TITLE 4.AGRICULTURE

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Chapter 20. COTTON PEST CONTROL

The Texas Department of Agriculture (the department) proposes amendments to §§20.1, 20.3, 20.20, 20.22 all concerning general provisions, definitions and stalk destruction, and the repeal of §20.23, concerning exceptions for no-till cotton production methods. The department has conducted a review of the Cotton Stalk Destruction Program and due to changes in the cotton industry, such as improved production techniques, boll weevil eradication, and other related issues, the department is proposing an update to regulations affecting cotton producers. Many of the proposed changes are the result of input received at Cotton Producer Advisory Committee meetings held across the state. The amendments are proposed to provide definitions needed for clarification of existing sections and to provide additional detail due to changing the policy on extension requests and when stalk destruction monitoring has ceased. The repeal is proposed to allow more flexibility toward the destruction date as long as cotton remains non-hostable.

Section 20.1 defines terms used in Chapter 20 and is amended to include revised definitions of the terms "destroyed or destruction, protection plan and volunteer cotton." The definition of the term "no-till cotton field" is being deleted due to the proposed repeal of §20.23. The amendment to §20.3 is being proposed to clarify a violation of the cotton stalk destruction program. The amendments to §20.20 are being proposed to divide Zone 8 into Area 1 and Area 2, which groups counties into northern and southern areas with more similar growing conditions and harvest dates. This change was recommended by the Zone 8 Cotton Producer Advisory Committee. The amendments to §20.22 (a) are being proposed to change the stalk destruction requirement for cotton in Zones 1-8 from "destroyed" to "rendered non-hostable" (as boll weevils do not reproduce in non-hostable cotton. In Zones 9 and 10, cotton plants must still be destroyed by shredding and plowing or burying the stalks. §20.22 (b)(1) allows producers to use alternative methods for destruction but no longer requires producers to notify the department before the deadline. §20.22(b)(2) removes the notification requirement for alternative methods in Zones 1-8 after the deadline. §20.22 (c)(1) allows producers in Zone 1 to apply for individual extensions, which has been allowed in Zones 2-10. Concerning requests for extensions due to research after the deadline date, the research must now be conducted within a sealed greenhouse or lab to prevent boll weevils from escaping and re-infesting a field. §20.22 (c)(3) allows the department to implement blanket extensions in a zone or area if a serious, unforeseen condition results that prevents the department from surveying fields or makes compliance by a majority of producers impossible. §20.22 (c)(6) allows a producer to obtain an extension after the deadline if wet weather prevents cotton producers from destroying volunteer cotton. §20.22 (d) specifies when stalk destruction requirements for a given crop year end and when penalties for violations shall cease to accrue.

The repeal of §20.23 is being proposed to allow no-till cotton growers and conventional cotton growers an equal time period for stalk destruction requirements and is no longer necessary. No-till cotton production is still encouraged in those areas where it is still beneficial. The current practice of using no-till methods already required the cotton to be non- hostable, however, this change will provide opportunity for growers to manage cotton in their area while achieving greater consistency of stalk destruction requirements across the state.

Ed Gage, coordinator for pest management programs, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendments and repeal are in effect, there is no anticipated fiscal impact on state or local governments as a result of administration and enforcement of the sections.

Mr. Gage has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments and repeal are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of administering and enforcing the repeal and amended sections is consistent and equitable cotton stalk destruction rules that supports boll weevil eradication and still allows maximum flexibility in achieving crop termination. There are no additional anticipated costs to microbusinesses, small businesses or individuals required to comply with the proposal.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Ed Gage, Coordinator for Pest Management, Texas Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 12847, Austin, Texas 78711. Comments must be received no later than 30 days after the date of the publication of the proposal in the Texas Register .

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

4 TAC §20.1, §20.3

The amendments to §20.1 and §20.3 are proposed in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §74.006 which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for the effective enforcement and administration of Chapter 74 and §74.004 which provides the department with the authority to establish regulated areas, dates and appropriate methods of destruction of stalks, other cotton parts and products of host plants for cotton pests.

The code that is affected by the proposal is Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 12 and Chapter 74, Subchapter A.

§20.1. Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) - (9) (No change.)

(10) Destroyed, or destruction--Killed by cutting or dislodging the roots, burying the entire plant, or by an alternative method which completely kills the leaves, stems, flowers, fruit, and roots of the plant. Applicable to Zones 9 and 10. [ In zones with a shred and/or plow destruction requirement, shredded cotton will be considered destroyed. ]

(11) - (19) (No change.)

(20) Non-hostable cotton--Cotton that is free of fruiting structures such as buds, squares, flowers or bolls in Zones 1 - 8 .

[(21) No-till cotton field--A field in which the soil is left undisturbed from the time the cotton crop is harvested until the new crop is planted in narrow slots and weed control is accomplished using herbicides.]

(21) [ (22) ] Oil mill waste--Waste products, including linters, derived from the milling of cottonseed.

(22) [ (23) ] Plow--To dislodge or sever the roots of plants in a manner which prevents further growth. Equipment used to accomplish this could include a stalk puller, any type of plow, or similar implement.

(23) [ (24) ]Protection plan--A plan developed for the purpose of mitigating, with the goal of preventing, boll weevil infestation and establishment in an area. Mitigating measures may include, but are not limited to, the following:

(A) the [ approved insecticide ] field treatment of cotton and cotton products prior to delivery to an area or a gin by an approved insecticide ;

(B) requirements for moving, handling, storage and treatment or use of approved insecticide applications to regulated articles; and

(C) monitoring of boll weevils at a specified site(s) as approved by the department .

(24) [ (25) ] Regrowth cotton--Cotton that has not been completely destroyed in such a way as to absolutely prevent further growth.

(25) [ (26) ] Restricted Area--An area designated as suppressed, functionally eradicated, or eradicated of boll weevils, as those terms are defined in this section.

(26) [ (27) ] Seed cotton--All forms of un-ginned cotton from which the seed has not been separated.

(27) [ (28) ] Stalk puller--An implement which dislodges the roots of cotton plants by pulling up the stalks.

(28) [ (29) ] Standing stalks--Original, undestroyed cotton plants growing in a field before or after harvesting.

(29) [ (30) ] Suppressed area--An area in which some boll weevil reproduction may be present in the area or a portion thereof, and in which the movement of regulated articles presents a threat to the success of the boll weevil eradication program The boll weevil population must be equal to or less than 0.025 boll weevils per trap per week for the cotton- growing season as measured by boll weevil pheromone traps operated by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation or other governmental agency.

(30) [ (31) ] Trap--type of adult boll weevil pheromone trap approved by the Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation.

(31) [ (32) ] Treatment--The act of eliminating possible cotton pest infestation(s) by means of cleaning, spraying or fumigation to eliminate the infestation.

(32) [ (33) ] Volunteer cotton-- For purposes of this chapter, cotton [ Cotton ] developing from incidental seeds after the growing season between harvest and planting the next year's crop [ from incidental seeds ].

§20.3.Violations and Enforcement Actions.

(a) Violations. In addition to any other violations that may arise under requirements of the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74, or regulations adopted pursuant to the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 71 or Chapter 74:

(1) Failure to comply with cotton stalk destruction requirements outlined in Subchapter C of this chapter (relating to Stalk Destruction Program) constitutes a violation.

(2) Cotton that is allowed to develop fruiting structures after the destruction deadline constitutes a violation. [ Failure to submit a notification of alternative stalk destruction methods when required constitutes a violation. ]

(b) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203768

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075


Subchapter C. STALK DESTRUCTION PROGRAM

4 TAC §20.20, §20.22

The amendments to §20.20 and §20.22 are proposed in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §74.006 which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for the effective enforcement and administration of Chapter 74 and §74.004 which provides the department with the authority to establish regulated areas, dates and appropriate methods of destruction of stalks, other cotton parts and products of host plants for cotton pests.

The code that is affected by the proposal is Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74, Subchapter A.

§20.20.Pest Management Zones.

(a) (No change.)

(b) Zones. Established zones include the following counties:

(1) - (11) (No change.)

(12) Zone 8 Area (1) . Bell, Bosque, Coryell, [ Ellis, ] Falls, Freestone, Hamilton, [ Henderson, ] Hill, [ Hood, Johnson, ] Lampasas, Limestone, and McLennan[ , Navarro and Somervell ].

(13) Zone 8 Area (2). Ellis, Henderson, Hood, Johnson, Navarro and Somervell.

(14) [ (13) ] Zone 9. Pecos, Reeves and Ward.

(15) [ (14) ] Zone 10. El Paso County and that portion of Hudspeth County bounded by Interstate Highway 10 on the north, the El Paso County line on the west, the Rio Grande River on the south and a line from old Fort Quitman, north along Highway 34 to Interstate 10 on the east.

§20.22.Stalk Destruction Requirements.

(a) Deadlines and methods. All cotton plants in [ a ] pest management zones 1-8 [ zone ] shall be rendered non- hostable [ destroyed, regardless of the method used, ] by the stalk destruction dates indicated for the zone. Destruction shall periodically be performed to prevent the presence of fruiting structures. Destruction of all cotton plants in Zones 9 and 10 shall be accomplished by shredding and plowing and completely burying the stalk. Soil should be tilled to a depth of 2 or more inches in Zone 9 and to a depth of 6 or more inches in Zone 10. [ the methods described as follows: ]

Figure: 4 TAC §20.22(a)

(b) Alternative destruction.

[ (1) ] Alternative [ Prior to the deadline, alternative ] methods of destruction are allowed except in Zones 9 and 10 without notifying the department. Exceptions to the standard destruction method in Zones 9 and 10 will be considered by the Cotton Producer Advisory Committee for those zones on a case by case basis.

[(2) After the deadline, alternative methods of destruction may be used to destroy volunteer cotton in Zones 1-8. provided that the farm owner and/or operator notifies the department in writing, on a notification form prescribed by the department, of his or her intent to utilize an alternative destruction method.]

[(3) Notification forms may be obtained from any of the following locations within a cotton pest management zone:]

[(A) County Extension office;]

[(B) Farm Service Agency office; or]

[(C) Texas Department of Agriculture.]

[(4) Conditions.]

[(A) For volunteer cotton in all zones, or regrowth cotton in, where shredding and/or plowing is required, destruction shall be achieved by the 14th day after notifying the department of the intent to use an alternative method; and]

[(B) If fruiting structures are present, the host plants shall be shredded immediately, in addition to performing the alternative destruction method; and]

[(C) If destruction of all host plants is not achieved by the 14th day after notification to the department, then mechanical destruction will be required to remove the remaining plants immediately, and the field will be considered in violation for the preceding 14 day period and any day thereafter, until destruction is complete; and]

[(D) Once the field has been declared a public nuisance by the department, the field is in violation regardless of notification of an alternative method of destruction.]

(c) Deadline extensions [ extension requests ].

(1) The department may, on written request by a farm owner and/or operator, grant an extension of the cotton destruction deadline in any pest management zone. [ except Zone 1. At the request of the Zone 1 Producer Advisory Committee, individual deadline extension requests will not be considered in Zone 1. ] Requests for extensions in any [ other ] zone may be granted for the reasons listed in subparagraphs (A)-(E) of this paragraph:

(A) research conducted inside a sealed greenhouse or lab ;

(B) - (E) (No change.)

(2) (No change.)

(3) A blanket extension may be implemented at the department's own initiative if a zone or other area experiences a serious unforeseen condition that prevents the department from surveying fields for compliance or which clearly makes compliance by a substantial majority of producers impossible.

(4) [ (3) ] Request forms may be obtained from any of the following locations within a cotton pest management zone:

(A) County Extension office;

(B) Farm Service Agency office;

(C) Texas Department of Agriculture.

(5) [ (4) ] Failure to complete the form entirely may result in denial of the request.

(6) [ (5) ] All requests for extensions shall be postmarked on or prior to the cotton destruction deadline. However, if a field is in compliance with destruction requirements on the deadline, but later is in violation due to [ regrowth or ] volunteer cotton with fruiting structures as a result of extended periods of wet weather that does not allow for mechanical destruction [ establishment ], an extension request may be submitted after the deadline. Once a field has been declared a public nuisance by the department, no extension requests will be granted.

(d) Once a new cotton crop is planted in a zone and has emerged, the requirement to destroy original growth, regrowth, or volunteer cotton from the previous crop year shall end until after the next harvest. Violations arising prior to the date of planting of a new crop in a zone will be pursued, but penalties shall cease to accrue on that date.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203767

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075


4 TAC §20.23

(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of the Texas Department of Agriculture or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeal of §20.23 is proposed in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code (the Code), §12.016, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for administration of the Code; and §74.006, which provides the department with the authority to adopt rules as necessary for enforcement of boll weevil eradication.

The code that is affected by the proposal is the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 74, Subchapter A.

§20.23.Exceptions For No Till Cotton.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203765

Dolores Alvarado Hibbs

Deputy General Counsel

Texas Department of Agriculture

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 463-4075


Part 2. TEXAS ANIMAL HEALTH COMMISSION

Chapter 40. CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE

4 TAC §40.1, §40.2

The Texas Animal Health Commission (Commission) proposes amendments to Chapter 40, concerning Chronic Wasting Disease. This proposal amends §40.1 regarding Definitions and §40.2, regarding, General Requirements.

Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy of deer and elk. CWD was initially described as a clinical syndrome in native mule deer and black-tailed deer held in a wildlife research facility in Colorado in 1967. The disease was later reported in additional research facilities in Colorado and Wyoming. By the early 1990s, the disease had been documented in free-ranging mule deer and elk in north-central Colorado and southeastern Wyoming. In December 1997, the disease was confirmed in two commercial elk operations in South Dakota. CWD has since been diagnosed in two additional commercial elk herds in South Dakota, one elk herd in Nebraska, and one elk herd in Oklahoma. Quarantines were placed on the affected commercial herds by the state animal health authorities.

Chronic Wasting Disease is known to affect mule deer, black-tailed deer, elk and white-tailed deer. The susceptibility of other species of native and exotic cervidae is unknown. Clinical signs include chronic weight loss, emaciation, excessive thirst, excessive frequency of urination, excessive salivation, and behavioral changes. The disease is progressive and always fatal. Based on the epidemiology of the disease, transmission is thought to be lateral and possibly maternal. Although not fully characterized, the causative agent is thought to be an infectious proteinaceous particle commonly referred to as a prion which is known to be extremely resistant to conventional heat and chemical disinfection procedures.

Recently, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued an interim rule regarding the payment of indemnity for cervids exposed to CWD. That rule provides that "subject to the availability of funding, the amount of indemnity payments for eligible animals will be determined by appraisal, with the indemnity payment set at 95 percent of the appraised value, with a cap on payments of $3,000 per animal." CWD positive herds will be jointly appraised by an APHIS official appraiser and a State official appraiser, or if APHIS and State authorities agree that both appraisers are not needed for a given situation, then by either a State official appraiser or an APHIS official appraiser alone. The appraised value of the cervids will be their fair market value as determined by the meat or breeding value of the animals. Animals may be appraised in groups, provided that where appraisal is by the head, each animal in the group is the same value per head, and where appraisal is by the pound, each animal in the group is the same value per pound.

To make this indemnity program equitable for producers in all the States that might participate, we will reduce the Federal indemnity payment for an animal when indemnity payments for the same animal from non-Federal sources exceed five (5) percent of its appraised value. The reduction in the Federal payment will equal the amount by which the non-Federal payments exceed five (5) percent of the animal's appraised value.

This action by USDA limits the Commission's ability to participate in any indemnity in excess of five (5) percent. Therefore, the Commission is promulgating a regulation which limits its participation to five (5) percent.

Also, the Commission is lowering the age of cervids eligible for the CWD Monitoring program from sixteen (16) months to twelve (12) months. This is in response to the fact that cervids have shown signs of CWD at this age. Furthermore, this is an appropriate standard based on the fact that cervids generally have their fawns in early summer making it easier to identify when a cervid has reached this age level.

Mr. Bruce Hammond, Deputy Director of Administration and Finance, Texas Animal Health Commission, has determined for the first five-year period the rules are in effect, there will be no additional fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. The agency currently processes indemnity requests for specific diseases. The Commission does not expect there to be a lot of eligible cervids and as such the proposed indemnification regulation is not expected to cause us to exceed funds budgeted for the biennium. There will be no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Hammond also has determined that for each year of the first five years the rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rules will be clear and concise regulations. The commission believes by participating in indemnifying producers for these animals we will improve detection and disposal of these high risk animals as well as help insure that Texas does not have an outbreak of a disease which could have a negative impact on the livestock industry in Texas.

In accordance with Government Code, §2001.022, this agency has determined that the adopted rule will not impact local economies and, therefore, did not file a request for a local employment impact statement with the Texas Workforce Commission.

The agency has determined that the proposed governmental action will not affect private real property. These adopted rules are an activity related to the handling of animals, including requirements concerning testing, movement, inspection, identification, reporting of disease, and treatment, in accordance with 4 TAC, §59.7, and are, therefore, compliant with the Private Real Property Preservation Act in Government Code, Chapter 2007.

Comments regarding the proposed amendments may be submitted to Edith Smith, Texas Animal Health Commission, 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, Texas 78758, by fax at (512) 719-0721, or by e-mail at "esmith@tahc.state.tx.us."

The amendments are proposed under the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 161, §161.041 (a) and (b), and §161.046 which authorizes the Commission to promulgate rules in accordance with the Texas Agriculture Code. Also, the amendments are adopted under the Texas Agriculture Code, Chapter 161, §161.058 which authorizes the commission to adopt rules related to indemnity for exposed or diseased livestock.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendments.

§40.1.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)--A transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of deer and elk.

(2) CWD Profile--A deer or elk 12 [ 16 ] months of age or older that is emaciated and exhibits some combination of clinical signs including abnormal behavior, increased salivation, tremors, stumbling, incoordination, difficulty in swallowing, excessive thirst, and excessive urination.

(3) Commission--The Texas Animal Health Commission.

(4) Herd--A group of deer or elk maintained on common ground, or two or more groups of deer or elk under common ownership or supervision that are geographically separated, but can have an interchange or movement without regard to health status.

(5) High Risk Animal--A deer or elk that has had direct contact with an animal which has been confirmed to be affected with CWD. In herds with evidence of transmission, as determined by an epidemiological investigation, high risk animals include all animals that have had contact with the affected animal(s) at any time during a 12 month period preceding the initial observation of clinical signs. In herds without evidence of transmission, as determined by an epidemiological investigation, high risk animals include all animals that have had contact with the affected animal at any time during a 12 month period preceding death of the affected animal.

(6) Official Eartag--An identification eartag that provides unique identification for each individual animal by conforming to the alphanumeric National Uniform Eartagging System.

(7) Official Laboratory--The National Veterinary Services Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa, is the reference laboratory for CWD diagnostic procedures.

(8) Positive Herd--A herd in which a diagnosis of CWD has been confirmed by the National Veterinary Services Laboratory.

(9) Suspicious Animal--A deer or elk which has clinical signs that resemble the CWD profile.

(10) Suspicious Herd--A herd in which one or more animals are observed with clinical signs that resemble the CWD profile.

(11) Trace Herd--The term includes both traceback and trace-forward herds. A traceback herd is any herd where an affected animal has resided during a 36 month period prior to death. A trace-forward herd is any herd which has received animals from a positive herd during a 30 month period prior to death of the affected animal.

§40.2.General Requirements.

(a) Procedures for issuing hold orders and quarantines.

(1) All herds suspicious of CWD, in which one or more animals are observed with signs which resemble the CWD profile, shall be reported to a representative of the Commission. The herd shall be restricted by hold order until the investigation and diagnosis have been completed.

(2) Trace herds shall be restricted by hold order until an epidemiologic investigation has been completed and the herd has met all requirements specified in a herd plan.

(3) CWD positive herds shall be restricted by quarantine until the herd has met all requirements specified in a herd plan.

(4) All suspicious, trace, and positive herds not complying with the requirements of an investigation or herd plan shall be restricted by quarantine.

(b) Procedures in suspicious, trace, and positive herds.

(1) CWD suspicious animals shall be presented to a representative of the Commission for the purpose of collection and submission of appropriate samples to an official laboratory for diagnosis.

(2) Disposition of a positive herd without evidence of transmission within the herd as determined by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist following completion of the investigation. A herd plan will be developed by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist in consultation with the herd owner, and their veterinarian (if requested by the owner). The herd plan shall include the following requirements for a period of five years:

(A) Routine visual inspection of all animals in the herd by a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of early detection of CWD suspicious animals.

(B) Annual verification of herd inventory by a TAHC or USDA veterinarian.

(C) Mandatory reporting of all CWD suspicious animals and all death losses. Mortality in animals 12 [ 16 ] months of age or older shall be immediately reported to a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of collection of appropriate samples for submission to an official laboratory for CWD surveillance.

(D) High risk animals must be removed from the herd and:

(i) Humanely destroyed, tested for CWD, and disposed of as specified in subsection (c) of this section, or

(ii) Maintained under hold order for 48 months from the last case of CWD.

(3) Disposition of a positive herd with evidence of transmission within the herd as determined by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist following completion of the investigation. A herd plan will be developed by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist in consultation with the owner, and their veterinarian (if requested by the owner). The herd plan shall include the following requirements for a period of five years:

(A) Routine visual inspection of all animals in the herd by a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of early detection of CWD suspicious animals.

(B) Annual verification of herd inventory by a TAHC or USDA veterinarian.

(C) Mandatory reporting of all CWD suspicious animals and all death losses. Mortality in animals 12 [ 16 ] months of age or older shall be immediately reported to a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of collection of appropriate samples for submission to an official laboratory for CWD surveillance.

(D) High risk animals must be removed from the herd and:

(i) Humanely destroyed, tested for CWD, and disposed of as specified in subsection (c) of this section, or

(ii) Maintained under hold order for 48 months from the last case of CWD.

(E) The herd shall remain under quarantine for 36 months from the last case of CWD.

(4) Disposition of trace herds. A herd plan will be developed by a TAHC or USDA epidemiologist in consultation with the owner, and their veterinarian (if requested by the owner). The herd plan shall include the following requirements for a period of three years:

(A) Routine visual inspection of all animals in the herd by a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of early detection of CWD suspicious animals.

(B) Annual verification of herd inventory by a TAHC or USDA veterinarian.

(C) Mandatory reporting of all CWD suspicious animals and all death losses. Mortality in animals 12 [ 16 ] months of age or older shall be immediately reported to a TAHC or USDA veterinarian for the purpose of collection of appropriate samples for submission to an official laboratory for CWD surveillance.

(D) High risk animals must be removed from the herd and:

(i) Humanely destroyed, tested for CWD, and disposed of as specified in subsection (c) of this section, or

(ii) Maintained under hold order for 48 months from the last potential exposure.

(c) Destruction of suspicious and high risk animals. Animals destroyed due to a presumptive diagnosis of CWD, including high risk animals in positive and trace herds, shall be humanely euthanized, appropriate samples collected to confirm the diagnosis, and disposed of by deep burial or incineration, including all animal products, by-products, and contaminated materials:

(1) on the premises where disclosed, or

(2) at a facility approved by the executive director.

(d) Payment of indemnity. The Commission may participate in paying indemnity to purchase and destroy CWD positive animals, CWD exposed animals, and CWD suspect animals. Subject to available funding, the amount of the state payment for any such animals will be five (5) percent of the appraised value established in accordance with 9 CFR, Part 55, Section 55.3. This payment is in participation with any Federal payments made in accordance with 9 CFR, Part 55, §55.2.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203746

Gene Snelson

General Counsel

Texas Animal Health Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 719-0714


Chapter 48. RIDING STABLE REGISTRATION PROGRAM

4 TAC §48.2, §48.7

The Texas Animal Health Commission proposes amendments to Chapter 48, concerning Riding Stable Registration Program. This proposal amends §48.2, regarding Definitions, and §48.7, regarding Registration and Renewal Fee.

During the 77th Texas Legislative Session, Senate Bill 685 was passed and signed by the Governor which amends Chapter 2053 of the Texas Occupations Code to transfer from the Texas Department of Health (TDH), the Texas Board of Health (board), and the commissioner of public health (commissioner) to the Texas Animal Health Commission (commission) all powers, duties, rights, and obligations relating to the regulation of riding stables. The bill sets forth procedures regarding the transfer of authority from TDH, the board, and the commissioner to the commission.

In reviewing and registering riding stables, the Commission has discovered that there are a number of riding facilities that utilize a variety of equine activity as treatment tools for people with disabilities or medical conditions. These are facilities that provide horses to the public for riding and/or driving in order to provide treatment or a benefit to a group of people. As the commission understands the intent of the legislation was to insure the well-being of equine utilized by the public, the registration program is applicable. This is further supported by the fact that it insures that the equine are in a healthy condition for the purpose of providing therapeutic lessons. However, in recognition of the fact that these facilities are providing an important service and in order to not add any additional fiscal impact to their program, the Commission is proposing to exempt them from the registration fee. This rule proposal will allow a facility that provides only this type of service to apply for a waiver of the fee based on that fact.

Mr. Bruce Hammond, Deputy Director for Administration and Finance, Texas Animal Health Commission, has determined for the first five year period the rules are in effect, there will be no additional fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. The TAHC is using the existing fee structure that was established by the TDH in administering the program. It is estimated that there are between ten to twenty such facilities. As such, the loss of fee revenue should not have a large impact on administering this program. An evaluation will be made at the end of the first two year period to determine if an adjustment in fees is necessary to recover the cost of administering the registration program and to employ agents to conduct inspections. There will be no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Hammond also has determined that for each year of the first five years the rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated is that these facilities will register, insuring the healthy condition of their equine, without having to incur the fiscal cost of registering.

In accordance with Government Code, §2001.022, this agency has determined that the adopted rule will not impact local economies and, therefore, did not file a request for a local employment impact statement with the Texas Workforce Commission.

The agency has determined that the proposed governmental action will not affect private real property, and is, therefore, compliant with the Private Real Property Preservation Act in Government Code, Chapter 2007.

Comments regarding the proposed amendments may be submitted to Edith Smith, Texas Animal Health Commission, 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, Texas 78758, by fax at (512) 719-0721 or by e-mail at "esmith@tahc.state.tx.us."

Senate Bill 685 amends Chapter 2053 of the Texas Occupations Code to transfer from the Texas Department of Health (TDH), the Texas Board of Health (board), and the commissioner of public health (commissioner) to the Texas Animal Health Commission (commission) all powers, duties, rights, and obligations relating to the regulation of riding stables. Rulemaking authority is expressly granted to the Texas Animal Health Commission in Section 3 (§2053.012, Occupations Code) of the bill. Sec. 2053.012 provides that the commission may adopt rules it considers necessary to carry out this chapter.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the proposed rules.

§48.2.Definitions.

The following words and terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Act--Senate Bill 685, 77th Legislature, 2001.

(2) Adequate food and water--Food and water which is sufficient in amount and appropriate for the particular type of animal to prevent starvation, dehydration, or significant risk to the animal's health from a lack of food or water.

(3) Adequate space--An area which is of sufficient length, width, and height to allow the equine to freely and comfortably move about, stand with all four feet on the ground, lie down, and get up without injury.

(4) Adequate ventilation--The provision of fresh air to an enclosure by means of windows, doors, vents, fans, or air-conditioning so as to minimize drafts, odors, and moisture condensation.

(5) Application--A written request to the commission for a registration, temporary registration, or renewal of registration. The application must be on the form prescribed by the commission.

(6) Body condition score--An assessment of equine body condition in accordance with the following:

Figure: 4 TAC §48.2(6) (No change.)

(7) Carriage--A two-or four-wheeled passenger vehicle pulled by an equine.

(8) Carriage equine--Any equine which is used by its owner or other person to pull any carriage, in exchange for a fee. An equine rented or leased by its owner to another person for any of the foregoing purposes shall be deemed to be a carriage equine for the purposes of this chapter.

(9) Commission--Texas Animal Health Commission.

(10) Equine--Any member of the Equidae family, including equine, mules, asses, donkeys, and ponies.

(11) Free-choice--Available in unlimited quantity for use or consumption by the equine at any time the equine elects.

(12) Humane care--Humane care is, but is not limited to, the provision of adequate ventilation, sanitary shelter, and adequate food and water, consistent with the normal requirements and feeding habits of the animal's size, species, and breed.

(13) Owner--The person who operates an establishment and who is responsible for the shelter and care of equine for hire.

(14) Registered establishment--Any facility, stable, or paddock where rented equine are kept that conforms to the requirements in these sections and is duly registered by the Texas Animal Health Commission.

(15) Rental equine--Any equine let for hire to be ridden or driven, either with or without the furnishing of riding or driving instruction.

(16) Riding stable--A facility where rental equine are housed, held, or maintained.

(17) Saddle equine--Any equine let for hire to be ridden, either with or without the furnishing of riding instruction.

(18) Shelter--Protection from severe weather conditions and direct hot sun.

(19) Stable--A structure having a permanent roof, stalls, and access ways used for quartering equine.

(20) Therapeutic Riding Stable--A facility where the only equine activities provided are to people with disabilities or medical conditions.

(21) [ (20) ] Veterinarian--A person licensed to practice veterinary medicine in the State of Texas.

(22) [ (21) ] Work--An equine is considered to be at work when it is out of its stable or paddock and presented to the public as being available for riding or pulling a carriage.

§48.7.Registration and Renewal Fee.

Each initial registration and renewal fee will be $100 for all riding stables with three or less equine and $200 for all riding stables with four or more equine. A Therapeutic Riding Stable may request a waiver of the registration and renewal fee based on documentation that the only services provided are for a therapeutic purpose.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203747

Gene Snelson

General Counsel

Texas Animal Health Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 719-0714


Chapter 51. ENTRY REQUIREMENTS

The Texas Animal Health Commission proposes two new requirements for cervids and poultry entering Texas. The TAHC proposes the repeal and replacement of §51.10 concerning entry requirements for cervids and Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) and an amendment to §51.15, concerning entry requirements for Poultry.

CWD is a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of elk and deer and it is recognized as communicable by the veterinary profession and is considered to be is a serious threat to the Texas exotic wildlife industry and native Texas deer. There is no live animal test to determine the presence of the disease in living animals. In response to the number of reported cases found in other states the agency is currently reproposing the requirements for entry of cervids because of CWD.

The Commission has issued a quarantine prohibiting entry of the aforementioned animals. Until that quarantine is rescinded or modified all entry under the requirements of §51.10 is suspended. The Commission recently included a statement into the entry requirement for Cervidae, §51.10, which denotes the fact that these requirements are not applicable if the commission has a quarantine in place which prohibits the entry of cervids or elk.

While the Quarantine is in place the commission is proposing new entry requirements related to CWD in order to provide for more protective standards for the Texas livestock, exotic livestock and wildlife industries. Those new proposed requirements are being put out for comments while the quarantine remains in effect. The proposal is being reviewed by a CWD Working Group made up of agency staff, a member of Texas Parks and Wildlife and members of various associations affected by the quarantine. The group's comments and suggested changes will be shared with all interested parties in order to try and develop the most effective rule for everyone involved.

The proposed entry requirements for CWD provide that all white-tailed deer, mule deer or black-tailed deer and elk (or other cervid species determined to be susceptible to CWD) shall obtain a entry permit from the Commission. All request for entry must be made in writing and accompanied with the information necessary to support import qualifications of the animal. This must be received by the TAHC at least ten working days prior to entry date. The applicant must identify the herd of origin and the herd of destination. The cervids, to be imported into this state, shall be individually identified. There shall be a certificate of veterinary inspection completed by a federally accredited veterinarian, who must certify that the cervid, to be imported, originate from a herd monitored for at least 5 years under a state-approved chronic wasting disease herd certification program and that there have been no clinical signs of chronic wasting disease in the herd. The Commission has provided minimum standards for what is an acceptable state-approved chronic wasting disease certification program and the animals intended for entry must be certified by the veterinarian as meeting those minimum standards. Those standards were taken from the draft model program that is currently being developed by USDA. Those standards the result of a series of discussions and reviews begun in 1998 with an initial program design put forward by the North American Elk Breeders Association and others. The United States Animal Health Association (USAHA) passed resolutions in 1998 and 1999 endorsing the development of a CWD program. In the latter part of 1999 through 2000, representatives of Veterinary Services of USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) met with State Departments of Agriculture, State Departments of Wildlife, Federal and State university diagnostic laboratories and research agencies, and producer associations to draft key elements of the program. Producer associations included the North American Elk Breeders Association, the Exotic Wildlife Association, the American Sheep Institute, and the North American Deer Farmers Association.

This proposal provides for new requirements for poultry entering Texas. Section 51.15 contains new entry requirements for Poultry based on national, as well as Texas, concern for Avian Influenza.

An infectious, contagious, but low pathogenic avian influenza virus, has been detected in recent months in several states could or might export live poultry and poultry products into Texas. Avian influenza subtypes H5 and H7 are of particular concern due to their potential for developing into highly pathogenic forms of the disease massive molting in the avian populations resulting in adverse trading sanctions for not only Texas but the entire United States poultry industry. Avian influenza is contagious and spreads rapidly. The normal movement of poultry and poultry products from any state in which avian influenza virus is present and spreading may pose a major and direct threat to Texas's poultry. Therefore the Commission proposed entry requirements for the importation of live poultry and poultry products into the state to substantially reduce the introduction of this contagious and infectious disease in this State.

Those requirements are established to manage the risk to the Texas poultry industry regarding Avian Influenza. Live domestic poultry, except those entering for slaughter and processing at a slaughter facility owned or operated by the shipper of the poultry entering, may enter Texas if they meet one of the three established set of criteria where by the origin flock has been shown to test negative for Avian Influenza. Live domestic poultry from states affected with Avian Influenza may enter Texas for slaughter and processing only where a minimum number of birds have tested serologically negative for Avian Influenza within 72 hours of entry, and specific written permission has been granted.

Bruce Hammond, Assistant Executive Director of Administration, Texas Animal Health Commission, has determined for the first five-year period the rules are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the rules. There will be no effect to small or micro businesses.

Mr. Hammond also has determined that for each year of the first five years the rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rules will be clear and concise regulations which can be found in one chapter.

In accordance with Government Code, §2001.022, this agency has determined that the adopted rule will not impact local economies and, therefore, did not file a request for a local employment impact statement with the Texas Workforce Commission.

The agency has determined that the proposed governmental action will not affect private real property. These adopted rules are an activity related to the handling of animals, including requirements concerning testing, movement, inspection, identification, reporting of disease, and treatment, in accordance with 4 TAC §59.7, and are, therefore, compliant with the Private Real Property Preservation Act in Government Code, Chapter 2007.

Comments regarding the proposed rules may be submitted to Edith Smith, Texas Animal Health Commission, 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, Texas 78758, by fax at (512) 719-0721 or by e-mail at "esmith@tahc.state.tx.us."

4 TAC §51.10

(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of the Texas Animal Health Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

Chapter 51 is proposed under the following statutory authority as found in Chapter 161 of the Texas Agriculture Code. The commission is vested by statute, §161.041 (a), with the requirement to protect all livestock, domestic animals, and domestic fowl from disease. The commission is authorized, by §161041 (b), to act to eradicate or control any disease or agent of transmission for any disease that affects livestock. If the commission determines that a disease listed in §161.041 of this code or an agent of transmission of one of those diseases exists in a place in this state among livestock, or that livestock are exposed to one of those diseases or an agent of transmission of one of those diseases, the commission shall establish a quarantine on the affected animals or on the affected place. That is found in §161.061.

Section 161.081, regarding the "Importation of Animals" provides that the commission by rule may regulate the movement, including movement by a railroad company or other common carrier, of livestock, exotic livestock, domestic animals, domestic fowl, or exotic fowl into this state from another state, territory, or country. Furthermore the commission by rule may provide the method for inspecting and testing animals before and after entry into this state.

Also the commission by rule may provide for the issuance and form of health certificates and entry permits. The rules may include standards for determining which veterinarians of this state, other states, and departments of the federal government are authorized to issue the certificates or permits.

As a control measure, the commission by rule may regulate the movement of animals. The commission may restrict the intrastate movement of animals even though the movement of the animals is unrestricted in interstate or international commerce. The commission may require testing, vaccination, or another epidemiologically sound procedure before or after animals are moved. That is found in §161.054. An agent of the commission is entitled to stop and inspect a shipment of animals or animal products being transported in this state in order to determine if the shipment originated from a quarantined area or herd; or determine if the shipment presents a danger to the public health or livestock industry through insect infestation or through a communicable or noncommunicable disease. That authority is found in §161.048.

Section 161.005 provides that the commission may authorize the executive director or another employee to sign written instruments on behalf of the commission. A written instrument, including a quarantine or written notice, signed under that authority has the same force and effect as if signed by the entire commission.

Section 161.061 provides that if the commission determines that a disease listed in §161.041 of this code or an agency of transmission of one of those diseases exists in a place in this state or among livestock, exotic livestock, domestic animals, domestic fowl, or exotic fowl, or that a place in this state or livestock, exotic livestock, domestic animals, domestic fowl, or exotic fowl are exposed to one of those diseases or an agency of transmission of one of those diseases, the commission shall establish a quarantine on the affected animals or on the affected place.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the repeal.

§51.10.Cervidae.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203748

Gene Snelson

General Counsel

Texas Animal Health Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 719-0714


4 TAC §51.10, §51.15

Chapter 51 is proposed under the following statutory authority as found in Chapter 161 of the Texas Agriculture Code. The commission is vested by statute, §161.041 (a), with the requirement to protect all livestock, domestic animals, and domestic fowl from disease. The commission is authorized, by §161041 (b), to act to eradicate or control any disease or agent of transmission for any disease that affects livestock. If the commission determines that a disease listed in §161.041 of this code or an agent of transmission of one of those diseases exists in a place in this state among livestock, or that livestock are exposed to one of those diseases or an agent of transmission of one of those diseases, the commission shall establish a quarantine on the affected animals or on the affected place. That is found in §161.061.

Section 161.081, regarding the "Importation of Animals" provides that the commission by rule may regulate the movement, including movement by a railroad company or other common carrier, of livestock, exotic livestock, domestic animals, domestic fowl, or exotic fowl into this state from another state, territory, or country. Furthermore the commission by rule may provide the method for inspecting and testing animals before and after entry into this state.

Also the commission by rule may provide for the issuance and form of health certificates and entry permits. The rules may include standards for determining which veterinarians of this state, other states, and departments of the federal government are authorized to issue the certificates or permits.

As a control measure, the commission by rule may regulate the movement of animals. The commission may restrict the intrastate movement of animals even though the movement of the animals is unrestricted in interstate or international commerce. The commission may require testing, vaccination, or another epidemiologically sound procedure before or after animals are moved. That is found in §161.054. An agent of the commission is entitled to stop and inspect a shipment of animals or animal products being transported in this state in order to determine if the shipment originated from a quarantined area or herd; or determine if the shipment presents a danger to the public health or livestock industry through insect infestation or through a communicable or noncommunicable disease. That authority is found in §161.048.

Section 161.005 provides that the commission may authorize the executive director or another employee to sign written instruments on behalf of the commission. A written instrument, including a quarantine or written notice, signed under that authority has the same force and effect as if signed by the entire commission.

Section 161.061 provides that if the commission determines that a disease listed in §161.041 of this code or an agency of transmission of one of those diseases exists in a place in this state or among livestock, exotic livestock, domestic animals, domestic fowl, or exotic fowl, or that a place in this state or livestock, exotic livestock, domestic animals, domestic fowl, or exotic fowl are exposed to one of those diseases or an agency of transmission of one of those diseases, the commission shall establish a quarantine on the affected animals or on the affected place.

No other statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the amendment and new rule.

§51.10.Cervidae.

(a) Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD): All white-tailed deer, mule deer or black-tailed deer and elk (or other cervid species determined to be susceptible to CWD) shall obtain a entry permit from the Commission prior to entering Texas. (A susceptible cervid species is one where a member of that species is shown to be a positive for CWD). All request for entry must be made in writing and accompanied with the information necessary to support import qualifications of the animal. This must be received by the TAHC at least ten working days prior to entry date.

(b) Requirements for entry: The applicant must identify the herd of origin and the herd of destination. The cervids, to be imported into this state, shall be individually identified as to herd of origin by legible tattoo, ear tag, or other methods of permanent identification. There shall be a certificate of veterinary inspection completed by a federally accredited veterinarian, who must certify that the cervid, to be imported, originate from a herd monitored for at least 5 years under a state-approved chronic wasting disease herd certification program and that there have been no clinical signs of chronic wasting disease in the herd. A state-approved chronic wasting disease certification program must be certified by the veterinarian as having the following minimum standards.

(c) State CWD Certification Program Minimum Standards:

(1) State Program shall have perimeter fencing requirements adequate to prevent ingress or egress of cervids.

(2) Surveillance based on testing of all deaths over 16 months of age is required. This includes surveillance at slaughter and surveillance of animals killed in shooter bull operations.

(3) Good quality sampling where State and Federal Officials have the authority to adjust herd status if poor quality samples, particularly samples that are from the wrong portion of the brain, are routinely submitted from a premise.

(4) Physical herd inventory with annual verification reconciling animals and identifications with records by an accredited veterinarian or state or federal personnel is required. Inventory is to include a crosscheck of all animal identifications with the herd inventory and specific information on the disposition of all animals not present

(5) Each animal should have a minimum of two official/approved unique identifiers.

(6) Premise locations must be specifically identified by GPS or detailed description during the first herd inventory. A detailed description of the physical facilities also is required.

(7) Herd additions are allowed from herds with equal or greater time in an equivalent State CWD program with no negative impact on the certification status of the receiving herd. If herd additions are acquired from a herd with a later date of enrollment, the receiving herd reverts to the enrollment date of the sending herd. If a herd participating in the certification program acquires animals from a nonparticipating herd, the receiving herd must start over with a new enrollment date based upon the date of acquisition of the animal.

(8) If a positive animal is identified in a herd, the State will impose an immediate quarantine and the herd status is changed to positive. Development and implementation of a herd plan will determine future eligibility to reenroll in the program.

(9) Animal health officials in the state of origin have access to herd records for the past 5 years, including records of deaths and causes of death.

§51.15.Poultry.

(a) All poultry must meet the requirements the contained in §57.11, of this title (relating to Entry [ General ] Requirements.

(b) Live domestic poultry, except those entering for slaughter and processing at a slaughter facility owned or operated by the owner of the poultry entering, may enter Texas only under the following circumstances:

(1) The domestic poultry originate from a flock that is certified as Avian Influenza clean in accordance with the National Poultry Improvement Plan and the shipment is accompanied by a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection; or

(2) The domestic poultry is from an Avian Influenza negative flock that participates in an approved state-sponsored Avian Influenza monitoring program and the shipment is accompanied by a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection indicating participation and listing the general description of the birds, test date, test results, and name of testing laboratory; or

(3) The domestic poultry originate from a flock in which a minimum of 30 birds, 4 weeks of age or older, or the complete flock, if fewer than 30, are serologically negative to an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) or Agar Gel Immunodiffusion (AGID) test for Avian Influenza within 72 hours of entry and a minimum of 10 birds (e.g. two pools of 5 birds per house) are tested negative on trachea swabs to a Directigen (R) test within 72 hours of entry or negative to other tests approved by the Commission; the shipment shall be accompanied by a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection listing the general description of the birds, test date, test results, and name of testing laboratory.

(4) Live domestic poultry from states affected with Avian Influenza may enter Texas for slaughter and processing only under the following circumstances: A minimum of 30 birds per flock are serologically negative to an ELISA or AGID test for Avian Influenza within 72 hours of entry, and a minimum of 10 birds (e.g., two pools of 5 birds per house) are tested negative on tracheal swabs to a Directigen (R) test within 72 hours of entry or negative to other tests approved by the TAHC, and specific written permission has been granted.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on June 17, 2002.

TRD-200203749

Gene Snelson

General Counsel

Texas Animal Health Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: July 28, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 719-0714