TITLE 31.NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION

Part 1. GENERAL LAND OFFICE

Chapter 13. LAND RESOURCES

Subchapter B. RIGHTS-OF-WAY OVER PUBLIC LANDS

31 TAC §13.17

The General Land Office adopts an amendment to §13.17(c) relating to the payment of fees for renewals of right-of-way easements for pipelines, with changes to the proposed text as published in the March 31, 2000, issue of the Texas Register (25 TexReg 2766). The amendment requires that the fee to be paid for renewals of right-of-way easements for pipelines be the full rate presented in §13.17(a) of the rule. The amendment to the rule is being adopted to increase deposits to the permanent school fund and to the special fund for removal of unauthorized structures on permanent school fund land as a result of increased payment of the fees for renewals of right-of-way easements by the users of the pipelines.

Written comments on the proposal were received from Texas Association of Business & Chamber of Commerce, Association of Texas Intrastate Natural Gas Pipelines, and Texas Oil & Gas Association. The comments addressed the same two concerns: 1) deletion of the word "automatically" from the rule subjects a pipeline user to a review of its pipeline use before a renewal of the easement will be granted by the agency, thereby creating uncertainty in planning for continuity of operations and acquisitions and dispositions, and 2) the requirement that the renewal be based on the then current rate applicable to pipelines imposes an additional economic burden on the pipeline user. With regard to the first concern, suggestions included: (i) retention of the word "automatically," and (ii) inclusion of language that clarifies the conditions upon which easement renewals will be given. With regard to the second concern, suggestions included: (i) no increase in rates, (ii) limiting any increase to 100% of the originally paid fee, and (iii) phasing any increase over a number of years.

In response to the first concern, the agency changed the language in the proposed amendment to §13.17(c) to provide that renewals "shall" be granted, provided that the grantee complies with the terms and conditions of the easement "agreement, including the notice, application, renewal payment, and documentation requirements contained therein." The word "automatically" remains deleted to avoid misunderstandings as to whether the grantee desires to renew the easement at the time for renewal. The notice procedure in the easement agreement will provide the agency with information on the grantee's intention to renew and should substantially reduce the agency's time and effort in policing the status of renewals on existing pipeline easements, while placing but a small burden on the user to notify the agency of its intent to renew the easement.

As to concern No. 2, the agency responds that the renewal rate, under the adopted rule, will be the same as that being paid by new pipeline users and users extending pipelines over additional areas, thereby putting first time users, extending users, and renewal users on the same rate level. Additionally, all users pay only a one-time fee over a ten-year term, with no periodic present value adjustments or other related increases; thereby affording the user extended budgetary planning time. Also, currently outstanding easement agreements, which contain a 50% renewal rate clause, will be honored by the agency, provided the user has complied with all of the terms of the easement at the time of renewal. Finally, because there have been no increases in pipeline user fees since 1984, deletion of the 50% renewal rate, at this time, should not result in an undue imposition on pipeline users.

The amendment is adopted under the Natural Resources Code, Chapter 31, §31.051, which provides the Land Commissioner with the authority to make and enforce suitable rules consistent with the law. The amendment is also adopted under Chapter 51, §51.295 and §51.296, relating to Easements.

The amendment affects Natural Resources Code, Chapter 51, §51.295 and §51.296.

§13.17.Fees for Right-of-Way Easements.

(a)

The following table lists the fees and terms for pipeline right-of-way easements across public lands as established by the commissioner of the General Land Office.

Figure: 31 TAC §13.17(a) (No change.)

(b)

Right-of-way easements for pipelines issued prior to December 31, 1983, shall be renewed upon the expiration of their current term at the full rate presented in subsection (a) of this section. These renewals shall be considered as easements for new pipelines for purposes of subsection (c) of this section

(c)

Right-of-way easements issued for new pipelines after December 31, 1983, shall be renewed for an additional 10-year term at the full rate applicable to pipelines at the time of renewal, provided grantee has complied with all the terms and conditions of the easement agreement, including the notice, application, renewal fee payment, and documentation requirements contained therein.

(d)

At the commissioner's discretion, a right-of-way easement for pipelines may be renewed for a term less than 10 years and the rates prorated accordingly.

(e)

The following table lists the fees and terms for power and telephone line rights-of-way over public lands as established by the commissioner.

Figure: 31 TAC §13.17(e) (No change.)

(f)

Renewal fees for all power and telephone line rights-of-way over public lands are the rates in effect at the time of renewal.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 2, 2000.

TRD-200005395

Larry Soward

Chief Clerk

General Land Office

Effective date: August 22, 2000

Proposal publication date: March 31, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 305-9129


Part 16. COASTAL COORDINATION COUNCIL

Chapter 501. COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

The Coastal Coordination Council (Council) adopts, without changes to the text, the proposed amendments to §501.3, relating to Definitions and Abbreviations, §501.4, relating to General Procedures, and adopts with nonsubstantive, editorial changes to the text §501.14, relating to Policies for Specific Activities and Coastal Natural Resource Areas. The proposed amendments were published in the May 19, 2000, edition of the Texas Register (25 TexReg 4486). The Council voted to adopt these amendments at its regularly scheduled meeting on June 28, 2000.

These rules are adopted concurrently with the amendments to Chapter 505, relating to Council Procedures for State Consistency with Coastal Management Program Goals and Policies, and Chapter 506, relating to Council Procedures for Federal Consistency with Coastal Management Program Goals and Policies. Together, the adopted amendments to Chapters 501, 505 and 506 are part of a single rulemaking action.

The adopted amendment to §501.3(b)(15), relating to the definition of "waters of the open Gulf of Mexico," clarifies that this coastal natural resource area includes the fishery habitat and fishery resources within the area.

The adopted amendment to §501.4(b), relating to General Procedures, has deleted the requirement that the Council meet in specific months. The Coastal Coordination Act (the Act) requires only that the Council meet once in each calendar quarter. Texas Natural Resources Code, §33.204(b). This adopted amendment revises the Coastal Management Program (CMP) rules to conform to the Act.

The adopted amendments to §501.4(e), relating to General Procedures, change the deadline for the submission of agenda items by Council members to 21 days prior to a meeting from the previous 14 days prior, allow the Council Secretary to notify the Council Members of the agenda via electronic mail, and clarify that the time periods under this subsection are measured in calendar days.

Adopted §501.4(h), relating to General Procedures, has added a new subsection containing general rules for the CMP Grants Program. This adopted amendment codifies the Council's existing policies and practices regarding the CMP Grants Program. Each year, the Council receives grant funds from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the implementation of the CMP. The Council passes through the majority of these funds to coastal local governments and other qualified entities for the planning and implementation of projects that enhance public access to and appreciation of coastal natural resource areas, further the acquisition and/or conservation of unique coastal ecosystems, and otherwise further the CMP goals and policies. For each year or for each grant cycle, the Council promulgates guidance for the CMP Grants Program describing the deadlines, schedule, eligibility requirements, funding policies, and approval process.

The adopted amendment to §501.14(f)(1)(D), relating to policies for the discharge of municipal and industrial wastewaters to coastal waters, expands the Council's existing policy for the establishment of Total Maximum Daily Pollutant Loads (TMDLs) to require the use of scientifically valid models calibrated and validated with monitored data and with public input from affected stakeholders.

The adopted amendment to §501.14(t), relating to policies for marine fishery management, establishes a new policy for the promulgation of fishery management measures by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Texas fishers raised concerns regarding the effectiveness of management measures for the Red Snapper Fishery, recently proposed by NMFS, and the impact of these management measures on Texas fishers. Council staff presented a report on federal fisheries policies at the Council's December 2, 1999, meeting in Galveston. The Council then formed a work group to consider and prepare proposed changes to the CMP rules, including draft policies for fishery management measures. In developing these policies, the work group worked closely with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and reviewed federal fishery policies as well as fishery policies from Texas, Florida, and other states. The new policies for fishery management measures require that fishery management measures conserve fishery resources, be based on the best information available, and be fair and equitable to all of the people of the state.

Concurrent with this rulemaking, the Council has adopted a general consistency concurrence to affirm the TPWD's primacy in the determination of Texas' fishery management policies and to ensure that the Council's review of federal management measures for consistency with the CMP goals and policies is consistent with the TPWD's state fishery management policies. The general consistency concurrence will find that where NMFS promulgates, as a federal rule, fishery management measures that incorporate and adopt the TPWD's state fishery management policies, the Council deems the federal fishery management measures to be consistent with the CMP goals and policies. A copy of the general consistency concurrence may be obtained by writing to Ms. Janet Fatheree, Secretary, Coastal Coordination Council, P.O. Box 12873, Austin, Texas 78711-2873, janet.fatheree@glo.state.tx.us, facsimile (512) 475-0680.

A public hearing on the proposed amendments was held on May 18, 2000, in Austin as part of the regularly scheduled meeting of the Council's Executive Committee. At the hearing, comments in support of the proposed amendments providing for the review of the federal fishery management measures were provided by the Texas Recreational Fishing Alliance and The Coastal Conservation Association. No other comments were received regarding the proposed amendments to Chapter 501.

An editorial change has been made to §501.14(d), relating to policies for construction and operation of solid waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities, to apply consistent terms. Under subparagraphs (B) and (C) of §501.14(d), the terms "100-year flood" and "100-year flood event" were used interchangeably. These subparagraphs have been revised to consistently use the term "100-year flood event." This is a change to the rule made for clarification and consistency.

Pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0225, a regulatory analysis is not required for the adopted amendments as a "major environmental rule." Under the Government Code, a major environmental rule is a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. A regulatory analysis is required only when a major environmental rule exceeds a standard set by federal law, exceeds an express requirement of state law, exceeds a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state or federal program, or are adopted solely under the general powers of the Council. The adopted amendments do not exceed a standard set by federal law, exceed an express requirement of state law, exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state or federal program, nor are the amendments adopted solely under the general powers of the Council.

