TITLE 30.ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Part 1. TEXAS NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION

Chapter 11. CONTRACTS

Subchapter D. RESOLUTION OF CONTRACT CLAIMS

30 TAC §§11.101 - 11.108

The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (TNRCC or commission) proposes new §11.101, Definitions; §11.102, Applicability, §11.103, Other rules and statutes; §11.104, Filing Notice of Claim for Breach of Contract; Counterclaim; §11.105, Negotiation; §11.106, Settlement of Claim; §11.107, Mediation; and §11.108, Request for Hearing.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES

The purpose of proposed Chapter 11, Subchapter D, Resolution of Certain Contract Claims Against the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, is to implement Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260, Resolution of Certain Contract Claims Against the State, which was created by House Bill (HB) 826, 76th Legislature, 1999. The statute requires that each unit of state government must adopt rules to govern the negotiation and mediation of contractor claims for breach of contract. Chapter 2260 provides that this administrative claim procedure is a prerequisite to filing suit by the contractor. Chapter 2260 also requires the commission to define by rule the process for mediating and settling claims against the state arising under contracts for goods and services. The proposed rules have been drafted to be consistent with the intent and language of HB 826, and to specifically satisfy the rulemaking requirements required of the commission.

The proposed rules establish a procedure for the administrative processing of contractor claims for breach of written contracts with the commission.

SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION

New proposed §11.101 defines terms used in this subchapter including "claim," contract," "contractor," and "counterclaim."

New proposed §11.102 provides that these rules apply to the types of claims authorized or required under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260, but do not apply to certain specified types of contracts. The list of exemptions is derived from the Texas Attorney General's HB 826, Model Rules. Section 11.102(b)(6) and (7) exclude contracts which are within the exclusive jurisdiction of local, state, and federal regulatory bodies and federal courts. An example would be a claim by a contractor who has filed for federal bankruptcy court protection.

New proposed §11.103 provides that the requirements of Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260 and those of commission rules 30 TAC §1.10 and §1.11 (except §1.11(a)) apply to claims under this subchapter. The rule informs the public that additional statutory requirements apply to contract claims but does not repeat or incorporate the wording of the statute.

New proposed §11.104 sets out the procedure for a contractor to file a claim with the commission. The statutory period of limitation for filing the claim (within 180 days of the event asserted as the basis of the claim) is repeated here to clarify that the statutory period is the same as the period for filing the claim with the chief clerk.

New proposed §11.105 sets out the procedure for negotiating a claim.

New proposed §11.106 provides that an agreement to settle a claim must be in writing, signed by both the executive director and the contractor and be filed with the chief clerk.

New proposed §11.107 provides that the parties may agree to mediate a claim. The mediation procedure is in 30 TAC Chapter 40.

New proposed §11.108 describes the process by which a contractor may request a contested case hearing on the claim if it has not been resolved. The rule clarifies that a hearing request may not be filed within 270 days after the original notice of claim in order to allow time for negotiation and possible resolution of the claim. The rule also recognizes that the period (when hearing requests are prohibited) may be extended or reduced by agreement. Such an agreement might occur when negotiations are either approaching a successful settlement or have clearly reached an impasse.

FISCAL NOTE

Jeff Grymkoski, Director, Strategic Planning and Appropriations Division, has determined for the first five-year period the rules as proposed are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local governments as a result of administration or enforcement of the proposed new rules. Enforcement of the rules will not result in an increase in workload for commission staff.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Grymkoski has also determined for each year of the first five years the proposed new rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from enforcement of and compliance with the rules will be an easier, more straightforward, less time-consuming, and less costly way to resolve contract disputes.

SMALL AND MICRO-BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSES

The proposed rules are not anticipated to impose costs on persons, small businesses, or micro-businesses because they create a cost-effective dispute resolution method, mediation, as an alternative to lawsuits in court, for resolving breach of contract claims. They will save money for those affected persons.

DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS

The commission has reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and has determined that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule" as defined in that statute. These are procedural rules governing the resolution of breach of contract claims. These rules do not set any environmental standards or affect the enforcement of environmental standards. There are no federal standards for these contracting issues. These rules are specifically required by state law, Texas Government Code, §2260.052(c). These rules are proposed under this specific state statute rather than the general powers of the commission. These rules do not exceed the requirements of state law. There are no delegation agreements or contracts between the state and federal government concerning state contracting procedures.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The commission has prepared a takings impact assessment for these rules under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The following is a summary of that assessment. The specific purpose of the proposed rules is to implement legislation on procedures for handling contract disputes between the commission, and persons who enter into contracts with it. These are procedural rules governing the resolution of breach of contract claims. These rules do not set any environmental standards or affect the enforcement of environmental standards. These proposed rules do not regulate the use of private real property. Therefore, these rules will not constitute a takings under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007.

COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENCY REVIEW

The commission has determined that the proposed rulemaking does not relate to an action or actions subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) in accordance with the Coastal Coordination Act of 1991, as amended (Texas Natural Resources Code, §§33.201 et seq.), and the commission's rules in 30 TAC Chapter 281, Subchapter B, concerning Consistency with the CMP. These are procedural rules that do not set environmental standards or affect their enforcement.

Interested persons may submit comments on the consistency of the proposed rules with the CMP during the public comment period.

PUBLIC HEARING

A public hearing on this proposal will be held in Austin on June 1, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. in Building F, Room 3202A at the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Complex, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order of registration. Open discussion will not occur during the hearing; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the proposal 30 minutes before the hearing and will answer questions before and after the hearing.

Persons with disabilities who have special communication or other accommodation needs, who are planning to attend the hearing, should contact the Office of Environmental Policy, Analysis, and Assessment at (512) 239-4900. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Written comments may be submitted to Angela Slupe, Office of Environmental Policy, Analysis, and Assessment, MC 205, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All comments should reference Rule Log Number 1999-081-011-AD. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., June 5, 2000. For further information, please contact Doug McArthur at (512) 239-6857.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

The new sections are proposed under HB 826, 76th Legislature, 1999, codified as Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260, which requires the commission to develop rules governing the negotiation and mediation of claims for breach of contract between the commission and a contractor.

The proposed new sections implement Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260.

§11.101. Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meaning, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

(1)

Claim - A demand for damages by the contractor based upon the agency's alleged breach of the contract.

(2)

Contract - A written contract between the agency and a contractor (including contract documents, work orders, purchase order change notices, and other documents amending, modifying, or supplementing the contract by the terms of which the contractor agrees either:

(A)

to provide goods or services, by sale or lease, to or for the agency; or

(B)

to perform a project as defined by Texas Government Code, §2166.001.

(3)

Contractor - Independent contractor who has entered into a contract directly with a unit of state government. The term does not include:

(A)

the contractor's subcontractor, officer, employee, agent, or other person furnishing goods or services to a contractor;

(B)

an employee of a unit of state government; or

(C)

a student at an institution of higher education.

(4)

Counterclaim - A demand by the agency relating to the contractor's claim.

(5)

Deputy director of OLS - the deputy director for the Office of Legal Services (OLS) or the director of a similar successor unit within the agency serving as legal counsel for the executive director and includes individuals designated to act for the deputy director of OLS or a similar unit.

§11.102. Applicability.

(a)

This chapter does not apply to an action of the agency for which a contractor is entitled to a specific remedy pursuant to state or federal constitution or statute.

(b)

This chapter does not apply to contracts:

(1)

between the agency and the federal government or its agencies, another state, or another nation;

(2)

between the agency and another unit of state government;

(3)

between the agency and a local governmental body, or a political subdivision of another state;

(4)

between a subcontractor and a contractor;

(5)

subject to the Transportation Code, §201.112;

(6)

within the exclusive jurisdiction of state or local regulatory bodies;

(7)

within the exclusive jurisdiction of federal courts or regulatory bodies; or

(8)

for grants of funds from the agency to grantees or subgrantees.

(c)

This subchapter applies to claims for breach of contract against the agency asserted by a contractor under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260 and to counterclaims of the agency. No employee or agent of the commission is authorized to waive the requirements of this subchapter nor the sovereign immunity of the agency, whether by means of acceptance of goods and services or otherwise.

§11.103. Other Rules and Statutes.

The requirements of the following statutes and rules also apply to claims filed under this subchapter:

(1)

Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260, regarding contract claims, including without limitation the time limits for filing the notice of claim, counterclaim, and request for hearing; and

(2)

Section 1.10 and §1.11 of this title (regarding Document Filing) except §1.11(a).

§11.104. Filing Notice of Claim for Breach of Contract; Counterclaim.

A contractor asserting a claim that the agency has breached a contract must file a notice of claim as follows.

(1)

The notice of claim must fully describe the claim in writing on a form to be determined by the agency and must be signed by the contractor or an authorized representative.

(2)

The notice of claim must be filed with the agency's chief clerk no later than 180 days after the event that the contractor asserts as the basis of the claim. The contractor must reference the docket number assigned by the chief clerk in any documents subsequently filed which pertain to the notice of claim.

(3)

Copies of the written notice of claim and all other documents filed with the chief clerk must be served on the executive director and the deputy director of OLS no later than the day of filing.

(4)

The executive director shall file any appropriate counterclaim with the chief clerk within 90 days after the filing of the notice of claim and provide a copy to the contractor.

§11.105. Negotiation.

(a)

The executive director is authorized to negotiate, mediate, and settle the claim, as appropriate, and may designate one or more employees of the agency to act.

(b)

Upon receiving a notice of claim, the executive director shall provide the contractor a reasonable opportunity to meet and negotiate the claim.

(c)

The executive director may also negotiate, mediate, or settle with a contractor concerning any assertion by a contractor which does not constitute either a notice or a claim under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2260. Such actions by the executive director do not constitute a waiver of statutory or regulatory requirements for a notice or a claim.

§11.106. Settlement of Claim.

Any agreement to settle all or a portion of the contractor's claim filed under this subchapter must be:

(1)

in writing;

(2)

signed by the executive director and the contractor or authorized representative; and

(3)

filed with the chief clerk.

§11.107. Mediation.

The contractor and the executive director may agree to mediate a claim made under this subchapter. Mediation must be conducted under Chapter 40 of this title (relating to Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure).

§11.108. Request for Hearing.

(a)

A contractor may request a contested case hearing before the state SOAH of any unsettled portion of the claim.

(b)

A contractor must file the request for hearing with the chief clerk in writing on a form to be determined by the commission.

(c)

A contractor may not file the request for hearing until the expiration of 270 days after the contractor files the notice of claim. This period may be extended or reduced by written agreement of the contractor, and the executive director. The agreement must be filed with the chief clerk.

(d)

A contractor must serve copies of the request for hearing on the executive director and the deputy director of OLS no later than the day of filing.

(e)

After a contractor files the request for hearing, the chief clerk shall refer the entire file on the claim and counterclaim to the SOAH for a contested case hearing under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001, as to the issues raised in the request for hearing. Referral of a request for hearing to SOAH does not constitute waiver by the commission of statutory or regulatory requirements for the notice of claim, the claim or the request for hearing.

(f)

Other chapters of this title regarding requests for, and conduct of, contested case hearings of applications do not apply to hearings of contract claims brought under this subchapter.

(g)

Contested case hearings brought under this subchapter must be conducted in compliance with the rules of SOAH applicable to hearings on contract claims and where those rules are silent, under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and the Texas Rules of Evidence.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 20, 2000.

TRD-200002832

Margaret Hoffman

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Proposed date of adoption: June 5, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 239-4712


Chapter 14. GRANTS

30 TAC §§14.1-14.16

The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission) proposes a new §14.1, Definitions; §14.2, Commission Authority; §14.3, Applicability; §14.4, Funding; §14.5, Recipient Eligibility; §14.6, Recipient Selection Criteria; §14.7, Solicitations; §14.8, Direct Award; §14.9, Notices; §14.10, Payment Procedures; §14.11, Other Requirements; §14.12, Eligible Activities; §14.13, Uniform Grant Management Standards; §14.14, Grant Awards Affecting Mexico; §14.15, Delegation of Authority; and §14.16, Affect on Prior Grants. The purpose of the new sections is to implement Senate Bill (SB) 1421 and House Bill (HB) 3561, 76th Legislature, 1999. Senate Bill 1421, 76th Legislature, 1999, adds Texas Water Code, §5.124 and House Bill 3561 adds Texas Water Code, §5.125 (Session Laws, 76th Legislature, 1999, Chapter 187 (HB 3561) pages 660-662), Authority to Award Grants. Both sections contain identical language and require the commission to establish, by rule, procedures for awarding a grant, for making any determination related to awarding a grant, and for making grant payments. The proposed rules, in a new Chapter 14, respond to this requirement.

SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION

Section 14.1 provides definitions of various terms used in the chapter.

Section 14.2 cites agency's authority to award grants.

Section 14.3 establishes the types of grants that may be awarded and requires the executive director to determine and document that a proposed grant satisfies an authorized purpose.

Section 14.4 lists funding sources the agency is authorized to use for grants.

Section 14.5 requires that, prior to proposing any grant or series of grants, the executive director establish recipient eligibility requirements appropriate to the purposes and activities under such grant or grants.

Section 14.6 requires that, prior to proposing any grant or series of grants for which there will be competitive selection of the recipient or recipients, the executive director establish appropriate recipient selection criteria and, then, award grants only to persons or entities that have been selected in accordance with those criteria.

Section 14.7 lists specific kinds of information that must be include in any formal request for proposals (RFP) issued by the agency for the purpose of soliciting competitive proposals for grants other than those that are to be directly awarded.

Section 14.8 describes the circumstances under which a grant may be directly awarded without using a formal competitive selection process. The section requires the executive director to determine and document, prior to the award, that such procedure is appropriate.

Section 14.9 contains requirements relating to the placing of formal notices in the state's electronic business daily, the Texas Marketplace, concerning both the solicitation of proposals from potential recipients and, then, to announce any grant awards made. The section also describes the notices required to be placed in the Texas Marketplace when a direct award grant is anticipated by the executive director.

Section 14.10 establishes payment procedures for grant recipients and identifies the various regulations and standards, including various federal standards, that affect different types of grant recipients.

Section 14.11 alerts potential grant recipients and others to certain contract-related requirements under the Texas Government Code.

Section 14.12 stipulates that all activities paid for under a grant must directly relate to a purpose specified in the grant.

Section 14.13 confirms that all applicable provisions of the Texas Government Code, Chapter 783, Uniform Grant and Contract Management, and the Uniform Grant Management Standards manual apply to grants awarded by the agency.

Section 14.14 stipulates that the requirements of Texas Government Code, Chapter 792, International Cooperation Agreements, apply to any grant awarded by the agency that involves either the United Mexican States, a political subdivision of the United Mexican States, or an agency or entity created under a treaty or executive agreement between the United States and the United Mexican States.

Section 14.15 simply allows the executive director to delegate authority under the chapter, but, specifies that delegation must be done in writing.

Section 14.16 defines the extent to which the requirements of the proposed chapter apply to grants either awarded or under consideration by the agency prior to September 1, 1999.

FISCAL NOTE

Jeff Grymkoski, Director, Strategic Planning and Appropriations, has determined that there will be no fiscal implications for units of state and local government as a result of administration and enforcement of the proposed new rules for the first five years that the proposed rules are in effect. The rules would implement certain provisions of SB 1421 and HB 3561. The rules would establish requirements for grant applications, selection of grantees, funding, and program activities eligible for grants.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Grymkoski also has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed rules are in effect, the public benefit anticipated from the enforcement of and compliance with the rules will be a greater assurance that: (1) grants are awarded only for purposes consistent with the agency's jurisdiction; (2) grants will be awarded to persons that meet the eligibility requirements; (3) selection of grant recipients will be by solicitation of a proposal or application (except under certain documented circumstances); and (4) certain grants will be awarded directly to recipients when the executive director determines that selection by solicitation or application is not feasible and is in the best interest of the state. The implementation of these rules is not anticipated to prevent any qualified business, unit of state government, university, or individual from being awarded a grant from the agency.

SMALL AND MICRO-BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSES

The implementation of these rules is not anticipated to affect adversely any qualified small business or micro-business awarded a grant from the agency and is not anticipated to impose additional costs on persons, small businesses, or micro-businesses.

DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS

The commission has reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and has determined that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule," as defined therein. In addition, the proposed rulemaking is not a major environmental rule because it does not meet any of the four applicability requirements of a "major environmental rule" defined in §2001.0225(a). There is no federal law or federal delegation agreement specifically applicable to these proposed rules.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The commission has prepared a takings impact assessment for the proposed rules pursuant to Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The specific purpose of the rules is to implement legislation concerning the commission's authority to award grants for resource conservation and environmental protection purposes. The proposed rules establish the agency's procedures for awarding grants, for making any determination relating to awarding a grant, and for making grant payments. The rules do not affect private real property. Therefore, these proposed rules under new Chapter 14 will not constitute a takings under Texas Government Code, Chapter 2007.

COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENCY REVIEW

The commission has reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found that the rules are not identified in the Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11, Actions and Rules Subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP), and will not affect any action/authorization identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11. Therefore, the proposed rules are not subject to the CMP.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Comments may be submitted to Angela Slupe, Office of Environmental Policy, Analysis, and Assessment, MC 205, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All comments should reference Rule Log No. 1999-040-014-AD. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., June 5, 2000. For further information, please contact Doug McArthur, Office of Administrative Services, Purchasing, MC 181, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087, telephone (512) 239-6857, fax (512) 239-0371.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

The new sections are proposed under SB 1421 and HB 3561, 76th Legislature, 1999, and require the commission to establish, by rule, procedures for awarding a grant, for making any determination relating to awarding a grant, and for making grant payments. Also, the new chapter is proposed under Texas Water Code, §5.103, which authorizes the commission to adopt any rules needed to carry out its powers and duties. This rulemaking responds to a new requirement of state law.

The proposed rules implement SB 1421 and HB 3561, 76th Legislature, 1999, and are authorized by Texas Water Code, §5.103.

§14.1.Definitions.

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1)

Direct award--The award of a grant without first soliciting competitive proposals or applications.

(2)

Grant--The award of financial assistance, including cooperative agreements, in the form of money, property in lieu of money, or other financial assistance paid or furnished by the state or federal government to carry out a program in accordance with rules, regulations, and guidance provided by the grantor agency. The term does not include technical assistance which provides services instead of money, or other assistance in the form of revenue sharing, loans, loan guarantees, interest subsidies, insurance, or direct appropriations. Also, the term does not include assistance, such as a fellowship or other lump sum award, for which the grantee is not required to account.

(3)

Local government--A county, municipality, city, town, township, local public authority (including any public and Indian housing agency under the United States Housing Act of 1937), school district, special district, intrastate district, council of governments (whether or not incorporated as a nonprofit corporation under state law), any other regional or interstate government entity, or any agency or instrumentality of a local government.

(4)

Pass-through grant--An award of financial assistance made by the agency to an eligible entity using federal grant funds. The term includes financial assistance when provided by contractual legal agreement, but does not include any form of assistance which is excluded from the definition of "grant" as defined in this section.

(5)

Political subdivision--A political subdivision as that term is used in Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, Interlocal Cooperation Contracts.

(6)

UGMS--The publication titled Uniform Grant Management Standards, promulgated by the Governor's Office of Budget and Planning in accordance with Texas Government Code, Chapter 783, Uniform Grant and Contract Management, as amended February 12, 1999.

§14.2.Authority.

The Texas Water Code, §§5.124 and 5.125 (Session Laws, 76th Legislature, 1999, Chapter 187 (HB 3561) pages 660-662) authorizes the agency to award grants for any resource conservation or environmental protection purpose.

§14.3.Applicability.

(a)

Grants may be awarded only for a purpose which is consistent with the agency's jurisdiction and purposes under law, as determined by the executive director.

(b)

Purposes for which the agency may award a grant include:

(1)

development or implementation of comprehensive conservation and management plans under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, §320 (33 United States Code, Chapter 1330), for designated national estuaries located in Texas;

(2)

demonstration projects which involve new techniques for pollution prevention, energy or resource conservation, or waste management;

(3)

environmental purposes identified in a federal grant which is intended as pass-through grant;

(4)

development or improvement of monitoring or modeling techniques for water or air quality;

(5)

support of local air pollution programs; or

(6)

studies or program-related efforts to prevent an area which is near-nonattainment with federal air quality standards from reaching nonattainment status or, if such an area has become a nonattainment area, to assist that area's efforts to return to attainment status.

(c)

If the agency awards a grant for a purpose other than those specifically listed in subsection (b) of this section, the executive director must identify the purpose, determine and document that it is consistent with the agency jurisdiction and purposes under law, and document how the funding requirements are met under §14.4 of this title (relating to Funding).

(d)

This chapter does not restrict or limit the ability of the agency to procure goods or services needed by the agency for the purpose of carrying out its own responsibilities in accordance with the Texas Government Code, Title 7, Intergovernmental Relations, or Title 10, General Government.

§14.4.Funding.

Grants awarded by the agency under this chapter may use:

(1)

money appropriated for specific grant-making purposes;

(2)

federal money granted to the agency for making pass-through grants; or

(3)

state or federal grant money appropriated for a purpose which the executive director determines is, and documents as being, consistent with a purpose of the grant.

§14.5.Recipient Eligibility.

The executive director shall, for each proposed grant or series of grants, establish recipient eligibility requirements appropriate to the purposes of and activities under the proposed grant or grants.

§14.6.Recipient Selection Criteria.

(a)

Except as provided under §14.8 of this title (relating to Direct Award), the executive director shall establish, for each proposed grant or series of grants, recipient selection criteria appropriate to the purposes of and activities under the proposed grant or grants.

(b)

The executive director may specify any selection criterion he considers relevant to the grant.

(c)

All selection criteria must address the evaluation and scoring of:

(1)

available fiscal controls;

(2)

project effectiveness;

(3)

project cost; and

(4)

the potential grant recipient's previous experience with grants and contracts.

(d)

The agency may award a grant only to an entity or person who meets the established eligibility requirements of the proposed grant and who has been selected in accordance with the established recipient selection requirements.

§14.7.Solicitations.

(a)

Except as otherwise provided under §14.8 of this title (relating to Direct Award), the executive director shall prepare and issue a formal request for proposal (RFP) for each proposed grant or series of grants. The RFP must specify the following:

(1)

the purpose and objective of the proposed grant or grants;

(2)

the agency's authority to offer and award the proposed grant or grants;

(3)

the applicable recipient eligibility requirements;

(4)

the grant recipient activities allowable or required to be performed;

(5)

the anticipated start date and end date of the proposed grant or grants;

(6)

the recipient selection criteria to be used;

(7)

an indication as to whether the agency expects to award more than one grant, and if so how the recipient selection criteria provide for selection of multiple recipients;

(8)

instructions concerning materials and information required to be submitted by potential grant recipients, including layout and format, required signatures, and number of copies;

(9)

the submission deadline and the required address or delivery location for proposals;

(10)

information as to whether grant recipients will be required to contribute matching funds, or other labor or material resources, as a condition of receiving a grant;

(11)

information as to whether, and if so how, the executive director proposes to adjust or waive any RFP-contained matching funds requirement as authorized under Texas Government Code, §783.009, Matching Fund Waiver for Economically Disadvantaged County or Census Track;

(12)

information as to how grant payments will be made;

(13)

information concerning requests for additional, pre-submittal information;

(14)

the time and location of any pre-submittal meetings, together with an indication as to whether attendance is mandatory; and

(15)

a requirement that successful recipients must enter into a signed grant agreement or contract with the agency following award announcement.

(b)

RFPs may indicate the amount of grant funding available to be awarded, but are not required to do so.

§14.8.Direct Award.

