TITLE attorney-general

Opinions

Opinion No. JC-0371

Mr. Jim Nelson Commissioner, Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701-1494

Re: Whether a school district trustee may serve as a volunteer teacher in the same district (RQ-0318-JC)

S U M M A R Y

A trustee of the Pearland Independent School District is barred by the common-law doctrine of incompatibility from simultaneously serving as a part-time volunteer teacher in a regular academic classroom for a single semester.

Opinion No. JC-0372

Mr. Robert J. Huston, Chair, Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087

Re: Whether certain types of property at new facilities qualify for a tax exemption as pollution-control property under section 11.31 of the Tax Code (RQ-330-JC)

S U M M A R Y

Add-on pollution-control devices and methods of production that limit pollution at new facilities are entitled to a tax exemption under section 11.31 of the Tax Code. The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission must administer the tax exemption to grant exemptions to only that portion of property that actually controls pollution.

Opinion No. JC-0373

The Honorable Carole Keeton Rylander, Comptroller of Public Accounts, P.O. Box 13528, Austin, Texas 78711-3528

Re: Whether the value of property subject to a tax increment financing agreement under Local Government Code chapter 374 may be deducted from a school district's total taxable value, and related questions (RQ-0303-JC)

S U M M A R Y

Section 403.302 of the Government Code requires the Comptroller to conduct annual studies to determine the total value of taxable property within Texas school districts. Subsection 403.302(d)(8) of the Government Code requires the Comptroller to deduct from the market value of property taxable by a school district any property value that is subject to a tax increment financing agreement entered into under Local Government Code, chapter 374, subchapter D. The deduction is not optional, but is required by statute.

The predecessor of Local Government Code chapter 374, subchapter D was unconstitutional when adopted. It was not impliedly validated by the 1981 adoption of article VIII, section 1-g of the Texas Constitution authorizing tax increment financing, but it was validated in 1987 when the predecessor statute was reenacted in the codification of laws relating to local government. A municipality may not adopt tax increment financing under Local Government Code, chapter 374, subchapter D unless it holds an election as required by section 374.031(a) of that statute.

Opinion No. JC-0374

Ms. Sandy Smith, Executive Director, Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying ,7701 North Lamar Boulevard, Suite 400, Austin, Texas 78752

Re: Whether a registered professional land surveyor may provide a competitive bid to the primary contractor of a contract with a governmental entity (RQ-0321-JC)

S U M M A R Y

If a governmental entity's contract with a prime contractor requires professional services, either expressly or in fact, then the governmental entity has entered into a contract that includes professional services as a component part and the contract is subject to the Professional Services Procurement Act, Tex. Gov't Code Ann. ch. 2254, subch. A (Vernon 2000). Assuming that the intent of the Texas Board of Professional Land Surveying's competitive-bidding rule is to mirror the Act's prohibitions, then the rule prohibits a surveyor from submitting competitive bids to a prime contractor in connection with a governmental contract, at either the planning and design or construction phase of a project. Although the Professional Services Procurement Act does not obligate a professional to determine whether a contract is subject to the Act's prohibition against competitive bidding, a contract or arrangement entered into in violation of the Act is expressly made "void as against public policy" by section 2254.005. See id. § 2254.005.

Opinion No. JC-0375

The Honorable Mike Moncrief, Chair, Committee on Human Services, Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 12068, Austin, Texas 78711-2068

Re: Whether a contractual requirement that a superintendent of schools attend executive sessions of meetings of her board of trustees violates the Open Meetings Act (RQ-0327-JC)

S U M M A R Y

A contractual provision requiring a superintendent of schools to attend all executive sessions of her board of trustees is valid under the Open Meetings Act, Tex. Gov't Code Ann. ch. 551 (Vernon 1994 & Supp. 2001).

For further information, please call (512) 463-2110.

TRD-200102533

Susan D. Gusky

Assistant Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

Filed: May 4, 2001


Request for Opinions

RQ-0377-JC

The Honorable Delwin Jones Chair, Redistricting Committee, Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 2910, Austin, Texas 78768-2910

Re: Whether the City of Lubbock Fire Department may provide "First Responder" services within the boundaries of the Lubbock County Hospital District (Request No. 0377-JC)

Briefs requested by June 4, 2001

RQ-0378-JC

Mr. Ron Allen, Executive Director, Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-330, Austin, Texas 78701-3998

Re: Whether a veterinarian may dispose of an animal held for nonpayment of fees, and related questions (Request No. 0378-JC)

Briefs requested by June 3, 2001

RQ-0379-JC

The Honorable Leslie C. Acker, Garza County Attorney, 300 West Main Street, Post, Texas 79356

Re: Whether a county may expend funds to expand a child care center (Request No. 0379-JC)

Briefs requested by June 3, 2001

RQ-0380-JC

The Honorable Edwin E. Powell, Jr., Coryell County Attorney, P.O. Box 796, Gatesville, Texas 76528

Re: Release of a "provisional autopsy report" under the Public Information Act (Request No. 0380-JC)

Briefs requested by June 3, 2001

For further information, please call 512-463-2110.

TRD-200102608

Rick Gilpin

Assistant Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General

Filed: May 9, 2001