TITLE 37.PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS

Part 3. TEXAS YOUTH COMMISSION

Chapter 93. YOUTH RIGHTS AND REMEDIES

37 TAC §93.17

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes new §93.17, concerning Access to Personal Minister, Pastor, or Religious Counselor. The new section will provide TYC youth with access to their personal ministers, pastors, or religious counselors through visitation. Staff will verify the religious affiliation prior to the visitation requested by the youth.

Terry Graham, Assistant Deputy Executive Director for Financial Support, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be to ensure the rights of youth committed to TYC. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. No private real property rights are affected by adoption of this rule.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Manager, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas, 78765.

The new section is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.045, which provides the Texas Youth Commission with the authority and responsibility for the welfare, custody, and rehabilitation of the children in a facility.

The proposed rule implements the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

§93.17.Access to Personal Minister, Pastor, or Religious Counselor.

(a)

Purpose. The purpose of this policy is to provide for youth access to their personal ministers, pastors or religious counselors through visitation.

(b)

Visitation.

(1)

A personal minister, pastor, or religious counselor is someone whose personal relationship with the youth or his/her legal guardian is that of a minister, pastor, or religious counselor.

(2)

Staff will verify the religious affiliation prior to visit.

(3)

Youth shall be allowed to receive visits from their personal ministers, pastors, or religious counselors any day of the week at any time between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. and after 5 p.m. if reasonable arrangements can be made.

(4)

Space will be provided for the visit.

(5)

The visitor will only be allowed to visit the youth with whom he/she has a personal relationship.

(6)

Staff may place limits on length of time allowed for visits and frequency of visits based on facility's program and schedule of activities for the youth.

(7)

Youth may decline a visit with personal minister, pastor, or religious counselor.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on June 28, 2000.

TRD-200004488

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: August 13, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


Chapter 95. YOUTH DISCIPLINE

Subchapter A. DISCIPLINARY PRACTICES

37 TAC §95.21

The Texas Youth Commission (TYC) proposes new §95.21, concerning Aggression Management Program. The new section will provide criteria for moving a youth who is assigned to a Texas Youth Commission (TYC) institution, from the general population of that institution to the Aggression Management Program (AMP) to address continued aggressive behavior. The AMP program will be used for youth who have not been responsive to other less restrictive interventions and pose a continuous threat of danger to other youth and/or staff. The AMP is a highly structured program designed to safely manage and treat the aggressive behavior in a self-contained unit. The program will provide a system of graduated reintegration into the campus general population. The program will be implemented and occupy part of the TYC program only at the McLennan County State Juvenile Corrections Facility in Mart, Texas.

Terry Graham, Assistant Deputy Executive Director for Financial Support, has determined that for the first five-year period the section is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section.

Mr. Graham also has determined that for each year of the first five years the section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be greater protection for the general public. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed. No private real property rights are affected by adoption of this rule.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Gail Graham, Policy and Manuals Manager, Texas Youth Commission, 4900 North Lamar, P.O. Box 4260, Austin, Texas, 78765.

The new section is proposed under the Human Resources Code, §61.075, which provides the Texas Youth Commission with the authority to order the youth's confinement under conditions it believes best designed for the youth's welfare and the interests of the public.

The proposed rule affects the Human Resource Code, §61.034.

§95.21.Aggression Management Program.

(a)

Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to provide criteria for removing from the general population youth assigned to a Texas Youth Commission (TYC) institution for dangerously aggressive behavior and placing a youth in the Aggression Management Program (AMP). The goal of the program is to safely manage and treat the aggressive behavior in a self-contained unit. The AMP program will be used for youth who have not been responsive to other less restrictive interventions and pose a continuous threat of danger to other youth and/or staff. The AMP is a highly structured program designed to address aggressive behavior modification and provide a system of graduated reintegration into the general population. Placement in the aggression management program is a major disciplinary consequence.

(b)

Authorized Facilities.

(1)

The McLennan County State Juvenile Corrections Facility (MCSJC) in Mart, Texas is the only facility authorized to administer the AMP.

(2)

TYC contract programs shall not develop an AMP. TYC contract programs shall not place TYC youth residing in the contract program in the TYC AMP program.

