Part I.
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Chapter 37.
Financial Assurance
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission) proposes
new §37.271, relating to Local Government Financial Test for Closure;
§37.281, relating to Local Government Guarantee for Closure; §37.371,
relating to Local Government Financial Test for Closure; §37.381, relating
to Local Government Guarantee for Closure; §37.3001, relating to Applicability;
and §37.3011, relating to Financial Assurance Requirements for Scrap
Tire Storage Facilities.
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED RULES The purpose of the proposed new sections
is to provide the options of satisfying financial assurance requirements for
closure through the use of local government financial tests and local government
guarantees, and to provide financial assurance requirements for owners and
operators of certain scrap tire sites.
Proposed new §37.271 contains provisions relating to the local government
financial test which consists of financial, public notice, recordkeeping,
and reporting components. This proposed section states that, in order to continue
using the local government financial test, the test must be passed on an annual
basis.
The financial component, as proposed under §37.271(1), would require
a local government to meet one of two main options, plus certain other conditions.
The first option is that the local government must have a ratio of cash plus
marketable securities to total expenditures greater than or equal to 0.05;
a ratio of annual debt service to total expenditures less than or equal to
0.20; and a ratio of the current cost estimates for closure and any other
environmental obligations assured by a financial test, to total annual revenue
less than or equal to 0.43, with any costs exceeding the 43% limit being covered
by an alternate financial assurance mechanism. The second of the two main
options is that the local government must have outstanding, rated, general
obligation bonds that are not secured by insurance, a letter of credit, or
other collateral or guarantee which have a current bond rating of Aaa, Aa,
A, or Baa, issued by Moody's, or AAA, AA, A, or BBB, as issued by Standard
and Poor's on all such general obligation bonds; and a ratio of the current
cost estimates for closure and any other environmental obligations assured
by a financial test, to total revenue less than or equal to 0.43. In addition
to meeting one of the two main options, the following general conditions are
proposed to be required: that the local government's financial statements
shall be prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principals
for local governments and have its financial statements audited by an independent
certified public accountant (or appropriate state agency); that a local government
must not have operated at a deficit equal to 5.0% or more of total annual
revenue in each of the past two fiscal years; that it must not currently be
in default on any outstanding general obligation bonds; that it must not have
any outstanding general obligation bonds rated lower than Baa as issued by
Moody's or BBB as issued by Standard and Poor's; and that it must not have
received an adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or other qualified opinion
from the independent certified public accountant (or appropriate state agency)
auditing its financial statements as required under paragraph (1)(C)(i). The
following definitions are proposed: "deficit," "total revenues," "total expenditures,"
"cash plus marketable securities," and "debt service." Other terms not defined
are proposed to be interpreted consistently with generally accepted accounting
principles for local governments.
The public notice component, as proposed under §37.271(2), would require
a local government to place a reference to the closure costs assured through
the financial test into its next comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR)
after the effective date of this section or prior to the initial receipt of
waste at the facility, whichever is later. The disclosure would have to include
the nature and source of closure requirements; the reported liability at the
balance sheet date; the estimated total closure care cost remaining to be
recognized, if applicable, the percentage of any landfill capacity used to
date; and the estimated landfill life in years. For the first year the financial
test is used to assure costs at a particular facility, the proposal allows
the disclosure to be placed in the operating record until issuance of the
next available CAFR if timing does not permit the disclosure to be incorporated
into the most recently issued CAFR or budget. Finally, §37.271(2) states
that for closure costs, conformance with Government Accounting Standards Board
Statement 18 assures compliance with this public notice component.
The recordkeeping and reporting component, as proposed under §37.271(3)
would require the following four items to be submitted to the executive director:
a letter signed by the local government's chief financial officer (CFO) that
is worded as specified in §37.371 and that lists all the current cost
estimates covered by a financial test and provides evidence and certain certification
statements; a copy of the local government's independently audited year-end
financial statements for the latest fiscal year, including the "unqualified
opinion" of the auditor; a special report from the independent certified public
accountant (CPA) or the appropriate state agency to the local government;
and a copy of the comprehensive annual financial report used to comply with
paragraph (2) or certification that the requirements of General Accounting
Standards Board Statement 18 have been met.
Section 37.271(4) proposes annual updates of the financial test documentation,
to be submitted to the executive director within 180 days after the close
of each succeeding fiscal year.
Section 37.271(5) contains proposed requirements for a local government
to satisfy the requirements of the financial test at the close of each fiscal
year, and if the local government no longer meets the requirements of the
financial test, it would be required to send notice to the executive director
of intent to establish alternate financial assurance, and to provide alternate
financial assurance within 120 days after the end of such fiscal year.
Section 37.271(6) proposes that the local government would no longer be
required to comply with the requirements of this section when the conditions
as specified in §37.61 are met.
Proposed §37.271(7) states that the executive director, based on a
reasonable belief that the local government may no longer meet the requirements
of the local government financial test, may require additional reports of
financial condition from the local government at any time. If the executive
director then finds that the local government no longer meets the requirements
of the financial test, the proposal would require the local government to
provide alternate financial assurance as specified in Subchapter C within
30 days after notification of such a finding.
Proposed new §37.281 contains the allowance for an owner or operator
to satisfy the requirements of financial assurance for closure by obtaining
a local government guarantee provided by a local government. Under this proposal,
the local government guarantee would have to meet the requirements of this
section, in addition to the requirements of Subchapters A and B. It is also
proposed that the local government guarantor would have to meet the requirements
of the local government financial test as specified in §37.271 and must
comply with certain terms to the local government guarantee proposed under
§37.281(1)-(6).
Proposed §37.281(1) states that, if the owner or operator fails to
perform closure of a facility covered by the guarantee, the local government
guarantor will perform, or pay a third party to perform closure as required,
or establish a fully funded trust fund as specified in §37.201 in the
name of the owner or operator. Proposed §37.281(2) states that the guarantee
will remain in force unless the local government guarantor sends notice of
cancellation by certified mail to the owner or operator and to the executive
director, provided, however, that cancellation may not occur for at least
120 days after the notice of cancellation. Proposed §37.281(3) states
that if a guarantee is canceled, the owner or operator must, within 90 days
following receipt of the cancellation notice, obtain alternate financial
assurance and submit evidence of that alternate financial assurance to the
executive director. The proposal would require the local government guarantor
to provide alternate financial assurance within 120 days following its notice
of cancellation, if the owner or operator fails to provide it. Under proposed
§37.281(4), the owner or operator must submit to the executive director
the original local government guarantee worded as specified in §37.381.
The proposal states that the guarantee must accompany the items sent to the
executive director as specified in §37.271(3) and that it must be updated
annually in accordance with the requirements of the local government financial
test. Proposed §37.281(5) contains an allowance that the owner or operator
is no longer required to comply with the requirements of this section when
the conditions as specified in §37.61 are met. Under proposed §37.281(6),
if a local government guarantor no longer meets the requirements of §37.271,
the owner or operator must, within 90 days, obtain alternate financial assurance,
and submit such evidence of the alternate assurance to the executive director.
If the owner or operator fails to obtain alternate financial assurance within
that 90-day period, the guarantor must provide that alternative assurance
within the next 30 days.
Proposed new §37.371 contains the format for the letter from the CFO
which, among other things, requires a listing of the current cost estimates
covered by a financial test, along with certain evidence and certification
statements.
Proposed new §37.381 contains the format for the local government
guarantee for closure.
Proposed new §37.3001 is the applicability statement for proposed
new Subchapter M, relating to Financial Assurance requirements for Scrap
Tire Sites, and states that Subchapter M applies to owners and operators
of scrap
tire sites required to provide evidence of financial assurance under Chapter
330, Subchapter R, relating to Management of Used or Scrap Tires. In concurrent
rulemaking, proposed new §330.810(b), relating to Scrap Tire Storage
Site Registration, requires applicants seeking registration or amended registration
for a scrap tire storage site to submit evidence of financial responsibility.
Proposed new §37.3011 contains the financial assurance requirements
and options for scrap tire storage sites, and states that an owner or operator
of a scrap tire site subject to this subchapter shall establish financial
assurance for the closure of the facility that meets the requirements of this
section, in addition to the requirements specified under Subchapters A, B,
C and D.
Proposed §37.3011(1) specifies that the financial assurance for scrap
tire sites shall be in the amount required under §330.821, relating to
Closure Cost Estimate for Financial Assurance. Options for financial assurance
mechanisms are proposed under §37.3011(2) as a fully-funded trust, surety
bond guaranteeing payment, surety bond guaranteeing performance, irrevocable
letter of credit, insurance, financial test, corporate guarantee, local government
financial test, or local government guarantee. Under proposed §37.3011(2),
the original mechanism would be required to be submitted to the executive
director. Proposed §37.3011(3) states that quarterly valuation statements
are required for a fully-funded trust, and delineates certain wording revisions
needed for Section 10 of the Trust Agreement specified in §37.301(a),
relating to Trust Agreement for Closure. Proposed §37.3011(4) states
that §37.161, relating to Establishment of a Standby Trust, does not
apply to an owner or operator who utilize either a surety bond or irrevocable
standby letter of credit under Subchapter M. Finally, proposed §37.3011(5)
requires an owner or operator who utilizes the insurance mechanism as specified
in §37.241, relating to Insurance for Closure, to replace the wording
specified in §37.241(b) to read as follows: At a minimum, the insurer
must be licensed to transact the business of insurance, or eligible to provide
insurance as an excess or surplus lines insurer, in Texas.
FISCAL NOTE Stephen Minick, Strategic Planning and Appropriations Division,
has determined that for the first five-year period these sections as proposed
are in effect, there will be fiscal implications as a result of enforcement
and administration of the sections. The fiscal implications are related to
the implementation of the financial assurance requirements for scrap tire
storage sites. No significant costs to state government are anticipated as
a specific result of adoption of the rules as proposed. The proposed rules
will retain certain elements of the existing financial assurance requirements
for used or scrap tires under more general authority for regulation of used
or scrap tires and management of solid waste. However, the costs to the state
of these activities as they are proposed will not vary significantly from
the costs currently being incurred under existing regulations and statutory
authority.
Costs to local governments are not anticipated to increase as a direct
result of the proposed rules and may, in fact, be mitigated by the proposed
provisions for the local government financial test. In addition, financial
assurance provisions for certain used or scrap tire sites will reduce many
of the potential costs to local governments of waste management and illegal
dumping.
