Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner
Notice of Rate Ceilings
The Consumer Credit Commissioner of Texas has ascertained the following
rate ceilings by use of the formulas and methods described in Sections 303.003
and 303.009, Tex. Fin. Code.
The weekly ceiling as prescribed by Sections 303.003 and 303.009 for the
period of 04/16/01 - 04/22/01 is 18% for Consumer
1
/Agricultural/Commercial
The weekly ceiling as prescribed by Sections 303.003 and 303.09 for the
period of 04/16/01 - 04/22/01 is 18% for Commercial over $250,000.
1
Credit for personal, family or household
use.
2
Credit for business, commercial, investment
or other similar purpose.
TRD-200102043
Leslie L. Pettijohn
Commissioner
Office of Consumer Credit Commissioner
Filed: April 10, 2001
Request for Proposals Concerning Evaluation of the Technology Integration in Education (TIE) Initiative: the Texas Technology Literacy Challenge Fund (TLCF) Initiative
Eligible Proposers. The Texas Education Agency (TEA) is requesting proposals
under Request for Proposals (RFP) #701-01-017 from nonprofit organizations,
institutions of higher education, private companies, and individuals to determine
the impact of the Technology Integration in Education (TIE)/Texas Technology
Literacy Challenge Fund (TLCF) awards on Texas students, educators, campuses,
and districts. Historically underutilized businesses (HUBs) are encouraged
to submit proposals.
Description. The purpose of this RFP is to select a contractor who will
gather, analyze, summarize, and submit data from the fiscal agents and collaborative
members and subgrantees awarded TIE/TLCF grants from 1997 to 2001. Information
about the grant recipients is available at http://www.tea.state.tx.us/technology/rfa/TIE/.
The contractor will develop quantitative and qualitative survey instruments,
conduct site visits as appropriate, conduct interviews, and gather data. Based
on the gathered data and data provided to the contractor by the TEA, the contractor
will prepare and submit reports identified and defined through the RFP process
and by TEA.
Dates of Project. All services and activities related to this proposal
will be conducted within specified dates. Proposers should plan for a starting
date of no earlier than July 17, 2001, and an ending date of no later than
July 31, 2002.
Project Amount. This project is funded 100% from Technology Literacy Challenge
funds authorized by federal law, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act
(ESEA).
Selection Criteria. Proposals will be selected based on the ability of
each proposer to carry out all requirements contained in this RFP. The TEA
will base its selection on, among other things, the demonstrated competence
and qualifications of the proposer and upon the reasonableness of the proposed
fee. The TEA reserves the right to select from the highest ranking proposals
those that address all requirements in the RFP and that are most advantageous
to the project.
The TEA is not obligated to execute a resulting contract, provide funds,
or endorse any proposal submitted in response to this RFP. This RFP does not
commit TEA to pay any costs incurred before a contract is executed. The issuance
of this RFP does not obligate TEA to award a contract or pay any costs incurred
in preparing a response.
Requesting the Proposal. A complete copy of RFP #701-01-017 may be obtained
by writing the: Document Control Center, Room 6- 108, Texas Education Agency,
William B. Travis Building, 1701 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701,
by calling (512) 463-9304, or e-mailing dcc@tea.state.tx.us. Please refer
to the RFP number in your request.
Further Information. For clarifying information about this RFP, contact
Anita Givens, Division of Educational Technology, TEA, at (512) 463 9400 or
by email at agivens@tea.state.tx.us.
Deadline for Receipt of Proposals. Proposals must be received in the Document
Control Center of the TEA by 5:00 p.m. (Central Time), Tuesday, June 5, 2001,
to be considered.
TRD-200102088
Criss Cloudt
Associate Commissioner, Accountability Reporting and Research
Texas Education Agency
Filed: April 11, 2001
Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Independent Audit Services
The Employees Retirement System of Texas ("the System") is requesting an
offer from independent certified public accountants ("the Auditor") to perform
a financial audit of the System for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2001,
2002 and 2003. The selected Auditor will enter into a contract with the System
for a period of three (3) years.
Contact Person
Interested Auditors must either fax their request on their company letterhead
to the attention of Marci B. Sundbeck, Director of Internal Auditing, Employees
Retirement System of Texas, at (512) 867-7480, or send their request via email
to msundbeck@ers.state.tx.us. An email request must include the name of the
company, mailing address, telephone number, fax number and email address,
if applicable. Upon receipt of request, a copy of the RFQ will be forwarded
to the requesting Auditor via U. S. Mail.
Please refer any requests for further information about the RFQ to Marci
B. Sundbeck, Director of Internal Auditing, Employees Retirement System of
Texas, P.O. Box 13207, Austin, Texas 78711-3207, TEL. 512-867-7302, FAX 512-867-7480.
The System will not be responsible for expenses incurred in preparing and
submitting the responses to the RFQ. Such costs will not be included in the
response to the RFQ.
Closing Date
The Auditor will submit seven (7) copies of the completed response to the
RFQ by 3:00 p.m. CST on May 11, 2001, to the Employees Retirement System of
Texas, P.O. Box 13207, Austin, Texas 78711-3207, to the attention of Marci
B. Sundbeck, Director of Internal Auditing, or hand-carried to the ERS Building,
Room 400, 18th & Brazos, Austin, Texas.
If the response to the RFQ will be submitted by mail, it must be received
by the System no later than the date and time set out above. Hand-carried
responses to the RFQ may be delivered between 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. CST
through the date and time set out above. All responses to the RFQ will be
in a sealed envelope with the Auditor's name, address and RFQ subject matter
shown on the outside.
Selection Process
Responses to the RFQ will be reviewed by the System staff. Based on this
review, interviews may be scheduled with the Auditors considered to be the
best qualified.
Evaluation Criteria
Responses to the RFQ will be evaluated using three (3) sets of criteria
in order to determine the demonstrated competence and qualifications of the
Auditor to perform the services for a fair and reasonable price. The Auditors
meeting the mandatory criteria will have their responses to the RFQ evaluated
and scored for both technical qualifications and fees. The following represent
the selection criteria that will be considered during the evaluation process.
I. Mandatory Elements
A. Independent of the System;
B. The firm has no conflict of interest with regard to any other work performed
by the Auditor for the System;
C. Licensed to practice in Texas;
D. The Auditor must submit a copy of its most recent external quality control
review report;
E. The Auditor has a record of quality audit work;
F. EEO compliance;
G. Child Support compliance; and
H. The Auditor adheres to the instructions in the RFQ on preparing and
submitting the response.
II. Technical Qualifications (Maximum Points -- 85)
A. Expertise and Experience
1. Similar Engagements (Maximum Points -- 35)
Extent, diversification, and quality of retirement system auditing experience
based on information provided by the Auditor as well as references of former
and present clients.
2. Ability to Perform (Maximum Points -- 20)
The Auditor's ability and willingness to meet the requirements and needs
of the System with respect to the audit as outlined in the RFQ and as demonstrated
in the response.
a.Firm's Qualifications and Experience
i. Broad experience of the firm;
ii. If joint venture or consortium, the qualifications of the principal
Auditor;
iii. Percentage of Professional Billings; and
iv. Adequacy of CPE.
3. Personnel Quality (Maximum Points - 10)
The quality of the Auditor's professional personnel to be assigned to the
engagement and the quality of the Auditor's management support personnel to
be available for technical consultation.
a. Auditor Staff Qualifications and Experience
i. Principal supervisory and management staff and other specialists assigned
to the engagement;
ii. Capability to audit computerized systems;
iii. Commitment to governments; and
iv. Public Employees Retirement System auditing experience.
B. Audit Approach (Maximum Points -- 20)
1. Adequacy of proposed audit approach and staffing plan for various segments
of the engagement.
a. Interim Work
b. Engagement Letter
c. Fieldwork - Audit of financial records:
i. System's budget
ii. Organizational charts, manuals and programs
iii. Financial information systems
iv. Other management information systems
d. Management Letter
e. Conferences
f. Other segments the Auditor considers essential
III. Professional Fees (Maximum Points -- 15)
A. Total all-inclusive maximum price;
B. Rates by partner, specialist, supervisory and staff level and hours
anticipated for each; and
C. Rates for additional professional services.
The selection of any Auditor will be made on the basis of demonstrated
competence and qualifications to perform the services for a fair and reasonable
price which must be consistent with and not higher than the recommended practices
and fees published by any applicable professional associations.
At the discretion of the System, the Auditors submitting responses may
be requested to make oral presentations as part of the evaluation process.
In all interviews held with the Auditor, the proposed audit partner and
manager for the System's engagement and the individual who will have on-site
responsibility for the audit (if a person other than the partner or manager)
must be present.
Final Selection
Final selection of any Auditor will be made by the System's Board of Trustees.
Contractual Agreement
The contract to be entered into between the Auditor and the System, for
audit services included in the RFQ, will be for a period of three (3) years.
The Auditor will include certification that the person signing the response
to the RFQ is entitled to represent the firm, empowered to submit the response
and authorized to sign a contract with the System by including the following
wording:
"I hereby certify that I have read all items of this RFQ and fully understand
the requirements listed herein. I further certify that I am an authorized
agent of the Auditor empowered to submit the response to the RFQ, and authorized
to sign a contract with the System."
A copy of the RFQ as well as the successful response to the RFQ will be
attached to the contract. The System expects the Auditor to fully execute
the contract and return it to the System along with the Auditor's response
to the RFQ.
Right To Reject
Submission of a response to the RFQ, along with the executed contract,
indicates acceptance by the Auditor of the conditions contained in the RFQ
and contract unless clearly and specifically noted in the response submitted
and confirmed in the contract between the System and the Auditor selected.
The System reserves the right to reject any and all responses to the RFQ
submitted without any obligation or payment for costs incurred by proposing
Auditors. The System reserves the right, where it may serve the System's best
interest, to request additional information or clarification from any respondent,
to allow corrections of errors or omissions, or to discuss points in the response
to the RFQ before and after submission, all of which may be used in forming
a recommendation. The System reserves the right to waive any and all formalities
contained within the RFQ except for the deadline for filing. Responses to
the RFQ received late will not be considered.
The System reserves the right to retain each response submitted and to
use any aspect of the response to the RFQ regardless of whether that Auditor
is selected.
Open Records
Copyrighted proposals are unacceptable and will be disqualified as non-responsive.
Following the selection of an Auditor, responses to the RFQ are subject
to release as public information unless the response or specific parts of
the response can be clearly shown to be exempt from the Texas Public Information
Act. The Auditor is advised to consult with its legal counsel regarding disclosure
issues and take the appropriate precautions to safeguard proprietary information.
The System assumes no obligation or responsibility for asserting legal arguments
on behalf of any respondent to the RFQ.
If the Auditor believes that its response or parts thereof are confidential,
then the Auditor must so specify. The Auditor must stamp in bold red letters
the term
"CONFIDENTIAL"
on that part of the
response that the Auditor considers confidential. The Auditor must submit
in writing specific detailed reasons, including relevant legal authority,
stating why the Auditor believes the material to be confidential. Vague and
general claims will not be accepted. The Attorney General of Texas will be
the sole judge as to whether a claim is general and/or vague in nature. All
responses and parts of responses that are not marked confidential will be
automatically considered public information after the Auditor is selected.
Any response may be considered public information by the Attorney General
of Texas even though parts are marked confidential.
TRD-200102068
Sheila W. Beckett
Executive Director
Employees Retirement System of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
Notice of Public Hearing for Proposed Rules Concerning Licensure of Tanning Facilities
A public hearing will be held by the Texas Department of Health (department)
on May 11, 2001, at 9:00 a.m., at the Texas Animal Commission, Conference
Room, 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, Texas, 78758, in regards to the proposed amendments
concerning the licensure of tanning facilities to accept comments. The proposed
amendments for 25 Texas Administrative Code, §§229.342, 229.343,
229.345 - 229.349, 229.351 - 229.354, 229.356, 229.357 were published in the
February 2, 2001, issue of the
Texas Register
(26 TexReg 1090).
Additional comments will be accepted by the department at the public hearing
held on May 11, 2001. Questions or additional information may be directed
to Tom Brinck, Director of Programs, Medical Devices, Texas Department of
Health, 1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas 78756, (512) 719-0237, ext. 465.
TRD-200102089
Susan K. Steeg
General Counsel
Texas Department of Health
Filed: April 11, 2001
Housing Trust Fund Housing & Youth Training Program
Request for Proposals for Construction of Affordable Housing & Youth
Training
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, through its Housing
Trust Fund, is pleased to announce that it will make available approximately
The Housing Trust Fund provides funding for organizations to increase the
supply of affordable, energy-efficient, sustainable housing and to educate
and train at-risk youth and young adults of the State of Texas. Mixed income
developments that include market rate units are encouraged, provided a portion
of the units are reserved for families or individuals at or below eighty percent
(80%) of Area Median Family Income and for persons with special needs.
Eligible applicants, which include private, non-profit, tax-exempt organizations
listed in Section 501(c)(3), Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 USC Section
501(c)(3)), public agencies that operate community-based youth employment
training programs, educational facilities approved by the Texas Youth Commission,
corps-based community service organizations, open-enrollment charter schools
approved by the Texas Education Agency and Certified Housing Development Organizations
(CHDO's) may compete on a statewide basis.
General Information on RFP:
Proposals will be evaluated and scored primarily, but not exclusively,
based on the following criteria: demonstrated performance in serving at-risk
youth; demonstrated performance in construction and community housing development;
cost effectiveness; qualifications of key personnel; organization's fiscal
management and systems; the plan to recruit, select and retrain eligible youth
participants; the plan to deliver services to eligible youth participants;
the plan to utilize sustainable energy efficient construction materials and
techniques. The Housing Trust Fund desires to select a diverse group of single
family and multifamily developments that will serve varied populations throughout
the state.
Organizations interested in submitting a proposal are requested to download
the HTF Affordable Housing & Youth Training RFP package from the Housing
Trust Fund web page of the TDHCA web site located at
http://www.tdhca.state.tx.us/htf.htm.
Applicants may also request a
diskette or hard copy version of the RFP package. RFP packages will be transmitted
via first class U.S. Postal Service unless applicants request transmittal
via overnight courier and provide the name and account number of their desired
courier.
The Department reserves the right to award less than the requested amount.
Applications must be submitted on or before 5:00
p.m., May 22, 2001.
FAXED APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
All interested parties with a viable single family or multifamily development
in conjunction with youth training and education are encouraged to participate
in these programs.
Proposal packages will be available
on April 20, 2001.
A Proposal Workshop for
this application will be on April 25, 2001, at 2:00 PM in the TDHCA Board
Room located at 507 Sabine, 4th Floor, Austin, Texas.
For additional
information, or to request an RFP package, please call the Housing Trust Fund
Office at (512) 475-1458, or e-mail your request to shiggins@tdhca.state.tx.us.
Please direct your proposals to:
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Housing Trust Fund - Attn: Keith Hoffpauir
Post Office Box 13941
Austin, Texas 78711-3941
Or by courier to:
507 Sabine, Suite 400
Austin, Texas 78701
TRD-200102040
Daisy A. Stiner
Executive Director
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Filed: April 10, 2001
In accordance with Subchapter E, Chapter 5, Texas Property Code, as added
by Chapter 994, Acts of the 74th Legislature, the Texas Department of Housing
and Community Affairs has determined that the requirements governing residential
contracts for deed in Subchapter E will apply to the following counties in
Texas:
1. Andrews
2. Brooks
3. Cameron
4. Culberson
5. Dimmit
6. Duval
7. El Paso
8. Frio
9. Hidalgo
10. Jimm Hogg
11. Jim Wells
12. Kinney
13. Kleberg
14. La Salle
15. Maverick
16. Pecos
17. Presidio
18. Reeves
19. San Patricio
20. Starr
21. Uvalde
22. Val Verde
23. Ward
24. Webb
25. Willacy
26. Winkler
27. Zapata
28. Zavala
Each county listed above is within 200 miles of an international border
and has a per capita income that averaged 25 percent below the state average
for the years 1996, 1997, and 1998 and an unemployment rate that averaged
25 percent above the state average for the years 1998, 1999, and 2000.