The General Land Office has assisted the Council in preparing a takings impact assessment for these adopted amendments and determined that the amendments will not result in the taking of private real property. To receive a copy of the takings impact assessment, please send a written request to Ms. Melinda Tracy, Texas Register Liaison, General Land Office, P.O. Box 12873, Austin, Texas 78711-2873, melinda.tracy@glo.state.tx.us, facsimile (512) 463-6311.

Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS

31 TAC §501.3, §501.4

These amendments are adopted under Texas Natural Resources Code §33.053(a)(2) and (4)-(7), which provide the Council with authority to analyze coastal land and water uses, identify land and water uses that would have a direct and significant impact on coastal waters, recommend incremental authority necessary to protect coastal lands and waters, inventory coastal natural resource areas (CNRAs), and describe an organizational structure for implementing and administering the CMP; §33.055 which requires that the Council hold public hearings, as deemed appropriate, to consider amendments to the CMP; §33.202 which provides that it is the policy of the state to make more effective and efficient use of public funds and to provide for more effective and efficient management of CNRAs by continually reviewing principal coastal problems of state concern and by coordinating the performance of government programs affecting CNRAs; and §33.204 which authorizes the Council to adopt by rule goals and policies for the CMP.

Natural Resources Code, §§33.053(a)(2) and (4)-(7), 33.055, 33.202, and 33.204 are affected by these adopted amendments.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005440

Larry Soward

Chief Clerk, General Land Office

Coastal Coordination Council

Effective date: August 27, 2000

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 305-9129


Subchapter B. GOALS AND POLICIES

31 TAC §501.14

This amendment is adopted under Texas Natural Resources Code §§33.053(a)(2) and (4)-(7), which provide the Council with authority to analyze coastal land and water uses, identify land and water uses that would have a direct and significant impact on coastal waters, recommend incremental authority necessary to protect coastal lands and waters, inventory coastal natural resource areas (CNRAs), and describe an organizational structure for implementing and administering the CMP; §33.055 which requires that the Council hold public hearings, as deemed appropriate, to consider amendments to the CMP; §33.202 which provides that it is the policy of the state to make more effective and efficient use of public funds and to provide for more effective and efficient management of CNRAs by continually reviewing principal coastal problems of state concern and by coordinating the performance of government programs affecting CNRAs; and §33.204 which authorizes the Council to adopt by rule goals and policies for the CMP.

Natural Resources Code, §§33.053(a)(2) and (4)-(7), 33.055, 33.202, and 33.204 are affected by this adopted amendment.

§501.14.Policies for Specific Activities and Coastal Natural Resource Areas.

(a)

Construction of Electric Generating and Transmission Facilities.

(1)

Construction of electric generating facilities and electric transmission lines in the coastal zone shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

New electric generating facilities shall, where practicable, be located at previously developed sites. New electric generating facilities at undeveloped sites shall be located so that future expansion will avoid construction in critical areas, Gulf beaches, critical dunes, and washovers to the greatest extent practicable. To the extent applicable to the public beach, the policies in this subsection are supplemental to any further restrictions or requirements relating to the beach access and use rights of the public.

(B)

Electric generating facilities using once-through cooling systems shall be located and designed to have the least adverse effects practicable, including impingement or entrainment of estuarine organisms.

(C)

Electric generating facilities shall be constructed at sites selected to have the least adverse effects practicable on recreational uses of CNRAs and on areas used for spawning, nesting, and seasonal migrations of terrestrial and aquatic fish and wildlife species.

(D)

Electric transmission lines to or on Coastal Barrier Resource System Units and Otherwise Protected Areas designated on maps dated October 24, 1990, under the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, 16 United States Code Annotated, §3503, on coastal barriers shall:

(i)

be located, where practicable, in existing rights-of-way or previously disturbed areas if necessary to avoid or minimize adverse effects; and

(ii)

be located at sites at which future expansion shall avoid construction in critical areas, Gulf beaches, critical dunes, and washovers to the greatest extent practicable.

(2)

The PUC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when issuing certificates of convenience and necessity and adopting rules under Texas Civil Statutes, Public Utility Regulatory Act, Article 1446c, governing construction of electric generating facilities, electric transmission lines, and associated facilities in the coastal zone.

(b)

Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Facilities.

(1)

Oil and gas exploration and production on submerged lands shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

In or near critical areas, facilities shall be located and operated and geophysical and other operations shall be located and conducted in such a manner as to avoid and otherwise minimize adverse effects, including those from the disposal of solid waste and disturbance resulting from the operation of vessels and wheeled or tracked vehicles, whether on areas under lease, easement, or permit or on or across access routes thereto. Where practicable, buffer zones for critical areas shall be established and directional drilling or other methods to avoid disturbance, such as pooling or unitization, shall be employed.

(B)

Lessees, easement holders, and permittees shall construct facilities in a manner that avoids impoundment or draining of coastal wetlands, if practicable, and shall mitigate any adverse effects on coastal wetlands impounded or drained in accordance with the sequencing requirements in this subsection.

(C)

Upon completion or cessation of operations, lessees, easement holders, and permittees shall remove facilities and restore any significantly degraded areas to pre-project conditions as closely as practicable, unless facilities can be used for maintenance or enhancement of CNRAs or unless restoration activities would further degrade CNRAs.

(2)

To the extent applicable to the public beach, the policies in this subsection are supplemental to any further restrictions or requirements relating to the beach access and use rights of the public.

(3)

The GLO and SLB shall comply with the policies in this subsection when approving oil, gas, and other mineral lease plans of operation and granting surface leases, easements, and permits and adopting rules under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 32, 33 and 51-53, governing oil and gas exploration and production on submerged lands.

(c)

Discharges of Wastewater and Disposal of Waste from Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities.

(1)

Disposal of oil and gas waste in the coastal zone shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

No new commercial oil and gas waste disposal pit shall be located in any CNRA.

(B)

Oil and gas waste disposal pits shall be designed to prevent releases of pollutants that adversely affect coastal waters or critical areas.

(2)

Discharge of oil and gas exploration and production wastewater in the coastal zone shall comply with the following policies.

(A)

All discharges shall comply with all provisions of surface water quality standards established by the TNRCC under subsection (f) of this section.

(B)

To the greatest extent practicable, new wastewater outfalls shall be located where the discharge will not adversely affect critical areas. Existing wastewater outfalls that adversely affect critical areas shall be either discontinued or relocated so as not to adversely affect critical areas within two years of the effective date of this section.

(C)

The RRC shall notify the TNRCC and the TPWD upon receipt of an application for a new permit to discharge produced waters to waters under tidal influence. In determining compliance with the policies in this subsection, the RRC shall consider the effects of salinity from the discharge.

(3)

The RRC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when issuing permits and adopting rules under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 91, for oil and gas waste, and under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26, and the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 91, for oil and gas wastewater discharges.

(d)

Construction and Operation of Solid Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.

(1)

Construction and operation of solid waste facilities in the coastal zone shall comply with the policies in this subsection. This subsection applies to both new facilities and areal expansion of existing facilities.

(A)

A landfill at which hazardous waste is received for a fee shall not be located in a critical area, critical dune area, critical erosion area, or a 100-year floodplain of a perennial stream, delineated on a flood map adopted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency after September 1, 1985, as zone A1-99, VO, or V1-30. This provision shall not apply to any facility for which a notice of intent to file an application, or an application, has been filed with the TNRCC as of September 1, 1985.

(B)

Except as provided in clauses (i) and (ii) of this subparagraph, a hazardous waste landfill shall not be located in a special hazard area existing before site development except in an area with a flood depth of less than three feet. Any hazardous waste landfill within a special hazard area must be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to prevent washout of any hazardous waste by a 100-year flood event.

(i)

The areal expansion of a landfill in a special hazard area may be allowed if the applicant demonstrates that the facility design will prevent the physical transport of any hazardous waste by a 100-year flood event.

(ii)

A new commercial hazardous waste management facility landfill unit may not be located in a special hazard area, unless the applicant demonstrates that the facility design will prevent the physical transport of any hazardous waste by a 100-year flood event.

(C)

Hazardous waste storage or processing facilities, land treatment facilities, waste piles, and storage surface impoundments shall not be located in special hazard areas unless they are designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to prevent washout of any hazardous waste by a 100-year flood event.

(D)

Hazardous waste land treatment facilities, waste piles, storage surface impoundments, and landfills shall not be located within 1,000 feet of an area subject to active coastal shoreline erosion, if the area is protected by a barrier island or peninsula, unless the design, construction, and operational features of the facility will prevent adverse effects resulting from storm surge and erosion or scouring by water. On coastal shorelines which are subject to active shoreline erosion and which are unprotected by a barrier island or peninsula, a separation distance from the shoreline to the facility must be at least 5,000 feet, unless the design, construction, and operational features of the facility will prevent adverse effects resulting from storm surge and erosion or scouring by water.

(E)

Hazardous waste storage or processing facilities, land treatment facilities, waste piles, storage surface impoundments, and landfills shall not be located in coastal wetlands, or in any CNRA that is the critical habitat of an endangered species of plant or animal unless the design, construction, and operation features of the facility will prevent adverse effects on the critical habitat of the endangered species.

(F)

Hazardous waste land treatment facilities, waste piles, storage surface impoundments, and landfills shall not be located on coastal barriers.

(G)

Hazardous waste landfills are prohibited if there is a practicable alternative to such a landfill that is reasonably available to manage the types and classes of hazardous waste which might be disposed at the landfill.

(H)

The TNRCC shall not issue a permit for a new hazardous waste management facility or the areal expansion of an existing hazardous waste facility unless it finds that the proposed site, when evaluated in light of proposed design, construction, and operational features, reasonably minimizes possible contamination of coastal waters.

(I)

New solid waste facilities and areal expansion of existing solid waste facilities shall be sited, designed, constructed, and operated to prevent releases of pollutants that may adversely affect CNRAs and, at a minimum, comply with standards established under the Solid Waste Disposal Act, 42 United States Code Annotated, §§6901 et seq.

(2)

The TNRCC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when issuing permits and adopting rules under Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361.

(e)

Prevention, Response and Remediation of Oil Spills.

(1)

The GLO regulations governing prevention of, response to and remediation of coastal oil spills shall provide for measures to prevent coastal oil spills and to ensure adequate response and removal actions. The GLO regulations for certification of vessels and facilities that handle oil shall be designed to ensure that vessels and facilities are capable of prompt response and adequate removal of unauthorized discharges of oil. The GLO regulations adopted pursuant to the Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act (OSPRA), Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 40, shall be consistent with the State Coastal Discharge Contingency Plan adopted pursuant to OSPRA; and the National Contingency Plan adopted pursuant to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 United States Code Annotated, Chapter 26.

(2)

Natural Resource Damage Assessment. GLO rules under OSPRA governing the assessment of damages to natural resources injured as the result of an unauthorized discharge of oil into coastal waters shall provide for reasonable and rational procedures for assessing damages and shall take into account the unique circumstances of the spill incident. The costs of assessing the damages shall not be disproportionate to the value of the injured resources. Plans for the restoration, rehabilitation, replacement or acquisition of equivalent resources shall provide for participation by the public and shall be designed to promote the restoration of the injured resources with all deliberate speed. The GLO rules shall be consistent with other state rules and policies and with the CMP goals and policies.

(f)

Discharge of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater to Coastal Waters.

(1)

TNRCC rules shall:

(A)

comply with the requirements of the Clean Water Act, 33 United States Code Annotated, §§1251 et seq, and implementing regulations at Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, which include establishing surface water quality standards in order to protect designated uses of coastal waters, including the protection of uses for water supply, recreational purposes, and propagation and protection of terrestrial and aquatic life, and establishing water-quality-based effluent limits, including toxicity monitoring and specific toxicity or chemical limits as necessary to protect designated uses of coastal waters;

(B)

provide for the assessment of water quality on a coastal watershed basis once every two years, as required by the Texas Water Code, §26.0135(d);

(C)

to the greatest extent practicable, provide that all permits for the discharge of wastewater within a given watershed or region of a single watershed contain the same expiration date in order to evaluate the combined effects of permitted discharges on water quality within that watershed or region;

(D)

identify and rank waters that are not attaining designated uses and establish total maximum daily pollutant loads in accordance with those rankings using scientifically valid models calibrated and validated with monitored data and with public input from affected stakeholders; and

(E)

require that increases in pollutant loads to coastal waters shall not:

(i)

impair designated uses of coastal waters; or

(ii)

result in degradation of coastal waters that exceed fishable/swimmable quality except in cases where lowering coastal water quality is necessary for important economic or social development.

(2)

Discharge of municipal and industrial wastewater in the coastal zone shall comply with the following policies.

(A)

Discharges shall comply with water-quality-based effluent limits.

(B)

Discharges that increase pollutant loadings to coastal waters shall not impair designated uses of coastal waters and shall not significantly degrade coastal water quality unless necessary for important economic or social development.

(C)

To the greatest extent practicable, new wastewater outfalls shall be located where they will not adversely affect critical areas.

(3)

The TNRCC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when adopting rules and authorizing wastewater discharges under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26.

(4)

The TNRCC shall consult with the Texas Department of Health when reviewing permit applications for wastewater discharges that may significantly adversely affect oyster reefs.

(g)

Nonpoint Source (NPS) Water Pollution.

(1)

State agencies and subdivisions with authority to manage NPS pollution shall cooperate in the development and implementation of a coordinated program to reduce NPS pollution in order to restore and protect coastal waters.

(2)

In an area that the TSSWCB identifies as having or having the potential to develop agricultural or silvicultural NPS water quality problems or an area within the coastal zone, the TSSWCB shall establish a water quality management plan certification program that provides, through the local soil and water conservation district, for the development, supervision, and monitoring of voluntary individual water quality management plans for agricultural and silvicultural lands. Each plan must be developed, maintained, and implemented under rules and criteria adopted by the TSSWCB and discharges under such a plan may not cause a violation of state water quality standards established by the TNRCC. The TSSWCB's rules shall certify a plan that satisfies the TSSWCB rules and criteria and discharges which do not cause a violation of state water quality standards established by the TNRCC. This policy is not intended, nor shall it be interpreted, to require the TSSWCB to establish non-voluntary requirements for the development, maintenance, or implementation of individual water quality management plans.

(3)

TNRCC rules under Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 366, governing on-site sewage disposal systems, and TNRCC rules under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26, Subchapter I, governing underground storage tanks, shall require that on-site disposal systems and underground storage tanks be located, designed, operated, inspected, and maintained so as to prevent releases of pollutants that may adversely affect coastal waters.

(4)

This policy shall not be interpreted or applied so as to require that either a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for stormwater discharges issued under the Clean Water Act, §402(p), or an NPDES permit for a concentrated animal feeding operation, requiring no discharge up to and including a 25-year, 24-hour frequency storm, provide additional NPS pollution control measures in addition to those required in the permit.

(h)

Development in Critical Areas.

(1)

Dredging and construction of structures in, or the discharge of dredged or fill material into, critical areas shall comply with the policies in this subsection. In implementing this subsection, cumulative and secondary adverse effects of these activities will be considered.

(A)

The policies in this subsection shall be applied in a manner consistent with the goal of achieving no net loss of critical area functions and values.

(B)

Persons proposing development in critical areas shall demonstrate that no practicable alternative with fewer adverse effects is available.

(C)

In evaluating practicable alternatives, the following sequence shall be applied:

(i)

Adverse effects on critical areas shall be avoided to the greatest extent practicable.

(ii)

Unavoidable adverse effects shall be minimized to the greatest extent practicable by limiting the degree or magnitude of the activity and its implementation.

(iii)

Appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation shall be required to the greatest extent practicable for all adverse effects that cannot be avoided or minimized.

(D)

Compensatory mitigation includes restoring adversely affected critical areas or replacing adversely affected critical areas by creating new critical areas. Compensatory mitigation should be undertaken, when practicable, in areas adjacent or contiguous to the affected critical areas (on-site). If on-site compensatory mitigation is not practicable, compensatory mitigation should be undertaken in close physical proximity to the affected critical areas if practicable and in the same watershed if possible (off-site). Compensatory mitigation should also attempt to replace affected critical areas with critical areas with characteristics identical to or closely approximating those of the affected critical areas (in-kind). The preferred order of compensatory mitigation is:

(i)

on-site, in-kind;

(ii)

off-site, in-kind;

(iii)

on-site, out-of-kind; and

(iv)

off-site, out-of-kind.

(E)

Mitigation banking is acceptable compensatory mitigation if use of the mitigation bank has been approved by the agency authorizing the development and mitigation credits are available for withdrawal. Preservation through acquisition for public ownership of unique critical areas or other ecologically important areas may be acceptable compensatory mitigation in exceptional circumstances. Examples of this include areas of high priority for preservation or restoration, areas whose functions and values are difficult to replicate, or areas not adequately protected by regulatory programs. Acquisition will normally be allowed only in conjunction with preferred forms of compensatory mitigation.

(F)

In determining compensatory mitigation requirements, the impaired functions and values of the affected critical area shall be replaced on a one-to-one ratio. Replacement of functions and values on a one-to-one ratio may require restoration or replacement of the physical area affected on a ratio higher than one-to-one. While no net loss of critical area functions and values is the goal, it is not required in individual cases where mitigation is not practicable or would result in only inconsequential environmental benefits. It is also important to recognize that there are circumstances where the adverse effects of the activity are so significant that, even if alternatives are not available, the activity may not be permitted regardless of the compensatory mitigation proposed.

(G)

Development in critical areas shall not be authorized if significant degradation of critical areas will occur. Significant degradation occurs if:

(i)

the activity will jeopardize the continued existence of species listed as endangered or threatened, or will result in likelihood of the destruction or adverse modification of a habitat determined to be a critical habitat under the Endangered Species Act, 16 United States Code Annotated, §§1531-1544;

(ii)

the activity will cause or contribute, after consideration of dilution and dispersion, to violation of any applicable surface water quality standards established under subsection (f) of this section;

(iii)

the activity violates any applicable toxic effluent standard or prohibition established under subsection (f) of this section;

(iv)

the activity violates any requirement imposed to protect a marine sanctuary designated under the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, 33 United States Code Annotated, Chapter 27; or

(v)

taking into account the nature and degree of all identifiable adverse effects, including their persistence, permanence, areal extent, and the degree to which these effects will have been mitigated pursuant to subparagraphs (C) and (D) of this paragraph, the activity will, individually or collectively, cause or contribute to significant adverse effects on:

(I)

human health and welfare, including effects on water supplies, plankton, benthos, fish, shellfish, wildlife, and consumption of fish and wildlife;

(II)

the life stages of aquatic life and other wildlife dependent on aquatic ecosystems, including the transfer, concentration, or spread of pollutants or their byproducts beyond the site, or their introduction into an ecosystem, through biological, physical, or chemical processes;

(III)

ecosystem diversity, productivity, and stability, including loss of fish and wildlife habitat or loss of the capacity of a coastal wetland to assimilate nutrients, purify water, or reduce wave energy; or

(IV)

generally accepted recreational, aesthetic or economic values of the critical area which are of exceptional character and importance.

(2)

The TNRCC and the RRC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when issuing certifications and adopting rules under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26, and the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 91, governing certification of compliance with surface water quality standards for federal actions and permits authorizing development affecting critical areas; provided that activities exempted from the requirement for a permit for the discharge of dredged or fill material, described in Code of Federal Regulations, Title 33, §323.4 and/or Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, §232.3, including but not limited to normal farming, silviculture, and ranching activities, such as plowing, seeding, cultivating, minor drainage, and harvesting for the production of food, fiber, and forest products, or upland soil and water conservation practices, shall not be considered activities for which a certification is required. The GLO and the SLB shall comply with the policies in this subsection when approving oil, gas, or other mineral lease plans of operation or granting surface leases, easements, and permits and adopting rules under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 32, 33 and 51-53, and Texas Water Code, Chapter 61, governing development affecting critical areas on state submerged lands and private submerged lands, and when issuing approvals and adopting rules under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 5421u, for mitigation banks operated by subdivisions of the state.

(3)

Agencies required to comply with this subsection will coordinate with one another and with federal agencies when evaluating alternatives, determining appropriate and practicable mitigation, and assessing significant degradation. Those agencies' rules governing authorizations for development in critical areas shall require a demonstration that the requirements of paragraph (1)(A)-(G) of this subsection have been satisfied.

(4)

For any dredging or construction of structures in, or discharge of dredged or fill material into, critical areas that is subject to the requirements of §501.15 of this title (relating to Policy for Major Actions), data and information on the cumulative and secondary adverse affects of the project need not be produced or evaluated to comply with this subsection if such data and information is produced and evaluated in compliance with §501.15(b)-(c) of this title (relating to Policy for Major Actions).

(i)

Construction of Waterfront Facilities and Other Structures on Submerged Lands.

(1)

Development on submerged lands shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

Marinas shall be designed and, to the greatest extent practicable, sited so that tides and currents will aid in flushing of the site or renew its water regularly.

(B)

Marinas designed for anchorage of private vessels shall provide facilities for the collection of waste, refuse, trash, and debris.

(C)

Marinas with the capacity for long-term anchorage of more than ten vessels shall provide pump-out facilities for marine toilets, or other such measures or facilities that provide an equal or better level of water quality protection.

(D)

Marinas, docks, piers, wharves and other structures shall be designed and, to the greatest extent practicable, sited to avoid and otherwise minimize adverse effects on critical areas from boat traffic to and from those structures.

(E)

Construction of docks, piers, wharves, and other structures shall be preferred instead of authorizing dredging of channels or basins or filling of submerged lands to provide access to coastal waters if such construction is practicable, environmentally preferable, and will not interfere with commercial navigation.

(F)

Piers, docks, wharves, bulkheads, jetties, groins, fishing cabins, and artificial reefs (including artificial reefs for compensatory mitigation) shall be limited to the minimum necessary to serve the project purpose and shall be constructed in a manner that:

(i)

does not significantly interfere with public navigation;

(ii)

does not significantly interfere with the natural coastal processes which supply sediments to shore areas or otherwise exacerbate erosion of shore areas; and

(iii)

avoids and otherwise minimizes shading of critical areas and other adverse effects.

(G)

Facilities shall be located at sites or designed and constructed to the greatest extent practicable to avoid and otherwise minimize the potential for adverse effects from:

(i)

construction and maintenance of other development associated with the facility;

(ii)

direct release to coastal waters and critical areas of pollutants from oil or hazardous substance spills or stormwater runoff; and

(iii)

deposition of airborne pollutants in coastal waters and critical areas.

(H)

Where practicable, pipelines, transmission lines, cables, roads, causeways, and bridges shall be located in existing rights-of-way or previously disturbed areas if necessary to avoid or minimize adverse effects and if it does not result in unreasonable risks to human health, safety, and welfare.

(I)

To the greatest extent practicable, construction of facilities shall occur at sites and times selected to have the least adverse effects on recreational uses of CNRAs and on spawning or nesting seasons or seasonal migrations of terrestrial and aquatic wildlife.

(J)

Facilities shall be located at sites which avoid the impoundment and draining of coastal wetlands. If impoundment or draining cannot be avoided, adverse effects to the impounded or drained wetlands shall be mitigated in accordance with the sequencing requirements of subsection (h) of this section. To the greatest extent practicable, facilities shall be located at sites at which expansion will not result in development in critical areas.

(K)

Where practicable, piers, docks, wharves, bulkheads, jetties, groins, fishing cabins, and artificial reefs shall be constructed with materials that will not cause any adverse effects on coastal waters or critical areas.

(L)

Developed sites shall be returned as closely as practicable to pre-project conditions upon completion or cessation of operations by the removal of facilities and restoration of any significantly degraded areas, unless:

(i)

the facilities can be used for public purposes or contribute to the maintenance or enhancement of coastal water quality, critical areas, beaches, submerged lands, or shore areas; or

(ii)

restoration activities would further degrade CNRAs.

(M)

Water-dependent uses and facilities shall receive preference over those uses and facilities that are not water-dependent.

(N)

Nonstructural erosion response methods such as beach nourishment, sediment bypassing, nearshore sediment berms, and planting of vegetation shall be preferred instead of structural erosion response methods.

(O)

Major residential and recreational waterfront facilities shall to the greatest extent practicable accommodate public access to coastal waters and preserve the public's ability to enjoy the natural aesthetic values of coastal submerged lands.

(P)

Activities on submerged land shall avoid and otherwise minimize any significant interference with the public's use of and access to such lands.

(Q)

Erosion of Gulf beaches and coastal shore areas caused by construction or modification of jetties, breakwaters, groins, or shore stabilization projects shall be mitigated to the extent the costs of mitigation are reasonably proportionate to the benefits of mitigation. Factors that shall be considered in determining whether the costs of mitigation are reasonably proportionate to the cost of the construction or modification and benefits include, but are not limited to, environmental benefits, recreational benefits, flood or storm protection benefits, erosion prevention benefits, and economic development benefits.

(2)

To the extent applicable to the public beach, the policies in this subsection are supplemental to any further restrictions or requirements relating to the beach access and use rights of the public.

(3)

The GLO and the SLB, in governing development on state submerged lands, shall comply with the policies in this subsection when approving oil, gas, and other mineral lease plans of operation and granting surface leases, easements, and permits and adopting rules under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 32, 33 and 51-53, and Texas Water Code, Chapter 61.

(j)

Dredging and Dredged Material Disposal and Placement.

(1)

Dredging and the disposal and placement of dredged material shall avoid and otherwise minimize adverse effects to coastal waters, submerged lands, critical areas, coastal shore areas, and Gulf beaches to the greatest extent practicable. The policies of this subsection are supplemental to any further restrictions or requirements relating to the beach access and use rights of the public. In implementing this subsection, cumulative and secondary adverse effects of dredging and the disposal and placement of dredged material and the unique characteristics of affected sites shall be considered.

(A)

Dredging and dredged material disposal and placement shall not cause or contribute, after consideration of dilution and dispersion, to violation of any applicable surface water quality standards established under subsection (f) of this section.

(B)

Except as otherwise provided in subparagraph (D) of this paragraph, adverse effects on critical areas from dredging and dredged material disposal or placement shall be avoided and otherwise minimized, and appropriate and practicable compensatory mitigation shall be required, in accordance with subsection (h) of this section.

(C)

Except as provided in subparagraph (D) of this paragraph, dredging and the disposal and placement of dredged material shall not be authorized if:

(i)

there is a practicable alternative that would have fewer adverse effects on coastal waters, submerged lands, critical areas, coastal shore areas, and Gulf beaches, so long as that alternative does not have other significant adverse effects;

(ii)

all appropriate and practicable steps have not been taken to minimize adverse effects on coastal waters, submerged lands, critical areas, coastal shore areas, and Gulf beaches; or

(iii)

significant degradation of critical areas under subsection (h)(1)(G)(v) of this section would result.

(D)

A dredging or dredged material disposal or placement project that would be prohibited solely by application of subparagraph (C) of this paragraph may be allowed if it is determined to be of overriding importance to the public and national interest in light of economic impacts on navigation and maintenance of commercially navigable waterways.

(2)

Adverse effects from dredging and dredged material disposal and placement shall be minimized as required in paragraph (1) of this subsection. Adverse effects can be minimized by employing the techniques in this paragraph where appropriate and practicable.

(A)

Adverse effects from dredging and dredged material disposal and placement can be minimized by controlling the location and dimensions of the activity. Some of the ways to accomplish this include:

(i)

locating and confining discharges to minimize smothering of organisms;

(ii)

locating and designing projects to avoid adverse disruption of water inundation patterns, water circulation, erosion and accretion processes, and other hydrodynamic processes;

(iii)

using existing or natural channels and basins instead of dredging new channels or basins, and discharging materials in areas that have been previously disturbed or used for disposal or placement of dredged material;

(iv)

limiting the dimensions of channels, basins, and disposal and placement sites to the minimum reasonably required to serve the project purpose, including allowing for reasonable overdredging of channels and basins, and taking into account the need for capacity to accommodate future expansion without causing additional adverse effects;

(v)

discharging materials at sites where the substrate is composed of material similar to that being discharged;

(vi)

locating and designing discharges to minimize the extent of any plume and otherwise control dispersion of material; and

(vii)

avoiding the impoundment or drainage of critical areas.

(B)

Dredging and disposal and placement of material to be dredged shall comply with applicable standards for sediment toxicity. Adverse effects from constituents contained in materials discharged can be minimized by treatment of or limitations on the material itself. Some ways to accomplish this include:

(i)

disposal or placement of dredged material in a manner that maintains physiochemical conditions at discharge sites and limits or reduces the potency and availability of pollutants;

(ii)

limiting the solid, liquid, and gaseous components of material discharged;

(iii)

adding treatment substances to the discharged material; and

(iv)

adding chemical flocculants to enhance the deposition of suspended particulates in confined disposal areas.

(C)

Adverse effects from dredging and dredged material disposal or placement can be minimized through control of the materials discharged. Some ways of accomplishing this include:

(i)

use of containment levees and sediment basins designed, constructed, and maintained to resist breaches, erosion, slumping, or leaching;

(ii)

use of lined containment areas to reduce leaching where leaching of chemical constituents from the material is expected to be a problem;

(iii)

capping in-place contaminated material or, selectively discharging the most contaminated material first and then capping it with the remaining material;

(iv)

properly containing discharged material and maintaining discharge sites to prevent point and nonpoint pollution; and

(v)

timing the discharge to minimize adverse effects from unusually high water flows, wind, wave, and tidal actions.

(D)

Adverse effects from dredging and dredged material disposal or placement can be minimized by controlling the manner in which material is dispersed. Some ways of accomplishing this include:

(i)

where environmentally desirable, distributing the material in a thin layer;

(ii)

orienting material to minimize undesirable obstruction of the water current or circulation patterns;

(iii)

using silt screens or other appropriate methods to confine suspended particulates or turbidity to a small area where settling or removal can occur;

(iv)

using currents and circulation patterns to mix, disperse, dilute, or otherwise control the discharge;

(v)

minimizing turbidity by using a diffuser system or releasing material near the bottom;

(vi)

selecting sites or managing discharges to confine and minimize the release of suspended particulates and turbidity and maintain light penetration for organisms; and

(vii)

setting limits on the amount of material to be discharged per unit of time or volume of receiving waters.

(E)

Adverse effects from dredging and dredged material disposal or placement operations can be minimized by adapting technology to the needs of each site. Some ways of accomplishing this include:

(i)

using appropriate equipment, machinery, and operating techniques for access to sites and transport of material, including those designed to reduce damage to critical areas;

(ii)

having personnel on site adequately trained in avoidance and minimization techniques and requirements; and

(iii)

designing temporary and permanent access roads and channel spanning structures using culverts, open channels, and diversions that will pass both low and high water flows, accommodate fluctuating water levels, and maintain circulation and faunal movement.

(F)

Adverse effects on plant and animal populations from dredging and dredged material disposal or placement can be minimized by:

(i)

avoiding changes in water current and circulation patterns that would interfere with the movement of animals;

(ii)

selecting sites or managing discharges to prevent or avoid creating habitat conducive to the development of undesirable predators or species that have a competitive edge ecologically over indigenous plants or animals;

(iii)

avoiding sites having unique habitat or other value, including habitat of endangered species;

(iv)

using planning and construction practices to institute habitat development and restoration to produce a new or modified environmental state of higher ecological value by displacement of some or all of the existing environmental characteristics;

(v)

using techniques that have been demonstrated to be effective in circumstances similar to those under consideration whenever possible and, when proposed development and restoration techniques have not yet advanced to the pilot demonstration stage, initiating their use on a small scale to allow corrective action if unanticipated adverse effects occur;

(vi)

timing dredging and dredged material disposal or placement activities to avoid spawning or migration seasons and other biologically critical time periods; and

(vii)

avoiding the destruction of remnant natural sites within areas already affected by development.

(G)

Adverse effects on human use potential from dredging and dredged material disposal or placement can be minimized by:

(i)

selecting sites and following procedures to prevent or minimize any potential damage to the aesthetically pleasing features of the site, particularly with respect to water quality;

(ii)

selecting sites which are not valuable as natural aquatic areas;

(iii)

timing dredging and dredged material disposal or placement activities to avoid the seasons or periods when human recreational activity associated with the site is most important; and

(iv)

selecting sites that will not increase incompatible human activity or require frequent dredge or fill maintenance activity in remote fish and wildlife areas.

(H)

Adverse effects from new channels and basins can be minimized by locating them at sites:

(i)

that ensure adequate flushing and avoid stagnant pockets; or

(ii)

that will create the fewest practicable adverse effects on CNRAs from additional infrastructure such as roads, bridges, causeways, piers, docks, wharves, transmission line crossings, and ancillary channels reasonably likely to be constructed as a result of the project; or

(iii)

with the least practicable risk that increased vessel traffic could result in navigation hazards, spills, or other forms of contamination which could adversely affect CNRAs;

(iv)

provided that, for any dredging of new channels or basins subject to the requirements of §501.15 of this title (relating to Policy for Major Actions), data and information on minimization of secondary adverse effects need not be produced or evaluated to comply with this subparagraph if such data and information is produced and evaluated in compliance with §501.15(b)(1) of this title (relating to Policy for Major Actions).

(3)

Disposal or placement of dredged material in existing contained dredge disposal sites identified and actively used as described in an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement issued prior to the effective date of this chapter shall be presumed to comply with the requirements of paragraph (1) of this subsection unless modified in design, size, use, or function.

(4)

Dredged material from dredging projects in commercially navigable waterways is a potentially reusable resource and must be used beneficially in accordance with this policy.

(A)

If the costs of the beneficial use of dredged material are reasonably comparable to the costs of disposal in a non-beneficial manner, the material shall be used beneficially.

(B)

If the costs of the beneficial use of dredged material are significantly greater than the costs of disposal in a non-beneficial manner, the material shall be used beneficially unless it is demonstrated that the costs of using the material beneficially are not reasonably proportionate to the costs of the project and benefits that will result. Factors that shall be considered in determining whether the costs of the beneficial use are not reasonably proportionate to the benefits include, but are not limited to:

(i)

environmental benefits, recreational benefits, flood or storm protection benefits, erosion prevention benefits, and economic development benefits;

(ii)

the proximity of the beneficial use site to the dredge site; and

(iii)

the quantity and quality of the dredged material and its suitability for beneficial use.

(C)

Examples of the beneficial use of dredged material include, but are not limited to:

(i)

projects designed to reduce or minimize erosion or provide shoreline protection;

(ii)

projects designed to create or enhance public beaches or recreational areas;

(iii)

projects designed to benefit the sediment budget or littoral system;

(iv)

projects designed to improve or maintain terrestrial or aquatic wildlife habitat;

(v)

projects designed to create new terrestrial or aquatic wildlife habitat, including the construction of marshlands, coastal wetlands, or other critical areas;

(vi)

projects designed and demonstrated to benefit benthic communities or aquatic vegetation;

(vii)

projects designed to create wildlife management areas, parks, airports, or other public facilities;

(viii)

projects designed to cap landfills or other waste disposal areas;

(ix)

projects designed to fill private property or upgrade agricultural land, if cost-effective public beneficial uses are not available; and

(x)

projects designed to remediate past adverse impacts on the coastal zone.

(5)

If dredged material cannot be used beneficially as provided in paragraph (4)(B) of this subsection, to avoid and otherwise minimize adverse effects as required in paragraph (1) of this subsection, preference will be given to the greatest extent practicable to disposal in:

(A)

contained upland sites;

(B)

other contained sites; and

(C)

open water areas of relatively low productivity or low biological value.

(6)

For new sites, dredged materials shall not be disposed of or placed directly on the boundaries of submerged lands or at such location so as to slump or migrate across the boundaries of submerged lands in the absence of an agreement between the affected public owner and the adjoining private owner or owners that defines the location of the boundary or boundaries affected by the deposition of the dredged material.

(7)

Emergency dredging shall be allowed without a prior consistency determination as required in the applicable consistency rule when:

(A)

there is an unacceptable hazard to life or navigation;

(B)

there is an immediate threat of significant loss of property; or

(C)

an immediate and unforeseen significant economic hardship is likely if corrective action is not taken within a time period less than the normal time needed under standard procedures. The council secretary shall be notified at least 24 hours prior to commencement of any emergency dredging operation by the agency or entity responding to the emergency. The notice shall include a statement demonstrating the need for emergency action. Prior to initiation of the dredging operations the project sponsor or permit-issuing agency shall, if possible, make all reasonable efforts to meet with council's designated representatives to ensure consideration of and consistency with applicable policies in this section. Compliance with all applicable policies in this section shall be required at the earliest possible date. The permit-issuing agency and the applicant shall submit a consistency determination within 60 days after the emergency operation is complete.

(8)

Mining of sand, shell, marl, gravel, and mudshell on submerged lands shall be prohibited unless there is an affirmative showing of no significant impact on erosion within the coastal zone and no significant adverse effect on coastal water quality or terrestrial and aquatic wildlife habitat within any CNRA.

(9)

The GLO and the SLB shall comply with the policies in this subsection when approving oil, gas, and other mineral lease plans of operation and granting surface leases, easements, and permits and adopting rules under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 32, 33, and 51-53, and Texas Water Code, Chapter 61, for dredging and dredged material disposal and placement. TxDOT shall comply with the policies in this section when adopting rules and taking actions as local sponsor of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 5415e-2. The TNRCC and the RRC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when issuing certifications and adopting rules under Texas Water Code, Chapter 26, and the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 91, governing certification of compliance with surface water quality standards for federal actions and permits authorizing dredging or the discharge or placement of dredged material. The TPWD shall comply with the policies in this subsection when adopting rules at Chapter 57 of this title (relating to Fisheries) governing dredging and dredged material disposal and placement. The TPWD shall comply with the policies in paragraph (8) of this subsection when adopting rules and issuing permits under Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 86, governing the mining of sand, shell, marl, gravel, and mudshell.

(k)

Construction in the Beach/Dune System.

(1)

Construction in critical dune areas and adjacent to Gulf beaches shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

Construction within a critical dune area that results in the material weakening of dunes and material damage to dune vegetation shall be prohibited.

(B)

Construction within critical dune areas that does not materially weaken dunes or materially damage dune vegetation shall be sited, designed, constructed, maintained, and operated so that adverse "effects" (as defined in §15.2 of this title (relating to Coastal Area Planning)) on the sediment budget and critical dune areas are avoided to the greatest extent practicable. For purposes of this subsection, practicability shall be determined by considering the effectiveness, scientific feasibility, and commercial availability of the technology or technique. Cost of the technology or technique shall also be considered. Adverse effects (as defined in Chapter 15 of this title (relating to Coastal Area Planning)) that cannot be avoided shall be:

(i)

minimized by limiting the degree or magnitude of the activity and its implementation;

(ii)

rectified by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the adversely affected dunes and dune vegetation; and

(iii)

compensated for on-site or off-site by replacing the resources lost or damaged seaward of the dune protection line.

(C)

Rectification and compensation for adverse effects that cannot be avoided or minimized shall provide at least a one-to-one replacement of the dune volume and vegetative cover, and preference shall be given to stabilization of blowouts and breaches and on-site compensation.

(D)

The ability of the public, individually and collectively, to exercise its rights of use of and access to and from public beaches shall be preserved and enhanced.