PUBLIC BENEFIT Mr. Minick has also determined that for each year of the
first five years these sections as proposed are in effect the public benefit
anticipated as a result of enforcement of and compliance with the sections
will be improved regulation and management of solid waste and used or scrap
tires, enhanced protection of human health and safety, and reductions in
the liabilities potentially imposed on the state and public funds for the
control, management and remediation of scrap tire facilities for which operators
lack the financial resources necessary for proper operation and closure.
The economic costs related to these rules are those associated with the provisions
for financial assurance for those facilities subject to the rules, primarily
storage sites. The actual costs of compliance with proposed rules are not
anticipated to be materially different for most affected operators from the
costs associated with compliance with existing regulations. Some compliance
costs could decrease, primarily due to the proposals for allowing local government
financial tests and local government guarantees. Some compliance costs could
increase for energy recovery and recycling facilities storing more than a
30-day supply
of used or scrap tires due to the required demonstration of financial assurance.
However, financial assurance costs for certain facilities may actually be
reduced as a result of the use of proposed cost estimate procedures, rather
than existing cost formulas. Although actual cost impacts to affected persons
and facilities may be positive or negative, no substantial economic costs
of these proposed rules are anticipated to occur. Some of the persons subject
to these proposed rules are small businesses. The effects on small businesses
will be directly related to the size and type of facility, the number of used
or scrap tires (or equivalents) generated, stored, processed or disposed,
and other site-specific conditions. There are no other economic costs anticipated
for persons required to comply with the sections as proposed.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS The commission has reviewed the proposed
rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government
Code, §2001.0225 and has determined that the rulemaking is not subject
to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental
rule" as defined in the act, and it does not meet any of the four applicability
requirements listed in §2001.0225(a).
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT The commission has prepared a Takings Impact
Assessment for these rules pursuant to Texas Government Code Annotated, §2007.043.
The following is a summary of that assessment. The specific purpose of the
rules is to adopt a set of regulations for the provision of financial assurance
for closure of solid waste and used or scrap tire facilities. The rules will
substantially advance this specific purpose by adopting by a set of standards
establishing the financial assurance. Promulgation and enforcement of these
rules will not burden private real property which is the subject of the rules
because the proposed changes do not limit or restrict a person's rights in
private real property.
Also, the following exceptions to the application of Chapter 2007 of the
Texas Government Code listed in Texas Government Code Annotated, §2007.003(b)
apply to these rules: an action taken to prohibit or restrict a condition
or use of private real property if the governmental entity proves that the
condition or use constitutes a public or private nuisance as defined by background
principles of nuisance and property law of this state; and an action taken
out of a reasonable good faith belief that the action is necessary to prevent
a grave and immediate threat to life or property.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENCY REVIEW The staff has reviewed the
proposed rulemaking and found that the proposal is a rulemaking identified
in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11, relating
to Actions and Rules Subject to the Coastal Management Program, or will affect
an action/authorization identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation
Rules, 31 TAC §505.11, and will, therefore, require that applicable goals
and policies of the CMP be considered during the rulemaking process.
The commission has prepared a consistency determination for the proposed
rules pursuant to 31 TAC §505.22 and has found the proposed rulemaking
is consistent with the applicable CMP goals and policies. The following is
a summary of that determination. The CMP goal applicable to the proposed rules
is the goal to protect, preserve, restore, and enhance the diversity, quality,
quantity, functions, and values of coastal natural resource areas. CMP policies
applicable to the proposed rules include the administrative policies and the
policies for specific activities related to construction and operation of
solid waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities. Promulgation and
enforcement of these rules is consistent with the applicable CMP goals and
policies because the proposed rules will encourage safe and appropriate storage,
transportation, treatment, and disposal of solid waste and used tires, scrap
tires, and tire pieces that are classified as municipal solid wastes, which
will result in an overall environmental benefit across the state, including
in coastal areas. In addition, the proposed rules do not violate any applicable
provisions of the CMP's stated goals and policies. The commission seeks public
comment on the consistency of the proposed rules.
PUBLIC HEARING A public hearing on the proposal will be held in Austin
on January 27, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 2210 of Building F of the commission's
Park 35 Office Complex located at 12100, Part 35 Circle, North IH-35, Austin.
The hearing is structured for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested
persons. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order
of registration. Open discussion with the audience will not occur during the
hearing; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the
proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing and will answer questions before
and after the hearing.
Written comments on the proposal should reference Rule Log Number 97140-330-WS
and may be submitted to Heather Evans, Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission, Office of Policy and Regulatory Development, MC 205, 12100 North
IH-35, Park 35 Circle, Building F, Room 4101 or P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas
78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-4808. Written comments must be received by
5:00 p.m., February 2, 1998. For further information or questions concerning
this proposal, please contact Debbie Bohl, Municipal Solid Waste Division,
at (512) 239-0044.
Subchapter C. Financial Assurance Mechanisms for Closure
30 TAC §37.271, §37.281
STATUTORY AUTHORITY The new sections are proposed under the
Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides the commission with the authority
to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers and duties under the
Code and other laws of the State of Texas, and to establish and approve all
general policy of the commission; under Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the
Act), Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361, §361.112, relating
to the Storage, Transportation, and Disposal of Used or Scrap Tires, and
under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the Act), Texas Health and Safety
Code, Chapter 361, §361.011 and §361.024 which provide the commission
with the authority to regulate municipal solid waste and adopt rules consistent
with the general intent and purposes of the Act.
The proposed new sections implement the Health and Safety Code, Chapter
361.
§37.271.Local Government Financial Test for Closure.
An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of financial assurance
for closure by obtaining a local government financial test or a local government
financial test and local government guarantee which conforms to the requirements
of this subchapter, in addition to the requirements specified in Subchapters
A and B of this chapter (relating to General Financial Assurance Requirements
and Financial Assurance Requirements for Closure). In order to continue using
the local government financial test, the test must be passed on an annual
basis. This test consists of a financial component, a public notice component,
and a record-keeping and reporting component. A local government must satisfy
each of the three components to pass the test. The criteria for each component
is as follows.
(1)
In order to satisfy the financial component of the test,
a local government must meet the criteria of either subparagraph (A) or (B)
of this paragraph and in addition must meet certain general conditions outlined
in subparagraph (C) of this paragraph.
(A)
The local government must have:
(i)
a ratio of cash plus marketable securities to total expenditures
greater than or equal to 0.05;
(ii)
a ratio of annual debt service to total expenditures
less than or equal to 0.20; and
(iii)
a ratio of the current cost estimates for closure and
any other environmental obligations assured by a financial test, to total
annual revenue less than or equal to 0.43. The local government must obtain
an alternate financial assurance mechanism for those costs that exceed the
43% limit.
(B)
The local government must have:
(i)
outstanding, rated, general obligation bonds that are
not secured by insurance, a letter of credit, or other collateral or guarantee
which have a current bond rating of Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa, issued by Moody's,
or AAA, AA, A, or BBB, as issued by Standard and Poor's on all such general
obligation bonds; and
(ii)
a ratio of the current cost estimates for closure and
any other environmental obligations assured by a financial test, to total
revenue less than or equal to 0.43.
(C)
In addition to meeting the criteria listed under subparagraph
(A) or (B) of this paragraph, the following general conditions must be met:
(i)
the local government's financial statements shall be prepared
in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for local governments
and have its financial statements audited by an independent certified public
accountant (CPA) (or appropriate state agency);
(ii)
a local government must not have operated at a deficit
equal to 5.0% or more of total annual revenue in each of the past two fiscal
years;
(iii)
it must not currently be in default on any outstanding
general obligation bonds;
(iv)
it must not have any outstanding general obligation bonds
rated lower than Baa as issued by Moody's or BBB as issued by Standard and
Poor's; and
(v)
it must not have received an adverse opinion, disclaimer
of opinion, or other qualified opinion from the independent CPA (or appropriate
state agency) auditing its financial statements as required under clause (i)
of this subparagraph.
(D)
Unless otherwise defined in this section, financial terms
used in this section are to be interpreted consistently with generally accepted
accounting principles for local governments. The following terms used in this
section are defined as follows:
(i)
Deficit
equals total
annual revenues minus total annual expenditures;
(ii)
Total revenues
include
revenues from all taxes and fees but does not include the proceeds from borrowing
or asset sales, excluding revenue from funds managed by local government on
behalf of a specific third party;
(iii)
Total expenditures
include all expenditures excluding capital outlays and debt repayment;
(iv)
Cash plus marketable securities
is all the cash plus marketable securities held by the local government
on the last day of a fiscal year, excluding cash and marketable securities
designated to satisfy past obligations such as pensions; and
(v)
Debt service
is the amount
of principal and interest due on a loan in a given time period, typically
the current year.
(2)
In order to satisfy the public notice component
of the test, a local government must comply with this paragraph. The local
government must place a reference to the closure costs assured through the
financial test into its next comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR)
after the effective date of this section or prior to the initial receipt of
waste at the facility, whichever is later. Disclosure must include the nature
and source of closure requirements; the reported liability at the balance
sheet date; the estimated total closure care cost remaining to be recognized;
if applicable, the percentage of any landfill capacity used to date; and the
estimated landfill life in years. For the first year the financial test is
used to assure costs at a particular facility, the disclosure may instead
be placed in the operating record until issuance of the next available CAFR
if timing does not permit the disclosure to be incorporated into the most
recently issued CAFR or budget. For closure costs, conformance with Government
Accounting Standards Board Statement 18 assures compliance with this public
notice component.
(3)
In order to satisfy the recordkeeping and reporting
component of the test, a local government must comply with this paragraph.
To demonstrate that the local government meets the requirements of this test,
the following four items must be submitted to the executive director:
(A)
a letter signed by the local government's chief financial
officer (CFO) and worded as specified in §37.371 of this title (relating
to Local Government Financial Test for Closure) that:
(i)
lists all the current cost estimates covered by a financial
test;
(ii)
provides evidence and certifies that the local government
meets the conditions of either paragraph (1)(A) or (1)(B) of this section;
and
(iii)
certifies that the local government meets the conditions
of paragraph (1)(A)(iii) or (1)(B)(ii) of this section, and paragraphs (1)(C)
and (2) of this section;
(B)
a copy of the local government's independently audited
year-end financial statements for the latest fiscal year, including the "unqualified
opinion" of the auditor. The auditor must be an independent CPA or an appropriate
state agency that conducts equivalent comprehensive audits;
(C)
a special report from the independent CPA or the appropriate
state agency to the local government which:
(i)
is based on performing an agreed upon procedures engagement
relative to the financial ratios required by paragraph (1)(A) of this section,
if applicable, and the requirements of paragraphs (1)(C)(i), (1)(C)(ii) and
(1)(C)(v) of this section; and
(ii)
states the procedures performed and the CPA's or state
agency's findings; and
(D)
a copy of the CAFR used to comply with paragraph (1)(B)
of this section or certification that the requirements of General Accounting
Standards Board Statement 18 have been met.
