TITLE 16.ECONOMIC REGULATION

Part 1. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Chapter 1. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE

Subchapter I. PERMIT PROCESSING

16 TAC §1.201

The Railroad Commission of Texas adopts amendments to §1.201, relating to Time Periods for Processing Applications and Issuing Permits Administratively, without changes to the proposal published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8937). The Commission adopts the amendments in order to conform Table 1 in §1.201 with substantive changes in §§3.14 and 3.78, which the Commission is adopting in a separate rulemaking, Docket No. 20-0228899, as a result of changes made to the Texas Natural Resources Code by Senate Bill (SB) 310, 77th Legislature (2001), and with other changes to Commission fees required by SB 310.

Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0521, as amended by SB 310, authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $150 with each exception to any Commission rule. Texas Natural Resources Code, §85.2021, as amended by SB 310, authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $200 for each application under §3.38, relating to Well Densities. Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.1013, as amended by SB 310, authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $200 with each application for a fluid injection well permit and a fee of $300 for each application to discharge to surface water. The Commission amends Table 1 in §1.201 only to identify the new amount of the filing fee required for the specific applications subject to the provisions of §1.201.

In Table 1 of §1.201, application fees for permits under Commission rule §3.8 to discharge hydrostatic test water; produced water to inland waters; produced water to the Gulf of Mexico from a non-land based facility; and gas plant effluent will increase from the current $200 to $300. The application fee for an exception under §3.9 for a disposal well permit (Form W- 14) will increase from the current $50 to $150. The application fee for a density exception under §3.38 will increase from the current $50 to $200. Application fees for injection permits under §3.46 (Forms H-1, H-1A, H-7, and H-1S) will change from the current $100 to $200; fees for other exceptions will increase from the current $50 to $150.

The Commission also amends subsection (c)(5) to clarify the wording. As originally worded, there could be an overlap of the initial review period and the final review period. The Commission intends that the final review period not begin until the conclusion of the initial review period; the amendment makes that clarifying correction.

The Commission received no comments on the proposed amendments.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §1.201 pursuant to Texas Government Code, §§2005.001-2005.007, which require the Commission to adopt procedural rules for processing permit applications and issuing permits and to establish by rule a complaint procedure allowing permit applicants to complaint directly to the chief administrator of the agency; Texas Government Code, §2001.004, which requires agencies to adopt rules of practice stating the nature and requirements of all available formal and informal procedures; Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which provide the Commission with jurisdiction over all persons owning or engaged in drilling or operating oil or gas wells in Texas and the authority to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission; and Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.0521 and 91.1013, as amended by SB 310.

Texas Government Code, §§2001.004 and 2005.001-2005.007, and Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, 81.0521, 91.1013, as amended by SB 310, are affected by the rules as amended.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 20, 2001.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108166

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7008


Chapter 3. OIL AND GAS DIVISION

16 TAC §3.14, §3.78

The Railroad Commission of Texas (Commission) adopts amendments to §3.14, relating to Plugging, and §3.78, relating to Fees, Performance Bonds and Alternate Forms of Financial Security Required to be Filed with changes to the versions published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8937).

The Commission adopts the amendments as a result of changes to the Texas Natural Resources Code made by Senate Bill 310, 77th Legislature (2001), which became effective September 1, 2001.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §3.78(b)(4) under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0521, as amended by Senate Bill 310, which authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $150 with each exception to any Commission rule. The amendments to §3.78(b)(4) reflect the statutory authorization to collect the $150 fee.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §3.78(b)(5) under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §85.2021, as amended by Senate Bill 310, which now authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $200 with each exception to §3.37, relating to Statewide Spacing Rule (Statewide Rule 37) and §3.38, relating to Well Densities (Statewide Rule 38). The amendments to §3.78(b)(5) reflect the statutory authorization to collect the $200 fee.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §3.78(b)(12) under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §81.0522, which authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of up to $150 with each application for a well category determination under the Natural Gas Policy Act (15 U.S.C. §§3301-3432). The amendments to §3.78(b)(12) reflect the statutory authorization to collect the $150 fee.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §3.78(b)(1), (3), and (6) under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §85.2021, which authorizes the Commission to collect a fee with each application or materially amended application for a permit to drill, deepen, plug back, or reenter a well of: (1) $200 if the total depth of the well is 2,000 feet or less; (2) $225 if the total depth of the well is greater than 2,000 feet but less than or equal to 4,000 feet; (3) $250 if the total depth of the well is greater than 4,000 feet but less than or equal to 9,000 feet; or (4) $300 if the total depth of the well is greater than 9,000 feet. Additionally, amended Texas Natural Resources Code, §85.2021, authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $150 when an applicant requests the Commission expedite an application for a permit to drill, deepen, plug back, or reenter a well, and a fee of $300 for each application for an extension of time to plug a well pursuant to Commission rules. The amendments to §3.78(b)(1), (3), and (6) reflect the statutory authorization to collect the increased fees.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §3.78(b)(8) and (9) under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.1013, which now authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $200 with each application for a fluid injection well permit and authorizes the Commission to collect a fee of $300 for each application to discharge to surface water. The amendments to §3.78(b)(8) and (9) reflect the statutory authorization to collect the increased fees.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §3.78 under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.104, which now requires operators to file financial security or alternate forms of financial security. The amended provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.104: (1) allow operators to submit a cash deposit to the Commission in the same amount that would be required for a bond or letter of credit; (2) add a new determination on the availability of bonds at reasonable prices before an operator with an acceptable record of compliance can choose to file a $1,000 annual fee in lieu of posting other acceptable forms of financial security; (3) increase the annual fee for operators with an acceptable record from $100 to $1,000; (4) eliminate the option of an operator meeting its financial security requirement by providing the Commission with a first lien on equipment; and (5) increase the nonrefundable cash alternative fee from 3% of the amount that would be required for a bond or letter of credit to 12.5%.

Commission records show that in the approximately six-month period between January 18, 2001, and June 26, 2001, an additional 117 operators have filed organizational bonds. This increase appears to be directly correlated to the Commission's previous amendment of §§3.14 and 3.78 to adopt financial security requirements for inactive wells effective November 1, 2000. The increase in operators filing organizational bonds also reflects a general availability of bonds for operators. Based on this increase in the number of operators filing organizational bonds, the Commission has determined that bonds are available at reasonable prices. This determination is included in proposed §3.78(f)(1) to satisfy the statutory requirement that the Commission make such a determination.

The Commission further recognizes that while this determination is generally applicable to operators throughout the state, there may be specific operators who are unable to obtain bonds at a reasonable price. Accordingly, the Commission has included as proposed §3.78(f)(2) the opportunity for an operator to request a hearing to determine that it cannot obtain a bond at a reasonable price. Proposed §3.78(f)(2) also sets forth the minimum required evidentiary burden of proof to be submitted by the operator to support a determination that bonds are not obtainable at reasonable prices. The Commission has determined that the minimum evidentiary showing should include: (1) evidence that no fewer than three companies which have issued a bond filed with the Commission in the past 12 months will not issue a bond to the requesting operator for an annual fee less than 12% of the face amount of the bond; and (2) evidence that the operator is otherwise eligible to file the $1,000 nonrefundable annual fee.

The amendments to §3.78(l) also establish conditions for cash deposits. The Commission will place any cash deposits in a special account within the Oil Field Clean Up Fund Account. Any interest accruing on cash deposits will be deposited into the Oil Field Clean Up Fund pursuant to Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.111(c)(8). Cash deposits will not be refunded until an operator ceases all Commission-regulated activity or another form of financial security is accepted by the Commission.

The Commission also adopts the amendments to §3.14(b)(2) and (3) and §3.78(n) under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.107, as amended by Senate Bill 310, which requires operators acquiring an active or inactive well to file either an individual performance bond or a blanket performance bond with the Commission before operatorship of the well is transferred. The statutory amendments require changes to Commission rules which did not specify the type of financial security required to transfer a well. Prior Commission rules did not require the operator obtaining wells through a transfer to file a specific type of financial security. The amendments to §3.14(b)(2) and (3) and §3.78(n) simply incorporate the statutory amendments.

The Commission also adopts amendments to §3.78(c) under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.142, which requires operators filing an organization report with the Commission to submit a fee not to exceed $1,000 to be calculated as follows: (1) for an operator of not more than 25 wells, $300; (2) for an operator of more than 25 but not more than 100 wells, $500; (3) for an operator of more than 100 wells, $1,000; (4) for an operator of one or more natural gas pipelines, $100; (5) for an operator of one or more service activities or facilities, including liquids pipelines, who does not operate any wells, an amount to be determined by the Commission, but not less than $300 or more than $500; (6) for an operator of one or more service activities or facilities, including liquids pipelines, who also operates one or more wells, an amount to be determined by the Commission, but not less than $300 or more than $1,000; and (7) for an entity not currently performing operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission, $300. The amendments reflect the statutory authorization to collect an annual organization report fee based on the number of wells, service activities or facilities operated by the operator.

The required filing fee for operators who operate one or more service activities but no wells was set at $300 for pollution cleanup contractors, directional surveyors, approved cementers for plugging wells, and operators physically moving or storing crude or condensate. All other operators of other service activities or facilities, including liquids pipelines, are required to submit a fee of $500. The required filing fee for operators who operate both wells and one or more service activities or pipelines is based on the sum of any fee associated with the number of wells operated plus the separate fee charged for each category of service activity, facility or pipeline.

The Commission also adopts an amendment to §3.78(b)(15) requiring operators who submit a check that is not honored on presentment to submit any subsequent payments in the form of a credit card, cashier's check, or cash for a period of 24 months. The amendment will promote administrative efficiency by reducing the number of dishonored checks submitted to the Commission.

The Commission also notes that under the provisions of Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.1041 and §91.1042, as amended by Senate Bill 310, the Commission is required to adopt rules setting a reasonable amount of financial security for each bay or offshore well above the base amount of financial security required to be submitted by each operator. The amount of financial security for each bay or offshore well above the base amount will be the subject of a separate rulemaking. The Commission has included in the amendments to §3.78 definitions of bay, offshore and land wells in anticipation of the future amendments.

The amendments to §§3.14 and 3.78 implement statutory changes made to financially strengthen and to better use the state's Oil Field Clean Up Fund ("OFCUF"). The statutory changes were recommended during the agency review process of the Commission by the Sunset Advisory Commission.

The financial strength of the OFCUF is increased by statutory changes and corresponding rule amendments raising the required amount for filing fees and by adding an annual organization report filing fee. Broadened financial security requirements will ensure that sufficient financial security is in place to adequately fund clean up and plugging operations. The expanded financial security requirements will allow the Commission to more effectively use a fiscally stronger OFCUF.

In addition to the substantive changes previously discussed, the Commission reorganizes and clarifies §3.78. The new format groups together in §3.78 both the existing and the amended provisions relating to fees charged by the Commission. Additionally, the new format of §3.78 incorporates the references in §3.14 to individual well bonds and letters of credit, and groups these references with the existing and the amended provisions related to financial security requirements in 3.78. Finally, §3.78(p) is clarified by noting that the requirements date from the original enactment of the subsection.

The substantive changes in filing fees and financial security requirements are made in §3.78. The amendments to §3.14(a)(1)(F) and (M) and §3.14(b)(2) and (3) are adopted to conform with the substantive changes in §3.78. Other changes in §3.14(a)(1) are made to conform the definitions in this rule to Texas Register format requirements.

The Commission received three comments on the proposed amendments, two from associations. The comments from the associations addressed only one amendment, proposed §3.78(f)(2)(A). One comment was in favor of the amendment, and one comment suggested additional changes. The first comment was received from the Texas Independent Producers & Royalty Owners Association (TIPRO) to proposed §3.78(f)(2)(A) which discusses the requirements at a hearing requested by an operator to qualify to pay a $1,000.00 fee in lieu of filing another form of financial security. TIPRO suggests that the Commission should not state that an annual rate of 12% of the face amount of the bond is reasonable. The Commission disagrees with this interpretation in light of Texas Natural Resources Code §91.104(b)(5) which sets the amount for a cash alternative payment in lieu of providing financial security at 12.5% of the face amount of any financial security requirement. The 12% amount specified in proposed §3.78(f)(2)(A) is based on the 12.5% amount for a cash alternative payment set by statute. The amount adopted by the Legislature is presumed to be a reasonable amount for the cash alternative payment. Because the 12% requirement in §3.78(f)(2)(A) is based on this enactment, the same presumption of reasonableness should therefore apply to the amount set in the proposed rule.

An additional comment was received from the Texas Land & Minerals Owners Association (TLMA) supporting the determination that 12% of the face amount of the bond annual rate is reasonable in §3.78(f)(2)(A). TLMA believes that setting a cap will protect industry from excessive rates. TLMA also asserts that if underwriters for bonds unreasonably charge a rate of 12%, that operators will opt less expensive means of financial security, such as a letter of credit. Market forces will then force bond underwriters to respond with lower rates.

The remaining comment was submitted by Statewide Bonding Agency and suggests eight changes to the bond form currently used by the Commission. Statewide Bonding Agency believes that the proposed changes will allow bonds to be issued without additional restrictions which are not applied to letters of credit. Statewide Bonding Agency believes that this will encourage more bond companies to undertake surety obligations for operators. While many of the comments appear to bear further investigation, the content of the Commission's bond forms is not a subject of the present rulemaking.

Statewide Bonding Agency also suggests that the $1,000.00 fee in lieu of filing another form of financial security discourages bonding companies from providing bonds and therefore should be eliminated. The Commission notes that the $1,000.00 fee in lieu of filing another form of financial security is set by statute in Texas Natural Resources Code §91.104(b)(4). Additionally, this option will be eliminated by additional amendments to Texas Natural Resources Code §91.104(b)(4) which were passed by the Legislature to become effective on September 1, 2004.