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs has also determined
that the requirements contained in Subchapter E will apply to the counties
listed above beginning June 1, 2001.
TRD-200102084
Daisy A. Stiner
Executive Director
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Filed: April 11, 2001
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs ("the Department")
programs were created to provide decent, safe and sanitary housing opportunities
for low and very low income Texans. The Department aids in building affordable
multifamily housing through several of its programs, including, but not limited
to, the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program, the HOME Program and the Housing
Trust Fund.
The Department recognizes the need to ensure that the location of any new
multifamily project is selected in a manner designed to enhance the viability
of all properties in the area by taking into account existing comparable low
income units in the affected market. Securing the viability of all properties
calls for placing controls on the number of units funded in a market. To achieve
this goal, the Department has developed a concentration policy to govern the
funding of all multifamily developments.
The Department will hold public hearings to receive comments on the proposed
Concentration Policy for Multifamily Housing, at the following times and locations:
DALLAS, Monday, April 30
City Council Chambers
1500 Marilla Street
6:00 p.m.
AUSTIN, Tuesday, May 1
TDHCA Headquarters
Board Room, 4th Flr.
507 Sabine
1:00 p.m.
HOUSTON, Wednesday, May 9
Original City Council Chambers
City Hall, 2nd Flr.
901 Bagby
6:00 p.m.
McALLEN, Wednesday, May 2
McAllen Main Library, Third Floor
601 North Main Street
6:00 p.m.
Written comments are also encouraged. Such comments should be addressed
to:
David Burrell, Director of Housing Programs
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Post Office Box 13941
Austin, Texas 78711-3941; or
via fax at 512.472.8526;or
via e-mail at info@genesis.tdhca.state.tx.us.
For additional information you may contact the Texas Department of Housing
and Community Affairs at 512.475.3800 or visit the program's web site at www.tdhca.state.tx.us.
Individuals who require auxiliary aids or services for these meetings should
contact Gina Esteves, ADA Responsible Employee, at 512.475.3943 or Relay Texas
at 1.800.735.2989 at least two days before the meeting so that appropriate
arrangements can be made.
The proposed Concentration Policy for Multifamily Housing follows:
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Concentration Policy for Multifamily Housing
The Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs (TDHCA), by and through
its Board of Directors recognizes the need to set limits on the concentration
of new housing units it funds in markets and submarkets throughout the state.
For the purposes of this policy a market is generally defined by the boundaries
of a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) or a county or city. In a market
with a population of greater than 500,000, submarkets should be delineated
that contain not more than 500,000 persons and not less than 50,000 persons.
In cases where the market is over 500,000, the city boundaries that contain
proposed projects should be used to delimit the submarket if the city contains
at least 50,000 persons but not more than 500,000 persons. In cases where
the city, as a submarket, is outside of this range, the submarket boundaries
should be generally defined as a three (3)-mile radius defined by a market
study analyst as prescribed in the Department's Market Analysis and Appraisal
Policy. In cases where a three (3)-mile radius is too large or too small to
contain 500,000 to 50,000 persons, the radius should be incrementally decreased
or increased by one (1) mile until the submarket defined contains a population
of 500,000 to 50,000 persons. For the purposes of this policy, the term comparable
means units that are dedicated to same household type as the proposed subject
property using the classifications of family, elderly or transitional as household
types.
1. The Department may limit annually the issuance of Determination Notices,
the allocation of tax credits, and the award of Department funding for new
construction projects to not more than 560 comparable units within any market
or submarket if the market area has been defined in accordance with the population
range described above; or
2. The Department may limit annually the issuance of Determination Notices,
the allocation of tax credits, and the award of Department funding for new
construction projects to not more than 280 units within any market or submarket
if the market area has been defined in accordance with the population range
described above, and includes existing or approved but not completed comparable
tax credit projects totaling 500 units or more that have maintained stabilized
occupancies of at least 90% for less than 1 full year.
3. In making a decision about the issuance of a Determination Notice under
items (1) or (2) above, the Department will act in accordance with the order
in which the bond reservations were issued subject to a project's feasibility
and a determination by the Department that the site is acceptable.
4. The Department will not issue a Determination Notice, allocate tax credits,
or award Department funds to any project that it determines would have a significant
negative impact on existing (or approved) multifamily housing projects. In
making this determination, the Department will take into account all pertinent
information including the data and conclusions of the market study. The findings
of the market study should result in an appropriately calculated capture rate
of not more than 25%. In general, the capture rate is calculated as the sum
of all proposed new units divided by the total income eligible renter household
demand in the market or submarket as appropriate. Additional definitions of
capture rate and demand shall be promulgated in the Department's Market Analysis
and Appraisal Policy and associated guidelines.
TRD-200102079
Daisy A. Stiner
Executive Director
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Filed: April 11, 2001
Notice of Contract Award
The Department of Information Resources (DIR) announces that it has entered
into a major consulting services contract with PeopleSoft USA, Inc. (PeopleSoft)
for services delivered to the Employees Retirement System of Texas (ERS).
The purpose of these services is to study and advise ERS on security aspects
of the State's benefits administration system as it migrates to the latest
version of PeopleSoft. These services are being conducted pursuant to a professional
services contract between PeopleSoft and the Texas Department of Information
Resources. The not-to-exceed cost is estimated to be $27,830.00
TRD-200101997
Renee Mauzy
General Counsel
Department of Information Resources
Filed: April 6, 2001
Insurer Services
Application to change the name of NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY
OF AMERICA to NATIONWIDE AFFINITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a foreign
life company. The home office is in Columbus, Ohio.
Application for admission to the State of Texas by CORNERSTONE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, a foreign fire and casualty company. The home office is in Duluth,
Georgia.
Application for admission to the State of Texas by SOUTHERN TITLE INSURANCE
CORPORATION, a foreign title company. The home office is in Richmond, Virginia.
Application for admission to the State of Texas by NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY, a foreign title company. The home office is in Commack, New York.
Any objections must be filed with the Texas Department of Insurance, addressed
to the attention of Godwin Ohaechesi, 333 Guadalupe Street, M/C 305-2C, Austin,
Texas 78701.
TRD-200102087
Judy Woolley
Deputy Chief Clerk
Texas Department of Insurance
Filed: April 11, 2001
The following third party administrator (TPA) application has been filed
with the Texas Department of Insurance and is under consideration.
Application for admission to Texas of SimplyHealth.Com, Inc., a foreign
third party administrator. The home office is Wilmington, Delaware.
Any objections must be filed within 20 days after this notice was filed
with the Secretary of State, addressed to the attention of Charles M. Waits,
MC 107-5A, 333 Guadalupe, Austin, Texas 78714-9104.
TRD-200102078
Judy Woolley
Deputy Chief Clerk
Texas Department of Insurance
Filed: April 11, 2001
Request for Funding for Consumer and Auctioneer Education
The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation and the Auctioneer Education
Advisory Board hereby solicits requests for funding. Requests must include
education for the advancement of the auctioneer profession. The subject matter
should concern universal standards of auctioneering, including the subjects
of ethics, deceptive trade practice act, laws and administrative rules concerning
taxes to be collected and paid to the State of Texas by auctioneers, and all
other state and federal statutes that apply to the auction business in the
State of Texas, including the Texas Auctioneer Law. Requests for funding must
encompass all four of the above subject areas, target delivery to all areas
of the state, and seek to attract both full time and part time licensed auctioneers.
To receive copies of the Request for Funding contact Caroline Jackson at
512/463-7348; 1-800-803-9202; facsimile-512/475-2872 or electronically at
caroline.jackson@license.state.tx.us. Requests for Funding must be received
by May 23, 2001 at 5:00 p.m.
Requests for Funding will be evaluated for completeness, content, and usefulness.
More than one request may be recommended for funding. Requests may be made
for clarification, but no changes to requests will be accepted. A recommendation
will be made by the Auctioneer Education Advisory Board to the Commissioner
of Licensing and Regulation at a public meeting to be scheduled and announced
at a later date.
The Department reserves the right to accept or reject any or all requests
submitted. The Department is under no legal or other obligation to execute
a contract on the basis of this Request for Funding. The Request for Funding
does not commit the Department to pay for any costs incurred prior to the
approval of a request.
This agency hereby certifies that this announcement has been reviewed by
legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
TRD-200102041
William H. Kuntz, Jr.
Executive Director
Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Filed: April 10, 2001
Notice of Joint Public Hearing on Reimbursement Rates for Services in Institutions for Mental Diseases (IMD)
The Health and Human Services Commission and the Texas Department of Mental
Health and Mental Retardation will conduct a joint public hearing to receive
public comment on the extension of current reimbursement rates for Institutions
for Mental Diseases (IMDs). The rates will be effective May 1, 2001, through
August 31, 2001. The joint hearing will be held in compliance with Title 1,
Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 355, Subchapter F, §355.702(h), which
requires a public hearing on proposed reimbursement rate for medical assistance
programs. Payment rates are proposed to be effective May 1, 2001, as follows:
$367.97 per day
Methodology and justification: The proposed rates were determined in accordance
with the rate setting methodology codified as 1 Texas Administrative Code
Chapter 355, Subchapter F (relating to Reimbursement Methodology for all medical
assistance programs (IMDs)), §355.761(c)(3,4).
The public hearing will be held on Monday, May 7, 2001, at 1:00 p.m. in
room 2-328, of TDMHMR Central Office building (Building 2) at 909 West 45th
Street, Austin, Texas 78751.
Written comments may be submitted to the Reimbursement and Analysis Section,
Medicaid Administration, Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation,
P. O. Box 12668, Austin, Texas 78711-2668, or faxed to (512) 206-5693. Hand
deliveries will be accepted at 909 West 45th Street, Building 4, Austin, Texas
78751. Comments must be received by 4:00 p.m. on Monday, May 7, 2001.
Persons requiring an interpreter for deaf or hearing impaired or other
accommodation should contact Tom Wooldridge by calling (512) 206-5753 or the
TDY phone number of Texas Relay, which is 1-800-735-2988, at least 72 hours
prior to the hearing.
TRD-200102035
Andrew Hardin
Chairman, Texas MHMR Board
Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation
Filed: April 10, 2001
Correction of Error
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission adopted 30 TAC §101.383,
concerning General Air Quality Rules. The rule appeared in the April 6, 2001,
Due to a typographical error in the agency's submission, the word "a" should
not appear in paragraphs (1) and (2) of §101.383(a) on page 26 TexReg
2735.
The paragraphs should read:
"(1) maximum daily cap with one-day surplus emission allowables generated
on the same day; and
"(2) rolling 30-day average daily system cap emission limitation with surplus
emission allowables generated over the same period."
TRD-200102033
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC or commission)
staff is providing an opportunity for written public comment on the listed
Agreed Orders (AOs) pursuant to Texas Water Code (the Code), §7.075,
which requires that the TNRCC may not approve these AOs unless the public
has been provided an opportunity to submit written comments. Section 7.075
requires that notice of the proposed orders and of the opportunity to comment
must be published in the
Texas Register
no
later than the 30th day before the date on which the public comment period
closes, which in this case is
May 21, 2001
.
Section 7.075 also requires that the TNRCC promptly consider any written comments
received and that the TNRCC may withhold approval of an AO if a comment discloses
facts or considerations that indicate the proposed AO is inappropriate, improper,
inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Code, the Texas Health
and Safety Code (THSC), and/or the Texas Clean Air Act (the Act). Additional
notice is not required if changes to an AO are made in response to written
comments.
A copy of each of the proposed AOs is available for public inspection at
both the TNRCC's Central Office, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Building
C, 1st Floor, Austin, Texas 78753, (512) 239-1864 and at the applicable Regional
Office listed as follows. Written comments about these AOs should be sent
to the enforcement coordinator designated for each AO at the TNRCC's Central
Office at P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 and must be
received by 5:00 p.m. on May 21, 2001
. Written comments may also be
sent by facsimile machine to the enforcement coordinator at (512) 239-2550.
The TNRCC enforcement coordinators are available to discuss the AOs and/or
the comment procedure at the listed phone numbers; however, §7.075 provides
that comments on the AOs should be submitted to the TNRCC in
writing
.
(1) COMPANY: AES Deepwater, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1434-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER:
Air Account Number HG-1495-V; LOCATION: Pasadena, Harris County, Texas; TYPE
OF FACILITY: electrical power generation; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §116.115(c),
Special Condition 1 of Permit 9276, and the Code, §382.085(b), by having
an upset emission of more than 2000 pounds of sulfur dioxide; and 30 TAC §101.6
and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to report an upset; PENALTY: $4,000;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Kevin Keyser, (713) 767-3500; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425
Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(2) COMPANY: Aker Gulf Marine; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1251-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER:
Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit Number 03012-000;
LOCATION: Aransas Pass, San Patricio County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: structural
metal fabrication; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1), TPDES Permit Number
03012-000, and the Code, §26.121, by failing to comply with the permitted
effluent limits for total suspended solids (TSS), chlorine, and flow; PENALTY:
$2,250; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: John Mead, (512) 239- 6010; REGIONAL OFFICE:
6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(3) COMPANY: AquaSource Utility, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1173-MWD-E;
IDENTIFIER: TPDES Permit Number 11974-001; LOCATION: Rockwall, Rockwall County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1),
TPDES Permit Number 11974-001, and the Code, §26.121, by failing to comply
with the permit effluent limits for ammonia nitrogen; PENALTY: $4,800; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: Sherry Smith, (512) 239-0572; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1101 East Arkansas
Lane, Arlington, Texas 76010-6499, (817) 588-5800.
(4) COMPANY: AquaSource, Inc. - Creekside Utilities Facility; DOCKET NUMBER:
2000- 1330-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER: TPDES Permit Number 11375-001; LOCATION: Houston,
Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §305.125(1), TPDES Permit Number 11375-001, and the Code, §26.121,
by failing to meet the permitted limit for ammonia nitrogen; PENALTY: $6,000;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Sherry Smith, (512) 239-0572; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425
Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(5) COMPANY: Bandera Ranch Resort L.C. dba Lost Valley Resort Ranch; DOCKET
NUMBER: 2000-1079-PWS-E; IDENTIFIER: Public Water Supply (PWS) Number 0100029;
LOCATION: Bandera, Bandera County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply;
RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(b)(2), (c)(3)(A)(ii), (f)(3), (g)(3) and
(4), and §290.122(b) and (c) (formerly 30 TAC §§290.106(b)(1),
(e)(1) and (2), 290.103(5), and 290.105(a)(2)), by exceeding the maximum contaminant
level (MCL) for total coliform bacteria, collect and submit repeat bacteriological
samples following a total coliform-positive sample result, provide public
notice related to the routine monthly and repeat sampling violations, and
provide public notice of the MCL violations; and 30 TAC §290.109(c),
(formerly 30 TAC §290.106(a)), by failing to collect and submit a routine
monthly water sample for bacteriological analysis; PENALTY: $1,250; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: Shawn Stewart, (512) 239-6684; REGIONAL OFFICE: 14250 Judson
Road, San Antonio, Texas 78233-4480, (210) 490-3096.
(6) COMPANY: Mr. Scott Wilson dba Bar-W Ranch; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1242-WR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Enforcement Identification Number 15415; LOCATION: Rising Star,
Eastland County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: hay producing ranch; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §297.11 and the Code, §11.121, by failing to obtain authorization
prior to diverting state water for irrigation purposes; PENALTY: $400; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: James Beauchamp, (915) 698- 9674; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1977 Industrial
Boulevard, Abilene, Texas 79602-7833, (915) 698-9674.
