Letter Opinions
LO# 98-119 (RQ-1026).
Requested from
Mr. Jay Brummett, Chair, Texas Real Estate Commission, P.O. Box 12188, Austin,
Texas, 78711-2188, concerning whether the licensing and registration requirements
of article 6573a, V.T.C.S., apply to persons who act to acquire or dispose
of real estate on behalf of their employers.
Summary.
The licensing and registration requirements
of article 6573a, V.T.C.S., the Real Estate License Act, do not apply to employees
of corporations and other business entities who act to acquire or dispose
of property on behalf of their employer. Employees of a registered corporation
or business entity who act as agents in third party transactions may not lawfully
perform the acts listed under section 9A of article 6573a, V.T.C.S., unless
they are licensed, exempt, or registered under the act.
LO# 98-120 (ID# 37188).
Requested from
The Honorable David M. Williams, County Attorney, County of San Saba, San
Saba, Texas, 76877, concerning whether a county or a school district may require
a landowner to remove a gate that the landowner constructed across a third-class
road.
Summary.
A landowner must remove a gate across
a third-class road if, in accordance with Transportation Code section 251.009(d),
the commissioners court has constructed a cattle guard to replace the gate.
LO# 98-121 (RQ-1065).
Requested from
The Honorable Robert T. Jarvis, County Attorney, Grayson County Justice Center,
Suite 116A, Sherman, Texas, 75090, seniority of police officer who accepts
voluntary demotion pursuant to section 143.054, Local Government Code.
Summary.
A police officer does not waive
his seniority rights by accepting a voluntary demotion pursuant to section
143.054 of the Local Government Code. "Seniority" is defined as years of service,
whether interrupted or uninterrupted.
LO# 98-122 (RQ-1081).
Requested from
William R. Archer III, M.D., Commissioner of Health, Texas Department of Health,
1100 West 49th Street, Austin, Texas, 78756-3199, concerning whether Health
and Safety Code section 673.002, which requires the commissioner of health
to review and authorize payment by the comptroller for autopsies performed
on children under the age of two years, has been superseded by Family Code
chapter 264, subchapter F.
Summary.
The obligation of the commissioner
of health to review and authorize payment of claims for the reasonable and
proper cost of autopsies conducted pursuant to Health and Safety Code section
673.002 has been superseded by Family Code, chapter 264. Children younger
than two years old who die suddenly of an unknown cause would be included
within the scope of Family Code chapter 264, and an autopsy would be required
in the course of the death investigation.
LO# 98-123 (RQ-1131).
Requested from
The Honorable Jerry Patterson, Chair, Committee on Veteran Affairs and Military
Installations, Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 12068, Austin, Texas, 78711-2068,
concerning whether a retired military officer may carry a firearm under the
provisions of House Bill 2909 Act of June 1, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 1261,
13, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 4766, 4771.
Summary.
A retired military officer is not
exempted from the statutory requirements imposed upon other licensees seeking
to carry a concealed handgun under the provisions of Government Code, chapter
411, subchapter H.
LO# 98-124 (RQ-1103).
Requested from
The Honorable Michael P. Fleming, Harris County Attorney, 1001 Preston, Suite
634, Houston, Texas, 77002-1891, concerning whether an individual may simultaneously
serve as municipal judge and as a director of the Gulf Coast Waste Disposal
Authority, and a related question.
Summary.
A municipal judge of the City of
Houston and a director of the Gulf Coast Waste Disposal Authority each hold
civil offices of emolument within article XVI, section 40 of the Texas Constitution.
That constitutional provision bars one person from simultaneously holding
both offices. Pursuant to sections 49.058 and 49.214 of the Water Code, chapter
171 of the Local Government Code applies to directors of the Gulf Coast Waste
Disposal Authority and to the contracts entered into by the authority.
LO# 98-125 (RQ-1152).
Requested from
Mr. Steve Robinson, Executive Director, Texas Youth Commission, P.O. Box 4260,
Austin, Texas, 78765, concerning whether out-of-state juvenile adjudicated
delinquent for a sexual offense and transferred to Texas for probation pursuant
to Uniform Interstate Compact on Juveniles may be required to register as
sex offender.
Summary.
A youth adjudicated delinquent in
another state for a sex offense is not required by the Texas Sex Offender
Registration Program, Code of Criminal Procedure chapter 62, to register in
Texas as a sex offender. A juvenile probation officer may not require a delinquent
juvenile transferred to Texas for probation supervision pursuant to the Uniform
Interstate Compact on Juveniles to register as a sex offender.
LO# 98-126 (RQ-1069).
Requested from
Ms. Linda Cloud, Executive Director, Texas Lottery Commission, P.O. Box 16630,
Austin, Texas, 78761-6630, concerning whether the Texas Lottery Commission
may establish a priority of payments for monies deducted from lottery winnings.
Summary.
The Lottery Commission may not adopt
a rule establishing a priority of payments for monies deducted from a lottery
winner's winnings. The Lottery Commission must comply with statutes establishing
priority, however, such as Family Code section 158.008. Payments not subject
to a statutory priority must be prorated among the various recipients.
LO# 98-127 (RQ-1117).
Requested from
Mr. Dudley M. Thomas, Director, Texas Department of Public Safety, 5805 North
Lamar Boulevard, Box 4087, Austin, Texas, 78773-0001, concerning whether the
1997 amendment to Transportation Code section 642.002, which requires certain
motor vehicles to have markings identifying the address of the vehicle's owner
or operator, is invalid because it was intended to impose the address requirement
only on tow trucks, and related question.
Summary.
The 1997 amendment to Transportation
Code section 642.002, which requires certain motor vehicles to have markings
identifying the address of the vehicle's owner or operator, is not invalid
because it may have been intended to impose the address requirement only on
tow trucks. The Department of Transportation may not adopt a rule modifying
its enforcement of section 642.002 to conform to the legislative intent rather
than the plain language of the statute.
TRD-9900193
Elizabeth Robinson
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: January 13, 1999
Opinion #DM-494 (RQ-1021).
Requested from
Mr. James D. Goerke, Executive Director, Advisory Commission on State Emergency
Communications, 333 Guadalupe Street, Suite 2-212, Austin, Texas, 78701-3942,
concerning whether an emergency communications district may unilaterally withdraw
from participation in a regional 9-1-1 plan under Health and Safety Code chapter
771 and related questions.
Summary.
Chapter 771 of the Health and Safety
Code impliedly authorizes an emergency communication district that elected
to participate in a regional plan for 9-1-1 service to unilaterally withdraw
from the plan. Withdrawal from a plan is effective on the date determined
by the district. The Advisory Commission on State Emergency Communications
must distribute a portion of the wireless 9-1-1 emergency fees collected to
the district that withdraws.
Opinion #DM-495. (RQ-1167).
Requested from
The Honorable Jerry Patterson, Chair, Committee on Veteran Affairs & Military
Installations, Texas State Senate, P.O. Box 12068, Austin, Texas, 78711-2068,
concerning whether the legislature may authorize a state agency to construe
Texas Constitution article XVI, section 50, the home equity amendment.
Summary.
The legislature has the power to
enact any law that is not in violation of state or federal constitutional
provisions. It may not, however, infringe upon the power of the judiciary
to construe and interpret the constitution. Thus while the legislature may
not, absent express constitutional authority, empower a state agency to definitively
construe article XVI, section 50 of the Texas Constitution the home equity
amendment the legislature may authorize a state agency to adopt rules implementing
the requirements of the home equity amendment. Whether any legislative or
administrative action is consistent with the requirements of the constitution
is ultimately a question for the courts to decide. The constitution may be
amended to create any law that the voters see fit to approve. The legislature
may propose, and the voters may approve, a constitutional amendment authorizing
a state agency to implement or construe provisions of the constitution.
Opinion #DM-496. (RQ-1145).
Requested from
Mr. Tom Treadway, Executive Director, General Services Commission, P.O. Box
13047, Austin, Texas, 78711-3047, concerning whether the Texas Council on
Purchasing from People with Disabilities mandatory purchasing program conflicts
with procedures governing the purchase of automated information systems set
forth in chapter 2157 of the Government Code.
Summary.
Human Resources Code chapter 122
and Government Code chapter 2157 conflict with respect to state agency purchases
of automated information systems. Chapter 2157, the more specific provision,
prevails to the extent of conflict. The General Services Commission or other
state agency is precluded from purchasing an automated information system
except in compliance with chapter 2157.
Opinion #DM-497. (RQ-1029).
Requested from
Mr. Willard L. Jackson, Jr., Chair, Board of Regents Texas Southern University,
3100 Cleburne Avenue, Houston, Texas, 77004, concerning validity of rider
to appropriations act requiring certain state agencies to expend appropriated
funds for training provided by the Texas Commission on Human Rights.
Summary.
The rider to the 1997 appropriations
act found at article IX, section 120.5, attempts to amend general law in violation
of article III, section 35 of the Texas Constitution and is therefore invalid.
Texas Southern University need not comply with its terms in choosing an outside
agency to provide training sessions and equal employment opportunity seminars
for its employees.
Opinion #DM-498. (RQ-1086).
Requested from
Mr. Ron Allen, Executive Director, Texas State Board of Veterinary Medical
Examiners, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 2-330, Austin, Texas, 78701-3998, concerning
whether business arrangements between corporations and practicing veterinarians
constitute the practice of veterinary medicine, and related questions.
Summary.
The Veterinary Licensing Act, article
8890, V.T.C.S., prohibits the practice of veterinary medicine by a private,
for-profit corporation not owned exclusively by veterinarians. Such a corporation
may not employ a licensed veterinarian to provide veterinary medical services
and itself receive the fee for those services nor may it own the patient or
business records or drug inventory of a veterinary medical practice. The Board
of Veterinary Medical Examiners may discipline a licensee for permitting or
allowing another to use his license or certificate to practice veterinary
medicine. Remedies and penalties in the Veterinary Licensing Act for practicing
veterinary medicine without a license do not apply to corporations.
Opinion #DM-499. (RQ-998).
Requested from
Ms. Delores L. Alspaugh, Interim Executive Director, Texas Cosmetology Commission,
5717 Balcones Drive, P.O. Box 26700, Austin, Texas, 78755-0700, concerning
whether an applicant for a new or renewed cosmetologist's license must submit
a health certificate signifying that the applicant is free of hepatitis.
Summary.
The Texas Cosmetology Commission
may, by rule, reasonably interpret the requirement in V.T.C.S. art. 8451a,
section 31(a) that an applicant for a new or renewed cosmetologist's license
be certified free of hepatitis. Whether, under the Americans with Disabilities
Act, 42 U.S.C. ch. 126, the Cosmetology Commission may refuse to license an
applicant who has viral hepatitis on the basis of the applicant's disease
is a question that the commission must determine on a case-by-case basis.
The commission must consider whether the viral hepatitis constitutes or is
perceived to constitute, in that case, a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits at least one of the applicant's major life activities;
whether freedom from viral hepatitis is an essential eligibility requirement
to be licensed as a cosmetologist; and, if it is, whether the commission reasonably
may accommodate the applicant.
Opinion #DM-500. (RQ-1144).
Requested from
The Honorable Toby Goodman, Chair, Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family
Issues, Texas House of Representatives, P.O. Box 2910, Austin, Texas, 78768-2910,
concerning advertising for placement of child for adoption.
Summary.
Section 25.09, Penal Code, prohibits
any person other than a licensed child-placing agency from advertising to
place, provide, or obtain a child for adoption. Whether a publisher of an
advertisement prohibited by section 25.09 is criminally responsible for the
conduct of the advertiser depends upon the facts of the particular case. Whether
Texas courts may exercise criminal jurisdiction over unlawful Internet advertisements
or communications initiated outside of Texas, but received within the state,
also depends upon the facts of the particular case. No Texas court or federal
court with jurisdiction over Texas has addressed this issue.
TRD-9900190
Elizabeth Robinson
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: January 13, 1999
RQ-1226.
Requested from The Honorable James
Warren Smith, Jr., Frio County Attorney, 500 East San Antonio Street, Box
1, Pearsall, Texas, 78061-3100, concerning authority of a county to make certain
payments in advance of services rendered.
RQ-1227.
Requested from The Honorable Jack
Skeen, Jr., Smith County Attorney, 100 North Broadway, 304, Tyler, Texas,
75702, concerning whether a criminal district attorney may waive service of
process by certified mail in habeas corpus case.
RQ-1228.
Requested from The Honorable Florence
Shapiro, Chair, Interim Committee on Sex Offenders, Texas State Senate, P.O.
Box 12068, Austin, Texas, 78711, concerning whether "van access aisles" provided
in parking spaces for the disabled constitute the kind of "architectural improvement"
contemplated by subsection 681.011(c), Texas Transportation Code.
TRD-9900175
Elizabeth Robinson
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: January 12, 1999
RQ-0001
Requested from Mr. Don W. Brown,
Commissioner, Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, P.O. Box 12788, Austin,
Texas, 78711, concerning authority of a junior college district to lease property
to a school district for the purpose of constructing a speciality high school,
and related questions.
RQ-0002.
Requested from The Honorable Michael
P. Fleming, Harris County Attorney, 1019 Congress, 15th Floor, Houston, Texas,
77002-1700, concerning whether a commissioners court may set a maximum speed
limit on certain county roads below 30 miles per hour, and related questions.
RQ-0003.
Requested from The Honorable Carol
Keeton Rylander, Comptroller of Public Accounts, LBJ State Office Building,
Austin, Texas, 78774, concerning whether a municipality must collect a sales
tax on parking fees at public beaches.
RQ-0004
Requested from Mr. Jay Kimbrough,
Executive Director, Texas Board of Private Investigators and Private Security
Agencies, P.O. Box 13509, Austin, Texas, 78711, concerning whether a municipality
that offers alarm monitoring services for a fee is subject to the licensing
requirements of article 4413(29bb), V.T.C.S.
TRD-9900176
Elizabeth Robinson
Assistant Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
Filed: January 12, 1998
Opinions
Request for Opinions