TITLE social-services-and-assistance

Part I. Texas Department of Human Services

Chapter 3. Income Assistance Services

Subchapter UU. State Immigrants Food Assistance Program

40 TAC §§3.7401-3.7409

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts new §§3.7401, 3.7403-3.7405, 3.7407, and 3.7409 with changes to the proposed text published in the November 14, 1997, issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 11061). New §§3.7402, 3.7406, and 3.7408 are adopted without changes to the proposed text and will not be republished.

Justification for the new sections is to implement a new food assistance program (State Immigrants Food Assistance Program) effective March 1998, for legally entered immigrants who are aged or disabled, and who lost eligibility for the federally-funded Food Stamp Program as a result of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996.

The new sections will function by providing food assistance to those individuals at approximately the level of food stamp benefits they previously received.

During the public comment period the department received written comments from a State Representative, Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Texas Appleseed Advocacy Fund, Organizacion Progesiva De San Elizario, Inc., Sin Fronteras Organizing Project, Inc., Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc., Texas Alliance for Human Needs, United Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights, United Way of Metropolitan Dallas, Inc., South Texas Project, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law of Texas, Texas Immigration and Refugee Coalition, Center for Public Policy Priorities, Southwest Community Health Clinic, and Texas Legal Services Center. A summary of the comments and DHS's responses follow:

Comment 1: Eleven commenters requested that in addition to those immigrants eligible under the proposed rule, the program should be expanded to cover all legal immigrants who were denied Food Stamp Program benefits and who are children, or who become age 65, or who begin receiving SSI, and immigrants who are elderly or receiving SSI but who did not receive Food Stamp benefits last year.

Response: No funds are available for this biennium to allow for expansion beyond the individuals identified in the proposed rule. DHS can ask for funds to expand the program in its legislative appropriations request for the next biennium.

Comment 2: Twelve commenters requested that before terminating a SIFAP recipient's benefits when information is received that the immigrant no longer meets eligibility requirements, DHS should provide a notice of denial explaining the reason for termination, and allow a recipient an opportunity to show a mistake has been made before his benefits are cut off. These commenters also commented that these basic fairness rights are required under the due process clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Response: The adopted rules are modified to provide notice at the time of termination and to provide continued benefits pending a fair hearing decision.

Comment 3: Eleven commenters requested that DHS initiate a public information campaign for potential recipients, DHS field staff, and social service providers throughout the state about this program, and a toll-free hotline to answer questions, assist with enrollment, and solve problems for potential recipients.

Response: Although the agency rules do not address these issues, DHS is currently developing plans for both public education and a toll-free hotline.

In addition to changes resulting from comments, DHS has initiated several changes to the text for clarification. In §3.7401(a), DHS has deleted the words "based on client data identified on the DHS data base and computer matches," added the words "in Texas" to paragraph (a)(1), and added a new paragraph (6) to subsection (a). In §3.7403, DHS has deleted the words "on the first day of." In §3.7404, DHS has revised the section by adding subsection (a), deleting the word "only" and adding the words "or by other issuance methods," adding subsection (b), deleting the words "and primary cardholder" and adding subsection (c) and the words "The case name is also the primary cardholder if benefits are issued by EBT," adding subsection (d) and the words "benefits issued by EBT," adding subsection (e) and new language "Benefits are to be used solely for purchase of items allowed under the federal Food Stamp Program," and adding subsection (f) and new language "DHS initiates replacement procedures for benefits issued by warrant that are reported as lost or stolen within two months after the issuance month. DHS holds returned warrants for two months after the issuance month and remails them if the recipient reports a new address within this time period. If a new address is not reported in this time period, DHS cancels the warrant and does not reissue it."

In §3.7405(a), DHS has deleted the word "except" and deleted paragraphs (a)(1)-(3) and subsection (b).

In §3.7407, DHS has deleted the words "Overpayments resulting from erroneous information provided by a recipient or caretaker of a minor recipient are subject to recovery by the Texas Department of Human Services," and added the words "Benefits issued to ineligible individuals are subject to recovery."

In §3.7409(a), DHS has added the word "an," deleted "s" from the word "individual" and added "s" to the word "lose," added the words "mails a written notice to the individual when the case is set to ineligible status," deleted the words "does not provide individual notice, except as noted in subsection (b) of this section. Eligibility criteria specified in §3.7401 of this title (relating to Eligibility Requirements) are explained in writing upon certification, along with an explanation that an individual notice is not provided when an individual no longer meets those eligibility criteria," and deleted subsection (b).

The new sections are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapter 22, which authorizes the department to administer public assistance programs.

The new sections implement the Human Resources Code, §§22.001- 22.030.

§3.7401. Eligibility Requirements.

(a)

Individuals who have legal immigration status with Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS), and who have lost eligibility for the federally-funded Food Stamp Program due to their immigration status, qualify for the State Immigrants Food Assistance Program (SIFAP) after the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) determines they meet all of the following criteria:

(1)

received food stamp benefits in Texas for the month of September 1996, or any month afterwards through the month of August 1997;

(2)

did not receive benefits for September 1997;

(3)

are age 65 or older, or were a Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipient during their last month of participation in the federally-funded Food Stamp Program;

(4)

currently not institutionalized;

(5)

currently living in Texas; and

(6)

have income below 200% of the federal poverty income limit.

(b)

There is no application process.

(c)

An individual loses eligibility for benefits under SIFAP when the individual no longer meets all of the eligibility requirements.

§3.7403. Benefit Amounts.

Eligible individuals receive benefits for a single person household. The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) provides monthly benefits of $10 to $122 each month after the State Immigrants Food Assistance Program is implemented. The allotment for a specific individual is determined by DHS based on the amount of benefits issued to the immigrant for the last month the individual participated in the federally-funded Food Stamp Program from September 1996 through August 1997.

§3.7404. Issuance Method.

(a)

The Texas Department of Human Services issues benefits for the State Immigrants Food Assistance Program (SIFAP) via Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) or by other issuance methods.

(b)

The eligible immigrant is always the case name.

(c)

The case name is also the primary cardholder if benefits are issued by EBT.

(d)

The EBT rules related to the Food Stamp Program in Subchapter NN of this title (relating to Electronic Benefit Transfer) apply to SIFAP benefits issued by EBT, except for §3.4002(b) of this title (relating to Primary Cardholder), §3.4005 of this title (relating to Benefit Availability Dates), §3.4007 of this title (relating to Benefit Conversion), §3.4010(a) of this title (relating to Dormant Accounts), and §3.4011(a)(2) and (3) of this title (relating to Expunging Benefits).

(e)

Benefits are to be used solely for purchase of items allowed under the federal Food Stamp Program.

(f)

DHS initiates replacement procedures for benefits issued by warrant that are reported as lost or stolen within two months after the issuance month. DHS holds returned warrants for two months after the issuance month and remails them if the recipient reports a new address within this time period. If a new address is not reported in this time period, DHS cancels the warrant and does not reissue it.

§3.7405. Appeals.

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) processes fair hearings pursuant to Chapter 79 of this title (relating to Legal Services).

§3.7407. Overpayments.

Benefits issued to ineligible individuals are subject to recovery.

§3.7409. Notice of Benefit Termination.

When an individual loses eligibility, the Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) mails a written notice to the individual when the case is set to ineligible status.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 5, 1998.

TRD-9801629

Glenn Scott

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 14, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3765


Chapter 15. Medicaid Eligibility

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts amendments to §15.450, §15.502, and §15.503, in its Medicaid Eligibility chapter. The amendment to §15.503 is adopted with a change to the proposed text published in the December 12, 1997, issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 12253). The amendments to §15.450 and §15.502 are adopted without changes to the proposed text and will not be republished.

The amendments are justified to clarify policy on garnishment of income and termination of marriage on spousal impoverishment provisions.

The amendments will function by providing clarification of policy that will ensure consistent application statewide.

During the public comment period, DHS received one comment from the Houston Welfare Rights Organization, requesting that a sentence be added to the proposed rule on income to address garnishment as related to deductions for incurred medical expenses. The department has determined that the requested addition is inappropriate for this rule, which concerns general principles for treating income. Specific rules for treatment of incurred medical expenses are addressed in their own rule chapter and reflect that federal Medicaid regulations do not allow deductions for garnishment of income.

The portions of proposed rule §15.503(k) which restated or explained existing state law regarding divorce have been deleted. Therefore, only the provision which was originally proposed regarding the application of termination of marriage on spousal impoverishment will be adopted.

Subchapter E. Income

40 TAC §15.450

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes the department to administer public and medical assistance programs and under Texas Government Code §531.021, which provides the Health and Human Services Commis- sion with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendment implements §§22.001-22.030 and 32.001-32.042 of the Human Resources Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 6, 1998.

TRD-9801690

Glenn Scott

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: April 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: December 12, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3765


Subchapter F. Budgets and Payment Plans

40 TAC §§15.502, 15.503

The amendments are adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes the department to administer public and medical assistance programs and under Texas Government Code §531.021, which provides the Health and Human Services Commis- sion with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendments implement §§22.001-22.030 and 32.001-32.042 of the Human Resources Code.

§15.503. Protection of Spousal Income and Resources.

(a)-(j)

(No change.)

(k)

Spousal impoverishment provisions do not apply in the case of void or annulled marriages. Clients with void marriages or who have obtained a court annulment of their marriage are treated as though they were always individuals. In the instance of a divorce, spousal impoverishment provisions apply through the end of the calendar month in which the divorce is issued.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 6, 1998.

TRD-9801691

Glenn Scott

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: April 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: December 12, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3765


Chapter 46. Licensed Personal Care Faclilities Contracting with the Texas Department of Human Services to Provide Residential Care Services

The Texas Department of Human Services (DHS) adopts amendments to §46.2005, §46.3001, §46.4005, and 46.5001, without changes to the proposed text published in the November 21, 1997 issue of the Texas Regis- ter (22 TexReg 11297).

The justification for the amendment is to clarify Community Based Alternatives options.

The amendments will function by providing a better audit trail for monitoring provider performance and enhancing the quality of service for participants.

The department received no comments regarding adoption of the amendments.