(E)

Non-structural erosion response methods such as beach nourishment, sediment bypassing, nearshore sediment berms, and planting of vegetation shall be preferred instead of structural erosion response methods. Subdivisions shall not authorize the construction of a new erosion response structure within the beach/dune system, except for a retaining wall located more than 200 feet landward of the line of vegetation. Subdivisions shall not authorize the enlargement, improvement, repair or maintenance of existing erosion response structures on the public beach. Subdivisions shall not authorize the repair or maintenance of existing erosion response structures within 200 feet landward of the line of vegetation except as provided in §15.6(d) of this title (relating to Concurrent Dune Protection and Beachfront Construction Standards).

(2)

The GLO shall comply with the policies in this subsection when certifying local government dune protection and beach access plans and adopting rules under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 61 and 63. Local governments required by the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapters 61 and 63, and Chapter 15 of this title (relating to Coastal Area Planning) to adopt dune protection and beach access plans shall comply with the applicable policies in this subsection when issuing beachfront construction certificates and dune protection permits.

(l)

Development in Coastal Hazard Areas.

(1)

Subdivisions participating in the National Flood Insurance Program shall adopt ordinances or orders governing development in special hazard areas under Texas Water Code, Chapter 16, Subchapter I, and Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 240, Subchapter Z, that comply with construction standards in regulations at Code of Federal Regulations, Title 44, Parts 59-60, adopted pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act, 42 United States Code Annotated, §4001 et seq.

(2)

Pursuant to the standards and procedures under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 33, Subchapter H, the GLO shall adopt or issue rules, recommendations, standards, and guidelines for erosion avoidance and remediation and for prioritizing critical erosion areas.

(m)

Development Within Coastal Barrier Resource System Units and Otherwise Protected Areas on Coastal Barriers.

(1)

Development of new infrastructure or major repair of existing infrastructure within or supporting development within Coastal Barrier Resource System Units and Otherwise Protected Areas designated on maps dated October 24, 1990, under the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, 16 United States Code Annotated, §3503(a), shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

Development of publicly funded infrastructure shall be authorized only if it is essential for public health, safety, and welfare, enhances public use, or is required by law.

(B)

Infrastructure shall be located at sites at which reasonably foreseeable future expansion will not require development in critical areas, critical dunes, Gulf beaches, and washover areas within Coastal Barrier Resource System Units or Otherwise Protected Areas.

(C)

Infrastructure shall be located at sites that to the greatest extent practicable avoid and otherwise minimize the potential for adverse effects on critical areas, critical dunes, Gulf beaches, and washover areas within Coastal Barrier Resource System Units or Otherwise Protected Areas from:

(i)

construction and maintenance of roads, bridges, and causeways; and

(ii)

direct release to coastal waters, critical areas, critical dunes, Gulf beaches, and washover areas within Coastal Barrier Resource System Units or Otherwise Protected Areas of oil, hazardous substances, or stormwater runoff.

(D)

Where practicable, infrastructure shall be located in existing rights-of-way or previously disturbed areas to avoid or minimize adverse effects within Coastal Barrier Resource System Units or Otherwise Protected Areas.

(E)

Development of infrastructure shall occur at sites and times selected to have the least adverse effects practicable within Coastal Barrier Resource System Units or Otherwise Protected Areas on critical areas, critical dunes, Gulf beaches, and washover areas and on spawning or nesting areas or seasonal migrations of commercial, recreational, threatened, or endangered terrestrial or aquatic wildlife.

(2)

TNRCC rules and approvals for the creation of special districts and for infrastructure projects funded by issuance of bonds by water, sanitary sewer, and wastewater drainage districts under Texas Water Code, Chapter 50; water control and improvement districts under Texas Water Code, Chapter 50; municipal utility districts under Texas Water Code, Chapter 54; regional plan implementation agencies under Texas Water Code, Chapter 54; special utility districts under Texas Water Code, Chapter 65; stormwater control districts under Texas Water Code, Chapter 66; and all other general and special law districts subject to and within the jurisdiction of the TNRCC, shall comply with the policies in this subsection. TxDOT rules and approvals under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6663 et seq, governing planning, design, construction, and maintenance of transportation projects, shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(n)

Development in State Parks, Wildlife management Areas or Preserves. Development by a person other than the Parks and Wildlife Department that requires the use or taking of any public land in such areas shall comply with Texas Parks and Wildlife Code, Chapter 26.

(o)

Alteration of Coastal Historic Areas.

(1)

Development affecting a coastal historic area shall avoid and otherwise minimize alteration or disturbance of the site unless the site's excavation will promote historical, archaeological, educational, or scientific understanding.

(2)

The THC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when adopting rules and issuing permits under the Texas Natural Resources Code, Chapter 191, governing alteration of coastal historic areas. The THC shall comply with the policies in this subsection when issuing reviews under the National Historic Preservation Act, §106 (16 United States Code Annotated, §470f), and the regulations enacted pursuant thereto, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36, Chapter 1, Part 63.

(p)

Transportation Projects.

(1)

Transportation construction projects and maintenance programs within the coastal zone shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

Pollution prevention procedures shall be incorporated into the construction and maintenance of transportation projects to minimize pollutant loading to coastal waters from erosion and sedimentation, use of pesticides and herbicides for maintenance of rights-of-way, and other pollutants from stormwater runoff.

(B)

Transportation projects shall be located at sites that to the greatest extent practicable avoid and otherwise minimize the potential for adverse effects from construction and maintenance of additional roads, bridges, causeways, and other development associated with the project; and direct release to CNRAs of pollutants from oil or hazardous substance spills, contaminated sediments or stormwater runoff.

(C)

Where practicable, transportation projects shall be located in existing rights-of-way or previously disturbed areas if necessary to avoid or minimize adverse effects.

(D)

Where practicable, transportation projects shall be located at sites at which future expansion will not require development in coastal wetlands except where such construction is determined to be essential for evacuation in the case of a natural disaster.

(E)

Construction and maintenance of transportation projects shall avoid the impoundment and draining of coastal wetlands. If impoundment or draining cannot be avoided, adverse effects to the impounded or drained wetlands shall be mitigated in accordance with the sequencing requirements of subsection (h) of this section.

(F)

Construction of transportation projects shall occur at sites and times selected to have the least adverse effects practicable on recreational uses of CNRAs and on spawning or nesting seasons or seasonal migrations of terrestrial or aquatic species.

(G)

Beach-quality sand from maintenance of roadways adjacent to Gulf beaches shall be beneficially used by placement on Gulf beaches where practicable. Where placement on Gulf beaches is not practicable, the material shall be placed in critical dune areas.

(2)

TxDOT rules and project approvals under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6663b and 6663c, and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6674a et seq, governing transportation projects within the coastal zone, shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(q)

Emission of Air Pollutants. TNRCC rules under Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 382, governing emissions of air pollutants, shall comply with regulations at Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, adopted pursuant to the Clean Air Act, 42 United States Code Annotated, §7401, et seq, to protect and enhance air quality in the coastal area so as to protect CNRAs and promote the public health, safety, and welfare.

(r)

Appropriations of Water.

(1)

Impoundments and diversion of state water within 200 stream miles of the coast, to commence from the mouth of the river thence inland, shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(A)

The TNRCC shall administer the law so as to promote the judicious use and maximum conservation and protection of the quality of the environment and the natural resources of the state. It is the public policy of the state to provide for the conservation and development of the state's natural resources, including:

(i)

the control, storage, preservation, and distribution of the state's storm and floodwaters and the waters of its rivers and streams for irrigation, power, and other useful purposes;

(ii)

the reclamation and irrigation of the state's arid, semiarid, and other land needing irrigation;

(iii)

the reclamation and drainage of the state's overflowed land and other land needing drainage;

(iv)

the conservation and development of its forest, water, and hydroelectric power;

(v)

the navigation of the state's inland and coastal waters; and

(vi)

the maintenance of a proper ecological environment of the bays and estuaries of Texas and the health of related living marine resources.

(B)

In this subsection, "beneficial inflows" means a salinity, nutrient, and sediment loading regime adequate to maintain an ecologically sound environment in the receiving bay and estuary system that is necessary for the maintenance of productivity of economically important and ecologically characteristic sport or commercial fish and shellfish species and estuarine life upon which such fish and shellfish are dependent.

(C)

In its consideration of an application for a permit to store, take, or divert water, the TNRCC shall assess the effects, if any, of the issuance of the permit on the bays and estuaries of Texas. For permits issued within an area that is 200 river miles of the coast, to commence from the mouth of the river thence inland, the TNRCC shall include in the permit, to the greatest extent practicable when considering all public interests, those conditions considered necessary to maintain beneficial inflows to any affected bay and estuary system.

(D)

For the purposes of making a determination under subparagraph (C) of this paragraph, the TNRCC shall consider among other factors:

(i)

the need for periodic freshwater inflows to supply nutrients and modify salinity to preserve the sound environment of the bay or estuary, using any available information, including studies and plans specified in and other studies considered by the TNRCC to be reliable; together with existing circumstances, natural or otherwise, that might prevent the conditions imposed from producing benefits;

(ii)

the ecology and productivity of the affected bay and estuary system;

(iii)

the expected effects on the public welfare of not including in the permit some or all of the conditions considered necessary to maintain the beneficial inflows to the affected bay or estuary;

(iv)

the quantity of water requested and the proposed use of water by the applicant, as well as the needs of those who would be served by the applicant;

(v)

the expected effects on the public welfare of the failure to issue all or part of the permit being considered; and

(vi)

for the purposes of this subsection, the declarations as to preferences for competing uses of water as found in Texas Water Code, §11.024 and §11.033, as well as the public policy statement in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph.

(E)

In its consideration of an application to store, take, or divert water, the TNRCC shall consider the effect, if any, of the issuance of the permit on existing instream uses and water quality of the stream or river to which the application applies. The TNRCC shall also consider the effect, if any, of the issuance of the permit on fish and wildlife habitats.

(F)

On receipt of an application for a permit to store, take, or divert water, the TNRCC shall send a copy of the permit application and any subsequent amendments to the TPWD. In making a final decision on any application for a permit, the TNRCC, in addition to other information, evidence, and testimony presented, shall consider all information, evidence, or testimony presented by the TPWD and the TWDB.

(G)

Permit conditions relating to beneficial inflows to affected bays and estuaries and instream uses may be suspended by the TNRCC if the TNRCC finds that an emergency exists and cannot practically be resolved in other ways. Before the TNRCC suspends a permit under this subparagraph, it must give written notice to the TPWD of the proposed suspension. The TNRCC shall give the TPWD an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed suspension within 72 hours from such time and the TNRCC shall consider those comments before issuing its order imposing the suspension.

(H)

In its consideration of an application for a permit under this section, the TNRCC shall assess the effects, if any, of the issuance of the permit on water quality in coastal waters. In its consideration of an application for a permit to store, take, or divert water in excess of 5,000 acre feet per year, the commission shall assess the effects, if any, on the issuance of the permit on fish and wildlife habitats and may require the applicant to take reasonable actions to mitigate adverse effects on such habitat. In determining whether to require an applicant to mitigate adverse effects on a habitat, the TNRCC may consider any net benefit to habitat produced by the project. The TNRCC shall offset against any mitigation required by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to Code of Federal Regulations, Title 33, §§320-330, any mitigation authorized by this section.

(I)

Unappropriated water and other water of the state stored in any facility acquired by and under the control of the TWDB may be released without charge to relieve any emergency condition arising from drought, severe water shortage, or other calamity, if the TNRCC first determines the existence of the emergency and requests the TWDB to release the water.

(J)

Five percent of the annual firm yield of water in any reservoir and associated works constructed with state financial participation within 200 river miles of the coast, to commence from the mouth of the river thence inland, is appropriated to the TPWD for use to make releases to bays and estuaries and for instream uses, and the TNRCC shall issue permits for this water to the TPWD under procedures adopted by the TNRCC. This subparagraph applies only to reservoirs and associated works on which construction begins on or after September 1, 1985. This subsection does not limit or repeal any other authority of or law relating to the TPWD or the TNRCC.

(K)

The TWDB, in coordination with the TNRCC and TPWD, shall identify ways to assist in providing flows to meet instream needs, including protection of water quality, protection of terrestrial or aquatic wildlife habitat, and bay and estuary inflow needs, in the implementation of the Texas Water Bank, Texas Water Code, Chapter 15, Subchapter K. This may include, but not be limited to, the purchase by the TPWD and/or the TWDB of water rights deposited in the Texas Water Bank in order to provide for existing instream uses and beneficial inflows to bays and estuaries if funds are available and such purchase is not prohibited by law. The TNRCC shall facilitate the approval of any necessary permit amendments to achieve this purpose.

(L)

An applicant for a new or amended water right permit shall submit a water conservation plan in accordance with 30 TAC §295.9 (relating to Conservation Plan). The TNRCC shall consider the information contained in the conservation plan in determining whether any feasible alternative to the proposed appropriation exists, whether the proposed amount to be appropriated as measured at the point of diversion is reasonable and necessary for the proposed use, the term and other conditions of the water right and to ensure that reasonable diligence will be used to avoid waste and achieve water conservation. Based upon its review, the TNRCC may deny or grant, in whole or in part, the requested appropriation.

(2)

The TNRCC rules and authorizations under Texas Water Code, Chapter 11, governing review and action on applications for new permits or amendments proposing changes to existing permits for diversions or impoundments of state water within 200 stream miles of the coast, and TNRCC rules and approvals governing creation of districts and issuance of district bonds for levee and flood control projects within the coastal zone, shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(s)

Levee and Flood Control Projects.

(1)

Drainage, reclamation, channelization, levee construction or modification, or flood- or floodwater-control infrastructure projects shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to avoid the impoundment and draining of coastal wetlands to the greatest extent practicable. If impoundment or draining of coastal wetlands cannot be avoided, adverse effects to the wetlands shall be mitigated in accordance with the sequencing requirements in subsection (h) of this section.

(2)

TNRCC rules and approvals for the levee construction, modification, drainage, reclamation, channelization, or flood- or floodwater-control projects, pursuant to the Texas Water Code, §16.236, shall comply with the policies in this subsection.

(t)

Marine Fishery Management.

(1)

Fishery management measures shall conserve the state's renewable marine fishery resources, based upon the best available information, emphasizing protection and enhancement of the marine environment in such a manner as to provide for optimum sustained benefits and use to coastal fishing communities and to all the people of the state for present and future generations.

(2)

Fishery management measures shall:

(A)

protect the continuing health and sustainability of the marine fisheries resources of the state;

(B)

be based upon the best information available, including biological, sociological, economic, and other information deemed relevant by the council;

(C)

permit reasonable means and quantities of annual harvest, consistent with maximum practicable sustainable stock abundance on a continuing basis;

(D)

manage fish stocks as an integral biological unit, to the greatest extent practicable;

(E)

assure proper quality control of marine resources that enter commerce;

(F)

be fair and equitable to all the people of the state and, to the maximum extent practicable, be carried out so that no person acquires an excessive share of fishing privileges;

(G)

include opportunity for public review and comment on proposed management measures; and

(H)

be consistent, to the maximum extent practicable, with federal fishery management measures, rules, and fishery management plans and the rules of other states or interstate commissions.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005441

Larry Soward

Chief Clerk, General Land Office

Coastal Coordination Council

Effective date: August 27, 2000

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 305-9129


Chapter 505. COUNCIL PROCEDURES FOR STATE CONSISTENCY WITH COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GOALS AND POLICIES

The Coastal Coordination Council (Council) adopts, without changes to the text, the proposed amendments to §505.30, relating to Agency Consistency Determinations, §505.31, relating to Preliminary Review of Proposed Agency Actions by the Coastal Coordination Council, §505.38, relating to Council Action on Review of a Proposed Agency Action, and §505.51 relating to Request for a Non-Binding Advisory Opinion and Council Action. The proposed amendments were published in the May 19, 2000, edition of the Texas Register (25 TexReg 4487). The Council voted to adopt these amendments at its regularly scheduled meeting on June 28, 2000.

These rules are adopted concurrently with amendments to Chapter 501, relating to Coastal Management Program, and Chapter 506, relating to Council Procedures for Federal Consistency with Coastal Management Program Goals and Policies. Together, the amendments to Chapter 505 and Chapters 501 and 506 are part of a single rulemaking action.

The adopted amendment to §505.30(d), relating to Agency Consistency Determination, has deleted the requirement that an agency provide the Council Secretary with notice of proposed actions that are subject to the Coastal Management Program (CMP). The Council's experience in implementing and administering the CMP has been that this provision and procedure were irrelevant and inefficient in that the procedure did not advance the CMP goals and policies.

The adopted amendments to §505.31(c), (d) and (e), relating to the Permitting Assistance Group, delete provisions relating to Permitting Assistance. The permitting assistance rules are now set forth under Chapter 504, Subchapter A. The remaining subsections (c) and (d) were reformatted for clarity.

The adopted amendment to §505.38(a), relating to Council Action on Review of a Proposed Agency Action, clarifies that, as required under §505.35(e), relating to Council Procedures for Review of a Proposed Agency Action, if the Council protests a proposed action, the Council must submit its findings to the agency or subdivision proposing the action within 26 days after the date the agency or subdivision proposed the action.

The adopted amendment to §505.51(b), relating to Request for a Non-Binding Advisory Opinion and Council Action, clarifies that, as required under subsection (d) of that section, the Council must consider a general plan within 90 days of receiving the request.

No comments were received concerning the proposed amendments to Chapter 505.

Pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0225, a regulatory analysis is not required for the adopted amendments as a "major environmental rule." Under the Government Code, a major environmental rule is a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. A regulatory analysis is required only when a major environmental rule exceeds a standard set by federal law, exceeds an express requirement of state law, exceeds a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state or federal program, or are adopted solely under the general powers of the Council. The adopted amendments do not exceed a standard set by federal law, exceed an express requirement of state law, exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state or federal program, nor are the amendments adopted solely under the general powers of the Council.

The General Land Office has assisted the Council in preparing a takings impact assessment for these adopted amendments and determined that the amendments will not result in the taking of private real property. To receive a copy of the takings impact assessment, please send a written request to Ms. Melinda Tracy, Texas Register Liaison, General Land Office, P.O. Box 12873, Austin, Texas 78711-2873, melinda.tracy@glo.state.tx.us, facsimile (512) 463-6311.

Subchapter C. CONSISTENCY AND COUNCIL REVIEW OF PROPOSED STATE AGENCY ACTIONS

31 TAC §§505.30, 505.31, 505.38

The amendments are adopted under Texas Natural Resources Code §33.053(a)(7), which provides the Council with authority to describe an organizational structure for implementing and administering the CMP; §33.055 which requires that the Council hold public hearings, as deemed appropriate, to consider amendments to the CMP; §33.202 which provides that it is the policy of the state to make more effective and efficient use of public funds and to provide for more effective and efficient management of coastal natural resource areas (CNRAs) by continually reviewing principal coastal problems of state concern and by coordinating the performance of government programs affecting CNRAs; §33.204 which authorizes the Council to adopt by rule goals and policies for the CMP; and §33.205 which provides that the council by rule shall establish a process by which an applicant for a permit or other proposed action or an agency or subdivision proposing an action may request and receive a preliminary consistency review, and a process by which an applicant may request and receive assistance with filing applications for permits or other proposed actions.

Natural Resources Code, §§33.053(a)(7), 33.055, 33.202, and 33.204 are affected by these adopted amendments.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005442

Larry Soward

Chief Clerk, General Land Office

Coastal Coordination Council

Effective date: August 27, 2000

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 305-9129


Subchapter D. COUNCIL ADVISORY OPINIONS ON GENERAL PLANS

31 TAC §505.51

The amendment is adopted under Texas Natural Resources Code §33.053(a)(7), which provides the Council with authority to describe an organizational structure for implementing and administering the CMP; §33.055 which requires that the Council hold public hearings, as deemed appropriate, to consider amendments to the CMP; §33.202 which provides that it is the policy of the state to make more effective and efficient use of public funds and to provide for more effective and efficient management of CNRAs by continually reviewing principal coastal problems of state concern and by coordinating the performance of government programs affecting CNRAs; and §33.204 which authorizes the Council to adopt by rule goals and policies for the CMP.

Natural Resources Code, §§33.053(a)(7), 33.055, 33.202, and 33.204 are affected by the adopted amendment.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005443

Larry Soward

Chief Clerk, General Land Office

Coastal Coordination Council

Effective date: August 27, 2000

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 305-9129


Chapter 506. COUNCIL PROCEDURES FOR FEDERAL CONSISTENCY WITH COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GOALS AND POLICIES

31 TAC §§506.11, 506.12, 506.20, 506.24 - 506.26, 506.32 - 506.34, 506.41, 506.42

The Coastal Coordination Council (Council) adopts, without changes to the text, the proposed amendments to §506.11, relating to Definitions, §506.12, relating to Federal Agency Actions, Federal Agency Activities and Development Projects, and Outer Continental Shelf Plans Subject to the Coastal Management Program, §506.20, relating to Consistency Determinations for Federal Agency Activities and Development Projects, §506.24, relating to Consistency Determinations for Federal Agency Activities Initiated Prior to Federal Approval of the Coastal Management Program, §506.25, relating to Public Notice and Comment, §506.26, relating to Referral of Federal Agency Activities, §506.32, relating to Public Notice and Comment, §506.33, relating to Referral of Federal Agency Action, §506.34, relating to Council Hearing to Review a Federal Agency Action, §506.41, relating to Public Notice and Comment, and §506.42, relating to Referral of an Outer Continental Shelf Plan. The proposed amendments were published in the May 19, 2000, edition of the Texas Register (25 TexReg 4490). The Council voted to adopt these amendments at its regularly scheduled meeting on June 28, 2000.

These rules are adopted concurrently with the adopted amendments to Chapter 501, relating to Coastal Management Program, and Chapter 505, relating to Council Procedures for State Consistency with Coastal Management Program Goals and Policies. Together, the proposed amendments to Chapter 506 and Chapters 501 and 505 are part of a single rulemaking action.

The adopted amendments to §506.11, relating to Definitions, provide definitions for the terms "administratively complete" and "federal development project." The definition for "administratively complete" is based on the consistency information required under §506.20, relating to Consistency Determinations for Federal Agency Activities and Development Projects, §506.30, relating to Consistency Certifications for Federal Agency Actions, and §506.40, relating to Consistency Certifications for Outer Continental Shelf Plans. The definition for "federal development project" is the same as the federal definition at Code of Federal Regulations, Title 15, §930.31(b).

The adopted amendments to §506.12(a)(1)(F) and (b)(1)(A), relating to Federal Agency Actions, Federal Agency Activities and Development Projects, and Outer Continental Shelf Plans Subject to the Coastal Management Program, list as federal agency activities subject to the CMP the promulgation of fishery management measures by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Under the adopted amendments to Chapter 501, §501.14(t), relating to marine fishery management policies, the rule now establishes a specific enforceable policy that would apply to the promulgation of fishery management measures by NMFS. The adopted amendment to §506.12(a)(2)(A)(iv) lists as a federal agency activity subject to the CMP the development of total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) and associated federally-developed TMDL implementation plans by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §1313. The adopted amendments to §506.12(a)(2)(A)(iii), (a)(2)(B)(iii)-(iv), (a)(2)(C)(i)-(ii), (a)(2)(D), (a)(2)(E)(i)-(iii), (a)(2)(F), and (b)(2)(A)(i)-(ii), clarify terms to clearly identify the listed actions and to conform to changes in federal law.

The adopted amendments to §506.12(f), relating to Federal Agency Actions, Federal Agency Activities and Development Projects, and Outer Continental Shelf Plans Subject to the Coastal Management Program, provides for the one-time review of federal agency activities that are not listed in subsection (a)(1) of this section, clarifies the references to other subsections, and reformats the subsection for ease in reading. The adopted amendments will allow for the one-time review of federal agency activities other than those listed under §506.12(a)(1) and (b)(1). Following the one-time review of an unlisted federal agency action or activity, the Council must amend the list of actions and activities described in §506.12(a) before the Council may again review the action or activity that was subject to one-time review.

The adopted amendment to §506.20, relating to Consistency Determinations for Federal Agency Activities and Development Projects, has created a new subsection (d) that provides that the consistency determination for fishery management measures promulgated by NMFS will be reviewed by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD). The purpose of this provision is to affirm TPWD's primacy in the determination of Texas' fishery management policies and to ensure that the Council's review of federal management measures for consistency with the CMP goals and policies is consistent with the TPWD's state fishery management policies. As provided under §506.26 of this title, relating to Referral of Federal Agency Activities, the Council will review a fishery management measure promulgated by NMFS if three or more Council members agree that the management measure presents a significant unresolved issue regarding consistency with the CMP goals and policies.

Concurrent with this rulemaking, the Council is adopting a general consistency concurrence to affirm the TPWD's primacy in the determination of Texas' fishery management policies and to ensure that the Council's review of federal management measures for consistency with the CMP goals and policies is consistent with the TPWD's state fishery management policies. The general consistency concurrence finds that where NMFS promulgates, as a federal rule, fishery management measures that incorporate and adopt the TPWD's state fishery management policies, the Council deems the federal fishery management measures to be consistent with the CMP goals and policies. A copy of the general consistency concurrence may be obtained by writing to Ms. Janet Fatheree, Secretary, Coastal Coordination Council, P.O. Box 12873, Austin, Texas 78711-2873, janet.fatheree@glo.state.tx.us, facsimile (512)475-0680.

The adopted amendment to §506.24(c), relating to Consistency Determinations for Federal Agency Activities Initiated Prior to Federal Approval of the Coastal Management Program, has revised the provision relating to consistency determinations for the United States Army Corps of Engineers' ongoing maintenance of commercially navigable waterways to include a reference to the amendments to the Memorandum of Agreement Between the Texas Coastal Coordination Council and the United States Army Corps of Engineers, dated October 27, 1994, that have been approved since this section was adopted.

The adopted amendments to §506.25(a)-(b), relating to Public Notice and Comment; §506.32(a)-(b), relating to Public Notice and Comment; and §506.41(a)-(b), relating to Public Notice and Comment, provide for the publication of notice of a consistency determination on the Council's web site as well as in the Texas Register and provide that the 30-day public comment period will be measured from the date of publication on the Council's web site.

The adopted amendments add a definition for "administratively complete" that will affect the deadlines for the Council's review of a consistency determination or consistency certification for a federal agency activity, a federal agency action, and Outer Continental Shelf Plan. The deadlines for the Council's review of a consistency determination or certification will be calculated from the date when the consistency determination or certification is "administratively complete," as defined in §506.11. The term "administratively complete" has been added to §506.25(a), relating to Public Notice and Comment; §505.26(c)-(e), relating to Referral of Federal Agency Activities; §506.32(a), relating to Public Notice and Comment; §506.33(b)-(e), relating to Referral of Federal Agency Action; §506.34(a), relating to Council Hearing to Review a Federal Agency Action; §506.41(a), relating to Public Notice and Comment; and §506.41(b)-(e), relating to Referral of an Outer Continental Shelf Plan.

A public hearing on the proposed amendments was held on May 18, 2000, in Austin as part of the regularly scheduled meeting of the Council's Executive Committee. At the hearing, comments in support of the proposed amendments providing for the review of federal fishery management measures were provided by the Texas Recreational Fishing Alliance and the Coastal Conservation Association. No other comments were received regarding the proposed amendments to Chapter 506.

Pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0225, a regulatory analysis is not required for the adopted amendments as a "major environmental rule." Under the Government Code, a major environmental rule is a rule the specific intent of which is to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure and that may adversely affect, in a material way, the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state. A regulatory analysis is required only when a major environmental rule exceeds a standard set by federal law, exceeds an express requirement of state law, exceeds a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state or federal program, or are adopted solely under the general powers of the Council. The adopted amendments do not exceed a standard set by federal law, exceed an express requirement of state law, exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state or federal program, nor are the amendments adopted solely under the general powers of the Council.

The General Land Office has assisted the Council in preparing a takings impact assessment for these adopted amendments and determined that the amendments will not result in the taking of private real property. To receive a copy of the takings impact assessment, please send a written request to Ms. Melinda Tracy, Texas Register Liaison, General Land Office, P.O. Box 12873, Austin, Texas 78711-2873, melinda.tracy@glo.state.tx.us, facsimile (512) 463-6311.

These amendments are adopted under Texas Natural Resources Code §33.053(a)(2), (4)-(7), and (10), which provide the Council with authority to analyze coastal land and water uses, identify land and water uses that would have a direct and significant impact on coastal waters, recommend incremental authority necessary to protect coastal lands and waters, inventory coastal natural resource areas (CNRAs), describe an organizational structure for implementing and administering the CMP, and list each federal activity that may have a direct and significant detrimental impact on CNRAs; §33.055 which requires that the Council hold public hearings, as deemed appropriate, to consider amendments to the CMP; §33.202 which provides that it is the policy of the state to make more effective and efficient use of public funds and to provide for more effective and efficient management of CNRAs by continually reviewing principal coastal problems of state concern and by coordinating the performance of government programs affecting CNRAs; §33.204 which authorizes the Council to adopt by rule goals and policies for the CMP; and §33.206(d) which authorizes the Council to adopt procedural rules for the review of federal actions, activities, and outer continental shelf plans.

Natural Resources Code, §§33.053(a)(2), (4)-(7), and (10), 33.055, 33.202, 33.204, and 33.206(d) are affected by these adopted amendments.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2000, 2000.

TRD-200005444

Larry Soward

Chief Clerk, General Land Office

Coastal Coordination Council

Effective date: August 27, 2000

Proposal publication date: May 19, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 305-9129