TITLE education

Part I. Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Chapter 5. Program Development

Subchapter E. Presentation of Request for New Academic Degree Programs

19 TAC §5.101

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts Chapter 5, Subchapter E, new §5.101 concerning Program Development (Presentation of Request for New Academic Degree Programs) with changes to the proposed text as published in the December 4, 1998 issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 12069). The new rules would allow the Coordinating Board to concentrate its efforts on setting major policy issues and spending less time on applying policy. The new rules will give more responsibility to governing boards to ensure that proposals for new degree programs and for facilities meet Coordinating Board policy.

Comments regarding the new rules were received from Texas A&M University, University of Houston System Schools (Main Campus, Downtown, Clear Lake, and Victoria), Sam Houston State University, University of North Texas, The University of Texas at Dallas, The University of Texas-Pan American, and The University of Texas at San Antonio. Comments were made regarding the limit of approval by the commissioner; that it be raised from $1 million limit to $2.5 million. The Board did not agree with this comment. More guidance was requested on terms such as "unnecessarily duplicative". The Board decided not to make any additional changes concerning that part of the rule. The Board approved the rules as proposed with the exception of adding a new subsection (f).

The new rule is adopted under Texas Education Code, Section 61.051 which provides the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules concerning Program Development (Presentation of Request for New Academic Degree Programs).

§5.101. Approvals by the Commissioner.

(a)

The Commissioner of Higher Education may approve proposals from the public universities and health-related institutions for new baccalaureate or master's degree programs and academic administrative change requests on behalf of the Board in accordance with the procedures and criteria specified in this section.

(b)

A proposal for a new degree program must include certification in writing from the Board of Regents of a proposing institution, in a form prescribed by the Commissioner, that the following criteria have been met:

(1)

The proposed degree program is within the Table of Programs previously approved by the Coordinating Board for the requesting institution.

(2)

The curriculum, faculty, resources, support services, and other components of a proposed degree program are comparable to those of high quality programs in the same or similar disciplines offered by other institutions.

(3)

Clinical or in-service placements, if applicable, have been identified in sufficient number and breadth to support the proposed program.

(4)

The program is designed to be consistent with the standards of the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, and with the standards of other applicable accrediting agencies; and is in compliance with appropriate licensing authority requirements.

(5)

The institution has provided credible evidence of long-term student interest and job-market needs for graduates; or, if proposed by a university, the program is appropriate for the development of a well-rounded array of basic baccalaureate degree programs at the institution where the principal faculty and other resources are already in place to support other approved programs and/or the general core curriculum requirements for all undergraduate students.

(6)

The program would not be unnecessarily duplicative of existing programs at other institutions.

(7)

Implementation and operation of the program would not be dependent on future Special Item funding.

(8)

New costs to the institution over the first five years after implementation of the program would not exceed $1,000,000.

(c)

A proposal for a new degree program or administrative change must include a statement from the institution's chief executive officer certifying adequate financing and explaining the sources of funding to support the first five years of operation of the program or administrative change.

(d)

If a proposal meets the criteria specified in this section, the Commissioner may either approve it or forward it to the Board for consideration at an appropriate quarterly meeting.

(e)

If a proposal does not meet the criteria specified in this section, the Commissioner may deny approval or forward it to the Board for consideration at an appropriate quarterly meeting. Institutions may appeal the Commissioner's decision to deny approval to the Board.

(f)

If a proposed program is the subject of an unresolved grievance or dispute between institutions, the Commissioner must forward it to the Board for consideration at an appropriate quarterly meeting.

(g)

At the beginning of each month, the Commissioner will make available to the public universities, health-related institutions, community/technical colleges, and Independent Colleges of Texas, Inc. a list of all pending proposals for new degree programs and administrative changes. If an institution wishes to provide the Commissioner information supporting a concern it has about the approval of a pending proposal for a new degree program at another institution, it must do so within one month of the initial listing of the proposal, and it must also forward the information to the proposing institution.

(h)

Each quarter, the Commissioner shall send a list of his approvals and disapprovals under this section to Board members. A list of the approvals and disapprovals shall also be attached to the minutes of the next quarterly Board meeting.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 1999.

TRD-9901118

James McWhorter

Assistant Commissioner for Administration

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: March 15, 1999

Proposal publication date: December 4, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 483-6162


Subchapter S. Transfer of Lower Division Course Credit

19 TAC §§5.391, 5.401-5.403

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to Chapter 5, Subchapter S, §§5.391, 5.401, 5.402, 5.403 concerning Core Curriculum Transfer and Field of Study Curricula. Section 5.402 and §5.403 are adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the November 27, 1998 issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 11892). Section 5.391 and §5.401 are being adopted without changes and will not be republished. The proposed rules would carry out the provisions of Senate Bill 148 of the 75th Legislature, directing the Coordinating Board to develop a recommended core curriculum of at least 42 semester credit hours, including a statement of the content, component areas, and objectives of the core curriculum. The proposed rules offer those guiding principles but do not prescribe specific courses, a responsibility designated in the bill to each individual college and university.

