TITLE 19.EDUCATION

Part 2. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY

Chapter 89. ADAPTATIONS FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS

Subchapter AA. COMMISSIONER'S RULES CONCERNING SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) proposes amendments to §§89.1001, 89.1011, 89.1015, 89.1035, 89.1055, 89.1065, 89.1075, 89.1090, 89.1095, 89.1121, 89.1125, and 89.1131; the repeal of §§89.1020, 89.1025, 89.1030, 89.1040, 89.1045, 89.1050, 89.1060, 89.1070, 89.1085, 89.1105, 89.1151, 89.1155, 89.1160, 89.1165, 89.1170, 89.1175, 89.1180, 89.1185, and 89.1190; and new §§89.1040, 89.1045, 89.1047, 89.1049, 89.1050, 89.1056, 89.1060, 89.1070, 89.1076, 89.1085, 89.1096, 89.1150, 89.1151, 89.1165, 89.1170, 89.1180, 89.1185, and 89.1191, concerning special education services. The sections clarify federal regulations and state statutes pertaining to delivering special education services to students with disabilities. The sections also establish definitions, requirements, and procedures related to: interagency agreements; special education funding; personnel issues; and resolution of disputes between parents and school districts.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997, was signed into law in June 1997. The final federal regulations were published by the United States Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, in March 1999. The IDEA Amendments of 1997 contain numerous changes to the federal law pertaining to the education of students with disabilities. In addition, during the 76th Texas Legislative Session, 1999, several new sections of special education law were added and other sections were amended. As a result of the changes to the federal special education law and regulations and state law, 19 TAC Chapter 89, Adaptations for Special Populations, Subchapter AA, Special Education Services, must be amended to reflect these changes to ensure school district compliance with new procedural and reporting requirements.

The most significant issue pertaining to these proposed changes relates to the proposed amendments to 19 TAC §89.1095 and proposed new §89.1096, relating to dual enrollment. Section 89.1095, proposed to expire on June 30, 2001, required school districts to serve students with disabilities placed in private schools by their parents if the student was dually enrolled in the school district and private school. The amended federal law limits the service that schools and states are obligated to provide to students placed in private schools by their parents. Proposed new §89.1096, proposed for implementation beginning July 1, 2001, addresses these federal regulations. Also, in order to conform to new provisions in IDEA and to promote effective and efficient determination of disputes arising under IDEA, changes to procedural rules are proposed in new §§89.1150, 89.1151, 89.1165, 89.1170, 89.1180, 89.1185, and 89.1191 pertaining to due process hearings on students with disabilities. In addition to the changes in federal law, the Texas Education Code (TEC) was amended during the legislative session in 1999 to require the commissioner to adopt rules relating to surrogate and foster parents and the transfer of assistive technology devices. As a result of these amendments to state statute, new 19 TAC §89.1047 and §89.1056 are proposed to reflect legislative intent.

Additional changes include: the restructuring of the age ranges and graduation requirements in 19 TAC §89.1035 and §89.1070 to more closely align with federal regulation; the restructuring of the eligible criteria in 19 TAC §89.1040 to more closely align with federal regulation; the addition of 19 TAC §89.1049 pertaining to parental rights regarding adult students; and the alignment of 19 TAC §89.1050 with federal statute and regulation pertaining to discipline and the attendance of the regular teachers at the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee. Also proposed is the inclusion of requirements from 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §§99.30-99.37, in 19 TAC §89.1050(f), relating to the disclosure of personally identifiable information from education records specific to transfer students. New language is also proposed in 19 TAC §89.1050(h)(1) that clarifies that a district may recess an ARD committee for reasons other than a disagreement of the parent. The proposed repeal of and new 19 TAC §89.1070 provide reorganization of existing language as well as alignment with federal and state laws. New 19 TAC §89.1076 is proposed relating to interventions and sanctions. As a result of TEC, §30.057, a new subsection (d) is proposed in 19 TAC §89.1085, relating to admission to the Texas School for the Deaf.

Also, 19 TAC §89.1105, pertaining to the memorandum of understanding relating to school-age residents of intermediate care facilities, is proposed for repeal because the section expired August 1997. Current 19 TAC §89.1115, pertaining to residential care facilities, includes intermediate care facilities. Subsection (d) of 19 TAC §89.1131, relating to the use of teacher assistants, also expired August 1997 and is proposed for repeal. Additional changes to §89.1131 include the addition of the eligibility category of deaf-blind to 19 TAC §89.1131 to ensure that appropriately certified personnel are in attendance at ARD committee meetings for students who are deaf-blind. Changes are proposed to other sections in order to reflect amended and new federal and state regulations and to provide structure and formatting consistency.

Carol Francois, associate commissioner for education of special populations, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Ms. Francois and Criss Cloudt, associate commissioner for policy planning and research, have determined that for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the sections will be a consistent linkage to the IDEA Amendments of 1997 and its implementing regulations and a specific reference for school districts to the new federal requirements that provide for the education of students with disabilities. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted to Criss Cloudt, Policy Planning and Research, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701, (512) 463-9701. Comments may also be submitted electronically to rules@tmail.tea.state.tx.us. All requests for a public hearing on the proposed sections submitted under the Administrative Procedure Act must be received by the commissioner of education not more than 15 calendar days after notice of a proposed change in the sections has been published in the Texas Register.

1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

19 TAC §89.1001

The amendment is proposed under 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.600, which outlines the responsibilities of TEA for all educational programs; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, 29.005, 29.015, 30.0015, and 30.057, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules related to delivering special education services.

The amendment implements 34 CFR, §300.600; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, 29.005, 29.015, 30.0015, and 30.057.

§89.1001.Scope and Applicability.

(a)

Special education services shall be provided to eligible students in accordance with all applicable federal law and regulations, state statutes, rules of the State Board of Education (SBOE) and commissioner of education, and the State Plan Under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

(b)

Education programs, under the direction and control of the Texas Youth Commission, Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired, Texas School for the Deaf, and schools within the Texas Department of Criminal Justice shall comply with state and federal law and regulations concerning the delivery of special education and related services to eligible students and shall be monitored by the Texas Education Agency in accordance with the requirements identified in subsection (a) of this section.

(c)

A school district having a residential [ care and treatment ] facility that is licensed by appropriate state agencies and located within the district's boundaries must provide special education and related services to eligible students residing in the facility if the facility does not have an education program.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005454

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701


2. CLARIFICATION OF PROVISIONS IN FEDERAL REGULATIONS AND STATE LAW

19 TAC §§89.1011, 89.1015, 89.1035, 89.1040, 89.1045, 89.1047, 89.1049, 89.1050, 89.1055, 89.1056, 89.1060, 89.1065, 89.1070, 89.1075, 89.1076, 89.1085, 89.1090, 89.1095, 89.1096

The amendments and new sections are proposed under 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.600, which outlines the responsibilities of TEA for all educational programs; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, 29.005, 29.015, 30.0015, and 30.057, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules related to delivering special education services.

The amendment implements 34 CFR, §300.600; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, 29.005, 29.015, 30.0015, and 30.057.

§89.1011.Referral for Full and Individual Initial Evaluation [ Comprehensive Assessment ].

Referral of students for a full and individual initial evaluation for possible special education services shall be a part of the district's overall, regular education referral or screening system. Prior to referral, students experiencing difficulty in the regular classroom should be considered for all support services available to all students, such as tutorial, remedial, compensatory, and other services. This referral for a full and individual initial evaluation [ assessment ] may be initiated by school personnel, the student's parents or legal guardian, or another person involved in the education or care of the student.

§89.1015.Time Line for All Notices.

"Reasonable time" required for the written notice to parents under 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.503 [ §300.504 ], is defined as at least five school days, unless the parents agree otherwise.

§89.1035.Age Ranges for Student Eligibility.

(a)

Pursuant to state and federal law, services provided in accordance with this subchapter shall be available to all eligible students ages 3-21. Services will be made available to eligible students on their third birthday. Graduation with a regular high school diploma pursuant to §89.1070 of this title (relating to Graduation Requirements) terminates a student's eligibility to receive services in accordance with this subchapter. An eligible [ A ] student receiving special education services who is 21 [ younger than 22 ] years of age on September 1 of a school [ scholastic ] year shall be eligible for services through the end of that school [ scholastic ] year or until graduation with a regular high school diploma pursuant to §89.1070 of this title , whichever comes first.

(b)

In accordance with the Texas Education Code (TEC), §§29.003, 30.002(a), and 30.081, a free, appropriate, public education shall be available from birth to students with visual or auditory impairments.

§89.1040.Eligibility Criteria.

(a)

Special education services. To be eligible to receive special education services, a student must be a "child with a disability," as defined in 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.7(a), subject to the provisions of 34 CFR, §300.7(c), the Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.003, and this section. The provisions in this section specify criteria to be used in determining whether a student's condition meets one or more of the definitions in federal regulations or in state law.

(b)

Eligibility determination. The determination of whether a student is eligible for special education and related services is made by the student's admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee. Any evaluation or re-evaluation of a student shall be conducted in accordance with 34 CFR, §§300.530-300.536. The multidisciplinary team that collects or reviews evaluation data in connection with the determination of a student's eligibility must include the following:

(1)

a licensed specialist in school psychology (LSSP), an educational diagnostician, or other appropriately certified or licensed practitioner with experience and training in the area of the disability, if the disability category is autism, emotional disturbance, mental retardation, multiple disabilities, a health impairment (if the underlying condition is attention deficit disorder or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder), a learning disability, or a traumatic brain injury; or

(2)

a licensed or certified professional for a specific eligibility category defined in subsection (c) of this section.