(7) COMPANY: BNP Petroleum Corporation; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1198-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number MC-0008-S; LOCATION: Tilden, McMullen County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: oil and gas exploration and production; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §101.10 and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit an
emissions inventory; and 30 TAC §101.27 and the Code, §382.085(b),
by failing to pay the emissions fees; PENALTY: $1,250; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Michael De La Cruz, (512) 239-0259; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite
1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(8) COMPANY: BP Amoco Chemical Company; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1174-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number HX-0055-V; LOCATION: Pasadena, Harris County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: alcohols and olefins manufacturing; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §115.542(a)(1) and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to use
a vapor control system; 30 TAC 117.211(e) and the Code, §382.085(b),
by failing to conduct three one-hour emission test runs; 30 TAC §115.214(a)(1)(B)
and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to stop liquid loading after leaks
occurred; and 30 TAC §101.20(1), 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §60.482-10
and §60.18, and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to test the HB-2
and HA-8 flare; PENALTY: $17,680; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Miriam Hall, (512)
239-1044; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486,
(713) 767-3500.
(9) COMPANY: Buckhorn Ranch & Lake, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1280-PWS-E;
IDENTIFIER: PWS Number 1011345; LOCATION: Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE
OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(c)(3),
(f), and (g), and §290.103(5), (formerly 30 TAC §§290.103(5),
290.105(a)(2) and 290.106(b)(1) and (e)), by failing to collect and submit
the required number of repeat samples for bacteriological analysis, exceeding
the MCL for total coliform bacteria, and provide public notice; PENALTY: $1,250;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Kimberly McGuire, (512) 239-4761; REGIONAL OFFICE:
5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(10) COMPANY: The City of Canton; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-0875-PWS-E; IDENTIFIER:
PWS Number 2340001; LOCATION: Canton, Van Zandt County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY:
public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.46(e)(1)(C), (formerly
30 TAC §290.46(e)(1)), and the Code, §341.033(a), by failing to
provide at least two grade "C" surface water operators; 30 TAC §290.46(e)(2)
and the Code, §341.033(a), by failing to have at least a grade "C" surface
water operator on duty when the plant is in operation or provide the plant
with continuous turbidity and disinfectant residual monitors; 30 TAC §290.46(b)(2)(F)
and the Code, §341.033(a), by failing to provide a service pump capacity
that provides each pump station or pressure plane with two or more pumps that
have a total capacity of two gallons per minute (gpm) per connection; and
30 TAC §290.42(k), (formerly 30 TAC §290.46(j)), by failing to provide
a plant operations manual; PENALTY: $2,625; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Terry
Thompson, (512) 239-6095; REGIONAL OFFICE: 2916 Teague Drive, Tyler, Texas
75701-3756, (903) 535-5100.
(11) COMPANY: The City of Centerville; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1001-MWD-E;
IDENTIFIER: TPDES Permit Number 10147-001; LOCATION: Centerville, Leon County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1)
and (5), TPDES Permit Number 10147-001, and the Code, §26.121, by failing
to comply with the permitted effluent limits for five-day biochemical oxygen
demand (BOD) and pH; PENALTY: $4,500; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: John Mead,
(512) 239-6010; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas
76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.
(12) COMPANY: Chevron Mart, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1228-PWS-E; IDENTIFIER:
PWS Number 1012162; LOCATION: Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY:
public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.109(c) and (g), and §290.122,
(formerly 30 TAC §290.106(a) and (e)(2) and §290.103(5)), by failing
to collect and submit routine monthly water samples for bacteriological analysis
and provide public notice; PENALTY: $1,000; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Kimberly
McGuire, (512) 239-4761; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston,
Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(13) COMPANY: Circle Bar Truck Corral, Incorporated; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1155-
IWD-E; IDENTIFIER: Expired Water Quality Permit Number 11868-001; LOCATION:
Ozona, Crockett County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment; RULE
VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.63(a), §305.125(2), and the Code, §26.121(a)(1),
by failing to renew Water Quality Permit Number 11868-001 and prevent the
unauthorized discharge of sewage; PENALTY: $5,600; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Mark Newman, (915) 655-9479; REGIONAL OFFICE: 622 South Oakes, Suite K, San
Angelo, Texas 76903-7013, (915) 655-9479.
(14) COMPANY: Cyndie Park II Water Supply Corporation; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1077-
PWS-E; IDENTIFIER: PWS Number 1780050; LOCATION: Banquete, Nueces County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.43(d)(2),
by failing to provide a pressure release device for the pressure tanks; 30
TAC §290.46(d)(2)(A), (m)(1), and (r), (formerly 30 TAC §290.46(f)(1)(A),
(p), and (u)), by failing to maintain a 0.2 milligram per liter (mg/l) free
chlorine residual, document inspection of the pressure tanks, and maintain
a normal system operating pressure of 35 pounds per square inch; 30 TAC §290.43(e),
by failing to provide intruder-resistant fences; 30 TAC §290.42(e)(7),
(formerly 30 TAC §290.43(e)(8)), by failing to properly house the hypochlorinator
equipment; 30 TAC §290.41(c)(3)(K), (M), and (O), by failing to provide
a proper casing vent, a properly installed raw water sampling tap, and a locked
well houses for the well units; and 30 TAC §290.118, (formerly 30 TAC §290.113),
by failing to meet the quality standard for total dissolved solids of 1000
mg/l; PENALTY: $1,375; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Audra Baumgartner, (361) 825-
3100; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas
78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(15) COMPANY: Degussa Corporation; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1002-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER:
Air Account Number AD-0001-F; LOCATION: Aransas Pass, Aransas County, Texas;
TYPE OF FACILITY: carbon black manufacturing; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §101.7(b)
and the Act, §382.085(b), by failing to submit a start-up report; 30
TAC §101.6(b) and the Act, §382.085(b), by failing to create complete
records of the reportable upsets; and 30 TAC §116.115(b)(2)(F) and (c),
Air Permit Number 8585, and the Act, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain
the records containing the information and data sufficient to demonstrate
compliance and maintain the opacity; PENALTY: $7,500; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Gary McDonald, (361) 825-3100; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200,
Corpus Christi, Texas 78412- 5503, (361) 825-3100.
(16) COMPANY: Dormaine Cordier U.S.A., Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1077-IWD-E;
IDENTIFIER: Water Quality Permit Number 0003177; LOCATION: Fort Stockton,
Pecos County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: winery; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1),
Water Quality Permit Number 0003177, and the Code, §26.121, by failing
to meet the permitted limit for daily average flow; PENALTY: $5,000; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: Dan Landenberger, (915) 570-1359; REGIONAL OFFICE: 3300 North
A Street, Building 4, Suite 107, Midland, Texas 79705- 5404, (915) 570-1359.
(17) COMPANY: Doty Sand Pit Venture, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1451-MSW-E;
IDENTIFIER: Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Identification Number 1247; LOCATION:
Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: landfill; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §330.255, by failing to have approval from the executive director
prior to constructing a golf course on an MSW landfill; PENALTY: $800; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: Steven Lopez, (512) 239-1896; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue,
Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(18) COMPANY: Duke Energy Field Services, LP; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1309-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number FC-0033-K; LOCATION: Winchester, Fayette County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: natural gas extraction; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §101.10(e)
and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit an annual emissions inventory
for the year 1999; PENALTY: $1,800; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Tom Greimel,
(512) 239-5690; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1921 Cedar Bend Drive, Suite 150, Austin,
Texas 78758-5336, (512) 339-2929.
(19) COMPANY: City of Florence; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-0964-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER:
TPDES No. 10944-001; LOCATION: Florence, Williamson County, Texas; TYPE OF
FACILITY: wastewater treatment; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1), TPDES
Permit Number 10944- 001, and the Code, §26.121, by failing to comply
with total chlorine residual, TSS, and ammonia- nitrogen permit requirements;
PENALTY: $4,000; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Cheryl Thompson, (817) 588-5800;
REGIONAL OFFICE: 1101 East Arkansas Lane, Arlington, Texas 76010-6499, (817)
588-5800.
(20) COMPANY: Florida Gas Transmission Company; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-0428-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number MH-0064-W; LOCATION: Pledger, Matagorda County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: natural gas compressor station; RULE VIOLATED: 30
TAC §122.146(2) and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit
compliance certification; PENALTY: $1,500; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Trina
Lewison, (713) 767-3500; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston,
Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(21) COMPANY: Mr. Mohammad Rahman dba Food Heaven; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-
1271-PST-E; IDENTIFIER: Petroleum Storage Tank (PST) Facility Identification
Number 0072561; LOCATION: Fort Worth, Tarrant County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY:
convenience store with retail sales of gasoline; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §115.245(2)
and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to perform pressure decay testing;
and 30 TAC §115.246(3) and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to
have maintenance records on site; PENALTY: $625; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Erika Fair, (512) 239-6673; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1101 East Arkansas Lane, Arlington,
Texas 76010-6499, (817) 588-5800.
(22) COMPANY: Good Time Stores Inc. dba Good Time Store No. 60; DOCKET
NUMBER: 2001-0142-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number EE-0910-S; LOCATION:
El Paso, El Paso County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail
sales of gasoline; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §114.100(a) and the Code, §382.085(b),
by allegedly offering for sale gasoline for use as a motor vehicle fuel which
failed to meet the minimum oxygenate content of 2.7% by weight; PENALTY: $720;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: David Van Soest, (512) 239-0468; REGIONAL OFFICE:
401 East Franklin Avenue, Suite 560, El Paso, Texas 79901-1206, (915) 834-4949.
(23) COMPANY: Mr. Cecil Greene dba Cecil Greene Plumbing; DOCKET NUMBER:
2000- 1119-SLG-E; IDENTIFIER: Enforcement Identification Number 15453; LOCATION:
Atlanta, Cass County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: sludge transporting; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §312.142(a), by failing to register a sludge transporter operation;
PENALTY: $1,250; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Elnora Moses, (903) 535-5100; REGIONAL
OFFICE: 2916 Teague Drive, Tyler, Texas 75701-3756, (903) 535-5100.
(24) COMPANY: Delton Osborne dba Grubs Bait & Grill; DOCKET NUMBER:
2001-0018- OSS-E; IDENTIFIER: Enforcement Identification Number 15666; LOCATION:
Justiceberg, Garza County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store, grill,
and recreational vehicle trailer park; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §285.50(b)
and the Code, §366.071, by failing to register as an on-site sewage facility
(OSSF) installer; and the Code, §366.051(a), by failing to submit plans
for approval and obtain a permit before construction of OSSFs; PENALTY: $3,500;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Craig Fleming, (512) 239-5806; REGIONAL OFFICE: 4630
50th Street, Suite 600, Lubbock, Texas 79414-3520, (806) 796-7092.
(25) COMPANY: Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 127; DOCKET
NUMBER: 2001-0898-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER: Water Quality Permit Number 12209-001;
LOCATION: Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment;
RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1) and (5), Water Quality Permit Number
12209-001, and the Code, §26.121, by failing to comply with the permitted
daily average limit for TSS, operate and maintain the plant properly, and
prevent sludge in the receiving stream; PENALTY: $22,500; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
John Mead, (512) 239-6010; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston,
Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(26) COMPANY: Hilcorp Energy Company; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-0934-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER:
Air Account Number BL-0005-M; LOCATION: Sweeny, Brazoria County, Texas; TYPE
OF FACILITY: natural gas production; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §116.115(c),
Permit Number 39982, and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to conduct
initial sample testing and submit quarterly monitoring results; 30 TAC §117.25(a)
and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit the final control plan;
30 TAC §122.146(2) and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to timely
submit the annual Title V compliance certification; and 40 CFR §60.334(b)(2)
and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to daily monitor the sulfur content
of the fuel; PENALTY: $28,125; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Sheila Smith, (512)
239-1670; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486,
(713) 767-3500.
(27) COMPANY: Hog Creek Water Supply Corporation; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1194-
PWS-E; IDENTIFIER: PWS Number 1550132; LOCATION: Valley Mills, McLennan County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.46(d)(2)(a)
and (f)(3)(A)(ii) and (E)(iv), (formerly 30 TAC §290.46(d), (f)(1)(A),
and (j)(3)), by failing to maintain free chlorine residual of 0.2 mg/l, include
daily distribution system pumpages in the monthly operation report, and provide
copies of properly completed customer service inspection certifications; and
30 TAC §290.41(c)(3)(M), by failing to provide a suitable sampling cock
on the discharge pipe; PENALTY: $1,488; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: James Jackson,
(254) 751-0335; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas
76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.
(28) COMPANY: J & B Habluetzel Trust; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1026-MSW-E;
IDENTIFIER: Unauthorized Site No. 45514006; LOCATION: Ingleside, San Patricio
County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: unauthorized municipal solid waste; RULE
VIOLATED: 30 TAC §330.4 and the Code, §26.121, by failing to obtain
authorization prior to accepting MSW for disposal; PENALTY: $880; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: Gary McDonald, (361) 825-3100; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6300 Ocean Drive,
Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(29) COMPANY: Kalyn/Siebert L.P.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1180-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER:
Air Account Number CW-0032-O; LOCATION: Gatesville, Coryell County, Texas;
TYPE OF FACILITY: cargo trailer manufacturing; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §122.121, §122.130(b)(1),
and the Code, §382.054 and §382.085(b), by failing to submit a federal
operating permit application and continuing to operate the plant without the
required permit authorization; PENALTY: $2,000; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: James
Jackson, (254) 751- 0335; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6801 Sanger Avenue, Suite 2500,
Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.
(30) COMPANY: Kruger Water Works, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1034-PWS-E;
IDENTIFIER: PWS Number 0610087; LOCATION: Krugerville, Denton County, Texas;
TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.46(d)(2)(A),
(f)(2) and (3)(E)(iii), (j), (r), and (t), (formerly 30 TAC §290.46(d),
(f)(2), (p)(1) and (2), (u), and (w)), by failing to maintain a minimum disinfectant
residual of 0.2 mg/l, provide monthly reports of waterworks operations for
review during inspection, provide documentation during the inspection that
disinfectant residual tests were performed, make records of the annual inspections
of the ground storage tanks, make records of the annual inspections of the
pressure tanks available, provide a minimum pressure of 35 pounds per square
inch throughout the distribution system, provide certifications of customer
service inspections, and post a legible sign at each production, treatment,
and storage site; 30 TAC §290.41(c)(1)(F) and (3)(B), by failing to secure
a sanitary easement around the wells and maintain the concrete sealing block
around the well casing; and 30 TAC §290.43(c)(3) and (e), by failing
to provide the ground storage tanks with properly designed overflow pipe and
provide intruder-resistant fencing; PENALTY: $3,000; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Brian Lehmkuhle, (512) 239-4482; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1101 East Arkansas Lane,
Arlington, Texas 76010-6499, (817) 588-5800.
(31) COMPANY: Lone Star Beef Processors, L.P.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1156-IWD-E;
IDENTIFIER: Water Quality Permit Number 0003574-000; LOCATION: San Angelo,
Tom Green County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: meat packing; RULE VIOLATED: 30
TAC §305.125(1), Water Quality Permit Number 0003574-000, and the Code, §26.121(c),
by failing to provide adequate treatment of wastewater effluent and report
effluent violations which deviate from the permitted effluent limitation;
PENALTY: $5,500; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Mark Newman, (915) 655-9479; REGIONAL
OFFICE: 622 South Oakes, Suite K, San Angelo, Texas 76903-7013, (915) 655-9479.
(32) COMPANY: Lone Star Steel Company; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-0104-IWD-E;
IDENTIFIER: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
Number TX0000027 (Water Quality 00348) ; LOCATION: Lone Star, Morris County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: steel works, rolling mill, and pipe fabrication;
RULE VIOLATED: NPDES Permit Number TX0000027, by failing to comply with permitted
effluent limits for total zinc; PENALTY: $1,800; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Terry Murphy, (512) 239-5025; REGIONAL OFFICE: 2916 Teague Drive, Tyler, Texas
75701-3756, (903) 535-5100.
(33) COMPANY: Mr. Frank Flores dba Lull's Public Scales and Scales Drive
In; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1371-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number HN-0454-Q;
LOCATION: Edinburg, Hidalgo County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: weighing service;
RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §101.4 and the Code, §382.085(a) and (b),
by failing to adequately control dust emissions; PENALTY: $1,250; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: Bill Davis, (512) 239-6793; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1804 West Jefferson
Avenue, Harlingen, Texas 78550-5247, (956) 425-6010.
(34) COMPANY: Madanco Corporation dba Shoppers Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1041-
PST-E; IDENTIFIER: PST Facility Identification Number 0035088; LOCATION: Hitchcock,
Galveston County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales
of gasoline; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §115.246(4) and (6), and the Act, §382.085(b),
by failing to maintain and provide documentation for the Stage II vapor recovery
training for at least one station representative and provide a record of the
results of the daily Stage II vapor recovery system (VRS) inspections; PENALTY:
$720; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Kent Heath, (512) 239-4575; REGIONAL OFFICE:
5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(35) COMPANY: Mountain Breeze, L.L.C. dba Mountain Breeze Campground; DOCKET
NUMBER: 2000-1215-PWS-E; IDENTIFIER: PWS Number 0460190; LOCATION: Sattler,
Comal County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §290.109(c), (formerly 30 TAC §290.106(a)), and the Code, §341.033(d),
by failing to collect routine monthly water samples for bacteriological analysis;
and 30 TAC §290.109(g)(4) §290.122(c), (formerly 30 TAC §290.106(e)(2)
and §290.103(5)), by failing to provide public notification of the failure
to conduct bacteriological sampling; PENALTY: $625; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Elvia Maske, (512) 239-0789; REGIONAL OFFICE: 14250 Judson Road, San Antonio,
Texas 78233-4480, (210) 490-3096.
(36) COMPANY: Northwest Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 12;
DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1206-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER: TPDES Permit Number 11991-001;
LOCATION: Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment;
RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC § 305.125(1), TPDES Permit No. 11991-001, and the
Code, §26.121, by failing to comply with permit limits for TSS, ammonia-nitrogen,
and five-day carbonaceous BOD; PENALTY: $750; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Faye
Liu, (713) 767-3500; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston,
Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(37) COMPANY: Northeast Texas Community College; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1269-
MWD-E; IDENTIFIER: TPDES Permit Number 13948-001; LOCATION: Mount Pleasant,
Titus County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: college; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1),
TPDES Permit No. 13948-001, and the Code, §26.121, by failing to comply
with permit limits for TSS and BOD; PENALTY: $1,200; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Elnora Moses, (903) 535-5100; REGIONAL OFFICE: 2916 Teague Drive, Tyler, Texas
75701-3756, (903) 535-5100.
(38) COMPANY: Northwest Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 24;
DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1135-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER: TPDES Permit Number 12655-001;
LOCATION: Houston, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment;
RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §305.125(1), TPDES Permit Number 12655-001, and
the Code, §26.121, by failing to comply with the permitted effluent limits
for daily average TSS; PENALTY: $600; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Terry Murphy,
(512) 239-5025; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas
77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(39) COMPANY: Oasis Pipe Line Company Texas L.P.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1386-AIR-
E; IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number KC-0013-N and Operating Permit Number O-00462;
LOCATION: Comfort, Kendall County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: natural gas compressor;
RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §122.146(2) and the Code, §382.085(b), by
failing to submit annual permit compliance certifications; and 30 TAC §122.145(2)(C)
and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit a permit deviation summary
report; PENALTY: $3,600; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Malcolm Ferris, (210) 490-3096;
REGIONAL OFFICE: 14250 Judson Road, San Antonio, Texas 78233-4480, (210) 490-3096.
(40) COMPANY: Mr. Randy Foster dba Palex; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1328-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number DB-3981-B; LOCATION: Balch Springs, Dallas
County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: pallet refurbishing and manufacturing; RULE
VIOLATED: 30 TAC §106.496(4), (7), (9) - (11), (13), (14), §116.110(a)(4),
and the Code, §382.085, by failing to maintain written records of the
hours of operation of the burner, store unburned material at least 75 feet
away from the trench, observe air stagnation advisory, ensure no additional
material is stacked above the air curtain, post operating instructions, remove
ash generated from the trench, and ensure an operator was monitoring burning
activities at all times; and 30 TAC §111.201, §116.110(a)(4), and
the Code, §382.085, by failing to contain burn to within the burner;
PENALTY: $4,375; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Judy Fox, (817) 588-5825; REGIONAL
OFFICE: 1101 East Arkansas Lane, Arlington, Texas 76010-6499, (817) 588-5800.
(41) COMPANY: City of Palmer; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1392-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER:
TPDES Permit Number 13620-001; LOCATION: Palmer, Ellis County, Texas; TYPE
OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC § 305.125(1), §319.7(d),
and TPDES Permit No. 13620-001, by failing to submit the discharge monitoring
reports; PENALTY: $3,360; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Michael De La Cruz, (512)
239-0259; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1101 East Arkansas Lane, Arlington, Texas 76010-6499,
(817) 588-5800.
(42) COMPANY: Phillips Petroleum Company; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1310-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number BL-0042-G; LOCATION: Sweeny, Brazoria County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: petroleum refining plant; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §101.6(a)
and (b), and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to determine if an upset
caused by two low pressure cold separator control valves at the atmospheric
residuum desulfurization unit not sealing completely was a reportable upset,
notify all appropriate air pollution control agencies within 24 hours of the
upset, and create final records of the reportable and nonreportable upsets;
30 TAC §112.31 and the Code, §382.085(b), by exceeding the hydrogen
sulfide (H2S) net ground level concentration standard of 0.08 parts per million
(ppm); and 30 TAC §112.32 and the Code, §382.085(b), by exceeding
the H2S net ground level concentration standard of 0.12 ppm; PENALTY: $20,000;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Stacey Young, (512) 239-1899; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425
Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(43) COMPANY: Rene Hinojosa dba Rene's Water System; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1418-
PWS-E; IDENTIFIER: PWS Number 1010578; LOCATION: Houston, Harris County, Texas;
TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.45(b)(1)(E)(i),
by failing to provide a minimum well capacity of one gpm per connection; and
30 TAC §290.41(c)(3)(O), by failing to provide a properly constructed
intruder-resistant fence; PENALTY: $188; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Terry Thompson,
(512) 239-6095; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas
77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(44) COMPANY: The Sherwin Williams Company; DOCKET NUMBER: 2001-0010-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number DB-0728-N; LOCATION: Garland, Dallas County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: paint plant; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §101.10 and
the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit an emissions inventory questionaire;
PENALTY: $3,125; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Bill Davis, (512) 239-6793; REGIONAL
OFFICE: 1101 East Arkansas Lane, Arlington, Texas 76010-6499, (817) 588-5800.
(45) COMPANY: Young Kim dba S & K Food Mart; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-0802-PST-E;
IDENTIFIER: PST Facility Identification Number 0039348; LOCATION: Grand Prairie,
Dallas County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail sales
of gasoline; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §115.245(1) and (2), and the Act, §382.085(b),
by failing to successfully perform initial Stage II VRS testing and perform
Stage II VRS annual pressure decay testing; 30 TAC §115.246(6) and the
Act, §382.085(b), by failing to maintain a record of daily inspections
of the Stage II VRS; and 30 TAC §334.7(d)(3), by failing to provide an
amended registration to represent the current ownership; PENALTY: $2,880;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Jorge Ibarra, (817) 588-5800; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1101
East Arkansas Lane, Arlington, Texas 76010-6499, (817) 588-5800.
(46) COMPANY: Tamina Water Supply Corporation; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1296-PWS-E;
IDENTIFIER: PWS Number 1700110; LOCATION: Conroe, Montgomery County, Texas;
TYPE OF FACILITY: public water supply; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §290.117(e)(2),
(formerly 30 TAC §290.120(e)(2)), by failing to conduct reduced monitoring
tap sampling for lead and copper; PENALTY: $313; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Shawn Hess, (806) 353-9251; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston,
Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(47) COMPANY: Texas Department of Criminal Justice; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1334-
MWD-E; IDENTIFIER: TPDES Permit Number 11181-001; LOCATION: near Trinity,
Houston County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: wastewater treatment; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §305.125(1), §319.7(d), TPDES Permit Number 11181-001, and
the Code, §26.121, by failing to maintain the permitted effluent limits
for ammonia nitrogen, dissolved oxygen, TSS and carbonaceous BOD and submit
the discharge monitoring report for the month of March 2000; and 30 TAC §§220.21,
305.503, 312.9, and 335.323, by failing to pay the water quality assessment,
wastewater inspection, beneficial land program, and hazardous waste generation
fees; PENALTY: $2,200; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Michael De La Cruz, (512)
239-0259; REGIONAL OFFICE: 3870 Eastex Freeway, Suite 110, Beaumont, Texas
77703-1892, (409) 898-3838.
(48) COMPANY: Mr. James Kim dba Times Market #9; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1131-PST-
E; IDENTIFIER: PST Facility Identification Number 49467; LOCATION: Corpus
Christi, Nueces County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail
sales of gasoline; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct
effective manual or automatic inventory control procedures; and 30 TAC §334.50(b)(1)(A)
and (2)(A)(i)(III), and the Code, §26.3475, by failing to monitor underground
storage tanks for releases, provide proper release detection, and test a line
leak detector for performance and operational reliability; PENALTY: $9,375;
ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Audra Baumgartner, (361) 825-3100; REGIONAL OFFICE:
6300 Ocean Drive, Suite 1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(49) COMPANY: Mr. Young J. Lee dba Times Market #18; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1132-
PST-E; IDENTIFIER: PST Facility Identification Number 49910; LOCATION: Corpus
Christi, Nueces County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: convenience store with retail
sales of gasoline; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §334.50(a)(1)(A) and the Code, §26.3475,
by failing to provide a method or combination of methods of release detection;
30 TAC §334.48(c), by failing to conduct effective manual or automatic
inventory control; and 30 TAC §334.49(a) and the Code, §26.3475,
by failing to provide corrosion protection; PENALTY: $6,000; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Audra Baumgartner, (361) 825-3100; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6300 Ocean Drive, Suite
1200, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5503, (361) 825-3100.
(50) COMPANY: Charles S. Timms; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1020-MSW-E; IDENTIFIER:
MSW Unauthorized Site Number 455020020 and Tire Transporter Registration Number
27033; LOCATION: Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: scrap tire
transportation; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §328.60(a), by failing to obtain
the required registration prior to operating a tire storage facility; 30 TAC §328.63(c),
by failing to obtain the required registration prior to operating a tire processing
facility; 30 TAC §328.54(d), by failing to place required identification
on both sides and rear of vehicle; 30 TAC §328.57(c)(3), by failing to
deliver scrap tires to an authorized facility; and 30 TAC §328.58(b),
by failing to properly complete manifests; PENALTY: $600; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR:
Gary Shipp, (806) 796-7092; REGIONAL OFFICE: 4630 50th Street, Suite 600,
Lubbock, Texas 79414-3520, (806) 796-7092.
(51) COMPANY: Tuboscope Vetco International L.P.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1184-AIR-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number GK-0075-J; LOCATION: Navasota, Grimes County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: oil field pipe inspection and coating; RULE VIOLATED:
30 TAC §122.146 and the Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit
their annual Title V compliance certification; PENALTY: $1,500; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: James Jackson, (254) 751- 0335; REGIONAL OFFICE: 6801 Sanger
Avenue, Suite 2500, Waco, Texas 76710-7826, (254) 751-0335.
(52) COMPANY: Turkey Creek Landfill TX LP; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1257-MSW-E;
IDENTIFIER: MSW Permit Number 1417-B; LOCATION: Alvarado, Johnson County,
Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: landfill; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §335.2(a) and §335.43(a),
and MSW Permit Number 1417-B, by allegedly having permitted the disposal of
an industrial hazardous waste without authorization; PENALTY: $2,000; ENFORCEMENT
COORDINATOR: Merrilee Gerberding, (512) 239-4490; REGIONAL OFFICE: 1101 East
Arkansas Lane, Arlington, Texas 76010-6499, (817) 588-5800.
(53) COMPANY: Vanceco, Inc. dba Creekwood Utilities Wastewater Treatment
Plant; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1105-MWD-E; IDENTIFIER: Expired Water Quality Permit
Number 13750-001; LOCATION: Conroe, Montgomery County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY:
wastewater treatment; RULE VIOLATED: the Code, §26.121, by allegedly
discharging wastewater into waters in the state without authorization; PENALTY:
$1,600; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Laurie Eaves, (512) 239-4495; REGIONAL OFFICE:
5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston, Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(54) COMPANY: Viking Pools Central, Inc.; DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1321-MLM-E;
IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number ML-0342-B and TNRCC Identification Number F0641;
LOCATION: Midland, Midland County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: fiberglass pool
manufacturing; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §335.62 and 40 CFR §262.11,
by failing to conduct a hazardous waste determination; 30 TAC §335.9,
by failing to keep records of all hazardous wastes and industrial solid wastes
generated, stored, processed, and disposed; 30 TAC §335.62 and §335.503(a),
by failing to classify each waste stream; 30 TAC §335.6, by failing to
file a notice of registration; 30 TAC §335.63(a) and 40 CFR §262.12,
by failing to file with the United States Environmental Protection Agency
for an identification number; 30 TAC §335.69(f)(2) and (4), and 40 CFR §262.34(d)(2)
and (4), and §265.173(a), by failing to keep the hazardous waste in closed
containers and label or mark clearly each hazardous waste container; 30 TAC §122.130(b)(1)
and the Code, §382.054 and §382.085(b), by failing to submit a Title
V federal operating permit application; and 30 TAC §122.121 and the Code, §382l.054
and §382.085(b), by operating an emission unit without a Title V federal
operating permit; PENALTY: $14,400; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Dan Landenberger,
(915) 570- 1359; REGIONAL OFFICE: 3300 North A Street, Building 4, Suite 107,
Midland, Texas 79705- 5404, (915) 570-1359.
(55) COMPANY: Williams Terminals Holdings, L.P. and Amerada Hess Corporation;
DOCKET NUMBER: 2000-1116-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER: Air Account Number HG-0017-W;
LOCATION: Galena Park, Harris County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: bulk petroleum
storage and warehousing; RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §116.115(b)(2)(G) and
(c), Air Permit Number 4850, and the Code, §382.085(b), by exceeding
the maximum allowable emission rates for volatile organic compound and failing
to conduct stack sampling; PENALTY: $103,125; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Sheila
Smith, (512) 239-1670; REGIONAL OFFICE: 5425 Polk Avenue, Suite H, Houston,
Texas 77023-1486, (713) 767-3500.
(56) COMPANY: Xerxes Corporation; DOCKET NUMBER: 2001-0088-AIR-E; IDENTIFIER:
Air Account Number GL-0049-W and Operating Permit Number O-00992; LOCATION:
Seguin, Guadalupe County, Texas; TYPE OF FACILITY: fiberglass tank manufacturing;
RULE VIOLATED: 30 TAC §122.145(2)(C) and the Code, §382.085(b),
by failing to submit a deviation report; and 30 TAC §122.146(2) and the
Code, §382.085(b), by failing to submit a permit compliance certification;
PENALTY: $1,800; ENFORCEMENT COORDINATOR: Malcolm Ferris, (210) 490-3096;
REGIONAL OFFICE: 14250 Judson Road, San Antonio, Texas 78233-4480, (210) 490-3096.
TRD-200102034
Paul Sarahan
Director, Litigation Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Filed: April 10, 2001
A person may request to be added to a mailing list for public notices processed
through the Office of the Chief Clerk for air, water, and waste permitting
activities at the TNRCC. You may request to be added to: (1) a permanent mailing
list for a specific applicant name and permit number; and/or (2) a permanent
mailing list for a specific county or counties.
Note that a request to be added to a mailing list for a specific county
will result in notification of all permitting matters affecting that particular
county.