(4)
Annual updates of the financial test documentation
must be submitted to the executive director within 180 days after the close
of each succeeding fiscal year. This information must consist of all the items
as specified previously.
(5)
A local government must satisfy the requirements
of the financial test at the close of each fiscal year. If the local government
no longer meets the requirements of paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of this section,
the local government must send notice to the executive director of intent
to establish alternate financial assurance. This notice must be sent within
90 days after the end of the fiscal year for which the year-end financial
data show that the local government no longer meets the requirements. The
local government must provide alternate financial assurance within 120 days
after the end of such fiscal year.
(6)
The local government is no longer required to comply
with the requirements of this section when the conditions as specified in
§37.61 of this chapter (relating to Termination of Mechanisms) are met.
(7)
The executive director, based on a reasonable belief
that the local government may no longer meet the requirements of the local
government financial test, may require additional reports of financial condition
from the local government at any time. If the executive director finds on
the basis of such reports or other information, that the local government
no longer meets the requirements of the financial test, the local government
must provide alternate financial assurance as specified in this subchapter
within 30 days after notification of such a finding.
§37.281.Local Government Guarantee for Closure.
An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of financial assurance
for closure by obtaining a local government guarantee provided by a local
government. The local government guarantee must meet the requirements of this
section, in addition to the requirements as specified in Subchapters A and
B of this chapter (relating to General Financial Assurance Requirements and
Financial Assurance Requirements for Closure). The local government guarantor
must meet the requirements of the local government financial test as specified
in §37.271 of this title (relating to Local Government Financial Test
for Closure) and must comply with the following terms to the local government
guarantee:
(1)
If the owner or operator fails to perform closure of a
facility covered by the guarantee, the guarantor will:
(A)
perform, or pay a third party to perform closure as required;
or
(B)
establish a fully funded trust fund as specified in §37.201
of this title (relating to Trust Fund for Closure) in the name of the owner
or operator.
(2)
The guarantee will remain in force unless the
guarantor sends notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner or operator
and to the executive director. Cancellation may not occur, however, during
the 120 days beginning on the date of the receipt of the notice of cancellation
by both the owner or operator and the executive director, as evidenced by
the return receipts.
(3)
If a guarantee is canceled, the owner or operator
must, within 90 days following receipt of the cancellation notice, obtain
alternate financial assurance and submit evidence of that alternate financial
assurance to the executive director. If the owner or operator fails to provide
alternate financial assurance within the 90-day period, the guarantor must
provide that alternate assurance within 120 days following the guarantor's
notice of cancellation.
(4)
The owner or operator must submit to the executive
director the original local government guarantee worded as specified in §37.381
of this title (relating to Local Government Guarantee for Closure). The guarantee
must accompany the items sent to the executive director as specified in §37.271(3)
of this title and must be updated annually in accordance with the requirements
of the local government financial test.
(5)
The owner or operator is no longer required to comply
with the requirements of this section when the conditions as specified in
§37.61 of this title (relating to Termination of Mechanisms) are met.
(6)
If a local government guarantor no longer meets the
requirements of §37.271 of this title, the owner or operator must, within
90 days, obtain alternate financial assurance, and submit such evidence of
the alternative assurance to the executive director. If the owner or operator
fails to obtain alternate financial assurance within that 90-day period, the
guarantor must provide that alternative assurance within the next 30 days.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716938
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: March 25, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1970
30 TAC §37.371, §37.381
STATUTORY AUTHORITY The new sections are proposed under the
Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides the commission with the authority
to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers and duties under the
Code and other laws of the State of Texas, and to establish and approve all
general policy of the commission; under Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the
Act), Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361, §361.112, relating
to the Storage, Transportation, and Disposal of Used or Scrap Tires, and
under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the Act), Texas Health and Safety
Code, Chapter 361, §361.011 and §361.024 which provide the commission
with the authority to regulate municipal solid waste and adopt rules consistent
with the general intent and purposes of the Act.
The proposed new sections implement the Health and Safety Code, Chapter
361.
§37.371.Local Government Financial Test for Closure.
A letter signed by the local government's chief financial officer,
as specified in §37.271(3)(A) of this title (relating to Local Government
Financial Test for Closure) must be worded as in the Local Government Financial
Test for Closure, except that the instructions in parenthesis are to be replaced
with the relevant information and the parenthesis deleted.
Figure: 30 TAC §37.371
§37.381.Local Government Guarantee for Closure.
The original local government guarantee, as specified in §37.281
of this title (relating to Local Government Guarantee for Closure) must be
submitted worded as in the Local Government Guarantee for Closure, except
that the instructions in parenthesis are to be replaced with the relevant
information and the parenthesis deleted.
Figure: 30 TAC §37.381
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716939
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: March 25, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1970
30 TAC §37.3001, §37.3011
STATUTORY AUTHORITY The new sections are proposed under the
Texas Water Code, §5.103, which provides the commission with the authority
to adopt any rules necessary to carry out its powers and duties under the
Code and other laws of the State of Texas, and to establish and approve all
general policy of the commission; under Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the
Act), Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361, §361.112, relating to
the Storage, Transportation, and Disposal of Used or Scrap Tires, and under
the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the Act), Texas Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 361, §361.011 and §361.024 which provide the commission
with the authority to regulate municipal solid waste and adopt rules consistent
with the general intent and purposes of the Act.
The proposed new sections implement the Health and Safety Code, Chapter
361.
§37.3001.Applicability.
This subchapter applies to owners and operators of scrap tire sites
required to provide evidence of financial assurance under Chapter 330, Subchapter
R of this title (relating to Management of Used or Scrap Tires).
§37.3011.Financial Assurance Requirements for Scrap Tire Sites.
An owner or operator of a scrap tire site subject to this subchapter
shall establish financial assurance for the closure of the facility that meets
the requirements of this section, in addition to the requirements specified
under Subchapters A, B, C and D of this chapter (relating to General Financial
Assurance Requirements; Financial Assurance Requirements for Closure; Financial
Assurance Mechanisms for Closure; Wording of the Mechanisms for Closure).
(1)
The financial assurance for a scrap tire site shall be
in the amount required under §330.821 of this title (relating to Closure
Cost Estimate for Financial Assurance).
(2)
An owner or operator subject to this subchapter may
utilize any of the mechanisms specified in subparagraphs (A)-(I) of this paragraph.
The original mechanism is required to be submitted to the executive director.
(A)
Fully-funded trust;
(B)
Surety bond guaranteeing payment;
(C)
Surety bond guaranteeing performance;
(D)
Irrevocable letter of credit;
(E)
Insurance;
(F)
Financial test;
(G)
Corporate guarantee;
(H)
Local government financial test; or
(I)
Local government guarantee.
(3)
Quarterly valuation statements are required
for a fully-funded trust. The wording to Section 10 of the Trust Agreement
specified in §37.301(a) of this title (relating to Trust Agreement for
Closure) will need to be revised as follows: Section 10. Quarterly Valuation.
The trustee shall quarterly, within 15 days of quarter-end, furnish to the
Grantor and the commission executive director a statement confirming the value
of the Trust. Quarter-ends are designated as March 31, June 30, September
30, and December 31. Any securities in the Fund shall be valued at market
value as of quarter-end. The failure of the Grantor to object in writing to
the Trustee within 90 days after the statement has been furnished to the Grantor
and the commission executive director shall constitute a conclusively binding
assent by the Grantor barring the Grantor from asserting any claim or liability
against the Trustee with respect to matters disclosed in the statement.
(4)
Section 37.161 of this title (relating to Establishment
of a Standby Trust) does not apply to an owner or operator who utilizes either
a surety bond or irrevocable standby letter of credit under this subchapter.
(5)
An owner or operator who utilizes the insurance mechanism
as specified in §37.241 of this title (relating to Insurance for Closure)
shall replace the wording specified in §37.241(b) of this title to read
as follows: At a minimum, the insurer must be licensed to transact the business
of insurance, or eligible to provide insurance as an excess or surplus lines
insurer, in Texas.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716940
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: March 25, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1970
Subchapter A. General Requirements
30 TAC §106.2
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission)
proposes amendments to §106.2, concerning Applicability, §106.224,
concerning Aerospace Equipment and Parts Manufacturing, §106.321, concerning
Metal Melting and Holding Furnaces, §106.373, concerning Refrigeration
Systems, §106.418, concerning Printing Presses, and §106.454, concerning
Degreasing Units. The commission also proposes the repeal of §106.222,
concerning Woodworking Shops.
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED RULES. The last two sentences in §106.2 would
be deleted, as they contain references to §116.211, a section that has
been repealed.
Section 106.224(1) would be amended to remove an incorrect reference to
a standard exemption number that was valid prior to November 1996 and is still
used as a cross-reference.
The amendment to §106.321 would expand the mechanism for authorizing
construction or modification of insignificant sources of air emissions from
foundries and correct an apparent typographical error in the exemption. The
revised exemption will allow for the production of ductile iron, the use of
a fluxing agent without chlorine for aluminum foundries, and the limited melting
of brass and bronze, and will prohibit the use of "manganese" bronze rather
than "magnesium" bronze, which is prohibited in the current exemption, and
which does not exist. By adopting the proposed changes into §106.321,
an estimated 40 foundries will be exempted from air permitting regulations
consistent with advances in chemistry and process technology. The amount of
chemicals used in these processes is minimal, as are the emissions from these
sources.
The commission directed that the New Source Review Permitting (NSRP) Division
evaluate the protectiveness of a significant portion of the exemptions from
permitting (previously referred to as standard exemptions). The protectiveness
evaluation for §106.373 revealed that in general, it was protective for
most compounds. However, additional information was needed to assess protectiveness
in all situations. Based on the technical evaluation of the exemption and
comments received from affected industry and regional offices, NSRP staff
has determined that the exemption needs minor clarifications to ensure its
protectiveness through prohibitions of some compounds, and that additional
requirements need to be included to address potential disaster situations
associated with anhydrous ammonia as a refrigerant. The compounds listed for
prohibition from use in this exemption are those that have a higher potential
for off-property environmental and health effects and those compounds with
disaster potential. The commission does not believe that these compounds are
commonly used as refrigerants, and there will be minimal economic effect as
a result of their prohibition.
