Part 1.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Chapter 1.
ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION
Subchapter C. PERSONNEL AND EMPLOYMENT POLICIES
37 TAC §1.38
(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for
repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of
the Texas Department of Public Safety or in the Texas Register office, Room
245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes the
repeal of §1.38, concerning Personnel Complaint Policy. The repeal of §1.38
is deemed necessary to implement changes resulting from the passage of Senate
Bill 370 by the 76th Texas Legislature. This repeal is being proposed simultaneously
with a proposal to adopt a new §1.38 that will better inform the public
of the Department's personnel complaint policies.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the repeal is in effect there will be no fiscal implications
for state or local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the repeal is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the repeal will be clarification of department policy. There is no anticipated
economic cost to individuals. There is no anticipated economic cost to small
or large businesses.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The repeal is proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.006(4),
which provides the director with the authority to adopt rules, subject to
commission approval, considered necessary for the control of the department.
This repeal affects Texas Government Code, §411.006(4).
§1.38.Personnel Complaint Policy.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908980
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
The Texas Department of Public Safety
proposes new §1.38, concerning Personnel Complaint Policy. The justification
for this section is to implement changes made to Texas Government Code, §411.0195
as a result of the passage of Senate Bill 370 by the 76th Texas Legislature.
This section describes the department's current procedures by which complaints
are filed and resolved by the department and methods by which consumers and
service recipients are notified of the name, mailing address, and telephone
number of the department for the purpose of directing complaints to the department.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications
to state or local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
or administering the rule will be clarification of department policy on how
to initiate personnel complaints. There is no anticipated economic cost to
individuals. There is no anticipated economic cost to small or large businesses.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The new section is proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.0195
which states the director, by rule, shall establish methods by which consumers
and service recipients are notified of the name, mailing address, and telephone
number of the department for the purpose of directing complaints to the department.
Texas Government Code, §411.0195 is affected by this proposal.
§1.38.Personnel Complaint Policy.
(a)
Purpose. The purpose of these rules is to set out how and
where to file a complaint about the actions or behavior of an employee of
the Texas Department of Public Safety in compliance with Texas Government
Code §411.0195.
(b)
Applicability. The policies and procedures described in
this subchapter apply only to complaints made against an employee of the department
either by another employee of the department or by a member of the public.
(c)
Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in
this subchapter, shall have the following meanings unless the context in which
the word or term is used clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
Complaint - a written statement of allegations against
an employee of the department made by a member of the public or another department
employee which alleges one or more of the following:
(A)
an infraction of department rules, regulations, or policies;
or
(B)
an illegal act.
(2)
Complainant - a person who files a complaint.
(3)
Department - the Texas Department of Public Safety.
(d)
Filing a Complaint.
(1)
Persons desiring to make a complaint must understand the
importance of submitting their complaint in writing with signature affixed.
(The Texas Government Code §614.022 provides that all complaints to be
considered on law enforcement officers must be made in writing and signed
by the person making the complaint.) If a complainant makes a complaint orally
or by e-mail, he or she will be requested to submit the complaint in writing
with their signature affixed, and given the necessary form and instructions
to file the complaint. Complaint forms may be obtained from any department
office or on the internet at the department's web page (www.txdps.state.tx.us).
(2)
The completed and signed complaint may be filed with
the employee's supervisor by United States mail or personal delivery, or by
United States mail at Texas Department of Public Safety, Internal Affairs
Unit, Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0160.
(3)
The name, mailing address, and telephone number of
the person to whom the complaint should be directed may be obtained by calling:
(A)
the department at its headquarters in Austin, Texas at
(512) 424-2000, or
(B)
by contacting any department office.
(4)
A complaint should contain the following information:
(A)
name, mailing address, and telephone number of the complainant;
(B)
the name of the employee about which the complaint is being
filed or sufficient information to enable the department to identify the employee;
and
(C)
a concise statement of the nature of the complaint, including
all relevant facts.
(5)
A summary of the department's complaint investigation
process is available on the department's web page. A copy will be provided
to any person who requests a complaint form or files a written complaint.
(e)
Complaint Investigation and Resolution Procedures.
(1)
A complete description of the department's complaint investigation,
resolution, and appeal procedures may be found in Chapter 7A of the Department's
General Manual which is on file with the Texas State Library located in Austin,
Texas. A summary of this information is available on the department's web
site.
(2)
All written complaints filed with the department will
be investigated thoroughly, objectively, and expeditiously. The complainant
will be notified that the complaint is to be investigated, and the complainant
will be contacted personally by the investigator if at all possible to discuss
the complaint allegations in detail.
(3)
The complainant and employee will be informed in writing
of the resolution of the complaint.
(4)
If the complaint investigation process is not complete
within 90 days of the complaint being filed, the complainant and the employee
will be notified of the complaint's status on a quarterly basis until final
resolution.
(f)
Anonymous or Unwritten Complaints. A complainant refusing
to file a written complaint or who makes an anonymous complaint, does not
necessarily prevent an investigation from being initiated on the facts provided.
However, unwritten or anonymous complaints do cause the matter to be more
difficult to process to an effective conclusion.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908981
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §1.251
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes new §1.251,
concerning Disposition of Forfeited Asset. The new section promulgates the
Public Safety Commission's policy and procedure to approve the Department
of Public Safety's (DPS) disposition or other use of an asset forfeited to
the department under federal or state law. The department must obtain prior
commission approval before disposing of any asset except tangible property,
such as a vehicle, firearm, or cellular telephone. The commission delegates
its authority to approve disposition of tangible property to a major division
chief if a report of the dispositions is made annually to the commission.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first-five
year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications as
a result of enforcing or administering the rule.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rule will be to ensure oversight by the Public Safety Commission of all
expenditures and other uses of a forfeited asset by the department. There
is no anticipated economic cost to individuals or to small or large businesses.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The new section is proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work and pursuant to specific mandate and
authority of Senate Bill 370 (Acts 76th Legislature, Regular Session, Chapter
1189, codified as Government Code, §411.0131).
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and §411.0131 are affected
by this proposal.
§1.251.Public Safety Commission Approval of Disposition of a Forfeited Asset.
(a)
The following words and terms, when used in this subchapter,
shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
(1)
Asset - refers to currency, a negotiable instrument, real
property, tangible property, or other non-tangible property forfeited to the
department under state or federal law. The term does not include controlled
substance property or other contraband summarily forfeited or destroyed by
the department under Health and Safety Code, Chapters 481-485.
(2)
Disposition - refers to the use, transfer, sale, expenditure,
or other disposition of an asset.
(b)
Except as provided by Subsections (f) and (g) of this section,
the department shall obtain commission approval of a proposed asset disposition.
(c)
If the intended disposition involves an asset other than
tangible property, the director or his designee shall submit a written request
to the commission for approval.
(d)
The written request shall include a description of the
asset and its intended use.
(e)
Before approving the disposition, the commission shall
consider:
(1)
how the disposition supports priorities established by
the legislature in the department's strategic plan; and
(2)
whether the disposition complies with applicable state
and federal guidelines.
(f)
The commission, by this rule, delegates to each major division
chief its authority to approve the disposition of a forfeited asset that is
tangible property.
