TITLE 40.SOCIAL SERVICES AND ASSISTANCE

Part 1. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES

Chapter 49. CONTRACTING FOR COMMUNITY CARE SERVICES

40 TAC §49.5, §49.19

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts amendments to §§49.5 and 49.19, without changes to the proposed text published in the December 3, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 10841).

The justification for the amendment to §49.5 is to specify that DHS may terminate the assignor's contract when the assignee does not meet the conditions for contracting. When the provider's contract is terminated because the assignee did not meet the conditions for contracting, DHS will establish a timeframe for terminating the contract to allow sufficient time for transferring clients. This change was prompted by a realization that a provider's contract could be terminated when the assignee did not meet the conditions for contracting, regardless of the assignor's compliance with program requirements. Also, the rule allows DHS sufficient time to transfer clients before terminating the contract. The justification for the amendment to §49.19 is to add a provision for contract termination when a provider does not deliver Community Care services for six consecutive months. This rule will eliminate administrative responsibilities, such as conducting monitoring visits and training associated with providers that are not actively participating. Before terminating a provider's contract, DHS will ensure adequate availability of providers in a geographic area.

The amendments will function by allowing DHS to evaluate a provider's compliance history prior to terminating the agency's contract when the agency attempts to assign a contract to an entity that does not meet the requirements for contracting. Also, the change will allow DHS contract management staff to focus their attention on providers who are actively participating in the program.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the amendments.

The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which provides the department with the authority to administer public and medical assistance programs and under Texas Government Code §531.021, which provides the Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendments implement §§22.001-22.030 and 32.001-32.042 of the Human Resources Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 24, 2000.

TRD-200000455

Paul Leche

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: February 15, 2000

Proposal publication date: December 3, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3108


Part 3. TEXAS COMMISSION ON ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE

Chapter 153. OFFENDER EDUCATION PROGRAMS

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS AND PROCEDURES

40 TAC §153.7

The Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse adopts an amendment to §153.7 concerning General Provisions and Procedures without changes to the proposed text as published in the October 29, 1999 issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9601).

This section contains information regarding sanctions.

This amendment is adopted to specify that violations of requirements are sufficient cause for revocation or denial of approval, certification or renewal of instructors or administrators as well as programs.

No comments were received regarding adoption of this amendment.

The amendment is adopted under the under the Texas Transportation Code, §§521.374-521.376, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, §106.115, the Texas Health and Safety Code, §461.012(18), and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 42.12, which provide the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse with the authority to promulgate written rules setting forth minimum standards for the approval or certification of offender education programs.

The codes affected by the adopted rule are Texas Transportation Code, §§521.374-521.376, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, §106.115, the Texas Health and Safety Code, §461.012(18), and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 42.12.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 26, 2000.

TRD-200000519

Karen Pettigrew

General Counsel

Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: October 29, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 349-6733


Subchapter B. PROGRAM STANDARDS

40 TAC §§153.33, 153.41, 153.42, 153.44, 153.52-153.55

The Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse adopts amendments to §§153.33, 153.41, 153.42, 153.44, and 153.52-153.55 concerning Program Standards without changes to the proposed text as published in the October 29, 1999 issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9601).

These sections contain information on uniform certificates of course completion, classroom facilities and equipment, program administration, program instructors, additional requirements for Drug Offender Education Programs, additional requirements for Alcohol Education Program for Minors, additional requirements for DWI Education Programs, and additional requirements for DWI Intervention Programs.

These amendments are adopted to stipulate requirements regarding retention and forwarding of certificates of course completion; to clarify that sessions must be conducted in appropriate classroom facilities and settings that comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; to eliminate a redundant statement regarding the requirement for program administrators to successfully complete the instructor training program; to add requirements related to conduct of instructors and administrators with regard to participants; to specify that classes must have a minimum of three participants; to implement new legislation regarding the process the instructor must follow when a participant completes a DWI Education Program or a DWI Intervention Program.

Comments on the rules were received from one individual.

The following comments were received regarding §§153.52, 153.53, 153.54 and 153.55.

Comment: The implementation of a standard that would require a minimum of three participants in order to conduct a class would pose a significant hardship on small business. The economic costs of paying for rental space and instructor fees despite low turnout for a class and a mandated class cancellation would be devastating. In addition, the possibility exists that sanctions could be imposed on the program for non-compliance with other Commission standards for repeated cancellation of classes.

Response: Small businesses will experience economic hardship if turnout is consistently low regardless of whether or not the class is cancelled.

Comment: I believe that the curriculum is as effective with one or two students as it is with more. In all the classes I have taught, there has been a significant increase between pre-test and post-test scores, regardless of class size. From my perspective, small classes serve as a tutorial session that has always been found to be beneficial in educational settings.

Response: The commission disagrees that the curriculum is equally effective with one or two students. The curricula were designed to have extensive interaction so that students share their experiences and reflect on their personal situations. The tests measure the factual information retained by the student, but do not capture the less tangible impact of the interactional elements of the course. A tutorial can successfully impart information, but it lacks the depth achieved through peer interaction.

Comment: I found that while students receive the same benefit of learning the objectives regardless of the class size, it was challenging to the instructor to maintain lengthy discussion in various topics. When the classes are smaller, less time is needed for discussion. However, the time allocations must be met in order for the student to complete the required hours. This obstacle could be resolved if the Commission approved inexpensive supplemental materials to be used under specific topics when teaching smaller classes.

Response: As stated above, the interaction is a fundamental component of the curricula. The Commission is not convinced the same benefit would be achieved through presentation of supplemental material. The commission does allow supplemental materials if approved by TCADA, but only for programs that exceed the required number of hours.

These amendments are adopted under the under the Texas Transportation Code, §§521.374-521.376, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, §106.115, the Texas Health and Safety Code, §461.012(18), and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 42.12, which provide the Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse with the authority to promulgate written rules setting forth minimum standards for the approval or certification of offender education programs.

The codes affected by the adopted rules are Texas Transportation Code, §§521.374-521.376, the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, §106.115, the Texas Health and Safety Code, §461.012(18), and the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 42.12.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 26, 2000.

TRD-200000520

Karen Pettigrew

General Counsel

Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: October 29, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 349-6733


Part 6. TEXAS COMMISSION FOR THE DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING

Chapter 182. SPECIALIZED TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Subchapter A. DEFINITIONS

40 TAC §182.3

The Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing adopts an amendment to §182.3 without changes to the text as published in the October 8, 1999 issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 8726).

This rule will broaden the program to include persons with disabilities other than impairment of speech or hearing and to allow services which allow access to the telephone network to be provided through the program.

No comments were received regarding the proposed amendment.

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, §81.006(b)(3), which provides the Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing with the authority to adopt rules for administration and programs.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 25, 2000.

TRD-200000474

David Myers

Executive Director

Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing

Effective date: February 14, 2000

Proposal publication date: October 8, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 407-3250


40 TAC §182.4

The Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing adopts an amendment to §182.4 without changes to the text as published in the October 8, 1999 issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 8727).

This rule will broaden the program to include services that would allow access to the telephone network.

No comments were received regarding the proposed amendment.

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, §81.006(b)(3), which provides the Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing with the authority to adopt rules for administration and programs.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 25, 2000.

TRD-200000473

David Myers

Executive Director

Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing

Effective date: February 14, 2000

Proposal publication date: October 8, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 407-3250


Subchapter B. PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

40 TAC §182.21

The Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing adopts amendment to §182.21 without changes to the text as published in the October 8, 1999 issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 8728).

This rule will broaden the program to include persons with disabilities other than impairment of speech or hearing and to allow services which allow access to the telephone network to be provided through the program.

No comments were received regarding the proposed amendment.

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, §81.006(b)(3), which provides the Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing with the authority to adopt rules for administration and programs.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 25, 2000.

TRD-200000475

David Myers

Executive Director

Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing

Effective date: February 14, 2000

Proposal publication date: October 8, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 407-3250


40 TAC §182.24

The Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing adopts an amendment to §182.24 without changes to the text as published in the October 8, 1999 issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 8728).

This rule will broaden the program to include persons with disabilities other than impairment of speech or hearing and to allow services which allow access to the telephone network to be provided through the program.

One comment was received related to allowing more than one device or service to be exchanged for a voucher in order to more appropriate accommodating persons with disabilities in accessing the telephone networks.

The comment was considered by the Commission, but not adopted since, Senate Bill 1441 authorizes the exchange of a voucher for a basic telecommunications device or service.

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, §81.006(b)(3), which provides the Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing with the authority to adopt rules for administration and programs.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 25, 2000.

TRD-200000476

David Myers

Executive Director

Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing

Effective date: February 14, 2000

Proposal publication date: October 8, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 407-3250


Part 19. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PROTECTIVE AND REGULATORY SERVICES

Chapter 715. DAY CARE LICENSING

The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) adopts amendments to §§715.102, 715.405, 715.411, 715.608, and 715.617, without changes to the proposed text published in the November 5, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9799).

The justification for the amendments to §§715.102, 715.411, and 715.608 is to make required changes regarding staff training for caregivers who care for children younger than 24 months of age as enacted by the 76th Legislature. The justification for the amendments to §§715.405 and 715.607 is to make required changes regarding maintaining individual screening records for each child required to be screened as enacted by the 76th Legislature.

The amendments will function by ensuring that TDPRS is in compliance with laws enacted by the 76th Legislature.

