TITLE 40.SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Chapter 2. MEDICALLY NEEDY AND CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN PROGRAMS

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts the repeal of §§2.1002, 2.1004, 2.1006, 2.1008, 2.1010, 2.1012, 2.1014, and 2.1016, and adopts new §§2.1, 2.11- 2.18, and 2.32-2.38 in its Medically Needy and Children and Pregnant Women Programs chapter. New §§2.1, 2.32, and 2.37 are adopted with changes to the proposed text published in the June 27, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4831). The repeals of §§2.1002, 2.1004, 2.1006, 2.1008, 2.1010, 2.1012, 2.1014, and 2.1016 and new §§2.11-2.18, 2.33-2.36, and 2.38 are adopted without changes to the proposed text.

The repeals and new sections were undertaken as part of a DHS project to rewrite agency rules in plain language format to make them easier to use and understand. Because the Medically Needy (MN) and Children and Pregnant Women (CPW) programs have similar rules and are both Medicaid programs, the rules governing these programs are incorporated into the same chapter, making them easier for providers and the public to access. The repeal of rules in DHS's Chapter 4, concerning the CPW Program, is adopted elsewhere in this issue of the Texas Register .

Justification for new §§2.11(1)(A), 2.14(2), and 2.34(2)(C) is to distinguish resource limits for the MN and CPW programs from those of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program. The three programs no longer have the same resource limits, since House Bill (HB) 2292 and Senate Bill (SB) 1862, 78th Texas Legislature, amended the Human Resources Code, §31.032, to reduce the TANF asset limit to $1,000.

Justification for new §2.32 is to comply with the new provisions of the Human Resources Code, §32.025 and §32.026, amended by SB 1522, SB 1862, and HB 2292, 78th Texas Legislature, which permit DHS to require personal interviews for applications and recertifications of children's Medicaid when necessary to obtain information needed for eligibility verification.

DHS received two written comments from the Center for Public Policy Priorities and the Coalition for Nurses in Advanced Practice. Additional oral comments were received at the Medical Care Advisory Committee meeting on July 9, 2003, and at a public hearing on July 11, 2003. A summary of the comments and DHS's responses follow.

Comment: Concerning §2.1(12), one commenter noted that the definition of a provider does not include important categories of Medicaid providers. DHS should use language proposed by the Health and Human Services Commission in an amendment to Title 1, Texas Administrative Code, §355.201(4) published in the June 27, 2003 issue of the Texas Register , that incorporates all categories of providers.

Response: DHS agrees, and has changed the definition of provider to include all categories of providers.

Comment: Concerning §2.14(6)(C) and §2.34(6)(C), one commenter suggested that DHS needs to carefully monitor its application of the policy to request Social Security Numbers (SSNs) from non-benefit recipients. Making non-applicant budget group members think they need to provide an SSN to DHS may unwittingly lead persons not authorized to obtain an SSN to apply for one.

Response: DHS agrees, and will be clear in instructions to staff and on written materials, such as the application for the Medicaid Program, that it is voluntary for people not applying for benefits to provide SSNs. DHS will handle this through internal procedures and does not believe this requires the adoption of a specific rule. DHS adopts these subparagraphs without change.

Comment: Concerning §2.32(a)(1)(B) and (C), one commenter expressed concern that the proposal may lead to unnecessary face-to-face interviews.

Response: DHS will continue to provide guidance to staff regarding the circumstances in which a face-to-face interview may be necessary and expects local DHS staff to exercise prudent discretion in this matter. DHS will handle this through internal procedures and does not believe this requires any change in the proposed rule. DHS adopts these subparagraphs without change.

Comment: Regarding §2.32(a)(1)(B) and (C), one commenter expressed concern that a private company contracted in the future to perform eligibility functions may not be as reliable as DHS in minimizing unnecessary face-to-face interviews.

Response: DHS notes this concern.

Comment: Concerning §2.32(b)(1), one commenter suggested that the reference to DHS be removed as DHS does not deliver the health care orientation.

Response: DHS agrees, and has changed the rule to remove the reference to DHS.

Comment: Concerning §2.37(b)(2), one commenter noted that the language in this paragraph conflicts with that in 2.35(4) and should be changed to clarify what changes children under age 19 must report.

Response: DHS agrees, and has changed the paragraph to clarify that a change in address and a child leaving or joining the household must be reported.

DHS has initiated a minor editorial change to the text of §2.32(a)(1)(B) to clarify and improve the accuracy of the section.

Additional comments were received that did not pertain to the rule proposal.

Subchapter A. DEFINITIONS

40 TAC §2.1

The new section is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The new section affects the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

§2.1.Definitions.

The words and terms used in this chapter have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The definitions apply to the Medically Needy (MN) and Children and Pregnant Women (CPW) programs.

(1) Applied income--A portion of a legal parent's income applied or counted to meet the needs of a minor applicant.

(2) Budget group--People living as a group at one address with needs, income, resources, and/or medical expenses in common. The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) includes each group member in the Medicaid budget when determining eligibility, whether or not each group member is individually Medicaid eligible.

(3) CPW--The Children and Pregnant Women Program. A program DHS administers that provides Medicaid benefits to pregnant women and children.

(4) Caretaker--A person who supervises and cares for a dependent child. A caretaker must be related to the child, as required by Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) rules (detailed in Chapter 3 of this title (relating to Texas Works)).

(5) Clearinghouse--A site with staff that process medical bills submitted by MN applicants who must spend down income to qualify for Medicaid. Clearinghouse staff determine if the bills are acceptable and when spend down is met.

(6) Client--A person who is either an applicant for or a recipient of Medicaid.

(7) DHS--The Texas Department of Human Services.

(8) FPIL--Federal Poverty Income Limit. FPILs are income amounts, by family size, that represent the dividing line between families who live above or below the poverty level. The Office of Management and Budget, a federal agency, periodically calculates, updates, and publishes the FPIL.

(9) Good cause--An acceptable reason that exempts an applicant or recipient from a Medicaid requirement. For the purposes of this chapter, good cause refers to a reason for an applicant or recipient not to cooperate to obtain medical support from an absent parent or not to comply with third party resource requirements.

(10) Health and human services office--An agency other than DHS that is authorized to accept Medicaid applications.

(11) MN--The Medically Needy Program. A program DHS administers that provides Medicaid benefits to pregnant women, children, and parents or caretakers of children whose income is too high to qualify for other Medicaid programs and who have high medical expenses.

(12) Provider--A health care practitioner, institution, or other entity that is enrolled in the medical assistance program and is authorized to submit claims for payment or reimbursement of medical assistance.

(13) Spend down--The amount of income that an MN applicant must apply toward incurred medical bills before he can be certified for Medicaid.

(14) TANF--The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program.

(15) Third-party--A person or organization, other than DHS or a person living with the applicant, who may be liable as a source of payment of the applicant's medical expenses (for example, a health insurance company).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305021

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter B. MEDICALLY NEEDY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §§2.11 - 2.18

The new sections are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The new sections affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305022

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter C. CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §§2.32 - 2.38

The new sections are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The new sections affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

§2.32.Application Procedures.

(a) The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) processes Children and Pregnant Women Program applications using the application rules of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program, as detailed in Chapter 3 of this title (relating to Texas Works), with the following exceptions:

(1) For applicants under the age of 19, DHS:

(A) processes applications and reviews active cases by mail, telephone, or face-to-face interview;

(B) may conduct a personal interview with an initial applicant if DHS has received conflicting information related to household membership, income, or assets that affects eligibility and the information cannot be verified through other means;

(C) conducts a personal interview for recertification of Medicaid eligibility when there is no associated case record for TANF or food stamps or adult Medicaid coverage, and DHS has received conflicting information related to household membership, income, or assets that affects eligibility and the information cannot be verified through other means;

(D) allows any office of a state health and human services agency to accept an initial application; and

(E) contracts with third parties to accept applications from hospital districts (including state- owned teaching hospitals), federally qualified health centers, and county health departments.

(2) For pregnant applicants who are potentially eligible but unable to provide proof of eligibility, DHS:

(A) postpones verifications and provides Medicaid coverage to ensure access to medical care within 30 days of application;

(B) continues the coverage of women who provide postponed verifications by the 30th day after the application date; and

(C) denies the coverage of those who fail to meet the 30-day deadline.

