TITLE 28.INSURANCE

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE

Chapter 11. HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATIONS

The commissioner of insurance adopts the amendment to §11.2, concerning definitions and adopts new §11.809, concerning risk-based capital requirements for health maintenance organizations (HMOs). The amendment and new section are adopted with changes to the text as proposed in the November 26, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 10499).

The new section and the amendment are necessary to implement House Bill 3023, 76th Legislature. House Bill 3023 added §13C to the Texas Health Maintenance Organization Act (Insurance Code Article 20A.13C) which authorizes the commissioner of insurance to adopt rules requiring an HMO operating in this state to maintain a specified net worth based on the risks inherent in its method of operation. House Bill 3023 also repealed the requirement that an HMO maintain a minimum surplus. The amendment to §11.2 deleted subsection (b)(17) which defined "excess surplus" since that term is obsolete with the repeal of a minimum surplus requirement. New definitions in §11.2(b)(48)-(54) are necessary to clarify new §11.809 concerning risk-based capital for HMOs. In response to a comment, §11.809(e)(4) was changed by deleting the reference to "Insurance Code, Articles 20A.13A and 20A.13B" and substituting "Insurance Code Article 20A.13C."

The risk-based capital formula provides the department with an important tool in evaluating the financial condition of an HMO. The adopted amendment and new section adopt by reference the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Managed Care Organization Risk-Based Capital Report (RBC Report). Risk-based capital is a method of measuring the minimum amount of capital appropriate for a managed care organization, such as an HMO, to support its overall business operations in consideration of its size and risk profile. An HMO's risk-based capital is calculated by applying factors to various asset, premium, and reserve items. The factor is higher for those items with greater underlying risk and lower for less risky items. The adequacy of an HMO's capital can then be measured by comparing its total adjusted capital to its risk-based capital requirement determined by the RBC Report. The RBC Report frequently uses the term "capital" to refer to "net worth," the latter being the term used in the statute. In accounting parlance, the words are practically synonymous, so the section uses the term "capital" to be consistent with the terminology in the RBC Report. Those HMOs that do not have total adjusted capital equal to or greater than the risk-based capital which will be required by this section will incur the cost of increasing their capital to the amount required by the section. This cost will be incurred over several years in accordance with the phase-in provided in the adopted section. As an alternative to increasing its net worth to comply with the section, an HMO may reduce the risks inherent in its operation. Changes have been made to the proposed text to correct typographical and grammatical errors.

COMMENT: A commenter pointed out that the new section did not include the four different levels of capital that are in the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Risk-Based Capital for Health Organizations Model Act.

REPLY: The department only adopts the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Risk-Based Capital Report for Managed Care Organizations. The department believes the National Association of Insurance Commissioners' Risk-Based Capital for Health Organizations Model Act which contains the capital levels of "company action level," "regulatory action level," "mandatory control level," and "authorized control level," referred to by the commenter are not necessary for effectively implementing risk-based capital for HMOs in Texas. The department believes the adoption of "authorized control level" in §11.809 provides flexibility and discretion for the department and HMOs in maintaining compliance with the requirements of the section.

COMMENT: A commenter questioned whether §11.809(e)(4) was correct in stating that the failure to meet risk-based capital results is a failure to maintain minimum net worth since Insurance Code Article 20A.13A sets minimum net worth requirements and §11.809 establishes a standard in excess of those requirements.

REPLY: The department believes the commenter's reading of §11.809(e)(4) is too narrow; however, to remove any ambiguity from the section, the department deletes the reference to Insurance Code Articles 20A.13A and 20A.13B and substitutes a reference to Insurance Code Article 20A.13C. The purpose of the section is to require a minimum level of capital appropriate to the risks inherent in the operations of an HMO and ensure the financial solvency of HMOs for the protection of enrollees. In any case, the facts of the particular case have to support any of the actions taken by the commissioner described in §11.809(e).

COMMENT: A commenter questioned whether §11.809(e)(4) authorizes the commissioner to file suit to place an HMO into receivership if it fails to maintain the risk-based capital required by the section, but still meets the requirements of Insurance Code Articles 20A.13A and 20A.13B.

REPLY: Insurance Code, Article 20A.31 is not limited to receivership. It also authorizes the commissioner to file suit for any violation of the HMO Act, Insurance Code Chapter 20A. If the facts of a particular case support a suit to place an HMO into receivership, then that action would be appropriate. Therefore, it is possible that a receivership action could be instituted against an HMO even if the HMO has the minimum net worth required by statute. Section 11.809 is designed to ensure the financial solvency of HMOs for the protection of enrollees. Section 11.809(e) notifies HMOs that the commissioner is not limited to seeking compliance with the section, but may take other actions considered appropriate to remedy the failure to maintain the minimum amount required by §11.809(b).

COMMENT: A commenter suggested §11.809(e)(5) be changed by inserting "applicable" before "sanctions."

REPLY: The department does not agree with the suggestion. As a matter of law, the department cannot pursue a sanction which is not applicable to an HMO. The addition of the word "applicable" does not add clarity or meaning to the rule.

The Texas Association of Health Plans commented against some provisions of the new section.

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

28 TAC §11.2

The amendment to §11.2 is adopted under Insurance Code Articles 20A.13C, 20A.22, 21.21 and Insurance Code, §36.001 (formerly Insurance Code Article 1.03A). Article 20A.13C authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules to establish guidelines requiring an HMO to maintain a specified net worth based on the risks inherent in its method of operation. Article 20A.22 authorizes the commissioner to adopt reasonable regulations necessary and proper to carry out Insurance Code Chapter 20A. Article 21.21 authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules concerning unfair methods of competition. Section 36.001(a) provides the commissioner with the authority to adopt rules for the conduct and execution of the powers and duties of the department only as authorized by a statute.

§11.2. Definitions.

(a)

The definitions found in the Texas Health Maintenance Organization Act §2, as amended, codified in Texas Insurance Code Article 20A.02, are hereby incorporated into this chapter.

(b)

The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1)

Act -- The Texas Health Maintenance Organization Act, Senate Bill 180, enacted by Acts 1975, 64th Legislature, Chapter 214, pages 514-530, first effective December 1, 1975, as amended, codified as the Texas Insurance Code Chapter 20A.

(2)

Admitted assets -- All assets as defined by statutory accounting principles, as permitted and valued in accordance with §11.803 of this title (relating to Investments, Loans, and Other Assets).

(3)

Adverse determination -- A determination upon utilization review that the health care services furnished or proposed to be furnished to a patient are not medically necessary or not appropriate.

(4)

Affiliate -- A person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the person specified.

(5)

Agent -- As defined in the Insurance Code Articles 20A.15 and 20A.15A, unless the context of the rule clearly indicates applicability to any agents licensed under one specific article.

(6)

ANHC or approved nonprofit health corporation -- A nonprofit health corporation certified under Medical Practice Act §5.01(a) (Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4495b).

(7)

Basic health care service -- Health care services which an enrolled population might reasonably require to maintain good health, including, without limitations as to time and cost, those benefits as prescribed in §§11.508 and 11.509 of this title (relating to Mandatory Benefit Standards: Group, Individual and Conversion Agreements, and Additional Mandatory Benefit Standards - Group Agreement Only), other than those limitations specifically prescribed in this title.

(8)

Code -- The Texas Insurance Code, 1951, as amended.

(9)

Contract holder -- An individual, association, employer, trust or organization to which an individual or group contract for health care services has been issued.

(10)

Control -- As defined in the Insurance Code Article 21.49-1.

(11)

Controlled HMO -- An HMO controlled directly or indirectly by a holding company.

(12)

Controlled person -- Any person, other than an HMO, who is controlled directly or indirectly by a holding company.

(13)

Copayment -- A charge in addition to premium to an enrollee for a service which is not fully prepaid.

(14)

Credentialing -- The review of qualifications and other relevant information pertaining to a physician, dentist, or provider who seeks a contract with an HMO.

(15)

Credentials -- Certificates, diplomas, licenses or other written documentation which verifies proof of training, education, and experience in a field of expertise.

(16)

Dentist -- An individual licensed to practice dentistry by the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners.

(17)

General hospital -- A licensed establishment that:

(A)

offers services, facilities, and beds for use for more than 24 hours for two or more unrelated individuals requiring diagnosis, treatment, or care for illness, injury, deformity, abnormality, or pregnancy; and

(B)

regularly maintains, at a minimum, clinical laboratory services, diagnostic X-ray services, treatment facilities including surgery or obstetrical care or both, and other definitive medical or surgical treatment of similar extent.