Ammonia is considered a compound possessing disaster potential in the event
of catastrophic failure of its containment system. However, it is a very common
refrigerant used in systems that are well designed, constructed, and have
an abundance of operating history. Claimants will be required to demonstrate
that the system will be designed and operated in a manner that will reduce
the potential for upsets, and that they have emergency procedures to manage
releases and protect the public.
Distance limits and limits on the amount of refrigerant allowed on-site
are not being recommended. Given that refrigeration systems are by design
"tighter" than other types of units (i.e., less potential for leaking components)
due to the high design pressures and the fact that in general, companies
do not want frequent, expensive recharges, nor do they want to lose cooling
power, any system leaks are likely fewer, of smaller volume, and repaired
quickly. The incorporation of the effects screening level (ESL) limit on
refrigerants serves to prevent highly toxic materials from being used in
exempted systems, which serves to ensure protectiveness. The requirement
for an audio, visual, and olfactory inspection program for ammonia systems
further reduces the risk of leaks and potential for off-site effects or nuisances.
The proposed amendment to §106.373 would modify the existing standard
exemption by prohibiting the use of compounds in refrigeration systems with
an ESL less than 150 µg/m
3
. The commission
has determined that the use of substances with an ESL below that figure would
result in a ground level concentration that would not be protective of human
health in the event of a system upset. The health effects would vary on the
type of substance involved and length of exposure, but systems using substances
with an ESL below 150 µg/m
3
would require
a more extensive engineering and toxicological review to assure their protectiveness
and would not be suitable to qualify for a standard exemption.
The amendment also requires protective measures for systems using ammonia
as a refrigerant. There are no additional or retroactive requirements being
placed on existing systems.
Section 106.418 would be amended to correct a reference in the rule to
30 TAC Chapter 115, Subchapter D. The correct reference is Subchapter E.
Section 106.454 would be amended to correct a reference to the section
designation of §115.415.
FISCAL NOTE. Stephen Minick, Strategic Planning and Appropriations, has
determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect,
there will be no significant fiscal implications for state or local government
as a result of administration or enforcement of the sections.
PUBLIC BENEFIT. Mr. Minick also has determined that for each year of the
first five years the sections are in effect, the anticipated public benefit
will be a decrease in regulatory burden for foundries with insignificant
emissions, an increase in the public health protectiveness of the exemption
concerning refrigeration units, and the removal of incorrect or obsolete
language from existing exemptions. Through research by the staff, the commission
believes that most businesses using ammonia as a refrigerant already protect
their storage tanks. This amendment would require new businesses with systems
using ammonia to erect a barrier around the ammonia tank. The commission
estimates the cost of construction to be less than $1,000. The amendment
is not retroactive.
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS. The commission has reviewed the proposed rulemaking
in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government Code,
§2001.0225, and has determined that the rulemaking is not subject to
§2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental
rule." The upper limit of costs to facilities affected by the amendments is
$1,000. The amendments thus will not adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment,
or the public health and safety of the state or a sector of the state.
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT. The commission has prepared a Takings Impact
Assessment for these rules under Texas Government Code, §2007.043. The
following is a summary of that assessment. The specific purpose of this rulemaking
is to expand the scope of the exemption from permitting concerning metal foundries,
to improve the ability of the exemption concerning refrigeration units to
protect public health, and to make nonsubstantive administrative corrections
to other existing exemptions. This proposal does not constitute a taking of
private, real property.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN. The commission has determined that this rulemaking
action relates to an action or actions subject to the Texas Coastal Management
Program (CMP) in accordance with the Coastal Coordination Act of 1991, as
amended (Texas Natural Resources Code, §§33.201 et. seq.), and the
commission's rules in 30 TAC Chapter 281, Subchapter B, concerning Consistency
with the Texas Coastal Management Program. As required by 31 TAC §505.11(b)(2)
and 30 TAC §281.45(a)(3), relating to actions and rules subject to the
CMP, commission rules governing air pollutant emissions must be consistent
with the applicable goals and policies of the CMP. The commission has reviewed
this rulemaking action for consistency with the CMP goals and policies in
accordance with the rules of the Coastal Coordination Council, and has determined
that this rulemaking action is consistent with the applicable CMP goals and
policies. Any increase in emissions that results from these amendments will
not be significant. The specific amendments to §106.373 will reduce the
potential for a catastrophic release of anhydrous ammonia.
PUBLIC HEARING. A public hearing on this proposal will be held January
26, 1998, at 10:00 a.m. in Room 2210 of Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission (TNRCC) Building F, located at 12100 Park 35 Circle, Austin. The
hearing is structured for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested
persons. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order
of registration. Open discussion within the audience will not occur during
the hearing; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss
the proposal 30 minutes prior to each hearing and will answer questions before
and after the hearing.
SUBMITTAL OF COMMENTS. Written comments may be mailed to Lisa Martin, TNRCC
Office of Policy and Regulatory Development, MC 205, P.O. Box 13087, Austin,
Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-4808. All comments should reference
Rule Log Number 97179-106-AI. Comments must be received by 5:00 p.m., February
2, 1998. For further information, please contact Kerry Drake, New Source
Review Division, (512) 239-1112 or Beecher Cameron, Office of Policy and
Regulatory Development, (512) 239-1495.
Persons with disabilities who have special communication or other accommodation
needs who are planning to attend the hearings should contact the agency at
(512) 239-4900. Requests should be made as far in advance as possible.
STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendment is proposed under the Texas
Health and Safety Code, the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §§382.011,
382.012, 382.017, and 382.057. Section 382.017 authorizes the commission
to adopt rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the TCAA, while
§382.057 authorizes the commission by rule to exempt certain facilities
or changes to facilities from the requirements of §382.0518 if such
facilities or changes will not make a significant contribution of air contaminants
to the atmosphere.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.017.
§106.2. Applicability.
This chapter applies to facilities or types of facilities listed in
this chapter where construction is commenced on or after the effective date
of the relevant exemption. [
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 17, 1997.
TRD-9716907
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: April 8, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1966
30 TAC §106.222
(Editor's note: The text of the following section proposed for
repeal will not be published. The section may be examined in the offices of
the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission or in the Texas Register
office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)
The repeal is proposed under the Texas Health and
Safety Code, the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §382.057, which provides
the Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission with the authority to adopt
rules consistent with the policy and purposes of the TCAA.
The proposed repeal implements Health and Safety Code, §382.017.
§106.222. Woodworking Shops (Previously SE 105).
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 17, 1997.
TRD-9716913
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: April 8, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1966
30 TAC §106.224
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Health and Safety
Code, the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §§382.011, 382.012, 382.017,
and 382.057. Section 382.017 authorizes the commission to adopt rules consistent
with the policy and purposes of the TCAA, while §382.057 authorizes the
commission by rule to exempt certain facilities or changes to facilities from
the requirements of §382.0518 if such facilities or changes will not
make a significant contribution of air contaminants to the atmosphere.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.017.
§106.224. Aerospace Equipment and Parts Manufacturing (Previously SE 123).
Any new aerospace equipment and parts manufacturing plant, or physical
and operational change to an existing aerospace equipment and parts manufacturing
plant are exempt, provided that the following conditions of this section
are satisfied.
(1)
For purposes of this section, aerospace equipment and
parts manufacturing plant means the entire operation on the property which
engages in the fabrication or assembly of parts, tools, or completed components
of any aircraft, helicopter, dirigible, balloon, missile, drone, rocket,
or space vehicle. This exemption will not include composite aerospace equipment
and parts manufacturing plants. Composite plants are defined to be plants
whose products are less than 50% metal, by weight, based on annual production
figures. This definition excludes those operations specifically authorized
by other exemptions. For example, a boiler would not be considered a part
of the aerospace manufacturing plant, but could be authorized under §106.181
of this title (relating to Boilers, Heaters, and Other Combustion Devices
[
(2)-(8)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 17, 1997.
TRD-9716908
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: April 8, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1966
30 TAC §106.321
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Health and Safety
Code, the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §§382.011, 382.012, 382.017,
and 382.057. Section 382.017 authorizes the commission to adopt rules consistent
with the policy and purposes of the TCAA, while §382.057 authorizes the
commission by rule to exempt certain facilities or changes to facilities from
the requirements of §382.0518 if such facilities or changes will not
make a significant contribution of air contaminants to the atmosphere.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.017.
§106.321. Metal Melting and Holding Furnaces [
Metal melting and holding furnaces as specified in this section are
exempt.
(1)
crucible furnaces, pot furnaces, or induction furnaces
with a holding capacity of 1,000 pounds or less, with the following limitations:
(A)
(No change.)
(B)
in ferrous melting furnaces where gray iron or steel is
melted:
(i)
ductile iron is [
(ii)
(No change.)
(C)
in nonferrous melting furnaces, only the following metals
are melted, poured, or held in a molten state:
(i)-(iv)
(No change.)
(v)
copper
, brass, or bronze
;
or
(vi)
(No change.)
(D)
no lead, leaded brass, leaded bronze, or
manganese
[
(2)
aluminum melting or holding furnaces with a
holding capacity of 2,000 pounds or less that melt only clean aluminum ingots
or pigs and in which no refining, smelting, metal separation, sweating, distilling,
or fluxing
with chlorine bearing gases
is performed.
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 17, 1997.
TRD-9716909
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: April 8, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1966
30 TAC §106.373
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Health and Safety
Code, the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §§382.011, 382.012, 382.017,
and 382.057. Section 382.017 authorizes the commission to adopt rules consistent
with the policy and purposes of the TCAA, while §382.057 authorizes
the commission by rule to exempt certain facilities or changes to facilities
from the requirements of §382.0518 if such facilities or changes will
not make a significant contribution of air contaminants to the atmosphere.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.017.
§106.373. Refrigeration Systems (Previously SE 103).
Refrigeration systems, including storage tanks used in refrigeration
systems
, that use one of the following categories of refrigerant
are exempt:
(1)
simple asphyxiants, freon,
propane, or liquefied natural gas; or
(2)
any other chemical, excluding
anhydrous ammonia, with an Effects Screening Level greater than 150 µg/m
(3)
anhydrous ammonia (ammonia)
under the following conditions.
(A)
Registration using Form PI-7 must be provided
before construction begins under this section.
(B)
Concrete and steel post barriers or concrete
retaining walls shall be erected around each ammonia storage unit located
within ten feet of any traffic area to prevent accidental ruptures by vehicles.
