Part 24.
TEXAS BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS
Chapter 575.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
22 TAC §575.27
The Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners adopts the
repeal of §575.27, concerning Complaints--Receipt, Investigation and
Disposition. The repeal is adopted without changes to the proposal as published
in the March 9, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 1967).
The repeal is needed because the section is outdated and does not reflect
the current complaint procedures of the Board. A new section will be adopted
to replace the repealed section.
No comments were received regarding adoption of the repeal.
The repeal is adopted under the authority of §801.151(a)
of the Texas Occupations Code which gives the Board authority to adopt rules
necessary to administer the Veterinary Licensing Act.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on July 2, 2001.
TRD-200103751
Ron Allen
Executive Director
Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners
Effective date: July 22, 2001
Proposal publication date: March 9, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 305-7555
22 TAC §575.27
The Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners adopts new §575.27,
concerning Complaints--Receipt, Investigation and Disposition. The new section
is adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the March
9, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg
1967) .
The section updates the Board's current practices with regard to filing
and investigating of complaints, informal disciplinary conferences and administrative
law hearings. No substantive changes have been proposed. Adoption of the new
section will explain in clear terms to both the complainant and respondent
veterinarian the Board's procedures in processing complaints and the rights
of the parties involved in the process. By restating these procedures, the
Board will encourage public understanding and acceptance of the Board's complaint
process.
One written comment on the section was received from Susan Hopper, D.V.M.
Dr. Hopper suggested that the Board consider establishing a filing fee for
complaints submitted to the Board. The Board responds that it is not legislatively
empowered to establish a fee. In addition, a fee would have a chilling effect
on the right of the public to file complaints against veterinarians and would
be contrary to public policy set out in the Veterinary Licensing Act. Dr.
Hopper also feels that the Board's investigators do not always obtain statements
from all witnesses in a complaint case. The Board feels that the new section
encourages witnesses with relevant knowledge to come forward with statements.
The respondent veterinarian is urged to provide all relevant information,
including any statements from witnesses, in the veterinarian's response to
the complaint. Finally, Dr. Hopper objects that all complaint information
in the investigation file is not available to the respondent veterinarian
before the convening of the informal conference. The Board notes that the
informal conference is a part of the investigative process and that by law
(Texas Occupations Code, §801.207) the investigative record is confidential.
If a veterinarian does not agree with the results of an informal conference,
the veterinarian has the right to full disclosure of charges and an administrative
hearing before the State Office of Administrative Hearings. The Board does
not propose any changes to the section based on the comments of Dr. Hopper.
An oral comment was received from Mr. Ellis Gilleland of Austin, Texas.
Mr. Gilleland stated that the new section gives too much discretion to the
executive director by allowing the executive director to dismiss complaints
without public review by the Board The Board notes that the current rules
have not been changed in this regard. The executive director makes a determination
as to whether a complaint should be processed based on a recommendation of
an investigator who first reviews the complaint. Because of the large number
of complaints received and the fact that the Board only meets three times
a year, it is not feasible for the Board to review each complaint. No changes
to the section are proposed based on these comments.
The new section is adopted under the authority of the Texas Occupations
Code, §801.151(a). The Board interprets, §801.151(a) as authorizing
it to adopt rules necessary to administer Chapter 801, including rules for
complaint procedures.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State on July 2, 2001.
TRD-200103752
Ron Allen
Executive Director
Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners
Effective date: July 22, 2001
Proposal publication date: March 9, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 305-7555
Chapter 741.
SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGISTS AND AUDIOLOGISTS
The State Board of Examiners for Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology
(board) adopts amendments to §741.1 and §741.41, concerning speech-language
pathology and audiology. Section 741.41 is adopted with changes to the proposed
text as published in the March 2, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 1824). Section 741.1 is adopted without changes
and therefore the section will not be republished.
The adopted amendment to §741.1 defines the term "dispense" and renumbers
the remaining paragraphs in this section. The adopted amendment to §741.41
clarifies advertising of services with respect to the fitting and dispensing
of hearing aids to residents within the State of Texas by facsimile broadcast
and Internet providers. The amendments are a result of the Audiology Practices,
Inc., Petition for Adoption of a Rule, which was submitted in response to
the phenomenal growth in the mail order business through the advent of the
Internet and E-commerce.
The public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections will
be to insure that clients seeking treatment of hearing loss through the use
of amplification devices receive a comprehensive audiological evaluation to
determine the appropriate device needed.
No comments were received on the proposal during the comment period.
A change was made due to staff comments. Concerning §741.41(d)(4),
the word "includes" was changed to "including" to clarify the rule.
Subchapter A. DEFINITIONS
Part 32.
STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS FOR SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY