TITLE public-safety-and-corrections

Part V. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles 

Chapter 145. Parole 

Subchapter B. Terms and Conditions of Parole 

37 TAC §145.27

The Policy Board of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles proposes new 37 TAC §145.27, concerning condition requiring certain releasees to participate in the Texas Department of Public Safety Personal Identification Program. The new rule is proposed for the purpose of adopting into rule Policy Board Order 98-10.01 adopted and made effective on October 7, 1998. This rule will require all parole certificates of all persons released on parole or mandatory supervision to participate in the Texas Department of Public Safety Driver’s License Program or Personal Identification Program as a term and condition of parole or mandatory supervision. 

Victor Rodriguez, Chair of the Policy Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering this section. 

Chairman Rodriguez also has determined that for each year of the first five years the new rule as proposed is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be to establish at least one generally accessible data base that may contain information about persons on release to parole or mandatory supervision. 

There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons required to comply with the new rule as proposed. 

Comments should be directed to Laura McElroy, General Counsel, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, P.O. Box 13401, Austin, Texas 78711. Written comments from the general public should be received within 30 days of the publication of the new section. 

The new section is proposed under the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 42.18, §8(g), and Government Code, §508.044(d)(3), which provide the Policy Board with the authority to adopt impose conditions on a person released to parole or mandatory supervision; and Government Code, §508.045, which provides parole panels with the authority to act in matters of release to parole or mandatory supervision. There is no cross-reference to the proposed new rule. 

§145.27. Condition Requiring Certain Releasees to Participate in the Texas Department of Public Safety Personal Identification Program. 

(a) The purpose of this rule is to adopt into rule the Policy Board Order 98-10.01 adopted and made effective on October 7, 1998. 

(b) Any person released to parole or mandatory supervision who does not hold a Texas driver’s license shall participate in the Texas Department of Public Safety Personal Identification Card Program under Chapter 521 of the Texas Transportation Code. 

(c) The parole certificates of all persons released to parole or mandatory supervision shall be modified to include a standard condition that requires that all releasees shall participate in the Texas Department of Public Safety Driver’s License Program or Personal Identification Program as a term and condition of parole or mandatory supervision. 

(d) Participation shall be deemed satisfactory if the releasee has in possession at all times a valid Texas driver’s license or personal identification card duly issued by the Texas Department of Public Safety. 

(e) All persons on release to parole or mandatory supervision shall comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in connection with the Texas Department of Public Safety Driver’s License Program or the Personal Identification Card Program.

(f) This condition shall be strictly enforced and shall remain in effect and govern all persons released to parole or mandatory supervision for the duration of the supervision period. 

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency’s legal authority to adopt. 

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on January 19, 1999. 

TRD-9900339 

Laura McElroy 

General Counsel 

Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles 

Earliest possible date of adoption: March 7, 1999 

For further information, please call: (512) 463–1883

 


Part VI. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Chapter 155. Reports and Information Gathering

Subchapter B. Site Selection and Facility Names

37 TAC §155.23

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice proposes new §155.23, concerning site selection process for the location of additional facilities. The new rule defines Agency policy for determining the location of new TDCJ facilities in a manner that is fair and open, and that results in facilities sites that are cost-effective for construction and operations, and sensitive to the ultimate mission of the facilities sited. 

David P. McNutt Director of Financial Services for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice has determined that there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the new section as proposed. 

Mr. McNutt also has determined that the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section as proposed will be the ability to construct additional facilities designed to house and support offenders, as needed, considering all logistical support requirements, operational concerns, and legal mandates, on State-owned property or on land acquired at no cost to the State. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to individuals required to comply with the section as proposed. 

Comments should be directed to Carl Reynolds, General Counsel, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas 78711. Written comments from the general public should be received within 30 days of the publication of this proposal. 

The new section is proposed under Government Code, §492.013, which grants general rulemaking authority; and Texas Government Code, §496.007. 

Cross-reference to statute: Texas Government Code, §496.007. 

§155.23. Site Selection Process for the Location of Additional Facilities. 