(18)

HMO -- A health maintenance organization as defined in Insurance Code Article 20A.02(n).

(19)

Health status related factor -- Any of the following in relation to an individual:

(A)

health status;

(B)

medical condition (including both physical and mental illnesses);

(C)

claims experience;

(D)

receipt of health care;

(E)

medical history;

(F)

genetic information;

(G)

evidence of insurability (including conditions arising out of acts of domestic violence, including family violence as defined by the Insurance Code Article 21.21-5); or

(H)

disability.

(20)

Limited provider network -- A subnetwork within an HMO delivery network in which contractual relationships exist between physicians, certain providers, independent physician associations and/or physician groups which limit the enrollees' access to only the physicians and providers in the subnetwork.

(21)

Limited service HMO -- An HMO which has been issued a certificate of authority to issue a limited service health care plan as defined in the Insurance Code Article 20A.02(l).

(22)

Out of area benefits -- Benefits that the HMO covers when its enrollees are outside the geographical limits of the HMO service area.

(23)

Pathology services -- Services provided by a licensed laboratory which has the capability of evaluating tissue specimens for diagnoses in histopathology, oral pathology, or cytology.

(24)

Pharmaceutical services -- Services, including dispensing prescription drugs, as defined in the Pharmacy Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4542a-1, §5 that are ordinarily and customarily rendered by a pharmacy or pharmacist.

(25)

Pharmacist -- An individual licensed to practice pharmacy under the Pharmacy Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4542a-1.

(26)

Pharmacy -- A facility licensed under the Pharmacy Act, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4542a-1 §29.

(27)

Premium -- The prospectively determined rate that is paid by or on behalf of an enrollee for specified health services.

(28)

Primary care physician or primary care provider -- A physician or provider who is responsible for providing initial and primary care to patients, maintaining the continuity of patient care, and initiating referral for care.

(29)

Primary HMO -- An HMO that contracts directly with, and issues an evidence of coverage to, individuals or organizations to arrange for or provide a basic, limited, or single health care service plan to enrollees on a prepaid basis.

(30)

Provider HMO -- An HMO that contracts directly with a primary HMO to provide or arrange to provide health care services on behalf of the primary HMO within the primary HMO's defined service area.

(31)

Psychiatric hospital -- A licensed hospital which offers inpatient services, including treatment, facilities and beds for use beyond 24 hours, for the primary purpose of providing psychiatric assessment and diagnostic services and psychiatric inpatient care and treatment for mental illness. Such services must be more intensive than room, board, personal services, and general medical and nursing care. Although substance abuse services may be offered, a majority of beds must be dedicated to the treatment of mental illness in adults and/or children.

(32)

Qualified HMO -- An HMO which has been federally approved under Title XIII of the Public Health Service Act, Public Law 93-222, as amended.

(33)

Quality improvement -- A system to continuously examine, monitor and revise processes and systems that support and improve administrative and clinical functions.

(34)

Reference laboratory -- A licensed laboratory that accepts specimens for testing from outside sources and depends on referrals from other laboratories or entities. HMOs may contract with a reference laboratory to provide clinical diagnostic services to their enrollees.

(35)

Reference laboratory specimen procurement services -- The operation utilized by the reference laboratory to pick up the lab specimens from the client offices or referring labs, etc. for delivery to the reference laboratory for testing and reporting.

(36)

Referral specialists (other than primary care) -- Physicians or providers who set themselves apart from the primary care physician or primary care provider through specialized training and education in a health care discipline.

(37)

Schedule of charges -- Specific rates or premiums to be charged for enrollee and dependent coverages.

(38)

Service area -- A geographic area within which direct service benefits are available and accessible to HMO enrollees who live, reside or work within that geographic area and which complies with §11.1606 of this title (relating to Organization of an HMO).

(39)

Single service HMO -- An HMO which has been issued a certificate of authority to issue a single health care service plan as defined in the Insurance Code Article 20A.02(y).

(40)

Special hospital -- A licensed establishment that:

(A)

offers services, facilities and beds for use for more than 24 hours for two or more unrelated individuals who are regularly admitted, treated and discharged and who require services more intensive than room, board, personal services, and general nursing care;

(B)

has clinical laboratory facilities, diagnostic X-ray facilities, treatment facilities or other definitive medical treatment;

(C)

has a medical staff in regular attendance; and

(D)

maintains records of the clinical work performed for each patient.

(41)

Statutory surplus -- Admitted assets minus accrued uncovered liabilities.

(42)

Subscriber -- If conversion or individual coverage, the individual who is the contract holder and is responsible for payment of premiums to the HMO; or if group coverage, the individual who is the certificate holder and whose employment or other membership status, except for family dependency, is the basis for eligibility for enrollment in the HMO.

(43)

Subsidiary -- An affiliate controlled by a specified person directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries.

(44)

Telemedicine -- As defined in the Insurance Code Article 21.53F.

(45)

Urgent care -- Health care services provided in a situation other than an emergency which are typically provided in a setting such as a physician or provider's office or urgent care center, as a result of an acute injury or illness that is severe or painful enough to lead a prudent layperson, possessing an average knowledge of medicine and health, to believe that his or her condition, illness, or injury is of such a nature that failure to obtain treatment within a reasonable period of time would result in serious deterioration of the condition or his or her health.

(46)

Utilization review -- A system for prospective or concurrent review of the medical necessity and appropriateness of health care services being provided or proposed to be provided to an individual within this state. Utilization review shall not include elective requests for clarification of coverage.

(47)

Voting security -- As defined in the Insurance Code Article 21.49-1, including any security convertible into or evidencing a right to acquire such security.

(48)

NAIC -- National Association of Insurance Commissioners.

(49)

Annual financial statement -- The annual statement to be used by HMOs, as promulgated by the NAIC and as adopted by the commissioner under Insurance Code Articles 1.11 and 20A.10.

(50)

RBC -- Risk-based capital.

(51)

RBC formula -- NAIC risk-based capital formula.

(52)

Authorized control level -- The number determined under the RBC formula in accordance with the RBC instructions.

(53)

RBC Report -- 1999 NAIC Managed Care Organizations Risk-Based Capital Report including Overview and Instructions for Companies published by the NAIC.

(54)

Total adjusted capital -- An HMO's statutory capital and surplus/total net worth as determined in accordance with the statutory accounting applicable to the annual financial statements required to be filed pursuant to the Insurance Code, and such other items, if any, as the RBC instructions provide.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 10, 2000.

TRD-200001839

Lynda Nesenholtz

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 30, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 26, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327


Subchapter I. FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

28 TAC §11.809

The new section is adopted under Insurance Code Articles 20A.13C, 20A.22, 21.21 and Insurance Code, §36.001 (formerly Insurance Code Article 1.03A). Article 20A.13C authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules to establish guidelines requiring an HMO to maintain a specified net worth based on the risks inherent in its method of operation. Article 20A.22 authorizes the commissioner to adopt reasonable regulations necessary and proper to carry out Insurance Code Chapter 20A. Article 21.21 authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules concerning unfair methods of competition. Section 36.001(a) provides the commissioner with the authority to adopt rules for the conduct and execution of the powers and duties of the department only as authorized by a statute.

§11.809. Risk-Based Capital for HMOs.

(a)

Scope and Purpose. This section applies to all domestic and foreign HMOs subject to the provisions of the Insurance Code Chapter 20A. The purpose of Insurance Code Article 20A.13C and this section is to require a minimum level of capital appropriate to the underwriting, financial, investment risks and other business and relevant risks assumed by an HMO.

(b)

Phase In of Risk-Based Capital. The risk-based capital requirements of this section are phased in as follows:

(1)

As of 12-31-99, HMOs are only required to file the RBC Report for informational purposes;

(2)

As of 12-31-2000, HMOs must have 50% of the authorized control level risk based capital in the RBC Report; and

(3)

As of 12-31-2001, and thereafter HMOs must have 70% of the authorized control level risk-based capital in the RBC Report.

(c)

Adoption of RBC formula by reference and filing requirements. The commissioner adopts by reference the 1999 NAIC Managed Care Organizations Risk-Based Capital Report including Overview and Instructions for companies which includes the RBC formula and the required diskettes. All HMOs subject to this section are required to file the diskettes with the NAIC in accordance with and by the due date specified in the RBC instructions.

(d)

Conflicts. In the event of a conflict between the Insurance Code, any currently existing rule of the department or any specific requirement of this section, and the RBC formula and/or the RBC instructions, the Insurance Code, rule or specific requirement of this section shall take precedence and in all respects control. It is the express intent of this section that the adoption by reference of the RBC instructions does not repeal or modify or amend any rule of the department or the Insurance Code.

(e)

Actions of commissioner. The commissioner, subject to the phase-in provisions in subsection (b) of this section, may take the following actions against an HMO that fails to maintain, at a minimum, 70% of the authorized control level risk-based capital in the RBC Report as calculated in accordance with the RBC instructions:

(1)

order the HMO to cease writing new business;

(2)

place the HMO in supervision or conservation;

(3)

find the HMO to be in hazardous financial condition as provided by the Insurance Code Article 20.19 and §11.810 of this title (relating to Hazardous Conditions for HMOs);

(4)

find the HMO to be in violation of the minimum net worth requirements of Insurance Code Article 20A.13C and take action as provided by Insurance Code Article 20A.31, or

(5)

apply any sanctions provided by the Insurance Code or Title 28 of the Texas Administrative Code.

(f)

Prohibition on Announcements. Except as otherwise required under the provisions of this section, the department believes that the comparison of an HMO's total adjusted capital to its risk-based capital is a regulatory tool which may indicate the need for corrective action with respect to the HMO and such a comparison is not intended as a means to rank HMOs generally; therefore, the making, publishing, disseminating, circulating or placing before the public, or causing, directly or indirectly to be made, published, disseminated, circulated or placed before the public, in a newspaper, magazine or other publication, or in the form of a notice, circular, pamphlet, letter or poster, or over any radio or television station, or in any other way, an advertisement, announcement or statement containing an assertion, representation or statement with regard to any component derived in the calculation, by any HMO, insurer, agent, broker or person engaged in any manner in the insurance business would be misleading and is, therefore, prohibited.

(g)

Limitations. In no event, shall the requirements of this section reduce the amount of net worth, capital and/or surplus otherwise required by provisions of the Insurance Code or Texas Administrative Code, or by order of the commissioner.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 10, 2000.

TRD-200001840

Lynda Nesenholtz

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 30, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 26, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327


28 TAC §§11.801 - 11.803, 11.807

The commissioner of insurance adopts amendments to §§11.801 - 11.803 and 11.807, concerning financial requirements for health maintenance organizations (HMOs). The amended sections are adopted with changes to the text as proposed in the November 26, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 10503).

The amendments are necessary to implement House Bill 3023, 76th Legislature. House Bill 3023 repealed Insurance Code Article 20A.13(i), (j), (k) and (l), which established minimum surplus requirements for health maintenance organizations doing business in Texas and enacted Insurance Code Articles 20A.13A and 20A.13B which establish minimum net worth requirements for HMOs doing business in Texas. House Bill 3023 also prescribed the investments an HMO must have to represent the minimum net worth. The adopted sections conform those sections to the provisions of House Bill 3023 concerning minimum net worth and the types of assets that must support the minimum net worth. Subsection (d) of §11.801 is deleted in response to a comment. It would have required an HMO to increase its net worth after a change of control to the amount required by Insurance Code Article 20A.13A. Proposed §11.801(e) was changed to (d) to reflect the deletion. To clarify §11.803(2), the department changed the first sentence to read, "An HMO may invest its funds in excess of minimum surplus in an amount at least equal to its uncovered liabilities..." from the proposed, "An HMO may invest its funds which support its uncovered liabilities...." Section 11.803(1) was changed by deleting "...and §11.801(d) of this title (Relating to Minimum Net Worth)" since subsection (d) was deleted.

HMOs licensed after September 1, 1999, must have a minimum net worth of $1,500,000 if they are authorized to provide basic health care services; $1,000,000 if they are authorized to provide limited health care services, and $500,000 if they are authorized to provide only a single health care service. Under the new law, HMOs licensed before September 1, 1999, are required to increase their net worth incrementally beginning December 31, 2000. Amended §11.803(1) reflects the enactment of Insurance Code Article 20A.13A(d) which requires that the minimum net worth be invested in those investments described in Insurance Code Article 20A.13A(d). Amended §11.803(2)(G) concerning investments in stocks in business corporations has been brought up to date with current business forms. Amended §11.807 requires an HMO to give prior notice to the commissioner of certain dividends or distributions.

COMMENT: A commenter stated that §11.801(d) was contrary to the new Insurance Code Article 20A.13, since the new law provides for a phase in of the new minimum net worth requirements for HMOs licensed before September 1, 1999.

REPLY: While the department does not believe that the requirement of subsection (d) is contrary to legislative intent, it has deleted (d) from the adopted section and will handle the net worth requirements of each change of control on a case by case basis.

COMMENT: A commenter asked whether "lawful money" in §11.802 included certificates of deposit issued by a bank.

REPLY: Attorney General's Opinion, WW-1331(1962), ruled that bank certificates of deposit are "lawful money of the United States" under the provisions of the Insurance Code. Since the Legislature used the term "lawful money of the United States of America" in Article 20A.13A, the same term was used in the regulation with the intent to follow the ruling of the Attorney General.

COMMENT: A commenter recommended that §11.802(a)(1) be changed to eliminate the requirement that a certificate of deposit be issued by a Texas bank.

REPLY: Since no change to §11.802(a)(1) was proposed in the Texas Register, the department cannot consider the commenter's request. The department further believes such a proposal would be unwise since the purpose of the requirement is to facilitate the ability of the department or a receiver to acquire control of an HMO's assets in the event the department or a receiver has to take control of the affairs of an HMO for the protection of enrollees or the public.

COMMENT: A commenter noted that §11.803 imposed a significant restriction on HMO investments by changing the standard in the section of "surplus in excess of minimum surplus" to "net worth in excess of minimum net worth."

REPLY: The department recognizes that in most cases the change in standard will reduce the amount an HMO can invest in an affected investment; however, the department believes the broad investment authority granted to an HMO in §§11.803(2) and 11.803(3) is more than adequate to allow an HMO to invest its funds productively. Prior to the amendment of art. 20A.13, covered liabilities were not deducted from the assets of an HMO so that surplus, from an accounting point of view, was overstated. With the adoption of House Bill 3023, which adopted a net worth requirement, the new standard in §11.803 is consistent with the new legislative amendment.

COMMENT: A commenter requested clarification of §11.803(2) regarding the investment of an HMO's funds that are in excess of its minimum net worth and which support uncovered liabilities.

REPLY: To clarify §11.803(2), the department has changed the first sentence to read, "An HMO may invest its funds in excess of minimum net worth in an amount at least equal to its uncovered liabilities..." from the proposed "An HMO may invest its funds which support its uncovered liabilities...." "Uncovered liabilities" is defined in Insurance Code Article 20A.02(w) as those liabilities that are not guaranteed by another person. Since uncovered liabilities are not guaranteed by another person, the department, through this section, requires an HMO to possess investments of reasonable quality and diversification in at least the amount of the uncovered liabilities.

COMMENT: A commenter suggested the thirty day notice requirement in §11.807 be changed to ten days to be consistent with the similar requirement in the Insurance Holding Company System Act (Insurance Code Article 21.49-1).

REPLY: The department disagrees. The amendment to §11.807 only addresses extraordinary dividends which, under Insurance Code Article 21.49-1 §4(c), requires thirty days notice to the commissioner. HMOs can declare and pay other dividends without notice to the department, while insurers subject to the Insurance Holding Company Act are required to give ten days notice to the department on such other dividends.

COMMENT: A commenter also asked what the current capitalization requirement is, in view of the repeal of the statutory surplus minimum as of September 1, 1999 and the imposition of the net worth requirement which goes into effect for existing HMOs on December 31, 2000.

REPLY: The department recognizes there is no current statutory minimum surplus or net worth requirement for HMOs; however, the department expects each HMO to maintain the capital appropriate for its projected profits or losses and to have a plan in place to be in compliance with the minimum net worth requirement when it becomes effective December 31, 2000. The department notes that there currently are sufficient administrative remedies to address HMOs that may be in a hazardous financial condition, which may be used until the minimum net worth requirements become effective December 31, 2000.

The Texas Association of Health Plans commented against some provisions of the proposal.