During the public comment period, TDPRS received two comments from an individual. A summary of the comments and TDPRS's responses follow:

Comments concerning §715.102:

1) The commenter stated that there is a need for annual offerings of trainings that include all three subjects covered in the revised rule--shaken baby syndrome, preventing sudden infant death syndrome, and early childhood brain development. The commenter stated that unless some training is created covering all three, registered family home providers have to take a separate course covering brain development. Current courses only include shaken baby syndrome and sudden infant death syndrome and this course is over an hour.

Response: TDPRS will make the training requirement known through the local licensing offices. When the requirement becomes known, local trainers will meet the needs of their audience.

2) The commenter does not feel that this type of training is needed every year. Shaken baby syndrome and sudden infant death syndrome are informative trainings, unlike CPR and first aid which involve techniques. Most CPR and first aid classes only need to be taken every two years. The commenter believes she can use her hour of training on a better subject, like brain development.

Response: The rule reflects requirements contained in the Human Resources Code, Chapter 42.0421, amended by the 76th Texas Legislature.

Subchapter B. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR REGISTERED FAMILY HOMES

40 TAC §715.102

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000641

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter E. MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR DAY CARE CENTERS

40 TAC §715.405, §715.411

The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code (HRC), Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendments implement the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000642

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter G. STANDARDS FOR GROUP DAY CARE HOMES

40 TAC §715.608, §715.617

The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code (HRC), Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendments implement the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000643

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 720. TWENTY-FOUR HOUR CARE LICENSING

Subchapter A. STANDARDS FOR CHILD-PLACING AGENCIES

40 TAC §720.24, §720.49

The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) adopts amendments to §720.24 and §720.49, in its 24-Hour Care Licensing chapter. The amendment to §720.24 is adopted with changes to the proposed text published in the November 5, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9801). The amendment to §720.49 is adopted without changes to the proposed text and will not be republished.

The justification for the amendment to §720.24 is to add new requirements for child-placing agencies to develop a plan to ensure that the needs of children in foster home settings are met. The justification for the amendment to §720.49 is to clarify the information which must be documented during quarterly supervisory visits.

The amendments will function by ensuring the health and safety of children in agency homes.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the amendments. As a result of TDPRS staff recommendations, TDPRS is adopting §720.24(b) with changes intended to be less prescriptive; avoid duplication of existing Minimum Standards; ensure qualified staff conduct or review, and sign off on investigations completed by the agency; and ensure the agency enforces correction of noncompliances by its verified homes.

The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code (HRC), Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendments implement the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

§720.24.Structure of a Child-Placing Agency.

(a)

The agency must:

(1)

be legally established to operate within Texas and comply with all applicable statutes;

(2)

along with the application for a license, submit documentation of the legal basis for operation to the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS);

(3)

notify TDPRS of any planned change in the agency's legal basis for operation at least five working days before that change is made;

(4)

observe the conditions of the license;

(5)

report any planned change impacting the conditions of the license to TDPRS at least five working days before the change is made;

(6)

have legal authority to place a child before making the placement; and

(7)

not act as an agent for unlicensed agencies, institutions, or individuals. When birth parents take an active role in the selection of an adoptive placement, the agency making the adoptive placement must ensure that the placement selected is in the child's best interest.

(b)

The agency must develop a plan that addresses how the agency will:

(1)

ensure that licensing staff are continually informed of the location of all agency staff, records, offices and agency homes, and any changes in agency personnel and professional staffing;

(2)

ensure that required Level I child-placing staff services are provided to all agency staff, foster homes, and adoption homes, and such services are documented in all agency records;

(3)

ensure that agency homes meet all applicable minimum standards prior to verification;

(4)

ensure that after a home is verified, there is an ongoing evaluation of the agency home, including documentation of unmet minimum standards and correction of all noncompliances;

(5)

contact Statewide Intake (SWI) to report serious incidents and allegations of abuse and neglect;

(6)

evaluate the effectiveness of its system for meeting standards and describe the process the agency will use to address problems that its evaluation system identifies; and

(7)

upon the request of licensing, investigate reports, excluding abuse and neglect, of standards violations in a timely manner and submit reports of the agency's activities and findings to licensing for review, follow-up (if appropriate), and closure.

(A)

Level I child-placing staff must conduct or review, and sign off on investigations completed by the agency.

(B)

The child-placing agency must submit an investigation report to a licensing representative within 30 days of the initial report.

(c)

The plan, as outlined in subsection (b) of this section, must be provided to licensing at the time the application for licensure is submitted. All other agencies must be in compliance with this rule by March 1, 2000. Licensing must be informed of any changes to this plan prior to implementing the changes.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000648

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Chapter 725. GENERAL LICENSING PROCEDURES

The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) adopts amendments to §§725.1001, 725.1404, 725.1805 and 725.2046; and adopts new §725.1813, without changes to the proposed text published in the November 5, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9812). The justification for the amendments to §725.1001 and §725.2046 is to define the word "agency" and to cite the correct paragraph in §725.2046 as a result of adding new definitions. The justification for the amendment to §725.1404 is to clarify that certain summer programs are not regulated by TDPRS. The justification for the amendment to §725.1805 is to clarify which persons are required to submit a completed TDPRS Affidavit for Applicants for Employment with a Facility or Registered Family Home as enacted by the 76th Legislature. The justification for new §725.1813 is to clarify child care licensing procedures when repeated complaints are received regarding allegations already investigated by licensing staff.

The amendments and new section will function by clarifying terminology and ensuring that TDPRS will be in compliance with laws enacted by the 76th Legislature.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the amendments and new section.

Subchapter A. DEFINITIONS

40 TAC §725.1001

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000644

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter O. EXEMPTIONS FROM LICENSING

40 TAC §725.1404

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000645

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter S. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

40 TAC §725.1805, §725.1813

The amendment and new section are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendment and new section implement the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000646

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter U. DAY CARE LICENSING PROCEDURES

40 TAC §725.2046

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code (HRC), Title 2, Chapter 42, which authorizes the department to administer general child-placing and child care licensing programs.

The amendment implements the Human Resources Code, §§42.001-42.077.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000647

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: March 1, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Subchapter NNN. ABUSE/NEGLECT INVESTIGATIONS IN CHILD CARE FACILITIES

The Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) adopts the repeal of §725.7004; and new §725.7008, without changes to the proposed text published in the November 5, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9814).

The justification for the repeal of §725.7004 is because it is redundant with new adopted §725.7008. New §725.7008 is needed to comply with federal law at 42 U.S.C. 5106a, which requires that the state have in place a statute or rule with the force and effect of law that provides for the confidentiality of all child abuse and neglect records. Prior to September 1, 1999, all abuse and neglect records were made confidential pursuant to Texas Family Code §261.201. Effective September 1, 1999, however, this section was amended to no longer apply to the records of an abuse or neglect investigation in a home or facility regulated under Chapter 42 of the Human Resources Code. In the absence of the protection formerly provided by §261.201 of the Texas Family Code, TDPRS must adopt a rule that satisfies the confidentiality requirements of federal law for child abuse and neglect records used, developed, or maintained in an investigation of a home or facility regulated under Chapter 42 of the Human Resources Code.

The repeal and new section will function by citing the proper state law authority to safeguard confidential abuse and neglect records as required by federal law.

No comments were received regarding adoption of the repeal and new section.

40 TAC §725.7004

The repeal is adopted under the Human Resources Code §40.005, which authorizes the department to adopt rules regarding the use, protection, and disclosure of its records.

The repeal implements the Human Resources Code §40.005.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000650

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: February 17, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


40 TAC §725.7008

The new section is adopted under the Human Resources Code §40.005, which authorizes the department to adopt rules regarding the use, protection, and disclosure of its records.

The new section implements the Human Resources Code §40.005 and 42 U.S.C. 5016(a).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 28, 2000.

TRD-200000651

C. Ed Davis

Deputy Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Effective date: February 17, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3734


Part 20. TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION

Chapter 809. CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT

Subchapter C. REQUIREMENTS TO PROVIDE CHILD CARE

40 TAC §809.46

The Texas Workforce Commission (Commission) adopts an amendment to §809.46, concerning assessing parent fees for child care, with changes to the proposed text as published in the December 10, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 11097).

The purpose of the amendment is to provide conformity with federal child care regulations requiring that a sliding fee scale used to assess parent fees for child care be based on family size as well as family income and that it also allows other applicable factors to be included. The amendment revises the method of determining the parent fee for child care services. The amount of the parent fee for child care is often a determining factor in a parent's ability to obtain and retain employment. By including family size in the methodology for assessing parent fees, the amendment will help ensure that a low-income working parent can become and remain self-sufficient. The amendment also helps ensure that low-income families have equal access to child care. This amendment does not relieve the local workforce development boards (Boards) from meeting Commission-approved performance targets.

The preamble to the federal regulations makes it clear that state agencies have the flexibility to take elements other than family size and gross monthly income, such as the number of children in care, into consideration when designing their fee scales. The Commission has passed this flexibility on to the Boards. The amendment requires that Boards vary the parent fee based on the number of family members and family gross monthly income, and also allows the Boards to consider the number of children in care. Specifically, the amendment provides that in areas where the Commission administers the program, the parent fee is 9% of the family's gross monthly income if there is one child receiving care, and 11% of the family's gross monthly income if there are two or more children receiving care. For families with seven or more members, the fee is 65% of the amount calculated at either 9% or 11%. Where Boards directly manage the program, they are required to vary the parent fee based on the number of members in the family and the family's gross monthly income, and they are allowed to also consider the number of children the family has in care.

One technical correction was made to the rule, the period was changed to a colon in subsection (a).

Comments were received from the North Central Texas Workforce Development Board and the Permian Basin Workforce Development Board. Both comments were favorable.

