Part 8.
TEXAS RACING COMMISSION
Chapter 303.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Subchapter D. TEXAS-BRED INCENTIVE PROGRAMS
1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §303.83
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §303.83,
relating to audits, financial statements, and performance measures. The amendment
would require each breed registry to submit a schedule of awards payable in
a format prescribed by the executive secretary.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there
are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated will be increased productivity
and efficiency in the auditing of the breed registries. There will be no fiscal
implications for small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic
cost to an individual required to comply with the rule as proposed. The proposal
has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training,
greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to make rules relating exclusively
to horse or greyhound racing; §6.08 and §6.09, which authorizes
the Commission to adopt rules relating to the accounting, audit and distribution
of all amounts set aside for the Texas-Bred program for horses and greyhounds
respectively.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§303.83.Audits, Financial Statements and Performance Measures.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
Not later than June 15 of each year, each breed registry
designated by the Act shall submit to the commission audited financial statements
regarding its operations. The executive secretary may prescribe the form for
the financial statements.
In conjunction with the financial statements,
each breed registry shall submit to the Commission a schedule of awards payable
in a format prescribed by the executive secretary.
(c)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008900
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
Subchapter B. OPERATION OF RACETRACKS
2.
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
16 TAC §309.117
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §309.117
relating to first aid care on association grounds. The amendment would permit
the associations more flexibility in providing first aid care to patrons and
licensees. The rule would no longer require certain equipment and personnel
but would leave those decisions to the associations, so long as adequate care
was provided. Additionally, the amendment would require first aid care be
available whenever the facility was open to the public, not only during a
live meet.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there
are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rule is in effect the anticipated public benefit is less governmental
regulation of the association operations while continuing to safeguarding
the public health and safety. There may be some cost to those associations
which elect to employee specialized personnel for first aid duties. There
will be no fiscal implications for small or micro-businesses. There is no
anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply with the rule
as proposed. The proposal has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse
breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to regulate every race meeting
in this state involving wagering on the result of greyhound or horse racing; §3.021
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of greyhound and horse
racing in the State.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§309.117.First Aid.
(a)
At all times that an association is open to the public,
the [
[
a first aid room equipped with
appropriately
qualified personnel and
[
[(2)
the services of a basic emergency medical
technician certified after September 1, 1996 or a certified paramedic.]
(b)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008901
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
2.
OPERATIONS
16 TAC §309.355
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §309.355,
relating to the grading system for greyhound. The proposed amendment increases
the number of mixed greyhound races permitted within a one-week period.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, determined
that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there are no fiscal
implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that the anticipated public benefit for
each of the first five years the rule is in effect will be quality racing
and additional wagering opportunities. There is no anticipated economic cost
to an individual required to comply with the rule as proposed.
Representatives of Gulf Greyhound Park presented the amendment to the Commission
as a petition for rulemaking. According to petitioners' oral testimony, this
amendment would increase racing opportunities provided to kennel owners. Therefore,
there may be a long-term increase in profits for greyhound breeding and training
industries. The proposal has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse
breeding, horse training.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to regulate every race meeting
in this state involving wagering on the result of greyhound or horse racing;§11.01
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate wagering on greyhound
and horse races.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§309.355.Grading System.
(a)-(k)
(No change.)
(l)
The racing secretary may schedule
up to eight
[
(m)-(p)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008902
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
Subchapter B. SPECIFIC LICENSES
16 TAC §311.103
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §311.103,
relating to greyhound kennel owners. The proposed amendment would reduce the
percentage of Texas-bred greyhounds required on a kennel owner's active list.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there
are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated will be increased quality
and quantity of greyhound races. However, there may be a slight decrease in
funds awarded under the Texas-bred Incentive Program which may impact small
kennel owners. There will be no fiscal implications for micro-businesses.
There is no anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply
with the amendment as proposed.
Representatives of Gulf Greyhound Park presented the amendment to the Commission
as a petition for rulemaking. According to petitioners' oral testimony, is
an insufficient number of Texas-bred greyhounds racing in Texas at this time.
Therefore, there is a temporary necessity to reduce the percentage of Texas-bred
greyhound required per kennel. Consequently, there may be a short-term decrease
in profit for greyhound breeding and training industries. The proposal has
no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to regulate every race meeting
in this state involving wagering on the result of greyhound or horse racing; §11.01
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate wagering on greyhound
and horse races.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§311.103.Kennel Owners.
(a)-(c)
(No change.)
(d)
Use of Texas-Bred Greyhounds.
(1)
Except as otherwise provided by this section, a kennel
owner shall ensure that at least
20%
[
(2)
During the first two years in which a kennel is under contract
with an association, the kennel owner shall ensure that the following percentage
of the greyhounds on the active list are accredited Texas-bred greyhounds:
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
for the second year,
10%
[
(3)
(No change.)
(e)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008903
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
Subchapter B. ENTRIES AND PRE-RACE PROCEDURES
16 TAC §315.102
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §315.102,
relating to race entry procedures for greyhounds. The amendment would grant
to the association racing secretary the discretion to allow double entries.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there
are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated will be an increased
quality and quantity of greyhound races. There will be no fiscal implications
for small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to an
individual required to comply with the rule as proposed.
Representatives of Gulf Greyhound Park presented the amendment to the Commission
as a petition for rulemaking. According to petitioners' oral testimony, this
amendment would increase racing opportunities provided to kennel owners. Therefore,
there may be a long-term increase in profits for greyhound breeding and training
industries. The proposal has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse
breeding, horse training.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to regulate every race meeting
in this state involving wagering on the result of greyhound or horse racing; §11.01
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate wagering on greyhound
and horse races.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§315.102.Entry Procedure.
(a)-(j)
(No change.)
(k)
In a purse race, there may not be more than two double
entries.
When a full active list is achieved and maintained, a
[
(l)-(m)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008904
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §319.14
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §319.14,
relating to possession of certain substances by veterinarian on association
grounds. The amendment would add substances which are not permitted to be
possessed on association grounds by veterinarians. The amendment also adds
language which will delegate the authority from the executive secretary to
the commission veterinarian to approve the possession of a substance upon
submission of documentation of proven beneficial, therapeutic application
for horses or greyhounds in veterinary journals.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the amendment is in effect
there are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result
of enforcing the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the amendment is in effect the public benefit anticipated will be increased
regulation of substances prohibited on association grounds thereby ensuring
safe and fair racing for the wagering public. There will be no fiscal implications
for small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to an
individual required to comply with the amendment as proposed. The proposal
has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training,
greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules for conducting
horse or greyhound racing and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of horse or greyhound
racing in this state with or without wagering; §3.16 which authorizes
the Commission to adopt rules prohibiting the illegal influence of the outcome
of a race; §6.06 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules relating
to all aspects of pari-mutuel tracks.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§319.14.Possession of Certain [
(a)
Except as otherwise provided by this section, a
[
(b)
Except as otherwise provided by this section,
a veterinarian may not possess on association grounds a prohibited drug, chemical,
or other substance listed as a Class I or Class II substance on the latest
version of the classification developed under §319.304 of this title
(relating to Penalties on Positive Test), unless the substance is on an approved
list developed by the executive secretary.
(c)
The commission veterinarian shall post
the approved lists developed under this section in the commission veterinarian's
office and in a prominent place that will ensure access by veterinarians and
other interested persons.
(d)
A veterinarian must obtain prior written
approval from the commission veterinarian to possess a substance which is
not on the approved list.
[
The
commission veterinarian
[
(e)
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008905
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §319.304
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §319.304,
concerning penalties on a positive test. The amendment delegates the authority
of the Commission to the executive secretary to promulgate a classification
for prohibited substances and a schedule for disciplinary action.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there
are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit in be increased confidence that pari-mutuel
racing will be conducted with the utmost integrity. There will be no fiscal
implications for small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic
cost to an individual required to comply with the rule as proposed. The proposal
has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training,
greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules for conducting
horse or greyhound racing and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of horse or greyhound
racing in this state with or without wagering; §3.16 which authorizes
the Commission to adopt rules prohibiting the illegal influence of the outcome
of a race; §6.06 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules relating
to all aspects of pari-mutuel tracks.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§319.304.Penalties on Positive Test.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
The
executive secretary
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008906
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §319.362
The Texas Racing Commission proposes an amendment to §319.362,
concerning split specimen. The proposed amendment adds language which would
limit the split option to an owner or trainer to the type of specimen that
rendered the positive result. The amendment would also require an owner, trainer
or designee to notify the executive secretary of his/her election within 48
hours of notification. Failure to do so will constitute a waiver of the split
election.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the rule is in effect there
are no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit will be increased confidence that
pari-mutuel racing is conducted with the utmost integrity. There will be no
fiscal implications for small or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated
economic cost to an individual required to comply with the rule as proposed.
The proposal has no effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse
training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2000,
to Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes, Article
179e, §3.02 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules for conducting
horse or greyhound racing and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of horse or greyhound
racing in this state with or without wagering; §3.16 which authorizes
the Commission to adopt rules prohibiting the illegal influence of the outcome
of a race; §6.06 which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules relating
to all aspects of pari-mutuel tracks.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§319.362.Split Specimen.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
The commission veterinarian or commission veterinarian's
designee shall retain
custody of the portion
[
(c)
An
[
(d)
If the retained part of a specimen is sent for testing,
the commission
staff
[
(e)
Notwithstanding this section, a urine specimen will not
be split if less than 50 cc of urine are obtained. In such instances, the
Commission
[
(f)-(g)
(No change.)
(h)
If an act of God, power failure, accident, labor strike,
or any other event, beyond the control of the
Commission
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008907
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
The Texas Racing Commission proposes the repeal and replacement of
Chapter 321 relating to pari-mutuel wagering in accordance with the requirements
of Chapter 1275, Acts of the 75th Legislature, 1997, Section 55 and the General
Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th Legislature, 1997,
Section 167 (167). Such reviews shall include, at a minimum, an assessment
by the agency as to whether the reason for adopting or readopting the rule
continues to exist.
As a result of the Commission's review and meetings with the licensed associations
and industry related organizations, it was determined that a complete replacement
is necessary to reflect the new technology in the pari-mutuel wagering industry.
As part of the replacement of the Commission rules, the agency is complying
with the Section 167 requirements, repealing rules that are redundant with
other statutes or rules, updating existing rules to ensure that they are consistent
with current agency application and interpretation.
Judith Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has determined
that for the first five-year period the rules are repealed there will be no
fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing
the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rules are repealed the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the proposal will be that there will be consistency between the law, agency
and industry practice and the rules. There will be no fiscal implications
for small businesses and micro-businesses as a result of enforcing this repeal.
There is no anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply
with the repeal as proposed. The proposal has no effect on the state's agricultural,
horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training
industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 1, 2001,
to Judith Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
Subchapter A. REGULATION AND TOTALISATOR OPERATIONS
1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §§321.1-321.8
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed
for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to
adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.1.Conduct of Wagering.
§321.2.Pari-mutuel Auditor.
§321.3.Investigations.
§321.4.System Failure.
§321.5.Access to Tapes.
§321.6.Pari-mutuel Track Report.
§321.7.Computer Printouts.
§321.8.Totalisator Systems.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the
Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008912
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.31-321.39
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed
for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to
adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.31. Mutuel Ticket.
§321.32. Expiration Date.
§321.33. Refusal To Cash.
§321.34. Claim for Payment.
§321.35.Cashed Tickets.
§321.36.Altering Cashed Tickets.
§321.37.Cashing Outstanding Tickets.
§321.38.Cancellation of Win Wagers.
§321.39. Teller's Records.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with
the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008913
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.61-321.69, 321.71, 321.72
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed
for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to
adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.61.Actions by Stewards or Racing Judges.
§321.62. Errors in Posted Payoff.
§321.63.Probable Odds.
§321.64.Wagering Explanation.
§321.65. Wagering Interests.
§321.66.Minimum Wager.
§321.67.Activities by Minors Restricted.
§321.68.Wagers by Employees of Commission.
§321.69. Certain Wagers Prohibited.
§321.71.Carryover Pools.
§321.72. Multiple Wagers.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with
the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008914
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.101-321.119
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed
for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to
adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.101.Distribution of Pools.
§321.102.Payoff on Minus Pool.
§321.103.Straight Pools.
§321.104.Win Pool.
§321.105.Place Pool.
§321.106.Show Pool.
§321.107.Daily Double.
§321.108.Quinella.
§321.109.Exacta.
§321.110.Trifecta.
§321.111.Twin Trifecta.
§321.112.Pick (n).
§321.113.Select Three, Four, or Five.
§321.114.Prevention of Start.
§321.115.Quinella Double.
§321.116.Superfecta.
§321.117.Tri-superfecta.
§321.118.Special Wager.
§321.119.Odd-Even.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with
the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008915
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §§321.201-321.210
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed
for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the Texas
Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to
adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.201.Purpose.
§321.202.Simulcasting License.
§321.203.Approval of Simulcasts.
§321.204.Approval of Wagering on Simulcast Races.
§321.205.Simulcast Contract.
§321.206.Duties of Receiving Location.
§321.207.Duties of Sending Racetrack.
§321.208.Emergency Procedures.
§321.209.Simulcasting Officials.
§321.210.Escrowed Purse Account.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with
the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008916
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.232 - 321.235
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission
to adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.232.Negotiation with Horsemen.
§321.233.Purses.
§321.234.Allocation of Purses and Funds for Texas Bred Incentive Programs.
§321.235.Priority of Signals.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008917
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.271 - 321.277
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission
to adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.271.General Provisions.
§321.272.Formation of Common Pool.
§321.273.Distribution of Common Pool.
§321.274.Breakage.
§321.275.Report to Commission.
§321.276.Manual Merge.
§321.277.Failure To Merge.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008918
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
1.
MUTUEL FACILITIES
16 TAC §§321.301 - 321.306
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission
to adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.301.Totalisators.
§321.302.Locking Devices.
§321.303.Stop Betting Command.
§321.304.Final Confirmation.
§321.305.Security for Totalisator Equipment.
§321.306.Access to Tote Room.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008919
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.321 - 321.337
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission
to adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.321.Redundant Capabilities.
§321.322.Record of Stop Betting Command.
§321.323.Odds.
§321.324.Odds Board Control.
§321.325.Retention of Racing Performance Data.
§321.326.Magnetic Tapes.
§321.327.Summary.
§321.328.Unique Ticket Number.
§321.329.Outstanding Tickets.
§321.330.Computer-Produced Reports.
§321.331.System Log.
§321.332.Security for Sub-System.
§321.333.Access to Sub-systems.
§321.334.Power Fluctuations.
§321.335.Comparison of Pool Totals.
§321.336.Loss of Communication Reports.
§321.337.Waivers for Scientific Advancement.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008920
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.351 - 321.363
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Racing Commission or in the Texas Register office, Room 245,
James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal of these sections are proposed under the
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission
to adopt rules for conducting racing with wagering and for administering the
Texas Racing Act.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.351.Pre-race Tests.
§321.352.Totalisator Computer Programs.
§321.353.Duplicates of Programs.
§321.354.Notice of Modification.
§321.355.Console Log.
§321.356.Control of System Use.
§321.357.Reports.
§321.358.Maintenance of Tapes.
§321.359.Access to Computer Equipment.
§321.360.Security Devices.
§321.361.Back-up Procedure.
§321.362.Alternate Power Source.
§321.363.Shut-down Procedure.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 21, 2000.
TRD-200008921
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
Subchapter A. MUTUEL OPERATIONS
The Texas Racing Commission proposes new §§321.1, 321.3,
321.5, 321.7, 321.9, 321.11, 321.13, 321.15, 321.17, 321.19, and 321.21 relating
to mutuel operations; §§321.23, 321.25, and 321.27 relating to wagering
explanations; and §§321.29, 321.31, 321.33, 321.34, 321.35, 321.37,
321.39, 321.41, 321.43, and 321.45 relating to mutuel tickets and vouchers.
The new rules define new terminology, delineate reporting requirements, describe
the duties of licensees and clarify the procedures and requirements for issuing,
canceling, and cashing mutual tickets or vouchers.
The Texas Racing Commission proposes these new sections in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter 1275, Acts of the 75th Legislature, 1997, Section
55 and the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th
Legislature, 1997, Section 167. Such reviews shall include, at a minimum,
an assessment by the agency as to whether the reason for adopting or readopting
the rule continues to exist.
As a result of the Commission's review and meetings with the licensed associations,
totalisator companies and industry related organizations, it was determined
that a complete replacement of Chapter 321 would be beneficial to both the
agency and the public. The repeal of current Chapter 321 is also proposed
elsewhere in this issue of the
Texas Register
.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the new rules are in effect
there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result
of enforcing the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the new rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of
enforcing the proposal will be that pari-mutuel wagering is strictly regulated,
the patrons are protected, and the rules are consistent with current technology.
There will be no new fiscal implications for small businesses and micro-businesses
as a result of enforcing the proposed new rules. Similarly, there will be
no new anticipated economic cost to an individual required to comply with
the new rules as proposed. The proposal has no additional effect on the state's
agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound
training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2001,
to Judith Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §§321.1, 321.3, 321.5, 321.7, 321.9, 321.11, 321.13, 321.15, 321.17, 321.19, 321.21
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.1.Definitions and General Provisions.
(a)
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter,
shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
ASCII formatted flat file--A data file containing structured
data which is both record and field delimited containing only characters found
in the American Standard Code for Information Interchange (ASCII) specification.
(2)
Betting interest--A single race animal or a group of race
animals coupled pursuant to the Rules which the totalisator system designates
as an interest on which a patron may wager.
(3)
Export simulcast--A race simulcast from a racetrack facility.
(4)
Firmware--The system software permanently stored in a computer
or ticket issuing machine's read-only memory or elsewhere in the circuitry
that cannot be modified by the user.
(5)
Guest racetrack--A racetrack facility at which a simulcast
race is received and offered for wagering purposes; a receiving location,
as defined in the Act, §1.03(64).