There were no comments received regarding the proposed amendments to the rules.

The amendments to the rules are adopted under Texas Education Code, Subchapter S, Section 61.822 which provides the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules concerning Transfer of Lower Division Course Credit.

§5.402.Core Curriculum.

(a)

In accordance with Texas Education Code, Chapter 61, Subchapter S, each general academic institution and community/technical college shall design and implement a core curriculum, including specific courses composing the curriculum, of no less than 42 lower-division semester credit hours.

(b)-(j)

(No change.)

§5.403.Core Curricula Larger than 42 Semester Credit Hours.

(a)

An institution may adopt a core curriculum under this subchapter in excess of 42 semester credit hours, but no more than 48 semester credit hours, if the courses in excess of 42 semester credit hours are selected from the first five component areas of Chart II of §5.402 of this title (relating to Core Curriculum (excluding the Institutionally Designated Option)) and are approved by the institution's governing board.

(b)

No institution may adopt a core curriculum of more than 42 semester credit hours without approval by the Board if the courses in excess of 42 semester credit hours are selected from component areas other than the first five component areas of Chart II of §5.402 of this title. The Board may approve a core curriculum under this section if:

(1)

It has been previously approved by the institution's governing board;

(2)

The institution has provided to the Board a narrative justification of the need and appropriateness of a larger core curriculum that is consistent with its role and mission; and

(3)

No proposed upper-division core course is substantially comparable in content or depth of study to a lower-division course listed in the "Texas Common Course Numbering System."

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 1999.

TRD-9901119

James McWhorter

Assistant Commissioner for Administration

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: March 15, 1999

Proposal publication date: November 27, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 483-6162


Chapter 9. Program Development in Public Community/Junior College Districts and Technical Colleges

Subchapter E. Certificate and Associate Degree Programs

19 TAC §9.93

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to Chapter 9, Subchapter E, §9.93 concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Application, Approval, and Revision Procedures for Instructional Programs in Workforce Education) with changes to the proposed text as published in the December 4, 1998 issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 12070). The proposed amendments would allow the Coordinating Board to concentrate its efforts on setting major policy issues and spending less time on applying policy. The proposed amendments to the rules will give more responsibility to governing boards to ensure that proposals for new degree programs and for facilities meet Coordinating Board policy.

There were no comments received regarding the proposed amendments to the rules.

The amendments to the rules are adopted under Texas Education Code, Sections 61.061, 61.062 and 130.001 which provides the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Application, Approval, and Revision Procedures for Instructional Programs in Workforce Education).

§9.93.Application, Approval, and Revision Procedures for Instructional Programs in Workforce Education.

(a)

In accordance with the Guidelines for Instructional Programs in Workforce Education as approved by the Board, each institution wishing to offer a new certificate or applied associate degree program must have completed the following procedures:

(1)

Completion of the Application for the Approval of a New Technical or Continuing Education Program. Completed application forms and a statement of assurances must be approved by the governing board and the chief executive officer of the institution, and forwarded to the Board's Community and Technical Colleges Division. The statement of assurances must certify that the following criteria have been met:

(A)

The institution has documented local and/or regional workforce demand for the program.

(B)

Basic and workforce skills have been integrated into the curriculum.

(C)

The institution has an enrollment management plan for the program.

(D)

The institution has or will initiate a process to establish articulation agreements for the program with secondary and/or senior level institutions.

(E)

The program is designed to be consistent with the standards of the Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, and with the standards of other applicable accrediting agencies, and is in compliance with appropriate licensing authority requirements.

(F)

The program would not unnecessarily duplicate existing programs at other institutions.

(G)

Representatives from private sector business and industry have been involved in the creation of the program through participation in an advisory committee.

(H)

Adequate funding is available to cover all new costs to the institution over the first five years after the implementation of the program.

(I)

The institution has an improvement plan in place for all workforce programs that do not currently meet Board standards for both graduation and placement.

(J)

The appropriate Higher Education Regional Council has been notified in writing of the proposal for a new program.

(2)

(No change.)

(3)

Completion of Formal Program Review.

(A)

Once the program requirements have been met, the Board staff may schedule the program for formal program review. This review process shall include representatives from the institution, the Board staff, and other appropriate agencies and institutions of higher education.

(B)

The Assistant Commissioner for Community and Technical Colleges Division shall recommend certificate and applied associate degree programs to the Commissioner for approval or disapproval or referral to the Board.