Provider Participation

40 TAC §46.2005

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes the department to administer public and medical assistance programs and under Texas Government Code §531.021, which provides the Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assis- tance funds.

The amendment implements §§22.001-22.030 and 32.001-32.042 of the Human Resources Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 6, 1998.

TRD-9801686

Glenn Scott

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 21, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3765


Claims Payment

40 TAC §46.3001

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes the department to administer public and medical assistance programs and under Texas Government Code §531.021, which provides the Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assistance funds.

The amendment implements §§22.001-22.030 and 32.001-32.042 of the Human Resources Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 6, 1998.

TRD-9801687

Glenn Scott

Director, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 21, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3765


Provider Contracts

40 TAC §46.4005

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes the department to administer public and medical assistance programs and under Texas Government Code §531.021, which provides the Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assis- tance funds.

The amendment implements §§22.001-22.030 and 32.001-32.042 of the Human Resources Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 6, 1998.

TRD-9801688

Glenn Scott

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 21, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3765


Records

40 TAC §46.5001

The amendment is adopted under the Human Resources Code, Title 2, Chapters 22 and 32, which authorizes the department to administer public and medical assistance programs and under Texas Government Code §531.021, which provides the Health and Human Services Commission with the authority to administer federal medical assis- tance funds.

The amendment implements §§22.001-22.030 and 32.001-32.042 of the Human Resources Code.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 6, 1998.

TRD-9801689

Glenn Scott

General Counsel, Legal Services

Texas Department of Human Services

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 21, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 438-3765


Part XX. Texas Workforce Commission

Chapter 809. Child Care and Development

Subchapter D. Client Eligibility Requirements

40 TAC §809.79

The Texas Workforce Commission (Commission) adopts new §809.79 concerning Parent Responsibility Agreement, Sanctions and Exemptions without changes to proposed text as published in the December 19, 1997, issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 12475). The adopted text will not be republished here.

The Commission adopts this new rule to carry out the purpose of House Bill 1863, 74th Legislature, as well as the Personal Responsibility And Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act of 1996. P.L.104-193.

Adopted §809.79(a) provides certain sanctions for failure of the "parent or caretaker" of a child to comply with the requirements of §809.78. Failure to comply with §809.78(b)(1) results in a sanction of an additional monthly fee of $25.00 for the noncomplying parent or caretaker until the parent or caretaker achieves compliance with the subsection. Failure to comply with §809.78(b)(2) results in a fine of an additional monthly fee of $25.00 for up to six months. Failure to comply with §809.78(b)(3) results in an additional monthly fee of $25.00 until the first month following the first full month in which the child in question has no unexcused school absences.

Adopted §809.79(b) provides that a Parent Responsibility Agreement is not required pursuant to §809.78 if the paternity of the child in question cannot be established, if the child is the product of an incestuous relationship, or if the parent of the child has been the subject of domestic violence. In addition, the terms in question are defined in the new section.

The Commission received four comments concerning §809.79. Two were received from Child Care Management Services contractors (West Texas Opportunities, Inc. and Child Care Management Services, Dallas County) and two from members of the State Advisory Committee on Child Care Programs.

Comment: One contractor stated that the word "may" should be changed to "must" in §809.79(2) and in §809.79(2)(a), (b), and (c).

Response: The Commission chooses not to make this change because §809.79(3) establishes sufficient exceptions in which the sanctions will not be applied.

Comment: The other contractor expressed concern over the potential administrative impact on parents, contractors and other agencies of obtaining and submitting the documentation required to demonstrate compliance with the Parent Responsibility Agreement.

Comment: One member of the State Advisory Committee on Child Care Programs expressed support for §809.79 but concern about the administrative burden of applying sanctions to parents who do not comply.

The other commenters did not specifically express support for this section but expressed the comments set out herein.

Response: The Commission will track the implementation of §809.79 and periodically review the administrative impact for any needed changes in procedures.

Comment: The other member of the State Advisory Committee on Child Care Programs recommended that §809.79 be amended to add the following exception "...parents are not required to comply with the requirement to establish paternity if the parent/caretaker does not want to receive financial assistance (i.e., child support) from the father of the child."

Response: The Commission chooses not to make this suggested change. The intent of requiring cooperation with Child Support Enforcement is to ensure that children who are receiving government assistance with child care services are also receiving the financial support that an absent parent is required to pay.

The new rule is adopted under Texas Labor Code §301.061, which provides that the Commission has the authority to adopt, amend, or rescind such rules as it deems necessary for the effective administration of the Act.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 1998.

TRD-9801779

J. Randel (Jerry) Hill

General Counsel

Texas Workforce Commission

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: December 19, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8812


Subchapter E. Client Elgibility Process Requirements

40 TAC §809.89

The Texas Workforce Commission adopts the repeal of §809.89 and new §809.89, concerning Assessing Required Parent Fees, with a non-substantive change to the proposed text as published in the December 19, 1997, issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 12476). The change reduces the cap on fees to 15% of a family's gross monthly income.

The repeal is concurrent with the adoption of new §809.89.