The amendments are adopted under Insurance Code Articles 20A.22, 20A.13A, 20A.13B, and Insurance Code §36.001 (formerly Insurance Code Article 1.03A). Article 20A.22 authorizes the commissioner to promulgate reasonable regulations necessary and proper to carry out Insurance Code Chapter 20A. Insurance Code Articles 20A.13A and 20A.13B establish the minimum net worth requirement of health maintenance organizations and the phase-in of those minimum requirements. Section 36.001(a) provides the commissioner of insurance with the authority to adopt rules for the conduct and execution of the powers and duties of the department only as authorized by a statute.

§11.801. Minimum Net Worth.

(a)

On or after September 1, 1999, at the time of the initial qualifying examination, an applicant for a certificate of authority to operate an HMO must have unencumbered assets of the type described in subsection (b) of this section in excess of all of its liabilities equal to or greater than the required net worth established in Insurance Code Article 20A.13A. An HMO licensed before September 1, 1999, must comply with the minimum net worth requirement in Insurance Code, Article 20A.13B.

(b)

The types of assets required for an applicant to possess at the time of the qualifying examination are lawful money of the United States of America, bonds of this state, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness of the United States of America or any of its agencies when such obligations are guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States of America, or bonds or other interest-bearing evidences of indebtedness of any counties or municipalities of this state. Lawful money of the United States of America includes deposits in an institution that is a member of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Demand deposits, savings deposits or time deposits, of the type that are federally insured in solvent banks and savings and loan associations and branches thereof, which are organized under the laws of the United States of America or under the laws of any state of the United States of America may not exceed the greater of:

(1)

the amount of federal deposit insurance coverage pertaining to such deposit; or

(2)

10% of the issuing financial institution's net worth, provided that such net worth is in excess of $25 million;

(c)

After the qualifying examination, the applicant must maintain unencumbered assets in excess of all of its liabilities by an amount equal to or greater than the minimum net worth requirement until it receives its certificate of authority, and thereafter, the HMO must meet the minimum net worth requirements of the Insurance Code Article 20A.13A, by maintaining unencumbered assets in excess of its liabilities equal to or greater than the minimum net worth requirement.

(d)

Notwithstanding subsections (b) and (c) of this section, foreign HMOs seeking admission to this state which are actively conducting business in other states, in addition to approved non-profit health corporations authorized under the Insurance Code Article 21.52F, shall be required, at a minimum, to comply with the Insurance Code Article 20A.13A at the time of the qualifying examination.

§11.802. Statutory Deposit Requirements.

(a)

Statutory deposits made pursuant to the Insurance Code Article 20A.13 must consist of funds in the form of lawful money of the United States of America, bonds of this state, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness of the United States of America or any of its agencies when such obligations are guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States of America, or bonds or other interest-bearing evidences of indebtedness of any counties or municipalities of this state.

(1)

Certificates of deposit must be issued by a solvent, federally insured and Texas domiciled bank. However, the amount of total deposits by the HMO in the same depository bank may not exceed the greater of:

(A)

the limits of federal insurance coverage pertaining to such deposits; or

(B)

10% of the issuing depository bank's net worth, provided that such net worth is in excess of $25 million.

(2)

Bonds of this state, bonds or other evidences of indebtedness of the United States of America or any of its agencies when such obligations are guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States of America, or bonds or other interest-bearing evidences of indebtedness of any counties or municipalities of this state must be valued at the lesser of current fair market value or amortized cost.

(b)

Before the issuance of the certificate of authority, the HMO must submit funds as described in subsection (a) of this section in the amount required by the Insurance Code Article 20A.13, with four completed originals of security deposit report form number 120, one original pledge document on bank letterhead, and the applicable fees pursuant to §7.1301(d) of this title (relating to Regulatory Fees) to the bond and securities officer of the department.

(c)

Each HMO must annually determine the amount of statutory deposit required as specified in the Insurance Code Article 20A.13 and deposit any required additional funds by March 15 in the manner set forth as follows:

(1)

Any additional statutory deposit required shall be in funds as described in subsection (a) of this section and shall be accompanied by four completed originals of security deposit report form 120 and the applicable fee.

(2)

If any statutory deposit is to be released, such request for release must be accompanied by four completed originals of withdrawal form number 121 and the applicable fee. If the commissioner directs such a release, the bond and securities officer of the department shall execute a release of any pledge and the funds shall be returned to the HMO.

(d)

For any substitution of funds, the HMO must submit four completed originals of security deposit report form number 120, four completed originals of withdrawal form number 121, one original pledge document on bank letterhead, and the applicable fees.

(e)

If the HMO wishes to request a release of all or part and/or a waiver of the statutory deposit requirements as permitted by the Insurance Code Article 20A.13, a written request must be submitted to the commissioner no less than 60 days prior to the March 15 due date. Such request for any release or waiver must provide adequate information, including the following, to justify the release:

(1)

Specification of the pertinent provision(s) of the Insurance Code under which the release or waiver is being requested;

(2)

The amount of the statutory deposit for which a release or waiver is being requested;

(3)

If a waiver is being requested, the period of time over which the waiver is requested;

(4)

Supporting documentation that justifies such release or waiver including:

(A)

Reasons for requesting the release or waiver;

(B)

Discussion as to impact of granting a release and/or waiver and assurance that the HMO and its enrollees will not be harmed if the release or waiver is granted;

(C)

Evidence that the HMO has reported net profits for the previous 12 months;

(D)

Evidence that the HMO's net worth is in a positive position;

(E)

If a request is based upon a guarantee:

(i)

a copy of the guarantee;

(ii)

a copy of the most current financial statements of the sponsoring organization;

(iii)

disclosure of the number of guarantees that the sponsoring organization has issued; and

(iv)

disclosure of the dollar amount of all obligations guaranteed and the amounts reflected as liabilities and the amounts guaranteed that are not reflected as liabilities in the sponsoring organization's consolidated financial statements;

(5)

If the request is based on projected uncovered expenses:

(A)

Projections for the next calendar year which includes an income statement, a balance sheet, a cash flow statement and enrollment, including assumptions on which the projections are based;

(B)

An explanation as to why expenses are classified as "covered"; and

(C)

A reconciliation with explanation for any differences between submitted projections and the previous calendar year's actual experience.

(6)

If a release is requested under subsections (d) or (e) of the Insurance Code Article 20A.13:

(A)

Evidence that the dollar amount of uncovered health care expenses are likely to continue and will not exceed the amount remaining on deposit; and

(B)

Explanation as to the reasons for the decrease in uncovered health care expenses from that which was incurred during previous years.

(7)

If the commissioner approves the release or waiver, the HMO must submit the forms required by subsection (c)(2) of this section.

(f)

Whenever conditions upon which a waiver were granted change to the extent that the HMO is no longer able to qualify for the waiver, the HMO must deposit adequate funds to comply with the requirements of the Insurance Code Article 20A.13, within 30 days.

(g)

All interest income when due on the statutory deposit funds may be paid directly to the HMO by the bank.

§11.803. Investments, Loans, and Other Assets.

The admitted assets of domestic and foreign HMOs must comply with the provisions of this section.

(1)

Investment of minimum net worth. An HMO must maintain assets in an amount equivalent to its required minimum net worth in accordance with Insurance Code Article 20A.13A(d). Demand deposits, savings deposits or time deposits, of the type that are federally insured in solvent banks and savings and loan associations and branches thereof, which are organized under the laws of the United States of America or under the laws of any state of the United States of America may not exceed the greater of:

(A)

the amount of federal deposit insurance coverage pertaining to such deposit; or

(B)

10% of the issuing financial institution's net worth, provided that such net worth is in excess of $25 million;

(2)

Investments to support uncovered liabilities. An HMO may invest its funds in excess of minimum net worth in an amount at least equal to uncovered liabilities only in the following:

(A)

any investments allowed in paragraph (1) of this section;

(B)

direct general obligations of any state of the United States of America for the payment of money, or obligations for the payment of money, to the extent guaranteed or insured as to the payment of principal and interest by any state of the United States of America, provided:

(i)

such state has the power to levy taxes for the prompt payment of the principal and interest of such obligations; and

(ii)

such state shall not be in default in the payment of principal or interest on any of its direct, guaranteed, or insured general obligations at the date of such investment;

(C)

bonds, interest-bearing warrants, or other obligations issued by authority of law by any county, city, town, school district, or other municipality or political subdivision which is now or hereafter may be construed or organized under the laws of any state in the United States of America and which is authorized to issue such bonds, warrants, or other obligations under the constitution and laws of the state in which it is situated, provided:

(i)

legal provision has been made by a tax to meet said obligations or a special revenue or income to meet the principal and interest payments as they accrue upon such obligations has been appropriated, pledged, or otherwise provided; and

(ii)

such county, city, town, school district, or other municipality or political subdivision shall not be in default in the payment of principal or interest on any of its obligations at the date of such investment;

(D)

bonds, interest-bearing warrants, or other obligations issued by authority of law by any educational institution which is now or hereafter may be construed or organized under the laws of any state in the United States, and which is authorized to issue such bonds and warrants under the constitution and laws of the state in which it is situated, provided:

(i)

legal provision has been made by a tax to meet said obligations or a special revenue or income to meet the principal and interest payments as they accrue upon such obligations shall have been appropriated, pledged, or otherwise provided; and

(ii)

such educational institution shall not be in default in the payment of principal or interest on any of its obligations at the date of such investment;

(E)

investments issued by insurers or HMOs subject to the following conditions:

(i)

an HMO may not make an investment under this subparagraph in any other HMO or insurer unless such other HMO or insurer is duly licensed to do business in its domestic state and at the time of such investment is in compliance with the minimum capital and surplus requirements then applicable under the provisions of that state's statutes and regulations; provided, however, an HMO may make an investment pursuant to this paragraph in another HMO which has not yet received its certificate of authority to conduct the business of an HMO in its domestic state or which does not yet possess the minimum capital and surplus required by its domestic state if such investment will be sufficient to give the investing HMO at least 50% control in such other HMO, as the term "control" is defined in §11.1201 of this title (relating to Definitions);

(ii)

an HMO may not invest, except as provided in subparagraphs (F) and (G) of this paragraph, in any other HMO or insurer unless such investment with subsequent investments shall result within 180 days of the first investment in the investing HMO having control in such other HMO or insurer, as the term "control" is defined in §11.1201 of this title (relating to Definitions);

(iii)

in no event may an HMO invest more than 50% of its net worth in excess of minimum net worth in any one other HMO or insurer;

(iv)

in no event may the total investments made by an HMO in all other HMOs or insurers pursuant to this subparagraph exceed 75% of the investing HMO's net worth in excess of minimum net worth;

(v)

the restrictions of clauses (iii) and (iv) of this subparagraph shall not apply if the HMO is purchasing 100% of the stock of another HMO for the purpose of merger, which is anticipated to take place no later than three months from the purchase date, unless said period is extended by the commissioner, and the resulting assets of the surviving HMO meet the requirements set forth in this subchapter within three months after said merger, unless said period of time is extended by the commissioner;

(F)

bonds, debentures, bills of exchange, commercial notes, or any other bills and obligations of any corporation incorporated under the laws of any state of the United States of America or of the United States of America, which issuing corporation has an investment grade rating according to Standard and Poors or Moody's;

(G)

equity interests, including common stocks issued by any business entity created under the laws of the United States of America or of any state of the United States, provided:

(i)

the business entity is solvent, with a net worth of at least $1 million;

(ii)

if the business entity is a dividend paying business entity, no cumulative dividends are in arrears;

(iii)

an HMO shall not be permitted to invest in a partnership, as a general partner, except through a wholly owned subsidiary;

(iv)

the restrictions of clauses (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph shall not apply if the business entity of which the HMO wishes to purchase the equity interest is, or is to be, a contracted provider of services;

(H)

shares of mutual funds doing business under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. §80a-1, et seq.) and shares in real estate investment trusts as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. §856), provided that such mutual funds and real estate investment trusts be solvent with at least $1 million of net assets as of the date of its latest annual, or more recent, certified audited financial statement;

(I)

loans by an HMO that are secured by valid first liens on improved real estate, provided that:

(i)

there is a title insurance policy or attorney's opinion evidencing that the borrower owns the real estate;

(ii)

there is an appraisal of the real estate and the loan does not exceed 75% of such appraised value;

(iii)

there is an executed note evidencing the loan;

(iv)

there is a recorded deed of trust;

(v)

if any part of the value of buildings is included in the value of the real estate:

(I)

each such building is insured against loss by a company authorized to do business in Texas or in the state in which the real estate is located; and

(II)

the insurance policy is made payable to the HMO and is in an amount equal to at least 50% of the value of such building, provided that such insurance coverage need not exceed the outstanding balance owed to the HMO when the outstanding balance falls below 50% of the value of such building;

(vi)

the commissioner has the right to obtain an independent appraisal, at the HMO's expense, of real estate securing any loan;

(J)

loans to individuals secured by collateral, specified in paragraph (1) of this section and subparagraphs (A)-(D) of this paragraph, but the amount loaned may not exceed the value of the securities held as collateral;

(K)

loans, without limit, whether secured or unsecured that are not in default, to medical and other health care providers under contract with the HMO for the provision of health care services, but in no event shall the value of any such loan or loans made under this subparagraph exceed the maker's ability to repay the loan or loans; the maker's ability to repay the loan or loans shall be determined by allowing only assets that an HMO may hold to be considered toward determining any excess of assets over all liabilities of the maker;

(L)

real estate acquired by way of security for loans previously contracted or for moneys due; all such real property not qualifying under any other provisions of this section shall be sold and disposed of within five years after the HMO has acquired title to same unless the time for disposal is extended by the commissioner;

(M)

investments in improved, income-producing real estate, the value of which real estate and improvements shall be depreciated cost or market value, whichever is less;

(N)

additional investments which are not otherwise specified by this section, provided:

(i)

the amount of any one such investment shall not exceed 10% of the net worth in excess of the minimum net worth of the HMO; and

(ii)

the total amount of investments authorized by this paragraph shall not exceed the HMO's net worth in excess of its minimum net worth.

(3)

Other assets. An HMO may have assets beyond those required to be held for its minimum net worth and uncovered liabilities which are either necessary for its operations or invested as permitted by this section. Assets an HMO may find necessary in its operations include, but are not limited to, the following:

(A)

uncollected premiums or subscriptions with an adequate provision for uncollectable premiums or subscriptions;

(B)

advances of capitation or other fees expected to be paid for the next month to medical and other health care service providers under contract with the HMO; provided that no termination of the contract may take place prior to the end of the period for which advances were paid;

(C)

equipment, vehicles, furniture, office equipment, and other labor saving devices used both directly and indirectly for the provision of medical services and the administration of the HMO, provided a detailed inventory is maintained with each item marked by an identifying number and a proof of cost is maintained, the items being required to be valued at depreciated costs, depreciation being based on a method permitted in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(D)

inventories of necessary supplies, it being the duty of the HMO to sufficiently prove the value of such inventories; and

(E)

real estate and leasehold estates, including buildings and improvements, and leasehold improvements on rented space, for the accommodation of the HMO's current or expected business operations used in the provision or support of health care services, including space for rent to any health care provider under contract with the HMO which property shall be used in the provision of health care services to members of the HMO by that provider.

(4)

Valuation. Except where elsewhere specifically provided, investments, loans and assets are valued in accordance with the Purposes and Procedures of the Securities Valuation Office of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as it applies to entities not required to maintain an asset valuation reserve. If no such standard applies, then the valuation shall be their liquidating value.

(5)

Evidence of ownership. A domestic HMO may own certificated and uncertificated securities, as evidenced by book entry of banks and securities brokerage limited as follows:

(A)

banks must be members of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

(B)

securities brokerage firms are incorporated securities brokers and dealers that:

(i)

are subject to the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission of the United States of America;

(ii)

are members of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation; and

(iii)

have a tangible net worth of not less than $100 million.

(C)

securities held by a bank or securities brokerage firm must be held in accordance with a custodial agreement entered into between the bank or securities brokerage firm and the HMO.

