TITLE banking-and-securities

Part I. State Finance Commission

Chapter 9. Rules of Procedure for Contested Case Hearings, Appeals, and Rulemakings

Subchapter E. Rulemaking

7 TAC §9.81, §9.84

The Finance Commission of Texas, the Texas Department of Banking, the Savings and Loan Commissioner, and the Consumer Credit Commissioner (the agencies) propose an amendment to §9.81 and §9.84, relating to rulemaking.

In connection with the enactment of the Texas Finance Code by Acts 1997, 75th Legislature, Chapter 1008, §1, certain provisions regarding special procedures for rulemaking in the consumer credit and pawnshop statutes were eliminated. Repealed Texas Civil Statutes, Article 5069-3.12(1) and Article 5069-51.09(b), codified in Finance Code, §342.501 and §371.006, respectively, formerly provided for procedures that were viewed by the legislature as superfluous or inconsistent with and implicitly repealed by the original enactment of the Texas Administrative Procedure and Texas Register Act (former Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6252-13a, §22). Existing §9.81 and §9.84 cross-reference to these now repealed provisions and the proposed amendment eliminates those references.

Larry J. Craddock, the administrative law judge for the finance commission, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections as proposed will be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Mr. Craddock also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the sections as proposed will be in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of the adoption will be the simplification in procedural process before the agencies, to the advantage of the public and attorneys who practice before the agencies. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the sections as proposed.

Written comments regarding the proposed sections may be submitted to Larry J. Craddock, Administrative Law Judge, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705-4294, or by e-mail to larry.craddock@banking.state.tx.us. Mr. Craddock will ensure that each agency receives copies of all comments received.

The amendments are proposed under Government Code, §2001.004(1), which requires all administrative agencies to adopt rules of practice stating the nature and requirements of all available formal and informal procedures. The new sections are also proposed under specific rulemaking authority in the substantive statutes administered by the agencies.

Finance Code, §31.003(a)(5), authorizes the finance commission to adopt rules necessary or reasonable to facilitate the fair hearing and adjudication of matters before the banking commissioner and the finance commission.

Finance Code, §153.002, authorizes the finance commission to adopt rules necessary to implement that chapter (governing regulation of currency exchange and transmission licensees).

Finance Code, §152.102, authorizes the finance commission to adopt rules necessary for the enforcement and orderly administration of that chapter.

Finance Code, §154.051(b), authorizes the department of banking to adopt rules concerning matters incidental to the enforcement and orderly administration of that chapter.

Finance Code, §11.302, authorizes the finance commission to adopt rules applicable to state savings associations or to savings banks. Finance Code, §96.002(a)(2), and Finance Code, §66.002, also authorize the savings and loan commissioner and the finance commission to adopt procedural rules for deciding applications filed with the savings and loan commissioner or the savings and loan department.

Finance Code, §11.304, authorizes the finance commission to adopt rules necessary for supervising the consumer credit commissioner and for ensuring compliance with Finance Code, Chapter 14 and Title 4, plus amendments to the source law made by Acts 1997, 75th Legislature, Chapter 1396). Texas Civil Statutes, Article 5069-3A.901, also authorizes the finance commission to adopt rules necessary for the enforcement of Article 5069-3A.001. Finance Code, §371.006, further authorizes the consumer credit commissioner to adopt rules necessary for the enforcement of Finance Code, Chapter 371.

The statutory provisions affected by the proposed sections are Finance Code, Title 3 and Title 4, Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, 5069-1B.001 et seq, and Health and Safety Code, Chapter 712.

§9.81. Rulemaking.

Rulemaking proceedings must comply with Government Code, Chapter 2001, Subchapter B (§§2001.021 et seq) [ , and with Texas Civil Statutes, Article 5069-3.12(1) and Article 5069-51.09(b), if applicable ].

§9.84. Hearings on Proposed Rules.

(a)

The agency shall grant an opportunity for a public hearing before adoption of any proposed rule as required by Government Code, §2001.029(b) , [ ; Texas Civil Statutes, Article 5069-51.09(b); ] or other applicable statute.

(b)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716981

Everette D. Jobe

Certifying Official

State Finance Commission

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Part II. Texas Department of Banking

Chapter 10. Trust Companies

7 TAC §§10.1-10.5, 10.10, 10.11

(Editor's note: The text of the following sections proposed for repeal will not be published. The sections may be examined in the offices of the Texas Department of Banking or in the Texas Register office, Room 245, James Earl Rudder Building, 1019 Brazos Street, Austin.)

The Finance Commission of Texas (the commission) proposes the repeal of §§10.1-10.5, and 10.10-10.11, concerning the regulation of trust companies.

The repeal of these sections is necessary because recently enacted Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001, et seq, now governs trust companies and replaces prior law applicable to trust companies. The substantive provisions of these sections that have continuing vitality are proposed for adoption as new sections in Title 7, Chapters 17, 19, and 21, in this issue of the Texas Register .

Everette D. Jobe, General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, has determined that for the first five-year period the repeal as proposed will be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the repeal.

Mr. Jobe also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the repeal as proposed will be in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of the repeal will be the elimination of obsolete and potentially confusing regulations. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the repeal as proposed.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted in writing to Jerry Sanchez, Assistant General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705-4294, or by e-mail to jerry.sanchez@banking.state.tx.us.

The repeal is proposed pursuant to rulemaking authority under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-1.003(a)(1), which authorize the commission to adopt rules necessary or reasonable to implement and clarify Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-1.001 et seq.

Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, are affected by the proposed repeal.

§10.1. Ratable Increases in Required Capital.

§10.2. Physical Location of Books and Records.

§10.3. Examination Fees.

§10.4. Advertising.

§10.5. Authorized Investments.

§10.10. Requirements to Apply for and Maintain Status as Exempt Trust Company.

§10.11. Revocation of Exempt Trust Company Status.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716982

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Chapter 12. Loans and Investments

The Finance Commission of Texas (the commission) proposes amendments to §12.11 and §12.61, concerning loan and investment limits.

Section 12.11 provides that a state bank does not violate the limitations on loans or extensions of credit with regard to a loan transaction that was legal when made but became nonconforming as a result of the enactment of the Texas Banking Act effective September 1, 1995. The section refers to this type of loan as a "conforming" loan when in fact it does not conform to currently effective limits, and the amendment changes this erroneous terminology.

Section 12.61 similarly provides that a state bank investment made prior to September 1, 1995, within the bank's investment limit when made but exceeding the new limits of the Texas Banking Act, remains a legal investment. The section refers to this type of investment as a "conforming" investment although it does not conform to currently effective limits, and the amendment changes this erroneous terminology.

Everette Jobe, General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect, there will be no fiscal implication for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Mr. Jobe also has determined that for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing these sections are the clarification of complex statutory standards to aid the industry in compliance. No net economic cost will result to persons required to comply with the proposed sections. No difference will exist between the cost of compliance for small businesses and the cost of compliance for the largest businesses affected by these sections.

Comments on the proposal may be submitted in writing to Everette D. Jobe, General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705-4294, or by e-mail to everette.jobe@banking.state.tx.us.

Subchapter A. Lending Limits

7 TAC §12.11

The amendment is proposed under Finance Code, §31.003(a)(1) and §34.201(b), which authorizes the commission to adopt rules necessary or reasonable to implement and clarify Finance Code, Title 3, Subtitle A, and further to adopt rules to administer the provisions of Finance Code, §34.201.

Finance Code, §34.201, is affected by the proposal.

§12.11. Transition Rules.

(a)

This subchapter applies to loans or extensions of credit made on or after September 1, 1995. A loan or extension of credit existing prior to September 1, 1995, that was within a bank's legal lending limit when made but is currently in excess of the limitations of Finance Code, §34.201 , is not a violation of the Finance Code, §34.201, and this subchapter, but [ and ] is considered a nonconforming [ conforming ] loan.

(b)-(c)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716983

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Subchapter C. Investment Limits

7 TAC §12.61

The amendment is proposed under Finance Code, §31.003(a)(1) and §34.101(j), which authorizes the commission to adopt rules necessary or reasonable to implement and clarify Finance Code, Title 3, Subtitle A, and further to adopt rules to administer the provisions of Finance Code, §34.101.

Finance Code, §34.101 and §34.104, is affected by the proposal.

§12.61. Transition Provisions.

(a)

An investment in securities made prior to September 1, 1995, that was within a state bank's investment limit when made but is currently in excess of the limitations of Finance Code, §34.101 or §34.104, is not a violation of Finance Code, §34.101 or §34.104, but is considered a nonconforming [ conforming ] investment.

(b)

(No change.)

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716984

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Chapter 17. Trust Company Regulation

The Finance Commission of Texas (the commission) proposes new §§17.1, 17.2, 17.21, and 17.22, regarding ratable increases in required capital, advertising, the physical location of books and records, and examination fees applicable to trust companies.

Effective September 1, 1997, Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, became the governing law for trust companies under the jurisdiction of the Texas Department of Banking (the department). New regulations implementing this law require proposal and adoption. As part of this process, 7 TAC Chapter 17 will contain generally applicable rules pertaining to trust companies. Proposed §17.1 and §17.2 will initially comprise all of Subchapter A, entitled "General," and proposed §17.21 and §17.22 will initially comprise all of Subchapter B, entitled "Examination and Call Reports."

