Part 1.
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Chapter 90.
INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS
Subchapter D. STRATEGICALLY DIRECTED REGULATORY STRUCTURE
30 TAC §§90.50, 90.52, 90.54, 90.56, 90.58, 90.60, 90.62, 90.64, 90.66, 90.68, 90.70, 90.72
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission
or TCEQ) adopts new §§90.50, 90.52, 90.54, 90.56, 90.58, 90.60,
90.62, 90.64, 90.66, 90.68, 90.70, and 90.72. Sections 90.52, 90.54, 90.56,
90.58, 90.60, 90.62, 90.64, 90.66, 90.68, 90.70, and 90.72 are adopted
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ADOPTED RULES
The 77th Legislature re-authorized the commission following an extensive
review by the Sunset Advisory Commission. The legislature re-authorized the
commission in House Bill 2912, 77th Legislature, 2001, and in Texas Water
Code (TWC), §5.755, Strategically Directed Regulatory Structure, directed
the commission to develop an initial rule for a strategically directed regulatory
structure that will provide incentives for enhanced environmental performance.
The legislature further directed the commission to develop the strategically
directed regulatory structure based on a person's compliance history classification
and voluntary measures undertaken by the person to improve environmental quality.
House Bill 2912 also requires that these initial rules be adopted by September
1, 2003 and the final rules be adopted by September 2005.
This initial rulemaking is intended to establish a system whereby persons
interested in participating in the commission's innovative programs may also
apply for incentives in recognition of their participation in these programs.
While the initial system will involve a case-by-case review and approval methodology,
it is the commission's intention to eventually develop a more streamlined
system, in which persons meeting certain eligibility requirements will be
able to receive a variety of appropriate incentives from an established menu
of options that will include federal, as well as state incentives. In developing
this system, the commission will make every effort to work with the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to develop consistent and meaningful
incentives for participation in innovative programs. Initial steps have already
been made in this direction through the development of a memorandum of agreement
between the commission and EPA on harmonizing application requirements for
certain environmental leadership programs.
TWC, §5.752, Definitions, defines strategically directed regulatory
structure as a program that is designed to use innovative programs to provide
maximum environmental benefit and to reward compliance performance. This section
defines innovative program as a program developed by the commission under
this subchapter, TWC, Chapter 26 or 27, or Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter
361, 382, or 401 that provides incentives to a person in return for benefits
to the environment that exceed benefits that would result from compliance
with applicable legal requirements under the commission's jurisdiction. TWC, §5.755,
requires that an innovative program offered as part of the strategically directed
regulatory structure must be consistent with other law and any requirement
necessary to maintain federal program authorization. Section 5.755 also defines
the commission's flexible permit program and regulatory flexibility program
as innovative programs.
In the Sunset Advisory Commission Staff Report, 2000, Management Action,
3.5, the Sunset Advisory Commission recommended that the commission "expand
opportunities for public participation within innovative regulatory programs."
The Sunset Advisory Commission stated that this recommendation, ". . .would
encourage TNRCC {now TCEQ} to find more ways for the public to participate
in its innovative regulatory programs. Since these programs offer an alternative
to traditional regulatory processes, greater public participation is a key
to ensuring accountability." (Sunset Advisory Commission Staff Report, Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 2000, page 38.)
To meet these legislative mandates and the Sunset Advisory Commission recommendation,
the commission solicited comments from a formal advisory group. The executive
director's staff worked with the Pollution Prevention Advisory Committee in
developing the process, structural elements, and appropriate incentives for
these rules. The legislature designated the committee, created by House Bill
2912 from the Waste Reduction Advisory Committee, to advise the commission
during this rulemaking process under Texas Health and Safety Code, §361.0215.
Accordingly, agency staff made a series of presentations to the committee
during the development of this proposal to solicit feedback, and will continue
to do so throughout the rulemaking process.
Additionally, the agency staff reviewed rules from other state environmental
agencies regarding innovative programs and identified several common elements.
These elements include using a person's compliance history classification
as a basis for tracking and/or admission to innovative regulatory programs;
using a tiered regulatory approach, in which the conventional compliance system
is used as the base-level tier and "beyond compliance" schemes are used for
higher tiers; providing technical assistance that is explicitly linked to
compliance and enforcement strategies; using environmental management systems
as compliance tools and requirements for participation in upper tier programs;
and encouraging participation in upper tier programs through incentives. Some
of the incentives used to move entities into higher tiers include recognition
for superior performance, regulatory flexibility, "single point of contact"
management through the regulatory process, and additional technical assistance
for meeting goals. Finally, several programs that the executive director's
staff reviewed contain strong public participation components, like active
stakeholder involvement in decision-making about project goals or in managing
projects either through a contract or a charter.
The purpose of these adopted rules is to establish a systematic approach
for using innovative programs to achieve maximum environmental benefit and
to reward compliance performance. As allowed by TWC, §5.755, one of the
factors the executive director must use to determine whether a person is eligible
for an incentive under an innovative program is that person's compliance history
classification. In December 2001, the commission adopted the definition of
compliance history and in August 2002 amended 30 TAC Chapter 60, Compliance
History, to include the process the commission uses in determining a person's
compliance history classification. These adopted rules reference the commission's
existing compliance history requirements and do not create a new evaluation
process to assess a person's compliance history classification. These adopted
rules reward good compliance and actions which exceed regulatory requirements
by providing meaningful incentives. Examples of categories of innovative programs
and incentives include alternative methods of compliance, burden reduction,
and recognition.
Additional incentives adopted in these rules include on-site technical
assistance, accelerated access to program information, and modification of
state or federal regulatory requirements that do not change emission or discharge
limits. These classes of incentives were identified in a related piece of
legislation, House Bill 2997, dealing with the establishment of an environmental
management system, and in a set of incentives proposed for the EPA's National
Environmental Performance Track Program and the EPA's Innovation Policy. These
classes of incentives were included in these adopted rules because they were
broad enough to cover most incentives available to the commission, because
they are similar to the list of incentives related to compliance history,
and finally because they have a firm legislative mandate under the terms of
House Bill 2997.
Also to evaluate a person's eligibility, the adopted rules provide that
the executive director may consider whether the proposal will address regional
environmental concerns. Potential environmental needs include, but are not
limited to, reducing ozone and ozone precursors in air quality nonattainment
and near nonattainment areas; reducing water pollution in impaired waters
and waters of concern; taking corrective action or remediation of contaminated
sites; addressing potential cumulative impacts from air emissions or wastewater
discharges; and providing needed ambient monitoring to enhance current efforts.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission has changed the name of Chapter 90 from Regulatory Flexibility
and Environmental Management Systems to Innovative Programs to better reflect
the contents of the chapter.
Subchapter D: Strategically Directed Regulatory
Structure
The commission has created a new Subchapter D, Strategically Directed Regulatory
Structure, to accommodate the new rule sections that outline how a person
would become eligible to request regulatory incentives through the commission's
strategically directed regulatory structure.
Adopted new §90.50, Purpose, explains that the purpose of Subchapter
D is to implement TWC, §5.755, to establish a framework for innovative
programs to provide for enhanced environmental performance and to reward compliance
performance.
Adopted new §90.52, Applicability, specifies the activities to which
Subchapter D applies.
Adopted new §90.52(a) specifies that the provisions of Subchapter
D apply to all persons subject to the requirements of TWC, Chapters 26 and
27, and Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapters 361, 382, and 401. Activities
that are regulated under these chapters include, but are not limited to, the
management and disposal of industrial solid waste, hazardous waste, or municipal
solid waste (including composting, sewage sludge, and water treatment sludge)
regulated under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act, Texas Health and Safety
Code, Chapter 361; discharges to surface water and groundwater regulated under
TWC, Chapter 26; petroleum storage tanks regulated under TWC, Chapter 26;
disposal of waste by underground injection regulated under TWC, Chapter 27;
emission sources of air contaminants regulated under Texas Health and Safety
Code, Chapter 382; and management and disposal of radioactive material regulated
under Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 401. This subsection implements
TWC, §5.751, Applicability, which specifies that programs under the jurisdiction
of the commission under TWC, Chapters 26 and 27 and Texas Health and Safety
Code, Chapters 361, 382, and 401 are eligible to participate in performance-based
regulation. The commission added the words "but not limited to" to specify
that the list of applicable regulatory activities is not an exhaustive list.
Adopted new §90.52(b) specifies that this subchapter does not apply
to occupational licensing programs or other programs specifically exempted
by statute. This subsection implements TWC, §5.751.
Adopted new §90.54, Single Point of Contact, specifies that the executive
director or the executive director's designee will serve as the single point
of contact within the agency to coordinate all innovative programs. This provision
is included to implement TWC, §5.757, which was added to the TWC by House
Bill 2912.
Adopted new §90.54 requires that the executive director, or the executive
director's designee, acting as the coordinator must inventory, coordinate,
and market and evaluate all innovative programs; provide information and technical
assistance to persons participating in or interested in participating in those
programs; and work with the Pollution Prevention Advisory Committee or its
successor(s) to assist the commission in integrating the innovative programs
into the agency's operations, including program administration, strategic
planning, and staff training. The commission adopted this requirement to implement
TWC, §5.757. In §90.54(3) the commission added "or its successors"
to clarify that even if the name of the Pollution Prevention Advisory Committee
changes, the commission will still work with this group in integrating innovative
programs into the agency's operations and changed the word "commission" to
"agency" to meet current agency rule writing standards.
Adopted new §90.56, Eligibility, specifies the eligibility requirements
for Subchapter D.
Adopted new §90.56(a) provides that except as provided in subsection
(b) or (c) of this section, a person whose application to participate in an
innovative program or whose application for an incentive meets the minimum
standards of §90.62 is eligible to receive regulatory incentives under
this chapter. The commission changed the word "title" to "chapter" to more
clearly define the location of Subchapter B. The commission adopted this subsection
to avoid making a person apply twice for the same incentives when that person's
eligibility has already been established.
Adopted new §90.56(b) explains that a person who has incurred a judgment
in a suit brought by the Texas or United States attorney general against the
site for which the person is requesting regulatory incentives, is ineligible
to participate in an innovative program or to receive regulatory incentives
at that site for a period of five years after the date the judgment was final.
The commission adopted this subsection for consistency with the requirements
in Chapter 60.
Adopted new §90.56(c) explains that a person who has been convicted
of willfully or knowingly committing an environmental crime regarding the
site for which the person is requesting to participate in an innovative program
or requesting regulatory incentives is ineligible to receive regulatory incentives
for using an environmental management system for a period of three years after
the date of the conviction. The commission adopted this subsection for consistency
with the requirements in Chapter 90, Subchapter C.
Adopted new §90.56(d) provides that a person will be accepted into
a strategically directed regulatory structure by meeting the criteria and
standards for regulatory flexibility under Subchapter B; the criteria and
standards to receive incentives for using an environmental management system
under Subchapter C; the criteria and standards of programs authorized as innovative
by the executive director; the criteria and standards for flexible permits
under 30 TAC Chapter 116; or the criteria and standards set forth under this
subchapter. The commission adopted this subsection to conform with the rules
for innovative programs and to avoid a person having to submit multiple applications
for the same incentives.
Adopted new §90.56(e) specifies that incentives granted under one
innovative program do not guarantee incentives offered under another innovative
program, except where those incentives are equivalent. This provision is adapted
from Chapter 90, Subchapter B.
Adopted new §90.58, Definitions, defines the terms used in Subchapter
D.
Applicable legal requirement is defined as an environmental law, regulation,
permit, order, consent decree, or other requirement. This definition is taken
from TWC, §5.752.
Enhanced environmental performance is defined as an activity by a person,
including any measurable voluntary action undertaken by a person to improve
environmental quality, which reduces or eliminates discharges or emissions
of pollutants to an extent that is greater than required by applicable legal
requirements; provides an overall reduction of discharges or emissions of
pollutants from a site to an extent that is greater than required by applicable
legal requirements; reduces a negative impact on air, water, land, natural
resources, or human health to an extent that is greater than required by applicable
legal requirements; or other activity determined by the executive director
to be greater than required by applicable legal requirements. The commission
developed this definition from the regulatory flexibility rules in Chapter
90, Subchapter B; and from TWC, §5.755(c).
Environmental outcome is defined as a measurable or discernable improvement
in the quality of air, water, land, or natural resources or in the protection
of the environment as determined by the executive director. This definition
is based on agency practices for measurement of environmental trends as used
by the commission in its strategic plan and the Small Business and Environmental
Assistance Division's definition of environmental outcomes for innovative
programs.
Innovative program is defined as a program developed by the commission
under TWC, Subchapter Q, Performance-Based Regulations, TWC, Chapter 26 or
27, or Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361, 382, or 401, that provides
incentives to a person in return for benefits to the environment that exceed
benefits that would result from compliance with applicable legal requirements;
the flexible permit program administered by the agency under Texas Health
and Safety Code, Chapter 382, and defined in Chapter 116; or the regulatory
flexibility program defined in Chapter 90, Subchapter B. The environmental
management system program and voluntary programs designated as innovative
by the executive director administered by the Small Business and Environmental
Assistance Division or that division's successor are also included as innovative
programs. This definition is taken from TWC, §5.752, and has been modified
for clarity. For readability, the commission deleted "under the commission's
jurisdiction" in §90.58(4)(a); changed the word "commission" to "agency"
in §90.58(4)(B); and deleted the word "commission" in §90.58(4)(E)
to meet current agency rule writing standards. The commission added "designated
as innovative by the executive director" to specify that it is the executive
director who determines if a program is innovative.
Maximum environmental benefit is defined as the overall long-term goal
of the agency for environmental improvement which is accomplished by enhanced
environmental performance over time from individual reductions in discharges
or emissions of pollutants by persons who reduce the negative impacts on water,
air, land, natural resources, or human health to an extent that is greater
than required by applicable legal requirements. TWC, §5.752(5), defines
strategically directed regulatory structure as " . . .a program that is designed
to use innovative programs to provide maximum environmental benefit and to
reward compliance performance." The commission developed this definition to
provide notice to persons seeking incentives through the strategically directed
regulatory structure program about how the goal of the strategically directed
regulatory structure program will be assessed. The commission changed the
word "commission" to "agency" to meet current agency rule writing standards.
Permit is defined as a license, certificate, registration, approval, permit
by rule, standard permit, or other form of authorization issued by the commission
under the TWC or Texas Health and Safety Code. This definition is taken from
TWC, §5.752, as amended by House Bill 2912. The commission adopted this
definition of permit for consistency with the strategically directed regulatory
structure framework set forth in House Bill 2912 and with Chapter 60.
Public participation is defined as activities by a person under this subchapter
intended to enhance public input that are not otherwise required by law or
by commission rules. This definition is based on a recommendation from the
Sunset Advisory Commission Staff Report, Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission, 2000, Issue 3.
Region is defined as a region of the Field Operations Division or that
division's successor. This definition is taken from TWC, §5.752. The
commission deleted the word "commission" to meet current agency rule writing
standards.
Site is defined as, except with regard to portable units, all regulated
units, facilities, equipment, structures, or sources at one street address
or location that are owned or operated by the same person. Site includes any
property identified in the permit or used in connection with the regulated
activity at the same street address or location. A site for a portable regulated
unit or facility is any location where the unit or facility is or has operated.
This definition is taken from §60.2(a).
Strategically directed regulatory structure is defined as a program that
is designed to use innovative programs to provide enhanced environmental performance
and to reward compliance performance. This definition is taken from TWC, §5.752.
Voluntary measure is defined as any program with specific performance measures
undertaken by a person to improve environmental quality that is not required
by rule or law. The commission developed this based on its experience developing
and implementing voluntary compliance and voluntary pollution reduction programs,
including the Clean Texas Program, Clean Industries, Clean Cities, and Clean
Texas Star.
Adopted new §90.60, Incentives, specifies the criteria that the executive
director will use when determining whether to grant an incentive.
Adopted new §90.60(a) specifies that a person's compliance history
classification will be used in determining eligibility for incentives. This
subsection also specifies that the executive director must consider a person's
voluntary measures undertaken to improve environmental quality. The executive
director may weigh more favorably voluntary measures that are related to the
specific media for which a person is requesting incentives or participation
in an innovative program. This section implements TWC, §5.755(b)(1) and
(2), which requires the commission to base incentives offered under a strategically
directed regulatory structure on a person's compliance history classification
and voluntary measures undertaken by a person to improve environmental quality.
Adopted new §90.60(b) allows the executive director to consider any
other factor that provides enhanced environmental performance that the executive
director finds relevant.
The executive director may also consider whether a person voluntarily engages
in restoring, enhancing, or preserving natural resources, or whether a person
mentors and/or helps other individuals and entities to comply with environmental
requirements, limits discharges or emissions of pollutants, or in some other
way minimizes the negative effects on air, water, land, natural resources,
or human health. Moreover, the executive director may consider efforts by
a person to address environmental issues beyond their own operations; efforts
made by the person to include stakeholder involvement and environmental reporting
of the person's environmental program with consideration to the size and resources
of the specific site; or whether a person undertakes community-based initiatives
that improve environmental quality or reduce environmental impacts.
Moreover, the executive director may also take into consideration the voluntary
measures a person has undertaken that contribute towards goals set in the
commission's strategic plan; that address environmental issues of local or
community concern; or that address environmental initiatives developed by
the regulated community. This section provides criteria that assist in implementing
TWC, §5.755(a) and (b), which directs the commission to develop a strategically
directed regulatory structure that offers incentives based on compliance history
classification and voluntary measures undertaken to improve environmental
quality.
Adopted new §90.60(c) specifies that the incentives the executive
director may offer for participation in innovative programs include, but are
not limited to, one point of contact for coordinating innovative programs;
technical assistance provided by the agency; accelerated access to agency
information; modification of state or federal regulatory requirements that
do not increase existing emission or discharge limits; flexibility in regulatory
processes; and public recognition. For consistency, the commission has taken
these incentives primarily from Chapter 90, Subchapter C. The commission changed
the word "commission" to "agency" to meet current agency rule writing standards
and deleted "that do not require modification of regulatory requirements"
for readability.
Adopted new §90.60(d) requires that an innovative program offered
as part of the strategically directed regulatory structure must be consistent
with other laws and any requirement necessary to maintain federal program
authorization, including the provisions of any agreements between the agency
and the federal government. This section implements TWC, §5.755(c), which
requires that any innovative programs offered as part of the strategically
directed regulatory structure be consistent with other laws and requirements
necessary to maintain federal program authorization. The commission changed
the word "commission" to "agency" to meet current agency rule writing standards.
Adopted new §90.62, Application, explains the requirements a person
must follow to apply for a regulatory incentive.
Adopted new §90.62(a) explains that a person who applies to the executive
director for a regulatory flexibility project or to use an environmental management
system under Chapter 90, or for a flexible permit under Chapter 116 or another
program that is designated as innovative under TWC, §5.752(2)(a), does
not need to submit another application under this subchapter. A person would,
however, need to submit another application under this subchapter if the person
requests incentives different from those incentives provided in another innovative
program under Subchapter D in which the person is already participating or
applying. Further, this subsection specifies that compliance with this provision
does not relieve the person from complying with all other applicable legal
requirements. For consistency, the provisions in this section are drawn from
the regulatory flexibility requirements in Chapter 90, Subchapter B, and the
requirements for using an environmental management system in Chapter 90, Subchapter
C. This section implements the requirements for providing incentives for participation
in innovative programs under TWC, §5.755.
Adopted new §90.62(b) specifies that within 30 days after receipt
of an application, the executive director must mail written notification informing
the person that the application is administratively complete or that it is
deficient. This subsection also allows the person who submitted the application
33 days to correct any deficiencies. Furthermore, the executive director may
request additional technical information within 60 days after issuing an administrative
completeness letter. If the person does not provide the requested technical
information within 33 days, the application will be sent back to the person
without further action by the executive director. This section also allows
a person to refile the application if the executive director sends the application
back based on reasons specified in this subsection. Upon request, the executive
director may provide additional time for a person to submit information regarding
the person's application to use an innovative program or to request an incentive.
The commission developed this subsection by adapting similar provisions in
Chapter 90, Subchapter B, and the requirements for using an environmental
management system in Chapter 90, Subchapter C. The commission deleted "to
use an innovative program or to request an incentive under this section" from
the rule language because the phrase is not necessary and to meet current
agency rule writing standards. The commission changed "30 days from the date
of receipt of the notice" to "33 days from the date of the notice" for consistency
throughout this rule and to be consistent with other agency rules. The commission
also changed the word "from" to the word "after" to make clear that the person
must provide the technical information within 33 days after the date of the
request. Additionally, the commission changed the word "applicant" to "person"
for consistency of terms throughout the rule.
Adopted new §90.62(c) requires the executive director to review the
person's application as well as the person's and site's compliance history
classification. This subsection implements TWC, §5.755(b)(1), which requires
the commission to base incentives offered under strategically directed regulatory
structure on compliance history classification. The commission added "submitted
under this section" to the rule language to specify that the applications
the executive director is going to review are the applications submitted under
this section. Additionally, the commission modified the rule language by deleting
"defined by" and adding "determined under" to make clear that it is Chapter
60 that will be used to determine a person's and site's compliance history
classification.
Adopted new §90.62(d) lists the items an application must, at a minimum,
include for participation in the strategically directed regulatory structure.
These items include a narrative summary of the proposal or project, including
the specific statutes or commission rules under which participation is being
sought; reference to the specific permit provision or regulation the person
requests to modify; and a detailed explanation, including a demonstration
as appropriate, that the proposal or project is more protective of the environment
and the public health than the method or standard prescribed by the statute
or commission rules that would otherwise apply; and that the proposal or project
is not inconsistent with federal law, including any requirement for a federally
approved or authorized program. Additional application requirements include
a description of any public participation component associated with the proposed
project; where appropriate, a project monitoring schedule which includes a
proposal for monitoring, recordkeeping, and/or reporting of environmental
performance and compliance; any documented results from the project demonstrating
that the project produces a measurable environmental outcome that enhances
environmental performance; an explanation of how the project will be consistent
with the needed environmental outcome/regional plan if the applicant chooses
a project that will address a regional environmental issue identified in the
agency's strategic plan, as amended; and any information requested from the
person by the executive director. The commission developed this subsection
by adapting similar provisions in Chapter 90, Subchapters B and C. The commission
changed the word "commission" to "agency" to meet current agency rule writing
standards.
Adopted new §90.62(e) requires the application to be signed, certifying
that all information is true, accurate, and complete to the best of the signatory's
knowledge. The commission developed this subsection by adapting similar provisions
in Chapter 90, Subchapters B and C.
Adopted new §90.62(f) requires the person to submit an original and
two copies of the signed application to the executive director for review,
and to send one additional copy to the regional office for the region in which
the site is located. A list of the regional offices can be found at
Adopted new §90.62(g) requires a person whose application is approved
by the executive director to maintain records and other supporting information
which shows that voluntary environmental measures associated with incentives
approved by the executive director are being carried out and are resulting
in enhanced environmental performance. Access to the site and all records
and data must be retained at the site and/or must be readily available for
review by an agency representative for a period of three years after the date
of any record or sample, measurement, report, application, or certification.
This period must be extended at the written request of the executive director.
The commission adapted this section from similar provisions regarding environmental
management systems in Chapter 90, Subchapter C. The commission changed the
word "commission" to "agency" to meet current agency rule writing standards.
Adopted new §90.64, Requests for Modification of State or Federal
Regulatory Requirements, outlines the requirements a person must meet when
requesting modifications of state or federal regulatory requirements.
Adopted new §90.64(a) requires persons who request modifications of
state or federal regulatory requirements which cannot be authorized by any
other approval method except a commission order to follow the requirements
of §90.62. The commission adapted this section from similar provisions
regarding regulatory flexibility in Chapter 90, Subchapter B.
Adopted §90.64(b) requires persons who request modification of federal
regulatory requirements under this subchapter to also meet the requirements
of agreements between the EPA and the agency to receive federal regulatory
incentives. This section implements TWC, §5.755(c), which requires that
any innovative programs offered as part of the strategically directed regulatory
structure be consistent with other laws and requirements necessary to maintain
federal program authorization. The commission changed the word "commission"
to "agency" to meet current agency rule writing standards.
Adopted new §90.64(c) requires persons who request modification of
federal regulatory requirements under this chapter to include a public participation
component in the project proposal. This section implements Management Action,
3.5, Sunset Commission Staff Report, 2000, to expand opportunities for public
participation within innovative regulatory programs.
Adopted new §90.66, Review by Executive Director Required, specifies
that the incentives the executive director grants must be terminated if a
person's or site's compliance history classification has declined to a lower
classification than the person or site had assigned at the time the incentives
were approved.
Adopted new §90.66(a) requires any person who receives incentives
under this subchapter to submit a progress report to the executive director
every two years documenting the enhanced environmental performance of the
project and specifies what the report must include. The commission adapted
this section from similar provisions in Chapter 90, Subchapters B and C. The
commission added "to the executive director" to the rule language to specify
that it is the executive director who should receive the progress report.
The commission also added the word "initial" to the rule language to specify
that the progress report should be submitted every two years from the date
of initial written approval. Additionally, the commission added "for the incentives"
to the rule language to specify that the initial written approval is for the
incentives.
Adopted new §90.66(b) specifies that at least once every two years,
the executive director must review the latest compliance history classification
available for the person and the site receiving incentives under this chapter,
as determined under §60.2. This subsection also requires the executive
director to review the latest progress reports required to be submitted under
this chapter and any voluntary measures undertaken by the person and site
receiving incentives under this chapter to enhance environmental performance
since any previous biennial review. The commission adapted this section from
similar provisions in Chapter 90, Subchapters B and C. The commission added
the word "initial" to the rule language to specify that the two-year time
period for the executive director to review the latest compliance history
classification begins from the date of initial written approval. Additionally,
the commission added "for the incentives" to the rule language to specify
that the executive director's written approval is for the incentives.
Adopted new §90.66(c) requires the executive director to begin termination
proceedings under §90.68 if the biennial review indicates that a person's
or site's compliance history classification has declined to a lower classification,
and the incentives were only available for the previous classification. The
commission adapted this section from similar provisions in Chapter 90, Subchapters
B and C.
Adopted new §90.66(d) requires the executive director to begin termination
proceedings under §90.68 if the executive director finds that a person's
voluntary environmental measures no longer provide enhanced environmental
performance. The commission adapted this section from similar provisions in
Chapter 90, Subchapters B and C; and TWC, §5.755.
Adopted new §90.66(e) specifies that a person who suspends or terminates
voluntary environmental measures associated with incentives granted by the
executive director must notify the executive director within ten calendar
days after the occurrence. The commission adopts this subsection to specify
that it is the person's responsibility to inform the commission when the person
has ceased the voluntary activity that was used to determine eligibility for
incentives and to be consistent with the reporting requirements for participants
in other innovative and voluntary programs of the agency.
Adopted new §90.68, Termination of Regulatory Incentives Under the
Strategically Directed Regulatory Structure, allows either the recipient of
the incentives or the executive director to terminate the incentives.
Adopted new §90.68(a) outlines the requirements for termination of
incentives by the recipient. This subsection allows a person who receives
regulatory incentives for a site under this subchapter to terminate the regulatory
incentives at any time by sending a notice of termination to the executive
director by certified mail, and requires the site for which a person received
incentives to be in compliance with all applicable legal requirements affected
by the regulatory incentives granted within 30 days after the date the incentive
is terminated. The commission adapted this section from similar provisions
in Chapter 90, Subchapters B and C. This subsection implements TWC, 5.755.
The commission changed the word "commission" to "executive director" in §90.68(a)(2)
to meet current agency rule writing standards.
Adopted new §90.68(b) outlines the requirements for termination of
incentives by the executive director. This subsection specifies that the executive
director may terminate incentives under this chapter if the executive director
finds that the person or site receiving incentives is not complying with other
applicable legal requirements, even though the site's or person's compliance
history classification has not changed. This subsection also specifies that
noncompliance with the terms and conditions of regulatory incentives, an environmental
management system approved under Chapter 90, or this subchapter, may result
in the regulatory incentives being terminated. Additionally, this subsection
specifies that if the executive director finds a person who is approved to
use regulatory incentives for a specific site under this subchapter is no
longer meeting the requirements of this subchapter, the executive director
must notify the person in writing within 90 days after the deficiencies are
found and allow the person 90 days to correct the deficiencies. If the person
does not correct the deficiencies within 90 days, the executive director will
terminate the regulatory incentives. Paragraph (5) of this subsection specifies
that if the incentives received by the person or site included exemptions
from state or federal requirements, the executive director will allow 30 days
for the person or site to be in full compliance with all requirements for
which exemptions were granted. If a permit or other authorization is required
from the commission in order for the person to be in compliance, an administratively
complete application for the permit or authorization must be submitted within
33 days after termination by the executive director. Further, a person may
request, in writing, an additional amount of time not to exceed 90 days after
the date the incentives are terminated to achieve compliance with applicable
legal requirements or apply for proper authorization. The commission changed
the word "shall" to "may" to allow the executive director discretion in the
executive director's decision to terminate. The commission changed the word
"chapter" to "title" to more clearly define the location of Subchapter B.
The commission adapted this section from similar provisions in Chapter 90,
Subchapters B and C; and TWC, §5.755.
Adopted new §90.70, Public Notice and Comment, specifies the requirements
for public notice, comment, and hearing. The commission proposes these provisions
to address the Sunset Advisory Commission's recommendation that the commission
"expand opportunities for public participation within innovative regulatory
programs." (Sunset Advisory Commission Staff Report, Texas Natural Resource
Conservation Commission, 2000, page 38.) The commission adopted this section
to implement the Sunset Commission's Management Recommendation.
Adopted new §90.70(a) requires that applicants for participation in
innovative programs with specific notice, comment, and hearing requirements
must follow the requirements under those programs notwithstanding the requirements
of this subchapter, unless the applicant is requesting additional incentives
under this subchapter. The commission adopted this subsection to be consistent
with TWC, §5.112, Public Testimony Policy; and existing statutory provisions
regarding public notice.
Adopted new §90.70(b) specifies that if an applicant for incentives
under this subchapter requests an exemption from a statute or commission rule,
the applicant must comply with all public notice, comment, and hearing requirements
associated with the statute or commission rule for which the applicant is
seeking an exemption, except as provided in subsection (c) of this section.
The commission adopted this subsection to be consistent with TWC, §5.112,
and with the Sunset Commission's Management Recommendation regarding public
participation in innovative programs, and existing statutory provisions regarding
public participation.
Adopted new §90.70(c) requires that if the specific innovative program
or statute or commission rule for which an applicant is seeking an exemption
does not require public notice, or an opportunity for comment, the applicant
must follow the requirements in §90.70(c)(1) and (2). The commission
adopted this subsection to be consistent with TWC, §5.112, the Sunset
Commission Management Recommendation regarding public participation in innovative
programs, and existing statutory provisions regarding public notice.
Adopted new §90.70(c)(1) requires the applicant to publish notice
at least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the
facility or site requesting incentives is located or proposed to be located.
The notice must be published within 30 days after the application is determined
to be administratively complete and not be smaller in font size than that
normally used in the newspaper's classified advertising section. The commission
adopted this paragraph to be consistent with TWC, §5.112, and the Sunset
Commission Management Recommendation regarding public participation in innovative
programs.
Adopted new §90.70(c)(2) requires that the executive director accept
public comment for 30 days after the last publication of the notice of application.
The commission adopted this paragraph to be consistent with TWC, §5.112,
and the Sunset Commission Management Recommendation regarding public participation
in innovative programs. The commission changed the word "commission" to "executive
director" to meet current agency rule writing standards.
Adopted new §90.70(d) lists the items that must be in the notice,
including a brief description of the proposal and of the business conducted
at the facility or activity described in the application; a brief description
of the incentive(s) requested; the name and address of the applicant and,
if different, the location of the facility for which incentives under this
subchapter are sought; the name and address of the agency; the name, address,
and telephone number of an agency contact person from whom interested persons
may obtain further information; the name of the applicant or applicant's designated
representative; a brief description of the public comment procedures; and
the date by which comments must be received by the executive director. The
commission adopted this paragraph to be consistent with TWC, §5.112,
and the Sunset Commission Management Recommendation regarding public participation
in innovative programs. The commission changed the word "commission" to "agency"
to meet current agency rule writing standards. Additionally, the commission
deleted §90.70(d)(6) since it was redundant with §90.70(d)(3). The
remaining paragraphs were renumbered accordingly.
Adopted new §90.72, Notice of Proposed Final Action, specifies the
actions the executive director will follow if comments are received and describes
the requirements for a motion to overturn.
