Part V. Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Subchapter B. Terms and Conditions of Parole
37 TAC §145.27
The Policy Board of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
proposes new 37 TAC §145.27, concerning condition requiring
certain releasees to participate in the Texas Department of
Public Safety Personal Identification Program. The new rule
is proposed for the purpose of adopting into rule Policy Board
Order 98-10.01 adopted and made effective on October 7,
1998. This rule will require all parole certificates of all persons
released on parole or mandatory supervision to participate in
the Texas Department of Public Safety Driver’s License Program
or Personal Identification Program as a term and condition of
parole or mandatory supervision.
Victor Rodriguez, Chair of the Policy Board, has determined that
for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect,
there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government
as a result of enforcing or administering this section.
Chairman Rodriguez also has determined that for each year
of the first five years the new rule as proposed is in effect, the
public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the section will
be to establish at least one generally accessible data base that
may contain information about persons on release to parole or
mandatory supervision.
There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no
anticipated economic cost to persons required to comply with
the new rule as proposed.
Comments should be directed to Laura McElroy, General
Counsel, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, P.O. Box 13401,
Austin, Texas 78711. Written comments from the general public
should be received within 30 days of the publication of the new
section.
The new section is proposed under the Code of Criminal
Procedure, Article 42.18, §8(g), and Government Code,
§508.044(d)(3), which provide the Policy Board with the
authority to adopt impose conditions on a person released
to parole or mandatory supervision; and Government Code,
§508.045, which provides parole panels with the authority to
act in matters of release to parole or mandatory supervision.
There is no cross-reference to the proposed new rule.
§145.27. Condition Requiring Certain Releasees to Participate
in the Texas Department of Public Safety Personal Identification
Program.
(a) The purpose of this rule is to adopt into rule the Policy
Board Order 98-10.01 adopted and made effective on October 7, 1998.
(b) Any person released to parole or mandatory supervision
who does not hold a Texas driver’s license shall participate in
the Texas Department of Public Safety Personal Identification Card
Program under Chapter 521 of the Texas Transportation Code.
(c) The parole certificates of all persons released to parole
or mandatory supervision shall be modified to include a standard
condition that requires that all releasees shall participate in the Texas
Department of Public Safety Driver’s License Program or Personal
Identification Program as a term and condition of parole or mandatory
supervision.
(d) Participation shall be deemed satisfactory if the releasee
has in possession at all times a valid Texas driver’s license or personal
identification card duly issued by the Texas Department of Public
Safety.
(e) All persons on release to parole or mandatory supervision
shall comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in
connection with the Texas Department of Public Safety Driver’s
License Program or the Personal Identification Card Program.
(f) This condition shall be strictly enforced and shall remain
in effect and govern all persons released to parole or mandatory
supervision for the duration of the supervision period.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency’s
legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on January 19,
1999.
TRD-9900339
Laura McElroy
General Counsel
Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Earliest possible date of adoption: March 7, 1999
For further information, please call: (512) 463–1883
Chapter 155.
Subchapter B. Site Selection and Facility Names
The Texas Department of Criminal Justice proposes new
§155.23, concerning site selection process for the location of
additional facilities. The new rule defines Agency policy for
determining the location of new TDCJ facilities in a manner
that is fair and open, and that results in facilities sites that are
cost-effective for construction and operations, and sensitive to
the ultimate mission of the facilities sited.
David P. McNutt Director of Financial Services for the Texas
Department of Criminal Justice has determined that there will
be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result
of enforcing or administering the new section as proposed.
Mr. McNutt also has determined that the public benefit
anticipated as a result of enforcing the section as proposed
will be the ability to construct additional facilities designed
to house and support offenders, as needed, considering all
logistical support requirements, operational concerns, and legal
mandates, on State-owned property or on land acquired at no
cost to the State. There will be no effect on small businesses.
There is no anticipated economic cost to individuals required to
comply with the section as proposed.
Comments should be directed to Carl Reynolds, General
Counsel, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, P.O. Box 13084,
Austin, Texas 78711. Written comments from the general public
should be received within 30 days of the publication of this
proposal.
The new section is proposed under Government Code,
§492.013, which grants general rulemaking authority; and
Texas Government Code, §496.007.
Cross-reference to statute: Texas Government Code, §496.007.
§155.23. Site Selection Process for the Location of Additional Facilities.
(a) Purpose. This rule establishes Agency policy for deter-mining
the location of new TDCJ facilities in a manner that is fair
and open, and that results in facilities sites that are cost-effective for
construction and operations, and sensitive to the ultimate mission of
the facilities sited. Determining the location of a new facility (stand-alone
facility or expansion of an existing facility) designed to house
and support offenders is a process requiring the review and analysis
of a number of factors, including cost-effectiveness, logistical support
requirements, operational concerns, and legal mandates. Generally,
funding priorities will dictate that such facilities be located on State-owned
property, or on land acquired at no cost to the State.
(b) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used
in this Chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context
clearly indicates otherwise.
(1) Agency - The Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
(2) Board - The Texas Board of Criminal Justice.
(3) Facility - A substantially self-contained, permanently
constructed correctional facility for housing offenders. This includes
prison units, State jails, Substance Abuse Felony Punishment (SAFP)
facilities, and transfer facilities, but does not include intermediate
sanction facilities, community corrections facilities, as defined in
§509.001, or facilities defined in §§508.118, 508.119, or 508.320, of
the Texas Government Code. This also includes additions to existing
facilities that add housing capacity or other capacity (such as program
capacity) that will increase the payroll of the facility by more than
five percent.
(4) Prison unit - Includes a private prison under Texas
Government Code, Chapter 495, Subchapter A, a psychiatric unit,
or a facility the capacity of which will be determined under, and
regulated by Texas Government Code, Chapter 499, Subchapters E
(Unit and System Capacity), and B (Population Management).
(5) SAFP facility - A substance abuse felony punishment
facility authorized by Texas Government Code, §493.009.
(6) State jail - A State jail felony facility authorized by
Texas Government Code, Chapter 507.
(7) TDCJ - The Texas Department of Criminal Justice.
(8) Transfer facility - A facility authorized by Texas
Government Code, Chapter 499, Subchapter G.
(c) Procedures. It is the policy of the Board that the
location of any additional facility operated by the TDCJ be carefully
considered in accordance with this policy.
(1) The Texas Criminal Justice Policy Council is the State
agency responsible for projecting the demand for prison, State jail,
SAFP and transfer facility beds. Based on these projections, a plan
shall be developed by staff and adopted by the Board that details how
any additional bed needs will be met. This plan will be presented
to the legislature with a request for appropriations. With respect to
facilities requiring siting, the plan adopted by the Board will include:
(A) recommendations for specific types of facilities
needed by the TDCJ, the approximate size of each facility, and
regional distribution by facility type that is needed;
(B) a description of the mission of the recommended
facilities;
(C) a description of the type of offenders to be housed
in each facility and the programming requirements for that population;
and
(D) any recommendations for redesignation and renovation
of existing facilities.
(2) Site selections will be made in accordance with and
through a Request for Proposals (RFP) process, published in the
Texas Register. The RFP shall be formulated and issued under the
direction of the Board beginning immediately after the legislature has
completed the appropriations bill. The RFP will be based on the array
of facilities authorized and appropriated for by the legislature. For
each round of site selections, an RFP will be developed that specifies:
(A) types of facilities needed;
(B) minimum acreage and site characteristics requirements
for each facility type;
(C) requirements for geotechnical information based
on drilling matrix and site preparation requirements;
(D) requirements for verified documentation of the
absence of any environmental problems and historical preservation
conditions;
(E) requirements for supporting information such as
easement, utility and topographical maps;
(F) requirements for description of land values, transferability
of mineral rights, surface leases, easements, title report, warranty
deed, aerial photographs and other issues affecting the timely
transferability of a site;
(G) transportation and utility requirements; and
(H) the requirements for solicited citizen input and
State and local elected official input regarding a specific site.
(3) Staff review will be conducted under the direction of
the TDCJ Executive Director. Planning and Programming within the
Facilities Division will have the responsibility to coordinate the site
selection process for the Executive Director. In accordance with the
Board approved criteria and process, staff will be responsible for the
development of the RFP, devising and completing scoring instruments
and cost analysis for Board review and action. Information presented
to the Board shall:
(A) be structured in a uniform format as illustrated in
the Facilities Division policies and procedures;
(B) include data from a weighted scoring evaluation
system that was developed before any review, and based on the Facilities
Division policies and procedures as well as on the requirements
as outlined in an RFP, that objectively assesses each site based on the
proposal, site visit and support information;
(C) include life-cycle cost calculations for a specific
time period for each responsive proposal; and
(D) identify and explain any deviations from the
approved process.
(4) Any selection process shall take into consideration the
intent of the legislature to locate each facility:
(A) in close proximity to a county with 100,000 or
more inhabitants to provide services and other resources provided in
such a county;
(B) cost-effectively with respect to its proximity to
other facilities in TDCJ;
(C) in close proximity to an area that would facilitate
release of offenders or persons to their area of residence;
(D) in close proximity to an area that provides adequate
educational opportunities and medical care;
(E) in close proximity to an area that would be capable
of providing hospital and specialty clinic medical services, as well
as a sufficient pool of medical personnel from which to recruit and
contract; and
(F) on State-owned or donated land.
(5) The Board is responsible for site selection, but may
request that the staff provide a short list of recommended sites or a
preference ranking of sites with an explanation for the recommendation
or ranking. Staff recommendations shall be based on scoring of
the information contained in each submitted proposal based on RFP
requirements, actual site assessment, and information obtained from
external and internal sources for each site.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency’s
legal authority to adopt.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on January 25,
1999.
TRD-9900510
Carl Reynolds
General Counsel
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Proposed date of adoption: March 7, 1999
For further information, please call: (512) 463–9693
Part VI. Texas Department of Criminal
Justice
Chapter 159. Special Programs
§159.13. Educational Services to Released Offenders / Memorandum of Understanding.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State, on January 25, 1999.
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Proposed date of adoption: March 7, 1999
For further information, please call: (512) 463–9693