the budget
group and includes:
(1)
Military pay and allowances for housing, food, base pay,
and flight pay;
(2)
Self-employment income (minus business expenses). A person
is self-employed if he is engaged in an enterprise for gain, either as an
independent contractor, franchise holder, or owner-operator. If someone other
than the earner withholds either income taxes or FICA from the earner's earnings,
the earner is an employee and is not self-employed;
(3)
Wages, salaries, and commissions; and
(4)
On-the-Job Training payments funded under the Workforce
Investment Act of 1998, 29 U.S.C. §§2801-2872, if received by an
adult member of the budget group.
(c)
Unearned income is countable income received by the budget
group and includes:
(1)
Cash contributions received on a regular and predictable
basis;
(2)
Child support payments[
(3)
Disability insurance benefits;
(4)
Government-sponsored program payments, (except for Supplemental
Security Income payments); however, payments from crisis intervention programs
are exempt;
(5)
Pensions;
(6)
Retirement, survivors, and disability insurance (RSDI)
benefits and other retirement benefits (minus the amount deducted from the
RSDI check for the Medicare premium and any amount that is being recouped
for a prior overpayment);
(7)
Income from property, whether from rent, lease, or sale
on an installment plan;
(8)
Unemployment compensation;
(9)
Veterans Administration (VA) benefits other than benefits
that meet a special need;
(10)
Worker's compensation benefits; and
(11)
Alimony.
(d)
All income that is not included as countable earned income
or countable unearned income is exempt income.
(e)
Gross
[
[(1)
Net income test.]
(1)
[
(2)
[
(3)
[
(4)
Budget groups with a gross monthly income
greater than 150% of FPL will be subject to an assets test.
[(2)
Income deductions. TCP makes the following
deductions from countable income:]
[(A)
TCP allows a standard work-related expense deduction of
$120 a month for each employed budget group member;]
[(B)
TCP deducts payments for the actual costs for the care
of a dependent child or disabled adult, if necessary for employment or to
receive training. The maximum dependent care deduction is $200 per month for
each dependent child and $175 per month for each dependent disabled adult.]
[(C)
TCP deducts payments for the actual costs of alimony or
child support paid to an individual who is not a budget group member.]
[(D)
TCP deducts the first $50 of the total child support payments
the budget group receives.]
(f)
Computing countable income.
TexCare
[
(1)
dividing yearly income by 12;
(2)
multiplying weekly income by 4.33;
(3)
adding amounts received twice a month; or
(4)
multiplying amounts received every other week by 2.17.
(g)
Verification of current countable income.
(1)
Countable income must be verified unless the amount of
income reported by the applicant makes the child ineligible.
(2)
TexCare
[
(3)
Verification may include, but is not limited to, obtaining:
(A)
copies of one or more paycheck stubs issued within the
immediately preceding 60-day period;
(B)
a copy of the most recent federal income tax return;
(C)
a copy of the applicant's most recent Social Security statement;
(D)
copies of one or more child support checks; or
(E)
written confirmation from an employer of the applicant's
income.
(h)
Verification of income deductions. Verification may include,
but is not limited to, obtaining:
(1)
a copy of a paycheck stub showing garnishment of wages
for a child support deduction if the paycheck clearly indicates the deduction
is for child support;
(2)
a copy of a hand written statement authored and signed
by the custodial parent verifying the child support deduction; or
(3)
a copy of a divorce decree specifying child support payments.
§370.46.Waiting period.
(a)
The waiting period is a delay in the start
of health insurance coverage and applies to a child determined to be CHIP
eligible and extends for a period of 90-days after:
(1)
the first day of the month in which the applicant is determined
eligible for CHIP, if the day of eligibility is on or before the 15th day
of the month; or
(2)
the first day of the month after which the applicant is
determined eligible for CHIP, if the day of eligibility is after the 15th
day of the month
[(a)
A child who is otherwise eligible for
CHIP may not be enrolled if the child was covered by health insurance at any
time within the 90 days immediately preceding the submission of a CHIP application.
After the 90-day waiting period, the child may be enrolled.]
[(b)
Collateral health benefits provided to
a CHIP-eligible child under a different type of insurance, such as workers
compensation or personal injury protection under an automobile policy, is
not health insurance coverage for purposes of this section.]
(b)
[
(1)
The child's budget group lost insurance coverage for the
child because:
(A)
The employment of a member of the Budget Group was terminated
due to:
(i)
a layoff;
(ii)
a reduction-in-force; or
(iii)
a business closure;
(B)
Insurance benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (Pub. L. No. 99-272) terminated;
(C)
The marital status of a parent of the child has changed;
(D)
The child's Medicaid eligibility was terminated because:
(i)
the budget group's earnings or resources exceed allowable
amounts for Medicaid eligibility; or
(ii)
the child reached an age for which Medicaid benefits are
no longer available; or
(E)
Other circumstances similar to those described in this
subparagraph that result in an involuntary loss of insurance coverage;
(2)
The child had insurance coverage provided by [
(3)
The child's health insurance coverage costs more than 10
percent of the budget group's
gross
[
(4)
The child has access to group-based health
benefits plan coverage and will participate in the premium payment reimbursement
program administered by the Commission; or
(5)
[
(c)
[
(1)
An applicant requests an exception:
(A)
Prior to submission of an application;
(B)
At the time of application; or
(C)
As part of a request for review or reconsideration of a
denial of eligibility under sections 370.52 or 370.54 of this chapter; or
(2)
The Commission reaches a determination based either on
information provided by an applicant or information obtained by the Commission.
§370.48.Completion of Application Process.
If the
TexCare
[
(1)
A child in the budget group appears to meet Medicaid income
eligibility requirements,
TexCare
[
(A)
electronically transfers the application to the Texas Department
of Human Services (DHS) within one working day of the application completion
date for a Medicaid eligibility determination;
(B)
delivers the paper application to the appropriate DHS office
within two additional working days; and
(C)
notifies the applicant of potential Medicaid eligibility
in writing with guidance regarding Medicaid's role for follow-up with the
family.
(2)
A child in the budget group does not meet one or more Medicaid
eligibility requirements, the budget group's
gross
[
(A)
Determines that the child is eligible for CHIP; and
(B)
Notifies the applicant of the CHIP eligibility by letter
and includes a CHIP enrollment packet.
[(3)
A child in the budget group does not
meet one or more Medicaid or CHIP eligibility requirements and the budget
group's net budget group income exceeds 200% of FPL, TCP:]
[(A)
electronically transfers the application to THKC within
one working day of the application completion date; and]
[(B)
Notifies the applicant in writing of the referral to THKC.]
§370.49.Medicaid Referrals.
If a
TexCare
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303627
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1 TAC §§370.51 - 370.54
The amendments are proposed under §62.051(d), Health
and Safety Code, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules necessary
to implement chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, and under §531.033,
Government Code, which provides the Commissioner of health and human services
with authority to adopt rules necessary to carry the duties of the Health
and Human Services Commission under Chapter 531, Government Code.
The proposal implements §62.051, Health and Safety Code, concerning
development of and the making of policy for the state child health plan program.
§370.51.Deadline and method for requesting review of initial decision.
(a)
An applicant may request a review of an initial CHIP decision
described in section 370.50(a) within 30 working days from the date the applicant
received written notice of the decision.
(b)
An applicant may request a review by contacting
TexCare
[
§370.52.Disposition of request for review.
(a)
TexCare
[
(b)
TexCare
[
(1)
explain the reason for the initial decision;
(2)
inform the requester whether the initial decision was reversed
following
TexCare's
[
(3)
if the initial decision is upheld, inform the requester
of its right to request reconsideration of the decision by HHSC if the requester
disagrees with the decision and provide instructions for submitting a written
request for reconsideration by HHSC.
§370.53.Request for reconsideration by HHSC.
(a)
An applicant that is dissatisfied or disagrees with the
result of
TexCare's
[
(b)
An applicant must request reconsideration by HHSC in writing
within 20 working days from the date the applicant received the written notice
of the result of the
TexCare
[
(c)
Within 20 working days from the date
TexCare
[
§370.54.Temporary enrollment pending disposition of review or reconsideration.
(a)
There is no retroactive enrollment in CHIP.
(b)
If an applicant's request for review by
TexCare
[
(c)
A child will remain enrolled until the
TexCare
[
(d)
If the initial eligibility decision is reversed, the child's
6
[
(e)
TexCare
[
(f)
TexCare
[
(g)
If a child who is temporarily enrolled under this section
ultimately is determined ineligible for CHIP, no repayment for health care
costs during the period of temporary enrollment will be sought by
TexCare
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303628
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
1.
TEXCARE ENROLLMENT
1 TAC §§370.301, 370.303, 370.305, 370.307, 370.309
The new rules are proposed under §531.033, Government
Code, which authorizes the commissioner of health and human services to adopt
rules necessary to carry out HHSC's duties under Chapter 531; under §62.051(d),
Health and Safety Code, which directs HHSC to adopt rules necessary to implement
Chapter 62, Health and Safety Code, concerning CHIP; and under §2001.006,
Government Code, which allows state agencies to adopt rules in preparation
for the implementation of legislation.
No other statutory provisions are affected by the proposed rules.
§370.301.CHIP Enrollment Packet.