Comment: One commenter supported the amendment because it brings the Commission's child care and development rule into compliance with the federal Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Final Rule. The commenter indicated that the Board had already established a parent fee policy that was in compliance with the federal CCDF Final Rule.

Response: The Commission appreciates the commenter's support, both of the amendment and the purpose behind it. The Commission agrees that the amendment will bring its rule into compliance with the federal CCDF Final Rule. The Commission also recognizes and appreciates the fact that most Boards have already established parent fee policies that comply with the federal CCDF Final Rule.

Comment: Another commenter supported the amendment because it allows Boards to establish their own parent fee policies. The amendment also takes into consideration that parent fees can be a deterrent if a sizable portion of a family's net income is needed to pay the parent fee for child care. The commenter stated that assessing parent fees based on family size and the number of children in care increases the parent's ability to participate in employment-related activities.

Response: The Commission appreciates the commenter's support of the amendment and agrees that it is critical that sliding fee scales used to assess parent fees consider family size and the number of children in care as well as income in order to avoid costs that are prohibitive to low-income families.

Background: The current rule requires Boards to ensure that parent fees are assessed to all parents or caretakers based on the family's gross monthly income with a few exceptions. A family is required by federal law to share in the cost of subsidized child care unless the lead agency waives the fee pursuant to the federal regulations. The federal regulations give the states flexibility in deciding the amount of fee to charge parents and whether to waive the fee. The preamble to the federal regulations also suggests that a parent fee of 10% of family gross monthly income would ensure parent access. The preamble makes it clear that the 10% is offered as a benchmark and not a limit on the state's flexibility in deciding the amount of fees to charge parents.

The Commission intends that the amendment will recognize that high parent fees limit parental choice by encouraging parents to choose less expensive and lower quality child care or not accept the subsidy. It is the intent of the Commission to ensure that any co-payment or fee paid by the parent is affordable for the family and that the sliding fee scale not limit parental choice. The Commission intends that this amendment will help prevent disruptions of a child's care that may adversely affect the child's development.

Child care services are provided under Texas Human Resources Code, Chapter 44.

If a Board fails to comply with the provisions contained in the rule, the Board shall be subject to the sanctions as detailed in Chapter 800, Subchapter E of this title, relating to Sanctions.

The amendment to the rule is adopted under Texas Labor Code §§301.061 and 302.002, which provide the Texas Workforce Commission with the authority to adopt, amend, or repeal such rules as it deems necessary for the effective administration of the Commission's programs.

§809.46.Assessing Parent Fees.

(a)

A Board shall assess parent fees to all parents or caretakers based on the family's size and gross monthly income, with the following exceptions:

(1)

Parents or caretakers who receive TANF are assessed no fee.

(2)

Parents or caretakers who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are assessed no fee.

(3)

Parents who participate in the Food Stamp Employment and Training program are assessed no fee. Children of parents or caretakers who receive protective services are assessed no fee unless the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services assesses a fee to a parent.

(b)

In families where the child is the only TANF or SSI recipient, the parent fee is assessed according to subsection (d) of this section.

(c)

Teen parents who live with their parents and who are not covered under exceptions outlined under subsection (a) of this section shall be assessed a parent fee. The parent fee is based solely on the teen parent's income.

(d)

Parent fees for all parents not covered under exceptions outlined under subsection (a) of this section are assessed using the following formulas:

(1)

In areas where the Commission manages child care service delivery contracts, the parent fee shall be 9% of the family's gross monthly income if there is one child receiving Commission paid child care and 11% of the family's gross monthly income if there are two or more children receiving Commission paid child care. For families with 7 or more members, the fee is 65% of the 9% or 11%.

(2)

In areas where the Board directly manages child care service delivery contracts, it is recommended that the parent fee should be no less than 9% and no more than 15% of the family's gross monthly income. The Board shall vary the parent fee based on the number of members in the family and the family's gross monthly income and may also vary the fee based on the number of children the family has in care. The Board shall set the actual fee policy in accordance with the requirements set forth in §809.12 of this chapter (relating to Board Policies and Plans for Child Care Services).

(e)

The Board's contractor is not permitted to assess a parent fee that exceeds the cost of care.

(f)

Parents who receive a child care subsidy from other state or federal programs such as the Workforce Investment Act shall pay that amount in addition to the assessed parent fee. The Board's contractor shall request documentation of child care subsidies from the parent.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 27, 2000.

TRD-200000575

J. Randel (Jerry) Hill

General Counsel

Texas Workforce Commission

Effective date: February 16, 2000

Proposal publication date: December 10, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8812


Chapter 809. CHILD CARE AND DEVELOPMENT

The Texas Workforce Commission (Commission) adopts amendments to §809.103, concerning Texas Workforce Commission Applicant Child Care, and §809.121, concerning the definition of children living at "very low incomes" for eligibility for child care, without changes to the proposed text as published in the December 10, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 11098).