(6)
Host racetrack--A racetrack facility at which a race is
conducted and simulcast for wagering purposes; a sending track, as defined
in the Act, §1.03(66).
(7)
Import simulcast--A simulcast race received at a racetrack
facility.
(8)
Intelligent Terminal--A terminal or peripheral device which
contains code extending beyond that which is necessary to allow the terminal
to communicate with the central controlling device to which it is directly
attached or to control the presentation of data on the display unit of the
device.
(9)
Log--An itemized list of each command, inquiry, or transaction
given to a computer during operation.
(10)
Major Revision--A specific release of a hardware or software
product, including additional functionality, major user interface revisions,
or other program changes that significantly alter the basic function of the
application.
(11)
Minor Revision--An incrementally improved version of hardware
or software, usually representing an error (bug) fix, or a minor improvement
in program performance which does not alter basic functionality.
(12)
Multi-leg wager--A wagering pool that involves more than
one race.
(13)
Remote site--A racetrack or other location at which wagering
is occurring that is linked via the totalisator system to a racetrack facility
for pari-mutuel wagering purposes.
(14)
Report--A summary of betting activity.
(15)
Resultant--The profit-per-dollar wagered in a pari-mutuel
pool computation.
(16)
TIM--Ticket-issuing machine.
(17)
TIM-to-Tote network--A wagering network consisting of
a single central processing unit and the TIM's at any number of remote sites.
(18)
Totalisator system--A computer system that registers and
computes the wagering and payoffs in pari-mutuel wagering.
(19)
Totalisator operator--The individual assigned to operate
the totalisator system at a racetrack facility.
(20)
Tote-to-tote network--A wagering network in which each
wagering location has a central processing unit.
(21)
User--A totalisator company employee authorized to use
the totalisator system in the normal course of business.
(b)
A reference in this chapter to the mutuel manager includes
the mutuel manager's designee, in accordance with §313.53 of this title
(relating to Mutuel Manager) or §315.36 of this title (relating to Mutuel
Manager.)
(c)
A request required to be made in writing under this chapter
may be transmitted via hand delivery, e-mail, facsimile, courier service,
or U.S. mail.
§321.3.Conduct of Wagering.
(a)
An association shall conduct pari-mutuel wagering in accordance
with the Act and the Rules.
(b)
In conducting pari-mutuel wagering, an association shall
use a totalisator system that:
(1)
meets the requirements outlined in Subchapter B of this
Chapter; and
(2)
is approved by the Commission and the Comptroller.
(c)
An association shall apply in writing to the executive
secretary for approval to offer the types of wagers the association wishes
to offer. An association may offer only the types of wagers the Commission
approves for that association.
(d)
The stewards or racing judges may cancel a pari-mutuel
pool offered by the association for a race if the stewards or racing judges
have concerns about the integrity of the pool or the race.
§321.5.Pari-mutuel Auditor.
(a)
The pari-mutuel auditor is a representative of the Commission
at a racetrack.
(b)
The pari-mutuel auditor shall verify the wagering pool
totals for each live and simulcast performance. The pari-mutuel auditor's
verification of the pool totals is the basis for computing the amount of money
to be set aside from each pool for the following:
(1)
horse purses;
(2)
greyhound purses;
(3)
the State;
(4)
the Texas Bred Incentive Programs;
(5)
the association; and
(6)
the winning wagerers.
(c)
The pari-mutuel auditor shall also assist the executive
secretary, the stewards or racing judges, and the Comptroller in investigating
alleged violations of the Act, the Rules, or the Comptroller's rules relating
to the totalisator system and pari-mutuel operations.
§321.7.Cooperation with Officials.
If the executive secretary or the Comptroller or any employee of the
executive secretary or Comptroller determines a certain cashed or canceled
ticket, cashed or canceled voucher, computer printout, mutuel report, or other
totalisator or mutuel record is needed to perform the official's regulatory
duties, the official shall request the item from the mutuel manager. On receipt
of a request under this section, the mutuel manager shall make the information
available to the official no later than the deadline established by the official.
§321.9.System Failure.
(a)
During a live racing performance, if the totalisator system
is unable to record wagers received or to guarantee the integrity of the pari-mutuel
pools, the totalisator operator shall verbally notify the association's mutuel
manager. The totalisator operator shall state whether the problem can be corrected
and if so, the estimated time needed to correct the problem. The mutuel manager
must promptly notify the pari-mutuel auditor and the stewards or racing judges.
(b)
If the totalisator operator determines that the problem
cannot be corrected before the scheduled end of the race performance, the
operator shall verbally notify the mutuel manager. The mutuel manager must
promptly notify the pari-mutuel auditor and the stewards or racing judges
of that determination.
(c)
The stewards or racing judges, after consulting with the
association and after considering the amount of purses and wagers involved
and the time required to repair the totalisator system, may permit any of
the remaining races in the performance to be run as exhibitions without wagering.
If a race is run as an exhibition under this subsection, the association shall
pay the purses in accordance with the Rules.
§321.11.Access to Magnetic Media.
(a)
An association shall submit a storage plan for all magnetic
media storing computer logs to the executive secretary for approval. This
plan must include sufficient information for the executive secretary to determine
that the information will remain secure, including:
(1)
sufficient space for the totalisator vendor to store all
magnetic media; and
(2)
a storage cabinet that will protect the media from damage.
(b)
An association shall include in its security plans a means
by which access to the magnetic media is restricted.
§321.13.Pari-mutuel Track Report.
(a)
Daily Pari-Mutuel Summary Report.
(1)
An association shall prepare a pari-mutuel summary report
for each day that pari-mutuel wagering occurs at its racetrack facility.
(2)
The pari-mutuel summary report is the association's record
of wagering activities at the racetrack.
(3)
The association shall deliver a copy of the pari-mutuel
summary report to the pari-mutuel auditor no later than 24 hours after the
date of the performance for which the report was prepared.
(4)
The report must contain, by each live and simulcast performance,
the following:
(A)
net handle at:
(i)
the association's racetrack facility; and
(ii)
the outlets wagering on the association's live performance;
(B)
payouts to the wagering public;
(C)
breakage;
(D)
settlements to the host racetrack or guest racetrack;
(E)
all purses earned, broken out by type;
(F)
Texas Bred Incentive Program revenue;
(G)
state tax; and
(H)
association revenue.
(b)
Monthly Pari-Mutuel Recap Report.
(1)
The executive secretary shall prescribe a form for the
monthly pari-mutuel recap report.
(2)
The association shall file with the executive secretary
a recap of pari-mutuel activity on the prescribed form. The monthly recap
of pari-mutuel activity must be filed no later than the 30th day after the
last day of the month for which the report is being filed.
§321.15.License to Provide Totalisator Services.
(a)
To provide totalisator services to an association in Texas,
a totalisator company must be licensed by the Commission as a vendor. The
license application must include:
(1)
a copy of a current written contract to provide a totalisator
system to an association;
(2)
a list of all totalisator personnel assigned to work in
Texas, or on behalf of an association operating in Texas, as described in §321.123
of this title (relating to Personnel Requirements);
(3)
an affidavit stating that the totalisator company and its
employees will comply with the Rules and the Comptroller's rules regarding
totalisator operations; and.
(4)
information of sufficient detail for the Commission to
determine that the totalisator company is in compliance with Subchapter B
of this chapter.
(b)
A contract between the totalisator company and an association
must be submitted to the Commission for approval before the contract's effective
date.
§321.17.Activities by Minors Restricted.
(a)
An association may not permit an individual who is less
than 16 years old to enter the public area of the association grounds unless
the individual is accompanied by the individual's parent or legal guardian.
(b)
An association may not accept a wager from an individual
who has not attained the minimum age required to purchase alcoholic beverages
in this state.
§321.19.Wagers by Employees of Commission.
A member or employee of the Commission may not place a wager or cause
a wager to be placed on a race conducted or offered for wagering in this state.
§321.21.Certain Wagers Prohibited.
(a)
An association may not accept a wager made by mail or by
telephone. A data communications link for common pooling purposes is not considered
a wager for purposes of this section.
(b)
An association may not accept a wager made on credit.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009029
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.23, 321.25, 321.27
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.23.Wagering Explanations.
(a)
An association shall include the following information
in the official live programs and simulcast programs and post in conspicuous
places on association grounds:
(1)
a general explanation of pari-mutuel wagering;
(2)
an explanation of each type of pari-mutuel wagering pool
offered; and
(3)
the expiration date of mutuel tickets.
(b)
Wagering explanations must be reviewed and approved by
the executive secretary before publication.
§321.25.Wagering Information.
(a)
An association shall make every effort to provide accurate
wagering information to the Texas pari-mutuel patron for handicapping purposes.
Examples of such information include:
(1)
the Daily Racing Form;
(2)
the official program; and
(3)
tip sheets.
(b)
If wagering information is inaccurate for a live or simulcast
race and the error is discovered before wagering has opened on the race, the
mutuel manager shall:
(1)
notify the pari-mutuel auditor and the stewards or racing
judges, if available, of the error; and
(2)
not open for wagering on the race until the correct information
is obtained and verified.
(c)
If wagering information is inaccurate for a live or simulcast
race and the error is discovered after wagering has opened on the race, the
mutuel manager shall:
(1)
notify the pari-mutuel auditor and stewards or racing judges,
if available, of the error;
(2)
close wagering on the race;
(3)
announce via the public address system the wagering information
error;
(4)
refund the wagers, or pay prices and manually refund the
wagers placed on the affected race by those pari-mutuel patrons who request
a refund; and
(5)
not reopen for wagering on the race until the correct information
is obtained and verified.
§321.27.Posting of Race Results.
An association shall submit to the executive secretary for approval
a plan for providing live and simulcast race results to the wagering public.
The plan must include:
(1)
methods by which the results will be provided;
(2)
types of results to be provided; and
(3)
the retention period of the race results.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009028
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.29, 321.31, 321.33-321.35, 321.37, 321.39, 321.41, 321.43, 321.45
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.29.Mutuel Tickets.
Each mutuel ticket issued must have printed on its face:
(1)
the name of the racetrack facility where the wager was
placed;
(2)
the name of the racetrack where the race was conducted;
(3)
the number of the race;
(4)
the unique computer-generated ticket number;
(5)
the date the ticket was issued;
(6)
the date of the race for which the ticket was issued;
(7)
the number of the ticket-issuing machine;
(8)
the type of pool;
(9)
the number of each entry on which the wager was placed;
and
(10)
the dollar amount of the wager.
§321.31.Vouchers.
Each voucher issued must have printed on its face:
(1)
the name of the racetrack facility where the voucher was
issued;
(2)
the unique computer-generated voucher number;
(3)
the date the voucher was issued;
(4)
the number of the ticket-issuing machine; and
(5)
the dollar amount of the voucher.
§321.33.Expiration Date.
(a)
A mutuel ticket:
(1)
expires on the 61st day after the last day of the calendar
year in which the ticket was purchased; and
(2)
may not be cashed by an association after the expiration
date for any reason.
(b)
A voucher has no expiration date.
§321.34.Refusal to Cash.
(a)
An association may refuse to cash a mutuel ticket if the
association determines the ticket has been:
(1)
recorded as previously cashed or canceled;
(2)
issued after the stop betting command was issued; or
(3)
altered to appear as a winning ticket.
(b)
An association may refuse to cash a voucher if the association
determines the voucher has been:
(1)
recorded as previously cashed; or
(2)
altered to appear as an outstanding voucher.
§321.35.Claim for Payment.
(a)
An association shall accept a claim for payment if the
association has withheld payment or has refused to cash a pari-mutuel ticket
or a voucher presented for payment. The claim must be made on a form prescribed
by the association. The original of the claim shall be promptly forwarded
to the Commission.
(b)
If a claim is made for payment of a mutilated ticket that
does not contain the information required under §321.29 of this title
(relating to Mutuel Tickets), the association shall make a recommendation
to accompany the claim forwarded to the Commission. The recommendation must
state whether or not the mutilated ticket has sufficient elements to be positively
identified as a winning ticket.
(c)
If a claim is made for payment of a mutilated voucher that
does not contain the information required under §321.31 of this title
(relating to Vouchers), the association shall make a recommendation to accompany
the claim forwarded to the Commission. The recommendation must state whether
or not the mutilated voucher has sufficient elements to be positively identified
as an outstanding voucher.
(d)
If a claim is made for the payment of a mutuel ticket or
a voucher, the executive secretary shall investigate the claim and may:
(1)
order the association to pay the claim;
(2)
deny the claim; or
(3)
enter any other order the executive secretary determines
appropriate.
(e)
A claim may not be made for a lost or destroyed mutuel
ticket or voucher.
§321.37.Cashed Tickets and Vouchers.
(a)
An association shall maintain facilities and use procedures
that ensure the security of cashed tickets and vouchers and the integrity
of records of outstanding tickets.
(b)
The association shall store cashed tickets and vouchers
in a secure area.
(c)
The association shall prohibit individuals other than the
association's mutuel manager from having access to the cashed tickets and
vouchers or to storage areas for outstanding ticket records.
§321.39.Altering Cashed Tickets and Cashed Vouchers.
An association shall ensure that each cashed or refunded mutuel ticket
and cashed voucher is altered in a manner that indicates the mutuel ticket
or voucher has been cashed or refunded, but does not destroy the identity
of the ticket or voucher.
§321.41.Cashing Outstanding Tickets.
(a)
For purposes of this section, an outstanding ticket is
one that was purchased for a race held at least 10 days before the date the
ticket is presented for payment.
(b)
An association shall designate one ticket window where
a patron must cash an outstanding ticket. If the association needs more than
one window, the association must submit a written request for approval from
the executive secretary for additional windows.
(c)
The association may not permit an outstanding ticket to
be cashed at a ticket window other than a designated window.
(d)
At the end of each race day, the mutuel manager shall deliver
to the pari-mutuel auditor:
(1)
a list of the outstanding tickets that were cashed on the
previous race day; and
(2)
a photostatic copy of each outstanding ticket cashed on
the previous race day.
(e)
In the event a photostatic copy can not be provided, the
association will not be held liable for a reader cashed ticket if the association
can produce documentation to support the ticket's existence.
§321.43.Cancellation of Win Wagers.
(a)
An association may not cancel a win wager for more than
$500 on any live or simulcast race offered for wagering by the association,
unless:
(1)
the patron requests to cancel the wager before the patron
leaves the teller's window and before the ticket-issuing machines are locked;
or
(2)
the stewards or racing judges order the wager to be canceled
because of a scratch in the race.
(b)
If a patron desires to cancel a wager that is on the same
mutuel ticket as a win wager that may not be canceled under this section,
the association may cancel the ticket but must immediately replace the win
wager that was on the ticket.
(c)
An association shall post a notice by each automatic ticket-issuing
machine that states that a win wager for more than $500 may not be canceled
except if the stewards or racing judges order the wager to be canceled because
of a scratch in the race.
(d)
An association may adopt a house policy regarding the cancellation
of win wagers that is more restrictive than this section, subject to the approval
of the executive secretary.
§321.45.Teller's Records.
Each pari-mutuel teller for an association shall retain and account
for all mutuel tickets or vouchers cashed, refunded or canceled by the teller.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 27, 2000.
TRD-200009041
Paula C. Flowerday
Executive Secretary
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
The Texas Racing Commission proposes new §§321.101, 321.103,
321.105, and 321.107 relating to facilities and equipment; §§321.121,
321.123, 321.125, and 321.127, relating to general management requirements;
and §§321.131, 321.133, 321.135, 321.137, 321.139, 321.141, and
321.143, relating to reporting and log requirements.
The new rules require the totalisator companies to maintain certain hardware
and software capabilities for the protection of the pari-mutuel wagering system.
The new rules also delineate the duties of totalisator company employees,
specify network requirements, and require the totalisator companies to maintain
certain reports and logs to ensure the proper operation of the totalisator
system.
The Texas Racing Commission proposes these new sections in accordance with
the requirements of Chapter 1275, Acts of the 75th Legislature, 1997, Section
55 and the General Appropriations Act of 1997, Article IX, Acts of the 75th
Legislature, 1997, Section 167. Such reviews shall include, at a minimum,
an assessment by the agency as to whether the reason for adopting or readopting
the rule continues to exist.
As a result of the Commission's review and meetings with the licensed associations,
totalisator companies and industry related organizations, it was determined
that a complete replacement of Chapter 321 would be beneficial to both the
agency and the public. The repeal of current Chapter 321 is also proposed
elsewhere in this issue of the
Texas Register
.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the new rules are in effect
there will be minor fiscal implications for state government as a result of
enforcing the proposal. The agency's computer database will require some additional
programming to facilitate download of wagering data from the totalisator companies.
The exact cost cannot be determined at this time because it will depend on
the number of hours of programming required. The average hourly rate for computer
programming at the agency is $31. There will be no fiscal impact on local
governments.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the new rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of
enforcing the proposal will be that pari-mutuel wagering will be strictly
regulated, the patrons will be protected, and the rules will be consistent
with current technology. Due to the additional documentation and training
requirements, it is anticipated that each of the totalisator companies will
incur a one-time cost of approximately $50,000. These companies were consulted
and have agreed to these implementation expenses. There will be no new fiscal
implications for other small businesses and micro-businesses as a result of
enforcing the proposed new rules. Similarly, there will be no new anticipated
economic cost to an individual required to comply with the new rules as proposed.
The proposal has no additional effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding,
horse training, greyhound breeding, or greyhound training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2001,
to Judith Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
1.
FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT
16 TAC §§321.101, 321.103, 321.105, 321.107
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.101.Purpose.
A totalisator system can be relied upon only if it has an adequate
system of internal controls. The Commission adopts these rules for totalisator
companies and operations to increase the Commission's level of reliance on
the totalisator employees, equipment, programming, maintenance, and operations
in this state and to ensure all totalisator operations maintain the integrity
of pari-mutuel wagering.
§321.103.Facility Requirements.
(a)
Totalisator Room. An association shall provide a totalisator
room to house the main computing and communications equipment and the operator's
terminal at the association's facility. The room must include:
(1)
air conditioning with humidity control to maintain a stable
environment that meets the specifications of the computer equipment manufacturer
;
(2)
a master power switch that allows all or part of the equipment
housed in the room to be turned off in an emergency;
(3)
a smoke/fire alarm system that sounds locally and is tied
into the association's master alarm system;
(4)
fire extinguishers to deal with minor electrical fires;
(5)
an internal communication system connecting the totalisator
operator with:
(A)
the stewards or racing judges;
(B)
the mutuel manager;
(C)
each betting line; and
(D)
the pari-mutuel auditor's office; and
(6)
a private outside line for communication with supervisors,
programmers, or totalisator personnel at other sites.
(b)
Totalisator Room at a Central Processing Location. An association
may contract with a totalisator service that uses a central processing location
off the association's grounds. The association shall:
(1)
provide an on-site totalisator room that satisfies the
requirements in subsection (a) of this section;
(2)
ensure the totalisator central processing location satisfies
the requirements of subsection (a)(1)-(4) of this section; and
(3)
ensure the totalisator central processing location has
a communications system connecting the central processing location operator
with:
(A)
the totalisator operator at the association's facility;
and
(B)
a private outside line for the communication with supervisors,
programmers, or totalisator personnel at other sites.
(c)
Totalisator Room Security.
(1)
The totalisator room housing the CPU that processes wagers
made at an association's facility must be secured at all times. Annually on
a date established by the executive secretary, the association shall submit
to the executive secretary for approval a security plan for the totalisator
room housing the CPU that processes wagers made at the association's facility
. The security plan must include:
(A)
a security system covering the totalisator room and any
other related service, electrical, or equipment room that consists of locking
closed doors and detecting unauthorized entry;
(B)
a system of controlled entry to the totalisator room and
other related rooms, using:
(i)
locking devices on all doors or entry points;
(ii)
controlling the distribution of keys or codes necessary
to unlock the doors; and
(iii)
a sign-in log for visitors escorted by authorized personnel.
(2)
If the totalisator room housing the CPU processing wagers
made at the association's facility is located on property owned or controlled
by the association, the association shall limit entry to the totalisator room
to totalisator, association, and Commission personnel approved by the executive
secretary. The association shall submit a list of the individuals to be approved
for totalisator room access at least two weeks before the first day of each
live race meeting and each time a personnel change necessitates a change to
the list.
(3)
If the totalisator room housing the CPU processing wagers
made at the association's facility is not located on property owned or controlled
by the association, the totalisator company shall limit entry to the totalisator
room in accordance with the totalisator company's policy. The association
shall provide a copy of the totalisator company's policy regarding totalisator
room access to the executive secretary.
§321.105.Hardware Requirements.
(a)
Cash/Sell System.
(1)
An association shall use a cash/sell totalisator system.
The system must comply with these Rules regardless of the location of the
central processing unit for the system.
(2)
A totalisator system must be a multi-computer or multi-processor
system with varying degrees of independence in the transaction processing
and system control functions distributed among the computers. The computers
must be configured so that if one computer actively tracking events fails,
another computer will immediately take over all functions of the failed computer.
(b)
Schematic Chart.
(1)
The totalisator company must provide to the Commission
an overview of the equipment in the totalisator systems in use at the Texas
racetrack facilities the company services. The overview must be a detailed
schematic chart showing the interconnections of each piece of hardware.
(2)
The chart must indicate, where appropriate, the part of
the database each terminal can access as well as the amount and degree of
access each terminal has to the application and operating system programs.
The schematic chart must also reflect the usual and potential user types assigned
to each terminal.
(3)
The schematic chart must be submitted to the Commission
at least two weeks before the scheduled date for system installation and testing.
(4)
If the totalisator company desires to change any component
in the hardware layout, the company must revise the schematic chart and submit
it to the executive secretary for approval before installation.
(c)
Peripherals. A totalisator system must include the following
peripherals:
(1)
a log printer for each computer if the system is unable
to reproduce the logs upon request;
(2)
a master control terminal that allows the operator to execute
routine maintenance and operational functions based on individual operator
identification/authentication;
(3)
user terminals that allow restricted system access to the
mutuel manager, money room personnel, and the stewards or racing judges;
(4)
wagering information screen displays that meet the requirements
of §321.25 of this title (relating to Wagering Information);
(5)
data storage devices to record necessary system data; and
(6)
backup devices capable of recording complete system information
on removable media for storage and restoration.
(d)
Stop wagering devices.
(1)
The totalisator company shall install two separate devices
that activate the stop wagering function of the totalisator system.
(2)
The primary device must be located in or near the stewards
or racing judges, in a location approved by the executive secretary, to issue
the stop wagering command during normal operations and activate the "off bell."
(3)
The secondary "back up" device must be installed in the
totalisator room to allow the totalisator operator to issue the stop wagering
command if a totalisator malfunction or human error prevents the totalisator
system from activating the stop wagering function at the appropriate time.
(e)
Tote Board. The tote board must:
(1)
update the odds on each betting interest in the win pool
at intervals of not more than 60 seconds, and
(2)
allow the stewards or racing judges or a designee of the
stewards or racing judges to post the order of finish, the official sign,
inquiry sign, objection sign, or dead heat sign.
(f)
Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS).
(1)
The computer system must be supported by an uninterruptible
power supply (UPS) to allow for system shutdown if a power failure occurs.
In a system shutdown, all wagering data in the computer at the time of the
failure must remain intact and all race and end-of-day reports must be produced.
(2)
The UPS must be able to supply even power to the totalisator
system, within accepted limits, when a power surge or drop occurs.
(3)
The alarm associated with the UPS must be readily recognizable
by the totalisator operator from inside the totalisator room.
(g)
Ticket Issuing Machines (TIMs).
(1)
A local area TIM, also known as a cash/sell teller terminal,
is not required to be intelligent, but must have an individual identity within
the network.
(2)
The programming of intelligent local area and remote TIMs
must be limited to communication with the main computer, maintenance routines,
and dynamic terminal configuration routines.
(3)
A program related to the production or verification of
the wager identification number printed on a mutuel ticket or assigned by
the main computer may not reside in a TIM.
(4)
A TIM may not access the wagering database except to conduct
the wagering or cashing functions necessary for a teller to serve the public.
(h)
Maintenance. A totalisator company shall provide sufficient
preventative maintenance to a totalisator system to ensure the system hardware
will provide a high degree of reliability. Maintenance must include testing
the UPS for battery life and power stability.
(i)
Common Pooling.
(1)
An association shall use a totalisator system that operates
in either a Tote-to-Tote network or a TIM-to-Tote network. The totalisator
system must, without regard to the location of the CPU:
(A)
meet the requirements of this chapter;
(B)
comply with the Rules;
(C)
use the current version of Inter-Tote Systems Protocol
recognized by the ARCI Tote Standards Committee; and
(D)
uses the current version of Standardized Track codes recognized
by the ARCI Tote Standards Committee.
(2)
An association may common pool if all equipment used is
of an approved type and in an approved location.
(3)
The host racetrack for which a common pool is created must
also provide a totalisator system that:
(A)
directs each totalisator system involved with the common
pool regarding the pools offered, live and scratched race animals, common
pool totals, network odds and probable payout, start and stop wagering commands,
official orders of finish, deduction and payout calculations; and
(B)
produces reports showing the amount wagered on each race
animal and pool from each site, in accordance with the current Inter-Tote
Systems Protocol.
(4)
A totalisator company must have a disaster recovery plan
to allow an association to continue to conduct pari-mutuel wagering in the
event of a disaster at the CPU's location.
(j)
Emergency Procedures.
(1)
The totalisator system must be supported by an uninterruptible
power supply (UPS) as described in subsection (f) of this section.
(2)
A totalisator company must have emergency procedures to
address a totalisator system failure. The procedures will apply whether the
system is operating as a stand-alone wagering site for separate pool wagering
or as a satellite in a common pool network.
(3)
In a Tote-to-Tote network, if system failure occurs at
either the remote site or the host, the pari-mutuel auditor and the network's
mutuel and system managers shall establish the pools for the unaffected sites.
The failure site shall cease wagering. The pari-mutuel auditor shall then
determine when the failed pari-mutuel system may resume operation.
§321.107.Software Requirements.
(a)
General requirements.
(1)
The totalisator system program must be able to:
(A)
sell, calculate, and cash according to the pool profile,
current Rules, and number of races;
(B)
produce the required reports and logs;
(C)
accept advanced wagers;
(D)
network with the remote wagering sites;
(E)
offer simultaneous wagering cards;
(F)
allow access to program functions and identification of
each user based on the user ID's/passwords;
(G)
automatically maintain , all carry-over data required for
the next performance on a rotating basis, including system date and time,
without operator intervention;
(H)
be subject to modification only by individuals holding
specific user ID's that allow gateways to the operating system;
(I)
document changes to production programs, including who
made the change and when the change was made;
(J)
provide software or hardware restrictions that eliminate
the capability of printing duplicate on-line tickets;
(K)
provide software or hardware restrictions that reduce the
possibility of invalid claims on unclaimed winners;
(L)
be able to detect abnormal system operation and the cause,
such as a validation problem, communication difficulty, and computer downtime,
and immediately notify the totalisator operator;
(M)
generate data usable across two major revisions, and within
all minor revisions or retrieve archived data reports requested by the Commission
within twenty-four hours; and
(N)
contain a utility program that backs up the totalisator
system and schedules these backups at regular intervals.
(2)
The operating system must be separated from the application
program. The operating system must be based on identified individual users
and maintain auditable records of those users.
(3)
The totalisator company must provide to the Commission
an inventory of all programs included in the system.
(4)
A totalisator system must be able to produce a copy of
all data necessary to re-create the wagering activity of any race performance
that the executive secretary requests.
(b)
Documentation. Software documentation, using computer software
industry accepted methods, must be available to the Commission upon request.
(c)
Backup. The totalisator system must be backed-up to removable
media. Before beginning operations in this state, the totalisator company
shall submit a backup procedure plan to the executive secretary for approval.
(d)
Changes to Totalisator Software.
(1)
All changes to the software on the central site computers,
peripherals, or firmware changes downloaded to terminals are subject to the
approval of the executive secretary.
(2)
A change to the software may not be initialized or operated
during wagering until tested and approved by the executive secretary. The
daily computer log must show:
(A)
when a change was loaded into the totalisator system;
(B)
the time the work commenced and the time the work was completed;
and
(C)
when the old software was removed from the system.
(3)
If a software problem occurs during wagering operations,
the programmers may make an emergency fix to the totalisator software. No
later than 24 hours after the fix has been made to the software, the totalisator
company shall file a written report with the executive secretary that states:
(A)
the situation that caused the need for the fix; and
(B)
the corrective changes the programmers made.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal
has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal
authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 27, 2000.
TRD-200009044
Paula C. Flowerday
Executive Secretary
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.121, 321.123, 321.125, 321.127
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.121.General Management Requirements
(a)
Programming.
(1)
A totalisator company shall develop and maintain written
procedure manuals that outline structured programming methods used by the
programmers. The manuals must give the programmers sufficient information
to understand the programming methodologies, base operating systems, and maintenance
procedures.
(2)
The totalisator company shall develop and maintain a written
Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) that requires sign-offs at pertinent
checkpoints. The SDLC must address the following or the equivalent as approved
by the executive secretary:
(A)
a procedure for accepting written requests for systems
design or major program changes from users and a method for handling and recording
these requests;
(B)
the feasibility study stage;
(C)
the general systems design stage;
(D)
detailed systems specification;
(E)
program testing;
(F)
system testing;
(G)
conversion; and
(H)
systems acceptance by the totalisator company.
(3)
A totalisator company must develop and follow procedures
to manage all program changes without regard to the complexity of the modification.
The procedures must:
(A)
establish controls to prevent unauthorized and potentially
inaccurate program changes from being incorporated into the production environment;
(B)
regulate both scheduled and emergency changes to ensure
the integrity of the computer system;
(C)
permit revisions of computer programs only after receiving
a written request from a user, submitted on a sequentially numbered change
request form, which is maintained;
(D)
require program changes to be developed, tested, and compiled
only in a test environment that is not connected to an on-line totalisator
network; and
(E)
require all program changes to be thoroughly tested, reviewed
and approved by a totalisator company supervisor before being placed into
production.
(4)
Before a totalisator company may place a major programming
revision into production or transfer any data affected by the revision from
the test environment to the production environment, the totalisator company
must submit a written description of the programming revision to the executive
secretary for approval.
(b)
Totalisator Operations. A totalisator company shall maintain
a written operations manual for each totalisator system. The manual must clarify
the authority, duties, responsibilities, and lines of communication for totalisator
operators and network managers. The manual must contain sufficient detail
to ensure totalisator personnel perform their job duties effectively. The
operations manual must include complete documentation for operation of the
totalisator system and its software, including:
(1)
the duties described in §321.123 of this title (relating
to Personnel Requirements);
(2)
clearly defined restrictions for totalisator room access;
(3)
general block diagrams of program options (menu tree) available
to totalisator operators;
(4)
a glossary of terms used in reports, including formulas
for calculating the displayed results;
(5)
the relationship, if any, between information contained
in reports;
(6)
start-up and shutdown procedures;
(7)
general operating procedures;
(8)
restart and recovery procedures; and
(9)
emergency procedures, including a list of individuals to
notify if a system requires an emergency revision.
(c)
Information to Commission. A totalisator system shall provide
to the Commission on request pari-mutuel wagering data on media readable by
the Commission. The totalisator company shall also provide documentation about
the structure of the data.
§321.123.Personnel Requirements.
(a)
General Requirements.
(1)
A totalisator company must provide necessary personnel
to perform the duties described in the Rules. The totalisator company shall
employ a sufficient number of personnel to ensure an adequate segregation
of duties between the personnel performing the network manager, programmer,
totalisator operator, and technician duties. The totalisator company may use
job titles different from those in the Rules.
(2)
The totalisator company must have job descriptions containing
the experience, education, and organization training requirements for each
of the following totalisator positions:
(A)
network manager.
(B)
programmer/software engineer;
(C)
systems analyst;
(D)
totalisator operator;
(E)
technicians; and
(3)
The totalisator company must certify in writing that its
personnel are properly trained to program, manage, operate, and maintain the
totalisator system. The totalisator company must provide ongoing training
to its personnel and document the training.
(4)
The totalisator company is responsible for the actions
of its personnel relating to the operations and use of the totalisator system.
The totalisator company shall designate an individual to act as a point of
contact for communications between the Commission and the totalisator company.
(5)
With each license application, a totalisator company must
include a list of all certified totalisator personnel assigned to work in
Texas. The list must indicate the position for which each person is qualified.
If a new employee is assigned to work in Texas, the totalisator company must
update the list of certified personnel and provide it to the executive secretary.
(6)
A totalisator company employee may not hold a position
of programmer and totalisator operator simultaneously unless approved by the
executive secretary.
(7)
A totalisator company employee is prohibited from wagering
in Texas while on duty.
(b)
Network Manager. A network manager shall:
(1)
coordinate the totalisator company's totalisator systems
operating in Texas;
(2)
ensure each totalisator operator follows proper procedures
when operating the totalisator system;
(3)
determine the on-site and off-site storage locations for
the back-up media;
(4)
provide information and prepare any report requested by
the association, the executive secretary, or the Comptroller; and
(5)
ensure a current list of personnel is maintained, all totalisator
operators are qualified, and the appropriate pari-mutuel accounts are maintained
within the operating system and application programs.
(c)
Totalisator operator. A totalisator operator shall:
(1)
maintain the communication links to the locations to and
from which the racetrack facility is simulcasting and ensure data is transmitted
accurately;
(2)
consult with the mutuel manager and the pari-mutuel auditor,
if available, when a problem occurs in determining a pool or calculation and
suggest alternatives for continued operation, including possible temporary
restrictions on or suspension of the communication links;
(3)
perform necessary daily performance testing, system initialization,
monitoring of wagering operations, and system shutdown;
(4)
execute established procedures to shutdown system software
and hardware in emergency situations including loss of communication between
computers or peripheral devices, power surges or failures, operating with
a partial system, and restarting the system during a performance;
(5)
perform necessary system maintenance;
(6)
perform daily back-ups as outlined in §321.107(c)
of this title (relating to Software Requirements);
(7)
ensure information is entered in the tote maintenance log
detailing all repairs or modifications to the totalisator system;
(8)
provide to the pari-mutuel auditor an incident report detailing
each unusual occurrence during totalisator system operations including a description
of the probable cause of the occurrence and the corrective action taken;
(9)
maintain a copy of the incident report or enter information
about the occurrence in the system incident log for each unusual occurrence
during totalisator system operations; and
(10)
consult with the pari-mutuel auditor regarding any other
operational issues encountered.
(d)
Technicians. The totalisator company may provide technicians
to service and maintain the totalisator. The technicians perform maintenance
on TIMs and the tote board.
§321.125.Totalisator Network.
Common pools must be merged and calculated at the site the totalisator
company designates as the network-computing center. In a Tote-to-Tote network
or at remote sites, the totalisator company providing totalisator services
for the association must use the Inter-Tote System Protocol endorsed by the
Association of Racing Commissioners International.
§321.127.Data Transmission Protocols.
(a)
An association using a TIM-to-Tote network may use whatever
communications protocol it wishes.
(b)
A remote site is considered part of a Tote-to-Tote network
and is subject to the requirements of §321.105 of this title (relating
to Hardware Requirements).
(c)
If the failure to compile pools or payout winning prices
is isolated to a remote site, the stopping of wagering or the manual cashing
and accounting of tickets need only occur at the affected site. The relevant
information must be transmitted between the CPU and the remote site through
the normal communication link or facsimile machine and must be verified by
the voice link.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009016
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.131, 321.133, 321.135, 321.137, 321.139, 321.141, 321.143
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §
3.021, which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in
this state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on
all matters relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes
the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.131.General Requirements.
(a)
General Requirements.
(1)
A totalisator system must be able to produce hard copy
reports and logs necessary to audit pari-mutuel activity and to recreate any
given day of wagering in its entirety.
(2)
A totalisator company shall retain the information needed
to produce these reports and logs on storage devices for at least 365 days
after the date the wagering occurred.
(3)
A totalisator company shall provide a report or log requested
by the executive secretary no later than 48 hours after the totalisator operator
receives the request. A printed report must have consecutively numbered pages.
Each page of the report must be headed with:
(A)
the name of the race track;
(B)
the date and time (in hours, minutes, and seconds) the
report was produced;
(C)
the performance number if applicable;
(D)
the wagering site to which the report refers; and
(E)
the version of software in use.
§321.133.Pre-Race Reports.
On request by the mutuel manager or pari-mutuel auditor, before starting
wagering each day, the totalisator operator shall print any of the following
reports:
(1)
a System Initialization Report showing:
(A)
the date and time the system was initialized; and
(B)
the identity of the totalisator operator initializing the
system;
(2)
a Configuration Parameter Report showing:
(A)
the pools that may be offered and that are currently operational
in the totalisator system;
(B)
the display cycle frequency, pools, any minimum pool required,
minimum wagers, and means of display of any approximate odds or will-pays
produced;
(C)
the minimum and maximum value of wagers for every pool
that a TIM may accept;
(D)
which TIMs are activated;
(E)
which remote sites may input into the totalisator system;
(F)
the split percentages and payout parameters for each multi-leg
pool offered;
(G)
verification of all operational locking devices;
(H)
the amount of delay between locking switch activation and
actual stop betting or canceling;
(I)
the canceling parameters for regular and supervisory TIMs;
(J)
configurations placed on each TIM;
(K)
the method of breakage and rounding used in calculating
the payout;
(L)
takeout percentages for each host site and for the live
races; and
(M)
federal tax withholding rates and parameters;
(3)
a Race Information Report showing for each live race and
simulcast performance to be offered:
(A)
the pools to be opened, indicating totals starting at zero
and totals starting with money from advance wagering;
(B)
pool summaries of all advance wagering;
(C)
money added due to overages;
(D)
underpayments or money added due to carry-overs; and
(E)
the race animals for each race, showing entries and scratched
animals;
(4)
an Odds Report showing the opening line of odds for the
Win pool; and
(5)
a TIM Report listing the teller's name and location.
§321.135.Race-by-Race Reports.
For each race offered, the totalisator system must be capable of printing
the following reports and have them available for review by the mutuel manager,
and/or the pari-mutuel auditor, if available:
(1)
a Scratch Report showing the time each late scratch was
entered into the totalisator system and the amount of money to be refunded
in each pool;
(2)
a Betting Report, produced immediately on activation of
the stop betting command and final merge of wagering information from all
sites showing:
(A)
the amount wagered and to be refunded for each betting
interest or combination in each pool offered, and the net amount for each
pool to be used for calculating the payout; and
(B)
the final dollar odds for the Win pool;
(3)
a Calculating Price Report, produced before each race is
declared official, showing for each pool:
(A)
the winning betting interests or combinations;
(B)
the winning wagers;
(C)
the minimum payout prices;
(D)
the breakage; and
(E)
the amount paid to the public;
(4)
a Probable Payout Report showing the payouts for the Daily
Double, subject to scratches, cancellations; and dead heats;
(5)
a Scan Report for multi-leg pools of four or more legs,
showing:
(A)
the total wagered in the pool;
(B)
the amounts of any carryover;
(C)
the winners of completed legs;
(D)
the amount of possible winning wagers, based on paying
the winner of completed legs combined with every betting interest entered
in subsequent legs; and
(E)
late scratches in each leg;
(6)
a Race Summary Report, produced before and after the race
results are official, showing as the sum for all pools paid out in that race:
(A)
the amount wagered;
(B)
the amount refunded;
(C)
the net amount to be used for calculating the payout;
(D)
any money added to the pool;
(E)
the actual pool total;
(F)
the total commissions;
(G)
the breakage;
(H)
the amount paid to the public;
(I)
the carryover balances; and
(J)
the liabilities (due to/due from); and
(7)
the Daily Summary Report, produced with the Race Summary
Report, showing the cumulative totals, for each pool and for all pools combined,
of the items listed under the Race Summary Report.
§321.137.End-of-Day Reports.
After wagering has ceased each day, the totalisator operator shall
print the following reports and provide them to the mutuel manager and the
pari-mutuel auditor, if available:
(1)
the Teller Balance Report showing for every TIM operated
on that day including:
(A)
the teller's name or identification number, or a patron
activated designation;
(B)
the total value and number of tickets sold, canceled, and
cashed, separating the outs from the current day's tickets;
(C)
the total amount of money drawn from the money room, including
the beginning draws;
(D)
the total amount of money returned to the money room; and
(E)
a listing of adjustments made to each TIM balance after
each TIM has been individually balanced;
(2)
the Wagering Summary Report showing:
(A)
by wagering site, the amount wagered, refunded, and added
for every pool and for each race;
(B)
the time of day each race's pools closed;
(C)
the commissions deducted, breakage calculated, and amount
paid out for every pool in each race;
(D)
the total value of outstanding tickets before the pools
were opened for the performance, the value of tickets cashed during the performance,
the value of tickets to be added to the outstanding ticket total, and the
new outstanding ticket total; and
(E)
the total value of outstanding vouchers before the pools
were opened for the performance, the value of vouchers cashed during the performance,
the value of vouchers to be added to the outstanding voucher total, and the
new outstanding voucher total;
(3)
the System Balance Report comparing the pool and paid-out
totals obtained by processing the transaction files with the pool and paid-out
totals obtained from the actual calculations;
(4)
the Money Room Balance Report showing cash added and subtracted
from the beginning day's balance resulting from the day's wagering and cashing
transactions; and
(5)
the IRS Report showing the winner's social security number,
the ticket number, amount won, and taxes withheld for each transaction requiring
a Form W2-G.
§321.139.Ad Hoc Reports.
When requested by the pari-mutuel auditor or executive secretary, the
totalisator operator shall produce the following reports:
(1)
an Odds Progression Report showing each successive line
of odds for the Win pool and the time it was displayed to the public;
(2)
a Ticket History Report showing the appropriate portion
of the ticket history log for the requested ticket identification numbers;
(3)
a Terminal History Report showing the portion of the terminal
log requested;
(4)
an Outstanding Ticket Report showing the following information
for uncashed winning tickets retained in the totalisator system:
(A)
the ticket identification number;
(B)
the wagers on the ticket;
(C)
the date and performance for which the ticket is outstanding;
(D)
the value of the winning wagers; and
(E)
the TIM location and number;
(5)
an Outstanding Tickets Cashed Report, for a performance,
race, or pool, showing each outstanding ticket cashed that day, in the form
of the Outstanding Ticket Report, including the identity of the TIM that cashed
the ticket and an indication as to whether the ticket was cashed using a manual
keyboard entry or an automatic machine read;
(6)
a Manually Cashed Tickets Report, for a performance, race,
or pool, showing every ticket cashed that day in the form of the Ticket History
Report, the identity of the TIM that cashed the ticket, and an indication
as to whether the ticket was cashed using a manual keyboard entry or an automatic
machine read;
(7)
a Canceled Tickets Report, for a performance or race, showing
each ticket canceled that day in the form of the Ticket History Report, the
identity of the TIM that cashed the ticket, and an indication as to whether
the ticket was cashed using a manual keyboard entry or an automatic machine
read; and
(8)
a Network Balance Report summarizing the activity and liabilities
for each site within a Tote-to-Tote network.
§321.141.Special Reports.
A totalisator operator shall produce any special report requested by
the Commission no later than 72 hours after receiving the request. The totalisator
system must be able to produce a special report that filters data by:
(1)
performance;
(2)
race;
(3)
pool;
(4)
betting interest;
(5)
TIMs;
(6)
sites; or
(7)
any combination of the indicia in this section.
§321.143.Logs.
(a)
On-Line Logs. The totalisator system must produce various
daily on-line logs. The totalisator operator shall provide a printed copy
of a daily log to the pari-mutuel auditor on request. The totalisator system
must produce the following logs:
(1)
a Teller/Machine History Log showing for every TIM operated
during a performance:
(A)
the time the TIM was opened and closed;
(B)
for each wagering transaction, the wagers made, tickets
issued, and total value of the transaction;
(C)
for each cashing, canceling, or refunding transaction,
the identification numbers of the tickets processed, the wagers paid out,
and the value of the wagers paid out;
(D)
for each cashing transaction, an indication as to whether
the ticket was cashed using a manual keyboard entry or an automatic machine
read;
(E)
the amount of each cash draw and return;
(F)
any special function, including Teller Balance, accessed
through the TIM; and
(G)
the times of day each of the transactions listed in this
subdivision were made;
(2)
a Ticket History Log showing for every ticket issued:
(A)
the identification number of each cashed/canceled ticket;
(B)
the TIM location and number;
(C)
the wagers and their values;
(D)
the cashing/canceling machine location and number;
(E)
the amount paid out;
(F)
the time of day each transaction occurred; and
(G)
an indication as to whether each transaction was manual
or automatic;
(3)
a User Terminal Log showing the time of day of each entry
for:
(A)
each terminal other than a TIM operating during a day:
(i)
each log-on/log-off and the operator's ID code;
(ii)
each command or transaction entered;
(iii)
each Stop Betting, Order of Finish, Official, and Sales
Open command and the device that issued it;
(iv)
each occurrence of loss/restoration of communication between
computers or sites; and
(v)
each occurrence of discrepancy between computers or sites
when comparing databases;
(B)
each TIM operated during a performance:
(i)
each log-on/log-off and the teller's ID code, if applicable;
and
(ii)
each instance of loss/restoration of communication and
the TIM; and
(4)
a System Error Log showing the date and time of each error.
(b)
Off-line Log. The totalisator operator must maintain a
system incident log and make it available on request for review by the pari-mutuel
auditor. The system incident log must include a description of each incident
involving the totalisator system, including system failures, their causes,
and corrective actions taken.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009017
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
The Texas Racing Commission proposes new §§321.201, 321.203,
321.205, 321.207, 321.209, 321.211, 321.213, 321.215, and 321.217, relating
to the regulation of live wagering; and §§321.301-321.318, relating
to distribution of pari-mutuel pools. The new rules authorize the stewards
and racing judges to correct posting errors, determine betting interests,
and issue "stop betting" commands. The rules also establish the types of wagering
pools permitted and the rules for distributing those pools under various scenarios.
Judith L. Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, has
determined that for the first five-year period the new rules are in effect
there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result
of enforcing the proposal.
Ms. Kennison has also determined that for each of the first five years
the new rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of
enforcing the proposal will be that pari-mutuel wagering will be strictly
regulated, the patrons will be protected, and the rules will be consistent
with current technology. There will be no new fiscal implications for small
businesses and micro-businesses as a result of enforcing the proposed new
rules. Similarly, there will be no new anticipated economic cost to an individual
required to comply with the new rules as proposed. The proposal has no additional
effect on the state's agricultural, horse breeding, horse training, greyhound
breeding, or greyhound training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2001,
to Judith Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §§321.201, 321.203, 321.205, 321.207, 321.209, 321.211, 321.213, 321.215, 321.217
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.201.Actions by Stewards or Racing Judges.
(a)
The stewards or racing judges may correct an inadvertent
mistake in the posting of the official order of finish before declaring the
race to be official.
(b)
The decision of the stewards or racing judges regarding
the order of finish is final at the time the stewards or judges order the
official sign displayed on the tote board.
(c)
A ruling by the stewards or racing judges made after the
result of the race has been declared official regarding the order of finish
or an award of purse money does not affect the distribution of the pari-mutuel
pools.
§321.203.Errors in Posted Payoff.
If an error is discovered in the payoff amounts posted on the tote
board, the association shall correct the amounts immediately and announce
the error and the subsequent correction over the public address system. The
corrected amounts shall be used in the payoff.
§321.205.Probable Odds.
The association shall set and print in the official program the morning
line odds for each betting interest in each race.
§321.207.Betting Interests.
(a)
Except as otherwise provided by the Rules, if the stewards
or racing judges determine that two or more race animals entered in a race
have common ties through ownership, the stewards or judges shall join the
animals as a coupled entry.
(b)
If the number of race animals competing in a race exceeds
the numbering capacity of the totalisator system, the highest numbered race
animal and any animals grouped with that animal constitute the mutuel field.
(c)
A coupled entry or a mutuel field is a single betting interest.
A wager on one animal in a coupled entry or mutuel field is a wager on all
animals in the coupled entry or mutuel field.
(d)
In a race with a coupled entry or a mutuel field, the racing
secretary may assign wagering numbers to entries that are different from the
post position numbers.
§321.209.Minimum Wager.
An association may accept wagers only in multiples of $1, except as
otherwise authorized by the executive secretary.
§321.211.Carryover Pools.
(a)
With the approval of the executive secretary, an association
may declare an amount as a cap or may designate specific dates, days, or performances
for a mandatory payout for any pool that may be carried forward to future
performances if it is not won. After declaring the amount of the cap for a
pool or designating specific dates, days, or performances for a mandatory
payout, the association may not change the amount of the cap or a designated
mandatory payout day, date, or performance during a race meeting without prior
written approval of the executive secretary.
(b)
If, at the end of a performance, the amount accumulated
in a pool for which a cap has been declared equals or exceeds the amount of
the cap, the pool shall be frozen until it is won in accordance with the Rules.
(c)
At each performance at which a pool frozen under this section
is not won, all money wagered for that pool at that performance shall be distributed
to the holders of tickets that contain the most winners.
(d)
If at a performance it is not possible to distribute money
wagered for a pool frozen under this section in accordance with the Rule regarding
that pool, all money wagered for that pool at that performance shall be refunded.
(e)
If an association does not designate a specific date, day,
or performance for a mandatory payout of a carryover pool, the pool shall
be distributed:
(1)
at a horse racetrack, at the last performance of the race
meeting; and
(2)
at a greyhound racetrack, at the last performance of the
calendar year.
(f)
If the last performance is canceled, the association shall
place the pool in escrow and the pool and all accrued interest shall be carried
over and included with the appropriate pool at the next succeeding performance
as an additional amount to be distributed.
§321.213.Straight Wagers.
The following wagers are considered to be straight wagers for all purposes:
(1)
win;
(2)
place;
(3)
show; and
(4)
odd/even.
§321.215.Multiple Wagers.
(a)
The following wagers are considered to be multiple two
wagers for all purposes:
(1)
daily double;
(2)
quinella;
(3)
exacta; and
(4)
quinella double.
(b)
The following wagers are considered to be multiple three
wagers for all purposes:
(1)
trifecta;
(2)
twin trifecta;
(3)
pick (n);
(4)
select three, four, or five;
(5)
superfecta; and
(6)
tri-superfecta.
§321.217.Stop Betting Command.
(a)
At the appropriate time before each live race, a steward
or racing judge shall issue the "stop betting" command to activate the locking
control switch and ring the off bell.
(b)
The mutuel manager and the totalisator operator shall ensure
all wagering stops when the "stop betting" command is issued.
(c)
An association may not permit a wager to be accepted or
a ticket to be cancelled after the "stop betting" command has been issued.
(d)
If a wager is accepted after the "stop betting" command
has been issued:
(1)
the mutuel manager, before the race is declared official,
shall inform the stewards or racing judges and the pari-mutuel auditor of
the wagers made after the "stop betting" command was issued;
(2)
the stewards or racing judges, after consulting with the
mutuel manager and the pari-mutuel auditor, shall order the association:
(A)
to refund the wagers made after the stop betting command
was issued; or
(B)
to refund all wagers on the race.
(e)
A wager accepted after the stop betting command has been
issued is not a valid wager and must be refunded. If the totalisator system
cannot document the time at which the "stop betting" command was issued, the
"stop betting" command is presumed to have been issued at the time the starting
gate opened for the race.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009018
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.301-321.318
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.301.Distribution of Pools.
After the stewards or racing judges have declared a race is "official",
an association shall distribute the pari-mutuel pools to the holders of mutuel
tickets who are entitled to share in the respective pools in accordance with
the Act and this chapter.
§321.302.Payoff on Minus Pool.
Regardless of whether a pari-mutuel pool contains sufficient money,
an association shall pay to the holder of a mutuel ticket that entitles the
holder to participate in the distribution of a pari-mutuel pool the amount
wagered by the holder plus a minimum of 5.0% of the wager.
§321.303.Straight Pools.
(a)
An association shall provide win, place, and show wagering
in any race in which five or more separate betting interests are scheduled
to start.
(b)
An association shall provide win and place wagering in
a race in which four separate betting interests are scheduled to start.
(c)
An association shall provide win wagering in a race in
which three or fewer betting interests are scheduled to start.
(d)
The association, with the permission of the stewards or
racing judges, may waive the requirement for a place or show pool in any race.
§321.304.Win Pool.
(a)
The takeout authorized by law is deducted from the total
wagered in the win pool. The balance is the net pool.
(b)
The amount wagered on the winner is divided into the net
pool. The quotient is the payoff price on the winner for each dollar wagered
and it includes the dollar wagered on the winner.
(c)
If a race animal wins and no money was wagered on the animal
to win, the win pool shall be distributed among the holders of tickets on
that animal in the place pool. If there are no tickets on the animal in the
place pool, the win pool shall be distributed among the holders of tickets
on that animal in the show pool. If there are no tickets on the animal in
the show pool, the money in the win pool shall be refunded.
(d)
If a race ends in a two-animal dead heat for first place,
the win pool shall be calculated as a place pool. If a race ends in a multiple-animal
dead heat for first place, the win pool shall be distributed as a profit for
split to the holders of tickets on any of the animals finishing first.
§321.305.Place Pool.
(a)
The takeout authorized by law is deducted from the total
wagered in the place pool. The balance is the net pool.
(b)
The amount wagered in the place pool on the race animals
that placed first and second is deducted from the net pool. The remaining
profits are divided into two equal parts, between the wagers on the winner
in the place pool and the wagers on the animal that finished second.
(c)
With the amount wagered in the place pool on the winner
as the divisor and one-half of the profits of the place pool as the dividend,
the quotient is the profit-per-dollar wagered in the place pool on the winner.
(d)
With the amount wagered in the place pool on the animal
finishing second as the divisor and one-half of the profits of the place pool
as the dividend, the quotient is the profit-per-dollar wagered in the place
pool on the animal finishing second.
(e)
The profit-per-dollar wagered is the resultant. Because
the amounts wagered on the animals finishing first and second must be returned,
the amount deducted from the net pool under subsection (b) of this section
is added to the quotient. The result is the payoff price for each dollar wagered
on the animals finishing first and second in the place pool.
(f)
If a race ends in a dead heat for first place, the place
pool shall be distributed in accordance with subsections (c) and (d) of this
section. If a race ends in a dead heat for second place, tickets on the first
place animal shall be paid in accordance with subsection (c) of this section,
and the remaining half of the place pool shall be distributed as a profit
for split to holders of tickets on any of the animals finishing in the dead
heat for second place.
(g)
If no money was wagered to place on an animal finishing
first or second in a race, the place pool shall be distributed among the holders
of the place tickets on the other animal that finished first or second. If
no money was wagered to place on either of the animals finishing first or
second in a race, the place pool shall be distributed among the holders of
tickets on the first and second place animals in the show pool. If the place
pool cannot otherwise be distributed in accordance with this section, the
money in the place pool shall be refunded.
§321.306.Show Pool.
(a)
The takeout authorized by law is deducted from the total
wagered in the show pool. The balance is the net pool.
(b)
The amount wagered in the show pool on the race animals
finishing first, second, and third is deducted from the net pool. The remaining
profits are divided into three equal parts, among the wagers in the show pool
on the winner, the animal finishing second, and the animal finishing third.
(c)
With the amount wagered in the show pool on the winner
as a divisor and one-third of the profits of the show pool as a dividend,
the quotient is the profit-per-dollar wagered in the show pool on the winner.
(d)
With the amount wagered in the show pool on the animal
finishing second as the divisor and one-third of the profits of the show pool
as the dividend, the quotient is the profit-per-dollar wagered in the show
pool on the animal finishing second.
(e)
With the amount wagered in the show pool on the animal
finishing third as the divisor and one-third of the profits of the show pool
as the dividend, the quotient is the profit-per-dollar wagered in the show
pool on the animal finishing third.
(f)
The profit-per-dollar wagered is the resultant. Because
the amounts wagered on the animals finishing first, second, and third must
be returned, the amount deducted from the net pool under subsection (b) of
this section is added to the quotient. The result is the payoff price for
each dollar wagered on the animals finishing first, second, and third in the
show pool.
(g)
If a race ends in a dead heat for first or second place,
the show pool shall be distributed in accordance with subsections (c)-(e)
of this section. If a race ends in a dead heat for third place, tickets on
the first and second place animals shall be paid in accordance with subsections
(c) and (d) and the remaining third of the show pool shall be distributed
as a profit for split to holders of tickets on any of the animals finishing
in the dead heat for third place.
(h)
If no money was wagered in the show pool on an animal finishing
first, second, or third in a race, the show pool shall be distributed as a
profit for split among the holders of the show tickets on the other animals
that finished first, second, or third. If no money was wagered in the show
pool on any of the animals finishing first, second, or third in a race, the
money in the show pool shall be refunded.
§321.307.Daily Double.
(a)
The daily double is not a parlay and has no connection
with or relation to the win, place, and show pools shown on the tote board.
All daily double tickets shall be calculated in a separate pool.
(b)
If any part of a coupled entry or mutuel field is a starter,
the association may not refund money wagered under this section to persons
wagering on the entry or field, regardless of whether any part of the entry
or field failed to start. If either race in the daily double ends in a dead
heat for first place, the pool shall be calculated as a place pool in proportion
to the number of animals in the dead heat.
(c)
If no ticket is sold that correctly selects the winner
of both races of the daily double, the entire daily double pool, minus the
takeout and the breakage, shall be distributed equally to the holders of tickets
which include the winner of either of the daily double races.
(d)
If no ticket is sold including the winner of the first
race of the daily double, the entire daily double pool, minus the takeout
and the breakage, shall be distributed equally to the holders of tickets which
include the winner of the second race of the daily double. If no ticket is
sold including the winner of the second race of the daily double, the entire
daily double pool, minus the takeout and the breakage, shall be distributed
equally to the holders of tickets which include the winner of the first race
of the daily double.
(e)
If no ticket is sold including the winner of either race
of the daily double, the entire daily double pool, minus the takeout and the
breakage, shall be distributed equally to holders of tickets which include
the animals finishing second in the two races of the daily double.
(f)
If the first race of a daily double is canceled, the association
shall provide a complete refund of the daily double pool. If the second race
of a daily double is canceled after the first race has been completed, the
entire daily double pool, minus the takeout and the breakage, shall be distributed,
in proportion of the amount wagered on those combinations including the winner
of the first race of the daily double, to holders of tickets which include
the winner of the first race of the daily double in combination with any animal
in the second race.
(g)
If before the first race of a daily double is run, an animal
entered in either race is scratched or otherwise prevented from racing, all
money wagered on the affected animal shall be deducted from the daily double
pool and refunded to the holders of tickets on the affected animal.
(h)
If after the first race of a daily double is run, an animal
entered in the second race is scratched or otherwise prevented from racing,
a consolation daily double shall be awarded. All tickets which select an animal
in the first race with the affected animal in the second race shall be deducted
from the daily double pool and this amount shall be placed in a consolation
pool. The consolation pool shall be distributed as a straight pool to the
holders of tickets who correctly selected the winner of the first race with
the affected animal in the second race.
(i)
If either race in a daily double ends in a dead heat, the
total daily double pool shall be distributed in the same manner as a place
pool.
(j)
If the daily double pool cannot otherwise be distributed
in accordance with this section, the money in the daily double pool shall
be carried forward and added to the next consecutive daily double pool.
§321.308.Quinella.
(a)
The quinella is not a parlay and has no connection with
or relation to the win, place, and show pools on the tote board. All tickets
on the quinella shall be calculated as a separate pool.
(b)
A quinella ticket is for the win and place combination
only. When purchasing a quinella ticket, the patron shall select the two animals
to be the top two finishers.
(c)
If any part of a coupled entry or mutuel field is a starter,
the association may not refund money wagered under this section to persons
wagering on the entry or field. For purposes of this section, if a part of
the entry or field finishes first, the order of finish of the other animals
in the entry or field shall be disregarded in determining which animal finished
second.
(d)
If after wagering has begun an animal entered in a quinella
race is scratched or otherwise prevented from racing, all money wagered on
the affected animal shall be deducted from the quinella pool and refunded
to the holders of tickets on the affected animal.
(e)
If no ticket is sold on the winning combination in a quinella
race, all quinella tickets bearing the number of the winning animal and all
quinella tickets bearing the number of the second place animal are considered
winning tickets and the payoff shall be calculated in the same manner as a
place pool.
(f)
If no ticket is sold on the winning combination in a race
and no quinella ticket bears the number of the winner, all quinella tickets
bearing the number of the second place animal are considered winning tickets
and the payoff shall be calculated as a win pool.
(g)
If no ticket is sold on the winning combination in a race
and no quinella tickets bear the number of the second place animal, all quinella
tickets bearing the number of the winner are considered winning tickets and
the payoff shall be calculated as a win pool.
(h)
If only one animal finishes in a quinella race, the entire
pool is distributed as a win pool for the persons who wagered on the winner.
(i)
If a quinella race ends in a dead heat for first place,
all animals finishing first are the winners of the race and the pool shall
be distributed as a place pool.
(j)
If a quinella race ends in a two-animal dead heat for second
place, the entire pool is distributed as a place pool. If a quinella race
ends in a multiple-animal dead heat for second place, all combinations that
couple the winning animal with any of the second place animals are winners
of the quinella and the pool shall be distributed as a profit split.
(k)
If no ticket is sold on the winning combination in a quinella
race and no quinella tickets bear the number of either the winner or the second
place animal, the quinella is considered "no contest" and the association
shall carry forward all money wagered in the quinella pool to the next consecutive
quinella pool.
§321.309.Exacta.
(a)
The exacta is not a parlay and has no connection with or
relation to the win, place, and show pools shown on the tote board. All tickets
in an exacta race shall be calculated as a separate pool.
(b)
When purchasing an exacta ticket, the patron shall designate
the exact order of finish for the first and second place animals.
(c)
If any part of a coupled entry or mutuel field is a starter,
the association may not refund money wagered under this section to persons
wagering on the entry or field, regardless of whether any part of the entry
or field failed to start. For purposes of this section, if a part of the entry
or field finishes first, the order of finish of the other animals in the entry
or field shall be disregarded in determining which animal finished second.
(d)
If after wagering has begun an animal entered in an exacta
race is scratched or otherwise prevented from racing, all money wagered on
the affected animal shall be deducted from the exacta pool and refunded to
the holders of tickets on the affected animal.
(e)
If no ticket is sold on the winning combination in an exacta
race, the net pool shall be distributed among the holders of tickets selecting
the winner to finish first. If no such ticket is sold, the net pool shall
be distributed among the holders of tickets selecting the second place animal
to finish second.
(f)
If a race ends in a dead heat for first place, the net
pool shall be calculated and distributed as a place pool to holders of the
winning combination.
(g)
If a race ends in a dead heat for second place, all tickets
designating the appropriate animal to win coupled with any of the second place
animals are winners and the pool shall be distributed as a place pool.
(h)
If a race ends in a dead heat for second place and no ticket
is sold on any of the winning combinations, the net pool shall be calculated
and distributed to the holders of tickets that designated the winner or any
of the second place animals according to their respective interest in the
net pool.
(i)
If a race ends in a dead heat for first among more than
two animals, the net pool shall be calculated and distributed as a profit
for split to holders of tickets designating any two of the animals participating
in the dead heat.
(j)
If no ticket is sold that would require distribution under
this section, the exacta is considered "no contest" and the association shall
carry forward all money wagered in the exacta pool to the next consecutive
exacta pool.
§321.310.Trifecta.
(a)
The trifecta wager is not a parlay and has no connection
with or relation to the win, place, and show pool shown on the tote board.
All tickets on the trifecta shall be calculated as a separate pool.
(b)
A person purchasing a trifecta ticket must select the three
animals in a race which will finish first, second, and third and designate
the exact order in which the first three will finish.
(c)
A coupled entry or mutuel field may not start in a horse
race with trifecta wagering unless there are six or more betting interests.
(d)
If after wagering has begun an animal entered in a trifecta
race is scratched or otherwise prevented from racing, all money wagered on
the affected animal shall be deducted from the trifecta pool and refunded
to the holders of tickets on the affected animal.
(e)
If no ticket is sold on the winning combination, the net
pool shall be distributed equally among the holders of tickets selecting the
animals finishing first and second .
(f)
If no ticket is sold that requires distribution under subsection
(e) of this section, the net pool shall be distributed equally among the holders
of tickets selecting the animals finishing first and third .
(g)
If no ticket is sold that requires distribution under subsections
(e) or (f) of this section, the net pool shall be distributed equally among
the holders of tickets selecting the animal finishing first.
(h)
If no ticket is sold requiring distribution under subsections
(e)-(g) of this section, the net pool shall be distributed equally among the
holders of tickets selecting the animals finishing second and third.
(i)
If no ticket is sold requiring distribution under subsections
(e)-(h) of this section, the net pool shall be distributed equally among the
holders of tickets selecting the animal finishing second.
(j)
If no ticket is sold requiring distribution under subsections
(e)-(i) of this section, the net pool shall be distributed equally among the
holders of tickets selecting the animal finishing third.
(k)
If a trifecta race ends in a dead heat for first place,
the winning combination shall include the first two animals as finishing in
either first or second and the animal finishing third. If a trifecta race
ends in a dead heat for second place, the winning combinations shall include
the animal finishing first and the two animals finishing in a dead heat as
finishing either second or third. If a trifecta race ends in a dead heat for
third place, the winning combinations include the animals finishing first
and second and any of the animals finishing in the dead heat as finishing
third. In all combinations paid under this subsection, the net pool shall
be divided into separate pools, calculated as a place pool, and paid out accordingly.
(l)
If a trifecta race ends in a triple dead heat or double
dead heats, the net pool shall be divided by the number of all win, place,
and show combinations formed, calculated as separate pools, and paid out accordingly.
(m)
If no ticket is sold that would require distribution under
this section, the trifecta is considered "no contest" and the association
shall carry forward all money wagered in the trifecta pool to the next consecutive
trifecta pool.
(n)
If fewer than six horses of different betting interests
leave the paddock for a race on which there is trifecta wagering, the association
shall cancel the trifecta wager for that race and refund the entire amount
in the pool.
§321.311.Twin Trifecta.
(a)
The twin trifecta wager is not a parlay and has no connection
with or relation to the win, place, and show pools shown on the tote board.
All tickets on the twin trifecta shall be calculated as a separate pool.
(b)
The twin trifecta requires selection of the first three
finishers, in exact order, in each of two designated races. Each winning ticket
for the first twin trifecta race must be exchanged for a free ticket on the
second twin trifecta race to remain eligible for the second-half twin trifecta
pool. Such tickets may be exchanged only at designated attended ticket windows
before the start of the second twin trifecta race. Winning first-half twin
trifecta wagers will receive both an exchange and a monetary payout. Both
of the designated twin trifecta races shall be included in one twin trifecta
pool.
(c)
After wagering closes for the first-half of the twin trifecta
and commissions have been deducted from the pool, the net pool shall then
be divided equally into two separate pools: the first-half twin trifecta pool
and the second-half twin trifecta pool.
(d)
In the first twin trifecta race only, the first-half twin
trifecta pool shall be distributed according to the following precedence,
based on the official order of finish for the first twin trifecta race:
(1)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first three betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(2)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(3)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(4)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(5)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(6)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(7)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(8)
The twin trifecta pool shall be canceled and the entire
pool shall be carried forward to the next consecutive performance and combined
with that performance's second-half twin trifecta pool.
(e)
If no first-half twin trifecta ticket selects the first
three finishers of that contest in exact order, no exchange tickets for the
second-half twin trifecta pool will be issued. In such case, the second-half
twin trifecta pool shall be carried forward and added to any existing twin
trifecta carryover pool.
(f)
A first-half twin trifecta ticket that selects the first
three finishers of that race in exact order may be exchanged for a ticket
selecting the first three finishers of the second twin trifecta race. The
second-half twin trifecta pool shall be distributed according to the following
precedence, based on the official order of finish for the second twin trifecta
race:
(1)
As a single price pool, including the carryover, to those
whose combination finished in correct sequence as the first three betting
interests; but if there are no such wagers, then
(2)
The second-half twin trifecta pool for that race shall
be carried forward to the next consecutive performance and shall be combined
with that performance's second-half twin trifecta pool.
(g)
If a winning first-half twin trifecta ticket is not presented
for cashing and exchange before the start of the second twin trifecta race,
the ticket holder may still collect the monetary value associated with the
first-half twin trifecta pool but forfeits all rights to a distribution of
the second-half twin trifecta pool.
(h)
If fewer than six horses of different betting interests
leave the paddock for the first twin trifecta race or fewer than six greyhounds
start the first twin trifecta race, the twin trifecta shall be canceled and
the entire twin trifecta pool for that performance shall be refunded.
(i)
Before the running of the first twin trifecta race, if
due to a scratch the second twin trifecta race has fewer than six horses of
different betting interests or fewer than six greyhounds of different betting
interests, the twin trifecta shall be canceled and the entire twin trifecta
pool for that performance shall be refunded.
(j)
After the running of the first twin trifecta race, if due
to a late scratch, the second twin trifecta race has fewer than six animals
of different betting interests that start, all exchange tickets and outstanding
first-half winning tickets shall be entitled to the second-half twin trifecta
pool for that performance as a single price pool, but not the twin trifecta
carryover.
(k)
Coupled entries and mutuel fields may not be permitted
in a twin trifecta horse race unless there are six or more betting interests.
Coupled entries or mutuel fields in a twin trifecta race shall race as a single
betting interest for the purpose of mutuel pool calculations and payout to
the public.
(l)
If a betting interest in the first twin trifecta race is
scratched, all twin trifecta wagers including the scratched betting interest
shall be refunded.
(m)
If a betting interest in the second twin trifecta race
is scratched, an announcement concerning the scratch shall be made and a reasonable
amount of time shall be provided to exchange tickets that include the scratched
betting interest.
(n)
If there is a dead heat or multiple dead heats in either
the first or second twin trifecta race, all twin trifecta wagers selecting
the correct order of finish, counting a betting interest involved in a dead
heat as finishing in any dead-heated position, shall be a winner. In the case
of a dead heat occurring in:
(1)
the first twin trifecta race, the payout shall be calculated
as a profit split; and
(2)
the second twin trifecta race, the payout shall be calculated
as a single price pool.
(o)
If either of the twin trifecta races are canceled before
the first twin trifecta race, or if the first twin trifecta contest is declared
"no contest", the entire twin trifecta pool for that performance shall be
refunded and the second-half pool shall be canceled.
(p)
If the second twin trifecta race is canceled or declared
"no contest" on a:
(1)
non-designated mandatory payout performance, all exchange
tickets and outstanding first-half winning twin trifecta tickets shall be
entitled to the net twin trifecta pool for that performance as a single price
pool, but not the twin trifecta carryover. If there are no such tickets, the
net twin trifecta pool shall be carried forward to the next consecutive performance
and combined with that performance's second-half twin trifecta pool; and
(2)
designated mandatory payout performance, all exchange tickets
and outstanding first-half winning twin trifecta tickets as determined by
subsection (s) of this section shall be entitled to the net twin trifecta
pool for that performance and the twin trifecta carryover as a single price
pool.