(4)

New Program Approval. The Board delegates to the Commissioner final approval authority for all certificate programs, and for applied associate degree programs that meet Board policies for approval as outlined in the Guidelines for Instructional Programs in Workforce Education.

(5)

Each quarter, the Commissioner shall send a list of his approvals and disapprovals under this section to Board members. A list of the approvals and disapprovals shall also be attached to the minutes of the next appropriate quarterly meeting.

(6)

The Commissioner must forward a program to the Board for consideration at an appropriate quarterly meeting if either of the following conditions is met:

(A)

The proposed program is the subject of an unresolved grievance or dispute between institutions.

(B)

The Commissioner has disapproved of the proposed program and the institution has requested a Board review.

(b)-(d)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 26, 1999.

TRD-9901193

James McWhorter

Assistant Commissioner for Administration

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: March 18, 1999

Proposal publication date: December 4, 1999

For further information, please call: (512) 483-6162


19 TAC §§9.94-9.97

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts the repeal of Chapter 9, Subchapter E, §§9.94-9.97 concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Certificate and Associate Degree Programs) without changes to the proposed text as published in the December 4, 1998 issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 12072). The repeal of the rules would allow the Coordinating Board to concentrate its efforts on setting major policy issues and spending less time on applying policy. The repeal of the rules will give more responsibility to governing boards to ensure that proposals for new degree programs and for facilities meet Coordinating Board policy.

There were no comments received regarding the proposed repeal of the rules.

The repeal of the rules is adopted under Texas Education Code, Sections 61.061, 61.062 and 130.001 which provides the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Application, Approval, and Revision Procedures for Instructional Programs in Workforce Education).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 26, 1999.

TRD-9901195

James McWhorter

Assistant Commissioner for Administration

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: March 18, 1999

Proposal publication date: December 4, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 483-6162


19 TAC §§9.94-9.96

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts Chapter 9, Subchapter E, new §§9.94-9.96 concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Certificate and Associate Degree Programs) without changes to the proposed text as published in the December 4, 1998 issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 12072). The new rules would allow the Coordinating Board to concentrate its efforts on setting major policy issues and spending less time on applying policy. The new rules will give more responsibility to governing boards to ensure that proposals for new degree programs and for facilities meet Coordinating Board policy.

There were no comments received regarding the new rules.

The new rules are adopted under Texas Education Code, Sections 61.061, 61.062 and 130.001 which provides the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Certificate and Associate Degree Programs).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 26, 1999.

TRD-9901194

James McWhorter

Assistant Commissioner for Administration

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: March 18, 1999

Proposal publication date: December 4, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 483-6162


Subchapter G. Contractual Agreements

19 TAC §9.128

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to Chapter 9, Subchapter G, §9.128 concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Disapproval of Courses; Noncompliance) with changes to the proposed text as published in the December 4, 1998 issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 12073). The proposed amendments would allow the Coordinating Board to concentrate its efforts on setting major policy issues and spending less time on applying policy. The proposed amendments to the rules will give more responsibility to governing boards to ensure that proposals for new degree programs and for facilities meet Coordinating Board policy.

There were no comments received regarding the proposed amendments to the rules.

The amendments to the rules are adopted under Texas Education Code, Sections 61.061, 61.062 and 130.001 which provides the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules concerning Program Development in Public Community/Junior College District and Technical Colleges (Disapproval of Courses; Noncompliance).

§9.128.Disapproval of Courses; Noncompliance.

No funds appropriated to any public community/junior college district or technical college may be expended for any course which has not been approved by the Commissioner, even if such course is taught under a contractual agreement.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 26, 1999.

TRD-9901198

James McWhorter

Assistant Commissioner for Administration

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: March 18, 1999

Proposal publication date: December 4, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 483-6162


Chapter 11. Texas State Technical College System

Subchapter B. General Provisions

19 TAC §§11.26, 11.27, 11.29

The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board adopts amendments to Chapter 11, Subchapter B, §§11.26, 11.27, 11.29 concerning Texas State Technical College System (General Provisions) without changes to the proposed text as published in the December 4, 1998 issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 12073). The proposed amendments would allow the Coordinating Board to concentrate its efforts on setting major policy issues and spending less time on applying policy. The proposed amendments to the rules will give more responsibility to governing boards to ensure that proposals for new degree programs and for facilities meet Coordinating Board policy.

There were no comments received regarding the proposed amendments to the rules.

The amendments to the rules are adopted under Texas Education Code, Sections 61.061, 61.062 and 135.04 which provides the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board with the authority to adopt rules concerning Texas State Technical College System (General Provisions).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 26, 1999.

TRD-9901197

James McWhorter

Assistant Commissioner for Administration

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Effective date: March 18, 1999

Proposal publication date: December 4, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 483-6162


Part II. Texas Education Agency

Chapter 92. Interagency Coordination

Subchapter AA. Memoranda of Understanding

19 TAC §92.1003

The Texas Education Agency (TEA) adopts new §92.1003, concerning a memorandum of understanding (MOU) relating to the Communities In Schools (CIS) program with changes to the proposed text as published in the December 25, 1998, issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 12995). The new section implements an MOU between the TEA and the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC), authorized under the Labor Code, 305.013. The purpose of the MOU is to specify the roles of the TEA and TWC to increase the effectiveness of the CIS program. The new section defines responsibilities relating to: (1) sharing student performance data; (2) developing program and student performance measures; (3) increasing quality of services by identifying professional development opportunities; and (4) encouraging local businesses to participate in local CIS programs.

The following changes have been made to the rule since it was published as proposed.

Language was amended in §92.1003(b)(1) to read "develop student performance measures and program measures" to specify the joint responsibilities of the TWC and the TEA. The language was reorganized as new subsection (b)(1)(A), amending the section subdivision structure of subsection (b)(1).

The phrase "provide presentations that will" was deleted in §92.1003(b)(2)(D) to simplify the responsibilities of the TWC under the MOU.

Language was amended in §92.1003(c) to clarify the effective date and terms of the MOU.

The following comment has been received regarding adoption of the new section.

Comment. The TWC commented that language be amended in §92.1003(b)(1), (b)(2), and (c) to clarify the responsibilities and terms of the MOU.

Agency Response. The agency agrees with the comment and has amended the section.

The new section is adopted under the Labor Code, §305.013, which authorizes the adoption of rules to implement a memorandum of understanding between the Texas Education Agency and the Texas Workforce Commission to enhance the effectiveness of the Communities In Schools program.

§92.1003.Memorandum of Understanding Concerning the Communities In Schools Program.

(a)

Purpose. This memorandum of understanding is a non-financial, mutual agreement between the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and the Texas Workforce Commission (TWC), established pursuant to the Labor Code, §305.013. The purpose of this agreement is to define specific responsibilities of the TEA and TWC that will increase the effectiveness of the Communities In Schools (CIS) Program.

(b)

Participation.

(1)

The TWC and the TEA agree to the following joint responsibilities:

(A)

develop student performance measures and program measures;

(B)

clarify requirements and procedures for school districts and local CIS programs pertaining to sharing student performance information;

(C)

share participant data, within the parameters of federal law and each agency's confidentiality and data collection policies;

(D)

identify strategies for supporting local school district academic improvement initiatives for students at risk of dropping out of school;

(E)

identify training and professional development opportunities for CIS state staff or direct service personnel that will increase the quality of services to CIS participants;

(F)

provide information about CIS to the education community, the business community, and the general public throughout the state; and

(G)

cooperate in identifying, obtaining, and implementing any federal or state funds available to either agency for programs that will serve the goals of CIS.

(2)

The TWC's responsibilities under this agreement shall be as follows:

(A)

evaluate the CIS program regularly and identify improvement needs that will increase the effectiveness of the CIS program at all levels of implementation;

(B)

implement a public information strategy to encourage local business community involvement and participation in local CIS programs;

(C)

work in partnership with the local workforce development boards and chief elected officials to obtain support for the CIS program and ensure that local needs are being met;

(D)

promote and market the CIS program to all public and private sectors in local communities that have not established a CIS program; and

(E)

ensure that the duties of the CIS state coordinator specified under the Labor Code, §305.012, are fully implemented.

(3)

The TEA's responsibilities under this agreement shall be as follows:

(A)

designate a CIS liaison from the TEA's central administration that will coordinate information sharing and responsibilities under this memorandum of understanding with the TWC's CIS state coordinator;

(B)

encourage school districts with CIS programs to participate in exemplary programs, teaching methods, professional development conferences, and other activities that will enhance the quality of the local CIS programs; and

(C)

provide the CIS state coordinator with the appropriate data needed from the Public Education Information Management System to evaluate the effectiveness of the CIS program in preventing students from dropping out of school, within the parameters of federal law and the TEA's confidentiality and data collection policies.

(c)

Terms of the memorandum of understanding. This memorandum of understanding shall be effective March 15, 1999. The memorandum shall be considered at least annually for expansion, modification, or amendment upon the mutual agreement of the executive officers of the named agencies.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 23, 1999.

TRD-9901137

Criss Cloudt

Associate Commissioner, Policy Planning and Research

Texas Education Agency

Effective date: March 15, 1999

Proposal publication date: December 25, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 463-9701