The purpose of the amendment to §809.103 is to conform the cross-reference to the amended §809.121.

The purpose of the amendment to §809.121 is to bring the rule into compliance with state plan requirements. Guidelines for the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) state plan require a definition of "very low income" that is below the state's income limits for CCDF eligibility. This requirement ensures that the state does not serve exclusively children of families with very low incomes. The amendment changes the category of Children At Risk in §809.121 from "Children Living At Very Low Incomes" to "Children Living At Low Incomes." This change in language retains the intent of the section but also mitigates the conflict between the current language and the state plan requirement related to the definition of "very low income." This amendment continues to ensure that child care assistance is available to low-income working families that may be at risk of becoming dependent on public assistance. This amendment does not relieve the local workforce development boards (Boards) from meeting Commission-approved performance targets.

Comments were received from the Permian Basin Workforce Development Board.

Comment: The commenter indicated that the Board the commenter represents had reviewed the proposed amendments to §809.121 and §809.103, and the Board supports the amendments.

Response: The Commission appreciates the support of the Board represented by the commenter and the Board's interest in the rules governing the provision of child care and development services in Texas. The Commission agrees with the commenter's statements in support of the amendment.

Background: The federal regulations require that 70% of the CCDF mandatory and matching funds be spent on families who are receiving assistance under Title IV-A of the Social Security Act, are attempting to transition off such assistance, and are at risk of becoming dependent on such assistance.

The Commission intends that the amendment to §809.121, by continuing to include children from families with incomes at or below 85% of State Median Income (SMI) in subchapter H (Children of Parents At Risk of Becoming Dependent on Public Assistance), will ensure that at least 70% of the mandatory and matching funds will be spent on the families cited in the federal regulations. It is also the Commission's intent to ensure that the state does not serve exclusively children of families with very low incomes.

Child care services are provided under Texas Human Resources Code, Chapter 44.

If a Board fails to comply with the provisions contained in the rule, the Board shall be subject to sanctions as detailed in Chapter 800, Subchapter E of this title, relating to Sanctions.

Subchapter G. CHILD CARE FOR PEOPLE TRANSITIONING OFF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE

40 TAC §809.103

The amendments are adopted under Texas Labor Code §§301.061 and 302.002, which provide the Texas Workforce Commission with the authority to adopt, amend, or repeal such rules as it deems necessary for the effective administration of the Commission's programs.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 27, 2000.

TRD-200000577

J. Randel (Jerry) Hill

General Counsel

Texas Workforce Commission

Effective date: February 16, 2000

Proposal publication date: December 10, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8812


Subchapter H. CHILDREN OF PARENTS AT RISK OF BECOMING DEPENDENT ON PUBLIC ASSISTANCE

40 TAC §809.121

The amendments are adopted under Texas Labor Code §§301.061 and 302.002, which provide the Texas Workforce Commission with the authority to adopt, amend, or repeal such rules as it deems necessary for the effective administration of the Commission's programs.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 27, 2000.

TRD-200000576

J. Randel (Jerry) Hill

General Counsel

Texas Workforce Commission

Effective date: February 16, 2000

Proposal publication date: December 10, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8812


Part 22. TEXAS COUNCIL ON WORKFORCE AND ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS

Chapter 901. DESIGNATION AND REDESIGNATION OF LOCAL WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AREAS

40 TAC §901.1, §901.2

The Texas Council on Workforce and Economic Competitiveness adopts new §901.1, concerning procedures for considering redesignation of workforce development areas, with changes to the proposed text as published in the November 5, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9818) and new §901.2, concerning appeal of decision on designation or redesignation, with changes to the proposed text as published in the November 5, 1999, issue of the Texas Register (24 TexReg 9818).

New §901.1 is adopted to establish a procedure for the Council to employ as it recommends to the Governor the designation or redesignation of workforce development areas for the local planning and delivery of workforce development. The new rule specifies who may initiate the redesignation process, the requirements for a request initiated by a local area or proposed local area, the notices to be given upon receipt of a proposal including publication in the Texas Register , consideration of a proposal or request for redesignation by the Council, and a recommendation by the Council to the Governor on the proposal or request.

New §901.2 is adopted to establish a procedure for making an appeal of a decision to designate or redesignate a workforce development area. The new rules sets a time limit for filing an appeal, specifies the contents of an appeal, requires notice of an appeal to be published in the Texas Register , provides for consideration of the appeal by the Council, and establishes a timeframe in which the Council must make a recommendation to the Governor on the appeal.

As required by the Texas Government Code, §2001.033(1), the Council's reasoned justification for the new rules are set out in this order which includes the preamble, which in turn includes the rule. This preamble contains a summary of the factual basis for the rules. No comments were received on either rule.