Adopted §809.89 includes much of the language from the repealed §809.89, but also includes additional language which the Commission deems appropriate to carry out the purpose of House Bill 1863, 74th Legislature, as well as the Personal Responsibility And Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act of 1996. P.L.104-193. The new portion of the rule applies to parents who are required to pay a parent fee and who reside in areas where the child care program will be under the direct management of a Local Workforce Development Board (board) (see Texas Government Code, Ch. 2308 Subchapters F and G). The new rule gives the boards flexibility to locally set the policy for the amount of the fee. The monthly parent or caretaker fee may be set by the boards at no less than nine percent (9%) and no more than fifteen percent (15%) of gross monthly income. In areas where the Commission manages the program, the fees will remain as they were under the prior rule.

The Commission received five comments on this rule; one from an individual, two from Child Care Management Services (CCMS) contractors (West Texas Opportunities, Inc. and Child Care Management Services, Dallas County), and two from members of the State Advisory Committee on Child Care Programs. One member of the State Advisory Committee on Child Care Programs stated agreement with the rule changes, but expressed concern that allowing boards to set fees locally will establish inequity in services across the state.

The other commenters did not specifically express support for this section but expressed the comments set out herein.

Four commenters stated that a maximum parent fee amount of 20% of gross monthly income is too high for low income parents. The individual commenter suggested a limit of 15% of gross monthly income while the State Advisory Committee member and one CCMS contractor suggested a limit of 10% of gross monthly income would be more appropriate. One of the commenters pointed out that the federal Department of Health and Human Services suggests a parent fee limit of 10% of income in the preamble to the recently published proposed rules for the Child Care and Development Fund (Public Law 104-193).

In consideration of these suggestions, the Commission has amended 809.89(c)(2) in order to set out the Commission's recommendation that the boards observe a fee cap of "15% of the family's gross monthly income" in areas where the local workforce boards manage the child care program. The actual fee is left to the discretion of the board within the range suggested in the rule.

The intent of the revisions to §809.89 is to allow boards to set parent fee policies that are responsive to local conditions. Section 809.89(d)(2) requires that the board set parent fee policy in accordance with §809.4 which requires the board to obtain local comment on proposed policies prior to adopting such policies. Therefore, the Commission chooses not to make the suggested changes to §809.89.

The repeal is adopted under Texas Labor Code, §301.061, which provides that the Commission has the authority to adopt, amend, or rescind such rules as it deems necessary for the effective administration of the Act.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 1998.

TRD-9801781

J. Randel (Jerry) Hill

General Counsel

Texas Workforce Commission

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: December 19, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8812


The new rule is adopted under Texas Labor Code, §301.061, which provides that the Commission has the authority to adopt, amend, or rescind such rules as it deems necessary for the effective administration of the Act.

§809.89.Assessing Required Parent Fees.

(a)

The Child Care Management Services (CCMS) contractor must assess parent fees to all parents or caretakers based on the family's gross monthly income, with the following exception.

(1)

Parents or caretakers who receive Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) are assessed no fee.

(2)

Parents or caretakers who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are assessed no fee.

(3)

Parents who participate in the Food Stamp Employment and Training (FSE&T) program are assessed no fee.

(4)

Parents or caretakers who receive Child Protective Services (CPS) are assessed no fee unless the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services (TDPRS) caseworker or the CPS Family Preservations contract provider authorizes the CCMS contractor to assess fees to a parent.

(b)

In families where the child is the only TANF or SSI recipient, the parent fee is assessed according to subsection (d) of this section.

(c)

Teen parents who live with their parents and who are not covered under exceptions outlined under subsection (a) of this section must be assessed a parent fee. The parent fee is based solely on the teen parent's income.

(d)

Parent fees for all parents not covered under exceptions outlined under subsection (a) of this section are assessed using the following formulas.

(1)

In areas where the Commission directly manages child care services, the parent fee must be 9% of the family's gross monthly income if there is one child receiving Commission paid child care and 11% of the family's gross monthly income if there are two or more children receiving TWC paid child care.

(2)

In areas where the Local Workforce Development Board (LWDB) directly manages child care services, it is recommended that the parent fee should be no less than 9% and no more than 15% of the family's gross monthly income. The LWDB must set the actual fee policy within this range in accordance with §809.4 of this title (relating to Board Procedures for Developing Additional Requirements for Child Care Services).

(e)

Parent fees for children enrolled in Independent School District (ISD) pre-kindergarten extended day programs are reduced to reflect no charge to the parent for the portion of the day that is core pre-kindergarten. The parent fee is assessed at 65% of the usual fee if the core pre-kindergarten program is three hours per day. The fee is assessed at 33% of the usual fee if the core pre-kindergarten program is more than three hours per day.

(f)

The CCMS contractor is not permitted to assess a parent fee that exceeds the cost of care.

(g)

Parents who receive a child care subsidy from other state or federal programs such as the Job Training Partnership Act must pay that amount in addition to the assessed parent fee. The CCMS contractor must request documentation of child care subsidies from the parent.

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 1998.