(c)

Eligibility definitions.

(1)

Autism. A student with autism is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for autism as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(1). Students with pervasive developmental disorders are included under this category. The team's written report of evaluation shall include specific recommendations for behavioral interventions and strategies.

(2)

Deaf-blindness. A student with deaf-blindness is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for deaf-blindness as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(2). In meeting the criteria stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(2), a student with deaf-blindness is one who, based on the evaluations specified in subsections (d) and (m) of this section:

(A)

meets the eligibility criteria for auditory impairment specified in subsection (c)(3) of this section and visual impairment specified in subsection (c)(12) of this section;

(B)

meets the eligibility criteria for a student with a visual impairment and has a suspected hearing loss that cannot be demonstrated conclusively, but a speech/language therapist, a certified speech and language therapist, or a licensed speech language pathologist indicates there is no speech at an age when speech would normally be expected;

(C)

has documented hearing and visual losses that, if considered individually, may not meet the requirements for auditory impairment or visual impairment, but the combination of such losses adversely affects the student's educational performance; or

(D)

has a documented medical diagnosis of a progressive medical condition that will result in concomitant hearing and visual losses that, without special education intervention, will adversely affect the student's educational performance.

(3)

Auditory impairment. A student with an auditory impairment is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for deafness as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(3), or for hearing impairment as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(5). The evaluation data reviewed by the multidisciplinary team in connection with the determination of a student's eligibility based on an auditory impairment must include an otological examination performed by an otologist or by a licensed medical doctor, with documentation that an otologist is not reasonably available. An audiological evaluation by a licensed audiologist shall also be conducted. The evaluation data shall include a description of the implications of the hearing loss for the student's hearing in a variety of circumstances with or without recommended amplification.

(4)

Emotional disturbance. A student with an emotional disturbance is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for emotional disturbance as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(4). The written report of evaluation shall include specific recommendations for behavioral supports and interventions.

(5)

Mental retardation. A student with mental retardation is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for mental retardation as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(6). In meeting the criteria stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(6), a student with mental retardation is one who has been determined to be functioning at two or more standard deviations below the mean on individually administered scales of verbal ability, and either performance or nonverbal ability, and who concurrently exhibits deficits in adaptive behavior.

(6)

Multiple disabilities.

(A)

A student with multiple disabilities is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for multiple disabilities as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(7). In meeting the criteria stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(7), a student with multiple disabilities is one who has a combination of disabilities defined in this section and who meets all of the following conditions:

(i)

the student's disability is expected to continue indefinitely; and

(ii)

the disabilities severely impair performance in two or more of the following areas:

(I)

psychomotor skills;

(II)

self-care skills;

(III)

communication;

(IV)

social and emotional development; or

(V)

cognition.

(B)

Students who have more than one of the disabilities defined in this section but who do not meet the criteria in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph shall not be classified or reported as having multiple disabilities.

(7)

Orthopedic impairment. A student with an orthopedic impairment is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for orthopedic impairment as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(8). The multidisciplinary team that collects or reviews evaluation data in connection with the determination of a student's eligibility based on an orthopedic impairment must include a licensed physician.

(8)

Other health impairment. A student with another health impairment is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for other health impairment as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(9). Except as provided in subsection (b)(1) of this section, the multidisciplinary team that collects or reviews evaluation data in connection with the determination of a student's eligibility based on another health impairment must include a licensed physician.

(9)

Learning disability.

(A)

A student with a learning disability is one who has been determined by a multidisciplinary team to meet the criteria for specific learning disability as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(10), and in whom the team has determined whether a severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability exists in accordance with the provisions in 34 CFR, §§300.540-300.543. A severe discrepancy exists when the student's assessed intellectual ability is above the mentally retarded range, but the student's assessed educational achievement in areas specified in 34 CFR, §300.541, is more than one standard deviation below the student's intellectual ability.

(B)

If the multidisciplinary team cannot establish the existence of a severe discrepancy in accordance with subparagraph (A) of this paragraph because of the lack of appropriate evaluation instruments, or if the student does not meet the criteria in subparagraph (A) of this paragraph but the team believes a severe discrepancy exists, the team must document in its written report the areas identified under subparagraph (A) of this paragraph and the basis for determining that the student has a severe discrepancy. The report shall include a statement of the degree of the discrepancy between intellectual ability and achievement.

(10)

Speech impairment. A student with a speech impairment is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for speech or language impairment as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(11). The multidisciplinary team that collects or reviews evaluation data in connection with the determination of a student's eligibility based on a speech impairment must include a certified speech and hearing therapist, a certified speech and language therapist, or a licensed speech/language pathologist.

(11)

Traumatic brain injury. A student with a traumatic brain injury is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for traumatic brain injury as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(12). The multidisciplinary team that collects or reviews evaluation data in connection with the determination of a student's eligibility based on a traumatic brain injury must include a licensed physician, in addition to the licensed or certified practitioners specified in subsection (b)(1) of this section.

(12)

Visual impairment.

(A)

A student with a visual impairment is one who has been determined to meet the criteria for visual impairment as stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(13). The visual loss should be stated in exact measures of visual field and corrected visual acuity at a distance and at close range in each eye. The report should also include prognosis whenever possible. If exact measures cannot be obtained, the eye specialist must so state and provide best estimates. In meeting the criteria stated in 34 CFR, §300.7(c)(13), a student with a visual impairment is one who:

(i)

has been determined by a licensed ophthalmologist or optometrist:

(I)

to have no vision or to have a serious visual loss after correction; or

(II)

to have a progressive medical condition that will result in no vision or a serious visual loss after correction.

(ii)

has been determined by the following evaluations to have a need for special services:

(I)

a functional vision evaluation by a professional certified in the education of students with visual impairments or a certified orientation and mobility instructor. The evaluation must include the performance of tasks in a variety of environments requiring the use of both near and distance vision and recommendations concerning the need for a clinical low vision evaluation and an orientation and mobility evaluation; and

(II)

a learning media assessment by a professional certified in the education of students with visual impairments. The learning media assessment must include recommendations concerning which specific visual, tactual, and/or auditory learning media are appropriate for the student and whether or not there is a need for ongoing evaluation in this area.

(B)

A student with a visual impairment is functionally blind if, based on the preceding evaluations, the student will use tactual media (which includes Braille) as a primary tool for learning to be able to communicate in both reading and writing at the same level of proficiency as other students of comparable ability.

(13)

Noncategorical. A student aged 3-9 may be eligible for special education and related services and reported using the term "noncategorical" if the following criteria are met:

(A)

the student has been determined to meet the criteria for mental retardation, emotional disturbance, a specific learning disability, or autism; or

(B)

the student does not appear to meet the independent criteria for eligibility under the categories mental retardation, emotional disturbance, a specific learning disability, or autism; however, the evaluation data establish a belief that the student meets the eligibility requirements for one or more of such categories.

§89.1045.Rights of Parents to Request Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD) Committee Meetings.

A parent may request that the school district convene an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee meeting at any mutually agreeable time to address specific concerns that the parent may have about his or her child's special education services. The school district must respond to the parent's request for an ARD committee meeting within a reasonable period of time by holding the requested meeting, addressing and resolving the parent's concerns through an alternative process, or requesting assistance through the Texas Education Agency's mediation process.

§89.1047.Procedures for Surrogate and Foster Parents.

(a)

An individual assigned to act as a surrogate parent for a student with a disability, in accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.515, relating to surrogate parents, must comply with the requirements specified in Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.001(10).

(1)

Pursuant to TEC, §29.001(10)(A), an individual assigned to act as a surrogate parent must complete a training program in which the individual is provided with an explanation of the provisions of federal and state laws, rules, and regulations relating to:

(A)

the identification of a student with a disability;

(B)

the collection of evaluation and re-evaluation data relating to a student with a disability;

(C)

the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee process;

(D)

the development of an individualized education program (IEP) and, for a student who is at least 16 years of age, an individual transition plan (ITP);

(E)

the determination of least restrictive environment;

(F)

the implementation of an IEP;

(G)

the procedural rights and safeguards available under 34 CFR, §§300.403, 300.500-300.529, 300.560-300.577, and 300.660-300.662, relating to the issues described in 34 CFR, §300.504(b); and

(H)

the sources that the surrogate parent may contact to obtain assistance in understanding the provisions of federal and state laws, rules, and regulations relating to students with disabilities.

(2)

The training program described in subsection (a)(1) of this section must be provided in the native language or other mode of communication used by the individual who is to serve as a surrogate parent.

(3)

The individual assigned to act as a surrogate parent must complete the training program described in subsection (a)(1) of this section within 90 calendar days after the effective date of this rule or the date of initial assignment as a surrogate parent, whichever comes later. Once an individual has completed a training program conducted or provided by or through the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (PRS), a school district, an education service center, or any entity that receives federal funds to provide Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) training to parents, the individual shall not be required by any school district to complete additional training in order to continue serving as the student's surrogate parent or to serve as the surrogate parent for other students with disabilities. School districts may provide ongoing or additional training to surrogate parents and/or parents; however, a district cannot deny an individual who has received the training as described in subsection (a)(1) of this section from serving as a surrogate parent on the grounds that the individual has not been trained.

(4)

A school district shall provide, or arrange for the provision of, the training program described in subsection (a)(1) of this section, within 90 calendar days after the effective date of this rule for individuals serving as surrogate parents as of the effective date of this rule. Thereafter, a school district should provide or arrange for the provision of the training program described in subsection (a)(1) prior to assigning an individual to act as a surrogate parent but no later than 90 calendar days after assignment.

(b)

A foster parent may act as a parent of a child with a disability, in accordance with 34 CFR, §300.20, relating to the definition of parent, if he/she complies with the requirements of TEC, §29.015(b), relating to foster parents, including the completion of the training program described in subsection(a)(1) of this section.

(1)

The foster parent must complete the training program described in subsection (a)(1) of this section within 90 calendar days after the effective date of this rule or the date of initial assignment as the parent, whichever comes later. Once a foster parent has completed a training program conducted or provided by the PRS, a school district, an education service center, or any entity that receives federal funds to provide IDEA training to parents, the foster parent shall not be required by any school district to complete additional training in order to continue serving as his/her child's surrogate parent or parent or to serve as the surrogate parent or parent for other students with disabilities. School districts may provide ongoing or additional training to foster parents and/or parents; however, a district cannot deny an individual who has received the training as described in subsection (a)(1) of this section from serving as the parent on the grounds that the individual has not been trained.

(2)

A school district shall provide, or arrange for the provision of, the training program described in subsection (a)(1) of this section, within 90 calendar days after the effective date of this rule for foster parents who are serving as parents as of the effective date of this rule. Thereafter, a school district should provide or arrange for the provision of the training program described in subsection (a)(1) prior to assigning a foster parent to act as a parent but no later than 90 calendar days after assignment.

(c)

Each school district or shared services arrangement shall develop and implement procedures for conducting an analysis of whether a foster parent or potential surrogate parent has an interest that conflicts with the interests of his/her child. A foster parent in a home which is verified by the PRS or a child-placing agency shall not be deemed to have a financial conflict of interest by virtue of serving as the foster parent in that home. These homes include, but are not limited to, basic, habilitative, primary medical, or therapeutic foster or foster group homes. In addition, issues concerning quality of care of the child do not constitute a conflict of interest. Concerns regarding quality of care of the child should be communicated, and may be statutorily required to be reported, to PRS.

(d)

If a school district denies a foster parent the right to serve as a surrogate parent or parent, the school district must provide the foster parent with written notice of such denial within seven calendar days after the date on which the decision is made. The written notice shall:

(1)

specify the reason(s) the foster parent is being denied the right to serve as the surrogate parent or parent (the notice must specifically explain the interests of the foster parent that conflict with the interests of his/her child); and

(2)

inform the foster parent of his/her right to file a complaint with the Texas Education Agency in accordance with 34 CFR, §§300.660-300.662, relating to complaint procedures.

§89.1049.Parental Rights Regarding Adult Students.

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and applicable federal regulations provide that a state may provide that when a student with a disability reaches the age of 18, the rights accorded to the student's parent under IDEA, Part B, transfer to the student. Current law in Texas does not appear to address the transfer of parental rights under IDEA to an adult student. Therefore, unless parental rights have been terminated by judicial decree, parental rights under IDEA shall remain with the parent of a student with a disability even after the student is 18 years of age.

§89.1050.The Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD) Committee.

(a)

Each school district shall establish an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee for each eligible student with a disability and for each student for whom a full and individual initial evaluation is conducted pursuant to §89.1011 of this title (relating to Referral for Full and Individual Initial Evaluation). The ARD committee shall be the individualized education program (IEP) team defined in federal law and regulations, including, specifically, 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.344. The ARD committee shall be responsible for all of the functions for which the IEP team is responsible under federal law and regulations and for which the ARD committee is responsible under state law, including, specifically, the following:

(1)

34 CFR, §§300.340-300.349, and Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.005 (Individualized Education Program);

(2)

34 CFR, §§300.400-300.402 (relating to placement of eligible students in private schools by a school district);

(3)

34 CFR, §§300.452, 300.455, and 300.456 (relating to the development and implementation of service plans for eligible students in private school who have been designated to receive special education and related services);

(4)

34 CFR, §§300.520, 300.522, and 300.523, and TEC, §37.004 (Placement of Students with Disabilities);

(5)

34 CFR, §§300.532-300.536 (relating to evaluations, re-evaluations, and determination of eligibility);

(6)

34 CFR, §§300.550-300.553 (relating to least restrictive environment);

(7)

TEC, §28.006 (Reading Diagnosis);

(8)

TEC, §28.0211 (Satisfactory Performance on Assessment Instruments Required; Accelerated Instruction);

(9)

TEC, Chapter 29, Subchapter I (Programs for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing);

(10)

TEC, §30.002 (Education of Children with Visual Impairments);

(11)

TEC, §30.003 (Support of Students Enrolled in the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired or Texas School for the Deaf);

(12)

TEC, §33.081 (Extracurricular Activities);

(13)

TEC, Chapter 39, Subchapter B (Assessment of Academic Skills); and

(14)

TEC, §42.151 (Special Education).

(b)

For a child from birth through two years of age with visual and/or auditory impairments, an individualized family services plan (IFSP) meeting must be held in place of an ARD committee meeting in accordance with 34 CFR, §§303.340-303.346, and the memorandum of understanding between the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and Texas Interagency Council on Early Childhood Intervention.

(c)

The special education teacher or special education provider that participates in the ARD committee meeting in accordance with 34 CFR, §300.344(a)(3), must be certified in the child's suspected areas of disability. When a specific certification is not required to serve certain disability categories, then the special education teacher or special education provider must be qualified to provide the educational services that the child may need. Districts should refer to §89.1131 of this title (relating to Qualifications of Special Education, Related Service, and Paraprofessional Personnel) to ensure that appropriate teachers and/or service providers are present and participate at each ARD committee meeting.

(d)

The ARD committee shall make its decisions regarding students referred for a full and individual initial evaluation within 30 calendar days from the date of the completion of the written full and individual initial evaluation report. If the 30th day falls during the summer and school is not in session, the ARD committee shall have until the first day of classes in the fall to finalize decisions concerning placement and the IEP, unless the full and individual initial evaluation indicates that the student will need extended year services during that summer.

(e)

The written report of the ARD committee shall document the decisions of the committee with respect to issues discussed at the meeting. The report shall include the date, names, positions, and signatures of the members participating in each meeting in accordance with 34 CFR, §§300.344, 300.345, 300.348, and 300.349. The report shall also indicate each member's agreement or disagreement with the committee's decisions. In the event TEC, §29.005(d), applies, the district shall provide a written or audiotaped copy of the student's IEP, as defined in 34 CFR, §300.346 and §300.347.

(f)

For a student who is new to a school district, the ARD committee may meet when the student enrolls and the parents verify that the student was receiving special education services in the previous school district, or the previous school district verifies in writing or by telephone that the student was receiving special education services. Special education services that are provided prior to receipt of valid evaluation data from the previous school district or collection of new evaluation data are temporary and contingent upon either receipt of valid evaluation data from the previous school district or the collection of new evaluation data. In any event, an ARD committee meeting must be held within 30 school days from the date of the student's enrollment in the district to finalize or develop an IEP based on the evaluation data. The student's current and previous school districts are not required to obtain parental consent before requesting or sending the student's special education records if the disclosure is conducted in accordance with 34 CFR, §99.31(a)(2) and §99.34. In accordance with TEC, §25.002, the school district in which the student was previously enrolled shall furnish the new school district with a copy of the student's records, including the child's special education records, not later than the 30th calendar day after the student was enrolled in the new school district.

(g)

All disciplinary actions regarding students with disabilities shall be determined in accordance with 34 CFR, §§300.121 and 300.519-300.529 (relating to disciplinary actions and procedures) and the TEC, Chapter 37, Subchapter A (Alternative Settings for Behavior Management).

(h)

All members of the ARD committee shall have the opportunity to participate in a collaborative manner in developing the IEP. A decision of the committee concerning required elements of the IEP shall be made by mutual agreement of the required members if possible. The committee may agree to an annual IEP or an IEP of shorter duration.

(1)

When mutual agreement about all required elements of the IEP is not achieved, the party (the parents or adult student) who disagrees shall be offered a single opportunity to have the committee recess for a period of time not to exceed ten school days. This recess is not required when the student's presence on the campus presents a danger of physical harm to the student or others or when the student has committed an expellable offense or an offense which may lead to a placement in an alternative education program (AEP). The requirements of this subsection (h) do not prohibit the members of the ARD committee from recessing an ARD committee meeting for reasons other than the failure of the parents and the school district from reaching mutual agreement about all required elements of an IEP.

(2)

During the recess the committee members shall consider alternatives, gather additional data, prepare further documentation, and/or obtain additional resource persons which may assist in enabling the ARD committee to reach mutual agreement.

(3)

The date, time, and place for continuing the ARD committee meeting shall be determined by mutual agreement prior to the recess.

(4)

If a ten-day recess is implemented as provided in paragraph (1) of this subsection and the ARD committee still cannot reach mutual agreement, the district shall implement the IEP which it has determined to be appropriate for the student.

(5)

When mutual agreement is not reached, a written statement of the basis for the disagreement shall be included in the IEP. The members who disagree shall be offered the opportunity to write their own statements.

(6)

When a district implements an IEP with which the parents disagree or the adult student disagrees, the district shall provide prior written notice to the parents or adult student as required in 34 CFR, §300.503.

(7)

Parents shall have the right to file a complaint, request mediation, or request a due process hearing at any point when they disagree with decisions of the ARD committee.

§89.1055.Content of the Individualized Education Program [ Individual Educational Plan ] (IEP).

(a)

The individualized education program [ individual educational plan ] (IEP) developed by the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee for each student with a disability shall comply with [ include the following information in addition to ] the requirements of 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.346 and §300.347 , and Part 300, Appendix A. [ C: ]

[ (1)

information to allow for determining the student's eligibility for participation in extracurricular activities;]

[ (2)

a statement addressing nonexemption, modification/accommodation, or exemption from some or all of the basic skills assessment instruments, as appropriate. Modifications/accommodation of regular classroom procedures which are provided for students by the local district as specified in the student's IEP shall be provided during the testing process in accordance with §101.3 of this title (relating to Testing Accommodations and Exemptions); and]

[ (3)

goals and objectives shall be specified if extended year services are included in the IEP.]

(b)

If the ARD committee determines that the student is in need of extended school year (ESY) services, as described in §89.1065 of this title (relating to Extended School Year Services (ESY Services)), then the IEP must also include goals and objectives for ESY services.

(c)

[ (b) ] For students with visual impairments, from birth through 21 years of age, the IEP or individualized family services plan (IFSP) shall also meet the requirements of Texas Education Code [ (TEC) ], §30.002(e).

(d)

[ (c) ] For students with autism/pervasive developmental disorders, information about the following shall be considered and, when needed, addressed in the IEP:

(1)

extended educational programming;

(2)

daily schedules reflecting minimal unstructured time;

(3)

in-home training or viable alternatives;

(4)

prioritized behavioral objectives;

(5)

prevocational and vocational needs of students 12 years of age or older;

(6)

parent training; and

(7)

suitable staff-to-students ratio.

(e)

[ (d) ] If the ARD committee determines that services are not needed in one or more of the areas specified in subsection (d)(1)-(7) [ (c)(1)-(7) ] of this section, the IEP must include a statement to that effect and the basis upon which the determination was made.

§89.1056.Transfer of Assistive Technology Devices.

(a)

Unless otherwise specifically defined in this section, the terms used in this section shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in Texas Education Code (TEC), §30.0015, (Transfer of Assistive Technology Devices).

(b)

A transfer of an assistive technology device (ATD) pursuant to TEC, §30.0015, shall be in accordance with a transfer agreement which incorporates the standards described in TEC, §30.0015(c), and which includes, specifically, the following.

(1)

The transferor and transferee must represent and agree that the terms of the transfer are based on the fair market value of the ATD, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

(2)

The informed consent of the parent of the student with a disability for whom the ATD is being transferred must be obtained before the transfer of an ATD pursuant to TEC, §30.0015. The procedures employed by a school district in obtaining such informed consent shall be consistent with the procedures employed by the district to obtain parental consent under 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.505. If the student has the legal capacity to enter into a contract, the informed consent may be obtained from the student. Consistent with 34 CFR, §300.505(c), informed parental or adult student consent need not be obtained if the school district can demonstrate that it has taken reasonable measures to obtain that consent, and the student's parent or the adult student has failed to respond. To meet the reasonable measures requirement, the school district must use procedures consistent with those described in 34 CFR, §300.345(d).

(3)

If the transfer is a sale, then the sale of the ATD shall be evidenced by a "Uniform Transfer Agreement" (UTA) which includes the following:

(A)

the names of the transferor and the transferee (which may be any individual or entity identified in TEC, §30.0015(b));

(B)

the date of the transfer;

(C)

a description of the ATD being transferred;

(D)

the terms of the transfer (including the transfer of warranties, to the extent applicable); and

(E)

the signatures of authorized representatives of both the transferor and the transferee.

(c)

The Texas Education Agency shall annually disseminate to school districts the standards for a school district's transfer of an ATD pursuant to TEC, §30.0015.

(d)

Nothing in this section or in TEC, §30.0015, shall:

(1)

alter any existing obligation under federal or state law to provide ATDs to students with disabilities;

(2)

require a school district to transfer an ATD to any person or entity;

(3)

limit a school district's right to sell, lease, loan, or otherwise convey or dispose of property as authorized by federal or state laws, rules, or regulations; or

(4)

authorize any transfer of an ATD that is inconsistent with any restriction on transferability imposed by the manufacturer or developer of the ATD or applicable federal or state laws, rules, or regulations.

§89.1060.Definitions of Certain Related Services.

In addition to the specific related services defined in 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.24, related services include interpreting services for students who are deaf. Interpreting services include interpreting/transliterating receptively and expressively for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing.

§89.1065.Extended School Year Services (ESY Services) [ (EYS) ].

Extended school year (ESY) services [ (EYS) ] are defined as individualized instructional programs beyond the regular school year for eligible students with disabilities [ who are enrolled in a school district's special education program ].

(1)

The need for ESY services [ EYS ] must be determined on an individual student basis by the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee in accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.309, and the provisions of this section. In determining the need for and in providing ESY services, a school district may not: [ . ]

(A)

limit ESY services to particular categories of disability; or

(B)

unilaterally limit the type, amount, or duration of ESY services.

(2)

The need for ESY services [ EYS ] must be documented from formal and/or informal evaluations provided by the district or the parents. The documentation shall demonstrate that in one or more critical areas addressed in the current individualized education program [ individual educational plan ] (IEP) objectives, the student has exhibited, or reasonably may be expected to exhibit, severe or substantial regression that cannot be recouped within a reasonable [ time ] period of time . Severe or substantial regression means [ shall mean ] that the student has been, or will be, unable to maintain one or more acquired critical skills in [ because of ] the absence of ESY services [ EYS ].

(3)

The reasonable [ time ] period of time for recoupment of acquired critical skills shall be determined on the basis of needs identified in each student's IEP. If the loss of acquired critical skills would be particularly severe or substantial, or if such loss results, or reasonably may be expected to result, in immediate physical harm to the student or to others, ESY services [ EYS ] may be justified without consideration of the [ time ] period of time for recoupment of such skills. In any case, the [ time ] period of time for recoupment shall not exceed eight weeks.

(4)

A skill is critical when the loss of that skill results, or is reasonably expected to result, in any of the following [ unplanned ] occurrences during the first eight weeks of the next regular school year:

(A)

placement in a more restrictive instructional arrangement;

(B)

significant loss of skills necessary for the student to appropriately progress in the general curriculum and appropriately advance toward achieving the goals set out in the student's IEP;

(C)

[ (B) ] significant loss of self-sufficiency in self-help skill areas as evidenced by an increase in the number of direct service staff and/or amount of time required to provide special education or related services;

(D)

[ (C) ] loss of access to community-based independent living skills instruction or an independent living environment provided by noneducational sources as a result of regression in skills; or

(E)

[ (D) ] loss of access to on-the-job training or productive employment as a result of regression in skills.

(5)

If the district does not propose ESY services [ EYS ] for discussion at the annual review of a student's IEP, the parent may request that the ARD committee discuss ESY services [ EYS ] pursuant to 34 CFR, §300.344 [ Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.504 and §300.505 ].

(6)

If a student for whom ESY services were [ EYS was ]considered and rejected loses critical skills because of the decision not to provide ESY services [ EYS ], and if those skills are not regained after the reasonable [ time ] period of time for recoupment, the ARD committee shall reconsider the current IEP if the student's loss of critical skills interferes with the implementation of the student's IEP.

(7)

For students enrolling in a district during the school year, information obtained from the prior school district as well as information collected during the current year may be used to determine the need for ESY services [ EYS ].

(8)

The provision of ESY services [ EYS ] is limited to the educational needs of the student and shall not supplant or limit the responsibility of other public agencies to continue to provide care and treatment services pursuant to policy or practice, even when those services are similar to, or the same as, the services addressed in the student's IEP. No student shall be denied ESY services [ EYS ] because the [ that ] student receives care and treatment services under the auspices of other agencies.

(9)

Districts are not eligible for reimbursement for ESY services [ EYS ] provided to students for reasons other than those set forth in this section.

§89.1070.Graduation Requirements.

(a)

Graduation with a regular high school diploma terminates a student's eligibility for special education services under this subchapter and Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 United States Code, §§14.01 et seq. In addition, as provided in Texas Education Code (TEC), §42.003(a), graduation with a regular high school diploma terminates a student's entitlement to the benefits of the Foundation School Program.

(b)

A student receiving special education services may graduate and be awarded a high school diploma only if:

(1)

the student has satisfactorily completed the minimum academic credit requirements for graduation applicable to students in regular education, including satisfactory performance on the exit level assessment instrument; or

(2)

the student's admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee has determined that the student has successfully completed the student's individualized education program (IEP), including the district's minimum credit requirements for students without disabilities. Successful completion of an IEP occurs when one of the following conditions has been met:

(A)

full-time employment, based on the student's abilities and local employment opportunities, in addition to sufficient self-help skills to enable the student to maintain the employment without direct and ongoing educational support of the local school district;

(B)

demonstrated mastery of specific employability skills and self-help skills which do not require direct ongoing educational support of the local school district; or

(C)

access to services which are not within the legal responsibility of public education, or employment or educational options for which the student has been prepared by the academic program.

(c)

When considering graduation under subsection (b)(2) of this section, the ARD committee shall, when appropriate, seek in writing and consider written recommendations from appropriate adult service agencies and the views of the parent and, when appropriate, the student.

(d)

Employability and self-help skills referenced under subsection (b)(2) of this section are those skills directly related to the preparation of students for employment, including general skills necessary to obtain or retain employment.

(e)

Students with disabilities who are eligible to take the exit level assessment instrument but have not performed satisfactorily are eligible for instruction in accordance with the TEC, §39.024.

(f)

A school district may award a certificate, or some other type of credential, to a student who has not met the requirement of subsection (b) of this section and who is therefore not eligible to graduate and receive a high school diploma. A school district may allow a student who receives a certificate, or some other type of credential, to participate in a graduation ceremony with students receiving high school diplomas. Receipt of a certificate or other type of credential does not terminate a student's eligibility for special education services under this subchapter and IDEA, Part B, nor does it terminate a student's entitlement to the benefits of the Foundation School Program under TEC, §42.003(a).

§89.1075.General Program Requirements and Local District Procedures.

(a)

Each school district shall maintain an eligibility folder for [ on ] each student receiving special education services, in addition to the student's [ student ] cumulative record. The eligibility folder must include, but need not be limited to: copies of referral data; documentation of notices and consents; evaluation [ assessment ] reports and supporting data; admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee reports [ deliberations ]; and the student's individualized education programs (IEPs) [ individual educational plan (IEP) ].

(b)

For school districts providing special education services to students with visual impairments, there shall be written procedures as required in the Texas Education Code (TEC), §30.002(c)(10).

[ (c)

Each school district shall provide parents of students receiving special education services written reports of the students' progress on the same timely basis as the reports provided to students in regular education.]

(c)

[ (d) ] Each school district shall have procedures to ensure that each teacher involved in a student's instruction has the opportunity to provide input and request assistance regarding the implementation of the student's IEP. These procedures must include a method for a student's regular or special education teachers to submit requests for further consideration of the student's IEP or its implementation. In response to this request, the district's procedures shall include a method for the district to determine whether further consideration is necessary and whether this consideration will be informal or will require an ARD committee meeting. If the district determines that an ARD committee meeting is necessary, the student's current regular and special education teachers shall have an opportunity to provide input. The school district shall also ensure that each teacher who provides instruction to a student with disabilities receives relevant sections of the student's current IEP, such as goals and objectives, modifications/accommodations, and adaptations.

(d)

[ (e) ] Students with disabilities shall have available an instructional day commensurate with that of students without disabilities. The ARD committee shall determine the appropriate instructional setting and length of day for each student, and these shall be specified in the student's IEP.

(e)

School districts that jointly operate their special education programs as a shared services arrangement, in accordance with TEC, §29.007, shall do so in accordance with procedures developed by the Texas Education Agency (TEA).

(f)

School districts that contract for services from non-public day schools shall do so in accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.402, and procedures developed by the TEA.

§89.1076.Interventions and Sanctions.

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) shall establish and implement a system of interventions and sanctions, in accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 USC, §§1400 et seq., Texas Education Code (TEC), §29.010, and TEC, Chapter 39, as necessary to ensure compliance with federal and state requirements regarding the implementation of special education and related services. In accordance with TEC, §39.131(a), the TEA may combine any intervention and sanction. The system of interventions and sanctions will include, but not be limited to, the following:

(1)

on-site review for failure to meet compliance requirements;

(2)

required fiscal audit of specific program(s) and/or of the district, paid for by the district;

(3)

required submission of corrective action(s), including compensatory services, paid for by the district;

(4)

required technical assistance from the education service center, paid for by the district;

(5)

public release of compliance review findings;

(6)

special investigation and/or follow-up verification visits;

(7)

required public hearing conducted by the local school board of trustees;

(8)

assignment of a special purpose monitor, master, or management team, paid for by the district;

(9)

hearing before the commissioner of education or designee;

(10)

reduction in payment or withholding of funds; and/or

(11)

lowering of the special education compliance status and/or the accreditation rating of the district.

§89.1085.Referral for the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the Texas School for the Deaf Services.

(a)

A student's admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee may place the student at the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired (TSBVI) or the Texas School for the Deaf (TSD) in accordance with the provisions of 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 300, the Texas Education Code (TEC), including, specifically, §§30.021, 30.051, and 30.057, and the applicable rules of this subchapter.

(b)

In the event that a student is placed by his or her ARD committee at either the TSBVI or the TSD, the student's "resident school district," as defined in subsection (e) of this section, shall be responsible for assuring that a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is provided to the student at the TSBVI or the TSD, as applicable, in accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 United States Code (USC), §§1400 et seq., 34 CFR, Part 300, state statutes, and rules of the State Board of Education (SBOE) and the commissioner of education. If representatives of the resident school district and representatives of the TSBVI or the TSD disagree, as members of a student's ARD committee, with respect to a recommendation by one or more members of the student's ARD committee that the student be evaluated for placement, initially placed, or continued to be placed at the TSBVI or TSD, as applicable, the representatives of the resident school district and the TSBVI or TSD, as applicable, may seek resolution through the mediation procedures adopted by the Texas Education Agency or through any due process hearing to which the resident school district or the TSBVI or the TSD are entitled under the IDEA, 20 USC, §§1401, et seq.

(c)

When a student's ARD committee places the student at the TSBVI or the TSD, the student's resident school district shall comply with the following requirements.

(1)

For each student, the resident school district shall list those services in the student's individualized education program (IEP) which the district cannot appropriately provide in a local program and which the TSBVI or the TSD can appropriately provide.

(2)

The district may make an on-site visit to verify that the TSBVI or the TSD can and will offer the services listed in the individual student's IEP and to ensure that the school offers an appropriate educational program for the student.

(3)

For each student, the resident school district shall include in the student's IEP the criteria and estimated time lines for returning the student to the resident school district.

(d)

In addition to the provisions of subsections (a)-(c) of this section, and as provided in TEC, §30.057, the TSD shall provide services in accordance with TEC, §30.051, to any eligible student with a disability for whom the TSD is an appropriate placement if the student has been referred for admission by the student's parent or legal guardian, a person with legal authority to act in place of the parent or legal guardian, or the student, if the student is age 18 or older, at any time during the school year if the referring person chooses the TSD as the appropriate placement for the student rather than placement in the student's resident school district or regional program determined by the student's ARD committee. For students placed at the TSD pursuant to this subsection, the TSD shall be responsible for assuring that a FAPE is provided to the student at the TSD, in accordance with IDEA, 20 USC, §§1401 et seq., 34 CFR, Part 300, state statutes, and rules of the SBOE and the commissioner of education.

(e)

For purposes of this section and §89.1090 of this title (relating to Transportation of Students Placed in a Residential Setting, Including the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the Texas School for the Deaf), the "resident school district" is the school district in which the student would be enrolled under TEC, §25.001, if the student were not placed at the TSBVI or the TSD.

§89.1090.Transportation of Students Placed in a Residential Setting, Including the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired and the Texas School for the Deaf.

For each student [ students ] placed in a residential setting by the student's [ based upon local school district ] admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee [ recommendations ], including those students placed in the Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired TSBVI and the Texas School for the Deaf TSD , the resident school district shall be responsible for transportation at the beginning and end of the term and for regularly scheduled school holidays when students are expected to leave the residential campus. The resident school district is [ School districts are ] not responsible for transportation costs for students placed in residential settings by their parents. Transportation costs shall not exceed state approved per diem and mileage rates unless excess costs [ charges ] can be justified and documented. Transportation shall be arranged using the most cost efficient means. When [ Where ] it is necessary for the safety of the student [ child ], as determined by the ARD committee, for an adult designated by the ARD committee to accompany the student, round-trip transportation for that adult shall also be provided. The resident school district and the residential facility shall coordinate to ensure that students are transported safely, including the periods of departure and arrival.

§89.1095.Provision of Services for Students Placed by their [ Their ] Parents in Private Schools.

(a)

This section will expire on June 30, 2001, and shall be superseded by §89.1096 of this title (relating to Provision of Services for Students Placed by their Parents in Private Schools or Facilities), beginning July 1, 2001.

(b)

[ (a) ] When a student with disabilities who has been placed by his or her parents directly in a private school or facility is referred to the local school district, the local district shall convene an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee meeting to determine whether the district can offer to the student a free, appropriate, public education. If the district determines that it can, the district is not responsible for providing educational or related services to the student until such time as the parents choose to enroll the child in the public school full-time or request services under the dual enrollment rule in subsection (g) [ (f) ] of this section.

(c)

[ (b) ] All state requirements concerning referral, assessment, and determination of eligibility are applicable to students placed by their parents in private schools once the students have been referred to the local school district. All state requirements concerning special education services are applicable to students admitted under the dual enrollment rule in subsection (g) [ (f) ] of this section.

(d)

[ (c) ] School districts shall use their established procedures and forms for the referral of students from private schools.

(e)

[ (d) ] To the maximum extent possible, the district shall use referral and assessment information from the private schools' records in order to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort or services.

(f)

[ (e) ] The district shall provide to private school personnel the opportunity to participate in, and provide information for, the district's ARD committee deliberations when the educational needs of private school students are being considered.

(g)

[ (f) ] If the ARD committee determines that a private school student is eligible for, and in need of, special education instruction or related services or both, the parent may choose to enroll the student full-time in the public school. If the parent does not choose to do this, the school district shall make the special education services available only on the basis of dual enrollment. Based on the services and amount of time needed to provide those services, as set forth in each student's individual educational plan (IEP), when parents choose to enroll a child under the dual enrollment provision, the school district shall use one of the following arrangements for dual enrollment:

(1)

enroll the student for at least four consecutive hours per day and count the student eligible for full state average daily attendance (ADA), for contact hours based on the instructional arrangement in which the student is served, and for full federal funding;

(2)

enroll the student for at least two consecutive hours per day and count the student eligible for one-half state ADA, for contact hours based on the instructional arrangement in which the student is served, and for full federal funding; or

(3)

enroll the student for any amount of time needed less than two hours per day and count the student eligible for full federal funding, but not for state ADA and for contact hours.

(h)

[ (g) ] The location and procedures for delivery of the instructional or related services or both specified in the IEP shall be determined based on the requirements concerning placement in the least restrictive environment and the policies and procedures of the local district.

(i)

[ (h) ] For students served under the provisions of this section, the school district shall be responsible for the employment and supervision of the personnel providing the service, providing the needed instructional materials, and maintaining pupil accounting records. Materials and services provided shall be equivalent to those provided for students enrolled only in the public school and shall remain the property of the school district.

(j)

[ (i) ] Students placed in a private school by parent choice shall not be eligible for state funded transportation services. The school district shall provide special transportation with federal funds only when the ARD committee determines that the condition of the student warrants the service in order for the student to receive the instruction or related service set forth in the IEP.

§89.1096.Provision of Services for Students Placed by their Parents in Private Schools or Facilities.

(a)

The provisions of this section shall be implemented beginning July 1, 2001, and at that time shall supersede §89.1095 of this title (relating to Provision of Services for Students Placed by their Parents in Private Schools).

(b)

Except as specifically provided in this section, in accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.454, no eligible student who has been placed by his or her parent(s) in a private school or facility has an individual right to receive some or all of the special education and related services that the student would receive if he or she were enrolled in a public school district. Except as specifically set forth in this section, a school district's obligations with respect to students placed by their parents in private schools are governed by 34 CFR, §§300.450-300.462.

(c)

When a student with a disability who has been placed by his or her parents directly in a private school or facility is referred to the local school district, the local district shall convene an admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee meeting to determine whether the district can offer the student a free appropriate public education (FAPE). If the district determines that it can offer a FAPE to the student, the district is not responsible for providing educational services to the student, except as provided in 34 CFR, §§300.450-300.462 or subsection (d) of this section, until such time as the parents choose to enroll the student in public school full-time.

(d)

Parents of an eligible student ages 3 or 4 shall have the right to "dual enroll" their student in both the public school and the private school beginning on the student's third birthday and continuing until the end of the school year in which the student turns five, subject to the following.

(1)

The student's ARD committee shall develop an individualized education program (IEP) designed to provide the student with a FAPE in the least restrictive environment appropriate for the student.

(2)

From the IEP, the parent and the district shall determine which special education and/or related services will be provided to the student and the location where those services will be provided, based on the requirements concerning placement in the least restrictive environment set forth in 34 CFR, §§300.550-300.553, and the policies and procedures of the district.

(3)

For students served under the provisions of this subsection, the school district shall be responsible for the employment and supervision of the personnel providing the service, providing the needed instructional materials, and maintaining pupil accounting records. Materials and services provided shall be consistent with those provided for students enrolled only in the public school and shall remain the property of the school district.

(e)

The school district shall provide special transportation with federal funds only when the ARD committee determines that the condition of the student warrants the service in order for the student to receive the special education and related services (if any) set forth in the IEP.

(f)

Complaints regarding the implementation of the components of the student's IEP that have been selected by the parent and the district under subsection (d) of this section may be filed with the Texas Education Agency under the procedures in 34 CFR, §§300.660-300.662. The procedures in 34 CFR, §§300.504-300.515 (relating to due process hearings) do not apply to complaints regarding the implementation of the components of the student's IEP that have been selected by the parent and the district under subsection (d).

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005455

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701


19 TAC §§89.1020, 89.1025, 89.1030, 89.1040, 89.1045, 89.1050, 89.1060, 89.1070, 89.1085, 89.1105

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the Texas Education Agency or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeals are proposed under 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.600, which outlines the responsibilities of TEA for all educational programs; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, 29.005, 29.015, 30.0015, and 30.057, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules related to delivering special education services.

The repeals implement 34 CFR, §300.600; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, 29.005, 29.015, 30.0015, and 30.057.

§89.1020.Written Notice to Parent Before Assessment.

§89.1025.Consent for Assessment.

§89.1030.Comprehensive Individual Assessment.

§89.1040.Eligibility Criteria.

§89.1045.Notice to Parents for Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD) Committee Meetings.

§89.1050.The Admission, Review, and Dismissal (ARD) Committee.

§89.1060.Definitions of Certain Related Services.

§89.1070.Graduation Requirements.

§89.1085.Referral for Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired and Texas School for the Deaf Services.

§89.1105.Memorandum of Understanding Relating to School-Age Residents of Intermediate Care Facilities for the Mentally Retarded.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005456

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701


4. SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING

19 TAC §89.1121, §89.1125

The amendments are proposed under 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.600, which outlines the responsibilities of TEA for all educational programs; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules related to delivering special education services.

The amendments implement 34 CFR, §300.600; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005.

§89.1121.Distribution of State Funds.

(a)

Procedures for counting the average daily attendance (ADA) of students receiving special education services in various instructional settings shall be developed by the commissioner of education and included in the daily register for pupil attendance accounting.

(b)

State special education funds shall be distributed to school districts on the basis of ADA of full-time equivalents of eligible students served in accordance with §129.21 of this title (relating to Requirements for Student Attendance Accounting for State Funding Purposes).

(c)

The special education attendance shall be converted to contact hours by instructional arrangement and then to full-time equivalents. The full-time equivalent for each instructional arrangement is multiplied by the school district's adjusted basic allotment and then multiplied by the weight for the instructional arrangement as prescribed in the Texas Education Code (TEC), §42.151(a). Contact hours for any one student receiving special education services may not exceed six hours per day or 30 hours per week for funding purposes. The total contact hours generated per week shall be divided by 30 to determine the full-time equivalents. Special education full-time equivalents generated shall be deducted from the school district's ADA for purposes of the regular education allotment.

(d)

The receipt of special education funds shall be contingent upon the operation of an approved comprehensive special education program in accordance with state and federal laws and regulations. No district may divert special education funds for other purposes, with the exception of administrative costs as defined in Chapter 105, Subchapter B, of this title (relating to Maximum Indirect Cost Allowable on Certain Foundation School Program Allotments). Funds generated by full-time equivalents in one instructional arrangement may be spent on the overall special education program and are not limited [ tied ] to the instructional arrangement [ in ] which [ they were ] generated the funds . The district must maintain separate accountability for the total state special education program fund within the general fund.

(e)

A special education fund balance may be carried over to the next fiscal year but [ and ] must be expended on the special education program in the subsequent year. State special education carryover funds cannot be used for administrative costs.

(f)

Students who are at least three, but younger than 22, years of age on September 1 of the current scholastic year who participate in the regional day school program for the deaf may be counted as part of the district's ADA if they receive instruction from the basic program for at least 50% of the school day.

(g)

Students from birth through age two with a visual or auditory impairment or both who are provided services by the district according to an individual family services plan (IFSP) shall be enrolled on the district home or regional day school campus and shall be considered eligible for ADA on the same basis as other students receiving special education services.

(h)

Funding for the mainstream special education instructional arrangement shall be based on the average daily attendance of the students in the arrangement multiplied by the adjusted basic allotment/adjusted allotment (ABA/AA) and the 1.1 weight. The attendance shall not be converted to contact hours/full-time equivalents as with the other instructional arrangements.

§89.1125.Allowable Expenditures of State Special Education Funds.

(a)

Persons paid from special education funds shall be assigned to instructional or other duties in the special education program and/or to provide support services to the regular education program in order for students with disabilities to be included in the regular program. Support services shall include, but not be limited to, collaborative planning, co-teaching, small group instruction with special and regular education students, direct instruction to special education students, or other support services determined necessary by the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee for an appropriate program for the student with disabilities. Assignments may include duties supportive to school operations equivalent to those assigned to regular education personnel.

(b)

Personnel assigned to provide support services to the regular education program as stated in subsection (a) of this section may be fully funded from special education funds.

(c)

If personnel are assigned to special education on less than a full-time basis, except as stated in subsection (a) of this section, only that portion of time for which the personnel are assigned to students with disabilities shall be paid from state special education funds.

(d)

State special education funds may be used for special materials, supplies, and equipment which are directly related to the development and implementation of individualized education programs [ individual educational plans ] (IEPs) of students and which are not ordinarily purchased for the regular classroom. Office and routine classroom supplies are not allowable. Special equipment may include instructional and assistive technology devices, audiovisual equipment, computers for instruction or assessment purposes, and assessment equipment only if used directly with students.

(e)

State special education funds may be used to contract with consultants to provide staff development, program planning and evaluation, instructional services, assessments, and related services to students with disabilities.

(f)

State special education funds may be used for transportation only to and from residential placements. Prior to using federal funds for transportation costs to and from a residential facility, a district must use state or local funds based on actual expenses up to the state transportation maximum for private transportation contracts.

(g)

State special education funds may be used to pay [ special education ] staff travel to perform services directly related to the education of eligible students with disabilities . Funds may also be used to pay travel of staff (including administrators, general education teachers, and special education teachers and service providers) to attend staff development meetings for the purpose of improving performance in assigned positions directly related to the education of eligible students with disabilities . In no event shall the [ The ] purpose for attending such staff development meetings [ shall not ] include time spent in performing functions relating to the operation of professional organizations. In accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.382(j), funds may also be used to pay for the joint training of parents and special education, related services, and general education personnel.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005457

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701


5. SPECIAL EDUCATION AND RELATED SERVICE PERSONNEL

19 TAC §89.1131

The amendment is proposed under 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.600, which outlines the responsibilities of TEA for all educational programs; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules related to delivering special education services.

The amendment implements 34 CFR, §300.600; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005.

§89.1131.Qualifications of Special Education, Related Service, and Paraprofessional Personnel.

(a)

All special education and related service personnel shall be certified, endorsed, or licensed in the area or areas of assignment in accordance with 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.23 and §300.136 [ §300.15 and §300.153 ]; the Texas Education Code (TEC), §§21.002, 21.003, and 29.304; or appropriate state agency credentials.

(b)

A teacher who holds a special education certificate or an endorsement may be assigned to any level of a basic special education instructional program serving eligible students 3-21 years of age, as defined in §89.1035(a) of this title (relating to Age Ranges for Student Eligibility), in accordance with the limitation of their certification, except for the following.

(1)

Persons assigned to provide speech therapy instructional services must hold a valid Texas Education Agency (TEA) certificate in speech and hearing therapy or speech and language therapy, or a valid state license as a speech/language [ speech language ] pathologist.

(2)

Teachers holding only a special education endorsement for early childhood education for children with disabilities shall be assigned only to programs serving infants through Grade 6.

(3)

Teachers assigned full-time to teaching students who are orthopedically impaired or other health impaired with the teaching station in the home or a hospital shall not be required to hold a special education certificate or endorsement as long as the personnel file contains an official transcript indicating that the teacher has completed a three-semester-hour survey course in the education of students with disabilities and three semester hours directly related to teaching students with physical impairments or other health impairments.

(4)

Teachers certified in the education of students with visual impairments must be available to students with visual impairments, including deaf-blindness, [ who are visually impaired ] through one of the school district's instructional options, a shared services [ service ] arrangement [ unit ] with other school districts, or an education service center (ESC). A teacher who is certified in the education of students with visual impairments must attend each admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee meeting or individualized family service plan (IFSP) meeting of a student with a visual impairment, including deaf-blindness. [ These teachers must attend admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee and individualized family services plan (IFSP) meetings when a student, birth through 21 years of age, with a visual impairment is being considered. ]

(5)

Teachers certified in the education of students with auditory impairments must be available to students with auditory impairments, including deaf-blindness, [ who are auditorially impaired ] through one of the school district's instructional options, a regional day school program for the deaf, a shared services [ service ] arrangement [ unit ] with other school districts, or an ESC. A teacher who is certified in the education of students with auditory impairments must attend each ARD committee meeting or IFSP meeting of a student with an auditory impairment, including deaf-blindness. [ These teachers must attend ARD committee and IFSP meetings when a student, birth through 21 years of age, with an auditory impairment is being considered. ]

(6)

The following provisions apply to physical education.

(A)

When the ARD committee has made the determination [ recommendation ] and the arrangements are specified in the student's individualized education program [ individual educational plan ] (IEP), physical education may be provided by the following personnel:

(i)

special education instructional or related service personnel who have the necessary skills and knowledge;

(ii)

physical education teachers;

(iii)

occupational therapists;

(iv)

physical therapists; or

(v)

occupational therapy assistants or physical therapy assistants working under supervision in accordance with the standards of their profession.

(B)

When these services are provided by special education personnel, the district must document that they have the necessary skills and knowledge. Documentation may include, but need not be limited to, inservice records, evidence of attendance at seminars or workshops, or transcripts of college courses.

(7)

Teachers assigned full-time or part-time to instruction of students from birth through age two with visual impairments , including deaf-blindness, shall be certified in the education of students with visual impairments. Teachers assigned full-time or part-time to instruction of students from birth through age two who are deaf , including deaf-blindness, shall be certified in education for students who are deaf and severely hard of hearing. Other certifications for serving these students shall require prior approval from TEA.

(8)

Teachers with secondary certification with the generic delivery system may be assigned to teach Grades 6-12 only.

(c)

Paraprofessional personnel may be assigned to work with eligible students, special education teachers, and related service personnel. Aides may also be assigned to assist students with special education transportation , [ or ] serve as a job coach , or serve in support of community-based instruction . Aides paid from state administrative funds may be assigned to the Special Education Resource System (SERS), the Special Education Management System (SEMS), or other special education clerical or administrative duties.

(d)

Interpreting services for students who are deaf shall be provided by an interpreter who is certified in the appropriate language mode(s), if certification in such mode(s) is available. If certification is available, the interpreter must be certified by the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf or the Texas Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing, unless the interpreter has been granted an emergency permit by the commissioner of education to provide interpreting services for students who are deaf. The commissioner shall consider applications for the issuance of an emergency permit to provide interpreting services for students who are deaf on a case-by-case basis in accordance with requirements set forth in 34 CFR, §300.136, and standards and procedures established by the TEA. In no event will an emergency permit allow an uncertified interpreter to provide interpreting services for more than a total of three school years to students who are deaf.

[ (d)

This subsection will expire August 31, 1997. An aide may be assigned to function as a teacher assistant under the following conditions.]

[ (1)

Qualifications shall include all of the following:]

[ (A)

high school graduate or equivalent;]

[ (B)

30 semester hours of college credit with some emphasis on child growth and development or related areas, or a minimum of three years experience working directly with children or youth (as appropriate) in instructional or child care facilities; and]

[ (C)

documented ongoing inservice or other staff development activities related to the education of students with disabilities.]

[ (2)

Assignment of an aide as a teacher assistant shall be for the following purposes:]

[ (A)

providing individualized instruction in an environment other than the designated supervising teacher's classroom;]

[ (B)

reinforcing academic or developmental skills requiring extensive repetition or drill and practice on skills which have been previously taught by the supervising teacher; and]

[ (C)

assisting students in job training/employment and community-based instructional programs.]

[ (3)

Supervision shall be by a certified special education teacher who is directly responsible for the implementation of the students' IEPs and evaluation of their progress. For teacher assistants operating under paragraph (2)(A) and (B) of this subsection, supervision shall be for a minimum of one hour per day during student instruction, in addition to the time necessary for joint planning and preparation. For teacher assistants operating under paragraph (2)(C) of this subsection, supervision shall be for a minimum of one hour per day or five hours per week.]

[ (4)

Assignment shall be in one of the following:]

[ (A)

homebound;]

[ (B)

hospital class;]

[ (C)

self-contained classes listed in §89.63 of this title (relating to Instructional Arrangements and Settings);]

[ (D)

off home campus; or]

[ (E)

vocational adjustment class.]

(e)

Orientation and mobility instruction shall be provided by a professional who holds at least a bachelor's degree with a major in the field of orientation and mobility instruction and who is certified by the Association for Education and Rehabilitation of the Blind and Visually Impaired.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005458

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701


6. HEARINGS CONCERNING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES UNDER THE INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION ACT

19 TAC §§89.1151, 89.1155, 89.1160, 89.1165, 89.1170, 89.1175, 89.1180, 89.1185, 89.1190

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the Texas Education Agency or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The repeals are proposed under 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.600, which outlines the responsibilities of TEA for all educational programs; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules related to delivering special education services.

The repeals implement 34 CFR, §300.600; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005.

§89.1151.Purpose.

§89.1155.Definitions.

§89.1160.Applicability.

§89.1165.Request for Hearing.

§89.1170.Impartial Hearing Officer.

§89.1175.Hearing Rights.

§89.1180.Prehearing Procedures.

§89.1185.Hearing.

§89.1190.Student's Status During Proceedings.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005459

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701


7. RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES BETWEEN PARENTS AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS

19 TAC §§89.1150, 89.1151, 89.1165, 89.1170, 89.1180, 89.1185, 89.1191

The new sections are proposed under 34 Code of Federal Regulations, §300.600, which outlines the responsibilities of TEA for all educational programs; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005, which authorizes the commissioner of education to adopt rules related to delivering special education services.

The new sections implement 34 CFR, §300.600; and Texas Education Code, §§29.001, 29.003, and 29.005.

§89.1150.General Provisions.

(a)

From time to time, disputes may arise between a parent and a school district relating to the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of or the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE), to a student with a disability.

(b)

It is the policy and intent of the Texas Education Agency (TEA) to encourage and support the resolution of any dispute described in subsection (a) of this section at the lowest level possible and in a prompt, efficient, and effective manner.

(c)

The possible options for resolving disputes include, but are not limited to:

(1)

meetings of the student's admission, review, and dismissal committee;

(2)

meetings or conferences with the student's teachers;

(3)

meetings or conferences, subject to local school district policies, with campus administrator(s), the special education director of the district (or the shared services arrangement to which the district may be a party), the superintendent of the district, or the board of trustees of the district;

(4)

requesting mediation through the TEA in accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 United States Code (USC), §1415(e), and 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.506;

(5)

filing a complaint with the TEA in accordance with 34 CFR, §§300.600-300.662; or

(6)

requesting a due process hearing through the TEA in accordance with IDEA, 20 USC, §1415(f), and 34 CFR, §§300.507-300.514. Upon the filing of a request for a due process hearing, the parent and the school district shall also be provided with an opportunity to resolve the dispute through the mediation process established by TEA.

§89.1151.Due Process Hearings.

(a)

A parent or public education agency may initiate a due process hearing as provided in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, as amended, 20 United States Code (USC), §§1401 et seq., and the applicable federal regulations, 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §§300.1 et seq.

(b)

The Texas Education (TEA) shall implement a one-tier system of due process hearings under the IDEA. The proceedings in due process hearings shall be governed by the provisions of 34 CFR, §§300.507-300.514, and 34 CFR, §300.528, if applicable, and §§89.1151, 89.1165, 89.1170, 89.1180, 89.1185 and 89.1191 of this subchapter.

(c)

The issues presented in a due process hearing, and any relief requested, are limited to and may be based only upon facts alleged to have occurred not more than one year prior to the date that the request for due process hearing is received by TEA or since the date of the last admission, review, and dismissal committee meeting of the student who is the subject of the hearing, whichever period is longer, but in no event more than two years prior to the date that the request for due process hearing is received by TEA.

§89.1165.Request for Hearing.

(a)

A request for a due process hearing must be in writing and must be filed with the Texas Education Agency, 1701 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701. The request for a due process hearing may be filed by mail, hand-delivery, or facsimile and shall be deemed filed only when actually received by the office responsible for legal services at the Texas Education Agency (TEA). The TEA has developed a model form which may be used by a parent to initiate a due process hearing. The form is available on request from TEA, all regional education service centers, and all school districts. The form is also available on TEA's website.

(b)

If the request for a due process hearing does not specify the issues to be heard and the relief requested, the hearing officer shall require the complaining party to supplement the request, orally or in writing, to clarify the issues to be heard at the hearing and the relief sought by the complaining party.

§89.1170.Impartial Hearing Officer.

(a)

Each due process hearing shall be conducted by an impartial hearing officer selected by the Texas Education Agency (TEA).

(b)

The hearing officer has the authority to administer oaths; call and examine witnesses; rule on motions, including discovery and dispositive motions; determine admissibility of evidence and amendments to pleadings; maintain decorum; schedule and recess the proceedings from day to day; and make any other orders as justice requires, including the application of sanctions as necessary to maintain an orderly hearing process.

(c)

If the hearing officer is removed, dies, becomes disabled, or withdraws from an appeal before the completion of duties, the TEA may designate a substitute hearing officer to complete the performance of duties without the necessity of repeating any previous proceedings.

§89.1180.Prehearing Procedures.

(a)

Promptly upon being assigned to a hearing, the hearing officer will schedule a prehearing conference to be held at a time reasonably convenient to the parties to the hearing. The prehearing conference shall be held by telephone unless the hearing officer determines that circumstances require an in-person conference.

(b)

The hearing officer shall ensure that a written, or, at the option of either party, an electronic, verbatim record of the prehearing conference is made.

(c)

The purpose of the prehearing conference shall be to consider any of the following:

(1)

specifying and simplifying issues;

(2)

admitting certain assertions of fact or stipulations;

(3)

establishing any limitation of the number of witnesses and the time allotted for presenting each party's case; and/or

(4)

discussing other matters which may aid in simplifying the proceeding or disposing of matters in controversy, including settling matters in dispute.

(d)

Promptly upon the conclusion of the prehearing conference, the hearing officer will issue and deliver to the parties, or their legal representatives, a written prehearing order which identifies:

(1)

the time, place, and date of the hearing;

(2)

the issues to be resolved at the hearing;

(3)

the relief being sought at the hearing;

(4)

the deadline for disclosure of evidence and identification of witnesses, which must be at least five business days prior to the scheduled date of the hearing (hereinafter referred to as the "Disclosure Deadline");

(5)

the date by which the final decision of the hearing officer shall be issued; and

(6)

other information determined to be relevant by the hearing officer.

(e)

No pleadings, other than the request for hearing, are mandatory, unless ordered by the hearing officer. Any pleadings after the request for a due process hearing shall be filed with the hearing officer. Copies of all pleadings shall be sent to all parties of record in the hearing and to the hearing officer. If a party is represented by an attorney, all copies shall be sent to the attorney of record. Telephone facsimile copies may be substituted for copies sent by other means. An affirmative statement that a copy of the pleading has been sent to all parties and the hearing officer is sufficient to indicate compliance with this rule.

(f)

Discovery methods shall be limited to those specified in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), Texas Government Code, Chapter 2001, and may be further limited by order of the hearing officer. Upon a party's request to the hearing officer, the hearing officer may issue subpoenas and commissions to take depositions under the APA. Subpoenas and commissions to take depositions shall be issued in the name of the Texas Education Agency.

(g)

On or before the Disclosure Deadline (which must be at least five business days prior to a scheduled due process hearing), each party must disclose and provide to all other parties and the hearing officer copies of all evidence (including, without limitation, all evaluations completed by that date and recommendations based on those evaluations) which the party intends to use at the hearing. An index of the documents disclosed must be included with and accompany the documents. Each party must also include with the documents disclosed a list of all witnesses (including their names, addresses, phone numbers, and professions) which the party anticipates calling to testify at the hearing.

(h)

A party may request a dismissal or nonsuit of a due process hearing to the same extent that a plaintiff may dismiss or nonsuit a case under Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 162. However, if a party requests a dismissal or nonsuit of a due process hearing after the Disclosure Deadline has passed and, at any time within one year thereafter requests a subsequent due process hearing involving the same or substantially similar issues as those alleged in the hearing which was dismissed or nonsuited, then, absent good cause or unless the parties agree otherwise, the Disclosure Deadline for the subsequent due process hearing shall be the same date as was established for the hearing that was dismissed or nonsuited.

§89.1185.Hearing.

(a)

The hearing officer shall afford the parties an opportunity for hearing after reasonable notice of not less than ten days, unless the parties agree otherwise.

(b)

Each hearing shall be conducted at a time and place that are reasonably convenient to the parents and child involved.

(c)

All persons in attendance shall comport themselves with the same dignity, courtesy, and respect required by the district courts of the State of Texas. All argument shall be made to the hearing officer alone.

(d)

Except as modified or limited by the provisions of 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §§300.507-300.514, 300.521, or 300.528, or the provisions of §§89.1151-89.1191 of this subchapter, the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure shall govern the proceedings at the hearing and the Texas Rules of Evidence shall govern evidentiary issues.

(e)

Before a document may be offered or admitted into evidence, the document must be identified as an exhibit of the party offering the document. All pages within the exhibit must be numbered, and all personally identifiable information must be redacted from the exhibit.

(f)

The hearing officer may set reasonable time limits for presenting evidence at the hearing.

(g)

Upon request, the hearing officer, at his or her discretion, may permit testimony to be received by telephone.

(h)

Granting of a motion to exclude witnesses from the hearing room shall be at the hearing officer's discretion.

(i)

Hearings conducted under this subchapter shall be closed to the public, unless the parent requests that the hearing be open.

(j)

The hearing shall be recorded and transcribed by a reporter, who shall immediately prepare and transmit a transcript of the evidence to the hearing officer with copies to each of the parties. The hearing officer shall instruct the reporter to delete all personally identifiable information from the transcription of the hearing.

(k)

Filing of post-hearing briefs shall be permitted only upon order of the hearing officer and only upon a finding by the hearing officer that the legal issues involved in the hearing are novel or unsettled in the State of Texas or the Fifth Circuit. Any post-hearing briefs permitted by the hearing officer shall be limited to the legal issues specified by the hearing officer.

(l)

The hearing officer shall issue a final decision, signed and dated, no later than 45 days after a request for hearing is received by the Texas Education Agency, unless the deadline for a final decision has been extended by the hearing officer as provided in subsection (m) of this section. A final decision must be in writing and must include findings of fact and conclusions of law separately stated. Findings of fact must be based exclusively on the evidence presented at the hearing. The final decision shall be mailed to each party by the hearing officer. The hearing officer, at his or her discretion, may render his or her decision following the conclusion of the hearing, to be followed by written findings of fact and written decision.

(m)

At the request of either party, the hearing officer shall include, in the final decision, specific findings of fact regarding the following issues:

(1)

whether the parent or the school district unreasonably protracted the final resolution of the issues in controversy in the hearing; and

(2)

if the parent was represented by an attorney, whether the parent's attorney provided the school district the appropriate information in the due process complaint in accordance with 34 CFR, §300.507(c).

(n)

In making a finding regarding the issue described in subsection (m)(1) of this section, the hearing officer shall consider the extent to which each party had notice of, or the opportunity to resolve, the issues presented at the due process hearing prior to the date on which the due process hearing was requested. If, after the date on which a request for a due process hearing is filed, either the parent or the school district requests that a meeting of the admission, review, and dismissal (ARD) committee of the student who is the subject of the due process hearing be convened to discuss the issues raised in the request for a due process hearing, the hearing officer shall also consider the extent to which each party participated in the ARD committee meeting in a good faith attempt to resolve the issue(s) in dispute prior to proceeding to a due process hearing.

(o)

A hearing officer may grant extensions of time for good cause beyond the 45-day period specified in subsection (l) of this section at the request of either party. Any such extension shall be granted to a specific date and shall be stated in writing by the hearing officer to each of the parties.

(p)

The decision issued by the hearing officer is final, except that any party aggrieved by the findings and decision made by the hearing officer, or the performance thereof by any other party, may bring a civil action with respect to the issues presented at the due process hearing in any state court of competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States, as provided in 20 United States Code (USC), §1415(i)(2), and 34 CFR, §300.512. A civil action brought in state or federal court under 20 USC, §1415(i)(2), and 34 CFR, §300.512, must be initiated no more than 45 days after the date the hearing officer issued his or her written decision in the due process hearing.

(q)

In accordance with 34 CFR, §300.514(c), a school district shall implement any decision of the hearing officer that is, at least in part, adverse to the school district in a timely manner within ten school days after the date the decision was rendered.

§89.1191.Special Rule for Expedited Due Process Hearings.

An expedited due process hearing requested by a party under 34 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), §300.528, shall be governed by the same rules as are applicable to due process hearings generally, except that the final decision of the hearing officer must be issued and mailed to each of the parties no later than 45 days after the date the request for the expedited hearing is received by the Texas Education Agency, without exceptions or extensions.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on August 7, 2000.

TRD-200005460

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 17, 2000

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701