(D)

Amounts invested in uncertificated securities through a securities brokerage firm may not exceed that amount of insurance protection provided by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation except that additional amounts may be invested whenever a securities brokerage firm has in effect additional coverage through an excess securities bond issued by an insurance company licensed in Texas and having a statutory net worth of at least 30 times the face amount of the excess securities bond, but in no event having a statutory net worth of less than $100 million according to its last filed annual statement, and then the limit on the amount that may be invested in uncertificated securities through one securities brokerage firm shall be extended to the total amount covered by the Securities Investor Protection Corporation and the excess securities bond, combined. The HMO shall be responsible for maintaining in its files a copy of the excess securities bond with a letter or copy of a letter furnished by its securities brokerage firm from the insurance company verifying the date through which premium is paid that the excess securities bond is in effect. The letter shall also reflect the excess bond number, face amount, company, and address of insuring company and the name and title of the individual signing the letter. Whenever the date is exceeded, the HMO shall be responsible for obtaining a similar letter updating the information. Certificated and uncertificated securities may be evidenced by transaction records such as receipts, invoices, and statements issued by banks and securities brokerage firms evidencing that the records of the bank or securities brokerage firm reflect the HMO's or its nominee's ownership of said securities. In addition, certificated securities shall be maintained in the possession of the HMO as its nominee, subject to obtaining any required approval under the Insurance Code Article 1.28, if located outside the State of Texas, and registered securities shall be in the name of the HMO or its nominee. An HMO may designate a depository where certificated securities are to be held, provided access to said securities is under the control of officers and employees of the HMO or its nominee as designated by the HMO's board of directors. Certificated securities purchased in transit from the vendor need not be in the HMO's or nominee's possession within a period of 45 days from the purchase date. Certificated securities in transit for the purpose of sale within 45 days of shipping date also are exempted from the requirement that they be in the possession of the HMO or its nominee.

(6)

Sale of investment. Section 7.4 of this title (relating to Admissible Assets) shall apply to investments not specifically allowed under this subchapter. The commissioner may require any investment to be sold which would otherwise be authorized under the provisions of this section if the commissioner finds that such investment would cause the investing HMO to operate in a condition which is hazardous to its enrollees, creditors, or the general public.

§11.807. Dividends.

(a)

Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, dividends may be declared by an HMO at any time from any and all admitted assets in excess of all liabilities, as long as that HMO meets or exceeds its deposit, minimum net worth and risk-based capital requirements.

(b)

An HMO shall give the commissioner at least 30 days' notice before the HMO shall make or pay any dividend or distribution of cash or other property (excluding pro rata distributions of any class of the HMO's own securities), whose fair market value together with that of other dividends or distributions made within the preceding 12 months exceeds the greater of 10% of the HMO's net worth as of the 31st day of December next preceding, or the net gain from operations of such HMO.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 10, 2000.

TRD-200001842

Lynda Nesenholtz

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 30, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 26, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327


28 TAC §11.810

The commissioner of insurance adopts new §11.810, concerning financial requirements for health maintenance organizations (HMOs). The section is adopted with changes to the text as proposed in the November 26, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 10507).

The Texas Health Maintenance Organization Act (Insurance Code Chapter 20A) provides comprehensive regulation of the financial condition of HMOs by the department. Insurance Code Article 20A.19 directs the commissioner to take action whenever the financial condition of an HMO indicates a condition such that the continued operation of the HMO might be hazardous to enrollees, creditors, or the general public. Section 11.810 implements Insurance Code Article 20A.19, which also authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules to fix uniform standards and criteria for early warning that the continued operation of any HMO might be hazardous to its enrollees, creditors, or the general public, and to fix standards for evaluating the financial condition of any HMO. The conditions described in the section were developed by the department by drawing on its experience in regulating HMOs. The conditions existed with HMOs in hazardous condition and, in the department's opinion, the conditions were an indicator or early warning that the HMO was developing financial problems. The section will aid in the identification of an HMO in a hazardous condition and facilitate corrective action by the department. This will provide greater protection to the public from the risk of an HMO operating in a hazardous condition. Section 11.810(b)(7) was changed in response to a comment. The section is changed to clarify the department's intent that it is the fact that the HMO does not know the financial condition of an essential service provider that may indicate the existence of a hazardous condition. In §11.810(b)(22), "policyholder" is changed to "enrollees" to correct a typographical error. An HMO does not have policyholders. None of the changes result in the introduction of new subject matter or enlarge the class of persons subject to the proposal as originally published.

While the conditions enumerated in the section are often referred to as "hazardous conditions," the existence of one or more of the prescribed conditions does not mean that an HMO is necessarily in hazardous condition and the commissioner is not required to take action when one or more of these conditions exist. The conditions are examples of circumstances which, when considered in the context of the state of affairs of an HMO, can be an early warning that the continued operation of an HMO might be hazardous to its enrollees, creditors and the general public. Based on the experience of the department, the existence of one or more of the conditions described in the section justifies an inquiry into the described condition and a detailed analysis of its causes to determine whether a hazardous condition exists. HMOs may also use the section to assist them in identifying possible hazardous conditions and taking corrective action. Whenever the financial condition of any HMO indicates that its continued operation might be hazardous to its enrollees, creditors and the general public, the commissioner may, after notice and opportunity for hearing, order the HMO to take such action as may be reasonably necessary to rectify the existing condition, including but not necessarily limited to, reducing the total amount of present and potential liability for benefits by reinsurance, reducing the volume of new business being accepted, reducing expenses, suspending or limiting writing of new business for a period of time, increasing the HMO's capital and surplus or suspending or revoking the HMO's certificate of authority.

COMMENT: A commenter raised an objection and stated that paragraphs (1), (6), (9) and (19) of subsection (b) of the section do not pertain to financial matters nor are they indicators of financial problems.

REPLY: The department believes Insurance Code Article 20A.19 authorizes the commissioner to identify conditions that do not pertain to financial matters or indicate financial problems. Article 20A.19 authorizes the commissioner to adopt rules to establish uniform standards or criteria for early warning that the continued operation of any HMO might be hazardous to its enrollees, creditors or the general public. Based on the department's experience, the conditions described in the section have existed in HMOs whose financial condition was such that its operation was hazardous to its enrollees, creditors and the general public. The condition may not describe a financial matter such as a minimum net worth or liquidity standard, but the department's experience indicates that the condition existed in HMOs whose financial condition became hazardous to enrollees, creditors and the general public and that condition was an indicator of the development of the hazardous condition.

COMMENT: Two commenters noted that an HMO could voluntarily discontinue its National Committee on Quality Assurance accreditation, therefore, §11.810(b)(1) should not be listed as a hazardous condition.

REPLY: The department disagrees. The condition described in §11.810(b)(1) is an example that the existence of the condition may or may not indicate that the operation of an HMO is hazardous. Based on the department's experience, an inquiry as to why the accreditation was discontinued could reveal that an HMO determined that it did not have adequate resources to commit to the quality levels required for a National Committee on Quality Assurance accreditation or that the accreditation was discontinued to avoid an action by the National Committee on Quality Assurance to revoke the accreditation.

COMMENT: A commenter stated, with regard to §11.810(b)(7), there is no law that requires an administrative or management company to submit financial statements to the department and that an HMO may not have the ability to require such an administrative or management company to submit financial statements to the department.

REPLY: The condition described in §11.810(b)(7) attempts to identify a situation where an HMO is relying on another entity to provide it services on a risk sharing basis; that is, the HMO is sharing part of its revenue with the entity in return for services. If the entity is financially unsound, it may not be able to deliver the services. The department has identified those arrangements involving the sharing of revenue as involving risk and the HMO should be aware of the financial condition of its partner in those arrangements. To that end, the rule seeks to identify that situation where the HMO is not able to obtain information about the financial condition of its partner. The paragraph has been reworded to clarify the department's intent.

COMMENT: A commenter stated that the word "frequent" in §11.810(b)(13) is subjective and requested guidance on its meaning.

REPLY: The exact meaning of "frequent" will depend on the period of time being reviewed. If an HMO's parent has made several contributions in one year, the department would consider that frequent. If the HMO's parent has made contributions each year over a five year period, that would be frequent. Generally, frequent contributions indicate the HMO is losing money. Each HMO is licensed by the department as a self-sustaining entity; therefore, habitual reliance on parental support indicates the HMO is not a self-sustaining business enterprise.

COMMENT: A commenter stated that the language "experience, competence and trustworthiness" in §11.810(b)(15) is subjective.

REPLY: Insurance Code Article 20A.05(a)(2) requires the commissioner to find that a person who proposes to operate an HMO be competent, trustworthy and possess a good reputation, as a condition precedent to granting a license to an HMO. The department believes that the standard expressed in §11.810(b)(15) is similar to that required to license an HMO. While not an exact standard, such as 10 years experience operating a similar sized managed care organization, or never been convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude, the terms require the experience, competence and trustworthiness necessary to operate a particular HMO. This requires the exercise of judgment based on the facts before the department.

COMMENT: A commenter stated that the use of the term "appropriate" in §11.810(b)(18) was subjective. The commenter stated that this is already covered by the premium deficiency reserve requirement in §11.706 of this title (relating to Determination of Reasonability of Rates). It created a no win situation with a small group where the laws require an HMO to accept the highest risk cases with a limit on the rate increases which are lower than would be considered appropriate to the risk from an actuarial perspective.

REPLY: The department recognizes that certain specific fact situations may be within the condition described in §11.810(b)(18). That is why the existence of a condition may or may not be a basis for the commissioner finding that an HMO is in hazardous condition. In actual practice, failure to follow policies appropriate to a risk will result in a loss to the HMO. Policies are developed to provide prudent guidance in business decisions. The department reviews these policies to assure they will result in safe and sound business operations. Failure to follow a policy may mean that management of the company is unaware of the effect of decisions until the financial results are posted after the fact. This can be hazardous to enrollees, creditors and the public.

COMMENT: A commenter stated that §11.810(b)(22), which authorizes the commissioner to find an HMO in hazardous condition based on any condition the commissioner finds which may present a hazard to enrollees, creditors, or the general public, whether or not the criteria are published, should be tightened by requiring objective evidence.

REPLY: Section 11.810(b)(22) is necessary to make it clear that the conditions described in the rule are not the only conditions the department may find to be potentially hazardous. In the future, it is possible that additional conditions will be added to this list. Insurance Code Article 20A.19 does not contemplate that the commissioner's authority to find an HMO in hazardous condition be limited to the conditions described in a rule. Insurance Code Article 20A.19(a) states, "Whenever the financial condition of any health maintenance organization indicates a condition such that the continued operation of the health maintenance organization might be hazardous to its enrollees, creditors, or the general public, then the commissioner may, after notice and opportunity for hearing, order the health maintenance organization to take such action as may be reasonably necessary to rectify the existing condition...." In Insurance Code Article 20A.19(b), the commissioner is authorized to promulgate rules relating to this matter, but nowhere does the statute indicate that the commissioner is limited to taking action only if the condition is described by rule. By promulgating rules, HMOs are provided guidance on conditions the department considers potentially hazardous, but the statute does not require that a condition be adopted as rule. Since Insurance Code Article 20A.19(a) does not require objective evidence to support a finding that an HMO is in hazardous condition, the department does not believe it is appropriate to include such a requirement in §11.810(b)(22).

For with changes: The Texas HealthCare Information Council and Texas Association of Health Plans.

The new section is adopted under Insurance Code Article 20A.19 and §36.001 (formerly Insurance Code Article 1.03A). Article 20A.19 authorizes the commissioner of insurance to adopt rules to fix uniform standards and criteria for early warning that the continued operation of an HMO might be hazardous to its enrollees, creditors, or the general public, and to fix standards for evaluating the financial condition of an HMO. Section 36.001(a) provides the commissioner of insurance with the authority to adopt rules for the conduct and execution of the powers and duties of the department only as authorized by a statute.

§11.810. Hazardous Conditions for HMOs.

(a)

Purpose. The purpose of this section is to enumerate conditions which may indicate an HMO is in hazardous condition and which may be a basis for the commissioner of insurance to initiate an action against an HMO under Insurance Code Articles 20A.20 or 20A.21. In evaluating any of the conditions in this section, all circumstances concerning the HMO's operation must be evaluated in making an ultimate conclusion that an HMO is in hazardous condition. The evaluation of the information relating to these conditions is a part of the examination process. The conditions enumerated in this section do not conclusively indicate that an HMO is in hazardous condition. One or more of the conditions can exist in an HMO which is in satisfactory condition; however, one or more of these conditions has often been found in an HMO which was unable to perform its obligations to enrollees, creditors or the general public, or has required the commissioner to initiate regulatory action to protect enrollees, creditors and the general public.

(b)

An HMO may be found to be in hazardous condition, after notice and opportunity for hearing, when one or more of the following conditions are found to exist by the commissioner:

(1)

an HMO's federal qualification designation and/or National Committee on Quality Assurance accreditation is revoked or discontinued;

(2)

an HMO's reported claims in process exceed 12% of annualized medical and hospital expenses (12% is approximately a 45 day backlog);

(3)

an HMO's parent or sponsoring organization is operating in a hazardous condition;

(4)

an HMO's annual CPA report or actuarial opinion contains a material adverse finding or findings;

(5)

an HMO fails to comply with the Texas Health Maintenance Organization Act (Insurance Code Chapter 20A) or Title 28, Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 11;

(6)

an HMO has an inadequate provider network;

(7)

an HMO contracts with a management or administrative company on a capitated or percentage of premium basis and such administrative or management company refuses to submit financial statements to the HMO;

(8)

an HMO does not file a financial statement with the department within the time required by the Insurance Code, or as requested by the department;

(9)

a health care provider that is under contract, directly or indirectly, with an HMO, has a pattern of balance billing;

(10)

an HMO files financial information with the department which is false or misleading;

(11)

an HMO does not amend its financial statement when requested by the department;

(12)

an HMO overstates its net worth by 25% or more;

(13)

an HMO relies on its parent's forgiveness of debt or frequent surplus contributions to finance its operations or to maintain its minimum net worth or risk based capital;

(14)

an HMO does not maintain books and records sufficient to permit examiners to determine the financial condition of the HMO, examples of which include, but are not limited to:

(A)

books and records of a domestic HMO are maintained outside the State of Texas in violation of the Insurance Code Article 1.28; or

(B)

an HMO moves, or maintains, the location of the books and records necessary to conduct an examination without notifying the department of such location;

(15)

an HMO's management does not have the experience, competence, or trustworthiness to operate the HMO in a safe and sound manner;

(16)

an HMO's management has been found to have engaged in unlawful transactions;

(17)

an HMO has a pattern of denial or nonpayment of emergency care;

(18)

an HMO does not follow its policy on rating and underwriting standards appropriate to the risk;

(19)

an administrative or judicial order, initiated by an insurance regulatory agency of another state, is issued against an HMO, its parent or affiliate, or a regulatory action is initiated by another agency within the state of domicile;

(20)

an HMO does not have the minimum net worth required by Insurance Code Articles 20A.13A or 20A.13B;

(21)

an HMO does not meet the requirements of §11.809 of this title (relating to Risk-Based Capital for HMOs); or

(22)

an HMO is in any condition that the commissioner finds may present a hazard to enrollees, creditors, or the general public.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 10, 2000.

TRD-200001841

Lynda Nesenholtz

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 30, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 26, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327


Chapter 34. STATE FIRE MARSHALL

Subchapter J. STOVETOP FIRE SUPPRESSION DEVICE APPROVAL

28 TAC §§34.1001-34.1004

The Commissioner of Insurance adopts new §§34.1001 through 34.1004 under new Subchapter J concerning state fire marshal approval, through the Commissioner of Insurance, of residential stovetop fire suppression devices for purposes of eligibility for certain premium reductions. The new sections are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the January 7, 2000, issue of the Texas Register (25 TexReg 53) and will not be republished.

The adopted sections are necessary to implement legislation enacted by the 76th Legislature in Senate Bill 139. Senate Bill 139 amended Subchapter C, Chapter 5, by adding Article 5.33C to the Insurance Code, which allows insurers to offer an insurance premium discount for a correctly installed residential stovetop fire suppression device, as defined by the statute, that has been approved by the state fire marshal through the commissioner. Amendments to the Texas Personal Lines Manual have been adopted regarding provisions for optional credits for Homeowners and Dwelling policies for stovetop fire suppression devices in conformity with the legislation. The adopted subchapter applies only to residential stovetop fire suppression devices in use on or after January 1, 2000. The new legislation provides that a policyholder of a single-family or multifamily dwelling, apartment owner, or condominium owner is eligible for a premium reduction for homeowners insurance coverage or fire or commercial fire insurance coverage if the policyholder has correctly installed on the covered property a stovetop fire suppression device that has been approved by the state fire marshal through the commissioner. Because the legislation contemplates that it is the policyholder who installs the device and that the discount is granted for "a correctly installed and functioning stovetop fire suppression device," the authority of the state fire marshal is limited solely to approval of the device to qualify for an optional premium discount on certain homeowners, fire, and commercial fire insurance premiums. The current statute and rules relating to fire extinguishers (Insurance Code Article 5.43-1; 28 TAC Chapter 34, Subchapters D and E) regulate, among other things, the leasing, selling, installing, and servicing of fire extinguishers, and prohibit the sale or use of all fire extinguishers, systems, and equipment that are not labeled or listed by an approved testing laboratory pursuant to nationally recognized or laboratory developed standards. As with that statute and rules, the state fire marshal believes that it is the most appropriate and efficient method, in approving stovetop fire suppression devices for purposes of the premium discount, to do so with reference to product certification by nationally recognized testing facilities and methods. The state fire marshal's office reviewed existing recognized product performance standards developed by Underwriters Laboratories (UL), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI), the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Factory Mutual Research Corporation (FMRC) and the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) in determining appropriate national testing and performance standards on which to base state fire marshal approval as indicated in the legislation. Currently, there is no single recognized national standard for residential stovetop fire suppression devices. The state fire marshal, therefore, has utilized a combination of standards and test criteria developed by recognized product performance standards organizations that the state fire marshal believes will best demonstrate the integrity of the device, provide a minimum performance capability, and afford the user a minimum level of safety in safeguarding lives and property.