(3) There are no conditions limiting the designation of an authorized representative.

(b) Parents or guardians of Medicaid children under the age of 19 must:

(1) attend a health care orientation;

(2) accompany the child on a visit to a health care provider; or

(3) meet with a DHS representative to discuss the child's eligibility and, as appropriate, receive counseling on the child's need for comprehensive health care.

(c) Parents or guardians of Medicaid children under the age of 19 who are eligible for the Texas Health Steps Program must:

(1) comply with the Texas Health Steps regimen of health care requirements, as required by the Texas Department of Health in 25 TAC Chapter 33, Subchapter J (relating to Texas Health Steps Medical Case Management); or

(2) meet with a DHS representative to discuss the child's eligibility and, as appropriate, receive counseling on the child's need for comprehensive health care.

(d) The services and policies in subsection (b) of this section and §2.35(3) and (4) of this chapter (relating to Medicaid Eligibility Dates) are administered according to the procedures in DHS's Medicaid simplification operating guidelines. The guidelines are published, available to the public, and are updated regularly to reflect procedural changes.

§2.37.Requirement to Report Changes.

(a) Children and Pregnant Women Program (CPW) recipients must report changes as required by Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program rules, and within the time frames specified by TANF rules as outlined in Chapter 3 of this title (relating to Texas Works).

(b) In addition to the reporting required by TANF Program rules, a recipient of the CPW Medicaid Program who is:

(1) pregnant must report the termination of pregnancy; and

(2) under age 19 must report a change in address, and a child leaving or joining the household. The child is continuously eligible, regardless of reported income and resource changes, until Medicaid eligibility is reviewed.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305020

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 2. MEDICALLY NEEDY PROGRAM

Subchapter A. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §§2.1002, 2.1004, 2.1006, 2.1008, 2.1010, 2.1012, 2.1014, 2.1016

The repeals are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The repeals affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001- 32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305017

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 2. MEDICALLY NEEDY AND CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN PROGRAMS

Subchapter B. MEDICALLY NEEDY PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §2.19

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts new §2.19 without changes to the proposed text published in the June 27, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4837).

Justification for the new section is to comply with House Bill 2292 and Senate Bill 1862, 78th Texas Legislature, which amended the Human Resources Code, §32.024(i), to state that operation of the Medically Needy (MN) Program is contingent on the availability of appropriated state funds. New §2.19 makes it clear that operation of the MN Program depends on funds being appropriated for the program and allows DHS to administer the MN Program if appropriated funds become available.

DHS received four written comments from the Center for Public Policy Priorities, the Seton Healthcare Network, the Texas Hospital Association, and the University Health System. Additional oral comments were received at the Medical Care Advisory Committee meeting on July 9, 2003, and at a public hearing on July 11, 2003. A summary of the comments and DHS's responses follow.

Comment: Several commenters were concerned that persons who would have been eligible for the MN program will have reduced access to healthcare as a result of the program being discontinued. They also commented on the negative impact of the rule proposal on hospitals and other healthcare providers and the resulting loss of federal Medicare and Medicaid funds. The proposal will strain the resources of hospitals and local governments.

Response: DHS notes the concern that the loss of Medicaid eligibility may result in reduced access to healthcare for some people. The discontinuation of the MN program is required to stay within the funding levels allocated to DHS in the 2004-2005 General Appropriations Act. The proposal allows DHS to continue operation of the MN program when funds become available. At this time, the MN program will continue to cover eligible children. DHS adopts this section without change.

Comment: Several commenters said that despite DHS's assertion to the contrary in the preamble of the proposed rule, published in the June 27, 2003 issue of the Texas Register , there will be a fiscal effect on state government as a result of discontinuation of the MN Program. Please clarify this fiscal note.

Response: DHS did not originally cite cost to the state or expected cost savings for the MN Program in the proposal because the proposal simply conditions the delivery of this program to be contingent upon available funds. The rule, therefore, does not put in place a reduction in funding. In reflecting upon the impact of the 2004-2005 General Appropriation Act, DHS has estimated that the effect on state government for the first five-year period the sections are in effect is an estimated additional cost in general revenue funds of $65,367 in fiscal year (FY) 2004; and an estimated reduction in cost in general revenue funds of $28,814,458 in FY 2004; $35,100,486 in FY 2005; $40,995,830 in FY 2006; $45,883,339 in FY 2007 and $51,450,766 in FY 2008.

Comment: Several commenters disagreed with the assertion in the preamble of the proposal that there are no fiscal implications for local governments as a result of enforcing the section. With the resulting loss of federal Medicare and Medicaid funds, the proposal will strain the resources of hospitals and local governments, resulting in local tax increases for public hospitals. Shifting the costs to local authorities is not a responsible and effective way of solving state government Medicaid shortfalls.

Response: DHS agrees that the proposal may result in additional costs to local governments, but is unable to quantify the amount because there are so many variables involved, such as, for example, the number of persons who may receive uncompensated care, the kind and level of care that persons would be seeking, nongovernmental resources, and other resources available to local governments in different parts of the state.

Additional comments were received that did not pertain to the rule proposal.

The new section is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The new section affects the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305018

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter C. CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §2.31, §2.39

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts new §2.31 and §2.39 without changes to the proposed text published in the June 27, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4838).

New §2.31 was undertaken as part of a DHS project to rewrite agency rules in plain language format to make them easier to use and understand. Justification for new §2.31(1) and §2.39 is to stay within funding levels for the Children and Pregnant Women Program allocated to DHS in the 2004-2005 General Appropriations Act. Funding levels for fiscal years 2004 and 2005 are based on lowering the income limit for pregnant women ages 19 and over to 158% of the Federal Poverty Income Limit; therefore, DHS needed to adopt rules that reflect the budget assumption.

DHS received four written comments from the Center for Public Policy Priorities, the Seton Healthcare Network, the Texas Hospital Association, the University Health System. Additional oral comments were received at the Medical Care Advisory Committee meeting on July 9, 2003, and at a public hearing on July 11, 2003. A summary of the comments and DHS's responses follow.

Comment: Concerning §2.31(1) and §2.39, several commenters were concerned that pregnant women who would have been eligible for Medicaid under the higher income limit will have reduced access to healthcare as a result of the new lower income limit. They also commented on the negative impact of the rule proposal on hospitals and other healthcare providers and the resulting loss of federal Medicare and Medicaid funds. The proposal will strain the resources of hospitals and local governments.

Response: DHS notes the concern that the loss of Medicaid eligibility may result in reduced access to healthcare for some people. The lower income limit for pregnant women ages 19 and over is required to stay within the funding levels allocated to DHS in the 2004-2005 General Appropriations Act. The proposal allows DHS to raise the income limit when funds become available.

Comment: Concerning §2.31(1) and §2.39, several commenters said that the fiscal impact in the preamble of the proposed rules, published in the June 27, 2003 issue of the Texas Register , is incorrect. DHS did not take into account potential clients from the Emergency Services Program (TP30).

Response: DHS acknowledges that the original cost savings estimated for the CPW Program did not take into account clients from the Emergency Services Program (TP30). The revised cost savings, taking these clients into account, is $27,543,012 in fiscal year (FY) 2004; $31,972,163 in FY 2005; $35,464,465 in FY 2006; $39,575,989 in FY 2007; and $44,485,623 in FY 2008.

Comment: Several commenters disagreed with the assertion in the preamble of the proposal that there are no fiscal implications for local governments as a result of enforcing the section. With the resulting loss of federal Medicare and Medicaid funds, the proposal will strain the resources of hospitals and local governments, resulting in local tax increases for public hospitals. Shifting the costs to local authorities is not a responsible and effective way of solving state government Medicaid shortfalls.

Response: DHS agrees that the proposal may result in additional costs to local governments, but is unable to quantify the amount because there are so many variables involved, such as, for example, the number of persons who may receive uncompensated care, the kind and level of care that persons would be seeking, nongovernmental resources, and other resources available to local governments in different parts of the state.