Within 5 business days of determining a child is CHIP eligible, TexCare
must send the applicant a CHIP enrollment packet containing:
(1)
an explanation of CHIP benefits;
(2)
a comparison chart of the value-added services provided
by health plans in areas where there is a choice of health plans;
(3)
an enrollment form and instructions for completing the
form;
(4)
a provider directory for each health plan available in
the applicant's CHIP Service Area (CSA);
(5)
a health plan member guide;
(6)
cost-sharing information specific to the budget group's
Federal Poverty Level (FPL), which includes:
(A)
the monthly premium amount, if any;
(B)
a schedule of co-payments, if any (e.g., Native Americans
have no cost-sharing)
(C)
a form to help the applicant track the cost-sharing expenditures
relative to the member's cost-sharing cap; and
(D)
the disenrollment process for non-payment of monthly premiums
(7)
the process for requesting review by TexCare of an unfavorable
eligibility or enrollment decision or filing a complaint or an appeal of an
adverse determination with the member's Health Maintenance Organization (HMO)
or Exclusive Provider Organization (EPO) plan; and
(8)
a flyer that specifies the date by which the completed
enrollment form must be received by TexCare to ensure enrollment on the first
day of the following month and that summarizes the importance of appropriate
health plan and Primary Care Provider (PCP) choices for applicants who live
in CSAs covered by more than one HMO.
§370.303.Completion of Enrollment Process.
(a)
To complete the enrollment process in a CSA with health
plan choice, an applicant must:
(1)
select and indicate on the enrollment form, a single health
plan to cover all eligible children, regardless of the number of eligible
children in the budget group;
(2)
select a PCP and place the name on the enrollment form;
and
(3)
sign and return the enrollment form to TexCare.
(b)
To complete the enrollment process in a CSA without health
plan choice, an applicant must sign and return the enrollment form and select
a PCP.
(c)
An applicant may return the enrollment form to TexCare
either by mail, in the postage paid envelope enclosed with the enrollment
packet, or by facsimile.
(d)
If an applicant who lives in a CSA covered by an HMO fails
to choose a PCP, or if the chosen PCP is not accepting new members, the health
plan must assign a PCP to each member in the budget group and inform the applicant.
The health plan will send the member a health plan identification card by
(e)
The enrollment process is closed 90 calendar days after
a child is determined eligible for CHIP if the applicant has not completed
the enrollment process. An applicant who fails to complete the enrollment
process must initiate a new application for CHIP.
§370.305.Children with Complex Special Health Care Needs (CCSHCN).
The enrollment process for an eligible child with complex special health
care needs is the same as described in section 370.303 of this subchapter,
except for the addition of the following:
(1)
based on the criteria identified in the member guide, which
is sent as part of the enrollment packet, an applicant may indicate on the
enrollment form that an eligible child has special health care needs;
(2)
TexCare will notify each HMO and EPO of members identified
through the enrollment process as having complex special health care needs;
(3)
within 10 business days of the effective date of coverage,
each HMO and EPO will contact each member identified on the enrollment form
as having complex special health care needs to confirm his or her health care
needs status; and
(4)
each HMO and EPO will notify TexCare of members who are
not confirmed as having complex special health care needs.
§370.307.Continuous Enrollment Period.
CHIP enrollment always begins on the first calendar day of the month
and continues for 6 consecutive months unless:
(1)
a sibling member in the home has an earlier initial date
of coverage, in which case the coverage period for the newly enrolled child
will be the remaining period of coverage of the already enrolled sibling;
or
(2)
one of the circumstances described in section 370.341,
concerning reasons for disenrollment, occurs.
§370.309.Incomplete or Missing Information.
(a)
Fourteen calendar days after the enrollment packet is mailed,
TexCare sends a reminder notice to applicants who have failed to:
(1)
sign the enrollment form; or
(2)
return the enrollment form or complete it properly.
(b)
If the applicant does not respond to the initial reminder
notice, TexCare sends a second reminder notice 14 calendar days after the
date of the initial reminder notice.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 16, 2003.
TRD-200303630
Steve Aragón
General Counsel
Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 27, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 424-6576
Requirements ].
(a)
]
A
[
In order
to obtain certification, a
] private,
nonprofit
[
non-profit
] crime stoppers organization must
submit the following information
to the director of the Crime Stoppers Advisory Council in order to obtain
certification
:
be a non-profit
] organization
tax exempt status;
be granted tax exempt status by the IRS
]
have at least one member of the organization's Board of Directors,
as well as the Police/Civilian Coordinator of the Crime Stoppers organization
attend a complete training conference provided by the Criminal Justice Division
of the Governor's office and the Texas Crime Stoppers Advisory Council, or
its designee, in the year prior to certification
]
complete and sign the conditions of certification form
];
(b)
]
A
[
In order
to obtain certification, a
] public
crime stoppers
organization
must
submit the following information to the director of the Crime Stoppers
Advisory Council in order to obtain certification:
[
have at least
one employee attend a complete training conference provided by the Office
of the Governor or its designee in the year prior to certification.
]
Part 9.
STATE AIRCRAFT POOLING BOARD
Part 15.
TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
§29.105
] of this title (relating to Optometrist Services), the services addressed
in this subchapter are those optometric services available to Medicaid recipients
who are 21 years old or older. Services are available to Medicaid recipients
under 21 years old through the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and
Treatment (EPSDT) Program
, Benefits and Limitations, described in 1
T.A.C. §363.502
. The amount, duration, and scope of optometric
services available through the Texas Medical Assistance Program are established
according to applicable federal regulations, the Texas state plan for medical
assistance under Title XIX of the Social Security Act, state law, and department
rules. Information regarding benefits and limitations is available to providers
of these services through the Texas Medicaid Provider Procedures Manual which
is issued to each provider on enrolling in the Medicaid Program. The benefits
and limitations applicable to optometric services available through the Medicaid
Program to Medicaid recipients who are 21 years old or older are as follows.
(A)
]
Examination. One examination of the eyes by
refraction may be provided to each eligible recipient every 24 months.
(B)
Prosthetic (aphakic) eyewear.
Prosthetic eyewear, including contact lenses and glass or plastic lenses in
frames, is a program benefit provided to an eligible recipient if the eyewear
is prescribed for postcataract surgery, congenital absence of the eye lens,
or loss of an eye lens because of trauma.]
(i)
Reimbursement is made for as many temporary
lenses as are medically necessary during postsurgical cataract convalescence
(the four-month period following the date of cataract surgery).]
(ii)
Only one pair of permanent prosthetic lenses
can be dispensed as a program benefit. Reimbursement is made by the program
for the replacement of lost or destroyed prosthetic eyewear and the replacement
of prosthetic eyewear if required because of a change in visual acuity of
.5 diopters or more.]
(C)
Nonprosthetic (nonaphakic)
eyewear. Nonprosthetic eyewear that is medically necessary to correct defects
in vision is a program benefit provided to an eligible recipient only once
every 24 months, unless his eyes have undergone a change in visual acuity
of .5 diopters or more. Nonprosthetic eyewear includes contact lenses and
glass or plastic lenses in frames.]
(i)
Prescriptions for contact lenses must have
written prior authorization by the department or its designee. Prior authorization
is based on the provider's written documentation that these lenses are the
only means of correcting the vision defect.]
(ii)
Replacement of nonprosthetic eyewear because
of a change in visual acuity begins a new 24-month period governing eligibility
for new eyewear.]
(D)
Repairs. Repairs to prosthetic
eyewear are reimbursable if the cost of materials exceeds $2.00. Repairs costing
less are not reimbursable by the program and the provider many not bill the
recipient for these services. Repairs to nonprosthetic eyewear are not reimbursable
by the program.]
(E)
Replacement of lost or destroyed
nonprosthetic eyewear. Replacement of lost or destroyed nonprosthetic eyewear
is not reimbursable by the program.]
(F)
Optometric services provided
in skilled or intermediate care facilities. These services are reimbursable
by the program if the recipient's attending physician has ordered the service(s)
and the order is included in the recipient's medical record in the nursing
facility.]
§29.1
] of this title (relating to Claim Information Requirements),
the following information is required for claims for services:
(1)
]
name, address, and Medicaid provider identification
number of the ordering provider, as appropriate
.
[
;
]
(2)
description of lenses and
frames provided;]
(3)
provider's signature on the
claim form verifying the diopter change required for the dispensing of replacement
eyewear;]
(4)
certification by the provider
that the dispensed eyewear materials used for repairs to prosthetic eyewear
meet the specifications for eyewear in §29. 102 of this title (relating
to Specifications for Eyewear);]
(5)
claims for eyewear with special
features must be signed by the recipient, acknowledging his selection of eyewear
that is beyond the specifications for eyewear in §29.102 of this title
(relating to Specifications for Eyewear). A signed patient certification satisfies
this requirement for claims that are electronically submitted;]
(6)
a copy of this invoice for
supplies dispensed must be attached to a claim for repairs;]
(7)
reimbursement for replacement
prosthetic eyewear is contingent upon the original eyewear being lost or damaged
beyond repair or upon the recipient's visual acuity having changed significantly
as defined in §29.101 (2)(B)(ii) of this title (relating to Benefits
and Limitations). If the original eyewear has been lost or damaged beyond
repair, the recipient must sign the claim form or, in the case of providers
who electronically bill, a patient certification. Reimbursement for replacement
nonprosthetic eyewear is contingent upon the recipient's visual acuity having
undergone a significant change as defined in §29.101(2)(C) of this title
(relating to Benefits and Limitations);]
(8)
the provider must show the
name of the physician who ordered optometric services on a claim showing a
skilled nursing facility or an intermediate care facility as the place of
service.]
§29.101
] and
§363.502
[
§33.402
] of this title (both relating to Benefits and Limitations) and subject
to the specifications, conditions, limitations, and requirements established
by the
Texas Health and Human Services Commission (Commission)
[
Texas Department of Health (department)
] or its designee, diagnostic
and treatment services provided by an optometrist are covered by the Texas
Medical Assistance Program.
department
]
Commission
or its designee; and
4.
MEDICAID CHIROPRACTIC SERVICES
§29.1
] of this title (relating to Claim Information Requirements),
the following information is required on chiropractic claims:
8.
PODIATRY SERVICES
§29.1
] of this title (relating to Claim Information Requirements),
the following information is required on claims for podiatry services:
15.
HEARING AID SERVICES
§29.1502
] of this title (relating to Requirements
for Hearing Aid Services). The following hearing aid services shall be reimbursed,
through the Texas Medicaid Program:
(3)
hearing aid;]
(4)
initial fitting, dispensing,
and post-fitting check of hearing aid; and]
(5)
first and second revisits
to assess the recipient's adaptation to the hearing aid and the functioning
of the instrument.]
(2)
Recipients shall be limited
to one hearing aid every six years (72 months) from the dispensing month of
the present instrument.]
(3)
] An individual using a hearing
aid before becoming eligible for Medicaid benefits may have a hearing evaluation
conducted by an approved hearing aid services provider after becoming eligible
for Medicaid. [
Medicaid payment for a new hearing aid, however, shall
be denied if the provider concludes, based upon the evaluation findings, that
the recipient's present hearing aid adequately compensates for the degree
of hearing loss.
]
(4)
] Providers may not submit a
hearing evaluation claim to the [
department
] Commission or its
designee unless the Medicaid recipient meets the eligibility criteria in
§354.1233
[
§29.1502(b)
] of this title (relating
to Requirements for Hearing Aid Services).
(5)
] The
Commission
[
department
] or its designee shall not pay for the replacement of batteries
or cords.
(6)
Binaural fittings shall not
be available except for legally blind, hearing-impaired recipients who can
document that they have no other available resources.]
(7)
Providers should dispense
United States manufactured hearing aids if the purchase price and quality
are comparable to those of foreign manufacturers.]
(8)
] Recipients may receive home
visit hearing evaluations [
and hearing aid fittings only
] on the
written recommendation of a physician.
(9)
Hearing aid services do not
include auditory training, speech reading, or other types of habilitative
or rehabilitative services.]
(10)
Medicaid reimbursement for
hearing aids shall be limited to eligible recipients whose air conduction
puretone average in the better ear is 45dB or greater.]
,
] hearing
evaluations [
, and fitting and dispensing services
].
and fitting and dispensing services
].
(3)
Fitters and dispensers. Fitters
and dispensers shall be reimbursed for fitting and dispensing services.]
The recipient must have a medical necessity for a hearing aid as stated
in §29.1501(b)(10) of this title (relating to Benefits and Limitations)
and have no medical contraindications to the recipient's ability to use and/or
wear a hearing aid.
]
and a recommendation for the hearing aid most appropriate
for the ear being amplified. If any of the criteria cited in this section
cannot be met, providers must specify in the evaluation report the factors
influencing or preventing assessments, and justify the recommendation for
a hearing aid.
]
(c)
Hearing aids. Providers must
offer each recipient eligible for a hearing aid a new instrument that meets
the recipient's hearing need and that is within the allowable fee paid by
the Texas Medicaid Program.]
(1)
Hearing aids above the maximum allowable fee.
The department shall pay the maximum allowable fee paid by the Texas Medicaid
Program toward hearing aids for recipients who meet the requirements cited
at §29.1504(b)(2) of this title (relating to Reimbursement for Hearing
Aid Services).]
(2)
Warranty. Providers must ensure that each hearing
aid purchased through the Texas Medicaid Program is a new and current model
which meets the performance specification of the manufacturer and the hearing
needs of the recipient. Providers must also ensure that each hearing aid is
covered by a standard 12-month manufacturer's warranty, effective from the
dispensing date.]
(3)
Required package. Providers must dispense each
hearing aid purchased through the Texas Medicaid Program with all necessary
tubing, cords, and connectors; instructions for care and use; and a one-month
supply of batteries.]
(4)
Thirty-day trial period. Providers must allow
each eligible recipient 30 days to determine if the recipient is satisfied
with a hearing aid purchased through the Texas Medicaid Program. The trial
period consists of 30 consecutive days from the dispensing date. Providers
must inform recipients of the trial period and of the beginning and ending
dates.]
(A)
During the trial period, providers may dispense
additional hearing aids, as medically necessary, until the recipient is satisfied
with the results of the aid or the provider determines that the recipient
cannot benefit from the dispensing of an additional hearing aid. A new trial
period begins with the dispensing date of each hearing aid.]
(B)
Providers may charge a rental fee for hearing
aids returned during the trial period.]
(i)
If a rental fee is charged, providers must
assess the rental fee according to the rules and regulations established by
the State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and Dispensing of Hearing
Instruments and the State Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology
and Audiology.]
(ii)
If there is no signed agreement between the
recipient and the provider specifying a greater amount, the maximum rental
for eligible Medicaid recipients shall be $2 per day. This fee shall not be
a covered benefit of the Texas Medicaid Program. Recipients shall be responsible
for paying any rental fee assessed them for instruments returned during the
30-day period. Providers must keep in the recipient's file the signed certification
acknowledging responsibility to pay hearing aid rental fees.]
(iii)
Providers must comply with all procedures
and directions provided by the department or its designee regarding forms
and certifications required during the 30-day trial period. Providers must
allow 30 days to elapse from the hearing aid dispensing date before completing
a "30-day trial period certification statement," which is kept in the recipient's
file.]
(5)
Postfitting checks. The fitter and dispenser
must perform a postfitting check of the hearing aid within five weeks of the
initial fitting. The postfitting check is part of the dispensing procedure.]
(6)
First revisit. The first revisit shall include
a hearing aid check and/or counseling and is conducted as needed within six
months of the postfitting check.]
(7)
Second revisit. The second revisit shall be
conducted as needed. The purpose of the second revisit is to make any necessary
adjustments to the hearing aid or to continue counseling.]
,
]
or
audiologist [
, or fitter and dispenser of hearing aids
]
claiming reimbursement for hearing aid services provided as a Title XIX benefit
to an eligible Medicaid recipient must be enrolled in the Texas Medicaid Program.
,
]
and
audiologists, [
and
fitters and dispensers
] must meet applicable federal and state licensing
and/or certification laws and rules for the services they provide. The following
requirements shall be applicable to Medicaid providers of hearing aid services
practicing in the State of Texas:
Audiologists providing fitting and dispensing services
must be registered with the State Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology
and Audiology.
]
(3)
Fitters and dispensers must
be currently licensed by the State Committee of Examiners in the Fitting and
Dispensing of Hearing Instruments.]
19.
PSYCHOLOGISTS' SERVICES
Texas Department of Health (department)
]
Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC)
or its
designee, psychological counseling and services provided by a licensed psychologist
are covered if the services:
Texas Department of Health (department)
] or its designee,
a psychologist must:
department
] or its designee;
department
] or its designee; and
department
] or its designee.
29.
LICENSED PROFESSIONAL COUNSELORS AND ADVANCED CLINICAL PRACTITIONERS
department
] or its designee;
department
] or its designee; and
department
] or its designee.
Chapter 355.
MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT RATES
or
] by providers who were participants during the prior
year desiring to be granted additional rate enhancement increments
or
by new contracts as described in subsection (g) of this section
. Using
the process described herein, HHSC first determines the distribution of carry-over
rate enhancement increments. If funds are available after the distribution
of carry-over rate enhancement increments, HHSC determines the distribution
of newly requested rate enhancement increments as follows:
Subchapter B. ESTABLISHMENT AND ADJUSTMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT RATES BY THE HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
Subchapter C. REIMBURSEMENT METHODOLOGY FOR NURSING FACILITIES
Department of
] Human Services
Commission
[
(DHS)
]
(HHSC)
reimbursement rates for nursing facilities (NFs) vary according
to the assessed characteristics of recipient. Rates are determined for 11
case mix classes of service, plus a 12th, temporary classification assigned
by default when assessment data are incomplete or in error.
DHS
] applies the general principles of cost determination as specified
in §355.101 of this title (relating to Introduction).
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff Rate
Component
).
40 TAC §19.1812
] (relating to Case Mix Classification System). The TILE classification
system includes four clinical categories, which are further subdivided on
the basis of an activity of daily living (ADL) scale, resulting in a total
of 11 TILE case mix groups. A 12th group is used by default when a recipient's
case-mix group membership is indeterminate because of assessment errors or
omissions. Each of the 12 case-mix groups, including the default group, is
assigned a case-mix index of effort. This index indicates the relative amount
of staff time required on average to deliver care to recipients in that group.
The case-mix index for each of the 11 TILE groups is determined through statistical
and clinical analyses of recipient resource utilization data previously collected
in Texas NFs. The lowest index for the 11 TILE groups is used as the case-mix
index for the default group.
the Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff Rate
enhancements
described in §355.308
of this title (relating to [
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff Rate
Component
).
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff Rate
Component
).
for non-participants
] as determined in §355.308
(k)
of this title (relating to [
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff
Rate
Component
).
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff
Base
Rate
enhancements
described
in §355.308 of this title (relating to [
Enhanced
] Direct Care
Staff Rate
Component
) is calculated by multiplying the resource
differential case mix index times the per diem average other recipient care
rate component, as described in paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection and by
the average direct care staff
base
rate component [
for participating
facilities staffing at the minimum levels required for participation
]
as described in §355.308
(k)
[
(1)
] of this title
(relating to [
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff Rate)
plus any enhancement
levels subject to case mix adjustments
and summing the products.
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff
Base
Rate
enhancements
described in §355.308 of this title (relating to [
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff
Base
Rate) is calculated by multiplying
the resource differential case mix index times the per diem average other
recipient care rate component, as described in paragraph (3)(C) of this subsection
and by the average direct care staff
base
rate component [
for non-participating facilities
] as described in §355.308(k) of
this title (relating to [
Enhanced
] Direct Care Staff
Base
Rate) and summing the products.
Enhanced ] Direct Care Staff Rate Component .
that
]
open enrollment has been postponed or cancelled. Should conditions warrant,
HHSC may conduct additional enrollment periods during a rate year.
associated with
minimum staffing requirements
] as determined in subsection
(k)
[
(j)(1)
] of this section [
until:
]
with no
enhancements.
(1)
]
For new
[
for
] facilities
specifying their desire to participate on an acceptable enrollment contract
amendment, the direct care staff rate is adjusted as specified in subsection
(l) [
(3)
] of this section, effective on the first day of the month
following receipt by HHSC of the acceptable enrollment contract amendment.
If the granting of newly requested enhancements was limited as per subsection
(j)(3) of this section during the most recent enrollment, enrollment for new
facilities will be subject to that same limitation.
(2)
for facilities specifying
their desire not to participate on an acceptable enrollment contract amendment,
the direct care staff rate is adjusted as specified in subsection (k) of this
section retroactive to the first day of their contract.]
(3)
for facilities from which
an acceptable enrollment contract amendment is not received, the direct care
staff rate is adjusted as specified in subsection (k) of this section retroactive
to the first day of their contract.]
contracted
] facilities will provide HHSC, in a method specified
by HHSC, an Annual Staffing and Compensation Report reflecting the activities
of the facility while delivering contracted services from the first day of
the rate year through the last day of the rate year. This report will be used
as the basis for determining compliance with the staffing requirements and
recoupment amounts as described in subsection (n) of this section [
for
participants
], and as the basis for determining the spending requirements
and recoupment amounts as described in subsection (o) of this section [
for all facilities
].
Participating
facilities failing to
submit an acceptable Annual Staffing and Compensation Report within 60 days
of the end of the rate year will be placed on vendor hold until such time
as an acceptable report is received and processed by HHSC.
Facilities
]
whose contracts are terminated either voluntarily or involuntarily must submit
a Staffing and Compensation Report covering the period from the beginning
of the rate year to the date recognized by DHS as the contract termination
date. This report will be used as the basis for determining any recoupment
amounts as described in subsections (n) and (o) of this section.
Facilities
]
whose cost report year coincides with the state of Texas fiscal year as per §355.105(b)(5)
(relating to General Reporting and Documentation Requirements, Methods and
Procedures) are exempt from the requirement to submit a separate Annual Staffing
and Compensation Report. For these facilities, their cost report will be considered
their Annual Staffing and Compensation Report.
Facilities
] that do not submit a Staffing and Compensation Report completed in
accordance with all applicable rules and instructions within 60 days of the
due dates described in this subsection will become nonparticipants retroactive
to the first day of the reporting period in question and will be subject to
an immediate recoupment of
funds related to participation
[
10% of direct care dollars
] paid to the facility for services provided
during the reporting period in question. These facilities will remain nonparticipants
and recouped funds will not be restored until they submit an acceptable report
and repay to HHSC or its designee funds identified for recoupment from subsections
(n) and/or (o) of this section.
If an acceptable report is not received
within 365 days of the due date, the recoupment will become permanent.
In
addition,
participating
facilities with an ownership change or
contract termination that do not submit a Staffing and Compensation report
completed in accordance with all applicable rules within 60 days of the change
in ownership or contract termination will become nonparticipants retroactive
to the first day of the reporting period in question and will be subject to
an immediate recoupment of
funds related to participation
[
10% of direct care dollars
] paid to the facility for services provided
during the reporting period in question. These facilities will remain nonparticipants
and recouped funds will not be restored until they submit an acceptable report
and repay to HHSC or its designee funds identified for recoupment from subsections
(n) and/or (o) of this section.
If an acceptable report is not received
within 365 days of the change of ownership or contract termination date, the
recoupment will become permanent.
Enhancements
held by nursing facilities whose staffing requirements were not met during
the most recent reporting period from which reliable data is available will
qualify as pre-existing if the facility submitted, with that staffing report,
documentation that demonstrates to the satisfaction of HHSC that the facility
has been unable, despite diligent efforts (including offering wages at the
community prevailing rate for nursing facilities), to recruit appropriate
personnel. If the report from the subsequent rate year indicates that the
staffing requirement was again not met, the unmet staffing will no longer
be considered pre-existing.
] Using the process described herein, HHSC
first determines the distribution of carry-over enhancements.
If HHSC
determines that funds are not available to carry over some or all pre-existing
enhancements, facilities will be notified as per subsection (ee) of this section.
If funds are available after the distribution of carry-over enhancements,
HHSC then determines the distribution of newly requested enhancements. HHSC
may not distribute newly requested enhancements to facilities owing funds
identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or (o) of this section.
and
]
multiplies
these units
[
this number
] by the rate add-on
associated with that enhancement
option for each TILE group
as
determined in subsection (l) of this section
and sums the products
.
products
] from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph to available funds.
rates for nonparticipating facilities.
]
ineligible
] facilities.
nonparticipating
] facilities for
each of the 11 TILE case mix groups and for the default group, multiply each
of the standardized statewide case mix indices associated with the initial
database by the average direct care staff
base
rate component from
paragraph (3) of this subsection.
(l)
Determination of direct care
staff rates for participating facilities. Direct care staff rates for participating
facilities as defined in subsection (i) will be determined as follows:]
(1)
Determine the direct care staff rate associated
with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at the minimum levels required for
participation.]
(A)
Determine the sum of recipient care costs from
the direct care staff cost center in subsection (a) in all nursing facilities
as included in the initial database from subsection (k)(1) of this section.]
(B)
Adjust the sum from subparagraph (A) of this
paragraph as specified in §355.108 of this title (relating to Determination
of Inflation Indices) to inflate the costs to the prospective rate year.]
(C)
Divide the result from subparagraph (B) of
this paragraph by the sum of recipient days of service in all facilities in
the initial database from subsection (k)(1) of this section and multiply the
result by 1.07. The result is the average direct care staff rate associated
with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at the minimum levels required for
participation.]
(D)
Case mix adjustment of direct care staff per
diem rate component. To calculate the direct care staff per diem rate component
associated with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at the minimum levels required
for participation for each of the 11 TILE case mix groups, for the default
group and for each supplemental reimbursement group, multiply each of the
standardized statewide case mix indices associated with the initial database
from subsection (k)(1) of this section by the average direct care staff rate
component from subparagraph (C) of this paragraph.]
(E)
The initial database from subsection (k)(1)
of this section used in determining the direct care staff rates will not change,
except for adjustments for inflation from subparagraph (B) of this paragraph.
HHSC may also recommend adjustments to the rates in accordance with §355.109
of this title (relating to Adjusting Reimbursement When New Legislation, Regulations,
or Economic Factors Affect Costs).]
(2)
Determine the direct care staff rate add-on
associated with each enhanced staffing level. Taking into consideration the
most recently available, reliable data relating to LVN equivalent compensation
levels, HHSC will determine a per diem add-on payment for each enhanced staffing
level.]
(3)
] Determine each participating
facility's total direct care staff rate. Each participating facility's
total
direct care staff rate will be equal to the direct care staff
base
rate [
associated with maintaining LVN equivalent minutes at
the minimum levels required for participation
] from [
paragraph
(1) of this
] subsection
(k) of this section
plus any add-on
payments associated with enhanced staffing levels selected by and awarded
to the facility during open enrollment.
HHSC will determine a per diem
add-on payment for each enhanced staffing level taking into consideration
the most recently available, reliable data relating to LVN equivalent compensation
levels. Add-on payments associated with staffing increments between the minimum
staffing requirement from subsection (j)(1) of this section and the minimum
staffing requirement for participation in effect in state fiscal year 2003,
adjusted based upon most recently available, reliable relative compensation
levels for the different staff types, will be adjusted for variations in facility
case mix.
(2)
] of this section plus the unadjusted LVN-equivalent minutes maintained
by the facility during the reporting period from paragraph (1) of this subsection.
according to the following formula: (Direct Care Spending Surplus / Per Diem
Enhancement Add-on for One LVN-equivalent Minute) + Unadjusted LVN-equivalent
Minutes.
Per diem enhancement add-on payments associated with staffing
increments between the minimum staffing requirement from subsection (j)(1)
of this section and the minimum staffing requirement for participation in
effect in state fiscal year 2003, adjusted based upon most recently available,
reliable relative compensation levels for the different staff types, will
be adjusted for variations in facility case mix.
facilities that failed
] to maintain the required
weighted average
LVN-equivalent minutes
for the reporting period
by four
or more adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes
or that a facility that was
[
, and facilities
] required to provide at least four LVN-equivalent minutes
above
its
[
their
] minimum staffing requirement, as determined
in subsection (j)(1) of this section[
, and that
]
failed
[
fail
] to meet
its
[
their
] minimum staffing requirement
for the reporting period,
[
are subject to the following:
]
(A)
Effective the first day of the rate year
immediately following the determination that a facility met the qualifications
detailed in paragraph (2) of this subsection,
] the facility will have
its enrollment in the enhancement program limited to a level consistent with
the highest adjusted LVN-equivalent minutes, as defined in subsection (m)
of this section, that the facility actually attained plus two additional LVN-equivalent
minutes. If the adjusted level attained is more than two LVN-equivalent minutes
below the minimum direct care staff requirement for participation, the facility
will be precluded from enrollment in the enhancement program and will be a
nonparticipant. These enrollment limitations will remain in effect for the
longer of either one full rate year or until the first day of the rate year
that begins after funds identified for recoupment from subsections (n) and/or
(o) of this section are repaid to HHSC or its designee.
(B)
HHSC or its designee will
collect interest from facilities that meet the qualifications of paragraph
(2) of this subsection as follows:]
(i)
Determine the average excess funds available
to the provider over the reporting period as the recoupment amount from paragraph
(1) of this subsection divided by two.]
(ii)
Determine the annualized average three-month
United States Treasury Bill rate during the provider's reporting period as
the unweighted monthly average for all months included, either partially or
fully, in the reporting period.]
(iii)
Determine the interest rate on the recoupment
amount by multiplying the annualized average rate from clause (ii) of this
subparagraph by the number of days in the reporting period divided by the
number of days in the rate year.]
(iv)
Determine the interest on the recoupment amount
by multiplying the recoupment interest rate calculated in clause (iii) of
this subparagraph by the average excess funds available to the provider over
the reporting period from clause (i) of this subparagraph.]
all facilities. All
]
Participating
facilities[
, participants
and nonparticipants alike,
] are subject to a direct care staff spending
requirement with recoupment calculated as follows:
(1)
]
Dietary and Fixed Capital Mitigation. Recoupment
of funds described in subsection (o) of this section may be mitigated by high
dietary and/or fixed capital expenses as follows.
(A)
] Calculate dietary cost deficit.
At the end of the facility's rate year, accrued Medicaid dietary per diem
revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary per diem
costs. If costs are greater than revenues, the dietary per diem cost deficit
will be equal to the difference between accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary
per diem costs and accrued Medicaid dietary per diem revenues. If costs are
less than revenues, the dietary cost deficit will be equal to zero.
(B)
] Calculate dietary revenue
surplus. At the end of the facility's rate, accrued Medicaid dietary per diem
revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary per diem
costs. If revenues are greater than costs, the dietary per diem revenue surplus
will be equal to the difference between accrued Medicaid dietary per diem
revenues and accrued, allowable Medicaid dietary per diem costs. If revenues
are less than costs, the dietary revenue surplus will be equal to zero.
(C)
] Calculate fixed capital cost
deficit. At the end of the facility's rate year, accrued Medicaid fixed capital
per diem revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid fixed capital
per diem costs as defined in §355.306(a)(2)
(A)
[
(B)
] of this title (relating to Cost Finding Methodology). If costs are
greater than revenues, the fixed capital cost per diem deficit will be equal
to the difference between accrued, allowable Medicaid fixed capital per diem
costs and accrued Medicaid fixed capital per diem revenues. If costs are less
than revenues, the fixed capital cost deficit will be equal to zero. For purposes
of this paragraph, fixed capital per diem costs of facilities with occupancy
rates below 85% are adjusted to the cost per diem the facility would have
accrued had it maintained an 85% occupancy rate throughout the rate year.
(D)
] Calculate fixed capital revenue
surplus. At the end of the facility's rate year, accrued Medicaid fixed capital
per diem revenues will be compared to accrued, allowable Medicaid fixed capital
per diem costs as defined in §355.306(a)(2)
(A)
[
(B)
]of
this title (relating to Cost Finding Methodology). If revenues are greater
than costs, the fixed capital revenue per diem surplus will be equal to the
difference between accrued Medicaid fixed capital per diem revenues and accrued,
allowable Medicaid fixed capital per diem costs. If revenues are less than
costs, the fixed capital revenue surplus will be equal to zero. For purposes
of this paragraph, fixed capital per diem costs of facilities with occupancy
rates below 85% are adjusted to the cost per diem the facility would have
accrued had it maintained an 85% occupancy rate throughout the rate year.
(E)
] Facilities with a dietary
per diem cost deficit will have their dietary per diem cost deficit reduced
by their fixed capital per diem revenue surplus, if any. Any remaining dietary
per diem cost deficit will be capped at $2.00 per diem.
(F)
] Facilities with a fixed capital
cost per diem deficit will have their fixed capital cost per diem deficit
reduced by their dietary revenue per diem surplus, if any. Any remaining fixed
capital per diem cost deficit will be capped at $2.00 per diem.
(G)
] Each facility's recoupment,
as calculated in subsection (o) of this section, will be reduced by the sum
of that facility's dietary per diem cost deficit as calculated in subparagraph
(E) of this paragraph and its fixed capital per diem cost deficit as calculated
in subparagraph (F) of this paragraph.
(2)
Performance-based Mitigation.
Recoupment of funds described in paragraph (1)(G) of this subsection will
be mitigated based upon each facility's compliance with state and federal
regulations as well as on the basis of resident outcomes as follows.]
(A)
Calculation of Performance-based Mitigation
Index. Calculate the performance-based mitigation index (PMI) using the formula:
PMI = (A+B) x C Where "A", "B", and "C" are the performance weights as detailed
in 1 TAC §§355.309(l), (m), and (i) (relating to Performance-based
Add-on Payment Methodology) for potential advantages, potential disadvantages,
and regulatory compliance, respectively. The performance weights used in the
calculation of the PMI will be those calculated for the service period as
defined in §355.309 (relating to Performance-based Add-on Payment Methodology)
that coincides with the rate year to which the recoupment described in subsection
(o) of this section applies.]
(B)
Recoupment eligible for Performance-based Mitigation.
Recoupment eligible for Performance-based Mitigation is limited to what the
facility's recoupment as described in paragraph (1)(G) of this paragraph would
have been if the facility had been a nonparticipant in the enhancement program
during the reporting period.]
(C)
Calculation of Performance-based Mitigation.
For each facility, multiply the PMI from subparagraph (A) of this paragraph
by the recoupment eligible for Performance-based Mitigation from subparagraph
(B) of this paragraph. The resulting product is the performance-based mitigation.]
(D)
Determination of recoupment after Performance-based
Mitigation. Each facility's recoupment as calculated in paragraph (1)(G) of
this subsection will be reduced by that facility's performance-based mitigation
as described in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph.]
(E)
In cases where a responsible entity has requested
to have its contracts' compliance with the spending requirements evaluated
in the aggregate, performance-based mitigation will be based on the lowest
PMI associated with any of its contracts.]
(F)
Facilities, for which a PMI cannot be calculated
due to missing, invalid or unverifiable data are not eligible for performance-based
mitigation. Facilities that are missing a PMI cannot be included in the group
of facilities to be aggregated as defined in subsection (aa), and must have
their spending requirement determined on a facility-specific basis.]
(G)
Facilities whose contracts are terminated,
either voluntarily or involuntarily, prior to the calculation of the performance
weights described in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph are not eligible for
performance-based mitigation.]
due date of their Annual Staffing and Compensation Report
or within 90 days of the date the report is submitted, whichever is later,
] of the amount to be repaid to HHSC or its designee. If a subsequent
review
by HHSC
or audit results in adjustments to the Annual Staffing
and Compensation Report as described in subsection (f)(1) of this section
that changes the amount to be repaid to HHSC or its designee, the facility
will be notified in writing of the adjustments and the adjusted amount to
be repaid. HHSC or its designee will recoup any amount owed from a facility's
vendor payment(s) following the date of the notification letter.
The new owner may request to become a participant or receive a higher enhancement
level than that conferred by submitting an acceptable enrollment contract
amendment to HHSC. To be acceptable, the enrollment contract amendment must
be received by HHSC Rate Analysis no later than 90 days from the date the
new owner is notified in writing by DHS of the ownership-change effective
date, be completed according to instructions, be signed by an authorized signator
as per DHS Form 2031, Corporate Board of Directors Resolution, and be legible.
Such requests will be granted within available funds to be effective on the
ownership change effective date.
]
liability
] partnerships in which the same single general
partner controls all the limited [
liability
] partnerships, that
single general partner may make this request. Other such requests will be
reviewed on a case-by-case basis. A new request to have compliance with spending
requirements evaluated in the aggregate must be submitted for each reporting
period. NF contracts that change ownership or terminate effective after the
end of the applicable reporting period, but prior to the determination of
compliance with spending requirements as per subsection (o) of this section,
are excluded from all aggregate spending calculations. These contracts' compliance
with spending requirements will be determined on an individual basis and the
costs and revenues will not be included in the aggregate spending calculation.
Effective
September 1, 2001, the portion of the rate accruing from reported general
liability insurance costs will only be disbursed to providers certifying that
they have purchased general liability insurance acceptable to HHSC and the
portion of the rate accruing from reported professional liability insurance
costs will only be disbursed to providers certifying that they have purchased
professional liability insurance acceptable to HHSC. Providers who cancel
or fail to renew their liability coverage during a rate year must notify HHSC
within two weeks of the effective date of their cancellation or failure to
renew.
]
Subchapter F. SPECIFIC REIMBURSEMENT METHODOLOGY
(b)
Recordkeeping requirements.
Each MRLA provider must retain records according to HHSC's requirements. MRLA
providers must ensure that records are accurate and sufficiently detailed
to provide the legal, financial, and statistical information requested by
HHSC.]
(c)
Noncompliance with recordkeeping
requirements. If an MRLA provider fails to maintain records that support the
information submitted, HHSC will notify TDMHMR to place the provider on vendor
hold.]
(d)
] Cost
report
certification.
MRLA providers
[
Providers
] must certify the accuracy of cost
reports submitted to
the
HHSC.
MRLA providers
[
Providers
] may be liable for civil and/or criminal penalties if the
cost report is not completed according to
the
HHSC requirements.
(e)
] Due date.
MRLA providers
[
Providers
] must submit cost reports no later than 90 days
after the reporting period or 90 days after the date that
the
HHSC
mails the form to the provider, whichever is later.
(f)
] Extension of due date.
The
HHSC may grant extensions of due dates for good cause. Good cause
is defined as a causal factor that the provider could not reasonably be expected
to control. A provider must submit a request for an extension in writing to
the
HHSC before the cost survey or cost report due date.
The
HHSC
will respond to a request for extension within
15
[
10
]
working days of its receipt.
(g)
] Cost data.
The
HHSC
may at times require additional financial and statistical information to ensure
the fiscal integrity of the MRLA program. [
Each provider must submit
additional information to HHSC upon request, unless the information is not
at the provider's disposal.
]
(h) Failure to submit requested data.
] Failure to submit acceptable cost data by the due date may result
in HHSC notifying TDMHMR to place the
MRLA
provider on vendor hold.
(i)
] Review of cost
reports
and
data.
The
HHSC reviews each
MRLA
provider's
cost
reports and additionally requested cost
data to ensure that
the financial and statistical information submitted conforms to all applicable
rules and instructions. Forms that are not completed according to
the
HHSC's instructions or rules may be returned to the
MRLA
provider
for proper completion.
(j)
] On-site [
financial
]
audits.
The
HHSC performs a sufficient number of on-site [
financial
] audits to ensure the fiscal integrity of the MRLA program.
The number of on-site audits performed may vary.
(k)
] On-site [
financial
]
audit standards.
The
HHSC or its designee performs on-site [
financial
] audits in a manner consistent with the generally accepted
auditing standards (GAAS) approved by the American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants and included in Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations,
Programs, Activities and Functions, issued by the United States Comptroller
General.
(m)
] Reviews of exclusions or adjustments.
A provider who disagrees with
the
HHSC's exclusion or adjustment
of items in cost reports may request an informal review and, when appropriate,
a formal appeal
[
an administrative hearing
] as specified
in §355.707 of this title (relating to Reviews and Administrative Hearings).
(n)
Notification of exclusions
and adjustments. HHSC will notify a provider of exclusions and any adjustments,
including caps applied, to reported costs.]
Fiscal accountability is a
process used to gauge the ongoing financial performance under the reimbursement
rates.
]
(1)
]
Annual reporting.
Fiscal
accountability will consist of the annual reporting of direct service costs
including wages, benefits, staffing, and supervisory span-of-control information
from all MRLA providers. The data will be collected
as part of
[
on
] a cost
report
[
survey
] designed by
the
HHSC.
(2)
Providers are required to
submit direct services costs on a survey during a uniform three-month period
of the year, selected by HHSC. The survey will reflect the provider's actual
direct costs for the three-month period. The direct service costs will be
compared to the "direct service cost" component of the MRLA rates. Instances
in which a provider's actual direct service costs, as captured by the quarterly
cost surveys, are less than 85% of the direct service revenues in the model
will require additional reporting of costs and other information from the
provider.]
(3)
HHSC will review the results obtained
from the direct services cost surveys with representatives of provider associations
and advocacy groups to further refine the fiscal accountability process. Direct
services cost surveys will be collected in each fiscal year. In instances
in which a provider's actual direct service costs are less than 85% of the
direct service revenues in the model, HHSC may require the provider to:
]
(A)
report more detailed financial
information;]
(B)
submit to a quality assurance
survey and review;]
(C)
submit to a utilization review
of all services provided; and/or]
(D)
submit to a detailed audit
of all relevant financial records.]
The rates will be the same as the HCS rates which are set
in accordance with §355.723 of this title (relating to Reimbursement
Methodology for Home and Community-based Services (HCS)), with the exception
of the case management service component, as explained in subsection (g) of
this section.
]
Subchapter J. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES
department
] or its designee rebases the standard dollar amount for each
payment division at least every three years.
HHSC will not rebase or
recalculate the standard dollar amounts for each payment division for admissions
during the period September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2005.
The relative
weights are recalibrated whenever the standard dollar amounts are recalculated.
The standard dollar amounts are not rebased on an interim basis unless the
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee determines that special
circumstances warrant rebasing.
year
] 2003
, 2004,
and 2005
will not be applied to the standard dollar amount for admissions
during the period September 1,
2003
[
2002
] through August
31,
2005
[
2003
]. The index used to update the standard
dollar amounts is the greater of:
department
] or its designee reimburses in-state children's
hospitals under similar methods and procedures used in the Social Security
Act, Title XVIII, as amended, effective October 1, 1982, by Public Law 97-248,
Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA)
except for the cost
of direct graduate medical education
(DGME). For cost reporting periods
beginning on or after September 1, 2003, children's hospitals with allowable
DGME costs as determined under TEFRA principles will receive a pro rata share
of their annual TEFRA DGME cost based on appropriations or allocations from
appropriations made specifically for this purpose. The amount and frequency
of interim payments will also be subject to the availability of appropriations
made specifically for this purpose. Interim payments are subject to settlement
at both tentative and final audit of a hospital's cost report.
The
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee establishes target rates
and stipulates payments per discharge, incentives, and percentage of payments.
The department or its designee uses each hospital's 1987 final audited cost
reporting period (fiscal year ending during calendar year 1987) as its target
base period. The target base period for hospitals recognized by Medicare as
children's hospitals after the implementation of this subsection is the hospital's
first full 12-month cost reporting period occurring after its recognition
by Medicare. The
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee annually
increases each hospital's target amount for the target base period by the
cost-of-living index described in subsection (n) of this section. The
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee selects a new target base
period at least every three years. The
HHSC
[
department
]
or its designee bases interim payments to each hospital upon the interim rate
derived from the hospital's most recent tentative or final Medicaid cost report
settlement. If a Title XIX participating hospital is subsequently recognized
by Medicare as a children's hospital after the implementation of this subsection,
the hospital must submit written notification to the
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee and include adequate documentation and claims
data. Upon receipt of the written notification from the hospital, the
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee reserves the right to take
90 days to convert the hospital's reimbursement to the reimbursement methodology
described in this subsection.
and are applicable only to
] hospitals with 100 or fewer
licensed beds at the beginning of the hospital's fiscal year
or hospital
fiscal years beginning on or after September 1, 2003 for hospitals with more
than 100 licensed beds at the beginning of the hospital's fiscal year, located
in a county that is not in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) as defined
by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and designated by the Center
for Medicare & Medicaid Services as a Sole Community Provider (SCH) or
Rural Referral Center RCC
. At tentative cost settlement of the hospital's
fiscal year (with subsequent adjustment at final cost settlement, if applicable),
the
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee determines what
the amount of reimbursement during the fiscal year would have been if the
HHSC
[
department
] or its designee reimbursed the hospital
under similar methods and procedures used in Title XVIII of the Social Security
Act, as amended, effective October 1, 1982, by Public Law 97-248, Tax Equity
and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA). This determination is made without
imposing a TEFRA cap. If the amount of reimbursement under the TEFRA principles
is greater than the amount of reimbursement received by the hospital under
the prospective payment system, the
HHSC
[
department
]
or its designee reimburses the difference to the hospital.
are
] used in the calculation of the provider's standard
dollar amount described in subsection (c) of this section. Those allowable
inpatient direct graduate medical education costs for services delivered to
Medicaid eligible patients with inpatient admission dates on or after September
1, 1997, will be subject to the cost determination and settlement provisions
as described in this subsection. No Medicaid inpatient direct graduate medical
education cost settlement provisions are applied to inpatient hospital admissions
prior to September 1, 1997.
For cost reporting periods beginning on or
after September 1, 2003, providers with Medicaid allowable direct graduate
medical education costs as described in this subsection will receive a pro
rata share of their annual GME cost based on appropriations or allocations
from appropriations made specifically for this purpose. The amount and frequency
of interim payments will also be subject to the availability of appropriations
made specifically for this purpose. Interim payments are subject to settlement
at both tentative and final audit of a provider's cost report.
[
Providers with Medicaid allowable inpatient direct graduate medical education
costs as described in this subsection will receive an interim monthly payment
based upon one-twelfth of their inpatient direct graduate medical education
cost from their most recent tentative or final audited cost report. The interim
payment amount as described in this subsection will not be updated during
the state fiscal year to reflect new tentative or final cost report settlements.
These payments are subject to settlement at both tentative and final audit
of provider cost reporting periods covering the state fiscal year.
]
2003
], prior to the effective date of this
subsection, may be adjusted in accordance with the methodology set out in
this subsection.
Bad debt charges are
used in the calculation of charges attributed to uninsured patients as defined
in paragraph (5) of this subsection, and are used only in the limited circumstances
described in subsection (f)(2)(E)(iv) of this section.
]
Charity charges
are used in the calculation of charges attributed to uninsured patients as
defined in paragraph (5) of this subsection, only in the limited circumstances
described in subsection (f)(2)(E)(iv) of this section.
] The amount of
total charity charges must be consistent with the amount reported on the Texas
Department of Health's [
(department)
] annual hospital survey.
2003 (September 1, 2002 through August 31, 2003)
],
the monthly disproportionate share payment calculated under subparagraph (C)
of this paragraph is subject to a conversion factor that is applied as follows:
and city hospitals
] located in MSAs
with populations between 1 and 3 million.
(vi)
] After the commission or its
designee determines each disproportionate share hospital's cost of services
to patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments
for services provided during the year, the commission or its designee subtracts
from each hospital's cost of services the amount of payments made by or on
behalf of those patients who have no health insurance or source of third party
payments for services provided during the year.
Cost of services
does not include any bad debt charges.
]
, as reported on the state
teaching hospitals' annual financial reports, for use only in the calculation
of the disproportionate share hospital payment under subsection (e)(1) of
this section.
]
(1)
A state teaching hospital
will receive a monthly disproportionate share payment based on the following
formula: Monthly Charity Charges of the State-Owned Teaching Hospital Divided
by Total Monthly Charity Charges of All State-Owned Teaching Hospitals x Available
Fund.]
(2)
If the adjusted hospital specific
limit for a state teaching hospital is less than the formula in paragraph
(1) of this subsection, a state teaching hospital will receive 100% of its
adjusted hospital specific limit, instead of the amount determined under this
subsection.]
Subchapter J. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES
§29.1104
] of this title (relating to Texas Medicaid Reimbursement Methodology
(TMRM) for Physicians and Certain Other Practitioners)
.
(a)
]
Reimbursement for physicians and certain
other practitioners.
which shall be
] based upon
the [
Texas Department of Health's (department's)
] determination
of adequacy of access to health care services
by the Texas Health and
Human Services Commission (HHSC) or its designee
as described in this
section[
, or the actual resources required by an economically efficient
provider to provide each individual service
].
the department
] deems necessary, to account for deficiencies
relating to the adequacy of access to health care services as defined in subparagraph
(B) of this paragraph.
department's
] determination
by HHSC
or its designee
of the resources required by an economically efficient
provider to provide individual services. An RBRF is defined mathematically
by the following formula: RBRF1 = (RVUw-1 + RVUo-1 + RVUm-1) * CF where, RBRF1
= Resource-Based Reimbursement Fee for Service 1, RVUw-1 = Relative Value
Unit for Work for Service 1, RVUo-1 = Relative Value Unit for Overhead for
Service 1, RVUm-1 = Relative Value Unit for Malpractice for Service 1, and
CF = Conversion Factor.
If funding
is available, the
] conversion factor will be
reviewed at the beginning
of each state fiscal year biennium, with any adjustments made within available
funding and
[
updated
] based on the adjustments described
in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph or such other percentage approved by
HHSC or its designee or its designee may
[
the Health and Human
Services Commission (HHSC) at the beginning of each state fiscal year biennium.
The department may, with the approval of HHSC,
] develop and apply multiple
conversion factors for various classes of service such as obstetrics, pediatrics,
general surgeries, and/or primary care services.
The biennium adjustment
of the conversion factor is composed of the following two components
].
one-half of
] the forecasted
rate of change of
a specific inflation factor appropriate to physician
or other professional services covered by the TMRM,
the [
implicit
price deflator-personal consumption expenditures (IPD-DCE)
]
Personal
Consumption Expenditures (PCE) chain-type price index, or some percentage
thereof
. To inflate the conversion factor for the prospective period,
HHSC or its designee
[
the department
] uses the lowest feasible
inflation factor
[
IPD-PCE
] forecast consistent with the forecasts
of nationally recognized sources available to
HHSC or its designee
[
the department
] at the time of preparation of the conversion factor(s).
which
] comprise
the cost of providing individual Medicaid services. The three cost components
of each reimbursement fee are intended to reflect the work, overhead, and
professional liability expense required to provide each individual service.
The RVUs that are employed in the TMRM must, except as otherwise specified,
be based upon the RVUs of the individual services as specified in the Medicare
Fee Schedule.
HHSC or its designee
[
The department
]
will review any changes to or revisions of the various Medicare RVUs and,
if applicable,
adopt
[
the department adopts
] the changes
as part of the TMRM
, within available funding
.
which must be
] composed
of RVUs for the work, overhead, and malpractice components. The sum of these
components must then be multiplied by the conversion factor to produce a reimbursement
fee for each individual service.
(b)
Reimbursement for ambulance
services. Ambulance services shall be reimbursed in accordance with a reasonable
charge methodology. The department or its designee shall define and determine
reasonable charges and payments based on reasonable charges as follows.]
(1)
A reasonable charge shall be a charge for a
specific service shall be the lowest of:]
(A)
the provider's customary charge for that service;]
(B)
the prevailing charges made for similar services
in the geographic locality; or]
(C)
the actual charge of the eligible provider.]
(2)
The department or its designee shall use a
statistical base for making reasonable charge determinations. The statistical
base is comprised of individual charges gathered from available sources, including
Medicare (Title XVIII) and Medicaid (Title XIX).]
(3)
Determination of reasonable charges, as set
forth in this section and established by the department, shall be made in
accordance with applicable federal requirements. Payments for services provided
must not exceed the Medicare allowable charges.]
(c)
Reimbursement for clinical
diagnostic laboratory services. Clinical diagnostic laboratory tests performed
in a physician's office, by an independent laboratory, or by a hospital laboratory
for its outpatients shall be reimbursed on the basis of the Medicare-established
fee schedule.]
31.
AMBULANCE SERVICES
32.
CLINICAL LABORATORY SERVICES
17.
LONESTAR SELECT CONTRACTING PROGRAM
Proposals by combinations
of health care providers under common ownership in a market area shall be
considered as individual proposals if the health care providers elect to apply
on that basis. Proposals by combinations of health care providers in a market
area that are not under common ownership will also be considered, provided
that each health care provider that is a party to a joint application in a
market area also submits an independent application for a selective contracting
agreement in the market area; and each such health care provider provides
written assurances that the terms of its individual proposal were arrived
at independently without any other health care provider or combination of
health care providers, and have not been communicated to any competitor or
groups of competitors. The department does not intend any action by the State
of Texas in the contracting process to require or sanction any form of communication
or joint action by competitors in the market for inpatient hospital services
(with respect to either individual or joint applications) that fails to comply
with the provisions of this section.
]
Where health
care providers have submitted a joint proposal for selective provider agreements,
the department shall evaluate the proposed provider network and the proposed
network in all possible combinations with remaining health care providers
that submitted proposals.
]
Chapter 357.
MEDICAL FAIR HEARINGS
An opportunity for a fair hearing is required
by federal law and regulation in any Medicaid case for an individual whose
claim for services is denied or not acted upon promptly. An opportunity for
a fair hearing is also required when an operating agency or its designee takes
action to suspend, terminate, or reduce services, including a denial of a
prior authorization request for Medicaid-covered services. These fair hearing
rules will also apply to any hearing involving the transfer or discharge of
an individual from a nursing facility or to an individual adversely affected
by the preadmission screening and annual resident review requirements.
]
(4)
] Designee--A contractor of an
operating agency authorized to take an action or adverse determination as
defined in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this section on behalf of the operating
agency.
(5)
] Medicaid eligibility--The eligibility
of an individual to receive services under the Texas Medicaid program.
(6)
] Operating agency--A state
agency operating part of the Title XIX (Medicaid) program under the Social
Security Act and includes the Department of Health, the Department of Human
Services, the Rehabilitation Commission, and the Department of Mental Health
and Mental Retardation
, and the Health and Human Services Commission
.
(7)
] Prior authorization request--a
request for services that are reimbursable only when authorization or approval
is obtained before services are rendered. Prior authorized services may be
limited in duration, scope, and amount. Services provided beyond those authorized
are not reimbursable. If a prior authorization is limited in duration, scope,
or amount, a separate request and approval must be obtained for each prior
authorized service.
(8)
] Program eligibility--The eligibility
of an individual to receive services within a particular Medicaid program.
(a)
Agency Notice.]
shall
] contain:
or
] a denial of a prior authorization request, or
that the operating
agency
intends to take in the case of any other action except for failing
to act upon an individual's request for Medicaid covered services or for an
eligibility determination within a reasonable amount of time;
required under subsection (a) of this section
] is mailed.
under subsection (a) of this
section
].
five
] days before the termination
or reduction would be effective.
ten
] days of the mailing of the notice, and the operating
agency or its designee determines that the action resulted from something
other than the application of federal or state law or policy, the operating
agency or its designee will reinstate and continue an individual's services
until a hearing decision is rendered.
shall
], at least
10
[
ten
] days prior to the date of the
fair
hearing, send a written
notification of the
fair
hearing to the individual who has requested
the
fair
hearing.
shall
] contain:
proposed
] action
or intended
action
;
place
]
of the
fair
hearing;
shall
] be given the opportunity to examine any appropriate
file, and other documents or records the operating agency wants the hearing
official to consider.
five
] days prior
to the
fair
hearing, to allow the operating agency to obtain a
review of the material by medical staff persons. The failure to so submit
such medical information shall not render the material inadmissible, but the
hearing official
will
[
shall
] be permitted to keep the
hearing record open. The hearing official may request a medical review by
the operating agency of the submitted material. If a hearing official requests
a medical review, the hearing official will mail a copy of that medical review
to the individual within
7
[
seven
] days after the hearing.
The individual will have
10
[
ten
] days from the date
the medical review was mailed to submit to the hearing official a written
response or rebuttal to the medical review. The hearing official will close
the hearing record at the end of the tenth day from the date the medical review
was mailed to the individual.
shall
]
determine the location of the hearing or whether it is appropriate to conduct
the hearing by telecommunication as provided in §357.15 of this
chapter
[
title
] (relating to Telecommunication). In making
this determination, the hearing official will consider the location of the
individual.
five
] days prior to the
fair
hearing without the necessity of taking oral testimony, provided
that the parties are given the opportunity to respond to any written material
submitted.
or an adverse determination
].
(b)
] The nursing facility bears
the burden of proof in a
fair hearing on an action described in §357.3(1)(E)
of this chapter (relating to Definitions)
[
transfer or discharge
case
].
(c)
] The individual bears the burden
on any issue requiring the showing of "good cause" or an affirmative defense
to the action or adverse determination.
used by the operating agency or nursing facility at the hearing
];
shall
] dismiss a request
for a fair hearing and the [
proposed
] action
becomes final
[
may be taken
] if the individual withdraws the request in
writing or fails to appear at the scheduled hearing without good cause.
Hearing
] decisions
must be based exclusively on evidence introduced at the hearing and received
in evidence.
proposed
]
by a designee of the operating agency, the operating agency will
promptly
[
also
] notify the designee of its decision. The decision
of the operating agency is binding on the designee.
Hearing
] decisions
are available to the public, subject to the requirements under federal and/or
state law for safeguarding information relating to the Medicaid program
and for protecting the privacy of individually identifiable health information
.
Chapter 370.
STATE CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM
Alien
] means a person
who is not a native born or naturalized citizen of the United States of America.
TCP
] that an applicant must complete
to apply for health care benefits or coverage through CHIP.
TCP
] database.
TCP
] database that includes all information
required under §370.23.
(16)
] "Enrollment" means the process
by which a child determined to be eligible for CHIP is enrolled in a CHIP
health plan serving the CHIP Service Area in which the child resides.
(17)
] "Exempt income" means income
received by the budget group that is not counted in determining income eligibility.
(18)
] "FPL" means Federal Poverty
Level Income Guidelines.
(19)
] "Health Plan" means a licensed
health maintenance organization, indemnity carrier, or authorized exclusive
provider organization that contracts with the Commission to provide health
benefits coverage to CHIP members.
(20)
] "Income eligibility standard"
means monthly
gross
[
net
] budget group income at or
below 200% of current (FPL). A child meets the CHIP income eligibility standard
if the budget group's monthly
gross
[
net
] income exceeds
the income eligibility standard applied to the child in the Texas Medicaid
Program and is at or below the 200% of FPL CHIP monthly income standard.
(21)
] "Member" means a child enrolled
in a CHIP Health Plan.
(22)
] "
Gross
[
Net
] budget group income" means monthly countable income
before
any payroll
[
minus
] deductions.
(23)
] "Qualified
Entrant
[
Alien
]" means an alien who applies for CHIP coverage and
who, at the time of such application, satisfies the criteria established under
8 U.S.C. §1641(b).
(24)
] "SSI" means Supplemental
Security Income.
(25)
] "State fiscal year" means
the 12-month period beginning September 1 of each calendar year and ending
August 31 of the following calendar year.
(26)
] "TexCare" [
"Partnership"
or "TCP"
] means the name designated to publicly identify the operational
entity that provides administrative services for the CHIP program.
(28)
] "TDHS" means the Texas Department
of Human Services.
,
] the following:
Subchapter B. APPLICATION SCREENING, REFERRAL AND PROCESSING
TCP
] application process may be
initiated:
TCP
] upon telephone request. The application booklet
may also be available through CBOs, local organizations that support CBO outreach
efforts, and participating CHIP health care providers;
TCP
] website; or
TCP's
]
toll-free telephone number or through TDD.
TCP
] staff
during hours that are posted on the
TexCare
[
TCP
] website
or published in applications, brochures, or other marketing media issued or
approved by
TexCare
[
TCP
]. Telephone applications may
also be accepted by
TexCare
[
TCP
] staff;
TCP
]
completes as much of the application as possible over the telephone, prints
it, and mails it to the applicant. The applicant is responsible for completing
any missing information, signing the application, attaching all required verifications,
and returning it to
TexCare
[
TCP
].
(D)
] The child's status as a United
States citizen or a legal resident;
(E)
] The full name of the child's
mother or father;
(F)
] If the child has income reported
on the application, the child's school status; and
(G)
] Confirmation by the applicant
whether the child currently has health insurance[
, or had health insurance
within 90 days prior to the date the application is being completed
]
or Medicaid.
TCP
]:
TCP
] monitors the status
of entered, incomplete application information.
TCP
] sends the applicant an initial follow-up letter requesting
the missing information.
TexCare
[
TCP
] will send the
initial follow-up letter within two working days from the date the application
information is entered into the database.
TCP
] does not receive
the requested missing information within 14 calendar days,
TexCare
[
TCP
] sends the applicant a second follow-up letter requesting the missing
information.
TCP
] enters the application information into the
database, then produces and mails an application back to the applicant for
signature.
TCP
] receives the signed application and enters receipt of the signed
application into the database.
TCP
] entered the incomplete application
information into the database, the application process is terminated.
TCP
] application
before CHIP coverage is provided.
2.
APPLICANT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES REGARDING APPLICATION AND ELIGIBILITY
TCP
] must respond in writing within
15 working days.
TCP
] application form regardless of where the application was obtained;
TCP
].
3.
ELIGIBILITY DETERMINATION
TCP
] enters a completed
application into the database, the automated eligibility system passes the
information through an eligibility screen to determine potential eligibility
for CHIP[
,
]
or
Medicaid[
, or THKC
].
4.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Green Card
], I-94 Card, [
(White Visitor
Card)
] I-688-B, I-766,
refugee letter,
[
I-551,
]
an INS asylum letter, an order from an immigration judge granting asylum or
showing deportation was withheld, employment authorization, passport or visa,
or any other
Bureau of Citizenship and Immigration Services (formally
know as the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service)
[
U. S.
Immigration and Naturalization Service
] approved document that demonstrates
that the child is a qualified alien.
TCP
] must consider the income
of all persons included in the budget group.
, except for the first $50
from the budget group's total monthly child support payments
];
Net
]
Income Test
[
income test and deductions
].
(A)
]
Gross
[
The
net
] income [
test
] is used to determine eligibility.
(B)
]
Gross
[
Net
] monthly income is [
gross
] monthly income
before any
payroll deduction
[
minus income deductions
].
(C)
] A child is eligible if the
budget group's
gross
[
net
] monthly income, after rounding
down cents, is equal to or less than the 200% of FPL for the budget group's
size. All budget groups must pass the
gross
[
net
] income
test.
TCP
] converts income received non-monthly to monthly amounts by:
TCP
] verifies all countable
income at initial application.
(c)
] The 90-day waiting period
specified in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to a child under
the following circumstances:
THKC,
] ERS, [
Laredo CHIP Pilot,
] or CHIP in another state;
net
] monthly income;
[
or
]
(4)
] The Commission grants an exception
to the waiting period under
subsection
[
paragraph
] (d)
of this section.
(d)
] The Commission may grant an
exception to the 90-day waiting period prescribed by this section if it determines
good cause exists to grant an exception and either:
TCP
] application screening indicates:
TCP
] sends the applicant
a Medicaid Assets Letter to collect information about the budget group's assets
and reviews the information returned by the family. If, following this review,
the budget group's assets do not exceed Medicaid limits,
TexCare
[
TCP
]:
net
]
income is at or below 200% of FPL, and the budget group meets all other CHIP
eligibility requirements,
TexCare
[
TCP
]:
TCP
] applicant child is referred
to Medicaid and subsequently determined ineligible for Medicaid, Medicaid
denies eligibility and may deem the child eligible for CHIP based on the budget
group's income and/or assets, or the child's citizenship or immigration status.
5.
REVIEW AND RECONSIDERATION OF ELIGIBILITY DENIALS AND TEMPORARY ENROLLMENT
TCP
] in writing.
TCP
] must complete its review
of the initial decision within 10 working days of receipt of the request for
review.
TCP
] must notify the requester
in writing of the results of its review of the initial decision not later
than the 10th day following receipt of the request. The written notification
must:
TCP's
]review; and
TCP's
] review of an initial decision
may request reconsideration of the
TexCare
[
TCP
] review
by HHSC.
TCP
] review.
TCP
] receives the written request for reconsideration, HHSC must complete
the reconsideration and notify the applicant in writing of its final decision.
TCP
] of an adverse eligibility decision includes factual information
that could have an impact on the decision,
TexCare
[
TCP
]
will approve temporary enrollment of the child pending completion of the review
and/or reconsideration by HHSC of the eligibility decision.
TCP
] review and/or HHSC reconsideration process is complete.
12
] months of eligibility continues. If the review/reconsideration
confirms the initial decision of ineligibility, the child is disenrolled as
of the next cut-off date.
TCP
] will not approve temporary
enrollment if the applicant's request for review/reconsideration includes
no factual basis for reversing the initial eligibility decision.
TCP
] may approve temporary
enrollment for a child on the basis of a review only once every
6
[
12
] months.
TCP
] or HHSC.
Subchapter C. ENROLLMENT, DISENROLLMENT, AND RENEWAL OF MEMBERSHIP
2.
COST-SHARING REQUIREMENTS