Part 1.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Chapter 6.
STATE INFRASTRUCTURE BANK
The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes amendments
to §6.23 and §6.32, concerning the State Infrastructure Bank (SIB).
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) adopted rules to govern
the SIB that became effective in early 1998 when the SIB was first being established.
Since then, the SIB has provided over $91 million in financial assistance
for transportation projects. Experience has shown that some of the requirements
initially imposed on applicants are unnecessary. SIB applicants can now be
relieved of the burden of complying with these unnecessary requirements.
Additional changes in the rules are made to provide the commission with
greater flexibility in considering requests for financial assistance. Throughout
the amended rules, non-substantive changes have been made to improve clarity,
to conform to current
Texas Register
standards,
and to make the rules consistent with the definitions and standards found
in the Code Construction Act, Government Code, Chapter 311. References to
loans are generalized to cover all forms of financial assistance.
Section 6.23(a)(5) is amended to give applicants more flexibility in submitting
financial information when there is no applicable bond rating.
Section 6.23(a)(6) is amended to eliminate the mandatory requirement that
an applicant determine a project's logical termini and independent utility,
and that an applicant identify the location of all right of way, facilities,
and equipment needed for a project. Experience has shown that it is not practical
for applicants to provide this level of detail, and the need to identify logical
termini and independent utility is better addressed in connection with the
environmental review that occurs at the time of final approval.
Section 6.23(a)(8) and (9) is relocated without substantive change from
former §6.23(b)(3)(A) and (B).
Section 6.23(b) is amended to eliminate the requirement that the listed
information be submitted with respect to every application. The revised language
allows the department to require any or all of this information if it is considered
relevant to the project and the financing.
Section 6.23(b)(1)(C) is amended to allow a pro forma analysis to be submitted
based on generally accepted accounting principles, instead of mandating that
it be prepared on the basis of cash accounting. This will lower the burden
on applicants who keep records based on the accrual method.
Section 6.32(a) is amended to broaden and generalize the items that the
commission may consider in evaluating a request for financial assistance.
This will give the commission more flexibility to consider any information
it considers relevant in making any decision regarding financial assistance.
Section 6.32(b)(2) is reworded to enhance clarity. No substantive change
is intended.
Section 6.32(c)(1)(G) is added to broaden and generalize the items that
the commission may consider in connection with preliminary approval of financial
assistance. This will give the commission more flexibility to consider any
information it considers relevant in connection with preliminary approval
of a request for financial assistance.
Section 6.32(c)(2)(E) is amended to generalize the requirement that the
commission consider the ability of the applicant to repay financial assistance.
Experience has shown that the detailed requirements formerly listed in this
section are unnecessary in connection with many applications for financial
assistance, and requiring this additional information from some applicants
would impose an unnecessary burden.
Section 6.32(d)(1) is reworded to clarify the precise environmental requirements
imposed on an applicant. No substantive change is intended.
Section 6.32(g) is amended to broaden the range of conditions that the
commission may impose on preliminary or final approval. This change will give
the commission more flexibility in evaluating requests for financial assistance.
Section 6.32(h) is amended to clarify that the rules should not be construed
to require the commission to provide financial assistance. This qualification
is implicit in the existing rules.
FISCAL NOTE
James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of
the first five years the amended sections are in effect, there will be no
fiscal implications to state or local governments as a result of enforcing
or administering the amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs for
persons required to comply with the sections as proposed.
Mr. Bass has certified that there will be no significant impact on local
economies or overall employment as a result of enforcing or administering
the proposed amendments.
PUBLIC BENEFIT
Mr. Bass has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the proposed amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a
result of enforcing or administering the amendments will be to reduce the
burden on SIB applicants and to provide the commission with greater flexibility
in evaluating applications. There will be no adverse economic effect on small
businesses.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to James Bass,
Director, Finance Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483.
The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on July 15, 2002.
Subchapter C. PROCEDURES
43 TAC §6.23
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which
provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct
of the work of the department, and more specifically, Transportation Code, §222.077(d),
which authorizes the commission to adopt rules governing the SIB.
No statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendments.
§6.23.Application Procedure.
(a)
Basic application. An eligible entity
must
[
(1)
an overview of the project,
including
[
(2)
the
amount
[
(3)
any proposed pledge of collateral or security and
any prior
[
(4)
a description of the need for the project and
its
potential
effect
[
(5)
the latest bond rating obtained by the applicant when using
the sources of revenue to be pledged, or if not applicable, other evidence
of creditworthiness [
(6)
official written approval of the project
by the governing body of each entity that may become liable for repayment
of any financial assistance;
(7)
a binding commitment that the environmental
consequences of the proposed project will be fully considered, and that the
proposed project will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal
environmental laws, regulations, and requirements;
(8)
[
(A)
an initial route and potential alignments;
and
[(B)
the project's logical termini and independent
utility;]
[(C)
the location of all right-of-way, facilities
and equipment required to make the project functional; and]
(B)
[
(9)
[
(b)
Supplemental information and data. The applicant
may be required to
[
(1)
Financial feasibility study. The applicant
may be
required to
[
(A)
a project construction or asset acquisition schedule identifying
the timing, amount, and source of all cash required;
(B)
an analysis of the expected financing period of the project;
(C)
a pro forma analysis based on
generally accepted accounting
principles
[
(i)
anticipated [
(ii)
anticipated [
(iii)
anticipated [
(iv)
funds
[
(D)
a description of the methods used in preparing the financial
feasibility study, the assumptions contained in the study, and persons [
(E)
the length of time the amounts will be outstanding or obligated;
(F)
the anticipated interest rates applicable during the term
of the financial assistance;
(G)
any interest rate subsidies requested;
(H)
the expected savings to the applicant resulting from the
assistance; and
(I)
a description of how the requested assistance will:
(i)
expand the availability of funding for transportation projects;
(ii)
reduce direct state costs;
(iii)
maximize private and local participation in financing
projects;
(iv)
improve the efficiency of the state's transportation systems;
and
(v)
accelerate the project's transportation benefits over conventional
financing methods.
(2)
Project impacts. The applicant
may be required to
[
(A)
how the project will be consistent with the Statewide Transportation
Plan and, if appropriate, with the metropolitan transportation plan
(MTP)
developed by
an MPO
[
(B)
if the project is in a Clean Air Act non-attainment area,
how the project will be consistent with the Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP)
[
(C)
the economic impact based on a study assessing the potential
impact of the project on the economy of the region in which the project is
to be located, including the economies of each county in which the project
is to be located and of the municipalities within those counties
;
[
[
[(A)
official written approval of the project
by the governing body of each entity that which may become liable for repayment
of any financial assistance;]
[(B)
a binding commitment that the environmental
consequences of the proposed project will be fully considered, and that the
proposed project will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal
environmental laws, regulations, and requirements;]
(D)
[
(E)
[
(c)
Waiver of required information or data. The executive director
may waive submission of
any
individual
item
[
(1)
the information or data [
(2)
the department already possesses information or data in
a format
that can
[
(d)
Requirement of additional information. The executive director
may require the applicant to submit explanations and expansions of information
or data required by this section [
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 31, 2002.
TRD-200203373
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 14, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
43 TAC §6.32
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which
provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct
of the work of the department, and more specifically, Transportation Code, §222.077(d),
which authorizes the commission to adopt rules governing the SIB.
No statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendments.
§6.32.Commission Action.
(a)
Commission analysis. The commission will
consider
all relevant information, including
[
(b)
Applications for limited financial assistance
[
(1)
Applications for financial assistance in the amount of
$250,000 or less may be approved by the commission without going through both
the preliminary and final approval processes prescribed in subsections (c)
and (e) of this section. These applications may be approved by the commission
using one final approval process.
(2)
Applications under this subsection must
meet all the requirements and are subject to all the conditions applicable
either to preliminary or final approval of financial assistance, except that
the negotiation process under subsection (c)(3) of this section may be completed
after final approval.
[(2)
All considerations, determinations, and
project requirements prescribed in subsections (c)-(e) and (h) of this section
must be complied with prior to any final approval of applications under this
subsection, with the exception of the negotiation process prescribed in subsection
(c)(3) of this section, which may be completed after final approval. These
applications are also subject to subsections (f) and (g) of this section.]
(3)
The commission may require
applications under this
subsection to receive preliminary and final approval separately
[
(c)
Preliminary approval.
(1)
Considerations. Prior to granting preliminary approval
of an eligible project, the commission
may
[
(A)
whether the project is on the state highway system;
(B)
the
transportation need for and anticipated
public benefit of the project;
(C)
the present and projected financial condition of the bank;
(D)
potential social,
economic
[
(E)
conformity with the purposes of the bank; [
(F)
evidence of local public support
; and
[
(G)
any other relevant consideration.
(2)
Project requirements. The commission may grant preliminary
approval to a project for bank financing if it finds that:
(A)
the project is consistent with the Statewide Transportation
Plan and, if appropriate, with the metropolitan transportation plan
(MTP)
developed by
an MPO
[
(B)
if the project is in a Clean Air Act non-attainment area,
the project will be consistent with the Statewide Transportation Improvement
Program (STIP)
[
(C)
the project will improve the efficiency of the state's
transportation systems;
(D)
the project will expand the availability of funding for
transportation projects or reduce direct state costs; and
(E)
the application shows that the project and the applicant
are likely to have sufficient revenues to assure repayment of the financial
assistance [
[(i)
the probable ability of any pledged revenues
to meet all obligations of the project and to repay the financial assistance
to the bank;]
[(ii)
management of the project;]
[(iii)
adequacy of working capital and operating
funds;]
[(iv)
collateral and other guarantees of repayment;]
[(v)
how quickly the financial assistance
will be repaid; and]
[(vi)
the presence of credit insurance or
other guarantees.]
(3)
Authorized actions. By granting preliminary approval, the
commission authorizes the executive director to negotiate:
(A)
the project's limits, scope, definition, design, and any
other factors
that may effect
[
(B)
the amount, type
,
and timing of disbursements
of financial assistance;
(C)
the
interest rates
,
including subsidies;
(D)
the
fees;
(E)
the
charges;
(F)
the
repayment schedules;
(G)
the
term to maturity of any financial assistance;
(H)
the
collateral securing the financial assistance;
(I)
the
appropriate covenants applicable to the
financial assistance;
(J)
the
default provisions; and
(K)
all other provisions necessary to complete an agreement
under Subchapter E of this chapter [
(d)
Social,
economic
[
(1)
Before final approval is granted
[
(2)
For a project not on the state highway system, the applicant
shall be responsible for completing required studies of social,
economic
[
(3)
For a project on the state highway system, the department
will
[
(e)
Final approval.
After
[
(1)
providing financial assistance will protect the
public's
[
(2)
the project will provide for all reasonable and feasible
measures to avoid, minimize, or mitigate for adverse environmental impacts.
(f)
Postponement. The commission may postpone final approval
if it finds that the current or projected financial condition of the bank
warrants this action.
(g)
Contingencies. The commission may make its preliminary
or final approval contingent
on further actions by the applicant, including
[
(h)
Order of approval or disapproval. Approval or disapproval
of
financial assistance
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 31, 2002.
TRD-200203372
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 14, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes the repeal
of §§11.50-11.53, concerning access driveways to state highways,
and simultaneously proposes new §§11.50-11.55, concerning access
management.
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED REPEALS AND NEW SECTIONS
Transportation Code, Chapter 203, provides that the Texas Transportation
Commission (commission) may lay out, construct, maintain, and operate a modern
state highway system, with emphasis on the construction of controlled access
highways. To promote public safety, facilitate the movement of traffic, preserve
the public's financial investment in highways, and promote national defense,
the commission may convert where necessary an existing street, road, or highway
into a controlled access highway in accordance with modern standards of speed
and safety.
This chapter also authorizes the commission to designate a state highway
as a controlled access highway, deny access to or from a controlled access
highway, designate the location, type and extent of access to be permitted
to a controlled access highway, and to close a public or private way at or
near its intersection with a controlled access highway.
Due to the significant cost associated with the construction and maintenance
of highways, it is imperative that they provide maximum traffic handling capacity
for as long as practical. Adjacent development and access points along highways
contribute to congestion and early deterioration of the operation of the highway,
thereby reducing the ability of the state highway system to safely and efficiently
move higher volumes of traffic.
In the December 28, 2001 issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 10816), the department proposed amendments to §15.54.
Those amendments proposed limitations on the construction of frontage roads
and prohibition on most new access to controlled access corridors. Those amendments
are being withdrawn by separate action. The department received numerous comments
to the proposed amendments to §15.54 stating that traffic congestion
on the state highway system can be best addressed through the adoption of
a comprehensive access management policy. The department agrees and therefore
proposes new §§11.50-11.55.
Existing §§11.50-11.53 provide the current regulations for access
driveways to state highways. Section 11.50 includes definitions for public,
commercial, and private access driveways. Section 11.51 outlines the safety
and operational basis for determining access driveways locations and the purpose
they serve. Section 11.52 outlines the responsibilities for construction and
maintenance of access driveways. Section 11.53 describes the conditions under
which these rules apply. These sections are all proposed for repeal and will
be replaced by language in new §§11.50-11.55.
New §11.50 defines terms used in this subchapter.
New §11.51 provides that the subchapter applies to new approaches
or driveways and those that are reconstructed as part of a department project.
New §11.52 describes the process for determining where access may
be permitted on a new location facility. Unless the commission determines
otherwise, all new location facilities such as freeways, relief routes, loops,
and major urban roadways will be designated as controlled access facilities
pursuant to Transportation Code, Chapter 203, as a method of preserving mobility
and safety on these new facilities. To maximize mobility and safety both on
and off the state highway system, the department will work cooperatively with
local governments and property owners to determine the location and type of
access to the proposed facility that may be permitted, provided access is
in conformance with the department's Access Management Manual. The Access
Management Manual is available from the department for reference.
After the department has established a proposed access management plan
for the facility, the commission will review the plan and determine whether
to approve the location and type of access proposed. To ensure consistency
with the Access Management Manual, access points approved by the commission
under this section will be specifically described by a metes and bounds property
description. To aid the project development process, subsequent to the release
to begin right of way acquisition, local governments or individuals desiring
access not in conformance with the approved access management plan must request
commission approval to acquire the access rights at a specific location in
the same manner as required for existing facilities.
New §11.53 describes the process to be followed regarding access to
existing facilities. Subsection (a) describes options regarding the right
to access a state highway undergoing reconstruction when property owners already
possess a right of access. To maximize mobility and safety both on and off
the state highway system, the department will work together with local governments
and property owners to review existing access points for impacts on mobility,
safety, and the efficient operation of the highway facility and reasonable
conformance with the Access Management Manual.
Subsection (b) describes the process for obtaining approval of a new access
point to an existing facility where the department does not own the access
rights. To protect safety and mobility on the state highway system, the department
may permit access to the highway based on the impacts on the mobility, safety,
and efficient operation of the state highway facility and in accordance with
the Access Management Manual and driveway permit procedures adopted by the
department.
Subsection (c) describes the process for obtaining approval to purchase
a new access point to an existing facility where the department owns the access
rights. To maximize mobility and safety both on and off the state highway
system, this subsection provides that the department will work cooperatively
with the applicable local government and the requestor to determine the location
and type of access that may be permitted. To ensure that the proposed access
will maximize mobility and safety, the request must include an engineering
study, which may include a Traffic Impact Analysis, acceptable to the department
that evaluates mobility, safety, and the operational impacts on the state
highway facility. Once the department has reached an agreement with the requestor,
the commission will determine whether to approve the sale of the department's
access rights to the requestor.