Proposed §17.1 concerns ratable increases in capital and provides a timetable for a trust company to comply with minimum restricted capital requirements under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.007. Proposed §17.1 is comparable to and drawn from 7 TAC §10.1, proposed for repeal in this issue of the Texas Register .

Proposed §17.2 prohibits certain misleading advertising by trust companies, and is comparable to and drawn from 7 TAC §10.4, proposed for repeal in this issue of the Texas Register .

Proposed §17.21 provides for the preservation and location of corporate and fiduciary records of a trust company to enhance the examination process by the department and to provide flexibility to trust companies in conducting their affairs. Proposed §17.21 is comparable to and drawn from 7 TAC §10.2, proposed for repeal in this issue of the Texas Register .

Proposed §17.22 specifies examination fees to be charged to trust companies by the department, and is comparable to and drawn from 7 TAC §10.3, proposed for repeal in this issue of the Texas Register , and 7 TAC §3.36(h).

Everette Jobe, General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect, there will be no fiscal implication for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Mr. Jobe also has determined that for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing these sections are the clarification of complex statutory standard to aid the industry in compliance. No net economic cost will result to persons required to comply with the proposed sections. No difference will exist between the cost of compliance for small businesses and the cost of compliance for the largest businesses affected by these sections.

Comments on the proposed sections may be submitted in writing to Jerry Sanchez, Assistant General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705-4294, or by e-mail to jerry.sanchez@banking.state.tx.us.

Subchapter A. General

7 TAC §17.1, §17.2

The new sections are proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.003(a)(1), 342a-1.003(a)(2), and 342a-3.103(a), which authorize the commission to adopt rules to implement and clarify Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, preserve or protect the safety and soundness of trust companies, and establish the basis for reductions and increases in restricted capital.

Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, are affected by the proposal.

§17.1. Ratable Increases in Required Capital.

(a)

Beginning restricted capital. As used in this section, the term "beginning restricted capital" means, at any time, the level of restricted capital of a trust company as determined by the immediately preceding September 30th statement of condition and income filed by the trust company pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-2.003, subject to correction or restatement as a result of examination.

(b)

Purpose. Pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.007, a trust company is required to possess minimum restricted capital of not less than $1 million, or a higher or lower amount set by the banking commissioner. Under prior law, the minimum restricted capital was $500,000. An existing trust company must achieve the new required level of restricted capital by September 1, 2000. This section provides for ratable increases in minimum restricted capital and for deferrals and extensions of time for a trust company acting in good faith to achieve minimum required restricted capital.

(c)

Transition for under-capitalized trust company.

(1)

A trust company with restricted capital as of September 1, 1995, that was less than the minimum restricted capital required under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.007, must increase its restricted capital annually thereafter, by the end of September 30th of each year, according to the following schedule:

(A)

September 30, 1996--by a sufficient amount to cause restricted capital to equal such company's beginning restricted capital plus at least 20% of the difference between the minimum restricted capital required at that time and such trust company's restricted capital as of the preceding September 30th;

(B)

September 30, 1997--by a sufficient amount to cause restricted capital to equal such trust company's beginning restricted capital plus at least 25% of the difference between the minimum restricted capital required at that time and such trust company's restricted capital as of the preceding September 30th;

(C)

September 30, 1998--by a sufficient amount to cause restricted capital to equal such trust company's beginning restricted capital plus at least 33% of the difference between the minimum restricted capital required at that time and such trust company's restricted capital as of the preceding September 30th;

(D)

September 30, 1999--by a sufficient amount to cause restricted capital to equal such trust company's beginning restricted capital plus at least 50% of the difference between the minimum restricted capital required at that time and such trust company's restricted capital as of the preceding September 30th; and

(E)

September 30, 2000--by a sufficient amount to cause restricted capital to equal at least the minimum restricted capital required at that time. Thereafter, the trust company shall have and maintain at least the minimum restricted capital required by Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.007.

(2)

The implementation schedule set forth in paragraph (1) of this subsection is a minimum requirement, and does not authorize a reduction of restricted capital for a trust company that has more restricted capital than is required under the implementation schedule but less than is required under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.007. Any trust company that possesses restricted capital in excess of minimal requirements or that achieves the minimum transition level of restricted capital prior to the required deadlines in the transition schedule may not reduce its restricted capital without the express written consent of the banking commissioner.

(d)

Extensions of time. Upon application by a trust company subject to subsection (c) of this section, the banking commissioner, in the exercise of discretion, may grant one or more extensions to a trust company to permit additional time to achieve the required restricted capital levels if, in the banking commissioner's opinion, the trust company has made a good faith effort to achieve such restricted capital levels.