(a)

A grant may be made by direct award only if:

(1)

the executive director determines and documents:

(A)

selection of recipients by the solicitation of proposals or applications is not feasible; and

(B)

awarding the grant directly is in the best interest of the state;

(2)

eligibility for the grant is limited to:

(A)

an agency or political subdivision of this state or of another state;

(B)

a state institution of higher learning of this state or of another state, including any part or service of the institution; or

(C)

an agency of the United States; or

(3)

the grant is awarded to an entity or person established or authorized to develop or implement a comprehensive conservation and management plan under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, §320 (33 United States Code, Chapter 1330), for a national estuary located in Texas.

(b)

If a solicitation for proposals is made for the purpose of identifying a partner for a joint application for a federal grant which is subsequently awarded to the agency, the executive director is not required to make an additional solicitation for entering into a pass-through grant with an identified partner.

§14.9.Notices.

(a)

The executive director shall publish on the state electronic business daily, commonly known as the Texas Marketplace, information regarding any solicitation related to a grant or series of grants to be awarded under this chapter.

(b)

The notice will indicate either that the executive director is seeking proposals or applications from potential grant recipients, or that one or more direct awards is anticipated, in accordance with §14.8 of this title (relating to Direct Award).

(c)

If one or more direct awards is anticipated, the notice will identify the recipients selected to receive a direct award and will describe the objective and amount of each proposed award.

(d)

Following recipient selection and final grant award, except in the case of a previously noted direct award, the executive director shall file a second notice in the state's electronic business daily identifying the successful recipients and indicating the amount of each awarded grant.

(e)

In addition, the executive director may publish or broadcast information concerning a grant or grants in any publication, web site, or other forum.

§14.10.Payment Procedures.

(a)

Payments to grant recipients shall be in accordance with the following regulations and standards:

(1)

all allowable cost standards and payment-related requirements of the Uniform Grant Management Standards (UGMS), Subpart C, Post-Award Requirements, as defined in §14.1 of this title (relating to Definitions) if the recipient is a local government, a Texas state agency, or an Indian Tribal Government;

(2)

all allowable cost standards and payment-related requirements of the United States Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-122, if the recipient is a private nonprofit organization, other than an institution of higher education, hospital, or an organization named in OMB Circular A-122 as not subject to that circular;

(3)

all allowable cost standards and payment-related requirements of OMB Circular A-21, if the recipient is an educational institution; and

(4)

all allowable cost standards and payment-related provisions of Title 48, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 31 (Contract Cost Principals and Procedures) if the recipient is a for-profit organization, other than a hospital or an organization named in OMB Circular A-122 as not subject to that circular.

(b)

In addition, payments to grant recipients shall be in accordance with any special payment-related requirements and/or procedures contained in the signed grant contract.

§14.11.Other Requirements.

For all grants awarded on or after September 1, 1999, the following sections of the Texas Government Code, Chapter 2259, State Contracting Standards and Oversight, shall apply:

(1)

§2259.101, Remedies and Sanctions Schedules, which requires that all contracts include appropriate remedies and sanctions schedules;

(2)

§2259.151, Reevaluation of Payment and Reimbursement Rates, which requires the executive director to implement procedures to ensure payment and reimbursement methods and rates are appropriate, especially those which are based on historical funding levels or on any formulas established by commission rule;

(3)

§2259.201, Double-Billing, which requires the executive director to establish procedures to detect and report double-billing by contractors; and

(4)

§2259.203, Comparable Costs, which requires the executive director to establish procedures to verify that comparable costs are being charged for comparable goods and services.

§14.12.Eligible Activities.

All activities funded by a grant awarded by the agency must relate directly to a purpose specified in the grant.

§14.13.Uniform Grant Management Standards.

All applicable provisions of the Texas Government Code, Chapter 783, Uniform Grant and Contract Management, and the requirements in the most recently adopted Uniform Grant Management Standards (UGMS), as defined in §14.1 of this title (relating to Definitions), apply to grants awarded by the agency.

§14.14.Grant Awards Affecting Mexico.

The requirements of the Texas Government Code, Chapter 792, International Cooperation Agreements, apply to all grants awarded by the agency on or after September 1, 1999, which involve either the United Mexican States, a political subdivision of the United Mexican States, or an agency or entity created under a treaty or executive agreement between the United States and the United Mexican States.

§14.15.Delegation of Authority.

The executive director may delegate his authority under this chapter as authorized under Texas Water Code, §5.221 and §5.238. Delegation must be in writing.

§14.16.Effect on Prior Grants.

Except to the extent that such grants are subject to pre-existing law embodying the same or similar requirements, the requirements of this chapter do not affect the validity of or apply to any grant:

(1)

awarded by the agency prior to September 1, 1999;

(2)

with respect to which the executive director issued a notice or solicitation prior to September 1, 1999, requesting proposals or applications from potential recipients;

(3)

for which the executive director accepted either a proposal or an application for consideration prior to September 1, 1999; or

(4)

directly awarded, for which the executive director entered into negotiations or award-related discussions with the grant recipient prior to September 1, 1999.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 21, 2000.

TRD-200002878

Margaret Hoffman

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: June 4, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087


Chapter 305. CONSOLIDATED PERMITS

Subchapter O. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES FOR WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS AND SEWAGE SLUDGE PERMITS

30 TAC §305.539

The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission or TNRCC) proposes new §305.539, Additional Requirements for Shrimp Aquaculture Facilities Within the Coastal Zone.

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THE PROPOSED RULES

The new section is proposed to implement Senate Bill (SB) 873, which became law as an act of the 76th Texas Legislature, 1999. Among other requirements, this proposal addresses the provisions of SB 873 by requiring a commercial aquaculture facility engaged in shrimp production and located within the "coastal zone" as defined by the Texas Natural Resources Code, §33.004, to obtain or maintain an individual Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) wastewater discharge permit if the facility will discharge into water in the state. Currently, all seven existing commercial shrimp aquaculture facilities operate under individual permits as required by §321.272(b)(3)(B) concerning Discharges from Aquaculture Production Facilities. This proposed rule would ensure that these operations will not be eligible to operate under an aquaculture general permit in accordance with SB 873.

SECTION BY SECTION DISCUSSION

Proposed new §305.539(a) sets requirements for commercial aquaculture facilities located within the coastal zone and engaged in the production of shrimp that will discharge into water in the state. The coastal zone is defined under Texas Natural Resources Code, §33.004, to mean that portion of the coastal area within the boundaries established by the Texas Coastal Management Program under Texas Natural Resources Code, §33.053(a)(1) and §33.2053(k), and rules of the Coastal Coordination Council. A description of this boundary is included in 31 TAC §503.1 and includes areas along the Texas coast of the Gulf of Mexico in portions of Cameron, Willacy, Kenedy, Kleberg, Nueces, San Patricio, Aransas, Refugio, Calhoun, Victoria, Jackson, Matagorda, Brazoria, Galveston, Harris, Chambers, Jefferson, and Orange Counties. Under proposed §305.539(a)(1), each such facility, hereinafter referred to as "facility," must submit an application for an individual TPDES permit, including a copy of the site-assessment environmental report submitted to the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) and a copy of the emergency plan approved by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), unless the application was submitted for an existing facility prior to January 26, 1998.

Proposed new §305.539(a)(2) requires a facility to obtain an individual TPDES wastewater discharge permit prior to discharging into water in the state unless the facility is an existing facility that submitted an application for an individual permit prior to January 26, 1998 and the application has not been withdrawn by the applicant or denied by the commission.

Proposed new §305.539(a)(3) requires a facility to obtain an amendment to an individual TPDES permit prior to an increase in the amount of discharge above the level allowed in the existing permit or a change in the nature of the discharge, unless the facility obtains a temporary or emergency order authorizing the discharge, under Chapter 35, Subchapter F.

Proposed new §305.539(a)(4) allows a facility, during times of flooding or other defined emergencies, to discharge wastewater in excess of permitted flow rates in order to prevent the release of exotic species or the violation of a quarantine condition imposed by the TPWD or the executive director. Emergency discharges are proposed to be allowed only to the extent necessary to comply with the emergency plan approved by TPWD. The proposed new rule also contains reporting requirements and other requirements related to discharges by a facility under an emergency plan approved by TPWD. For example, a facility must notify the appropriate TNRCC regional office at least 48 hours before initiating any action under an Emergency Plan in response to an emergency event, under proposed §305.539(a)(4)(B). Then, a follow-up report is required within 30 days following initiation of the Emergency Plan, according to the requirements of proposed §305.539(a)(4)(D). Proposed §305.539(a)(4)(C) requires the facility to control discharges made under an Emergency Plan in the most environmentally sound practicable manner. Proposed §305.539(a)(4)(E) places the responsibility on the facility of demonstrating that the discharges were necessary and that conditions required initiation of the Emergency Plan.

Proposed new §305.539(a)(5) requires a facility to immediately notify the TNRCC regional office and Wastewater Permitting Section, and TPWD in order to report shrimp mortalities due to apparent disease. The facility must have the cause of the mortality diagnosed by a pathologist as soon as practicable, must immediately notify the executive director of the results of the diagnosis, and must act to prevent the transmission of the disease to aquatic life endemic to the state. The executive director may require suspension or termination of the discharge of effluent from infected portions of the facility in order to protect aquatic life.

Proposed new §305.539(a)(6) requires a facility to immediately notify the TNRCC regional office and Wastewater Permitting Section when TPWD places the facility under quarantine. This proposed paragraph also prohibits any discharge from a facility under quarantine unless the discharge is approved by the executive director under certain conditions, such as to allow implementation of the facility's emergency plan approved by TPWD.

Proposed new §305.539(a)(7) requires a facility to comply with the terms and conditions of their individual TPDES permit except as provided in paragraph (4), discussed earlier in this preamble. The proposed new rule also provides that the permit shall include conditions related to suspended solids based on levels and measures adequate to prevent a potential significant adverse response in aquatic organisms, changes in receiving waters flow patterns, and excessive sedimentation of bays, and adequate to prevent a potential significant adverse response in aquatic plants caused by reduction in light due to suspended solids in discharges.

Proposed new §305.539(b) provides that individual TPDES permits applications to which the requirements of this section apply are subject to review by a three-member application review committee comprised of one representative each from the executive director, TPWD, and TDA.

Proposed new §305.539(c) requires the commission, when determining whether to approve an application for a TPDES permit for an aquaculture facility, to consider the applicant's site- assessment environmental report, any sensitive aquatic habitat guidelines established by TPWD, and comments by the three-member application review committee.

FISCAL NOTE

Jeff Grymkoski, Director, Strategic Planning and Appropriations, has determined that for the first five-year period that the proposed rule is in effect, there will be no significant fiscal implications to units of state and local government to implement the provisions of this rule.

The proposed rule would implement certain provisions of SB 873, 76th Legislature, 1999 (An Act relating to the regulation of aquaculture). Specifically, the rule would require shrimp farms operating within the coastal zone to obtain or maintain a site-specific wastewater discharge permit.

PUBLIC BENEFIT

Mr. Grymkoski has also determined that for each of the first five years this rule is in effect, the anticipated public benefit will be increased compliance with the provisions of a wastewater discharge permit by the issuance of site-specific permits for shrimp farms operating within the coastal zone of Texas to protect public health and the environment.

The rule is not anticipated to affect seven shrimp farms operating within the coastal zone of Texas which are currently required to obtain or maintain a site-specific wastewater discharge permit. The rule will require shrimp farms intending to operate in the coastal zone to obtain an individual TPDES permit which is anticipated to cost $5,000 to $10,000 in consulting fees, $2,000 for analysis, $350 application fee, and up to $5,000 in annual fees.

SMALL BUSINESS AND MICRO-BUSINESS IMPACT ANALYSES

Shrimp farmers operating within the coastal zone of Texas that are determined to be a small or micro- business will experience no adverse fiscal implications as a result of implementation of this rule.

The proposed rule would implement certain provisions of SB 873, 76th Legislature, 1999 (An Act relating to the regulation of agriculture). Specifically, the rule would require shrimp farms operating within the coastal zone to obtain or maintain a site-specific wastewater discharge permit.

The rule is not anticipated to affect seven shrimp farms operating within the coastal zone of Texas which are currently required to obtain or maintain a site-specific wastewater discharge permit. This rule will require shrimp farms intending to operate in the coastal zone to obtain an individual TPDES permit which is anticipated to cost $5,000 to $10,000 in consulting fees, $2,000 for analysis, $350 application fee, and up to $5,000 in annual fees.

DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS

The commission has reviewed the proposed rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and has determined that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule" as defined in the Texas Government Code. "Major environmental rule" means a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. Current rules require commercial aquaculture facilities located in the coastal zone engaged in shrimp production to obtain individual TPDES permits. This proposal is intended to make current rules consistent with new statutory language that prevents commercial aquaculture facilities engaged in shrimp production from obtaining coverage for wastewater discharge under a general permit. This rule is proposed with the specific intent of protecting the environment by requiring commercial aquaculture facilities located within the coastal zone and engaged in the production of shrimp that will discharge into water in the state to obtain an individual TPDES wastewater discharge permit that will include conditions relating to suspended solids as well as other environmentally protective requirements. However, the rulemaking is not a major environmental rule because it will not adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state because the rule is consistent with legislation enacted in 1999 by the 76th Legislature in SB 873 which expressly sets out in statute many of the requirements which were already being required of commercial aquaculture facilities under the commission's general authority in Chapter 26 of the Texas Water Code (TWC).

Even if the proposed rule is a major environmental rule, the rule is not subject to a full regulatory analysis under §2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code because the rule does not meet one of the four threshold requirements in that statute. The proposed rule does not exceed a standard set by federal law which is not specifically required by state law because each requirement set out in the rule is expressly required by state law enacted by the 76th Legislature in SB 873. For the same reason, the proposed rule does not exceed an express requirement of state law that is not specifically required by federal law. The proposed rule does not exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and federal government to implement a federal program. Rather, the proposed rule is consistent with the September 14, 1998 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the United States Environmental Protection Agency and TNRCC, which authorizes the TNRCC to implement the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program in Texas, because the MOU provides that the TNRCC will require a TPDES permit for facilities that will discharge wastewater into waters in the United States. Finally, the rule is not proposed under the general powers of the TNRCC, but rather, under specific state law enacted by the 76th Legislature in SB 873.

TAKING IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The commission has prepared a takings impact assessment for this rule under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The following is a summary of that assessment. The specific purpose of the rulemaking is to implement changes made by SB 873, 76th Legislature, 1999. Current rules require commercial aquaculture facilities located in the coastal zone engaged in shrimp production to obtain individual TPDES permits. This proposal is intended to make current rules consistent with new statutory language that prevents commercial aquaculture facilities engaged in shrimp production from obtaining coverage for wastewater discharge under a general permit. The proposed rule will maintain standards for commercial aquaculture facilities located within the coastal zone and engaged in the production of shrimp that will discharge into water in the state by requiring them to maintain or obtain an individual TPDES wastewater discharge permit. Promulgation and enforcement of this rule will not burden private real property which is the subject of the rule because the rulemaking is intended to make the current rules consistent with statutory language. This rulemaking does not constitute a taking of private property because a commercial shrimp aquaculture facility located in the coastal zone which discharges into water in the state will still be able to operate, provided the facility obtains an individual TPDES permit from the commission.

COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENCY REVIEW

The commission has reviewed this rulemaking and found that the proposal is a rulemaking subject to the Texas Coastal Management Program (CMP) and must be consistent with all applicable goals and policies of the CMP. The commission has prepared a consistency determination for this proposed rule pursuant to 31 TAC §505.22 and has found that the rulemaking is consistent with the applicable CMP goals and policies. The following is a summary of that determination. The CMP goals applicable to the rulemaking are the goals to protect, preserve, restore, and enhance the diversity, quality, quantity, functions, and values of coastal natural resource areas (CNRAs). Applicable policies are those related to discharge of industrial wastewater to coastal waters in 31 TAC §501.14(f)(1). These policies require that commission rules comply with the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act and implementing regulations; provide for the assessment of water quality on a coastal watershed basis once every two years; to the greatest extent practicable, provide that all permits for the discharge of wastewater within a given watershed contain the same expiration date; identify and rank waters that are not attaining designated uses and establish total maximum daily loads according to the rankings; and require that increases in pollutant loads to coastal waters shall not impair designated uses of coastal waters or result in degradation of coastal waters that exceed swimmable/fishable quality except when necessary for important economic or social development. Current rules require commercial aquaculture facilities located in the coastal zone engaged in shrimp production to obtain individual TPDES permits. This proposal is intended to make current rules consistent with new statutory language that prevents commercial aquaculture facilities engaged in shrimp production from obtaining coverage for wastewater discharge under a general permit. Promulgation and enforcement of this proposed rule would be consistent with the applicable CMP goals and policies because the rule would maintain standards for commercial aquaculture facilities located within the coastal zone and engaged in the production of shrimp that will discharge into water in the state by requiring them to maintain or obtain an individual TPDES wastewater discharge permit that will include conditions relating to suspended solids as well as other environmentally protective requirements. This will protect, preserve, restore, and enhance the diversity, quality, quantity, functions, and values of CNRAs and is consistent with the applicable policies set out above. In addition, the proposed rule does not violate any applicable provisions of the CMP's stated goals and policies. The commission invites public comment on the consistency of the proposed rule.

SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS

Comments may be submitted to Lola Brown, Office of Environmental Policy, Analysis and Assessment, MC 205, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas, 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All comments should reference Rule Log Number 1999-035-305-WT. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., June 5, 2000. For further information, please contact Yvonna Pierce, Wastewater Permitting Section, (512) 239-4618.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

The new section is proposed under TWC, §5.102, which provides the commission with general powers to carry out duties under the TWC and §§5.103, 5.105, and 5.120, which provide the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out the powers and duties under the provisions of the TWC and other laws of this state and to establish and approve all general policies of the commission. The new section is also proposed under TWC, §26.0345, which requires the commission to establish permit conditions relating to suspended solids in discharge permits for shrimp aquaculture facilities located in the coastal zone; Texas Agriculture Code, §134.013, which requires commercial shrimp aquaculture facilities located in the coastal zone to obtain an individual permit from the commission prior to discharging wastewater into water in the state and requires the applicant to provide an environmental site assessment report as part of its application for a permit; Texas Agriculture Code, §134.031, which requires the commission, TPWD, and TDA to enter into a memorandum of understanding related to regulation of aquaculture and the establishment of a three-member application review committee, comprised of one member each appointed by the commission, TPWD, and TDA, to review permit applications to ensure that the proposed discharge will not adversely affect water in the state; Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, §66.007(j), which provides that an aquaculture facility placed under quarantine condition by TPWD may not discharge wastewater from the facility except with approval of the TPWD and authorization from the commission; and Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, §66.007(k), which provides that even if under a quarantine condition, an aquaculture facility shall discharge wastewater as necessary to comply with an emergency plan approved by TPWD and incorporated into a wastewater discharge authorization issued by the commission.

The new section implements TWC, §26.0345; Texas Agriculture Code, §134.013 and §134.031; and Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, §66.007(j) and §66.007(k).

§305.539. Additional Requirements for Shrimp Aquaculture Facilities Within the Coastal Zone.

(a)

A commercial aquaculture facility located within the coastal zone as delineated under rules of the Coastal Coordination Council, 31 TAC §503.1, and engaged in the production of shrimp that will discharge into water in the state shall comply with the following requirements.

(1)

The applicant shall apply for an individual Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) permit to the executive director. Unless the application was submitted for an existing facility before January 26, 1998, the application, in addition to the information required by the application form, shall include:

(A)

a copy of the site-assessment environmental report submitted to the Texas Department of Agriculture (TDA) as part of the application for an aquaculture license; and

(B)

a copy of an Emergency Plan, approved by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD), for incorporation into the TPDES permit.

(2)

The applicant shall obtain an individual TPDES wastewater discharge permit in accordance with the requirements of this chapter before discharging into water in the state, except for an existing facility that submitted an application for an individual permit before January 26, 1998 that has not been withdrawn by the applicant or denied by the commission.

(3)

The applicant shall obtain an amendment to an individual TPDES permit prior to an increase in the amount of discharge above the levels allowed in the existing permit or a change in the nature of the discharge, except as otherwise provided by Chapter 35, Subchapter F of this title (relating to Water Quality Emergency and Temporary Orders).

(4)

The facility shall comply with the terms and conditions of its individual TPDES permit, and any quarantine conditions imposed by TPWD, except in cases where the facility is in imminent danger of overflow, flooding, or similar conditions that could result in either the release of exotic species that are regulated by the TPWD or that would result in the violation of a quarantine condition imposed by the executive director or the TPWD. In such cases, the facility may discharge effluent in excess of the permitted flow rates, but only to the extent necessary to comply with an Emergency Plan that is approved by the TPWD, and the following provisions shall also apply.

(A)

The facility is not subject to effluent limitations, discharge flow limitations, and other effluent monitoring requirements in the permit for discharges that comply with an Emergency Plan approved by the TPWD.

(B)

A facility shall notify the appropriate TNRCC regional office at least 48 hours prior to initiating any action under an Emergency Plan in response to an emergency event, such as landfall of a hurricane, and shall notify the regional office as soon as practicable following initiation of the Emergency Plan.

(C)

The facility shall control discharges made under an Emergency Plan in the most environmentally sound manner that is practicable.

(D)

Within 30 days following initiation of the Emergency Plan, the facility shall submit a written report to the appropriate TNRCC regional office that includes the following information:

(i)

the reason for initiation of the plan;

(ii)

actions taken to prevent or mitigate impacts of the discharge to the receiving stream;

(iii)

volumes of wastewater discharged;

(iv)

the dates that discharges occurred; and

(v)

a general summary of receiving stream conditions at the time of the discharges.

(E)

The facility is responsible for demonstrating that the discharges were necessary and that conditions required initiation of the Emergency Plan.

(5)

A facility engaged in the propagation and/or rearing of shrimp which suffer mortalities due to apparent disease shall immediately report the apparent disease to the TNRCC regional office and Wastewater Permitting Section, and to TPWD, and shall have the cause of mortality diagnosed by a pathologist as soon as practicable. The executive director shall be immediately notified of the results of the diagnosis. Any actions which are deemed necessary by the discharger to prevent transmission of the disease to aquatic life endemic to waters in the state shall be implemented as soon as possible. The executive director may require suspension or termination of the discharge of effluent from infected portions of the facility as is necessary to protect aquatic life in the receiving stream from potential adverse effects.

(6)

A facility required to hold a permit from TPWD regulating the possession and sale of exotic fish and shellfish shall immediately notify the TNRCC regional office and Wastewater Permitting Section if the TPWD places the facility under quarantine condition. There shall be no discharge during the quarantine period, except upon approval by the executive director. The executive director may suspend or terminate the prohibition on discharge to allow for implementation of the facility's Emergency Plan approved by TPWD, following the lifting of the quarantine condition by TPWD, or based on other relevant factors.

(7)

Except as provided in paragraph (4) of this subsection, a facility shall comply with the terms and conditions in its individual TPDES permit, which shall include conditions related to suspended solids based on levels and measures adequate to prevent:

(A)

a potential significant adverse response in aquatic organisms, changes in flow patterns of receiving waters, or excessive sedimentation of bays; and

(B)

a potential significant adverse response in aquatic plants caused by reduction of light due to suspended solids in discharges.

(b)

All new, amendment, or renewal applications for an individual TPDES permit to which the requirements of this section apply are subject to review by a three-member application review committee comprised of one representative each from the executive director, TPWD, and TDA.

(c)

In considering whether to approve an application for a new, amended, or renewed individual TPDES permit for a commercial aquaculture facility located within the coastal zone and engaged in the production of shrimp, the commission shall consider the following:

(1)

the site-assessment environmental report provided by the applicant under subsection (a)(1)(A) of this section;

(2)

any sensitive aquatic habitat guidelines established by TPWD; and

(3)

any comments on the application provided by the three-member application review committee referred to in subsection (b) of this section.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on April 21, 2000.

TRD-200002844

Margaret Hoffman

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Proposed date of adoption: September 7, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 239-0348