New §11.54 describes the construction and maintenance requirements
for approved access driveways. Since a commercial or private access driveway
benefits primarily the property owner, the permittee is responsible for all
costs associated with the construction and maintenance of the driveway. Since
public access driveways benefit both the permittee and the traveling public,
the department will maintain these facilities within the state highway right
of way if they connect to highways that are the maintenance responsibility
of the department and provided that the permittee pays for the cost of materials
and installation of the driveway.
To ensure the safety of the traveling public and to protect the integrity
of the highway facility by providing for proper drainage of storm water in
the area, §11.54 provides that access driveways must not alter or impede
drainage and that department approval of the drainage structure for the driveway
is required.
To minimize impacts on adjacent landowners when access driveways are destroyed
or removed as part of highway construction, §11.54 provides that the
department, when replacing or reconstructing those impacted driveways, will
do so in accordance with the Access Management Manual and to a condition equal
to or better than the original driveway.
To ensure the safety of the traveling public and to protect the integrity
of the highway facility, §11.54 also requires the holder of a driveway
permit to take corrective action when drainage or safety problems occur. Section
11.54 further provides that the department may make the necessary alterations
to correct a safety or drainage problem and hold the permittee financially
responsible if the permittee fails to correct the problem.
To ensure that the department considers all reasonable alternatives during
project development, new §11.55 provides that the department may construct
local access roads when necessary to restore circulation, to resolve a landlock
condition on a parcel of land, or when the local access roads will otherwise
benefit the state highway system. This section provides that commission approval
must be obtained prior to the department entering into any agreements to provide
local access roads in conjunction with a department project.
FISCAL NOTE
James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of
the first five years the repeals and new sections are in effect, there will
be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of the
repeals or enforcing or administering the new sections. There are no anticipated
economic costs for persons required to comply with the sections as proposed.
Ken Bohuslav, P.E., Director, Design Division, has certified that there
will be no significant statewide impact on local economies or overall employment
as a result of enforcing or administering the repeals or new sections. Any
impact on a specific local economy is unknown and would be a matter of conjecture.
PUBLIC BENEFIT
Mr. Bohuslav has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect, the public benefits anticipated as a result of
enforcing or administering the sections will be to preserve the safety, mobility,
and efficient operation of the state highway system. By minimizing the degradation
of highway system operations, the department anticipates that fewer additional
highways will be needed, thereby saving in future public expenditures for
highway construction. In addition, interested parties will find all information
related to access to the state highway system conveniently located in Chapter
11. There will be no adverse economic effect statewide on small businesses.
PUBLIC HEARING
Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter
2001, the department will conduct three public hearings to receive comments
concerning the proposed rules. Each public hearing will begin at 2:00 p.m.
on the following dates and at the following locations:
June 26, 2002: Joe C. Thompson Conference Center Auditorium, Dean Keeton
26th & Red River, Austin, Texas 78705.
July 1, 2002: TxDOT Houston District Office, 7721 Washington Avenue, Houston,
Texas 77251.
July 3, 2002: Irving Arts Center, 3333 North MacArthur Boulevard, Irving,
Texas 75062.
These public hearings will be conducted in accordance with the procedures
specified in 43 TAC §1.5. Those desiring to make official comments or
presentations may register starting at 1:30 p.m. Any interested persons may
appear and offer comments, either orally or in writing; however, questioning
of those making presentations will be reserved exclusively to the presiding
officer as may be necessary to ensure a complete record. While any person
with pertinent comments will be granted an opportunity to present them during
the course of the hearing, the presiding officer reserves the right to restrict
testimony in terms of time and repetitive content. Organizations, associations,
or groups are encouraged to present their commonly held views and identical
or similar comments through a representative member when possible. Comments
on the proposed text should include appropriate citations to sections, subsections,
paragraphs, etc. for proper reference. Any suggestions or requests for alternative
language or other revisions to the proposed text should be submitted in written
form. Presentations must remain pertinent to the issues being discussed. A
person may not assign a portion of his or her time to another speaker. Persons
with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary
aids or services such as interpreters for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, readers, large print or Braille, are requested to contact Randall
Dillard, Director, Public Information Office, 125 East 11th Street, Austin,
Texas 78701-2483, (512) 463-8588 at least two working days prior to the hearing
so that appropriate services can be provided.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Written comments on the proposed repeals and new sections may be submitted
to Ken Bohuslav, P.E., Director, Design Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin,
Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on July
15, 2002.
Subchapter C. ACCESS DRIVEWAYS TO STATE HIGHWAYS
43 TAC §§11.50 - 11.53
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Department of Transportation or in the Texas Register office,
Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The repeals are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which
provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to establish
rules for the conduct of the work of the department.
No statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed repeals.
§11.50.Definitions.
§11.51.Access Driveway Facilities.
§11.52.Access Driveway Facilities Outside the Corporate Limits of Municipalities.
§11.53.Applicability.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 31, 2002.
TRD-200203371
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 14, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
43 TAC §§11.50 - 11.55
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The new sections are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to establish
rules for the conduct of the work of the department.
No statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed new sections.
§11.50.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter, shall
have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
Access Management Manual--Guidelines adopted by the department
to provide for reasonable access to a state highway facility while ensuring
mobility, safety, and the efficient operation of the state highway system.
(2)
Commercial access driveway--An entrance to, or exit from,
any commercial, business, or similar type establishment.
(3)
Commission--The Texas Transportation Commission.
(4)
Controlled access facility--A facility designated by the
commission under Transportation Code, Chapter 203, where the commission controls
the location and type of access. Controlled access facilities include freeways
where direct access to the mainlanes is not permitted and highways where limited
direct access to the mainlanes may be permitted in accordance with the Access
Management Manual.
(5)
Department--The Texas Department of Transportation.
(6)
Engineering study--An appropriate level of analysis, which
may include a Traffic Impact Analysis, that determines the expected impact
that permitting access will have on mobility, safety, and the efficient operation
of the state highway system, and prepared in accordance with the Access Management
Manual.
(7)
Freeway--A facility intended to safely and efficiently
move large volumes of traffic at high speeds where preference is given to
through traffic by providing access to selected public roads only, and by
prohibiting crossings at grade and direct private driveway connections to
the mainlanes.
(8)
Local access management guidelines--Guidelines adopted
by a local government that meet or exceed the requirements in the Access Management
Manual and provide for reasonable access while ensuring the mobility and safety
of roadways within its jurisdiction.
(9)
Local access road--A local public street or road, generally
one that is parallel to a highway on the state highway system, that provides
access for businesses or properties located between the highway and the local
access road.
(10)
Loop--A fully or partially circumferential route on a
new location that is constructed primarily to improve mobility and reduce
congestion on existing routes.
(11)
Permittee--A property owner or his or her authorized representative
who receives a driveway permit from the department to construct or modify
an access driveway from the property to a highway under the jurisdiction of
the department.
(12)
Private access driveway--An entrance to, or exit from,
a residential dwelling, farm, or ranch for the exclusive use and benefit of
the permittee.
(13)
Public access driveway--Any approach from a county or
city maintained road or street, or an entrance to, or exit from, a public
school, a publicly owned cemetery, or other publicly owned place or building
of a like character.
(14)
Relief route--A new location highway that is constructed
primarily to improve mobility and reduce congestion on an existing route.
(15)
Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA)--A traffic engineering study,
paid for by the person or entity requesting access, conducted in accordance
with the Access Management Manual, and signed, sealed, and dated by an engineer
licensed to practice in the State of Texas, that determines the potential
traffic impacts of a proposed traffic generator. This study must include,
but is not limited to, an estimation of future traffic with and without the
proposed generator, analysis of the traffic impacts including a capacity and
operational analysis of both the main roadways and adjacent intersections
impacted by the generator, and the recommended roadway and intersection improvements
needed to accommodate the expected traffic within logical limits or boundaries.
§11.51.Applicability.
This subchapter applies to all new access driveway facilities constructed
on highways under the jurisdiction of the department. It also applies to existing
driveways that may be reconstructed as part of a department project.
§11.52.Access to new location facilities.
(a)
Intent. The intent of the department when developing new
location facilities is to provide for the mobility and safety of the traveling
public. All new location facilities such as freeways, relief routes, loops,
and major urban roadways will be designated as controlled access facilities
pursuant to Transportation Code, Chapter 203, unless the commission determines
otherwise. Access to these facilities may be permitted in accordance with
the provisions of this section. Typically, rural low-volume roads will not
be designated as controlled access facilities.
(b)
Determination. Prior to acquiring right of way for a project,
the department will work cooperatively with the local government and property
owners to determine the location and type of access to the proposed facility
that may be permitted. Access must conform to the Access Management Manual.
Access may be provided by the inclusion of frontage roads or by other means.
Preference will be given to public access and shared use driveways.
(c)
Approval. The commission may approve the provision of access
on controlled access facilities after considering:
(1)
impacts on mobility, safety, and the efficient operation
of the state highway facility as determined by an engineering study, which
may include Traffic Impact Analysis, acceptable to the department;
(2)
conformance of the proposal to local access management
guidelines; and
(3)
significant prior commitments such as a local transportation
plan adopted prior to January 1, 2002 or department release to begin right
of way acquisition.
(d)
Documentation. Access points on new location controlled
access facilities that are approved by the commission under this section must
be specifically described by a metes and bounds property description.
(e)
Modification. Subsequent to the release to begin right
of way acquisition, local governments or individuals desiring access must
request commission approval to acquire the access rights at a specific location
under the provisions of §11.53 of this subchapter.
§11.53.Access to existing facilities.
(a)
Existing driveways. Property owners with right of access
to the state highway system prior to a highway reconstruction project will
retain access to the facility by either the retention of their existing driveway,
the inclusion of frontage roads, or by other means, unless access rights are
purchased by the department to resolve a safety, mobility, or operational
concern. During project development, the department will work with the local
government and property owners to review existing access points for impacts
on mobility, safety, and the efficient operation of the highway facility and
reasonable conformance to the Access Management Manual.
(b)
New driveways to existing facilities where the department
does not own the access rights. Access to the state highway system may be
permitted based on the impacts to mobility, safety, and the efficient operation
of the state highway facility and in accordance with the Access Management
Manual and driveway permit procedures adopted by the department.
(c)
New driveways to existing facilities where the department
owns the access rights. Requests to purchase the department's access rights
will be considered under the provisions of this subsection. Appraisals will
be prepared at the sole cost of the requestor.
(1)
Determination. When an individual or entity requests access
to a controlled access facility, the department will work cooperatively with
the applicable local government and the requestor to determine the location
and type of access that may be permitted to the facility. The requested access
must be in conformance with the Access Management Manual and local access
management guidelines. The request must include an engineering study, which
may include a Traffic Impact Analysis, acceptable to the department. Access
may be provided by the inclusion of frontage roads or by other means.
(2)
Approval. Commission approval is required to sell the department's
access rights. In determining whether to approve the sale of access rights,
the commission will consider the information submitted with the request, including
the findings of the engineering study, and significant prior commitments such
as a local transportation plan adopted prior to January 1, 2002.
(3)
Documentation. When the commission approves a sale of access
rights to the owner of property adjoining the facility, the sale will be accomplished
under Transportation Code, Chapter 202, Subchapter B. Access points approved
by the commission under this paragraph will be specifically described by a
metes and bounds property description.
§11.54.Construction and maintenance of approved access driveways.
(a)
For commercial and private access driveways, the cost of
materials, installation, and maintenance is the responsibility of the permittee.
(b)
For public access driveways, the cost of materials and
installation is the responsibility of the permittee. The department shall
maintain all portions of public access driveways that lie within the state
highway right of way and that connect to highways that are the maintenance
responsibility of the department.
(c)
Access driveways must not alter or impede drainage. When
drainage structures are required, size of opening and other design features
shall be approved by the department.
(d)
Except as provided in §11.53(a) of this subchapter,
any existing driveway facility that is destroyed or removed in the construction
or reconstruction of a section of highway will be replaced or reconstructed
by the department to a design in accordance with the Access Management Manual
and to a condition equal to or better than the original driveway.
(e)
If drainage or safety problems related to new driveway
facilities occur, it is the permittee's responsibility to take corrective
action. If drainage or safety problems related to existing commercial or private
access driveways occur, it is the permittee's responsibility to take corrective
action. If the permittee fails to take corrective action, the department may
make the necessary alterations and hold the permittee financially responsible.
The department will correct drainage or safety problems related to existing
public access driveways.
§11.55.Local access roads.
If local access roads are necessary to restore circulation or to resolve
a landlock condition on a parcel of land, or will otherwise benefit the state
highway system, local access roads may be included in a department project
on a standard participation basis as established in Appendix A of §15.55
of this title (relating to Construction Cost Participation). Commission approval
must be obtained prior to the department entering into any agreements to provide
local access roads in conjunction with a department project. Local access
roads will not be considered service projects as defined in §15.56 of
this title (relating to Local Financing of Highway Improvement Projects on
the State Highway System).
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State on May 31, 2002.
TRD-200203370
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 14, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
Subchapter E. FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL PARTICIPATION
43 TAC §15.54
The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes
amendments to §15.54, construction, concerning federal, state, and local
participation in highway improvement projects.
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Transportation Code, Chapter 203, provides that the Texas Transportation
Commission (commission) may lay out, construct, maintain, and operate a modern
state highway system, with emphasis on the construction of controlled access
highways. To promote public safety, facilitate the movement of traffic, preserve
the public's financial investment in highways, and promote national defense,
the commission may convert, where necessary, an existing street, road, or
highway into a controlled access highway in accordance with modern standards
of speed and safety.
This chapter also authorizes the commission to designate a state highway
as a controlled access highway, deny access to or from a controlled access
highway, designate the location, type and extent of access to be permitted
to a controlled access highway, and to close a public or private way at or
near its intersection with a controlled access highway.
Due to the significant cost associated with the construction and maintenance
of highways, it is imperative that they provide maximum traffic handling capacity
for as long as practical. Adjacent development and access points along highways
may contribute to congestion and early deterioration of the operation of the
highway, thereby reducing the ability of the state highway system to safely
and efficiently move higher volumes of traffic.
In the December 28, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 10816), the department proposed amendments to §15.54.
These amendments proposed limitations on the construction of frontage roads
and prohibition on most new access to controlled access corridors. Those proposed
amendments are withdrawn by separate action. The department received numerous
comments to the proposed amendments stating that traffic congestion on the
state highway system can be best addressed through the adoption of a comprehensive
access management policy. The department agrees and under separate action,
is proposing adoption of new §§11.50-11.55, concerning access management
on the state highway system.
These new proposed amendments to §15.54 delete subsection (d) thereby
eliminating confusion that results from an assumption that access will be
afforded if a frontage road is constructed. The department intends to construct
frontage roads, when appropriate to do so, and will eliminate the consideration
of how the frontage road is funded from the decision of whether to build a
frontage road. Once frontage road construction has been approved by the department,
funding decisions will be negotiated based on the benefit to the state highway
system provided by the frontage road. The remaining language in subsection
(d) relates to access issues and is no longer appropriate in this section
concerning federal, state, and local participation in highway improvement
projects. This language has been consolidated into the new sections proposed
in Chapter 11.
FISCAL NOTE
James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of
the first five years the amendments are in effect, there will be no fiscal
implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering
the amended section. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required
to comply with the amendments as proposed.
Ken Bohuslav, P.E., Director, Design Division, has certified that there
will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as
a result of enforcing or administering the amended section.
PUBLIC BENEFIT
Mr. Bohuslav has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the amendments are in effect, the public benefits anticipated as a result
of enforcing or administering the amendments will be that interested parties
will find that all information related to access provisions to the state highway
system are conveniently located in Chapter 11. There will be no adverse economic
effect on small businesses.
PUBLIC HEARING
Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter
2001, the department will conduct three public hearings to receive comments
concerning the proposed amendments. Each public hearing will begin at 2:00
p.m. on the following dates and at the following locations:
June 26, 2002: Joe C. Thompson Conference Center Auditorium, Dean Keeton
26th & Red River, Austin, Texas 78705.
July 1, 2002: TxDOT Houston District Office, 7721 Washington Avenue, Houston,
Texas 77251.
July 3, 2002: Irving Arts Center, 3333 North MacArthur Boulevard, Irving,
Texas 75062.
These public hearings will be conducted in accordance with the procedures
specified in 43 TAC §1.5. Those desiring to make official comments or
presentations may register starting at 1:30 p.m. Any interested persons may
appear and offer comments, either orally or in writing; however, questioning
of those making presentations will be reserved exclusively to the presiding
officer as may be necessary to ensure a complete record. While any person
with pertinent comments will be granted an opportunity to present them during
the course of the hearing, the presiding officer reserves the right to restrict
testimony in terms of time and repetitive content. Organizations, associations,
or groups are encouraged to present their commonly held views and identical
or similar comments through a representative member, when possible. Comments
on the proposed text should include appropriate citations to sections, subsections,
paragraphs, etc. for proper reference. Any suggestions or requests for alternative
language or other revisions to the proposed text should be submitted in written
form. Presentations must remain pertinent to the issues being discussed. A
person may not assign a portion of his or her time to another speaker. Persons
with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary
aids or services such as interpreters for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, readers, large print or Braille, are requested to contact Randall
Dillard, Director, Public Information Office, 125 East 11th Street, Austin,
Texas 78701-2483, (512) 463-8588 at least two working days prior to the hearing
so that appropriate services can be provided.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Ken Bohuslav,
P.E., Director, Design Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin, Texas 78701-2483.
The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on July 15, 2002.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which
provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct
of the work of the department.
No statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendments.
§15.54.Construction.
(a)
Purpose. This section describes the conditions under which
state, federal and local financing of construction costs are to be shared.
(b)
Funding. Construction costs may be funded by the commission
at the entire expense of the department, with local participation, and/or
with federal participation, as described in §15.55 of this title (relating
to Construction Cost Participation), and in accordance with criteria set forth
by federal and state law and regulations. The local government shall also
be responsible for the total cost of any work included which is ineligible
for federal or state participation as specified in §15.52 of this title
(relating to Agreements).
(c)
Sidewalks. The department will also provide for sidewalk
construction, accomplished in accordance with the requirements of the Americans
with Disabilities Act and other applicable state and federal laws, on designated
state highway system routes:
(1)
when replacing an existing sidewalk;
(2)
where highway construction severs an existing sidewalk
system (the state will make connections within highway right of way to restore
sidewalk system continuity); or
(3)
where pedestrian traffic is causing or is expected to cause
a safety conflict.
[(d)
Control of Access on Freeway Mainlanes.]
[(1)
For facilities with full control of access, such as interstate
highways or freeways developed by commission designation pursuant to Transportation
Code, Chapter 203, access to the main travel lanes is fully controlled through
designation, purchase of access rights, or provision of frontage roads.]
[(2)
The department will include frontage roads in the planning
stage of highways with full access control when:]
[(A)
it is necessary to unlandlock the remainder of a parcel
of land which has a value equal to or nearly equal to the cost of the frontage
road;]
[(B)
the appraised damages, resulting from the absence of frontage
roads at the time of planning, would exceed the cost of the frontage roads;
or]
[(C)
it is necessary to restore circulation of local traffic
due to local roads or streets being severed or seriously impaired by the construction
of the controlled access highway, and an economic analysis shows the benefits
derived more than offset the costs of constructing and maintaining the frontage
roads.]
[(3)
In those instances where requests for additional frontage
roads are received during or subsequent to the planning stage or after the
freeway has been constructed, they may be considered and placed in order of
the priority of highway needs.]
[(A)
When right of way and utility adjustment costs are shared
with a local government on a standard participation basis applicable to the
highway designation, the department may assume 100% responsibility for additional
frontage road construction as follows:]
[(i)
on relatively short sections of frontage roads where through
lane traffic is experiencing high accident rates due to local access and where
such construction can be expected to substantially improve safety; or]
[(ii)
in heavily traveled urban corridors where gaps occur
in the existing frontage road systems, and closing these frontage road gaps
will restore system continuity and provide a cost-effective method of enhancing
traffic operations in the corridor.]
[(B)
The department may assist a requesting local government
in the construction of additional frontage roads as follows:]
[(i)
where a usable section of frontage road that will be of
benefit to the traveling public is to be developed (usable section being defined
as an addition or extension from a cross road separation to cross road separation
or connecting to a public roadway or major traffic generator);]
[(ii)
where such frontage road construction is judged to not
adversely impact existing traffic operations or safety;]
[(iii)
where the department is responsible for design and construction
of the added frontage roads; and]
[(iv)
except as provided in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph,
and as adjusted under §15.55 of this title (relating to Construction
Cost Participation), when the requesting local government furnishes 100% of
needed right of way and utility adjustment costs and 50% of the cost of construction,
including preliminary and construction engineering.]
[(C)
The department may approve additional frontage road construction,
which is 100% funded by the requesting local government as follows:]
[(i)
if the frontage road construction primarily provides new
or improved access to abutting property and does not necessarily provide a
usable section as defined in subparagraph (B)(i) of this paragraph (a type
of addition that would provide limited benefits to the general traveling public);
and]
[(ii)
except as provided in subparagraph (E) of this paragraph,
where the department is responsible for designing and constructing the frontage
road and the requesting local government is responsible for 100% of the construction,
right of way, and utility adjustment costs including preliminary and construction
engineering.]
[(D)
Where right of way costs are 100% the responsibility of
the requesting local government, relocation assistance benefits will also
be 100% the responsibility of the local government and must be accomplished
in compliance with department policies and procedures.]
[(E)
The department may waive any one or more of the cost conditions
stated in subparagraphs (B)(iv) and (C)(ii) of this paragraph, provided that
the waiver is first approved by written order of the commission. In approving
a waiver, the commission will base its decision on consideration of the population
level, bonded indebtedness, tax base, and tax rate of the local government
involved, or other conditions the commission deems pertinent.]
[(4)
For additional frontage roads requested subsequent to
the planning stage or after the freeway has been constructed, control of access
as originally conceived for the facility may be modified to allow access to
the proposed frontage road only to the extent as may be permitted by safety
considerations and in keeping with department policies and procedures. The
sale or disposal of access rights shall be accomplished in accordance with §§21.101-21.104
of this title (relating to Disposal of Real Estate Interests).]
[(5)
Access driveway facilities shall be for securing access
to abutting property. Costs and provision thereof shall be in accordance with
the criteria and responsibilities established in §§11.50-11.53 of
this title (relating to Access Driveways to State Highways).]
(d)
[
(1)
In general, it shall be the duty and responsibility of
the department to construct, at its expense, a drainage system within state
highway right of way, including outfalls, to accommodate the storm water which
originates within and reaches state highway right of way from naturally contributing
drainage areas.
(2)
Where a drainage channel, man-made, natural, or a combination
of both, is in existence prior to the acquisition of highway right of way,
including right of way for widening the highway, it shall be the duty and
responsibility of the state to provide for the construction of the necessary
structures and/or channels to adjust or relocate the existing drainage channel
in such a manner that the operation of the drainage channel will not be injured.
The construction expense required shall be considered a construction item.
The acquisition of any land required to accomplish this work shall be considered
a right of way item, with cost participation to be in accordance with §15.55
of this title (relating to Construction Cost Participation).
(3)
Where an existing highway crosses an existing drainage
channel, and a political unit or subdivision with statutory responsibility
for drainage develops a drainage channel to improve its operation, both upstream
and downstream from the highway, and after the state establishes that the
drainage plan is logical and beneficial to the state highway system, and there
is no storm water being diverted to the highway location from an area which,
prior to the drainage plan, did not contribute to the channel upstream of
the highway, and after construction on the drainage channel has begun or there
is sufficient evidence to insure that the drainage plan will be implemented,
the department, at its expense, shall adjust the structure and/or channels
within the existing highway right of way as necessary to accommodate the approved
drainage plan.
(4)
Where a state highway is in existence, and there is a desire
of others to cross the existing highway at a place where there is not an existing
crossing for drainage, then those desiring to cross the highway must provide
for the entire cost of the construction and maintenance of the facility which
will serve their purpose while at the same time adequately serving the highway
traffic. The design, construction, operation, and maintenance procedures for
the facility within state highway right of way must be acceptable to the department.
(5)
In the event the local government involved expresses a
desire to join the department in the drainage system in order to divert drainage
into the system, the local government shall pay for the entire cost of collecting
and carrying the diverted water to the state's system and shall contribute
its proportional share of the cost of the system and outfall based on the
cubic feet per second of additional water diverted to it when compared to
the total cubic feet per second of water to be carried by the system. The
local government requesting the drainage diversion shall indemnify the state
against or otherwise acknowledge its responsibility for damages or claims
for damages resulting from such diversion.
(e)
[
(1)
Where existing highways and roads provide a satisfactory
traffic facility in the opinion of the department and no immediate rehabilitation
or reconstruction is contemplated, it shall be the responsibility of the reservoir
agency, at its expense, to replace the existing road facility disturbed by
reservoir construction in accordance with the current design standards of
the department, based upon the road classification and traffic needs.
(2)
Where no highway or road facility is in existence but where
a route has been designated for construction across a proposed reservoir area,
the department will bear the cost of constructing a satisfactory facility
across the proposed reservoir, on a line and grade for normal conditions of
topography and stream flow, and any additional expense as may be necessary
to construct the highway or road facility to line and grade to comply with
the requirements of the proposed reservoir shall be borne by the reservoir
agency.
(3)
In soil conservation and flood control projects involving
the construction of flood retarding structures where a highway or road operated
by the department will be inundated at less than calculated 50-year frequencies
by the construction of a floodwater retarding structure, it will be expected
that the soil conservation service or one of its cooperating agencies will
provide funds as necessary to raise or relocate the road above the water surface
elevation which might be expected at 50-year intervals. In those cases where
a highway or road operated by the department will not be inundated by floods
of less than 50-year calculated frequency, it will be the purpose of the department
to underwrite this hazard for the general welfare of the state and continue
to operate the road at its existing elevation until such time as interruption
and inconvenience to highway travel may necessitate raising the grade.
(f)
[
(1)
Where an irrigation facility is in existence prior to the
acquisition of highway right of way, including right of way for widening,
and the highway project will interfere with such a facility, the following
provisions shall govern.
(A)
If, at the place of interference, the irrigation facility
consists primarily of an irrigation canal which crosses the entire width of
the proposed right of way, this shall be considered a crossing and it shall
be the duty and responsibility of the department to construct and maintain
an adequate structure and to make the necessary adjustments or relocations
of minor laterals and pumps, etc., associated with the crossing, in such a
manner that the operation of the irrigation facility will not be injured.
The construction work at a crossing will be considered a construction item
with the expense to be borne by the department. The acquisition of any land
required to accomplish the adjustments and/or relocation shall be a right
of way consideration.
(B)
Any irrigation facility encountered which does not cross
the right of way and consists primarily of a longitudinal canal and/or associated
irrigation appurtenances such as pumps, gates, etc., which must be removed
and relocated shall be considered a right of way item.
(C)
In those cases where both crossing and longitudinal adjustments
or relocation of irrigation facilities are encountered, each segment shall
be classified in accordance with subparagraph (A) and (B) of this paragraph.
(2)
Where a highway is in existence, and there is a desire
of others to cross the existing highway with an irrigation facility at a highway
point where there is not an existing crossing facility, then those desiring
to cross the highway must provide for the entire cost of the construction
and maintenance of the irrigation facility which will serve their purpose
while at the same time adequately serve the highway traffic. The design, construction,
operation, and maintenance procedures for the facility within highway right
of way must be acceptable to the department.
(g)
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 31, 2002.
TRD-200203368
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 14, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
Subchapter B. MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION
43 TAC §17.29
The Texas Department of Transportation (department) proposes
amendments to §17.29, concerning vehicle registration renewal via the
internet.
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
The Texas Transportation Commission (commission) adopted §17.29 in
2000 to establish a pilot program for vehicle registration renewal over the
internet. This program has been successful, and it is now appropriate to revise
the rules to incorporate experience gained in administering the pilot program.
Moreover, the proposed amendments should facilitate the expansion of the program
into more Texas counties.
Amended §17.29 eliminates references to internet registration as a
pilot program. It also changes the procedures for allocating credit card fees.
Section 17.29(a) is amended to delete the reference to the development
of the internet registration renewal system.
Existing §17.29(b)(1) is deleted because the program is no longer
a pilot program.
Section 17.29(c) is amended to remove the requirement that registration
must expire no more than 90 days after the date on which the application for
registration renewal is submitted. Experience has shown that this qualification
is unnecessary.
Section 17.29(d) is amended to alter the allocation of fees collected in
connection with internet registration. The total fee of $3.00 remains unchanged,
but $2.00 will be charged for credit card processing instead of $1.00 for
credit card processing and $1.00 for electronic registration renewal. This
reallocation will enable higher payments to a credit card service provider
and therefore will facilitate expansion of the program into more counties.
Section 17.29(f)(2) is amended to replace references to "contract" with
references to "agreement." In addition, references to a third-party vendor
are no longer required.
Section 17.29(f)(4) is deleted because it is no longer necessary. The technical
requirements for participation in internet registration are inherent in the
department's RTS II software and need not be addressed separately.
FISCAL NOTE
James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of
the first five years the amendments are in effect, there will be no fiscal
implications for state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering
the amendments. There are no anticipated economic costs for persons required
to comply with the section as proposed.
Jerry L. Dike, Director, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, has
certified that there will be no significant impact on local economies or overall
employment as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments.
PUBLIC BENEFIT
Mr. Dike has also determined that for each of the first five years the
amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
or administering the amendments will be to provide the public with current
and accurate information regarding vehicle registration renewal via the internet.
There will be no adverse economic effect on small businesses.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted to Jerry L.
Dike, Director, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, 125 East 11th Street,
Austin, Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of written comments is
5:00 p.m. on July 15, 2002.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The amendments are proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which
provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct
of the work of the department, and more specifically, Transportation Code, §502.0021,
which requires the department to adopt rules governing the issuance of motor
vehicle registration.
No statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed amendments.
§17.29.Vehicle Registration Renewal via the Internet.
(a)
Internet Registration Renewal Program.
[
(b)
County participation in program.
County participation is optional and requires approval from the commissioners
court of a county. A county tax assessor-collector must submit an agreement
to the director indicating intent to participate in the program.
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
(c)
Eligibility of individuals for participation. To be eligible
to renew a vehicle's registration via the internet, a vehicle owner must meet
the following criteria.
(1)
The vehicle owner must meet all criteria for registration
renewal outlined in this section, in §17.22 of this subchapter, and in
Transportation Code, Chapter 502.
(2)
The vehicle owner must be a resident of a participating
county.
(3)
The vehicle must have [
(d)
Fees. A vehicle owner who renews registration via the
internet
[
(1)
registration fees prescribed by law;
(2)
any local fees or other fees prescribed by law and collected
in conjunction with registering a vehicle;
(3)
a fee of $1.00 for the processing of a registration renewal
by mail in accordance with Transportation Code, §502.101(a);
and
[
(4)
[
(e)
Information to be submitted by vehicle owner. A vehicle
owner who renews registration via the internet must submit or verify the following
information:
(1)
registrant information, including the vehicle owner's name
and county of residence;
(2)
vehicle information, including the license plate number
of the vehicle to be registered;
(3)
insurance information, including the name of the insurance
company, the name of
the
insurance company's agent (if applicable),
the telephone number of the insurance company or agent (local or toll free
number serviced Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.), the insurance
policy number, and [
(4)
credit card information, including the type of credit card,
the name appearing on the credit card, the credit card number, and the expiration
date; and
(5)
other information prescribed by rule or statute.
(f)
Duties of participating counties. A participating county
tax assessor-collector shall:
(1)
accept electronic payment for vehicle registration renewal
via the internet;
(2)
execute
an agreement
[
(3)
process qualified internet registration renewal transactions
as submitted by the third-party vendor;
[
(4)
[
(5)
[
(6)
[
(7)
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 31, 2002.
TRD-200203366
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 14, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
Subchapter F. DISPOSAL OF REAL ESTATE INTERESTS
43 TAC §21.104
(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for
repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of
the Texas Department of Transportation or in the Texas Register office, Room
245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The Texas Department of Transportation (department)
proposes the repeal of §21.104, concerning substitute consideration for
disposal of access rights.
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED REPEAL
Transportation Code, Chapter 202, Subchapter B, authorizes the department
to sell any interest in real property, including highway right of way, that
was acquired for a highway purpose and, as determined by the Texas Transportation
Commission (commission), is no longer needed for that purpose.
Since the statute adequately addresses the subject, §21.104 is not
necessary and is proposed for repeal to eliminate confusion regarding the
circumstances under which a frontage road may be constructed and access provided
when a third party contributes to the cost of constructing the frontage road.
FISCAL NOTE
James Bass, Director, Finance Division, has determined that for each of
the first five years the repeal is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications
for state or local governments as a result of repealing this section. There
are no anticipated economic costs for persons required to comply with the
repeal of this section.
Ken Bohuslav, P.E., Director, Design Division, has certified that there
will be no significant impact on local economies or overall employment as
a result of enforcing or administering this repeal.
PUBLIC BENEFIT
Mr. Bohuslav has also determined that for each year of the first five years
the repeal is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of the
repeal will be to further the department's mission to provide an efficient
and fair process of selling surplus property and maximizing the generation
of revenue for the department. The public will also benefit from having all
information related to access provisions to the state highway system located
together in Chapter 11. There will be no adverse economic effect on small
businesses.
PUBLIC HEARING
Pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, Government Code, Chapter
2001, the department will conduct three public hearings to receive comments
concerning the proposed repeal. Each public hearing will begin at 2:00 p.m.
on the following dates and at the following locations:
June 26, 2002: Joe C. Thompson Conference Center Auditorium, Dean Keeton
26th & Red River, Austin, Texas 78705.
July 1, 2002: TxDOT Houston District Office, 7721 Washington Avenue, Houston,
Texas 77251.
July 3, 2002: Irving Arts Center, 3333 North MacArthur Boulevard, Irving,
Texas 75062.
These public hearings will be conducted in accordance with the procedures
specified in 43 TAC §1.5. Those desiring to make official comments or
presentations may register starting at 1:30 p.m. Any interested persons may
appear and offer comments, either orally or in writing; however, questioning
of those making presentations will be reserved exclusively to the presiding
officer as may be necessary to ensure a complete record. While any person
with pertinent comments will be granted an opportunity to present them during
the course of the hearing, the presiding officer reserves the right to restrict
testimony in terms of time and repetitive content. Organizations, associations,
or groups are encouraged to present their commonly held views and identical
or similar comments through a representative member when possible. Comments
on the proposed text should include appropriate citations to sections, subsections,
paragraphs, etc. for proper reference. Any suggestions or requests for alternative
language or other revisions to the proposed text should be submitted in written
form. Presentations must remain pertinent to the issues being discussed. A
person may not assign a portion of his or her time to another speaker. Persons
with disabilities who plan to attend this meeting and who may need auxiliary
aids or services such as interpreters for persons who are deaf or hearing
impaired, readers, large print or Braille, are requested to contact Randall
Dillard, Director, Public Information Office, 125 East 11th Street, Austin,
Texas 78701-2483, 512/463-8588 at least two working days prior to the hearing
so that appropriate services can be provided.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS
Written comments on the proposed repeal of this section may be submitted
to Ken Bohuslav, P.E., Director, Design Division, 125 East 11th Street, Austin,
Texas 78701-2483. The deadline for receipt of comments is 5:00 p.m. on July
15, 2002.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY
The repeal is proposed under Transportation Code, §201.101, which
provides the commission with the authority to establish rules for the conduct
of the work of the department.
No statutes, articles, or codes are affected by the proposed repeal.
§21.104.Substitute Consideration for Disposal of Access Rights.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on May 31, 2002.
TRD-200203365
Richard D. Monroe
General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Earliest possible date of adoption: July 14, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
Subchapter C. CONGESTION MITIGATION FACILITIES
shall
] submit an application to the executive director in a form prescribed
by the department. The application must be accompanied by:
which shall include
] a description of the project, the total cost of
the project
,
and the proposed use of the requested financial assistance;
amounts
] of money required
to supply the requested assistance
,
[
(
]including [
the needs of
] any reserve funds
that
[
which
] must
be established and held by the bank for the applicant's benefit, but
that
[
which
] may not be expended from the bank[
)
];
priority of
] claim to those items;
impact
] on traffic congestion
and mobility; and
similar to that required to obtain a bond rating
];
(6)
] for public roadway projects,
a preliminary design study
, including
[
which includes
]:
(D)
] revisions or changes to state
highway system facilities necessitated by the project; and
(7)
] for transit projects, a preliminary
scope study
, including
[
which shall include
] preliminary
layouts, architectural drawings, equipment specifications, and other information
necessary to [
fully
] describe the project
fully
and
to comply with all requirements of the Federal Transit Administration.
shall
] submit
any or all of
the following supplemental information and data
if
[
. If the
project is in the Unified Transportation Program's Priority 1 or Priority
2 designations, the applicant must submit only that supplemental information
and data which
] the executive director finds
that information or
data to be
relevant to the project and the requested financing. In determining
the relevance of
[
relevant
] supplemental information and
data, the executive director will consider the complexity and size of the
project, the type of infrastructure or asset involved, the type and complexity
of financial assistance requested, the complexity of the project's and the
applicant's financial status, and how soon transportation benefits will begin.
shall
] submit a financial feasibility study
, including
[
which must include
]:
cash basis accounting
] for the expected financing
period of the project
, including
[
showing
]:
cash
] revenues to be used in repayment
by source;
cash
] disbursements by category
,
including disbursements for operations, maintenance, renewal, and
replacement;
cash
] balances at the close of
each calendar or fiscal year; and
cash
] used to meet the requirements
of any sinking funds, reserve funds, and [
loan
] amortization payments;
and entities
] responsible for the preparation of the study;
shall
] conduct studies analyzing the impact of the project
, including
[
. The studies must include
]:
a metropolitan planning organization
];
Plan
], with the conforming plan and Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) for the
MPO
[
metropolitan planning
organization
] in which the project is located (if necessary), and with
the State Implementation Plan
(SIP)
; [
and
]
.
]
(3)
Commitments and approvals. The applicant
shall obtain commitments and approvals which must include:
]
(C)
] a preliminary identification
of potential social, economic, and environmental impacts; and
(D)
] appropriate documentary evidence
of community involvement in
the
development of the proposed project
and
of
public support for it.
items
] of information or data required by this section
under either
of the following circumstances
: [
if
]
required by this section
] is not relevant to the project, applicant, or [
the
] financial
assistance requested (in determining
the relevance of
[
relevant
] supplemental information and data, the executive director will consider
the complexity and size of the project, the type of infrastructure or asset
involved, the type and complexity of financial assistance requested, the complexity
of the project's and the applicant's financial status, and how soon transportation
benefits will begin); or
which may
] be substituted for the
required information or data.
which are relevant to the project,
applicant, or financial assistance requested
]. In determining when additional
relevant explanations and expansions of information or data
will be
[
are
] required, the executive director will consider the complexity
and size of the project, the type of infrastructure or asset involved, the
type, complexity, and amount of financial assistance requested, and the complexity
of the project's and the applicant's financial status.
Subchapter D. DEPARTMENT AND COMMISSION ACTION
determine
] the sufficiency
of the information, the probable reliability of the projections, and the anticipated
financial condition of the applicant and the project.
Small loan applications
].
small loan applications to be subject to both the preliminary and final approval
steps of this section
]. In making this determination, the commission
will consider the complexity and size of the project, the type of infrastructure
or asset involved, and the complexity of the project's and the applicant's
financial status.
will
] consider:
economical
], and environmental impacts;
and
]
.
]
a metropolitan planning organization
];
Plan
], with the conforming plan and Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) for the
MPO
[
metropolitan planning
organization
] in which the project is located (if necessary), and with
the State Implementation Plan
(SIP)
;
according to the terms of the agreement
]. [
In
making this finding, the commission will consider:
]
which might impact
] the
financing of the project;
(relating to Financial Assistance
Agreements)
].
economical
], and
environmental impact.
Prior
to receiving final approval
] under subsection (e) of this section, the
department or the applicant
must
[
shall
] complete a
study of the social,
economic
[
economical
], and environmental
impact of the project
. The study must meet all requirements for a federal
or state project as if the project had been undertaken directly by the department.
[
, consistent with the spirit and intent of the National Environmental
Policy Act, Title 42, United States Code, §§4321 et seq., and Title
23, United States Code, §109(h), and shall provide for public involvement
and meet all other requirements of Chapter 2, Subchapter C of this title (relating
to Environmental Review and Public Involvement For Transportation Projects).
]
economical
], and environmental impacts
,
unless
the applicant and the department agree otherwise. If the department agrees
to be responsible for these studies, then any costs will be charged according
to the department's local participation agreement.
shall
] be responsible for completing required studies
of social,
economic
[
economical
], and environmental
impacts with any costs to be charged to the project.
Subsequent to
]
preliminary approval under subsection (c) of this section, the completion
of negotiations under subsection (c)(3) of this section, and the approval
of the social,
economic
[
economical
], and environmental
study
[
impact
] required by subsection (d) of this section,
the commission may grant final approval if it determines that:
public
] safety and prudently provide for the protection
of public funds
,
while furthering the purposes of this chapter;
and
upon the applicant
] making changes
in the application
, levying taxes,
and
[
performing other acts, or
]
maintaining
specified
[
certain
] conditions necessary
to
assure repayment
[
provide for adequacy of repayments
].
the project
], whether preliminary
or final,
will
[
shall
] be by written order of the commission
[
,
] and
will
[
shall
] include the rationale,
findings, and conclusions on which approval or disapproval is based.
Approval or disapproval will be in the sole discretion of the commission,
and nothing in this subchapter is intended to require approval of any financial
assistance.
Chapter 11.
DESIGN
Subchapter C. ACCESS MANAGEMENT
Chapter 15.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING
(e)
] Drainage Construction Costs.
(f)
] Highway adjustments for reservoir
construction.
(g)
] Irrigation crossings.
(h)
] Continuous and safety lighting
systems and traffic signals. For the installation, maintenance, and operation
of continuous and safety lighting systems and traffic signals, the local government
shall be responsible for providing matching funds as shown in Appendix A of §15.55
of this title (relating to Construction Cost Participation), except as adjusted
under that section. Such installation, maintenance, and operation shall be
accomplished in accordance with §25.5 of this title (relating to Installation,
Operation, and Maintenance of Traffic Signals) and §25.11 of this title
(relating to Continuous and Safety Lighting Systems).
Chapter 17.
VEHICLE TITLES AND REGISTRATION
Development of internet registration renewal system.
] The department
will [
develop and
] maintain a uniform internet registration renewal
process. This process will provide for the renewal of vehicle registrations
via the internet and will be in addition to vehicle registration procedures
provided for in §17.22(d) of this subchapter. The internet registration
renewal
program
[
system
] will be facilitated by a third-party
vendor.
(b)
Selection of counties for
participation.]
(1)
Pilot program. Before the system is implemented
statewide, the director may begin implementation in a limited number of counties
for the purpose of testing and adjusting the system's performance.]
(A)
After receiving necessary approval from the
commissioners court of a county, a county tax assessor-collector who wishes
to participate in the pilot program may request approval from the director.]
(B)
The director will choose no more than 15 counties
to participate in the pilot program. Counties will be selected on the basis
of:]
(i)
whether the county is actively developing internet
registration renewal processing;]
(ii)
whether the county is adjacent to a county
described in clause (i) of this subparagraph; and]
(iii)
ability and willingness to work flexibly
with the department and the third-party vendor in implementing and adjusting
the pilot program on a trial basis.]
(2)
Statewide program. The director
will determine when the program is sufficiently developed for statewide implementation.
All counties participating in the pilot program will automatically be a part
of the statewide program, provided ongoing program requirements are met.]
(A)
After receiving necessary approval from the
commissioners court of a county, a county tax assessor-collector may request
approval from the director to participate in the statewide program.]
(B)
The director will approve participation in
the statewide program on the basis of:]
(i)
the ability of the program to accommodate an
additional county at a particular time; and]
(ii)
the ability of the county to meet the requirements
of the statewide program.]
current
] registration
at the time
[
and that registration must expire no more than 90
days after the date on which
] the application for registration renewal
is submitted. In calculating the expiration date of the [
current
]
registration, the 5-working-day grace period established by Transportation
Code, §502.407, will not be considered.
The county shall register
the vehicle for a 12-month period without changing the initial month of registration.
Internet
] must pay:
(4)
a fee of $1.00 for the processing
of an electronic registration renewal in accordance with Transportation Code, §502.101(b);
and]
(5)
] a convenience fee of
$2.00
[
$1.00
] for the processing of
an electronic registration
renewal paid by
a credit card payment in accordance with [
§5.43
of this title (relating to Methods of Payment), and
] Transportation
Code, §201.208.
a
] representation that the policy meets all
applicable legal standards;
a contract
]
with the department [
and a third-party vendor,
] as provided by
the director;
(4)
meet all technical requirements
established by the department for participation in the internet registration
renewal system;]
(5)
] communicate with the third-party
vendor and applicants via email, regular mail, or other means, as specified
by the director;
(6)
] promptly mail renewal registration
validation stickers and license plates to applicants;
(7)
] ensure that all requirements
for registration renewal are met, including all requirements set forth in
this section, in §17.22 of this subchapter, and in Transportation Code,
Chapter 502; and
(8)
] reject applications that do
not meet all requirements set forth in this section, in §17.22 of this
subchapter,
and
[
or
] in Transportation Code, Chapter
502.
Chapter 21.
RIGHT OF WAY
Chapter 25.
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS