TITLE 22.EXAMINING BOARDS

Part 23. TEXAS REAL ESTATE COMMISSION

Chapter 535. PROVISIONS OF THE REAL ESTATE LICENSE ACT

Subchapter F. EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS, TIME PERIODS AND TYPE OF LICENSE

22 TAC §535.62

The Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) proposes an amendment to §535.62, concerning acceptable courses of study. Section 535.62 establishes the guidelines for TREC's acceptance of core real estate courses from license applicants. Under the current section, a proctor must conduct the examination for a correspondence course offered by a college or university. The proposed amendment would clarify how the examination must be graded by the instructor or provider, and would permit the course provider to conduct the examination by use of a computer, thus allowing students to take the course examination online or at a site designated by the provider. Whether the examination is conducted by proctor or by computer, the proposed amendment section would require the provider to ensure that the examinee is the same person as the person who seeks course credit. The amendment would permit correspondence course providers to employ the same examination alternatives that exist for providers who use alternative delivery systems, such as computers, for their courses.

Mark A. Moseley, general counsel, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for the state or for units of local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses, micro businesses or local or state employment as a result of implementing the section.

Mr. Moseley also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section as proposed is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be greater flexibility in the offering of examinations for correspondence courses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed section.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mark A. Moseley, General Counsel, Texas Real Estate Commission, P.O. Box 12188, Austin, Texas 78711-2188.

The amendment is proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6573a, §5(h), which authorizes the Texas Real Estate Commission to make and enforce all rules and regulations necessary for the performance of its duties.

The statute which is affected by this proposal is Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6573a.

§535.62.Acceptable Courses of Study.

(a)-(c) (No change.)

(d) A core real estate course also must meet each of the following requirements to be accepted.

(1)-(4) (No change.)

(5) For a correspondence course, the course must have been offered by an accredited college or university, and students receiving credit for the course must pass either: [ successful completion of a written final examination was a requirement for receiving credit from the provider, and the examination was administered under controlled conditions to positively identified students ]

(A) a proctored final examination administered under controlled conditions to positively identified students and graded by the instructor or, if the examination is being graded mechanically or by use of a computer, by the provider, using answer keys approved by the instructor or provider; or

(B) an examination by use of a computer under conditions that satisfy the commission that the examinee is the same person who seeks course credit .

(6)-(9) (No change.)

(e)-(f) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on July 17, 2001.

TRD-200104109

Mark A. Moseley

General Counsel

Texas Real Estate Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 2, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 465-3910


Subchapter G. MANDATORY CONTINUING EDUCATION

22 TAC §535.71, §535.72

The Texas Real Estate Commission (TREC) proposes amendments to §535.71, concerning approval of mandatory continuing education (MCE) providers, courses and instructors and §535.72, concerning presentation of courses, advertising and records.

Under current §535.71, MCE correspondence course examinations must be conducted by a proctor. The proposed amendment would clarify how the examination must be graded by the instructor or provider and would permit the course provider to conduct the examination by use of a computer, thus allowing students to take the course examination online or at a site designated by the provider. Whether the examination is conducted by proctor or by computer, the section would require the provider to ensure that the examinee is the same person as the person who seeks course credit. The amendment would permit correspondence course providers to employ the same examination alternatives that exist for providers who use alternative delivery systems, such as computers. The amendment to §535.71 also would adopt by reference a revised form, MCE 9-4, Alternative Instructional Methods Reporting Form, which would be used by the provider to report the student's passing of the examination and successful completion of the course. The report form has been rearranged for clarity, and additional language has been added to emphasize the provider's obligation to submit the form to TREC. If the provider administers the examination on line, the section relating to the proctor would not be completed.

The amendment to §535.72 updates a reference to the revised reporting form.

Mark A. Moseley, general counsel, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for the state or for units of local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections. There is no anticipated impact on small businesses, micro businesses or local or state employment as a result of implementing the sections.

Mr. Moseley also has determined that for each year of the first five years the sections as proposed are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections will be greater flexibility in the offering of examinations for MCE correspondence courses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the proposed sections.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mark A. Moseley, General Counsel, Texas Real Estate Commission, P.O. Box 12188, Austin, Texas 78711-2188.

The amendments are proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6573a, §5(h), which authorizes the Texas Real Estate Commission to make and enforce all rules and regulations necessary for the performance of its duties.

The statute which is affected by this proposal is Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6573a.

§535.71.Mandatory Continuing Education: Approval of Providers, Courses and Instructors.

(a)-(b) (No change.)

(c) The commission adopts by reference the following forms published and available from the commission, P.O. Box 12188, Austin, Texas, 78711-2188:

(1)-(7) (No change.)

(8) MCE Form 9-4 [ 9-3 ], Alternative Instructional Methods Reporting Form;

(9)-(13) (No change.)

(d)-(o) (No change.)

(p) Correspondence courses. The commission may approve a provider to offer an MCE course by correspondence subject to the following conditions:

(1)-(2) (No change.)

(3) students receiving MCE credit for the course must pass either:

(A) a proctored written examination administered under controlled conditions to positively identified students, at a location and by an official approved by the commission and graded by the instructor or, if the examination is being graded mechanically or by use of a computer, by the provider, using answer keys approved by the instructor or provider; or

(B) an examination by use of a computer under conditions that satisfy the commission that the examinee is the same person who seeks MCE credit; and

(4) written course work required of students must be graded by an approved instructor or the provider's coordinator or director, who is available to answer students' questions or provide assistance as necessary, using answer keys approved by the instructor or provider[ ; and ]

[(5) final examinations must be graded by the instructor or, if the examination is being graded mechanically or by use of a computer, by the provider, using answer keys approved by the instructor or provider].

(q)-(r) (No change.)

§535.72.Mandatory Continuing Education: Presentation of Courses, Advertising and Records.

(a)-(c ) (No change.)

(d) Providers of MCE correspondence or alternative delivery method courses shall furnish each student with an Alternative Instructional Methods Reporting Form, MCE Form 9-4 [ 9-3 ], at the time of the final examination. Upon successful completion of the examination the student shall sign MCE Form 9-4 [ 9-3 ]. To report successful course completion the provider shall file the completed MCE Form 9-4 [ 9-3 ] with the commission.

(e)-(o) (No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on July 17, 2001.

TRD-200104108

Mark A. Moseley

General Counsel

Texas Real Estate Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 2, 2001

For further information, please call: (512) 465-3900