(e)

Inapplicability to new trust company. This section does not create a presumption regarding the adequacy of the capital structure proposed for a new trust company in a charter application to the banking commissioner.

§17.2. Advertising.

(a)

An advertisement published by or on behalf of a trust company may not include the following:

(1)

a guaranteed rate of return or interest rate on funds deposited in trust;

(2)

a statement that tends to deceive or mislead the public; or

(3)

a term that may deceive the public into belief that the trust company is engaged in the banking business.

(b)

Advertisements published by or on behalf of a trust company must be retained in the trust company's records for examination by department personnel.

(c)

A trust company that violates this section is subject to an enforcement action initiated by the banking commissioner under Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-6.001 et seq.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716986

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Subchapter B. Examination and Call Reports

7 TAC §17.21, §17.22

The new sections are proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.003(a)(1), 342a-1.003(a)(4), and 342a-4.109, which authorize the commission to adopt rules to implement and clarify Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, to provide for the recovery of the cost and maintenance and operation of the department and the cost of enforcing Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, through the imposition and collection of ratable and equitable fees for notices, applications and examinations, and to require maintenance of fiduciary records.

Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, are affected by the proposal.

§17.21. Physical Location of Books and Records.

(a)

Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide for the preservation and location of trust company records to enhance the examination process by the department and to provide flexibility to trust companies in conducting their affairs. A trust company that maintains fiduciary records at one or more locations other than its principal place of business should be aware that a separate examination may be required at each such location, the cost of which will be borne by the trust company. This section may not be construed to prevent the maintenance of a duplicate set of records if the trust company considers such to be advisable.

(b)

Corporate records. Those books and records of a trust company that are related to corporate governance and operations must be kept and maintained at the trust company's principal place of business in this state. Such books and records include but are not necessarily limited to:

(1)

general and subsidiary ledgers;

(2)

income and expense ledgers;

(3)

supporting documentation for assets and liabilities;

(4)

contracts with suppliers and service providers;

(5)

corporate state and federal tax information and documentation;

(6)

correspondence with the department;

(7)

directors minutes;

(8)

shareholders minutes;

(9)

corporate governance documents such as bylaws, articles of association, and stock register; and

(10)

reports of condition and income.

(c)

Fiduciary records. Those books and records of a trust company that are related to fiduciary accounts and operations may be kept and maintained either at the trust company's principal place of business in this state or at the place where the trust company's fiduciary accounts are administered; provided that such books and records may not be divided and kept partially at different locations without the prior consent of the department. Such books and records include but are not necessarily limited to:

(1)

governing documents for each trust, custodial account, agency or other type of account administered;

(2)

documentation supporting the purchase or sale of any investments from or to the accounts administered, including broker confirmations and safekeeping receipts;

(3)

documentation on any assets accepted in-kind with supporting documentation justifying the amount booked;

(4)

account reviews, including administrative and asset reviews;

(5)

copies of all correspondence on each account administered, including documents relating to litigation, bankruptcy proceedings or other court action;

(6)

copies of income tax returns on any accounts which are required to submit income tax returns;

(7)

copies of customer account statements;

(8)

trial balance of all accounts administered reflecting all investments, including principal cash and income cash, at market value and cost;

(9)

overdraft listing of any overdrawn account administered and reflecting date of overdraft;

(10)

large cash balance listing of accounts administered;

(11)

safekeeping report from each institution holding items for safekeeping, with reconcilement to the trust company account trial balance;

(12)

master asset listing of all investments by type, reflecting account holder, number of units held with cost and market values;

(13)

assets by account holder reflecting investments with number of units, cost and market values;

(14)

broker commission report reflecting all brokers utilized for purchase or sale of investments, dollar volume, commissions paid and number of transactions;

(15)

reconcilement of fiduciary cash accounts including copies of bank account statements;

(16)

reconcilement of suspense accounts with listing of items outstanding and origination dates;

(17)

complaint file; and

(18)

copies of quarterly report of trust assets.

§17.22. Examination and Investigation Fees.

(a)

Calculation of fees. A trust company shall pay to the department a fee for examination, whether a regular or special examination, or for an investigation in connection with an application, calculated at a uniform rate of $500 per examiner per day, to recoup the salary expense of examiners plus a proportionate share of the department's overhead allocable to the examination or investigation function. The commissioner may lower the uniform rate without the prior approval of the finance commission.

(b)

Travel expenses. In connection with an examination or investigation, a trust company shall reimburse the department for actual travel expenses incurred, including mileage, public transportation, food, and lodging, in addition to paying the fees set forth in subsection (a) of this section.

(c)

Payment due. Fees and expenses charged under this section are due no later than the 30th day after a bill for fees and expenses is submitted to the trust company. Failure to pay such fees and expenses or file a request for hearing within the time period may subject the trust company to enforcement proceedings.

(d)

Dispute of fees and expenses.

(1)

A trust company may dispute the amount of a bill for fees and expenses assessed under this section by paying the amount of fees and expenses that are undisputed and filing a written request for hearing with the banking commissioner on or before the 30th day after a bill for fees and expenses is submitted to the trust company. If the trust company does not request a hearing in writing within the time period allowed, the assessed fees and expenses are final and nonappealable.

(2)

A requested hearing must be held not later than the 30th day after the date the request was received by the banking commissioner unless the parties agree to a later hearing date. Each party shall be given written notice by personal delivery or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, of the date set by the banking commissioner for the hearing not later than the 11th day before that date. The hearing shall be conducted as provided by Chapter 9 of this title (relating to Rules of Procedure for Contested Case Hearings, Appeals, and Rulemakings).

(3)

After the hearing, the banking commissioner shall affirm or modify the bill for fees and expenses by written order.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716987

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Chapter 19. Trust Company Loans and Investments

The Finance Commission of Texas (the commission) proposes new §§19.1, 19.21, and 19.22, concerning loans or extensions of credit and investments by trust companies.

Effective September 1, 1997, Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, became the governing law for trust companies. New regulations implementing this new law require proposal and adoption. As part of this process, Chapter 19 will contain rules applicable to loans and investments of trust companies. Proposed §19.1 will initially comprise all of Subchapter A, entitled "Loans," and proposed §19.21 and §19.22 will initially comprise all of Subchapter B, entitled "Investments."

Proposed §19.1 clarifies that a state trust company does not violate the limitations on loans or extensions of credit, including lease financing transactions, if such transactions were legal when made but become nonconforming as a result of exceeding the new legal lending limit created by Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.201. Proposed §19.1 also authorizes the banking commissioner, under certain limited circumstances, to allow renewal, extension, or restructuring of loans which are not in compliance with a trust company's legal lending limit.

Proposed §19.21 clarifies that a state trust company does not violate the limitations on investments if such investments were legal when made but become nonconforming as a result of exceeding the new investment limit created by Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101. A trust company may not make an investment on or after September 1, 1997, that is not in compliance with law, or that would cause an existing investment to become further out of compliance with law.

Pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.104(c), a trust company's total investment in mutual funds for its own account may not exceed an amount equal to 15 percent of the trust company's restricted capital. Proposed §19.22 will substantially reduce this restriction by permitting investment of an amount up to 15 percent of the trust company's restricted capital in each qualified mutual fund, subject to the exercise of prudent investment judgment. A trust company must periodically review the investments in the portfolios of mutual funds in which it invests to determine that investment limits are not exceeded by reason of the combined holdings of the securities of a single issuer held directly by the trust company and held indirectly by multiple mutual funds in which the trust company is invested. Documentation of periodic reviews must be maintained by the trust company for examination purposes.

Further, proposed §19.22 will permit a trust company to invest without limitation in a mutual fund with stated objectives of investing solely in securities that the trust company could invest in directly for its own account without limit, provided the mutual fund's portfolio in fact consists entirely of such securities.

Finally, proposed §19.22 clarifies that a mutual fund investment is subject to the provisions of proposed §19.21. Thus, a mutual fund investment made prior to September 1, 1997, that was within a trust company's investment limit when made but became nonconforming as a result of the new limitations of Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101, remains a legal but nonconforming investment. A trust company may not make a mutual fund investment on or after September 1, 1997, that is not in compliance with Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101, or that would cause an existing mutual fund investment to become further out of compliance with Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101, such as by electing to reinvest dividends.

Everette D. Jobe, General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, has determined that for the first five-year period the sections are in effect, there will be no fiscal implication for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the sections.

Mr. Jobe also has determined that for each year of the first five years the sections are in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing these sections are the clarification of complex statutory standards to aid the industry in compliance. No net economic cost will result to persons required to comply with the proposed sections. No difference will exist between the cost of compliance for small businesses and the cost of compliance for the largest businesses affected by these sections.

Comments on the proposed sections may be submitted in writing to Jerry Sanchez, Assistant General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705-4294, or by e-mail to jerry.sanchez@banking.state.tx.us.

Subchapter A. Loans

7 TAC §19.1

The new section are proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.003(a)(1), 342a-1.003(a)(2), and 342a-5.201(c), which authorize the commission to adopt rules to implement and clarify Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, to preserve or protect the safety and soundness of state trust companies, and to establish limits, requirements, or exemptions for particular classes or categories of loans or extensions of credit, and establish collective lending and investment limits.

Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.201, and Article 342a-5.202, are affected by the proposal.

§19.1. Grandfathered Loans.

(a)

Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.201, and this subchapter apply to loans or extensions of credit made on or after September 1, 1997. A loan or extension of credit existing prior to September 1, 1997, that was within a trust company's lending limit when made but is currently in excess of the limitations of Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.201, is not a violation of Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.201, or this subchapter, but is considered a nonconforming loan.

(b)

Except as provided in subsections (c)-(e) of this section, a trust company may not renew, extend the maturity of, or restructure a nonconforming loan or extension of credit described in subsection (a) of this section unless the renewed, extended, or restructured loan complies with Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.201.

(c)

Provided a trust company first makes a reasonable effort, consistent with safety and soundness principles, to collect a loan or extension of credit described in subsection (a) of this section at its maturity or to comply with subsection (b) of this section, a trust company may renew, extend the maturity of, or restructure the nonconforming loan or extension of credit unless:

(1)

additional funds are advanced by the trust company to the borrower;

(2)

a new borrower replaces the original borrower; or

(3)

the banking commissioner determines that the renewal, extension, or restructuring of the loan or extension of credit is designed to evade the trust company's lending limit.

(d)

An extension, if any, of the maturity of the loan or extension of credit, in the aggregate, may not exceed the lesser of the original term of the loan or one year.

(e)

Notwithstanding subsections (b)-(d) of this section, the banking commissioner may authorize terms for the renewal, extension, or restructuring of an existing loan or extension of credit on written application if the banking commissioner concludes that:

(1)

the excess loan or extension of credit is not prohibited by other applicable law; and

(2)

the safety and soundness of the requesting trust company:

(A)

would not be adversely affected by renewal, extension, or restructuring of the existing loan or extension of credit; or

(B)

would be adversely affected if the loan or extension of credit is not renewed, extended, or restructured as requested.

(f)

A lease financing transaction is considered an extension of credit for lending limit purposes. A lease financing transaction in existence prior to September 1, 1997, is therefore subject to this section.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716988

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Subchapter B. Investments

7 TAC §19.21, §19.22

The sections are proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.003(a)(1), 342a-1.003(a)(2), and 342a-5.101(h), which authorize the commission to adopt rules to implement and clarify Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, to preserve or protect the safety and soundness of state trust companies, and to establish limits, requirements, or exemptions for particular classes or categories of investment, or limit or expand investment authority for trust companies for particular classes or categories of securities or other property.

Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101, are affected by the proposal.

§19.21. Grandfathered Investments.

(a)

An investment in securities made prior to September 1, 1997, that was within a trust company's investment limit when made but exceeds the new limitations of Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(c) or (e), effective September 1, 1997, is not a violation of Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101, but is considered a nonconforming investment.

(b)

Without the prior written approval of the banking commissioner pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(c), a trust company may not make an investment on or after September 1, 1997, that is not in compliance with law, or that would increase an existing investment described in subsection (a) of this section and cause it to become further out of compliance with law.

§19.22. Investments in Mutual Funds.

(a)

Subject to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(f), and this section, a trust company may invest for its own account in a mutual fund as defined in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-1.002(a)(31), unless the mutual fund portfolio contains an investment that the trust company could not make directly.

(b)

Notwithstanding the limits stated in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(c), a trust company may invest in a mutual fund not more than an amount equal to 15% of the trust company's restricted capital unless a larger investment is permitted under subsection (c) of this section. Pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(c), the banking commissioner may authorize investments in excess of this limitation on written application if the banking commissioner concludes that:

(1)

the excess investment is not prohibited by other applicable law; and

(2)

the safety and soundness of the requesting trust company is not adversely affected.

(c)

Notwithstanding the limits stated in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(c), and subsection (b) of this section, a trust company may invest in a mutual fund without limit if:

(1)

the mutual fund's stated investment objective is to invest solely in securities that the trust company could invest in directly for its own account without limit under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(d); and

(2)

the mutual fund's portfolio in fact consists wholly of investments in which the trust company could invest directly without limitation under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.101(d).

(d)

A trust company that invests in an mutual fund as permitted by subsection (b) of this section shall periodically determine that its pro rata share of any security in the portfolio of the mutual fund is not in excess of applicable investment and lending limits by reason of being combined with the trust company's pro rata share of that security held by all other mutual funds in which the trust company has invested and with the trust company's own direct investment and loan holdings. Documentation of periodic reviews must be maintained by the trust company for examination purposes.

(e)

A trust company's investment in a mutual fund made prior to September 1, 1997, is subject to §19.21 of this title (relating to Grandfathered Investments). Pursuant to §19.21, without the written approval of the banking commissioner, a trust company may not increase its grandfathered investment in a mutual fund on or after September 1, 1997, including by means of an election to reinvest dividends, unless subsection (c) of this section applies.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716989

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300


Chapter 21. Trust Company Corporate Activities

Subchapter A. Fees and Other Provisions of General Applicability

7 TAC §21.2

The Finance Commission of Texas (the commission) proposes new §21.2, regarding filing and investigation fees applicable to trust company corporate applications.

Effective September 1, 1997, Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, became the governing law for trust companies. New regulations implementing this new law require proposal and adoption. As part of this process, Chapter 21 will contain rules applicable to corporate applications filed by trust companies. Proposed §21.2 will be the initial section in Subchapter A, entitled "Fees and Other Provisions of General Applicability."

Pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-1.003(a)(4), the commission must recover the cost of maintaining and operating the department and the cost of enforcing the law by imposing and collecting ratable and equitable fees for notices, applications, and examinations. Proposed §21.2 will establish fees applicable to the corporate application process, and is based on existing §15.2, currently applicable to trust companies. The purpose of a fee charged by the department, whether the fee is for applications, annual assessments, examinations, recovery of costs, or other purposes, is to enable the department to be self-supporting. Proposed §21.2 is designed to impose appropriate fees and cost recovery provisions to make application processing services self-sustaining to the extent possible. The following paragraphs discuss only those fees that are proposed to change.

Five new fees are proposed in connection with new notices and applications. An application for authority to accept deposits, a power newly available effective September 1, 1997, is proposed to bear a fee of $1,000. A notice of additional office pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.203(a), will bear a fee of $200, and an application for an additional office under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.203(b), must be accompanied by a $1,500 fee. A fee of $1,500 is added for an application for approval of a reverse stock split, although few if any such applications are expected. Until a rule is adopted regarding reverse stock splits, trust companies should comply with existing §15.122 (relating to Amendment of Articles to Effect a Reverse Stock Split). Finally, a $100 fee will be imposed for statements of condition and income filed pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-2.003.

Three fees are increased to better match actual resources used in processing the related notices or applications. A $1,000 fee will be imposed for an application for trust company exemption pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.012 (formerly $500). A fee of $100 will be charged for the annual certification filed by an exempt trust company pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.013 (formerly $50).

In addition, trust company charter and conversion applications currently bear a per hour charge for investigation and that charge is proposed to be replaced with a flat $5,000 investigation fee. Annual revenues from investigation fees are expected to be less than revenues generated by investigative cost recovery under existing §15.2.

The fee for an application for approval of a change of control has been and continues to be $5,000, except that the proposed fee structure will reduce this fee to $2,500 for an expedited application if the applicant has previously been approved to control another trust company and no material changes in the applicant's circumstances have occurred since the prior approval. Other reduced fees for expedited applications will be proposed in 1998 in conjunction with a proposed rule or rules to permit such applications. Applicants and applications that meet certain minimum qualifications are anticipated to eventually be able to pay lower fees and file for expedited treatment of applications for charter, change of control, merger, and purchase of assets and assumption of liabilities.

Lynda A. Drake, Director of the Corporate Activities Division, Texas Department of Banking, has determined that for the first five-year period the section as proposed will be in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the section because the fee provisions in the proposal are expected to be revenue neutral.

Ms. Drake also has determined that for each year of the first five-year period the section as proposed will be in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of the proposed section will be better matching of the actual cost of regulation with the service provided, for the purpose of achieving economic self-sufficiency for application processing within the department. The fee provisions in the proposed section will merely rearrange sources of revenue and is not expected to increase or decrease the net revenue of the department from the trust company industry. There will be no effect on small businesses. There is no anticipated economic cost to persons who are required to comply with the section as proposed.

Comments on the proposed section may be submitted in writing to Jerry Sanchez, Assistant General Counsel, Texas Department of Banking, 2601 North Lamar Boulevard, Austin, Texas 78705-4294, or by e-mail to jerry.sanchez@banking.state.tx.us.

The new section is proposed under Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-1.003(1) and Article 342a-1.003(a)(4), which authorize the commission to adopt rules to implement and clarify Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-1.001 et seq, and to provide for the recovery of the cost and maintenance and operation of the Texas Department of Banking and the cost of enforcing Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-1.001 et seq, through the imposition and collection of ratable and equitable fees for notices, applications, and examinations.

Texas Civil Statutes, Articles 342a-6.202, 342a-3.003, 342a-3.011, 342a-3.012, 342a-3.013, 342a-3.101, 342a-3.103, 342a-3.202, 342a-3.203, 342a-3.302, 342a-3.401, 342a-3.405, 342a-4.002, 342a-5.102, and 342a-5.103, are affected by the proposal.

§21.2. Filing and Investigation Fees.

(a)

Types of fees. Subsection (b) of this section contains filing fees for specified applications and notices submitted to the department, and subsection (c) of this section requires a fee for protesting an application. These fees are due at the time the application or protest is submitted. Subsection (d) of this section requires an investigation fee to be paid in certain cases once an application has been accepted by the department for filing, and in other cases may require payment of investigative costs upon written request of the department. Pursuant to subsection (e) of this section, an applicant may seek waiver or reduction of required fees.

(b)

Filing fees. Simultaneously with a submitted application or notice, an applicant shall pay to the department:

(1)

$5,000 for an application for trust company charter pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.003;

(2)

$5,000 for an application for conversion of exempt trust company to non-exempt pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.011(d);

(3)

$4,000 for an application to authorize a merger or share exchange pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.302;

(4)

$2,500 for each request to authorize an additional merger if more than one affiliated merger is to occur simultaneously;

(5)

$4,000 for an application to authorize a purchase of assets pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.401;

(6)

$1,000 for an application to authorize the sale of substantially all assets pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.405;

(7)

$500 for a subsidiary notice letter pursuant to the Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.103(c), plus an amount up to an additional $3,500 if the banking commissioner notifies the applicant that additional information and analysis is required;

(8)

$5,000 for an application regarding acquisition of control pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-4.002, or $2,500 for an expedited application if the applicant has previously been approved to control another trust company and no material changes in the applicant's circumstances have occurred since the prior approval;

(9)

$200 for a notice to change home office with no abandonment of existing office pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.202(c);

(10)

$1,500 for an application to relocate the home office with abandonment of existing office pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.202(d);

(11)

$200 for a notice of additional office pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.203(a);

(12)

$1,500 for an application to open an additional office pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.203(b);

(13)

$200 for an application to amend a trust company charter (articles of association) pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.101;

(14)

$1,500 for an application to authorize a reverse stock split subject to the substantive provisions of §15.122 of this title (relating to Amendment of Articles to Effect a Reverse Stock Split);

(15)

$100 for a request for a "no objection" letter to use a name containing a term listed in Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-6.202, by an entity other than a depository institution or a trust company;

(16)

$500 for an application to authorize acquisition of treasury stock pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-5.102, and §15.121 of this title (relating to Acquisition and Retention of Shares as Treasury Stock);

(17)

$500 for an application to authorize an increase or reduction in capital and surplus pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.103;

(18)

$1,000 for an application for trust company exemption pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.012;

(19)

$1,000 for an application for authority to accept deposits pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.101 and Article 342a-5.401, and §21.24 of this title (relating to Trust Deposits);

(20)

$100 for the annual certification filing for an exempt trust company pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-3.013; and

(21)

$100 for required filing of a statement of condition and income pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 342a-2.003.

(c)

Filing fee for protest. A person or entity filing a protest to the application of another person or entity shall pay a fee of $2,500 simultaneously with such protest filing. The purpose of the fee required under this subsection is to partially offset the department's increased cost of processing and reduce the costs incurred by the applicant resulting solely from the protest.

(d)

Investigative fees and costs. An applicant for a trust company charter or conversion from an exempt trust company to a non-exempt trust company or limited trust association shall pay an investigation fee of $5,000 once the application has been accepted for filing. If required by the banking commissioner, an applicant under another type of application or filing listed in subsection (b) of this section shall pay the reasonable investigative costs of the department incurred in any investigation, review, or examination considered appropriate by the department, calculated as provided by §17.22(a) of this title (relating to Examination and Investigation Fees). Such investigation fee or costs must be paid by the applicant upon written request of the department. Failure to timely pay the investigation fee or a bill for investigative costs constitutes grounds for denial of the submitted or accepted filing.

(e)

Reduction or waiver of fees. Fees paid are nonrefundable and the banking commissioner shall charge fees on a consistent and nondiscriminatory basis. However, in the exercise of discretion, the banking commissioner may reduce, waive, or refund all or part of a filing fee, investigation fee, or bill for investigative costs if the banking commissioner concludes that:

(1)

the application demonstrates that the fee creates an unreasonable hardship on the applicant; or

(2)

the nature of the application will result in substantially reduced processing time compared to normal expectations for an application of that type.

(f)

Severability. If any fee or cost recovery set forth in this section is finally determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid that fee or cost recovery shall be severed from this section and the remainder of this section shall remain fully enforceable.

This agency hereby certifies that the proposal has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be within the agency's legal authority to adopt.

Issued in Austin, Texas, on December 19, 1997.

TRD-9716990

Everette D. Jobe

General Counsel

Texas Department of Banking

Proposed date of adoption: February 20, 1998

For further information, please call: (512) 475-1300