Part 1.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Chapter 12.
SPECIAL NUTRITION PROGRAMS
Subchapter A. CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM
40 TAC §12.24
The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) proposes to
amend §12.24, concerning sanctions and penalties, in its Special Nutrition
Programs chapter. The purpose of the amendment is to modify current rules
for taking adverse action against Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP)
day care home sponsors. The amendment requires DHS to give CACFP day care
home contractors advance notification that DHS intends to terminate their
contract when DHS determines during the first follow-up review that the contractor
has not corrected all instances of program noncompliance identified in the
initial review. The amendment also removes the provision for DHS to suspend
contractors' administrative payments and deny payment of contractors' outstanding
claims when DHS determines during the first follow-up review that the contractor
has not corrected all instances of program noncompliance identified in the
initial review. Additionally, the amendment makes technical and other non-substantive
improvements to the rule language.
James R. Hine, Commissioner, has determined that, for the first five-year
period the proposed section will be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications
for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the
section.
Mr. Hine also has determined that, for each year of the first five years
the section is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the section will be improved administration of the CACFP. Specifically, the
rights of contractors subject to adverse action will be improved by giving
the contractors advance notice when their contracts are subject to termination
and allowing them due process. There will be no effect on small or micro businesses
as a result of enforcing or administering the section, because the providers
affected by this amendment are nonprofit or governmental entities and therefore
not small or micro businesses. The economic effects are identical for all
businesses, regardless of size. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons
who are required to comply with the proposed section. There is no anticipated
effect on local employment in geographic areas affected by this section.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Karen Van
Reenen at (512) 420-2581 in DHS's Special Nutrition Programs. Written comments
on the proposal may be submitted to Supervisor, Rules and Handbooks Unit-235,
Texas Department of Human Services E-205, P.O. Box 149030, Austin, Texas 78714-9030,
within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Texas Government Code, DHS has determined
that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly,
DHS is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these
rules.
The amendment is proposed under the Human Resources Code, Title
2, Chapters 22 and 33, which authorizes DHS to administer public and nutritional
assistance programs.
The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§22.001-22.036
and §§33.001-33.027.
§12.24.Sanctions and Penalties.
(a)-(b)
(No change.)
[(c)
If DHS has evidence that a contractor
has submitted false information, DHS will immediately suspend all program
payments, including advance payments, until DHS can determine whether the
contractor knowingly submitted false information. If DHS determines, after
a review of information provided by the contractor or other sources, that
the contractor has knowingly submitted false information, DHS will immediately
declare the contractor seriously deficient; terminate the contractor's agreement,
in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25 of this title (relating
to Denials and Terminations); suspend payment of any unpaid claim for reimbursement;
and notify the contractor's eligible providers that they may transfer to another
approved sponsor.]
(c)
[
(d)
[
(1)
If DHS determines during an initial review of the sponsor
for the contract year that the sponsor has not complied with the requirements
in this subsection, DHS will deny administrative reimbursements for the test
month of the review for any provider who was not monitored or trained according
to program requirements, and require the contractor to submit a plan describing
how the program noncompliance will be corrected.
(2)
DHS will conduct a follow-up review not later than 90 days
after notifying the contractor of the review findings to determine if the
sponsor is in compliance with the requirements in this subsection. If DHS
determines during the follow-up review that the sponsor has not corrected
all instances of program noncompliance identified in the initial review, DHS
imposes
[
(A)
terminate the contractor's agreement,
in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25 of this title (relating
to Denials and Terminations);
(B)
declare the organization seriously deficient
in its administration of the program;
(C)
release the contractor's eligible providers
to transfer to another approved sponsor; and
(D)
debar individuals responsible for the
deficiencies.
(3)
DHS will conduct a second follow-up review not later than
45 days after notifying the contractor of the findings of the initial follow-up
review to determine if the sponsor is in compliance with the requirements
in this subsection.
If the contractor fails to demonstrate at the second
follow-up review that all serious deficiencies identified by DHS have been
or will be corrected,
DHS will notify the contractor that
as a
result of
failure to correct all instances of noncompliance with the
requirements
for monitoring and training providers:
[
(A)
the contractor's agreement
is terminated
, in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25 of this title
(relating to Denials and Terminations)
;
[
(B)
[
(C)
[
(D)
[
(e)
[
(1)
If DHS determines during an initial review of the sponsor
for the contract year that the sponsor has failed to ensure that claims are
submitted only for eligible meals served to eligible children, DHS
imposes
[
(2)
If 10% or more of the meals sampled and claimed for reimbursement
for the test month of the initial review fail to meet program requirements,
DHS
conducts
[
(A)
If DHS determines during the follow-up review
that 10% or more of the meals sampled and claimed for reimbursement for the
test month of the follow-up review fail to meet program requirements, DHS
imposes
[
(i)
terminate the contractor's agreement,
in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25 of the title (relating
to Denials and Terminations);
(ii)
declare the organization seriously deficient
in its administration of the program;
(iii)
release the contractor's eligible providers
to transfer to another sponsor; and
(iv)
debar the individuals responsible for
the deficiencies.
(B)
If less than 10% of all meals claimed for the
test month of the follow-up review are ineligible, the sponsor may not claim
reimbursement for any ineligible meals for the test month, may not receive
administrative reimbursement for any day care home provider who does not have
eligibility or enrollment forms containing the required information, and must
submit a plan describing how the program noncompliance will be corrected.
(3)
If more than 10% of the meals sampled for the test month
of the follow-up review fail to meet program requirements, DHS
conducts
[
(A)
the contractor's agreement
is terminated
, in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25 of this title
(relating to Denials and Terminations)
;
[
(B)
[
(C)
[
(D)
[
(f)
[
(1)
If DHS determines during an initial review of the sponsor
for the contract year that the sponsor has not complied with the requirements
identified in this subsection, DHS
imposes
[
(2)
DHS will conduct a follow-up review not later than 90 days
after notifying the contractor of the review findings to determine if the
sponsor is in compliance with the requirements identified in this subsection.
If DHS determines during the follow-up review that the sponsor has not corrected
all instances of program noncompliance identified in the initial review, DHS
will extend the sanctions to include the months subsequent to the month of
the initial review through the month of the follow-up review and establish
a cap on the number of day care home providers the contractor may sponsor,
not to exceed the number of day care homes sponsored at the time of the review,
and rescinding and/or denying approval for advance payments.
DHS also
notifies the contractor that, if the contractor fails to demonstrate at the
second follow-up review that all serious deficiencies identified by DHS have
been or will be corrected, then DHS will:
(A)
terminate the contractor's agreement,
in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25 of this title (relating
to Denials and Terminations);
(B)
declare the organization seriously deficient
in its administration of the program;
(C)
release the contractor's eligible providers
to transfer to another approved sponsor; and
(D)
debar individuals responsible for the
deficiencies.
(3)
DHS will conduct a second follow-up review not later than
45 days after notifying the contractor of the findings of the initial follow-up
review to determine if the sponsor is in compliance with the requirements
[
(A)
the contractor's agreement
is terminated
, in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25 of this title
(relating to Denials and Terminations)
;
[
(B)
[
(C)
[
(D)
[
(g)
[
(h)
[
[(j)
DHS suspends payments to day home sponsoring
organizations submitting repeated amended claims until the sponsoring organization
demonstrates that it can produce a final claim on time each month, unless
the sponsoring organization can demonstrate good cause beyond its control
for submitting the amended claims. DHS ensures that no future adjustments
in claims are paid beyond the claiming time frames, except when justified
by on-site DHS/USDA reviews or independent audits.]
(i)
[
(1)
DHS takes fiscal sanctions against a contractor according
to the procedures specified in paragraphs (1)-(4) of this subsection.
(A)
DHS notifies each contractor upon approval of the application
for program participation of the date by which an acceptable audit must be
received by DHS, and that failure to comply will result in the termination
of the contractor's agreement, in whole or in part, in accordance with §12.25
of this title (relating to Denials and Terminations), and recovery of overpayments
as identified through audit findings.
(B)
DHS provides the contractor two advance notices reminding
the contractor of the specific date that the audit is due.
(i)
DHS issues the first notice by regular mail six months
after the end of the contractor's fiscal year for which the audit is due.
(ii)
DHS issues the second notice by certified and regular
mail eight months after the end of the contractor's fiscal year for which
the audit is due. DHS notifies the contractor that:
(I)
DHS must receive the audit on or before the due date specified
in the notice;
(II)
if DHS does not receive the audit on or before the specified
due date, DHS will terminate the contractor's agreement, in whole or in part,
in accordance with §12.25 of this title (relating to Denials and Terminations);
and
(III)
the contractor has the right to appeal this decision.
(C)
If DHS does not receive the audit on or before the specified
due date, DHS notifies the contractor by certified and regular mail of its
intent to terminate the contractor's agreement, in whole or in part, in accordance
with §12.25 of this title (relating to Denials and Terminations).
(2)
If DHS
determines
[
(3)
If a contractor submits an audit
that
[
(A)
the contractor failed to provide an acceptable audit within
the specified time frames;
(B)
DHS must receive an acceptable audit by the due date specified
in this notification;
(C)
if DHS does not receive an acceptable audit by the specified
due date, DHS intends to terminate their agreement, in whole or in part, in
accordance with §12.25 of this title (relating to Denials and Terminations);
and
(D)
the contractor has the right to appeal this decision. DHS
may extend the time within which a contractor must submit an audit if DHS
determines such an extension is justified.
(4)
If DHS does not receive the required audit by the specified
due date and has not granted an extension of the due date, DHS notifies the
contractor by certified and regular mail that:
(A)
the contractor failed to provide an acceptable audit by
the specified due date; and
(B)
DHS intends to terminate their agreement, in whole or in
part, in accordance with §12.25 of this title (relating to Denials and
Terminations).
(5)
Once a contractor's participation in the CACFP has been
terminated for failure to submit an acceptable audit, the contractor must
provide an acceptable audit for any outstanding audit year(s) and comply with
the requirements of the Single Audit Act, as amended, in order to be eligible
to participate in the Special Nutrition Programs.
(j)
[
(1)
the serious deficiencies;
(2)
the actions to be taken by the sponsor and the provider
to achieve compliance; and
(3)
the date by which corrective action must be completed.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 21, 2002.
TRD-200203918
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: August 4, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) proposes to amend §19.210,
concerning temporary change of ownership, §19.211, concerning relocation, §19.2301,
concerning conditions for participation as a Medicaid-certified facility;
to repeal §19.2322, concerning allocation, reallocation, and decertification
requirements, §19.2324, concerning selection and contracting procedures
for adding Medicaid beds in high-occupancy areas, and §19.2325, concerning
selection and contracting procedures for rural counties; and new §19.2322,
concerning Medicaid bed allocation requirements, and §19.2324, concerning
selection and contracting procedures for adding Medicaid beds in high-occupancy
areas, in its Nursing Facility Requirements for Licensure and Medicaid Certification
chapter. The purpose of the amendments, repeals, and new sections is to clarify
definitions; allow DHS to make exceptions to the quality-of-care screen when
necessary to benefit Medicaid recipients; require bed allocation exemptions
to comply with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) restrictions;
restrict the transferability of waivers; relax spend-down provisions; require
applicants for certain waivers to submit a demographic study that presents
objective evidence to justify the waiver request; move the rural county waiver
requirements from §19.2325 to the bed allocation rules waiver section
and delete §19.2325; standardize time limits and extensions; require
applicants granted waivers or exemptions to submit progress reports on construction;
require property owners of closed facilities to identify their plans for future
use of allocated Medicaid beds; establish informal review procedures; and
simplify the requirements that pertain to high-occupancy counties by deleting
the requirements for proof of ownership of land, a letter of finance, liquidated
damages, and a third posting of notice of an open solicitation period for
additional Medicaid beds.
James R. Hine, Commissioner, has determined that for the first five-year
period the proposed sections will be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications
for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the
sections.
Mr. Hine also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of
enforcing the sections will be rule language that is easier for the general
public to understand. The proposal also promotes competition, which may result
in an improved quality of care, and allows private-pay residents who spend-
down their resources to have greater access to Medicaid beds. The proposal
adds flexibility to the quality-of-care screen in order to benefit Medicaid
recipients. There will be no effect on small or micro businesses as a result
of enforcing or administering the sections, because while the proposed sections
change departmental procedure, they do not require anything of facilities,
unless they choose to seek additional Medicaid beds. Large, small, or micro
facilities seeking a community needs, under-served minority, or Alzheimer's
waiver will have to pay for an independent, professional demographic study
to justify their request for a waiver. Such studies will cost the same amount
regardless of the facility size. There is no way to reduce the cost for smaller
businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required
to comply with the proposed sections. There is no anticipated effect on local
employment in geographic areas affected by these sections.
Questions about the content of this proposal may be directed to Susan Syler
at (512) 438- 3111 in DHS's Long Term Care-Policy section. Written comments
on the proposal may be submitted to Supervisor, Rules and Handbooks Unit-212,
Texas Department of Human Services E-205, P.O. Box 149030, Austin, Texas 78714-9030,
within 30 days of publication in the
Texas Register
.
Under §2007.003(b) of the Texas Government Code, DHS has determined
that Chapter 2007 of the Government Code does not apply to these rules. Accordingly,
DHS is not required to complete a takings impact assessment regarding these
rules.
Subchapter C. NURSING FACILITY LICENSURE APPLICATION PROCESS
40 TAC §19.210, §19.211
The amendments are proposed under the Human Resources Code,
Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes DHS to administer public and
medical assistance programs; and under Texas Government Code, §531.021,
which provides the Texas Health and Human Services Commission with the authority
to administer federal medical assistance funds.
The amendments implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.001-22.036
and §§32.001-32.052.
§19.210.Temporary Change of Ownership.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
A nursing facility license holder with an excellent operating
record may be eligible to acquire a license on an expedited basis to operate
another existing nursing facility. A license holder that appears on the expedited
change of ownership list may be granted expedited approval in obtaining a
temporary change of ownership license to operate another existing nursing
facility in Texas.
(1)
(No change.)
(2)
In order to establish and maintain the excellent performing
nursing facility license holder list, DHS uses the criteria found in
§19.2322(e)
[
(3)-(9)
(No change.)
(c)-(g)
(No change.)
§19.211.Relocation.
(a)-(e)
(No change.)
(f)
This section applies to relocation of a currently licensed
facility, and does not govern the relocation of Medicaid-certified beds. See §19.2322
of this title (relating to
Medicaid Bed Allocation Requirements
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on June 21, 2002.
TRD-200203910
Paul Leche
General Counsel, Legal Services
Texas Department of Human Services
Earliest possible date of adoption: August 4, 2002
For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734
(d)
] If a contractor fails to attend
training designated by DHS as mandatory, DHS
requires
[
will
require
] the contractor to take corrective action to comply with program
requirements. Failure by the contractor to accomplish the corrective action
by the date established by DHS will result in adverse action up to, and including,
termination of the contractor's agreement, in whole or in part, in accordance
with §12.25 of this title (relating to Denials and Terminations) and
recommendation for placement on the United States Department of Agriculture's
(USDA's)
National Disqualified List. If the contractor is a sponsoring
organization, DHS will notify the contractor's eligible providers or centers
that they may transfer to another approved sponsor.
(e)
] DHS imposes sanctions against
contractors that sponsor day care homes who fail to comply with program requirements
for monitoring[
,
] and who fail to train providers
. When
[
when
] program violations related to monitoring or training of
providers identified during an administrative review exceed a tolerance level
of one provider or 10% of the providers sampled, whichever amount is greater
,
[
.
] DHS imposes sanctions according to the following procedure:
will impose
] sanctions
,
including denial
of administrative reimbursements for the months subsequent to the month of
the initial review through the month of the follow-up review for any provider
who was not monitored or trained according to program requirements, establishing
a cap on the number of day care home providers the contractor may sponsor,
not to exceed the number of day care homes sponsored at the time of the review,
and
rescinding and/or denying approval for advance payments[
, and
suspending all administrative reimbursements. DHS will continue to reimburse
sponsors to pay providers for meals served to children
].
DHS also
notifies the contractor that, if the contractor fails to demonstrate at the
second follow-up review that all serious deficiencies identified by DHS have
been or will be corrected, then DHS will:
in this
subsection will result in the termination of
]
,
]
declaration that
] the organization
is seriously deficient in its administration of the program
;
[
,
]
forfeiture of any outstanding claims for
reimbursement, release of
] the contractor's eligible providers
will be released
to transfer to another approved sponsor
;
[
,
] and
that
] individuals responsible for
the deficiencies
are
[
will be
] debarred.
(f)
] DHS imposes sanctions against
contractors that sponsor day care homes who fail to ensure that claims are
submitted only for eligible meals served to eligible children according to
the following procedure:
will impose
] sanctions
,
including denial of
administrative reimbursements for any day care home provider who does not
have eligibility or enrollment forms containing required information and requiring
the contractor to submit an amended claim for reimbursement to remove all
ineligible meals for the test month, and a plan describing how the program
noncompliance will be corrected.
will conduct
] a follow-up review not later
than 90 days after notifying the contractor of the review findings to determine
if the sponsor is in compliance with requirements for ensuring claims are
submitted only for eligible meals served to eligible children.
will impose
] additional sanctions to include the
months subsequent to the month of the initial review through the month of
the follow-up review
,
including denial of administrative reimbursements
for any day care home provider who does not have eligibility or enrollment
forms containing required information, establishing a cap on the number of
day care home providers the contractor may sponsor, not to exceed the number
of day care homes sponsored at the time of the review,
and
rescinding
and/or denying approval for advance payments[
, and suspending all administrative
reimbursements. DHS will continue to reimburse sponsors for meals served to
children
].
DHS also notifies the contractor that, if the contractor
fails to demonstrate at the second follow-up review that all serious deficiencies
identified by DHS have been or will be corrected, then DHS will:
will conduct
] a second follow-up review not later than
45 days after notifying the contractor of the findings of the initial follow-up
review to determine if the sponsor is in compliance with requirements for
ensuring claims are submitted only for eligible meals served to eligible children.
If the contractor fails to demonstrate at the second follow-up review that
all serious deficiencies identified by DHS have been or will be corrected,
DHS
notifies
[
will notify
] the contractor that
as a result of
failure to correct all instances of noncompliance with
requirements for ensuring claims are submitted only for eligible meals served
to eligible children
:
[
will result in the termination of
]
,
]
declaration that
] the organization
is seriously deficient in its administration of the program
;
[
,
]
forfeiture of any outstanding claims for
reimbursement, release of
] the contractor's eligible providers
will be released
to transfer to another approved sponsor
;
[
,
] and
that
] individuals responsible for
the deficiencies
are
[
will be
] debarred.
(g)
] DHS imposes sanctions against
contractors that sponsor day care homes who fail to disburse program funds
to providers in accordance with program requirements when program violations
related to the disbursement of program funds to providers identified during
an administrative review exceed a tolerance level of one provider or 10% of
the providers sampled, whichever amount is greater. DHS imposes sanctions
according to the following procedure:
will impose
]
sanctions for the test month of the review
,
including requiring
the contractor to submit an amended claim to remove, for the purpose of determining
administrative reimbursement, all providers who have not been issued program
funds according to program requirements (day care home provider's meal reimbursement
will not be recouped) from its reimbursement claim for the test month. DHS
will require the contractor to submit a plan describing how the program noncompliance
will be corrected.
identified
] in
this
subsection [
(h) of this section
].
If the contractor fails to demonstrate at the second follow-up
review that all serious deficiencies identified by DHS have been or will be
corrected,
DHS
notifies
[
will notify
] the contractor
that
as a result of
failure to correct all instances of noncompliance
relating to the disbursement of provider funds
:
[
will result
in the termination of
]
,
]
declaration that
] the organization
is seriously deficient in its administration of the program
;
[
,
]
forfeiture of any outstanding claims
for reimbursement, release of
] the contractor's eligible providers
will be released
to transfer to another approved sponsor
;
[
,
] and
that
] individuals responsible for
the deficiencies
are
[
will be
] debarred.
(h)
] If, during a review or an
audit, DHS cites a day home sponsoring organization for deficiencies in administrative
or financial capabilities because of an excessive number of day home providers,
DHS places a cap on the number of day home providers the organization may
sponsor. DHS identifies the number of day home providers the sponsoring organization
can properly administer and immediately notifies the sponsor. The sponsor
has 10 days to submit a plan to DHS to reduce the number of day home providers
to the level of the approved cap.
(i)
] DHS approves no additional
day home providers for day home sponsoring organizations identified through
audit or review as deficient in program operations until the sponsoring organization
submits to DHS an acceptable plan to correct the deficiency.
(k)
] DHS imposes fiscal sanctions
specified in this subsection on contractors who are required to obtain an
audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act, as amended, and who fail to
comply with the requirements of said Act. The contractor has the right to
appeal this action as specified in Chapter 79 of this title (relating to Legal
Services).
has determined
]
there are extenuating circumstances, DHS may conduct an audit, either directly
or through the engagement of a third party. All costs associated with such
an audit must be paid by the contractor.
which
] does not meet the requirements of the Single Audit Act, as amended,
then DHS notifies the contractor in writing that the audit is unacceptable,
how it is unacceptable, and that the contractor has 30 calendar days from
the date on the notification to submit an acceptable audit to DHS. If DHS
does not receive the required audit by the specified time frame and has not
granted an extension of the due date, DHS notifies the contractor by certified
and regular mail that:
(l)
] If a sponsoring organization
of day homes determines during a monitoring review, or by other means, that
a provider has failed to comply with program requirements, the sponsor must
execute a corrective action plan to achieve compliance. If a sponsoring organization
conducts two or more unannounced monitoring reviews in any 12-month period
during which the sponsor cannot confirm that children are enrolled for child
care and participating in the program, the sponsor must execute a corrective
action plan to ensure they are able to effectively monitor the provider's
participation in the program. Exception: A sponsor may suspend the participation
of a day care home provider without a corrective action plan if the safety
of the children in care is at risk. The corrective action plan must notify
the provider that failure to correct serious deficiencies will result in the
termination of the provider's agreement and placement of the provider on USDA's
National Disqualified List and specify:
Chapter 19.
NURSING FACILITY REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSURE AND MEDICAID CERTIFICATION
§19.2322(d)
] of this title (relating
to
Medicaid Bed Allocation Requirements
[
Allocation, Reallocation,
and Decertification Requirements
]). An excellent performing nursing
facility license holder meeting these criteria appears on the list and is
eligible for an expedited change of ownership license to operate another existing
institution in Texas.
Allocation, Reallocation, and Decertification Requirements
]) for
guidelines on relocation of Medicaid-certified beds.
Subchapter X. REQUIREMENTS FOR MEDICAID-CERTIFIED FACILITIES