TITLE environmental-quality

Part I. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Chapter 285. On-Site Sewage Facilities

The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission) adopts amendments to §285.2, and §285.32 and adopts a new §285.8 concerning definitions, updating of testing criteria, and permitting and maintenance requirements for aerobic treatment systems. Section 285.32 are adopted with changes and §285. 2 and §285.8 are adopted without changes to the text as published in the September 25, 1998, issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 9701).

EXPLANATION OF ADOPTED RULE

These amendments will bring this chapter into conformity with House Bill (HB) 3059, passed by the 75th Legislature (1997), which amended Chapter 366 of the Health and Safety Code related to on-site sewage disposal systems. HB 3059 established that for single family residences in counties with a total population of less than 40,000 the regulatory authority for on-site may not condition the issuance of a permit to require the owner of an aerobic treatment system to have a maintenance contract. The amendment allows that in such situations the owner, after receiving the appropriate training, may either maintain the facility personally or enter into a maintenance contract. Also, HB 3059 modified the definition for on-site sewage disposal systems to allow the use of cluster-type systems and expanded the definition of local governmental entity to allow public health districts to become authorized agents under this program. Finally, these amendments reflect the latest version of the National Sanitation Foundation International (NSF) criteria for the testing of proprietary treatment systems.

The amendments to §285.2, relating to Definitions, are made to the definition for on-site sewage disposal system and local government entity in order to conform with the definition of HB 3059.

Adopted new section §285.8, relating to Maintenance Contracts, adds a section to the rules which addresses the limitation on when a permitting authority can require a maintenance contract for aerobic treatment systems.

Section 285.32(b)(4), related to Criteria for Sewage Treatment Systems, is amended to reflect the most current publication dates for the appropriate NSF International standards. This section contains a phrase which was repeated and it has been deleted as it is not contained in the current rule.

FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS

Section 2001.0225 of the Texas Government Code requires a state agency to prepare a regulatory analysis of a major environmental rule in certain circumstances. The regulatory analysis must be prepared where the result of the adoption of the rule is to: exceed a standard set by federal law, unless the rule is specifically required by state law; exceed an expressed requirement of state law, unless the rule is specifically required by federal law; exceed a requirement of a delegation agreement or contract between the state and an agency or representative of the federal government to implement a state and federal program; or adopt a rule solely under the general powers of the agency instead of under a specific state law. The commission has determined that this rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule" as defined in the act, and it does not meet any of the four applicability requirements listed in §2001.0225(a).

This rule does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule" because the regulatory amendments proposed will bring the definition for on-site sewage disposal systems into conformance with the statutory change as well as to provide numerical numeration for all the definitions in Chapter 285 and incorporate the most recent dates for appropriate testing standards requirements. The only addition to the rules is in response to statutory directives regarding maintenance contracts in counties of less than 40,000 inhabitants. The specific intent of the changes in this rule package will not adversely affect in a material way the economy or a sector of the economy but rather will provide the regulated community greater clarity as to the requirements.

Also the rule does not adversely affect public health and safety as the changes in the rules regarding maintenance contracts provide that a homeowner must insure proper maintenance of aerobic treatment system. In addition, the rule does not meet any of the four applicability requirements listed in §2001.0225(a). There is no federal requirement or standard related to this program. These amendments are in accordance with applicable requirements of state law. There is currently no delegation agreement or contract between the state and any agency or representative of the federal government to perform these functions. State law under Chapter 366 of the Health and Safety Code specifically authorizes the commission to regulate on-site sewage facilities.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

The "Texas Government Action Affecting Private Property Act" as found in Chapter 2007 of the Texas Government Code, applies to governmental actions which affect private property. This statute provides that the regulation of on-site sewage disposal systems is specifically exempted from the application of that chapter for political subdivisions. The specific exemption is found at Chapter 2007.003(b)(11)(B). The actions are for the purpose of bringing the rules into conformity with HB 3059 of the 75th Legislative Session and, the changes would not affect private property because the rules as originally promulgated were intended to prevent the occurrence of a nuisance condition. The changes include amendments to definitions, a reduction in the permitting requirements for specific systems in certain counties and incorporating the most current NSF International standards into the rules. These actions in themselves do not constitute a taking of private property.

COASTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

The commission has prepared a consistency determination for the amendments pursuant to 31 TAC §505.22 and has found the adopted rulemaking is consistent with the applicable Coastal Management Plan (CMP) goals and policies. The following is a summary of that determination. CMP goals applicable to the amendments include §501.12 (1)(2)(5) and (10). CMP policies applicable to the amendments include §501.14(g)(3). Promulgation and enforcement of these amendments will not violate (exceed) any standards identified in the applicable CMP goals and policies because the amendments will maintain or enhance existing agency criteria utilized for management of on-site wastewater systems and will effectively maintain or enhance agency strategies for the protection of coastal natural resource areas.

PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENTERS

A public hearing was held on October 22, 1998, in Austin. No one presented testimony at the public hearing. A total of two written comments to the proposed rules were submitted. Calhoun County Health Department expressed general opposition to the portion of the statute regarding maintenance of aerobic treatment units in counties less than 40,000 population that led to these proposed rules. Comments and questions about implementation were submitted by the Brazos County Health Department.

GENERAL COMMENTS

Subchapter A - General Provisions

Section 285.8. Maintenance Contract

Calhoun County Health Department stated that the portion of HB 3059 related to maintenance contracts should be rescinded. This would negate the need for these Section of the rules. The reasons given were: 1) enforcement on a homeowner will be more difficult than enforcing on an installer; 2) training of a homeowner will be difficult and there is no recourse for lack of training of the homeowner; 3) homeowner not required to receive the same level of training required for an installer; 4) homeowners will not submit the required testing paperwork and will not comply with rules; and 5) the County will be required to hire more staff to monitor homeowner compliance. Brazos County Health Department also stated that the requirement in the previous rules for a maintenance contract with a private contractor provides the best service and protection for a community than what was established by HB 3059.

Although the commission appreciates the comments and the concerns addressed in the letters, the intent of this rulemaking process is to revise the state's minimum on-site sewage facility (OSSF) standards such that they reflect past legislative changes. Any revisions to Chapter 366 of the Health and Safety Code will need to be accomplished through the legislative process.

Brazos County Health Department questioned what will occur when a county of less than 40,000 grows to a population of greater than 40,000.

The commission believes that the language used is sufficient. If a county grows to a population greater than 40,000, this section would no longer apply and maintenance contracts would be required in order to obtain and/or maintain a permit.

Brazos County Health Department questioned whether a homeowner can repair or install an aerobic treatment unit.

The commission responds that in regards to homeowner installation, the rule changes in this proposal did not address, nor change, the existing language in §285.51 of the current rule, regarding a homeowner's ability to install a system. In response to the comment regarding homeowner repair of an aerobic system, in accordance with HB 3059, the rule provides that a homeowner, in a county with a population of 40,000 or less, may elect to maintain an aerobic system directly, but must receive appropriate training in order to do so.

Brazos County Health Department questioned whether a homeowner would provide biased sampling and reporting data.

The commission believes that the language used is sufficient. A homeowner is required to test and report at the same frequency as an installer. Failure to test and report could result in enforcement action against the homeowner.

Subchapter A. General Provisions

30 TAC §285.2, , §285.8

STATUTORY AUTHORITY

These sections are adopted under the authority of Chapter 366 of the Texas Health and Safety Code relating to On-site Sewage Disposal Systems. These amendments will bring 30 TAC Chapter 285 into conformity with changes to Chapter 366 as made by the 75th Legislature through HB 3059.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 18, 1998.

TRD-9818445

Margaret Hoffman

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Effective date: January 8, 1999

Proposal publication date: September 25, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 239-4640


Subchapter D. Planning, Construction and Installation Standards for OSSFs

30 TAC §285.32

STATUTORY AUTHORITY The amendment is adopted under the authority of Chapter 366 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, relating to On-Site Sewage Disposal Systems. These amendments will bring 30 TAC Chapter 285 into conformity with changes to Chapter 366 as made by the 75th Legislature through HB 3059.

§285.32.Criteria for Sewage Treatment Systems.

(a)

(No change.)

(b)

Treatment processes - proprietary.

(1)-(3)

(No change.)

(4)

Approval of proprietary aerobic treatment systems. All agency approved proprietary aerobic treatment systems will be identified and published in a list of approved systems which may be obtained from the executive director. Only treatment systems which have been tested by and are currently listed by NSF International as Class I systems under NSF Standard 40 (1996) or have been tested and certified as a Class I system in accordance with NSF Standard 40 (1996) by an American National Standard Institute (ANSI) or NSF International accredited testing institution shall be considered for approval by the executive director. All agency approved systems at the time of the effective date of this rule shall continue to be listed on the list of approved systems subject to retesting under the requirements of NSF Standard 40 (1996) and Certification Policies for Wastewater Treatment Devices (1997). The manufacturers of proprietary treatment systems and the accredited certification institution must comply with all the provisions of NSF Standard 40 (1996) and Certification Policies for Wastewater Treatment Devices (1997).

(5)

(No change.)

(c)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 18, 1998.

TRD-9818444

Margaret Hoffman

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Effective date: January 8, 1999

Proposal publication date: September 25, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 239-4640


Chapter 330. Municipal Solid Waste

Subchapter P. Fees and Reporting

30 TAC §§330.601-330.603

The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission) adopts amendments to §§330.601-330.603, concerning fees and reports. Amended §§330.601 and 330.602 are adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the September 4, 1998, issue of the Texas Register (23 TexReg 8998). Section 330.603 is adopted without changes and will not be republished.

EXPLANATION OF ADOPTED RULES The purpose of the amendments is to delete §330.602(a)(8), which references §330.804. Section 330.804, which related to a reduction in solid waste disposal fees for landfills that beneficially use tire shreds, expired on December 31, 1996, and has been repealed. Section 330.602(a)(8) also expired on December 31, 1996, but remained in the commission's rules. The amendments also clarify the method of reporting the amount of waste received at a solid waste disposal facility by defining "waste received for disposal" to ensure that the correct amount of fees is paid by all facility operators.

FINAL REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS The commission has reviewed the rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code, §2001.0225, and has determined that the rulemaking is not subject to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental rule" as defined in the act, and it does not meet any of the four applicability requirements listed in §2001.0225(a). Specifically, the rulemaking is not directly related to and does not result in any decrease in the protection of the environment or human health; rather, it only clarifies a requirement of state law. The rulemaking clarifies the process for the calculation of municipal solid waste fees as authorized by Texas Health and Safety Code, §361.013. The rulemaking is not the result of any federal law or mandate and is not the result of any delegation agreement or contract with an agency of the federal government. The purpose of the amendments is to delete §330.602(a)(8), which references 330.804.Section 330.804, which related to a reduction in solid waste disposal fees for landfills that beneficially use tire shreds, expired on December 31, 1996. The amendments would also clarify the method of reporting the amount of waste received at a solid waste disposal facility to ensure that the correct amount of fees is paid by all facility operators. No comments on the proposed regulatory impact analysis were received.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT The commission has prepared a Takings Impact Assessment for these rule amendments pursuant to Texas Government Code Annotated, §2007.043. The following is a summary of that assessment. The specific purpose of the amendments is to repeal an expired provision pertaining to the reduction of fees for the use of tire shreds for engineering purposes in landfill construction and to clarify the method of reporting the amount of waste received at a solid waste disposal facility to ensure that the correct amount of fees is paid by all facility operators. The rule amendments will substantially advance the specific purpose by deleting the expired provision and explicitly explaining that the reporting of the amount of waste received for disposal fee purposes must be consistent with the total amount of the waste (measured in tons or cubic yards, or determined by the population equivalent method specified in §330.603(a)(3)) received by a disposal facility at the gate, excluding only those wastes which are recycled or exempted from payment of fees by rule or law. Promulgation and enforcement of these rule amendments will not affect or create a burden on private real property because the amendments only provide clarification to municipal solid waste facility operators on how to properly calculate and report the amounts of waste received for disposal.

COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENCY REVIEW The commission has reviewed the rulemaking and found that the rules are neither identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11, relating to Actions and Rules Subject to the Coastal Management Program (CMP), nor will affect any action/authorization identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11. Therefore, the rule amendments are not subject to the CMP.

HEARINGS AND COMMENTERS The commission did not hold a public hearing on the proposed rule changes. The comment period for the proposed rules closed at 5:00 p.m., October 5, 1998. Comments were received from the Texas Chapter, National Solid Wastes Management Association (NSWMA); East Texas District, Olympic Waste Services (Olympic); and a district manager from Trinity Waste Services (Trinity).

NSWMA recommended, with respect to the proposed change in §330.601(b)(1), that the phrase "(measured in tons or cubic yards)" be added to clarify that disposal facility operators have the option to use weight or volume.

The commission agrees with the recommendation and has incorporated the change.

NSWMA recommended, with respect to the proposed changes in §330.602(a)(2) and (b)(2), that "The volume or weight reported on the quarterly solid waste summary report must be consistent with the volume or weight on which tipping fees were charged, or would have been charged in the ordinary course of business, at the receipt of the waste at the gate" be changed to "The volume or weight reported on the quarterly solid waste summary report must be consistent with the actual volume or weight of the waste received for disposal." It also recommended that language be added to both paragraphs requiring that a facility operator who charges tipping fees at the gate by a method other than volume or weight must weigh all waste received for disposal and report that weight on the quarterly solid waste summary report. NSWMA commented that the commission would be exceeding its statutory authority if it were to require a facility operator that charges for disposal either by weight or volume to report the amount of waste for calculating the state fee in the same unit of measurement as the operator charges for disposal services.

The commission believes that the general statutory authority under Health and Safety Code, §361.011, to exercise all powers necessary or convenient to carry out its responsibilities, gives the commission authority to establish the method for payment of fees. It also believes that the same authority exists for requiring that the waste be weighed when the facility operator charges tipping fees based on a method other than by weight or volume. However, the commission believes that with the changes being adopted, the desired effect will be achieved without requiring that the payment of fees be based on the same unit of measurement as the one used by the operator to charge for disposal services, or without requiring an operator to weigh the incoming waste when he charges tipping fees on a method other than by weight or volume which can readily be calculated from the amount of tipping fees charged. The commission believes that requiring the actual volume or weight to be reported and requiring an operator to weigh the incoming waste when he charges tipping fees on a method other than by volume or weight will establish a conflict with the flexibility now allowed for small landfill operators to report waste received on a population-equivalent basis. Therefore, instead of adopting all of the recommended language, the commission adopts as an alternative: "The volume or weight of the waste received for disposal shall be determined prior to disposal or processing of the waste." This will provide an operator the flexibility to select the unit of measure to report the waste received at the gate, maintaining the highest degree of accuracy. In connection with this change, the text in §330.602(a)(3) and (b)(3) has been modified to more specifically identify the documentation required for reporting purposes.

Comments submitted by Olympic and Trinity were in support of the comments and recommendations submitted by NSWMA.

The commission's responses to the NSWMA comments and recommendations respond to the Olympic and Trinity comments.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY The amendments are adopted under Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers and duties under the Texas Water Code and other laws of the State of Texas; and the Solid Waste Disposal Act (Act), Texas Health and Safety Code, §361.024, which provides the commission with the authority to adopt rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the Act, and §361.013(a), which establishes the rates and basis for solid waste disposal fees to be charged.

§330.601.Purpose and Applicability.

(a)

(No change.)

(b)

Applicability.

(1)

Fees. Each operator of a municipal solid waste disposal facility or process for disposal is required to pay a fee to the commission based upon the amount of waste received for disposal. For the purpose of this subchapter, "waste received for disposal" means the total amount of the waste (measured in tons or cubic yards, or determined by the population equivalent method specified in §330.603(a)(3) of this title (relating to Reports)) received by a disposal facility at the gate, excluding only those wastes which are recycled or exempted from payment of fees under this subchapter or by law. For the purpose of these sections, landfills, waste incinerators, and sites used for land treatment or disposal of wastes, sites used for land application of sludge or similar waste for beneficial use, composting facilities, and other similar facilities or activities are determined to be disposal facilities or processes. Recycling operations or facilities that process waste for recycling are not considered disposal facilities. Source separated yard waste composted at a composting facility, including a composting facility located at a permitted landfill, is exempt from the fee requirements set forth and described in these sections. For the purpose of these sections, source separated yard waste is defined as leaves, grass clippings, yard and garden debris and brush, including clean woody vegetative material not greater than six inches in diameter, that results from landscape maintenance and land-clearing operations which has been separated and has not been commingled with any other waste material at the point of generation. The commission will credit any fee payment due under this subchapter for any material received and converted to compost product for composting through a composting process. Any compost or product for composting that is not used as compost and is deposited in a landfill or used as landfill daily cover is not exempt from the fee.

(2) - (4)

(No change.)

§330.602.Fees.

(a)

Landfilling. Each operator of a facility in Texas that disposes of municipal solid waste by means of landfilling, including landfilling of incinerator ash, is required to pay a fee to the commission for all waste received for disposal. The fee rate for waste disposed of by landfilling is dependent upon the reporting units used.

(1)

(No change.)

(2)

Measurement options. The volume or weight reported on the quarterly solid waste summary report must be consistent with the volume or weight of the waste received for disposal, as defined in §330.601(b)(1) of this title (relating to Purpose and Applicability). The volume or weight of the waste received for disposal shall be determined prior to disposal or processing of the waste.

(A)

The recommended method for measuring and reporting waste received at the gate is in short tons. The facility operator must accurately measure and report the number of cubic yards or tons of waste received at the gate.

(i)

The fee for waste reported in short tons will be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $1.25 per ton.

(ii)

The fee for compacted waste reported in cubic yards will be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $0.40 per cubic yard.

(iii)

The fee for uncompacted waste reported in cubic yards will be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $0.25 per cubic yard.

(B)

If a landfill operator chooses to report the amount of waste received utilizing the population equivalent method authorized in §330.603(a)(3) of this title (relating to Reports), the fee for such waste received shall be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $1.25 per ton.

(3)

Fee calculation. The fee shall be calculated by the commission using information obtained from the quarterly solid waste summary report. The total cubic yards or tonnage reported to the commission in the quarterly solid waste summary report shall be derived from gate tickets (weight or volume) or invoices, except in the case of operators who are authorized to report utilizing the population equivalent method in §330.603(a)(3), and records of recycled materials or any other information deemed relevant by the executive director. A billing statement will be generated quarterly by the commission and forwarded to the applicable permittee/registrant or a designated representative.

(4) - (7)

(No change.)

(b)

Incinerators and processes for disposal. Each operator of a facility that disposes of or processes municipal solid waste for disposal by means other than landfilling is required to pay a fee to the commission for all waste received for processing or disposal. Facilities and/or processes included in this category include, but are not limited to, incineration; composting; application of sludge, septic tank waste, or shredded waste to the land; and similar facilities or processes. Not included as a process for disposal is land application of waste that has already been properly composted in one of the facilities named.

(1)

(No change.)

(2)

Measurement options. The volume or weight reported on the quarterly solid waste summary report must be consistent with the volume or weight of the waste received for disposal, as defined in §330.601(b)(1) of this title (relating to Purpose and Applicability). The volume or weight of the waste received for disposal shall be determined prior to disposal or processing of the waste.

(A)

The recommended method for measuring and reporting waste received at the gate is in short tons. The operator must accurately measure and report the number of cubic yards or tons of waste received.

(i)

The fee for waste reported in short tons will be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $0.62 and one half cent per ton.

(ii)

The fee for compacted waste reported in cubic yards will be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $0.20 per cubic yard.

(iii)

The fee for uncompacted waste reported in cubic yards will be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $0.12 and one half cent per cubic yard.

(B)

If a facility operator chooses to report the amount of waste received utilizing the population equivalent method authorized in §330.603(a)(3) of this title (relating to Reports), the fee shall be calculated by the commission at an amount equal to $0.62 and one half cent per ton.

(3)

Fee calculation. The fee shall be calculated by the commission using information obtained from the quarterly solid waste summary report. The total cubic yards or tonnage reported to the commission in the quarterly solid waste summary report shall be derived from gate tickets (weight or volume) or invoices, except in the case of operators who are authorized to report utilizing the population equivalent method in §330.603(a)(3), and records of recycled materials or any other information deemed relevant by the executive director. A billing statement will be generated quarterly by the commission and forwarded to the applicable permittee/registrant or a designated representative.

(4) - (7)

(No change.)

(c)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on December 18, 1998.

TRD-9818469

Margaret Hoffman

Director, Environmental Law Division

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission

Effective date: January 7, 1999

Proposal publication date: September 4, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 239-6087