TRD-9801780

J. Randel (Jerry) Hill

General Counsel

Texas Workforce Commission

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: December 19, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8812


Subchapter I. Child Care Training Center Pilot Programs

40 TAC §§809.171-809.174

The Texas Workforce Commission (Commission) adopts new §§809.171-809.174, concerning the establishment and operation of the child care training center pilot programs without changes to the proposed text as published in the December 19, 1997 issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 12478). The adopted text will not be republished here.

One of the primary goals of the Commission is to prepare, place and retain individuals in employment. Texas Labor Code §302.003 directed the Commission to establish a program for providing training to recipients of public assistance in basic skills, child care, child care vendor entrepreneurial training and early childhood education to assist these individuals in making the transition into the workforce from public assistance and to increase the number of trained child care workers.

The adopted rules describe the operation of the child care training center pilot programs. Section 809.171 states that the purpose of the child care training center pilot programs is to provide child care training to recipients of public assistance. Section 809.172 defines terms used in the rules. Section 809.173 describes the criteria to be used by the Commission in selecting training centers for participation in the child care training center pilot programs. Section 809.174 lists some of the required elements for a contract with the Commission to provide services under the child care training center pilot programs.

The commenters did not state whether they were for or against the rule but expressed the following concerns. Comments were received from two members of the State Advisory Committee on Child Care Programs on proposed rules concerning the Child Care Training Center Pilot Programs. Following each comment is the Commission's response.

Comment: A commenter asked if NAEYC accreditation standards were considered in developing the training center selection criteria in §809.173.

Response: Training center selection criteria will be specified in the request for proposal packets and incorporated in the contracting documents. The Commission is considering several national accreditations, including NAEYC.

Comment: A commenter asked if §809.173 required private funding.

Response: The Commission seeks to develop local partnerships in the pilot projects that include additional sources of funding that can be used to both support and expand the projects. Therefore, there is a decided preference for contributory private funding.

Comment: A commenter asked if §809.174 was meant to require a specific number of trainees.

Response: This rule is not meant to specify a specific number of trainees. Criteria regarding anticipated number of trainees will be included in the request for proposal packet and incorporated in the contracting documents for the pilot projects.

Comment: A commenter suggested that §809.171 be amended to refer to "financially viable" employment. The commenter stated that the average hourly wage for child care providers is less than $7.00 per hour and in Austin is less than $6.00 per hour.

Response: The Commission recognizes the importance of ensuring that trainees receive sufficient training to enable them to obtain employment that results in self-sufficiency. In drafting the text of adopted §809.171, the Commission used the language of the statute. Therefore, the Commission chooses not to make this suggested change. The request for proposal and contracting documents for the pilot programs will contain information about the need to ensure sufficient training for the participants.

The rules have been reviewed by the Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services which has submitted no comments to the Commission regarding the rules.

The new rules are adopted under Texas Labor Code §301.061, which provides the Texas Workforce Commission with the authority to adopt, amend, or rescind such rules as it deems necessary for the effective administration of Texas Workforce Commission programs and under Texas Labor Code §302.003(j).

This agency hereby certifies that the adoption has been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's legal authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 9, 1998.

TRD-9801778

J. Randel (Jerry) Hill

General Counsel

Texas Workforce Commission

Effective date: March 1, 1998

Proposal publication date: December 19, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-8812


div-name="exempt-filings"> Texas Department of Insurance

Proposed Action

The Commissioner of Insurance, at a public hearing under Docket No. 2340 scheduled for March 25, 1998 at 9:00 a.m., in Room 100 of the William P. Hobby Jr. State Office Building, 333 Guadalupe Street in Austin, Texas, will consider a proposal made in a staff petition. Staff's petition (captioned "Second Petition . . .") seeks amendment of the Texas Automobile Rules and Rating Manual (the Manual), to adopt new and/or adjusted 1998 model Private Passenger Automobile Physical Damage Rating Symbols and revised identification information. Staff's petition (Ref. No. A-0298-04-I) was filed on February 5, 1998.

The new and/or adjusted symbols for the Manual's Symbols and Identification Section reflect data compiled on damageability, repairability, and other relevant loss factors for the listed 1998 model vehicles.

A copy of the petition, including an exhibit with the full text of the proposed amendments to the Manual is available for review in the office of the Chief Clerk of the Texas Department of Insurance, 333 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas. For further information or to request copies of the petition, please contact Sylvia Gutierrez at (512) 463-6326; refer to (Ref. No. A-0298-04-I).

Comments on the proposed changes must be submitted in writing within 30 days after publication of the proposal in the Texas Register, to the Office of the Chief Clerk, Texas Department of Insurance, P. O. Box 149104, MC 113-2A, Austin, Texas 78714-9104. An additional copy of comments is to be submitted to David Durden, Deputy Commissioner, Property and Casualty Insurance Lines, Texas Department of Insurance, P. O. Box 149104, MC 104-5A, Austin, Texas 78714-9104.

This notification is made pursuant to the Insurance Code, Article 5.96, which exempts it from the requirements of the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act).

TRD-9802006

Bernice Ross

Deputy Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: February 11, 1998


Proposed Action

The Commissioner of Insurance, at a public hearing under Docket No. 2341 scheduled for March 25, 1998 at 9:00 a.m., in Room 100 of the William P. Hobby Jr. State Office Building, 333 Guadalupe Street in Austin, Texas, will consider a proposal made in a staff petition. Staff's petition (captioned "Third Petition . . .") seeks amendment of the Texas Automobile Rules and Rating Manual (the Manual), to adopt new and/or adjusted 1998 model Private Passenger Automobile Physical Damage Rating Symbols and revised identification information. Staff's petition (Ref. No. A-0298-05-I) was filed on February 5, 1998.

The new and/or adjusted symbols for the Manual's Symbols and Identification Section reflect data compiled on damageability, repairability, and other relevant loss factors for the listed 1998 model vehicles.

A copy of the petition, including an exhibit with the full text of the proposed amendments to the Manual is available for review in the office of the Chief Clerk of the Texas Department of Insurance, 333 Guadalupe Street, Austin, Texas. For further information or to request copies of the petition, please contact Sylvia Gutierrez at (512) 463-6326; refer to (Ref. No. A-0298-05-I).

Comments on the proposed changes must be submitted in writing within 30 days after publication of the proposal in the Texas Register, to the Office of the Chief Clerk, Texas Department of Insurance, P. O. Box 149104, MC 113-2A, Austin, Texas 78714-9104. An additional copy of comments is to be submitted to David Durden, Deputy Commissioner, Property and Casualty Insurance Lines, Texas Department of Insurance, P. O. Box 149104, MC 104-5A, Austin, Texas 78714-9104.

This notification is made pursuant to the Insurance Code, Article 5.96, which exempts it from the requirements of the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act).

TRD-9802007

Caroline Scott

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Filed: February 111998

ADOPTED

The Commissioner of Insurance, at a public hearing under Docket No. 2325 held at 9:00 a.m., January 29, 1998 in Room 100 of the William P. Hobby Jr. State Office Building, 333 Guadalupe Street in Austin, Texas, adopted amendments proposed by Staff to the Texas Automobile Rules and Rating Manual (the Manual), Rule 74.E.1., Credit for Young Driver Training. Staff's petition (Ref. No. A-1197-36-I) was published in the November 28, 1997 issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 11722).

This order amends Manual Rule 74.E.1. regarding the 10% credit given for young driver training, commonly referred to as "driver education." New forms of certificates (including 964-D and 964-E, Driver Education Certificates) are added to those currently listed as satisfactory evidence of course completion. Also in Rule 74.E.1., the standards for these courses and instructors set forth in subsections a, b, and c are deleted, as those standards are no longer appropriate because of statutory changes and rule changes by other agencies of the state.

Senate Bill 964, passed by the 74th Texas Legislature in 1995 made numerous changes regarding driver education courses. One change allows the parent or legal guardian, hereafter referred to as "parent" to teach the course to his or her child or ward, rather than requiring the course to be taught by a certified instructor at a driver education school licensed by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) (including the Central Education Agency, the State Board of Education or the Commissioner of Education). Although Senate Bill 964 made this change by reciting the addition of Section 7A to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6687b, that article was repealed during that same legislative session by adoption of the Transportation Code, of which Section 521.142 is the current applicable statute. That statute requires the Department of Public Safety (DPS) to administer parent-taught driver education, and DPS has adopted rules accomplishing that mission (37 TAC §§ 18.21-18.24 and 18.31-18.33, all effective April 7, 1997).

The Transportation Code, Section 521.142 provides in regard to parent-taught driver education, "(d) Completion of a driver training course approved under this section has the same effect under this Act as completion of a driver training course approved by the Central Education Agency." Staff referred to advice by several members of the Texas Legislature that the legislative intent of this statutory provision is that parent-taught trainees are entitled to all privileges (such as insurance discounts) that are extended to driver education school trainees.

Staff referred to many factors, in addition to the legislative intent as expressed by several legislators, that support extension of the insurance discount to parent-taught trainees. One factor is that DPS rules require the parent-teacher to use a DPS-approved course, which substantially meets or exceeds DPS's own model curriculum prescribed for parent-taught driver education, as well as the TEA "Driver Education Classroom and In-Car Instruction Curriculum Guide," which was initially developed for driver education schools. Furthermore, the parent-taught trainee must pass DPS tests for vision, road signs, and road rules before an instruction permit (restricted driver's license) is issued.

Staff explained the curriculum for parent-taught trainees under DPS rules must contain a minimum of 14 hours of in-car training, which is the same total required under TEA rules for school-taught trainees, though there are certain differences in the details of these requirements. Also, DPS rules for parents, like TEA rules for schools, require at least 32 hours of classroom instruction. Furthermore, Staff was informed that parent-taught trainees generally receive much more training than these minimum requirements. Staff informally reviewed a privately developed course that has received DPS approval for parent-taught driver education, which requires a minimum of 70 hours behind-the-wheel instruction and 45 hours of classroom instruction.

Staff also reviewed a study initiated by Advanced Traffic Technologies, Inc. concerning the effectiveness of parent-taught driver education. The study found that the average behind-the-wheel test score for students completing driver education school courses is 87 (out of 100 possible) compared to 94 for parent-taught students. The study also found that within the first 18 months after licensing, parent-taught students are involved in severe crashes less frequently than school-taught students. A severe crash is defined in the study to be one causing damage exceeding $3,000.00 and/or injuries resulting in hospitalization.

The information outlined in Staff's petition warrants the extension of the 10% credit, currently given to school-taught trainees, to parent-taught trainees. The standards for driver education courses and instructors set forth in subsections, a, b, and c, of Rule 74.E.1. need to be deleted because they do not allow the credit for parent-taught driver training. Because all driver education courses and instructors (including parents) are regulated by other state agencies, the Texas Department of Insurance does not need to specify course standards nor to require certified instructors.

Another result of Senate Bill 964 has been the development by the Texas Education Agency of two new forms, (pursuant to Texas Civil Statutes, Article 4413 (29c), Section 9A) issued as evidence of completion of driver education courses, namely, 964-D and 964-E, Driver Education Certificates. Those new form designations need to be added to the current list of forms in Manual Rule 74.E.1. that serve as satisfactory evidence of course completion for purposes of the 10% insurance credit. The new language of Rule 74.E.1. will allow the use of any other form approved for this purpose by the Texas Education Agency.

The amendments as adopted by the Commissioner of Insurance are shown in an exhibit on file with the Chief Clerk under Ref. No. A-1197-36-I, which is incorporated by reference into Commissioner's Order No. 98-0162.

The Commissioner of Insurance has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the Insurance Code, Articles 5.10, 5.96, 5.98, and 5.101.

This notification is made pursuant to the Insurance Code, Article 5.96, which exempts it from the requirements of the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act).

Consistent with the Insurance Code, Article 5.96(h), the Department will notify all insurers writing automobile insurance of this adoption by letter summarizing the Commissioner's action.

This agency hereby certifies that the amendments as adopted have been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 11, 1998.

TRD-9801982

Caroline Scott

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 9, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 28, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327


ADOPTED

The Commissioner of Insurance, at a public hearing under Docket No. 2326 held at 9:00 a.m., January 29, 1998 in Room 100 of the William P. Hobby Jr. State Office Building, 333 Guadalupe Street in Austin, Texas, adopted amendments proposed by Staff to the Texas Automobile Rules and Rating Manual (the Manual), and the Texas Standard Provisions for Automobile Policies (the Standard Provisions), through changes to Amendatory Endorsements 593C and TE 00 40. Staff's petition (Ref. No. A-1197-37-I) was published in the November 28, 1997 issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 11722).

This order amends Automobile Policy Endorsements 593C (applicable to the Personal Auto Policy) and TE 00 40 (applicable to the Business Auto, Garage and Truckers Coverage Forms). Endorsement 593C will become 593D and Endorsement TE 00 40 will become TE 00 40A. The physical damage coverage limit of liability is amended to allow an insurer not to apply the deductible, should there be one, when damage to glass is repaired rather than replaced. The new wording requires that the insurer and insured must mutually agree to the settlement option, if it is to be used.

It is noted that an insurer's consent not to apply the deductible for glass repair becomes inapplicable if the glass is later replaced at the insurer's cost as a result of the same occurrence. For example, an insured may not be satisfied with the repair job, and may then possibly seek replacement.

The practice of not applying or waiving the deductible began in the early 1980's. On October 24, 1984, the Attorney General of Texas issued Opinion No. JM-218 concerning the legality of the insurer's practice of waiving the deductible when the insured agrees to have the windshield repaired rather than replaced. Staff noted that one concern expressed in the attorney general opinion was whether the practice of waiving the comprehensive deductible after the loss could be considered a contract provision not written into an approved policy form, or not otherwise approved by the Board. Staff asserted that one or more insurers have recently made a decision to discontinue the practice of offering the option of repairing glass damage due to a concern that the practice may constitute a violation of the Insurance Code, Article 5.06. Staff asserted that any concerns regarding the practice of allowing an insurer not to apply a deductible when glass damage is repaired can be addressed by the approval of an amended endorsement that allows the insurer and insured to agree to the waiver of deductible and the glass repair. The new language accomplishes this purpose by providing that upon mutual agreement between the insurer and insured, the insurer will not apply the applicable deductible for a glass loss if the glass is repaired rather than replaced. Requiring mutual agreement between the insurer and insured assures that the glass repair option will be utilized only when feasible and when it is acceptable to an insured.

Staff also asserted that the practice of not applying the deductible when glass is repaired rather than replaced is good public policy. The insured benefits by not having to pay the deductible and the insurer benefits by holding down the cost of losses. The general insuring public benefits by the lower cost of losses, which holds down physical damage insurance rates.

The amendments are enhancements without additional premium charge. Under policy liberalization clauses the changes will become effective upon the effective date of the amendments (see last paragraph of this order), without policies or endorsements having to use the new language. However, a policy or renewal that becomes effective on or after June 1, 1998 must have the revised endorsement attached, or else must have the new language incorporated into the policy itself.

The amendments as adopted by the Commissioner of Insurance are shown in exhibits on file with the Chief Clerk under Ref. No. A-1197-37-I, which are incorporated by reference into Commissioner's Order No. 98-0161.

The Commissioner of Insurance has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the Insurance Code, Articles 5.06, 5.10, 5.96, and 5.98.

This notification is made pursuant to the Insurance Code, Article 5.96, which exempts it from the requirements of the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act).

Consistent with the Insurance Code, Article 5.96(h), the Department will notify all insurers writing automobile insurance of this adoption by letter summarizing the Commissioner's action.

This agency hereby certifies that the amendments as adopted have been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 11, 1998.

TRD-9801981

Caroline Scott

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 9, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 28, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327


ADOPTED

The Commissioner of Insurance, at a public hearing under Docket No. 2327 held at 9:00 a.m., January 29, 1998 in Room 100 of the William P. Hobby Jr. State Office Building, 333 Guadalupe Street in Austin, Texas, adopted amendments proposed by Staff to the Texas Automobile Rules and Rating Manual (the Manual). These amendments to Manual Rule 74 set the credit at 5% for the optional Youth Group Member Discount, under the Insurance Code, Article 5.03-5, enacted through House Bill 1498 of the 75th Texas Legislature. Staff's petition (Ref. No. A-1197-38-I) was published in the November 28, 1997 issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 11721).

The Insurance Code, Article 5.03-5 provides an insurer may grant a discount for certain automobile insurance premiums for members of certain youth groups if necessary qualifications are met. Article 5.03-5 provides the "commissioner by rule shall set the amount of the discount applicable under this article...." This new article applies to policies "delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed on or after January 1, 1998."

The Insurance Code, Article 5.03-5 defines "Youth group" as a nonprofit organization that is chartered as a national or statewide organization that is run exclusively for youth recreational or educational purposes. The group must have, as part of its program, components relating to prevention of drug abuse, character development, citizenship training, and physical and mental fitness. The group must have been in existence for at least 10 years, and must have a membership of which at least 65 percent are younger than age 22.

In order for an applicant to be eligible, among other requirements and restrictions, he or she must:

(1) be licensed to drive in this state;

(2) be a member of a youth group, including an adult leader, board member, or officer of the group;

(3) be younger than 22 years of age or an adult leader, board member, or officer of the group;

(4) have held a driver's license for at least three years on the date the application is filed;

(5) have not, during the three years preceding the date of the application, been convicted of a violation of a traffic safety regulation that involves a moving vehicle; and

(6) have not, during the three years preceding the date of the application, been found at fault in a motor vehicle accident.

TDI's Technical Analysis Division recommended that a credit of 5% be established as the optional discount under Manual Rule 74.J., and that is the credit hereby adopted. The amount of credit is based on judgment, since no data concerning likely experience is known to exist. Once credible actual experience has been gathered, Staff will propose any amendments to the amount of credit as deemed necessary.

The amendments as adopted by the Commissioner of Insurance are shown in an exhibit on file with the Chief Clerk under Ref. No. A-1197-38-I, which is incorporated by reference into Commissioner's Order No. 98-0164.

The Commissioner of Insurance has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the Insurance Code, Articles 5.10, 5.96, 5.98, and 5.101.

This notification is made pursuant to the Insurance Code, Article 5.96, which exempts it from the requirements of the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act).

Consistent with the Insurance Code, Article 5.96(h), the Department will notify all insurers writing automobile insurance of this adoption by letter summarizing the Commissioner's action.

This agency hereby certifies that the amendments as adopted have been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 11, 1998.

TRD-9801983

Caroline Scott

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: March 9, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 28, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327


ADOPTED

The Commissioner of Insurance, at a public hearing under Docket No. 2332 held at 9:00 a.m., January 29, 1998 in Room 100 of the William P. Hobby Jr. State Office Building, 333 Guadalupe Street in Austin, Texas, adopted amendments proposed by Staff to the Texas Automobile Rules and Rating Manual (the Manual). The amendments consist of new and/or adjusted 1998 model Private Passenger Automobile Physical Damage Rating Symbols and revised identification information. Staff's petition (Ref. No. A-1297-39-I) was published in the December 19, 1997 issue of the Texas Register (22 TexReg 12557).

The new and/or adjusted symbols for the Manual's Symbols and Identification Section reflect data compiled on damageability, repairability, and other relevant loss factors for the specified model year of the listed vehicles.

The amendments as adopted by the Commissioner of Insurance are shown in an exhibit on file with the Chief Clerk under Ref. No. A-1297-39-I, which is incorporated by reference into Commissioner's Order No. 98-0163.

The Commissioner of Insurance has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to the Insurance Code, Articles 5.10, 5.96, 5.98, and 5.101.

This notification is made pursuant to the Insurance Code, Article 5.96, which exempts it from the requirements of the Government Code, Chapter 2001 (Administrative Procedure Act).

Consistent with the Insurance Code, Article 5.96(h), the Department will notify all insurers writing automobile insurance of this adoption by letter summarizing the Commissioner's action.

This agency hereby certifies that the amendments as adopted have been reviewed by legal counsel and found to be a valid exercise of the agency's authority.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 11, 1998.

TRD-9801984

Caroline Scott

General Counsel and Chief Clerk

Texas Department of Insurance

Effective date: April 21, 1998

Proposal publication date: November 28, 1997

For further information, please call: (512) 463-6327