(g)
An annual report will be submitted to the commission detailing
the disposition of all assets that are tangible property. This report shall
include a statement of:
(1)
how the disposition supports priorities established by
the legislature in the department's strategic plan; and
(2)
whether the disposition complies with applicable state
and federal guidelines.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908982
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
Subchapter A. LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
37 TAC §15.6, §15.7
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes amendments
to §15.6 and §15.7, concerning Licensing Requirements. Amendment
to §15.6 changes the cubic centimeter piston displacement of a motorcycle
that a 15 year old applicant, provided other requirements are met, may operate
from 125cc to 250cc. Amendment to §15.7 changes the $50 reinstatement
fee to a "statutory" reinstatement fee (currently $100). The amendments are
necessary in order for the department to comply with Senate Bill 370 and House
Bill 1492 passed during the 76th Texas Legislature, 1999.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the rules are in effect there will be a positive impact to
state government due to the increase in reinstatement fee from $50 to $100.
The anticipated increase in revenue for year 2000 is $11,464,529.00; the increase
for year 2001 is $11,829,614.00; for year 2002, the increase is $12,210,871.00;
for year 2003, the increase is $12,609,089.000; and for year 2004, the increase
is $12,979,975.00. There is no anticipated impact on local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rules will be to allow for the operation of a motorcycle that is better
suited to be driven on public streets and highways and to clarify what the
required reinstatement fee is. There is no anticipated cost to small or large
businesses. The cost to individuals who are required to comply with the section
as proposed will be the required statutory reinstatement fee.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules, considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work, and Texas Transportation Code, §521.005.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §521.005
are affected by this proposal.
§15.6.Motorcycle License.
A motorcycle license authorizes the driving of a motorcycle or motor-assisted
bicycle. Three types of motorcycle licenses are issued. One is for all motorcycles
of any size engine; one is for motor-driven cycles of
250
[
(1)
Motorcycle. Requires a Class M license.
(A)
This authorizes operation of all motorcycles, motor-driven
cycles, and mopeds.
(B)
The minimum age is 16 years with completion of the classroom
phase of driver education and the Department-Approved Basic Motorcycle Operator
Training Course or Minor's Restricted Driver's License (MRDL) approval.
(2)
Motor-Driven Cycle. Requires restricted Class
M license.
(A)
The minimum age is 15 years with completion of the classroom
phase of driver education and the Department-Approved Basic Motorcycle Operator
Training Course or Minor's Restricted Driver's License (MRDL) approval.
(B)
The Class M license will be restricted to driving a motor-driven
cycle with
250
[
(3)
Moped. Requires restricted Class M license.
(A)
The minimum age is 15 years with parent or guardian authorization
and pass the vision and written test. No road test is required.
(B)
The Class M license will be restricted to driving a moped
(Code K).
§15.7.Occupational License (Essential Need).
(a)
An occupational license authorizes the driving of any motor
vehicle subject to the restrictions imposed and is a special license issued
without photograph by the Driver Improvement and Control Bureau in Austin
upon authorization by a district court or county court. It may authorize the
driving of any motor vehicle:
(1)
in the performance of an occupation or trade or transportation
to and from such occupation or trade;
(2)
for transportation to and from an educational facility
in which the person is enrolled; or
(3)
in the performance of essential household duties.
(b)
The person issued an occupational license is required to
carry a certified copy of the court order showing the restrictions imposed
by the court along with the license issued by Driver Improvement and Control
Bureau and is required to show the court order and license to a peace officer
on request.
(c)
The basic requirements for the issuance of an occupational
license are:
(1)
a certified copy of petition and a copy of a legally issued
certified court order finding an essential need for operating a motor vehicle
as provided in subsection (a) of this section and setting forth the conditions
for such driving; and
(2)
the filing of an SR-22 and the maintenance of such
proof of financial responsibility.
(d)
The fee is $10 for one year. If the suspension is an automatic
suspension or a safety responsibility suspension which has become effective,
an additional
statutory
reinstatement fee[
(e)
The expiration date will be shown on the license and will
be the first of the following dates, unless further extended by the court:
(1)
when the suspension ends; or
(2)
as determined by court order.
(f)
A certified copy of the court order by itself may be used
as a restricted license for a period of 30 days from the date of the order.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908984
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §15.57
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes an amendment
to §15.57, concerning Examination Requirements. Amendment to the section
changes the cubic centimeter piston displacement of a motorcycle that a 15-year-old
applicant, provided other requirements are met, may operate from 125cc to
250cc.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications
to state or local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five year
period the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of
enforcing the rule will be to allow for the operation of a motorcycle by 15
year old applicants that is better suited to be driven on public streets and
highways. There is no anticipated economic cost to individuals or to small
or large businesses.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules, considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work, and Texas Transportation Code, §521.005.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §521.005
are affected by this proposal.
§15.57.Restrictions, Physical.
Performance on the driving test generally establishes what effect physical
disabilities may have on an applicant's driving. To assist the examining officer
in arriving at a competent judgment, disabilities that are often encountered
and the aids that are generally considered applicable for such conditions
are outlined as follows.
(1)-(2)
(No change.)
(3)
Vehicle restrictions and endorsements.
(A)
Unusual vehicles. If a motorcycle, motor-driven cycle,
or other motor vehicle of unusual design which requires altogether different
basic skills for driving is used for taking the road test, the applicant will
be restricted to such vehicle.
(B)
Horsepower. Driver's licenses issued to minors ages 15
to 18 on the basis of parental authorization only are restricted to "motorcycle
only not to exceed
250
[
(4)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908978
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §§15.111, 15.112, 15.114, 15.116-15.119
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes amendments
to §§15.111, 15.112, 15.114, and 15.116-15.119, concerning Denial
of Renewal of Driver's License for Failure to Appear for Traffic Violation.
Amendments to the sections add additional offenses/violations for which a
person may be denied renewal of their driver license for failure to appear
to pay a fine involving an offense within justice and municipal court jurisdictions.
The amendments are necessary in order for the department to comply with House
Bill 2802 passed during the 76th Texas Legislature, 1999.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the rules are in effect there will be a positive fiscal impact
on state and local government. However, based on the number of additional
offenses added to this program and the fact that the department does not have
access to these figures, we are not able to calculate the increase in revenues.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rules will be to allow for a more efficient process for the courts to
administer their failure to appear or payment of fines programs. There is
no anticipated economic cost to small or large businesses. The anticipated
cost to individuals who are required to comply with the sections as proposed
will be the approximately $30 administration cost imposed by the courts.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules, considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work, and Texas Transportation Code, §706.012.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §706.012
are affected by this proposal.
§15.111.Purpose and Scope.
This section applies to denial of license renewal for failure to appear
reported to the department under authority of Texas Transportation Code, Chapter
706, based on
a complaint, citation, or court order to pay a traffic
fine involving:
[
(1)
a violation of a traffic law;
(2)
an offense under Texas Transportation
Code, §543.009(b);
(3)
an offense under Penal Code, §38.10,
if the underlying offense is a traffic offense; or
(4)
any other offense that a justice
or municipal court has jurisdiction of under Code of Criminal Procedure, Article
4.11 or 4.14.
§15.112.Authority To Enter Interlocal Contract.
A political subdivision may contract with the department to provide
information necessary for the department to deny renewal of the driver's license
of a person who has failed to appear for a complaint, citation, or court order
to pay a fine involving
an offense listed in §15.111 of this title
(relating to Purpose and Scope)
[
§15.114.Originating Court To File Failure To Appear Report.
If a person violated a promise to appear for
an offense listed
in §15.111 of this title (relating to Purpose and Scope)
[
(1)
the name of the political subdivision submitting the report;
(2)
the jurisdiction in which the alleged offense occurred;
(3)
the name, date of birth, and the Texas driver's license
number of the person alleged to have committed the [
(4)
the date of the alleged violation;
(5)
the offense title or a brief description of the alleged
[
(6)
a statement that the person promised to appear and
failed to appear as promised, and the date on which the person failed to appear;
and
(7)
any other information required by the department.
§15.116.Local [
If the [
§15.117.When Denial May Be Imposed.
On receipt of the necessary information from the political subdivision,
the department may deny renewal of the person's driver's license for failure
to appear based on a complaint, citation, or court order to pay a fine involving
a violation of
an offense listed in §15.111 of this title (relating
to Purpose and Scope)
[
§15.118.Clearance Report.
A clearance report is required to be filed by the political subdivision
when there is no cause to continue to deny renewal of a person's driver's
license based on the person's previous failure to appear[
(1)
the name of the political subdivision submitting the report;
(2)
the jurisdiction in which offense occurred;
(3)
the name, date of birth, and the Texas driver's license
number of the person alleged to have committed the
offense
[
(4)
the date of the alleged violation;
(5)
the offense title or a brief description of the alleged
[
(6)
the basis for the clearance;
(7)
whether a fee was required;
(8)
whether a required fee was paid; and
(9)
any other information required by the department.
§15.119.Clearance Report When No Fee Is Required.
(a)
If the court finds that the license holder has established
good cause for having previously failed to appear, the court shall file an
appropriate clearance report to the department without requiring the license
holder to pay a fee. For purposes of this section, "good cause" means a reasonable
excuse such as would constitute a defense to a criminal prosecution for failure
to appear. Examples of good cause are: death of a close family member; a serious,
sudden accident or illness; required military service; or confinement.
(b)
If the person who failed to appear is acquitted of the
underlying traffic charge for which the failure to appear report was filed,
the court shall file an appropriate clearance report without requiring the
license holder to pay a fee. Acquittal means an official fact-finding made
in the context of the adversary proceeding by an individual or group of individuals
with the legal authority to decide the question of guilt or innocence. For
purposes of this section, acquittal also includes a dismissal by the court
upon proof of actual innocence. A person is not considered to have been acquitted
of the traffic charge if the court imposes any conditions upon dismissal of
the traffic complaint, such as penalties, court costs, educational programs,
a period of probation, or any other sanction. For purposes of this section,
a person is not considered to have been acquitted, and the prescribed administrative
fee shall apply, in all cases that are dismissed under [
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908983
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §25.18
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes an amendment
to §25.18, concerning Fees. Amendment to the section deletes subsection
(a), reformats subsection (b) and changes the section title. The amendment
removes unnecessary language and changes the $50 reinstatement fee to "statutory"
reinstatement fee. The amendment is necessary in order for the department
to comply with Senate Bill 370 passed during the 76th Texas Legislature, 1999.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the rule is in effect there will be a positive impact to
state government due to the increase in reinstatement fee from $50 to $100.
The anticipated increase in revenue for year 2000 is $11,464,529.00; the increase
for year 2001 is $11,829,614.00; for year 2002, the increase is $12,210,871.00;
for year 2003, the increase is $12,609,089.00; and for year 2004, the increase
is $12,979,975.00. There is no anticipated impact on local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rule will be to clarify what the required reinstatement fee is. There
is no anticipated cost to small or large businesses. The cost to individuals
who are required to comply with the section as proposed will be the required
statutory reinstatement fee.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules, considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work, and Texas Transportation Code, §521.005.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §521.005
are affected by this proposal.
Reinstatement
[
[
No statutory filing fee is
required if:]
[
financial responsibility by insurance is shown;]
[
the party was legally parked or stopped;]
[
nonconsent applies to the owner;]
[
the party is not the owner of the vehicle;]
[
the accident occurred on private property;]
[
the parties are exempted from paying the
fee by reason of governmental immunity;]
[
there is an affidavit of no suspended
items; or]
[
there is no probability of judgment.]
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on
December 22, 1999.
TRD-9908976
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §§29.1-29.49, 29.101-29.157
(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for
repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices
of the Texas Department of Public Safety or in the Texas Register office,
Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes the
repeal of §§29.1-29.49 and §§29.101-29.157 concerning
Practice and Procedure. The sections are proposed for repeal because the department
no longer conducts its own formal administrative hearings. The State Office
of Administrative Hearings, pursuant to statutory authority, now conducts
these hearings. The repeal of these sections removes those rules which are
duplicated elsewhere or which conflict with other statutory or regulatory
provisions. This action is being filed simultaneously with a proposal for
new §§29.1-29.34 which provide general procedures for administrative
hearings held under Texas Transportation Code, Chapters 548, 643, and 644.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the repeals are in effect there will be no fiscal implications
to state or local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five-year
period the repeals are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result
of enforcing the repeal will be the removal of obsolete or duplicative rules
and an overall improvement in the accessibility and clarity of the adopted
rules. There is no anticipated economic cost to individuals. There is no anticipated
economic cost to small or large businesses.
Comments on the repeal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of Legal
Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0140,
(512) 424-2890.
The repeals are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work and Texas Transportation Code, §§548.002,
643.003, and 644.003.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §§548.002,
643.003 and 644.003 are affected by these repeals.
§29.1.Definitions.
§29.2.Object.
§29.3.Scope.
§29.4.Filing of Documents.
§29.5.Computation of Time.
§29.6.Agreements To Be in Writing.
§29.7.Service in Rulemaking Proceedings.
§29.8.Service in Nonrulemaking Proceedings.
§29.9.Conduct and Decorum.
§29.10.Classification of Parties.
§29.11.Parties in Interest.
§29.12.Appearances Personally or by Representative.
§29.13.Classification of Pleadings.
§29.14.Form and Content of Pleadings.
§29.15.Examination by the Director.
§29.16.Motions.
§29.17.Amendments.
§29.18.Incorporation by Reference of Agency Records.
§29.19.Licenses.
§29.20.Contested Proceedings.
§29.21.Personal Service.
§29.22.Prehearing Conference.
§29.23.Motions for Postponement, Continuance, Withdrawal, or Dismissal of Applications or Other Matters before the Commission or the Agency.
§29.24.Place and Nature of Hearings.
§29.25.Presiding Officer.
§29.26.Order of Procedure.
§29.27.Reporters and Transcript.
§29.28.Formal Exceptions.
§29.29.Dismissal without Hearing.
§29.30.Rules of Evidence.
§29.31.Documentary Evidence and Official Notice.
§29.32.Prepared Testimony.
§29.33.Limitations on Number of Witnesses.