New §34.1001 states the purpose and application of adopted Subchapter J, and provides for the severability of the provisions of the subchapter. New §34.1002 sets forth the definitions of the new subchapter which incorporates some of the definitions from the new legislation and which sets forth the requirements for an approved testing laboratory and a product performance standard. New §34.1003 outlines the specific product performance standards from UL, adopted by reference by the commissioner, and where to access this information. New §34.1004 provides the criteria necessary to obtain approval by the state fire marshal for residential stovetop fire suppression devices. It further requires that each device contain a certification mark of the approved testing laboratory and that each device sold must include a manual, as submitted to the approved testing laboratory, with the specifically identified instruction topics of installation, operation, recharge, inspection, and maintenance.

Comment: Several commenters stated their concern with the proposed rules that call for products to be tested to both the UL 1254 or UL 299 standard and the UL 300A. The commenters were concerned that if the department requires companies to comply with both of these standards, then the purpose of the legislation (Senate Bill 139), which the commenters stated was to encourage the use of such devices in homes, would be diluted. The commenters encouraged the department to consider having products meet either UL 1254 or UL 299, or UL 300A, which the commenters believe contain sufficient testing criteria to determine whether the device will perform as expected. One commenter described a specific product which the commenter manufactures and markets and proposed three alternatives to the approval standards set forth in the rules. The first alternative would allow for approval of a stovetop fire suppression device under either of the UL approved tests for such devices. The commenter stated that a mandatory test to two UL standards is contrary to Insurance Code Article 5.43-1, §5, concerning fire extinguishers. The commenter agreed with the state fire marshal that there is currently no single recognized standard for residential stovetop fire suppression devices but objected to the state fire marshal's proposed combination of standards and test criteria. The second alternative would modify the approval criteria set forth in the section by listing alternative approval criteria applicable to suppression devices used for limited purposes. The proposed alternative refers to "self-contained extinguisher units intended to suppress or extinguish certain fires occurring on residential range top cooking surfaces." These criteria would specify that they do not apply to a device that is designed to extinguish a deep fat frying fire and would further require any device tested in accordance with these requirements to include a disclaimer on the device stating that it is not designed or tested to extinguish a deep fat frying fire. The third alternative would retain the language of §34.1004 as proposed but add the wording, "or other applicable approval criteria as approved by the State Fire Marshal."

Agency Response: The department disagrees that Insurance Code Article 5.43-1, §5 requires testing to only one standard. That section does not reference standards, and indeed, all dry chemical-type fire extinguishers must meet two standards as stated in UL 299. For the state fire marshal to approve a device in accordance with Senate Bill 139, the state fire marshal, in the interest of public safety, will consider testing for product integrity and performance of fire suppression. As previously noted, currently, there is no single recognized national standard for residential stovetop fire suppression devices; therefore, the state fire marshal has proposed a combination of nationally accepted criteria that the state fire marshal believes will best demonstrate the integrity of the device, provide a minimum performance capability, and afford the user a minimum level of safety in safeguarding lives and property. The department believes that alternatives one and three would not achieve these objectives and would not achieve the goal of stating the criteria necessary for state fire marshal approval. The department will need further study of alternative two since the alternative at present does not meet the standards as proposed. In any event, the department believes that the proposed alternatives are substantive changes. The commissioner has decided to adopt the rule as proposed in order to allow products to be approved for purposes of eligibility for insurance premium reductions in accord with Senate Bill 139. The department will continue to work with the commenter and, if warranted, may propose modifications to the rules in the future.

Comment: Commenters also presented a history of one of the commenter's product in terms of legislation and discussions with the state fire marshal regarding testing criteria. These commenters opposed the rule to the extent that it references the criteria of UL Subject 300A, which the commenter stated is too stringent for its device (i.e., this device is not designed to extinguish a deep fat frying fire), but further stated that they do not expect this rule to be adopted for one specific product, and that they want to work with the state fire marshal on their second alternative so long as the process is not too protracted.

Agency Response: The department agrees in part and disagrees in part. The rule as adopted represents a combination of nationally accepted criteria that the state fire marshal believes will best demonstrate the integrity of the device, provide a minimum performance capability, and afford the user a minimum level of safety in safeguarding lives and property. The state fire marshal will study the commenter's second alternative with these goals in mind and acknowledges, with the concurrence of the commenter, that any further modifications to the rule will also necessitate reviewing the amount of the insurance discount.

Commenter: One commenter opposed adoption of the rule on the ground that it would exclude a particular device from taking advantage of the insurance discount. This commenter suggested that the proposed rule be left pending to continue the flow of modification to the rule, which the commenter stated that the department could propose for public comment and then decide which rule to adopt.

Agency Response: The department disagrees. The Secretary of State's rule procedures pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act do not allow two simultaneous proposals for the same rule. Re-proposing the entire rule to add the commenter's alternative would delay rule adoption. Adopting the rule now will allow products to be approved for purposes of eligibility for insurance premium reductions in accord with Senate Bill 139, while the department continues to work with the commenter to evaluate the commenter's proposed alternative.

Comment: One commenter stated its agreement with the proposal's approach to approve fire suppression devices or systems with reference to product certification or listing by nationally recognized testing facilities and methods. It also concurred that there is presently no single recognized national standard for residential stovetop fire suppression devices since the product and technology are too new, even though commercial cooking protection has been available for decades. The commenter stated that virtually all manufactured stovetop extinguishing systems developed over the last ten to fifteen years have been tested to the UL Subject 300A or attempt has been made to comply with this protocol, which the commenter believes is a proper testing criteria for listing or certification until such time as nationally recognized authority can develop a more complete set of standards. The commenter's only concern with the proposed rules was that the reference to UL 299 and UL 1254 makes only specific reference to the subject titles as applying to "dry chemical" extinguisher when, in fact, the commenter stated that UL pulls applicable standards from both these publications for both dry and wet extinguishers. The commenter would not want to see an interpretation that only dry chemical agent systems are acceptable based on the titles of the standards.

Agency Response: The department appreciates the support of the commenter. With regard to the commenter's concern about wet chemical extinguishers, the department notes the commenter's point that UL currently pulls applicable standards from both these publications for both dry and wet chemical extinguishers. The department has not limited the statutory definition of "stovetop fire suppression device" to either wet or dry extinguishers and cannot change the titles of the copyrighted documents referred to in the rule; however, the department would note that since UL applies these criteria to both wet and dry extinguishers, the rules as adopted should suffice to ease the commenter's concern.

For with changes: Twenty First Century International Fire Equipment and Services Corporation. Against: Williams-Pyro, Inc., State Firemen's and Fire Marshals' Association of Texas, Texas Fire Chiefs Association.

The new sections are adopted pursuant to the Insurance Code Article 5.33C and §36.001. The 76th Legislature enacted Senate Bill 139, which amended Subchapter C, Chapter 5, Insurance Code by adding Article 5.33C. Article 5.33C provides that a policyholder of a single-family or multifamily dwelling, apartment owner, or condominium owner is eligible for a premium reduction for homeowners insurance coverage or fire or commercial fire insurance coverage if the policyholder has correctly installed on the covered property a stovetop fire suppression device that has been approved by the state fire marshal through the commissioner and permits the commissioner to adopt rules necessary for the implementation of the article. Insurance Code §36.001 authorizes the Commissioner of Insurance to adopt rules for the conduct and execution of the duties and functions of the Texas Department of Insurance only as authorized by statute.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on March 7, 2000.

TRD-200001723

Lynda Nesenholtz

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 27, 2000

Proposal publication date: January 7, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327