Adopted new §90.72(a) requires that after the public comment period,
the executive director must send notice by first-class mail of the proposed
final action on the application to any person who commented during the public
comment period and to the applicant. The commission moved "of the proposed
final action on the application" between the word "notice" and the word "by"
from the end of the sentence for readability. The commission adopted this
subsection to be consistent with TWC, §5.112, and with the Sunset Commission's
Management Recommendation regarding public participation in innovative programs.
Adopted new §90.72(b) specifies that the notice must include the executive
director's decision on the application, the response to any comments submitted
during the public comment period, and a statement that any person may file
a motion to overturn the executive director's decision under subsection (c)
of this section. The commission adopted this subsection to be consistent with
TWC, §5.112, and with the Sunset Commission's Management Recommendation
regarding public participation in innovative programs.
Adopted new §90.72(c) specifies that the applicant, the executive
director, the public interest counsel, or any other person may file with the
chief clerk a motion to overturn the executive director's decision to grant
or deny incentives. A motion must be filed within 23 days after the date the
agency mails notice of the executive director's decision to the applicant
and persons who submitted timely comment. Timely motions are subject to 30
TAC §50.139(e) - (g). The provision specifies that a person whose incentives
have been terminated by the executive director may continue to receive those
incentives pending final disposition of any motion to overturn the executive
director's decision filed by the person. The commission adapted this section
from similar provisions in Chapter 90, Subchapters B and C; Chapter 60; and
TWC, §5.755. The commission added "or terminate" to the first sentence
to specify that an applicant who has had incentives terminated may file a
motion to overturn. The commission also changed the word "commission" to "agency"
in §90.72(c) to meet current agency rule writing standards.
FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed this rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis
requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined that
the rulemaking is not subject to that section because it does not meet the
definition of a "major environmental rule." "Major environmental rule" means
a rule developed with the specific intent of protecting the environment or
reducing risks to human health from environmental exposure, and that may adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the
state or a sector of the state. The specific intent of these rules is to implement
TWC, §5.755 and §5.757, which require the commission to adopt rules
to develop a strategically directed regulatory structure to provide incentives
for enhanced regulatory performance, and to adopt rules to designate a single
point of contact within the commission to coordinate all innovative programs.
Although the intent of the strategically directed regulatory structure rules
is to encourage additional protection of the environment and human health
resulting from environmental exposure, participation in the program is voluntary
and therefore should not adversely affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or
the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. Since
eligibility for participation in the program depends on verifiable environmental
enhancements, the environment and the public health and safety of the state
should be improved with implementation of the rules.
In addition, the specific intent of this rulemaking does not meet the applicability
criteria for a major environmental rule found in Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(a).
That section defines a major environmental rule as one that: 1) exceeds a
standard set by federal law, unless the rule is specifically required by state
law; 2) exceeds an express requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically
required by federal law; 3) exceeds a requirement of a delegation agreement
or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal
government to implement a state and federal program; or 4) adopts a rule solely
under the general powers of the agency instead of under a specific state law.
This rulemaking does not meet any of these four applicability requirements
of a "major environmental rule." The adopted rules do not require regulated
entities to meet a standard that exceeds a federal standard, an express requirement
of state law, or a requirement contained in a delegation agreement. The adopted
rules were not developed solely under the commission's general powers, but
rather were developed to implement the specific requirements of House Bill
2912, §4.01, which added TWC, §5.755 and §5.757.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission completed a takings impact assessment for this rulemaking
action. The specific purpose of this rulemaking is to implement House Bill
2912, §4.01, which added TWC, §5.755 and §5.757. These sections
require the commission to develop a strategically directed regulatory structure
to provide incentives for enhanced environmental performance, and to promulgate
rules designating a single point of contact within the commission to coordinate
all innovative programs. Promulgation and enforcement of the adopted rules
would be neither a statutory nor a constitutional taking because they do not
adversely affect private real property. Private property will not be adversely
affected because participation in the program is voluntary, and participation
will not prohibit activities that would otherwise be allowed on private property.
The rulemaking does not affect private property in a manner that restricts
or limits an owner's right to the property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of a governmental action. Therefore, these rules do not constitute
a taking under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
This rulemaking is subject to the Coastal Coordination Act, Texas Natural
Resources Code, §§33.201
et seq
.
and the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) and, therefore, must be consistent
with CMP goals and policies. The commission reviewed this rulemaking for consistency
with the CMP goals and policies in accordance with the regulations of the
Coastal Coordination Council, and determined that the rulemaking establishes
procedural processes and will have no substantive effect on commission actions
subject to the CMP and is therefore consistent with CMP goals and policies.
PUBLIC COMMENT
A public hearing on these rules was held in Austin on March 27, 2003, and
the public comment period closed on April 7, 2003. The agency did not receive
any oral or written comments regarding these rules.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new rules are adopted under TWC, §5.103 and §5.105, which
provide the commission the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry
out its powers and duties under this code and other laws of this state; and
TWC, §5.112, which requires the commission to develop and implement policies
that will provide the public with a reasonable opportunity to appear before
the commission and speak on any issue under the jurisdiction of the commission.
Specific statutory authorization derives from House Bill 2912, which amended
the TWC by adding §5.755. This section requires the commission to promulgate
rules to develop a strategically directed regulatory structure to provide
incentives for enhanced regulatory performance. Further specific statutory
authorization derives from House Bill 2912, which amended the TWC by adding §5.757.
This section requires the commission to promulgate rules designating a single
point of contact within the commission to coordinate all innovative programs.
§90.52.Applicability.
(a)
The provisions of this subchapter are applicable to all
persons subject to the requirements of Texas Water Code (TWC), Chapters 26
and 27, and Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), Chapters 361, 382, and 401.
The applicable regulatory activities include, but are not limited to:
(1)
management and disposal of industrial solid waste, hazardous
waste, or municipal solid waste (including composting, sewage sludge, and
water treatment sludge) regulated under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act,
THSC, Chapter 361;
(2)
discharges to surface water and groundwater regulated under
TWC, Chapter 26;
(3)
petroleum storage tanks regulated under TWC, Chapter 26;
(4)
disposal of waste by underground injection regulated under
TWC, Chapter 27;
(5)
emission sources of air contaminants regulated under THSC,
Chapter 382; and
(6)
management and disposal of radioactive material waste regulated
under THSC, Chapter 401.
(b)
This subchapter does not apply to occupational licensing
programs or other programs specifically exempted by statute.
§90.54.Single Point of Contact.
The executive director or the executive director's designee shall serve
as the single point of contact within the agency to coordinate all innovative
programs. The executive director, or the executive director's designee, acting
as the coordinator, shall:
(1)
inventory, coordinate, and market and evaluate all innovative
programs;
(2)
provide information and technical assistance to persons
participating in or interested in participating in those programs; and
(3)
work with the Pollution Prevention Advisory Committee or
its successor(s) to assist the commission in integrating the innovative programs
into the agency's operations, including:
(A)
program administration;
(B)
strategic planning; and
(C)
staff training.
§90.56.Eligibility.
(a)
Except as provided in subsection (b) or (c) of this section,
a person whose application to participate in an innovative program or whose
application for an incentive meets the minimum standards of §90.62 of
this title (relating to Application) shall be eligible to receive regulatory
incentives under this chapter.
(b)
A person who has incurred a judgment in a suit brought
by the Texas or United States attorney general against the site for which
the person is requesting regulatory incentives, is ineligible to participate
in an innovative program or to receive regulatory incentives at that site
for a period of five years after the date the judgment was final.
(c)
A person who has been convicted of willfully or knowingly
committing an environmental crime regarding the site for which the person
is requesting to participate in an innovative program or requesting regulatory
incentives is ineligible to receive regulatory incentives through participation
in an innovative program under this chapter for a period of three years after
the date of the conviction.
(d)
A person shall be accepted into a strategically directed
regulatory structure by meeting the criteria and standards for the following:
(1)
regulatory flexibility under Subchapter B of this chapter
(relating to General Provisions);
(2)
incentives for using an environmental management system
under Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Regulatory Incentives for
Using Environmental Management Systems);
(3)
programs authorized as innovative by the executive director;
(4)
flexible permits under Chapter 116 of this title (relating
to Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification);
or
(5)
other programs set forth under this subchapter.
(e)
Incentives granted under one innovative program do not
guarantee incentives offered under another innovative program, except where
those incentives are equivalent.
§90.58.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, have the
following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
Applicable legal requirement--An environmental law, regulation,
permit, order, consent, decree, or other requirement.
(2)
Enhanced environmental performance--An activity by a person,
including any measurable voluntary action undertaken by a person to improve
environmental quality, which:
(A)
reduces or eliminates discharges or emissions of pollutants
to an extent that is greater than required by applicable legal requirements;
(B)
provides an overall reduction of discharges or emissions
of pollutants from a site to an extent that is greater than required by applicable
legal requirements;
(C)
reduces a negative impact on air, water, land, natural
resources, or human health to an extent that is greater than required by applicable
legal requirements; or
(D)
is otherwise determined by the executive director to improve
environmental quality to an extent greater than required by applicable legal
requirements.
(3)
Environmental outcome--A measurable or discernable improvement
in the quality of air, water, land, or natural resources or in the protection
of the environment as determined by the executive director.
(4)
Innovative program--
(A)
a program developed by the commission under Texas Water
Code (TWC), Subchapter Q, Performance Based Regulation, TWC, Chapter 26 or
27; or Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC), Chapter 361, 382, or 401; that
provides incentives to a person in return for benefits to the environment
that exceed benefits that would result from compliance with applicable legal
requirements;
(B)
the flexible permit program administered by the agency
under THSC, Chapter 382, and defined in Chapter 116, Subchapter G of this
title (relating to Flexible Permits);
(C)
the regulatory flexibility program defined in Subchapter
B of this chapter (relating to General Provisions);
(D)
the environmental management systems program defined in
Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Regulatory Incentives for Using
Environmental Management Systems); or
(E)
other voluntary programs administered by the Small Business
and Environmental Assistance Division or that division's successor designated
as innovative by the executive director.
(5)
Maximum environmental benefit--The overall long-term goal
of the agency for environmental improvement which is accomplished by enhanced
environmental performance over time from individual reductions in discharges
or emissions of pollutants by persons who reduce the negative impacts on water,
air, land, natural resources, or human health to an extent that is greater
than required by applicable legal requirements.
(6)
Permit--A license, certificate, registration, approval,
permit by rule, standard permit, or other form of authorization issued by
the agency under the Texas Water Code or Texas Health and Safety Code.
(7)
Public participation--Activities by a person under this
subchapter intended to enhance public input that are not otherwise required
by law or by commission rules.
(8)
Region--A region of the Field Operations Division or that
division's successor.
(9)
Site--Except with regard to portable units, all regulated
units, facilities, equipment, structures, or sources at one street address
or location that are owned or operated by the same person. Site includes any
property identified in the permit or used in connection with the regulated
activity at the same street address or location. A site for a portable regulated
unit or facility is any location where the unit or facility is or has operated.
(10)
Strategically directed regulatory structure--A program
that is designed to use innovative programs to provide maximum environmental
benefit and to reward compliance performance.
(11)
Voluntary measure--A program with specific performance
measures undertaken by a person to improve environmental quality that is not
required by rule or law.
§90.60.Incentives.
(a)
In providing incentives for enhanced environmental performance,
the executive director shall offer incentives based on:
(1)
a person's and/or site's compliance history classification
under §60.2 of this title (relating to Classification); and
(2)
a person's voluntary measures, including participation
in innovative programs, to improve environmental quality. The executive director
may weigh more favorably voluntary measures that are related to the specific
media for which a person is requesting incentives or participation in an innovative
program.
(b)
In granting incentives, the executive director may also
consider any other factor that the executive director finds relevant that
leads to enhanced environmental performance.
(c)
The incentives the executive director may offer for participation
in innovative programs include, but are not limited to:
(1)
one point of contact for coordinating innovative programs;
(2)
technical assistance provided by the agency;
(3)
accelerated access to agency information;
(4)
modification of state or federal regulatory requirements
that do not increase existing emission or discharge limits or decrease public
involvement;
(5)
flexibility in regulatory processes; and
(6)
public recognition.
(d)
An innovative program offered as part of the strategically
directed regulatory structure must be consistent with other law and any requirement
necessary to maintain federal program authorization, including the provisions
of any agreements between the agency and the federal government.
§90.62.Application.
(a)
A person who applies to the executive director for a regulatory
flexibility project or to use an environmental management system under this
chapter, or for a flexible permit under Chapter 116 of this title (relating
to Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification)
or another program designated as innovative under Texas Water Code (TWC), §5.752(2),
does not need to submit another application under this section's requirements,
unless the person requests an additional incentive not available to the person
in the program in which the person is already participating or applying to
participate. Compliance with this requirement does not relieve the person
from complying with all other applicable legal requirements.
(b)
If a person seeks incentives under this section that are
not available under specific innovative programs designated in this chapter,
Chapter 116 of this title, or other programs designated as innovative under
TWC, §5.752(2), the person must submit an application to the executive
director to receive incentives available under this section. Within 30 days
after receipt of an application under this section, the executive director
shall mail written notification informing the person that the application
is administratively complete or that it is deficient.
(1)
If the application is deficient, the notification shall
specify the deficiencies, and allow the person 33 days from the date of the
notice to provide the requested information. If the person does not submit
an adequate response within the allotted time, the application will be sent
back to the person without further action by the executive director.
(2)
Additional technical information may be requested within
60 days after issuance of an administrative completeness letter. If the person
does not provide the requested technical information within 33 days after
the date of the request, the application will be sent back to the person without
further action by the executive director.
(3)
If an application is sent back to the person under paragraph
(1) or (2) of this subsection, the person may refile the application at any
time.
(4)
The person may request that the executive director allow
additional time for a person to submit information regarding the person's
application to use an innovative program or to request an incentive.
(c)
In making a determination of eligibility, the executive
director shall review the application submitted under this section, as well
as the person's and site's compliance history classification as determined
by Chapter 60 of this title (relating to Compliance History).
(d)
An application for participation in the strategically directed
regulatory structure must, at a minimum, include:
(1)
a narrative summary of the proposal or project, including
the specific statutes or commission rules under which participation is being
sought;
(2)
a specific reference to the appropriate permit provision
or citation to a regulation if the person's request is to modify an existing
state or federal regulatory requirement;
(3)
a detailed explanation, including a demonstration as appropriate,
that the proposal or project is:
(A)
more protective of the environment and the public health
than the method or standard prescribed by the statute or commission rules
that would otherwise apply; and
(B)
not inconsistent with federal law, including any requirement
for a federally approved or authorized program;
(4)
a description of any public participation component associated
with the proposal or project;
(5)
where appropriate, a project monitoring schedule which
includes a proposal for monitoring, recordkeeping, and/or reporting of environmental
performance and compliance;
(6)
any documented results from the project or estimates of
future project outcomes demonstrating that the project produces a measurable
environmental outcome that enhances environmental performance;
(7)
an explanation of how the project will be consistent with
the needed outcome/regional plan if the applicant chooses a project that will
address a regional environmental issue identified in the agency's strategic
plan, as amended; and
(8)
any necessary additional information as determined by the
executive director.
(e)
The application must be signed and must certify that all
information is true, accurate, and complete to the best of the signatory's
knowledge.
(f)
An original and two copies of the signed application shall
be submitted to the executive director for review, and one additional copy
shall be submitted to the appropriate regional office for the region in which
the site is located.
(g)
A person whose application is approved by the executive
director must maintain records and other supporting information which shows
that voluntary environmental measures associated with incentives approved
by the executive director are being carried out and are resulting in enhanced
environmental performance. All records and data shall be retained at the site
and/or shall be readily available for review by an agency representative or
any local air pollution control program with jurisdiction for a period of
three years after the date of any record or sample, measurement, report, application,
or certification. This period shall be extended at the written direction of
the executive director.
§90.64.Requests for Modification of State or Federal Regulatory Requirements.
(a)
Persons who request a modification of a state or federal
regulatory requirement which requires approval by commission order must follow
the requirements of §90.62 of this title (relating to Application).
(b)
Persons who request modification of federal regulatory
requirements under this subchapter must also meet the requirements of agreements
between the EPA and the agency in order to receive federal regulatory incentives.
(c)
Persons who request modification of federal regulatory
requirements under this chapter must include a public participation component
in the project proposal.
§90.66.Review by Executive Director Required.
(a)
Any person who is receiving incentives under this subchapter
shall submit a progress report to the executive director every two years from
the date of initial written approval from the executive director for the incentives,
documenting the enhanced environmental performance of the project, including:
(1)
a demonstration that the results are more protective of
the environment than the method or standard prescribed by the statute or commission
rule that would otherwise apply;
(2)
specific measurable results of the project and how these
contribute toward environmental outcomes;
(3)
documentation of any public participation component; and
(4)
how the results achieved compare to the results projected
in the application.
(b)
At least once every two years from the date of initial
written approval for the incentives from the executive director, the executive
director shall review the latest compliance history classification available
for the person and the site receiving incentives under this chapter, as determined
under §60.2 of this title (relating to Classification). The executive
director shall also review the latest progress reports required to be submitted
under this chapter and any voluntary measures by the person and the site receiving
an incentive under this chapter to enhance environmental performance undertaken
since any previous biennial review.
(c)
If the biennial review indicates that a person's or site's
compliance history classification has declined to a lower classification than
the person or site held at the time the incentives were approved, the executive
director shall begin termination proceedings under §90.68 of this title
(relating to Termination of Regulatory Incentives Under the Strategically
Directed Regulatory Structure) for any incentives granted that were only available
to the person and/or site under the previous compliance classification.
(d)
If the executive director finds that a person's voluntary
environmental measures no longer provide for enhanced environmental performance,
the executive director shall begin termination proceedings under §90.68
of this title.
(e)
If a person suspends or terminates voluntary environmental
measures associated with incentives granted by the executive director, that
person must notify the executive director within ten calendar days after the
occurrence.
§90.68.Termination of Regulatory Incentives Under the Strategically Directed Regulatory Structure.
(a)
Termination by the recipient.
(1)
A person who receives regulatory incentives for a site
under this subchapter may terminate the regulatory incentives at any time
by sending a notice of termination to the executive director by certified
mail.
(2)
If the incentives received by the person or site included
exemptions from state or federal requirements, the person or site must be
in full compliance with all requirements for which exemptions were granted
within 30 days after notice of termination is mailed to the executive director.
If a new permit, permit amendment, or other authorization is necessary in
order for the person to achieve compliance, an administratively complete application
for such authorization shall be submitted to the executive director within
30 days after notice of termination is mailed to the executive director.
(b)
Termination by the executive director.
(1)
Noncompliance with the terms and conditions of regulatory
incentives, an environmental management system approved under Chapter 90,
Subchapter B of this title (relating to General Provisions), or this chapter,
may result in termination of the regulatory incentives.
(2)
The executive director may also terminate incentives under
this chapter if the executive director finds that the person or site receiving
incentives is not complying with other applicable legal requirements, even
if the site's or person's compliance history classification has not changed.
(3)
If the executive director determines that a person who
is granted regulatory incentives under this subchapter no longer meets the
requirements of this subchapter, the executive director shall notify the person
in writing within 90 days after the deficiencies are documented.
(4)
If the noted deficiencies are not corrected and supporting
documentation submitted within 90 days after receipt of the notification,
regulatory incentives shall be terminated.
(5)
If the incentives received by the person or site included
exemptions from state or federal requirements, the person or site must be
in full compliance with all requirements for which exemptions were granted
within 30 days after termination by the executive director. If a new permit,
permit amendment, or other authorization is necessary in order for the person
to achieve compliance, an administratively complete application for such permit
or authorization shall be submitted within 33 days after termination by the
executive director. Upon written request, the executive director may allow
an additional amount of time not to exceed 90 days from the date the incentive
is terminated for a person to achieve compliance with applicable legal requirements
or apply for proper authorization.
§90.70.Public Notice and Comment.
(a)
Applicants for participation in innovative programs with
specific notice, comment, and hearing requirements shall follow the requirements
under those programs notwithstanding the requirements of this subchapter,
unless the applicant is requesting additional incentives under this subchapter.
(b)
If an applicant for incentives under this subchapter requests
an exemption from a statute or commission rule, the applicant shall comply
with all public notice, comment, and hearing requirements associated with
the statute or commission rule for which the applicant is seeking an exemption,
except as provided in subsection (c) of this section.
(c)
If the specific innovative program or statute or commission
rule for which an applicant is seeking an exemption does not require public
notice or an opportunity for comment, the following requirements shall apply.
(1)
The applicant shall publish notice of the application at
least once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the facility
or site requesting incentives is located or proposed to be located. The notice
shall be published within 30 days after the application is determined to be
administratively complete. Notice under this section shall not be published
in a font size smaller than that normally used in the newspaper's classified
advertising section.
(2)
The executive director shall accept public comment for
30 days after the last publication of the notice of application.
(d)
Notice under this section shall include, at a minimum:
(1)
a brief description of the proposal and of the business
conducted at the facility or activity described in the application;
(2)
a brief description of the incentive(s) requested;
(3)
the name and address of the applicant and, if different,
the location of the facility for which incentives under this subchapter are
sought;
(4)
the name and address of the agency;
(5)
the name, address, and telephone number of an agency contact
person from whom interested persons may obtain further information;
(6)
a brief description of the public comment procedures; and
(7)
the date by which comments must be received by the executive
director.
§90.72.Notice of Proposed Final Action.
(a)
After the public comment period, the executive director
shall send notice of the proposed final action on the application by first-class
mail to any person who commented during the public comment period and to the
applicant.
(b)
The notice shall include the executive director's decision
on the application, the response to any comments submitted during the public
comment period, and a statement that any person may file a motion to overturn
the executive director's decision under subsection (c) of this section.
(c)
The applicant, the executive director, the public interest
counsel, or any other person may file with the chief clerk a motion to overturn
the executive director's decision to grant, deny, or terminate incentives.
A motion must be filed within 23 days after the date the agency mails notice
of the executive director's decision to the applicant and persons who submitted
timely comment. Timely motions are subject to §50.139(e) - (g) of this
title (relating to Motion to Overturn Executive Director's Decision). If a
person who received a final notice from the executive director terminating
incentives received under this section files a motion to overturn the executive
director's decision, the person will continue to receive the incentives pending
final disposition of the motion to overturn under the procedures in §50.139(e)
- (g) of this title. If the motion to overturn is denied or overruled by operation
of law, the provisions of §90.68(b)(5) of this title (relating to Termination
of Regulatory Incentives Under the Strategically Directed Regulatory Structure)
apply on the date the motion is denied or overruled by operation of law.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304532
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: August 14, 2003
Proposal publication date: March 7, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-5017
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) adopts
the repeal of §122.131 and §§122.511 - 122.516
without changes
as published in the March 21, 2003 issue of the
These sections provide for an application option that has not been used
and is now expired, and for industry and county-specific general operating
permits that have now become non-rule general operating permits. The commission
also accepted public comment on the submission of previously adopted §122.217
to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a revision to
the state implementation plan (SIP). No changes were proposed to §122.217.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ADOPTED REPEALS
Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (FCAA) as codified
in 42 United States Code required all states to develop operating permit programs
that met federal criteria. The EPA has promulgated a final rule identifying
the criteria for state operating permit programs, 40 Code of Federal Regulations
Part 70, State Operating Permit Programs. The general goal of the operating
permit program requirement is to facilitate compliance and improve enforcement
by issuing permits that consolidate all applicable requirements into a federally-enforceable
document.
The rules in Chapter 122 were originally developed to meet this federal
requirement. The commission now repeals §122.131 because the phased permit
process has not been used by any facilities and the scheduled application
dates have since passed. The commission also repeals §§122.511 -
122.516 since the permits contained in §§122.511 - 122.516 have
expired and have been converted to non-rule general operating permits.
On November 20, 2002, the commission adopted amendments to §122.217
regarding minor revision procedures. However, the commission did not fulfill
the public notice requirements necessary to submit §122.217 to the EPA
as a revision to the SIP for the November 20, 2002 adoption. Public comment
was accepted on this section being submitted as a revision to the SIP. No
public comment was received. The adopted rule for §122.217 can be viewed
on the
Texas Register
Web site at:
www.sos.state.tx.us
.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
The commission adopts the repeal of §122.131, Phased Permit Detail.
The phased permit process has not been used by any facilities and the scheduled
application dates have since passed. The commission also adopts the repeal
of §§122.511 - 122.516, Oil and Gas General Operating Permit - Brazoria,
Chambers, Collin, Dallas, Denton, El Paso, Fort Bend, Galveston, Hardin, Harris,
Jefferson, Liberty, Montgomery, Orange, Tarrant, and Waller Counties; Oil
and Gas General Operating Permit - Gregg, Nueces, and Victoria Counties; Oil
and Gas General Operating Permit - Aransas, Bexar, Calhoun, Matagorda, San
Patricio, and Travis Counties; Oil and Gas General Operating Permit - All
Texas Counties Except for Aransas, Bexar, Brazoria, Calhoun, Chambers, Collin,
Dallas, Denton, El Paso, Fort Bend, Galveston, Gregg, Hardin, Harris, Jefferson,
Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, San Patricio, Tarrant, Travis, Victoria, and
Waller Counties; Bulk Fuel Storage Terminal General Operating Permit; and
Site-wide General Operating Permit. The contents of these sections were industry
and county-specific general operating permits that have now become non- rule
general operating permits.
FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission has reviewed the adopted rulemaking in accordance with the
regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225,
and determined that the rulemaking does not meet the definition of a major
environmental rule. A "major environmental rule" means a rule the specific
intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health
from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state.
Although the rules adopted by the commission to implement the requirements
of 42 United States Code, §§7661 - 7661e, are intended to protect
the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure
through increased compliance with requirements already applicable to facilities,
the adopted rules are not anticipated to have adverse effects on the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and
safety of the state or a sector of the state. The adopted rulemaking merely
repeals sections that are unnecessary.
The requirements of the adopted repeals are expected to result in little
or no impact on the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. All
facilities affected by the repeals no longer have the opportunity to select
the phased permit detail process since the deadlines have passed, and facilities
may use the non-rule general operating permits in place of the rule-based
general operating permits repealed in this rulemaking.
Additionally, the analysis required by Texas Government Code, §2001.0225(c),
does not apply because the adopted repeals do not meet any of the four applicability
requirements of a major environmental rule. The adopted repeals do not exceed
a standard set by federal law, exceed an express requirement of state law,
exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement, or adopt a rule solely under
the general powers of the agency. The adopted repeals do not exceed the requirements
of either 42 United States Code, §§7661 - 7661e (the requirements
for the federal operating permit program), or related provisions of the Texas
Clean Air Act. Additionally, the adopted repeals do not exceed a requirement
of a delegation agreement, since there is no agreement that is applicable
to this rulemaking, and are not adopted solely under the general powers of
the agency.
The commission invited public comment on the draft regulatory analysis
determination and no comments were received.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission evaluated the adopted repeals and performed an analysis
of whether the repeals are subject to Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007.
The purpose of the adopted repeals is to remove unnecessary provisions of
the state operating permit program, required by 42 United States Code, §§7661
- 7661e and 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 70. All facilities affected
by the adopted repeals no longer have the opportunity to select the phased
permit detail process since the deadlines have passed, and facilities may
use non-rule general operating permits in place of the rule- based general
operating permits repealed in this rulemaking.
The commission's analysis indicates that Texas Government Code, Chapter
2007, does not apply to the adopted repeals because this is an action that
is reasonably taken to fulfill an obligation mandated by federal law, which
is exempt under Texas Government Code, §2007.003(b)(4). The adopted repeals
will implement requirements of 42 United States Code, §§7661 - 7661e.
While the adopted repeals are not specifically mandated by federal law, the
state is required to maintain a state operating permit program to avoid the
imposition of sanctions under 42 United States Code, §7509, and the deletion
of these unnecessary sections provides for a better, more clear program. Additionally,
promulgation and enforcement of the repeals do not burden private real property.
The adopted repeals do not affect private property in a manner which restricts
or limits an owner's right to the property that would otherwise exist in the
absence of governmental action. Consequently, the adopted repeals do not meet
the definition of a taking under Texas Government Code, §2007.002(5).
The commission invited public comment on the draft regulatory analysis
determination and no comments were received.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the adopted rulemaking and found the adoption is
a rulemaking identified in the Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules,
31 TAC §505.11(b)(2), relating to rules subject to the Coastal Management
Program, and, therefore, required that goals and policies of the Texas Coastal
Management Program (CMP) be considered during the rulemaking process. The
commission reviewed this action for consistency and determined that the repeal
of §§122.131 and 122.511 -122.516 does not impact any CMP goals
or policies because it is administrative. Additionally, the repeals do not
adversely impact any CMP goals or policies since the deadline for submitting
an application under the phased permit detail process has passed, and there
are non-rule general operating permits available to those facilities which
would previously have used the general operating permits repealed in this
rulemaking. The commission invited public comment on the consistency of the
proposed repeals with applicable CMP goals and policies. No comments were
received.
EFFECT ON SITES SUBJECT TO THE FEDERAL OPERATING PERMITS PROGRAM
This adoption has no impact on owners and operators of sites subject to
the operating permit program since the repeal of the sections merely deletes
unnecessary sections. The application dates of the phased permit detail have
passed and the only general operating permits that are now available are non-rule
general operating permits which are now being used by those subject to the
Federal Operating Permits Program.
PUBLIC COMMENT
A public hearing on this proposal was held April 14, 2003, and the comment
period closed on April 21, 2003. The commission received one comment. EPA
supported the proposed changes.
Subchapter B. PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
3.
PERMIT APPLICATION
30 TAC §122.131
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The repeal is adopted under Texas Health and Safety Code, Texas Clean Air
Act, §382.011, which authorizes the commission to administer the requirements
of the Texas Clean Air Act; §382.017, which authorizes the commission
to adopt rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the Texas Clean
Air Act; §382.051, which authorizes the commission to issue permits and
adopt rules as necessary to comply with changes in federal law or regulations
applicable to permits issued under this chapter; §382.054, which requires
sources to obtain a federal operating permit; §382.0541, which authorizes
the administration and enforcement of federal operating permits; and Texas
Water Code, §5.103, which authorizes the commission to propose rules.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304530
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: August 14, 2003
Proposal publication date: March 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-5017
2.
AVAILABLE GENERAL PERMITS
30 TAC §§122.511 - 122.516
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The repeals are adopted under Texas Health and Safety Code, Texas Clean
Air Act, §382.011, which authorizes the commission to administer the
requirements of the Texas Clean Air Act; §382.017, which authorizes the
commission to adopt rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the Texas
Clean Air Act; §382.051, which authorizes the commission to issue permits
and adopt rules as necessary to comply with changes in federal law or regulations
applicable to permits issued under this chapter; §382.054, which requires
sources to obtain a federal operating permit; §382.0541, which authorizes
the administration and enforcement of federal operating permits; and Texas
Water Code, §5.103, which authorizes the commission to propose rules.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304531
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: August 14, 2003
Proposal publication date: March 21, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-5017
Subchapter A. EDWARDS AQUIFER IN MEDINA, BEXAR, COMAL, KINNEY, UVALDE, HAYS, TRAVIS, AND WILLIAMSON COUNTIES
30 TAC §213.3, §213.5
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission)
adopts amendments to §213.3 and §213.5. Section 213.5 is adopted
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ADOPTED RULES
Senate Bill (SB) 405, 77th Legislature, established the Texas Board of
Professional Geoscientists and the regulation of professional geoscientists.
The Geoscience Practice Act (the Act) requires that a person may not take
responsible charge of a geoscientific report or a geoscientific portion of
a report required by state agency rule unless the person is licensed through
the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists. The primary purpose of the
adopted amendments is to establish regulations for the public practice of
geoscience in conformance with the Act by requiring a person who prepares
and submits geoscientific information to the commission to be a licensed professional
geoscientist. According to the bill analysis prepared at the time of passage,
the ultimate purpose of the Act was public safety through the public registration
of the practice of geoscience.
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271b, requires a geologist who provides
information to the agency as part of either a geologic assessment or a hydrogeologic
evaluation of a sensitive feature to be licensed by the Texas Board of Professional
Geoscientists. The geologist must also have training and experience in groundwater
hydrology and related fields that enable that individual to make sound professional
judgments regarding the identification of sensitive features located in the
recharge zone or transition zone.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
Adopted amendments to §213.3, Definitions, eliminate possible conflict
or ambiguity in the introductory paragraph and in paragraph (14) and revise
the definition of geologist to be a Texas licensed professional geoscientist
who has training and experience in groundwater hydrology and related fields
that enable that individual to make sound professional judgments regarding
the identification of sensitive features located in the recharge zone or transition
zone. This amendment supercedes the current definition, which defines a geologist
as a person who has received a baccalaureate or post-graduate degree in the
natural science of geology from an accredited university and has training
and experience in groundwater hydrology and related fields, or has demonstrated
such qualifications by registration or licensing by a state, professional
certification, or has completed accredited university programs that enable
that individual to make sound professional judgments regarding the identification
of sensitive features located in the recharge zone or transition zone. Section
213.3 also adopts new paragraph (21) that defines licensed professional geoscientist
as a geoscientist who maintains a current license through the Texas Board
of Professional Geoscientists in accordance with its requirements for professional
practice. Existing paragraphs (21) through (38) are renumbered accordingly.
Adopted §213.5, Required Edwards Aquifer Protection Plans, Notification,
and Exemptions, amends subsections (b)(3), (c)(3)(K) and (4)(C), (d)(2)(C),
(e)(2)(C), and (f)(2)(B), (C)(i), and (D). Adopted subsection (b)(3) requires
that the geologic assessment report be signed, sealed, and dated by the geologist
preparing the report. To correct a typographical error, the word "list" has
been changed to "lift" in subsection (c)(3)(C). In §213.5(c)(3)(E)(i)(IV),
the word "above" has been changed to "in this subsection" for readability.
Adopted subsection (c)(3)(K) requires that the location and extent of geologic
features encountered during construction of sewer lines be assessed by a geologist.
Adopted subsection (c)(4)(C) adjusts the reference back to subsection (b)(3);
makes a minor grammatical correction; requires that the geologic assessment
for an organized sewage collection system plan be performed by a geologist;
and requires that the geologic assessment report be signed, sealed, and dated
by the geologist preparing the report. Adopted subsection (d)(2)(C) corrects
a punctuation error; requires that the geologic assessment for an underground
storage tank facility plan be prepared by a geologist; and requires that the
geologic assessment report be signed, sealed, and dated by the geologist preparing
the report. Adopted subsection (e)(2)(C) corrects a punctuation error; requires
that the geologic assessment for an aboveground storage tank facility plan
be prepared by a geologist; and requires that the geologic assessment report
be signed, sealed, and dated by the geologist preparing the report. The catchline
"Site location map" has been added to subsections (d)(2)(B) and (e)(2)(B)
to conform with
Texas Register
style and formatting
requirements.
Adopted subsection (f)(2)(B) amends the requirements regarding reports
given to the executive director if a sensitive feature is discovered during
construction, replacement, or rehabilitation. The geologic assessment report
must be prepared by a geologist and must be signed, sealed, and dated by the
geologist preparing the report. Adopted subsection (f)(2)(C)(i) requires the
geologist who certifies that a lift station excavation has been inspected
for the presence of sensitive features must sign, seal, and date the certification.
Adopted subsection (f)(2)(D) requires the geologist who certifies that an
underground storage tankhold excavation has been inspected for the presence
of sensitive features must sign, seal, and date the certification. In addition,
punctuation changes have been made throughout the section to improve readability.
FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the adopted rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and determined
that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not
meet the criteria for a "major environmental rule" as defined in that statute.
A "major environmental rule" means a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state.
The specific intent of the adopted rules is to establish regulations allowing
for the public practice of geoscience in agency procedures in conformance
with the Act. The Act requires that a person may not take responsible charge
of a geoscientific report or a geoscientific portion of a report required
by a state agency rule unless the person is licensed through the Texas Board
of Professional Geoscientists. The adopted rules are not specifically intended
to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health. The adopted rules
are intended to establish procedures to require that specific reports and
necessary data submitted to the commission be produced, signed, sealed, and
dated by licensed professional geoscientists who have obtained their licenses
through the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists. Therefore, it is not
anticipated that the adopted rules will adversely affect in a material way
the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the
state. The commission concludes that these adopted rules do not meet the definition
of major environmental rule.
In addition, even if the adopted rulemaking did meet the definition of
a major environmental rule, the amendments are not subject to Texas Government
Code, §2001.0225, because they do not accomplish any of the four results
specified in §2001.0225(a). Section 2001.0225(a) applies to a rule adopted
by an agency, the result of which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal
law, unless the rule is specifically required by state law; 2) exceed an express
requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal
law; 3) exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between
the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement
a state and federal program; or 4) adopt a rule solely under the general powers
of the agency instead of under a specific state law.
In this case, the adopted amendments to Chapter 213 do not meet any of
these requirements. First, there are no federal standards that these rules
would exceed. Second, the adopted rules do not exceed an express requirement
of state law. Third, there is no delegation agreement that would be exceeded
by these adopted rules. Fourth, the commission adopts these rules to allow
for the public practice of geoscience in agency procedures in conformance
with the Act. Therefore, the commission does not adopt the rules solely under
the commission's general powers.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission evaluated these adopted rules and performed a preliminary
assessment of whether these rules constitute a takings under Texas Government
Code, Chapter 2007. The specific intent of the rules is to establish regulations
allowing for the public practice of geoscience in agency procedures in conformance
with the Act. The rules would substantially advance this stated purpose by
requiring that specific reports and necessary data submitted to the commission
be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by licensed professional geoscientists
who have obtained their licenses through the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists.
Promulgation and enforcement of these rules would be neither a statutory
nor a constitutional taking of private real property. Specifically, the adopted
rules do not affect a landowner's rights in private real property by burdening
private real property, nor restricting or limiting a landowner's right to
property, or reducing the value of property by 25% or more beyond that which
would otherwise exist in the absence of the adopted rulemaking. These rules
simply require that specific portions of applications or necessary data submitted
to the commission be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by a qualified professional
individual who has demonstrated his or her qualifications by obtaining a license
to engage in the public practice of geoscience from the Texas Board of Professional
Geoscientists. These adopted rules do not affect any private real property.
There are no burdens imposed on private real property, and the benefits
to society are better applications for environmental permits based upon reliable
reports and data submitted by qualified licensed professional geoscientists.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission has reviewed the adopted rulemaking and found that the rules
are neither identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31
TAC §505.11(b)(2), relating to Actions and Rules Subject to the Coastal
Management Program, nor will they affect any action/authorization identified
in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11(a)(6).
Therefore, the adopted rules are not subject to the Coastal Management Program.
PUBLIC COMMENT
A public hearing was not held on this rulemaking, and one comment was received
from the Texas Board of Professional Engineers during the comment period which
closed June 2, 2003.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT
The Texas Board of Professional Engineers stated that it did not have any
objection or comment on the proposed rules.
The commission appreciates the submission of a comment from the Texas Board
of Engineers.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are adopted under the Texas Water Code, §5.103, which
provides the commission with the authority to adopt rules necessary to carry
out its power and duties under this code and other laws of this state; §5.105,
which authorizes the commission to establish and approve all general policy
of the commission by rule; and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271b, the Act,
which authorizes the public practice of geoscience in the State of Texas.
§213.5.Required Edwards Aquifer Protection Plans, Notification, and Exemptions.
(a)
Required plans. A plan must be submitted for the following,
as appropriate:
(1)
a water pollution abatement plan under subsection (b) of
this section to conduct regulated activities on the recharge zone not covered
by subsections (c), (d), or (e) of this section;
(2)
an organized sewage collection system plan under subsection
(c) of this section for rehabilitation or construction related to existing
or new organized sewage collection systems on the recharge zone;
(3)
an underground storage tank facility plan for static hydrocarbon
and hazardous substance storage under subsection (d) of this section for the
construction or rehabilitation of an underground storage tank system; including
tanks, piping, and related systems located on the recharge zone or transition
zone; and
(4)
an aboveground storage tank facility plan for static hydrocarbon
and hazardous substance storage under subsection (e) of this section for the
construction or rehabilitation of an aboveground storage tank system; including
tanks, piping, and related systems, for the storage of hydrocarbon or hazardous
substance located on the recharge zone or transition zone.
(b)
Water pollution abatement plan. A water pollution abatement
plan must contain the following information.
(1)
Application. The information required under §213.4
of this title (relating to Application Processing and Approval) is part of
the plan and must be filed with the executive director at the appropriate
regional office.
(2)
Site location.
(A)
Location data and maps must include a legible road map
with directions, including mileage, which would enable the executive director
to locate the site for inspection.
(B)
A general location map must include:
(i)
the site location on a copy (or spliced composite of copies,
if necessary) of an official recharge zone map(s) with quadrangle name(s)
and recharge and transition zone boundaries clearly labeled; and
(ii)
a drainage plan, shown on the recharge zone map, indicating
all paths of drainage from the site.
(C)
A site plan with a minimum scale of one inch to 400 feet
must show:
(i)
the 100-year floodplain boundaries (if applicable);
(ii)
the layout of the development showing existing and finished
contours as appropriate, but not greater than ten-foot contour intervals;
(iii)
the location of all known wells (including, but not limited
to, water wells, oil wells, and unplugged and abandoned wells);
(iv)
the location of any sensitive feature on the site of the
proposed regulated activity as identified in the geologic assessment under
paragraph (3) of this subsection;
(v)
the drainage patterns and approximate slopes anticipated
after major grading activities;
(vi)
areas of soil disturbance and areas which will not be
disturbed;
(vii)
locations of major structural and nonstructural controls
identified in the technical report;
(viii)
locations where stabilization practices are expected
to occur;
(ix)
surface waters (including wetlands); and
(x)
locations where stormwater discharges to a surface water
or a sensitive feature.
(3)
Geologic assessment. For all regulated activities, the
applicant must submit a geologic assessment report prepared by a geologist
describing the site-specific geology. The report must identify all potential
pathways for contaminant movement to the Edwards Aquifer. Single-family residential
subdivisions constructed on less than ten acres are exempt from this requirement.
The geologic assessment report must be signed, sealed, and dated by the geologist
preparing the report.
(A)
The geologic assessment must include a geologic map, at
site-plan scale, illustrating:
(i)
the outcrop of surface geologic units; and
(ii)
all geologic and manmade features, specifically identifying:
(I)
caves;
(II)
sinkholes;
(III)
faults;
(IV)
permeable fractures;
(V)
solution zones;
(VI)
surface streams; and
(VII)
other sensitive features.
(B)
The geologic assessment must contain a stratigraphic column
showing, at a minimum, formations, members, and thicknesses.
(C)
The geologic assessment must contain a description and
evaluation of all geologic and manmade features, on forms provided by, or
approved by, the executive director. The assessment must determine which of
these features are sensitive features. The assessment must include:
(i)
the identification of each geologic or manmade feature,
with a cross-reference to the site-plan map coordinates; and
(ii)
the type of geologic or manmade feature including, but
not limited to:
(I)
sinkholes;
(II)
caves;
(III)
faults;
(IV)
wells;
(V)
surface streams; or
(VI)
potentially permeable fractures and solution zones.
(D)
The geologic assessment must contain a narrative assessment
of site-specific geology. The assessment must detail the potential for fluid
movement to the Edwards Aquifer and include a discussion of the stratigraphy,
structure, and karstic characteristics of the site.
(E)
The geologic assessment must contain a narrative description
of soil units and a soil profile, including thickness and hydrologic characteristics.
(4)
Technical report.
(A)
The technical report must address the following issues.
(i)
The report must describe the nature of the regulated activity
(such as residential, commercial, industrial, or utility), including:
(I)
the size of the site in acres;
(II)
the projected population for the site;
(III)
the amount and type of impervious cover expected after
construction is complete, such as paved surface or roofing;
(IV)
the amount of surface expected to be occupied by parking
lots; and
(V)
other factors that could affect surface water and groundwater
quality.
(ii)
The report must describe the volume and character of wastewater
expected to be produced. Wastewater generated at a site should be characterized
as either domestic or industrial, or if commingled, by approximate percentages
of each type.
(iii)
The report must describe the volume and character of
stormwater runoff expected to occur. Estimates of stormwater runoff quality
and quantity should be based on area and type of impervious cover, as described
in clause (i) of this subparagraph. An estimate of the runoff coefficient
of the site for both the pre-construction and post-construction conditions
should be included in the report.
(iv)
The report must describe any activities or processes which
may be a potential source of contamination.
(v)
The report must describe the intended sequence of major
activities which disturb soils for major portions of the site (e.g., grubbing,
excavation, grading, utilities and infrastructure installation).
(vi)
The report must contain estimates of the total area of
the site that is expected to be disturbed by excavation, grading, or other
activities.
(vii)
The report must contain the name of the receiving water(s)
at or near the site which will be disturbed or which will receive discharges
from disturbed areas of the project.
(B)
The technical report must describe the temporary best management
practices (BMPs) and measures that will be used during and after construction.
The technical report must clearly describe for each major activity identified
in subparagraph (A)(v) of this paragraph appropriate control measures and
the general timing (or sequence) during the construction process that the
measures will be implemented.
(i)
BMPs and measures must prevent pollution of surface water,
groundwater, or storm water that originates upgradient from the site and flows
across the site as provided under this paragraph.
(ii)
BMPs and measures must prevent pollution of surface water
or groundwater that originates on-site or flows off site, including pollution
caused by contaminated stormwater runoff from the site as provided under this
paragraph.
(iii)
BMPs and measures must prevent pollutants from entering
surface streams, sensitive features, or the aquifer as provided under this
paragraph.
(iv)
To the maximum extent practicable, BMPs and measures must
maintain flow to naturally- occurring sensitive features identified in either
the geologic assessment, executive director review, or during excavation,
blasting, or construction.
(I)
The temporary sealing of a naturally-occurring sensitive
feature which accepts recharge to the Edwards Aquifer as a temporary pollution
abatement measure during active construction should be avoided.
(II)
A request to temporarily seal must include a justification
as to why no reasonable and practicable alternative exists. The request will
be evaluated by the executive director on a case-by-case basis.
(v)
Temporary BMPs and measures must meet the requirements
contained in subparagraph (D)(i) of this paragraph.
(vi)
The report must include a plan for the inspection of temporary
BMPs and measures and for their timely maintenance, repair, and, if necessary,
retrofit.
(vii)
Temporary sediment pond or basin construction plans and
design calculations for a proposed temporary BMP or measure must be prepared
by or under the direct supervision of a Texas licensed professional engineer.
All construction plans and design information must be signed, sealed, and
dated by the Texas licensed professional engineer.
(viii)
Pilot-scale field testing (including water quality monitoring)
may be required for BMPs that are not contained in technical guidance recognized
by, or prepared by, the executive director.
(ix)
The construction-phase BMPs for erosion and sediment controls
should be designed to retain sediment on site to the extent practicable.
(x)
All control measures must be properly selected, installed,
and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers specifications and good
engineering practices. If periodic inspections by the applicant or the executive
director, or other information indicates a control has been used inappropriately,
or incorrectly, the applicant must replace or modify the control for site
situations.
(xi)
If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations
of sediment must be removed at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site
impacts to water quality (e.g., fugitive sediment in street being washed into
surface streams or sensitive features by the next rain).
(xii)
Sediment must be removed from sediment traps or sedimentation
ponds not later than when design capacity has been reduced by 50%.
(xiii)
Litter, construction debris, and construction chemicals
exposed to storm water shall be prevented from becoming a pollutant source
for storm water discharges (e.g., screening outfalls, picked up daily).
(C)
The technical report must describe the permanent BMPs and
measures that will be used during and after construction is completed.
(i)
BMPs and measures must prevent pollution of surface water,
groundwater, or storm water that originates upgradient from the site and flows
across the site.
(ii)
BMPs and measures must prevent pollution of surface water
or groundwater that originates on-site or flows off the site, including pollution
caused by contaminated storm water runoff from the site.
(iii)
BMPs and measures must prevent pollutants from entering
surface streams, sensitive features, or the aquifer.
(iv)
To the extent practicable, BMPs and measures must maintain
flow to naturally occurring sensitive features identified in either the geologic
assessment, executive director review, or during excavation, blasting, or
construction.
(I)
The permanent sealing of, or diversion of, flow from a
naturally occurring sensitive feature that accepts recharge to the Edwards
Aquifer as a permanent pollution abatement measure should be avoided.
(II)
A request to seal a naturally occurring sensitive feature
must include a justification as to why no reasonable and practicable alternative
exists. The request will be evaluated by the executive director on a case-by-case
basis.
(v)
Permanent BMPs and measures must meet the requirements
contained in subparagraph (D)(ii) of this paragraph.
(vi)
Construction plans and design calculations for the proposed
permanent BMPs and measures must be prepared by, or under the direct supervision
of, a Texas licensed professional engineer. All construction plans and design
information must be signed, sealed, and dated by the Texas licensed professional
engineer.
(vii)
The technical report must include a plan for the inspection
of the permanent BMPs and measures and for their timely inspection, maintenance,
repair, and, if necessary, retrofit. The plan must be prepared and certified
by the engineer designing the permanent BMPs and measures. The plan must be
signed by the owner or responsible party.
(viii)
Pilot-scale field testing (including water quality monitoring)
may be required for BMPs that are not contained in technical guidance recognized
by, or prepared by, the executive director.
(I)
When pilot-scale field testing of an innovative technology
(including water quality monitoring) is required, only one pilot site will
be approved.
(II)
No additional approvals will be granted until the pilot
study is complete and the applicant demonstrates adequate protection of the
Edwards Aquifer.
(III)
If the innovative technology demonstrates adequate protection
of the Edwards Aquifer, additional units may be approved for use as permanent
pollution abatement measures on the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone.
(IV)
If the innovative technology demonstrates inadequate protection
of the Edwards Aquifer, a retrofit of the pollution abatement measure may
be required to achieve compliance with requirements under subparagraph (D)
of this paragraph and no additional units will be approved for use on the
Edwards Aquifer recharge zone.
(D)
Requirements for BMPs and measures.
(i)
Temporary BMPs.
(I)
The technical report must include a description of interim
and permanent stabilization practices for the site, including a schedule of
when the practices will be implemented. Stabilization practices may include,
but are not limited to: establishment of temporary vegetation, establishment
of permanent vegetation, mulching, geotextiles, sod stabilization, vegetative
buffer strips, protection of trees, preservation of mature vegetation, and
other appropriate measures.
(-a-)
The following records shall be maintained and made available
to the executive director upon request: the dates when major grading activities
occur; the dates when construction activities temporarily or permanently cease
on a portion of the site; and the dates when stabilization measures are initiated.
(-b-)
Stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as
practicable in portions of the site where construction activities have temporarily
or permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the construction
activity in that portion of the site has temporarily or permanently ceased.
Where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after construction
activity temporary or permanently cease is precluded by weather conditions,
stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon as practicable. Where construction
activity on a portion of the site is temporarily ceased, and earth disturbing
activities will be resumed within 21 days, temporary stabilization measures
do not have to be initiated on that portion of site. In areas experiencing
droughts where the initiation of stabilization measures by the 14th day after
construction activity has temporarily or permanently ceased is precluded by
seasonal arid conditions, stabilization measures shall be initiated as soon
as practicable.
(II)
The technical report must include a description of structural
practices to divert flows from exposed soils, store flows, or otherwise limit
runoff and the discharge of pollutants from exposed areas of the site to the
degree attainable. Structural practices may include, but are not limited to:
silt fences, earth dikes, drainage swales, sediment traps, checks dams, subsurface
drains, pipe slope drains, level spreaders, storm drain inlet protection,
rock outlet protection, reinforced soil retaining systems, gabions, and sediment
basins. Placement of structural practices in floodplains should be avoided
to the degree attainable.
(-a-)
For common drainage locations that serve an area with
ten or more acres disturbed at one time, a sediment basin that provides storage
for a calculated volume of runoff from a two-year, 24-hour storm from each
disturbed acre drained, or equivalent control measures, shall be provided
where attainable until final stabilization of the site. Where no such calculation
has been performed, a sediment basin providing 3,600 cubic feet of storage
per acre drained, or equivalent control measures, shall be provided where
attainable until final stabilization of the site. When computing the number
of acres draining into a common location it is not necessary to include flows
from off-site areas and flows from on-site areas that are either undisturbed
or have undergone final stabilization where such flows are diverted around
both the disturbed area and the sediment basin.
(-b-)
In determining whether installing a sediment basin is
attainable, the applicant may consider factors such as site soils, slope,
and available area on site. For drainage locations which serve ten or more
disturbed acres at one time and where a sediment basin or equivalent controls
is not attainable, smaller sediment basins and/or sediment traps should be
used. Where neither the sediment basin nor equivalent controls are attainable
due to site limitations, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or equivalent
sediment controls are required for all down slope boundaries of the construction
area and for those side slope boundaries deemed appropriate as dictated by
individual site conditions. The executive director encourages the use of a
combination of sediment and erosion control measures in order to achieve maximum
pollutant removal.
(-c-)
For drainage locations serving less than ten acres, smaller
sediment basins and/or sediment traps should be used. At a minimum, silt fences,
vegetative buffer strips, or equivalent sediment controls are required for
all down slope boundaries (and for those side slope boundaries deemed appropriate
as dictated by individual site conditions) of the construction area unless
a sediment basin providing storage for a calculated volume of runoff from
a two-year, 24- hour storm or 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre drained
is provided. The executive director encourages the use of a combination of
sediment and erosion control measures in order to achieve maximum pollutant
removal.
(ii)
Permanent BMPs and measures.
(I)
BMPs and measures must be implemented to control the discharge
of pollution from regulated activities after the completion of construction.
These practices and measures must be designed, constructed, operated, and
maintained to insure that 80% of the incremental increase in the annual mass
loading of total suspended solids from the site caused by the regulated activity
is removed. These quantities must be calculated in accordance with technical
guidance prepared or accepted by the executive director.
(II)
Owners of permanent BMPs and measures must insure that
the BMPs and measures are constructed and function as designed. A Texas licensed
professional engineer must certify in writing that the permanent BMPs or measures
were constructed as designed. The certification letter must be submitted to
the appropriate regional office within 30 days of site completion.
(III)
Where a site is used for low density single-family residential
development and has 20% or less impervious cover, other permanent BMPs are
not required. This exemption from permanent BMPs must be recorded in the county
deed records, with a notice that if the percent impervious cover increases
above 20% or land use changes, the exemption for the whole site as described
in the property boundaries required by §213.4(g) of this title, may no
longer apply and the property owner must notify the appropriate regional office
of these changes.
(IV)
The executive director may waive the requirement for other
permanent BMPs for multi-family residential developments, schools, or small
business sites where 20% or less impervious cover is used at the site. This
exemption from permanent BMPs must be recorded in the county deed records,
with a notice that if the percent impervious cover increases above 20% or
land use changes, the exemption for the whole site as described in the property
boundaries required by §213.4(g) of this title, may no longer apply and
the property owner must notify the appropriate regional office of these changes.
(E)
The technical report must describe measures that will be
used to avoid or minimize surface stream contamination and changes in the
way in which water enters a stream as a result of the construction and development.
The measures should address the following:
(i)
increased stream flashing;
(ii)
the creation of stronger flows and in-stream velocities;
or
(iii)
other in-stream effects caused by the regulated activity
which increase erosion that results in water quality degradation.
(F)
The technical report must describe the method of wastewater
disposal from the site.
(i)
If wastewater is to be disposed of by conveyance to a sewage
treatment plant for treatment and disposal, the existing or proposed treatment
facility must be identified.
(ii)
If wastewater is to be disposed of by an on-site sewage
facility, the application must include a written statement from the appropriate
authorized agent, stating that the site is suitable for the use of private
sewage facilities and will meet the special requirements for on-site sewage
facilities located on the Edwards Aquifer recharge zone as specified under
Chapter 285 of this title (relating to On-Site Sewage Facilities), or identifying
those areas that are not suitable.
(G)
The technical report must describe the measures that will
be used to contain any spill of hydrocarbons or hazardous substances such
as on a roadway or from a pipeline or from temporary aboveground storage of
250 gallons or more.
(i)
Temporary storage facilities are those used on site for
less than one year.
(ii)
Temporary aboveground storage tank systems of 250 gallons
or more cumulative storage capacity must be located a minimum horizontal distance
of 150 feet from any domestic, industrial, irrigation, or public water supply
well, or other sensitive feature.
(5)
Responsibility for maintenance of permanent BMPs and measures
after construction is complete.
(A)
The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the
permanent BMPs after construction until such time as the maintenance obligation
is either assumed in writing by another entity having ownership or control
of the property (such as without limitation, an owner's association, a new
property owner or lessee, a district, or municipality) or the ownership of
the property is transferred to the entity. Such entity shall then be responsible
for maintenance until another entity assumes such obligations in writing or
ownership is transferred.
(B)
A copy of the transfer of responsibility must be filed
with the executive director at the appropriate regional office within 30 days
of the transfer.
(C)
This paragraph applies to:
(i)
multiple single-family residential developments, multi-family
residential; and
(ii)
non-residential developments such as commercial, industrial,
institutional, schools, and other sites where regulated activities occur.
(c)
Organized sewage collection systems.
(1)
No person may commence rehabilitation or construction related
to an existing or new organized sewage collection system on the recharge zone,
until final design plans, specifications, and an engineering report, as specified
in Chapter 317 of this title (relating to Design Criteria for Sewerage Systems)
and appropriate special requirements of this section, have been filed with
and approved by the executive director.
(2)
General design of sewage collection systems. Design of
new sewage collection systems on the recharge zone must comply with Chapter
317 of this title.
(3)
Special requirements for sewage collection systems. In
addition to the requirements in paragraph (2) of this subsection, sewage collection
systems on the recharge zone must meet the following special requirements.
(A)
Manhole rehabilitation or construction. All manholes rehabilitated
or constructed after March 21, 1990, must be watertight, with watertight rings
and covers and must be constructed and tested to meet the requirements of §317.2(c)(5)(H)
of this title (relating to Sewage Collection System).
(B)
Piping for gravity and pressurized collection systems.
Compliance with the following is required, unless local regulations dictate
more stringent standards:
(i)
for gravity collection systems, all PVC pipe must have
a Standard Dimension Ratio (SDR) of 35 or less and meet the requirements of §317.2(a)
- (c)(4) of this title; and
(ii)
for all pressurized sewer systems, all PVC pipe must have
a minimum working pressure rating of 150 pounds per square inch and meet the
requirements of §317.2(d)(2) - (4) and §317.3(d)(5) - (7) of this
title (relating to Sewage Collection System and Lift Stations).
(C)
Lift station design. Lift stations must be designed and
constructed to ensure that bypassing of any sewage does not occur. All lift
stations must be designed to meet the requirements of §317.2(d) and §317.3
of this title. A lift station application must include final construction
plans and a design report prepared by or under the direct supervision of a
Texas licensed professional engineer. All design information must be signed,
sealed, and dated by a Texas licensed professional engineer.
(D)
Certification of new sewage collection system lines by
a Texas licensed professional engineer. Owners of sewage collection systems
must insure that all new gravity sewer system lines having a diameter greater
than or equal to six inches and all new force mains are tested for leakage
following construction. Such lines must be certified by a Texas licensed professional
engineer to meet the appropriate requirements of §317.2 of this title.
The engineer must retain copies of all test results which must be made available
to the executive director upon request. The engineer must certify in writing
that all wastewater lines have passed all required testing to the appropriate
regional office within 30 days of test completion and prior to use of the
new collection system. Following the completion of the new sewer lines and
manholes, they must be tested every five years thereafter in accordance with
subparagraph (E) of this paragraph.
(E)
Testing of existing sewer lines. Owners of sewage collection
systems must insure that all existing sewer lines having a diameter greater
than or equal to six inches, including private service laterals, manholes,
and connections, are tested to determine types and locations of structural
damage and defects such as offsets, open joints, or cracked or crushed lines
that would allow exfiltration to occur. Existing manholes and lift station
wet wells must be tested using methods for new structures which are approved
by the executive director.
(i)
Testing of all sewage collection systems must be conducted
every five years after being put into use. Any sewage collection system in
place as of March 21, 1990 must have commenced and completed the first round
of five-year testing. Every five years, existing sewage collection systems
must be tested to determine types and locations of structural damage and defects
such as offsets, open joints, or cracked or crushed lines that would allow
exfiltration to occur. These test results must be certified by a Texas licensed
professional engineer. The test results must be retained by the plan holder
for five years and made available to the executive director upon request.
The use of one of the following methods will satisfy the requirements for
the five-year testing of existing sewer lines.
(I)
In-place deflection testing must meet the requirements
of §317.2(a)(4)(C) of this title. No pipe shall exceed a deflection rate
of 5.0%.
(II)
Internal line inspections, using a color television camera
to verify that the lines are free of structural damage such as offsets, open
joints, or cracked or crushed lines, that would allow exfiltration to occur,
are acceptable. The use of black and white television equipment may be used
following demonstration to the executive director that an acceptable inspection
can be performed as provided in subclause (IV) of this clause.
(III)
In-line smoke testing is acceptable only for the testing
of private service laterals.
(IV)
Testing methods other than those listed in this subsection
must be approved by the executive director prior to initiating the sewer line
testing.
(ii)
Except as otherwise provided in an enforcement order of
the commission, as soon as possible, but at least within one year of detecting
defects, repairs to the sewage collection system must be completed by the
system's owner. However, all leakage must be immediately contained to prevent
any discharge to water in the state or pollution of the Edwards Aquifer whether
necessary repairs have been completed or not. Leakage is a violation of Texas
Water Code, §26.121 and these rules are not intended to excuse such unlawful
discharge of waste into or adjacent to water in the state. All repairs must
be certified by a Texas licensed professional engineer. Repairs must be tested
within 45 days of completion using the methods described in clause (i) of
this subparagraph. Results must be submitted to the appropriate regional office
within 30 days of testing.
(F)
Blasting for sewer line excavation. Blasting for sewer
line excavation must be done in accordance with appropriate criteria established
by the National Fire Protection Association. Should such blasting result in
damage to an existing or newly completed sewer line or any of its appurtenances,
the owner of the sewer system and appurtenances must repair and retest the
damaged sewer line and its appurtenances immediately. The use of sand for
pipe embedment or backfill in blasted rock is prohibited.
(G)
Sewer line stub outs. New collection system lines must
be constructed with stub outs for the connection of anticipated extensions.
The location of such stub outs must be marked on the ground such that their
location can be easily determined at the time of connection of the proposed
extensions. All stub outs must be sealed with a manufactured cap to prevent
leakage. Extensions that were not anticipated at the time of original construction
or that are to be connected to an existing sewer line not furnished with stub
outs must be connected using a manufactured saddle in accordance with accepted
plumbing techniques.
(i)
Main line stub outs. Manholes must be placed at the end
of all sewer lines that will be extended at a future date, as specified in §317.2(c)(5)
of this title. If the main line is to be extended within one year, a variance
to allow the use of a stub out until the line is extended will be considered
on a case-by-case basis. At the time of original construction, new stub outs
must be constructed sufficiently to extend beyond the end of the street pavement.
Stub outs that were not anticipated at the time of original construction must
enter the manhole using a bored or drilled hole. Chiseling or hammering to
enter a manhole is prohibited.
(ii)
Private service lateral stub outs. Such stub outs must
be manufactured using wyes or tees that are compatible in size and material
with both the sewer line and the extension. Private service lateral stub outs
that were not anticipated at the time of original construction must be connected
using a manufactured saddle in accordance with accepted plumbing techniques.
(H)
Locating sewer lines within a five-year floodplain. Sewer
lines may not be located within the five-year floodplain of a drainageway,
unless an exemption is granted by the executive director. If the applicant
demonstrates to the executive director that such location is unavoidable,
and the area is subject to inundation and stream velocities which could cause
erosion and scouring of backfill, the trench must be capped with concrete
to prevent scouring of backfill, or the sewer lines must be encased in concrete.
All concrete must have a minimum thickness of six inches.
(I)
Inspection of private service lateral connections. After
installing and prior to covering and connecting a private service lateral
to an organized sewage collection system, a Texas licensed professional engineer,
Texas registered sanitarian, or appropriate city inspector must inspect the
private service lateral and the connection to the collection system and certify
that construction conforms with the applicable provisions of this subsection
and local plumbing codes. Private service laterals may only be connected to
approved sewage collection systems.
(J)
Embedment materials. Embedment materials must meet the
specification for bedding contained in §317.2(a)(5) of this title.
(K)
Sewer lines bridging caverns or other sensitive features.
Sewer lines that bridge caverns or sensitive features must be constructed
in a manner that will maintain the structural integrity of the line. When
such geologic features are encountered during construction, the location and
extent of those features must be assessed by a geologist and must be reported
to the appropriate regional office in writing within two working days of discovery.
Notification and inspection must comply with the requirements under subsection
(f) of this section.
(L)
Erosion and sedimentation control. A temporary erosion
and sedimentation control plan must be included with all construction plans.
All temporary erosion and sedimentation controls must be installed prior to
construction, must be maintained during construction, and must be removed
when sufficient vegetation is established to control the erosion and sedimentation
and the construction area is stabilized.
(M)
Alternative sewage collection systems. The executive director
may approve an alternative procedure which is technically justified; signed,
sealed, and dated by a Texas licensed professional engineer indicating equivalent
environmental protection; and which complies with the requirements of §317.2(d)
of this title.
(N)
Required corrective action. Notwithstanding compliance
with the requirements of subparagraphs (A) - (M) of this paragraph, sewage
collection systems must operate in a manner that will not cause pollution
of the Edwards Aquifer. Any failure must be corrected in a manner satisfactory
to the executive director.
(4)
Contents of organized sewage collection system plan.
(A)
Application. For organized sewage collection systems, the
information required under §213.4 of this title must be filed with the
executive director at the appropriate regional office.
(B)
Narrative description of proposed organized sewage collection
system. A narrative report must include, at a minimum, a geographic description
and anticipated type of development within the sewage collection system service
area.
(C)
Geologic assessment. A geologic assessment, as described
in subsection (b)(3) of this section, must be performed by a geologist along
the path of the proposed sewer line(s), plus 50 feet on each side of the proposed
sewer line(s). The geologic assessment report must be signed, sealed, and
dated by the geologist preparing the report.
(D)
Technical report. For an organized sewage collection system,
a technical report must be submitted on forms provided by, or approved by,
the executive director. The technical report must contain the information
requested in the following subsections of this section: (b)(4)(A)(ii) and
(iv), (B), (D)(i), (F)(i), and (G). A technical report for a water pollution
abatement plan submitted under subsection (b) of this section satisfies this
requirement, provided it properly addresses the proposed sewage collection
system.
(E)
Plans and specifications. Plans and specifications addressing
all the requirements in paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection, must include
at a minimum:
(i)
a map showing the location of the organized sewage collection
system layout in relation to recharge zone boundaries;
(ii)
a map showing the location of the organized sewage collection
system layout overlaid by topographic contour lines, using a contour interval
of not greater than ten feet, and showing the area within both the five-year
floodplain and the 100-year floodplain of any drainage way;
(iii)
construction documents prepared by, or under the supervision
of, a Texas licensed professional engineer, which have also been signed, sealed,
and dated by that Texas licensed professional engineer, at a minimum, must
include:
(I)
plan and profile views of the collection system;
(II)
construction details of collection system components;
(III)
specifications for all collection system components;
and
(IV)
proposed pollution abatement measures for sensitive features
identified along the path of the proposed sewer line.
(d)
Static hydrocarbon and hazardous substance storage in underground
storage tanks system.
(1)
Standards for underground storage tank systems. New or
replacement systems for the underground storage of static hydrocarbons or
hazardous substances must be of double-walled or an equivalent method approved
by the executive director. Methods for detecting leaks in the inside wall
of a double-walled system must be included in the facility's design and construction.
The leak detection system must provide continuous monitoring of the system
and must be capable of immediately alerting the system's owner of possible
leakages.
(A)
Installation. All underground hydrocarbon and hazardous
substance storage tank systems must be installed by a person possessing a
valid certificate of registration in accordance with the requirements of Chapter
334, Subchapter I of this title (relating to Underground Storage Tank On-Site
Supervisor Licensing and Contractor Registration).
(B)
Siting. Any new underground hydrocarbon and hazardous substance
storage tank system that does not incorporate a method for tertiary containment
must be located a minimum horizontal distance of 150 feet from any domestic,
industrial, or irrigation well, or other sensitive feature as determined under
the geologic assessment at the time of construction or replacement under paragraph
(2)(C) of this subsection or the tankhold inspection under subsection (f)(2)(B)
of this section. This method of tertiary containment also applies to the placement
of a tank system within 150 feet of a public water supply well without a sanitary
control easement of 150 feet as defined in §290.41(c)(1)(F) of this title
(relating to Water Sources).
(2)
Contents of an underground storage tank facility plan.
An underground storage tank facility plan must, at a minimum, contain the
following information.
(A)
Application. The information required under §213.4
of this title must be filed with the executive director at the appropriate
regional office.
(B)
Site location map. A site location map as specified in
subsection (b)(2) of this section including a legible road map, a general
location map, and a site plan, must be submitted as part of the plan.
(C)
Geologic assessment. For all facilities located on either
the recharge zone or transition zone, a geologic assessment prepared by a
geologist, as described in subsection (b)(3) of this section, must be submitted
for the site. The geologic assessment report must be signed, sealed, and dated
by the geologist preparing the report.
(D)
Technical report. For all facilities, located on either
the recharge zone or transition zone, a technical report must be submitted
on forms provided by, or approved by, the executive director. The technical
report must contain the information requested in subsection (b)(4)(B) and
(C) and (5) of this section. A technical report for a water pollution abatement
plan submitted under subsection (b) of this section satisfies this requirement,
provided it properly addresses the proposed underground storage tank facility.
(e)
Static hydrocarbon and hazardous substance storage in an
aboveground storage tank facility.
(1)
Design standards. Systems used for the temporary and permanent
aboveground storage of static hydrocarbon and hazardous substance must be
constructed within controlled drainage areas that are sized to capture one
and one-half (1-1/2) times the storage capacity of the system. The controlled
drainage area must be constructed of, and in a material impervious to, the
substance(s) being stored, and must direct spills to a convenient point for
collections and recovery. Any spills from storage tank facilities must be
removed from the controlled drainage area for disposal within 24 hours of
the spill.
(2)
Contents of an aboveground storage tank facility plan.
A permanent aboveground storage tank facility plan must contain, at a minimum,
the following information.
(A)
Application. For an aboveground storage tank facility,
the information required under §213.4 of this title must be filed with
the executive director at the appropriate regional office.
(B)
Site location map. A site location map as specified in
subsection (b)(2) of this section, including a legible road map, a general
location map, and a site plan, must be submitted as part of the plan for a
permanent facility.
(C)
Geologic assessment. For all facilities located on either
the recharge zone or transition zone, a geologic assessment prepared by a
geologist, as described in subsection (b)(3) of this section, must be submitted
for the area containing the aboveground storage tank system. The geologic
assessment report must be signed, sealed, and dated by the geologist preparing
the report.
(D)
Technical report. For all facilities located on either
the recharge zone or transition zone, a technical report must be submitted
on forms provided by, or approved by, the executive director. The technical
report must contain the information requested in subsection (b)(4)(B) and
(C) and (5) of this section. A technical report for a water pollution abatement
plan submitted under subsection (b) of this section satisfies this requirement,
provided it properly addresses the proposed aboveground storage tank facility.
(3)
A description of measures that will be used to contain
any spill of hydrocarbons or hazardous substances from temporary storage of
250 gallons or more must be included with the plan unless described under
subsection (b)(4)(G) of this section. Any new temporary aboveground hydrocarbon
and hazardous substance storage tank system must be located a minimum horizontal
distance of 150 feet from any domestic, industrial, irrigation, or public
water supply well, or other sensitive feature.
(4)
Exemptions from this section.
(A)
Equipment used to transmit electricity that utilizes oil
for insulation or cooling purposes, including transformers and oil circuit
breakers, are exempt from this subsection. Construction of supporting structures
is a regulated activity for which a water pollution abatement plan under subsection
(a)(1) of this section is required.
(B)
Permanent storage facilities with a cumulative storage
capacity of less than 500 gallons are exempt from this section.
(f)
Notification and inspection.
(1)
The applicant must provide written notification of intent
to commence construction, replacement, or rehabilitation. Notification must
be given to the appropriate regional office no later than 48 hours prior to
commencement of the regulated activity.
(A)
Written notification must include:
(i)
the date on which the regulated activity will commence;
(ii)
the name of the approved plan for the regulated activity;
and
(iii)
the name of the prime contractor and the name and telephone
number of the contact person.
(B)
The executive director will use the notification to determine
if the applicant is eligible for an extension of an approved plan. Construction
will not be considered to have commenced until written notification is received
by the appropriate regional office.
(2)
If any sensitive feature is discovered during construction,
replacement, or rehabilitation, all regulated activities near the sensitive
feature must be suspended immediately.
(A)
The holder of an approved Edwards Aquifer protection plan
must immediately notify the appropriate regional office of any sensitive features
encountered during construction. This notice must be given before continuing
construction.
(B)
Regulated activities near the sensitive feature may not
proceed until the executive director has reviewed a geologic assessment report
prepared by a geologist that consists of information required under subsection
(b)(3)(C) and (D) of this section for the sensitive feature and has reviewed
and approved the methods proposed to protect the sensitive feature and the
Edwards Aquifer from potentially adverse impacts to water quality. The geologic
assessment report must be signed, sealed, and dated by the geologist preparing
the report.
(C)
The holder of an approved sewage collection system plan,
must meet the following.
(i)
Upon completion of any lift station excavation, a geologist
must certify that the excavation has been inspected for the presence of sensitive
features. The certification must be signed, sealed, and dated by the geologist
preparing the certification. Certification that the excavation has been inspected
must be submitted to the appropriate regional office.
(I)
Further activities may not proceed until the executive
director has reviewed and approved the methods proposed to protect any sensitive
feature and the Edwards Aquifer from potentially adverse impacts to water
quality from the lift station.
(II)
Construction may continue if the geologist certifies that
no sensitive feature or features were present.
(ii)
The applicant must submit a plan for ensuring the structural
integrity of the sewer line or for modifying the proposed collection system
alignment around the feature. The plan must be certified by a Texas licensed
professional engineer. These plans must be submitted to the appropriate regional
office for review and approval.
(D)
For an approved underground storage tank facility plan,
a geologist must certify that a completed tankhold excavation has been inspected
for the presence of sensitive features. The certification must be signed,
sealed, and dated by the geologist preparing the certification.
(i)
Certification that the tankhold excavation has been inspected
must be submitted to the appropriate regional office.
(ii)
If a sensitive feature is discovered, the applicant must
propose methods to protect the feature and the Edwards Aquifer from potentially
adverse impacts to water quality from the underground storage tank system.
Installation activities may not proceed until the executive director has reviewed
and approved the proposed methods. The protection methods must be consistent
with subsection (d)(1)(B) of this section.
(iii)
Construction may continue if the geologist certifies
that no sensitive feature or features were present.
(3)
The executive director must review methods or plans proposed
to protect sensitive features and the Edwards Aquifer from potentially adverse
impacts to water quality. This review will be completed within one week of
receiving a method or plan. Regulated activities near the sensitive feature
may not continue until the executive director has approved the proposed methods
or plans.
(g)
On-site sewerage systems. On-site sewerage systems located
on the recharge zone are subject to §285.40 of this title (relating to
OSSFs on the Recharge Zone of the Edwards Aquifer) and other applicable provisions
contained in Chapter 285 of this title. Systems must be designed, installed,
maintained, repaired, and replaced in accordance with Chapter 285 of this
title.
(h)
Exemption.
(1)
Regulated activities exempt from the Edwards Aquifer protection
plan application requirements under this section are:
(A)
the installation of natural gas lines;
(B)
the installation of telephone lines;
(C)
the installation of electric lines;
(D)
the installation of water lines;
(E)
the installation of other utility lines which are not designed
to carry and will not carry the following:
(i)
pollutants;
(ii)
storm water runoff;
(iii)
sewage effluent; or
(iv)
treated effluent from a wastewater treatment facility.
(2)
An individual land owner who seeks to construct his/her
own single-family residence or associated residential structures on the site
is exempt from the Edwards Aquifer protection plan application requirements
under this section, provided that he/she does not exceed 20% impervious cover
on the site.
(3)
Temporary erosion and sedimentation controls are required
to be installed and maintained for exempted activities on the recharge zone.
(4)
All temporary erosion and sedimentation controls:
(A)
must meet the requirements contained in subsection (b)(4)(D)(i)
of this section;
(B)
must be installed prior to construction;
(C)
must be maintained during construction; and
(D)
may be removed only when vegetation is established and
the construction area is stabilized.
(5)
The executive director may monitor storm water discharges
from these projects to evaluate the adequacy of the temporary erosion and
sedimentation control measures. Additional protection will be required if
the executive director determines that these controls are inadequate to protect
water quality.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's
legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304516
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: September 1, 2003
Proposal publication date: May 2, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) adopts
amendments to §§312.8, 312.50, and 312.64
without changes
to the proposed text as published in the May 16, 2003
issue of the
Texas Register
(28 TexReg 3919)
and will not be republished.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ADOPTED RULES
Senate Bill 405, 77th Legislature, established the Texas Board of Professional
Geoscientists and the regulation of professional geoscientists. The Geoscience
Practice Act (the Act) requires that a person may not take responsible charge
of a geoscientific report or a geoscientific portion of a report required
by state agency rule unless the person is licensed through the Texas Board
of Professional Geoscientists. The primary purpose of the adopted amendments
is to establish regulations for the public practice of geoscience in conformance
with the Act by requiring a person who prepares and submits geoscientific
information to the commission to be a licensed professional geoscientist.
The Act also allows certain specified engineers to publicly practice geoscience
in conformance with the Act. According to the bill analysis prepared at the
time of passage, the ultimate purpose of the Act was public safety through
the public registration of the practice of geoscience.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
Adopted §312.8, General Definitions, amends the introductory paragraph
by deleting the word "shall" and the phrase "unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise." The definition of licensed professional geoscientist is added
as a new paragraph (46) and the definition of qualified groundwater scientist
is deleted. The definitions for Clean Water Act (CWA), commission, United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), executive director, and person
are deleted because these definitions are located in 30 TAC §3.2. All
existing paragraphs are renumbered accordingly.
Adopted §312.50(a), Storage and Staging of Sludge at Beneficial Use
Sites, substitutes "must" for "shall." In subsection (a)(4), the use of "groundwater"
as a single word reflects current agency usage and a minor punctuation error
is corrected. Subsection (a)(4) requires that certification of the completed
storage area lining be made by a licensed professional engineer or licensed
professional geoscientist prior to using the facilities and that the certification
be signed, sealed, and dated by a licensed professional engineer or licensed
professional geoscientist.
Adopted §312.64, Management Practices, amends subsection (n) by substituting
"must" for "shall" in the first sentence and replaces licensed professional
geoscientist or licensed professional engineer for qualified groundwater scientist
as the person who shall develop the groundwater monitoring program or certify
that sewage sludge will not contaminate an aquifer. The licensed professional
geoscientist shall also sign, seal, and date the certification or the results
of the program.
FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the adopted rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225 and determined
that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not
meet the criteria for a "major environmental rule" as defined in that statute.
A "major environmental rule" means a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state.
The specific intent of the rules is to establish regulations allowing for
the public practice of geoscience in agency procedures in conformance with
the Act. The Act requires that a person may not take responsible charge of
a geoscientific report or a geoscientific portion of a report required by
a state agency rule unless the person is licensed through the Texas Board
of Professional Geoscientists. The rules are not specifically intended to
protect the environment or reduce risks to human health. The rules are intended
to establish procedures to require that specific reports and necessary data
submitted to the commission be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by licensed
professional geoscientists who have obtained their licenses through the Texas
Board of Professional Geoscientists. Therefore, it is not anticipated that
the rules will adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. The commission concludes
that these rules do not meet the definition of major environmental rule.
Furthermore, even if the rulemaking did meet the definition of a major
environmental rule, the amendments are not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0225,
because they do not accomplish any of the four results specified in §2001.0225(a).
Section 2001.0225(a) applies to a rule adopted by an agency, the result of
which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law, unless the rule is specifically
required by state law; 2) exceed an express requirement of state law, unless
the rule is specifically required by federal law; 3) exceed a requirement
of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative
of the federal government to implement a state and federal program; or 4)
adopt a rule solely under the general powers of the agency instead of under
a specific state law.
In this case, the amendments to Chapter 312 do not meet any of these requirements.
First, there are no federal standards that these rules would exceed. Second,
the rules do not exceed an express requirement of state law. Third, there
is no delegation agreement that would be exceeded by these rules. Fourth,
the commission adopts these rules to allow for the public practice of geoscience
in agency procedures in conformance with the Act. Therefore, the commission
does not adopt the rules solely under the commission's general powers.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission evaluated these rules and performed a preliminary assessment
of whether these rules constitute a takings under Texas Government Code, Chapter
2007. The specific intent of the rules is to establish regulations allowing
for the public practice of geoscience in agency procedures in conformance
with the Act. The rules would substantially advance this stated purpose by
requiring that specific reports and necessary data submitted to the commission
be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by licensed professional geoscientists
who have obtained their licenses through the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists.
Promulgation and enforcement of these rules would be neither a statutory
nor a constitutional taking of private real property. Specifically, the rules
do not affect a landowner's rights in private real property by burdening private
real property, nor restricting or limiting a landowner's right to property,
or reducing the value of property by 25% or more beyond that which would otherwise
exist in the absence of the adopted rulemaking. These rules simply require
that specific portions of applications or necessary data submitted to the
commission be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by a qualified professional
individual who has demonstrated his or her qualifications by obtaining a license
to engage in the public practice of geoscience from the Texas Board of Professional
Geoscientists. These rules do not affect any private real property.
There are no burdens imposed on private real property, and the benefits
to society are better applications for environmental permits based upon reliable
reports and data submitted by qualified licensed professional geoscientists.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the rulemaking and found that the rulemaking is
identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11(b)(2),
relating to Actions and Rules Subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program
(CMP), or will affect an action and/or authorization identified in Coastal
Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11(a)(6), and will
therefore require that applicable goals and policies of the CMP be considered
during the rulemaking process. The commission prepared a consistency determination
for the rules under 31 TAC §505.22 and found that the rulemaking is consistent
with the applicable CMP goals and policies. The following is a summary of
that determination. The CMP goal applicable to the rulemaking is the goal
to protect, preserve, restore, and enhance the diversity, quality, quantity,
functions, and values of coastal natural resource areas. CMP policies applicable
to the rules include the construction and operation of solid waste treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities, and the discharge of municipal and industrial
wastewater to coastal waters. Promulgation and enforcement of these rules
will not violate (exceed) any standards identified in the applicable CMP goals
and policies because the rule changes do not modify or alter standards set
forth in existing rules, and do not govern or authorize any actions subject
to the CMP. The rulemaking would require a person who prepares and submits
geoscientific information to the agency to be a licensed professional geoscientist.
PUBLIC COMMENT
A public hearing was not held on this rulemaking and one comment was received
from the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists during the comment period
which closed June 16, 2003.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT
The Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists stated that the proposed
rules add needed clarification to commission rules as the rules relate to
the role of professional geoscientists.
The commission appreciates the support from the Texas Board of Geoscientists.
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
30 TAC §312.8
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is adopted under Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides
the commission with the authority to adopt rules necessary to carry out its
power and duties under this code and other laws of this state; §5.105,
which authorizes the commission to establish and approve all general policy
of the commission by rule; and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271b, the Act,
which authorizes the public practice of geoscience in the State of Texas.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304517
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: September 1, 2003
Proposal publication date: May 16, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
30 TAC §312.50
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is adopted under Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides
the commission with the authority to adopt rules necessary to carry out its
power and duties under this code and other laws of this state; §5.105,
which authorizes the commission to establish and approve all general policy
of the commission by rule; and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271b, the Act,
which authorizes the public practice of geoscience in the State of Texas.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304518
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: September 1, 2003
Proposal publication date: May 16, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
30 TAC §312.64
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is adopted under Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides
the commission with the authority to adopt rules necessary to carry out its
power and duties under this code and other laws of this state; §5.105,
which authorizes the commission to establish and approve all general policy
of the commission by rule; and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271b, the Act,
which authorizes the public practice of geoscience in the State of Texas.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304519
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: September 1, 2003
Proposal publication date: May 16, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (commission) adopts
amendments to §§321.32, 321.35, 321.39, 321.55, 321.252, 321.255,
321.271, and 321.274
without changes
to the
proposed text as published in the May 16, 2003 issue of the
Texas Register
(28 TexReg 3924) and will not be republished.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE ADOPTED RULES
Senate Bill 405, 77th Legislature, established the Texas Board of Professional
Geoscientists and the regulation of professional geoscientists. The Geoscience
Practice Act (the Act) requires that a person may not take responsible charge
of a geoscientific report or a geoscientific portion of a report required
by state agency rule unless the person is licensed through the Texas Board
of Professional Geoscientists. The primary purpose of the adopted amendments
is to establish regulations for the public practice of geoscience in conformance
with the Act by requiring a person who prepares and submits geoscientific
information to the commission to be a licensed professional geoscientist.
The Act also allows certain specified engineers to publicly practice geoscience
in conformance with the Act. According to the bill analysis prepared at the
time of passage, the ultimate purpose of the Act was public safety through
the public registration of the practice of geoscience.
SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION
Adopted §321.32, Definitions, amends the introductory paragraph by
deleting the word "shall" and the phrase "unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise." The definition of licensed professional geoscientist is added
and the definition of qualified groundwater scientist is deleted, and existing
paragraphs (20) - (33) are renumbered accordingly.
Adopted §321.35(c), Procedures for Making Application for Registration,
makes minor grammatical corrections, substituting "that" for "which" and removing
"such." In §321.35(c)(8), "shall" is substituted for "must" and requires
that documentation of liner certifications be prepared, signed, sealed, and
dated either by a licensed professional engineer or a licensed professional
geoscientist. Subsection (c)(10) states that a recharge feature certification
may be made by a Natural Resources Conservation Service engineer, a licensed
professional engineer, or a licensed professional geoscientist (rather than
a qualified groundwater scientist). In subsection (c)(10)(G), licensed professional
geoscientist is substituted for qualified groundwater scientist, and a minor
grammatical error is corrected. In subsection (c)(11), the commission replaces
qualified groundwater scientist with licensed professional geoscientist; corrects
two minor grammatical errors; and breaks the final sentence into two sentences
for readability. In subsection (c)(11)(B), the commission requires that the
groundwater monitoring plan be prepared, certified, signed, sealed, and dated
by a licensed professional geoscientist and substitutes "must" for "shall."
Cross-references in §321.35(b), (d), (e), and (h) are updated.
Adopted §321.39(f), Pollution Prevention Plans, substitutes "must"
for "shall." Subsection (f)(16) is amended by making an antecedent noun agree
in number with its precedent nouns and by substituting "that" for "which."
In subsection (f)(16)(A), a minor grammatical correction in the choice of
indefinite article is made; and licensed professional geoscientist replaces
qualified groundwater scientist as one of the three people who may document
no significant leakage from a retention structure. In amended subsection (f)(16)(B),
the commission specifies what the documentation must include or show; corrects
a minor grammatical error; and replaces licensed professional geoscientist
for qualified groundwater scientist as one of the three people who may make
the written determination. Amended subsection (f)(17), substitutes "must"
for "shall"; substitutes "that" for "which"; corrects a minor grammatical
error; replaces licensed professional geoscientist for qualified groundwater
scientist as one of the three people who can make a site-specific assessment;
makes an antecedent noun agree in number with its precedent noun; and uses
the correct noun "equivalent" meaning "equal" rather than "equivalency," which
means "a condition of equality." Amended subsection (f)(18), makes a precedent
noun agree in number with its antecedent noun; corrects a minor grammatical
error; and replaces licensed professional geoscientist for qualified groundwater
scientist as one of the three people who can do a site evaluation every five
years.
Adopted §321.55, Protection of Groundwater, substitutes "must" for
"shall"; correctly specifies the requirements of paragraphs (1) and (2); and
deletes the word "such." In paragraph (2), the commission substitutes "must"
for "shall"; deletes an unnecessary period; spells out centimeters per second;
provides the correct and proper name of the laboratory test to be conducted;
and requires certification of the pond liner by a licensed professional engineer
or a licensed professional geoscientist and that the certification be signed,
sealed, and dated by a licensed professional engineer or a licensed professional
geoscientist.
Adopted §321.252, Definitions, amends the introduction of the section
by adding the word "when"; deleting the word "shall"; and deleting the phrase
"unless the context clearly indicates otherwise." The definition of licensed
professional geoscientist is added as new paragraph (6) and the remaining
paragraphs are renumbered accordingly. A corrected reference to Chapter 213
instead of Chapter 313 is made in renumbered paragraph (10). Formatting changes
are made throughout this section to be consistent with other agency rules.
Adopted §321.255(c), Requirements for Containment of Wastes and Pond(s),
substitutes "licensed" for "registered" professional engineer; includes a
licensed professional geoscientist among the persons who can certify a pond
lining; and substitutes "using" for "utilization of." Subsection (c) also
requires that the certification be signed, sealed, and dated by a licensed
professional engineer or licensed professional geoscientist. Formatting changes
are made throughout this section to be consistent with other agency rules.
A cross-reference is corrected in subsection (e).
Adopted §321.271, Definitions, amends the introduction of the section
by deleting the word "shall" and the phrase "unless the context clearly indicates
otherwise." The definition of licensed professional geoscientist is added
as new paragraph (14) and the remaining paragraphs are renumbered accordingly.
Administrative changes, which include formatting, grammatical, and cross-reference
corrections, are made throughout the section to conform with Texas Register
and agency requirements.
Adopted §321.274, Ground-water Protection, amends the title to Groundwater
Protection, to reflect the accepted usage of "groundwater" as a single, unhyphenated
word. Subsection (a) substitutes "that" for "which"; substitutes "must" for
"shall"; and spells out milligrams per liter. The commission amends subsection
(a)(1) to substitute "must" for "shall"; eliminate a superfluous grammatical
construction; and reflect the accepted usage of "groundwater" as a single,
unhyphenated word. Subsection (a)(1)(E) requires that the certification be
signed, sealed, and dated by a licensed professional engineer or licensed
professional geoscientist; substitutes "licensed" for "registered" professional
engineer; includes a licensed professional geoscientist among the persons
who can certify a pond lining; and substitutes "using" for "utilization of."
The commission amends §321.274(b) by substituting "using" for "utilizing";
substituting "that" for "which"; specifying the noun antecedent of the demonstrative
pronoun; and substituting "must" for "shall." Subsection (b)(1) substitutes
"must" for "shall"; eliminates a superfluous grammatical construction; and
reflects the accepted usage of "groundwater" as a single, unhyphenated word.
Amended subsection (b)(1)(D) requires that the certification be signed, sealed,
and dated by a licensed professional engineer or licensed professional geoscientist;
substitutes "licensed" for "registered" professional engineer; includes licensed
professional geoscientist among the persons who can certify a pond lining;
and substitutes "using" for "utilization of." Formatting changes are made
throughout this section to be consistent with other agency rules.
FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS DETERMINATION
The commission reviewed the adopted rulemaking in light of the regulatory
analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225 and determined
that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not
meet the criteria for a "major environmental rule" as defined in that statute.
A "major environmental rule" means a rule the specific intent of which
is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental
exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector
of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state.
The specific intent of the rules is to establish regulations allowing for
the public practice of geoscience in agency procedures in conformance with
the Act. The Act requires that a person may not take responsible charge of
a geoscientific report or a geoscientific portion of a report required by
a state agency rule unless the person is licensed through the Texas Board
of Professional Geoscientists. The rules are not specifically intended to
protect the environment or reduce risks to human health. The rules are intended
to establish procedures to require that specific reports and necessary data
submitted to the commission be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by licensed
professional geoscientists who have obtained their licenses through the Texas
Board of Professional Geoscientists. Therefore, it is not anticipated that
the rules will adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public
health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. The commission concludes
that these rules do not meet the definition of major environmental rule.
Furthermore, even if the rulemaking did meet the definition of a major
environmental rule, the amendments are not subject to Texas Government Code, §2001.0225,
because they do not accomplish any of the four results specified in §2001.0225(a).
Section 2001.0225(a) applies to a rule adopted by an agency, the result of
which is to: 1) exceed a standard set by federal law, unless the rule is specifically
required by state law; 2) exceed an express requirement of state law, unless
the rule is specifically required by federal law; 3) exceed a requirement
of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative
of the federal government to implement a state and federal program; or 4)
adopt a rule solely under the general powers of the agency instead of under
a specific state law.
In this case, the amendments to Chapter 321 do not meet any of these requirements.
First, there are no federal standards that these rules would exceed. Second,
the rules do not exceed an express requirement of state law. Third, there
is no delegation agreement that would be exceeded by these rules. Fourth,
the commission adopts these rules to allow for the public practice of geoscience
in agency procedures in conformance with the Act. Therefore, the commission
does not adopt the rules solely under the commission's general powers.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT
The commission evaluated these rules and performed a preliminary assessment
of whether these rules constitute a takings under Texas Government Code, Chapter
2007. The specific intent of the rules is to establish regulations allowing
for the public practice of geoscience in agency procedures in conformance
with the Act. The rules would substantially advance this stated purpose by
requiring that specific reports and necessary data submitted to the commission
be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by licensed professional geoscientists
who have obtained their licenses through the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists.
Promulgation and enforcement of these rules would be neither a statutory
nor a constitutional taking of private real property. Specifically, the rules
do not affect a landowner's rights in private real property by burdening private
real property, nor restricting or limiting a landowner's right to property,
or reducing the value of property by 25% or more beyond that which would otherwise
exist in the absence of the adopted rulemaking. These rules simply require
that specific portions of applications or necessary data submitted to the
commission be produced, signed, sealed, and dated by a qualified professional
individual who has demonstrated his or her qualifications by obtaining a license
to engage in the public practice of geoscience from the Texas Board of Professional
Geoscientists. These rules do not affect any private real property.
There are no burdens imposed on private real property, and the benefits
to society are better applications for environmental permits based upon reliable
reports and data submitted by qualified licensed professional geoscientists.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The commission reviewed the rulemaking and found that the rulemaking is
identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11(b)(2),
relating to Actions and Rules Subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program
(CMP), or will affect an action and/or authorization identified in Coastal
Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11(a)(6), and will
therefore require that applicable goals and policies of the CMP be considered
during the rulemaking process. The commission prepared a consistency determination
for the rules under 31 TAC §505.22 and found that the rulemaking is consistent
with the applicable CMP goals and policies. The following is a summary of
that determination. The CMP goal applicable to the rulemaking is the goal
to protect, preserve, restore, and enhance the diversity, quality, quantity,
functions, and values of coastal natural resource areas. CMP policies applicable
to the rules include the construction and operation of solid waste treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities, and the discharge of municipal and industrial
wastewater to coastal waters. Promulgation and enforcement of these rules
will not violate (exceed) any standards identified in the applicable CMP goals
and policies because the rule changes do not modify or alter standards set
forth in existing rules, and do not govern or authorize any actions subject
to the CMP. The rulemaking would require a person who prepares and submits
geoscientific information to the agency to be a licensed professional geoscientist.
PUBLIC COMMENT
A public hearing was not held on this rulemaking and one comment was received
from the Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists during the comment period
which closed June 16, 2003.
RESPONSE TO COMMENT
The Texas Board of Professional Geoscientists stated that the proposed
rules add needed clarification to commission rules as the rules relate to
the role of professional geoscientists.
The commission appreciates the support from the Texas Board of Geoscientists.
Subchapter B. CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS
30 TAC §§321.32, 321.35, 321.39
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are adopted under Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides
the commission with the authority to adopt rules necessary to carry out its
power and duties under this code and other laws of this state; §5.105,
which authorizes the commission to establish and approve all general policy
of the commission by rule; and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271b, the Act,
which authorizes the public practice of geoscience in the State of Texas.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304522
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: September 1, 2003
Proposal publication date: May 16, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
30 TAC §321.55
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendment is adopted under Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides
the commission with the authority to adopt rules necessary to carry out its
power and duties under this code and other laws of this state; §5.105,
which authorizes the commission to establish and approve all general policy
of the commission by rule; and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 3271b, the Act,
which authorizes the public practice of geoscience in the State of Texas.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on July 25, 2003.
TRD-200304521
Stephanie Bergeron
Director, Environmental Law Division
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Effective date: September 1, 2003
Proposal publication date: May 16, 2003
For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348
Chapter 122.
FEDERAL OPERATING PERMITS PROGRAM
Subchapter F. GENERAL OPERATING PERMITS
Chapter 213.
EDWARDS AQUIFER
Chapter 312.
SLUDGE USE, DISPOSAL, AND TRANSPORTATION
Subchapter B. LAND APPLICATION FOR BENEFICIAL USE AND STORAGE AT BENEFICIAL USE SITES
Subchapter C. SURFACE DISPOSAL
Chapter 321.
CONTROL OF CERTAIN ACTIVITIES BY RULE
Subchapter C. MEAT PROCESSING
Subchapter N. HANDLING OF WASTES FROM COMMERCIAL FACILITIES ENGAGED IN LIVESTOCK TRAILER CLEANING