TITLE 22.EXAMINING BOARDS

Part 22. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY

Chapter 501. RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

Subchapter C. RESPONSIBILITIES TO CLIENTS

22 TAC §501.70

The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy (Board) proposes an amendment to §501.70, concerning Independence.

The amendment to §501.70 will apply all applicable independence standards to a CPA or licensed firm in a concise format.

William Treacy, Executive Director of the Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment will be in effect:

A. the additional estimated cost to the state expected as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the independence standards are already applied to CPAs and firm license holders.

B. the estimated reduction in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the independence standards are already applied to CPAs and firm license holders.

C. the estimated loss or increase in revenue to the state as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the independence standards are already applied to CPAs and firm license holders.

Mr. Treacy has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect the public benefits expected as a result of adoption of the proposed amendment will be efficient application and construction of independence standards to CPAs and firm license holders.

The probable economic cost to persons required to comply with the amendment will be zero because the independence standards are already applied to CPAs and firm license holders.

Mr. Treacy has determined that a Local Employment Impact Statement is not required because the proposed amendment will not affect a local economy.

The Board requests comments on the substance and effect of the proposed amendment from any interested person. Comments must be received at the Board no later than noon on February 15, 2002. Comments should be addressed to Amanda G. Birrell, General Counsel, Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, 333 Guadalupe, Tower III, Suite 900, Austin, Texas 78701 or faxed to her attention at (512) 305-7854.

Mr. Treacy has determined that the proposed amendment will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses because the independence standards are already applied to CPAs and firm license holders by the existing rule.

The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed amendment will have an adverse economic effect on small business; if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, then how may the Board legally and feasibly reduce that effect considering the purpose of the statute under which the amendment is to be adopted; and if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, how the cost of compliance for a small business compares with the cost of compliance for the largest business affected by the amendment under any of the following standards: (a) cost per employee; (b) cost for each hour of labor; or (c) cost for each $100 of sales. See Texas Government Code, §2006.002(c).

The amendment is proposed under the Public Accountancy Act, Tex. Occupations Code, Section 901.151 (Vernon 2001) which authorizes the Board to adopt rules deemed necessary or advisable to effectuate the Act.

No other article, statute or code is affected by this proposed amendment.

§501.70.Independence.

A certificate or registration holder in the performance of professional services, including those who are not members of the AICPA, shall conform in fact and in appearance to the independence standards established by the AICPA and the board, and, where applicable, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the General Accounting Office and other regulatory or professional standard setting bodies.

[ (a) A certificate or registration holder must be independent in fact and in appearance when performing an engagement in which the certificate or registration holder will issue a report on financial statements of any client, except for a report in which lack of independence may be cured by disclosure under applicable professional standards.]

[ (b) Independence will be considered to be impaired if, for example, during the period of the professional engagement or at the time of expressing an opinion, the certificate or registration holder:]

[ (1) had or was committed to acquire any direct or material indirect financial interest in the client;]

[ (2) was a trustee of any trust or executor or administrator of any estate if such trust or estate had or was committed to acquire any direct or material indirect financial interest in the client;]

[ (3) had any joint closely-held business investment with the client or any officer, director, partner, or principal stockholder thereof which was material in relation to the net worth of the certificate or registration holder; or]

[ (4) had any loan to or from the client or any officer, director, partner, or principal stockholder thereof other than certain "grandfathered loans" and "other permitted loans" which will not be considered to impair independence.]

[ (A) Grandfathered loans-Loans from a financial institution made under that institution's normal lending procedures, terms, and requirements, and that meet the other specified conditions stated herein. Grandfathered loans must, at all times, be current as to all terms and such terms shall not be renegotiated after the latest of the dates in clauses (i)-(iv) of this subparagraph. Grandfathered loans include those which:]

[ (i) existed as of January 1, 1997;]

[ (ii) were obtained from a financial institution prior to its becoming a client requiring independence;]

[ (iii) were obtained from a financial institution for which independence was not required and that were later sold to a client for which independence is required; or]

[ (iv) were obtained from a firm's financial institution client requiring independence, by a borrower prior to his or her becoming a member of the firm or registration holder, such as:]

[ (I) loans obtained by the certificate or registration holder which are not material to the net worth of the borrower;]

[ (II) home mortgages; and]

[ (III) other secured loans in which the collateral must equal or exceed the remaining balance of the loan at January 1, 1997, and at all times thereafter.]

[ (B) Other permitted loans-Personal loans obtained from a financial institution client from which independence is required which were made under that institution's normal lending procedures, terms and requirements. Such loans must, at all times, be kept current as to all terms. Other permitted loans include:]

[ (i) automobile loans and leases collateralized by the automobile;]

[ (ii) loans of the surrender value under terms of an insurance policy;]

[ (iii) loans fully collateralized by cash deposits at the same financial institution; and]

[ (iv) credit cards and cash advances on checking accounts with an aggregate balance not paid currently of $5,000 or less.]