(a) Purpose. This rule establishes Agency policy for deter-mining the location of new TDCJ facilities in a manner that is fair and open, and that results in facilities sites that are cost-effective for construction and operations, and sensitive to the ultimate mission of the facilities sited. Determining the location of a new facility (stand-alone facility or expansion of an existing facility) designed to house and support offenders is a process requiring the review and analysis of a number of factors, including cost-effectiveness, logistical support requirements, operational concerns, and legal mandates. Generally, funding priorities will dictate that such facilities be located on State-owned property, or on land acquired at no cost to the State. 

(b) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this Chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. 

(1) Agency - The Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

(2) Board - The Texas Board of Criminal Justice. 

(3) Facility - A substantially self-contained, permanently constructed correctional facility for housing offenders. This includes prison units, State jails, Substance Abuse Felony Punishment (SAFP) facilities, and transfer facilities, but does not include intermediate sanction facilities, community corrections facilities, as defined in §509.001, or facilities defined in §§508.118, 508.119, or 508.320, of the Texas Government Code. This also includes additions to existing facilities that add housing capacity or other capacity (such as program capacity) that will increase the payroll of the facility by more than five percent. 

(4) Prison unit - Includes a private prison under Texas Government Code, Chapter 495, Subchapter A, a psychiatric unit, or a facility the capacity of which will be determined under, and regulated by Texas Government Code, Chapter 499, Subchapters E (Unit and System Capacity), and B (Population Management). 

(5) SAFP facility - A substance abuse felony punishment facility authorized by Texas Government Code, §493.009. 

(6) State jail - A State jail felony facility authorized by Texas Government Code, Chapter 507. 

(7) TDCJ - The Texas Department of Criminal Justice. 

(8) Transfer facility - A facility authorized by Texas Government Code, Chapter 499, Subchapter G. 

(c) Procedures. It is the policy of the Board that the location of any additional facility operated by the TDCJ be carefully considered in accordance with this policy. 

(1) The Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council is the State agency responsible for projecting the demand for prison, State jail, SAFP and transfer facility beds. Based on these projections, a plan shall be developed by staff and adopted by the Board that details how any additional bed needs will be met. This plan will be presented to the legislature with a request for appropriations. With respect to facilities requiring siting, the plan adopted by the Board will include: 

(A) recommendations for specific types of facilities needed by the TDCJ, the approximate size of each facility, and regional distribution by facility type that is needed; 

(B) a description of the mission of the recommended facilities; 

(C) a description of the type of offenders to be housed in each facility and the programming requirements for that population; and 

(D) any recommendations for redesignation and renovation of existing facilities. 

(2) Site selections will be made in accordance with and through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, published in the Texas Register. The RFP shall be formulated and issued under the direction of the Board beginning immediately after the legislature has completed the appropriations bill. The RFP will be based on the array of facilities authorized and appropriated for by the legislature. For each round of site selections, an RFP will be developed that specifies: 

(A) types of facilities needed; 

(B) minimum acreage and site characteristics requirements for each facility type; 

(C) requirements for geotechnical information based on drilling matrix and site preparation requirements; 

(D) requirements for verified documentation of the absence of any environmental problems and historical preservation conditions; 

(E) requirements for supporting information such as easement, utility and topographical maps; 

(F) requirements for description of land values, transferability of mineral rights, surface leases, easements, title report, warranty deed, aerial photographs and other issues affecting the timely transferability of a site; 

(G) transportation and utility requirements; and 

(H) the requirements for solicited citizen input and State and local elected official input regarding a specific site. 

(3) Staff review will be conducted under the direction of the TDCJ Executive Director. Planning and Programming within the Facilities Division will have the responsibility to coordinate the site selection process for the Executive Director. In accordance with the Board approved criteria and process, staff will be responsible for the development of the RFP, devising and completing scoring instruments and cost analysis for Board review and action. Information presented to the Board shall: 

(A) be structured in a uniform format as illustrated in the Facilities Division policies and procedures; 

(B) include data from a weighted scoring evaluation system that was developed before any review, and based on the Facilities Division policies and procedures as well as on the requirements as outlined in an RFP, that objectively assesses each site based on the proposal, site visit and support information; 

(C) include life-cycle cost calculations for a specific time period for each responsive proposal; and 

(D) identify and explain any deviations from the approved process. 

(4) Any selection process shall take into consideration the intent of the legislature to locate each facility: 

(A) in close proximity to a county with 100,000 or more inhabitants to provide services and other resources provided in such a county; 

(B) cost-effectively with respect to its proximity to other facilities in TDCJ; 

(C) in close proximity to an area that would facilitate release of offenders or persons to their area of residence; 

(D) in close proximity to an area that provides adequate educational opportunities and medical care; 

(E) in close proximity to an area that would be capable of providing hospital and specialty clinic medical services, as well as a sufficient pool of medical personnel from which to recruit and contract; and 

(F) on State-owned or donated land. 

(5) The Board is responsible for site selection, but may request that the staff provide a short list of recommended sites or a preference ranking of sites with an explanation for the recommendation or ranking. Staff recommendations shall be based on scoring of the information contained in each submitted proposal based on RFP requirements, actual site assessment, and information obtained from external and internal sources for each site. 

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency’s legal authority to adopt. 

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on January 25, 1999. 

TRD-9900510 

Carl Reynolds 

General Counsel 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice 

Proposed date of adoption: March 7, 1999 

For further information, please call: (512) 463–9693

 


Chapter 159.
Special Programs 

37 TAC §159.13 

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice (Department) proposes new §159.13, concerning a memorandum of understanding between the Department and the Texas Education Agency to provide educational services to released offenders. The memorandum of understanding is designed to offer releasees choices and opportunities, within the realm of educational services, to remain outside prison and to integrate smoothly and successfully into the community. The new section adopts by reference 19 TAC §89.1311 effective October 1, 1998, (23 TexReg 9341). 

Pursuant to the Texas Government Code, §508.318, the Texas Education Agency and the Department shall set forth the respective responsibilities of the board and the agency in implementing a continuing education program to increase the literacy of releasees. 

David P. McNutt, Director of Financial Services for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice has determined that for the first five year period the section is in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the new section as proposed. 

Mr. McNutt also has determined that for each year of the first five years the new section is in effect the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will be services that offer releasees choices and opportunities, within the realm of educational services, to remain outside prison and to integrate smoothly and successfully into the community. 

There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons required to comply with the section as proposed. 

Comments should be directed to Carl Reynolds, General Counsel, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas 78711. Written comments from the general public should be received within 30 days of the publication of this proposal. 

The new section is proposed under Government Code, §492.013, which grants general rulemaking authority and the Texas Government Code, §508.318, as added by the 75th Texas Legislature, 1997, Chapter 165, §12.01, which authorizes the Department and the Texas Education Agency to adopt a memorandum of understanding that establishes the respective responsibilities of the board and the agency in implementing a continuing education program to increase the literacy of releasees. 

Cross Reference to Statute: Texas Government Code, §508.318, as added by the 75th Texas Legislature, 1997, Chapter 165, §12.01. 

§159.13. Educational Services to Released Offenders / Memorandum of Understanding. 

(a) The Texas Department of Criminal Justice adopts by reference a memorandum of understanding with the Texas Education Agency, 19 TAC §89.1311 (relating to Memorandum of Understanding to Provide Educational Services to Released Offenders), establishes the respective responsibilities of the board and the agency in implementing a continuing education program to increase the literacy of releasees. 

(b) The memorandum of understanding is required by the Texas Government Code, §508.318, as added by the 75th Texas Legislature, 1997, Chapter 165, §12.01. 

(c) Copies of the memorandum of understanding are filed in the Office of the Texas Education Agency, 1701 North Congress Avenue, Austin, Texas 78701. 

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency’s legal authority to adopt. 

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on January 25, 1999. 

TRD-9900511 

Carl Reynolds 

General Counsel 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice 

Proposed date of adoption: March 7, 1999 

For further information, please call: (512) 463–9693