Additional comments were received that did not pertain to the rule proposal.

The new sections are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The new sections affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305019

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 3. TEXAS WORKS

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts amendments to §§3.301, 3.1104, 3.1105, 3.1801, and 3.7609. DHS adopts §3.301 and §3.1105 with changes to the proposed text published in the June 27, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4839). DHS adopts §§3.1104, 3.1801, and 3.7609 without changes to the proposed text.

Justification for the amendments is to implement the changes in law made by sections 2.86- 2.88 of House Bill (HB) 2292, 78th Texas Legislature, which amended the Human Resources Code, §§31.0031-31.0034. Justification for the amendment to §3.301(d) is to implement the provisions of the Human Resources Code, §31.0031, as amended by HB 2292, section 2.86, which defines a payee and requires a TANF payee to sign a responsibility agreement that defines the responsibilities of the state and the payee. The amendment also implements the provisions of the Human Resources Code, §31.0031(c), as amended by HB 2292, section 2.87, which require DHS to adopt rules governing sanctions and penalties against a person and the family of a person who fails to cooperate with the responsibility agreement. In addition, DHS is amending the language of §3.301(d)(2)(C)(i) as proposed, in response to a request for clarification from the Texas Workforce Commission, to clarify when a recipient is considered to be out of compliance with work requirements. As amended, §3.301(d) implements the provisions of the Human Resources Code, §§31.0032-31.0034, as amended by HB 2292, section 2.88, which require DHS to apply an immediate sanction to terminate the total amount of financial assistance provided to or for the person and person's family for failure to cooperate with a requirement contained in the responsibility agreement. Justification for the amendments to §§3.1104, 3.1105, 3.1801, and 3.7609 is to implement provisions of the legislation in associated rules in DHS's rule base that refer to §3.301(d).

DHS received one written comment from the Texas Workforce Commission and an additional oral comment from the Center for Public Policy Priorities at a public hearing on July 11, 2003. A summary of the comments and DHS's responses follow.

Comment: A commenter noted that the proposed language in §3.301(d)(4)(A) conflicts with language in HB 2292 that requires TANF families to be sanctioned or penalized, rather than lose eligibility, after one month of noncooperation with each requirement of the responsibility agreement.

Response: DHS agrees and has clarified the rule.

Comment: A commenter suggested that clarification is needed in §3.1105(b) regarding requirements for TANF families who are denied due to noncooperation. The commenter suggests that the family may reapply for financial assistance but must cooperate with each requirement of the responsibility agreement for a one-month period before receiving an assistance payment for that month.

Response: DHS agrees and has clarified the rule.

Comment: A commenter suggested DHS clarify definitions regarding a "household denied for continuous failure to cooperate" and a "household denied for noncooperation." The commenter suggests DHS use consistent terms.

Response: Since there is no intended difference between the two phrases, consistent terminology should be used. DHS has modified the rules.

Comment: A commenter indicated that the terms "compliance" and "cooperation" are used interchangeably throughout the proposed rules. The commenter suggests using "cooperation" and "noncooperation" to align with HB 2292.

Response: DHS agrees and has modified the rules.

Comment: A commenter proposed that DHS make a reasonable attempt to contact the TANF recipient before imposition of a full family sanction to ensure the recipient has received notification and that there is no obvious good cause.

Response: DHS agrees that clients should be adequately informed and potential good cause explored before imposition of the full family sanction but does not believe a specific rule is required. To the extent possible, this suggestion will be included in DHS policies and procedures.

Subchapter C. THE APPLICATION PROCESS

40 TAC §3.301

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 31, which authorizes DHS to administer financial assistance programs.

The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§31.001-31.081.

§3.301.Responsibilities of Clients and the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS).

(a) To apply, the client must complete the application process. Clients must:

(1) fill out and sign an application. Clients must answer the questions on the application before DHS can certify them.

(2) give the application to DHS. Except for households with all SSI recipients, clients must file their applications at the office DHS designates. Applications may be filed in person, by mail, or through an authorized representative. Clients may file an application anytime during office hours and on the same day they get the form.

(3) participate in an interview. DHS does not require clients to be interviewed before they file their application.

(4) sign a responsibility agreement as specified in subsection (d) of this section.

(5) provide proof of any eligibility factor specified in Chapter 3 of this title (relating to Texas Works). Clients have the primary responsibility for providing proof needed by DHS to determine their eligibility and benefits. DHS allows clients 10 calendar days to provide requested proof.

(6) comply with the requirements of the finger imaging process unless exempt as specified in §3.7002 of this title (relating to Individuals Exempt from Finger Imaging Requirements).

(7) comply with the requirement to attend a workforce orientation unless the individual meets the exception criteria as specified in §3.7302 of this title (relating to Exceptions to the Workforce Orientation Requirements--Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)).

(b) DHS mails or gives applications for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and food stamps to clients on the same day they are requested. DHS must take the application when the client gives it if it contains the information specified in §3.303 of this title (relating to Receipt of Application-Acceptability Factors).

(c) If required proof is incomplete, DHS offers, or attempts to offer, reasonable help.

(d) Additional state and client responsibilities are explained by eligibility staff to households as a condition of TANF eligibility in Texas as specified in paragraphs (1)-(5) of this subsection.

(1) Requirements.

(A) State requirements. The state will:

(i) provide recipients with help in finding employment and necessary support services within available resources;

(ii) provide support services to strengthen the family such as life skills and parenting skills training;

(iii) ensure that programs administered are efficient, fraud-free and easily accessible;

(iv) gather accurate client information;

(v) promote the development of community resources;

(vi) promote clear and tangible goals for recipients;

(vii) enable parents to provide for their children's basic necessities in a time-limited benefits program;

(viii) promote education, job training and workforce development; and

(ix) give communities the opportunity to develop alternative programs that meet the unique needs of local recipients.

(B) Client requirements. DHS requires each adult TANF recipient, each minor parent applying as a caretaker or second parent, and each payee, as a condition of eligibility, to sign a responsibility agreement as specified in Human Resources Code, §31.0031. DHS requires household members to comply with any applicable requirements contained in the agreement and listed in Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d), after the agreement has been signed or the household is subject to a penalty as described in paragraph (4) of this subsection. For the parenting skills training specified in Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(8), DHS requires participation by certified caretakers and second parents of a certified child under age five and teen parents. Others may voluntarily participate.

(2) Establishing cooperation. Cooperation with a responsibility agreement that contains any one or more of the requirements listed in Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d), is established in the following manner:

(A) Recipients and payees must provide proof of cooperation with provisions in Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(2), (6), and (7), at each periodic review. DHS accepts the following as proof of cooperation:

(i) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(2). For Texas Health Steps medical screens, DHS uses information from National Heritage Insurance Company's (NHIC's) paid claims system, or secondary verification provided by staff of the Texas Department of Health (TDH). For the immunization requirement, DHS accepts immunization records completed by a doctor or other medical professional licensed to perform immunization services indicating that a child's immunizations are current or, if not current, that the medical provider has established an alternate schedule for the child. DHS also accepts verification of school attendance at a public school in Texas or proof that a child is current for Texas Health Steps as proof for purposes of meeting the immunization requirement.

(ii) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(6) and (7). DHS accepts written or verbal proof from the school that each household member, unless exempted under Human Resource Code, §31.0031(d)(6), is attending school regularly (as determined by the school).

(B) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(8). DHS accepts written or verbal proof of training completion from the person or organization that provided training.

(C) Recipients are considered to be in cooperation related to the sections of the Human Resource Code described in clauses (i)-(ii) of this subparagraph, unless noncooperation is determined.

(i) DHS considers a recipient to be cooperating with Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(4), unless DHS is notified by the Texas Workforce Commission that the recipient is not cooperating or DHS determines that the recipient has failed to cooperate with another requirement that is considered a work requirement of the Choices employment plan; or

(ii) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(3), unless DHS verifies the recipient voluntarily quit a job.

(D) Recipients and payees are considered to be in cooperation related to the sections of the Human Resource Code described in clauses (i)-(ii) of this subparagraph, unless noncooperation is determined.