§29.34.Exhibits.
§29.35.Offer of Proof.
§29.36.Depositions.
§29.37.Proposals for Decision.
§29.38.Filing of Exceptions, Briefs, and Replies.
§29.39.Form and Content of Briefs, Exceptions, and Replies.
§29.40.Oral Argument.
§29.41.Final Decisions and Orders.
§29.42.Administrative Finality.
§29.43.Motions for Rehearing.
§29.44.Rendering of Final Decision or Order.
§29.45.The Record.
§29.46.Ex Parte Consultations.
§29.47.Suspension of Rules.
§29.48.Amendments to Rules.
§29.49.Effective Date.
§29.101.Definitions.
§29.102.Scope.
§29.103.Institution of Penalty Proceeding.
§29.104.Filing of Documents.
§29.105.Computation of Time.
§29.106.Agreements To Be in Writing.
§29.107.Service of Notice of Hearing.
§29.108.Service of Pleadings and Motions.
§29.109.Conduct and Decorum.
§29.110.Classification of Parties.
§29.111.Parties-in-Interest.
§29.112.Appearances Personally or by Representative.
§29.113.Classification of Pleadings.
§29.114.Form and Content of Pleadings.
§29.115.Examination by the Judge.
§29.116.Motions.
§29.117.Amendments.
§29.118.Incorporation by Reference to Department Records.
§29.119.Consolidation.
§29.120.Informal Disposition.
§29.121.Prehearing Conference.
§29.122.Motions for Postponement, Continuance, Withdrawal, Dismissal, or Other Matters.
§29.123.Venue.
§29.124.Presiding Officer.
§29.125.Order of Procedure.
§29.126.Reporters and Transcription.
§29.127.Formal Exceptions.
§29.128.Dismissal without Hearing.
§29.129.Rules of Evidence.
§29.130.Documentary Evidence and Official Notice.
§29.131.Prepared Testimony.
§29.132.Limitations on Number of Witnesses.
§29.133.Exhibits.
§29.134.Offer of Proof.
§29.135.Discovery-General.
§29.136.Depositions.
§29.137.Admissions of Facts and Genuineness of Documents.
§29.138.Interrogatories.
§29.139.Discovery and Production for Inspection.
§29.140.Discovery Motions and Sanctions.
§29.141.Subpoena.
§29.142.Failure To Attend Hearing; Default Judgment.
§29.143.Entry of Appearance; Continuance.
§29.144.Proposal for Decision.
§29.145.Proof of Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Expenses of the State.
§29.146.Filing of Exceptions, Briefs, and Replies.
§29.147.Form and Content of Briefs, Exceptions, and Replies.
§29.148.Final Decisions and Orders.
§29.149.Administrative Finality.
§29.150.Motions for Rehearing.
§29.151.Rendering of Final Decision or Order.
§29.152.Judicial Review.
§29.153.The Record.
§29.154.Certified Record.
§29.155.Ex Parte Consultations.
§29.156.Conflicts.
§29.157.Effective Date.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on
December 22, 1999.
TRD-9908987
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §§29.1-29.34
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes new §§29.1-29.34,
concerning Practice and Procedure. The new sections provide general procedures
for administrative hearings held under Texas Transportation Code, Chapters
548 and 644. These chapters require hearings on denial, revocation or suspension
of certification of inspection stations and inspectors; and hearings on administrative
penalties assessed against commercial motor carriers for violations of motor
carrier rules. The new sections are proposed simultaneously with the repeal
of current §§29.1-29.49 and 29.101-29.157.
The new sections are necessary to accurately reflect current law and agency
practices with regard to contested cases. The current rules are out of date
and no longer used because the department does not conduct its own formal
hearings as was the case when the rules were originally adopted in 1976. Date
conflict with other rules and those of the State Office of Administrative
Hearings (SOAH), causing confusion concerning their applicability. The proposed
rules apply to Motor Carrier Hearings and Vehicle Inspection Hearings that
are held before SOAH. The proposed rules remove unnecessary duplication of
applicable SOAH rules and statutory provisions of the Texas Administrative
Procedures Act. The proposed rules also supplement SOAH rules on these contested
cases in order to more adequately address department-specific issues such
as manner of service, notices of hearing, and informal dispositions.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the new sections are in effect there will be no fiscal implications
for state or local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rules will be rules that are more streamlined and less confusing. There
is no anticipated economic cost to individuals. There is no anticipated economic
cost to small or large businesses.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The new sections are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work and Texas Transportation Code, §§548.002
and 644.003, which authorize the department to adopt rules to administer and
enforce programs regulating vehicle inspection stations and inspectors, and
commercial motor vehicle safety standards.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §§548.002
and 644.003 are affected by this proposal.
§29.1.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have
the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)
APA-refers to The Administrative Procedures Act, Texas
Government Code §2001.001, et seq.
(2)
Contested case-refers to a contested case as defined
by APA.
(3)
Department-refers to the Department of Public Safety.
(4)
Director-refers to the director of the Department
of Public Safety or the designee of the director.
(5)
Intervenor-refers to any party not otherwise defined.
(6)
Judge-refers to the administrative law judge or hearing
examiner assigned to hear a contested case and prepare a proposal for decision
for the director or the director's designee.
(7)
Movant-refers to the party who files a motion.
(8)
Non-movant-refers to any party other than the party
filing a motion.
(9)
Party-refers to each person or agency named or admitted
in a contested case.
(10)
Petitioner-refers to the party classification of
the department after it has instituted a contested case.
(11)
Respondent-refers to a party against whom a contested
case has been instituted by the department.
(12)
SOAH- refers to the State Office of Administrative
Hearings.
§29.2.Scope.
These rules shall govern the procedure for the institution, conduct
and determination of all contested cases arising under the department's jurisdiction
with the exception of cases arising under Texas Transportation Code, Chapters
521, 522, 524, and 724. These rules do not apply to internal personnel matters
of the department.
§29.3.Institution of a Contested Case.
(a)
A contested case shall be instituted by the department
after a person has requested a hearing or declined a penalty.
(b)
Upon receipt of a setting for a hearing in a contested
case, the department shall serve a notice of hearing upon the respondent.
(c)
A notice of hearing shall include the following:
(1)
a statement of the nature of the hearing;
(2)
a statement of the date, time, and place of the hearing;
(3)
a statement of the legal authority and jurisdiction
under which a hearing is to be held;
(4)
a reference to the particular sections of the statutes
and rules involved;
(5)
a short, plain statement of the matters asserted,
including the recommended penalty or action;
(6)
the following language in capital letters in at least
10-point boldface type: "YOUR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE HEARING WILL RESULT
IN THE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST YOU SET OUT IN THIS NOTICE BEING ADMITTED AS TRUE,
AND THE RELIEF SOUGHT IN THIS NOTICE OF HEARING MAY BE GRANTED BY DEFAULT";
and
(7)
the language provided under §29.11(e) of this
title (relating to Entry of Appearance; Continuance).
(d)
After a hearing has been set, any party may move for appropriate
relief, including, but not limited to, prehearing conferences, discovery,
evidentiary rulings, continuances, and settings.
