Part I.
Texas Department of Transportation
Chapter 6.
State Infrastructure Bank
The Texas Department of Transportation adopts new Chapter 6, §§6.1-6.4,
6.11, 6.12, 6.21-6.24, 6.31, 6.32, and 6.41-6.46 concerning a state infrastructure
bank. Sections 6.1-6.4, 6.11, 6.12, 6.21-6.24, 6.31, 6.32, and 6.41-6.46
are adopted without changes to the proposed text as published in the October
10, 1997, issue of the
Texas Register
(22
TexReg 10076) and will not be republished.
Section 350 of the Federal National Highway System Designation Act of 1995
(Pub. L. No. 104-59) provides that federal funds are available for the provision
of financial assistance to eligible transportation projects through a state
infrastructure bank. Senate Bill 370, 75th Legislature, 1997, enacted Transportation
Code, Chapter 222, new Subchapter D to create a state infrastructure bank
to provide financial assistance for urgently needed transportation systems.
Final adoption of new Chapter 6 is necessary to implement this legislation.
Section 6.1 describes the purpose of the bank as defined by law.
Section 6.2 provides definitions for words and terms used in this chapter.
Section 6.3 describes general policies to provide the public with information
which pertains to all activities of the bank. Subsections (a) through (f)
restate provisions of law and are included to emphasize requirements which
cannot be negotiated. Subsection (g) implements audit requirements of the
federal regulations and further provides for prudent safeguards for the use
of public funds.
Section 6.4 provides that projects which are complete or are in advanced
stages of consideration by the department do not have to incur additional
costs or time delays because of the adoption of these rules.
Section 6.11 provides that applicants must be legally authorized to construct,
maintain, or finance eligible projects. Section 6.12 implements the provisions
of law by defining projects that are eligible for consideration.
Section 6.21 states that the executive director may assist potential applicants
in developing an application provided the department is authorized by state
law to do so.
Section 6.22 provides that all requests for financial assistance will be
made in a form which allows comparison regardless of the type of assistance
requested. Comparability will aid in approving or rejecting projects and
in prioritizing projects should the demand for assistance exceed the bank's
ability to provide assistance.
Section 6.23 provides that applicants must submit basic information in
an application to describe the project and requested financial assistance.
Supplemental information and data are also required to more fully describe
the project and to provide information regarding financial feasibility, project
impacts, and commitments and approvals. An exception is provided to avoid
unduly burdening applicants with new study requirements when the project
is in the Unified Transportation Program's Priority 1 or Priority 2 designations.
Also to avoid undue burdens, irrelevant requirements may be waived. To provide
complete information, additional explanations and expansions of information
or data may be required.
Section 6.24 provides that the commission may suspend and subsequently
restart the taking of applications should the bank's operation or financial
condition need such action. This is intended to avoid applicants incurring
the costs of studies and application preparation when the bank is unable
to promptly consider offering financial aid.
Section 6.31 provides that applicants will be notified when an application
is complete. The executive director will analyze the information presented
and submit findings and recommendations for the application to the commission
for further consideration.
Section 6.32 explains that all completed applications will be submitted
to the commission for consideration. The commission may grant preliminary
approval if the project and applicant are likely to have sufficient revenues
to repay the financial assistance, the project is consistent with various
transportation plans, and meets applicable requirements for social, economic
and environmental impact studies. Preliminary approval authorizes the executive
director to negotiate an appropriate agreement with the applicant regarding
the project and financial assistance. Preliminary approval of an agreement
to provide financial assistance may be made so long as it does not authorize
final approval and construction of the project.
Final approval of a project and its construction may be made only after
completion and approval of all required social, economic and environmental
studies. The commission may postpone action on an application if warranted
by the bank's financial condition. The commission may make both preliminary
and final approval contingent on the applicant meeting requirements or performing
acts. Preliminary approval, final approval, or disapproval must be made by
written commission order and include rationale, findings and conclusions.
Section 6.41 provides that the executive director will negotiate agreements.
Specific guidance on the anticipated nature of these agreements is provided.
However, the executive director may choose to not include terms given in
the subchapter and may include terms that are not in the subchapter depending
on the nature of each individual project.
Section 6.42 provides that the department may perform all or part of the
work for a project. If performed, the work will be performed in the normal
course of business with financial aid provided as required. The applicant
will be liable for repayment of principal, interest and any fees from the
date the financial aid is provided. In order to allow the department to work
on the project in the most efficient and economic manner, applicants may
not contest the department's decisions. The applicant will provide rights
of entry and otherwise assist in the pursuit of the work.
The section also provides that the department may allow the applicant to
conduct all or part of the work. If so conducted, additional provisions are
required to avoid jeopardizing the department's revenues from federal reimbursements.
Should an applicant charged with conducting the work fail to comply with
requirements, then the applicant will reimburse the department for the loss
of any federal funds. To ensure that federal requirements are met, requests
for approvals will be routed through normal departmental channels.
Section 6.43 provides that the department may require adherence to applicable
standards in order to ensure that federal requirements are met.
Section 6.44 provides that the department may require the use of maintenance
standards when needed to protect security interests in a project or asset
and to protect the public's safety. The section also provides that applicants
shall set any applicable speed limits as prescribed by state law in order
to meet the department's duty to provide for the public safety.
Section 6.45 provides that traditional terms covering the loan of financial
assistance, repayment and security will be included.
Section 6.46 provides notice to the public and applicants that additional
terms and conditions may be included as the executive director may require.
A public hearing was held on October 28, 1997 and no oral comments were
received. However, the department did receive a written comment from the
City of Dallas.
Comment: The City of Dallas requested that an allowance be made to utilize
city design criteria and standards for off-system projects rather than being
required to utilize federal and state design criteria as provided for in
proposed §6.13(a).
Response: This requirement cannot be changed. For a project to qualify
for financial assistance from the State Infrastructure Bank, it must be eligible
for federal aid. Thus, any project eligible for federal aid must use federal
or state design criteria. The department does not have the authority to allow
the City of Dallas to use local design criteria.
Subchapter A. General Provisions
43 TAC §§6.1-6.4
The new sections are adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to
establish rules for the conduct of work of the Texas Department of Transportation,
and more specifically, Chapter 222, new Subchapter D, which requires the
commission to, by rule, implement the subchapter and establish eligibility
criteria for an entity applying for financial assistance from the state infrastructure
bank.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716959
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: January 8, 1998
Proposal publication date: October 10, 1997
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
43 TAC §6.11, §6.12
The new sections are adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to
establish rules for the conduct of work of the Texas Department of Transportation,
and more specifically, Chapter 222, new Subchapter D, which requires the
commission to, by rule, implement the subchapter and establish eligibility
criteria for an entity applying for financial assistance from the state infrastructure
bank.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716961
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: January 8, 1998
Proposal publication date: October 10, 1997
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
43 TAC §§6.21-6.24
The new sections are adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to
establish rules for the conduct of work of the Texas Department of Transportation,
and more specifically, Chapter 222, new Subchapter D, which requires the
commission to, by rule, implement the subchapter and establish eligibility
criteria for an entity applying for financial assistance from the state infrastructure
bank.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716962
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: January 8, 1998
Proposal publication date: October 10, 1997
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
43 TAC §6.31, §6.32
The new sections are adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to
establish rules for the conduct of work of the Texas Department of Transportation,
and more specifically, Chapter 222, new Subchapter D, which requires the
commission to, by rule, implement the subchapter and establish eligibility
criteria for an entity applying for financial assistance from the state infrastructure
bank.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716963
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: January 8, 1998
Proposal publication date: October 10, 1997
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
43 TAC §§6.41-6.46
The new sections are adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to
establish rules for the conduct of work of the Texas Department of Transportation,
and more specifically, Chapter 222, new Subchapter D, which requires the
commission to, by rule, implement the subchapter and establish eligibility
criteria for an entity applying for financial assistance from the state infrastructure
bank.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716964
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: January 8, 1998
Proposal publication date: October 10, 1997
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
Subchapter C. Texas Highways Magazine
43 TAC §23.27
The Texas Department of Transportation adopts new §23.27,
concerning magazine ancillary products. Section 23.27 is adopted without
changes to the proposed text as published in the October 17, 1997, issue
of the
Texas Register
(22 TexReg 10290) and
will not be republished.
Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6144e, authorizes the department to sell
promotional items such as calendars, books, prints, caps, light clothing,
or other items that advertise the resources of Texas. Section 23.27 provides
department policies and procedures relating to the selection, pricing, and
sale of these products through Texas Highways magazine.
Section 23.27 describes products which may be designed and produced by
the department or purchased for resale, including a requirement that the
product convey a positive image of the scenic, recreational, historical,
geographical, cultural, or artistic treasures of Texas. The new section also
prescribes a selection panel consisting of department employees to set prices
for and recommend products, prescribes how a vendor may request its product
be considered for purchase and resale, prescribes requirements for selection
panel recommendation of a product, and prescribes a contract between the
department and a vendor whose product has been selected for purchase and
resale. The new section also describes pricing and payment for products advertised
in the magazine, including prescribing the addition of shipping and handling
and sales tax charges, the method of payment for products, and refunds for
the return of purchased merchandise. The new section finally describes an
avenue for complaints about merchandise, a department mailing list for vendors
interested in supplying products, and when the department may discontinue
an advertised product.
No comments were received on the proposed new section.
The new section is adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which provides the Texas Transportation Commission with the authority to
promulgate rules for the conduct of the work of the Texas Department of Transportation
and Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6144e, which provides the Texas Department
of Transportation with the authority to sell products approved by the Texas
Transportation Commission as advertising the resources of Texas.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716965
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: January 8, 1998
Proposal publication date: October 17, 1997
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
Subchapter F. Hazardous Material Routing Designations
43 TAC §§25.101-25.104
The Texas Department of Transportation adopts new §§25.101-25.104,
concerning hazardous material routing designations for the transportation
of non-radioactive hazardous materials (NRHM) on roads or highways in the
state of Texas. Sections 25.101-25.104 are adopted without changes to the
proposed text as published in the October 17, 1997, issue of the
Texas Register
(22 TexReg 10292), and will not be republished.
House Bill 711, 75th Legislature, 1997, amended Texas Civil Statutes, Article
6675d, to designate the Texas Department of Transportation as the state routing
agency for the transportation of NRHM, in accordance with Title 49, Code
of Federal Regulations, Part 397, Subpart C. Section 3A of Article 6675d
requires the Texas Transportation Commission to adopt rules for the routing
of NRHM consistent with 49 C.F.R. Part 397. Section 3A authorizes a political
subdivision of the state or a state agency to designate a route for the transportation
of NRHM provided the department approves the route. Section 3A also authorizes
the commission to designate a NRHM route over any public road or highway
in the state, provided that, in the case of a road or highway that is not
part of the state highway system, the political subdivision that maintains
the road or highway approves the designation.
House Bill 970, 75th Legislature, 1997, requires any municipality with
a population of more than 750,000 to develop a route for commercial motor
vehicles carrying hazardous materials on a road or highway in the municipality,
and requires the municipality to submit the route to the department for approval.
New §25.101 describes the purpose of the new subchapter, including
implementing House Bill 711 and House Bill 970, and designating the department
as the state routing agency for the transportation of non-radioactive hazardous
materials. This section also identifies the department as the approving agency,
as of January 1, 1998, for all new NRHM routing designations and revisions
to routing designations established prior to January 1, 1998 by the Texas
Department of Public Safety.
New §25.102 provides definitions for words and terms used in the new
subchapter.
New §25.103 prescribes the responsibilities of political subdivisions
in establishing NRHM route designations, prescribes the responsibilities
of political subdivisions and the department related to consultation with
other political subdivisions and agencies during route development, prescribes
how the public will be involved in establishing NRHM route designations,
and describes how the department will review and approve a proposal to designate
a route submitted by a political subdivision and to authorize political subdivisions
to designate a NRHM route.
New §25.104 prescribes the responsibilities of the department, the
commission, and political subdivisions in establishing NRHM route designations,
prescribes responsibilities of the department related to consultation with
political subdivisions and agencies during route development, and describes
how the public will be involved in establishing NRHM route designations.
On October 31, 1997, a public hearing was held to receive comments, views,
or testimony concerning the proposed adoption of §§25.101-25.104.
Comments were received at the hearing from Mr. Carl Mixon of the Bexar County
Local Emergency Planning Committee. No written comments were received.
Mr. Mixon's first comment concerned §25.102, specifically the definition
of political subdivision, which includes counties and local boards. He asked
"what is a local board, i.e., could it be a local emergency planning committee,
or is that just a local governing board?"
A local board as defined would not include a local emergency planning committee
(LEPC). The definition of political subdivision specifies that the political
subdivision (e.g., county, municipality, local board) must have the authority
to construct and maintain a public road or highway. The construction and
maintenance of roads and highways is outside the statutory authority of LEPCs.
Mr. Mixon also asked when the rules use the term county, as, for example,
in the definition of political subdivision, and in relation to the responsibilities
of political subdivisions in §25.103, "is that term used across the
board? For example, does a political subdivision include the county or all
of the cities or municipalities within the county? Are those terms interchangeable,
political subdivision for county?"
The department notes that the term "political subdivision" as defined in
the rules includes both counties and municipalities. Any entity that comes
within the definition of political subdivision would have the authority to
establish non-radioactive hazardous material (NRHM) route designations on
roads or highways open to the public under the jurisdiction of that entity.
The department also notes that the definition of the types of political subdivisions
comes from the federal regulations the department is implementing in these
rules. Those regulations consider a political subdivision to be a separate
entity, not an interjurisdictional one. The responsibility for establishing
NRHM routes would therefore not reside in either a county or a municipality
acting for itself and any other affected entity. Accordingly, the rules cannot
be changed.
Mr. Mixon next stated that §25.103(c), where the department encourages
political subdivisions to coordinate with the local emergency planning council
or committee, should be changed to require such coordination. He asserted
that "as the State has assigned very clear and defined roles that LEPCs are
responsible for carrying out, this would help in accomplishing that task
if those terms were used in a stronger way."
In response, the department believes that the permissive nature of this
coordination is appropriate. There is no statutory or regulatory requirement
for LEPCs to review and approve proposed NRHM routes. Additionally, while
coordination with the LEPC during the route development process is useful,
NRHM route development is outside the powers and duties set out in an LEPC's
enabling statutes. Finally, the rules prescribe a public involvement process
that provides the general public or any other interested party sufficient
opportunity to comment on any proposed route.
Mr. Mixon's next comment concerns §25.103(e)(1), which requires political
subdivisions to give the public 30 days prior notice of the public hearing
on a proposed NRHM routing designation, through publication in at least two
newspapers of general circulation in the affected area, one of which is a
newspaper with statewide circulation. He asked "what is a newspaper with
statewide circulation?" He also noted that §25.104 allows the department
to publish notice in the Texas Register and wonders if that was something
the local governments would be able to do.
In response, the department notes that the intention of this requirement
is to ensure that notice of a proposed route is adequately publicized on
both the local and statewide levels. Newspapers with statewide circulation
are those newspapers that are distributed and available for purchase throughout
the State of Texas. These newspapers would include, but would not be limited
to, publications such as the Dallas Morning News, the Houston Chronicle,
the Fort Worth Star Telegram, the San Antonio Express-News, and the Austin
American-Statesman.
The department also notes that Government Code, §2002.011 requires
the
Texas Register
to contain notices of
open meetings issued and filed in the office of the secretary of state as
provided by law. Government Code, §551.053 requires notices of meetings
involving a district or political subdivision extending into four or more
counties to be filed with the office of the secretary of state. Districts
or political subdivisions extending into fewer than four counties do not
have such a requirement. Accordingly, the latter notices are not published
in the
Texas Register
. A political subdivision
as defined in the rules would therefore not have the authority to publish
a notice in the
Texas Register
.
Mr. Mixon's next comment concerns §25.103(f)(3), which requires a
route proposal to include a signature of approval by an authorized official
of the political subdivision, such as the mayor, city manager, county judge
or an equivalent level of authority. He asks whether each of these officials
would provide a signature of approval or whether a county judge representing
all of the political subdivisions could provide the signature of approval.
In response, the department reiterates that any entity that comes within
the definition of political subdivision would have the authority to establish
NRHM route designations, and that a political subdivision is not considered
to be an interjurisdictional entity. Any such political subdivision would
be required to submit a route proposal to the department, and would have
to provide a signature of approval from an authorized official of that political
subdivision. A county judge would be considered such an official. The intention
of the rules is to have an official from the political subdivision that submits
the route proposal provide the signature of approval, not for a county judge
representing cities within the county provide the signature. The department
notes, however, that §25.103(c) requires a political subdivision considering
the establishment of a NRHM route to contact any other political subdivision
within a 25 mile radius of any point along the route and to consult with
those entities during the process for determining the best NRHM route. The
section cannot be changed.
Mr. Mixon additionally asserts that if a municipality with a population
of more than 750,000 does not designate a non-radioactive hazardous materials
transportation route, then the department should do so.
In response, the department notes that House Bill 970, 75th Legislature,
1997 requires such a municipality to develop a route for commercial motor
vehicles carrying hazardous materials on a road or highway in the municipality.
The department also notes that it has the authority to propose a route in
such a municipality. However, given the statutory mandate of House Bill 970,
the department is not required to develop a route for commercial motor vehicles
carrying hazardous materials on a road or highway in these municipalities.
The transportation of NRHM within a municipality is a matter of local concern,
as well as a matter of statewide concern. The requirements of the rules in
that regard will remain unchanged.
Mr. Mixon next stated that §25.104(c), which authorizes the department
to coordinate with the local emergency planning council or committee during
the route development process, should be changed to require coordination.
In response, for the reasons stated in the response to the comments concerning
§25.103(c), the department reiterates its belief that the permissive
nature of this coordination is appropriate. The section will remain unchanged.
Mr. Mixon finally asks if these rules could look at making a political
subdivision be a countywide entity that would include the cities as well
as the county in the route establishment process, so that cities with large
populations include counties during this process or make the county the driving
force in making the route recommendation to the department.
In response, the department reiterates its comments concerning the interjurisdictional
nature of a political subdivision, and again notes that §25.103(c) requires
a political subdivision considering the establishment of a NRHM route to
contact any other political subdivision within a 25 mile radius of any point
along the proposed route, and to consult with those entities during the route
establishment process. This would necessarily involve the county or counties
in which the NRHM route is to be located. This coordination with affected
political subdivisions would be an essential element in the department's
review of a proposed route. Accordingly, the department believes that the
rules provide ample opportunity for counties as well as other local governments
to have input in the development of a route. The rules will not be changed.
The new sections are adopted under Transportation Code, §201.101,
which authorizes the Texas Transportation Commission to promulgate rules
for the conduct of the work of the Texas Department of Transportation, and
more specifically, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6675d, as amended by House
Bill 711 and House Bill 970, 75th Legislature, 1997.
This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716966
Bob Jackson
Deputy General Counsel
Texas Department of Transportation
Effective date: January 8, 1998
Proposal publication date: October 17, 1997
For further information, please call: (512) 463-8630
The Texas Department of Transportation adopts amendments to §28.2,
concerning definitions and amendments to §§28.10-28.16, concerning
oversize and overweight vehicles and loads. Sections 28.11 and 28.13 are
adopted with changes to the proposed text as published in the October 17,
1997 issue of the
Texas Register
(22 TexReg
10296). Sections
28.2, 28.10, 28.12 and 28.14-28.16 are adopted without changes and will not
be republished.
The amendments are necessary to implement the provisions of Senate Bill
370, Senate Bill 605, Senate Bill 1631, House Bill 1345, and House Bill 2703,
75th Legislature, 1997, and to ensure the department's proper administration
of the laws concerning the issuance of permits for the movement of oversize
and overweight loads.
Senate Bill 370 amended Chapter 201, Transportation Code, to allow the
filing of license applications and the issuance of licenses by electronic
means, and provides procedures for allowing the use of digital signatures
on license applications. As used in this bill, the term "license" includes
an oversize/overweight permit issued by the department. Further, Senate Bill
370 amended §623.074, Transportation Code, to authorize the department
to adopt rules authorizing electronic submission of permit applications and
electronic issuance of permits.
Senate Bill 605 amended Subchapter F, Chapter 623, Transportation Code
to allow the transport of portable building unit compatible cargo with a portable
building unit permit, and established portable building unit escort vehicle
requirements. Senate Bill 1631 amends Chapter 621 and 623, Transportation
Code, to allow electronic fund transfers.
House Bill 1345 amended §623.071, Transportation Code, to authorize
the department to issue an annual permit for water well drilling machinery
and to authorize the department to issue an annual permit for superheavy or
oversize equipment.
House Bill 2703 amends §623.093, Transportation Code, to provide that
the mover of a manufactured home, which is not being moved to or from a location
where it is intended to be occupied as a dwelling, need not supply information
relating to taxing authorities when applying for a permit. House Bill 2703
further authorizes the department to issue an annual permit for the transportation
of new homes from a manufacturing facility to a temporary storage location.
Section 28.2, Definitions, is amended to include various new terms and
definitions.
Section 28.10, Purpose, includes references to the issuance of permits
for portable building compatible cargo and the issuance of permits for the
movement of water well drilling machinery and equipment.
Section 28.11, Permit Issuance Requirements and Procedures, is amended
to clarify and provide procedures for submitting electronic applications,
the use of escrow accounts for the payment of fees, and escort requirements
for portable building units and portable building compatible cargo.
Section 28.12, Single-trip Permits Issued Under Transportation Code, Chapter
623, Subchapter D, is amended to provide requirements and fees for the movement
of vehicles and loads with annual water well drilling and equipment permits,
annual envelope vehicle permits, and annual manufactured housing permits.
Section 28.13, which establishes procedures for the issuance of permits
for the movement of manufactured housing and industrialized housing and buildings,
is amended to provide procedures for initiating and replenishing escrow accounts
with electronic funds transfers, and exempt permittees from providing taxing
authority information for tax exempt moves of manufactured homes.
Section 28.15, which establishes procedures for the issuance of permits
for the movement of portable buildings. is amended to include requirements
and fees for the movement of portable building compatible cargo, including
escort vehicle requirements.
Section 28.16, Permits for Military and Governmental Agencies, is amended
to reflect a name change from "Central Permit Office" to "Motor Carrier Division."
A public hearing was held on November 12, 1997. Verbal comments were received
from an individual and from a representative of the Texas Motor Transportation
Association. One written comment was also received.
Comment: One commenter requested that the department lower the cost of
the annual envelope vehicle permit provided for in §28.13(d)(3), in
order to bring the permit price more in line with those of other states,
and to make the permit economically attractive to permittees.
Response: The department has evaluated the potential use factor and the
language in the statute, which allows the department to set the annual envelope
vehicle permit fee up to $3,500. Based upon this evaluation, and uncertainties
regarding usage of the annual envelope vehicle permit, the department has
determined that the annual envelope vehicle permit fee shall be lowered to
$2,000. Section 28.13(d)(3) will reflect this change. The department has
further determined that a detailed cost analysis will be performed after
the permit has been available for a period of 12 months, and the permit fee
will be reevaluated at that time based upon such analysis.
Comment: One commenter requested that §28.10 be amended to state explicitly
that a "hand-written" permit is acceptable as an "original" permit, for law
enforcement purposes. The commenter also requested that department policies
concerning night movement of permitted vehicles be clarified.
Concerning §28.13(d)(3), regarding Annual Envelope Vehicle Permits,
the commenter stated that the rules should be more specific concerning the
type of information to be included on the permit for enforcement purposes,
and requested that the rules stipulate legal axle load limits. Further, the
commenter questioned why an annual envelope vehicle permit could be used in
conjunction with a single trip for additional width, height, or length, but
could not be used for additional weight.
Response: Concerning §28.10, the requested amendments are not part
of this rulemaking, and the department feels that additional study, in conjunction
with law enforcement, is needed prior to making such amendments. In general,
the department contends that it is generally understood by law enforcement
that permits issued over the telephone are original permits and are handwritten,
as well as night movement requirements. The department will evaluate this
request further prior to the Chapter 28 rulemaking planned for early spring,
1998.
Concerning §28.13, §28.13(d)(3)(F) states that a permitted vehicle
must comply with §28.11(d)(2) and (3), which delineates maximum axle
weight limits and weight limits for load restricted roads. Therefore, the
department believes that additional information concerning axle weight limits
would not provide any further clarification. Further, concerning the request
that an annual envelope vehicle permit be used in conjunction with a single
trip permit for additional weight, Transportation Code §623.071(f) states
that an annual envelope vehicle permit may be used in conjunction with a
single trip permit to increase height or width limits. Therefore, the use
of an annual envelope vehicle permit in conjunction with a single trip permit
to increase weight is not permitted under this statute.
Comment: The Texas Motor Transportation Association recommended that the
annual envelope vehicle permit fee provided for in §28.13(d)(3) be lowered
for the first year in order to attract more users. The commenter also stated
that more users would purchase this permit if purchasers were allowed to
pay the permit fee in quarterly installments.
Further, the commenter recommended that §28.11(f)(2) be amended to
allow a permittee to return with a load, rather than empty, after delivering
a permitted load.
Response: As stated earlier, the department has evaluated the potential
use factor and the language in the statute, and has determined that the annual
envelope vehicle permit fee shall be lowered to $2,000 for the first year.
In response to recommended amendments to §28.11(f)(2), the department
has evaluated the statement and agrees with the commenter, however, amendments
to this section were not a part of this rulemaking. The department will continue
reviewing this recommendation and consider it for the previously mentioned
rulemaking planned for early Spring, 1998.
Finally, the department lacks the statutory authority to authorize quarterly
installments of the permit fee. In §28.11(f)(2) the department is correcting
a typographical error in the cross reference to §28.13(b)(3).
Subchapter A. General Provisions
Subchapter B. Eligibility
Subchapter C. Procedures
Subchapter D. Department and Commission Action
Subchapter E. Financial Assistance Agreements
Chapter 23.
Travel Information
Chapter 25.
Traffic Operations
Chapter 28.
Oversize and Overweight Vehicles and Loads