To be added to a mailing list, send us your name and address, clearly specifying
which mailing list(s) to which you wish to be added. Your written request
should be sent to the TNRCC, Office of the Chief Clerk, Mail Code 105, P.
O. Box 13087, Austin, TX 78711-3087.
Individual members of the public who wish to inquire about the information
contained in this notice, or to inquire about other agency permit applications
or permitting processes, should call the TNRCC Office of Public Assistance,
Toll Free, at 1-800-687-4040.
TRD-200102076
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Filed: April 11, 2001
The following notices were issued during the period of March 26, 2001 through
March 30, 2001.
The following require the applicants to publish notice in the newspaper.
The public comment period, requests for public meetings, or requests for a
contested case hearing may be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk,
Mail Code 105, P O Box 13087, Austin Texas 78711-3087, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE
DATE OF NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF THIS NOTICE.
CITY OF BAILEY has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 13584-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 26,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately
900 feet west of Farm-to-Market Road 816 and 3000 feet southwest of the intersection
of Farm-to-Market Road 816 and State Highway 11 in Fannin County, Texas. The
treated effluent is discharged via an eight-inch pipe to an unnamed tributary
of Loring Creek; thence to Loring Creek; thence to Spring Creek; thence to
the Upper South Sulphur River in Segment No. 0306 of the Sulphur River Basin.
CANUTILLO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT has applied for a renewal of Permit
No. 11561- 003, which authorizes the disposal of treated domestic wastewater
at a daily average flow not to exceed 9,000 gallons per day via soil absorption
trenches with a minimum area of 11,700 ft2. This permit will not authorize
a discharge of pollutants into waters in the State. The wastewater treatment
facilities and disposal area are located between Hemley Road and Chicken Farm
Road, and Doniphan Drive and Kiely Road, approximately 0.5 mile southeast
of the City of Vinton and 2.0 miles north of the City of Canutillo in El Paso
County, Texas.
CHEVRON PHILLIPS CHEMICAL COMPANY which operates the Cedar Bayou Chemical
Plant, which manufactures commodity petrochemicals and plastics, has applied
for a major amendment to TNRCC Permit No. 01006 to authorize an increase in
the daily average flow at Outfall 001 from 3.0 million gallons per day (MGD)
to 4.0 MGD; to remove oil and grease limitations at Outfalls 001 and 003;
to increase effluent limitations for chloroform at Outfall 001; to reduce
the biomonitoring testing frequency at Outfall 001; to add Outfalls 004, 005,
and 007 which discharge storm water; to increase pH holding times at storm
water outfalls; and to reduce the monitoring frequency for several parameters
at Outfall 001. The current permit authorizes the discharge of treated process
wastewater commingled with treated domestic wastewater, cooling tower blowdown,
sour water, and storm water at a daily average dry weather flow not to exceed
3,000,000 gallons per day via Outfall 001; storm water on an intermittent
and flow variable basis via Outfall 002; and storm water and rinse water on
a continuous and flow variable basis via Outfall 003. The facility is located
at 9500 I-10 East, in the City of Baytown, Harris County, Texas.
DIOCESE OF GALVESTON-HOUSTON has applied for a new permit, proposed Texas
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit No. 14218-001, to authorize
the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to
exceed 15,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately 7 miles
southeast of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 1488 and State Highway
249 in Montgomery County, Texas.
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY has applied to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC) for a major amendment to TNRCC Permit No. 00663 to authorize
the use of synthetic dilution water for toxicity testing, the removal of total
zinc monitoring requirements at Outfall 001, the removal of monitoring requirements
and effluent limitations for inorganic nitrogen at Outfall 001, the use of
an alternate test method for total oxygen demand at Outfall 001, the change
of the self-reporting forms submittal date, the reduction in the monitoring
frequency for various limited parameters at Outfall 001, and the additional
discharge of process and utility wastewater from a new production plant via
Outfall 001. The current permit authorizes the discharge of process wastewater,
storm water, utility water, and domestic wastewater at a daily average flow
not to exceed 1,650,000 gallons per day via Outfall 001; and storm water on
an intermittent and flow variable basis via Outfalls 002 and 003, which will
remain the same. Issuance of this Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(TPDES) permit will replace the existing NPDES Permit No. TX0002933 issued
on July 24, 1998, and TNRCC Permit No. 00663, issued on July 3, 1998. The
applicant operates the La Porte Plant which manufactures plastics and synthetic
organic chemicals. The plant site is located at 550 Battleground Road (State
Highway 134) on the east side of State Highway 134, approximately 0.5 mile
north of State Highway 225 in the City of La Porte, Harris County, Texas.
DYNAMIC PRODUCTS, INC. has applied for a renewal of TNRCC Permit No. 11841-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 5,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately
2.0 miles south of Interstate Highway 10 and approximately 0.75 mile east
of the intersection of Sheldon Road and Peninsula on the south side of Jacintoport
Slip and 0.25 mile north of the Houston Ship Channel in Harris County, Texas.
CITY OF GLADEWATER has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 10433-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated water treatment filter backwash
water at a daily average flow not to exceed xxx,000 gallons per day. The facility
is located at 1509 East Lake Drive, 3/4 mile north of the City of Gladewater
in Upshur County, Texas. The treated effluent is discharged to an unnamed
tributary; thence to Glade Creek; thence to Sabine River Below Lake Tawakoni
in Segment No. 0506 of the Sabine River Basin.
CITY OF GRANGER has applied for a renewal of TNRCC Permit No. 10891-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 200,000 gallons per day. The facility is located approximately
1300 feet south of Farm-to-Market Road 971 and 1 mile east of State Highway
95 in Williamson County, Texas.
GRAPE CREEK INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT has applied for a new permit, Proposed
Permit No. 14242-001, to authorize the disposal of treated domestic wastewater
at a daily average flow not to exceed 9,600 gallons per day via drip irrigation
of 2.2 acres of school athletic field. This permit will not authorize a discharge
of pollutants into waters in the State. The facility and disposal site are
located 3,800 feet north of the intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 2288 and
U.S. Highway 87 in Tom Green County, Texas.
HARRIS COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 84 has applied
for a renewal of TNRCC Permit No. 10558-001, which authorizes the discharge
of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 1,000,000
gallons per day. The draft permit authorizes the discharge of treated domestic
wastewater at an annual average flow not to exceed 1,000,000 gallons per day.
The facility is located at 16224 Bear Bayou Drive, southwest of the intersection
of Bear Bayou Drive and North Avenue in the Old River Subdivision in Harris
County, Texas.
INTERNATIONAL TERMINALS COMPANY which operates a petroleum and chemical
for-hire bulk terminal, has applied for a major amendment to TNRCC Permit
No. 01984 to remove effluent limitations and monitoring requirements for ammonia-nitrogen
and organic nitrogen at storm water Outfalls 001, 003, 004, 005, 006, 008,
and 009; and to relocate unconstructed Outfall 009. The current permit authorizes
the discharge of storm water from tank farm areas on an intermittent and flow
variable basis via Outfalls 001, 003, 004, 005, 006, 008, and 009, which will
remain the same; treated industrial wastewater at a daily average flow not
to exceed 273,000 gallons per day via Outfall 002, which will remain the same;
and treated ballast water at a daily average flow not to exceed 50,000 gallons
per day via Outfall 007, which will remain the same. The facility is located
at 1943 Battleground Road, just north of the intersection of Miller Cutoff
Road and State Highway 134, in the City of Deer Park, Harris County, Texas.
KINGS MANOR MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT has applied for a renewal of TNRCC
Permit No. 13526-001, which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater
at a daily average flow not to exceed 200,000 gallons per day. The plant site
is located 0.6 mile northeast of the intersection of State Highway Loop 494
and Kingwood Drive in Harris County, Texas.
CITY OF KRUM has applied for a major amendment to TPDES Permit No. 10729-001
to authorize an increase in the discharge of treated domestic wastewater from
a daily average flow not to exceed 95,000 gallons per day to a daily average
flow not to exceed 247,000 gallons per day. The facility is located on the
east side of North Hickory Creek, approximatly 0.6 miles southwest of the
intersection of Farm-to-Market Road 156 and Farm-to-Market Road 1173 in Denton
County, Texas
CITY OF LA PORTE has applied for a renewal of TPDES Permit No. 10206-001,
which authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at an annual
average flow not to exceed 7,560,000 gallons per day. The current permit also
authorizes the disposal of treated domestic wastewater via irrigation of 187
acres. The facility is located at 1301 South 4th Street, approximately 0.5
mile southeast of the intersection of State Highway 146 and Fairmont Parkway
in Harris County, Texas. The irrigation site is located on 187 acres of golf
course and park land directly south of the wastewater treatment facility.
The sludge disposal site is at the Baytown landfill located at 4791 Tri City
Beach Road.
LOVE'S COUNTRY STORES, INC. which operates Love Country Stores No. 214,
a truck stop, convenience store, and fuel service station, has applied for
a renewal of Permit No. 03482, which authorizes the disposal of truck wash
water, fueling wastewater, and storm water runoff from the fueling area on
an intermittent and flow variable basis via evaporation. This permit will
not authorize a discharge of pollutants into waters in the State. The facility
and disposal area are located at 12800 Horizon Boulevard, on the southeast
corner of the intersection of Interstate Highway 10 and Horizon Boulevard,
El Paso County, Texas.
NALCO/EXXON ENERGY CHEMICALS, L.P. has applied for a renewal of an existing
wastewater permit. The applicant has an existing National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. TX0008761 and an existing Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) Permit No. 01806. The draft permit
authorizes the discharge of previously monitored effluent (process wastewater,
sanitary wastewater, utility wastewater, stormwater runoff, and treated groundwater)
on a flow variable basis via Outfall 001, and stormwater runoff on an intermittent,
flow variable basis via Outfalls 002, 003, and 004. The applicant operates
an oxyalkylation plant. The plant site is located on County Road 229, approximately
1.25 miles east of the intersection of County Road 229 and Farm-To Market-Road
523, northeast of the City of Freeport in Brazoria County, Texas.
ORANGE COUNTY WATER CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 has applied
for a renewal of TNRCC Permit No. 10875-001, which authorizes the discharge
of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average flow not to exceed 750,000
gallons per day. The facility is located approximately 300 feet northwest
of the intersection of Oak Lane and Ferndale Street in the City of Vidor in
Orange County, Texas.
ROBROY INDUSTRIES-TEXAS, INC. has applied for a renewal of an existing
wastewater permit. The applicant has an existing National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. TX0059561 and an existing Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) Permit No. 01052. The draft permit
authorizes the discharge of non-contact cooling water, boiler blowdown and
storm water runoff at a daily average flow not to exceed 225,000 gallons per
day. The plant site is located at State Highway (S.H.) 271 and Dean Street,
on the west side of S.H. 271 at a point approximately 1,000 feet south of
its intersection with S.H. 300, in the City of Gilmer in Upshur County, Texas.
CITY OF SHALLOWATER has applied for a renewal of Permit No. 10609-001,
which authorizes the disposal of treated domestic wastewater at a daily average
flow not to exceed 250,000 gallons per day via surface irrigation of 54 acres
of non-public access agricultural land. The facility and disposal site are
located southeast of the intersection of U.S. Highway 84 and Farm-to-Market
Road 179, adjacent to the City of Shallowater in Lubbock County, Texas.
TEXAS MILITARY FACILITIES COMISSION has applied for renewal of an existing
wastewater permit. The applicant has an existing National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. TX0101214 and an existing Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) Permit No. 13249- 001. The draft
permit authorizes the discharge of treated domestic wastewater at a daily
average flow not to exceed 7,000 gallons per day. The plant site is located
approximately 1/2 mile southeast of the intersection of U.S. Highway 271 and
Farm-to-Market Road 2648 in Lamar County, Texas.
TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY has applied for a renewal of an existing
wastewater permit. The applicant has an existing National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. TX0101168 and an existing Texas Natural
Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) Permit No. 02877. The draft permit
authorizes the discharge of coal pile runoff on an intermittent and flow variable
basis via Outfall 001, cooling tower blowdown and stormwater runoff at a daily
maximun dry weather flow rate of 1,500,000 gallons per day via Outfall 002,
and stormwater runoff on an intermittent and flow variable basis via Outfall
003. The applicant operates a lignite fired steam electric station. The plant
site is located approximately one mile east of the Town of Hammond and approximately
eight miles north (via State Highway 6) of the City of Calvert in Robertson
County, Texas.
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY has applied for a renewal of TNRCC Permit
No. 01152, which authorizes the discharge of once through cooling water and
previously monitored effluents (PMEs) at a daily average flow not to exceed
131,400,000 gallons per day via Outfall 001. Issuance of this Texas Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) permit will replace the existing NPDES
Permit No. TX0001422 issued on May 27, 1994 and TNRCC Permit No. 01152 issued
on August 30, 1993. The applicant operates the San Angelo Steam Electric Station.
The plant site is located at 6465 Knickerbocker Road, approximately two miles
southwest of the intersection of Knickerbocker Road and State Highway 306,
in the City of San Angelo, Tom Green County, Texas.
WINDERMERE OAKS WATER SUPPLY CORPORATION has applied for a renewal of Permit
No. 11694-001, which authorizes the disposal of treated domestic wastewater
at a daily average flow not to exceed 40,000 gallons per day via surface irrigation
of 24 acres of land. This permit will not authorize a discharge of pollutants
into waters in the State. The facility and disposal site are located approximately
13 miles east of the intersection of State Highway 71 and U.S. Highway 281
in Burnet County, Texas.
TRD-200102075
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Filed: April 11, 2001
For the Period of April 9, 2001
APPLICATION. Waste Management of Texas, Inc., P.O. Box 141968, Austin,
TX 78714-1968, has applied to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
(TNRCC) for a minor amendment to Permit No. MSW 249C which would authorize
the use of an alternate soil final cover over Subtitle D cells at the Austin
Community Landfill. This Type I municipal solid waste facility is located
at 9708 Giles Road in Travis County. The Executive Director of the TNRCC has
prepared a draft permit which, if approved, will authorize a minor amendment
to this permit under the terms described above. PUBLIC COMMENT. Written comments
concerning this minor amendment may be submitted to the TNRCC, Chief Clerk's
Office, Mail Code 105, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 telephone
(512) 239-3300. Comments must be received no later than 10 days from the date
this notice is mailed. Written comments must include the following: (1) your
name (or for a group or association, the name of an official representative),
mailing address, daytime phone number, and fax number, if any; (2) the name
of the applicant and the permit number; and (3) the location of your property
relative to the applicant's operations. INFORMATION. Individual members of
the public who wish to inquire about the information contained in this notice
may contact the TNRCC Office of Public Assistance, Toll Free, at 1-800-687-4040.
APPLICATION. Waste Management of Texas, Inc., 1600 S. Railroad Street,
Lewisville, TX 77700, has applied to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC) for a minor amendment to Permit No. MSW 1454A which would
authorize the use of an alternate final cover including geosynthetic clay
liner in Sector 1, elimination of Sector 7, and reconfiguration of the final
contours in Sectors 1 and 6 at the B&B Landfill. This Type I municipal
solid waste facility is located 1.6 miles north of the junction of FM Road
1499 and U.S. Highway 271 on the east side of Gate 2 Road and just south of
the National Guard Firing Range in Lamar County. The Executive Director of
the TNRCC has prepared a draft permit which, if approved, will authorize a
minor amendment to this permit under the terms described above. PUBLIC COMMENT.
Written comments concerning this minor amendment may be submitted to the TNRCC,
Chief Clerk's Office, Mail Code 105, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087
telephone (512) 239-3300. Comments must be received no later than 10 days
from the date this notice is mailed. Written comments must include the following:
(1) your name (or for a group or association, the name of an official representative),
mailing address, daytime phone number, and fax number, if any; (2) the name
of the applicant and the permit number; and (3) the location of your property
relative to the applicant's operations. INFORMATION. Individual members of
the public who wish to inquire about the information contained in this notice
may contact the TNRCC Office of Public Assistance, Toll Free, at 1-800-687-4040.
TRD-200102077
LaDonna Castañuela
Chief Clerk
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Filed: April 11, 2001
The State Office Administrative Hearing issued a Proposal for Decision
and Order to the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission on April 4,
2001. Executive Director of the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission,
Petitioner v. BioTex Environmental Corporation and Teri Hada Mathis; Respondent;
SOAH Docket No. 582-00-1287; TNRCC Docket No.1999-0061-MLM-E. In the matter
to be considered by the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission on
a date and time to be determined by the Chief Clerk's Office in Room 201S
of Building E, 12118 N. Interstate 35, Austin, Texas. This posting is Notice
of Opportunity to Comment on the Proposal for Decision and Order. The comment
period will end 30 days from date of publication. Written public comments
should be submitted to the Office of the Chief Clerk, MC-105 TNRCC PO Box
13087, Austin Texas 78711-3087. If you have any questions or need assistance,
please contact Doug Kitts, Chief Clerk's Office, (512) 239-3317.
TRD-200102074
Doug Kitts
Agenda Coordinator
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Filed: April 11, 2001
Notice of Application for a Certificate to Provide Retail Electric Service
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas (commission) of an application on April 2, 2001, for retail electric
provider (REP) certification, pursuant to §§39.101 - 39.109 of the
Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA). A summary of the application follows.
Docket Title and Number: Application of Entergy Solutions Select Ltd. for
Retail Electric Provider (REP) certification, Docket Number 23893 before the
Public Utility Commission of Texas.
Applicant's requested service area includes the service area of specific
transmission and distribution utilities and/or municipal utilities or electric
cooperatives in which competition is offered, specifically, Entergy Arkansas,
Inc.; Entergy Gulf States, Inc.; Entergy Louisiana, Inc.; Entergy Mississippi,
Inc.; Entergy New Orleans, Inc.; and Entergy Solutions Ltd.
Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 no later
than April 27, 2001. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone
(TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.
TRD-200101978
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 4, 2001
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas (commission) of an application on April 4, 2001, for retail electric
provider (REP) certification, pursuant to §§39.101 - 39.109 of the
Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA). A summary of the application follows.
Docket Title and Number: Application of FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc.
for Retail Electric Provider (REP) certification, Docket Number 23917 before
the Public Utility Commission of Texas.
Applicant's requested service area is by customers.
Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas, P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 no later
than April 27, 2001. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text telephone
(TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.
TRD-200101986
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 5, 2001
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas (commission) of an application of Verizon Southwest (Verizon) to
revise its TXG and TXC General Exchange Tariffs filed on March 29, 2001. A
summary of the application follows:
Docket Style and Number: Application of Verizon Southwest to Revise its
TXG and TXC General Exchange Tariffs Pursuant to P.U.C. Substantive Rule §26.207
and §26.208. Docket Number 23813.
The Application: Verizon stated the purpose of the filing was to allow
Verizon to charge an unauthorized provider of local exchange service the applicable
tariff charges from it's General Exchange Tariff to transfer a subscriber
back to Verizon:
Section 64.1140(3) of the FCC Slamming Rules (FCC-00-135) reads as follows:
"If the subscriber has been absolved of liability as prescribed in this
section, the unauthorized carrier shall also be liable to the subscriber for
any change required to return the subscriber to his or her properly authorized
carrier, if applicable."
Verizon stated that the filing also contained language based on the FCC's
Slamming Liability Rules in Docket Number 94-129 which states if an alleged
unauthorized local service provider is ultimately exonerated of liability,
the alleged unauthorized local service provider is entitled to receive full
payment from the end user for all services provided. In such situations, any
nonrecurring charges assessed against the alleged unauthorized local service
provider by Verizon are subject to rebilling to the end user by the alleged
unauthorized local service provider.
Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326, or
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or (888)
782-8477. Hearing and speech- impaired individuals with text telephone (TTY)
may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136 or use Relay Texas (toll-free)
1-800-735-2989.
TRD-200102062
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas (commission) of an application on April 3, 2001, pursuant to P.U.C.
Substantive Rule §26.171 for approval to implement a minor rate change.
Tariff Title and Number: Application of Livingston Telephone Company, Inc.
(Livingston) for Approval of a Minor Rate Change Pursuant to P.U.C. Substantive
Rule §26.171. Tariff Number 23911.
The Application: Livingston seeks to implement minor rate changes to its
tone access dialing and business, residence, tel-assistance, rotary key trunk
and PBX monthly local exchange access service rates. In addition, Livingston
seeks approval to remove the following obsolete services: business rural 4-party
local exchange access service, residence access line local exchange access
service and tel-assistance 2-party local exchange access service. This application
will increase Livingston's regulated intrastate gross annual revenues by $103,713.
The company proposes an effective date of August 1, 2001.
Subscribers of Livingston have a right to petition the commission for review
of this proposed minor rate change by filing a protest with the commission.
The protest must be signed by a minimum of 5.0%, or 1,500 of the affected
local service customers, and must be received by the commission no later than
July 1, 2001.
Persons who wish to comment upon the action sought should contact the Public
Utility Commission of Texas, by mail at P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas, 78711-3326,
or call the commission's Customer Protection Division at 512-936-7120 or toll
free 1-888-782-8477 on or before July 1, 2001. Hearing and speech-impaired
individuals with text telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at 512-936-7136.
Please reference Tariff Number 23911.
TRD-200101993
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 5, 2001
On April 3, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Accutel of Texas,
Inc. doing business as 1-800-4-A-Phone collectively referred to as applicants,
filed a joint application for approval of amendment to an existing interconnection
agreement under §252(i) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,
Public Law Number 104-104, 110 Statute 56, (codified as amended in scattered
sections of 15 and 47 United States Code) (FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory
Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 &
Supplement 2001) (PURA). The joint application has been designated Docket
Number 23903. The joint application and the underlying interconnection agreement
are available for public inspection at the commission's offices in Austin,
Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the amendment
to the interconnection agreement. Any interested person may file written comments
on the joint application by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's
filing clerk. Additionally, a copy of the comments should be served on each
of the applicants. The comments should specifically refer to Docket Number
23903. As a part of the comments, an interested person may request that a
public hearing be conducted. The comments, including any request for public
hearing, shall be filed by May 3, 2001, and shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888- 782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23903.
TRD-200101989
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 5, 2001
On April 3, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Accutel of Texas,
Inc. doing business as 1-800-4-A-Phone collectively referred to as applicants,
filed a joint application for approval of amendment to an existing interconnection
agreement under §252(i) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,
Public Law Number 104-104, 110 Statute 56, (codified as amended in scattered
sections of 15 and 47 United States Code) (FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory
Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 &
Supplement 2001) (PURA). The joint application has been designated Docket
Number 23904. The joint application and the underlying interconnection agreement
are available for public inspection at the commission's offices in Austin,
Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the amendment
to the interconnection agreement. Any interested person may file written comments
on the joint application by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's
filing clerk. Additionally, a copy of the comments should be served on each
of the applicants. The comments should specifically refer to Docket Number
23904. As a part of the comments, an interested person may request that a
public hearing be conducted. The comments, including any request for public
hearing, shall be filed by May 3, 2001, and shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23904.
TRD-200101990
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 5, 2001
On April 3, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and TXU Communications
Telecom Services Company doing business as TXU Communications collectively
referred to as applicants, filed a joint application for approval of amendment
to an existing interconnection agreement under §252(i) of the federal
Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law Number 104-104, 110 Statute 56,
(codified as amended in scattered sections of 15 and 47 United States Code)
(FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated,
Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 & Supplement 2001) (PURA). The joint application
has been designated Docket Number 23905. The joint application and the underlying
interconnection agreement are available for public inspection at the commission's
offices in Austin, Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the amendment
to the interconnection agreement. Any interested person may file written comments
on the joint application by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's
filing clerk. Additionally, a copy of the comments should be served on each
of the applicants. The comments should specifically refer to Docket Number
23905. As a part of the comments, an interested person may request that a
public hearing be conducted. The comments, including any request for public
hearing, shall be filed by May 3, 2001, and shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23905.
TRD-200101991
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 5, 2001
On April 3, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Wes-Tex Telecommunications
doing business as Westex Telecom collectively referred to as applicants, filed
a joint application for approval of amendment to an existing interconnection
agreement under §252(i) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,
Public Law Number 104-104, 110 Statute 56, (codified as amended in scattered
sections of 15 and 47 United States Code) (FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory
Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 &
Supplement 2001) (PURA). The joint application has been designated Docket
Number 23906. The joint application and the underlying interconnection agreement
are available for public inspection at the commission's offices in Austin,
Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the amendment
to the interconnection agreement. Any interested person may file written comments
on the joint application by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's
filing clerk. Additionally, a copy of the comments should be served on each
of the applicants. The comments should specifically refer to Docket Number
23906. As a part of the comments, an interested person may request that a
public hearing be conducted. The comments, including any request for public
hearing, shall be filed by May 3, 2001, and shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23906.
TRD-200101992
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 5, 2001
On April 6, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Paging Professionals
of Oklahoma, Inc. doing business as Protel Communications, collectively referred
to as applicants, filed a joint application for approval of amendment to an
existing interconnection agreement under §252(i) of the federal Telecommunications
Act of 1996, Public Law Number 104-104, 110 Statute 56, (codified as amended
in scattered sections of 15 and 47 United States Code) (FTA) and the Public
Utility Regulatory Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60
(Vernon 1998 & Supplement 2001) (PURA). The joint application has been
designated Docket Number 23939. The joint application and the underlying interconnection
agreement are available for public inspection at the commission's offices
in Austin, Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the amendment
to the interconnection agreement. Any interested person may file written comments
on the joint application by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's
filing clerk. Additionally, a copy of the comments should be served on each
of the applicants. The comments should specifically refer to Docket Number
23939. As a part of the comments, an interested person may request that a
public hearing be conducted. The comments, including any request for public
hearing, shall be filed by May 8, 2001, and shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23939.
TRD-200102066
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
On April 9, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and 360 Communications
Company, collectively referred to as applicants, filed a joint application
for approval of amendment to an existing interconnection agreement under §252(i)
of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law Number 104-104,
110 Statute 56, (codified as amended in scattered sections of 15 and 47 United
States Code) (FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Texas Utilities
Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 & Supplement 2001) (PURA).
The joint application has been designated Docket Number 23944. The joint application
and the underlying interconnection agreement are available for public inspection
at the commission's offices in Austin, Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the amendment
to the interconnection agreement. Any interested person may file written comments
on the joint application by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's
filing clerk. Additionally, a copy of the comments should be served on each
of the applicants. The comments should specifically refer to Docket Number
23944. As a part of the comments, an interested person may request that a
public hearing be conducted. The comments, including any request for public
hearing, shall be filed by May 8, 2001, and shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23944.
TRD-200102067
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
Notice is given to the public of the filing with the Public Utility Commission
of Texas (commission), of a long run incremental cost (LRIC) study pursuant
to P.U.C. Substantive Rule §26.214
Docket Title and Number. United Telephone Company of Texas doing business
as Sprint for Approval of LRIC Study for Call Waiting ID Service Pursuant
to P.U.C. Substantive Rule §26.214 on or about April 19, 2001, Docket
Number 23945.
Any party that demonstrates a justiciable interest may file with the administrative
law judge, written comments or recommendations concerning the LRIC study referencing
Docket Number 23945. Written comments or recommendations should be filed no
later than 45 days after the date of a sufficient LRIC study and should be
filed at the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701 North Congress Avenue,
P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may call the commission's Customer
Protection Division at (512) 936-7120. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals
with text telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136.
TRD-200102063
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
On April 4, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and Caprock Cellular
Limited Partnership, collectively referred to as applicants, filed a joint
application for approval of interconnection agreement and amendment to interconnection
agreement under §252(i) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996,
Public Law Number 104-104, 110 Statute 56, (codified as amended in scattered
sections of 15 and 47 United States Code) (FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory
Act, Texas Utilities Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 &
Supplement 2001) (PURA). The joint application has been designated Docket
Number 23916. The joint application and the underlying interconnection agreement
are available for public inspection at the commission's offices in Austin,
Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the interconnection
agreement. Any interested person may file written comments on the joint application
by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's filing clerk. Additionally,
a copy of the comments should be served on each of the applicants. The comments
should specifically refer to Docket Number 23916. As a part of the comments,
an interested person may request that a public hearing be conducted. The comments,
including any request for public hearing, shall be filed by May 7, 2001, and
shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23916.
TRD-200102018
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 9, 2001
On April 5, 2001, United Telephone Company of Texas, Inc., doing business
as Sprint, Central Telephone Company of Texas doing business as Sprint (collectively,
Sprint), and Snappy Phone of Texas, Inc., collectively referred to as applicants,
filed a joint application for approval of interconnection agreement under §252(i)
of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law Number 104-104,
110 Statute 56, (codified as amended in scattered sections of 15 and 47 United
States Code) (FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory Act, Texas Utilities
Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 & Supplement 2001) (PURA).
The joint application has been designated Docket Number 23934. The joint application
and the underlying interconnection agreement are available for public inspection
at the commission's offices in Austin, Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the interconnection
agreement. Any interested person may file written comments on the joint application
by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's filing clerk. Additionally,
a copy of the comments should be served on each of the applicants. The comments
should specifically refer to Docket Number 23934. As a part of the comments,
an interested person may request that a public hearing be conducted. The comments,
including any request for public hearing, shall be filed by May 8, 2001, and
shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23934.
TRD-200102065
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
On April 6, 2001, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company and New Access Communications,
LLC, collectively referred to as applicants, filed a joint application for
approval of interconnection agreement and amendment to interconnection agreement
under §252(i) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, Public Law
Number 104-104, 110 Statute 56, (codified as amended in scattered sections
of 15 and 47 United States Code) (FTA) and the Public Utility Regulatory Act,
Texas Utilities Code Annotated, Chapters 52 and 60 (Vernon 1998 & Supplement
2001) (PURA). The joint application has been designated Docket Number 23940.
The joint application and the underlying interconnection agreement are available
for public inspection at the commission's offices in Austin, Texas.
The commission must act to approve the interconnection agreement within
35 days after it is submitted by the parties.
The commission finds that additional public comment should be allowed before
the commission issues a final decision approving or rejecting the interconnection
agreement. Any interested person may file written comments on the joint application
by filing ten copies of the comments with the commission's filing clerk. Additionally,
a copy of the comments should be served on each of the applicants. The comments
should specifically refer to Docket Number 23940. As a part of the comments,
an interested person may request that a public hearing be conducted. The comments,
including any request for public hearing, shall be filed by May 8, 2001, and
shall include:
1) a detailed statement of the person's interests in the agreement, including
a description of how approval of the agreement may adversely affect those
interests;
2) specific allegations that the agreement, or some portion thereof:
a) discriminates against a telecommunications carrier that is not a party
to the agreement; or
b) is not consistent with the public interest, convenience, and necessity;
or
c) is not consistent with other requirements of state law; and
3) the specific facts upon which the allegations are based.
After reviewing any comments, the commission will issue a notice of approval,
denial, or determine whether to conduct further proceedings concerning the
joint application. The commission shall have the authority given to a presiding
officer pursuant to P.U.C. Procedural Rule §22.202. The commission may
identify issues raised by the joint application and comments and establish
a schedule for addressing those issues, including the submission of evidence
by the applicants, if necessary, and briefing and oral argument. The commission
may conduct a public hearing. Interested persons who file comments are not
entitled to participate as intervenors in the public hearing.
Persons with questions about this project or who wish to comment on the
joint application should contact the Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1701
North Congress Avenue, P. O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas 78711-3326. You may
call the commission's Customer Protection Division at (512) 936-7120 or toll
free at 1-888-782-8477. Hearing and speech-impaired individuals with text
telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512) 936-7136. All correspondence
should refer to Docket Number 23940.