(C)
All ammonia facilities shall be equipped with
warning signs clearly indicating that ammonia is in use, for example "Danger:
Ammonia. Unauthorized entry prohibited."
(D)
Audio, visual, and olfactory checks for any
ammonia leaks shall be made every month. Records of the date and time of inspections,
inspector identification, number of leaks detected, identification of the
leaking component, and the date and time of leak repair shall be maintained
for the most recent 24-month period.
(E)
On-site personnel shall temporarily repair
the leak within one day after detection of a leak.
(F)
All leaks shall be repaired within 15 days
of detection.
(G)
An emergency response plan including notification
of the appropriate civil authorities shall be maintained on-site which describes
the course of action to be taken by personnel in the event of an upset or
a leak which cannot be contained.
(H)
Accidental releases of refrigerant must be
recorded and reported in accordance with §101.6 of this title (relating
to Upset Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements).
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal
has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal
authority to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 17, 1997.
TRD-9716910
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: April 8, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1966
30 TAC §106.418
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Health and Safety
Code, the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §§382.011, 382.012, 382.017,
and 382.057. Section 382.017 authorizes the commission to adopt rules consistent
with the policy and purposes of the TCAA, while §382.057 authorizes
the commission by rule to exempt certain facilities or changes to facilities
from the requirements of §382.0518 if such facilities or changes will
not make a significant contribution of air contaminants to the atmosphere.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.017.
§106.418. Printing Presses (Previously SE 13).
Printing operations (including, but not limited to, screen printers,
ink-jet printers, presses using electron beam or ultraviolet light curing,
and labeling operations) and supporting equipment (including, but not limited
to, corona treaters, curing lamps, preparation, and cleaning equipment) which
directly supports the printing operation are exempt, provided that all the
following conditions of this section are satisfied.
(1)-(6)
(No change.)
(7)
Facilities located in ozone nonattainment areas shall
meet the requirements of Chapter 115, Subchapters B and
E
[
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 17, 1997.
TRD-9716911
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: April 8, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1966
30 TAC §106.454
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Health and Safety
Code, the Texas Clean Air Act (TCAA), §§382.011, 382.012, 382.017,
and 382.057. Section 382.017 authorizes the commission to adopt rules consistent
with the policy and purposes of the TCAA, while §382.057 authorizes the
commission by rule to exempt certain facilities or changes to facilities from
the requirements of §382.0518 if such facilities or changes will not
make a significant contribution of air contaminants to the atmosphere.
The proposed amendment implements Texas Health and Safety Code, §382.017.
§106.454. Degreasing Units (Previously SE 107).
Any degreasing unit that satisfies the following conditions of this
section is exempt.
(1)
The following general requirements are applicable to all
degreasers unless specifically exempted by the conditions of this section.
(A)-(E)
(No change.)
(F)
Each unit, regardless of the county in which it is located,
shall meet the requirements of §115.412 and §115.415 of this title
(relating to Control Requirements and
Testing Requirements
[
(2)-(5)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been
reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority
to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 17, 1997.
TRD-9716912
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: April 8, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1966
The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission (commission) proposes
amendments to §330.601, relating to Purpose and Applicability; the repeal
of §§330.801-330.818, 330.820-330.836, 330.838, and 330.840-330.889;
and new §§330.801-330.821 in Subchapter R, concerning Management
of Used or Scrap Tires.
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED RULES The purposes of the proposed amendments,
repeals and new sections are to address the sunset provisions of Health and
Safety Code Chapter 361, Subchapter P, address the requirements of existing
statutory language which does not contain a sunset provision, and to streamline
certain requirements of the existing rules. In most areas of the proposed
new sections, rule language from the existing sections has simply been streamlined,
clarified, and/or reformatted. In other areas, new requirements are proposed.
Due to the sunset provisions of Health and Safety Code Chapter 361, Subchapter
P, all references to reimbursement, end-use requirements, and the Waste Tire
Recycling Fund (WTRF) have been deleted in this proposal. The proposed new
rules no longer contain the 90-day limit for generators to remove whole tires
from storage. Other proposed changes concerning generator requirements include
removal of the requirement to accept used tires, removal of the restriction
from accepting money for tires, removal of the requirement to remove tires
from rims, removal of the differentiation between large and regular volume
generators, and removal of the restriction that generators can only store
their own tires. For transporters, the registration fee is proposed to be
removed, the exemption from registration is proposed to be expanded to include
generators hauling their own tires and to include municipal solid waste vehicles,
and the prohibition from charging a fee to haul tires is proposed to be deleted.
For storage facilities, an exemption from registration as a storage site is
proposed for generators who process and/or store 500 or fewer used or scrap
tires on the ground or 2,000 or fewer in enclosed containers; the registration
and design requirements for a scrap tire storage site have been reorganized
but are essentially unchanged from the current rules; requirements are proposed
to be added for land reclamation projects using tires (LRPUT); and the training
requirements for employees transporting or handling tires and for transporters
who deliver tires to the storage facility have been removed in the proposal.
Concerning scrap tire facilities, the proposal includes processing, recycling,
and energy recovery facilities under this designation, requires a scrap tire
storage site registration for certain processors and for facilities storing
more than a 30-day supply of tires, reduces the frequency of reporting to
an annual report, and removes the $500 registration fee. Concerning the Special
Authorization Priority Enforcement List (SAPEL) and the Priority Enforcement
List (PEL) program, the proposal has removed the 2,500,000 tire "trigger"
for issuing contracts to procure cleanups for the removal of tires from PEL
sites, and has removed the rule language concerning assignment of PEL sites
on an individual basis to waste tire facilities, in favor of the contract
process done on a competitive basis. Concerning closure costs estimates and
financial assurance, the per-tire formula is proposed to be deleted, the written
estimate of closure costs is proposed to be calculated based on actual estimates
for third-party closure, and financial assurance sections are being proposed
under Chapter 37 of this title (relating to Financial Assurance).
Also due to the sunset provisions of Health and Safety Code Chapter 361,
Subchapter P, the following sections are proposed for repeal and will not
be streamlined, clarified, or reformatted in the proposed new sections: §330.804,
concerning the use of tire shreds in landfills; §§330.820-330.829,
concerning WTRF allocation method, model, notification, fiscal audits, overpayment
from the WTRF, and WTRF program reviews; §330.838, concerning requirements
for a Type VIII-W.T. waste tire storage facility; §330.842, concerning
waste tire facility classification and operational requirements such as shredding;
§330.848, concerning eligibility for the WTRF program; §330.850,
concerning requirements for waste tire recycling facilities; §330.853
and §330.854, concerning requirements and funding for waste tire energy
recovery facilities; §330.856 and §330.857, concerning requirements
for waste tire transfer stations and collection centers; §330.864, concerning
ranking of illegal waste tire sites; §330.871 and §330.872, concerning
the WTRF; and §§330.874-330.884, concerning WTRF grants, confidentiality,
WTRF reimbursement and transfer of funds, special authorization tires, community
service, executive director's regional site directive and protests thereof,
formal petitions and hearings, and end use credit system.
Section 330.601(a)(1) is amended to update the reference to new §330.807.
Thus, the phrase "§330.817 of this title (relating to Transporter Fees)"
is replaced by the phrase "§330.807 of this title (relating to Transporter
Requirements)."
Proposed new §330.801 sets forth purpose, which is to establish procedures
and requirements for the safe storage, transportation, processing, utilization,
and disposal of used or scrap tires or tire pieces.
Proposed new §330.802 contains applicability statements. Section 330.802(a)
states that the proposed rules are applicable to persons that are involved
in the generation, transportation, processing, storage, utilization, and disposal
of used or scrap tires or tire pieces that are classified as municipal solid
waste, recyclable materials, or inert fill materials and are regulated by
the commission under §330.3. Proposed §330.802(b) states that all
used or scrap tires or tire pieces, except those collected incidentally by
municipal solid waste collection vehicles, are subject to manifesting by registered
generators. Section 330.802(c) contains an exemption for scrap tires that
are off-the-road tires from the requirement to be split, quartered or shredded
at a storage site or a permitted landfill.
Proposed new §330.803 contains definitions for the following terms:
"30-Day Supply;" "Alter;" "Authorized representative;" "Authorized scrap tire
facility;" "Closure;" "Fleet operator;" "Generator;" "Good used tire;" "Land
reclamation projects using tires;" "Manufacturer reject tire;" "Off-the-road
tire;" "Operator;" "Owner;" "Processing;" "Professional engineer;" "Scrap
tire;" "Scrap tire facility;" "Scrap tire storage site;" "Scrap tire transporter;"
"Supersize pile;" "Tire monofill;" "Tire piece;" "Tire processor;" "Tire shredder;"
and "Transportation facility."
Proposed new §330.804 contains general requirements relating to penalties,
and requirements concerning commingling, registration, permitted municipal
solid waste facilities, and collection and transportation. Under §330.804(a),
the penalties for violation of applicable sections of this subchapter are
proposed to be any actions authorized by law to secure compliance, including
administrative or civil penalties, and the suspension or revocation of registration
or permit. Under proposed §330.804(b), scrap tires are not allowed to
be commingled with other types of scrap material or solid waste, except for
incidental scrap tires picked up in enclosed municipal solid waste collection
vehicles. Section 330.804(c) proposes that any permitted municipal solid waste
landfill may store or process whole tires or tire pieces in an unused portion
of the property within its permit boundary dedicated to tires only, with the
requirement that such storage must be above-ground in controlled piles or
lockable containers. Also, it is proposed that above ground storage of tires
or tire pieces in quantities greater than 500 tires or the equivalent on the
ground or 2,000 tires or the equivalent in enclosed or lockable containers
at a permitted municipal solid waste landfill site shall not proceed until
approval from the executive director or the commission is received. Approval
is proposed to be by authorization for such storage in an approved Site Development
Plan, or, as applicable, through a Class I permit modification and an amendment.
Finally, §330.804(c) proposes to require that tire storage activity shall
be conducted in a manner so as to not adversely affect operations at the site
or to otherwise endanger human health or the environment. Proposed §330.804(d)
contains standards for vehicles and equipment used for the collection or transportation
of used or scrap tires or tire pieces, including basic requirements for construction,
operation, maintenance, safety, and identification requirements. Under proposed
§330.804(e), a person who, for eventual recycling, reuse, or energy recovery,
temporarily stores scrap tires in a designated recycling collection area at
a landfill permitted by the commission may be granted an exemption from shredding,
splitting, or quartering the scrap tires by the executive director upon request.