The Commission adopts the amendments to §§3.14 and 3.78 pursuant to Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which provide the Commission with jurisdiction over all persons owning or engaged in drilling or operating oil or gas wells in Texas and the authority to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission, and under the provisions of Senate Bill 310, 77th Legislature (2001).

The Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051, 81.052, 81.0521, 81.0522, 85.202, 85.2021, 88.011, 91.101, 91.1013, 91.103, 91.104, 91.1041, 91.1042, 91.105-91.108, 91.1091, 91.111- 91.113, 91.142, and the provisions of Senate Bill 310, 77th Legislature (2001) are affected by the adopted amendments.

Issued in Austin, Texas on December 20, 2001.

§3.14.Plugging.

(a) Definitions and application to plug.

(1) The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(A) Active operation--Regular and continuing activities related to the production of oil and gas for which the operator has all necessary permits. In the case of a well that has been inactive for 12 consecutive months or longer and that is not permitted as a disposal or injection well, the well remains inactive for purposes of this section, regardless of any minimal activity, until the well has reported production of at least 10 barrels of oil for oil wells or 100 mcf of gas for gas wells each month for at least three consecutive months.

(B) Bay well--Any well under the jurisdiction of the Commission for which the surface location is either:

(i) located in or on a lake, river, stream, canal, estuary, bayou or other inland navigable waters of the state; or,

(ii) located on state lands seaward of the mean high tide line of the Gulf of Mexico in water of a depth at mean high tide of not more than 100 feet that is sheltered from the direct action of the open seas of the Gulf of Mexico.

(C) Delinquent inactive well--An unplugged well that has had no reported production, disposal, injection, or other permitted activity for a period of greater than 12 months and for which, after notice and opportunity for hearing, the Commission has not extended the plugging deadline.

(D) Funnel viscosity--Viscosity as measured by the Marsh funnel, based on the number of seconds required for 1,000 cubic centimeters of fluid to flow through the funnel.

(E) Good faith claim--A factually supported claim based on a recognized legal theory to a continuing possessory right in a mineral estate, such as evidence of a currently valid oil and gas lease or a recorded deed conveying a fee interest in the mineral estate.

(F) Individual well bond--A bond or letter of credit issued:

(i) on a Commission-approved form;

(ii) by a third party surety, insurance company, or financial institution approved by the Commission; and

(iii) to secure the timely and proper plugging of a specified well and remediation of the wellsite in accordance with Commission rules.

(G) Land well--Any well subject to Commission jurisdiction for which the surface location is not in or on inland or coastal waters.

(H) Offshore well--Any well subject to Commission jurisdiction for which the surface location is on state lands in or on the Gulf of Mexico, that is not a bay well.

(I) Operator designation form--A certificate of transportation authority and compliance or an application to drill, deepen, recomplete, plug back, or reenter which has been completed, signed and filed with the Commission.

(J) Productive horizon--Any stratum known to contain oil, gas, or geothermal resources in producible quantities in the vicinity of an unplugged well.

(K) Reported production--Production of oil or gas, excluding production attributable to well tests, accurately reported to the Commission on a monthly producer's report.

(L) To serve surface notice--To hand deliver a written notice identifying the well to be plugged and the projected date the well will be plugged to the intended recipient at least three days prior to the day of plugging or to mail the notice by first class mail, postage pre-paid, to the last known address of the intended recipient at least seven days prior to the day of plugging.

(M) Unbonded operator--An operator that has a current and active organization report on file with the Commission but that does not have a current individual performance bond, blanket performance bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit as its financial security under §3.78 of this title (relating to Fees, Performance Bonds, and Alternate Forms of Financial Security Required to be Filed (Statewide Rule 78).

(N) Usable quality water strata--All strata determined by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission to contain usable quality water.

(O) Written notice--Notice actually received by the intended recipient in tangible or retrievable form, including notice set out on paper and hand-delivered, facsimile transmissions, and electronic mail transmissions.

(2) The operator shall give the Commission notice of its intention to plug any well or wells drilled for oil, gas, or geothermal resources or for any other purpose over which the Commission has jurisdiction, except those specifically addressed in §3.100(f)(1) of this title (relating to Seismic Holes and Core Holes) (Statewide Rule 100), prior to plugging. The operator shall deliver or transmit the written notice to the district office on the appropriate form.

(3) The operator shall cause the notice of its intention to plug to be delivered to the district office at least five days prior to the beginning of plugging operations. The notice shall set out the proposed plugging procedure as well as the complete casing record. The operator shall not commence the work of plugging the well or wells until the proposed procedure has been approved by the district office. The operator shall not initiate approved plugging operations before the date set out in the notification for the beginning of plugging operations unless authorized by the district director. The operator shall notify the district office at least four hours before commencing plugging operations and proceed with the work as approved. The district director may grant exceptions to the requirements of this paragraph concerning the timing of notices when a workover or drilling rig is already at work on location, ready to commence plugging operations. Operations shall not be suspended prior to plugging the well unless the hole is cased and casing is cemented in place in compliance with Commission rules.

(4) The landowner and the operator may file an application to condition an abandoned well located on the landowner's tract for usable quality water production operations, provided the landowner assumes responsibility for plugging the well and obligates himself, his heirs, successors, and assignees as a condition to the Commission's approval of such application to complete the plugging operations. The application shall be made on the form prescribed by the Commission. In all cases, the operator responsible for plugging the well shall place all cement plugs required by this rule up to the base of the usable quality water strata.

(5) The operator of a well shall serve surface notice on the surface owner of the well site tract, or the resident if the owner is absent, before the scheduled date for beginning the plugging operations. A representative of the surface owner may be present to witness the plugging of the well. Plugging shall not be delayed because of the lack of actual notice to the surface owner or resident if the operator has served surface notice as required by this paragraph. The district director may grant exceptions to the requirements of this paragraph concerning the timing of notices when a workover or drilling rig is already at work on location ready to commence plugging operations.

(b) Commencement of plugging operations and extensions.

(1) The operator shall complete and file in the district office a duly verified plugging record, in duplicate, on the appropriate form within 30 days after plugging operations are completed. A cementing report made by the party cementing the well shall be attached to, or made a part of, the plugging report. If the well the operator is plugging is a dry hole, an electric log status report shall be filed with the plugging record.

(2) Plugging operations on each dry or inactive well shall be commenced within a period of one year after drilling or operations cease and shall proceed with due diligence until completed. Plugging operations on delinquent inactive wells shall be commenced immediately unless the well is restored to active operation. For good cause, a reasonable extension of time in which to start the plugging operations may be granted pursuant to the following procedures.

(A) Wells that have been inactive for less than 36 months.

(i) The Commission or its delegate may administratively grant an extension of up to one year of the deadline for plugging a well that is operated by an unbonded operator and has been inactive, without a return to active operation, for a period of less than 36 months if the following criteria are met:

(I) The well and associated facilities are in compliance with all other laws and Commission rules;

(II) The operator's organization report is current and active;

(III) The operator has, and upon request provides evidence of, a good faith claim to a continuing right to operate the well;

(IV) The operator has paid the proper fee as provided in §3.78 of this title (relating to Fees, Performance Bonds, and Alternative Forms of Financial Security Required To Be Filed) (Statewide Rule 78);

(V) The operator has tested the well in accordance with the provisions of subparagraph (E) of this section and files with its application proof of either:

(-a-) a fluid level test conducted within 90 days prior to the application for a plugging extension demonstrating that any fluid in the wellbore is at least 250 feet below the base of the deepest usable quality water strata; or,

(-b-) a hydraulic pressure test conducted during the period the well has been inactive demonstrating the mechanical integrity of the well; and,

(VI) The requested plugging extension will not extend beyond the thirty-sixth month of inactivity.

(ii) A plugging extension granted under this subparagraph may not extend the period of inactivity beyond 36 months.

(B) Wells that have been inactive for 36 months or longer.

(i) The Commission or its delegate may administratively grant an extension of up to one year of the deadline for plugging a well that is operated by an unbonded operator and has been inactive, without a return to active operation, for a period of 36 months or longer if the criteria set out in subclauses (I)-(IV) of subsection (b)(2)(A)(i) of this section are met, and, in addition:

(I) The operator has tested the well in accordance with the provisions of subparagraph (E) of this paragraph and files with its application proof of either:

(-a-) a fluid level test conducted within 90 days prior to the application for a plugging extension demonstrating that any fluid in the wellbore is at least 250 feet below the base of the deepest usable quality water strata, or,

(-b-) a hydraulic pressure test conducted during the period the well has been inactive and not more than four years prior to the date of application demonstrating the mechanical integrity of the well; and,

(II) The operator files an individual well bond in the amount provided for in §3.78(m) of this title (relating to Fees, Performance Bonds, and Alternative Forms of Financial Security Required To Be Filed) (Statewide Rule 78).

(ii) An operator may rebut the presumed estimated plugging costs for a specific well for which a plugging extension is sought at hearing by clear and convincing evidence establishing a higher or lower prospective plugging cost for the well. The operator, Commission staff, or any owner of the surface or mineral estate on which the well is located may initiate a hearing on the prospective plugging cost for a well for the purpose of setting the amount of an individual well bond by filing a request for hearing.

(C) Plugging of inactive wells operated by bonded operators. An operator that maintains valid, Commission-approved financial security in the form of an individual performance bond, blanket performance bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit as provided in §3.78 of this title (relating to Fees, Performance Bonds, and Alternate Forms of Financial Security Required to be Filed) (Statewide Rule 78) will be granted a one-year plugging extension for each well it operates that has been inactive for 12 months or more at the time its annual organizational report is approved by the Commission if the following criteria are met:

(i) The well and associated facilities are in compliance with all laws and Commission rules; and,

(ii) The operator has, and upon request provides evidence of, a good faith claim to a continuing right to operate the well.

(D) Revocation or denial of plugging extension.

(i) The Commission or its delegate may revoke a plugging extension if the operator of the well that is the subject of the extension fails to maintain the well and all associated facilities in compliance with Commission rules; fails to maintain a current and accurate organizational report on file with the Commission; fails to provide the Commission, upon request, with evidence of a continuing good faith claim to operate the well; or fails to obtain or maintain a valid individual well bond or organizational bond or letter of credit as required by this subsection.

(ii) If the Commission or its delegate declines to grant or continue a plugging extension or revokes a previously granted extension, the operator shall either return the well to active operation or, within 30 days, plug the well or request a hearing on the matter.

(E) The operator of any well more than 25 years old that becomes inactive and subject to the provisions of this paragraph and the operator of any well for which a plugging extension is sought under the terms of subparagraph (A) or (B) of this paragraph shall plug or test such well to determine whether the well poses a potential threat of harm to natural resources, including surface and subsurface water, oil and gas.

(i) In general, a fluid level test is a sufficient test for purposes of this subparagraph. The operator must give the district office written notice specifying the date and approximate time it intends to conduct the fluid level test at least 48 hours prior to conducting the test; however, upon a showing of undue hardship, the district office may grant a written waiver or reduction of the notice requirement for a specific well test. The Commission or its delegate may require alternate methods of testing if the Commission deems it necessary to ensure the well does not pose a potential threat of harm to natural resources. Alternate methods of testing may be approved by the Commission or its delegate by written application and upon a showing that such a test will provide information sufficient to determine that the well does not pose a threat to natural resources.

(ii) No test other than a fluid level test shall be acceptable without prior approval from the district office. The district office shall be notified at least 48 hours before any test other than a fluid level test is conducted. Mechanical integrity test results shall be filed with the district office and fluid level test results shall be filed with the Commission in Austin. Test results shall be filed on a Commission-approved form, within 30 days of the completion of the test. Upon request, the operator shall file the actual test data for any mechanical integrity or fluid level test that it has conducted.

(iii) Notwithstanding the provisions of clause (ii) of this subparagraph, a hydraulic pressure test may be conducted without prior approval from the district office, provided that the operator gives the district office written notice specifying the date and approximate time for the test at least 48 hours prior to the time the test will be conducted, the production casing is tested to a depth of at least 250 feet below the base of usable quality water strata, or 100 feet below the top of cement behind the production casing, whichever is deeper, and the minimum test pressure is greater than or equal to 250 psig for a period of at least 30 minutes.

(iv) If the operator performs a hydraulic pressure test in accordance with the provisions of clause (iii) of this subparagraph, the well shall be exempt from further testing for five years from the date of the test, except to the extent compliance with paragraph (2) of subsection (b) of this section requires more frequent testing. Further, the Commission or its delegate may require the operator to perform testing more frequently to ensure that the well does not pose a threat of harm to natural resources. The Commission or its delegate may approve less frequent well tests under this subparagraph upon written request and for good cause shown provided that less frequent testing will not increase the threat of harm to natural resources.

(v) Wells that are returned to continuous production, as evidenced by three consecutive months of reported production of at least 10 barrels of oil or 100 mcf of gas per month, need not be tested.

(3) Transfer of operatorship. A transfer of operatorship submitted for any well or lease will not be approved unless the operator acquiring the well or lease has on file with the Commission financial security as provided in §3.78 of this title (relating to Fees, Performance Bonds, and Alternate Forms of Financial Security Required to be Filed) (Statewide Rule 78).

(4) The Commission may plug or replug any dry or inactive well as follows:

(A) After notice and hearing, if the well is causing or is likely to cause the pollution of surface or subsurface water or if oil or gas is leaking from the well, and:

(i) Neither the operator nor any other entity responsible for plugging the well can be found; or

(ii) Neither the operator nor any other entity responsible for plugging the well has assets with which to plug the well.

(B) Without a hearing if the well is a delinquent inactive well and:

(i) the Commission has sent notice of its intention to plug the well as required by §89.043(c) of the Texas Natural Resources Code; and

(ii) the operator did not request a hearing within the period (not less than 10 days after receipt) specified in the notice.

(C) Without notice or hearing, if:

(i) The Commission has issued a final order requiring that the operator plug the well and the order has not been complied with; or

(ii) The well poses an immediate threat of pollution of surface or subsurface waters or of injury to the public health and the operator has failed to timely remediate the problem.

(5) The Commission may seek reimbursement from the operator and any other entity responsible for plugging the well for state funds expended pursuant to paragraph (4) of this subsection.

(c) Designated operator responsible for proper plugging.

(1) The entity designated as the operator of a well specifically identified on the most recent Commission-approved operator designation form filed on or after September 1, 1997, is responsible for properly plugging the well in accordance with this section and all other applicable Commission rules and regulations concerning plugging of wells.

(2) As to any well for which the most recent Commission-approved operator designation form was filed prior to September 1, 1997, the entity designated as operator on that form is presumed to be the entity responsible for the physical operation and control of the well and to be the entity responsible for properly plugging the well in accordance with this section and all other applicable Commission rules and regulations concerning plugging of wells. The presumption of responsibility may be rebutted only at a hearing called for the purpose of determining plugging responsibility.

(d) General plugging requirements.

(1) Wells shall be plugged to insure that all formations bearing usable quality water, oil, gas, or geothermal resources are protected. All cementing operations during plugging shall be performed under the direct supervision of the operator or his authorized representative, who shall not be an employee of the service or cementing company hired to plug the well. Direct supervision means supervision at the well site during the plugging operations. The operator and the cementer are both responsible for complying with the general plugging requirements of this subsection and for plugging the well in conformity with the procedure set forth in the approved notice of intention to plug and abandon for the well being plugged. The operator and cementer may each be assessed administrative penalties for failure to comply with the general plugging requirements of this subsection or for failure to plug the well in conformity with the approved notice of intention to plug and abandon the well.

(2) Cement plugs shall be set to isolate each productive horizon and usable quality water strata.

(3) Cement plugs shall be placed by the circulation or squeeze method through tubing or drill pipe. Cement plugs shall be placed by other methods only upon written request with the written approval of the district director or the director's delegate.

(4) All cement for plugging shall be an approved API oil well cement without volume extenders and shall be mixed in accordance with API standards. Slurry weights shall be reported on the cementing report. The district director or the director's delegate may require that specific cement compositions be used in special situations; for example, when high temperature, salt section, or highly corrosive sections are present.

(5) Operators shall use only cementers approved by the assistant director of well plugging or the assistant director's delegate, except when plugging is conducted in accordance with subparagraph (B)(ii) of this paragraph or paragraph (6) of this subsection. Cementing companies, service companies, or operators may apply for designation as approved cementers. Approval will be granted on a showing by the applicant of the ability to mix and pump cement in compliance with this rule. An approved cementer is authorized to conduct plugging operations in accordance with Commission rules in each Commission district.

(A) A cementing company, service company, or operator seeking designation as an approved cementer shall file a request in writing with the district director of the district in which it proposes to conduct its initial plugging operations. The request shall contain the following information:

(i) the name of the organization as shown on its most recent approved organizational report;

(ii) a list of qualifications including personnel who will supervise mixing and pumping operations;

(iii) length of time the organization has been in the business of cementing oil and gas wells;

(iv) an inventory of the type of equipment to be used to mix and pump cement; and

(v) a statement certifying that the organization will comply with all Commission rules.

(B) No request for designation as an approved cementer will be approved until after the district director or the director's delegate has:

(i) inspected all equipment to be used for mixing and pumping cement; and

(ii) witnessed at least one plugging operation to determine if the cementing company, service company, or operator can properly mix and pump cement to the specifications required by this rule.

(C) The district director or the director's delegate shall file a letter with the assistant director of well plugging recommending that the application to be designated as an approved cementer be approved or denied. If the district director or the director's delegate does not recommend approval, or the assistant director of well plugging or the assistant director's delegate denies the application, the applicant may request a hearing on its application.

(D) Designation as an approved cementer may be suspended or revoked for violations of Commission rules. The designation may be revoked or suspended administratively by the assistant director of well plugging for violations of Commission rules if:

(i) the cementer has been given written notice by personal service or by registered or certified mail informing the cementer of the proposed action, the facts or conduct alleged to warrant the proposed action, and of its right to request a hearing within 10 days to demonstrate compliance with Commission rules and all requirements for retention of designation as an approved cementer; and

(ii) the cementer did not file a written request for a hearing within 10 days of receipt of the notice.

(6) An operator may request administrative authority to plug its own wells without being an approved cementer. An operator seeking such authority shall file a written request with the district director and demonstrate its ability to mix and pump cement in compliance with this subsection. The district director or the director's delegate will determine whether such a request warrants approval. If the district director or the director's delegate refuses to administratively approve this request, the operator may request a hearing on its request.

(7) The district director may require additional cement plugs to cover and contain any productive horizon or to separate any water stratum from any other water stratum if the water qualities or hydrostatic pressures differ sufficiently to justify separation. The tagging and/or pressure testing of any such plugs, or any other plugs, and respotting may be required if necessary to insure that the well does not pose a potential threat of harm to natural resources.

(8) For onshore or inland wells, a 10-foot cement plug shall be placed in the top of the well, and casing shall be cut off three feet below the ground surface.

(9) Mud-laden fluid of at least 9-1/2 pounds per gallon with a minimum funnel viscosity of 40 seconds shall be placed in all portions of the well not filled with cement. The hole shall be in static condition at the time the cement plugs are placed. The district director may grant exceptions to the requirements of this paragraph if a deviation from the prescribed minimums for fluid weight or viscosity is necessary to insure that the well does not pose a potential threat of harm to natural resources.

(10) Non-drillable material that would hamper or prevent reentry of a well shall not be placed in any wellbore during plugging operations, except in the case of a well plugged and abandoned under the provisions of §3.35 or §3.94(e) of this title (relating to Procedures for Identification and Control of Wellbores in Which Certain Logging Tools Have Been Abandoned (Statewide Rule 35); and Disposal of Oil and Gas NORM Waste (Statewide Rule 94), respectively). Pipe and unretrievable junk shall not be cemented in the hole during plugging operations without prior approval by the district director.

(11) All cement plugs, except the top plug, shall have sufficient slurry volume to fill 100 feet of hole, plus 10% for each 1,000 feet of depth from the ground surface to the bottom of the plug.

(12) The operator shall fill the rathole, mouse hole, and cellar, and shall empty all tanks, vessels, related piping and flowlines that will not be actively used in the continuing operation of the lease within 120 days after plugging work is completed. Within the same 120 day period, the operator shall remove all such tanks, vessels, related surface piping, and all subsurface piping that is less than three feet beneath the ground surface, remove all loose junk and trash from the location, and contour the location to discourage pooling of surface water at or around the facility site. The operator shall close all pits in accordance with the provisions of §3.8 of this title (relating to Water Protection (Statewide Rule 8)). The district director may grant a reasonable extension of time of not more than an additional 120 days for the removal of tanks, vessels and related piping.

(e) Plugging requirements for wells with surface casing.

(1) When insufficient surface casing is set to protect all usable quality water strata and such usable quality water strata are exposed to the wellbore when production or intermediate casing is pulled from the well or as a result of such casing not being run, a cement plug shall be placed from 50 feet below the base of the deepest usable quality water stratum to 50 feet above the top of the statum. This plug shall be evidenced by tagging with tubing or drill pipe. The plug must be respotted if it has not been properly placed. In addition, a cement plug must be set across the shoe of the surface casing. This plug must be a minimum of 100 feet in length and shall extend at least 50 feet above and below the shoe.

(2) When sufficient surface casing has been set to protect all usable quality water strata, a cement plug shall be placed across the shoe of the surface casing. This plug shall be a minimum of 100 feet in length and shall extend at least 50 feet above the shoe and at least 50 feet below the shoe.

(3) If surface casing has been set deeper than 200 feet below the base of the deepest usable quality water stratum, an additional cement plug shall be placed inside the surface casing across the base of the deepest usable quality water stratum. This plug shall be a minimum of 100 feet in length and shall extend from 50 feet below the base of the deepest usable quality water stratum to 50 feet above the top of the stratum.

(f) Plugging requirements for wells with intermediate casing.

(1) For wells in which the intermediate casing has been cemented through all usable quality water strata and all productive horizons, a cement plug meeting the requirements of subsection (d)(11) of this section shall be placed inside the casing and centered opposite the base of the deepest usable quality water stratum, but extend no less than 50 feet above and below the stratum.

(2) For wells in which intermediate casing is not cemented through all usable quality water strata and all productive horizons, and if the casing will not be pulled, the intermediate casing shall be perforated at the required depths to place cement outside of the casing by squeeze cementing through casing perforations.

(g) Plugging requirements for wells with production casing.

(1) For wells in which the production casing has been cemented through all usable quality water strata and all productive horizons, a cement plug meeting the requirements of subsection (d)(11) of this section shall be placed inside the casing and centered opposite the base of the deepest usable quality water stratum and across any multi-stage cementing tool.

(2) For wells in which the production casing has not been cemented through all usable quality water strata and all productive horizons and if the casing will not be pulled, the production casing shall be perforated at the required depths to place cement outside of the casing by squeeze cementing through casing perforations.

(3) The district director may approve a cast iron bridge plug to be placed immediately above each perforated interval, provided at least 20 feet of cement is placed on top of each bridge plug. A bridge plug shall not be set in any well at a depth where the pressure or temperature exceeds the ratings recommended by the bridge plug manufacturer.

(h) Plugging requirements for well with screen or liner.

(1) If practical, the screen or liner shall be removed from the well.

(2) If the screen or liner is not removed, a cement plug in accordance with subsection (d)(11) of this section shall be placed at the top of the liner.

(i) Plugging requirements for wells without production casing and open-hole completions.

(1) Any productive horizon or any formation in which a pressure or formation water problem is known to exist shall be isolated by cement plugs centered at the top and bottom of the formation. Each cement plug shall have sufficient slurry volume to fill a calculated height as specified in subsection (d)(11) of this section.

(2) If the gross thickness of any such formation is less than 100 feet, the tubing or drill pipe shall be suspended 50 feet below the base of the formation. Sufficient slurry volume shall be pumped to fill the calculated height from the bottom of the tubing or drill pipe up to a point at least 50 feet above the top of the formation, plus 10% for each 1,000 feet of depth from the ground surface to the bottom of the plug.

(j) The district director shall review and approve the notification of intention to plug in a manner so as to accomplish the purposes of this section. The district director may approve, modify, or reject the operator's notification of intention to plug. If the proposal is modified or rejected, the operator may request a review by the director of field operations. If the proposal is not administratively approved, the operator may request a hearing on the matter. After hearing, the examiner shall recommend final action by the Commission.

(k) Plugging horizontal drainhole wells. All plugs in horizontal drainhole wells shall be set in accordance with subsection (d)(11) of this section. The productive horizon isolation plug shall be set from a depth 50 feet below the top of the productive horizon to a depth either 50 feet above the top of the productive horizon, or 50 feet above the production casing shoe if the production casing is set above the top of the productive horizon. If the production casing shoe is set below the top of the productive horizon, then the productive horizon isolation plug shall be set from a depth 50 feet below the production casing shoe to a depth that is 50 feet above the top of the productive horizon. In accordance with subsection (d)(7) of this section, the Commission or its delegate may require additional plugs.

§3.78.Fees, Performance Bonds and Alternate Forms of Financial Security Required To Be Filed.

(a) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1) Violation--Noncompliance with a Commission rule, order, license, permit, or certificate relating to safety or the prevention or control of pollution.

(2) Outstanding violation--A violation for which:

(A) either:

(i) a Commission order finding a violation has been entered and all appeals have been exhausted; or

(ii) an agreed order between the Commission and the organization relating to a violation has been entered; and

(B) one or more of the following conditions still exist:

(i) the conditions that constituted the violation have not been corrected;

(ii) all administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, if any, relating to the violation of such Commission rules, orders, licenses, permits, or certificates have not been paid; or

(iii) all reimbursements of any costs and expenses assessed by the Commission relating to the violation of such Commission rules, orders, licenses, permits, or certificates have not been paid.

(3) An acceptable record of compliance--

(A) A record of compliance showing:

(i) No enforcement orders issued; and

(ii) No outstanding violations; or

(B) A record of compliance showing:

(i) Only one enforcement order, provided the order specifies that it shall not be considered to meet the elements of subparagraph (A) of this definition and provided the requirements of the order are met;

(ii) No enforcement orders issued other than those that are resolved in the order referenced in clause (i) of this subparagraph;

(iii) No outstanding violations other than those resolved in the order referenced in clause (i) of this subparagraph.

(4) Commercial facility--A facility whose owner or operator receives compensation from others for the storage, reclamation, treatment, or disposal of oil field fluids or oil and gas wastes that are wholly or partially trucked or hauled to the facility and whose primary business purpose is to provide these services for compensation if:

(A) the facility is permitted under §3.8 of this title (relating to Water Protection);

(B) the facility is permitted under §3.57 of this title (relating to Reclaiming Tank Bottoms, Other Hydrocarbon Wastes, and Other Waste Materials);

(C) the facility is permitted under §3.9 of this title (relating to Disposal Wells) and a collecting pit permitted under §3.8 is located at the facility; or

(D) the facility is permitted under §3.46 of this title (relating to Fluid Injection into Productive Reservoirs) and a collecting pit permitted under §3.8 is located at the facility.

(5) Financial security--An individual performance bond, blanket performance bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit filed with the Commission.

(6) Alternate form of financial security--Payment of a nonrefundable annual fee to the Commission.

(7) Individual well bond A bond or letter of credit issued:

(A) on a Commission-approved form;

(B) by a third party surety, insurance company, or financial institution approved by the Commission; and

(C) to secure the timely and proper plugging of a specified well and remediation of the wellsite, in accordance with Commission rules.

(8) Bay well--Any well under the jurisdiction of the Commission for which the surface location is either:

(A) located in or on a lake, river, stream, canal, estuary, bayou, or other inland navigable waters of the state; or,

(B) located on state lands seaward of the mean high tide line of the Gulf of Mexico in water of a depth at mean high tide of not more than 100 feet that is sheltered from the direct action of the open seas of the Gulf of Mexico.

(9) Land well--Any well subject to Commission jurisdiction for which the surface location is not in or on inland or coastal waters.

(10) Offshore well--Any well subject to Commission jurisdiction for which the surface location is on state lands in or on the Gulf of Mexico, that is not a bay well.

(b) Filing fees. The following filing fees are required to be paid to the Railroad Commission.

(1) With each application or materially amended application for a permit to drill, deepen, plug back, or reenter a well, the applicant shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of:

(A) $200 if the proposed total depth of the well is 2,000 feet or less;

(B) $225 if the proposed total depth of the well is greater than 2,000 feet but less than or equal to 4,000 feet;

(C) $250 if the proposed total depth of the well is greater than 4,000 feet but less than or equal to 9,000 feet; or

(D) $300 if the proposed total depth of the well is greater than 9,000 feet.

(2) An application for a permit to drill, deepen, plug back, or reenter a well will be considered materially amended if the amendment is made for a purpose other than:

(A) to add omitted required information;

(B) to correct typographical errors;

(C) to correct clerical errors.

(3) An applicant shall submit an additional nonrefundable fee of $150 when requesting that the Commission expedite the application for a permit to drill, deepen, plug back, or reenter a well.

(4) With each individual application for an exception to any rule or rules in this chapter, the applicant shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $150, except as provided in paragraph (5) of this subsection.

(5) With each application for an exception to any rule or rules in this chapter that includes an exception to §3.37 of this title (relating to Statewide Spacing Rule) (Statewide Rule 37) or §3.38 of this title (relating to Well Densities) (Statewide Rule 38), the applicant shall submit a nonrefundable fee of $200.

(6) With each application for an extension of time to plug a well pursuant to Commission rules, an applicant who has filed an alternate form of financial security as provided for under this rule, shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $300.

(7) With each application for an oil and gas waste disposal well permit, the applicant shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $100 per well.

(8) With each application for a fluid injection well permit, the applicant shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $200 per well. Fluid injection well means any well used to inject fluid or gas into the ground in connection with the exploration or production of oil or gas other than an oil and gas waste disposal well.

(9) With each application for a permit to discharge to surface water other than a permit for a discharge that meets national pollutant discharge elimination system (NPDES) requirements for agricultural or wildlife use, the applicant shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $300.

(10) If a certificate of compliance has been canceled, the operator shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $100 before the Commission may reissue the certificate pursuant to §3.58 of this title (relating to Oil, Gas, or Geothermal Resource Producer's Reports) (Statewide Rule 58).

(11) With each application for issuance, renewal, or material amendment of an oil and gas waste hauler's permit, the applicant shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $100.

(12) With each Natural Gas Policy Act (15 United States Code §§3301-3432) application, the applicant shall submit to the Commission a nonrefundable fee of $150.

(13) Hazardous waste generation fee. A person who generates hazardous oil and gas waste, as that term is defined in §3.98 of this title (relating to Standards for Management of Hazardous Oil and Gas Waste), shall pay to the Commission the fees specified in §3.98(z).

(14) A check or money order for any of the aforementioned fees shall be made payable to the Railroad Commission of Texas. If the check accompanying an application is not honored upon presentment, the permit issued on the basis of that application, the allowable assigned, the exception to a statewide rule granted on the basis of the application, the extension of time to plug a well, or the Natural Gas Policy Act category determination made on the basis of the application may be suspended or revoked.

(15) If an operator submits a check that is not honored on presentment, the operator shall, for a period of 24 months after the check was presented, submit any payments in the form of a credit card, cashier's check, or cash.

(c) Organization Report Fee. An organization report required by Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.142, shall be accompanied by a fee as follows:

(1) for an operator of:

(A) not more than 25 wells, $300;

(B) more than 25 but not more than 100 wells, $500; or

(C) more than 100 wells, $1,000;

(2) for an operator of one or more natural gas pipelines, $100;

(3) for an operator of one or more of the following service activities: pollution cleanup contractor; directional surveying; approved cementer for plugging wells; or physically moving or storing crude or condensate, $300;

(4) for an operator of all other service activities or facilities, including liquids pipelines, $500;

(5) for an operator of wells who also operates one or more service activities, facilities, or pipelines as classified by the Commission, the sum of the fees that would be separately charged for each category of service activity, facility, pipeline, or number or wells operated, provided that such fee shall not exceed $1,000; or

(6) for an entity not currently performing operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission, $300.

(d) Financial security and alternate forms of financial security. Any person, including any firm, partnership, joint stock association, corporation, or other organization, required by Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.142, to file an organization report with the Commission must also file financial security in one of the following forms:

(1) an individual performance bond;

(2) a blanket performance bond;

(3) a nonrefundable annual fee of $1,000, if:

(A) the Commission determines that individual and blanket performance bonds as specified by this section are not obtainable at reasonable prices as provided for under subsection (f) of this section;

(B) the person can demonstrate to the Commission an acceptable record of compliance with all Commission rules, orders, licenses, permits, or certificates that relate to safety or the prevention or control of pollution for the previous 48 months and the person has no outstanding violations; and

(C) if the person is a firm, partnership, joint stock association, corporation, or other organization, its officers, directors, general partners, or owners of more than 25% ownership interest or any trustee must also not have any outstanding violations.

(4) a nonrefundable annual fee equal to 12.5% of the face amount of the performance bond that otherwise would be required; or

(5) a letter of credit or cash deposit in the same amount as required for an individual performance bond or blanket performance bond.

(e) Eligibility for nonrefundable $1,000 fee.

(1) For the purposes of this subsection, "officers and owners" include directors, general partners, owners of more than 25% ownership interest, or any trustee of an organization.

(2) A person filing an organization report for the first time in order to perform any Commission-regulated operations is a new organization and is not eligible to file the nonrefundable fee of $1,000.

(3) A person who filed an initial organization report less than 48 months prior to the current filing is not eligible to file the nonrefundable fee of $1,000.

(4) A change in name, without any other organizational change, of a person registered with the Commission does not indicate a new organization. If the Commission determines that only a name change has occurred, then a person operating under a new name may file the nonrefundable fee of $1,000 if the person meets all other eligibility requirements.

(5) An individual registered with the Commission as a sole proprietor or who is a general partner of a partnership that is registered with the Commission and who reorganizes his or her oil and gas operations under a new legal entity or establishes a new and separate entity will be considered to have satisfied the 48- month eligibility requirement for filing the nonrefundable fee of $1,000.

(6) A surviving or new corporation or other entity resulting from a merger under the Texas Business Corporation Act, Part Five, may file the nonrefundable fee of $1,000 if:

(A) the existing record of compliance for each entity that is a party to the merger qualifies;

(B) the records of compliance for the officers and owners of the surviving or new entities qualify; and

(C) the number of surviving or new entities eligible does not exceed the number of parties registered with the Commission at the time of the merger.

(7) In any Commission enforcement proceeding, if a person is determined not to be the responsible party for a violation and is dismissed from the proceeding for that reason, that violation shall not be considered in determining whether that person has an acceptable record of compliance.

(f) Availability of bonds.

(1) In determining the applicability of the $1,000 nonrefundable fee as provided for under this section, the Commission presumes that individual and blanket performance bonds are obtainable at reasonable prices.

(2) An operator may request a hearing to determine that individual and blanket performance bonds are not obtainable at reasonable prices. In order to support a determination that bonds are not obtainable at reasonable prices, the operator must show:

(A) that no fewer than three companies which have issued a bond filed with the Commission in the past 12 months will not issue a bond to the requesting operator for an annual fee less than 12% of the face amount of the bond; and

(B) that the operator is otherwise eligible under this section to file a $1,000 nonrefundable annual fee.

(g) Forms for financial security. Operators shall submit bonds and letters of credit on forms prescribed by the Commission.

(h) Filing deadlines for financial security. Operators shall submit required financial security at the time of filing an initial organization report or upon yearly renewal, or as required under subsection (m) of this section.

(i) New operators. A person filing an organization report for the first time is a new organization and is not eligible to file an individual performance bond for the first year of operation.

(j) Amount of bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit.

(1) A person who operates one or more wells may file an individual performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit in an amount equal to $2.00 for each foot of total well depth for each well, plus an additional amount to be determined by the Commission in a subsequent rulemaking for each bay and offshore well operated.

(2) A person operating wells may file a blanket bond, letter of credit or cash deposit to cover all wells for which a bond, letter of credit or cash deposit is required in an amount equal to the sum of:

(A) A base amount determined by the total number of wells operated, as follows:

(i) a person who operates 10 or fewer wells or performs other operations shall have a base amount of $25,000;

(ii) a person who operates more than 10 but fewer than 100 wells shall have a base amount of $50,000; and

(iii) a person who operates 100 or more wells shall have a base amount of $250,000, plus;

(B) an additional amount, to be determined by the Commission in a subsequent rulemaking, for each bay well operated, plus

(C) an additional amount, to be determined by the Commission in a subsequent rulemaking, for each offshore well operated.

(3) A person operating wells and performing other operations, who chooses to cover all operations by a blanket performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit shall file a bond, letter of credit or cash deposit in an amount determined by the total number of wells, but not less than $25,000. Only one blanket performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit is required for a person performing multiple operations, unless the person is operating a commercial facility subject to the financial security requirements of subsection (p) of this section.

(4) Financial security amounts are the minimum amounts required by this section to be filed. A person may file a greater amount if desired.

(k) Bond Conditions. Any financial security required under this section is subject to the conditions that the operator will plug and abandon all wells and control, abate, and clean up pollution associated with the oil and gas operations and activities covered under the required financial security in accordance with applicable state law and permits, rules, and orders of the Commission.

(l) Conditions for cash deposits. Operators shall tender cash deposits in United States currency or certified cashiers check only. All cash deposits will be placed in a special account within the Oil Field Clean Up Fund account. Any interest accruing on cash deposits will be deposited into the Oil Clean Up Fund pursuant to Texas Natural Resources Code, §91.111(c)(8). The Commission will not refund a cash deposit until either financial security or an alternate form of financial security is accepted by the Commission as provided for under this section or an operator ceases all activity.

(m) Individual well bonds.

(1) An operator who has filed an alternate form of financial security with the Commission and who applies for a plugging extension for a well that has been inactive for more than 36 months is required under §3.14 of this title (relating to Plugging) to file an individual well bond or individual well letter of credit in the face amount of the estimated plugging cost of the well for which a plugging extension is requested. The Commission shall presume that the estimated plugging cost for wells for which a plugging extension is sought is as follows:

(A) for land wells, the product of the total depth of the well multiplied by $3 per foot;

(B) for bay wells, $60,000; and,

(C) for offshore wells, $250,000.

(2) An operator may rebut the presumed estimated plugging costs for a specific well for which a plugging extension is sought at hearing by clear and convincing evidence establishing a higher or lower prospective plugging cost for the well. The operator, Commission staff, or any owner of the surface or mineral estate on which the well is located may initiate a hearing on the prospective plugging cost for a well for the purpose of setting the amount of an individual well bond by filing a request for hearing.

(3) If an individual well bond is required, it shall be continuously maintained until the well is plugged or returned to active operation, as defined under §3.14, unless the operator files financial security as provided by this section.

(n) Well or lease transfer.

(1) The Commission shall not approve a transfer of operatorship submitted for any well or lease unless the operator acquiring the well or lease has on file with the Commission one of the following approved forms of financial security in an amount sufficient to cover both its current operations and the wells being transferred:

(A) an individual performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit; or

(B) a blanket performance bond, letter of credit or cash deposit.

(2) Any existing financial security or individual well bond covering the well or lease proposed for transfer shall remain in effect and the prior operator of the well remains responsible for compliance with all laws and Commission rules covering the transferred well until the Commission approves the transfer.

(3) A transfer of a well or lease from one entity to another entity under common ownership is a transfer for the purposes of this section.

(o) Reimbursement liability. Filing any form of financial security does not extinguish a person's liability for reimbursement for the expenditure of state oilfield clean-up funds pursuant to the Texas Natural Resources Code, §89.083 and §91.113.

(p) Financial security for commercial facilities. The provisions of this subsection shall apply to the holder of any permit for a commercial facility.

(1) Application.

(A) New permits. Any application for a new or amended commercial facility permit filed after the original effective date of this subsection shall include:

(i) a written estimate of the maximum dollar amount necessary to close the facility prepared in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (4) of this subsection that shows all assumptions and calculations used to develop the estimate;

(ii) a copy of the form of the bond or letter of credit that will be filed with the Commission; and

(iii) information concerning the issuer of the bond or letter of credit as required under paragraph (5) of this subsection including the issuer's name and address and evidence of authority to issue bonds or letters of credit in Texas.

(B) Existing permits. Within 180 days of the original effective date of this subsection, the holder of any commercial facility permit issued on or before the original effective date of this subsection shall file with the Commission the information specified in subparagraph (A)(i)-(iii) of this paragraph.

(2) Notice and hearing.

(A) New permits. For commercial facility permits issued after the original effective date of this subsection, the provisions of §3.8 or §3.57 of this title (relating to Water Protection; and Reclaiming Tank Bottoms, Other Hydrocarbon Wastes, and Other Waste Materials), as applicable, regarding notice and opportunity for hearing, shall apply to review and approval of financial security proposed to be filed to meet the requirements of this subsection.

(B) Existing permits. Notice of filing of information required under paragraph (1)(B) of this subsection shall not be required. In the event approval of the financial security proposed to be filed for a commercial facility operating under a permit in effect as of the original effective date of this subsection is denied administratively, the applicant shall have the right to a hearing upon written request. After hearing, the examiner shall recommend a final action by the Commission.

(3) Filing of instrument.

(A) New permits. A commercial facility permitted after the original effective date of this subsection may not receive oil field fluids or oil and gas waste until a bond or letter of credit in an amount approved by the Commission or its delegate under this subsection and meeting the requirements of this subsection as to form and issuer has been filed with the Commission.

(B) Existing permits. Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, after one year from the original effective date of this section, a commercial facility permitted on or before the original effective date of this subsection may not continue to receive oil field fluids or oil and gas waste unless a bond or letter of credit in an amount approved by the Commission or its delegate under this subsection and meeting the requirements of this subsection as to form and issuer has been filed with and approved by the Commission or its delegate.

(C) Extensions for existing permits. On written request and for good cause shown, the Commission or its delegate may authorize a commercial facility permitted before the original effective date of this subsection to continue to receive oil field fluids or oil and gas waste after one year after the original effective date of this section even though financial security required under this subsection has not been filed. In the event the Commission or its delegate has not taken final action to approve or disapprove the amount of financial security proposed to be filed by the owner or operator under this subsection one year after the original effective date of the section, the period for filing financial security under this subsection is automatically extended to a date 45 days after such final Commission action.

(4) Amount.

(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) or (C) of this paragraph, the amount of financial security required to be filed under this subsection shall be an amount based on a written estimate approved by the Commission or its delegate as being equal to or greater than the maximum amount necessary to close the commercial facility, exclusive of plugging costs for any well or wells at the facility, at any time during the permit term in accordance with all applicable state laws, Commission rules and orders, and the permit, but shall in no event be less than $10,000.

(B) The owner or operator of a commercial facility may reduce the amount of financial security required under this subsection by $25,000 if the owner or operator holds only one commercial facility permit.

(C) The owner or operator of more than one commercial facility may reduce the amount of financial security required under this subsection for one such facility by $25,000. The full amount of financial security required under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall be required for the remaining commercial facilities.

(D) Except for the facilities specifically exempted under subparagraph (E), a qualified professional engineer licensed by the State of Texas shall prepare or supervise the preparation of a written estimate of the maximum amount necessary to close the commercial facility as provided in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph. The owner or operator of a commercial facility shall submit the written estimate under seal of a qualified licensed professional engineer to the Commission as required under paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(E) A facility permitted under §3.57 of this title (relating to Reclaiming Tank Bottoms, Other Hydrocarbon Wastes, and Other Waste Materials) that does not utilize on-site waste storage or disposal that requires a permit under §3.8 of this title (relating to Water Protection) is exempt from subparagraph (D) of this paragraph.

(F) Notwithstanding the fact that the maximum amount necessary to close the commercial facility as determined under this paragraph is exclusive of plugging costs, the proceeds of financial security filed under this subsection may be used by the Commission to pay the costs of plugging any well or wells at the facility if the financial security for plugging costs filed with the Commission is insufficient to pay for the plugging of such well or wells.

(5) Issuer and form.

(A) Bond. The issuer of any commercial facility bond filed in satisfaction of the requirements of this subsection shall be a corporate surety authorized to do business in Texas. The form of bond filed under this subsection shall provide that the bond be renewed and continued in effect until the conditions of the bond have been met or its release is authorized by the Commission or its delegate.

(B) Letter of credit. Any letter of credit filed in satisfaction of the requirements of this subsection shall be issued by and drawn on a bank authorized under state or federal law to operate in Texas. The letter of credit shall be an irrevocable, standby letter of credit subject to the requirements of Texas Business and Commerce Code, §§5.101-5.118. The letter of credit shall provide that it will be renewed and continued in effect until the conditions of the letter of credit have been met or its release is authorized by the Commission or its delegate.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108167

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7008


16 TAC §3.40

The Railroad Commission of Texas adopts amendments to §3.40, relating to Assignment of Acreage to Pooled Development and Proration Units, with changes to the proposal published in the October 5, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 7721). The amendments are only to subsection (a) of §3.40, and are intended to provide clear and specific instructions for operators in preparing and filing the certified plat and the Certificate of Pooling Authority, Form P-12. In those portions of subsection (a) in which the Commission has adopted slightly different wording than it proposed, the changes are to clarify the Commission's intent with respect to the function of the rule and Form P-12.

The Commission simultaneously adopts the review and readoption of §3.40, as amended, in accordance with Texas Government Code, §2001.039 (as added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1499, §1.11(a) ). The agency's reasons for adopting the rule continue to exist. The notice of adopted review has been filed with the Texas Register concurrently with the adoption of the amendments to §3.40.

The Commission received no comments on the proposed amendment or rule review from a group or association; the commission received one comment that made several points.

The first point in the comment concerns the proposed wording in subsection (a), which provides that an operator may pool acreage, up to the acreage limits specified in applicable field rules, into a development or proration unit by filing an original certified plat delineating the pooled unit and a Certificate of Pooling Authority, Form P-12 (revised 5/2001), according to the requirements set out in the remainder of the paragraphs. The comment notes that the proposed wording is not a substantial change to the existing language, but suggests that it be revised to eliminate any implication that the Commission's field rules may override the contractual authority of operators to form pooled units pursuant to their oil and gas leases or other private agreements, because the Commission's authority is limited to conservation matters. The comment concedes that the Commission may limit the amount of acreage that may be assigned to wells for proration and allowable purposes. The comment also noted that the term "development unit" is undefined in Commission rules, and proposed alternative wording that would eliminate the term.

The Commission notes that the wording of the current rule includes a reference to the Commission's field rules, does not contain any reference to "appropriate contractual authority," and uses both "development unit" and "proration unit." The Commission is unaware of any problems interpreting or applying §3.40 because of the current wording, but agrees that it is preferable not to use undefined terms in its rules. The Commission has clarified the wording in §3.40(a) to eliminate the term "development unit" and to include a reference to the contractual source of an operator's authority to pool.

A second point in the comment concerns the wording in §3.40(a)(2)(A), which provides that as part of the information filed under the rule, the operator must separately list each tract that is to be pooled by authority of an agreement between the various interest holders in the several tracts committed to the unit. The comment states that under normal circumstances, the various royalty interest-owning interests within different tracts of a pooled unit do not agree among themselves to pooling authority. Instead, these lessor/royalty owners and/or working interest owners grant pooling authority to their lessees/operators in oil and gas leases, joint operating agreements, or by other contractual agreements. The comment suggested alternative wording.

The Commission notes that the wording "tracts are pooled by authority of an agreement between the various interest holders in the several tracts committed to the unit," is part of the current wording of the rule. The Commission is unaware of any difficulties or problems caused by this language; nevertheless, the comment's suggested wording is more succinct and is a clearer statement of the Commission's intent with respect to the operation of this requirement. The Commission has adopted this alternative wording.

A third point in the comment concerns wording in §3.40(a)(2)(B), which requires an operator to state, for each tract listed on Form P-12, the number of acres contained within the tract and to indicate, by checking the appropriate box on Form P-12 if, within an individual tract, there exists a non-pooled and/or unleased interest. The comment objects to identifying unleased interests and states that the Commission's only concern should be whether a tract within a pooled unit contains a non-pooled interest; whether such a tract contains an unleased interest is relevant only if the unleased interest is also not pooled. The comment continues that there are situations in which the unleased interest owners have agreed to pool, thereby removing the Commission's concern for the protection of such interests's correlative rights. The comment offered alternative wording that eliminates the requirement to identify unleased interests on Form P-12.

The Commission disagrees with this comment, because both pieces of information about a tract are necessary. If the operator/applicant is placing a well within the distance limits governed by the provisions of §3.37, relating to Statewide Spacing Rule, where there is an unleased interest, the operator/applicant must give notice to the holder of the unleased interest. For this reason, the Commission declines to make the change suggested in the comment.

A fourth point in the comment objects to language in §3.40(a)(2)(E) that would require an operator to provide the requested identification and "contract" information on the Form P-12. The Commission notes that this is a typographical error, and the requirement is to provide "contact" information. The correction has been made in the rule text.

The fifth point in the comment concerns the proposed amendment in §3.40(a)(5)(A), which requires an operator to file the Form P-12 and certified plat with the drilling permit application when two or more tracts are pooled to form a pooled unit to obtain a drilling permit. The comment points out that this language, and specifically the words "are pooled," may imply that a pooled unit must actually be formed, normally by the filing of an appropriate pooled unit designation in the courthouse, before the drilling permit application is filed with the Commission. The Commission's long-standing custom and practice has not been to require that pooled units actually be formed prior to permitting a well on a pooled-unit basis; most oil and gas leases authorize the formation of pooled units either before or after the drilling of a well. The comment further observed that changing the Commission's policy does not serve any conservation purpose and may impede the ability of operators to drill and develop their acreage and to form pooled units on the basis of more definitive geology after wells have been drilled. The comment offered alternative language for this subparagraph.

The Commission points out that the current wording of §3.40(a) includes the phraseology to which the comment objects; nevertheless, the Commission agrees that clarification of the proposed wording in §3.40(a)(5)(A) is appropriate. The Commission adopts slightly different wording from that suggested in the comment.

Sixth, the comment noted that proposed §3.40(a)(5)(C) is not clear whether the Form P-12 must be filed whenever a pooled unit is changed, even if no pooled unit has been previously recognized by the Commission, or only when the pooled unit has been previously designated at the Commission. The comment further observed that the Commission historically has not been concerned with the manner in which operators pooled their leases and acreage unless such pooling related to some conservation purpose. The comment urged retention of this policy and unnecessary filings of Form P-12 avoided for pooled units not previously recognized by the Commission and having no regulatory significance. The comment provided substitute wording.

Again, the Commission agrees that clarification in §3.40(a)(5) is necessary, but has adopted slightly different wording from that offered by the comment.

Finally, the comment twice made the point that the proposed amendment is much more specific than most Commission rules as it relates to the identification, version, and content of a Commission form (P-12). The comment stated that such specificity may raise questions whether any revision to the Form P-12 will require a rulemaking.

The Commission recognizes that form revisions may be necessary periodically to improve the format, or to add or delete information to be reported on the form. The Commission intends to make these changes part of rulemaking proceedings so that all interested persons--the general public as well as the industry-- can have notice of proposed changes in agency regulatory policy and an opportunity to participate, consistent with the notice and comment procedures in Tex. Gov't Code, Chapter 2001.

The Commission adopts the amendments pursuant to Texas Natural Resources Code, §§81.051 and 81.052, which provide the Commission with jurisdiction over all persons owning or engaged in drilling or operating oil or gas wells in Texas and the authority to adopt all necessary rules for governing and regulating persons and their operations under the jurisdiction of the Commission; and Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 102, which gives the Commission the authority to establish pooled units for the purpose of avoiding the drilling of unnecessary wells, protecting correlative rights, or preventing waste.

Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 102, is affected by the amendments.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 20, 2001.

§3.40.Assignment of Acreage to Pooled Development and Proration Units.

(a) An operator may pool acreage, in accordance with appropriate contractual authority and applicable field rules, for the purpose of creating a drilling unit or proration unit by filing an original certified plat delineating the pooled unit and a Certificate of Pooling Authority, Form P-12 (revised 5/2001), according to the following requirements:

(1) Each tract in the certified plat shall be identified with an outline and a tract identifier that corresponds to the tract identifier listed on the Form P-12.

(2) The operator shall provide information on the Certificate of Pooling Authority, Form P-12, accurately and according to the instructions on the form.

(A) The operator shall separately list each tract committed to the pooled unit by authority granted to the operator.

(B) For each tract listed on Form P-12, the operator shall state the number of acres contained within the tract. The operator shall indicate by checking the appropriate box on Form P-12 if, within an individual tract, there exists a non-pooled and/or unleased interest.

(C) The operator shall state on Form P-12 the total number of acres in the pooled unit. The total number of acres in the pooled unit shall equal the sum of all acres in each individual tract listed.

(D) If a pooled unit contains more tracts than can be listed on a single Form P-12, the operator shall file as many additional Forms P-12 as necessary to list each pooled tract individually. The additional Forms P-12 shall be numbered in sequence.

(E) The operator shall provide the requested identification and contact information on the Form P-12.

(F) The operator shall certify the information on the Form P-12 by signing and dating the form.

(3) Failure to timely file the required information on the certified plat or the Form P-12 may result in the dismissal of the W-1 application. "Timely" means within three months of the Commission notifying the operator of the need for additional information on the certified plat and/or the Form P-12.

(4) The operator shall file the original certified plat and Form P-12 at the Commission's Austin office. The operator shall file a copy of the certified plat and Form P-12 with the appropriate Commission district office or offices. If the operator files electronically through the Commission's Electronic Compliance and Approval Process (ECAP) system, the operator is not required to file additional paper copies in the appropriate Commission district office, because all Commission offices will have electronic access to the Form P-12 and certified plat.

(5) The operator shall file the Form P-12 and certified plat:

(A) with the drilling permit application when two or more tracts are joined to form a pooled unit for Commission purposes to obtain a drilling permit;

(B) with completion paperwork when the pooled unit's acreage is being used or assigned for allowable purposes;

(C) to designate a pooled unit formed after completion paperwork has been filed when the pooled unit's acreage is being used or assigned for allowable purposes; or

(D) to designate a change in a pooled unit previously recognized by the Commission. The operator shall file any changes to a pooled unit in accordance with the requirements of §3.38(d)(3) of this title, relating to Well Densities.

(b) If a tract to be pooled has an outstanding interest for which pooling authority does not exist, the tract may be assigned to a unit where authority exists in the remaining undivided interest, provided, that total gross acreage in the tract is included for allocation purposes, and the certificate filed with the commission shows that a certain undivided interest is outstanding in the tract. The commission will not allow an operator to assign only his undivided interest out of a basic tract, where a nonpooled interest exists.

(c) The nonpooled undivided interest holder retains his development rights in his basic tract, and should such rights be exercised, authority to develop the basic tract be approved by the commission, and a well completed as a producer thereon, then the entire interest in the basic tract must be allocated to said well, and any interest insofar as it is pooled with another tract must be assigned to the well on the basic tract for allocation purposes. Splitting of undivided interest in a basic tract between two or more wells on two or more tracts is not acceptable.

(d) Acreage assigned to a well for drilling and development, or for allocation of allowable, shall not be assigned to any other well or wells projected to or completed in the same reservoir; such duplicate assignment of acreage is not acceptable, provided, however, that this limitation shall not prevent the reformation of development or proration units so long as no duplicate assignment of acreage occurs, and further, that such reformation does not violate other conservation regulations.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108169

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: October 5, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7008


16 TAC §3.73

The Railroad Commission of Texas adopts the repeal of §3.73, relating to Inscriptions on Railroad Commission of Texas Vehicles, without changes to the proposal published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8952). The Commission is repealing §3.73 (commonly referred to as Statewide Rule 75) in order to move the rule into 16 TAC Chapter 20, as new §20.405, proposed in a separate, concurrent rulemaking. Chapter 20, entitled Administration, includes the Commission's general administrative rules, including those regarding Commission vehicles. The text of §3.73 was proposed as new §20.405; no substantive changes were proposed to the text of the rule, but the citation to statutory authority was updated.

The Commission concurrently filed a notice of intention to review §3.73, as proposed to be repealed, in accordance with Tex. Gov. Code §2001.39 ( as amended by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1499 §1.11(a) ).

The Commission received no comments on the proposed review and repeal of §3.73.

The Commission adopts the repeal pursuant to Texas Transportation Code, §721.003(a)(8), which permits the Railroad Commission by rule to exempt itself from the vehicle identification and marking requirements imposed under Texas Transportation Code, §721.002.

Texas Transportation Code, §§721.002 and 721.003, are affected by the repeal.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 20, 2001.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108174

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7008


Chapter 20. ADMINISTRATION

Subchapter A. CONTRACTS AND PURCHASES

The Railroad Commission of Texas adopts the repeal of §20.1, relating to Protest/Dispute Resolution Procedures, without changes to the proposal published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8952), and adopts new §20.1, relating to Procedures for Filing and Resolving Protests of a Contract Solicitation or Award, and new §20.10, concerning Bid Opening and Tabulation, without changes to the proposal published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8954). The Commission adopts these actions to comply with statutory provisions requiring state agencies to adopt procedures for dealing with issues attendant to state agency purchasing and contracting, and to clearly describe the requirements of the Commission's procedures for the benefit of bidders, vendors, and members of the public.

New §20.1 will instruct prospective bidders, offerors, or contractors about the procedures for filing a protest regarding a Commission procurement. The rule clearly articulates the information that must be included in a protest, the procedures for pursuing a protest, the standards by which a protest will be evaluated, and remedies available for violations of statutes or rules in the procurement process. Additionally, the rule includes appeal procedures in the event that the protestant is not satisfied with the Commission's initial determination.

New §20.1 establishes three levels of consideration of a protest concerning claimed violations of statutes or rules in the procurement process. At the first level, the director of finance ("the director") receives protests, gathers information, and makes a determination. At the second level, the director of finance and administration ("the DFA") receives appeals of determinations made by the director of finance. At the third level, the Commission entertains appeals of determinations made by the director of finance and administration. For any determination which would result in a contract being declared void or rescinded, the Commission makes the final decision.

New §20.1(a) contains definitions of key terms used in the rule. New §20.1(b) contains general provisions that govern the filing of a protest, appeal, or appeal to the Commission, including a delegation of authority to the director and the DFA to resolve complaints and appeals. In the event the director receives a timely, proper protest, the director may not proceed further with the solicitation or with the award of the contract in question unless the director makes a written determination that the award of the contract, without delay, is necessary to protect substantial interests of the state. Any protest determination by the director or appeal determination by the DFA that results in a declaration that a contract should be void or rescinded and that is not appealed must be forwarded to the next level as if it were an appeal. A protest or appeal determination that does not declare a contract void or rescinded and that is not timely appealed is considered to be the final administrative action of the Commission.

New §20.1(c) states the proper ground for filing a protest, an appeal, or an appeal to the Commission, and the basis on which the director, the DFA, and the Commission may decline to consider and may dismiss a matter. The absence of an award of a contract to a protestant, an appellant, or a person who appeals to the Commission is not a proper ground for protest or appeal, unless that protestant, appellant, or person makes a specific factual allegation that the failure to award a contract to that protestant, appellant, or person was the result of a violation of statutes or rules. Unless a protestant, appellant, or person who appeals to the Commission demonstrates good cause for delay or unless the director, the DFA, or the Commission determines that a protest or appeal raises issues significant to procurement practices or procedures, the director, the DFA, and the Commission shall not consider a protest, an appeal, or an appeal to the Commission that is not timely filed. Finally, the director, the DFA, or the Commission may dismiss a protest or an appeal that fails to state a proper ground; that is untimely; or that is incomplete when filed.

New §20.1(d) prescribes the contents of protest and establishes the deadline for filing a protest, which is generally no later than the tenth day after the protestant knows or should have known of the occurrence of the action that is protested; new subsection (e) sets forth the director's obligations in the event of receiving a protest, one of which is to notify all other vendors for the procurement that is the subject of the protest and invite them to submit comments or request to participate in the protest inquiry. If a protest is not withdrawn by the protestant, the director must issue a written determination on the protest by letter and notify the protestant and all interested parties. If the director determines that no violation of rules or statutes has occurred, regardless of whether a contract has been awarded, the director must so state and give the reasons for the determination. If no contract has been awarded, the director may proceed with the award of a contract. If the director determines that a violation of the rules or statutes has occurred in a case in which no contract has been awarded, the director must so state and give both the reasons for the determination and the appropriate remedial action and may, at the director's discretion, proceed with the award of a contract. If the director determines that a violation of the rules or statutes has occurred in a case in which a contract has been awarded, the director must so state and shall set forth the reasons for the determination and the appropriate remedial action, which may include declaring the contract void or rescinded. Any protest determination that declares a contract void or rescinded that is not appealed by an appellant must be forwarded to the DFA to be reviewed as if it were an appeal.

New §20.1(f) sets forth the procedure on appeal of a director's determination to the DFA, and prescribes the contents of an appeal and the deadline for filing it. The DFA's obligations on appeal, set forth in new subsection (g), include notifying all other interested parties in the protest inquiry and determination that is the subject of the appeal, inviting their participation in the appeal, and setting a deadline by which they must respond. The DFA may request that the General Counsel review and make a recommendation on the matter. If an appeal is not withdrawn by the appellant, the DFA must issue a written determination on the appeal by letter. If the DFA determines that the director's determination was substantially correct, the DFA must so state and give the reasons for the determination. If the DFA determines that the director's determination was substantially incorrect, the DFA must so state and provide the reasons for the determination and the appropriate remedial action. Any appeal determination that results in a contract being declared void or rescinded and that is not appealed must be forwarded to the Commission to be reviewed.

New §20.1(h) describes the procedures applicable when a DFA's appeal determination is appealed to the Commission. The appeal is filed with the General Counsel, who schedules the matter for consideration at an open meeting of the Commission, notifies the parties, and sets a deadline by which parties must file any additional comments or request to be heard in oral argument before the Commission at the scheduled open meeting. The Commission's determination of the appeal must be by written order.

Finally, new §20.1(i) provides that, in the event the Commission receive a protest, the Commission will retain documents collected as part of a solicitation, evaluation, and/or award of a contract for a period of four years from the date of the initial procurement action. In addition, the Commission will also retain the protest file, the appeal file, and any documents or Commission orders pertaining to a determination made by the Commission.

New §20.10 will instruct prospective bidders, offerors, or contractors in the bid opening and tabulation process used by the Commission. The rule adopts by reference the practices of the Texas Building and Procurement Commission (formerly the General Services Commission) found in 1 Texas Administrative Code §113.5(b), relating to Bid Submission, Bid Opening and Tabulation, as required by Texas Government Code, §2156.005(d). These practices provide that all bid openings shall be open to the public; bid opening dates may be changed and bid openings rescheduled if bidders are properly notified in advance of the new opening date; if a bid opening is canceled, all bids which are being held for opening will be returned to the bidders; and all bid tabulation files are available for public inspection. Bid tabulations may be reviewed by any interested person during regular working hours at the offices of the Commission. Employees of the Commission are not required to give bid tabulation information by telephone.

Also, in a separate, concurrent action, the Commission adopted the review of current §20.1, required under Texas Government Code, §2001.039 ( as added by Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 1499, §1.11(a) ).

16 TAC §20.1

The Commission adopts the repeal of §20.1 pursuant to Texas Government Code, §2155.076, which requires agencies to develop and adopt protest procedures for resolving vendor protests relating to purchasing issues that are consistent with the rules of the Texas Building and Procurement Commission.

Texas Government Code, §2155.076, is affected by the repeal.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 20, 2001.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108171

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7008


16 TAC §20.1, §20.10

The Commission adopts new §20.1 pursuant to Texas Government Code, §2155.076, which requires agencies to develop and adopt protest procedures for resolving vendor protests relating to purchasing issues that are consistent with the rules of the Texas Building and Procurement Commission; and new §20.10 pursuant to Texas Government Code, §2156.005, which requires state agencies making purchases to adopt the Texas Building and Procurement Commission's rules related to bid opening and tabulation.

Texas Government Code, §§2155.076 and 2156.005, are affected by the new rules.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 20, 2001.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108172

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7008


Subchapter E. VEHICLE MANAGEMENT

16 TAC §20.401, §20.405

The Railroad Commission of Texas adopts new §20.401, relating to Agency Vehicles, and §20.405, relating to Inscriptions on Railroad Commission of Texas Vehicles, without changes to the proposal published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8957). The new rules will be in new subchapter E to be titled Vehicle Management.

The Commission adopts new §20.401 pursuant to Texas Government Code, §2171.1045, which requires each state agency to adopt rules consistent with the management plan adopted under Texas Government Code, §2171.104, relating to the assignment and use of the agency's vehicles. The management plan was adopted by the State Council on Competitive Government on October 11, 2000. The legislature stated, in Senate Bill 1, Article 9, Section 9.13, 77th Legislature (2001), its intent that all state agencies adopt rules or policies to implement the State Vehicle Fleet Management Plan, issued by the Office of Vehicle Fleet Management of the General Services Commission (now the Texas Building and Procurement Commission).

The State Vehicle Fleet Management Plan sets forth management provisions regarding: (1) opportunities for consolidating and privatizing the operation and management of vehicle fleets in areas where there is a concentration of state agencies, including the Capitol Complex and the Health and Human Services Complex in Austin; (2) the number and type of vehicles owned by each agency and the purpose each vehicle serves; (3) procedures to increase vehicle use and improve the efficiency of the state vehicle fleet; (4) procedures to reduce the cost of maintaining state vehicles; (5) the sale of excess state vehicles; and (6) lower- cost alternatives to using state-owned vehicles, including using rental cars and reimbursing employees for using personal vehicles. The plan may be viewed on the web site of the General Services Commission (now known as the Texas Building and Procurement Commission) at www.gsc.state.tx.us/fleet. The Railroad Commission adopted its vehicle management plan on February 22, 2001.

The Commission adopts new §20.405 in order to move the rule text from §3.73 (commonly referred to as Statewide Rule 75) into Chapter 20, Subchapter D, relating to Vehicle Management. The repeal of §3.73, and the concurrent rule review, were proposed in separate, concurrent rulemakings. Other than the change in chapter and rule number and correction of a statutory citation, there are no substantive changes to the current rule language. The rule declares that Railroad Commission vehicles are exempt from the identification requirements imposed on agencies under Texas Transportation Code, §721.002, as permitted by Texas Transportation Code, §721.003(a)(8).

The Commission received no comments on the proposed new rules.

The Commission adopts new §20.401 under Texas Government Code, §2171.1045, which requires the Commission to adopt rules consistent with the management plan adopted under Texas Government Code, §2171.104, relating to the assignment and use of the agency's vehicles. The Commission adopts new §20.405 under Texas Transportation Code, §721.003, which permits the Commission by rule to exempt its vehicles from the identification requirement imposed on agencies under Texas Transportation Code, §721.002.

Texas Government Code, §§2171.104 and 2171.1045, and Texas Transportation Code, §§721.002 and 721.003, are affected by the new sections.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 20, 2001.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108175

Mary Ross McDonald

Deputy General Counsel

Railroad Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-7008


Part 2. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Chapter 25. SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS

Subchapter R. CUSTOMER PROTECTION RULES FOR RETAIL ELECTRIC SERVICE

16 TAC §25.474

The Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) adopts amendments to §25.474, relating to Selection or Change of Retail Electric Provider, with changes to the proposed text as published in the September 7, 2001 Texas Register (26 TexReg 6820). The amendments are necessary to accomplish the commission's customer education goals. The amendments provide the commission the flexibility to seek a more efficient and effective means to accomplish its education goals. This amendment was adopted under Project Number 24551.

The commission received comments on the proposed amendment from American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP), Reliant Resources, Inc. (Reliant), TXU Energy Services Company (TXU), and Enron Corporation (Enron).

AEP, TXU, and Reliant generally agreed with the commission's proposed amendments and rationale for modifying §25.474(b). Reliant stated that by revising the language, the commission would be afforded greater latitude in deciding what information was necessary to distribute and how best to educate the selecting public. TXU noted that given budget limitations, the commission should have flexibility to use available customer education funds for the most effective purposes at the most effective times and found it reasonable for the commission to eliminate the requirement that a customer be able to select a retail electric provider (REP) using a form distributed by the commission (commonly referred to as a REP Selection form). Enron, however, was concerned that the proposed amendments would nullify a major intent of the original rules, namely, to enable competition by equipping customers to participate in the market.

The commission agrees with AEP, Reliant, and TXU and finds that the education program can equip customers with knowledge about the market without a REP selection form. Information about retail electric competition can be effectively disseminated to customers without the use of a REP selection form. Since the adoption of §25.474, issues in the competitive retail market have arisen that impact which methods will be most effective in conveying customer education messages. Consequently, the commission finds that the proposed amendments to subsection (b)(1), including the deletion of existing subsection (b)(1)(C), will provide customers with a sufficient explanation of the REP selection process while allowing the customer education program to respond to the evolving retail electric market.

AEP stated that the commission should delay the initial REP selection process described in §25.474(b) due to cost considerations, market readiness and timing issues, and unresolved issues of what constitutes education and what defines market facilitation. Enron argued that if the commission does not send out customer education and the REP selection form prior to market opening, it would be endorsing the misinformation of some "market participants" that nothing will change on January 1, 2002. Enron proposed that the commission segregate the mailing of the REP selection form between residential and non-residential customers and administer to the non-residential customers first, since large customers stand to gain substantially. Enron further proposed that the commission initiate a working group to coordinate with various REPs on this issue and to enable the commission to leverage the advertising schedule and budget of these REPs to ensure effective customer education.

The commission finds that market readiness and timing issues, which could not be predicted when §25.474 was adopted, affect the methods by which education messages can best be conveyed. The commission should be allowed to make use of qualitative and quantitative research information and adjust its education program to make the most effective use of its limited resources. While the commission does intend to segregate education materials for different classes of customers, it does not agree that one class of customers should be prioritized over another. Rather, the commission determines that a segregation of education materials warrants a difference in the nature of the material, not in the dissemination of the materials. The commission therefore rejects Enron's proposal. The commission also notes that informal meetings have already been initiated with REPs that are currently marketing in order to work together to ensure effective education.

Enron disagreed with the commission's proposal to delete the word "all" from subsection (b)(1) and noted that all electric customers in Texas are entitled to receive customer education.

The commission agrees with Enron that all electric customers are entitled to receive customer education. However, the commission does not agree that all customers must receive the same type of education materials. Different customer classes have different needs. By deleting the word "all" in subsection (b)(1) large commercial and industrial customer are not precluded from receiving customer education; therefore, this proposed amendment is adopted without change.

AEP recommended that the commission eliminate the phrase "REP selection" and any aspect of the customer education materials that imply a customer should choose to ensure that the commission's overall campaign efforts remained strictly educational. TXU urged the commission to ensure that what is sent remains a customer education piece and not a REP marketing document and suggested the commission amend proposed subsection (b)(1) to identify the information issued by the commission as customer education information.

The commission disagrees with AEP. AEP's suggestion is contrary to the commission's policy of informing customers about their choices. The commission agrees with TXU and amends subsection (b)(1) to reflect that the information disseminated by the commission will be educational.

TXU requested that the commission include a requirement in subsection (b)(1) that REPs be given 60 days advance notice of its intent to issue a customer education mailer, including a description of its expected contents, in order to allow REPs to formulate a marketing plan and respond to customer requests for information.

The commission finds TXU's request for a 60-day advance notice unreasonable. Given the changing market conditions, to which the customer education program must respond, the commission must be allowed to remain flexible. The commission shall strive to achieve advance notice at the earliest possible time. However, the commission finds that this notice represents an internal policy of the commission and it is unnecessary to include this provision in the rule.

TXU recommended that the commission delete subsection (b)(1)(B) to eliminate the requirement that a list of qualified REPs be sent to customers. TXU based its argument upon the difficulty in determining to which customers REPs are marketing and the need to prepare different mailers for different parts of the state. In the alternative, TXU suggested the commission change the reference to "certified" REPs.

The commission disagrees with TXU and finds it necessary to include only qualified REPs on the list sent to customers because some REPs are not certified to serve all customers. Including REPs that do not serve certain classes of customers would only aggravate and discourage customers from educating themselves about various REP offers; therefore, the commission makes no changes to proposed subsection (b)(1)(B).

Should the commission decide to issue a list of qualified REPs, then AEP urged the commission to include the affiliated REP in this list. AEP further urged the commission to include information that informs customers that they do not have to make a choice, and that if a customer does not select another REP, that customer will be served by the affiliated REP at the price to beat. AEP cited recent reports of slamming activity during the pilot program as a demonstration of the need for informing customers of all available options. AEP suggested the commission edit subsection (b)(1)(A) to include this information.

The commission finds that including the affiliated REP in the list of qualified REPs would confuse and mislead customers by implying that they must take action to remain with the affiliated REP or to prevent changes to their account. The commission finds that information about the affiliated REP and the price to beat are contained in a general explanation of retail electric competition provided elsewhere by the customer education program and do not have to be individually noted in the rule. Therefore, the commission makes no changes to proposed subsection (b)(1)(A).

Enron opposed the commission's proposal to delete existing subsection (b)(1)(C) because doing so would defeat the major purpose of enabling competition to take off. Enron noted that if there is not customer participation in competition, retail electric competition would fail.

The commission finds that a proper authorization form for each qualified REP could not be included to sufficiently comply with §25.474(d) and (f)(1). Additionally, incorporating a REP authorization form into a customer education piece would be cost prohibitive and may confuse customers and facilitate unintended switching by customers who merely want more information. For these reasons, the commission finds that a REP authorization form should not be included in a customer education piece.

Reliant stated that there is no reason to continue to lock the commission to a specific form and data. AEP also recommended the commission delete any reference in the rule to a form that allows customers to select one or more of the listed REPs because there is no indication of how customers may return the form and leaves questions as to who is responsible for the processing and processing costs associated with the return of these forms. TXU agreed with Reliant and AEP and suggested the need for a form and a reply card is a costly procedure that is more a marketing function than a customer education function. TXU also suggested the commission may provide REP contact information but should not mandate reply cards. TXU suggested proposed subsection (b)(1)(C) be deleted. Enron opposed TXU's proposal to delete proposed subsection (b)(1)(C).

The commission agrees with parties that the proposed amendment was unclear about who would be responsible for the processing of forms. The commission adopts TXU's suggestion that the commission provide REP contact information but not mandate reply cards. Therefore, the commission amends proposed subsection (b)(1)(C) to allow customers to contact or select one or more of the listed REPs from which they desire to receive information or to be contacted.

All comments, including any not specifically referenced herein, were fully considered by the commission.

This amendment is adopted under the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated §14.002 (Vernon 1998, Supplement 2002) (PURA) which provides the commission with the authority to make and enforce rules reasonably required in the exercise of its powers and jurisdiction; and specifically, PURA §39.101, which requires that the commission establish customer protections.

Cross Reference to Statutes: Public Utility Regulatory Act §§14.002, 39.101 and 39.902.

§25.474.Selection or Change of Retail Electric Provider.

(a) General purpose. A retail electric provider (REP) shall not enroll a customer without obtaining the customer's authorization and having that authorization verified consistent with this section.

(b) Initial REP selection process.

(1) In conjunction with the commission's customer education campaign, the commission may issue to customers for whom customer choice will be an option an explanation of the REP selection process. The customer education information issued by the commission may include, but is not limited to:

(A) an explanation of retail electric competition;

(B) a list of all REPs qualified to provide electric service to the customer;

(C) a form that allows the customer to contact or select one or more of the listed REPs from which the customer desires to receive information or to be contacted; and

(D) information on how a customer may designate whether the customer would like to be placed on the statewide Do Not Call List and indicate the fee for such placement.

(2) Any affiliate REP assigned to serve a customer that is entitled to receive the price to beat rate, pursuant to PURA §39.202(a), due to non-selection by the customer shall issue to a customer, either as a bill insert or through a separate mailing, by January 31, 2002:

(A) A terms of service document that includes an explanation of the price to beat rate;

(B) Your Rights as a Customer disclosure; and

(C) An Electricity Facts label for the price to beat, which may be in a separate document, or may be contained in the terms of service document.

(3) An electric utility, whose successor affiliate REP will continue to serve a customer not eligible for the price to beat pursuant to PURA §39.102(b) due to non-selection by the customer of another REP, shall issue to a customer by June 1, 2001, a terms of service document. Such document shall contain an explanation of the price the customer will be charged by the affiliate REP.

(c) General standards for authorizations and verifications of enrollment or switch orders.

(1) All authorizations and verifications of enrollment or switch orders shall be in plain, easily understood English or another language, if the underlying sales transaction was conducted in the other language. The entire authorization and verification shall be the same language.

(2) The specific electric service package or plan for which the customer's assent is being attained or verified shall be disclosed to the customer.

(3) The name of the specific REP for which the customer's authorization is being obtained and verified shall be disclosed to the customer. Any use of a name for the purposes of deception or to obtain a customer's authorization and verification based on confusion or inability to understand the import of the name of the REP and the services offered is prohibited.

(4) Each authorization and verification shall affirmatively inquire as to the identity of the individual with the authority to change the customer's REP and explain that only that customer can agree to a change in REP.

(5) A REP or an aggregator, other than a municipally owned utility or electric cooperative, shall submit copies of its sales script, contract, terms of service document and any other materials used to obtain a customer's authorization or verification to the commission upon request.

(6) In the event a customer disputes an enrollment or switch, the REP shall provide to the customer proof of the customer's authorization and verification within five business days of the customer's request.

(d) Required authorization disclosures. All authorizations shall clearly and conspicuously disclose the following information contained in the REP's contract or terms of service document for each product offered to the customer:

(1) the name of the new REP;

(2) the ability of a customer to select to receive information in English, Spanish, or the language used in the marketing of service to the customer. The REP shall provide a means of obtaining and recording a customer' language preference;

(3) price, including the total price stated in cents per kilowatt-hour, for electric service;

(4) term or length of the contract or term of service;

(5) the presence or absence of early termination fees or penalties, and applicable amounts;

(6) any requirement to pay a deposit and the amount of that deposit;

(7) any fees to the customer for switching to the REP pursuant to subsection (l) of this section; and

(8) the customer's right to review and cancel the contract within three federal business days without penalty and a statement that the customer will receive a written copy of the terms of service document that will explain all the terms of the agreement and how to exercise the right of cancellation before the customer's electric service is switched to the REP.

(e) Verification requirements. A verification shall clearly:

(1) confirm the customer's billing name, address, and electric service identifier (ESI) or account number to be used by the selected REP in making an enrollment or switch request to the registration agent;

(2) confirm appropriate verification data, such as the customer's date of birth, the customer's mother's maiden name, or other voluntarily submitted information;

(3) confirm the decision to change from the current REP to the new REP; and

(4) confirm that the customer designates the new REP to act as the customer's agent for the switch of REP.

(f) Methods of obtaining customer authorization and verification. Customer authorizations and verifications shall be obtained by using one of the methods listed in this subsection.

(1) Written authorization and verification. A written authorization from a customer for a selection or switch of a REP shall use a letter of agency (LOA) as specified in this subsection.

(A) The LOA shall be a separate or easily separable document containing the requirements prescribed in subparagraph (D) of this paragraph for the sole purpose of authorizing the REP to initiate a REP switch request. The LOA shall be signed and dated by the customer requesting the REP switch.

(B) The LOA shall not be combined with inducements of any kind on the same document.

(C) At a minimum, the LOA shall be printed in a size and type that is clearly legible, and shall contain clear and unambiguous language that confirms:

(i) the customer's billing name, address, and ESI or account number to be used by the REP in making a switch request;

(ii) the decision to switch from the current REP to the new REP; and

(iii) that the customer designates (name of the new REP) to act as the customer's agent for switching the REP.

(D) The following LOA form meets the requirements of this subsection. Other versions may be used, but shall comply with all the requirements of this subsection.

Figure: 16 TAC §25.474(f)(1)(D) (No change.)

(E) The customer's signature on the letter of agency, contract or other document which contains the materials terms and conditions of the service shall constitute an authorization and verification if the letter of agency, contract or documents comply with the provisions of this section.

(F) Before obtaining a signature from a customer, a REP shall provide the customer a reasonable opportunity to read any written materials accompanying the contract or terms of service document and shall answer any and all questions posed by any customer about information contained in the documents.

(G) Upon obtaining the customer's signature, a REP or aggregator shall immediately provide the customer a legible copy of the signed contract, the required terms of service document, and Your Rights as a Customer disclosure. If written solicitations by a REP contain the terms of service document or contract, any tear-off portion that is submitted by the customer to the REP to obtain electric service shall allow the customer to retain the terms of service document.

(2) Telephonic authorization and verification. A REP or aggregator that obtains a customer's authorization by means of a telephone conversation shall audio record the entirety of such authorization, or obtain independent third party verification of, the customer's authorization prior to submitting an enrollment or switch order. In addition to the requirements of this paragraph, both the authorization and audio recording or third party verification shall adhere to the requirements of subsections (d) and (e) of this section.

(A) Additional authorization and verification requirements. Telephonic enrollment or switch orders shall:

(i) clearly inform the customer at the beginning of a call that the call is being recorded. The entire authorization and verification conversation with the customer shall be recorded so that evidence of a customer's consent can be reviewed and investigated if a subsequent complaint is filed;

(ii) read any script and respond to any questions in the language used to make the underlying sales transaction and proceed at a normal conversational speed using plain, easily, understood language;

(iii) at a normal conversational speed, state the name of the REP to which the customer is being switched in its entirety; and

(iv) for both the authorization and the verification, agents shall clearly state that the customer will have a right of cancellation without penalty and that the customer will receive a written copy of the terms of service document that will explain all the terms of the agreement and how to exercise the right of cancellation before the customer's electric service is switched by the REP.

(B) Independent third party. An independent third party shall operate in a location physically separate from the REP or aggregator or the REP's or aggregator's marketing agent and shall not:

(i) be owned, managed, or directly controlled by the REP or aggregator or the REP's or aggregator's marketing agent; or

(ii) have financial incentive to confirm enrollment or switch orders.

(3) Internet enrollment. A REP or aggregator that offers Internet enrollment to customers shall comply with the authorization and verification requirements in subsections (c) and (d) of this section and with the following minimum requirements:

(A) The aggregator or REP shall maintain an Internet website at the website address provided to the commission. The website shall identify the legal name of the aggregator or REP, its address, telephone number, and Texas license number to provide aggregation services or sell retail electric service.

(B) The means of transfer of information, such as electronic enrollment, renewal, and cancellation information between the customer and the REP or aggregator shall be by an encrypted transaction using Secure Socket Layer or similar encryption standard to ensure the privacy of customer information;

(C) The REP or aggregator shall identify the terms of service document by a version number to ensure the ability to verify the particular agreement to which the customer assents. The REP or aggregator shall make available a copy of the terms of service document, as required by §25.475 of this title (relating to Information Disclosures to Residential and Small Commercial Customers), that is agreed to by a customer, on the REP's or aggregator's Internet website. The terms of service document shall be accessible by the customer for the duration of the contract term offered to the customer.

(D) The Internet enrollment procedure shall prompt the customer to print or save the terms of service document to which the customer assents and provide an option to have a written terms of service document sent by regular mail.

(E) The REP or aggregator shall provide to the customer a toll-free telephone number, Internet website address, and e-mail address for contacting the REP or aggregator throughout the duration of the customer's agreement. The REP or aggregator shall also provide the appropriate toll-free telephone number that the customer can use to report service outages.

(F) The REP or aggregator shall obtain a verification that meets the standards of subsection (e) of this section, provide a statement with a box that must be checked by the customer to indicate that the customer has read and agrees to select the REP to supply electric service, and the time and date of the customer's enrollment. The customer's enrollment shall be followed by a confirmation of the change of the customer's REP by e-mail, which shall include a conspicuous notice of the applicable right of cancellation and offer the customer the option of exercising this right by toll-free telephone number, e-mail, Internet website, facsimile transmission, or regular mail.

(G) Customer authorizations and verifications shall adhere to any state and federal guidelines governing the use of electronic signatures.

(4) Door-to-door sales. A REP or aggregator that engages in door-to-door marketing at a customer's residence, or personal solicitation at a public location (such as malls, fairs, or places of retail commercial activity) shall be subject to the following:

(A) The REP or aggregator shall comply with the standards set forth in subsections (c) - (e) of this section and paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(B) The REP or aggregator shall provide the disclosures and right of rescission required by this section and the Federal Trade Commission's Trade Regulation Rule Concerning a Cooling Off Period for Door-to-Door Sales (16 C.F.R. §29).

(C) The individual who represents the REP or aggregator shall wear a clear and conspicuous identification on the front of the individual's outer clothing that prominently displays the name of the REP or aggregator. The name displayed shall conform to the name on the REP's certification or aggregator's registration obtained from the commission and the name that appears on all of the REP's or aggregator's contracts and terms of service documents in possession.

(D) The REP or aggregator shall affirmatively state that it is not a representative of the customer's transmission and distribution utility. The REP's or aggregator's clothing and sales presentation shall be designed to avoid the impression by a reasonable customer that the individual represents the customer's transmission and distribution utility or the provider of last resort (POLR).

(g) Record retention. A REP shall maintain non-public records of a customer authorization or verification for a change in REP for 24 months from the date of the REP's initial service to the customer and shall provide such records to the customer and the commission upon request.

(h) Right of cancellation. A REP shall promptly provide the customer with the terms of service document after the customer has provided authorization to select the REP pursuant to one of the methods set forth in this section. The REP shall offer the customer a right to cancel the contract without penalty or fee of any kind for a period of three federal business days after the customer's receipt of the terms of service document and acceptance of the REP's offer. The provider may assume that any delivery of the terms of service document deposited first class with the United States Postal Service (U.S. mail) will be received by the customer within three federal business days. The cancellation period shall not start until the customer receives the terms of service document in the manner prescribed by this subchapter, based on the customer's method of enrollment. Any REP receiving a late notice of cancellation from the customer shall contact the registration agent and cancel the pending switch as soon as possible after such late notice is received.

(i) Submission of customer's selection to the registration agent. A REP may submit a customer's selection of the REP to the registration agent prior to the expiration of the cancellation period prescribed by subsection (h) of this section. Additionally, the REP shall submit the switch request to the registration agent at the proper time so that the switch will be processed on the date agreed to by the customer and as allowed by the tariff of the transmission and distribution utility, municipally owned utility, or electric cooperative. The customer shall be informed of the scheduled date that the customer will begin receiving electric service from the REP, and of any delays in meeting that date. Additionally, the REP must advise the registration agent of any "special needs" customers and renew such notification to the registration agent annually.

(j) Duty of the registration agent. When the registration agent receives an enrollment or switch request from a REP, the registration agent shall:

(1) process that request promptly; and

(2) send the customer an enrollment or switch notification notice in English and Spanish pursuant to either subparagraph (A) or (B) of this paragraph, as appropriate.

(A) Standard enrollment and switches. The notice provided by the registration agent to the customer shall comply with the provisions of this subparagraph, unless the switch is considered a "switch to POLR" as described in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph. The notice shall:

(i) identify the REP that initiated the enrollment or switch request;

(ii) inform the customer that the customer's REP will be switched unless the customer requests the registration agent to cancel the switch by the date stated in the notice;

(iii) provide a cancellation date by which the customer may request a switch to be cancelled, no less than seven calendar days after the customer receives the notice; and

(iv) provide instructions for the customer to request that the switch be cancelled. These instructions which shall include a telephone number, facsimile machine number, and e-mail address to reach the registration agent.

(B) Switch to POLR. If the customer is being switched to the POLR at the request of the REP currently serving the customer, the notice provided to the customer by the registration agent shall include only the following:

(i) the name of the REP that initiated the request;

(ii) the name of the POLR that will begin providing electric service to the customer; and

(iii) the date such switch will be effective.

(3) unless the customer makes a timely request to cancel the switch, direct the transmission and distribution utility to implement the switch effective with the customer's next meter reading provided that such meter reading is at least one business day after the transmission and distribution utility receives notice of the switch request or such other time and date as requested by the customer or the REP.

(k) Customer's switch to POLR. The methods of customer authorization, customer verification, and rights of cancellation are not applicable when the customer's electric service is "dropped" to the POLR by a REP for non-payment pursuant to §25.482 of this title (relating to Termination of Contract). Nothing in this subsection shall be read to imply that the customer is accepting a contract with the POLR for a specific term.

(l) Fees. A REP, other than a municipally owned utility or an electric cooperative, shall not charge a fee to a customer to select, switch or enroll with the REP unless the customer requests a switch or enrollment that does not conform with the normal meter reading and billing cycle. Such fee shall not exceed the rate charged by the transmission and distribution utility for this off-cycle meter reading. The registration agent shall not charge a fee to the end-use customer for the switch or enrollment process performed by the registration agent.

(m) Transferring customers from one REP to another.

(1) Any REP that will acquire customers from another REP due to acquisition, merger, bankruptcy or any other reason, shall provide notice to every affected customer. The notice shall be in a billing insert or separate mailing at least 30 days prior to the transfer of any customer. If legal or regulatory constraints prevent sending the notice at least 30 days prior to the transfer, the notice shall be sent promptly after all legal and regulatory conditions are met. If the transfer of customers will materially change the terms of service for the affected customers, the notice shall:

(A) identify the current and acquiring REP;

(B) explain why the customer will not be able to remain with the current REP;

(C) explain that the customer has a choice of selecting a REP and may select the acquiring REP or any other REP;

(D) explain that if the customer wants another REP, the customer should contact that other REP;

(E) explain the time frame for the customer to make a selection and what will happen if the customer makes no selection;

(F) identify the date that customers will be or were transferred to the acquiring REP;

(G) provide the Electricity Facts label and terms of service document of the acquiring REP; and

(H) provide a toll-free telephone number for a customer to call for additional information.

(2) The acquiring REP shall provide the commission with a copy of the notice when it is sent to customers.

(3) If the transfer of customers will not result in a material change to the terms of service for the affected customers, the notice shall contain only the information in paragraph (1)(A), (B), and (F) - (H) of this subsection.

(n) Complaints alleging unauthorized change of REP (Slamming). A customer may file a complaint with the commission, pursuant to §25.485 of this title (relating to Customer Access and Complaint Handling), against a REP for any reasons related to the provisions of this section.

(1) REP's response to complaint. After review of a customer's complaint, the commission shall forward the complaint to the REP that the customer believes made an unauthorized switch. The REP is responsible for performing the following upon receiving a complaint:

(A) take all actions within its control to facilitate the customer's prompt return to the original REP within three days;

(B) cease any collections activities related to the switch until the complaint has been resolved by the commission; and

(C) respond to the commission within 21 calendar days after receiving the complaint. The REP's response shall include the following:

(i) all documentation related to the authorization and verification used to switch the customer's service; and

(ii) all corrective actions taken as required by paragraph (3) of this subsection, if the switch in service was not verified in accordance with subsections (c) - (e) of this section.

(2) Commission investigation. The commission shall review all of the information related to the complaint, including the REP's response, and make a determination of whether the REP complied with the requirements of this section. The commission shall inform the complainant and the REP of the results of the investigation and identify any additional corrective actions that may be required of the REP or the customer's obligation to pay any charges related to the authorized switch.

(3) Responsibilities of the REP that initiated the change. If a customer's REP is changed without authorization consistent with this section, the REP that initiated the unauthorized change shall:

(A) within five business days of the customer's request, pay all charges associated with returning the customer to the original REP;

(B) within ten business days of the customer's request, provide all billing records and usage history information to the original REP related to the unauthorized change of services;

(C) within 30 days of the original REP's request for payment, pay the original REP the amount it would have received from the customer if the unauthorized change had not occurred;

(D) within 30 days of the customer's request, refund any amounts paid by the customer as required by paragraph (4) of this subsection; and

(E) cancel all unpaid charges.

(4) Responsibilities of the original REP. The original REP shall:

(A) inform the REP that initiated the unauthorized switch of the amount that would have been charged for identical services if the unauthorized change had not occurred, within ten business days of the receipt of the billing records required under paragraph (3)(B) of this subsection;

(B) provide to the customer all benefits or gifts associated with the service, such as frequent flyer miles, that would have been awarded had the unauthorized change not occurred, upon receiving payment for service provided during the unauthorized change;

(C) maintain a record of customers that experienced an unauthorized change in REP that contains:

(i) the name of the REP that initiated the unauthorized change;

(ii) the account number affected by the unauthorized change;

(iii) the date the customer asked the unauthorized REP to return the customer to the original REP; and

(iv) the date the customer was returned to the original REP; and

(D) not bill the customer for any charges the customer incurred during the first 30 days after the unauthorized change in providers, but may bill the customer for charges that were incurred after the first 30 days based on what the original REP would have charged if the unauthorized change had not occurred.

(o) Compliance and enforcement.

(1) Records of customer verifications and unauthorized changes. A REP, other than a municipally owned utility or an electric cooperative, shall provide a copy of records maintained under subsections (c) - (f) and (n) of this section to the commission upon request.

(2) Administrative penalties. If the commission finds that a REP or aggregator, other than a municipally owned utility or an electric cooperative, is in violation of this section, the commission shall order the REP or aggregator to take corrective action as necessary. Additionally, the REP or aggregator may be subject to administrative penalties pursuant to the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA) §15.023 and §15.024. If the commission finds that an electric cooperative or a municipally owned utility is in violation, it shall inform the cooperative's board of directors and general manager, or the municipal utility's general manager and city council.

(3) Certificate revocation. If the commission finds that a REP or aggregator, other than a municipally owned utility or an electric cooperative, repeatedly violates this section, and if consistent with the public interest, the commission may suspend, restrict, deny, or revoke the registration or certificate, including an amended certificate, of the REP or aggregator, thereby denying the REP or aggregator the right to provide service in this state.

(4) Coordination with the office of the attorney general. The commission shall coordinate its enforcement efforts regarding the prosecution of fraudulent, misleading, deceptive, and anticompetitive business practices with the office of the attorney general in order to ensure consistent treatment of specific alleged violations.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 18, 2001.

TRD-200108053

Rhonda Dempsey

Rules Coordinator

Public Utility Commission of Texas

Effective date: January 7, 2002

Proposal publication date: September 7, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 936-7308