Part 1.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Chapter 20.
COTTON PEST CONTROL
The Texas Department of Agriculture (the department) proposes amendments
to §§20.1, 20.3, 20.20, 20.22 all concerning general provisions,
definitions and stalk destruction, and the repeal of §20.23, concerning
exceptions for no-till cotton production methods. The department has conducted
a review of the Cotton Stalk Destruction Program and due to changes in the
cotton industry, such as improved production techniques, boll weevil eradication,
and other related issues, the department is proposing an update to regulations
affecting cotton producers. Many of the proposed changes are the result of
input received at Cotton Producer Advisory Committee meetings held across
the state. The amendments are proposed to provide definitions needed for clarification
of existing sections and to provide additional detail due to changing the
policy on extension requests and when stalk destruction monitoring has ceased.
The repeal is proposed to allow more flexibility toward the destruction date
as long as cotton remains non-hostable.
Section 20.1 defines terms used in Chapter 20 and is amended to include
revised definitions of the terms "destroyed or destruction, protection plan
and volunteer cotton." The definition of the term "no-till cotton field" is
being deleted due to the proposed repeal of §20.23. The amendment to §20.3
is being proposed to clarify a violation of the cotton stalk destruction program.
The amendments to §20.20 are being proposed to divide Zone 8 into Area
1 and Area 2, which groups counties into northern and southern areas with
more similar growing conditions and harvest dates. This change was recommended
by the Zone 8 Cotton Producer Advisory Committee. The amendments to §20.22
(a) are being proposed to change the stalk destruction requirement for cotton
in Zones 1-8 from "destroyed" to "rendered non-hostable" (as boll weevils
do not reproduce in non-hostable cotton. In Zones 9 and 10, cotton plants
must still be destroyed by shredding and plowing or burying the stalks. §20.22
(b)(1) allows producers to use alternative methods for destruction but no
longer requires producers to notify the department before the deadline. §20.22(b)(2)
removes the notification requirement for alternative methods in Zones 1-8
after the deadline. §20.22 (c)(1) allows producers in Zone 1 to apply
for individual extensions, which has been allowed in Zones 2-10. Concerning
requests for extensions due to research after the deadline date, the research
must now be conducted within a sealed greenhouse or lab to prevent boll weevils
from escaping and re-infesting a field. §20.22 (c)(3) allows the department
to implement blanket extensions in a zone or area if a serious, unforeseen
condition results that prevents the department from surveying fields or makes
compliance by a majority of producers impossible. §20.22 (c)(6) allows
a producer to obtain an extension after the deadline if wet weather prevents
cotton producers from destroying volunteer cotton. §20.22 (d) specifies
when stalk destruction requirements for a given crop year end and when penalties
for violations shall cease to accrue.
The repeal of §20.23 is being proposed to allow no-till cotton growers
and conventional cotton growers an equal time period for stalk destruction
requirements and is no longer necessary. No-till cotton production is still
encouraged in those areas where it is still beneficial. The current practice
of using no-till methods already required the cotton to be non- hostable,
however, this change will provide opportunity for growers to manage cotton
in their area while achieving greater consistency of stalk destruction requirements
across the state.
Ed Gage, coordinator for pest management programs, has determined that
for the first five-year period the proposed amendments and repeal are in effect,
there is no anticipated fiscal impact on state or local governments as a result
of administration and enforcement of the sections.
Mr. Gage has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed amendments and repeal are in effect, the public benefit anticipated
as a result of administering and enforcing the repeal and amended sections
is consistent and equitable cotton stalk destruction rules that supports boll
weevil eradication and still allows maximum flexibility in achieving crop
termination. There are no additional anticipated costs to microbusinesses,
small businesses or individuals required to comply with the proposal.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ed Gage, Coordinator for Pest
Management, Texas Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 12847, Austin, Texas
78711. Comments must be received no later than 30 days after the date of the
publication of the proposal in the
Texas Register
.
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
4 TAC §20.1, §20.3
The amendments to §20.1 and §20.3 are proposed in
accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §74.006 which
provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for
the effective enforcement and administration of Chapter 74 and §74.004
which provides the department with the authority to establish regulated areas,
dates and appropriate methods of destruction of stalks, other cotton parts
and products of host plants for cotton pests.
The code that is affected by the proposal is Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter
12 and Chapter 74, Subchapter A.
§20.1. Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have
the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1) - (9)
(No change.)
(10)
Destroyed, or destruction--Killed by cutting or dislodging
the roots, burying the entire plant, or by an alternative method which completely
kills the leaves, stems, flowers, fruit, and roots of the plant.
Applicable
to Zones 9 and 10.
[
(11) - (19)
(No change.)
(20)
Non-hostable cotton--Cotton that is free of fruiting structures
such as buds, squares, flowers or bolls
in Zones 1 - 8
.
[(21)
No-till cotton field--A field in which
the soil is left undisturbed from the time the cotton crop is harvested until
the new crop is planted in narrow slots and weed control is accomplished using
herbicides.]
(21)
[
(22)
[
(23)
[
(A)
the
[
(B)
requirements for moving, handling, storage and treatment
or use of approved insecticide applications to regulated articles; and
(C)
monitoring of boll weevils at a specified site(s)
as approved by the department
.
(24)
[
(25)
[
(26)
[
(27)
[
(28)
[
(29)
[
(30)
[
(31)
[
(32)
[
§20.3.Violations and Enforcement Actions.
(a)
Violations. In addition to any other violations that may
arise under requirements of the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74, or regulations
adopted pursuant to the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 71 or Chapter 74:
(1)
Failure to comply with cotton stalk destruction requirements
outlined in Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Stalk Destruction Program)
constitutes a violation.
(2)
Cotton that is allowed to develop fruiting structures
after the destruction deadline constitutes a violation.
[
(b)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.
TRD-200203768
Dolores Alvarado Hibbs
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Agriculture
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075
4 TAC §20.20, §20.22
The amendments to §20.20 and §20.22 are proposed
in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §74.006 which
provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for
the effective enforcement and administration of Chapter 74 and §74.004
which provides the department with the authority to establish regulated areas,
dates and appropriate methods of destruction of stalks, other cotton parts
and products of host plants for cotton pests.
The code that is affected by the proposal is Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter
74, Subchapter A.
§20.20.Pest Management Zones.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
Zones. Established zones include the following counties:
(1) - (11)
(No change.)
(12)
Zone 8
Area (1)
. Bell, Bosque, Coryell, [
(13)
Zone 8 Area (2). Ellis, Henderson, Hood,
Johnson, Navarro and Somervell.
(14)
[
(15)
[
§20.22.Stalk Destruction Requirements.
(a)
Deadlines and methods. All cotton plants in [
Figure: 4 TAC §20.22(a)
(b)
Alternative destruction.
[
[(2)
After the deadline, alternative methods
of destruction may be used to destroy volunteer cotton in Zones 1-8. provided
that the farm owner and/or operator notifies the department in writing, on
a notification form prescribed by the department, of his or her intent to
utilize an alternative destruction method.]
[(3)
Notification forms may be obtained from
any of the following locations within a cotton pest management zone:]
[(A)
County Extension office;]
[(B)
Farm Service Agency office; or]
[(C)
Texas Department of Agriculture.]
[(4)
Conditions.]
[(A)
For volunteer cotton in all zones, or regrowth cotton
in, where shredding and/or plowing is required, destruction shall be achieved
by the 14th day after notifying the department of the intent to use an alternative
method; and]
[(B)
If fruiting structures are present, the host plants shall
be shredded immediately, in addition to performing the alternative destruction
method; and]
[(C)
If destruction of all host plants is not achieved by the
14th day after notification to the department, then mechanical destruction
will be required to remove the remaining plants immediately, and the field
will be considered in violation for the preceding 14 day period and any day
thereafter, until destruction is complete; and]
[(D)
Once the field has been declared a public nuisance by
the department, the field is in violation regardless of notification of an
alternative method of destruction.]
(c)
Deadline
extensions
[
(1)
The department may, on written request by a farm owner
and/or operator, grant an extension of the cotton destruction deadline in
any pest management zone. [
(A)
research
conducted inside a sealed greenhouse or lab
;
(B) - (E)
(No change.)
(2)
(No change.)
(3)
A blanket extension may be implemented
at the department's own initiative if a zone or other area experiences a serious
unforeseen condition that prevents the department from surveying fields for
compliance or which clearly makes compliance by a substantial majority of
producers impossible.
(4)
[
(A)
County Extension office;
(B)
Farm Service Agency office;
(C)
Texas Department of Agriculture.
(5)
[
(6)
[
(d)
Once a new cotton crop is planted in a
zone and has emerged, the requirement to destroy original growth, regrowth,
or volunteer cotton from the previous crop year shall end until after the
next harvest. Violations arising prior to the date of planting of a new crop
in a zone will be pursued, but penalties shall cease to accrue on that date.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.
TRD-200203767
Dolores Alvarado Hibbs
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Agriculture
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075
4 TAC §20.23
(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for
repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of
the Texas Department of Agriculture or in the Texas Register office, Room
245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of §20.23 is proposed in accordance
with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §12.016, which provides the
department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for administration
of the Code; and §74.006, which provides the department with the authority
to adopt rules as necessary for enforcement of boll weevil eradication.
The code that is affected by the proposal is the Texas Agriculture Code,
Chapter 74, Subchapter A.
§20.23.Exceptions For No Till Cotton.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.
TRD-200203765
Dolores Alvarado Hibbs
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Agriculture
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075
Chapter 40.
CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE
4 TAC §40.1, §40.2
The Texas Animal Health Commission (Commission) proposes
amendments to Chapter 40, concerning Chronic Wasting Disease. This proposal
amends §40.1 regarding Definitions and §40.2, regarding, General
Requirements.
Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy
of deer and elk. CWD was initially described as a clinical syndrome in native
mule deer and black-tailed deer held in a wildlife research facility in Colorado
in 1967. The disease was later reported in additional research facilities
in Colorado and Wyoming. By the early 1990s, the disease had been documented
in free-ranging mule deer and elk in north-central Colorado and southeastern
Wyoming. In December 1997, the disease was confirmed in two commercial elk
operations in South Dakota. CWD has since been diagnosed in two additional
commercial elk herds in South Dakota, one elk herd in Nebraska, and one elk
herd in Oklahoma. Quarantines were placed on the affected commercial herds
by the state animal health authorities.
Chronic Wasting Disease is known to affect mule deer, black-tailed deer,
elk and white-tailed deer. The susceptibility of other species of native and
exotic cervidae is unknown. Clinical signs include chronic weight loss, emaciation,
excessive thirst, excessive frequency of urination, excessive salivation,
and behavioral changes. The disease is progressive and always fatal. Based
on the epidemiology of the disease, transmission is thought to be lateral
and possibly maternal. Although not fully characterized, the causative agent
is thought to be an infectious proteinaceous particle commonly referred to
as a prion which is known to be extremely resistant to conventional heat and
chemical disinfection procedures.
Recently, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued an interim
rule regarding the payment of indemnity for cervids exposed to CWD. That rule
provides that "subject to the availability of funding, the amount of indemnity
payments for eligible animals will be determined by appraisal, with the indemnity
payment set at 95 percent of the appraised value, with a cap on payments of
$3,000 per animal." CWD positive herds will be jointly appraised by an APHIS
official appraiser and a State official appraiser, or if APHIS and State authorities
agree that both appraisers are not needed for a given situation, then by either
a State official appraiser or an APHIS official appraiser alone. The appraised
value of the cervids will be their fair market value as determined by the
meat or breeding value of the animals. Animals may be appraised in groups,
provided that where appraisal is by the head, each animal in the group is
the same value per head, and where appraisal is by the pound, each animal
in the group is the same value per pound.
To make this indemnity program equitable for producers in all the States
that might participate, we will reduce the Federal indemnity payment for an
animal when indemnity payments for the same animal from non-Federal sources
exceed five (5) percent of its appraised value. The reduction in the Federal
payment will equal the amount by which the non-Federal payments exceed five
(5) percent of the animal's appraised value.
This action by USDA limits the Commission's ability to participate in any
indemnity in excess of five (5) percent. Therefore, the Commission is promulgating
a regulation which limits its participation to five (5) percent.
Also, the Commission is lowering the age of cervids eligible for the CWD
Monitoring program from sixteen (16) months to twelve (12) months. This is
in response to the fact that cervids have shown signs of CWD at this age.
Furthermore, this is an appropriate standard based on the fact that cervids
generally have their fawns in early summer making it easier to identify when
a cervid has reached this age level.
Mr. Bruce Hammond, Deputy Director of Administration and Finance, Texas
Animal Health Commission, has determined for the first five-year period the
rules are in effect, there will be no additional fiscal implications for state
or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. The
agency currently processes indemnity requests for specific diseases. The Commission
does not expect there to be a lot of eligible cervids and as such the proposed
indemnification regulation is not expected to cause us to exceed funds budgeted
for the biennium. There will be no effect to small or micro businesses.
Mr. Hammond also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rules will be clear and concise regulations. The commission believes by
participating in indemnifying producers for these animals we will improve
detection and disposal of these high risk animals as well as help insure that
Texas does not have an outbreak of a disease which could have a negative impact
on the livestock industry in Texas.
In accordance with Government Code, §2001.022, this agency has determined
that the adopted rule will not impact local economies and, therefore, did
not file a request for a local employment impact statement with the Texas
Workforce Commission.
The agency has determined that the proposed governmental action will not
affect private real property. These adopted rules are an activity related
to the handling of animals, including requirements concerning testing, movement,
inspection, identification, reporting of disease, and treatment, in accordance
with 4 TAC, §59.7, and are, therefore, compliant with the Private Real
Property Preservation Act in Government Code, Chapter 2007.
Comments regarding the proposed amendments may be submitted to Edith Smith,
Texas Animal Health Commission, 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, Texas 78758, by
fax at (512) 719-0721, or by e-mail at "esmith@tahc.state.tx.us."
The amendments are proposed under the Texas Agriculture Code,
Chapter 161, §161.041 (a) and (b), and §161.046 which authorizes
the Commission to promulgate rules in accordance with the Texas Agriculture
Code. Also, the amendments are adopted under the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter
161, §161.058 which authorizes the commission to adopt rules related
to indemnity for exposed or diseased livestock.
No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendments.
§40.1.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have
the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)--A transmissible spongiform
encephalopathy (TSE) of deer and elk.
(2)
CWD Profile--A deer or elk
12
[
(3)
Commission--The Texas Animal Health Commission.
(4)
Herd--A group of deer or elk maintained on common ground,
or two or more groups of deer or elk under common ownership or supervision
that are geographically separated, but can have an interchange or movement
without regard to health status.
(5)
High Risk Animal--A deer or elk that has had direct contact
with an animal which has been confirmed to be affected with CWD. In herds
with evidence of transmission, as determined by an epidemiological investigation,
high risk animals include all animals that have had contact with the affected
animal(s) at any time during a 12 month period preceding the initial observation
of clinical signs. In herds without evidence of transmission, as determined
by an epidemiological investigation, high risk animals include all animals
that have had contact with the affected animal at any time during a 12 month
period preceding death of the affected animal.
(6)
Official Eartag--An identification eartag that provides
unique identification for each individual animal by conforming to the alphanumeric
National Uniform Eartagging System.
(7)
Official Laboratory--The National Veterinary Services Laboratory,
United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, is the reference laboratory
for CWD diagnostic procedures.
(8)
Positive Herd--A herd in which a diagnosis of CWD has been
confirmed by the National Veterinary Services Laboratory.
(9)
Suspicious Animal--A deer or elk which has clinical signs
that resemble the CWD profile.
(10)
Suspicious Herd--A herd in which one or more animals are
observed with clinical signs that resemble the CWD profile.
(11)
Trace Herd--The term includes both traceback and trace-forward
herds. A traceback herd is any herd where an affected animal has resided during
a 36 month period prior to death. A trace-forward herd is any herd which has
received animals from a positive herd during a 30 month period prior to death
of the affected animal.
§40.2.General Requirements.
(a)
Procedures for issuing hold orders and quarantines.
(1)
All herds suspicious of CWD, in which one or more animals
are observed with signs which resemble the CWD profile, shall be reported
to a representative of the Commission. The herd shall be restricted by hold
order until the investigation and diagnosis have been completed.
(2)
Trace herds shall be restricted by hold order until an
epidemiologic investigation has been completed and the herd has met all requirements
specified in a herd plan.
(3)
CWD positive herds shall be restricted by quarantine until
the herd has met all requirements specified in a herd plan.
(4)
All suspicious, trace, and positive herds not complying
with the requirements of an investigation or herd plan shall be restricted
by quarantine.
(b)
Procedures in suspicious, trace, and positive herds.
(1)
CWD suspicious animals shall be presented to a representative
of the Commission for the purpose of collection and submission of appropriate
samples to an official laboratory for diagnosis.
(2)
Disposition of a positive herd without evidence of transmission
within the herd as determined by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist following completion
of the investigation. A herd plan will be developed by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist
in consultation with the herd owner, and their veterinarian (if requested
by the owner). The herd plan shall include the following requirements for
a period of five years:
(A)
Routine visual inspection of all animals in the herd by
a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of early detection of CWD suspicious
animals.
(B)
Annual verification of herd inventory by a TAHC or USDA
veterinarian.
(C)
Mandatory reporting of all CWD suspicious animals and all
death losses. Mortality in animals
12
[
(D)
High risk animals must be removed from the herd and:
(i)
Humanely destroyed, tested for CWD, and disposed of as
specified in subsection (c) of this section, or
(ii)
Maintained under hold order for 48 months from the last
case of CWD.
(3)
Disposition of a positive herd with evidence of transmission
within the herd as determined by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist following completion
of the investigation. A herd plan will be developed by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist
in consultation with the owner, and their veterinarian (if requested by the
owner). The herd plan shall include the following requirements for a period
of five years:
(A)
Routine visual inspection of all animals in the herd by
a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of early detection of CWD suspicious
animals.
(B)
Annual verification of herd inventory by a TAHC or USDA
veterinarian.
(C)
Mandatory reporting of all CWD suspicious animals and all
death losses. Mortality in animals
12
[
(D)
High risk animals must be removed from the herd and:
(i)
Humanely destroyed, tested for CWD, and disposed of as
specified in subsection (c) of this section, or
(ii)
Maintained under hold order for 48 months from the last
case of CWD.
(E)
The herd shall remain under quarantine for 36 months from
the last case of CWD.
(4)
Disposition of trace herds. A herd plan will be developed
by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist in consultation with the owner, and their
veterinarian (if requested by the owner). The herd plan shall include the
following requirements for a period of three years:
(A)
Routine visual inspection of all animals in the herd by
a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of early detection of CWD suspicious
animals.
(B)
Annual verification of herd inventory by a TAHC or USDA
veterinarian.
(C)
Mandatory reporting of all CWD suspicious animals and all
death losses. Mortality in animals
12
[
(D)
High risk animals must be removed from the herd and:
(i)
Humanely destroyed, tested for CWD, and disposed of as
specified in subsection (c) of this section, or
(ii)
Maintained under hold order for 48 months from the last
potential exposure.
(c)
Destruction of suspicious and high risk animals. Animals
destroyed due to a presumptive diagnosis of CWD, including high risk animals
in positive and trace herds, shall be humanely euthanized, appropriate samples
collected to confirm the diagnosis, and disposed of by deep burial or incineration,
including all animal products, by-products, and contaminated materials:
(1)
on the premises where disclosed, or
(2)
at a facility approved by the executive director.
(d)
Payment of indemnity. The Commission
may participate in paying indemnity to purchase and destroy CWD positive animals,
CWD exposed animals, and CWD suspect animals. Subject to available funding,
the amount of the state payment for any such animals will be five (5) percent
of the appraised value established in accordance with 9 CFR, Part 55, Section
55.3. This payment is in participation with any Federal payments made in accordance
with 9 CFR, Part 55, §55.2.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.
TRD-200203746
Gene Snelson
General Counsel
Texas Animal Health Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 719-0714
4 TAC §48.2, §48.7
The Texas Animal Health Commission proposes amendments to
Chapter 48, concerning Riding Stable Registration Program. This proposal amends §48.2,
regarding Definitions, and §48.7, regarding Registration and Renewal
Fee.
During the 77th Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill 685 was passed and
signed by the Governor which amends Chapter 2053 of the Texas Occupations
Code to transfer from the Texas Department of Health (TDH), the Texas Board
of Health (board), and the commissioner of public health (commissioner) to
the Texas Animal Health Commission (commission) all powers, duties, rights,
and obligations relating to the regulation of riding stables. The bill sets
forth procedures regarding the transfer of authority from TDH, the board,
and the commissioner to the commission.
In reviewing and registering riding stables, the Commission has discovered
that there are a number of riding facilities that utilize a variety of equine
activity as treatment tools for people with disabilities or medical conditions.
These are facilities that provide horses to the public for riding and/or driving
in order to provide treatment or a benefit to a group of people. As the commission
understands the intent of the legislation was to insure the well-being of
equine utilized by the public, the registration program is applicable. This
is further supported by the fact that it insures that the equine are in a
healthy condition for the purpose of providing therapeutic lessons. However,
in recognition of the fact that these facilities are providing an important
service and in order to not add any additional fiscal impact to their program,
the Commission is proposing to exempt them from the registration fee. This
rule proposal will allow a facility that provides only this type of service
to apply for a waiver of the fee based on that fact.
Mr. Bruce Hammond, Deputy Director for Administration and Finance, Texas
Animal Health Commission, has determined for the first five year period the
rules are in effect, there will be no additional fiscal implications for state
or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. The
TAHC is using the existing fee structure that was established by the TDH in
administering the program. It is estimated that there are between ten to twenty
such facilities. As such, the loss of fee revenue should not have a large
impact on administering this program. An evaluation will be made at the end
of the first two year period to determine if an adjustment in fees is necessary
to recover the cost of administering the registration program and to employ
agents to conduct inspections. There will be no effect to small or micro businesses.
Mr. Hammond also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated is that these facilities
will register, insuring the healthy condition of their equine, without having
to incur the fiscal cost of registering.
In accordance with Government Code, §2001.022, this agency has determined
that the adopted rule will not impact local economies and, therefore, did
not file a request for a local employment impact statement with the Texas
Workforce Commission.
The agency has determined that the proposed governmental action will not
affect private real property, and is, therefore, compliant with the Private
Real Property Preservation Act in Government Code, Chapter 2007.
Comments regarding the proposed amendments may be submitted to Edith Smith,
Texas Animal Health Commission, 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, Texas 78758, by
fax at (512) 719-0721 or by e-mail at "esmith@tahc.state.tx.us."
Senate Bill 685 amends Chapter 2053 of the Texas Occupations
Code to transfer from the Texas Department of Health (TDH), the Texas Board
of Health (board), and the commissioner of public health (commissioner) to
the Texas Animal Health Commission (commission) all powers, duties, rights,
and obligations relating to the regulation of riding stables. Rulemaking authority
is expressly granted to the Texas Animal Health Commission in Section 3 (§2053.012,
Occupations Code) of the bill. Sec. 2053.012 provides that the commission
may adopt rules it considers necessary to carry out this chapter.
No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed rules.
§48.2.Definitions.
The following words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless
the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
Act--Senate Bill 685, 77th Legislature, 2001.
(2)
Adequate food and water--Food and water which is sufficient
in amount and appropriate for the particular type of animal to prevent starvation,
dehydration, or significant risk to the animal's health from a lack of food
or water.
(3)
Adequate space--An area which is of sufficient length,
width, and height to allow the equine to freely and comfortably move about,
stand with all four feet on the ground, lie down, and get up without injury.
(4)
Adequate ventilation--The provision of fresh air to an
enclosure by means of windows, doors, vents, fans, or air-conditioning so
as to minimize drafts, odors, and moisture condensation.
(5)
Application--A written request to the commission for a
registration, temporary registration, or renewal of registration. The application
must be on the form prescribed by the commission.
(6)
Body condition score--An assessment of equine body condition
in accordance with the following:
Figure: 4 TAC §48.2(6) (No change.)
(7)
Carriage--A two-or four-wheeled passenger vehicle pulled
by an equine.
(8)
Carriage equine--Any equine which is used by its owner
or other person to pull any carriage, in exchange for a fee. An equine rented
or leased by its owner to another person for any of the foregoing purposes
shall be deemed to be a carriage equine for the purposes of this chapter.
(9)
Commission--Texas Animal Health Commission.
(10)
Equine--Any member of the Equidae family, including equine,
mules, asses, donkeys, and ponies.
(11)
Free-choice--Available in unlimited quantity for use or
consumption by the equine at any time the equine elects.
(12)
Humane care--Humane care is, but is not limited to, the
provision of adequate ventilation, sanitary shelter, and adequate food and
water, consistent with the normal requirements and feeding habits of the animal's
size, species, and breed.
(13)
Owner--The person who operates an establishment and who
is responsible for the shelter and care of equine for hire.
(14)
Registered establishment--Any facility, stable, or paddock
where rented equine are kept that conforms to the requirements in these sections
and is duly registered by the Texas Animal Health Commission.
(15)
Rental equine--Any equine let for hire to be ridden or
driven, either with or without the furnishing of riding or driving instruction.
(16)
Riding stable--A facility where rental equine are housed,
held, or maintained.
(17)
Saddle equine--Any equine let for hire to be ridden, either
with or without the furnishing of riding instruction.
(18)
Shelter--Protection from severe weather conditions and
direct hot sun.
(19)
Stable--A structure having a permanent roof, stalls, and
access ways used for quartering equine.
(20)
Therapeutic Riding Stable--A facility
where the only equine activities provided are to people with disabilities
or medical conditions.
(21)
[
(22)
[
§48.7.Registration and Renewal Fee.
Each initial registration and renewal fee will be $100 for all riding
stables with three or less equine and $200 for all riding stables with four
or more equine.
A Therapeutic Riding Stable may request a waiver of the
registration and renewal fee based on documentation that the only services
provided are for a therapeutic purpose.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.
TRD-200203747
Gene Snelson
General Counsel
Texas Animal Health Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 719-0714
The Texas Animal Health Commission proposes two new requirements for
cervids and poultry entering Texas. The TAHC proposes the repeal and replacement
of §51.10 concerning entry requirements for cervids and Chronic Wasting
Disease (CWD) and an amendment to §51.15, concerning entry requirements
for Poultry.
CWD is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of elk and deer
and it is recognized as communicable by the veterinary profession and is considered
to be is a serious threat to the Texas exotic wildlife industry and native
Texas deer. There is no live animal test to determine the presence of the
disease in living animals. In response to the number of reported cases found
in other states the agency is currently reproposing the requirements for entry
of cervids because of CWD.
The Commission has issued a quarantine prohibiting entry of the aforementioned
animals. Until that quarantine is rescinded or modified all entry under the
requirements of §51.10 is suspended. The Commission recently included
a statement into the entry requirement for Cervidae, §51.10, which denotes
the fact that these requirements are not applicable if the commission has
a quarantine in place which prohibits the entry of cervids or elk.
While the Quarantine is in place the commission is proposing new entry
requirements related to CWD in order to provide for more protective standards
for the Texas livestock, exotic livestock and wildlife industries. Those new
proposed requirements are being put out for comments while the quarantine
remains in effect. The proposal is being reviewed by a CWD Working Group made
up of agency staff, a member of Texas Parks and Wildlife and members of various
associations affected by the quarantine. The group's comments and suggested
changes will be shared with all interested parties in order to try and develop
the most effective rule for everyone involved.
The proposed entry requirements for CWD provide that all white-tailed deer,
mule deer or black-tailed deer and elk (or other cervid species determined
to be susceptible to CWD) shall obtain a entry permit from the Commission.
All request for entry must be made in writing and accompanied with the information
necessary to support import qualifications of the animal. This must be received
by the TAHC at least ten working days prior to entry date. The applicant must
identify the herd of origin and the herd of destination. The cervids, to be
imported into this state, shall be individually identified. There shall be
a certificate of veterinary inspection completed by a federally accredited
veterinarian, who must certify that the cervid, to be imported, originate
from a herd monitored for at least 5 years under a state-approved chronic
wasting disease herd certification program and that there have been no clinical
signs of chronic wasting disease in the herd. The Commission has provided
minimum standards for what is an acceptable state-approved chronic wasting
disease certification program and the animals intended for entry must be certified
by the veterinarian as meeting those minimum standards. Those standards were
taken from the draft model program that is currently being developed by USDA.
Those standards the result of a series of discussions and reviews begun in
1998 with an initial program design put forward by the North American Elk
Breeders Association and others. The United States Animal Health Association
(USAHA) passed resolutions in 1998 and 1999 endorsing the development of a
CWD program. In the latter part of 1999 through 2000, representatives of Veterinary
Services of USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) met
with State Departments of Agriculture, State Departments of Wildlife, Federal
and State university diagnostic laboratories and research agencies, and producer
associations to draft key elements of the program. Producer associations included
the North American Elk Breeders Association, the Exotic Wildlife Association,
the American Sheep Institute, and the North American Deer Farmers Association.
This proposal provides for new requirements for poultry entering Texas.
Section 51.15 contains new entry requirements for Poultry based on national,
as well as Texas, concern for Avian Influenza.
An infectious, contagious, but low pathogenic avian influenza virus, has
been detected in recent months in several states could or might export live
poultry and poultry products into Texas. Avian influenza subtypes H5 and H7
are of particular concern due to their potential for developing into highly
pathogenic forms of the disease massive molting in the avian populations resulting
in adverse trading sanctions for not only Texas but the entire United States
poultry industry. Avian influenza is contagious and spreads rapidly. The normal
movement of poultry and poultry products from any state in which avian influenza
virus is present and spreading may pose a major and direct threat to Texas's
poultry. Therefore the Commission proposed entry requirements for the importation
of live poultry and poultry products into the state to substantially reduce
the introduction of this contagious and infectious disease in this State.
Those requirements are established to manage the risk to the Texas poultry
industry regarding Avian Influenza. Live domestic poultry, except those entering
for slaughter and processing at a slaughter facility owned or operated by
the shipper of the poultry entering, may enter Texas if they meet one of the
three established set of criteria where by the origin flock has been shown
to test negative for Avian Influenza. Live domestic poultry from states affected
with Avian Influenza may enter Texas for slaughter and processing only where
a minimum number of birds have tested serologically negative for Avian Influenza
within 72 hours of entry, and specific written permission has been granted.
Bruce Hammond, Assistant Executive Director of Administration, Texas Animal
Health Commission, has determined for the first five-year period the rules
are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government
as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There will be no effect
to small or micro businesses.
Mr. Hammond also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rules will be clear and concise regulations which can be found in one
chapter.
In accordance with Government Code, §2001.022, this agency has determined
that the adopted rule will not impact local economies and, therefore, did
not file a request for a local employment impact statement with the Texas
Workforce Commission.
The agency has determined that the proposed governmental action will not
affect private real property. These adopted rules are an activity related
to the handling of animals, including requirements concerning testing, movement,
inspection, identification, reporting of disease, and treatment, in accordance
with 4 TAC §59.7, and are, therefore, compliant with the Private Real
Property Preservation Act in Government Code, Chapter 2007.
Comments regarding the proposed rules may be submitted to Edith Smith,
Texas Animal Health Commission, 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, Texas 78758, by
fax at (512) 719-0721 or by e-mail at "esmith@tahc.state.tx.us."
In zones with a shred and/or plow destruction
requirement, shredded cotton will be considered destroyed.
]
(22)
] Oil mill waste--Waste products,
including linters, derived from the milling of cottonseed.
(23)
] Plow--To dislodge or sever
the roots of plants in a manner which prevents further growth. Equipment used
to accomplish this could include a stalk puller, any type of plow, or similar
implement.
(24)
]Protection plan--A plan
developed for the purpose of mitigating, with the goal of preventing, boll
weevil infestation and establishment in an area. Mitigating measures may include,
but are not limited to, the following:
approved insecticide
] field
treatment of cotton and cotton products prior to delivery to an area or a
gin
by an approved insecticide
;
(25)
] Regrowth cotton--Cotton that
has not been completely destroyed in such a way as to absolutely prevent further
growth.
(26)
] Restricted Area--An area
designated as suppressed, functionally eradicated, or eradicated of boll weevils,
as those terms are defined in this section.
(27)
] Seed cotton--All forms of
un-ginned cotton from which the seed has not been separated.
(28)
] Stalk puller--An implement
which dislodges the roots of cotton plants by pulling up the stalks.
(29)
] Standing stalks--Original,
undestroyed cotton plants growing in a field before or after harvesting.
(30)
] Suppressed area--An area
in which some boll weevil reproduction may be present in the area or a portion
thereof, and in which the movement of regulated articles presents a threat
to the success of the boll weevil eradication program The boll weevil population
must be equal to or less than 0.025 boll weevils per trap per week for the
cotton- growing season as measured by boll weevil pheromone traps operated
by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation or other governmental agency.
(31)
] Trap--type of adult boll
weevil pheromone trap approved by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation.
(32)
] Treatment--The act of eliminating
possible cotton pest infestation(s) by means of cleaning, spraying or fumigation
to eliminate the infestation.
(33)
] Volunteer cotton--
For
purposes of this chapter, cotton
[
Cotton
] developing
from incidental seeds
after the growing season
between harvest
and planting the next year's crop
[
from incidental seeds
].
Failure
to submit a notification of alternative stalk destruction methods when required
constitutes a violation.
]
Subchapter C. STALK DESTRUCTION PROGRAM
Ellis,
] Falls, Freestone, Hamilton, [
Henderson,
] Hill, [
Hood, Johnson,
] Lampasas, Limestone,
and
McLennan[
,
Navarro and Somervell
].
(13)
] Zone 9. Pecos, Reeves and
Ward.
(14)
] Zone 10. El Paso County and
that portion of Hudspeth County bounded by Interstate Highway 10 on the north,
the El Paso County line on the west, the Rio Grande River on the south and
a line from old Fort Quitman, north along Highway 34 to Interstate 10 on the
east.
a
]
pest management
zones 1-8
[
zone
] shall be
rendered
non- hostable
[
destroyed, regardless of the method used,
]
by the stalk destruction dates indicated for the zone.
Destruction shall
periodically be performed to prevent the presence of fruiting structures.
Destruction
of all cotton plants in Zones 9 and 10
shall
be accomplished by
shredding and plowing and completely burying the stalk.
Soil should be tilled to a depth of 2 or more inches in Zone 9 and to a depth
of 6 or more inches in Zone 10.
[
the methods described as follows:
]
(1)
]
Alternative
[
Prior to the
deadline, alternative
] methods of destruction are allowed except in
Zones 9 and 10 without notifying the department. Exceptions to the standard
destruction method in Zones 9 and 10 will be considered by the Cotton Producer
Advisory Committee for those zones on a case by case basis.
extension requests
].
except Zone 1. At the request of the Zone
1 Producer Advisory Committee, individual deadline extension requests will
not be considered in Zone 1.
] Requests for extensions in any [
other
] zone may be granted for the reasons listed in subparagraphs (A)-(E)
of this paragraph:
(3)
] Request forms may be obtained
from any of the following locations within a cotton pest management zone:
(4)
] Failure to complete the form
entirely may result in denial of the request.
(5)
] All requests for extensions
shall be postmarked on or prior to the cotton destruction deadline. However,
if a field is in compliance with destruction requirements on the deadline,
but later is in violation due to [
regrowth or
] volunteer
cotton with fruiting structures as a result of extended periods of wet weather
that does not allow for mechanical destruction
[
establishment
],
an extension request may be submitted after the deadline. Once a field has
been declared a public nuisance by the department, no extension requests will
be granted.
Part 2.
TEXAS ANIMAL HEALTH COMMISSION
16
]
months of age or older that is emaciated and exhibits some combination of
clinical signs including abnormal behavior, increased salivation, tremors,
stumbling, incoordination, difficulty in swallowing, excessive thirst, and
excessive urination.
16
] months of
age or older shall be immediately reported to a TAHC or USDA veterinarian
for the purpose of collection of appropriate samples for submission to an
official laboratory for CWD surveillance.
16
] months of
age or older shall be immediately reported to a TAHC or USDA veterinarian
for the purpose of collection of appropriate samples for submission to an
official laboratory for CWD surveillance.
16
] months of
age or older shall be immediately reported to a TAHC or USDA veterinarian
for the purpose of collection of appropriate samples for submission to an
official laboratory for CWD surveillance.
Chapter 48.
RIDING STABLE REGISTRATION PROGRAM
(20)
] Veterinarian--A person licensed
to practice veterinary medicine in the State of Texas.
(21)
] Work--An equine is considered
to be at work when it is out of its stable or paddock and presented to the
public as being available for riding or pulling a carriage.
Chapter 51.
ENTRY REQUIREMENTS