Proposed new §330.805 contains registration requirements for scrap
tire storage sites, scrap tire facilities, transportation facilities, and
transporters, including application, record keeping, notice to the executive
director of certain changes, reapplication, and procedures relating to the
annulment, suspension, revocation, or denial of a registration. Under §330.805(1),
an application for registration is proposed to be required on a form obtained
from the executive director, with certain registration information listed.
Section 330.805(2) requires the application to be signed by the authorized
representative, and if applicable, the professional engineer who assisted
in its preparation. Section 330.805(3) requires a copy of the registration
notice to be kept at the site. Section 330.805(4) contains written notice
to the executive director within 15 days if certain changes occur, such as
changes in address, telephone number, applicant's registered name, or authorized
representative. Section 330.805(5) contains the requirement to submit a new
registration application if a change in operations or management methods
occurs such that the existing registration no longer adequately describes
current operations or methods. It is proposed that the executive director
may issue a new registration, cancel the old registration, or transfer the
old registration to the new registrant, and that timeliness of required submittals
may be a factor in the executive director's determination. Section 330.805(6)
spells out proposed registration annulment, suspension, revocation, and denial
procedures. Also proposed are procedures for appeal, including an opportunity
for a formal hearing which shall be a contested case proceeding.
Proposed new §330.806 contains requirements for generators of used
or scrap tires or tire pieces. Under §330.806(a), each generator shall
be responsible for ensuring that scrap tires or scrap tire pieces are transported
by a registered transporter to an authorized facility. Under §330.806(b),
it is proposed that generators who store more than 500 (or weight equivalent)
used or scrap tires or tire pieces on the ground or 2,000 (or weight equivalent)
in enclosed and lockable containers are required to obtain a scrap tire storage
registration. Section 330.806(b) also proposes restrictions on retailers and
wholesalers of good used tires, requiring them to be sorted, marked, classified,
and arranged in an organized manner, or else the used tires would be considered
as stockpiled scrap tires subject to registration as a scrap tire storage
site, and that tires stored outside in an uncontrolled pile shall be monitored
for vectors, with appropriate control measures used at least once every two
weeks. Section 330.806(c) contains an allowance for generators to transport
its scrap tires to an authorized facility, or between its own business locations,
without a transporter registration.
Proposed new §330.807 relates to transporter requirements, and contains
registration, record keeping, reporting, and interstate transportation requirements.
Section 330.807(a) proposes that this section applies to transporters collecting
and hauling used or scrap tires or tire pieces. Proposed §330.807(b)
spells out certain exemptions. These exemptions include transporter registration
exemptions, subject to certain specified requirements, for used or defective
tires shipped back to the manufacturer or its representative; for persons
registered as On-Site Sewage Facility Installers transporting scrap tire pieces
for construction of an on-site sewage disposal system; for certain types of
hauling by retreaders; for trucks engaged in municipal solid waste collection
or commercial routes which handle incidental loads of used or scrap tires
or tire pieces; and for transportation vehicles owned and operated by municipalities,
counties, or other governmental entities or agencies used to transport used
or scrap tires to an authorized facility. Section 330.807(c) pertains to proposed
general requirements, and requires transporters to register prior to conducting
business, to maintain records using the manifest system, and to be responsible
for ensuring that scrap tires or tire pieces are transported to an authorized
scrap tire facility. Section 330.807(d) proposes to require transporters to
retain all manifests, work orders, and invoices showing the collection and
disposition of all used or scrap tires and tire pieces, for a period of at
least three years at the designated place of business and available to the
executive director upon request. Section 330.807(d) also proposes detailed
requirements concerning any changes made to the face of an original record.
Section 330.807(e) contains annual report requirements for transporters. Proposed
§330.807(f)
pertains to interstate transportation, and requires compliance with applicable
requirements of this subchapter by persons who transport or otherwise manage
used or scrap tires, including persons who transport from Texas to other states
or countries, or from other states or countries to Texas, or persons who collect
or transport in Texas but have their place of business outside the state.
There is a proposed conditional exemption for persons who transport tires
from outside the state, and go through the state without leaving tires in
the state (i.e., those which do not originate or end up in Texas).
Manifest system requirements are proposed in §330.808, including manifest
requirements applicable to generators, transporters, and authorized facilities.
It is proposed that generators be required to obtain the completed manifest
within 60 days after the scrap tires or tire pieces were transported off-site
by the transporter, and there are proposed requirements concerning uncompleted
manifest and maintenance of records. Finally, proposed §330.808 states
that if a transporter removes for beneficial use all tires from an individually
manifested load, the transporter shall return the original manifest to the
generator within 60 days of the date of collection.
Proposed new §330.809 contains standards for storage of used or scrap
tires or tire pieces. Section 330.809(a) states that the standards are applicable
to persons that store or intend to store used or scrap tires or tire pieces,
with exemption from this subchapter provided for the use of tires in the storage,
protection, or production of agricultural commodities, and that storage of
used or scrap tires or tire pieces requires registration in accordance with
this proposed subchapter. Under §330.809(b), registration and deed recordation
is proposed to be required for any property intended for storage of used or
scrap tires or tire pieces. Other general requirements of this proposed subsection
include: deed recordation; ensuring that the received tires have been manifested;
abiding by all state and local codes and permitting, licensing, and registration
requirements; maintaining a copy of the mechanism for financial assurance
on-site, which is to be made available for inspection purposes; and submitting
an annual summary of activities through the end of each calendar year on a
form provided by the executive director, to be submitted no later than March
1 of the following year, giving the number of used or scrap tires or tire
pieces received and their disposition, and giving the number of used or scrap
tires or tire pieces removed from the facility.
Proposed new §330.810 contains requirements for scrap tire storage
site registration. This section contains proposed requirements for obtaining
a registration from the executive director, and spells out proposed registration
application requirements for scrap tire storage sites, including general application
requirements, site and surrounding area information requirements, engineering
information requirements, and evidence of financial assurance. Section 330.810(a)
states that persons who store more than 500 used or scrap tires or tire pieces
(or weight equivalent), or more than 2,000 used or scrap tires (or weight
equivalent) shall be required to obtain a scrap tire storage registration
from the executive director, pursuant to §330.805, with the proposed
stipulation that storage activities shall not commence without an approved
registration issued by the executive director. Section 330.810(b) sets out
registration application requirements, including information concerning the
number of copies, preparation, application drawings, maps, and applicant's
statement. Site and surrounding area information requirements are proposed
to include location maps, topographic maps, land ownership maps and lists,
floodplain maps, legal description of the storage facility, property owner
affidavit, and fire marshall approval of the fire protection system. Engineering
information requirements are proposed to include site layout plan, drainage
plan, fire plan, cost estimate for closure, and a detailed site operating
plan. Finally, evidence of financial assurance is proposed to be required.
Proposed §330.810(c) contains time frames for registration application
processing, while §330.810(d) pertains to term limits, with an expiration
60 months from the date of issuance unless there is a change in ownership,
and with renewal required prior to the expiration date.
Proposed new §330.811 contains the design requirements for scrap tire
storage sites, which include safety standards, pile design specifications,
processing standards, and requirements concerning aisle space, fire lane,
buffer zone, fire protection, drainage, signs, flood protection, and compliance
with all local building codes, fire codes, and other appropriate local codes.
Section 330.811(a) sets out the proposed safety standard that scrap tire
storage sites shall be designed so that the health, welfare, and safety of
operators, transporters, and others who use the sites are maintained. Section
330.811(b) includes limitations on the size of tire piles, except where a
variance has been authorized by the executive director upon request, and
after public comments are considered, and requirements relating to tire storage
in trailers, enclosed buildings, and other types of covered enclosures. Section
330.811(c) includes the proposed requirements that outdoor tire piles be
provided with fire lanes and all-weather roads including access to public
roads, and other design and operating requirements. Under §330.811(d),
a minimum buffer zone of 40 feet is proposed for any supersize piles and
40 feet with an opportunity for a variance for other outdoor tire piles.
Section 330.811(e) includes the requirement, with a variance, for scrap tires
to be split, quartered, or shredded within 90 days from the date of delivery
to the site. Off-the-road tires, not including truck tires, are exempt from
this requirement under this proposal. Appropriate vector controls are also
required under proposed §330.811(e). Proposed §330.811(f) contains
the access control requirement of a fence completely around the facility
with a gate that is locked when the facility is closed, and for a scrap tire
storage site the fence must be a chain-link type security fence at least
six feet high. Proposed §330.811(g)-(h) contain fire-protection requirements,
including options for fire hydrants, a storage pond, or a tank at the facility,
and including large capacity dry chemical fire extinguishers. Proposed §330.811(i)
requires, where necessary, diversion of rainfall runoff or other uncontaminated
surface water within the site to a location off-site. Section 330.811(j)
contains proposed entrance sign requirements. Proposed §330.811(k) requires
sites in the 100-year floodplain to be protected, and requires demonstration
that the tire storage will not restrict the flow of the 100-year flood, reduce
temporary water storage capacity of the floodplain, or result in washout
of tires, tire pieces, or other material so as to pose a hazard to human
health and the environment. Under proposed §330.811(l), the site shall
be designed in accordance with all local building codes, fire codes, and
other appropriate local codes.
Proposed new §330.812 contains record-keeping requirements applicable
to scrap tire storage sites, which include general requirements and requirements
relating to daily logs, manifests, and annual reporting. Additionally, it
is proposed that where local ordinances require controls or records more
stringent than the requirements of this subchapter, the owner or operator
shall use such criteria to satisfy the commission's requirements.
Proposed new §330.813 contains scrap tire facility requirements applicable
to owners and/or operators of certain facilities at which used or scrap tires
or tire pieces are processed or used for energy recovery or recycling. The
proposed section states that an applicant for a scrap tire recycling facility
who intends to have more than a 30-day supply or who intends to store more
than 500 used or scrap tires (or weight equivalent tire pieces or any combination
thereof) on the ground or 2,000 used or scrap tires (or weight equivalent
tire pieces or any combination thereof) in enclosed and lockable containers
and who is solely a scrap tire processing facility with no recycling or energy
recovery on-site must obtain a scrap tire storage site registration. The
proposed section also includes scrap tire facility registration requirements,
including the requirement to register prior to commencing operations and
requirements
relating to the application for registration. General requirements are included
concerning local ordinances, vector control, fire protection, operation of
vehicles and equipment, and annual reporting.
Proposed new §330.814 contains requirements for scrap tire transportation
facilities storing tires for longer than 30 days to register, and to comply
with all applicable requirements contained in §330.805, concerning registration.
Proposed new §330.815 sets forth tire monofill permit requirements.
Section 330.815(a) states that, in accordance with §330.4(a), no person
may cause, suffer, allow, or permit the underground disposal or placement
of tires or tire pieces into a tire monofill unless such activity is authorized
by a permit from the commission; and that no person may commence physical
construction of a tire monofill without first having submitted a permit application
in accordance with certain Chapter 330 permit procedures and having received
a permit from the commission. Section 330.810(b) contains the allowance that
a separate permit is not required for the underground disposal or placement
of tires or tire pieces into a tire monofill if such disposal or placement
occurs within the permit boundary at a permitted municipal solid waste landfill
site, with the proposed stipulation that such disposal or placement shall
be conducted only as authorized by the approved site development plan, or
by a permit modification or amendment, as appropriate.
Proposed new §330.816 contains requirements relating to LRPUT. Under
proposed §330.816(a), notification to the executive director in writing
and subsequent approval to proceed is required before the reclamation project
may be initiated. It is proposed that the executive director may withhold
such approval if the information submitted is not complete, that the executive
director has 60 days to review the notification for completeness, and that
additional information may be requested. Section 330.816(a) also spells out
the notification requirements, including certain maps, legal description,
property owner's affidavits, capacity, time frames for the project, and professional
engineer's certification. Section 330.816(b) contains the proposed requirement
that undisturbed land shall not be excavated for the purpose of filling the
same land with a mixture of tires and debris or soil, and that any borrow
area, hole or other disturbed land area to be used for a LRPUT must have existed
prior to the project, and it must have been excavated or soil removed for
a purpose other than for the burial of tire pieces. Proposed §330.816(c)
states that the LRPUT shall not result in a public nuisance. Proposed §330.816(d)
states that the owner and/or operator of the LRPUT shall notify the local
fire marshall or fire department serving the area of the tire placement or
fill activity. Proposed §330.816(e) contains the requirement that all
tires used to fill land shall be split, quartered or shredded. Proposed §330.816(f)
states that the owner and/or operator of the LRPUT shall comply with all applicable
local ordinances. Proposed §330.816(g) limits the volume percent of tire
pieces below ground to 50% maximum, with the rest of the placement being natural,
inert material acceptable for filling land, such as rubble, soil, or rocks.
If greater than 50% tire pieces by volume are placed below the ground, it
is proposed that the site is considered to be a tire monofill subject to §330.815.
Proposed §330.816(h) requires at least an 18-inch soil cover. Proposed
§330.816(i) states that the owner and/or operator shall register as a
scrap tire facility if a shredding operation is conducted on site for the
processing of tires. Proposed §330.816(j) states that a scrap tire storage
site registration is required if storing more than 500 used or scrap tires
(or weight equivalent tire pieces or any combination thereof) on the ground
or 2,000 used or scrap tires (or weight equivalent tire pieces or any combination
thereof) in enclosed and lockable containers would qualify as a tire storage
site subject to registration under §330.811, and a scrap tire storage
site registration is required if the duration of the LRPUT extends beyond
90 days from the date of delivery of tires or tire pieces to the site. Finally,
proposed §330.816(k) requires the executive director to issue an identifying
number at the time the approval letter for the LRPUT is issued, and requires
that this number be used in correspondence relating to the LRPUT.
Proposed new §330.817 contains requirements relating to the SAPEL,
which consists of scrap tires generated in specially designated counties
or regions which are identified by the executive director as areas which
are not receiving adequate tire collection service and which pose a threat
to public health and safety or the environment. Under §330.817(a)(1),
the executive director may designate SAPEL collection entities and impose
certain conditions on them, as necessary to minimize disruption of activities
at generator locations. Section 330.817(a)(1) also states that implementation
of this section is not intended to impair or reduce existing generator collection
where this collection service is currently adequately provided. Section 330.817(a)(2)
states that, unless otherwise provided by the executive director, the requirements
in §330.817, relating to the PEL Program, do not apply to the SAPEL
or SAPEL process. Section 330.817(a)(3) covers generator responsibilities
relating to the SAPEL, stating that a generator wishing to have tires located
at his site listed on the SAPEL shall cooperate fully with executive director
instructions and shall make his site available for access by designated collection
entities. Finally, §330.817(a)(3) states that failure to comply may
result in tires at that site being ineligible for listing on the SAPEL. Proposed
§330.817(b) contains requirements relating to SAPEL contracts. Under
§330.817(b)(1), the executive director may contract with designated
collection entities as necessary to ensure adequate collection of SAPEL tires.
Section 330.817(b)(2) contains requirements that may apply to a designated
collection entity, as part of the SAPEL contract.
Proposed new §330.818 contains provisions concerning the PEL program.
Section 330.818(a)(1) states that this section establishes standards applicable
to the creation and maintenance of the PEL, the identification of illegal
scrap tire sites, and the determination of a Potentially Responsible Party
(PRP). Section 330.818(a)(2) would allow the executive director to issue
contracts to procure clean-ups for the removal of tires from PEL sites through
a competitive bid process, and states that if no reasonable bids are submitted,
or at the executive director's discretion, the executive director may rebid
the PEL sites. Section 330.818(b)(1) states that the PEL is a list maintained
by the executive director of illegal scrap tire sites with over 500 scrap
tires or tire pieces identified prior to December 31, 1997 and classified
by the executive director; that the list shall be used by the executive director
for the awarding of sites to successful contract bidders; and that scrap tires
or tire pieces obtained from the PEL sites are eligible for payment according
to contract guidelines. Section 330.818(b)(2) states that the executive director
may, on an as-needed basis and with notice, recontract or execute additional
contracts for any PEL site identified and contracted in the state. Section
330.818(b)(3) and (4) contain conditions relating to site access by commission
members, employees, or agents, or authorized contractors or subcontractors.
Section 330.818(b)(5) states that authorized contractors and their subcontractors
are not considered agents of the state, and that they are solely responsible
for their own actions and the actions of their agents. Under proposed §330.818(b)(6),
property owners are not eligible for future tire cleanup assistance once their
PEL site has been cleaned up. Section 330.818(c) states that authorized scrap
tire facilities that intend to receive payment for the utilization of scrap
tires or tire pieces must enter into a PEL scrap tire site clean-up contract
as a guarantee of job performance, and that should the facility's registration
be suspended or revoked, then the PEL sites remaining in the PEL Scrap Tire
Site Clean-up Contract shall be rebid. Section 330.818(d) spells out the authority
of commission personnel with regard to cleaning up PEL sites, including requirements
for the contractor to report on the status of the clean-up activities to the
executive director; that the executive director shall have the authority to
suspend clean-up activities at a PEL site in order to ensure protection of
public health and safety, or the environment; that the executive director
may undertake immediate remediation of a site under certain situations; that
the executive director may implement a remedial program for a site if a person
ordered to eliminate an imminent and substantial endangerment has failed to
do so within the specified time limits; that the commission or the executive
director may bring suit against a potentially responsible party to recover
reasonable expenses, with criteria listed for determining whether a person
is a potentially responsible party; that the commission or executive director
shall seek to file the suit no later than one year after the date removal
or remedial measures are completed; and that the commission or the executive
director, in lieu of bringing suit to recover costs, may seek to file a lien
against the property on which the site is located.
Proposed new §330.819 relates to public notice of intent to operate.
Section 330.819(a) contains requirements for registered scrap tire storage
facilities to publish notice in a local area newspaper, and provides for a
variance to the public notice requirement, which may be requested if similar
notice has been published within the previous 12-month period and the notice
was associated with activities under the jurisdiction of this subchapter.
Section 330.819(b) contains the requirement for registered scrap tire facilities
that have submitted an application amendment for a variance from the 8000
square feet pile size to publish notice of intent to increase the pile size.
Section 330.819(c)-(e) spell out minimum requirements for notices of intent
published by scrap tire storage site owners.
Proposed new §330.820 relates to motion for reconsideration by a person
affected by an issued registration, and states that such a person may file
such a motion pursuant to §50.39. The requirements of this new section
are proposed to be added as new tire rule requirements, as opposed to requirements
that have been streamlined, clarified, and/or reformatted from the existing
tire rules.
Proposed new §330.821 contains requirements relating to closure cost
estimates for financial assurance. Section 330.821(a) contains requirements
for owners or operators of scrap tire storage sites to prepare, as part of
the facility's registration application, a written cost estimate for the
cost of hiring a third party to close the facility, which is to be determined
by the sum of the estimated cost for a third party to undertake the closure
and cleanup, with a minimum level of $3000 proposed. Section 330.821(b) states
that the closure cost estimate must equal the cost of closing the facility
based on the maximum number of whole tires stored at the facility, the maximum
volume of tire pieces, and disabling any equipment on site; that the executive
director shall evaluate and determine the amount of closure costs for which
evidence of financial assurance is required, and may amend the closure cost
estimate provided by the owner or operator; and that the owner or operator
remains responsible for the entire costs to close the site in cases where
the closure cost estimate was not sufficient. Section 330.821(c) contains
the requirement that any amendment application include a recalculation of
the closure cost estimate based on any requested volume increases; that facilities
shall not increase the stored volume until the registration amendment has
been approved by the executive director; and that only upon approval of the
executive director will the amended registration closure cost estimate be
the basis for determining financial assurance requirements. Section 330.821(d)
contains conversion factors concerning the calculation of closure costs estimates
for financial assurance. Section 330.821(e) states that the capacity of a
site, as calculated for closure costs, may not be exceeded without an approved
amended registration, along with posting at the facility of the revised financial
assurance. Section 330.821(f) states that a copy of the latest approved closure
cost estimate and a copy of the financial assurance mechanism must be kept
at the facility during its operating life. Section 330.821(g) states that
financial assurance required under this section shall be provided in accordance
with §37.3001 and §37.3011. Section 330.821(h) states when closure
will begin. Section 330.821(i) states that following a determination that
the owner or operator has failed to perform closure in accordance with the
registration requirements when required to do so, or when closure begins
under subsection (h) of this section, the executive director may terminate
or revoke the registration and draw on the financial assurance funds.