Changes made to the rules as proposed were made based upon further review by the staff to clarify roles, ensure necessary information was submitted with requests for redesignation, and set a timeframe in which the Council must respond to an appeal of a decision regarding designation or redesignation of a workforce area. The changes are described more specifically below.

Adopted New §901.1.

The new section is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §2308.101(3) which requires the Council to recommend to the Governor the designation and redesignation of local workforce development areas. Prior to the adoption of this rule, Texas exercised its option to designate existing local workforce development areas as local workforce development areas for the purposes of the Workforce Investment Act. The adoption of this rule does not require previously designated local workforce development areas to submit a new request in order to maintain the current designation. This rule merely establishes a formal process under which applications for redesignation shall be submitted and considered.

New §901.1(a) defines the term "chief elected officials" to mean the officials designated by state law as the chief elected officials for the purposes of establishing agreements to form local workforce development boards.

New §901.1(b) allows the Council to submit a written proposal or a local area or proposed area to submit a written request to initiate the process to consider redesignation of workforce development areas.

New §901.1(c) sets out the requirements for a written request for redesignation submitted by a local area or proposed local area. The request must be signed by the chief elected officials in the proposed new area whose signature would be required to create a local workforce development board if the request was granted. One of those chief elected officials must also be designated as the lead official. The director of the Council will notify the lead official and the Governor of receipt of the request as well as any deficiencies in the request. The lead official has 30 days to correct any deficiencies. The written request must show that each proposed area complies with state requirements for a local workforce development area and include specific information about geographic areas served by local and intermediate educational agencies, post secondary educational institutions, and vocational education schools; the extent to which such local areas are consistent with labor market areas; the distance individuals will need to travel to receive services; the resources available to effectively administer the activities carried out under state and federal law; the total population of the proposed area; any prior designation of the area as a JTPA service delivery area or service as a rural concentrated employment program; and other information requested by the Council. If a proposed area is identified in the request as a local labor market area, the request must also contain sufficient evidence that each such area is an economically integrated geographic area within which people may reside and find employment within a reasonable distance. If one or more existing areas is to be further divided, the request must contain a description of how services of all programs under the local board's purview will be coordinated with other local boards and workforce development areas within the region, documentation that justifies designation of an area that has less than 200,000 population if applicable, and an analysis of costs associated with dividing the region with an emphasis on administrative costs.

New §901.1(d) requires the director to notify all current workforce development board members of affected areas if a proposal or request is made to split a designated area into two or more areas.

New §901.1(e) requires notice of a proposal or request to redesignate workforce development areas to be published in the Texas Register with a statement inviting input, specifying the deadline for submitting written input, and setting an open meeting at which oral comments will be accepted.

New §901.1(f) requires the Council to consider a proposal or request or to designate a committee to do so and to make a report to the Council. In considering the proposal or request, all relevant information may be reviewed in addition to the information submitted with the proposal or request and the information obtained during the public comment process.

New §901.1(g) requires the Council to make a recommendation to the Governor after considering a proposal or request.

No public comments were received on this rule. However, two amendments to the rule were made based on staff recommendations. The first amendment deleted the reference to the Governor in subsection (b) to clarify that only the Council could propose or a local area or proposed local area could request initiation of the redesignation process. The second amendment added clauses (vi) through (viii) to subsection (c)(3)(A). These three clauses track language from the Workforce Investment Act which set out the qualifications required to qualify for an automatic designation.

Adopted new §901.2.

The new section is proposed under the Texas Government Code, §2308.101(3) which requires the Council to recommend to the Governor the designation and redesignation of local workforce development areas.

New §901.2(a) requires an appeal of a designation or redesignation of a workforce area to be delivered to the Council no later than 30 days after the date the designation or redesignation decision was made.

New §901.2(b) requires an appeal to be in writing and include the specific reasons for appealing the designation or redesignation. The request is also required to include any new information the requestor seeks to have considered in the appeal process.

New §901.2(c) requires a notice of the appeal to be published in the Texas Register with a statement inviting input and specifying the deadline for submitting written input. The Council also has the discretion to schedule a public meeting at which public comments will be accepted.

New §901.2(d) allows the Council to consider an appeal or to designate a committee to do so and to make a report to the Council. All relevant information may be considered in connection with an appeal in addition to the information submitted with the appeal and the information obtained during the public comment process.

New §901.2(e) requires the Council to make a recommendation on the appeal to the Governor within 120 days of receiving the appeal request.

No public comments were received on this rule. However, one amendment to subsection (e) of the rule was made based on a staff recommendation. The amendment added the 120 day time limit on making a recommendation to the Governor.

The public benefits anticipated as a result of enforcing the rules include the following:

Workforce development system partners will benefit from an unambiguous process, defined by the rules, that will provide an efficient and consistent application of requirements for the designation or redesignation of local workforce development areas as well as the appeal of such a decision.

Chief elected officials will clearly understand the requirements for requesting the designation or redesignation of a local workforce development area. CEO's will benefit from the streamlined process defined in the rules, and in the event that an appeal is necessary, will know the requirements that must be met to file an appeal. This provides an opportunity for increased efficiency, better usage of resources, and more effective communication processes.

The new sections are adopted under the Texas Government Code, §2308.101(3) which requires the Council to recommend to the Governor the designation and redesignation of local workforce development areas and §2308.103(a)(1) which authorizes the Council to adopt rules.

§901.1.Procedures for Considering Redesignation of Workforce Development Areas.

(a)

Definitions. "Chief Elected Officials" means the officials designated by state law as the Chief Elected Officials for the purposes of establishing agreements to form local workforce development boards.

(b)

Initiation of Redesignation. The Texas Council on Workforce and Economic Competitiveness may submit a written proposal or a local area or proposed local area may submit a written request to initiate the process to consider redesignation of workforce areas.

(c)

Requirements for a request by a local area or proposed local area.

(1)

Written Request. A request for redesignation of workforce development areas must be signed by the Chief Elected Officials (CEO) of the proposed new area to be designated. These must be the same officials who would be able to create a local workforce development board if the request is granted. The request must designate one of the officials as the lead CEO.

(2)

Acknowledgment and Summary Action. The director will notify the lead CEO and the Governor of receipt of the request and any deficiencies in the written request. The lead CEO has 30 days to correct any deficiencies.

(3)

Contents of Written Request.

(A)

The written request must show that each proposed area complies with state requirements for a local workforce development area and include information on the following factors:

(i)

geographic areas served by local educational agencies and intermediate educational agencies;

(ii)

geographic areas served by postsecondary educational institutions and area vocational education schools;

(iii)

the extent to which such local areas are consistent with labor market areas;

(iv)

the distance that individuals will need to travel to receive services provided in such local areas;

(v)

the resources of such local areas that are available to effectively administer the activities carried out under Texas and federal law;

(vi)

the total population of the proposed area;

(vii)

any prior designation of the area as a Job Training Partnership Act Service Delivery Area or Substate Area or service as a rural concentrated employment program; and

(viii)

other information required by the Council to make a determination.

(B)

If one or more of the proposed areas is identified in the request as a local labor market area, the request must also contain sufficient evidence that each such area is an economically integrated geographic area within which people may reside and find employment within a reasonable distance.

(4)

Further Division of Areas. If one or more of the existing areas would be further divided, the request must also contain the following:

(A)

a description of how services of all programs under the local board's purview will be coordinated with other local boards and workforce development areas within the region;

(B)

if applicable, documentation that justifies the designation of an area that has less than 200,000 population; and

(C)

an analysis of costs associated with dividing the region, with particular emphasis on administrative costs.

(d)

Splitting Designated Areas. If a proposal or request is made to split a designated area into two or more areas, the director shall notify all current workforce development board members of the affected areas.

(e)

Notification of Proposal or Request. When a proposal is made by the Governor or the Council to redesignate workforce development areas or when a complete request to redesignate such areas is received from a local area or proposed local area, notice of the proposal or request shall be published in the Texas Register with a statement inviting input, specifying the deadline for submitting written input, and setting an open meeting at which oral comments will be accepted.

(f)

Consideration of Proposal or Request. The Council may consider a proposal or request or may designate a committee to do so and make a report to the Council. In considering a proposal or request, all relevant information may be reviewed in addition to the information submitted with the proposal or request and the information obtained during the public comment process.

(g)

Recommendation. After considering a proposal or request, the Council shall make a recommendation to the Governor.

§901.2.Appeal of Decision on Designation or Redesignation.

(a)

Time Limit for Appeal. An appeal of a designation or redesignation of a workforce area must be delivered to the Council no later than 30 days after the date the designation or redesignation was made.

(b)

Contents of Appeal. An appeal shall be in writing and shall include the specific reasons for appealing the designation or redesignation. The request shall also include any new information the requestor seeks to have considered in the appeal process.

(c)

Notice of Appeal. When an appeal is received, notice of the appeal shall be published in the Texas Register with a statement inviting input, specifying the deadline for submitting written input. The council, at its discretion, may also schedule a public meeting at which oral comments on the appeal will be accepted.

(d)

Consideration of Proposal or Request. The Council may consider an appeal or may designate a committee to do so and make a report to the Council. In considering an appeal, all relevant information may be reviewed in addition to the information submitted with the appeal and the information obtained during the public comment process.

(e)

Recommendation. After considering an appeal, the Council shall make a recommendation to the Governor within 120 days of the date of receipt of the appeal request.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on January 25, 2000.

TRD-200000463

Claudia Nadig

Assistant General Counsel, Office of the Governor

Texas Council on Workforce and Economic Competitiveness

Effective date: February 14, 2000

Proposal publication date: November 5, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 463-1788