(c)

Eligibility Criteria. A youth is eligible for the aggression management program:

(1)

if, at the youth's current institutional placement, a level II hearing has been held and a finding made that the youth engaged in eligible conduct for the AMP with no extenuating circumstance; and

(2)

the youth committed, attempted to commit, or helped someone else to commit at least one of the following offenses:

(A)

assault resulting in substantial bodily injury that involves more than a passing discomfort or fleeting pain; or

(B)

intentionally participating in a riot; or

(C)

using or threatening to use either an object defined as a weapon by the Penal Code or an object that could be used as a weapon, which placed the victim in fear of imminent bodily injury.

(3)

If the disposition at the level II hearing held pursuant to this policy resulted in a transfer to AMP, but bed space is not available in AMP, the youth may be assigned to a placement in Disciplinary Segregation Program (DSP) pending admission to AMP (at the youth's current placement) with an assigned maximum length of stay, pending admission to AMP. However, if the youth completes the maximum length of stay in the DSP prior to admission to AMP, the youth shall not be admitted to AMP as a result of the conduct determined at the level II hearing that resulted in the current assignment to DSP.

(4)

The following are specifically disqualified from placement in the AMP.

(A)

females;

(B)

sentenced offenders who are eligible for transfer to the Institutions Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

(d)

Admission Criteria.

(1)

The local AMP Admission Review Committee at the McLennan County State Juvenile Correctional Facility is composed of at least the assistant superintendent, AMP psychologist and the AMP program administrator.

(2)

The AMP Admission Review Committee shall approve admission to the AMP based on the following considerations.

(A)

Evidence that the youth is not suffering from a major emotional disturbance and/or psychiatric disorder but the behavior is the primary result of a conduct disorder or antisocial personality disorder.

(B)

Documentation that less restrictive interventions have been attempted without successfully reducing the behavior and that the AMP represents the least restrictive available and appropriate intervention.

(3)

The AMP Admission Review Committee shall not approve admission to the AMP for a youth who was placed in DSP pending admission to AMP if the maximum length of stay assigned for that DSP placement has been completed.

(4)

The AMP Admission Review Committee should not approve admission to the AMP if a youth has substantially completed a placement in DSP without an incidence of aggression.

(5)

Priority is given to youth with the most dangerous, recent and chronic aggressive behavior, greater frequency of the use of weapons, and older age.

(e)

Release from AMP.

(1)

Program Completion Requirements.

(A)

Youth are released from AMP upon successful completion of requirements:

(i)

stages I through V of the AMP program; and

(ii)

phase II of the resocialization program.

(I)

Stage I. Youth must complete a minimum of 15 consecutive days without an aggressive act or credible threat of one; and

(II)

Stages II-V. Youth must:

(-a-)

complete a minimum of 30 consecutive days on each stage without an aggressive act or credible threat of one; and

(-b-)

have 30 days on each stage of program compliance; and

(-c-)

phase II of the resocialization program.

(B)

Program compliance is defined as completion of the resocialization phases (phase components) required for each of the stages as specified in this policy.

(i)

Progress is based on successful completion of the ICP objectives established in each of the five stages of AMP.

(ii)

Progress is assessed by the AMP treatment team consisting of the youth's PSW, the AMP program administrator, AMP psychologist, a JCO staff, and a teacher (or representative of education department.) Additional members may be appointed to the team as needed.

(iii)

The treatment team will staff youth weekly to review progress in the behavioral and treatment objectives.

(iv)

The treatment team will determine the appropriate stage for each youth using compliance with ICP objectives as the criteria. A youth may be retained on or promoted to the next stage based on completing ICP objectives. However, youth may be assigned to a lower stage based only on specific acts of aggressive behavior. The treatment team shall document the reasons used to support their decisions and may make recommendations for modification of the treatment objectives or strategies.

(v)

The treatment team will conduct assessments to determine the youth's resocialization phase at least every 30 days.

(C)

The AMP treatment team will determine when a youth has successfully completed all the criteria for release from the AMP, and the youth shall be released from AMP.

(D)

The superintendent or designee will determine whether the youth will be permanently assigned to the MCSJC general campus program or be referred for placement elsewhere. If the youth is to be transferred, the superintendent or designee will refer the case to the Centralized Placement Unit (CPU) for placement assignment.

(2)

Mental Health Release. Youth may be released from AMP at any time for mental health reasons based on a recommendation by the AMP psychologist and approval by the director of clinical services at MCSJCF.

(f)

Stage Requirements and Conditions. A youth obtains stages in the AMP based upon the following criteria.

(1)

Stage I.

(A)

Youth must complete 15 consecutive days without an aggressive act or the credible threat of one.

(B)

Youth are confined to single occupancy rooms except for periods of highly supervised and structured activity in the self-contained unit.

(C)

Youth will spend up to two hours a day out of the locked room.

(2)

Stage II.

(A)

Youth must complete 30 consecutive days without an aggressive act or credible threat of one.

(B)

Youth must have 30 days of program compliance including successful completion of six components of phase 1 of the resocialization program.

(C)

Youth are confined to single occupancy rooms except for periods of specific, highly supervised, and structured activities with limited numbers of other youth in the self contained program.

(D)

Youth will spend up to four hours a day out of the locked room.

(3)

Stage III.

(A)

Youth must complete 30 consecutive days without an aggressive act or credible threat of one.

(B)

Youth must have 30 days of program compliance including successful completion of all components of phase 1 of the resocialization program.

(C)

Youth are confined to single occupancy rooms except for periods of specific, highly supervised, and structured activities with limited numbers of other youth in the self contained program.

(D)

Youth will spend up to six hours a day out of the locked room.

(4)

Stage IV.

(A)

Youth must complete 30 consecutive days without an aggressive act or credible threat of one.

(B)

Youth are confined to self-contained program and closely supervised.

(C)

Youth begin transition to the general population by attending campus school for half a day and complete all school assignments for specific periods.

(D)

Youth must complete six components of phase 2 of the resocialization program.

(E)

Youth will spend up to eight hours a day out of the locked room.

(5)

Stage V.

(A)

Youth must complete 30 consecutive days without an aggressive act or credible threat of one.

(B)

Youth must successfully complete all components of phase 2 of the Resocialization program.

(C)

Youth are transitioned to the general population for the standard daily schedule and return to AMP only at night.

(D)

Youth will spend up to 14 hours a day out of the locked room.

(g)

Program Components.

(1)

Confined to Rooms. Youth will be confined in their rooms at all times unless otherwise provided for in this policy or if they engage in aggressive or inappropriate conduct.

(2)

Use of Mechanical Restraints. Approved and appropriate mechanical restraints may be used on youth on stage I while not confined to their rooms.

(3)

Locked Doors. Doors to individual rooms may be locked when youth are confined to the rooms.

(4)

Individual Case Plan. Within the first week of admission to AMP, an ICP will be developed for each youth. The plan will consist of behavior modification strategies and treatment objectives necessary to reduce aggressive behavior. The ICP shall be developed and reviewed according to case management standards.

(5)

Education Component. All youth are expected to participate in an individualized educational program for a minimum of four hours per day. Youth that were enrolled in a special education program shall have a temporary Admission Review and Dismissal (ARD) Committee meet and enroll the youth in special education services.

(6)

Individual Counseling.

(A)

Youth in stage I will receive at least one hour a week of individual counseling from either the Primary Service Worker (PSW) or unit psychologist.

(B)

Youth in stage II will receive at least 30 minutes a week of individual counseling from either the PSW or AMP psychologist.

(C)

Youth on stages III-V shall receive individual counseling according to case management standards.

(7)

Group Therapy.

(A)

Group therapy will be offered on stages I-III in the AMP. The emphasis will be on individual resocialization work in stages I and II and on core group in stage III.

(B)

On stages IV and V, the youth will attend core groups.

(8)

Behavior Management. Youth are expected to follow their prescribed schedules and commit no rule violations per (GAP) §95.3 of this title (relating to Rules of Conduct, Contraband, and Dress). Youth will be entitled to earn privileges within the AMP with progression through the stages.

(9)

Physical Exercise.

(A)

Large muscle exercise will be offered to youth daily and will be offered in an exercise yard if safety permits.

(B)

On stage IV and V physical exercise may be held on the general campus.

(10)

Medical and Psychological Treatment.

(A)

The AMP program psychologist will continually assess the mental status of youth to identify any therapeutic contraindications for continued confinement on the unit. If such indications are assessed and with approval by the director of clinical services, the youth shall be released from AMP.

(B)

Youth will be seen by medical and/or psychiatric staff as needed, and treatment will be provided as ordered.

(h)

Program Monitoring and Youth Rights.

(1)

Youth will be seen daily by a caseworker.

(2)

Youth will be offered the opportunity to meet with the youth rights specialist weekly.

(3)

The AMP will be visited daily by the superintendent or assistant superintendent (or their designees) and the director of clinical services or his/her designee.

(i)

Independent Review.

(1)

If a youth remains on any one stage for more than 45 days, his case shall be reviewed by an Independent Review Team (IRT). The IRT shall continue to review the case every 45 days after the initial review until the youth progresses to the next stage.

(2)

The IRT shall include the assistant superintendent and the director of clinical services. Additional members may be appointed as needed.

(3)

The IRT reviews the justification and documentation of the reasons the youth has failed to progress in the program stages and to determine if appropriate interventions are being provided to the youth. The IRT may direct changes in the youth's individual case plan to enhance the youth's ability to progress in the program stages.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on July 3, 2000.

TRD-200004602

Steve Robinson

Executive Director

Texas Youth Commission

Earliest possible date of adoption: August 13, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 424-6244


Part 5. TEXAS BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES

Chapter 145. PAROLE

Subchapter A. PAROLE PROCESS

37 TAC §145.3

The Policy Board of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles proposes amendments to 37 TAC §145.3 concerning Policy Statements Relating to Parole Release Decisions by the Board of Pardons and Paroles. The amendments are proposed in order to reflect the Board's ongoing efforts to have more efficient procedures in place for parole release decisions, including release decisions following revocation of parole or mandatory supervision. The first amendment, proposed by the Policy Board on April 18, 2000, relating to parole release votes which may be withdrawn upon receipt of further information, is to amend paragraph (2)(C) of the rule to clarify the language by deleting the last word, "decision-maker" and replace it with "panel that rendered the decision." The second amendment, proposed by the Policy Board on June 28, 2000, relating to the effect of a revocation on subsequent release on parole, is to amend paragraph (2)(D) to delete the last sentence which contains language that prohibits the release of an inmate who has been revoked for one full year from the in-custody date.

Gerald Garrett, Chair of the Policy Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the amended rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government.

Chairman Garrett has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amended rule is given effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amended rule will be more efficient procedures in the Board's parole release decisions.

There will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons required to comply with the amended rule as proposed.

Comments should be directed to Laura McElroy, General Counsel, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 209 West 14th Street, 5th Floor, Austin, Texas 78701, or to the following electronic mail address: laura.mcelroy@tdcj.state.tx.us. Written comments from the public should be received within 30 days of the publication of the proposed amended rule.

The amendment is proposed under §508.036, Government Code, which grants the Policy Board the power to promulgate rules relating to the decision-making process used by the Board and parole panels, and under §508.044, Government Code, which provides that the Policy Board may adopt reasonable rules as the Policy Board considers proper or necessary relating to the eligibility of an inmate for release on parole or mandatory supervision, the conduct of a parole or mandatory supervision hearing, or conditions to be imposed on a releasee.

There is no cross-reference to the proposed amended rule.

§145.3.Policy Statements Relating to Parole Release Decisions by the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

To aid the Board of Pardons and Paroles in its analysis and research of parole release, the board adopts the following policies.

(1)

(No change.)

(2)

An inmate will be considered for parole when eligible and when the inmate meets the following criteria with regard to behavior during incarceration.

(A)-(B)

(No change.)

(C)

If any inmate who has received an affirmative vote to parole and following the vote, notification is received that the inmate has been reduced below initial classification status or has lost good conduct time, the parole decision will be reviewed and revoted by the parole panel that rendered the decision [ decision-maker ].

(D)

A person who has been revoked and returned to custody for a violation of the conditions of release to parole or mandatory supervision will be considered for release to parole or mandatory supervision when eligible. [ Releasees who have been revoked shall not be released on parole prior to serving 12 calendar months from the return to custody date. ]

(E)-(F)

(No change.)

(3)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on July 3, 2000.

TRD-200004597

Laura McElroy

General Counsel

Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles

Earliest possible date of adoption: August 13, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1883


Subchapter C. REVOCATION OF PAROLE OR MANDATORY SUPERVISION

37 TAC §145.54

The Policy Board of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles proposes an amendment to 37 TAC §145.54(c) concerning motions to reopen revocation hearings. The amendment is proposed in order to reflect the Policy Board's ongoing efforts to have more efficient procedures in place for decision-making following hearings on revocation of parole or mandatory supervision. The amendment, proposed by the Policy Board on June 28, 2000, is to amend subsection (c) to provide that the Chair of the Board may designate a three-member Board panel, other than the panel who made the original revocation decision, to make the decision on a motion to reopen a revocation hearing.

Gerald Garrett, Chair of the Policy Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the amended rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing the section as proposed.

Chairman Garrett has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amended rule is given effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amended rule will be more efficient procedures in the Board's revocation decision-making process.

There will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons required to comply with the amended rule as proposed.

Comments should be directed to Laura McElroy, General Counsel, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 209 West 14th Street, 5th Floor, Austin, Texas 78701, or to the following electronic mail address: laura.mcelroy@tdcj.state.tx.us. Written comments from the public should be received within 30 days of the publication of the proposed amended rule.

The amendment is proposed under §508.036, Government Code, which grants the Policy Board the power to promulgate rules relating to the decision-making process used by the Board and parole panels, and under §508.044, Government Code, which provides that the Policy Board may adopt reasonable rules as the Policy Board considers proper or necessary relating to the eligibility of an inmate for release on parole or mandatory supervision, the conduct of a parole or mandatory supervision hearing, or conditions to be imposed on a releasee.

There is no cross-reference to the proposed amended rule.

§145.54.Releasee's Motion To Reopen Hearing.

(a)-(b)

(No change.)

(c)

On transmittal, a parole panel designated by the chair other than the original panel assumes jurisdiction over the case and [ the board ] shall dispose of the motion by:

(1)

granting of the motion and ordering that the hearing be reopened for a stated specified and limited purpose[ , in which event the case shall be referred to a parole panel ];

(2)-(3)

(No change.)

(d)-(e)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on July 3, 2000.

TRD-200004598

Laura McElroy

General Counsel

Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles

Earliest possible date of adoption: August 13, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1883


Chapter 146. REVOCATION OF PAROLE OR MANDATORY SUPERVISION

37 TAC §146.9

The Policy Board of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles proposes an amendment to 37 TAC §146.9(a), (b), and (c) concerning revocation hearings. The amendment is proposed in order to reflect the Policy Board's ongoing efforts to have more efficient procedures in place for hearings and decisions on revocation of parole or mandatory supervision. The amendment, proposed by the Policy Board on June 28, 2000, is to amend subsection (a) to provide that the hearing officer may take mitigation information regarding a releasee's adjustment while on parole at any time during the hearing, in order to provide the Board panel with all the relevant information in order to make a decision. The Policy Board proposes to strike subsection (b). In addition, to update rule language, the Policy Board proposes to amend subsection (c) in order to strike "director of paroles, hearings, and clemency" and to insert "board administrator."

Gerald Garrett, Chair of the Policy Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the amended rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing the section as proposed.

Chairman Garrett has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amended rule is given effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the amended rule will be more efficient procedures in the Board's revocation decision-making process.

There will be no effect on small businesses or micro-businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons required to comply with the amended rule as proposed.

Comments should be directed to Laura McElroy, General Counsel, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, 209 West 14th Street, 5th Floor, Austin, Texas 78701, or to the following electronic mail address: laura.mcelroy@tdcj.state.tx.us. Written comments from the public should be received within 30 days of the publication of the proposed amended rule.

The amendment is proposed under §508.036, Government Code, which grants the Policy Board the power to promulgate rules relating to the decision-making process used by the Board and parole panels, and under §508.044, Government Code, which provides that the Policy Board may adopt reasonable rules as the Policy Board considers proper or necessary relating to the eligibility of an inmate for release on parole or mandatory supervision, the conduct of a parole or mandatory supervision hearing, or conditions to be imposed on a releasee.

There is no cross-reference to the proposed amended rule.

§146.9.Revocation Hearing.

(a)

The parole panel or designee of the board shall conduct the revocation hearing. The purpose of the revocation hearing is to consider the evidence offered pursuant to an allegation of a violation of a condition of parole or mandatory supervision and to consider adjustment information . The parole panel or designee of the board must determine whether it is shown by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the releasee violated a condition of parole or mandatory supervision.

[(b)

The revocation hearing shall not proceed to the mitigation phase unless it is determined by the parole panel or designee of the board by a preponderance of the credible evidence that the releasee did violate a condition of parole or mandatory supervision.]

(b)

[ (c) ] At the close of the hearing or within a reasonable time thereafter, the parole panel or designee of the board shall collect, prepare and forward to a parole panel or to the board administrator [ director of paroles, hearings, and clemency ], if the hearing was held pursuant to the Interstate Compact Agreement:

(1)

all documents and exhibits offered or admitted into evidence at the hearing;

(2)

a summary report of the hearing separately setting out findings of fact relative to the alleged violation of a condition of parole or mandatory supervision, based on a preponderance of the credible evidence, which includes statements of the evidence relied upon in reaching said finding; and

(3)

the tape recording of the hearing.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on July 3, 2000.

TRD-200004599

Laura McElroy

General Counsel

Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles

Earliest possible date of adoption: August 13, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1883