[ (c) Independence also will be considered to be impaired if, during the period covered by the financial statements, during the period of the professional engagement, or at the time of issuing his report, the certificate or registration holder:]

[ (1) was connected with the client as a promoter, underwriter, or voting trustee, a director or officer, or in any capacity equivalent to that of a member of management or of any employee;]

[ (2) was a trustee for any pension or profit-sharing trust of the client;]

[ (3) receives or had a commitment to receive from the client or third party, with respect to services or products procured or to be procured by or for the client, compensation for other than the performance of professional services that is material in relation to the aggregate normally-recurring fees charged annually to the client for reports on financial statements;]

[ (4) had a commitment from the client for a contingent fee in violation of §501.72 of this title (relating to Contingency Fees); or]

[ (5) had an engagement to provide for the supervision of an individual as provided for in §511.124(a)(1) of this title (relating to Acceptable Supervision).]

[ (d) Independence will be presumed to be impaired if the certificate or registration holder performs audit services, other than for charitable organizations, for a fee that is less than the direct labor cost reasonably expected, at the time the engagement was accepted, to be incurred in performing such services. For this purpose direct labor costs means the total compensation of the person or persons expected to perform the service for the time they are expected to serve on the audit plus all payroll expenses related to such compensation.]

[ (e) A certificate or registration holder's independence may be impaired by a close relative's association with a client. Close relatives are defined as spouses and dependent persons, whether or not related, and defined as dependent and non-dependent children, grandchildren, stepchildren, brothers, sisters, parents, grandparents, parents-in-law, and their respective spouses.]

[ (1) Certificate and registration holders must consider whether the strength of personal and business relationships between the certificate or registration holder and the close relative would lead a reasonable person who is aware of all the facts to conclude that the situation poses an unacceptable threat to the certificate or registration holder's objectivity and appearance of independence. In reaching this conclusion, the certificate or registration holder should consider the specific association with the client.]

[ (2) A certificate or registration holder's independence will be presumed to be impaired with respect to a client if:]

[ (A) during the period of the professional engagement or at the time of expressing an opinion, the certificate or registration holder participating in the engagement has knowledge of a close relative who has a material financial interest in the client;]

[ (B) during the period covered by the financial statements, during the period of the professional engagement, or at the time of expressing an opinion:]

[ (i) the certificate or registration holder participating in the engagement has a close relative who could exercise significant influence over the operative, financial, or accounting policies of the client or is otherwise employed in a position in which the close relative's activities are normally an element of or subject to significant internal accounting controls;]

[ (ii) a proprietor, shareholder, or individual in a managerial position in a certificate or registration holder's office, has a close relative who could exercise significant influence over the client's operating, financial, or accounting policies, if that proprietor, shareholder or individual participates in a significant portion of the engagement.]

[ (f) The examples of impaired independence described in subsections (b)-(e) of this section are not intended to be all-inclusive.]

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 17, 2002.

TRD-200200258

William Treacy

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Public Accountancy

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 3, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 305-7848


Subchapter D. RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE PUBLIC

22 TAC §501.81

The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy proposes an amendment to §501.81, concerning Firm License Requirements.

The amendment to §501.81 will clarify that the rule also applies to sole proprietorships.

William Treacy, Executive Director of the Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment will be in effect:

A. the additional estimated cost to the state expected as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the rule was intended to apply to sole proprietorships and was so applied.

B. the estimated reduction in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the rule was intended to apply to sole proprietorships and was so applied.

C. the estimated loss or increase in revenue to the state as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the rule was intended to apply to sole proprietorships and was so applied.

Mr. Treacy has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect the public benefits expected as a result of adoption of the proposed amendment will be efficient administration of the rule through the explicit inclusion of sole proprietorships.

The probable economic cost to persons required to comply with the amendment will be zero because the rule was intended to apply to sole proprietorships and was so applied.

Mr. Treacy has determined that a Local Employment Impact Statement is not required because the proposed amendment will not affect a local economy.

The Board requests comments on the substance and effect of the proposed amendment from any interested person. Comments must be received at the Board no later than noon on February 15, 2002. Comments should be addressed to Amanda G. Birrell, General Counsel, Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, 333 Guadalupe, Tower III, Suite 900, Austin, Texas 78701 or faxed to her attention at (512) 305-7854.

Mr. Treacy has determined that the proposed amendment will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses because the rule is only clarifying an existing application of the rule.

The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed amendment will have an adverse economic effect on small business; if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, then how may the Board legally and feasibly reduce that effect considering the purpose of the statute under which the amendment is to be adopted; and if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, how the cost of compliance for a small business compares with the cost of compliance for the largest business affected by the amendment under any of the following standards: (a) cost per employee; (b) cost for each hour of labor; or (c) cost for each $100 of sales. See Texas Government Code, §2006.002(c).

The amendment is proposed under the Public Accountancy Act, Tex. Occupations Code, Section 901.151 (Vernon 2001) which authorizes the Board to adopt rules deemed necessary or advisable to effectuate the Act.

No other article, statute or code is affected by this proposed amendment.

§501.81.Firm License Requirements.

(a) A Firm , including a sole proprietorship, may not provide attest services or use the title "CPA," "CPAs," [ "CPA's," ] "CPA Firm," "Certified Public Accountants," "Certified Public Accounting Firm," or "Auditing Firm" or any variation of those titles unless the firm holds a firm [ Firm ] license.

(b) An individual may not provide attest services unless:

(1) the individual has a license or registration issued under the Act; and

(2) the individual offers the attest services through an entity holding a firm license.

(c) Each advertisement or written promotional statement that refers to a CPA's designation and his or her association with an unlicensed entity in the client practice of public accountancy must include the disclaimer: "This firm is not a CPA firm." The disclaimer must be included in conspicuous proximity to the name of the unlicensed entity and be printed in type not less bold than that contained in the body of the advertisement or written statement. If the advertisement is in audio format only, the disclaimer shall be clearly declared at the conclusion of each such presentation.

(d) The requirements of subsection (c) of this section do not apply with regard to a certificate or registration holder performing services:

(1) as a licensed attorney at law of this state while in the practice of law or as an employee of a licensed attorney when acting within the scope of the attorney's practice of law; or

(2) as an employee, officer, or director of a federally-insured depository institution, when lawfully acting within the scope of the legally permitted activities of the institution's trust department.

(e) On the third determination by the board that a certificate holder has practiced without a license or through an unregistered entity in violation of subsection (c) of this section, the individual's certificate shall be subject to revocation and may not be reinstated for at least 12 months from the date of the revocation.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 17, 2002.

TRD-200200259

William Treacy

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Public Accountancy

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 3, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 305-7848


22 TAC §501.83

The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy (Board) proposes an amendment to §501.83, concerning Firm Names.

The amendment to § 501.83 will permit the names of non-CPA owners to be included in licensed CPA firm names.

William Treacy, Executive Director of the Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment will be in effect:

A. the additional estimated cost to the state expected as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the amendment will require no action on the part of the state.

B. the estimated reduction in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the amendment will require no action on the part of the state or local governments.

C. the estimated loss or increase in revenue to the state as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the amendment will require no action on the part of the state or local governments.

Mr. Treacy has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect the public benefits expected as a result of adoption of the proposed amendment will be that the public will not be confused as to the ownership of a licensed firm by permitting non-CPA owners to include their names in the name of a licensed CPA firm.

The probable economic cost to persons required to comply with the amendment will be zero because the amendment requires no more cost by non-CPAs than CPAs.

Mr. Treacy has determined that a Local Employment Impact Statement is not required because the proposed amendment will not affect a local economy.

The Board requests comments on the substance and effect of the proposed amendment from any interested person. Comments must be received at the Board no later than noon on February 15, 2002. Comments should be addressed to Amanda G. Birrell, General Counsel, Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, 333 Guadalupe, Tower III, Suite 900, Austin, Texas 78701 or faxed to her attention at (512) 305-7854.

Mr. Treacy has determined that the proposed amendment will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses because the amendment requires no more cost by non-CPAs than CPAs.

The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed amendment will have an adverse economic effect on small business; if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, then how may the Board legally and feasibly reduce that effect considering the purpose of the statute under which the amendment is to be adopted; and if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, how the cost of compliance for a small business compares with the cost of compliance for the largest business affected by the amendment under any of the following standards: (a) cost per employee; (b) cost for each hour of labor; or (c) cost for each $100 of sales. See Texas Government Code, §2006.002(c).

The amendment is proposed under the Public Accountancy Act, Tex. Occupations Code, Section 901.151 (Vernon 2001) which authorizes the Board to adopt rules deemed necessary or advisable to effectuate the Act.

No other article, statute or code is affected by this proposed amendment.

§501.83.Firm Names.

(a) A firm name may not include descriptive words relating to the quality of services offered or that is misleading about the legal form of the firm, or about the persons who are partners, officers, or shareholders of the firm, or about any other matter. However, names of one or more former partners or shareholders may be included in the name of a firm or its successor.

(b) A firm name is misleading if:

(1) it is not the lawful and registered name of the firm;

(2) the name contains a misrepresentation of facts;

(3) the name indicates character or grade of service which is not based upon verifiable facts;

(4) the name is likely to mislead or deceive because it fails to make full disclosure of relevant facts; the following are examples, but are not inclusive:

(A) the name indicates a geographic area of service which is not based on verifiable facts; or

(B) the firm name includes a non-owner firm employee [ or a non-CPA ].

(5) the name is intended or likely to create false or unjustified expectations of favorable results;

(6) the name implies special expertise;

(7) the name implies educational or professional attainment or licensing recognition of the firm and/or of its owners, partners, or shareholders which are not supported in fact;

(8) the name of the firm that is incorporated does not include the words "corporation," "incorporated," "professional corporation," or "company," or an abbreviation thereof as a part of the firm name; the words "professional corporation," or "PC" are not included with the firm name each time it is used; and the name of a firm organized under the limited liability partnership rules does not include the words "professional limited liability company" or "professional limited liability partnership" as appropriate, or an abbreviation thereof as part of the firm name unless the entity was organized prior to September 1, 1993;

(9) the name includes the designation "and company," "company," "group," "associates" or "and associates" or abbreviations thereof or similar names implying more than one employed licensee in the firm unless there are at least two licensees involved full time in the practice;

(10) the name of a firm that is a partnership or professional corporation fails to contain the personal name or names of one or more individuals presently or previously a partner, officer, or shareholder thereof; except that an acronym may be used for a firm name if the acronym is composed exclusively of the first letters of the surnames of current or past partners or shareholders of the firm;

(11) the name of a firm that is a sole proprietorship fails to contain the name of the sole proprietor; [ or ]

(12) the name implies that a non-CPA owner is a CPA; or

(13) [ (12) ] the name contains other representations or implications that in reasonable probability will cause a reasonably prudent person to misunderstand or be deceived.

(c) A partner surviving the death or withdrawal of all other partners may continue to practice under a partnership name for up to two years after becoming a sole practitioner.

(d) The name of any former partner or former shareholder may not be used in a registered firm name during the period when the former partner or former shareholder has been prohibited from practicing public accountancy or prohibited from using the title "CPA" or "PA."

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 17, 2002.

TRD-200200260

William Treacy

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Public Accountancy

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 3, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 305-7848


22 TAC §501.84

The Texas State Board of Public Accountancy (Board) proposes an amendment to §501.84, concerning Form of Practice.

The amendment to §501.84 will broaden the permissible business structures of licensed firms to reflect that non-CPAs may own interests in licensed firms.

William Treacy, Executive Director of the Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendment will be in effect:

A. the additional estimated cost to the state expected as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the amendment will require no action on the part of the state.

B. the estimated reduction in costs to the state and to local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the amendment will require no action on the part of the state or local governments.

C. the estimated loss or increase in revenue to the state as a result of enforcing or administering the amendment will be zero because the amendment will require no action on the part of the state or local governments.

Mr. Treacy has determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect the public benefits expected as a result of adoption of the proposed amendment will be that appropriate business structures will be utilized by licensed firms owned by non-CPAs.

The probable economic cost to persons required to comply with the amendment will be zero because the amendment requires no more cost by non-CPAs than CPAs.

Mr. Treacy has determined that a Local Employment Impact Statement is not required because the proposed amendment will not affect a local economy.

The Board requests comments on the substance and effect of the proposed amendment from any interested person. Comments must be received at the Board no later than noon on February 15, 2002. Comments should be addressed to Amanda G. Birrell, General Counsel, Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, 333 Guadalupe, Tower III, Suite 900, Austin, Texas 78701 or faxed to her attention at (512) 305-7854.

Mr. Treacy has determined that the proposed amendment will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses because the amendment requires no more cost by non-CPAs than CPAs.

The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed amendment will have an adverse economic effect on small business; if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, then how may the Board legally and feasibly reduce that effect considering the purpose of the statute under which the amendment is to be adopted; and if the amendment is believed to have such an effect, how the cost of compliance for a small business compares with the cost of compliance for the largest business affected by the amendment under any of the following standards: (a) cost per employee; (b) cost for each hour of labor; or (c) cost for each $100 of sales. See Texas Government Code, §2006.002(c).

The amendment is proposed under the Public Accountancy Act, Tex. Occupations Code, Section 901.151 (Vernon 2001) which authorizes the Board to adopt rules deemed necessary or advisable to effectuate the Act.

No other article, statute or code is affected by this proposed amendment.

§501.84.Form of Practice.

A certificate or registration holder may practice public accountancy only in a proprietorship, a partnership, a limited liability company, a registered limited liability partnership, a professional public accounting corporation , or business corporation organized under the laws of the State of Texas or an equivalent law of another state, territory, or foreign country, or as an employee of one of these entities.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 17, 2002.

TRD-200200261

William Treacy

Executive Director

Texas State Board of Public Accountancy

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 3, 2002

For further information, please call: (512) 305-7848