(e)
A notice of hearing shall be served in accordance with
the procedure set out in §29.5 (relating to Service of Notice of Hearing
for Contested Cases-Motor Carrier) or §29.6 (relating to Service of Notice
of Hearing for Contested Cases-Other) of this title. An amended notice of
hearing may be served in accordance with §29.9 of this title (relating
to Service of Pleadings and Motions).
§29.4.Agreements To Be in Writing.
No stipulation of agreement between the parties, their attorneys or
representatives, with regard to any matter involved in any proceeding under
this title shall be enforced unless it shall have been reduced to writing
and signed by the parties or their authorized representatives, or unless it
shall have been dictated into the record by them during the course of a hearing,
or incorporated in an order bearing their written approval. This section does
not limit a party's ability to waive, modify, or stipulate any right or privilege
afforded by these rules, unless precluded by law.
§29.5.Service of Notice of Hearing for Contested Cases-Motor Carrier.
(a)
Registered motor carriers: A notice of hearing shall be
served on a respondent who is a motor carrier that is registered with the
Texas Department of Transportation by certified mail, return receipt requested,
or by personal delivery at:
(1)
the last known address as reflected in the records or investigation
of the department, or
(2)
an alternative address specified in writing to the
department by the respondent or the respondent's authorized representative
after receipt of a notice of claim under §3.62 of this title (relating
to Regulations Governing Transportation Safety), or
(3)
the address registered by the motor carrier with the
Texas Department of Transportation.
(b)
Unregistered motor carriers and other persons. A notice
of hearing shall be served on a person who is an unregistered motor carrier
or other person subject to administrative penalties under Texas Transportation
Code, Chapter 644, by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by personal
delivery, and addressed to the last known address of the motor carrier or
other person as reflected in the records of investigation of the department.
(c)
Commercial driver's license. A notice of hearing shall
be served on a person who holds a commercial driver's license and is subject
to administrative penalties under Texas Transportation Code, Chapter 644,
by serving the notice on the last known address provided to the department
or other governmental authority that issued the license by certified mail,
return receipt requested, or personal delivery.
§29.6.Service of Notice of Hearing for Contested Cases-Other.
A notice of hearing shall be served on a respondent by certified mail,
return receipt requested, or by personal delivery, and addressed to at least
one of the following:
(1)
if respondent is an individual, the last known address
of the respondent;
(2)
if respondent is a corporation, the legal agent for
service of process at the address registered with the Texas Secretary of State;
or
(3)
the last known address of the respondent as reflected
in the records or investigation of the department.
§29.7.Notice of hearing.
(a)
Service. A notice of hearing shall be served by the department
after SOAH has issued a setting. Service of the notice of hearing by mail
shall be complete upon deposit of the notice enclosed in a post-paid and properly
addressed envelope in a post office or official depository under the care
and custody of the United States Postal Service. Service by personal delivery
shall be complete at the time of delivery.
(b)
Certification. A certification filed by an authorized representative
of the department certifying that the notice of hearing was served in accordance
with this section shall be filed with SOAH and constitute prima facie evidence
of service in compliance with this rule.
§29.8.Computation of Time.
Unless otherwise required by statute, in computing time periods prescribed
by this chapter or by a judge's order, the day of the act, event, or default
on which the designated period of time begins to run is not included. The
last day of the period is included, unless it is a Saturday, a Sunday, or
an official State holiday. When these rules specify a deadline or set a number
of days for filing documents or taking other actions, the computation of time
shall be by calendar days rather than business days, unless otherwise provided
in this chapter or a judge's order. However, if the period to act is five
days or less, the intervening Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays are not
counted.
§29.9.Service of Pleadings and Motions.
(a)
After the institution of proceedings, all pleadings, pleas,
motions, discovery requests and any other documents that are filed or served
by respondents and/or intervenors on the department, or any employee of the
department, shall be served on the department's named attorney of record at
the address identified in the notice of hearing or complaint.
(b)
All pleadings, pleas, or motions shall be served by certified
mail, return receipt requested, facsimile transmission, personal delivery,
or overnight carrier.
§29.10.Parties-in-Interest.
Any party-in-interest may appear in any contested case. All appearances
shall be subject to a motion to strike upon a showing that the party has no
justifiable or administratively cognizable interest in the proceeding. An
appearance under this section shall be filed at least 15 days in advance of
the hearing date and shall include a statement that identifies the party's
cognizable interest in the proceeding.
§29.11.Entry of Appearance; Continuance.
(a)
The respondent shall enter an appearance within 30 days
of the date on which the notice of hearing is provided to the respondent.
(b)
For purposes of this section, an entry of appearance means
the filing of a written answer or other responsive pleading with SOAH.
(c)
For purposes of this section, notice of hearing is provided
to a respondent on the date of deposit in the United States mail of a registered
or certified letter, return receipt requested, containing the notice of hearing,
or if provided by personal service, the date of personal delivery of the notice
of hearing.
(d)
The failure of a party to timely enter an appearance as
provided in this section shall entitle the petitioner to a continuance if
so requested.
(e)
The notice of hearing shall include the following language
in capital letters in at least 10-point boldface type: "YOUR FAILURE TO ENTER
AN APPEARANCE BY FILING A WRITTEN ANSWER OR RESPONSE TO THE ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED
IN THIS NOTICE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE DATE THIS NOTICE WAS MAILED OR PERSONALLY
DELIVERED TO YOU SHALL ENTITLE THE DEPARTMENT TO RESCHEDULE THE HEARING OF
THIS CASE UNTIL A LATER DATE AS SET BY THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE. ANY COSTS
INCURRED IN RESCHEDULING THE HEARING MAY BE ASSESSED AGAINST YOU."
§29.12.Appearances Personally or by Representative.
Any individual may represent himself or herself, or may be represented
by an attorney authorized to practice law in the State of Texas, or by a bona
fide full-time employee. A corporation, partnership or association may appear
and be represented by any bona fide officer, partner or full-time employee.
The judge may require any person appearing in a representative capacity to
provide such evidence of authority as the judge deems necessary.
§29.13.Sufficiency of Pleadings.
(a)
Upon the filing of any pleading, the judge shall examine
the same and determine its sufficiency under these rules. If the judge finds
that the pleading does not comply in all material respects with these rules,
SOAH's rules, or the APA, the judge shall return the pleading to the party
who filed it, along with a statement of the reasons for rejecting the same.
The party who filed such pleading shall thereafter have the right to file
a corrected pleading; provided that the filing of such corrected pleading
shall not be permitted to delay any hearing unless the judge shall determine
that such delay is necessary in order to prevent injustice or to protect the
public interest and welfare.
(b)
The judge shall direct all parties to enter their appearances
on the record. If exceptions to the form or sufficiency of a pleading have
been filed in writing at least three days prior to the date of hearing, they
shall be heard; otherwise not. If exceptions are sustained, the judge shall
allow a reasonable time for amendment, subject to the provisions of subsection
(a) of this section and §29.15 of this title (relating to Trial Amendments).
§29.14.Motions.
Any motion relating to a pending contested case shall, unless made
during a hearing, be written, and shall set forth the relief sought and the
specific reasons and grounds for the relief. If based upon matters, which
do not appear of record, it shall be supported by affidavit. Any motion not
made during a hearing shall be filed with the judge, who shall act upon the
motion at the earliest practicable time.
§29.15.Trial Amendments.
Any pleading may be amended at any time upon motion. A motion to amend
a pleading filed less than seven days prior to the hearing shall be grounds
for a continuance unless the amendment(s) would not be an unfair surprise
to the non-moving party. However, the pleading upon which notice has been
issued shall not be amended so as to broaden the scope of the notice.
§29.16.Incorporation of Department Records by Reference.
Any pleading may adopt and incorporate, by specific reference thereto,
any part of any document or entry in the official files and records of the
department. This section shall not relieve any party of the necessity of alleging
in detail, if required, facts necessary to sustain the burden of proof imposed
by law.
§29.17.Consolidation and Severance.
(a)
The department may consolidate two or more contested cases
if the cases involve common questions of law and fact, and separate hearings
would result in unwarranted expense or delay or substantial injustice.
(b)
A motion for severance of one or more proceedings shall
be in writing, signed by the movant or the movant's attorney or representative,
and filed with the judge prior to the date set for hearing. A severance shall
not be granted without the affirmative consent of the parties unless the judge
finds that a consolidation of two or more proceedings would result in unwarranted
expense or delay or substantial injustice to the movant.
§29.18.Informal Disposition.
(a)
If the parties reach an agreed settlement which resolves
the facts or issues in controversy, further proceedings shall be abated upon
a motion. A settlement agreement shall be filed directly with the director
or the director's designee for approval. If the director or the director's
designee does not approve the agreed settlement, the matter shall proceed
as a contested case under this title.
(b)
An executed settlement agreement is binding on the respondent
and the department according to its terms.
(c)
Once a respondent consents to a settlement, the respondent
may not withdraw consent pending approval by the director or the director's
designee. However, if the director or director's designee has not approved
the settlement within 30 days after respondent's consent to the settlement,
respondent may withdraw consent.
§29.19.Motions for Continuance Made During the Course of a Hearing.
Once a contested case hearing has been called to order by the judge,
no postponement or continuance shall be granted by the judge without the consent
of all parties involved.
§29.20.Venue.
All contested case hearings shall be held in Austin, Texas, and shall
be open to the public.
§29.21.Transcripts.
(a)
Transcripts. Contested case hearings shall be transcribed
or tape-recorded. The cost of any transcription may be assessed against the
party requesting it and included in the final decision of the director or
the director's designee.
(b)
Suggested corrections. Suggested corrections to the transcript
of the record may be offered within 10 days after the transcript is filed
in the contested case, unless the judge shall permit suggested corrections
to be offered thereafter. Suggested corrections shall be served in writing
upon each party of record, the official reporter, and the judge. If suggested
corrections are not objected to, the judge will direct the corrections to
be made and the manner of making them. In case the parties disagree on suggested
corrections, they may be heard by the judge, who shall then determine the
manner in which the record shall be changed, if at all.
§29.22.Rules of Evidence.
In all cases, irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence
shall be excluded. The rules of evidence as applied in non-jury civil cases
in the district courts of this state shall be followed. When necessary to
ascertain facts not reasonably susceptible of proof under those rules, evidence
not admissible thereunder may be admitted if it is of a type commonly relied
upon by reasonable persons in the conduct of their affairs. The judge shall
give effect to the rules of privilege recognized by law. Objections to evidentiary
offers may be made and shall be noted in the record. In order to expedite
a hearing, any part of the evidence may be received in written form. An affidavit
by a witness, investigator or law enforcement officer or a report of a department
employee which has been filed with the department shall be admissible as a
public record.
§29.23.Offer of Proof.
When testimony is excluded by ruling of the judge, the party offering
such evidence shall be permitted to make an offer of proof by dictating or
submitting in writing the substance of the proposed testimony, prior to the
conclusion of the hearing, and such offer of proof shall be sufficient to
preserve the point for review. The judge may ask such questions of the witness
as he or she deems necessary to determine that the witness would testify as
represented in the offer of proof. An alleged error in sustaining an objection
to questions asked on cross-examination may be preserved without making an
offer of proof.
§29.24.Discovery-General.
(a)
The scope of discovery in contested case proceedings under
this chapter is governed by APA. Responses to requests for admission, written
interrogatories, and requests for production that are served with the initial
notice of hearing shall be due 30 days from the date notice is received by
respondent.
(b)
Any time after SOAH acquires jurisdiction, a party may
deliver or have delivered to any other party a written request for admissions
of facts and genuineness of documents. Requests for admission shall be filed
with SOAH at the time they are mailed or personally delivered to the receiving
party.
(c)
Each matter for which an admission is requested shall be
deemed admitted unless, within the time provided, the party to whom the request
is directed serves upon the party requesting admissions, a sufficient written
answer or objection addressed to each matter of which an admission is requested.
An evasive or incomplete answer may be treated as a failure to answer.
(d)
If a respondent refuses to admit a matter or the authenticity
of a document which is later proved, the petitioner may include its costs
incurred in making the proof under §29.29 of this title (relating to
Proof of Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Expenses of the Department).
§29.25.Discovery Motions and Sanctions.
(a)
Certificate for disputes. All discovery motions concerning
a discovery dispute shall contain a certificate by the movant that efforts
to resolve the discovery dispute without the necessity of intervention have
been attempted and failed.
(b)
Compelling discovery. Upon reasonable notice to all party
representatives and affected persons, a party may apply to the judge for an
order compelling discovery. A party may not request sanctions without first
obtaining an order compelling discovery.
(c)
Sanctions. If a party fails to comply with proper discovery
requests or to obey an order compelling discovery, the judge may, after opportunity
for hearing, make orders in response to the failure, including:
(1)
disallow any further discovery of any kind or a particular
kind for the non-compliant party;
(2)
rule that particular facts shall be regarded as established
for purposes of the proceeding; or
(3)
disallow presentation by the non-compliant party of
evidence on issues that were the subject of the discovery request.
(d)
Costs. Costs as a discovery sanction may not be imposed
except as specifically provided under §29.24(d) of this title (relating
to Discovery-General) and §29.29 of this title (relating to Proof of
Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Expenses of the Department).
§29.26.Subpoena.
The issuance of subpoenas for witnesses and production of books, records,
paper and objects that may be necessary in a proceeding shall be governed
by APA, Texas Government Code §2001.089 and §2001.103. The judge
shall issue a subpoena upon the written application of any party showing good
cause and the deposit of the sums estimated to accrue as provided under APA
with SOAH. A party requesting a subpoena shall serve a copy of the application
on all other parties. An application for subpoena shall be received by SOAH
at least ten days prior to the scheduled hearing.
§29.27.Failure To Attend Hearing; Default Judgment.
(a)
If a respondent fails to appear in person or by authorized
representative on the day and time set for hearing in the contested case,
regardless of whether an appearance has been entered, the judge shall enter
a default judgment in the matter adverse to the respondent.
(b)
For purposes of this section, default judgment means the
issuance of a proposal for decision against the respondent in which the factual
allegations against the respondent in the notice of hearing are deemed admitted
as true, without any requirement for additional proof to be submitted by the
petitioner.