TRD-200102064
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
The Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) will hold a workshop
regarding service and transition issues when telecommunications carriers file
for bankruptcy protections on Friday, April 27, 2001, at 9:30 a.m.. in the
Commissioners' Hearing Room, located on the 7th floor of the William B. Travis
Building, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701. Project Number
23948,
Proceeding Relating to Service and Transition
Issues when Telecommunications Carriers File for Chapter 7 or 11 Bankruptcy
Protection
, has been established for this proceeding. With the increase
in bankruptcy filings by telecommunications carriers, the commission, with
the help of the telecommunications industry, hopes to develop and implement
a process to ensure that customers are not left without service(s) and, where
applicable, are seamlessly transitioned.
This notice is not a formal notice of proposed rulemaking; however, the
workshop will assist the commission in developing policy or determining the
necessity for a related rulemaking.
The commission requests that persons planning on attending the workshop
register by phone or e-mail with Patrick Tyler, Legal Division, (512) 936-7282
or patrick.tyler@puc.state.tx.us. Questions concerning the workshop or this
notice should also be referred to Patrick Tyler. Hearing and speech-impaired
individuals with text telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512)
936-7136.
TRD-200102083
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 11, 2001
The Public Utility Commission of Texas (commission) established Project
Number 22490,
Review of P.U.C. Subst. R. 26.122 Regarding
Customer Proprietary Network Information
, to amend commission Substantive
Rule §26.122, Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI). The proposed
amendments will incorporate the changes made by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) under 47 CFR 64, Telecommunications Carrier's Use of CPNI.
The FCC final rules were published in the Federal Register in January 2001.
The commission asks that interested parties file comments addressing the
questions below. Some of these questions are being re-issued in light of 47
CFR 64. If the parties have previously responded to the re-issued questions,
their responses will still be considered unless the parties desire to supplement
their responses.
1. Please provide an analysis of 47 CFR 64, the FCC rules on Telecommunications
Carriers' Use of Customer Propriety Network Information (CPNI). Specifically,
identify sections of 47 CFR 64 that affect §26.122 and those sections
that still contravene the decision in
U.S. West,
Inc., v. Federal Communication Commission
, Number 98-9518, 199 (10th
Circuit, August 18, 1999).
2. Please comment on and propose language to revise §26.122 to be
consistent with 47 CFR 64, and any other effective federal rules regarding
CPNI. Specifically, comment on the following sections of §26.122:
a. §26.122(c)(1), regarding optional extended area calling plans;
b. §26.122(d)(1)(B), regarding customer premises equipment (CPE) and
information services, including call answering, voice mail or messaging, voice
storage, and retrieval services, and fax storage and retrieval services;
c. §26.122(d)(1)(C), identity and tracking of customers;
d. §26.122(d)(1)(D), regarding winback;
e. §26.122(f), regarding notifications through oral and written methods;
f. §26.122(g), regarding software safeguards; and
g. any other provisions of §26.122.
Responses may be filed by submitting 16 copies within 30 days of the date
of publication of this notice to the commission's Filing Clerk, Public Utility
Commission of Texas, 1701 North Congress Avenue, P.O. Box 13326, Austin, Texas
78711-3326. All responses should reference Project Number 22490. The parties'
responses to the questions will assist the commission in developing a commission
policy and determining the needed changes to the existing rule.
Questions concerning this notice should be referred to Steven Pamintuan,
Policy Development Division, at (512) 936-7257. Hearing and speech-impaired
individuals with text telephones (TTY) may contact the commission at (512)
936-7136.
TRD-200102019
Rhonda Dempsey
Rules Coordinator
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Filed: April 9, 2001
Consultant Contract Award
Sam Houston State University (SHSU), in accordance with provisions of Government
Code, §2254.030, announces the awarding of a consultant contract to a
consulting firm based in Washington, D.C. The solicitation for proposals was
published in the February 23, 2001 issue of the
Texas Register
(Volume 26, TexReg 1795).
The consultant will represent and assist the University in developing a
project, the Criminal Research Information Management Evaluation System (CRIMES),
deemed important to the University.
One proposal was received in response to this solicitation for proposals.
The proposal was from G & H International Services LLC, 1747 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20006-4604.
The consultant awarded the contract was: G & H International Services
LLC, 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20006-4604.
The consultant contract begins April 1, 2001 and ends March 31, 2002 with
the option to renew. The fee estimate is $18,000, excluding expenses.
Reports and documents will be submitted as required.
TRD-200102048
Dr. B.K. Marks
President
Sam Houston State University
Filed: April 10, 2001
Request for Proposal for Network Update
The South East Texas Regional Planning Commission-Metropolitan Planning
Organization (SETRPC-MPO) is in the process of updating the JOHRTS MTP-2025
and requires the assistance of a Consultant to update the roadway attributes
for the 2007, 2017, and 2025 networks for the JOHRTS travel demand model.
Updating the travel demand model for the JOHRTS area will involve the following
major tasks:
• Collection of proposed roadway improvement projects in the JOHRTS
area from 2000 to 2025.
• Development and implementation of a QC/QA process for all coded
projects and network years.
• Coding of proposed roadway improvements into their appropriate network
years according to TxDOT standards.
• Submission of all
completed
network
years in TRANPLAN, TRANSCAD, and GIS shapefile format.
• Development of the network annotation files for the conformity analysis
component of the MTP according to TxDOT standards.
• Formal presentations of each network year to MPO staff and the JOHRTS
Technical Committee.
• Creation of a short report on the network update for informational
purposes.
Specific descriptions of each task to be completed by the Consultant are
listed below:
Review of all network years from the JOHRTS travel
demand model and development of a QC/QA methodology.
This task will make the Consultant familiar with coding difficulties and
previous revisions to the networks in the JOHRTS travel demand model. Specifically,
the Consultant should consult with the MPO staff on their experiences with
updating the 1997 base year and review the 2007, 2017, and 2025 network years
from the current travel demand model. Potential coding problems should be
identified and communicated to the MPO staff before starting any revisions
to the networks.
Upon its review of the networks, the Consultant must develop a QC/QA methodology
to ensure that all revisions are accurately coded. The QC/QA methodology must
include a series of checks to test the integrity and accuracy of the coded
network and to verify node and link specific attributes. Highway paths will
be checked through the use of techniques such as shortest path evaluation
and comparison of estimated travel times between node pairs. The MPO and TxDOT
must approve the proposed QC/QA methodology before the Consultant starts to
code the projects into the networks.
Collection and Evaluation of Roadway Improvements
Proposed for Construction from 2000 to 2025 in the JOHRTS area.
The purpose of this task is to identify, collect, and analyze proposed
transportation projects for the JOHRTS area. The Consultant is responsible
for ensuring that all relevant projects are identified and correctly coded
into the appropriate network years.
Specific subtasks include:
• Collection and analysis of roadway improvement projects in the current
JOHRTS MTP-2025, 2000-2002 TIP, 2002-2004 TIP, TxDOT's Unified Transportation
Plan, and other appropriate long-range transportation plans/comprehensive
plans in the JOHRTS area. Capital Works Programs or City Budgets can be used
as substitutes in the absence of more appropriate materials at the city level.
• The Consultant must ensure that the proposed roadway improvements
construction schedule has received the approval of city and state officials
and MPO staff. Interviews with these agencies to collect project information
and review projects should be conducted with MPO staff present.
Coding of proposed roadway improvements into their
appropriate network years.
Once all local agencies have agreed to their respective project construction
schedules, and TxDOT and the MPO approve the QC/QA methodology, the Consultant
may proceed to code the projects into their respective network years. The
coding scheme used by Consultant staff must follow TxDOT network coding formats.
Note that draft versions of the networks must be made available for review
by MPO staff in TRANSCAD format.
All projects and network years must be checked for accuracy using the QC/QA
methodology developed in consultation with TxDOT and MPO staff.
Formal presentations of each network to MPO staff
and the JOHRTS Technical Committee.
The Consultant will be required to present each completed network year
to the MPO staff and the JOHRTS Technical Committee and discuss all the projects
shown on the network, other coding issues, and their QC/QA of the network.
Submission of all networks to the MPO.
Once TxDOT approves the revised networks, the Consultant must forward four
(4)copies of the networks the MPO on compact disk. Each disk must contain
one copy of each network year in TRANPLAN, TRANSCAD, and GIS shapefile format.
Report on the Network Update.
The Consultant is also required to develop a short report, no longer than
twenty (20) pages (excluding the appendix). The report should be in the following
format and include, at a minimum, the information described below. Note that
the format and information listed in the report can be revised upon request.
Introduction:
This section should describe
the purpose of the contract, names of the persons involved, and a copy of
the project timeline.
Network Development:
Should briefly describe
network development, including information sources, coding techniques, and
each step in the update process. Problems encountered during the network update
should be identified, with a brief explanation of how they were resolved.
QC/QA Methodology:
This section should include
a detailed explanation of the methodology used by the Consultant. Discrepancies
highlighted during the QC/QA process should be identified and briefly discussed.
Recommendations:
This section should mention
any recommendations that the Consultant has regarding future updates. This
may include staff training, new resources or software, and other information
that the Consultant feels would assist the MPO in future network updates.
Appendix:
The Consultant must provide a Project
Annotation Listing in a format previously agreed to by MPO staff.
type-name="bold">An electronic copy of the project annotation listing must
be provided to the MPO for its conformity documentation.
Final Products
The following products must be submitted to the MPO by the end of the contract.
(1) Four (4) compact disks, each containing copies of the final 1997, 2007,
2017, and 2025 networks for the JOHRTS area in TRAN PLAN, TRANSCAD, and GIS
shapefile format.
(2) Presentations of each network year to the MPO staff and the JOHRTS
Technical Committee.
Note that the MPO may request
a final presentation at the end of the update.
(3) Three (3) copies of the report on the network update, including an
additional copy of the report in electronic format.
(4) An electronic copy of the Project Annotation Listing in a format previously
agreed to by MPO staff.
Contact:
Bob Dickinson, Director, Transportation
Programs and Environmental Resources, South East Texas Regional Planning Commission,
at (409) 727-2384, 3501 Turtle Creek Drive, Port Arthur, Texas 77642.
Closing Dates:
If your firm is interested
and qualified to update the travel demand model for the JOHRTS area, please
contact our office either via letter addressed to Bob Dickinson, South East
Texas Regional Planning Commission, 3501 Turtle Creek Drive, Port Arthur,
Texas, 77642 or via fax at (409) 729-6511 to express your interest. All responding
firms will receive a complete Request for Proposal package.
Final proposals will be due by 12 noon CST on Friday, June 1, 2001.
Proposals will be reviewed by a technical sub-committee based on Consultant
Selection Criteria included in the Request for Proposal package mailed to
interested parties.
TRD-200102042
Chester R. Jourdan
Executive Director
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
Filed: April 10, 2001
Notice of Award
In accordance with Government Code, Chapter 2254, Subchapter B, the Texas
Department of Transportation publishes this notice of a consultant contract
award for providing rural transit planning services. The request for consultant
services was published in the
Texas Register
on December 15, 2000 (25 TexReg 12541).
The consultant will provide a management review and develop a five year
development plan for ten rural transit agencies. These plans are due by March
31, 2002.
Contract #51151F7099, Austin. The consultant for these services is: Peter
Schauer Associates, 25220 Highland School Road, Boonville, Missouri 65233.
The total value of the contract is $350,000 and the contract period started
on March 30, 2001, and will continue until March 31, 2002.
TRD-200102030
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Filed: April 9, 2001
FHWA-TX-EIS-97-01-F; U.S. 190 CORRIDOR FROM FM 2657 TO THE; EAST CITY LIMITS
OF COPPERAS COVE; CORYELL AND LAMPASAS COUNTIES, TEXAS
DECISION
Based on the U.S. 190 Corridor Major Investment Study/Final Environmental
Impact Statement (MIS/FEIS), the Green Alternative (Alternative G) has been
selected as the appropriate course of action for the construction of the U.S.
190 Reliever Route.
As summarized in Section 8.1.2.3 of the FEIS, the Green Alternative would
result in the fewest environmental impacts of any of the build alternatives
such as the fewest number of relocations (six households) and reduced impacts
to vegetative areas. In addition, the Green Alternative would improve aesthetics
due to the alternative crossing the end of the valley between two hills referred
to as the "Saddle" and Sevenmile Mountain. From an engineering perspective,
the Green alignment presents the best means of conforming to the terrain by
minimizing the depths of cuts and lengths and heights of bridged sections.
The projected construction cost of $53 million is also the lowest as compared
to the other two alternatives (Yellow and Blue).
As described in Sections 2.2.3.2 and 8.1.2.3 and on Figure 2.2-8 of the
FEIS, the Green Alternative is a 10.5 kilometer (km) (6.5 mile) new location
roadway that follows a generally east/west alignment departing from existing
U.S. 190 just west of FM 2657 and north of the Rolling Hills residential area
at its western terminus to the eastern terminus where the proposed roadway
merges with existing U.S. 190 just east of the Copperas Cove City Limit in
Coryell County, Texas. This alternative would consist of a combination of
alternating four-lane parkway and freeway sections. The freeway sections will
include one-way frontage roads, which will have two travel lanes in each direction.
The parkway sections will not include frontage roads. In addition, there are
eight elevated sections associated either with the Green Alternative or crossing
roadways. One of the bridged sections on the Green Alternative is over Clear
Creek and includes frontage roads; the remaining elevated sections do not
include frontage roads.
The selection of the Green Alternative occurred as a result of a multi-phased
MIS/NEPA process that involved input from the Technical Team, the Policy Work
Group and members of the public. The Technical Team and Policy Work Group
included representatives from the FHWA, TxDOT, the consulting team, local
officials, and the public. Letters of support from the Central Texas Council
of Governments, the Copperas Cove Economic Development Corporation, and the
City of Copperas Cove are included in Appendix 1 of the MIS/FEIS. A public
hearing on the proposed project was held on November 5, 1998 in Copperas Cove,
Texas, with approximately 250 persons in attendance. The summary and analysis
of views along with the public hearing transcript are included in Appendix
5 of the FEIS. Other public involvement information is included in Appendices
6 and 7. In addition, the project is included in the current approved federally
required Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) and in the State Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP) and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). The
planning and project development process is described in Section 1.2.4 of
the MIS/FEIS.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
No-build Alternative
--U.S. 190 is the principal
arterial roadway in the Copperas Cove area, serving both regional and local
travel requirements. Existing regional travel (trips that begin and end outside
the Copperas Cove area) accounts for about 6,600 vehicles per day (vpd). Local
travel ranges from 5,300 vpd near the western city limits to 35,400 vpd east
of Avenue D (FM 1113). These traffic volumes are projected to increase by
approximately 35% by the design year of 2020. The segment of U.S. 190 through
Copperas Cove experienced approximately 800 accidents per 100 million miles
of vehicle travel in 1996. This was over three times higher than the 1996
statewide rate of 263 accidents per year per 100 million vehicle-miles of
travel. The segment of U.S. 190 between Old Copperas Cove Rd. on the east
and F.M. 116 south of U.S. 190 on the west currently operates at a Level of
Service (LOS) E to F during peak hours. This represents an unacceptable level
of congestion along most of U.S. 190's length through the Copperas Cove area
as referred to in Section 1.1.3.1 of the FEIS. These conditions are expected
to deteriorate without actions to address the problem.
This alternative would leave the current transportation network to handle
future demand. The No-build Alternative could not alleviate the traffic increases
on the already strained capacity of existing U.S. 190. Thus, the No-build
Alternative is not considered a viable alternative.