(i) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(5), unless DHS determines the recipient or payee, as applicable, has, since signing the responsibility agreement, committed and either been convicted of or received a deferred adjudication for:

(I) using, selling, or possessing marijuana or any other controlled substance in violation of Health and Safety Code, Chapter 481; or

(II) the abuse of alcohol; or

(ii) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(1), unless noncooperation is determined pursuant to §3.1801 of this title (relating to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Child Support Requirements).

(3) Failure to sign the responsibility agreement. If a member of the household who is required to sign the responsibility agreement fails or refuses to sign, the application or case for the entire TANF household is denied.

(4) Penalties for noncooperation with requirements of a responsibility agreement. Failure to cooperate results in the penalties specified in subparagraphs (A)-(D) of this paragraph.

(A) A recipient or payee who fails to cooperate is penalized from receiving TANF cash assistance for the recipient or payee and their family for one month or until the person demonstrates cooperation with the requirement of the responsibility agreement for which the penalty was imposed, whichever is longer.

(B) A recipient or payee who fails to cooperate for two consecutive months becomes ineligible for TANF cash assistance for the recipient or payee and family.

(C) A family denied for noncooperation may reapply for TANF cash assistance but must cooperate with any applicable requirements of a responsibility agreement for one month before receiving cash assistance. This month of cooperation does not count toward the 45-day time frame DHS allows for processing applications.

(D) Penalty periods. DHS starts penalty periods beginning with the earliest month benefits can be adjusted. DHS considers noncooperation with these requirements to have ended as specified in:

(i) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(1). DHS is notified by the Title IV-D agency of the parent's compliance with child support requirements.

(ii) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(2). Medical screening for the child is completed, treatments are completed, or the recipient or payee, as applicable, has shown good faith effort because treatments are initiated by the medical provider. Immunizations are current or the recipient has shown good faith effort because an immunization schedule is established by the medical provider.

(iii) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(6) and (7). The recipient or payee, as applicable, has shown a good faith effort because he or she provides verification from the school that the required student has attended school without an unexcused absence (as determined by the school) for one calendar month.

(iv) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(8). For recipients participating in the Choices program, the case manager monitors and ensures the client participates and completes the parenting skills program. The case manager determines cooperation. The DHS eligibility worker monitors participation and completion of parenting skills for non-Choices clients.

(5) Good cause. Good cause for noncooperation as specified in Human Resources Code, §31.0033, is established for the requirements listed in Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d), as explained in the following subparagraphs.

(A) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(1). Good cause is established as specified in §3.1801 of this title (relating to Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Child Support Requirements).

(B) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(2). Good cause regarding immunizations is established if the child is exempt under the provisions in Health and Safety Code, §161.004(d).

(C) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(3). Good cause is established according to the regulations applicable to the Food Stamp Program as specified in 7 CFR §273.7(n)(3), regarding voluntary quit.

(D) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(4). Good cause is established as specified in 45 CFR §250.35 and Human Resources Code, §31.0031(f), regarding employment education and training activities.

(E) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(5). Good cause cannot be established for this requirement.

(F) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(6) and (7). Good cause is established as specified in Human Resources Code, §31.0031(f), regarding lack of funding for support services. Regarding child care or day care, good cause is established if child care for a child under the age of 12 years (or day care for any incapacitated individual) living in the same home as the recipient is necessary for an individual to attend school, and such care is not available and outside funding is not available to provide such care. If there is another responsible household member in the home who is willing and able to provide such care, good cause does not apply. Good cause is also established if a student is expelled from school and the school system verifies it does not offer an alternative educational program.

(G) Human Resources Code, §31.0031(d)(8). Good cause is established if:

(i) no classes are available in the area or verification from known providers is received indicating that all classes were full when offered;

(ii) the provider verifies the client is currently attending classes;

(iii) the client provides a physician's statement or medical evidence that verifies that illness or injury prevented training completion when classes were available; or

(iv) the client provides verification that other circumstances beyond his control prevented training completion, such as a household disaster.

(H) Good cause noncompliance hearings. As required by the Human Resources Code, §31.0033, if the recipient claims good cause during the 13-day period after notice of adverse action concerning the noncompliance penalty is sent, DHS either makes a determination on the claim before the 13-day period expires or files the claim as a fair hearing pursuant to DHS's rules. The recipient retains the right to request a fair hearing within 90 days of agency action pursuant to Chapter 79 of this title (relating to Legal Services).

(I) Good cause related to parenting skills noncompliance. A client may request a determination that his noncompliance was due to good cause after a penalty is imposed. The client receives a determination regarding good cause for parenting skills noncompliance by the eligibility worker or case manager.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 12, 2003.

TRD-200305050

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter K. EMPLOYMENT SERVICES

40 TAC §3.1104, §3.1105

The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 31, which authorizes DHS to administer financial assistance programs.

The amendments implement the Human Resources Code, §§31.001-31.081.

§3.1105.Reestablishing Eligibility.

(a) A household denied for noncooperation and who remains subject to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) work participation requirement can reestablish eligibility as explained in §3.301(d) of this title (relating to Responsibilities of Clients and the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS)).

(b) A household denied for noncooperation and who does not remain subject to the TANF work participation requirement may reestablish eligibility by making application, signing the responsibility agreement, meeting other eligibility requirements, and demonstrating cooperation with all applicable personal responsibility requirements for one month.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 12, 2003.

TRD-200305049

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter R. CHILD SUPPORT

40 TAC §3.1801

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 31, which authorizes DHS to administer financial assistance programs.

The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§31.001-31.081.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 12, 2003.

TRD-200305048

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter WW. TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES--STATE PROGRAM

40 TAC §3.7609

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapter 31, which authorizes DHS to administer financial assistance programs.

The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§31.001-31.081.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 12, 2003.

TRD-200305047

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 3. TEXAS WORKS

Subchapter V. MEDICAID ELIGIBILITY

40 TAC §§3.2201 - 3.2207

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts the repeal of §§3.2201- 3.2207 without changes to the proposed text published in the June 27, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4844).

DHS undertook the repeals in order to remove the rules in Chapter 3 regarding Medicaid eligibility for households that are eligible for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families so that they could be rewritten in plain language format and placed into their own chapter.

DHS received no comments regarding adoption of the repeals.

The repeals are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The repeals affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.001-22.038 and §§32.001- 32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305041

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 4. TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR NEEDY FAMILIES (TANF)-LEVEL MEDICAL ASSISTANCE

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts the repeal of §§4.1002, 4.1004, 4.1006, 4.1008, 4.1010, 4.1012, 4.1014, and 4.1016; and adopts new §4.1-4.11 without changes to the proposed text published in the June 27, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4844).

DHS undertook the repeals and new sections as part of its initiative to reorganize its rules and write them in plain language format and in response to legislation passed by the 78th Texas Legislature. Rules concerning Medicaid programs for children and pregnant women were repealed from Chapter 4 so that they could be relocated to DHS's new Chapter 2 with the rules for the Medically Needy Program, since the two programs have similar criteria. Rules concerning Medicaid eligibility for households that are eligible for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) were repealed from Chapter 3, Subchapter V, so they could be placed into their own chapter. DHS placed the TANF-level Medicaid rules in a separate chapter because federal welfare reform legislation delinked Medicaid eligibility from cash assistance eligibility. The new eligibility automation system (Texas Integrated Eligibility Re-design System, or TIERS) processes eligibility separately for TANF and Medicaid, as required by federal law. The new chapter reflects the eligibility requirements for a TANF-level family applying for Medicaid.

The new sections were written in plain language format to make them easier for the public to understand. New §4.2 was necessary to distinguish the resource limits applicable to Medicaid eligibility from those applicable to TANF, since the latter were changed during recent legislative amendments to the Human Resources Code, §31.032(d)(1). New §4.8 and §4.9 were included to clarify the current requirement that medical support and compliance with the medical support requirement are applicable to recipients of TANF-level medical assistance. New §4.10 and §4.11, concerning compliance with work requirements and denying medical assistance to a person who is eligible for TANF but for whom TANF is denied because of the person's failure to comply with the work requirement, were necessary in order to stay within the levels of funding allocated to DHS in the 2004-2005 General Appropriations Act.

DHS received one written comment from the Center for Public Policy Priorities (CPPP) and similar oral comments from representatives of CPPP at the Medical Care Advisory Committee meeting on July 9, 2003, and a public hearing on July 11, 2003. A summary of the comments and DHS's responses follow.

Comment: DHS should not adopt the rule to deny medical assistance as part of the new full-family sanction policy, because although the legislation allows the agency to do so, DHS is not required to do so.

Response: In consideration of the amount funded by appropriations to DHS in the 2004- 2005 General Appropriations Act, DHS has determined that the rule (§4.11) is necessary to stay within its appropriated limits.

Comment: DHS should clarify that the Medicaid sanction applies only to non-pregnant, adult caretakers over the age of 18.

Response: DHS notes that the Children and Pregnant Women Program is available to TANF non-compliers who qualify.

Comment: DHS should clarify that the sanction provision will be applied strictly to the work and child support requirements of the PRA.

Response: DHS believes that the rules as written limit the denial of Medicaid for TANF non- compliance to adults who fail to cooperate with child support and work requirements. The Office of the Attorney General defines what constitutes cooperation with child support, and the Texas Workforce Commission defines what constitutes work requirements.

Comment: DHS should develop clear and understandable notices for clients about this change and share information with community-based organizations who work with low-income families.

Response: DHS worked diligently to produce easy-to-understand client notices regarding this change. DHS has regular interaction with client advocacy organizations and will continue this communication on these important issues.

Comment: The cost savings estimated for the Medicaid penalty for non-cooperating TANF adults and the position stated by others that this sanction will produce a high level of cooperation need to be reconciled.

Response: DHS believes that the Medicaid sanction for non-cooperating TANF adults will eventually result in a higher level of cooperation with the TANF work requirement. However, in the early stages of implementation of this change in program policy, there will continue to be noncooperation that will produce cost savings. Further, once the level of cooperation has been increased, additional savings will occur due to more TANF adults leaving the TANF Program for employment as a result of the services the clients receive in the Choices Program.

Subchapter A. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §§4.1 - 4.11

The new sections are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The new sections affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305042

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 4. MEDICAID PROGRAMS--CHILDREN AND PREGNANT WOMEN

Subchapter A. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §§4.1002, 4.1004, 4.1006, 4.1008, 4.1010, 40.1012, 4.1014, 4.1016

The repeals are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The repeals affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.001-22.038 and §§32.001- 32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305043

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 47. PRIMARY HOME CARE

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts the repeal of §47.2909; adopts amendments to §§47.1901, 47.1903, 47.2901-47.2904, 47.2911-47.2914, 47.3906, 47.4902, and 47.5902; and adopts new §47.2909 and §47.3908 in its Primary Home Care chapter. The amendments to §§47.1901, 47.2904, and 47.5902, and new §47.2909 are adopted with changes to the proposed text published in the June 27, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4870). The repeal of §47.2909, amendments to §§47.1903, 47.2901-47.2903, 47.2911-47.2914, 47.3906, and 47.4902; and new §47.3908 are adopted without changes to the proposed text.

DHS removed the provider agency nurse from Primary Home Care (PHC) Program requirements to require only a non-nurse supervisor because the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services no longer requires nurse involvement in the state's personal care option and because the PHC Program is a non-medical program. The adopted rules reflect efforts to incorporate these intentions as part of a larger effort to streamline the PHC Program and to allow DHS to continue the program within reduced funding levels. Provider agency licensing requirements were changed to support the streamlining efforts. New §47.3908 was needed to make the retroactive payment procedures clearer to ensure more accurate claims of this type. Finally, DHS changed references to "1929(b) (Frail Elderly) services" to "community attendant services" to comply with new language for the program as provided in the Human Resources Code, §32.061.

DHS initiated a minor editorial change to the text of §47.1901(23) to clarify and improve the accuracy of the section.

DHS received written comments from ADAPT and an individual, and oral comments from the Texas Association for Home Care and Advocacy, Incorporated, during the Medical Care Advisory Committee meeting on July 9, 2003; at the DHS public hearing on July 11, 2003; and at the Aged and Disabled Advisory Committee on August 1, 2003. A summary of the comments and DHS's responses follow.

Comment: Several commenters expressed concerns about provider agencies' liability in service provision and that they may not be able to meet all of a client's needs.

Response: DHS is adding a statement to the assessment and the orientation/supervisory visit forms that the client and the provider agency sign, which indicates they are aware the program only provides certain services and the provider agency is not responsible for services outside of the program.

Comment: A comment was expressed about provider agency implementation of the reduction in hours for PHC clients.

Response: The comment does not directly address a proposed rule so there is no change to a rule. However, DHS will provide guidance on this issue.

Comment: Regarding §47.1901, Definitions, a comment was made about the different service names under the Primary Home Care Program being confusing. Specific reference was made to the new name of the services provided under Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act, 1929(b), called "Community Attendant Services." Another commenter proposed changing the name of the Primary Home Care Program.

Response: DHS did not revise this rule. The service names cannot be changed at this time. A change to the program and service names would require a change to automation programs and systems. DHS cannot currently make any automation changes due to the pending implementation of a new automation system.

Comment: Regarding §47.1901, Definitions, comments were received about the definition of "Practitioner" in these proposed rules, which limits orders or statements to a Texas physician. Licensure rules allow acceptance of orders or statements from physicians who are licensed in states that are contiguous to Texas.

Response: DHS revised the definition of "Practitioner" in §47.1901(20) to allow a statement from physicians currently licensed in contiguous states.

Comment: Regarding §47.1903, Staffing Requirements, and §47.2911, Orientation of Attendants, a commenter requested that language about attendant qualifications, orientation, and supervision of those attendants be removed and deferred to personal assistance service (PAS) licensure requirements.

Response: DHS did not revise these rules. PHC Program requirements are patterned after PAS licensure standards wherever possible. However, some additional contract requirements are necessary for program quality.

Comment: Regarding §47.2909, Medical Need Determination, and §47.2904, Critical Omissions/Errors for Primary Home Care or Community Attendant Services, there were comments about the provider agencies no longer having nurses on staff, but still being responsible for documenting medical diagnosis(es).

Response: DHS is developing a new form the provider agencies will use to obtain a statement from the practitioner documenting the client's medical need for personal care services. The provider agency will only be obtaining the form. DHS revised §47.2904 and §47.2909 to indicate that provider agencies are not responsible for ensuring a client's functional impairment related to a medical diagnosis.

Comment: Regarding §47.5902, a commenter noted that subsection (d) was inadvertently deleted. This section needs to be added back into the rules

Response: DHS revised §47.5902 as requested.

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND SERVICES

40 TAC §47.1901, §47.1903

The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendments affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

§47.1901.Definitions.

The following words and terms have the following meanings when used in this chapter, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Abuse--Willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or cruel punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish; or willful deprivation by a caretaker or oneself of goods or services that are necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness.

(2) Adult--A person 18 or older, or an emancipated minor.

(3) Aged or elderly person--A person 65 or older.

(4) Assignee--A legal entity that assumes the responsibilities and duties of a current primary home care contract through a legal assignment of contract from another legal entity.

(5) Assignor--A legal entity that assigns its primary home care contract to another legal entity through an assignment of contract.

(6) Attendant--A provider agency employee who provides the authorized tasks to the client.

(7) Client--A person who is determined by the department to be eligible for services.

(8) Community attendant (CA) services--A service under the Primary Home Care program providing in-home attendant services to eligible clients. Clients receiving CA services must have a medical need for specific tasks. CA services are provided under Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act (relating to Grants to States for Medical Assistance Programs), at 42 U.S.C. §1396t (relating to Home and community care for functionally disabled elderly individuals).

(9) Controlling interest--an owner who is a sole proprietor, a partner owning 5.0% or more of the partnership, or a corporate stockholder owning 5.0% or more of the outstanding stock of the contracted provider, or a member of the board of directors.

(10) Days--Any reference to days means calendar days, unless otherwise specified in the text. Calendar days include weekends and holidays.

(11) Department--The Texas Department of Human Services.

(12) Emancipated minor--A person under 18 years of age who has the power and capacity of an adult. This includes a minor who has had the disabilities of minority removed by a court of law or a minor who, with or without parental consent, has been married.

(13) Exploitation--The illegal or improper act or process of a caretaker or others using an adult's resources for monetary or personal benefit, profit, or gain.

(14) Family care (FC) services--A service under the Primary Home Care Program providing in- home attendant services to eligible adults. FC services are provided under Title XX of the federal Social Security Act (relating to Block Grants to States for Social Services), at 42 U.S.C. §1397 et seq.

(15) Income eligible--An adult who is neither a Supplemental Security Income (SSI) or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) client, but who has income that is equal to or less than the eligibility level established by the department.

(16) Institution--A nursing home, personal care home, intermediate care facility for the mentally retarded (ICF-MR), or state hospital.

(17) Medicaid eligible--An individual who is eligible for Medicaid as an SSI or TANF client, or who is eligible for medical assistance only while living in the community.

(18) Neglect--Failure to provide for oneself the goods or services that are necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness; or the failure of a caretaker to provide these goods or services.

(19) Person with a disability--A person who, because of physical, mental, or developmental impairment, is limited in his capacity to adequately perform one or more essential activities of daily living. Activities of daily living include but are not limited to:

(A) personal and health care;

(B) mobility;

(C) communication; and

(D) money management.

(20) Practitioner--A physician currently licensed in Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, or New Mexico; a physician assistant currently licensed in Texas; or a registered nurse approved by the Texas State Board of Nurse Examiners to practice as an advanced practice nurse.

(21) Practitioner's statement--A document signed by a practitioner that includes a client's diagnosis, current medications, and a statement that the client has a current medical need for assistance with personal care tasks and other activities of daily living.

(22) Primary Home Care Program--A Texas Department of Human Services attendant care services program. Community attendant (CA), primary home care (PHC), and family care (FC) are the three types of services available under the Primary Home Care Program.

(23) Primary home care (PHC) services--A service under the Primary Home Care Program providing in-home attendant services to eligible clients. Clients receiving PHC services must have a medical need for specific tasks. PHC services are provided under Title XIX of the federal Social Security Act, at 42 U.S.C. §1396a et seq. (relating to State plans for medical assistance).

(24) Prior approval--A decision made by the department regional nurse/caseworker, before services begin and before payment can be made, that the applicant or client meets the department criteria for the requested service.

(25) Provider agency--A home and community support services agency that has a contract with the department to provide services under the Primary Home Care Program.

(26) Provisional contract--A time-limited contract.

(27) Special attendant--A provider agency employee who can substitute for another attendant.

(28) Supervisor--A provider agency employee who:

(A) coordinates the delivery of services in the client’s service plan;

(B) supervises attendants; and

(C) complies with §97.404 of this title (relating to Standards Specific to Agencies Licensed to Provide Personal Assistance Services).

(29) Unit of service--One hour of authorized service delivered to a prior-approved client.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305006

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter B. SERVICE REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §§47.2901 - 47.2904, 47.2909, 47.2911 - 47.2914

The amendments and new section are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendments and new section affect the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001- 22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

§47.2904.Critical Omissions/Errors for Primary Home Care or Community Attendant Services.

(a) If the client assessment/service plan form or the practitioner's statement is missing, or if any of the following critical omissions or errors has occurred in the required documentation, the provider agency cannot obtain prior approval.

(1) The supervisor fails to sign or date the client assessment/service plan.

(2) The practitioner's statement does not include the credential of the practitioner who signed the order.

(3) Service plan tasks are not identified on the service plan form.

(4) The total number of service hours per week is not specified on the service plan form.

(5) The practitioner's statement does not include the license number of the practitioner who signed it.

(6) The practitioner who signed the order is excluded from participation in Medicare or Medicaid.

(7) The practitioner's signature is not on the practitioner's statement.

(8) The practitioner's signature date is missing or illegible and the provider agency's stamped date is missing from the practitioner's statement.

(9) The provider agency's stamped date used instead of the practitioner's date on the practitioner's statement does not include the provider agency's name, abbreviated name, or initials.

(b) Corrections of critical omissions or errors in provider agency documentation must be postmarked or date stamped as received by the department within 14 days after the regional nurse mails notification of the omission or error to the provider agency. If the provider agency fails to meet this time frame, the date of prior approval can be no earlier than the postmark or department-stamped date on the corrected documentation, or the department may refer the client to another provider agency of the client's choice.

§47.2909.Medical Need Determination.

(a) Applicability. This section does not apply to family care.

(b) Obtaining medical need. The provider agency must obtain the statement of medical need from the practitioner and submit the statement to the regional nurse within the time frame described in §47.2902 of this chapter (relating to Assessment, Service Plan, and Requesting Prior Approval) for:

(1) applicants who are referred to the provider agency (unless the applicant requests and is to receive family care only);

(2) clients who are receiving family care only and who are referred to the provider agency for primary home care or community attendant services; and

(3) clients who are referred to the provider agency to have medical need re-assessed, as requested by the case manager, such as when the initial medical need was established for a limited time.

(c) Negotiated referrals. In the case of negotiated referrals, the provider agency:

(1) must initially determine medical need by obtaining an oral statement of medical need from the practitioner before initiating services as described in §47.2905 of this chapter (relating to Initiation of Service); and

(2) must then complete and submit a practitioner's statement as described in §47.2903 of this chapter (relating to Provider Agency Requirements after Verbal Referral for Primary Home Care or Community Attendant Services).

(d) Mental illness and mental retardation. Persons diagnosed with mental illness or mental retardation or both are not considered to have established medical need based solely on such diagnoses, but may establish medical need through a related diagnosis.

(e) Documentation of medical need determination. The provider agency must maintain the practitioner's statement in the client file.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305007

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


40 TAC §47.2909

The repeal is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The repeal affects the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001- 32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305008

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter C. CLAIMS PAYMENT

40 TAC §47.3906, §47.3908

The amendment and new section are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendment and new section implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001- 22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305009

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter D. PROVIDER CONTRACTS

40 TAC §47.4902

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendment affects the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305010

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter E. SUPPORT DOCUMENTS

40 TAC §47.5902

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and medical assistance programs, and under Government Code, §531.021, which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendment affects the Human Resources Code, §§22.0001-22.038 and §§32.001-32.053.

§47.5902.Reimbursement Methodology for Primary Home Care.

(a) General requirements. The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) or its designee applies the general principles of cost determination as specified in §20.101 of this title (relating to Introduction).

(b) Cost reporting. Providers must follow the cost-reporting guidelines as specified in §20.105 of this title (relating to General Reporting and Documentation Requirements, Methods and Procedures).

(1) All contracted providers must submit a cost report unless the number of days between the date the first DHS client received services and the provider's fiscal year end is 30 days or fewer. The provider may be excused from submitting a cost report if circumstances beyond the control of the provider make cost report completion impossible, such as the loss of records due to natural disasters or removal of records from the provider's custody by any governmental entity. Requests to be excused from submitting a cost report must be received at the address specified in the letter mailed with the cost report before the due date of the cost report.

(2) Providers are responsible for reporting only allowable costs on the cost report, except where cost report instructions indicate that other costs are to be reported in specific lines or sections. Only allowable cost information is used to determine recommended reimbursement. DHS or its designee excludes from reimbursement determination unallowable expenses included in the cost report and makes the appropriate adjustments to expenses and other information reported by providers. The purpose is to ensure that the database reflects costs and other information which are necessary for the provision of services and are consistent with federal and state regulations.

(A) Individual cost reports may not be included in the database used for reimbursement determination if:

(i) there is reasonable doubt as to the accuracy or allowability of a significant part of the information reported; or

(ii) an auditor determines that reported costs are not verifiable.

(B) When material pertinent to proposed reimbursements is made available to the public, the material will include the number of cost reports eliminated from reimbursement determination for the reason stated in subparagraph (A)(i) of this paragraph.

(c) Reimbursement determination. Reimbursement is determined in the following manner.

(1) Cost determination by cost area. Allowable costs are combined into three cost areas, after allocating payroll taxes to each salary line item on the cost report on a pro rata basis based on the portion of that salary line item to the amount of total salary expense and after applying employee benefits directly to the corresponding salary line item.

(A) Service support cost area. This includes field supervisors' salaries and wages, benefits, and mileage reimbursement expenses. This also includes building, building equipment, and operation and maintenance costs; administration costs; and other service costs. Administration expenses equal to $0.18 per Priority 1 unit of service are allocated to Priority 1. The administration costs remaining after this allocation are summed with the other service support costs.

(B) Nonpriority attendants cost area. This includes nonpriority attendants' salaries and wages, benefits, and mileage reimbursement expenses. This cost area is calculated as specified in §20.112 of this title (relating to Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement).

(C) Priority 1 attendants cost area. This includes Priority 1 attendants' salaries and wages, benefits, mileage reimbursement, expenses. This cost area is calculated as specified in §20.112 of this title (relating to Attendant Compensation Rate Enhancement).

(2) Recommended reimbursement by cost area. For the service support cost area described in paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection the following is calculated:

(A) Projected costs. Each provider's total allowable costs, excluding depreciation and mortgage interest, per unit of service are projected from each provider agency's reporting period to the next ensuing reimbursement period, as described in §20.108 of this title (relating to Determination of Inflation Indicies) to calculate the projected expenses. Reimbursement may be adjusted where new legislation, regulations, or economic factors affect costs as specified in §20.109 of this title (relating to Adjusting Reimbursement When New Legislation, Regulations, or Economic Factors Affect Costs).

(B) Projected cost per unit of service. To determine the projected cost per unit of service for each provider agency, the total projected allowable costs for the service support cost area are divided by total units of service, including nonpriority services, Priority 1 services, and STAR+PLUS services, in order to calculate the projected cost per unit of service.

(C) Projected cost arrays. All provider agencies' projected allowable costs per unit of service are rank ordered from low to high, along with each provider agency's corresponding total units of service.

(D) Recommended reimbursement for the service support cost area. The total units of service for each provider agency are summed until the median hour of service is reached. The corresponding projected expense is the weighted median cost component. The weighted median cost component is multiplied by 1.044 to calculate the recommended reimbursement for the service support cost area. The service support cost area recommended reimbursement is limited, if necessary, to available appropriations.

(3) Total recommended reimbursement.

(A) For nonpriority clients. The recommended reimbursement is determined by summing the recommended reimbursement described in paragraph (2) of this subsection and the cost area component from paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection.

(B) For Priority 1 clients. The recommended reimbursement is determined by summing the recommended reimbursement described in paragraph (2) of this subsection and the cost area component from paragraph (1)(C) of this subsection.

(d) Reimbursement determination authority. The reimbursement determination authority is specified in §20.101 of this title (relating to Introduction).

(e) Desk reviews and field audits of cost reports. Desk reviews or field audits are performed on cost reports for all contracted providers. The frequency and nature of the field audits are determined by DHS or its designee to ensure the fiscal integrity of the program. Desk reviews and field audits will be conducted in accordance with §20.106 of this title (relating to Basic Objectives and Criteria for Audit and Desk Review of Cost Reports), and providers will be notified of the results of a desk review or an audit in accordance with §20.107 of this title (relating to Notification of Exclusions and Adjustments). Providers may request an informal review and, if necessary, an administrative hearing to dispute an action taken under §20.110 of this title (relating to Informal Reviews and Formal Appeals).

(f) Factors affecting allowable costs. Providers must follow the guidelines in determining whether a cost is allowable or unallowable as specified in §20.102 this title (relating to General Principles of Allowable and Unallowable Costs) and §20.103 of this title (relating to Specifications for Allowable and Unallowable Costs).

(g) Reporting revenues. Revenues must be reported on the cost report in accordance with §20.104 of this title (relating to Revenues).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305011

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: September 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: June 27, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Part 4. TEXAS COMMISSION FOR THE BLIND

Chapter 167. BUSINESS ENTERPRISES OF TEXAS

40 TAC §§167.2 - 167.4, 167.6 - 167.15, 167.17

The Texas Commission for the Blind adopts amendments to §§167.2-167.4 and §§167.6-167.15 pertaining to the administration of the agency's Business Enterprises of Texas. The Commission also adopts new §167.17. §§167.2, 167.3, 167.4, 167.6, 167.8-167.15, and §167.17 are adopted without changes to the text proposed in the May 23, 2003, issue of the Texas Register (28 TexReg 4083) and will not be republished. §167.7 is adopted with changes.

The Commission received comments on the proposed rules from the Elected Committee of Managers. The changes to §167.7 reflect the results of a meeting in which representatives of the Elected Committee of Managers (ECM) participated in additional discussions about the agency's procedures for making initial and career advancement assignments. The discussions were held in compliance with §107b-1 of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 U. S. C., Chapter 6A, §107 et seq.). During the course of the meeting, representatives of the Elected Committee of Managers (ECM) recommended several changes, summarized as follows:

The ECM chairman recommended changes to paragraph 9 of §167.7 to require the same selection and assignment procedures for level one and level two facilities. He suggested eliminating the establishment of a pool of impartial and qualified individuals from which to draw a third panel member to facilitate promotional selection panels for level two facilities. The board disagrees with the recommendation and did not eliminate the selection method for career advancement selections. The random selection of an impartial person connected neither to the Commission nor managers to facilitate the panel interview and selection process for promotion assignments better ensures a fair and unbiased decision. With regard to (9)(H) pertaining to duties of selection panels, the ECM representatives recommended that changes be made to ensure that panels give greater weight to the interview portion of the selection process than the business plan score and performance evaluation score. The recommended weighted ratio was 60/20/20 for all career advancement panels. The board agrees and has made the changes.

The ECM chairman also recommended the total elimination of subsections (i) and (j) pertaining to improper contacts, stating that the rules are unnecessarily harsh. Another ECM representative suggested the insertion of "alleged" before improper contact in the subsections. The board disagrees with the elimination of the subsections because of the need to protect the integrity of the selection process, but agrees with the suggestion to modify the subsections with the words "alleged" and "improperly" where appropriate. In addition, the board is modifying the subsection to ensure that the ECM chairman receives notices of alleged improper contacts when they are reported. The board is also changing subsection (j) to have reports of improper contact be made to the BET director in lieu of the executive director for administrative purposes.

The amendments and new section are adopted under Human Resources Code §94.012, which authorizes the Commission to promulgate rules for the administration of the vending facility program, and §94.016, which authorizes the Commission to administer the program in accordance with the provisions of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 U.S.C. Section 107 et seq.).

The adoption affects no other statutes.

§167.7.Initial and Career Advancement Assignment Procedures.

(a) Purpose. This section defines the process for the initial and career advancement assignments of managers. It is the goal of the process to provide a fair, unbiased, and impartial process for selection, transfer, and promotion.

(b) Initial assignment. Upon successful completion of BET training, the initial assignment for a newly-licensed licensee shall be made by the BET director. The initial assignment shall be for a minimum of 12 months. The BET director shall make the assignment based on the following:

(1) availability of a Level 1 facility;

(2) recommendations from the BET training specialist and the ECM chairperson;

(3) licensee's training records;

(4) licensee's geographical concerns; and

(5) any other circumstances on a case-by-case basis.

(c) Career advancement assignments.

(1) Availability. All career advancement opportunities are dependent upon the availability of BET facilities. No facility with a projected annual income equal to the annual median income level of all managers or $30,000, whichever is the greater after set-aside fees, shall be used for an initial assignment unless it has first been advertised and made available to all licensees in the BET Program and no one has been assigned to such facility as a result of the advertising process.

(2) Notice. As BET facilities become available and ready for permanent assignment, written notice of such availability shall be given to all licensees within 30 business days .

(3) On-site visits. An advertised facility shall be available for onsite visits upon reasonable notice by applicants.

(4) Eligibility. To apply for an available facility, a licensee must meet the following requirements:

(A) The licensee must have successfully managed a BET facility for a minimum of one year.

(B) The licensee must have been current on all accounts payable for the preceding 12 months prior to the date of the facility announcement.

(C) The licensee must not be on probation under the section of these rules relating to administrative actions.

(D) The licensee must meet eligibility requirements of the facility's host organization.

(E) The licensee must not have submitted two or more insufficient fund checks to the Commission within the 12 months prior to the date of the facility announcement.

(F) The licensee must not have submitted two or more late reports within the 12 months prior to the date of the facility announcement.

(G) If unassigned, the licensee must have fulfilled all resignation requirements in the licensee's last facility or be displaced and eligible to apply for a facility.

(H) The manager must have an inventory of merchandise and expendables in the manager's current facility as the Commission has determined sufficient for its satisfactory operation.

(I) The licensee must satisfy the Commission that he can acquire the merchandise and expendables required for the available facility.

(J) A licensee who has been placed on probation is not eligible for promotion and transfer for 30 days following release from probation.

(K) A licensee who has been placed on probation twice within a twelve-month period is not eligible for promotion or transfer for six months following release from probation.

(L) A licensee who has been placed on probation three times within a two-year period is not eligible for promotion or transfer for one year following release from probation.

(5) BET application deadline. A licensee may apply for an available facility by submitting an application not later than the 12th business day (exclusive of date of mailing) after the date the facility notice was mailed. The submission date shall be:

(A) the date the application is delivered to the Commission; or

(B) 3 days after deposit of the application in the United States mail, whichever is earlier; or

(C) the date the application is delivered to an overnight courier.

(6) BET application contents. A copy of the current form of the application shall be included in the BET manual. The substance of the application form shall not be modified except by action of the Commission's board. Modifications shall be provided to all licensees prior to their effective date. Upon request by the manager and prior to the submission deadline, assistance is available from the local BET staff and ECM representative in completing the BET Application Form.

(7) Preliminary review of applications. Commission staff and the ECM representative in each geographic area in which the applying licensees are currently located shall review all applications from their areas and shall verify the applicant's eligibility. In the event an ECM representative is an applicant for an available BET facility, the ECM chairperson shall appoint another ECM member for the review. Completed applications shall then be forwarded to the BET director who shall provide copies to the ECM and Commission staff in the area in which the available facility is located.

(8) Level 1 assignments. Assignments to Level 1 facilities shall be made by the BET director after reviewing the recommendations and assessments of all applicants conducted by the ECM representative and Commission staff for the regions in which the available facilities are located.

(9) Level 2 assignments. For Level 2 assignments, the following additional procedures shall apply:

(A) Business plan. An applicant must submit a business plan to the BET director no later than the 20th business day after the postmark date on the notice of facility availability. Upon request by an applicant, the Commission staff in the area in which the available facility is located shall provide a standard packet of information to the applicant containing information necessary to prepare the business plan. The Commission staff shall deliver the packet to the applicant no later than the 3rd business day after receiving a request.

(B) Establishment of pool of impartial and qualified individuals. The Commission shall establish and maintain a pool of qualified individuals. The pool members shall be individuals who:

(i) have no personal, professional, or financial interest that would be in conflict with the objectivity of the individual;

(ii) neither have nor have had any association with the Commission or Business Enterprises of Texas prior to being considered as a pool member; and

(iii) have at least 5 years experience in business at a managerial or executive level, including experience in budget preparation and administration, personnel supervision or management; and administration of business plans or equivalents to business plans in the sector of business in which the person has experience.

(C) Evaluation of business plans. All business plans shall be reviewed and evaluated by an individual chosen at random from the pool of impartial and qualified individuals. Business plans shall be evaluated and scored based on a scoring system of 100 points. The evaluations and scores shall then be forwarded to the BET director for consideration by the selection panel in the selection process.

(D) Selection panel. A selection panel consisting of one representative from the ECM, one Commission staff member, and one individual from the pool of impartial and qualified individuals shall be chosen by means of a computer program that selects randomly from a database. The selection of each panel member shall be from among all persons within their respective categories, except that the impartial member may not be the individual who evaluated the business plans. If the member of a category of panel members who is selected is unable or refuses to serve, the BET director shall use the same method of random selection until three members are chosen.

(E) Presiding officer. The impartial panel member shall serve as the presiding officer of the selection panel.

(F) Interview notices. Applicants shall be notified by first class U. S. Mail of the date, place and time of the selection panel interview no fewer than 10 business days prior to the convening of the selection panel.

(G) Selection panel materials. Completed applications, business plans, and each applicant's most recent performance evaluation shall be provided to the selection panel members no fewer than 5 business days prior to the date the selection panel is to convene.

(H) Duties of selection panel. The selection panel shall review the documents provided and interview the applicants. The panel shall prepare a tabulation sheet for each manager on which the member will enter the business plan score and performance evaluation score previously received by the applicant. A third score shall be awarded by each panel member for the interview performance of the applicant. Each interview shall be rated on a maximum score of 100 based on such areas as the quality of the applicant's presentation, knowledge of the submitted business plan, and preparation for the assignment. Each applicant shall be interviewed on the same areas and given a similar amount of time to present their case. While questions must necessarily be tailored to each individual's business plan, presentation, and knowledge, the panel should strive to conduct the interviews as similarly as possible. The selection panel shall then rank the top three applicants. An applicant's ranking shall be determined after weighting each applicant's business plan score by 20%, weighting each applicant's most recent performance evaluation by 20%, and weighting the average interview score received by panel members by 60%. In the event of a tie in scores, the panel will award one point to whichever applicant has the greater length of accumulated service as an assigned manager in a BET facility according to BET records, thereby breaking the tie. The selections shall be transmitted to the BET director, who shall in turn notify the highest ranked applicant of the decision of the selection panel. The available facility shall be offered to the applicants in order of ranking.

(I) Reports of improper contact. Members of the selection panel must report alleged improper contacts to the BET director or the executive director. Improper contact is defined as any communication with a member of the selection panel for the purpose of improperly influencing or manipulating, directly or indirectly, the selection of an applicant for the facility being considered for assignment. Nothing contained in this section, however, shall be deemed to prohibit any licensee from endorsing or supporting any candidate for selection by furnishing a letter or other document to that effect to be included with the applying licensee's application. At the conclusion of the selection panel's responsibilities, each panel member shall be required to sign a statement certifying whether the member had, or had knowledge of, an improper contact during the selection proceedings.

(J) Process for investigating reports of improper contact. When alleged improper contact is reported, each applicant for the facility under consideration and the ECM Chairman shall be informed as to the occurrence of an alleged improper contact. The information provided to the applicants shall describe the nature of the alleged improper contact but shall not divulge the identities of any persons allegedly participating in such improper contact. Each applicant may make objection to continuation by the existing panel and request that a new panel be formed to select the manager for the available facility. The BET Director, upon the request of any applicant for the facility, shall determine if the improper contact is such as to require that the panel be disbanded and a new panel formed. In making that decision, the BET Director shall consider all relevant factors, including the objections, if any, of the applicants, to determine if the improper contact is likely to influence the decision of the selection panel. If the BET Director determines that the improper contact is likely to influence the selection process, the BET Director shall direct that the panel be disbanded and that a new panel be formed to consider the selection for the facility being considered. The BET Director shall inform all applicants of his decision to continue the selection process with the existing panel or to form a new panel and shall state the basis of the decision. The actions prescribed as a consequence of improper contact set forth in policies pertaining to administrative actions shall apply whether or not any improper contact results in the panel being disbanded.

(K) Exceptions to assignment and selection procedures. Unusual circumstances may require exceptions to assignment and selection procedures. Exceptions to these procedures shall be made only if the circumstance is not covered by assignment procedures and failure to react to the circumstance would be detrimental to BET or a licensee. Notwithstanding anything in this section, no exceptional procedure shall result in the removal of a manager from a facility except for reasons contained in policies pertaining to administrative actions. Assignment and selection decisions that are exceptions to these procedures shall be made by the BET director after discussing relevant information with the ECM chairperson and receiving the chairperson's recommendation. Should a decision contrary to the ECM chairperson's recommendation be made, the BET director shall provide a written explanation of the decision to the ECM chairperson.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 11, 2003.

TRD-200305023

Terrell I. Murphy

Executive Director

Texas Commission for the Blind

Effective date: October 1, 2003

Proposal publication date: May 23, 2003

For further information, please call: (512) 377-0611