(c)
Any default judgment granted under this section will be
entered on the basis of the factual allegations contained in the notice of
hearing, and upon the proof of proper notice to the defaulting party opponent.
(d)
After the granting of a motion for default judgment, a
motion by the respondent to reopen the record may be granted if the respondent
establishes that the failure to attend the hearing was neither intentional
nor the result of conscious indifference.
(1)
A motion to reopen the record must be filed with the judge
within five (5) days of the date of the hearing. The judge shall only grant
the motion to reopen the record upon a showing of good cause for the respondent's
failure to attend the hearing.
(2)
A motion to reopen the record is not a motion for
rehearing and is not to be considered a motion for rehearing. The filing of
a motion to reopen has no effect on either the statutory time periods for
the filing of a motion for rehearing or on the time period for ruling on a
motion for rehearing.
§29.28.Filing of Exceptions, Briefs and Replies.
(a)
Any party of record may, within 15 days after the date
of service of a proposal for decision, file exceptions and briefs to the proposal
for decision, and replies to such exceptions and briefs may be filed within
10 days after the date for filing of such exceptions or briefs.
(b)
The points involved in exceptions, briefs, and replies
shall be concisely stated. The evidence in support of each point shall be
abstracted or summarized, and/or briefly stated in the form of proposed findings
of fact. Complete citations to the page number of the record of exhibit referring
to evidence shall be made. The specific purpose for which the evidence is
relied upon shall be stated. The argument and authorities shall be organized
and directed to each point properly proposed as a finding of fact in a concise
and logical manner. Briefs shall contain a table of contents and authorities.
Prior to the issuance of a proposal for decision, briefs may be filed only
when requested or permitted by the judge.
§29.29.Proof of Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Expenses of the Department.
(a)
General. If authorized by statute, the department may submit
evidence of costs, fees, expenses, and reasonable and necessary attorney's
fees incurred by the department. Costs include all expenses incurred by the
department in instituting and prosecuting the contested case. Costs specifically
include, but are not limited to, investigative costs, witness fees and deposition
expenses, travel expenses of witnesses, fees for professional services or
expert witnesses, costs of adjudication before SOAH, and any other costs that
are necessary for the preparation of the department's case including the cost
of any transcriptions, or any other costs specifically provided for by statute.
(b)
Submission. The department may submit evidence of costs,
fees, expenses, and reasonable and necessary attorney's fees as part of its
case-in-chief, by affidavit, or by motion after the issuance of the judge's
proposal for decision. Postponement of the introduction of evidence of costs
until after the issuance of a proposal for decision shall not constitute a
waiver of the department's right to recover any part of its incurred costs.
§29.30.Final Decisions and Orders.
(a)
All final decisions and orders shall be in writing and
shall be signed by the director or the director's designee.
(b)
If the director or the director's designee seeks clarification
or additional information relating to the proposal for decision, the director
or the director's designee may send written questions, including a request
to reopen the hearing if necessary, to the judge with copies to all parties
of record.
(c)
The director or the director's designee's final decision
may adopt the judge's finding, setting out costs, fees, expenses, and reasonable
and necessary attorneys' fees incurred by the department in bringing the proceeding.
§29.31.Stay of Enforcement-Motor Carrier.
(a)
A party filing an affidavit to stay enforcement of a penalty
based on financial inability to give a supersedeas bond shall serve a copy
of the affidavit by certified mail on the director or the director's designee.
The affidavit shall be mailed to the attorney of record for the department
in the contested case.
(b)
A supersedeas bond filed under this rule shall be executed
by a person authorized to do business in Texas as a surety.
§29.32.Certified Record.
(a)
Upon receiving a copy of a petition filed in district court
which seeks judicial review of a final decision in a contested case decided
under this title, the department shall prepare a certified copy of the entire
record of the proceeding under review, and transmit it to the reviewing court.
(b)
Pursuant to APA §2001.177, a party seeking judicial
review of the final decision of the director or the director's designee in
a contested case shall pay all costs of preparing a record of the contested
case proceedings.
§29.33.Conflicts.
If there is a conflict between SOAH's rules of procedure and these
rules of procedure, these rules shall control. If there is conflict between
these rules and the applicable statutes, the statutes shall control.
§29.34.Effective Date.
These sections shall govern all proceedings filed after they take effect,
and they also govern all proceedings then pending, and except to the extent
that the director or the director's designee shall determine that their application
in a particular pending proceeding would not be feasible or would work injustice,
in which event the former procedure applies.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on
December 22, 1999.
TRD-9908989
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §§31.1, 31.4, 31.6, 31.9-31.11
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes amendments
to §§31.1, 31.4, 31.6, and 31.9-31.11, concerning Motorcycle Operator
Training Course. Amendment to §31.1 is necessary due to a reorganization
within the department wherein the Motorcycle Safety Bureau was renamed the
Motorcycle Safety Unit. Amendment to §31.4(b) is necessary to reflect
that a student who is 15 years old but is less than 18 years old and who presents
an instructional permit or unrestricted provisional Class C or higher driver
license is qualified to take the basic motorcycle operator training course.
Amendment to §31.6(1) adds language which clarifies the instructional
requirements for the basic course, as well, as providing additional grounds
for de-certification of instructors who fail to comply with these requirements.
Section 31.9 and §31.10 are amended to comport with the language of Texas
Transportation Code, §662.004 which defines the Motorcycle Safety Coordinator's
duties and the program's new title established as the result of the reorganization.
Amendment to §31.11 is also necessary due to the reorganization.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications
to state or local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five year
period the rules are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result
of enforcing the rules will be clarification of existing rules. There is no
anticipated economic cost to individuals. There is no anticipated economic
cost to small or large businesses.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, Box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the commission to adopt rules considered necessary for carrying
out the department's work and Texas Transportation Code, §662.009.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Texas Transportation Code, §662.009
are affected by this proposal.
§31.1.Definitions.
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have
the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.
(1)-(6)
(No change.)
(7)
Motorcycle Safety
Unit
[
(8)-(9)
(No change.)
§31.4.Student Admission Requirements.
(a)
(No change.)
(b)
A person who is 15 years old but
is
less than
18 years old may not be admitted to a basic motorcycle operator training course
unless he or she has a Class C instructional permit
[
(c)
(No change.)
§31.6.Approved Motorcycle Training Courses.
(a)
Except as modified by subsection (c) of this section, the
department adopts the educational, safety, and instructor standards, by reference,
of the most current versions of the following Motorcycle Safety Foundation
(MSF) courses:
(1)
the approved basic motorcycle operator training course
is the Motorcycle RiderCourse: Riding and Street Skills (MRC:RSS), Modules
1 through 15 and Exercise 22
. Instructors shall adhere to the MSF's Evaluation,
Coaching and Range Management - Instructor Guide requirements when conducting
all range exercises
;
(2)
the approved advanced motorcycle operator training
courses are the Experienced RiderCourse (ERC) and the Optional Experienced
RiderCourse. The choice of curricula is determined by the size of the riding
area. The skill and knowledge tests for either curricula are not required
but may be used at the sponsor's discretion; and
(3)
the approved instructor preparation course is the
MSF instructor preparation course curriculum.
(b)-(d)
(No change.)
§31.9.Suspension.
The term of suspension under §31.2 of this title (relating to
Program Sponsor) and §31.3 of this title (relating to Motorcycle Instructor)
may not exceed one year. The term of suspension may be reduced by the
coordinator
[
§31.10.Quality Assurance Visits.
(a)-(b)
(No change.)
(c)
While conducting the QAV, the evaluator will use the same
pass/fail criteria as is utilized to evaluate the student teaching portion
of the approved motorcycle safety instructor training course. Instructor(s)
not meeting the requirements of the approved criteria will be suspended as
outlined in §31.3 of this title (relating to Motorcycle Instructor).
Remedial actions necessary to remove the suspension will be determined by
the [
(1)
attending a department-sponsored instructor curriculum
refresher course;
(2)
attending all or portions of a department-sponsored
instructor training course; or
(3)
teaching an entire course under the supervision of
a Motorcycle Safety
Unit
[
§31.11.Notification of Legal Actions.
All sponsors shall notify the Motorcycle Safety
Unit
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908990
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
37 TAC §32.2
The Texas Department of Public Safety proposes an amendment
to §32.2, concerning Bicycle Safety Curriculum. Subsection (c) is amended
to indicate the department bureau responsible for the SuperCyclist Bicycle
Safety Course.
Tom Haas, Chief of Finance, has determined that for each year of the first
five-year period the rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications
to state or local government.
Mr. Haas also has determined that for each year of the first five years
the rule is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing
the rule will be the enhancement of bicycle safety behaviors by children and
adults as a result of completing and teaching the SuperCyclist course. There
is no anticipated economic cost to individuals. There is no anticipated economic
cost to small or large businesses.
Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Mary Ann Courter, Chief of
Legal Services, Texas Department of Public Safety, box 4087, Austin, Texas
78773-0140, (512) 424-2890.
The amendment is proposed pursuant to Texas Government Code, §411.004(3),
which authorizes the Public Safety Commission to adopt rules considered necessary
for carrying out the department's work and Health and Safety Code, Chapter
758 which provides that a licensed provider may contract with instructors
and may subsequently issue completion certificates to those students who successfully
complete the course.
Texas Government Code, §411.004(3) and Health and Safety Code, Chapter
758 are affected by this proposal.
§32.2.Bicycle Safety Curriculum.
(a)-(b)
(No change.)
(c)
The SuperCyclist Bicycle Safety Course is available for
inspection at the Department's Austin Headquarters, in the custody of the
Training
[
(d)-(i)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December
22, 1999.
TRD-9908988
Dudley M. Thomas
Director
Texas Department of Public Safety
Earliest possible date of adoption: February 6, 2000
For further information, please call: (512) 424-2135
Subchapter T. DISPOSITION OF FORFEITED ASSET
Chapter 15.
DRIVERS LICENSE RULES
125
] cubic centimeter piston displacement or less; and one is for motor-assisted
bicycles of less than 50 cubic centimeter piston displacement. A driver qualifying
to operate both motorcycle and Class A, B, or C type vehicles will be issued
one license showing both classes with restrictions when applicable.
125
] cubic centimeter piston displacement
(Code I).
of $50
] is
required with the SR-22 form.
Subchapter C. EXAMINATION REQUIREMENTS
125
] cubic centimeter piston
displacement" or "Moped only of less than 50 cubic centimeter piston displacement."
Subchapter G. DENIAL OF RENEWAL OF DRIVER'S LICENSE FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR FOR TRAFFIC VIOLATION
violations of traffic law occurring on and after
September 1, 1995.
]
a violation of a traffic law.
] A contract under this section must be made in accordance with Texas
Government Code, Chapter 791. A contract made under this section is subject
to the ability of the parties to provide or pay for the services required
under the contract.
a traffic violation
], without good cause, a political subdivision shall
submit a failure to appear report to the department. The political subdivision
shall make reasonable efforts to ensure that each failure to appear report
is accurate, complete, and nonduplicative. The report shall include the following
information:
traffic law
]violation;
traffic law
]violation;
Traffic ]Ordinances.
traffic
]offense alleged is a violation of local
ordinance, but not state law, the political subdivision shall provide the
department with a copy of the local ordinance alleged to have been violated,
shall certify that the ordinance is currently in effect, and shall provide
any other information required by the department. The department shall determine
whether the local ordinance meets the statutory criteria for enforcement under
this section.
a traffic law
]. Denial of renewal
may occur at any time following an attempt to renew a license without regard
to the expiration date of the current or previous license. Denial of renewal
may occur at any time after the expiration of the current or previous license
if a person does not attempt to renew his license. For purposes of this section,
the department may deny renewal of an applicant's driver's license at any
time before mailing the completed driver's license document.
for a traffic
violation
]. In all cases when a clearance report is required, the political
subdivision shall notify the department or the department's designee within
one business day. The clearance report shall contain the following information:
traffic law violation
];
traffic law
]violation;
Texas Transportation
Code, Chapter 543, Subchapter B, or under
]Texas Code of Criminal Procedure[
, Article 45.54
].
Chapter 25.
SAFETY RESPONSIBILITY REGULATIONS
Fees
].
(a)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(b)
]
Proof of financial responsibility maintained
by a certificate of insurance must be filed on Form SR-22.
] When a party's
license and registrations have been suspended, a
statutory
[
$50
] reinstatement fee and proof of financial responsibility are prerequisites
for the withdrawal of such suspension. When a party's license and registrations
are suspended in several cases and proof of financial responsibility is required
in each case, only one
statutory
[
$50
] reinstatement
fee is required.
Chapter 29.
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
Chapter 31.
STANDARDS FOR AN APPROVED MOTORCYCLE OPERATOR TRAINING COURSE
Bureau
]--An
administrative
unit
[
bureau
] within the department assigned
with the responsibility for establishing and administering the motorcycle
operator training and safety program.
before providing
proof of successful completion of the first six hours of the driver education
course as required by the Texas Education Agency. Proof of successful completion
of the classroom driver education requirement is a properly annotated Texas
Driver Education Certificate, form DE-964(E). An instruction permit for a
Class C, or higher, driver license
] or an unrestricted Class C, or higher,
driver license[
is considered proof of completion of the driver education
requirement
].
manager of the
] Motorcycle Safety
Unit
[
Bureau
] if corrective actions have been taken and the reason
for suspension no longer exists. If the reason for suspension still exists
at the end of the suspension period, the suspension automatically elevates
to [
the
]cancellation of approval. To regain approval, a [
disapproved
]sponsor or instructor whose approval has been canceled
must reapply and meet all current requirements for approval.
manager of the
]Motorcycle Safety
coordinator
[
Bureau
] and may include, but is not limited to:
Bureau
] staff member, an approved
chief instructor, or other individual expressly designated by the department
to perform such duties.
Bureau
] with the details of any legal action which has been filed against
the sponsor, its officers, or its contracted instructors within 30 days of
such action.
Chapter 32.
BICYCLE SAFETY AND EDUCATION PROGRAM
Motorcycle Safety
] Bureau, Bicycle Safety Coordinator.
Chapter 33.
ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE OPERATOR EDUCATION AND CERTIFICATION PROGRAM