The Blue Alternative (Alternative B)
--This
alternative is 11.2 km (6.9 miles) long and is the longest of the three primary
build alternatives. Although the Blue Alternative has the same western and
eastern termini as the other build alternatives, its alignment differs from
the other build alternatives as it traverses the project area. The biggest
difference in the alignment is that it travels much further south than either
Alternative G or Y. As a result, the Blue Alternative crosses Clear Creek
to the south of the South Meadow Addition residential area. From the bridge
over Clear Creek, the alignment curves to the northeast, running south of
and avoids the landmark hills known as the "Saddle." It then proceeds through
the middle of the valley between Sevenmile Mountain and the "Saddle" on a
long bridge structure. After the Blue Alternative ascends Sevenmile Mountain
it continues northeast along the same alignment as the other build alternatives
to the existing U.S. 190, just east of Old Copperas Cove Road.
The Green Alternative (Alternative G)
--This
is the preferred alternative and it is 10.5 km (6.5 miles) long, and is the
shortest of the three primary build alternatives. This alignment proceeds
east from the existing U.S. 190 toward FM 3046 and FM 116. From east of FM
116, the Green Alternative curves northeast through a cut in the northern
face of the local landmark known as the "Saddle." It continues to the northeast
on a bridged section located on the north rim of the valley between Sevenmile
Mountain and the "Saddle." It then continues northeast to the existing U.S.
190, just east of Old Copperas Cove Road.
The Yellow Alternative (Alternative Y)
--This
alternative is 10.6 km (6.6 miles) long. Like the Green Alternative, the Yellow
Alternative proceeds east from existing U.S. 190 toward FM 3046 and FM 116.
However, the alignment differs from the Green Alternative by traveling in
a slight northeasterly direction between FM 3046 and FM 116. After crossing
FM 116 this alignment curves slightly to the southeast, passing between the
two hills known locally as the "Saddle." It then follows a northeasterly course
on an elevated section across the valley between Sevenmile Mountain and the
"Saddle." From Sevenmile Mountain to its eastern terminus, this alignment
follows the same route as the other primary build alternatives, continuing
in a northeast direction to the existing U.S. 190, just east of Old Copperas
Cove Road.
Construction of any of the build alternatives would divert a portion of
existing and future increased level of traffic. Any of the build alternatives
would improve mobility on existing U.S. 190 by reducing traffic congestion
and providing a reliable, efficient alternative. Public safety would be positively
affected regardless of which alternative was selected, by providing an enhanced
high speed alternative to existing U.S. 190 for emergency vehicles, peace
officers, and civilian and military personnel at Fort Hood.
The above information on all of the alternatives considered was provided
to the public through a series of public meetings held in Copperas Cove on
March 7, 1996 (100 attendees), July 18, 1996 (120 attendees), and April 17,
1997 (100 attendees). Media/Press packages were assembled for each public
meeting. A Policy Work Group consisting of local stakeholders met six times
throughout the course of the project from January 9, 1995 through November
16, 1998. In addition, a toll free telephone number was provided in media
releases, project newsletters, and public meetings to allow the public direct
access to express comments on the project. A total of five (5) newsletters
were published and distributed to as many as 800 addresses. Area elected and
public officials were routinely notified and encouraged to participate in
the process. As previously stated, a public hearing was also held on November
5, 1998 in Copperas Cove.
Based on the Major Investment Study and the subsequent alternatives analysis
for U.S. 190 in Copperas Cove, the Green Alternative was designated as the
Preferred Alternative from an engineering perspective, a mobility perspective,
and an environmental perspective. The Green Alternative would produce the
fewest negative impacts and the most positive benefits for the people and
environment of Lampasas and Coryell Counties. From an engineering perspective
the Green Alternative is favored because it is the most financially constrained
of the build alternatives. The Green Alternative's lower cost is directly
related to its shorter length and the number and length of bridges. In terms
of mobility, the Green Alternative would have the greatest positive impacts
to traffic on existing U.S. 190. It will also add the fewest vehicle miles
traveled among the build alternatives. As a result, the Green Alternative
would generate the greatest public safety benefits of any of the alternatives.
The Green Alternative also generates the fewest environmental impacts. Due
to its shorter length, the Green Alternative would result in the conversion
of the smallest area of land to transportation uses of all of the build alternatives.
In addition, the Green Alternative would result in the fewest residential
relocations of the build alternatives. It also provides the lowest impact
on local aesthetics due to its shorter bridged sections and shallower limestone
cut sections. The Green Alternative would also generate the fewest impacts
to vegetative areas. The preferred alignment's impacts to wildlife would be
less than other alternatives because it is closer to densely populated urban
subdivisions than either the Yellow or Blue Alternative. As a result of the
above-mentioned benefits, the Green Alternative would accommodate anticipated
traffic demand and provide for a safe and efficient transportation system.
U.S ARMY--FORT HOOD
Section 5.1.2 and Table 5.1-1 describe land use impacts for all three build
alternatives. The Fort Hood land use impacts are equivalent for all proposed
build alternatives. Approximately 88 hectares (217 acres) of military land
will be taken in the form of an easement. This area is in a part of the base
that is approved for conversion to enhance their existing transportation network.
As noted in their April 20, 2000 letter of support (Appendix 1-116), the U.
S. Army--Fort Hood has worked closely with Federal Highway Administration
and Texas Department of Transportation on this Major Investment Study and
Environmental Impact Statement for Transportation Improvements in the U.S.
190 Corridor in Copperas Cove, Texas.
SECTION 4(f)
A Section 4(f) evaluation is not required because the Green Alternative
will not involve the taking of any parkland or other Section 4(f) properties.
MEASURES TO MINIMIZE HARM
All practicable measures to minimize harm have been incorporated into the
FEIS. These measures are summarized below. A complete discussion of these
measures is included in Section 8.4 of the FEIS.
The Green Alternative will result in the relocation of 6 households (2
residences and 1 fourplex), 3 businesses, and 1 church. This alternative would
result in 3 to 14 fewer relocations than the Yellow and Blue Alternatives.
TxDOT in accordance with the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the
Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, and the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1974 will provide
relocation assistance. No disproportionately high or adverse effects on the
human health or environment or minority or low-income population will result.
No distinct neighborhoods or ethnic groups will be isolated.
Noise and visual impacts from the project will be minor. The mainlanes
between FM 116 and FM 3046 interchanges will be depressed and will reduce
noise and visual impacts to nearby neighborhoods. Landscaping would be provided
along the selected alignment, especially along parkway areas.
The construction of the U.S. 190 reliever route will conform to TxDOT and
FHWA specifications and guidelines regarding drainage design. "State of the
art" containment and capture facilities to protect against any spill of hazardous
waste or contaminated runoff from the highway in sensitive areas will be included
in the project design.
Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department, TxDOT will replace mixed deciduous woodlands (as described
in Table 3.9-3 of the FEIS) impacted by the construction of the U.S. 190 relief
route at an acreage ratio of 1:1, with actual replacement acreage to be determined
based upon the final roadway schematic. Trees will be replaced within the
right-of-way in areas where vehicular safety considerations allow. Exact locations
will be decided during the final design phase.
Informal consultation under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act took
place between TxDOT and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Based
upon this coordination and findings documented (see in the FEIS section 5.9.4
and Appendix 1-114), the USFWS reached a "may affect, but not likely to adversely
impact golden-cheeked warbler and black-capped vireo populations" ruling under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act regarding the impacts of the Green
Alternative.
The Green Alternative will disturb more than 2 hectares (5 acres) of land
and will, therefore, require compliance with the EPA National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System General Permit for Industrial Activity. This includes preparation
of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SW3P) and the use of Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to control erosion during construction.
Approximately six crossings of minor drainages would occur in association
with the Green Alternative. Five of these jurisdictional crossings will impact
less than 0.10 acre and would not require notification to the U. S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USACE). No wetlands will be impacted. The proposed crossing
at Turkey Run (Crossing #11 on Plate 2-2 in Appendix 3 of the FEIS) would
impact approximately 0.23 acre and would require a pre-construction notification
to the USACE. Final permitting for this project will be accomplished by TxDOT
when more definite site plans are completed and prior to authorization for
construction.
The hydraulic design practices for this project will be in accordance with
current TxDOT and Federal Highway Administration design policy and standards.
The roadway facility will be designed to accommodate a 100-year flood, inundation
of the roadway being acceptable.
Background studies indicate that archeological sites may be present within
each of the alignment alternatives, but the types of sites that would be present
will be similar. No one alternative has a higher probability of site presence.
Archeological surveys and subsequent coordination by TxDOT with the Texas
Historical Commission (THC) will be completed for the preferred alternative
prior to construction. FHWA and TxDOT shall complete that coordination with
the THC and ACHP in accordance with FHWA's Programmatic Agreement (PA). Should
discovery of other, potentially important, sites be inadvertently discovered
during construction, FHWA and TxDOT shall also coordinate those sites with
the THC in accordance with the PA.
There are no historic standing properties listed or eligible for listing
in the National Register of Historic Places (NHRP). A copy of the State Historic
Preservation Officer's concurrence letter is included in Appendix 1-115 of
the FEIS.
A plan of action prepared during project development to address environmental
concerns related to the City of Copperas Cove's closed landfill (located within
the Green Alternative's right-of-way) was approved in a letter from the Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC) dated April 25, 1997. The
proposed plan of action is described below and is included in Sections 5.12.2
and 5.12.3 of the FEIS.
MONITORING OR ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
TxDOT and other appropriate State, Federal and local agencies to ensure
compliance, will monitor all commitments and conditions of approval stated
in the FEIS. These commitments and conditions are discussed in "Section 8.4
Environmental Permitting and Mitigation Issues" of the FEIS.
Below is a description of the necessary steps, plans, and methodologies
to be implemented prior to and during the construction of the proposed reliever
route. The following paragraphs address the necessary steps to be taken assuming
that the contents of the landfill consist only of municipal solid waste material.
1) A site plan of the landfill that shows the area that will be affected
by excavation/construction related activities and the fill areas will be prepared.
In general, the excavation of the waste material from the right-of-way will
be accomplished using conventional excavation equipment, i.e., excavator with
bucket and/or clamshell and dump trucks. Details of the complete methodology
for the excavation will be prepared prior to commencement of work.
2) Detailed site plans and structural details of the location of the proposed
footprint of the reliever route and any structures associated with the construction
on the landfill site will be prepared. These plans and details will only address
features within the proposed right-of-way. All plans developed for this project
will be submitted to TNRCC for review.
3) A calculation sheet shall be prepared and submitted showing total volume
of waste to be excavated and relocated from the right-of-way during construction
activities. A cut and fill plan will be prepared using the data attained from
the subsurface investigation performed. Excavated materials from the right-of-way
will be redeposited on site and then properly capped with a clay liner. Any
excess waste will be disposed at an approved landfill, and a copy of an agreement/contract
showing that disposal of excavated materials at the facility has been approved
at the landfill will be provided for documentation. All plans will be submitted
to TNRCC for review.
4) Notification shall be given to the public, adjacent landowners, and
local emergency officials regarding waste excavation and relocation activities.
Also, TNRCC Region 9 office, located in Waco, shall be notified prior to the
beginning of waste excavation and relocation activities. Methods for notification
prior to the start of each waste relocation event shall be specified and coordinated
with the appropriate parties involved. Methods for notification to the public
and adjacent landowners, etc. prior to waste relocation will be prepared and
approved by TNRCC prior to excavation activities.
5) A Contingency Plan will be prepared to address weather conditions, handling
of nuisance odors and air monitoring during the course of construction.
6) A Daily Cover Plan will be prepared prior to excavation activities.
The plan will be submitted to TNRCC for approval prior to start of construction.
7) A leachate and contaminated water plan will be prepared and approved
by TNRCC to address containment and handling of rainfall surface run-off from
the active working face in the event of inclement weather and leachate generated
by excavation of the waste. All rainfall surface run-off from the active face
will be disposed of at a permitted facility.
8) If waste is exposed in the sidewalls of the excavation, then appropriate
liners will be constructed to cap the exposed surfaces. If this is the case,
then a Soil and Liner Quality Control Plan (SLQCP) will be developed in accordance
with 30 Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Section §330.205. Soils and Liner
Evaluation Report (SLER) will be prepared and submitted in accordance with
30 TAC §330.206.
9) Nuisance odor control measures will be implemented at the site to minimize
the effect of waste relocation on the operation of local businesses, adjacent
property owners, and the general public using appropriate routes of transportation
in the vicinity of the site. The measures may include, but not be limited
to, spraying of exposed waste and/or application of soil cover to the exposed
waste surfaces to minimize odors and the attraction of vectors. A plan will
be developed to control air pollution related problems describing measures
to be taken in the event of occurrence of objectionable odors. This plan will
be submitted to TNRCC for review.
10) The site will be monitored with on-site combustible gas detection equipment.
The conditions will be monitored to ensure that concentration of methane gas
(CH
4
) does not exceed Lower Explosive Limit (LEL),
5% methane by volume in air. A comprehensive Health and Safety Plan will be
prepared.
11) Appropriate engineering controls will be implemented to reduce the
likelihood of ponding water occurring in the operational areas. A detailed
drainage control plan will be prepared and reviewed by TNRCC.
12) Windblown waste and litter will be controlled in accordance with 30
TAC §330.120.
13) A construction schedule showing dates and time of day that work in
the landfill area will take place shall be prepared.
14) If believed to be necessary, a weather monitoring station will be established
at the site. Measurements of meteorological parameters such as wind speed,
wind direction, temperature, and wind chill, if necessary, shall be taken
hourly and recorded during each waste relocation event.
15) Air monitoring shall be performed at the site on a daily basis during
each waste relocation event. The ambient air shall be monitored for the presence
of Hydrogen Sulfide (H
2
S), Methane (CH
4
), Carbon Dioxide (CO
2
), and Oxygen (O
16) During each waste relocation event, a status report of work activities,
quantity of waste relocated, air monitoring results, and any anticipated problems
that might arise as a result of changing weather conditions will be submitted
to the TNRCC for review and documentation purposes. These status reports will
be submitted on a weekly basis during each waste relocation event.
17) The excavated waste that is redeposited on site will be covered with
a cap consisting of 24" of soil, 18" of SC or CL clay and 6" of topsoil.
18) Post-Closure Care Maintenance, as necessary, will be performed in accordance
with §330.254.
Extensive coordination with the EPA and TNRCC relative to the remediation
of the Green Alternative right-of-way where it passes through the closed municipal
landfill will be necessary. Specific permitting and mitigation actions for
the landfill or hazardous material sites are not anticipated for this project.
No comments regarding hazardous materials site impacts were received from
resource agencies.
COMMENTS ON FINAL EIS
No comments were received on the Final EIS.
CONCLUSION
Based on the MIS/FEIS, the selected alternative is the Green Alternative
(Alternative G). The Green Alternative and its associated impacts are summarized
in Section 8.0 of the MIS/FEIS.
TRD-200102069
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Filed: April 11, 2001
Texas Education Agency
Employees Retirement System of Texas
Texas Department of Health
Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs
Notice of Determination of Certain Counties
Public Hearing Schedule for a Concentration Policy for Multifamily Housing Programs
Department of Information Resources
Texas Department of Insurance
Third Party Administrator Application
Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation
Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Settlement Agreements of Administrative Enforcement Actions
Notice of Opportunity to Participate in Permitting Matters
Notice of Water Quality Applications
Notices of Minor Amendment
Proposal for Decision
Public Utility Commission of Texas
Notice of Application for a Certificate to Provide Retail Electric Service
Notice of Application of Verizon Southwest to Revise its TXG and TXC General Exchange Tariffs
Notice of Application Pursuant to P.U.C. Substantive Rule §26.171
Public Notice of Amendment to Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Amendment to Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Amendment to Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Amendment to Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Amendment to Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Amendment to Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Intent to File Pursuant to P.U.C. Substantive Rule §26.214
Public Notice of Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Interconnection Agreement
Public Notice of Workshop Regarding Service and Transition Issues when Telecommunications Carriers File for Bankruptcy Protection
Request for Comments Regarding Customer Proprietary Network Information and Substantive Rule §26.122
Sam Houston State University
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
Texas Department of Transportation
Public Notice-Record of Decision
University of Houston