TITLE 1.ADMINISTRATION

Part 1. OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR

Chapter 3. CRIMINAL JUSTICE DIVISION

Subchapter C. FUND-SPECIFIC GRANT POLICIES

7. TEXAS NARCOTICS CONTROL PROGRAM

1 TAC §3.703

The Office of the Governor reviewed the rules affecting the Criminal Justice Division grant processes and procedures with the goal of increasing efficiency and updating the rules to address changes in the administration process. The review disclosed that a number of the rules required clarification and updating. Therefore, the Office of the Governor amends the section of the Texas Administrative Code identified below.

The Office of the Governor adopts an amendment to Title 1, Part 1, Chapter 3, Subchapter C, §3.703 without changes as published in the November 16, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 9345). The revisions clarify existing provisions and add new general and fund-specific requirements.

The adopted amendment provides processes and procedures relating to grants made through the Criminal Justice Division and include fund-specific policies within Subchapter C of this chapter relating to criminal justice grants.

No public comments were received regarding the proposed amendment.

The amendment of the rule is adopted under the Texas Government Code, Title 7, §772.006(a)(11), which provides the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, the authority to adopt rules and procedures as necessary.

The amended rule implements the Texas Government Code, Title 7, §772.066(a), which requires the Office of the Governor, Criminal Justice Division, to advise and assist the governor in developing policies, plans, programs, and proposed legislation for improving the coordination, administration, and effectiveness of the criminal justice system.

No other statutes, articles or codes are affected by the adoption of the amendment.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 18, 2001.

TRD-200108051

David Zimmerman

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Effective date: January 7, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 16, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1919


Chapter 5. BUDGET AND PLANNING OFFICE

Subchapter B. STATE AND LOCAL REVIEW OF FEDERAL AND STATE ASSISTANCE APPLICATIONS

1. INTRODUCTION AND GENERAL PROVISIONS OF TEXAS REVIEW AND COMMENT SYSTEM

1 TAC §5.195

The Office of the Governor adopts amendment to 1 TAC §5.195, concerning the Texas Review and Comment System without changes to the proposed text published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8929).

The amendment adds 208 new programs for review and deletes 32 programs no longer in existence or no longer of widespread interest and conforms to the program numbers to current listings in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance. The amendment will provide for more efficient use of the Texas Review and Comment System.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the amendment.

The amendment is adopted under the Government Code, Title 7, §772.004 and §772.005, and the Local Government Code, Chapter 391, (§391.008) which authorizes the Governor's Office to provide for review of state and local applications for grant and loan assistance and to establish policies and guidelines for review and comment. Chapter 391 of the Local Government Code requires certain applicants for state or federal assistance to submit their applications for review to the appropriate regional planning commissions and directs the governor to issue guidelines for carrying out such reviews.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 20, 2001.

TRD-200108184

Bob Pemberton

Assistant General Counsel

Office of the Governor

Effective date: January 9, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1771


Part 2. TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION

Chapter 7. FORMS

1 TAC §7.1

The Texas Ethics Commission adopts the repeal of 1 T.A.C. Chapter 7, §7.1, concerning forms and the adoption and revision of forms, proposed in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8930). The entire chapter is repealed because the Commission has determined the information is redundant and unnecessary.

No comments were received regarding the repeal of Chapter 7.

The repeal is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which provides authorization for the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

The adopted repeal of Chapter 7 affects no other codes, articles, or statutes.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 17, 2001.

TRD-200108043

Tom Harrison

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: January 6, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5787


Chapter 18. GENERAL RULES CONCERNING REPORTS

The Texas Ethics Commission adopts the repeal of 1 T.A.C. Chapter 18, regarding general rules concerning reports filed with the Texas Ethics Commission, proposed in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8930). The entire chapter is being deleted and replaced by new rules adopted concurrently with this notice of adopted repeal. The repeal allows the Commission to adopt new rules that are consistent with the current requirements for filing reports with the Commission. The new chapter is concise and easier to understand and apply by the Commission's filers and the general public.

Subchapter A (Forms and Reports, §§18.1, 18.3, 18.5, 18.7, 18.9, 18.11, 18.13, 18.15, 18.17, 18.19, 18.21, 18.23, and 18.25) contains general provisions regarding the adoption and revision of forms; the forms to be used by local filing authorities; notice requirements; substitution or replication of forms; the format for names, addresses, changes of address, telephone numbers, titles and designation of office; and the filing of duplicate reports. The Commission has determined that the scope and content of this subchapter is unnecessary and does not provide concise useful information for the Commission's filers and the general public. The subchapter is replaced by new sections adopted concurrently with this repeal concerning the adoption and approval of forms; the provision of forms by local filing authorities; and the designation of office being sought or held.

Subchapter B (Corrected Reports, §§18.41, 18.43, 18.45, 18.47, and 18.49) contains general provisions on correcting a report filed with the Commission. The Commission has determined that the scope and content of this subchapter is unnecessary and does not provide concise useful information for the Commission's filers and the general public. The subchapter is replaced by new sections adopted concurrently with this repeal concerning correcting reports and minor reporting errors.

Subchapter C (Late Reports, §§18.61, 18.63, 18.65, 18.67, and 18.69) contains general provisions concerning the determination, notification, and defense of late reports. The Commission has determined that the scope and content of this subchapter is unnecessary and does not provide concise useful information for the Commission's filers and the general public. The subchapter is replaced by new sections adopted concurrently with this repeal concerning timely reports and complete reports and the filing of an affidavit of timely filing.

Subchapter D (Administrative Penalties, §§18.81, 18.83, 18.85, 18.87, 18.89, 18.91, 18.93, 18.95, and 18.97) contains general provisions concerning the administrative penalties the Commission may impose for late reports; a provision on material reporting errors; and a provision on attorney's fees. The Commission has determined that the scope and content of this subchapter is unnecessary and does not provide concise useful information for the Commission's filers and the general public. The subchapter is replaced by new sections adopted concurrently with this repeal concerning fines.

Subchapter E (Waiver of Fine, §§18.111, 18.113, and 18.115) contains general provisions concerning the Commission's jurisdiction to consider waiver requests; the administrative waiver of fines; and waiver of fines by the Commission. The Commission has determined that the scope and content of this subchapter is unnecessary and does not provide concise useful information for the Commission's filers and the general public. The subchapter is replaced by new sections adopted concurrently with this repeal concerning the Commission's jurisdiction to consider waiver requests; the administrative waiver of fines; and waiver of fines by the Commission.

No comments were received regarding the repeal of Chapter 18.

Subchapter A. FORMS AND REPORTS

1 TAC §§18.1, 18.3, 18.5, 18.7, 18.9, 18.11, 18.13, 18.15, 18.17, 18.19, 18.21, 18.23, 18.25

The repeal is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which provides authorization for the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

The adopted repeal of Chapter 18 affects no other codes or articles. It affects the statutes administered and enforced by the Commission as listed in Section 571.061, Government Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 17,2001.

TRD-200108044

Tom Harrison

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: January 6, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5787


Subchapter B. CORRECTED REPORTS

1 TAC §§18.41, 18.43, 18.45, 18.47, 18.49

The repeal is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which provides authorization for the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

The adopted repeal of Chapter 18 affects no other codes or articles. It affects the statutes administered and enforced by the Commission as listed in Section 571.061, Government Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 17, 2001.

TRD-200108045

Tom Harrison

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: January 6, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5787


Subchapter C. LATE REPORTS

1 TAC §§18.61, 18.63, 18.65, 18.67, 18.69

The repeal is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which provides authorization for the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

The adopted repeal of Chapter 18 affects no other codes or articles. It affects the statutes administered and enforced by the Commission as listed in Section 571.061, Government Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 17, 2001.

TRD-200108046

Tom Harrison

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: January 6, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5787


Subchapter D. ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES

1 TAC §§18.81, 18.83, 18.85, 18.87, 18.89, 18.91, 18.93, 18.95, 18.97

The repeal is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which provides authorization for the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

The adopted repeal of Chapter 18 affects no other codes or articles. It affects the statutes administered and enforced by the Commission as listed in Section 571.061, Government Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 17, 2001.

TRD-200108047

Tom Harrison

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: January 6, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5787


Subchapter E. WAIVER OF FINE

1 TAC §§18.111, 18.113, 18.115

The repeal is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which provides authorization for the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

The adopted repeal of Chapter 18 affects no other codes or articles. It affects the statutes administered and enforced by the Commission as listed in Section 571.061, Government Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 17, 2001.

TRD-200108049

Tom Harrison

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: January 6, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5787


Chapter 18. GENERAL RULES CONCERNING REPORTS

1 TAC §§18.1, 18.3, 18.5, 18.7, 18.9, 18.11, 18.13, 18.15, 18.17, 18.19, 18.21, 18.23, 18.25, 18.27

The Texas Ethics Commission adopts new 1 T.A.C. Chapter 18, §§18.1, 18.3, 18.5, 18.7, 18.9, 18.11, 18.13, 18.15, 18.17, 18.19, 18.21, 18.23, 18.25, and 18.27, regarding general rules concerning reports filed with the Texas Ethics Commission. Sections 18.1, 18.3, 18.5, 18.7, 18.11, 18.17, 18.19, 18.21, 18.23, 18.25, and 18.27 are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the November 9, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8933) and will not be republished. Sections 18.9, 18.13, and 18.15 are adopted with changes. Section 18.9 was changed to correct typographic errors. The cross-reference in subsections (c) and (d) was corrected to read §18.27(b). Section 18.13 was changed to add subsection (d), concerning fines imposed on filers who file a late report and who did not file two or more previous reports by the applicable deadline. Section 18.15 was changed to delete subsections (b) and (c) and add "subject to the statutory limit" to the end of the language that was proposed as subsection (a). The new chapter provides concise information that will be easier to understand and apply by the Commission's filers and the general public. The new provisions cover the Commission's forms; provision of forms by local filing authorities; specification of office sought or held; timely reports; corrected reports; late reports; fines; and waiver of fines.

No comments were received regarding Chapter 18.

The chapter is adopted under Government Code, Chapter 571, Section 571.062, which provides authorization for the commission to adopt rules concerning the laws administered and enforced by the commission.

The adoption of new Chapter 18 affects no other codes or articles. It affects the statutes administered and enforced by the Commission as listed in Section 571.061, Government Code.

§18.9.Corrected Reports.

(a) A filer may correct a report filed with the commission or a local filing authority at any time.

(b) A corrected report must clearly identify how the corrected report is different from the report being corrected.

(c) Except as provided by section 18.27(b), the late fine for a report that is corrected, other than a report due eight days before an election, is waived if:

(1) the original report was filed by the applicable filing deadline;

(2) the corrected report is complete and accurate; and

(3) the filer establishes, in accordance with subsection (e), that the original report was incomplete or incorrect because of a good-faith error.

(d) Except as provided by section 18.27(b), the late fine for a report due eight days before an election that is corrected is waived if:

(1) the requirements for waiver under subsection (c) are satisfied; and

(2) the corrected report corrects minor errors only.

(e) A filer who files a corrected report may submit an affidavit to establish that the original report was incomplete or incorrect because of a good-faith error. The affidavit must:

(1) explain the nature of the error that led to the filing of an incomplete report;

(2) state that the corrected report was filed promptly after the error became known to the filer; and

(3) establish that the filer did not intend to violate a reporting requirement at the time of filing the original report.

§18.13.Fine for a Late Report.

(a) Except for a report due eight days before an election, the fine is $100 for:

(1) a late report required to be filed with the commission under Election Code chapter 254 or 257, Government Code chapter 302, Government Code chapter 305, or Government Code chapter 572; or

(2) a late report filed with the commission under Local Government Code chapter 159, subchapter C.

(b) The fine for a report due eight days before an election is $100 for each day that the report is late, up to a maximum fine of $10,000.

(c) A fine assessed under this chapter is in addition to any other sanction assessed under other law.

(d) The commission may impose a fine of more than $100 against a filer who files a late report and who did not file two or more previous reports by the applicable deadline, except that the fine may not exceed the statutory limit.

§18.15.Additional Fine.

In addition to any other fine assessed under this chapter, the commission may vote to impose a fine against a filer whose report is more than 30 days late or who has not paid an assessed fine within 10 days after receiving the commission notice of lateness, subject to the statutory limit.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 17, 2001.

TRD-200108048

Tom Harrison

Executive Director

Texas Ethics Commission

Effective date: January 6, 2002

Proposal publication date: November 9, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 463-5787


Part 15. TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION

Chapter 355. MEDICAID REIMBURSEMENT RATES

Subchapter J. PURCHASED HEALTH SERVICES

4. MEDICAID HOSPITAL SERVICES

1 TAC §355.8065

The Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) adopts an amendment to §355.8065 (concerning reimbursement to disproportionate share hospitals). The adopted amendment adds references to managed care data and clarifies the language in the rule. There is no change to the graphic in subsection (f), paragraph (2), subparagraph (B). This rule is adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the October 26, 2001, issue of the Texas Register (26 TexReg 8435).

The following comments were received by HHSC concerning the proposed rule. Following each comment is the response from the commission.

Comment: Concerning §355.8065, the Commission received several comments in support of the rule changes in general.

Response: No response from the Commission is necessary.

Comment: Concerning the fixed amount of funds, the commission received two comments that changing the recipients of a fixed amount of funds would advantage some hospitals and disadvantage other hospitals.

Response: The Commission understands the commenter's concerns. However, federal law establishes a fixed amount of funds.

Comment: Concerning inflation methodology in §355.8065(b)(12), one commenter suggested that the commission add specific language similar to what appears in §355.8063, rather than referencing the rule.

Response: The commission agrees and added the language as suggested to the section on inflation methodology.

Comment: Concerning a redundant sentence in §355.8065(g)(3), one commenter suggested its deletion.

Response: The commission agrees and deleted the redundant sentence.

Comment: Concerning §355.8065(e)(5), a commenter suggested that adding the word "urban" to the section would clarify the commission's intent.

Response: The commission agrees and added the word.

Comment: Concerning §355.8065(b)(26), a commenter asked why the state was changing the language regarding state and local revenue.

Response: The commission changed this wording because of inconsistency in interpretation of the word revenue. The commission's intent is for hospitals to report inpatient payments received from state and local governments. The change was made to clarify the language and to improve consistency in the data submitted to HHSC.

Comment: Concerning §355.8065(b)(23), one commenter asked how the commission will determine and verify the number of days for which a patient was eligible for Medicaid but for which claims were not filed.

Response: The commission expects hospitals to furnish sufficient patient record detail to verify that the inpatient services occurred. The commission will then verify the patient's eligibility for Medicaid services for the time in question.

Comment: Concerning §355.8065(b)(9), a commenter asked the commission to consider excluding distinct part units from the calculation of a hospital's gross inpatient revenue.

Response: The commission will consider this suggestion in the future.

Comment: Concerning §355.8065(b)(24), one commenter asked the commission to credit a hospital's potential Medicaid inpatient payments, foregone because of selective contracting, towards its actual Medicaid inpatient payments.

Response: The commission will consider this suggestion in the future.

The amendment is adopted under the Texas Government Code, §531.033, which provides the commissioner of HHSC with broad rulemaking authority; Human Resources Code, §32.021, and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(a), which provides the Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) with the authority to administer the federal medical assistance (Medicaid) program in Texas; and the Texas Government Code, §531.021(b), which provides HHSC with the authority to propose and adopt rules governing the determination of Medicaid reimbursements.

The adopted amendment affects the Human Resources Code, Chapter 32 and the Government Code, Chapter 531.

§355.8065.Additional Reimbursement to Disproportionate Share Hospitals.

(a) Introduction. Hospitals participating in the Texas Medical Assistance (Medicaid) program that meet the conditions of participation and that serve a disproportionate share of low-income patients are eligible for additional reimbursement from the disproportionate share hospital fund. The single state agency or its designee shall establish each hospital's eligibility for and amount of reimbursement as specified in this section. For purposes of Medicaid disproportionate share eligibility determination, a multi-site hospital is considered as one provider unless it has separate Medicaid cost reports for each site. To verify data referred to in this section, hospitals must allow state personnel access to the hospital and its records.

(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following words and terms, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Adjusted hospital specific limit--A hospital specific limit trended forward to account for inflation update factor since the base year.

(2) Bad debt charges--Uncollectible inpatient and outpatient charges that result from the extension of credit. Bad debt charges are used in the calculation of charges attributed to uninsured patients as defined in paragraph (5) of this subsection, and are used only in the limited circumstances described in subsection (f)(2)(D)(iv) of this section.

(3) Charity care--The unreimbursed cost to a hospital of providing, funding, or otherwise financially supporting health care services on an inpatient or outpatient basis to a person classified by the hospital as financially or medically indigent or providing, funding, or otherwise financially supporting health care services provided to financially indigent patients through other nonprofit or public outpatient clinics, hospitals, or health care organizations.

(4) Charity charges--Total amount of hospital charges for inpatient and outpatient services attributed to charity care in a hospital fiscal year. These charges do not include bad debt charges, contractual allowances or discounts (other than for indigent patients not eligible for medical assistance under the approved Medicaid state plan); that is, reductions or discounts in charges given to other third party payers such as, but not limited to, health maintenance organizations, Medicare, or Blue Cross. Charity charges are used in the calculation of charges attributed to uninsured patients as defined in paragraph (5) of this subsection, only in the limited circumstances described in subsection (f)(2)(D)(iv) of this section. The amount of total charity charges must be consistent with the amount reported on the Texas Department of Health's (department) annual hospital survey.

(5) Cost of services to uninsured patients--Inpatient and outpatient charges to patients who have no health insurance or other source of third party payment for services provided during the year, multiplied by the hospital's ratio of costs to charges (inpatient and outpatient), less the amount of payments made by or on behalf of those patients. Uninsured patients are patients who have no health insurance or other source of third party payments for services provided during the year. Uninsured patients include those patients who do not possess health insurance that would apply to the service for which the individual sought treatment.

(6) Cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient only)--Hospital's overall inpatient cost-to-charge ratio, as determined from its Medicaid cost report it submitted for its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. The latest available Medicaid cost report will be used in the absence of the cost report for the hospital fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year.

(7) Cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient)--Hospital's overall cost-to-charge ratio, as determined from its Medicaid cost report it submitted for its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. The latest available Medicaid cost report will be used in the absence of the cost report for the hospital fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year.

(8) Financially indigent--An uninsured or underinsured person who is accepted for care with no obligation or a discounted obligation to pay for the services rendered based on the hospital's eligibility system.

(9) Gross inpatient revenue--Amount of gross inpatient revenue (charges) reported by the hospital in the appropriate part of the Medicaid cost report it submitted for its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. Gross inpatient revenue excludes revenue related to the professional services of hospital-based physicians, swing bed facilities, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, and other revenue that is unidentified. The latest available Medicaid cost report will be used in the absence of the cost report for the hospital fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year.

(10) Hospital eligibility criteria--The financial criteria used by a hospital to determine if a patient is eligible for charity care. The system includes income levels and means testing indexed to the federal poverty guidelines; provided, however that a hospital may not establish an eligibility system that sets the income level eligible for charity care lower than that required by counties under the Texas Health and Safety Code, §61.023, or higher, in the case of the financially indigent, than 200% of the federal poverty guidelines. A hospital may determine that a person is financially or medically indigent pursuant to the hospital's eligibility system after health care services are provided.

(11) Hospital specific limit--The sum of the following two measurements:

(A) the Medicaid shortfall; and

(B) cost of services to uninsured patients.

(12) Inflation update factor--The commission or its designee applies a cost of living index to a hospital's unreimbursed Medicaid costs and its cost of treating uninsured patients. The index used is the greater of:

(A) the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Market Basket Forecast (PPS Hospital Input Price Index) based on the report issued for the federal fiscal year quarter ending in March of each year, adjusted for the state fiscal year by summing one-third of the annual forecasted rate of the index for the current calendar year and two-thirds of the annual forecasted rate of the index for the next calendar year; or

(B) an amount determined by selecting the lesser of the following two measures:

(i) the change in total charges per case for the latest year available compared to total charges per case for the previous year; or

(ii) the change in the Texas medical consumer price index-urban (that is, the arithmetic mean of the Houston and Dallas/Fort Worth medical consumer price indices for urban consumers) for the latest year available compared to the Texas medical consumer price index-urban for the previous year.

(13) Low-income days--Number of days derived by multiplying a hospital's total inpatient census days by its low-income utilization rate.

(14) Low-income utilization rate--The result of the following computation: ((Title XIX inpatient hospital payments plus inpatient payments received from state and local governments) divided by (gross inpatient revenue multiplied by cost-to-charge ratio)) plus ((total inpatient charity charges minus inpatient payments received from state and local governments) divided by (gross inpatient revenue)).

(15) Medicaid inpatient utilization rate--Fraction expressed as a percentage, the numerator of which is the hospital's number of inpatient days attributable to patients who (for these days) were eligible for medical assistance under a state plan, and the denominator of which is the total number of the hospital's inpatient days in that period. The term "inpatient day" includes each day in which an individual (including a newborn) is an inpatient in the hospital, whether or not the individual is in a specialized ward and whether or not the individual remains in the hospital for lack of suitable placement elsewhere.

(16) Medicaid shortfall--The cost of services (inpatient and outpatient) furnished to Medicaid patients, less the amount paid under the nondisproportionate share hospital payment method under the state plan.

(17) Medically indigent--A person whose medical or hospital bills after payment by third-party payers exceed a specified percentage of the patient's annual gross income, determined in accordance with the hospital's eligibility system, and the person is financially unable to pay the remaining bill.

(18) Medicare inpatient utilization rate--Medicare inpatient days divided by total inpatient census days.

(19) Payments received--Payments received from uninsured patients from or on behalf of uninsured patients as defined in paragraph (5) of this subsection.

(20) Rural area--Area outside a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or a Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (PMSA). MSA and PMSA are defined by the Office of Management and Budget.

(21) Total inpatient census days--Total number of a hospital's inpatient census days during its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year.

(22) Total inpatient charity charges--Total amount (excluding bad debt charges) of the hospital's charges for inpatient hospital services attributed to charity care (care provided to individuals who have no source of payment, third-party or personal resources) in a cost reporting period. The total inpatient charges attributable to charity care does not include contractual allowances and discounts (other than for indigent patients not eligible for medical assistance under an approved Medicaid State Plan); that is, reduction or discounts, in charges given to other third-party payers such as but not limited to HMOs, Medicare, or Blue Cross. The amount of total inpatient charity charges must be consistent with the amount reported on the commission or its designee's annual hospital survey.

(23) Total Medicaid inpatient days--Total number of Title XIX inpatient days based on the latest available state fiscal year data for patients eligible for Title XIX benefits. The term excludes days for patients who are covered for services which are fully or partially reimbursable by Medicare. The term includes Medicaid-eligible days of care billed to managed care organizations. Total Medicaid inpatient days includes days that were denied payment for reasons other than eligibility. Included are inpatient days of care provided to patients eligible for Medicaid at the time the service was provided, regardless of whether the claim was filed or paid. These denied claims include, but are not limited to, claims for patients whose spell of illness limits are exhausted, or claims that were filed late. The term excludes days attributable to Medicaid patients between the ages of 21 and 65 who live in an institution for mental diseases. The term includes days attributable to individuals eligible for Medicaid in other states. Total Medicaid inpatient days includes days with dates of admissions between September 1 and August 31 (state fiscal year) and claims finalized dates within the fiscal year and for nine months after the end of the fiscal year (May 31).

(24) Total Medicaid inpatient hospital payments--Total amount of Title XIX funds, excluding Medicaid disproportionate share funds, a hospital received for admissions during the latest available state fiscal year for inpatient services. The term includes dollars received by a hospital for inpatient services from managed care organizations. The term includes Medicaid inpatient payments received by a hospital for patients eligible for Medicaid in other states. Total Medicaid inpatient hospital payments includes payments associated with dates of admissions between September 1 and August 31 (state fiscal year) and dates of payments within the fiscal year and for nine months after the end of the fiscal year (May 31).

(25) Total operating costs--Total operating costs of a hospital during its fiscal year ending in the calendar year before the start of the current federal fiscal year, according to the hospital's Medicaid cost report (tentative, or final audited cost report, if available).

(26) Total state and local revenue--Total amount of state and local payments a hospital received for inpatient care, excluding all Title XIX payments, during its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. Sources of state and local payments include but are not limited to County Indigent Health Care, Children with Special Health Care Needs, Kidney Health Care, and tax funds. Payment sources containing federal dollars are not to be included in state and local payments. These sources include, but are not limited to: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Ryan White Title I, Ryan White Title II, Ryan White Title III, and TRICARE Foundation Health, Medicare, and Medicare/Medicaid contractual funds and allowances. The commission or its designee adjusts tax dollars for hospitals that report all or none of their tax dollars received as inpatient tax dollars. To make adjustments, the commission or its designee uses the appropriate parts of the Medicaid cost report that the hospital submitted for its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year.

(27) Urban--Area inside an MSA or PMSA.

(28) Weighted low-income days--Low-income days multiplied by an appropriate weighing factor.

(29) Weighted Medicaid days--Medicaid days multiplied by an appropriate weighing factor.

(30) Available fund (state mental and chest hospitals)--Sum of 100% of their adjusted hospital specific limits.

(31) Available fund (hospitals other than mental and chest hospitals)--Total federal fiscal year cap (state disproportionate share hospital allotment) minus the available fund for state teaching hospitals minus the available fund for state mental and chest hospitals.

(c) Conditions of participation. Before the beginning of each state fiscal year, which begins September 1, the single state agency or its designee shall survey Medicaid hospitals to determine which hospitals meet the state's conditions of participation. Hospitals must allow state personnel access to the hospital and its records to ensure compliance with the conditions of participation. Failure to meet all of the conditions of participation shall result in ineligibility for participation in the program. These conditions of participation do not apply to state-owned teaching hospitals as specified in §355.8067 of this title (relating to Disproportionate Share Hospital Reimbursement Methodology for State-Owned Teaching Hospitals). The conditions of participation are as follows.

(1) Hospital eligibility criteria for indigent patients needing medical care. Each Medicaid hospital must submit to the state Medicaid director its hospital eligibility criteria for indigent patients and the procedures for identifying those indigent patients eligible for emergency and nonemergency medical care. Hospital eligibility criteria should address financially indigent people as well as the medically indigent and are indexed to the federal poverty guidelines. Hospitals must identify the number of patients to whom they provide charity care and must make available to state personnel sufficient records to document the amount of charity care provided to those patients. A hospital must allow state personnel to observe the implementation of its stated charity policy and must permit state personnel access to the hospital or its records evidencing charity care. Exception: State mental hospitals and state chest hospitals are exempt. Indigent care criteria for these hospitals are defined in state law.

(2) Charity charge requirements. Exceptions: Urban hospitals with combined Medicaid and Medicare inpatient utilization rates equal to or greater than 80% are exempt. Rural and children's hospitals with combined Medicare and Medicaid inpatient utilization rates equal to or greater than 65% are exempt. Any hospital that qualifies for Medicaid disproportionate share funds in a state fiscal year, and that did not get Medicaid disproportionate share funds in the previous year, is exempt from this specific condition. State mental hospitals and state chest hospitals are exempt. The ratio of a hospital's total inpatient and outpatient charity charges of a hospital fiscal year must be equal to or greater than 25% of its net disproportionate share payments received in the next state fiscal year.

(3) Posting requirements. Each hospital must annually provide assurances to the state Medicaid director that it posts policies informing patients and prospective patients of its eligibility and charity care. These policies must be posted prominently and continuously in common, patient-entry points. Hospitals must advise all patients of the availability of no-cost medical care and the application procedures. The posting must be in English and Spanish.

(4) Reporting requirements. Each hospital must report receipt and expenditure of Medicaid disproportionate share funds to the commission or its designee at least once a year. Each hospital must maintain records for the receipt and expenditure of its disproportionate share funds for five years.

(5) Community health care assessment. Each hospital, or group of hospitals, must annually furnish to the commission or its designee a copy, developed at the direction of the hospital's governing board, of its assessment of the health care needs of its community. The assessment must contain a socioeconomic and demographic description of the hospital's service area and an assessment of the service area's existing health care resources. The assessment must demonstrate how the hospital is using its disproportionate share funds to address its community health needs. Exceptions: State mental hospitals and state chest hospitals are exempt because their expenditures are governed by state law.

(6) Alternative access to primary care. Each hospital must annually report to the commission or its designee the availability of alternative access (other than emergency care) to primary care in its community. Alternative access to primary care includes, but is not limited to, primary care physician offices, minor emergency centers, and primary care clinics. Hospitals must have plans to arrange for nonemergency patients to receive care that is not in their emergency rooms, unless they can demonstrate that there is no feasible alternative in the community. This kind of plan includes, but is not limited to, a hospital-based clinic for nonemergent patients referred to after triage. Hospitals also must report their progress in treating nonemergency patients apart from their emergency rooms. Exceptions: The following hospitals are exempt from this condition: State mental and state chest hospitals; psychiatric hospitals licensed by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation (TXMHMR); and certain hospitals licensed as "special" by the Texas Department of Health (department) (i.e., long-term care hospitals, ventilator hospitals, burn institutes, and alcohol-chemical dependency hospitals); rehabilitation hospitals; maternity hospitals; college infirmaries; contagious disease hospitals; and hospitals for the terminally ill.

(7) Trauma system. Disproportionate share hospitals must actively participate in the development of a regional trauma system, which includes trauma facility designation as defined in the state trauma laws (Health and Safety Code, §773.111-773.120) and department rules. This condition shall apply only if rules and procedures to designate facilities have been adopted. Exceptions: The following hospitals are exempt from the trauma system condition: State mental and state chest hospitals; psychiatric hospitals licensed by TXMHMR; and certain hospitals licensed as "special" by the department (i.e., long term care hospitals, ventilator hospitals, burn institutes, and alcohol-chemical dependency hospitals); rehabilitation hospitals; maternity hospitals; college infirmaries; contagious disease hospitals; and hospitals for the terminally ill. Pediatric and adolescent facilities are exempt from trauma facility designation requirements until the time that state law authorizes the designation of pediatric and/or adolescent trauma facilities.

(A) Hospitals qualifying for the disproportionate share program for the first time must meet the regional trauma system development participation requirement in the first year of their participation in the disproportionate share program, regional trauma system development participation and application for trauma facility designation in the second year of their participation in the disproportionate share program, regional trauma system development participation and confirmation that a consultation survey has been scheduled or a complete designation application packet has been submitted to the Bureau of Emergency Management in the third year of their participation in the disproportionate share program, regional trauma system development participation and confirmation that a verification or designation survey has been scheduled in the fourth year of their participation in the disproportionate share program and continued participation and completed verification or designation survey in the fifth year of their participation in the disproportionate share program, continued participation and trauma facility designation in the sixth year of their participation in the disproportionate share program, and continued participation and maintenance of trauma facility designation in their subsequent years of participation in the disproportionate share program. By March 1 of each year, the Bureau of Emergency Management reports hospital participation in regional trauma system development, application for trauma facility designation, and trauma facility designation status to the disproportionate share program.

(B) Hospitals shall be designated as trauma facilities under four levels that range from "basic" (stabilization and transfer of major and severe trauma patients) to "comprehensive" (care and management of all trauma patients, plus education and research

(8) Maintenance of effort. Hospital districts and city/county hospitals with greater than 250 licensed beds in the state's largest MSAs and PMSAs are not eligible for disproportionate share payments if local revenues are reduced as a result of disproportionate share funds received.

(9) Two-physician requirement. In order to qualify for disproportionate share hospital payments, each hospital must have at least two physicians (M.D. or D.O.) who have hospital staff privileges and who have agreed to provide nonemergency obstetrical services to Medicaid clients. The two-physician requirement does not apply to hospitals whose inpatients are predominantly under 18 years old or that did not offer nonemergency obstetrical services as of December 22, 1987.

(d) Qualifying formulas for determining disproportionate share status. Each hospital must have a Medicaid inpatient utilization rate, at a minimum, of 1.0%. The single state agency or its designee shall identify the qualifying Medicaid disproportionate share providers from among the hospitals that meet the two-physician requirement and the state's conditions of participation, as specified in subsection (c)(1)-(9) of this section, by using the following formulas. In the case of hospitals that have merged to form a single Medicaid provider, the single state agency or its designee shall aggregate the data points from the individual hospitals that now make up the single provider to determine whether the single Medicaid provider qualifies as a Medicaid disproportionate share hospital. Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals shall receive payments if they merge with other hospitals during the fiscal year, if they continue to meet the two-physician requirement, and if they meet the other conditions of participation. Children's hospitals that do not otherwise qualify as disproportionate share hospitals shall be deemed disproportionate share hospitals. The formulas are as follows:

(1) a Medicaid inpatient utilization rate at least one standard deviation above the mean Medicaid inpatient utilization rate for all hospitals participating in the Medicaid program: Title XIX Inpatient Days / Total Inpatient Census Days;

(2) for rural hospitals, a Medicaid inpatient utilization rate greater than the mean Medicaid inpatient utilization rate for all hospitals participating in the Medicaid program; or

(3) a low-income utilization rate exceeding 25% but not more than 100%. For a hospital, the low-income utilization rate is the sum (expressed as a percentage) of the fractions calculated as follows:

(A) the total Medicaid inpatient payments paid to the hospital, plus the amount of payments received directly from state and local governments for inpatient hospital care, excluding all Title XIX payments, in a hospital fiscal year, divided by a hospital's gross inpatient revenue multiplied by the hospital's inpatient cost-to-charge ratio for the same cost-reporting period: (Title XIX Inpatient Hospital Payments + Total State and Local Revenue) / (Gross Inpatient Revenue x Cost to Charge Ratio).

(B) the total amount of the hospital's charges for inpatient hospital services attributable to charity care (care provided to individuals who have no source of payment, third-party or personal resources), excluding bad debt charges, in a cost reporting period, minus the amount of payments for inpatient hospital services received directly from state and local governments, excluding all Title XIX payments, in a hospital fiscal year, divided by the total amount of the hospital's charges for inpatient services in the hospital in the same period. The total inpatient charges attributable to charity care will not include contractual allowances and discounts (other than for indigent patients not eligible for medical assistance under an approved Medicaid state plan); that is, reductions or discounts in charges given to other third-party payers such as but not limited to HMOs, Medicare, or Blue Cross: (Total Inpatient Charity Charges - Total State and Local Payments) / Gross Inpatient Revenue.

(4) total Medicaid inpatient days at least one standard deviation above the mean Medicaid inpatient days for all hospitals participating in the Medicaid program.

(5) Total Medicaid inpatient days at least 75 percent of one standard deviation above the mean Medicaid inpatient days for all hospitals, participating in the Medicaid program, in urban counties with populations of 250,000 persons or less, according to the most recent decennial census.

(e) Determining disproportionate share status. To determine Medicaid disproportionate share status:

(1) the single state agency arrays each hospital's Medicaid utilization rate in descending order. The single state agency first selects hospitals meeting the two-physician requirement or one of the exceptions to the requirement whose Medicaid utilization rates are at least one standard deviation above the mean Medicaid inpatient utilization rate for all hospitals participating in the Medicaid program. The state considers these hospitals to be Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals;

(2) the single state agency arrays each rural hospital's Medicaid utilization rate in descending order. The single state agency then selects rural hospitals meeting the two-physician requirement or one of the exceptions to the requirement whose Medicaid utilization rate is above the mean Medicaid utilization rate for all hospitals participating in the Medicaid program. The state considers these hospitals to be Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals;

(3) the single state agency then arrays each remaining hospital's low income utilization rate in descending order. The single state agency selects hospitals meeting the two-physician requirement or one of the exceptions to the requirement whose low income utilization rates are greater than 25%. The state considers these hospitals to be Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals;

(4) the single state agency arrays each remaining hospital's total Medicaid inpatient days in descending order. The single state agency selects hospitals meeting the two-physician requirement or one of the exceptions to the requirement whose total inpatient Medicaid days is at least one standard deviation above the mean Medicaid inpatient days for all hospitals participating in the Medicaid program. The state considers these hospitals to be Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals.

(5) the single state agency arrays each remaining hospital's total Medicaid inpatient days in descending order. The single state agency selects hospitals, located in urban counties with populations of 250,000 persons or less, meeting the two-physician requirement or one of the exceptions to the requirement, whose total Medicaid inpatient days is at least 75 percent of one standard deviation above the mean Medicaid inpatient days for all hospitals participating in the Medicaid program in urban counties of 250,000 persons or less, according to the most recent decennial census. The state considers these hospitals to be Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals.

(f) Reimbursing Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals. The department shall reimburse Medicaid disproportionate share hospitals on a monthly basis. Monthly payments will equal one-twelfth of annual payments unless it is necessary to adjust the amount because payments will not be made for a full 12-month period, to comply with the annual state disproportionate share hospital allotment, or to comply with other state or federal disproportionate share hospital program requirements. Before the start of the next state fiscal year, the department determines the size of the available funds to reimburse disproportionate share hospitals for the next state fiscal year, which begins each September 1. The funds available to reimburse the state chest hospitals and state mental hospitals equal the total of their adjusted hospital specific limits. The available fund for the remaining hospitals equals the lesser of the funds remaining in the state's annual disproportionate share hospital allotment or the sum of qualifying hospitals' adjusted hospital specific limits. Payments shall be made in the following manner, unless the department determines the hospital's proposed reimbursement has exceeded its specific limit.

(1) A state chest hospital (facility of the Texas Department of Health) or a state mental hospital (facility of the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation) that meets the requirements for disproportionate share status and provides inpatient psychiatric care or inpatient hospital services receives annually 100% of its adjusted hospital specific limit.

(2) For the remaining hospitals, payments will be based on both weighted inpatient Medicaid days and weighted low income days. The department weighs each hospital's total inpatient Medicaid days and low income days by the appropriate weighing factor. The department defines a low income day as a day derived by multiplying a hospital's total inpatient census days from its fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year by its low income utilization rate. Hospital districts and city/county hospitals with greater than 250 licensed beds in the state's largest MSAs shall receive weights based proportionally on the MSA population according to the most recent decennial census. MSAs with populations greater than or equal to 150,000, according to the most recent decennial census, are considered as the "largest MSAs." Children's hospitals also shall receive weights because of the special nature of the services they provide. All other hospitals receive weighing factors of 1.0. The inpatient Medicaid days of each hospital shall be based on the latest available state fiscal year data for patients entitled to Title XIX benefits. The available fund shall be divided into two parts. One half of the available fund will reimburse each qualifying hospital on a monthly basis by its percent of the total inpatient Medicaid days. One-half of the available fund will reimburse each qualifying hospital by its percent of the total low income days. The department determines whether hospitals in rural areas will receive 5.5% or more of the gross disproportionate share hospital funds for non-state hospitals. If hospitals in rural areas will receive at least 5.5% of the gross non-state hospitals funds, the department will reimburse them using existing principles. If hospitals in rural areas will not receive at least 5.5% of gross non-state hospital funds, the department will reimburse them at 5.5% of non-state hospital funds, using existing principles. Reimbursement for the remaining hospitals is determined monthly as follows.

(A) The single state agency or its designee determines the average monthly number of weighted Medicaid inpatient days and weighted low-income days of each qualifying hospital.

(B) A qualifying hospital receives a monthly disproportionate share payment based on the following formula:

Figure: 1 TAC §355.8065(f)(2)(B) (No change.)

(C) All MSA population data are from the most recent decennial census. The specific weights for certain hospital districts and children's hospitals are as follows:

(i) Children's hospitals are weighted at 1.25.

(ii) MSAs with populations greater than or equal to 150,000 and less than 300,000 are weighted at 2.75.

(iii) MSAs with populations greater than or equal to 300,000 and less than 1 million are weighted at 3.0.

(iv) MSAs with populations greater than or equal to 1 million and less than 3 million are weighted at 3.25.

(v) MSAs with populations greater than or equal to 3 million are weighted at 3.75.

(D) The department or its designee determines the hospital specific limit for each disproportionate share hospital. This limit is the sum of a hospital's Medicaid shortfall, as defined in subsection (b)(16) of this section, and its cost of services to uninsured patients, as defined in subsection (b)(5) of this section, multiplied by the appropriate inflation update factor, as provided for in subsection (g)(2)(E) of this section.

(i) The Medicaid shortfall includes total Medicaid billed charges and any Medicaid payment made for the corresponding inpatient and outpatient services delivered to Texas Medicaid clients, as determined from the hospital's fiscal year claims data, regardless of whether the claim was paid. These denied claims include, but are not limited to, patients whose spell of illness claims were exhausted, or payments were denied due to late filing. See subsection (b)(16) of this section for definition of "Medicaid shortfall."

(ii) The total Medicaid billed charges for each hospital are converted to cost, utilizing a calculated cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient). The department or its designee determines that ratio by using the hospital's Form HCFA 2552, Hospital and Hospital Health Care Complex Cost Report, that was submitted for the fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. The department or its designee uses the latest available Medicaid cost report in the absence of the Medicaid cost report submitted in the fiscal year ending in the previous calendar year. To determine the cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) for each hospital, the department or its designee uses the total cost from the HCFA 2552, Worksheet B, Part I, Column 25, and total charges from the HCFA 2552, Worksheet C Part I, Column 6. The ratio is the total cost divided by the total gross patient charges.

(iii) The commission or its designee determines the cost of services to patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the fiscal year for each hospital. Hospitals are surveyed each year to determine charges that can be attributed to patients without insurance or other third party resources. The charges from reporting hospitals are multiplied by each hospital's cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) to determine the cost.

(iv) Hospitals that do not respond to the survey, or that are unable to determine accurately the charges attributed to patients without insurance, shall have their bad debt charges as defined in subsection (b)(2) of this section, and their charity charges as defined in subsection (b)(4) of this section, reduced by a percentage derived from a representative sample of hospitals to be determined annually by the commission or its designee. The commission or its designee derives the percentages using the following formula; for each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph, the commission or its designee sums the total amount of charges for patients without health insurance or other third party payments. For each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph, the commission or its designee sums the charity and bad debt charges. For each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph, the department then divides the charges for patients without health insurance or other third party payments by the sum of charity and bad debt charges. The commission or its designee then uses the resulting ratio for each specific category of hospitals listed in clause (v) of this subparagraph in the following manner. Individual hospitals that do not respond to the survey, or that are unable to accurately determine the charges attributed to patients without insurance have their hospital's individual sum of bad debt and charity charges multiplied by the appropriate ratio for the specific hospital category. After the commission or its designee has calculated a value for the charges for patients without health insurance or other source of third party payment for each individual hospital, the commission or its designee multiplies each hospital's calculated value by that hospital's cost-to-charge ratio (inpatient and outpatient) to obtain the proxy cost of services delivered to uninsured patients at each hospital.

(v) The representative sample of hospitals is one of the following specific categories of hospitals: urban public, other urban, rural, state-operated psychiatric and nonstate psychiatric. In the event that less than 20% of the hospitals in a specific category provide data to the commission or its designee, the commission or its designee uses the overall ratio calculated for all responding hospitals. The commission or its designee creates additional categories, by submitting a state plan amendment, as it deems appropriate for the economic and efficient operation of the Medicaid disproportionate share hospital program.

(vi) After the commission or its designee determines each disproportionate share hospital's cost of services to patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the year, the commission or its designee subtracts from each hospital's cost of services the amount of payments made by or on behalf of those patients who have no health insurance or source of third party payments for services provided during the year.

(E) The commission or its designee shall trend each hospital's "hospital specific limit" calculated from its historical base period cost report to the state's fiscal year disproportionate share program. For hospitals without a full 12-month fiscal year cost report, the commission or its designee shall convert their costs to annualized hospital specific limits. The commission or its designee shall use the inflation rates described in (b)(12) of this title. The commission or its designee shall calculate the number of months from the mid-point of the hospital's cost reporting period to the mid-point of the state fiscal year disproportionate share program. The commission or its designee shall then multiply the portion of the hospital's cost report year occurring in the state fiscal year by the inflation update factor used for each state fiscal year in the calculation of hospital reimbursement rates for each state fiscal year. The product of these calculations shall be multiplied by each hospital's "hospital specific limit" to obtain each hospital's "adjusted hospital specific limit."

(F) The commission or its designee compares the projected payment for each disproportionate share hospital, as determined by subsections (d) and (e) of this section, with its adjusted hospital specific limit, as determined by subparagraphs (D) and (E) of this paragraph. If the hospital's projected payment is greater than its adjusted hospital specific limit, the commission or its designee reduces the hospital's payment to its adjusted hospital specific limit.

(G) If there are disproportionate share hospital funds left in the available fund for the remaining hospitals, because some hospitals have had their disproportionate share hospital payments reduced to their adjusted hospital specific limits, the commission or its designee distributes the excess funds according to the provisions in this section. For hospitals whose projected disproportionate share hospital payments are less than their adjusted hospital specific limits, the commission or its designee does the following:

(i) calculate the difference between its adjusted hospital specific limit and its projected disproportionate share hospital payment;

(ii) add all of the differences from clause (i) of this subparagraph;

(iii) calculate a ratio for each hospital by dividing the difference from clause (i) of this subparagraph by the sum for clause (ii) of this subparagraph; and

(iv) multiply the ratio from clause (iii) of this subparagraph by the remaining available fund. Remaining Available Fund x

(H) Only those hospitals that are below their adjusted hospital specific limits are eligible to participate in this distribution. The disproportionate share hospital funds remaining in the available fund are distributed to the hospitals that have not already reached their adjusted hospital specific limits. Each hospital's total disproportionate share payment (including the redistribution of excess funds) cannot exceed its adjusted hospital specific limit.

(g) Review of agency determination. The commission or its designee notified hospitals of their tentative eligibility or ineligibility and the estimated amount of payment before the beginning of the state fiscal year. Any hospital, including those hospitals that do not qualify or that contend the amount of payment is incorrect, is allowed to request a review by the state. The actual amount of payment also may vary if a successful review request by one or more hospitals necessitates an adjustment in the amount of payments to the other hospitals in the program. Because of the state's ongoing review of data elements used in the formulas before the first monthly payment, it is possible that a hospital may either gain or lose eligibility after receiving tentative notification, which would also affect payment amounts. The hospital's written request for a review must be made to commission or its designee and must be received within 10 business days after the hospital receives notification of its eligibility or ineligibility. The hospital's request must contain specific documentation supporting its contention that factual or calculation errors were made, which, if corrected, would result in the hospital qualifying for payments or receiving payment in a corrected amount. The state will accept documentation from hospitals seeking reviews for 30 business days after the hospital receives notification of its eligibility or ineligibility.

(1) The hospital's written request for a review must be made to the director of acute care services and must be received by the director within 10 calendar days after the hospital receives notification of its eligibility or ineligibility. The hospital's request must contain specific documentation supporting its contention that factual or calculation errors were made, which, if corrected, would result in the hospital qualifying for payments or receiving payment in a corrected amount.

(2) The review is:

(A) limited to allegations of factual or calculation errors;

(B) limited to a review of documentation submitted by the hospital or used by the single state agency or its designee in making its original determination; and

(C) not conducted as an adversary hearing.

(3) The commission or its designee conducts the review as quickly as possible and makes its decision before the first monthly payment is made for that fiscal year. Hospitals that have requested a review are notified of the results of the review at the time of the first monthly payment. Any adjustments made as a result of these reviews will not exceed the limits of available funds for implementing the applicable disproportionate share program. Once the first monthly payment is made, no additional review or appeal is available to hospitals, with one exception. If a hospital, receiving a tentative eligibility letter and not requesting a review, then receives a letter stating the hospital is now ineligible for DSH funding, that hospital may now request a review of eligibility determination according to the terms of (g)(1).

(h) Disproportionate share funds held in reserve.

(1) Hospitals participating in the disproportionate share program are required to comply at all times with the conditions of participation specified in subsection (c) of this section. If the commission or its designee has reason to believe that a hospital is not complying with the conditions of participation, the commission or its designee notifies the hospital of possible noncompliance. Upon receipt of the notice of possible noncompliance, the hospital has 30 days to demonstrate its compliance with conditions of participation. If the hospital fails to demonstrate its compliance within 30 days, the commission or its designee has the authority to hold that hospital's disproportionate share payments in reserve until the:

(A) hospital can demonstrate its compliance with the conditions of participation;

(B) decision to hold payments in reserve is reviewed and the decision results in favor of the hospital; or

(C) date the last monthly payment in the relevant state fiscal year occurs; whichever occurs first.

(2) If a hospital's disproportionate share payments are being held in reserve on the date of the last monthly payment in the state fiscal year, the amount of the payments is divided proportionately among the hospitals receiving a last monthly payment and is not restored to the hospital. If the hospital demonstrates its compliance with the conditions of participation or if the hospital receives a favorable review decision, the funds are restored to the hospital.

(3) Hospitals that have had disproportionate share payments held in reserve may request a review by the single state agency or its designee.

(A) The hospital's written request for a review must:

(i) be made to the commission or its designee;

(ii) be received by the commission or its designee within 10 days after the hospital's disproportionate share payments are held in reserve; and

(iii) contain specific documentation supporting its contention that it is in compliance with the conditions of participation.

(B) The review is:

(i) limited to allegations of compliance with conditions of participation;

(ii) limited to a review of documentation submitted by the hospital or used by the commission or its designee in making its original determination; and

(iii) not conducted as an adversary hearing.

(C) The commission or its designee conducts the review as quickly as possible and notifies hospitals requesting the review of the results. Once the last monthly payment for the relevant state fiscal year is made, no additional review or appeal is available to hospitals.

(4) If a hospital that is already receiving Medicaid disproportionate share funds closes, loses its license, loses its Medicare or Medicaid eligibility, that hospital's disproportionate share funds are reallocated among the remaining disproportionate share hospitals. If the hospital reopens, as the same hospital type, regains similar licensure or Medicare and Medicaid eligibility during the same fiscal year, that hospital receives monthly disproportionate share payments for the remaining months in the state fiscal year, as determined by the appropriate reimbursement formula and from available funds.

(i) Provision for reduction in federal disproportionate share cap. If the federal government reduces the amount of Medicaid disproportionate share funds allotted to Texas, the state must reduce the net amount allotted to each disproportionate share hospital during the state fiscal year by the same percentage.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 21, 2001.

TRD-200108264

Marina S. Henderson

Executive Deputy Commissioner

Texas Health and Human Services Commission

Effective date: January 10, 2002

Proposal publication date: October 26, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 424-0576