(q)
An association may file a written request for permission
to distribute the twin trifecta carryover on a specific performance with the
executive secretary. The request must contain justification for the distribution,
an explanation of the benefit to be derived, and the intended date and performance
for the distribution.
(r)
Notwithstanding subsections (f) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meeting or on a designated mandatory payout
performance, the following precedence will be followed in determining winning
tickets for the second-half of the twin trifecta:
(1)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first three betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(2)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(3)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(4)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(5)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(6)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(7)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(8)
As a single price pool to holders of valid exchange tickets;
but if there are no such persons, then
(9)
As a single price pool to holders of outstanding first-half
winning tickets.
(s)
Distribution on Mandatory Payout.
(1)
Notwithstanding subsections (e) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meeting or a designated mandatory payout
performance, exchange tickets will be issued for those combinations selecting
the greatest number of betting interests in the first twin trifecta race in
the following order:
(A)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first three betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(B)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(C)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(D)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(E)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(F)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(G)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest.
(2)
Notwithstanding subsections (e) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meeting or a designated mandatory payout
performance, if there are no wagers selecting the finishers in the order described
in paragraph (1) of this subsection and there is a carryover, all first-half
tickets are considered winners and the twin trifecta pool for that performance
and any existing twin trifecta carryover shall be distributed equally among
them.
(3)
Notwithstanding subsections (e) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meeting or a designated mandatory payout
performance, if there are no wagers selecting the finishers in the order described
in paragraph (1) of this subsection and there is no carryover, the twin trifecta
shall be canceled and the entire twin trifecta pool shall be refunded.
(t)
Cap on Carryover.
(1)
The twin trifecta carryover may be capped at a designated
level approved by the executive secretary so that if, at the close of any
performance, the amount in the twin trifecta carryover equals or exceeds the
designated cap, the twin trifecta carryover will be frozen until it is won
or distributed under other provisions of this section. After the twin trifecta
carryover is frozen, 50% of the twin trifecta pool shall be distributed to
winners of the first twin trifecta race using the following precedence:
(A)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first three betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(B)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(C)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(D)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(E)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(F)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(G)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(H)
the twin trifecta shall be canceled and the entire twin
trifecta pool for that performance shall be refunded.
(2)
After the twin trifecta carryover is frozen, exchange tickets
will be issued for tickets selecting the first three finishers of the second
twin trifecta race. The second-half twin trifecta pool shall be distributed
according to the following precedence, based upon the official order of finish
for the second twin trifecta race:
(A)
As a single price pool, including the carryover, to those
whose combination finished in correct sequence as the first three betting
interests; but if there are no such tickets, then
(B)
The second-half twin trifecta pool for that performance
only shall be distributed in the following precedence:
(i)
as a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(ii)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(iii)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(iv)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(v)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(vi)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(vii)
As a single price pool to holders of valid exchange tickets;
but if there are no such persons, then
(viii)
As a single price pool to holders of outstanding first-half
winning tickets.
(u)
The twin trifecta carryover shall be designated for mandatory
payout on a specified date and performance only under the following circumstances:
(1)
on written approval from the executive secretary as provided
in subsection (q) of this section;
(2)
on written approval from the executive secretary when there
is a change in the carryover cap or when the twin trifecta is discontinued;
and
(3)
on the closing performance of the race meeting.
(v)
If the twin trifecta carryover must be held over to the
corresponding twin trifecta pool of a subsequent race meeting, the carryover
shall be deposited in an interest-bearing account approved by the executive
secretary. The twin trifecta carryover plus accrued interest shall be carried
over and added to the second-half twin trifecta pool of the following race
meeting on a date and performance designated by the executive secretary.
(w)
The association must obtain written approval from the executive
secretary concerning the scheduling and the amount of the cap to be set on
the carryover. Any changes to the approved twin trifecta format require prior
approval from the executive secretary.
§321.312.Pick (N).
(a)
The pick (n) wager is not a parlay and has no connection
with or relation to the win, place, and show pools shown on the tote board.
All tickets on the pick (n) shall be calculated as a separate pool.
(b)
The association may select a distinctive name for the pick
(n), with the prior approval of the executive secretary.
(c)
The pick (n) pari-mutuel pool consists of amounts contributed
for a selection to win only in each of six, seven, eight, nine, or 10 races
designated by the association. After designating the number of races comprising
the pick (n), the association may not change the number during a race meeting
without prior written approval of the executive secretary.
(d)
A person purchasing a pick (n) ticket shall designate the
winning animal in each of the races comprising the pick (n). The association
shall issue to the purchaser of a pick (n) ticket a ticket that reflects each
of the purchaser's selections.
(e)
A pick (n) ticket is a contract between the holder of the
ticket and the association and the ticket constitutes acceptance of this section.
The association, totalisator company, and the State of Texas are not liable
to a person for a pick (n) ticket that is not a winning ticket under this
section or for a pick (n) ticket that is not delivered.
(f)
A coupled entry or mutuel field in a race that is part
of the pick (n) races shall race as a single betting interest for the purpose
of mutuel pool calculations and payoffs to the public.
(g)
The pick (n) pool shall be distributed as provided by this
section. The net pool in the pick (n) pool is divided into a major pool and
a minor pool. The association may designate the major pool to consist of either
75% or 50% of the net amount wagered on the pick (n). The remaining percentage
constitutes the minor pool. The association shall notify the executive secretary
in writing before the beginning of each race meeting of its designation regarding
the division between the major and minor pools. After designating the division
between the major and minor pools, an association may not change the division
during a race meeting without prior written approval of the executive secretary.
(h)
The major pool shall be distributed among holders of pick
(n) tickets which correctly designate the winner in each of the races comprising
the pick (n).
(i)
Except as otherwise provided by this section, the minor
pool shall be distributed to those ticket holders who failed to correctly
designate the winner in each of the races comprising the pick (n), but who
correctly selected the winners in the most, but not all of, the races comprising
the pick (n).
(j)
If no ticket is sold that designates the winner in each
of the races comprising the pick (n), the major pool shall be carried forward
to the next performance to be paid in the major pool of that performance.
Except as otherwise provided by this section, the major pool shall be supplemented
each performance by the amount added to the pool from all previous performances'
major pools that have not been won in accordance with subsection (h) of this
section.
(k)
If a pick (n) ticket designates a selection and the selection
is scratched or otherwise prevented from racing, the favorite, as determined
by the largest amount wagered in the win pool at the start of the race, will
be substituted for the nonstarting selection for all purposes, including mutuel
pool calculations and payoffs to the public. If there are two or more identical
favorites in the win pool, both favorites will be substituted for the nonstarting
selection.
(l)
If a race in the pick (n) ends in a dead heat for first
place, all animals in the dead heat are winners for purposes of calculating
the pick (n) pool.
(m)
Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, if one
or more races in the pick (n) are canceled or declared a "no race", the amount
contributed to the major pool for that performance shall be added to the minor
pool for that performance and distributed as an extra amount in the minor
pool to the holders of the tickets that designate the most winners in the
remaining races. All contributions to the major pool from prior performances
shall remain in the major pool, to be carried forward to the next performance
to be paid in the major pool for that performance. If the stewards or racing
judges cancel or declare as a "no race" three or more of the races comprising
a pick six, seven, or eight, four or more of the races comprising the pick
nine, or five or more of the races comprising the pick 10, the pick (n) is
canceled and the association shall refund all pick (n) tickets. A person may
not win the major pool unless the person holds a pick (n) ticket that correctly
designates the official winners of all the scheduled races comprising the
pick (n) for that performance. On the last performance of a race meeting or
on a designated mandatory payout performance, if one or two races comprising
the pick (n) are canceled or declared a "no race", the major pool and the
minor pool for that performance shall be combined with the prior performance
major pool and be paid to those holders of tickets who correctly designated
the most winners of the remaining races of the pick (n). If three or more
races comprising the pick (n) are canceled or declared a "no race", the association
shall refund all pick (n) tickets and the prior performance major pool shall
be distributed in accordance with subsection (o) of this section.
(n)
If on the last performance of the race meeting or on a
designated mandatory payout performance the major pool is not distributable
under subsection (h) of this section, the major pool and all money carried
forward into that pool from previous performances shall be combined with the
minor pool and distributed to the holders of tickets correctly designating
the most, but not all, of the races comprising the pick (n) for that performance.
(o)
If the final or designated mandatory payoff performance
is canceled or the major pool has not been distributed, the major pool shall
be escrowed by the association and the major pool plus all accrued interest
shall be carried over and included in a major pool offered on one of the first
five days of the next subsequent race meeting or on the next performance after
the undistributed mandatory payout performance, as approved by the executive
secretary.
(p)
Except for refunds required by this section, a pick (n)
ticket may not be sold, exchanged, or canceled after the close of wagering
on the first of the pick (n) races.
(q)
A person may not disclose the number of tickets sold in
the pick (n) pool or the number or amount of tickets selecting winners of
the races comprising the pick (n) until the results of the last race comprising
the pick (n) are official. The totalisator equipment shall be programmed or
constructed to suppress the publication or printing of any such information,
except the total number of dollars wagered in the pick (n), until the results
of the last race comprising the pick (n) are official.
§321.313.Select Three, Four, or Five.
(a)
The select three, four, or five wager is not a parlay and
has no connection with or relation to the win, place, and show pools shown
on the tote board.
(b)
A select three, four, or five ticket is evidence of a binding
contract between the holder of the ticket and the association and the ticket
constitutes an acceptance of this section. The association may select a distinctive
name for the select three, four, or five, with the prior approval of the executive
secretary.
(c)
The select three, four, or five pari-mutuel pool consists
of amounts contributed for a selection to win only on each of three, four,
or five races designated by the association with the approval of the executive
secretary. Each person purchasing a select three, four, or five ticket shall
designate the winning animal in each of the races comprising the select three,
four, or five.
(d)
A coupled entry or mutuel field in a race that is part
of the select three, four, or five shall race as a single betting interest
for the purpose of the select three, four, or five pari-mutuel pool calculations
and payoffs to the public. If any part of a coupled entry or mutuel field
is a starter in a race, the entry or field selection remains as the designated
selection to win in that race for the select three, four, or five calculation,
and the selection may not be deemed a scratch.
(e)
The select three, four, or five pari-mutuel pool shall
be distributed in accordance with this section. One hundred percent of the
net amount in the pari-mutuel pool subject to distribution among winning ticket
holders shall be distributed among the holders of pari-mutuel tickets which
correctly designate the official winner in each of the races comprising the
select three, four, or five.
(f)
If no pari-mutuel ticket is sold combining the winners
of all of the races comprising the select three, four, or five, 100% of the
net amount in the pari-mutuel pool shall be distributed among the holders
of pari-mutuel tickets which include the winners of the next highest number
of winners of the races the select three, four, or five.
(g)
If no pari-mutuel ticket is sold that would require distribution
of the select three, four, or five pool under subsections (e)-(f) of this
section, the association shall carry over all money wagered in the select
three, four, or five pool to the next consecutive select three, four, or five
pool.
(h)
If the final day of a race meeting is canceled or the select
three, four, or five pool has not been distributed, the pool shall be escrowed
by the association, and the pool plus all accrued interest shall be carried
over and added to the select three, four, or five pari-mutuel pools in the
following race meeting on a date and performance designated by the executive
secretary.
(i)
If one or two of the races comprising a select three is
canceled, two or three of the races comprising a select four are canceled,
or three or four of the races comprising a select five are canceled, the net
amount of the pari-mutuel pool shall be distributed as provided in subsections
(f)-(g) of this section.
(j)
If all of the races comprising the select three, four,
or five are canceled, the association shall refund the pari-mutuel tickets
sold on the select three, four, or five on that day. The association shall
carry over the remaining amount in the select three, four, or five pari-mutuel
pool to the next consecutive select three, four, or five pari-mutuel pool.
(k)
If a selection on a select three, four, or five ticket
in one or more of the races is scratched or determined by the stewards or
racing judges to be a nonstarter in the race, the actual favorite, as shown
by the largest amount wagered in the win pool at the time of the start of
the race, will be substituted for the nonstarting selection for all purposes,
including pool calculations and payoffs.
(l)
In the event of a dead heat for win between two or more
animals in a select three, four, or five race, all the animals in the dead
heat for win shall be considered as winning animals in the race for the purpose
of calculating the pool.
(m)
A pari-mutuel ticket for the select three, four, or five
pool may not be sold, exchanged, or canceled after the time of the closing
of wagering in the first of the races comprising the select three, four, or
five, except for refunds on select three, four, or five tickets as required
by subsection (j) of this section. A person may not disclose the number of
tickets sold in the select three, four, or five pool or the number or amount
of tickets selecting winners of select three, four, or five races until the
stewards or racing judges have determined the last race comprising the select
three, four, or five to be official.
§321.314.Superfecta.
(a)
The superfecta is not a parlay and has no connection with
or relation to the win, place, and show pools shown on the tote board. All
tickets on the superfecta shall be calculated as a separate pool.
(b)
A person purchasing a superfecta ticket shall select the
four animals that will finish first, second, third, and fourth in one race.
The pool shall be distributed only to the holders of tickets that select the
same order of finish as officially posted.
(c)
If no superfecta ticket is sold for the winning combination,
the pool shall be distributed to the holders of tickets selecting the win,
place, and show finishers. If no ticket is sold combining the win, place,
and show finishers, the pool shall be distributed to the holders of tickets
selecting the win and place finishers. If no ticket is sold combining the
win and place finishers, the pool shall be distributed to the holders of tickets
selecting the winner. If less than four animals finish and the race is declared
official by the stewards or racing judges, the pool shall be distributed to
holders of tickets selecting the finishing animals in order, ignoring the
balance of the selection.
(d)
In the event of a dead heat, all superfecta tickets selecting
the correct order of finish, counting an animal in a dead heat as finishing
in either position dead heated, shall be winning tickets. The pool shall be
distributed as a place pool.
(e)
If an animal is scratched in a superfecta race, a superfecta
ticket may not be exchanged. All tickets which include a scratched animal
shall be eliminated from further participation in the superfecta pool and
shall be refunded.
(f)
If the superfecta pool cannot otherwise be distributed
in accordance with this section, the money in the superfecta pool shall be
carried forward to the next consecutive superfecta pool.
(g)
A coupled entry or mutuel field may not start in a horse
race with superfecta wagering unless there are seven or more betting interests.
(h)
If fewer than seven horses of different betting interests
leave the paddock for a race in which there is superfecta wagering, the association
shall cancel the superfecta wager for that race and refund the entire amount
in the pool.
§321.315.Tri-Superfecta.
(a)
The tri-superfecta is not a parlay and has no connection
with or relation to the win, place, or show pools on the tote board. All tickets
on the tri-superfecta shall be calculated as a separate pool.
(b)
The tri-superfecta requires selection of the first three
finishers, in exact order, in the first of two designated races. Each winning
ticket for the first tri-superfecta race must be exchanged for a free ticket
on the second tri-superfecta race to remain eligible for the second-half tri-superfecta
pool. Such tickets may be exchanged only at designated attended ticket windows
before the start of the second tri-superfecta race. Winning first-half tri-superfecta
wagers will receive both an exchange and a monetary payout. Both of the designated
tri-superfecta races shall be included in one tri-superfecta pool.
(c)
After wagering closes for the first-half of the tri-superfecta
and commissions have been deducted from the pool, the net pool shall then
be divided equally into two separate pools: the first-half tri-superfecta
pool and the second-half tri-superfecta pool.
(d)
In the first tri-superfecta ace only, the first-half tri-superfecta
pool shall be distributed according to the following precedence, based upon
the official order of finish for the first tri-superfecta race:
(1)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first three betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(2)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(3)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(4)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(5)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(6)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(7)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(8)
The tri-superfecta pool shall be canceled and the entire
pool shall be carried forward to the next consecutive performance and combined
with that performance's second-half tri-superfecta pool.
(e)
If no first-half tri-superfecta ticket selects the first
three finishers of that race in exact order, no exchange tickets for the second-half
tri-superfecta pool will be issued and the second-half tri-superfecta pool
shall be carried over and added to the tri-superfecta carryover pool.
(f)
A first-half tri-superfecta ticket that selects the first
three finishers of that race in exact order may be exchanged for a ticket
selecting the first four finishers of the second tri-superfecta race. The
second-half tri-superfecta pool shall be distributed according to the following
precedence, based upon the official order of finish for the second tri-superfecta
race:
(1)
As a single price pool, including the carryover, to those
whose combination finished in correct sequence as the first four betting interests;
but if there are no such tickets, then
(2)
The second-half tri-superfecta pool for that contest shall
be carried forward to the next consecutive performance and shall be combined
with that performance's second-half tri-superfecta pool.
(g)
If a winning first-half tri-superfecta ticket is not presented
for cashing and exchange before the start of the second tri-superfecta race,
the ticket holder may collect the monetary value associated with the first-half
tri-superfecta pool but forfeits all right to a distribution of the second-half
tri-superfecta pool.
(h)
If fewer than six horses of different betting interests
leave the paddock for the first tri-superfecta race or fewer than six greyhounds
start the first tri-superfecta race, the tri-superfecta contest shall be canceled
and the entire tri-superfecta pool for that performance shall be refunded.
(i)
Before the running of the first tri-superfecta race, if
due to a scratch the second tri-superfecta race has fewer than seven horses
of different betting interests or fewer than seven greyhounds of different
betting interests, the tri-superfecta shall be canceled and the entire tri-superfecta
pool for that performance shall be refunded.
(j)
After the running of the first tri-superfecta race, if
due to a late scratch, the second tri-superfecta race has fewer than seven
horses of different betting interests that start or has fewer than seven greyhounds
of different betting interests that start, all exchange tickets and outstanding
first-half winning tickets shall be entitled to the second-half tri-superfecta
pool for that performance as a single price pool, but not the tri-superfecta
carryover.