FISCAL NOTE Stephen Minick, Strategic Planning and Appropriations Division,
has determined that for the first five- year period these sections as proposed
are in effect, there will be fiscal implications as a result of enforcement
and administration of the sections. The significant fiscal implications of
requirements for the management of used or scrap tires are related to the
repeal of the statutory authority for the tire program effective December
31, 1997. Revenue to the waste tire fund, approximately $29 million annually,
will not be collected after December 31, 1997 and no statutory authority for
payments from the fund for processing or end use of used or scrap tires will
exist beyond that date. For the period January 1, 1998 through August 31,
1999, additional funding for management of used or scrap tires has been provided
through an emergency appropriation for the 1998-1999 biennium, however, no
funding for the used or scrap tire program is currently authorized beyond
August 31, 1999. The costs to the state of management of the used or scrap
tire program will decrease as a result of the repeal of the specific statutory
authority, however, no significant costs to state government are anticipated
as a specific result of adoption of the rules as proposed. The proposed rules
will retain certain elements of the existing regulatory program under more
general authority for regulation of used or scrap tires and management of
solid waste. The costs to the state of these activities as they are proposed
will not vary significantly from the costs currently being incurred under
existing regulations and statutory authority.
The repeal of the specific statutory provisions for management of used
or scrap tires may result in increased costs to units of local government.
These costs will relate to increased requirements for management of solid
waste, litter abatement and removal of illegally discarded tires. Costs to
local governments are not anticipated to increase as a direct result of the
proposed rules and may, in fact, be mitigated by the provision of emergency
appropriations beyond the sunset date of the waste tire program and the adoption
of these sections in order to retain basic elements of the waste tire program.
Continuing regulation of used or scrap tires, including cleanup of illegal
tire disposal sites, regulation of used or scrap tire facilities, financial
assurance provisions for storage sites and authorization for legal landfilling
of used or scrap tires will reduce many of the potential costs to local governments
of waste management and illegal dumping, at least for the period for which
funding is available.
PUBLIC BENEFIT Mr. Minick has also determined that for each year of the
first five years these sections as proposed are in effect the public benefit
anticipated as a result of enforcement of and compliance with the sections
will be improved regulation and management of solid waste and used or scrap
tires, enhanced protection of human health and safety, and increased conservation
of energy and natural resources. The economic costs related to these rules
are those associated with the operation of facilities subject to the rules
- generators and transporters of used or scrap tires and operators of storage,
processing or disposal facilities. The costs imposed by these sections may
be considered to be significant only when compared to the costs of compliance
in the absence of specific regulations for management of used or scrap tires
with the repeal of the statutory authority for the waste tire program. The
actual costs of compliance with proposed rules are not anticipated to be materially
different for most affected operators from the costs associated with compliance
with the sections that are proposed to be repealed. Some compliance costs
for generators and handlers of used or scrap tires could decrease. These reductions
will result from changes in requirements and allowable time periods for storage
of used or scrap tires, reduced requirements and associated costs for transporters,
and changes to registration and application requirements, including reductions
in certain processing fees. Other operating requirements, including those
for demonstration of financial assurance, may result in increased costs for
energy recovery and recycling facilities storing more than a 30-day supply
of used or scrap tires. However, financial assurance costs for certain facilities
may actually be reduced as a result of the use of proposed cost estimate procedures,
rather than formulas, and the authorization of landfilling of used tires,
which will reduce the disposal costs required to be guaranteed. Although actual
cost impacts to affected persons and facilities may be positive or negative,
no substantial economic costs of these proposed rules, separate and distinct
from the sunset of the waste tire program, are anticipated to occur. Many
of the persons subject to these proposed rules are small businesses. The effects
on small businesses will be directly related to the size and type of facility,
the number of used or scrap tires (or equivalents) generated, stored, processed
or disposed, and other site-specific conditions. Persons purchasing new or
good used tires will not be required to pay a fee for the sale of tires after
the sunset date for the waste tire authority. This future cost savings, equivalent
to $2.00 for a new passenger car tire, will not be affected by the adoption
of these rules. These are no other economic costs anticipated for persons
required to comply with the sections as proposed.
DRAFT REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS The commission has reviewed the proposed
rulemaking in light of the regulatory analysis requirements of Texas Government
Code §2001.0225 and has determined that the rulemaking is not subject
to §2001.0225 because it does not meet the definition of a "major environmental
rule" as defined in the act, and it does not meet any of the four applicability
requirements listed in §2001.0225(a).
TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT The commission has prepared a Takings Impact
Assessment for these rules pursuant to Texas Government Code Annotated §2007.043.
The following is a summary of that assessment. The specific purpose of the
rules is to adopt a set of regulations for the sound and proper management
of used or scrap tires or tire pieces that are classified as municipal solid
waste. The rules will substantially advance this specific purpose by adopting
a set of standards controlling the storage, transportation, treatment, and
disposal of used tires, scrap tires, and tire pieces. Promulgation and enforcement
of these rules will not burden private real property which is the subject
of the rules because the proposed changes provide for a streamlined set of
regulatory management standards and do not limit or restrict a person's rights
in private real property.
Also, the following exceptions to the application of Chapter 2007 of the
Texas Government Code listed in Texas Government Code Annotated §2007.003(b)
apply to these rules: an action taken to prohibit or restrict a condition
or use of private real property if the governmental entity proves that the
condition or use constitutes a public or private nuisance as defined by background
principles of nuisance and property law of this state; and an action taken
out of a reasonable good faith belief that the action is necessary to prevent
a grave and immediate threat to life or property.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSISTENCY REVIEW The executive director has
reviewed the proposed rulemaking and found that the proposal is a rulemaking
identified in Coastal Coordination Act Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11,
relating to Actions and Rules Subject to the Coastal Management Program, or
will affect an action/authorization identified in Coastal Coordination Act
Implementation Rules, 31 TAC §505.11, and will, therefore, require that
applicable goals and policies of the CMP be considered during the rulemaking
process.
The commission has prepared a consistency determination for the proposed
rules pursuant to 31 TAC §505.22 and has found the proposed rulemaking
is consistent with the applicable CMP goals and policies. The following is
a summary of that determination. The CMP goal applicable to the proposed rules
is the goal to protect, preserve, restore, and enhance the diversity, quality,
quantity, functions, and values of coastal natural resource areas. CMP policies
applicable to the proposed rules include the administrative policies and the
policies for specific activities related to construction and operation of
solid waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities.
Promulgation and enforcement of these rules is consistent with the applicable
CMP goals and policies because the proposed rules will encourage safe and
appropriate storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of used tires,
scrap tires, and tire pieces that are classified as municipal solid wastes,
which will result in an overall environmental benefit across the state, including
in coastal areas. In addition, the proposed rules do not violate any applicable
provisions of the CMP's stated goals and policies. The commission seeks public
comment on the consistency of the proposed rules.
PUBLIC HEARING A public hearing on the proposal will be held on January
27, 1998 at 10:00 a.m. in Room 2210 of Building F of the commission's Park
35 Office Complex located at 12100 North IH-35, Park 35 Circle, Austin. The
hearing is structured for the receipt of oral or written comments by interested
persons. Individuals may present oral statements when called upon in order
of registration. Open discussion with the audience will not occur during the
hearing; however, an agency staff member will be available to discuss the
proposal 30 minutes prior to the hearing and will answer questions before
and after the hearing.
Written comments on the proposal should reference Rule Log Number 97140-330-WS
and may be submitted to Heather Evans, Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission, Office of Policy and Regulatory Development, MC 201, 12100, Park
35 Circle, North Interstate 35, Building F, Room 4101 or P.O. Box 13087, Austin,
Texas 78711-3087 or faxed to (512) 239-4808. Written comments must be received
by 5:00 p.m., February 2, 1998. For further information or questions concerning
this proposal, please contact Debbie Bohl, Municipal Solid Waste Division,
at (512) 239-0044.
Subchapter P. Fees and Reporting
30 TAC §330.601
The amendment is proposed under the Texas Water Code, §5.103,
which provides the commission with the authority to adopt any rules necessary
to carry out its powers and duties under the Code and other laws of the State
of Texas, and to establish and approve all general policy of the commission;
under Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the Act), Texas Health and Safety Code,
Chapter 361, §361.112, relating to the Storage, Transportation, and Disposal
of Used or Scrap Tires, and under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act (the
Act), Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361, §361.011 and §361.024
which provide the commission with the authority to regulate municipal solid
waste and adopt rules consistent with the general intent and purposes of the
Act.
The proposed amendment implements the Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361.
§330.601.Purpose and Applicability.
(a)
Purpose.
(1)
Fees. The commission is mandated by the Solid Waste Disposal
Act, Health and Safety Code, Chapter 361, to collect a fee for solid waste
disposed of within the state, and from transporters of solid waste who are
required to register with the state. Fee requirements for persons who collect
and/or transport municipal wastewater treatment plant sludges, water supply
treatment plant sludges, grit trap waste, grease trap waste, and septage are
contained in §330.448 of this title (relating to Transporter Fees). [
(2) - (3)
(No change.)
(b)
(No change.)
This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed
by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.
Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.
TRD-9716935
Kevin McCalla
Director, Legal Division
Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission
Proposed date of adoption: March 25, 1998
For further information, please call: (512) 239-1970
Subchapter D. Wording of the Mechanisms for Closure
Subchapter M. Financial Assurance Requirements for Scrap Tire Sites
Chapter 106.
Exemptions from Permitting
Facilities or types of facilities contained
in this chapter must qualify for an exemption under this chapter and may
not
be qualified for an exemption listed in §116.211 of this title (relating
to Standard Exemption List). Facilities or types of facilities not contained
in this chapter may qualify for an exemption under §116.211 of this title.
]
Subchapter I. Manufacturing
(Previously SE 7)
]), if all pertinent requirements were met.
Subchapter M. Metallurgy Furnace ] (Previously SE 58).
not
] produced
only when
emissions are captured by a vent hood and filtered or within a crucible with
a lid which allows no visible emissions
; and
magnesium
] bronze is melted, poured, or held in a molten
state;
Subchapter P. Plant Operations
Subchapter R. Service Industries
D
] of this chapter (relating to
General
Volatile Organic
Compound Sources and
Solvent-Using Processes
[
Petroleum Refining
and Petrochemical Processes
]).
Subchapter T. Surface Preparation
Alternate Control Requirements
]).
Chapter 330.
Municipal Solid Waste
Transportation fee schedules for persons who engage in the collection and/or
transportation of used or scrap tires are contained in §330.817 of this
title (relating to Transporter Fees)
]. Persons desiring to transport
or deliver waste in enclosed containers or enclosed vehicles to a Type IV
municipal solid waste management facility are subject to special route permit
application and maintenance fees set forth and described in §330.32 of
this title (relating to Collection and Transportation Requirements). The fee
amount may be raised or lowered in accordance with spending levels authorized
by the legislature.
Subchapter R. Management of Whole Used or Scrap Tires