(k)
Coupled entries and mutuel fields may not be permitted
in a tri-superfecta horse contest unless there are six or more betting interests
in the first race and seven or more betting interests in the second race.
Coupled entries or mutuel fields in a tri-superfecta race shall race as a
single betting interest for the purpose of mutuel pool calculations and payout
to the public.
(l)
If a betting interest in the first tri-superfecta race
is scratched, all tri-superfecta wagers including the scratched betting interest
shall be refunded.
(m)
If a betting interest in the second tri-superfecta race
is scratched, an announcement concerning the scratch shall be made and a reasonable
amount of time shall be provided to exchange tickets that include the scratched
betting interest.
(n)
If there is a dead heat or multiple dead heats in either
the first or second tri-superfecta race, all tri-superfecta wagers selecting
the correct order of finish, counting a betting interest involved in a dead
heat as finishing in any dead-heated position, shall be a winner. In the case
of a dead heat occurring in:
(1)
the first tri-superfecta race, the payout shall be calculated
as a profit split; and
(2)
the second tri-superfecta race, the payout shall be calculated
as a single price pool.
(o)
If either of the tri-superfecta races are canceled prior
to the first tri-superfecta race, or if the first tri-superfecta race is declared
"no contest", the entire tri-superfecta pool for that performance shall be
refunded and the second-half pool shall be canceled.
(p)
If the second tri-superfecta race is canceled or declared
"no contest" on a:
(1)
non-designated mandatory payout performance, all exchange
tickets and outstanding first-half winning tri-superfecta tickets shall be
entitled to the net tri-superfecta pool for that performance as a single price
pool, but not the tri-superfecta carryover. If there are no such tickets,
the net tri-superfecta pool shall be carried over to the next consecutive
performance and combined with that performance's second-half tri-superfecta
pool; and
(2)
designated mandatory payout performance, all exchange tickets
and outstanding first-half winning tri-superfecta tickets as determined by
subsection (s) of this section shall be entitled to the net tri-superfecta
pool for that performance and the tri-superfecta carryover as a single price
pool.
(q)
An association may file a written request for permission
to distribute the tri-superfecta carryover on a specific performance with
the executive secretary. The request must contain justification for the distribution,
an explanation of the benefit to be derived, and the intended date and performance
for the distribution.
(r)
Notwithstanding subsections (f) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meeting or on a designated mandatory payout
performance, the following precedence will be followed in determining winning
tickets for the second-half of the tri-superfecta:
(1)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first four betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(2)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first three betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(3)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(4)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(5)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second-place betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(6)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(7)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the fourth-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(8)
As a single price pool to holders of valid exchange tickets;
but if there are no such persons, then
(9)
As a single price pool to holders of outstanding first-half
winning tickets.
(s)
Distribution on Mandatory Payout.
(1)
Notwithstanding subsections (e) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meet or a designated mandatory payout performance,
exchange tickets will be issued for those combinations selecting the greatest
number of betting interests in the first tri-superfecta race in the following
order:
(A)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first three betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(B)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(C)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(D)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(E)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(F)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(G)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest.
(2)
Notwithstanding subsections (e) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meeting or a designated mandatory payout
performance, if there are no wagers selecting the finishers in the order described
in paragraph (1) of this subsection and there is a carryover, all first-half
tickets are considered winners and the tri-superfecta pool for that performance
and the tri-superfecta carryover shall be distributed equally among them.
(3)
Notwithstanding subsections (e) and (t) of this section,
on the last performance of a race meeting or a designated mandatory payout
performance, if there are no wagers selecting the finishers in the order described
in paragraph (1) of this subsection and there is no carryover, the tri-superfecta
shall be canceled and the entire tri-superfecta pool shall be refunded.
(t)
Cap on Carryover.
(1)
The tri-superfecta carryover may be capped at a designated
level approved by the executive secretary so that if, at the close of any
performance, the amount in the tri-superfecta carryover equals or exceeds
the designated cap, the tri-superfecta carryover will be frozen until it is
won or distributed under other provisions of this section. After the tri-superfecta
carryover is frozen, 50% of the tri-superfecta pool shall be distributed to
winners of the first tri-superfecta contest using the following precedence:
(A)
As a single price pool to those whose combination finished
in correct sequence as the first three betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(B)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(C)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first and third betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(D)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(E)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second and third betting interests; but if there
are no such wagers, then
(F)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the second-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(G)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(H)
the tri-superfecta shall be canceled and the entire tri-superfecta
pool for that performance shall be refunded.
(2)
After the tri-superfecta carryover is frozen, exchange
tickets will be issued for tickets selecting the first four finishers of the
second tri-superfecta race. The second-half tri-superfecta pool shall be distributed
according to the following precedence, based upon the official order of finish
for the second tri-superfecta race:
(A)
As a single price pool, including the carryover, to those
whose combination finished in correct sequence as the first four betting interests;
but if there are no such tickets, then
(B)
The second-half tri-superfecta pool for that performance
only shall be distributed in the following precedence:
(i)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first three betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(ii)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the first two betting interests; but if there are no
such wagers, then
(iii)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the first-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(iv)
As a single price pool to those whose combination included,
in correct sequence, the second-place betting interests; but if there are
no such wagers, then
(v)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the third-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(vi)
As a single price pool to those whose combination correctly
selected the fourth-place betting interest; but if there are no such wagers,
then
(vii)
As a single price pool to holders of valid exchange tickets;
but if there are no such persons, then
(viii)
As a single price pool to holders of outstanding first-half
winning tickets.
(u)
The tri-superfecta carryover shall be designated for mandatory
payout on a specified date and performance only under the following circumstances:
(1)
on written approval from the executive secretary as provided
in subsection (q) of this section;
(2)
on written approval from the executive secretary when there
is a change in the carryover cap or when the tri-superfecta is discontinued;
and
(3)
on the last performance of the race meeting.
(v)
If the tri-superfecta carryover must be held over to the
corresponding tri-superfecta pool of a subsequent race meeting, the carryover
shall be deposited in an interest-bearing account approved by the executive
secretary. The tri-superfecta carryover plus accrued interest shall be carried
forward and added to the second-half tri-superfecta pool of the following
race meeting on a date and performance designated by the executive secretary.
(w)
The association must obtain written approval from the executive
secretary concerning the scheduling and the amount of the cap to be set on
the carryover. Any changes to the approved tri-superfecta format require prior
approval from the executive secretary.
§321.316.Odd-Even.
(a)
The odd-even is not a parlay and has no connection with
or relation to the win, place, and show pools shown on the tote board. The
odd-even is a separate pool and shall be calculated as a win pool.
(b)
A person purchasing an odd-even ticket shall designate
"odd" or "even". An "odd" ticket represents a wager on each race animal with
an odd number as listed in the official program. An "even" ticket represents
a wager on each race animal with an even number as listed in the official
program.
(c)
If the race animal finishing first has an odd program number,
the odd-even pool shall be distributed to the holders of tickets designating
odd. If the race animal finishing first has an even program number, the odd-even
pool shall be distributed to the holders of tickets designating even.
(d)
Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, if after
wagering has begun an animal entered in an odd-even race is scratched or otherwise
prevented from racing, there will be no refund. The association, with the
approval of the stewards or racing judges, may cancel the odd-even pool and
refund all money in the pool if there are less than three odd program number
race animals or less than three even program number race animals participating
in a race.
(e)
Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, if a race
ends in a dead heat for first place between a race animal with an odd program
number and a race animal with an even program number, the program number of
the third place finishing animal will determine the winners of the odd-even
pool. If there is a dead heat for third place between a race animal with an
odd program number and a race animal with an even program number, the program
number of the fifth place finishing animal will determine the winners of the
odd-even pool. If a race ends a dead heat for first place between three race
animals, the type of program number of the majority of the animals involved
in the dead heat will determine the winners of the odd-even pool.
§321.317.Prevention of Start.
Except as otherwise provided by these rules, if a door in a starting
gate or box fails to open simultaneously with the other doors, thereby preventing
a horse or greyhound from obtaining a fair start when the starter dispatches
the field, that animal is considered scratched for pari-mutuel purposes only
and all wagers made on that animal shall be refunded.
§321.318.Special Wager.
(a)
Special wager authorized.
(1)
Subject to the prior approval of the Commission, an association
may offer a special wager in any form of wager authorized by the Rules. All
applicable laws and rules that apply to the form of wager selected for the
special wager apply to the special wager.
(2)
A special wager must be based on the outcome of a race
or races and comply with the definition of pari-mutuel wagering as defined
by the Act, §1.03(18). The wager must be based on the performance of
a specific race animal or animals in a race or races.
(3)
All tickets on a special wager shall be calculated as a
separate pool. If a special wager uses a point system to determine the winning
tickets, the stewards or racing judges are responsible for certifying the
accuracy of the point totals for purposes of payoff calculations and pool
distribution. The use of any point system must be based on objective criteria.
(b)
Approval of special wager.
(1)
To offer a special wager, an association must file a written
request with the executive secretary. The request must be filed no later than
the 30th day before the day on which the Commission is to consider the request.
(2)
The request must state:
(A)
the name of the wager;
(B)
the type of wagering pool to be used;
(C)
the method by which winning tickets will be determined;
and
(D)
the method for addressing dead heats, no contest races,
scratches, jockey changes, coupled entries, prevention of start, and disqualifications.
(3)
After reviewing the request, the executive secretary may
request additional information regarding the special wager.
(4)
If the Commission determines the proposed special wager
will be offered in a manner that complies with the Rules and that is consistent
with maintaining the integrity of pari-mutuel wagering, the Commission may
approve the request. The Commission may place reasonable conditions on the
approval of the special wager. The Commission has sole discretion to approve
or disapprove requests for special wagers.
(5)
The executive secretary shall notify the association of
the Commission's decision regarding the request no later than the fifth day
after the Commission's decision.
(c)
Notice of special wager.
(1)
An association shall publish notice of a special wager
that is approved in its program at least 14 days before the first day the
special wager will be offered. If the wager is to be offered during the first
14 days of a live race meeting, the association shall publish notice of the
special wager in the program for every race day in the race meeting before
the day the special wager is to be offered.
(2)
The association shall post in a prominent place in the
grandstand of the racetrack a full description of the special wager, including
all information described in subsection (b)(2) of this section and any conditions
imposed by the Commission.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009019
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
The Texas Racing Commission proposes new §§321.401, 321.403,
321.405, 321.407, 321.409, 321.411, 321.413, 321.415, 321.417, 321.419, and
321.421, relating to general provisions for simulcast wagering; §§321.451,
321.453, 321.455, 321.457, 321.459, and 321.461, relating to common pool wagering;
and §§321.501, 321.503, 321.505, 321.507, and §321.509 relating
to simulcasting at horse racetracks.
The new rules set forth the association requirements for receiving and
sending simulcast signals, specify the duties and responsibilities of the
association's mutuel and totalisator employees, and clarify the procedures
for emergencies and for establishing and distributing common pools. The new
rules also require the associations to negotiate with horsemen in all simulcasting
matters and establish procedures for the allocation of purses and Texas-bred
funds.
The proposal also incorporates a policy change to permit non-profit county
fair racetracks, i.e. Class 3 and Class 4 racetrack to offer simulcast races
for wagering at times other than when the track is offering live racing. This
change, in §321.507, is the result of a rulemaking petition filed by
Gillespie County Fair and Festivals Assn., the state's only licensed Class
3 racetrack. There are no licensed Class 4 racetracks. To ensure complete
control over simulcasting by Class 3 and Class 4 racetracks, the Commission
incorporated into new §321.507 several restrictions which will prevent
a proliferation of inexperienced and unqualified operators seeking to simulcast
extensively without conducting a quality live racing program.
Paula C. Flowerday, Executive Secretary for the Texas Racing Commission,
has determined that for the first five-year period the rules are in effect
there are no fiscal implications for local government as a result of enforcing
the proposals. There will be fiscal implications for state government. A Class
3 or 4 racetrack that conducts simulcasting during periods when there is no
live racing will be required to pay a fee to the Commission to offset the
costs of regulating the simulcasting. Further, wagering on simulcast races
will generate revenue for the state treasury through the 1 cent pari-mutuel
tax on each dollar wagered.
Ms. Flowerday has also determined that for each of the first five years
the rules are in effect the public benefit will be that pari-mutuel wagering
will be strictly regulated, the patrons will be protected, the rules will
be consistent with the current technology, non-profit fair racetracks will
have increased viability, wagering opportunities for Texas patrons will increase,
purse payouts to the owners and trainers of horses racing at the affected
Class 3 or 4 racetracks will increase, revenue for the Texas-bred incentive
programs will increase, the distribution of the simulcast races conducted
at other Texas racetracks will increase, and funds generated from wagering
for the use of the owners, trainers, and breeders of race animals will be
distributed fairly and accurately.
There will be fiscal implications for Class 3 or 4 racetracks that elect
to conduct simulcasting during periods when there is no live racing. The racetracks
will incur costs associated with providing the simulcasting, but the racetracks
will also earn profit from the wagers made on the simulcasting. Any Texas
racetrack that sends a simulcast to the Class 3 or 4 racetrack will also earn
revenue from the sale of that signal. In addition, the simulcasting will generate
money for purses to be paid to horse owners and trainers during the live racing.
The simulcasting will also generate revenue for the owners and breeders of
accredited Texas-bred horses. If the racetrack elects to simulcast greyhound
races, the owners and trainers of greyhounds racing at Texas greyhound racetracks
will receive purse funds generated from the simulcasting. The exact amount
of the costs, profits, purse money, and Texas-bred incentive funds generated
from the simulcasting cannot be determined at this time because it will depend
entirely on the amount of money wagered on the simulcasts.
There will be no new anticipated economic cost to an individual required
to comply with the new rules as proposed.
According to oral testimony from representatives of Gillespie County Fair
and Festivals Assn., this rule change to permit increased simulcasting at
non-profit fair racetracks is necessary to permit the racetrack to continue
to operate and to fund its annual scholarships for local students. The continuation
of Gillespie County Fair's live horse racing operations will ensure all the
attendant benefits to the state's agricultural, horse breeding, and horse
training industries. As stated earlier, if an affected Class 3 or 4 racetrack
offers simulcast greyhound races for wagering, the proposal will enhance the
state's greyhound breeding and training industries.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted on or before February 15, 2001,
to Judith Kennison, General Counsel for the Texas Racing Commission, P.O.
Box 12080, Austin, Texas 78711-2080.
1.
GENERAL PROVISIONS
16 TAC §§321.401, 321.403, 321.405, 321.407, 321.409, 321.411, 321.413, 321.415, 321.417, 321.419, 321.421
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.401.Purpose.
The Commission finds that, although wagering on simulcast races provides
additional revenue for the state treasury, the primary advantage of wagering
on simulcast races is the additional revenue it provides for purses for live
races conducted in this state. The Commission further finds it is in the public
interest to encourage live racing, which promotes economic development in
a variety of racing-related industries. Therefore, it is the Commission's
intent to adopt and enforce rules relating to simulcast wagering in a manner
that will encourage live racing and enhance the horse breeding, owning, and
training industries and the greyhound breeding, owning, and training industries.
§321.403.Simulcasting License.
(a)
A license to operate a pari-mutuel racetrack in this state
held by an association that has been granted live race dates includes as a
part of its privileges the privilege of conducting pari-mutuel wagering on
simulcast races and to simulcast races conducted by the association. The conducting
of pari-mutuel wagering on simulcast races and the simulcasting of races conducted
by the association is subject to the approval of the executive secretary.
(b)
The approval of any particular simulcasting or wagering
on particular simulcast races or programs is not binding on the executive
secretary for other requests for approval of simulcasting or wagering on simulcast
races or programs.
§321.405.Approval Of Exporting Simulcast Races.
(a)
An association that wishes to serve as an exporting racetrack
shall submit the form of its contract as an exporting racetrack to the executive
secretary for approval.
(b)
If the association changes the form of the contract, the
association shall submit the changed version of the form to the executive
secretary for approval.
(c)
If an association enters into a contract as an exporting
racetrack that differs from the form approved by the executive secretary with
respect to its responsibilities as a host racetrack under these rules, the
association shall immediately notify the executive secretary in writing.
(d)
After the association has entered into a contract to export
its races, the association shall file a request for approval of the export
to the executive secretary on a form prescribed by the executive secretary.
A request for approval to export must be filed before post time of the first
race covered by the request.
§321.407.Approval Of Wagering On Simulcast Import Races.
(a)
To receive approval to conduct pari-mutuel wagering on
a simulcast import, an association must file a request for approval to import
to the executive secretary on a form prescribed by the executive secretary.
A request for approval to import a simulcast must be filed at least three
days before the first simulcast race covered by the request.
(b)
The executive secretary may approve a request for approval
to import a simulcast, subject to rescission of the approval by the Commission
at its next regular meeting.
(c)
The executive secretary may require the association to
submit additional information if the executive secretary determines the additional
information is necessary to effectively evaluate the request.
(d)
In considering whether or not to approve a request for
approval to import a simulcast, the executive secretary shall consider:
(1)
the financial stability of the association and the effect
simulcasting will have on the economic viability of the association;
(2)
the operating experience of the association;
(3)
the regulatory compliance and conduct of the association;
(4)
the impact of the association's proposed simulcasting on
purses at the association's racetrack; and
(5)
the public interest that will be served by the simulcasting.
(e)
An association may not conduct pari-mutuel wagering on
a simulcast import in place of a regularly scheduled live race, except as
authorized by the executive secretary.
§321.409.Simulcasting Contract.
All contracts executed by an association regarding simulcasting are
subject to inspection by the executive secretary. An association shall maintain
each contract regarding simulcasting for at least one year after the end of
the term of the contract. An association must provide a copy of the contract
to the executive secretary on request.
§321.411.Public Address System.
An association that conducts pari-mutuel wagering on a simulcast import
must have a public address system in place that is:
(1)
accessible to the mutuel manager from the mutuel department
work area; and
(2)
capable of being heard in all areas where the patrons may
view a simulcast race.
§321.413.Duties Of Guest Racetrack.
(a)
An association that conducts pari-mutuel wagering on a
simulcast import acts as a guest racetrack on those dates. The guest racetrack
shall:
(1)
provide adequate communication facilities, enabling pari-mutuel
data transmissions and data communications between totalisator systems of
the host racetrack and the guest racetrack;
(2)
if the guest racetrack participates in common pools, provide
a direct telephone line and a facsimile machine, or other means approved by
the executive secretary, located in the mutuel area to transmit information
to the host racetrack in case of a system failure; and
(3)
display the audio and video signals of the races being
simulcast to the patrons.
(b)
After each simulcast performance, the guest racetrack shall
provide the reports of its pari-mutuel operations required by Subchapters
A and B of this chapter.
§321.415.Duties Of Host Racetrack.
(a)
An association that exports races conducted by the association
acts as a host racetrack on the dates the races are conducted and exported.
(b)
A host racetrack is responsible for the content of the
simulcast and shall use reasonable effort to present a simulcast which offers
the viewers an exemplary depiction of the performance, a periodic display
of wagering information, and continuity of programming between racing events.
(c)
The host racetrack shall provide transmission equipment
of acceptable broadcast quality that does not interfere with the closed circuit
TV system of the guest racetrack. The host racetrack must transmit and receive
wagering information via a data circuit. If the host racetrack plans to form
common pools, the racetrack shall provide a direct telephone line and a facsimile
machine, or other means approved by the executive secretary, located in the
mutuel area to receive information from the guest racetracks in case of a
system failure.
(d)
Unless otherwise permitted by the executive secretary,
a simulcast must contain in its video content:
(1)
the date;
(2)
a digital display of the actual time of day at the host
racetrack;
(3)
the name of the host racetrack;
(4)
the number of the race being displayed; and
(5)
any other relevant information available to patrons at
the host racetrack.
(e)
At least 15 minutes before post time for the first race,
the host racetrack must be transmitting its signal to ensure proper operation
of the transmission system.
§321.417.Emergency Procedures.
(a)
If an association is unable to establish or to maintain
the audio or video signal from a host racetrack, the association shall immediately
notify the host racetrack of the lost signal and may continue to accept wagers
for 30 minutes while attempting to establish the signal.
(b)
If after 30 minutes the audio or video signal cannot be
established the association may continue to accept wagers on the signal provided:
(1)
the mutuel manager makes an announcement to the public
informing them that due to technical difficulties the audio or video signal
has been lost;
(2)
the association transmits the odds on the affected race
to the video department to be displayed to the patrons; and
(3)
the totalisator operator locks all wagering on the affected
race at zero minutes to post to ensure the integrity and transfer of the wagering
pools.
(c)
If the host racetrack loses the ability to transmit the
audio or video signal, the host racetrack:
(1)
shall notify all guest racetracks of the technical difficulties
being experienced;
(2)
may continue to accept wagers from the guest racetracks
on that day's races; and
(3)
may not accept wagers from the guest racetracks for subsequent
race days until the technical difficulties have been corrected.
§321.419.Simulcasting Officials.
The mutuel manager shall be present on association grounds at all times
that the association is conducting pari-mutuel wagers on a simulcast import.
The mutuel manager shall:
(1)
before wagering is opened, proof the pools and entries
available for wagering for accuracy;
(2)
advise the wagering public via the public address system
of all matters required to be announced by the Rules;
(3)
make decisions on common pooling issues;
(4)
be responsible for the integrity of the pools wagered at
the association's racetrack facilities; and
(5)
notify the pari-mutuel auditor of any problems occurring
during simulcast wagering.
§321.421.Stop Betting Command.
(a)
The totalisator operator shall ensure the auto-lock feature
on the totalisator system is engaged at all times the totalisator system is
operating. If the stop betting command from a host racetrack is not received,
the totalisator operator shall issue the "stop betting" command and lock all
wagering on the race at that location.
(b)
The association's mutuel manager and the totalisator operator
are responsible for ensuring that all wagering stops at that location when
the "stop betting" command is issued from the host racetrack.
(c)
If the link between the totalisator systems at the host
and guest racetracks is lost, the totalisator operator at the guest racetrack
shall lock all pools at the guest racetrack at zero minutes to post.
(d)
An association may not permit a wager to be accepted or
a ticket to be cancelled after the "stop betting" command has been issued.
(e)
If a wager is accepted after the "stop betting" command
has been issued:
(1)
the mutuel manager, before the race is declared official,
shall inform the pari-mutuel auditor that a wager was accepted after the "stop
betting" command was issued; and
(2)
the mutuel manager shall decide to either:
(A)
refund the wagers accepted after the "stop betting" command
was issued, or
(B)
to refund all the wagers made on the race.
(f)
A wager accepted after the "stop betting" command is issued
is not considered a valid wager.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of
the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009021
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.451, 321.453, 321.455, 321.457, 321.459, 321.461
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.451.General Provisions.
(a)
With the prior approval of the executive secretary, pari-mutuel
pools offered by an association that is participating in a simulcast may be
combined with corresponding wagering pools offered by the other racetracks
participating in the simulcast to form a common pool.
(b)
An association participating in a common pool must include
in the simulcast contract:
(1)
the take out rates;
(2)
public payout rates;
(3)
contact names and phone numbers; and
(4)
settlement arrangements for liabilities incurred.
(c)
The content and format of the visual display of racing
and wagering information at facilities in other racing jurisdictions in the
interstate common pools need not be identical to the information required
to be displayed under the Rules.
§321.453.Formation Of Common Pool.
(a)
An association shall transmit wagering data through a method
authorized by this subsection, in the following order of preference:
(1)
via a data circuit or frame relay;
(2)
via facsimile; or
(3)
by voice.
(b)
Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, the odds
and prices for a common pool shall be calculated in accordance with the laws
and rules of the jurisdiction in which the host racetrack is located. In determining
the amount distributable to the wagerers, the total takeout required in the
jurisdiction in which the host racetrack is located shall be used. If the
association desires, the association may use the net pool pricing method for
determining the payoff prices.
(c)
An association shall ensure that the necessary records
are maintained regarding the amounts wagered at its racetrack for accounting,
auditing, and reporting purposes.
§321.455.Distribution Of Common Pool.
(a)
For purposes of pool calculations, a wager is considered
made at the place at which the pool originates.
(b)
The payoff attributable to the association shall be based
on the actual winnings indicated by the totalisator system.
(c)
The total takeout applicable to the wagers received in
this state for a common pool shall be distributed in accordance with the Act.
A gain or loss caused by a difference in takeout totals shall be part of the
association's revenue or expense from the interstate simulcast.
(d)
A surcharge or other withholding other than the takeout
authorized by law shall be applied only in the jurisdiction imposing the surcharge
or withholding.
§321.457.Breakage.
Breakage calculation is determined by the host racetrack.
§321.459.Manual Merge.
(a)
If the guest racetrack's totalisator system fails to adequately
transmit wagering data to the host racetrack, the host racetrack shall manually
merge the pools if a manual merge will not endanger the pools at the host
racetrack and the host racetrack permits a manual merge.
(b)
To merge the pools manually, the guest racetrack's mutuel
manager shall send the host racetrack a facsimile containing the total amount
in the pool, the total dollars on winning wagers, and the total dollars on
losing wagers. When the manual merge is complete, for purposes of declaring
the race official, the totalisator operator at the host racetrack shall notify:
(1)
the stewards or racing judges at the host racetrack; and
(2)
the presiding steward or racing judge, or the highest ranking
mutuel official if the steward or judge is not on the grounds, at the guest
racetrack.
§321.461.Failure To Merge.
(a)
Except as otherwise provided by this section, if it becomes
impossible to successfully merge a guest racetrack's wagers in the common
pool via data circuit or manual merge, the mutuel manager shall:
(1)
refund the pools not successfully merged after announcing
to the public that the pools were not merged successfully and the pools will
be refunded ; or
(2)
pay the winning wagerers based on the prices established
at the host racetrack.
(b)
The mutuel manager shall report the failure to merge any
common pool to the pari-mutuel auditor. The report must be on a form prescribed
by the executive secretary and be filed no later than the day after the date
the common pool failed to merge.
(c)
A contract for common pools entered into by an association
as a host racetrack must contain a provision stating that the association
is not liable if a guest racetrack's wagers are not accepted into a common
pool if:
(1)
it becomes impossible to successfully merge the wagers
placed in another state in the common pool; or
(2)
the mutuel manager determines that attempting to transfer
pool data from the guest racetrack will endanger the common pool.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009022
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
16 TAC §§321.501, 321.503, 321.505, 321.507, 321.509
The new sections are proposed under the Texas Civil Statutes,
Article 179e, §3.02, which authorize the Commission to adopt rules for
conducting racing with wagering and for administering the Texas Racing Act; §3.021,
which authorizes the Commission to regulate all aspects of racing in this
state; §6.06, which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules on all matters
relating to the operation of racetracks; §11.01, which authorizes the
Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering; and §11.011
which authorizes the Commission to adopt rules to regulate pari-mutuel wagering
on simulcast races.
The proposal implements Texas Civil Statutes, Article 179e.
§321.501.Negotiation with Horsemen.
(a)
Except as otherwise provided by this subsection, an association
shall negotiate with the officially recognized horsemen's organization in
this state regarding all simulcasting. An association and the officially recognized
horsemen's organization may not agree to an allocation of simulcast revenue
to purses that differs from §321.503 of this title (relating to Purses.)
(b)
If after a good faith effort the association and the organization
cannot reach an agreement on simulcasting, either party may petition the Commission
to decide the issues in dispute. The decision of the Commission is binding
on all parties.
§321.503.Purses.
(a)
To be approved by the executive secretary, an association's
request for approval to import a simulcast must allocate for purses as follows:
(1)
for a same species simulcast, as provided by the Act, §6.08;
and
(2)
for a cross-species simulcast, as provided in the contract
with the officially recognized horsemen's organization.
(b)
To be approved by the executive secretary, an association's
request for approval to export a simulcast must allocate 37.0% for purses
from the simulcast fee charged to the guest racetrack.
(c)
An association shall distribute the funds derived for purses
from a simulcast during the 12-month period immediately following the simulcast.
§321.505.Allocation of Purses and Funds for Texas Bred Incentive Programs.
(a)
Purses.
(1)
An association shall recommend the percentages by which
it will divide the purse revenue generated from simulcasting among the various
breeds of horses. The percentages are subject to the approval of the Commission.
(2)
Before recommending the percentages, the association shall
receive information from the organizations recognized by the Commission or
in the Act as representatives of horse owners, trainers, and/or breeders.
(3)
When requesting Commission approval of the percentages,
the association shall present studies, statistics, or other documentation
to support its proposed allocation of funds.
(b)
Texas Bred Incentive Program Funds.
(1)
The Commission shall determine the percentages by which
Texas Bred Incentive Program funds generated from simulcasting are divided
among the various breeds of horses.
(2)
Before determining the percentages, the Commission shall
receive information from the official breed registries designated in the Act
and the associations. In determining the percentages the Commission shall
consider the effect of the proposed percentages on the state's agricultural
horse breeding and horse training industry.
§321.507.Priority of Signals.
(a)
Class 1 and Class 2 Racetracks. A Class 1 or Class 2 racetrack
may offer pari-mutuel wagering on a race simulcast from another jurisdiction,
subject to the approval of the executive secretary, provided the Class 1 or
Class 2 racetrack also offers all available simulcast races originating in
Texas on that day.
(b)
Class 3 and Class 4 Racetracks. A Class 3 or Class 4 racetrack
may conduct pari-mutuel wagering on a race simulcast from another jurisdiction,
subject to the approval of the executive secretary, provided the Class 3 or
Class 4 racetrack:
(1)
also offers all available simulcast races originating in
Texas on that day;
(2)
is owned or managed by an entity that has at least five
years experience operating a pari-mutuel racetrack in Texas;
(3)
demonstrates to the executive secretary's satisfaction
that the simulcasting is necessary to provide sufficient purses to support
the Texas live racing industry;
(4)
demonstrates to the executive secretary's satisfaction
that the live racing program offered at the racetrack provides significant
support to the Texas horse breeding industry; and
(5)
obtains the approval of each Class 1, Class 2, or greyhound
racetrack located within 100 miles of the Class 3 or Class 4 racetrack.
§312.509.Escrowed Purse Account.
(a)
At least once a year, the Commission shall distribute all
funds accrued in the escrowed purse account created by the Act, §6.091(e).
The executive secretary shall establish a deadline for receiving requests
for distribution from the account and publicize that deadline to the horse
racetrack associations at least 30 days before the deadline.
(b)
The Commission shall determine the amount of the distribution
to each racetrack in accordance with the standards set forth in the Act, §6.091(e)
and (f).
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed
with the Office of the Secretary of State, on December 22, 2000.
TRD-200009020
Judith L. Kennison
General Counsel
Texas Racing Commission
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 4, 2001
For further information, please call: (512) 833-6699
Chapter 401.
ADMINISTRATION OF STATE LOTTERY ACT
Subchapter D. LOTTERY GAME RULES
Chapter 309.
RACETRACK LICENSES AND OPERATIONS
During a live race performance, a greyhound racing
]
association shall provide[
:
]
(1)
]
at least two beds and other appropriate
] equipment
suitable to respond to medical emergencies of its patrons
and licensees.
[
;
]
Subchapter D. GREYHOUND RACETRACKS
only four
] mixed grade races each week. A mixed grade race must
be designated by the letter "T" in the racing program.
Chapter 311.
OTHER LICENSES
30%
] of the greyhounds
on the active list of the kennel are accredited Texas-bred greyhounds.
15%
].
Chapter 315.
OFFICIALS AND RULES FOR GREYHOUND RACING
A
] double entry may not be entered until all single interests
eligible for the performance are used.
Double entries may be used at
the discretion of the racing secretary when the active list is low with approval
of the racing judges.
A double entry shall be uncoupled for wagering
purposes.
Chapter 319.
VETERINARY PRACTICES AND DRUG TESTING Controlled ] Substances.
A
] veterinarian may not possess on association grounds a controlled
substance, as defined by the Texas Controlled Substances Act, Health and Safety
Code, Chapter 481, unless the controlled substance is on an approved list
developed by the executive secretary. [
The approved list of controlled
substances shall be posted in the commission veterinarian's office and in
a prominent place that will ensure access by veterinarians and other interested
persons. A veterinarian must obtain approval from the commission veterinarian
to possess on association grounds a controlled substance which is not on the
approved list.
]
(b)
]
executive secretary
] may not approve the possession of a [
controlled
] substance which is not on the approved list unless the person requesting
approval submits documentation in recognized veterinary journals or by recognized
veterinary experts that the substance has a
proven
beneficial,
therapeutic application for a horse or greyhound in race training.
(c)
] A person may not prescribe,
provide, obtain, order, administer, possess, dispense, give or deliver a controlled
substance, prescription drug, or legend drug to or for a race animal solely
for training or racing purposes.
Subchapter D. DRUG TESTING
commission staff
] may promulgate a
classification for prohibited drugs, chemicals,
and other substances and a schedule for
[
fine schedule with
]
recommended disciplinary action for use by stewards, racing judges, and the
Commission
[
commission
] in assessing penalties for various
violations under this chapter.
3.
PROVISIONS FOR HORSES
the part
]
of the specimen that is not sent to the laboratory. The veterinarian or designee
shall store the retained part in a manner that ensures the integrity of the
specimen.
The
] owner or trainer of a horse
which has received
[
for which
] a positive result on a drug
test [
is obtained
] may request, in writing, that the retained [
part of the specimen
]
serum or urine, whichever provided the positive
result,
be submitted for testing [
in accordance with this subchapter
] to a
Commission approved and listed
laboratory
that
is
[
on a list maintained by the commission and
] acceptable
to [
the commission and
] the owner or trainer. The
owner or
trainer must notify the executive secretary of the
request [
must
be submitted
] not later than 48 hours after [
the owner or trainer
receives
] notice of the positive result.
Failure to request the
split within the prescribed time period will be deemed a waiver of the right
to the split specimen.
veterinarian
] shall arrange for
the transportation of the specimen in a manner that ensures the integrity
of the specimen. The person requesting the tests shall pay all costs of transporting
and conducting tests on the specimen. To ensure the integrity of the specimen,
the split specimen must be shipped to the selected laboratory no later than
10 days after the day the trainer is notified of the positive test. Subject
to this deadline, the owner or trainer of the horse from whom the specimen
was obtained is entitled to be present or have a representative present at
the time the split specimen is sent for testing.
commission
] is entitled to submit the entire
urine specimen for testing or detain the horse until an adequate amount of
urine can be obtained.
commission
] or its representatives, prevents the split from being tested,
the findings of the original laboratory shall be prima facie evidence of the
condition of the horse at the time of the race.
Chapter 321.
PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
2.
MUTUEL TICKETS
3.
REGULATION OF WAGERING
Subchapter B. DISTRIBUTION OF PARI-MUTUEL POOLS
Subchapter C. SIMULCAST WAGERING
2.
SIMULCASTING AT HORSE RACETRACKS
4.
COMMON POOL WAGERING
Subchapter D. TOTALISATOR OPERATIONS
2.
TOTALISATOR SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
3.
TOTALISATOR OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Chapter 321.
PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING
2.
WAGERING INFORMATION AND RESULTS
3.
MUTUEL TICKETS AND VOUCHERS
Subchapter B. TOTALISATOR REQUIREMENTS AND OPERATING ENVIRONMENT
2.
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
3.
REPORTING AND LOG REQUIREMENTS
Subchapter C. REGULATION OF LIVE WAGERING
2.
DISTRIBUTION OF PARI-MUTUEL POOLS
Subchapter D. SIMULCAST WAGERING
2.
COMMON POOL WAGERING
3.
SIMULCASTING AT HORSE RACETRACKS
Part 9.
TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION